+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Regulatory requirements in international fish and...

Regulatory requirements in international fish and...

Date post: 18-Aug-2018
Category:
Upload: voduong
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
30
Regulatory requirements in international fish and seafood trade Dr Lahsen Ababouch, Chief Fish Utilization and Marketing Service Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization Silver Spring, USA. May 2008
Transcript

Regulatory requirements in international fish and seafood

trade

Dr Lahsen Ababouch, ChiefFish Utilization and Marketing Service

Department of Fisheries and AquacultureThe United Nations Food and Agriculture

Organization

Silver Spring, USA. May 2008

Million tonnes

Fisheries and aquaculture production (1951-2006)

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

1951 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006

Mill

ion

tonn

es

Capture (marine waters) Capture (inland waters) Total aquaculture

World Fish Production

World

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

1975

2006

Aquaculture

Capture

China

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

1975

2006

Aquaculture

Capture

World minus China

0

10,000

20,00030,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,00080,000

90,000

100,000

1975

2006

Aquaculture

Capture

State of the Resources

State of the world fish stocks in 2004 (FAO, 2004)

3%

20%

52%

17%

7%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Under exploited

Moderately exploited

Fully exploited

Over exploited

Depleted

Recovering

Contribution to food-fish supply

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

mill

ion

tonn

es

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

AquacultureCaptureAQ share

Fish exports (1976–2005)

US$ billion

10

20

30

40

1976 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 2000 2002 2004

year

US$

bill

ion

Developed countries or areas Developing countries or areas

Contribution of fish to human diet (2003)

22.0

18.7

10.0

9.8

7.7

6.7

19.4

15.5

0 5 10 15 20 25

Asia

Africa

Europe

Oceania

North and Central America

South America

LIFDC's

WORLD

Fish as percentage of total animal protein intake

Imports

Japan 18%

USA 15%

Others7%Developing

countries18%

EU (25)40%

Exports

Japan 2%

EU (25)25%

Others20%

USA 5%

Developing countries

48%

World Fish Trade 2005 (by value)

Commodity breakdown (Trade)

8%

19%

8%

4%

12%3%3%1%

42%

TunaShrimpSalmonPelagicsDemersalsCephalopodsFishmealFish oilOthers

International regulatory Framework

Minimal Technical Obstacles to trade

Liberalization of tradeMaximal protection of

plant, animal and human health

Issue:Issue:

• GATT (1948, Article XXII:b)• Codex Alimentarius (FAO/WHO, 1962)• TBT Agreement (GATT, Tokyo Round, 1974-1979)• Code of Conduct For responsible fisheries (FAO, 1994.

Article 11)• FAO COFI and its two sub committees• SPS/TBT Agreements (WTO, 1995)• ISO 9000:2000 (QMS) and 22000:2005 (FSMS)• International Principles for Responsible Shrimp Farming,

2006• FAO Guidelines on Eco-labeling for wild capture fisheries• FAO Guidelines for Aquaculture Certification

International regulatory Framework

SPS/TBT Agreements

TBT measures can cover any subject related to industrial goods, from car safety to energy –saving devices to food packaging

SPS cover health (human, animal and plant) protection measuresThe TBT Agreement covers all technical

requirements, voluntary standards and the procedures (Conformity assessment procedures) to ensure that these are met, except when these are SPS measures as defined by the SPS Agreement

SPS SPS

vs.vs.

TBTTBT

SPS/TBT AgreementsGeneral Principles

• Sovereignty • Harmonization• Transparency• Equivalency• Scientific basis• Special and differential treatment• Technical Assistance • Consultation and dispute settlement

• Establishment, Recognition and Application of Common SPS Measures by Members

• Members shall base their measures on those developed by relevant international organizations (OIE, CAC, IPPC)

• Measures which conform to international standards are consistent with Agreement

• Members are to fully participate in the work of relevant international organizations

• WTO to monitor progress of international harmonization (SPS and TBT Committees)

Harmonization

World Trade Organisation

CODEXGuidelines,Standards

Codes of Practice

SPS/TBT and Codex

National Regulations

General Subject Committees

– General Principles (France)

– Import/Export Inspection and Certification Systems (Australia)

– Food Labeling (Canada)

– Methods of Analysis & Sampling (Hungary)

– Food Hygiene (USA)

– Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Food (USA)

– Pesticide Residues (Netherlands)

– Food Additives and Contaminants (Netherlands)

– Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (Germany)

Active Commodity Committees

– Fats and Oils (U. K.)

