This article was downloaded by: [University of Haifa Library]On: 13 August 2013, At: 07:53Publisher: RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Research Quarterly for Exercise and SportPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/urqe20
Relationships between Body Composition andFundamental Movement Skills among Children andAdolescentsAnthony D. Okely a , Michael L. Booth b & Tien Chey ca University of Wollongong, USAb School of Public Health, University of Sydney, USAc South Western Sydney Area Health Service, USAPublished online: 25 Feb 2013.
To cite this article: Anthony D. Okely , Michael L. Booth & Tien Chey (2004) Relationships between Body Composition andFundamental Movement Skills among Children and Adolescents, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 75:3, 238-247,DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2004.10609157
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2004.10609157
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of theContent. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon andshould be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable forany losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use ofthe Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Growth and Motor Development
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport©2004 by the American Alliance for Health,Physical Education, Recreation and DanceVol. 75, No.3, pp.238-247
Relationships Between Body Compositionand Fundamental Movement Skills AmongChildren and Adolescents
Anthony D. Okely, Michael L. Booth, and Tien Chey
Thepurpose of thisstudy was toexamineassociations offundamental movement skills(FMS)with measures ofbody compositionamong children and adolescents. Secondary analysesof cross-sectional data collectedfrom 4,363 children and adolescents inGrades 4, 6, 8, and 10 as part of the 1997New South Wales Schools Fitness and PhysicalActivity Survey were conducted. SixFMS (run, verticaljump, throw, catch, kick, and strike) were assessed byobservation. Height and weight(usedto calculate bodymass index; BMl) and waist circumference were directly measured. Results indicatedthat thechildren's and adolescents' abilitytoperform FMS wassignificantlyrelated toBMl and waist circumference. Specifically, BMI and waist circumference weresignificant predictorsfor FMS in six of theeightdemographic groups. Adjusted oddsratiosrevealed that overweight boys and girlsin allgrades were less likely topossess high levels ofFMS and more likely topossess lowleoels ofFMS than those whoweren't overweight. lWum FMS were partitionedinto locomotor and object-eontrol skills, nonoverweight boys and girlsin eachgradewere twotothree times more likely topossess more advancedlocomotor skillsthan overweight boys and girls. However, for object-eontrol skills, theonlydemographic groupsin whichnonoverweight studentspossessed a greater numberof advancedskillsthan overweight studentswere boys in Grades 6 and 10. There appeartobesignificantand importantassociations between performance of locomotor skillsand weightstatus among children and adolescents. This would suggest that intervention strategies topreventunhealthy weightgain among children and youth might usefullyinclude increasingproficiency of locomotor skillsas a key component.
Key words: adiposity, body mass index, motor skills, waistcircumference
Body composition is considered a key component ofhealth-related fitness (Corbin & Lindsey, 1997)
The health consequences ofexcess adiposity have beenwell documented in children and youth and include agreater risk of psychosocial distress, orthopedic complications, gastrointestinal disorders, features of the insulin resistance syndrome, hypertension, and abnormal
Submitted: September 30, 2002Accepted: December 7,2003
Anthony D. Dkely is with theFaculty of Education andMetabolicResearch Center at the University of Wollongong. Michael L.Booth is with the School of Public Health at the University ofSydney. lien Chey is with the Epidemiology Unitat the SouthWestern Sydney Area Health Service.
238
lipid profiles (Dietz, 1998). Because obese children andadolescents are more likely than their leaner peers tobecome obese adults and because adolescent obesity isrelated to adverse health outcomes during adulthoodindependent ofadult adiposity, obese children and adolescents have an increased risk ofmortality and morbidityas adults (Must, 1996). The prevalence of being overweight or obese is increasing rapidly and is now one ofthe most significant public health challenges internationally (Ebbeling, Pawlak, & Ludwig, 2002; Styne, 2001).
It is important to understand influences on excessadiposityto address obesityamong children. There are both biologicaland behavioral determinants to being overweightand obese, and, at present, the behavioral determinantsoffer the most fruitful possibilities for successful intervention (Baranowski et al., 2000). Fundamental movementskills (FMS) are critical to participation in most physicalactivities,because they represent the requisite behavioralcompetencies for participation. Previous studies among
ROES: September 2004
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f H
aifa
Lib
rary
] at
07:
53 1
3 A
ugus
t 201
3
children and youth have shown a relationship betweenFMSproficiency and cardiorespiratoryendurance (Okely,Booth, & Patterson, 2001a) and participation in organizedphysical activity (Okely, Booth, & Patterson, 2001b). Itcould be argued, then, that the effects ofFMS proficiencyon being overweight or obese is mediated through cardiorespiratory endurance and physical activity participation and that little can be gained by examining therelationship between FMS proficiency and adiposity.However, it is not uncommon for determinants to have bothdirect and mediated relationships with health outcomes,and a more comprehensive understanding ofthe factorsinfluencing overweight can only improve our capacity tointervene effectively. In addition, because physical activityisdifficult to measure in population studies ofchildrenand adolescents (Welk, Corbin, & Dale, 2000) and hassuch wide error, it may not be possible to detect ifassociations between FMS proficiency and being overweight!obese are mediated by physical activity. Because FMSandbeing overweight/obese are easier to measure in childand adolescent populations, a plausible first step is to explore the hypothesis that proficiency ofFMS is related tobeing overweight/obese among children and adolescents.
