+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: setraining
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 136

Transcript
  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    1/136

    PRESENTATION BYREGULATORY & COMMERCIAL

    DEPARTMENT

    HARANE A.ASUPDTG. ENGR.

    REGULATORY CELL

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    2/136

    Edisons Dream

    We will make Electricity socheap that only the rich will

    burn candles

    - Thomas Alva Edison

    (1847 - 1931)

    2

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    3/136

    3

    Power Scenario . . . 3

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    4/136

    4

    Mahagecos business

    Mahagencos Generation Business regulated by

    CERC (Central Electricity Regulatory Commission)

    MERC (Mahrashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission)

    CEA (Central Electricity Authority)

    MoP (Ministry of Power)

    Appellate Tribunal for Electricity

    Supreme Court

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    5/136

    5

    LEGAL

    STATUS OF

    MERC

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    6/136

    6

    All proceedings before MERC are

    deemed judicial proceedings within the

    meaning of IPC sections 193 & 228

    MERC is a deemed civil court for the

    purposes of sections 345 & 346 of the

    Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. (95).

    LEGAL STATUS OF MERC. . . 1

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    7/136

    7

    MERC has the same powers as are vested in a civilcourt under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for --

    Summoning any person and examining him on oath;

    Discovery and production of any document producible as

    evidence

    Receiving evidence on affidavits;

    Requisitioning of any public record;

    The examination of witnesses; Reviewing its decisions, directions and orders (94. (1))

    LEGAL STATUS OF MERC . . . 2

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    8/136

    8

    MERC has the powers to pass interim order inany proceeding, hearing or matter before it. (94(2))

    MERC may authorize any person, to represent

    the interest of the consumers in the proceedings

    before it. (94(3))

    LEGAL STATUS OF MERC . . . 3

    Prayas, Pune

    Thane Belapur Industries Association, Thane

    Mumbai Grahak Panchayat, mumbai

    Vidarbha Industries Association Nagpur

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    9/136

    9

    FUNCTIONS

    OF MERC

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    10/136

    Approval of Power purchase agreement between a Generating

    Company and a Licensee

    FUNCTIONS OF MERC . . . 1

    safeguarding of consumers' interest & ensures recovery of the cost of electricity in a

    reasonable manner

    Intra-State transmission of electricity;

    Rates of transmission charges,

    Wheeling of electricity;

    Retail sale of electricity:

    Surcharge for wheeling in accordance with the Distribution Open

    Access Regulations; 10

    To determinetariff

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    11/136

    11

    FUNCTIONS OF MERC. . . 2

    MERC shall ask the generating company to furnish separate details

    for determination of tariff. (62. (1) ,(2),(5))

    MERC may ask the generating company to comply with specified

    procedures for calculating the expected Aggregate Revenues from the

    tariff permitted to recover.

    An application for determination of tariff shall be made by a

    generating company or licensee accompanied by appropriate fee.

    Every applicant shall publish the application, in form and manner, as

    specified by MERC.(64. (1), (2))

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    12/136

    12

    FUNCTIONS OF MERC. . . 3

    Declare different regulations with respect to determination of tariff

    Formulate State grid Code

    Formulate scheduling and despatch code

    Formulate norms for performance parameters

    Formulate norms for depreciation, O&M expenses

    Monitoring the performance vis--vis the norms

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    13/136

    13

    FUNCTIONS OF MERC . . . 4

    Maintain Transparency in process

    Public hearings for most important matters

    Form State Advisory Committee.

    Issue Consultative papers on key Issues.

    Issue Orders spelling out the policies of the

    Commission.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    14/136

    14

    Data submission

    Data regarding Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) and

    Annual Performance Review (APR)

    Accounts data and Technical Performance data

    FY 07- 08 FY 09 - 10

    True up APR ARR

    FY08 - 09

    EstimatesEstimateActualsActuals

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    15/136

    15

    Data submission

    Technical & accounting Data required for tariff determination is

    to be furnished to MERC as per --

    MERC (Uniform Recording, Maintenance and Reporting of

    Information) Regulation 2009 (URMRI) (20th April 2009)

    Submission on quarterly basis in specified formats

    Information based on actuals

    Basis of allocation in case of common items

    Transparency

    Credibility to the Utilities

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    16/136

    16

    Data submission .. .. URMRI

    Generation companies in Maharashtra

    Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Ltd (MSPGCL),

    The Tata Power Company Limited (TPC)

    Reliance Infrastructure Limited (RIL) Transmission companies

    Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd (MSETCL)

    The Tata Power Company Limited (TPC)

    Reliance Infrastructure Limited (RIL) Distribution companies

    Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (MSEDCL),

    The Tata Power Company Limited (TPC)

    Reliance Infrastructure Limited (RIL)

    Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BEST).

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    17/136

    17

    Data submission .. .. URMRI

    Few entities manage regulated businesses viz. generation,

    transmission, distribution, etc as well as non-regulated businesses out

    of the purview of the Commission. Few entities operate in Maharashtra and also other states which fall

    outside the jurisdiction of the Commission.

    Few companies have integrated bundled electricity business within

    the State.

    These companies maintain their annual books of accounts as

    per respective Acts like

    Companies Act, 1956,

    Electricity (Supply) Annual Accounts Rules (ESSAR),

    1985

    National Municipal Accounts Manual.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    18/136

    18

    Data submission .. .. URMRI

    Formats to be filled up

    Format 1 : Balance Sheet

    Format 2 : Accumulated Depreciation

    Format 3 : Current Assets

    Format 4 : Loans

    Format 5 : Current Liabilities

    Format 6 : Profit and Loss Statement

    Format :Cost of Fuel

    Format 7 :Cost of Power Purchase

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    19/136

    19

    Data submission .. .. URMRI

    Format 8.1: Administrative and General Expenses Format 8.2 :Repair and Maintenance Expenses

    Format 8.3 :Employee Expenses

    Format 9: Long Term Interest Charges

    Format 10: Interest on working capital

    Format 11 :Income Tax

    Format 12 :Return on Equity

    Format :Cash Flow Format :Capex Format

    Format :Operational Parameter Format- Generation

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    20/136

    20

    Data submission

    Regulatory Information Management System (RIMS)

