+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Reinventing Urban Transportation and Mobility - … · Reinventing Urban Transportation and...

Reinventing Urban Transportation and Mobility - … · Reinventing Urban Transportation and...

Date post: 30-Aug-2018
Category:
Upload: lecong
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
59
1 Reinventing Urban Transportation and Mobility Pascal Van Hentenryck University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI
Transcript

1

Reinventing Urban Transportation

and MobilityPascal Van HentenryckUniversity of Michigan

Ann Arbor, MI

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Outline‣ Motivation ‣ Technology enablers ‣ Some case studies ‣ The MIDAS Ritmo projet ‣ Conclusion

2

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

The First/Last Mile Problem

3

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

The First/Last Mile Problem

4

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

The Importance of Mobility‣ Car ownership in the US

– best predictor of upwards social mobility

– Transportation Emerges as Crucial to Escaping Poverty, New York Times, May 2015

5

The relationship between transportation and social mobility is stronger than that between mobility and several other factors, like crime, elementary-school test scores or the percentage of two-parent families in a community

Nathaniel Hendren, Harvard University

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Congestion‣ The cost of congestion

– in 2013, 124 billions – predicted to be 184 billions in 2030

6

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

The Challenge

7

Can we transform mobility in a scalable way?

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Outline‣ Motivation ‣ Technology enablers ‣ Some case studies ‣ The MIDAS Ritmo projet ‣ Conclusion

8

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Connectivity

9

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Automated Vehicles

10

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Progress in Analytics

11

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Progress in Optimization‣ “If you only knew optimization from 10 years ago,

you probably don’t have the techniques needed to solve real-world sport scheduling problems” – Mike Trick, Professor at CMU, 2008

‣ “The following do make a big difference (and are much more recent ideas)” – Complicated variables – Large neighborhood search – Constraint programming (ideally combined with integer

programming).

12

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

‣ Motivation ‣ Technology enablers ‣ Some case studies

– Public transportation in Canberra ‣ The MIDAS Ritmo projet ‣ Conclusion

Outline

13

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Canberra

14

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Planned City

‣ Garden city – Walter Griffin

‣ Design principle – self-contained communities – greenbelt – “bush capital”

‣ Many towns – city centers – infrastructure

‣ Started in 1913

15

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Urban Transportation‣ The problem: off-peak bus service

– long routes – 1-hour frequency – buses running almost empty – buses are expensive

16

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Hub and Shuttle in Canberra

17

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Urban Transportation

18

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Public Transportation‣ Descriptive Analytics

– bus boarding and alighting – Discovering true O/D pairs from individual trips

‣ Predictive Analytics – Predictive models for travel demand

‣ Prescriptive Analytics – designing the network

• Benders decomposition – online vehicle routing

• under uncertainty

19

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Hub and Shuttle Transportation

20

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Nature of the Trips

21

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Case Study

22

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

‣ Motivation ‣ Technology enablers ‣ Some case studies

– Public transportation in Canberra – Evacuation Planning

‣ The MIDAS Ritmo projet ‣ Conclusion

Outline

23

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Rush Hours

24

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Saturday Afternoon in AA

25

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016 26

Prescriptive Evacuations

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016 27

Prescriptive Evacuations

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Prescriptive Evacuations

28

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Prescriptive Evacuations

29

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Scheduling Evacuations

30

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Scheduling Evacuations

31

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Disaster Management

32

Text

33

The Inputs

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

vs 020

0

2

B

0

1

B

0

1

A

∞ ∞ ∞

B

A

10

10 10

9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00

∞ ∞vt

2

B

1

A

3

B

1

A

3

A

110

5 5

Node 2 is flooded at 11:00

34

Time-expanded evacuation graph

Going from 2 to B takes 1 hour

At most 10 vehicles per hour

20 5

510

5

10

5

10

5

5

10

10

10

Waiting

Scheduling Evacuations

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Scheduling Evacuations‣ Large-scale optimization model

– that needs to be solved in real time

185 nodes458 edges

21212 nodes58290 edges

10h horizon 5min steps ?

35

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Outline‣ Motivation ‣ Technology enablers ‣ Some case studies

– Public transportation in Canberra – Evacuation Planning

‣ The MIDAS Ritmo projet – project vision

‣ Conclusion

36

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

MIDAS

37

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Project Vision ‣ On-Demand Multimodal Transportation System

– multiple fleets of vehicles • buses, shuttles, cars, light-rail, bicycles, pedestrian

– on-demand • address the first/last mile problem

– human-centered mobility • one click to order and trip tracking

– congestion management and quality of service • routing and dispatching • traffic lights and lane priorities

– pricing • differentiated service

– infrastructure optimization • road and bridge condition optimization

38

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

‣ Motivation ‣ Technology enablers ‣ Some case studies

– Public transportation in Canberra – Evacuation Planning

‣ The MIDAS Ritmo projet – project vision – Ann Arbor as a living mobility lab

‣ Conclusion

Outline

39

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

UM Living Mobility Lab

40

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

UM Transit System‣ Some figures

– 50,000 commuting trips a day – 7.4 millions a year – 75% capacity utilization – increasing congestion issues

41

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

UM Ann Arbor Campus

42

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Bus Routes and Capacity

43

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

The Research Team‣ Ceren Budak, Assistant Professor, School of Information. ‣ Amy Cohn, Industrial and Operations Engineering. ‣ Rebecca Cunningham, M.D., Emergency Medicine, ‣ Tawanna Dillahunt, School of Information. ‣ Robert Hampshire, Transportation Research Institute. ‣ Jerome Lynch, Civil and Environmental Engineering ‣ Jonathan Levine, Taubman College of Architecture and Urban

Planning. ‣ Louis Merlin, Taubman College of Architecture and Urban

Planning. ‣ Jim Sayer, Transportation Research Institute. ‣ Pascal Van Hentenryck, Industrial and Operations Engineering. ‣ Michael Wellman, Computer Science & Engineering.

44

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

UM Parking and Transportation

45

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Information and Technology Services

46

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

MTC

47

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Outline‣ Motivation ‣ Technology enablers ‣ Some case studies

– Public transportation in Canberra – Evacuation Planning

‣ The MIDAS Ritmo projet – project vision – Ann Arbor as a living mobility lab – some early steps

‣ Conclusion

48

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

UM Mobility Data

49

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

UM Mobility Data‣ Application for experiment

– filed in eResearch ‣ Development in collaboration with

– Information and Technology Services (ITS) • Bill Burns (Manager, Mobile/Portal/Web) and Jane Zhao • Tom Amerman (Director Application Development)

– Advanced Research Computing • Brock Palen, Jeffrey Sica

‣ Location data – Real time

50

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

UM Buses

51

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

UM Buses (Commuter North)

52

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

UM Buses

53

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

UM Buses (NE Shuttle)

54

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

AATA Buses

55

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Census Data

56

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

UM Mobility Data

57

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Outline‣ Motivation ‣ Technology enablers ‣ Some case studies ‣ The MIDAS Ritmo projet ‣ Conclusion

58

Pascal Van Hentenryck 2016

Conclusions‣ Living Mobility Lab

– unique experimental laboratory • 50,000 transit trips and >30,000 car trips a day • data-rich environment • freedom to experiment

‣ Next generation urban transportation systems – multimodal transportation system

• on-demand service for first/last mile mobility • economy of scale and congestion management • pricing • optimization of the underlying optimization

59


Recommended