Several studies have examined the relationship ofbody composition to health-related fitness and motor ability (e.g., speed, power, explosive strength) and reportedstrongcorrelations between body composition and healthrelated fitness components, such as cardiorespiratory fitness (Pissanos, Moore, & Reeve, 1983; Reeves, Broeder,Kennedy-Honeycutt, East, & Matney, 1999) and muscularendurance (Hensley, East, & Stillwell,1982), and weak tomodest correlations between body composition and motor abilities (Hensley et aI., 1982; Malina et aI., 1995;Pissanos et al., 1983). However, it is known that geneticfactors (Maeset al., 1996) determine health-related fitnessand motor abilities during the prepubertal years and arenot easily modified by practice or training (Burton &Miller, 1998), thus, limiting the implications of these findings for practice. Fundamental movement skills (whichare directly observable, qualitative expressions of movement performance, unlike motor abilities, which are general traits or capacities not easilyobserved; Burton & Miller,1998) are different in that they are amenable to change,especiallyduring the prepubertal years, suggested as a sensitive learning period for mastering FMS (Gallahue,1996). If there is a direct association between FMS proficiency and adiposity among young people, programs intended to prevent or treat being overweight might usefullyinclude FMS training. Improved proficiency ofFMS alsohas the potential to improve perceived competence andself-esteem (Ulrich, 1987), twovariables known to be loweramong overweight and obese children and youth (Phillips& Hill, 1998; Southall, Okely, & Steele, 2004). Subsequently, improved FMS proficiency has the potential toenhance motivation to be physically active through im-
RaES: September 2004
Oka/y, Booth, and Chay
proved self-esteem and enjoyment of physical activity, inaddition to improved skills.
As plausible as this may seem, studies examiningthe association between FMS proficiency and body composition among children and adolescents are rare.Ellery (1991) found no relationship between skinfoldthickness and gross motor skill performance among 220preschool children. This differs from the results ofotherrecent studies. Malina et al. (1995) examined the association between the sum offive skinfolds and five motorperformance items in over 9,000 girls ages &-18 yearsand found that as adiposity increased, balance, speed,power, and strength decreased. McKenzie et al. (2002)investigated the relationship of three movement skills(balance, catch, andjump) and the mean oftwoskin-foldsamong 400 children ages 4-6 years. Skinfolds were inversely related to balance in boys and girls and the jumpand index ofthe three skillsin boys.These latter twostudies assessed only a small number ofFMS (between 1 and3) and used product-oriented assessments in contrastto recent trends to assess movement skills using processoriented measures (Burton & Miller, 1998).
Examining the relationships between differentmeasures of body composition and multiple processoriented measures ofFMS proficiency may now extendthe previous research. In addition, because FMS arepredominantly categorized into locomotor and objectcontrol skills (Burton & Miller, 1998) it would be helpfulto know if this relationship was different between thesecategories. The purpose of this study was to describe thenature ofthe association between FMSproficiency and twofrequently used measures ofbody composition (BMIandwaist circumference). Specifically,we hypothesized that,among children and adolescents: (a) overall FMS proficiency would be inversely associated with body composition, and (b) this inverse association would exist forboth locomotor and object-eontrol skills.
Method
Data were collected as part of the New South WalesSchools Fitness and Physical Activity Survey, 1997 (N=5,518; Booth et al., 1997). The methods ofthe surveyhavebeen reported in detail elsewhere (Booth, Macaskill,Phongsavan, McLellan, & Okely, 1998) and are onlybriefly described here.
$ample Selection
Proportional stratified random sampling ofall primary and high schools in New South Wales (NSW) Australia was conducted. Special schools, schools withenrollments less than 180 students, and schools in re-
239
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f H
aifa
Lib
rary
] at
07:
53 1
3 A
ugus
t 201
3
Gke/y, Booth, and Chey
Table 1. Components of the sprint run andoverhand throw
Note. From Fundamental Motor Skills: A Manual for ClassroomTeachers (Department of Education Victoria, 1996, pp. 20-241.
provide information about developmental trends in FMSproficiency (including the order in which youth acquiredevelopmental levels on the way to proficiency), for thepurpose of this study FMS proficiency was not measuredfrom a developmental perspective; rather, it wasmeasuredin comparison to an "expert" performer (i.e.,one who hasmastered all components of that skill). For each skill, ascore was calculated for each student based on the totalcomponents performed correctly. Process-oriented assessments ofFMS were used rather than product-oriented assessments, because they more accurately identify specifictopographical aspects of the movement (Ulrich, 2000).The test battery included skillsclosely related to activitiesand sports in which students were most likely to participate. Field staff assessed skill components byscoring eachas present or absent on four offive trials (Department ofEducation Victoria, 1996). That is, if a student demonstrated the skill component on four offive trials he or shewasrecorded as possessing that skillcomponent Field staffwere required to reach a 90% interobserver agreementcriterion for all skills on pre-coded videotapes. The reliabilityand validityof the skillsand their components werepreviouslyestablished (Department of Education Victoria,1996). Briefly,content validity was assessed by a panel of52 FMSexperts who reviewed and ranked the importanceof the skills and identified and reviewed each skill component. In addition, the instructor's manual reported amean test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.75 for the sixskills. An example of the components for two skills, thesprint run and overhand throw, are presented in Table 1.
Sprint run 1.2.
Description of the component
Eyes focused forward throughout the runKnees bend at right angles during recoveryphase
3. Arms bend at elbows and move in opposition tolegsContact ground with front part of footBody leans slightlyforwardEyes are focused onthe target throughout thethrow
2. Stand side-on to the target3. Throwing arm nearly straightened behind the
body4. Step toward the target with foot opposite
throwing arm during the throw5. Marked sequential hip-to-shoulder rotation
during the throw6. Throwing armfollows through down and across
the body
Skill
4.5.