    Online uploading of data on monthly basis in specified

    formats

    Information based on actuals

    Basis of allocation in case of common items

    Accounting data and technical performance data

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    21/136

    21

    Fixing of norms for performance parameters

    Technical Performance parameters

    Station Heat Rate,

    Auxiliary consumption,

    Secondary oil consumption :

    Coal Transit loss :

    Availability :

    2ml/kWh

    80%

    0.8%

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    22/136

    22

    Fixing of norms for performance parameters

    Financial Performance parameters

    Depreciation & advance against depreciation

    O & M Expenses

    Interest on long term loan capital

    Interest on working capital

    Return on equity :

    Sharing of profit or loss

    14%

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    23/136

    23

    SCHEDULING

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    24/136

    24

    Scheduling

    Scheduling is the procedure used to formulate the order

    in which generating units are to be loaded for the following

    day in accordance with certain methodology

    Scheduling is carried out based on economic dispatch

    principles and satisfying various constraints

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    25/136

    The State Load Dispatch Centre (SLDC) shall be responsible for optimum

    scheduling and dispatch of electricity within a State, in accordance with the

    contracts entered into with the licensees or the generating companies

    operating in that State.

    25

    REGULATORY ASPECT

    Section 32 (2) of EA 03 statesthat --

    The State Grid Code (Part E) provides for a Scheduling and Dispatch

    Code to be prepared by MSLDC.

    The State Grid Code further specifies that the provisions of the

    Scheduling & Dispatch Code shall be consistent with the Scheduling and

    Dispatch Code under IEGC specified by CERC under clause (h) of

    Section 79 of the Act

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    26/136

    26

    PROCESS OF SCHEDULING AND DISPATCH

    The scheduling period comprises of 96 time blocks of a day, each of 15-

    minute duration, starting from 00:00 hours ending with 24:00 hours.

    All Generating Stations (with unit size > 50 MW) to furnish their forecasted

    unit-wise availability schedule to MSLDC on day-ahead basis for every 15-

    minute block.

    The Generation Schedules of all generating stations in the state and drawal

    schedules of Distribution Licensees/Discoms shall be prepared by MSLDC

    on 15 minute block basis.

    In case the day ahead schedule is not received by 10 AM the schedule

    assigned for the previous day shall be the schedule for next day.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    27/136

    27

    TIMELINE OF SCHEDULING

    By 10 AM each day, InSGS shall furnish to MSLDC, their availabilityschedule in MW and MU on day ahead basis taking into consideration any

    outage of its generating unit for the next day, in 15 minute blocks

    By 2 PM MSLDC shall receive the revised demand forecast from

    licensees and revised availability forecast from generators.

    By 3 PM MSLDC shall intimate the generation schedule to InSGS.

    By 6 PM, the MSLDC shall finalise target dispatch schedules forgenerators and target drawal schedules for licensees.

    At 11 PM, MSLDC shall release final generation schedules to InSGS

    and drawal schedule to each Distribution Licensees/ Discom.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    28/136

    28

    RESCHEDULING

    Revision of final generation and dispatch schedule issued by MSLDC

    may be necessitated on account of --

    Reduction of Generation from ISGS or InSGS due to tripping of

    units or caused by loss of auxiliaries or due to re-start restrictions of

    a Thermal unit following a grid disturbance.

    Constraints in interstate / intrastate Transmission System

    Hydro station constraints

    Movement of system frequency outside the band of 49 Hz to 50

    Hz

    Scheduling is day ahead, whereas rescheduling is same day

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    29/136

    29

    RESCHEDULING

    In case offorced outage of an InSGS, MSLDC will revise the schedules

    on the basis of revised generation schedule of the InSGS.

    The revised schedule will become effective from the 4th time block after

    the time block in which the revision is advised by the InSGS.

    During the 1st , 2nd and 3rd time blocks of such an event, the scheduled

    generation of the InSGS shall be deemed to have been revised to be

    equal to actual generation.

    In case ofany grid disturbance, the scheduled generation of all thegenerating stations shall be deemed to have been revised to be equal to

    theiractual generation for all the time blocks affected by the grid

    disturbance.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    30/136

    30

    RESCHEDULING.

    If, at any point of time, MSLDC observes that there is need forrevision

    of the schedules forbetter system operation, it may do so on its own, and

    in such cases, the revised schedules shall become effective from the 4th

    time block, after the time block in which the revised schedule is issued by

    the MSLDC.

    MSLDC shall permit the revision of generation schedule by InSGS for

    the remaining period of the day/block with advance notice of6 time

    blocks. Revised generation schedules in such cases shall becomeeffective from the 6th time block after the time block in which the request

    for revision has been received by MSLDC.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    31/136

    31

    As per MERC order(Case No. 77 of 2006) for approval ofSLDC Budgetfor FY 2007-08 SLDC is entitled to levy Rescheduling Charges on

    generating companies, distribution licensees, trading companies,

    transmission OA users, as the case may be, at the rate of Rs 3000/-

    1. for each revision in schedule after finalization of schedules by

    MSLDC on day-ahead basis,

    2. for non submission of schedule as per State Grid Code

    requirements.

    RESCHEDULING CHARGES

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    32/136

    32

    RESCHEDULING CHARGES: Issues

    As per CERC terms and conditions of tariff Reg. 24(2):

    (i) Any generation up to 105% of the declared capacity in any time block

    of 15 minutes and averaging up to 101% of the average declared

    capacity over a day shall not be construed as gaming..

    (ii) For any generation beyond the prescribed limits, the Regional LoadDespatch Centre shall investigate so as to ensure that there is no

    gaming.

    If gaming is found by the Regional Load Despatch Centre, the

    corresponding UI charges due to the generating station on account of

    such extra generation shall be reduced to zero and the amount shall be

    adjusted in UI account of beneficiaries in the ratio of their capacity share

    in the generating station.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    33/136

    33

    The practical experience only can be used to resolve theseissues.

    Variation in coal quality is one of the reasons for

    rescheduling.

    Generally, coal quality of a particular mine is fairly constant

    & known to our operating engineers. If source of coal is

    intimated to operating staff, decision about loading the unit

    can be taken accordingly. This practice is being used

    successfully at NTPC for rescheduling.

