Relationship-Based • Member-Driven • Independence...

Southwest Power Pool, Inc. SPP-ITO LG&E/KU Stakeholder Meeting Agenda

May 4, 2010 Hyatt Regency Louisville, 320 W Jefferson Louisville, KY 40202

• A G E N D A • 8:30 AM (Breakfast 7:30 – 8:30)

Dial in Access: 1-877-937-6918 Participant Code: 5038185 7:30 - 8:30 Breakfast

Introductions & Overview ……….….……………….….…Katherine Prewitt (Director, Engineering Planning)

Action Items from Fall 2009 Stakeholders ………….….…………………………Katherine Prewitt (ITO)

ITO Operations …………………………………………………………………………..Jonathan Hayes (ITO)

• Operation Data

• AFC/ATC

ITO Tariff & Large Generator Interconnection (LGI) Studies …………………………Jonathan Hayes (ITO)

• GI Queue

ITO System Impact Studies (SIS) ....……………………..………...………………………Chris Mann (ITO)

• SIS Metrics

ITO Update of 2009 TEP Review………….………………………………………..………….Chris Mann (ITO)

E.ON Expansion Plan Update………………….……………..………………….…………..Tom Seeley (E.ON)

ITO Transition ………………..………………………..……Keith Yocum (E.ON), Katherine Prewitt (ITO)

Open Forum – Stakeholder Feedback & Wrap-Up ……………………..……………Katherine Prewitt (ITO)

Adjourn/Break

Network Operating Committee (NOC)……………………………… ........ ……………..... Keith Yocum (E.ON)

Stakeholder Planning Committee (SPC) Meeting……………………………………..... Keith Yocum (E.ON)

Relationship-Based • Member-Driven • Independence Through Diversity

Evolutionary vs. Revolutionary • Reliability & Economics Inseparable

1

SPP Presentation -ITO

HELPING OUR MEMBERS WORK TOGETHERTO KEEP THE LIGHTS ON… TODAY AND IN THE FUTURE

Spring 2010 Stakeholders MeetingMay 4, 2010

Prepared by:Independent Transmission Organization

Relationship-Based • Member-Driven • Independence Through DiversityEvolutionary vs. Revolutionary • Reliability & Economics Inseparable

Independent Transmission Organization

Katherine Prewitt

Introductions & Overview

2

May 4, 2010


2

Introductions & Overview

Logistics


Logistics♦ Safety♦ Breaks/Lunch♦ Restrooms♦ Silence Cell Phones and Blackberries

3

♦ Name & Company when Speaking

Introductions


Overview of MeetingAction Items from Fall 2009 Stakeholders

ITO Operations PresentationITO Operations Presentation

ITO Generator Interconnection (GI) Studies

ITO System Impact Studies (SIS)

ITO Update of 2009 Transmission Expansion Plan (TEP) Review

4

3

Overview of MeetingE.ON Expansion Plan Update

ITO TransitionITO Transition

Open Forum

Adjourn/Break

Network Operating Committee (NOC) Meeting

Stakeholder Planning Committee (SPC) Meeting

5


Katherine Prewitt

Open Action Items from Fall 2009 Stakeholder Meeting

6

May 4, 2010


4

Open Action ItemsSubmit requests for different statistics at future stakeholders meetings to Katherine Prewitt or Keith Yocum


meetings to Katherine Prewitt or Keith Yocum

ITO will review the proposed DNR/NITS process changes and NITS Application changes based on the feedback from Stakeholders (carryover)

ITO will provide the flowgate breakdown of how many days the top five most limiting flowgate show up as a constraint

ITO will check with OATI and report to the group to see if OATI l th i ith d t il i i l

7

can resolve the issue with no details given on scenario analyzer tool

The TSR Exception File discussion



Questions?

8


5

Contact SPPITO

[email protected]


http://www.spp.org/itoGeneral Inquiries: 501-614-3200

p g


1







ITO – Operations

2

May 4, 2010


2

ITO Operations

Operational Data


♦ Tariff Administration

♦ Scheduling

♦ TLR Statistics

Available Transfer Capacity

♦ Daily Firm Statistics

3

♦ Hourly Non-firm Statistics

Stakeholder Questions


Tariff Administration

Reservations


♦ 4946 Total Reservations processed

♦ 4513 TSRs Confirmed

♦ 4 TSRs in Study

♦ 169 TSRs Refused or Declined

260 TSR Withd R t t d A ll d I lid Di l d

4

♦ 260 TSRs Withdrawn, Retracted, Annulled, Invalid, Displaced or Superseded

Additional reservation statistics can be found at http://www.spp.org.

3

SchedulingThe ITO processed 4658 e-Tags from October 2009 through March 2010


through March 2010.

5

TLR Statistics2 TLRs were called on LGEE flowgates over the 6 month period. Please refer to the charts below for more detailed information.

6

*Note the TLR information was provided by the Reliability Coordinator (TVA).

4

Daily Firm (Day Ahead) ATC MetricsBelow are the most frequently limited (ATC ≤ 0) flowgates for Daily


Firm

♦ Alcalde-Elihu 161

♦ Pineville 345/161 XFM (flo) Pineville 345/500 XFM

♦ Newtonville 138/161 XFM T3 (flo) Newtonville 138/161 XFM T5

♦ StLouis_East_Interface

G h ill S P d h 161 kV (fl ) Sh M h ll 500 kV

7

♦ Grahamville-S Paducah 161 kV (flo) Shawnee-Marshall 500 kV

Analysis of the Daily Firm ATC Metrics can be found at http://www.spp.org.