Overhand 1.throw
Sixteen field staff (four teams offour staff, one teamper school), consisting of 14 teachers and two researchofficers, collected the data. All were trained to Levell ofthe International Society for the Advancement ofKinanthropometry accreditation and completed 3 days oftraining in assessing FMS proficiency during the 2 weeksof training and orientation prior to data collection. Datawere concurrently collected in schools from each education sector and geographic location, over a &week periodduring School Term 1 (summer) 1997. The University ofSydney Human Research Ethics Committee approved thestudy. Written consent from parents and caregivers wasrequired for students to participate in the study.
Body Composition Assessment. Body composition measurements included height, weight (used to calculateBMI), and waist circumference. These were collectedprior to the other tests to avoid fluid loss due to exertion.Height was assessed using portable stadiometers and thestretch stature method. Measurements were taken to thenearest 0.1 ern, Tanita 1597 (Mentone Educational Center, Victoria, Australia) bathroom scales were used to assess weight to the nearest 0.1 kg. Students wore lightclothing and removed their shoes prior to measurement.Nonextensible steel tapes were used to assess waist circumference, which was measured at the narrowest pointbetween the lower costal border and the iliac crest.
FMSMeasurement. Six FMSwere assessed-run, vertical jump, catch, overhand throw, forehand strike, andkick-using process-oriented checklists comprising 5-7components for each skill. Methods for assessing theseskills are described in detail elsewhere (Department ofEducation Victoria, 1996) and only briefly mentionedhere. Each skill was composed of observable behavioralcomponents that together constituted a proficient performance. Although a main purpose of this measure was to
Data Collection
mote rural regions were excluded from the samplingframe. Despite these exclusions, the target populationcomprised 86% of the primary school population and97% of the high school population.
Forty-five primary and 44 high schools were selected,stratified by education sector (government, Catholic,and independent schools). The number of schools ineach stratum was proportional to the number of students enrolled in that education sector, and the likelihood of a school being selected in each stratum wasproportional to the size of the student enrollment.Within each selected school, one class in each ofGrades2,4, 6,8, and 10 was randomly chosen from mixed-ability class lists. Grade 2 children were included for thepurpose of measuring body composition, while FMSproficiency was not assessed in this grade. Hence, theirdata are not used in the current analyses.
240 ROES: September 2004
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f H
aifa
Lib
rary
] at
07:
53 1
3 A
ugus
t 201
3
Results of FMS assessments are conventionally reported as the proportion ofstudents who have masteredall components of the skill (Booth, Okely et aI., 1999;Walkley, Holland, Treloar, & Probyn-Smith, 1993). A limitation of this reporting method is that it is difficult tojudge what proportion of the students might be close toachieving mastery. As a result, we have created anotherreporting format (near mastery) in which the proportionof students who have mastered all but one ofthe components ofeach skillis reported. To compare nonoverweightand overweight students, those who displayed masteryor near mastery were combined into a single group andidentified as possessing "advanced" skills.
Sociodemographic Measures. Students were asked forinformation on their age (date of birth) , grade, sex, cultural background, suburb, and postcode of residence(equivalent to the U.S. zip code). Students were groupedinto quintiles ofsocioeconomic status (SES) based on theAustralian Bureau ofStatistics Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage (Australian Bureau ofStatistics,1993) which gives a SES score for each postcode. Ruralitywas a dichotomous (urban/rural) variable based onthe school location. To determine cultural background,students were asked what language was spoken most athome and, from this, were grouped into English-, European- (languages other than English), Middle Eastern,or Asian-speaking backgrounds.
Data Handling andAnalysis
Each FMSwasstandardized to a score of5, and scoresfor the six skills were added to create an overall indexofFMS proficiency (range: 0-30). Within gender andschool grade, students were ranked into quintiles by theFMS index scores, such that the number ofstudents ineach quintile was approximately equal. An ordinal scalevariable for FMS quintiles was constructed (1-5, with 1being the lowest). FMS was analyzed both as an ordinaland continuous scale variable.
Students were classified as overweight or obese(henceforward referred to as overweight) based on exactcalendar age-and gender-specific international cut-pointsfor BMI (Cole, Bellizzi,Flegal, & Dietz, 2000). FMS werealso grouped into locomotor (run and verticaljump) andobject-eontrol (catch, overarm throw, kick, and forehandstrike) skills. The number of advanced skills possessedwas classified as 0, 1,2 for locomotor skillsand 0, 1,2, orgreater than 2 for boys and 0, 1,or greater than 1 for girlsfor object-eontrol skills.Different object-eontrol classifications for boys and girls were used, because few girls hadthree or more advanced skills and the groupings wouldnot have had adequate numbers for some of the grades.Analyses were carried out separately for boys and girls,stratified by school grade. Results were presented as percentage distribution of the prevalence ofFMS measures
RaES: September 2004
Okely, Booth, and Chey
as quintiles and as number ofadvanced skillsby body composition grouping. The significance ofany differences inpercentage prevalence was assessed by chi-square test ofassociation. Any linear trends between groups were as
sessed byMantel-Haenszel chi-square test with one degreeoffreedom.
Age, SES, cultural background and rurality areknown to be associated with body composition amongchildren and adolescents (Booth et al., 1997). Two modelling approaches were used to investigate the relationships between FMS proficiency and body composition,adjusting for these covariates and design effects (schoolas a cluster). First, cumulative logistic regression models were modelled, in which the probabilities of havinglower order values ofFMS proficiency in the overweightgroup, separately for boys and girls in each school grade.Second, multiple linear regression was used to modelthe standardized proficiency of FMS index score as afunction of body composition measure (BMI and waistcircumference) , adjusting for covariates and design effects. Body composition variables were tested for normality beforehand, and separate analyses were exploredusing log-transformed values for each variable. This didnot change the results, so, for ease ofinterpretation, logtransformed values are not presented. Analyses wereconducted using the statistical package SASV8.2 (SASInstitute Inc., Cary, NC, 1999-2001). All results wereadjusted for clustering design effects using the PROCGENMOD (Generalized Estimating Equation approach) and PROC SURVEYREGprocedures for ordinal and continuous outcome variables.