    RESCHEDULING CHARGES: Issues

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    34/136

    34

    Improvement in Communication between

    CHP personnel who knows the source of

    coal rake,

    person who is bunkering the coal and

    the shift in charge of the unit which is being

    fed

    will certainly help in rescheduling.

    RESCHEDULING CHARGES: Issues

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    35/136

    As per MERC tariff regulation 40,

    Declared capacity to be demonstrated as and when required by theSLDC.

    Penalty for every mis-declaration for any duration/block in a day isreduction in Fixed cost.

    Where the declared capacity is lower side than actual generation, thenany UI charges shall be reduced to zero. 40.3

    The operating log books of the generating station shall be available forreview by the Commission

    35

    Mis-declaration Penalty

    First 2 days Fixed charges

    Second 4 days Fixed charges

    Subsequent In Geometrical Progression

    Rescheduling

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    36/136

    36

    Station heat rate

    Coal firedmachines

    200/210/250 MW 500 MW & above

    DURINGSTABILISATION

    AFTERSTABILISATION

    DURINGSTABILISATION

    AFTERSTABILISATION

    MotorDriven BFP

    2600kCal/kWh

    2500kCal/kWh

    2510kCal/kWh

    2410kCal/kWh

    TurboDriven BFP

    - - 2550kCal/kWh

    2450kCal/kWh

    Open /Combinedcycle gas

    turbines

    Advanced classmachines

    E/EA/EC/E2 classmachines

    Open cycle Combined

    cycle

    Open cycle Combined

    cycle

    Large size 2685

    kCal/kWh

    1850

    kCal/kWh

    2830

    kCal/kWh

    1950

    kCal/kWh

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    37/136

    37

    Norms of Auxiliary consumption

    Coal-based generating stations With cooling

    tower

    Without

    cooling

    tower

    200 MW series 9.0% 8.5%

    500 MW series Steam driven

    boiler feed pumps

    7.5% 7.0%

    Electrically drivenboiler feed pumps

    9.0% 8.5%

    Gas Turbine/

    Combined Cyclegenerating stations

    Combined cycle Open cycle

    3.0% 1.0%

    31.1.2

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    38/136

    38

    Straight line method 90% depreciation till end of life

    of asset

    Advance against depreciation = (actual amount

    payable allowable depreciation )

    limited to 1/10 of Principle amount of loan

    allowable depreciation

    Norms for Depreciation

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    39/136

    39

    DEPRECIATION

    Life span of the asset

    Annualpremium

    of loan

    Advance against

    depreciationInitialvalueof theasset

    Residualvalue of

    asset

    Repaymentperiod of loan

    Annualdepreciation

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    40/136

    40

    Norms for O & M Expenses

    Existing generating stations34.6.1

    Average of the actual O&M expenses for the five (5) years ending March

    31, 2004 shall be considered as O&M expenses for FY 2002 and

    escalated at 4 % to arrive at O&M expenses for the base year

    commencing April 1, 2005 & further escalated at 4 % per annum

    New generating stations34.6.2

    200/210/250 MW sets : Rs. 10.82 lakh/MW

    500 MW and above sets : Rs. 9.73 lakh/MW

    Weighted average for stations with combination of 200/210/250 MW sets

    and 500 MW & above set

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    41/136

    41

    Working capital:

    cost fuel for 2 months corresponding to target availability.

    O&M expenses for 1 month

    Maintenance spares @ 1% of historical cost

    Receivables towards sale of electricity (fixed cost + energy

    cost) for 2 months

    Minus fuel cost for 1 month corresponding to target

    availability.

    Interest on working capital @ Prime Lending Rate of SBI

    Norms for Interest on working capital

    Sharing of profit / loss on account of controllable /

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    42/136

    42

    Sharing of profit / loss on account of controllable /uncontrollable factors

    Uncontrollable factors

    Force Majeure Events

    Changes in Law, Judicial pronouncements and ordersof Central Govt., StateGovt. or Commission

    Economy-wide influences such as unforeseen

    changes in inflation rate, market interest rate, taxes and

    statutory levies.

    Sharing of profit / loss on account of controllable /

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    43/136

    43

    Sharing of profit / loss on account of controllable /uncontrollable factors

    (Reg.18,19) GAIN LOSS

    Due toControllable

    factors

    Due toUncontrollable

    factors

    Due toControllable

    factors

    Due toUncontrollable

    factors

    MAHAGENCO 2/3 0 2/3 0

    Consumer 1/3 1 1/3 1

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    44/136

    44

    Working Approach Effective submissionIn view of the need of the hour to work under regulatoryregime, Regulatory Cell was formed in FY 2005 afterformation of Mahagenco.Later on it was envisaged that since the regulatory activitiesare more related to the revenue to the company , it will be

    more useful if the billing related work is also carried by thesame dept.So in 2010, in order to enhance a commercial approach in

    companys working , Commercial activities were added tothe portfolio of Regulatory Dept.

    A brief history of RCD

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    45/136

    45

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    46/136

    46

    Co-ordination for Data collection from power stations

    Data compilation and preparation of petition with proper

    justification for further submission to MERC

    Promptly fulfilling the data gaps.

    Capex & DPRs submission to commission & follow up for In

    principle approval.

    Justifying the need of the of the scheme and co-ordination

    with the stations for Cost Benefit Analysis and related

    submission for the capex scheme.

    Pre-submission activities

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    47/136

    47

    Hearing at MERC

    Meeting with Regulatory Experts of MERC to resolve the

    issues

    Public Hearing for tariff determination

    Analysis of orders received from MERC

    Post-submission activities

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    48/136

    48

    Analysis of Orders received from MERC and according to

    decide on way ahead( to file Review before MERC or Appeal

    at Appellate Tribunal (APTEL) New Delhi or alternatives

    available)

    Hearing at APTEL

    Matters in supreme court if any.Providing guidelines/suggestions to stations/ concerned

    authorities as per the MERC/APTEL orders

    Post MERC order activities

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    49/136

    49

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    50/136

    50

    Power purchase agreement for the generating stations.

    Raising monthly bills to MSEDCL on 1st of every month.

    Calculations for FAC (Fuel Adjustment Change) for every

    station & submit up to 22nd of every month .