Hourly Non-Firm ATC Metrics

Below are the most frequently limited (ATC ≤ 0) flowgates for Hourly


q y ( ) g yNon-Firm

♦ Newtonville 138/161 XFM T3 (flo) Newtonville 138/161 XFM T5

♦ Speed-Ghent 345

♦ Albion-Crossville 138 (flo) Newton-Xenia 345

♦ Pineville 345/161 XFM (flo) Pineville 345/500 XFM

8

♦ Livingston-Earlington North 161 (flo) Livingston-Crittenden 161

Analysis of the HNF ATC Metrics can be found at http://www.spp.org.

5

Questions


9

Contact SPPITO

Email: [email protected]



p g


1







May 4, 2010

ITO – LGI Studies

2


2

Topics


Update

New Agreements (Ad Hoc)

Achievements

3

Update / Coordination

♦ 9 Active requests (end of 1st Quarter)


q ( Q )

♦ Public info (Oasis)

4


3

Public Info Update Generation

Interconnectio Nearest Town State CA In-Service Date CAPACITY (MW) Type STATUS


Interconnection Number or County State CA (proposed) CAPACITY (MW) Type STATUS

LGE-GIS-2007-004

Henderson County KY LGEE 3/31/2011 640.0

Combined Cycle

RESTUDY SET TO BEGIN

LGE-GIS-2008-001 Wise County VA LGEE 12/1/2011 150.0 Wind AD HOC

LGE-GIS- 2008 – 002 Ohio County KY LGEE 8/01/2010 5.4 Small Gen

WAITING FOR QUEUE POSITION

LGE-GIS-2008-003 Sulphur KY LGEE 8/1/2010 9.0 Small Gen

WAITING FOR QUEUE POSITION

LGE-GIS-2008-004 Stanford KY LGEE 8/1/2010 5.4 Small Gen

WAITING FOR QUEUE POSITION004 Stanford KY LGEE 8/1/2010 5.4 Small Gen POSITION

LGE-GIS-2009-001 Paducah KY LGEE 5/1/2010 123.4

Pratt & Whitney

FT-8 Swift Pacs AD HOC

LGE-GIS-2009-003 Green River KY LGEE 4/1/2017 690.0

Combined Cycle

REQUEST RECEIVED

LGE-GIS-2009-004 Trimble County KY LGEE 5/1/2010 35.0

Combined Cycle REQUEST RECEIVED

LGE-GIS-2010-001 Cane Run KY LGEE 1/1/2016 690.0

Combined Cycle REQUEST RECEIVED

5

Ad Hoc Process

A tAgreements♦ SISA

♦ AD-HOC

Process Overview

6

4

Achievements


Running Enfuzion ♦ New dedicated server for studies

Business Analysis♦ Bi weekly calls

AD HOC Process

7

Questions/Comments

??8

5

Contact SPPITO

Email: [email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]



p g


1



Spring 2010 Stakeholder MeetingMay 4, 2010




Chris Mann

ITO – Tariff Studies

2

May 4, 2010


2

Outline

SIS Metrics


SIS MetricsFS MetricsQuestions

3


SIS Metrics – 2009 Q4 and 2010 Q1

New SISA delivered 13


New SISA delivered – 13New SISA executed – 11SIS Completed – 9SIS Completed Late – 0

4

SIS Avg. Completion time – 57


3

FS Metrics – 2009 Q4 and 2010 Q1

New FSA delivered 4


New FSA delivered – 4New FSA executed – 1FS Withdrawn - 2FS Completed – 1

5

FS Completed Late – 0FS Avg. Completion time – 26



Questions?

6


4

Contact SPPITO

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]@ pp g



p g


1



Spring 2010 Stakeholder MeetingMay 4, 2010




Chris Mann

Transmission Expansion Planning

2

May 4, 2010


2

ITO’s Assessment of E.ON’s 2009 TEP

2009 TEP based on summer and winter peak


pmodels for 2010, 2014, and 2019ITO Assessment Includes:♦ Planning Guidelines♦ Model Validation♦ Powerflow Analysis

33

♦ Operating Guidelines Assessment♦ Planned Project Assessment


TEP Changes


Projects in 2008 TEP 168Projects Completed -9

Projects Delayed or Eliminated -98

Projects Accelerated 23

Projects Added 32

Projects in 2009 TEP 123

44


3

Powerflow Analysis

Contingency Analysis:


♦ N-1: Loss of a single generator, line, or transformer♦ N-1-1: Loss of a generator AND line or generator AND

transformer♦ Loss of two generators

Results analyzed against criteria provided in planning guidelines♦ Thermal issues: Flow above 100 percent of applicable normal

or contingency rating

5

or contingency rating♦ Voltage issues: Voltage below 94 percent or above 105

percent nominal during normal conditions and below 90 percent and above 105 percent nominal during contingency conditions


Powerflow Analysis Results

Started Powerflow analysis


y♦ Anticipate having results at Fall

Stakeholder Meeting

♦ Final report by end of the year

6


4

Operating Guidelines Assessment

Operating Guidelines independently verified to:


to:♦ Mitigate the problem

♦ Check for any resulting new problems

♦ Identify coordination issues

7


Planned Project Assessment

Projects independently verified for:


♦ Proper modeling

♦ Timing

♦ Problem resolution

8


5

2010 TEP

Request for stakeholder input on development


q p pof 2010 expansion plan♦ Questions or comments may be submitted via

IssueTrak

99



Questions?

1010


6

Contact SPPITO

http://spp.issuetrak.com/Login.asp



p g


Date post:	23-Aug-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

Relationship-Based • Member-Driven • Independence...

Documents