Results
The range ofstandardized scores assigned to eachFMS proficiency quintile for boys and girls in each gradeare shown in Table 2. In each grade, the minimum andmaximum scores in every quintile were higher for boysthan girls except in Grade 4, where the maximum scorewas higher for girls than for boys in Quintile 5.
Table 3 shows the distribution (%) of students byFMSquintiles for nonoverweight and overweight groupsof boys and girls in Grades 4,6,8, and 10. The statisticsin Table 3 clearly show an inverse linear association between FMS quintile among the overweight group andthat these students were approximately twice as likelyas nonoverweight students to be in the lowest FMSquintile. These strong relationships were consistentacross grades and between sexes. An illustration of thisrelationship for Grade 4 students appears in Figure 1.
Table 4 presents the distribution (%) of studentsby number of advanced locomotor skills possessed bynonoverweight and overweight groups for each grade
247
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f H
aifa
Lib
rary
] at
07:
53 1
3 A
ugus
t 201
3
Okely, Booth, and Chey
and gender. Adjusted odds ratios from the cumulativelogistic regression models revealed that, in each grade,nonoverweight boys and girlswere two to four times morelikely to be advanced in both locomotor skills than overweight boys and girls. An illustration of this relationshipfor Grade 6 students appears in Figure 2. The distribution (%) ofstudents by number ofadvanced object-control skills for nonoverweight and overweight groups ispresented in Table 5. Adjusted odds ratios indicated no
differences in number of advanced skills betweennonoverweight and overweightgirls in any grade. Amongboys, the significant chi-square statistics indicated anassociation between overweight and object-control skills,but the fact that the chi-square test for trend and the oddsratio were significant only for boys in Grades 6 and 10suggests the association is weak and inconsistent.
Multiple linear regression models that controlledfor exact age, SES, cultural background, and rurality
Table 2.The rangeof standardized scores assigned to each FMS quintilefor boys and girls in Grades 4,6,8,and10
Quintiles ofstandardizedFMS score
Grade 4Boys Girls
Grade 6Boys Girls
School yearGrade 8
Boys GirlsGrade 10
Boys Girls
1 (low)2345 (high)
5.42-14.7014.71-17.7917.83-20.4620.50-22.7722.81-28.58
3.00-12.0812.14-14.1514.19-16.2916.31-18.6518.69-29.17
3.00-17.53 3.00-13.70 4.00-18.62 2.00-15.3417.54-20.36 13.73-16.12 18.66-21.79 15.40-17.4120.38-22.62 16.14-18.17 21.81-23.82 17.42-19.8922.64-24.89 18.23-20.79 23.88-25.86 19.90-22.6224.90-30.00 20.83-27.74 25.90-30.00 22.64-28.46
7.73-19.9820.00-22.8922.90-24.9125.00-27.0027.02-30.00
0.83-16.1216.14-18.2918.35-20.7720.78-23.4823.52-30.00
Note. FMS = fundamental movement skills.
Table 3. Thedistribution (%)of students by FMS quintiles for nonoverweight andoverweight/obese groups
Quintiles of School yearstandardized Grade 4 Grade 6 Grade 8 Grade 10FMS score n Nonow% Owob% n Nonow% Owob% n Nonow% Owob% n Nonow% Owob%
Boys (n= 466) (n= 125) (n= 525) (n = 132) (n= 426) (n = 113) (n=413) (n= 96)1 (low) 118 16.6 32.8 131 16.4 33.8 106 17.7 27.2 101 17.5 28.92 119 19.6 22.4 128 18.3 24.1 107 17.0 30.7 103 18.5 26.83 114 19.1 20.0 134 21.9 14.3 107 21.9 12.3 104 21.1 16.54 120 22.8 11.2 132 21.1 15.8 109 20.3 20.2 100 20.1 16.55 (high) 119 21.9 13.6 133 22.3 12.0 109 23.1 9.7 106 22.8 11.3Test statistics: X2
14,· 23.32 (p < .001) 28.12 (p < .001) 24.87 (p < .001) 14.26 (p < .01)X2
111b 19.76 (p < .0011 23.46 (p < .001) 16.02 (p <.001) 12.99 (p <.001)
OR' 2.32 (1.66-3.23)** 2.29 (1.49-3.51 )** 2.08 (1.42-3.06)- 2.12 (1.34-3.36)**
Girls (n= 408) (n = 116) (n=413) (n = 124) (n = 409) (n = 92) (n = 332) (n = 79)1 (low) 103 16.0 32.8 107 18.4 25.0 98 16. 1 34.8 78 16.9 27.22 105 20.2 19.8 108 18.4 25.8 102 20.4 19.6 83 19.0 24.73 104 18.7 24.1 107 19.4 21.8 101 20.4 18.5 82 19.9 19.84 103 20.7 16.4 106 20.3 17.7 100 20.4 17.4 84 19.9 22.25 (high) 107 24.4 6.9 109 23.5 9.7 102 22.6 9.8 86 24.4 6.2Test statistics: X2
14,· 28.47 (p < .001) 14.25 (p < .01) 20.17 (p < .001) 15.27 (p < .01)
X2111
b 23.52 (p < .001) 12.24 (p < .001) 16.07 (p < .001) 11.91 (p < .001)OR' 2.48 (1.67-3.67)** 1.96 (1.42-2.71)** 2.03 (1.34-3.06)** 2.30 (1.42-3.71 )**
Note. FMS = fundamental movement skills; Nonow=nonoverweight; Owob =overweight/obese.·Chi-square test for independent factors.bMantel-Haenszel chi-square test for linear trend.'Adjusted odds ratios (estimate, 95% confidence intervals) for Owob derived from the cumulative logistic model, nonoverweight isthe referent group. Covariates adjusted were exact age (continuous), socioeconomic status(five categories), cultural background(four categories), and rurality (two categories).**p < .01.