    Other billing related activities like reconciliation, co-

    ordination with stations for documentation regarding billing.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    51/136

    51

    Discuss various important issues in different forums like

    Backing down, FAC calculation, merit order dispatch.

    Keeping in touch with other generating utilities performance

    & regulatory matters.

    Study of emerging energy trading market scenario and

    prepare our self ready for the future.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    52/136

    52

    E l f t d t filli

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    53/136

    53

    In the ARR formats in Excel there is inter-linking for many cells.

    Also at many locations it is expected that the figures should be reached

    through the formulas for the concerned cell.

    While giving the order ,MERC people follow the inter-links and formulas

    only.

    If some figures are directly punched this may create problems when MERC

    finalises the order.

    This is especially important for truing up year data.

    Excel format data filling

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    54/136

    54

    In case of Uran , during FY 08-09 true up, the total fuel quantity and cost

    in Form 2.1 was directly punched.

    The fuel rates in Form 2.1 and 2.2 were given in $/MMBTU as per

    contract.There were some purchases at spot price but this was not considered in

    Form 2.2 information.

    Resultantly the rates were less than actual .

    MERC people simply took the quantity and rate as per format to

    arrive at true up fuel cost and ultimately we lost Rs.90 Crs. on true up

    ( which we regained through APTEL but it took six months)

    Example

    Ti l it li ti f C dit

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    55/136

    55

    The timely capitalisation of the CAPEX investment is essential.

    Generally such works are carried out in the O/H or shutdown and

    technical people declare that the scheme is implemented as we

    complete the actual installation/commissioning work during the

    O/H or shutdown.

    But the work completion certification and its cognizance by

    Accounts people is much delayed.

    This results in delay in capitalization, increase in

    IDC,unnecessary comments from MERC for our delays in

    implementation.

    Timely capitalization of Capex expenditure

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    56/136

    Reform Agenda

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    57/136

    Reform Agenda

    Indian Power SystemOpen access in T&D

    Parallel Licensing

    Cross Subsidy Reduction

    History of Indian Power SystemHistory of Indian Power System

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    58/136

    History of Indian Power SystemHistory of Indian Power System

    18th Nov.1897 first generating station in India (Asia) commissioned at

    Sidrapong (Darjeeling) .

    Installed capacity on 15th Aug 1947: 1362 MW.

    Electricity: Prime mover for economic

    development, Industrial & Green Revolution.

    Installed capacity :1,67,077 MW (30/11/2010)

    AI Energy & Peak Load Shortages: 11.1% & 11.9%

    Per capita: 734 U/year (FY 08) Target: 1000 U (Mar 12)

    Indian Power Sector

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    59/136

    Indian Power Sector

    Total No. of consumers: Over 130 million.

    Revenue: Rs 350,000 CR/year

    T&D losses: 18 to 62% in various states.

    35% of Indians do not have access to Electricity.

    Use: Industries: 42%, Domestic: 25%, AG: 24%, RLY: 3% As on 31/10/10: 5,08,992 villages electrified ( 85.7%)

    1,68,33,575 Nos (85.2%) of AG pumps energized

    India is 6th Largest electricity utilizing country next to USA, China,Japan, UK & France. By 2014 we will be fourth

    59

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    60/136

    Indian Power SystemIndian Power System Challenges in Transition StageChallenges in Transition Stage

    To Reduce Distribution Losses.

    Reduce Shortage of power by

    effective Load Management .

    Promote and Develop Competition

    Promote DSM/EE activities.

    Promote RE Generation

    60

    Highlights of Indian Gen Sector

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    61/136

    Highlights of Indian Gen Sector

    Coal/ Gas/ Diesel: 108,362 MW : (64.9%)

    Nuclear: 4,560 MW : ( 2.7%) Hydro: 37367 : (22.4%)

    RES : 16,799 : (10.0%)

    Total: 1,67,077 MW (MU: 8,30,757 in FY 2010-11)

    AI PLF: 2009-10: 77.48%

    Coal: 2009-10: 341 MT

    Growth: 31/03/85: 42,584 31/03/97: 85,795 MW

    31/03/2007: 132,329 MW 31/11/2010: 167,077 MW

    Renewable Generation

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    62/136

    Renewable Generation

    RE Source: Wind/ Solar/ Bio-Gas/ Small Hydro (Mini, Micro Run Of RiverProjects)/ Baggase/ Bio mass: Infirm sources

    Issues in RE Sources:

    Site Selection/

    Grid Connectivity / Storage

    Non Schedulable resource/

    Low Plant load factor Satara, Maharashtra

    AI Transmission Network

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    63/136

    AI Transmission Network

    400 KV Lines: 102,166 Km, 220 KV Lines: 196,355 KM

    400KV S/S: 124,676 MVA 220KV: 196,355 KM 765KV Lines: 3910 KM & S/S: 4500 MVA

    EHV: 765 KV/ 400KV/ 220 KV/ 132 KV/ 110 KV /(+/-) 500 KV HVDC

    In 11th Plan JV/Private Sector Transmission projects (1200KV/765 /400/220KV) are being developed

    During 2009-10, 765KV Seoni-Bina S/s line & second circuit of Bina-Gwailor have been commissioned.

    Evolution of National Grid

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    64/136

    Evolution of National Grid

    State grids ( 1948+)

    Regional Grids (1970+) National Grid (2003+)

    What are the advantages of Interconnections?