–– Fish and Fishery Products (Norway)Fish and Fishery Products (Norway)

– Milk and Milk Products (New Zealand)

– Fresh Fruits and Vegetables (Mexico)

– Cocoa Products & Chocolate (Switzerland)

– Natural Mineral Waters (Switzerland)

Thank you

Lahsen AbabouchChief, FIIU

Fish products and Industry DivisionDepartment of Fisheries and Aquaculture

The U.N Food and Agriculture OrganizationVia Delle Terme di Caracalla

00100 Rome, Italy+390657054157+390657055188

[email protected]

Outputs relevant to Aquaculture

• Code of practice for food hygiene (GHP, HACCP, Risk assessment)

• Standards for fish and fishery products (Volume 9A)

• Code of practice for intensive aquaculture (GAP, HACCP)

• Several risk assessments (Vibrios in seafood, biotoxins, antimicrobial resistance)

• Several principles and guidelines for food import and export inspection and certification

• MRL for veterinary drugs

• Members shall accept other Member measures as equivalent, if final results are the same ( achieve same ALOP)

• Members shall consult to achieve bilateral and multilateral agreements (Mutual Recognition Agreements)

Equivalence

Scientifically based standards

• SPS measures are to be based on the assessment of risks to humans, animals or plants, using internationally accepted risk assessment techniques and taking into account the available scientific evidence

• SPS measures should minimize negative trade effects and arbitrary and unjustified measures should not be considered

Risk Communication(interactive exchange

ofinformation and ideas)

RiskAssessment

(“scientific”)•hazards•exposure•dose-response•synthesis•uncertainty

Risk Management

(“policy”)•social

•cultural•economicProcess

Initiation

The Risk Analysis Process

FAO/WHO/IOC Expert Consultation on Biotoxins

Background

• During the discussion of– the Code of Practice for Fish and Fishery Products and – the Proposed Draft Standard for Live and Raw Bivalve Molluscs,

The CCFFP requested scientific advice on biotoxins to be addressed through an FAO/WHO/IOC Expert Consultaion to;

– Provide Scientific Advice for the Establishment of Safe Upper Limits;

– Provide guidance on the application of different methods of analysis concerning each toxin group;

– Monitoring and management of growing areas;

– Geographic Distribution of the biotoxins

Process

• March 04: Planning Workshop in Dublin, Ireland• April 04 : Call for Experts and Data• May – Sep 04: electronic drafting group • Sep 04: Expert Consultation – Oslo, Norway• Feb 05- 27th CCFFP (Cape Town, South Africa):

– presentation of the report– Establishment of an inter-sessions working group to

examine the EC report and prepare a discussion paper for the next CCFFP session

• April 05- Updated draft scientific monographs• April 2006: Meeting of the ISWG (Ottawa, Canada)• September 2006: Presentation at the 28th Session of

CCFFP

Certification in aquaculture

• Harmonization• Equivalence• Transparency• science-based• Definition of boundaries between private

and public sectors. Who is responsible for what?

Border cases in EU....Eu

rope

non

EU

Afric

aAs

iaAm

eric

aO

cean

ia

Euro

pe n

on E

UAf

rica

Asia

Amer

ica

Oce

ania

Euro

pe n

on E

UAf

rica

Asia

Amer

ica

Oce

ania

Euro

pe n

on E

UAf

rica

Asia

Amer

ica

Oce

ania

Euro

pe n

on E

UAf

rica

Asia

Amer

ica

Oce

ania

Euro

pe n

on E

UAf

rica

Asia

Amer

ica

Oce

ania

Euro

pe n

on E

UAf

rica

Asia

Amer

ica

Oce

ania

0

50

100

150

200

250

Num

ber o

f Ale

rts

Microbial

Chemical

Histamine

Parasites

Other Causes

1999 20002001

2002

20032004

2005

Chemical….

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005¹ Totals %

Cadmium 12 7 5 12 58 33 31 158 16,8 Chloramphenicol 44 102 9 8 163 17,4 Carbon monoxide 1 3 6 19 28 2,9 DSP 2 4 2 1 2 2 13 1,4 Lead 3 1 1 1 6 0,6 Mercury 14 11 11 19 19 26 22 122 13 Nitrofuran 89 51 27 20 187 20 PAH 3 11 9 23 2,5 Phenol 1 1 0,1 Residues 1 1 10 12 2 1 27 2,8 Sulphite 2 7 8 31 31 79 8,4 Bacterial inhib. 21 2 4 3 30 3,2 Malachite Green 1 9 14 28 52 5,6 Histamine 4 8 1 3 4 19 7 46 4,9 Totals 32 32 68 279 186 173 165 935 100

1 figures to August 2005

Thank you


Recommended