242 ROES: September2004
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f H
aifa
Lib
rary
] at
07:
53 1
3 A
ugus
t 201
3
Oke/y, Booth, and Chey
measured the strength of association between the standardized sum ofall six FMS and the two measures ofbody
composition (BMI and waist circumference) are described in Table 6. These models confirmed that: (a)
o+--....--.---r-........--.r--........--.r--........-r--~--l
60
~00)
50GIqJ()
J::.
~ 40Q,I
.5 1VI I
\~ 30 • \Q,I
\
"~ ..Vi- 200~0'f0 10Q. • non-overweighte
CL.- - • - - overweight
0
0 2 0 2
Number of advanced locomotor skills
III
234 5
II\
non-overweight
I·\ .•
•\
•- - • - - overweight
234 5
35
•I
~ 30 \
~ I
'3 Io:::r \
J::. 25~Q,I
.5 20VI~Q,I
"~ 15Vi'0~ 100'f0Q.e 5
CL.
FMS Quintile
Figure 1. Proportion of overweight and nonoverweight boys andgirls in Grade 4 in each fundamental movement skill quintile(forfundamental movement skills quintile, 1 =low and 5 =high).
Figure 2. Proportion of overweight and nonoverweight boys andgirls in Grade 6 possessing advanced skills in 0, 1,or 2locomotor skills (thetwo locomotor skills assessed were thesprint run and vertical jump).
Table 4. Thedistribution (%)of students by number of advanced locomotor skills for nonoverweight andoverweight/obese groups
Number of School yearadvanced Grade 4 Grade 6 Grade 8 Grade 10locomotor skills n Nonow% Owob% n Nonow% Owob % n Nonow% Owob% n Nonow% Owob%
Boys (n=466) (n=125) (n=524) In =132) (n= 426) (n=113) (n=413) (n= 96)0 153 20.6 45.6 106 13.2 28.0 n 12.0 23.0 59 9.2 21.91 227 39.9 32.8 247 34.9 48.5 209 37.8 42.5 176 33.4 39.62 211 39.5 21.6 303 51.9 23.5 253 50.2 34.5 274 57.4 38.5Test statistics: X21218 33.92 (p < .001) 38.01 (p < .001) 12.82(p<.01) 16.79lp<.001)
X2111
b 29.85 (p < .001) 36.99 (p < .001) 12.62 (p < .001) 16.23 (p < .001)OR' 3.14 (2.09-4.73)** 2.93 (2.06-4.18)** 1.94 (1.41-2.67)** 2.20 11.38-3.52)**
Girls (n=408) (n= 116) (n=413) (n= 124) (n= 409) (n= 92) (n= 332) (n=19)0 159 25.5 47.4 106 16.2 31.5 107 16.6 42.4 82 17.2 31.71 214 40.0 44.0 236 43.1 46.8 198 40.3 35.9 147 33.7 44.32 151 34.6 8.6 195 40.7 21.8 196 43.0 21.7 182 49.1 24.0Test statistics: X21218 35.75 (p < .001) 20.88 (p < .001) 32.43 (p < .001) 17.74 (p < .0011
X2111b 34.92 (p < .001) 20.80 lp < .001) 28.96 (p < .001) 17.05 (p <.001)OR' 3.26 (2.22-4.79)** 2.65 (1.76-3.99)** 3.15 (1.95-5.09)** 3.14 (1.95-5.04)**
Note. Nonow = nonoverweight; Owob = overweight/obese.8Chi-Square test for independent factors.bMantel-Haenszel chi-square test for linear trend. .'Adjusted odds ratios (estimate. 95% confidence intervals) for Owob derived from the cumulative logistic model, nonoverweight isthe referent group. Covariates adjusted were exact age (continuous). socioeconomic status (five categories), cultural background(four categories). and rurality (two categories).**p < .01.
ROES: September 2004 243
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f H
aifa
Lib
rary
] at
07:
53 1
3 A
ugus
t 201
3
Okely, Booth, and Chey
BMI was a significant predictor for FMS proficiency forall demographic groups except Grade 10 boys; (b) waistcircumference was a significant predictor for FMS proficiency for all groups except Grade 8 girls and Grade10 boys; and (c) FMS proficiency was inversely relatedto BMI and waist circumference, and the effects weregreater in the lower school grades (Grades 4 and 6).