    Higher Moment of Inertia (Stable system)

    Higher Power Number Mumbai (60MW/HZ) /Maharashtra (400MW/HZ)/ Western

    Region (800 MW/HZ)/ India (2100 MW/HZ)

    Regional Grids of August 2006

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    65/136

    Regional Grids ofIndia

    Merging of markets alongwith synchronization ofregions

    NEW Grid

    SouthGrid

    South

    West

    North

    East

    Northeast

    FiveRegional GridsFive Frequencies

    October 1991East and Northeast

    synchronized

    March 2003

    West synchronizedWith East & Northeast

    gNorth synchronized

    With Central Grid

    Central Grid

    65

    harashtra Load Curve and Demand Manageme

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    66/136

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

    BASE LOAD

    BASE LOAD

    MW

    Base Load Managed through Long Term PPAs

    Daily Variations Managed through

    1) Day ahead Power Exchange or 2) UI Balancing

    Seasonal Variations Managed through Short Term trades, by

    1) Traders, 2) Bilateral Contracts or 3) Banking Arrangements

    14

    12

    10

    8

    6

    4

    Hours

    66

    Mumbai Load curve as on 10/05/2010

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    67/136

    67

    Functions of Distribution Utilities

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    68/136

    68

    To Give

    Good quality supply / services

    Continuous Supply

    At an Affordable Cost

    Issues

    We cannot store electricity in bulk

    Control switches with consumers

    Payment Afterwards

    Main issues with Distribution System

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    69/136

    Main issues with Distribution System

    Distribution Losses: Technical ( I Square R) & Non-Technical (Commercial) losses(Theft, faulty/ Slow meters)

    Solution to Theft: Areal Bunched Conductors (ABC)/ High Voltage DistributionSystems (HVDS)

    High Distribution Transformer failure rate (13.4%)

    Consumer Metering:Automated Meter Reading (AMR) system

    Time of Day (TOD)/ Time of Use (TOU) metering

    Challenge: Demand Side Management (DSM)/ Energy Conservation

    Aggregate Revenue Requirement

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    70/136

    Aggregate Revenue Requirement

    Sr.No.

    Paerticulars ApprovedARR (Rs Cr)

    % of totalARR

    1 Power Purchase 24213 76.3%

    2 Employee Expenses 2591 8.2%

    3 A&G and R&M 772 2.4%

    4 Depreciation 458 1.4%

    56

    InterestOther Exp

    640661

    2.0%2.1%

    7 Transmission charges 1879 5.91

    78

    Total expensesROE

    31214533

    98.3%1.7%

    9 Total ARR 31747 100.0%

    10 Non-Tariff Income 1450

    11 ARR from Tariff 30297

    Tariff Setting

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    71/136

    71

    TariffSetting

    Consider a Utility purchasing 8000 MUs from Genco

    (Rs 1.50 P.U.) & 2000 MUs from Traders(Rs 4.0 P.U.)

    P.P. Cost = 8000 * 1.5 + 2000 * 4

    = 1200 + 800= Rs. 2000 Cr. for 10,000 MU

    i.e. P.U. input cost = Rs 2 / Unit

    Consider the Utility has Fixed Expenditure = Rs. 800 Cr.

    i.e. Total Input Cost = Rs. 2800 Cr. for10000 MU input

    (i.e. Per unit Cost = Rs 2.80)

    Tariff Setting

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    72/136

    72

    If Distribution loss is 30% ,One unit of Input means, 0.7 Unit Sold.

    i.e. Rs 2.80 have to be recovered from 0.7 Unit sale

    i.e. P.U. Sale Cost = 2.8 / 0.7 = Rs 4 P.U. at consumer end

    If the losses are 20%, i.e. 0.8 P.U. sold per unit Input

    i.e. P.U. Sale Cost = 2.8 / 0.8 = Rs 3.50

    If Losses are 40%, i.e. 0.6 unit sold per unit Input

    P.U Sale Cost = 2.8 / 0.6 = Rs 4.58

    Distribution loss is Integral Component of Retail TariffDistribution loss is Integral Component of Retail Tariff

    TariffSetting...

    What is Success?

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    73/136

    What is Success?

    In 1988 Tendulkarfailed inEnglish in 10th

    standard

    Now, in 2011 for10th Standard English

    bookthe first lesson is

    about

    Open Access, Parallel Licensee

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    74/136

    Open Access, Parallel Licensee

    Electricity Act 2003M d t f R f

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    75/136

    Mandate for Reform

    Promoting competition/ Protecting consumers interest /

    Providing power to All Consolidation of Laws in G/T/D/ Trading

    Gen is decentralized but Regulatory freedom needed foraccessing the market

    Transmission: Licensed activity. Regulatory framework

    necessary for competitive & transparent operation

    Buying/Selling commoditynamed Electricity

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    76/136

    named Electricity..

    Which cannot be seen, counted in numbers, or measured

    in Kilos, liters or meters Which cannot be put into container with forwarding

    address, on a particular truck taking a particular route,but flows as per laws of Physics

    Which cannot be stored and whose availability and cost

    keep changing widely

    Buying /Selling of Electricity.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    77/136

    uy g /Se g o ec c y

    Which intermingles with other supplies in an inevitable

    pool & cannot have an owners name tag Buyer has no control over what seller supplies &seller

    has no control over what buyer draws from the pool &the two may not match all time

    Thus, it is necessary to have mechanism for commercial

    handling of mismatches

    Solution ????

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    78/136

    Solution ????

    Power trading has to be notional : the buyer has to pay

    the agreed amount to the supplier for scheduledquantum of power

    Payment for variations from the schedule through acommon mechanism called UI (Unscheduled

    Interchange)

    C t f U h d l d

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    79/136

    Drawl from CS 2500MW

    Gen 10000 MW

    State Load12500 MW

    CS Schedule 2000MW

    CS UI 500MW

    If System frequency is 49.5 Hz, the State has to pay ar Rs 8.73 PU isRs.10,18,250 in 15 minutes! (500 MW: Rs. 1.018M)

    Cost of 12000 MW scheduled generation for 15Min at Rs 3 PU is

    Rs. 12000/4 X 3 i.e. 90,00,000 in 15 minutes! (12000 MW: Rs.9.0 M)

    (For only 4% Energy: Price is over 10% : Avoid overdrawing)

    Concept of UnscheduledInterchange

    79

    UI rate in Paisa

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    80/136

    80

    Electricity Markets

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    81/136

    y

    More private sector participation needed Need to unbundle supply system & start multi-seller,

    multi-buyer model

    Basic need: consensus building in various stakeholders

    Competition: Open access (using existing DLs wires & paying wheeling charges)

    Parallel Licensing (New DL to lay the network & give supply)

    We should see competition as an opportunity & not as a threat

    Open Access

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    82/136

    Open Access

    OA means that customer can pick & choose their supplier & any supplier can useexisting lines to reach any customer.