Discussion
Two hypotheses were posited in this study. The results of this study supported the first, that overall FMSproficiency is inversely associated with body composition.Specifically,for boys and girls in almost every grade, twiceas many overweight students are in the lowest FMS
Table 5. The distribution (%) of students bynumber of advanced object-control skills for nonoverweight and overweight/obese groups
Number of School yearadvanced Grade 4 Grade 6 Grade 8 Grade 10object-control skills n Nonow% Owob% n Nonow % Owob % n Nonow% Owob% n Nonow % Owob%
Boys (n = 466) (n = 125) (n = 525) (n= 132) (n= 425) (n= 113) (n = 417) (n= 97)0 198 31.3 41.6 89 12.8 16.7 71 12.9 14.2 39 5.3 17.51 181 30.9 29.6 178 24.8 36.4 114 18.6 31.0 78 15.4 14.42 125 23.4 12.8 193 29.9 27.3 152 31.1 17.7 127 23.7 28.93 or more 87 14.4 16.0 197 32.6 19.7 201 37.4 37.2 270 55.6 39.2Test statistics: X
2131•
8.56 (p < .05) 12.51 (p <.01) 12.20 (p < .01) 20.50 (p < .001)X2
111b 2.76 10.42 (p <.01) 1.83 13.52 (p < .001)
OR' 1.42 (0.99-2.03) 1.76 (1.24-2.49)** 1.25 (0.81-1.92) 2.15 (1.30-3.56)**
Girls (n= 407) (n= 116) (n=412) (n= 124) (n= 409) (n= 92) (n = 331) (n= 81)0 328 60.7 69.8 238 43.9 46.0 159 30.8 35.9 115 27.8 28.41 140 28.0 22.4 172 31.3 34.7 179 34.5 41.3 149 35.9 37.02 or more 55 11.3 7.8 126 24.8 19.3 163 34.7 22.8 148 36.3 34.6Test statistics: x2
m• 3.34 1.61 4.85 0.08X2
111b 3.15 0.83 3.35 0.05
OR' 1.44 (0.90-2.30) 1.14 (0.82-1.59) 1.28 (0.84-1.95) 1.12 (0.74-1.69)
Note. Nonow = nonoverweight; Owob = overweight/obese.·Chi-square test for independent factors.bMantel-Haenszel chi-square test for lineartrend.'Adjusted odds ratios (estimate, 95% confidence intervals) for Owob derived from the cumulative logistic model, nonoverweight isthe referent group. Covariates adjusted were exactage (continuous), socioeconomic status (5 categories), cultural background (4categories), and rurality (2 categories).**p< .01.
Teble 6. Results from multiple linear regressions with measures of body composition as predictor for standardized fundamentalmovement skills indexadjusted for age·, socioeconomic status, cultural background, and rurality
Predictorvariable
Effects of body composition (estimate, standard error)onstandardized FMS indexGrade 4 Grade 6 Grade 8 Grade 10
BoysBody mass indexWaist circumference
GirlsBody mass indexWaistcircumference
-0.290 (.07)**-0.126 (.03)**
-0.253 (.06)**-0.119 (.03)**
-0.326 (.07)**-0.137(.02)**
-0.168(.05)**-0.084 (.02)**
-0.142 (.05)**-0.076 (.02)**
-0.103 (.05)*-0.050 (.02)
-0.109 (.08)-0.055 (.03)
-0.219 (.07)**-0.097 (.03)**
Note. FMS = fundamental movement skills; Nonow = nonoverweight; Owob = overweight/obese.·Exact calendar agewhere available.*p < .05.**p < .01.
244 ROES: September 2004
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f H
aifa
Lib
rary
] at
07:
53 1
3 A
ugus
t 201
3
quintile as compared to nonoverweight students, andtwo to four times as many nonoverweight students are inthe highest FMS quintile as compared to overweight students. These results agree with other studies in this areathat have used both process- (Southall et aI., 2004) andproduct-oriented (McKenzie et aI., 2002) assessmentsin smaller samples and across narrower age ranges. Interestingly, the differences between overweight andnonoverweight students were strongest at the extremequintiles (that is, 1 and 5). Perhaps the variation inmaturation rate around puberty may confound this relationship in the middle three quintiles, because slightlyoverweight students and early maturers and normal andunderweight children and late maturers are in some ofthese groups.
Considering that FMS proficiency is associated withparticipation in organized physical activities (OkelyetaI., 2001b), this finding provides some explanation forthe lower physical activity levels reported among overweight children (Trost, Kerr, Ward, & Pate, 2001). Itdemonstrates that overweight children are not developing their FMS, or actual competence, to the same levelas nonoverweight children, potentially reducing theirenjoyment of (Okely & Booth, 2000) and participationin physical activity (Okely et aI., 2001b).
The results did not support the second hypothesis ofthis study. That is, body composition was found to be inversely related to only locomotor skill proficiency; it wasvirtually unrelated to object-eontrol skill proficiency. Thisfinding supports the only other published study that hasexamined these differences. Southall et al. (2004) alsofound that, among Grade 6 students, overweight or obesestudents performed selected locomotor skillsmore poorlythat their leaner peers, but there was no difference inperformance on object-eontrol skills. The results fromSouthall and colleagues (performed with a much smallersample but broader range of skills) complement theseresults (larger sample but fewer skills and adjusted forSES,cultural background, and rurality).
There are several possible explanations for the significant findings for only locomotor skills. First, as locomotor movements require greater overall movement ofbody mass than object-eontrol skills (which are morestatic in nature), they may be more difficult for overweight children to perform. Ithas been shown that obesechildren find it more difficult to move their larger bodymass against gravity (Riddiford, 2000). In addition, overweight children are more likely to have orthopedic complications, such as slipped capital femoral epiphyses(Loder, 1996), Blount's disease (Dietz, Gross, &Kirkpatrick, 1982), and flat feet (Riddiford-Harland,Steele, & Storlien, 2000), which may lead to greater painwhen performing physical activity and reduced participation. However, because the data were drawn from across-sectional survey, we cannot infer causal direction.
RaES: September2004
Okely, Booth, and Chey
It is equally plausible that overweight children performless physical activity, which reduces the their opportunities to learn, practice, and develop FMS proficiency(being overweight causes low FMS proficiency) or thatchildren with poorer FMS proficiency have fewer opportunities for and gain less enjoyment from participatingin physical activity (low FMS proficiency causes them tobe overweight). We offer the speculation that, in fact, bothof these alternatives are at least partially correct and thatFMSproficiency and overweight are reciprocally related.