    On payment of wheeling charges, CS surcharge & additional surcharge whereverapplicable. (S 42(2), 42 (4))

    Open access means enabling Sale/ purchase of energy between two parties utilizing thesystem of an (in-between) third party & not blocking it on any unreasonable grounds.

    Implications: Competitors may cherry pick high revenue customers but Cross Subsidy &Stand by issues

    More clear definition

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    83/136

    Open access means enabling non-

    discriminatory Sale/ purchase of electrical energybetween two parties

    utilizing the system of an (in-between) third party

    & not blocking it on any unreasonable grounds

    Example of OA

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    84/136

    Tata Power wants to sell 100 MW to Discom A in Andhra

    TPC & Discom A agree on terms & conditions of sale TPC to get consent from MSETCL /STU & no objection

    from SLDC Kalwa

    Discom A to get consent from APTRANSCO and APSTUand no objection from AP SLDC

    Example (contd)

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    85/136

    Both SLDCs after ascertaining transmission adequacy

    agree to arrange for necessary metering, scheduling,EA, UI settlement

    All concerned to have a common understanding abouttreatment/ sharing of transmission losses, levy oftransmission/ wheeling charges for use of intra-state &

    inter-state system

    OA REGULATIONS OF MERC

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    86/136

    MERC has formulated two Regulations: Transmission OA2005 & Distribution OA , 2005

    Distribution OA Regulations permit consumers with contractdemand >= 1 MVA are eligible to avail OA from by 1st April2007

    Draft for OA Regulations were finalized & uploaded onMERC website for comments by stakeholders & consumersup to 11th Feb.2011.Final Version is getting ready

    Categorization of OA Customers

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    87/136

    Long term Open Access customers OA for a period >= 12 years but not exceeding 25 years

    Medium term Open Access customers OA for a period < 3 years & > 3 months

    Short-term Open Access customer OA for a period up to one month, at a time.

    Limited Short term OA customer means consumer, who has a supplyagreement with the DL & avails OA only during pre-scheduled LS period

    Open Access: issues

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    88/136

    Cross subsidy: To compensate full/partial revenue loss of

    existing DL Apportionment of losses

    Shortage scenario: load shedding

    State of Art Energy metering & EA system

    Despite none of these issues, most countries took over tenyears to implement full OA

    Charges for Open Access Customer

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    89/136

    Charges payable by OA customers:

    Transmission charges & Wheeling charges Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS)

    Additional Surcharge (ASC)

    Standby Support charges (SBSC)

    Scheduling & System Operation Charges payable toSLDC

    Why Cross Subsidy Surcharge(CSS)?

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    90/136

    In current tariff orders, CSS & ASC are identified as NIL

    from 1st

    April 2007 (due to negative values) Study Committee re-examined approach

    towards CSS & ASC. By identifying a value for CSS & ASC, prospective OA

    applicant would share burden of Cross Subsidy.

    Cross Subsidy Surcharge NTP formula

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    91/136

    S = T [ C (1+ L / 100) + D ]

    S: Surcharge T: Tariff payable by relevant category of consumers; C: Weighted average cost of PP of top 5% at the margin excluding

    liquid fuel based Gen. & renewable power D: Wheeling charge L: % System Losses for applicable voltage level

    ( In case the formula gives negative value of surcharge, C in theformula needs to be redefined (????))

    Cross subsidy surcharge

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    92/136

    Surcharge formula (NTP)S = T [C (1+L/100) + D]

    C Costliest long term contracted PP cost excluding liquidfuel generation may be considered

    Example:If C Rs.4.26 PU (for costliest LTPP) then S =67 PS/Unit for IND consumer @ 33KV & above

    OA CSS IN Various States

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    93/136

    State

    Punjab

    Haryana

    Uttrakhand

    Himachal Pradesh

    Madhya Pradesh

    Rajasthan

    Cross Subsidiary in Paise/Unit

    0

    72

    38

    20

    84 at 66/33 KV and 62 at 132 KV

    13

    Additional Surcharge: Stranded costs

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    94/136

    OA customer, receiving supply from a person other than DL of his areaof supply, shall pay to the DL, an additional surcharge, in addition to

    wheeling charges & CSS, to meet out the fixed cost of such DL, arisingout of his obligation to supply as provided under Section 42(4) of EA2003.

    Additional surcharge shall become applicable only if, the obligation ofDL in terms of LTPP commitments has been stranded.

    Fixed costs related to network assets are recovered through wheelingcharges.

    Additional Surcharge (ASC)

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    95/136

    DL should be required to demonstrate stranded cost, ifany, every six months to SERC.

    On being satisfied, SERC would determine additionalsurcharge (Ps/KWH)

    Such ASC should be levied only on new open accessapplicants.

    No ASC for captive GEN plant for carrying electricity to

    destination of his own use.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    96/136

    Unscheduled Interchange

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    97/136

    If an OA consumer is unable to draw scheduled energy dueto failure of InSTS &/or network of DL, power injected maybe treated as Banked Power& OA consumer may be allowedto draw the same within a period of 3 months with anadvance notice of 24 hours to DL.

    Beyond 3 months, energy would be treated as lapsed.

    Metering

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    98/136

    For OA consumer having load of >= 10 MW & allGen Stations irrespective of capacity, Special Energy

    Meters shall be installed by STU or DL as the casemay be, for & at the cost of the customer.

    SEM can be inspected by any person authorized bySTU/ SLDC.

    As regards OA consumers having load < 10 MW, theTOD meter shall be installed by DL concerned.

    All OA customers shall follow Metering Standards ofCEA.

    States Allowing OA Power Procurement through Power Exchanges

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    99/136

    Punjab

    Haryana Uttarakhand

    Himachal Pradesh

    Madhya Pradesh

    Rajasthan

    Tamil Nadu

    Volume on Power Exchanges

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    100/136

    Price on Power Exchange

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    101/136

    BENEFITS OF OPEN ACCESS

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    102/136

    Maharashtra is facing peak & energy deficits, even after subsequentreforms programs, the utilities are not unable to bridge the gap and

    provide quality & reliable power supply to consumers. With OA, consumers are will get alternative sources of power from

    Market, may be, at a lower cost, & can have assured availability ofpower on demand

    Purchase of costly power to meet demand can be avoided, which willactually result in lower PP cost for DL, leading to lower tariffs for

    remaining utility consumers. However, Revenue of DL will get affected (CSS/ASC/SBC)

    Parallel Distribution Licensee

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    103/136

    MERC can grant distribution license to more than onepersons for distribution through their own networks insame area (6thproviso of S14)

    Implications: DL will face Competition in its HT & HighRevenue Customers.

    Determination of tariffSection 62 (1) proviso 1 (d)

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    104/136

    The appropriate Commission may determine tariff inaccordance with provisions of this Act for (a)Generation (b) Transmission (c) Wheeling (d) retailsale of electricity

    PROVIDED that, in case of distribution of electricity in

    the same area by two or more DL, the Commissionmay, for the purpose of promoting competition,among DLs, fix only maximum ceiling of tariff forretail sale of electricity.

    Competition through parallel licensee

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    105/136

    SERC to grant License if investment meets GoIstipulated norms (S 14/Proviso 6)

    Tariff ceiling may be set by Regulator(S 62(1d))

    No time frame issue unlike OA: Commencement ofoperation by time & cost of roll out plan

    Competition in retail through parallel network is an

    immediate possibility.

    Main Difference

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    106/136

    OA: On incumbent licensees Network

    CSS/SB-Charges/ASC to be decided as the network ofincumbent Licensee is used

    Parallel Licensee: DL will have to lay the network.

    Ceiling Tariff concept.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    107/136

    Case study: TPC-D and R Infra-D

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    108/136

    Hon. Supreme Court Order dated 8th July 2008 allowing supply ofelectrical energy in retail by TPC-D utilizing distribution network of the

    other licensee present in the area.

    and allow these three appeals upon holding that under the Terms &Conditions of the licenses held by it Tata Power Co. Ltd. Is entitled toeffect supply of electrical energy in retail directly to consumers, whoseMD is less than 1000 KVA, apart from its entitlement to supply energy

    to other licensees for their own purpose, and in bulk, within its area ofsupply as stipulated in its licenses.

    TPC Petition dated 30th August 2009

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    109/136

    R-Infras area of supply forms the part of TPCs area ofsupply. Both have common areas to the extent of R-Infras area of supply .

    TPC proposes to use R-Infras existing Dist networksystem to ensure smooth Change over.

    Public Hearing on TPCs petition 30th Sept 2009 & 8th Oct

    2009 (136 persons present)

    MERC Order..

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    110/136

    Noting the consumer interest & their keenness to exercise the choiceof supplier on immediate basis, MERC decided to issue interim order.

    Order issued on 15th Oct 2009 as per powers vested under Section 94(2)of EA 2003:

    The appropriate Commission shall have powers to pass such interimorder in any proceeding, hearing or matter before the Commission, asthat Commission may consider appropriate.

    No reference has been drawn to Section 42 of EA 2003 & Regulations

    issued there under, to avoid the applicability of Section 86(1)(a).

    Some issues about change over

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    111/136

    Period for change over: shall not exceed 30 days fromthe date of receipt of complete change over applicationform by TPC.

    Past Dues/liabilities & disconnection: As per Section 56of EA. (Disconnection of supply in default of payment).

    Migration is not allowed to consumer who is in arrears,

    without clearing his dues or for a disconnectedconsumer (in arrears)

    Shifting : Energy Meter Issues

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    112/136

    Shifting : Energy Meter Issues

    Ownership of Energy Meters: Consumers have a choice tocontinue with the existing meter of R-Infra/ Opt for meterfrom TPC / Purchase his own meter from third party

    Joint testing of meter at the time of migration

    Meter for changeover consumers

    to have downloadable capability Common meter specifications

    for third party meter purchase

    Shifting of consumersfrom RIL To TPC

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    113/136

    Meter reading for consumers to be done by TPC . As TPC will beresponsible for Billing/ Collection & meter reading is an

    integral part of bill preparation.

    TPC will provide meter reading info to R-infra on daily basisalong with the date& time

    TPC shall pay R-Infra wheeling charges within 21 days fromdate of bills raised on changeover consumers ,irrespective ofpayment of WC by consumers.

    Security Deposit & Theft detection

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    114/136

    Security Deposit: Last month bill will be issued by RIL In case of non-payment ofdues, RIL after deducting the SD available with them can disconnect theconsumer, if the consumer does not pay the balance amount in time

    Theft & inspection: Any theft by meter tampering or bypassing meter leads toincreased distribution losses for R-Infra and requires R-Infra to pay for thisenergy, in intra State pool at System Marginal price. To ensure that wheeling DLis able to manage distribution losses, it should have the RIGHT TO INSPECT andREAD Consumer METER from time to time for detection & investigation of theft

    by way of meter tampering or bypassing the meter

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    115/136

    Calculation of tariff forChange-over consumers

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    116/136

    Tariff for Change-Over consumers

    = Charges based on tariff of supply DL

    (-) Wheeling Charges of Supply DL [a](+) Wheeling Charges of wheeling DL [b]

    (a) HT = 18 Ps/KWH & LT = 37 Ps/KWH

    (b) HT = 46 Ps/KWH & LT = 88 Ps/KWH

    Two DL: Supply (Tata), Wheeling: R-infra

    About 90,000 Consumers shifted from R-Infra to TPC. Applications received50,000 (+) MIAL Case: Daily savings Rs 10.5 Lakh

    Residential (monthly bill in Rs) : Savings :13.5% to 31.2%

    Conclusions

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    117/136

    EA 2003: Engineers/Economists/LawyersEngineers: like to operate sophisticated PS

    Economists: like to work on optimal incentives

    Lawyers: like to write rules & agreement

    Power sector reform brings all of them

    into close contact. But None of them can

    succeed at their chosen tasks, unless they work

    together in designing sustainable solutions

    for the Customers

    Important issues inCross Subsidy Reduction

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    118/136

    Analysis of various MERC tariff orders: No definite pattern forCS is being followed.

    CSR plan for each utility, to be prepared, separately.

    We are in the process of finalizing the Roadmap &

    simultaneously preparing the draft Regulations.