The multiple linear regression analyses revealed thatBMI and waist circumference are significant predictorsfor FMS proficiency in all demographic groups exceptGrade 8 girls and Grade 10 boys. The relationships areconsistentfor both measures, and this consistencybetweentwo rather different measures strengthens the findings.We also found that the strength of the estimates betweenbeing overweight and FMSproficiencydecreases with age.Possible reasons for these differences between year groupsmay be the lower proportion ofGrade 4 and Grade 6 children who had advanced skills (mastery or near mastery)ofeach FMS (less ofa "ceiling" effect); that, as expected,BMI increased with age among this sample (Booth,Macaskill, Lazarus, & Baur, 1999); that overweight is lessamenable to change during adolescence (Styne, 2001);and that other factors, such as sedentary behaviors (forexample, homework and "hanging out" with friends), mayexert a greater influence on body composition during adolescence as students spend more time participating inthem (Kristjansdottir & Vilhjalmsson, 2001). It may alsobe a result of the interaction that occurs between physicalactivity and FMSproficiencywith respect to age. It isknownthat physical activityparticipation declines during adolescence, but that performance of FMS improves with ageduring this developmental period. An adolescent may beimproving FMS proficiency but at the same time decreasing participation in physical activity, therefore expendinglessenergy, which, assuming all else remains constant, willnot have as great an effect on body composition. This finding further highlights the importance offocusing on FMSinstruction during preschool and primary school yearswhen children are keen to develop skills, have less competingdistractions, and have, we hope, notyet developedbad habits, which maximizes their success and their motivation to be active,which, in tum, can influence adiposity.
These findings have particular relevance for thosewho work with overweight children and youth in developing FMS proficiency (e.g., physical education teachers, coaches, parents, sports development officers). It isknown that these children suffer ridicule and teasingfrom their peers, especially in performing movementskills where they are often on public display (Puhl &Brownell, 2001). Consequently, overweight childrenoften opt out of these activities, thus reducing theiropportunities to develop actual competence and be
245
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f H
aifa
Lib
rary
] at
07:
53 1
3 A
ugus
t 201
3
Okely, Booth, and Chey
physically active. This was partly confirmed in some additional analyses we conducted on the students in thisdata set. We found that students who participated in theanthropometric measurements but who opted out of theFMS assessments had much higher BMIs and waist circumferences compared with students in the nonmasteryFMSgroup.
This study is significant in that it is the first to usemore than one measure ofadiposity and a battery ofsixFMS. Its strengths include the use ofa large populationsample and the replication of results ofanalyses ofFMSproficiency and BMI, with another anthropometric measure (waist circumference). It builds on previous studies (Malina et al., 1995; McKenzie et aI., 2002) by usingdifferent body composition measures and a larger battery ofFMS, assessed using process-oriented techniques.
In conclusion, our results indicate that BMI andwaist circumference are inversely associated with FMSproficiency among children and adolescents and thatthe association is strong for locomotor skills and weakfor object-control skills. These findings suggest thatmastery ofFMS may be an important factor in preventing unhealthy weight gain among children and youth.This association is sufficiently robust to warrant investigation using both prospective cohort and experimental methodologies.
References
Australian Bureau ofStatistics. (1993). Informationpaper: 1991Censussocio-economic indicesfor areas. ABS Cat. No. 2912.0.Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Baranowski, T., Mendlein.]., Resnicow, K., Frank, E., Cullen,K. w., & Baranowski,j. (2000). Physical activity and nutrition in children and youth: An overview of obesityprevention. PreventiveMedicine, 31, SI-SIO.
Booth, M., Macaskill, P., McLellan, L., Phongsavan, P.,Okely,A, Patterson.j., etal. (1997). NSWSchoolsFitness andPhysicalActivity Survey.Sydney, Australia: NSW Department ofSchool Education.
Booth, M. L., Macaskill, P., Lazarus, R, & Bam, L. A. (1999).Sociodemographic distribution of measures of body fatness among children and adolescents in NewSouth Wales,Australia. InternationalJoumal of Obesity, 23, 456-462.
Booth, M. L., Macaskill, P., Phongsavan, P., McLellan, L., &Okely, A. (1998). Methods of the NSW Schools Fitnessand Physical Activity Survey, 1997. .Joumal of Science andMedicinein Sport, 1,111-124.
Booth, M. L., Okely, A. D., McLelIan, L., Phongsavan, P.,Macaskill, P., Patterson,j., et aI. (1999). Mastery of fundamental motor skills among New South Wales schoolstudents: Prevalence and sociode-mographic distribution. Joumal of Science and Medicinein Sport, 2, 93-105.
Burton, A. w., & Miller, D. E. (1998). Movementskillassessment.Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
246
Cole, r.j., BeIlizzi, M. c, Flegal. K. M., & Dietz, W. H. (2000).Establishing a standard definition for child overweightand obesity worldwide: International survey. BritishMedical.Joumal, 320, 1-6.
Corbin, C. B.,& Lindsey, R (1997). Concepts offitnessand ioellnesswith laboratories (2nd ed.). Boston: WCB McGraw-Hili.
Department of Education Victoria. (1996). Fundamental motorskills:A classroom manualfor teachers. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
Dietz, W. H. (1998). Health consequences of obesity in youth:childhood predictors of adult disease. (The causes andhealth consequences of obesity in children and adolescents). Pediatrics, 101,518-530.
Dietz, W. H., Gross, W. L., & Kirkpatrick.]. A. (1982). Blountdisease (tibia vara): another skeletal disorder associatedwith childhood obesity.Joumal o{Pediatrics, 101,735-737.