    ACOS for various utilities

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    119/136

    MSEDCL: 455 P/UBEST: 575 P/U

    TPC-D: 520 P/UR-Infra-D: 635 P/U

    Categories having >1% of total Sale AND /OR >1% of total consumers AND >1% Revenue

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    120/136

    Utility ACOS (Ps/Unit) Min ABR (Ps/U)Categories

    Max ABR (Ps/U)Category

    MSEDCL 455 210(46%) LTV- AG

    845 (186%) HT-Com

    BEST 575 368 (64%) LT-Res

    755 (131%) HT-Com

    R-Infra (*) 706 524 (74%) LT- I-Res

    952 (135%) LT-II-Com

    TPC-D 520 395 (76%) LT-I-Res

    551 (106%) HT-Com

    Three step in Cross subsidy Reduction

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    121/136

    Step I: Inter category Cross subsidy Reduction based onAverage cost of supply for utility

    Step II: Inter category Cross subsidy Reduction based oncost to serve for each category

    Step III: Intra category (sub-category wise) cross

    subsidy reduction

    Tariff Subsidy by GOM(Consumers to pay at a lesser tariff than approved by MERC)

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    122/136

    Financial Year AG Consumers (RsCR)

    P/L Consumers(Rs CR)

    Total Subsidy (RsCR)

    FY 2005-06 1309 333 1642

    FY 2006-07 1229 484 1713

    FY 2008-09 1305 471 1776

    FY 2009-10 1397 485 1882

    FY 2010-11 1865 658 2523

    Important issues

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    123/136

    Categories having Sale

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    124/136

    ACOS= RS.4.55/KWH Total CS = Rs. 5020 Cr in total ARR of Rs 32056

    Cr (15.7%) [64% from IND & 31% from COM]

    CATEGORY SALE MU ABR % of ACOS CS=(ABR-ACOS)

    CS IN RS.CR

    % ofTotal CS

    LT-COM 3814 686 151% (*) 231 881 18%

    LT IND 4549 537 118% 82 373 7%

    HT IND 25024 570 125% (*) 115 2878 57%

    HT-COM 1620 845 186% (*) 390 632 13%

    RLYS 1427 604 133% (*) 149 212 4%

    CS IN MSEDCL (FY 2010-11)Subsidized Categories[71%to AG & 19% Domestic]

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    125/136

    CATEGORY SALE MU ABR % of ACOS CS=(ABR-ACOS)

    CS IN RS. CR % CS of TTLCS

    LT-Res 12478 379 83% 76 948 19%

    LT PWW 591 226 50% (*) 229 135 3%

    LT Ag 14057 210 46% (*) 245 3444 69%

    HT Ag 496 248 54% (*) 207 102 2%

    HT PWW 1190 417 92% 38 45 1%

    MPECS 743 296 65% (*) 159 118 2%

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    126/136

    Other SERCs

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    127/136

    AP: No specific road map & just trying CSR. COS approach to be used.CS to be brought into +/-20 % level

    Delhi: Does have specific CSR Road map. But decided to use ACOSapproach (No specific mention of intra-class CSR)

    Orissa: Tariff Policy being followed for deciding allowable level of CS.There is an intra- Discom CS. No specific mention about the

    method/Road map for CSR. (No mention about Intra-Class CSR)

    MPERC Notification: 06/10/2010: LT(ABR as % of ACOS of that FY)

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    128/136

    Category FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12

    Dom 93 93 94 95

    Non-Dom 152 140 130 120

    PWW 86 90 92 95

    IND 121 121 121 120

    AG Met 67 67 73 80

    St Light 100 100 100 100

    MPERC Notification: 06/10/2010: HT(ABR as % of ACOS of that FY)

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    129/136

    Category FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12

    RLY 128 123 123 120

    Coal mines 149 140 130 120

    PWW 88 90 92 95

    IND 125 124 122 120

    Non-IND 136 131 126 120

    Seasonal 179 160 140 120

    Bulk-Res 97 97 97 97

    Bulk supply 80 85 90 95

    CS Reduction: Rs 341 CR to be reduced per year

    (considering ACOS remains constant for 5 years)

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    130/136

    Category PresentABR %

    Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

    LT COMABR

    CSR in Rs Cr

    151%685

    145%660

    -107

    139%632

    -107

    -132%610

    -107

    126%573

    -107

    120%546

    -107

    HT-INDABRCSR

    125%570

    124%565

    -120

    123%560

    -120

    122%555-12

    121%550

    -120

    120%546

    -120

    HT-COMABRCSR

    186%845

    173%786-97

    160%727-97

    147%668-97

    134%609-97

    120%545-97

    RLYSABR

    CSR

    133%604

    130%590-16

    127%576-16

    125%568-16

    122%554-16

    120%545-16

    CS : Rs 252 CR to be increased per year

    (considering ACOS remains constant for 5 years)

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    131/136

    Category PresentABR %

    Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

    LT PWWABR

    CSR in Rs Cr

    50%226

    56%253

    16

    62%28016

    68%30716

    74%334

    16

    80%363

    17

    LT-AgABRCSR

    46%210

    49%221217

    53%239217

    57%257217

    61%275217

    65%293217

    HT-AgABRCSR

    54%247

    58%265

    9

    62%284

    9

    66%302

    9

    70%321

    9

    74%339

    9

    MPECSLABR

    CSR

    65%295

    68%309

    10

    71%32210

    74%33610

    77%349

    10

    80%363

    10

    Some imp issues.

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    132/136

    LT AG tariff: 46% to 65% in 5 years (CSR in 10 years)

    HT AG tariff: 54% to 74% in 5 years (CSR in 7 years)

    CSR/ Year: Rs. 340 Cr/year Rise: 252 Cr/year

    Balance amount to be increased in categories with ABR>80 &

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    133/136

    CS reduction roadmap being prepared & CSR regulationsbeing prepared

    Final draft under preparation

    CS Surcharge for each utility will be computed &

    computations will be sent to stakeholders for comments.

    Reforming the Existing system

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    134/136

    Many of the important thingsin the world have beenaccomplished

    by the people,who kept on trying, even when

    there seem to beno hope at all

    Dale Carnegie

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    135/136

    135

    PERFORM OR PERISH

    -Visveshwariah

  • 8/6/2019 Regulatory Compliance Issues for Nashik Training Session

    136/136

    Thankyou


Recommended