Ebbeling, C. B., Pawlak, D. B., & Ludwig, D. S. (2002). Childhood obesity: Public health crisis, common sense cure.Lancet, 360,473-482.
Ellery, P.J. (1991). The relationship between gross motor skillperformance and skinfold thickness, physical activityinstruction, age, gender, and parental income in preschool age children (motor development). DissertationAbstracts International, 52(09A), 3216.
Gallahue, D. L. (1996). Developmentalphysical education fortodas's children(3rd ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: WCB Brown &Benchmark.
Hensley, L. D., East, W. B., & Stillwell,j. L. (1982). Body fatness and motor performance during adolescence. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 53, 133-140.
Kristjansdottir, G., & Vilhjalmsson, R (200 I). Sociodemographic differences in patterns of sedentary and physically active behavior in older children and adolescents.Acta Paediatrica, 90, 429-435.
Loder, R T. (1996). The demographics of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: An international multicenter study. ClinicalOrthopaedics and RelatedResearch, 322,8-27.
Maes, H. H., Beunen, G. P., Vlietinck, R. F., Neale, M. C.,Thomis, M., Vanden Eynde, B., et aI. (1996). Inheritanceof physical fitness in IO-year-old twins and their parents.Medicine& Science in Sports & Exercise, 28, 1479-1491.
Malina, R M.,Beunen, G. P.,Claessens,A. L., Lefevre.]., VandenEynde, B., Renson, R, et al. (1995). Fatness and physicalfitness ofgirls 7 to 17 years. Obesity Research, 3,221-231.
McKenzie, T. L., SaIlis,j. F., Broyles, S. L., Zive, M. M., Nader,P. R, Berry, C. c., & Brennan, j. j. (2002). Childhoodmovement skills: Predictors of physical activity in AngloAmerican and Mexican American adolescents. ResearchQuarterZv for Exercise and Sport, 73, 238-244.
Must, A. (1996). Morbidity and mortality associated with elevated body weight in children and adolescents. AmericanJoumal of ClinicalNutrition, 63(Suppl.), S445-S447.
Okely, A. D., & Booth, M. L. (2000). Relationship of enjoyment of physical activityand preferred activities to fundamental movementskillprofidencyinyoungchildren. In1mUlJinno1.JoumalofBehaviouraIMedicine, 7(Suppl. I), 151.
Okely, A. D., Booth, M. L., & Patterson,j. W. (200Ia). Relationship of cardiorespiratory endurance to fundamental movement skillproficiency among adolescents. PediatricExercise Science, 13, 380-391.
ROES: September 2004
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f H
aifa
Lib
rary
] at
07:
53 1
3 A
ugus
t 201
3
Okely, A. D., Booth, M. L., & Patterson,]. W. (2001b). Relationship of physical activity to fundamental movementskills among adolescents. Medicine& Science in Spurts &t'xercise,33,1899-1904.
Phillips, R. G., & Hill, A.]. (1998). Fat, plain, but not friendless: Self-esteem and peer acceptance of obese pre-adolescent girls. IntemationalJoumaloJObesity, 22,287-293.
Pissanos, B. W., Moore,]. B., & Reeve, T. G. (1983). Age, sex,and body composition as predictors of children's performance on basic motor abilities and health-related fitness items. Perceptual and MotorSkills, 56, 71-77.
Puhl, R., & Brownell, K. D. (2001). Bias, discrimination, andobesity. Obesity Research, 9, 788-805.
Reeves, L., Broeder, C. E., Kennedy-Honeycutt, L., East, C., &Matney, L. (1999). Relationship of fitness and gross motor skills for five- to six-year-old children. Perceptual andMotorSkills, 89,739-747.
Riddiford, D. L. (2000). Does body massindexinfluenceJunctionalcapacity in prepubescent children? Unpublished masters thesis, University ofWollongong, Wollongong, New SouthWales, Australia.
Riddiford-Harland, D. L., Steele.]. R., & Storlien, L. H. (2000).Does obesity influence foot structure in prepubescentchildren? IntemationalJoumaloJObesity, 24, 1-4.
Southall,J. E., Okely, A D., & Steele.]. R. (2004). Actual andperceived competence in overweight and non-overweightchildren. Pediatric Exercise Science, 16, 15-24.
Styne, D. M. (2001). Childhood and adolescent obesity: Prevalence and significance. Pediatric Clinics oj North America,48,823-854.
ROES: Sflptflmbflr2004
Oke/y, Booth, and Chey
Trost, S. G., Kerr, L. M., Ward, D. S., & Pate, R. R. (2001).Physical activity and determinants of physical activity inobese and non-obese children. International Joumal ojObesity, 25,822-829.
Ulrich, B. D. (1987). Perceptions of physical competence,motor competence and participation in organized sport:Their interrelationships in young children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58,57-67.
Ulrich, D. A. (2000). Test oJgross motordevelopment (2nd ed.).Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Walkley,J.,Holland, B.,Treloar, R., & Probyn-Smith, H. (1993).Fundamental motor skill proficiency of children. TheACHPERNationalJouma~ 40(3), 11-14.
Welk, G.J, Corbin, C. B, & Dale, D. (2000). Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children.Research Quarterly[or Exercise & Sport, 71,59-73.
Authors' Notes
This study was supported by grants from the New SouthWales Department ofEducation and Training, the NewSouth Wales Department of Health, and the NationalProfessional Development Program. Please address allcorrespondence concerning this article to Anthony D.Okely, Faculty ofEducation, University ofWollongong,New South Wales, Australia, 2522.
E-mail: [email protected]
247
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f H
aifa
Lib
rary
] at
07:
53 1
3 A
ugus
t 201
3