Date post: | 16-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Health & Medicine |
Upload: | frank-jr-goes |
View: | 142 times |
Download: | 2 times |
SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
WWW.GOES.BE
Figure 2. (Walter) Monthly comparison between outdoor humidity, procedure room humidity, and outdoor temperature with the percentage of enhancement rates. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:798–803 2004 ASCRS and ESCRS
RELEX SMILE CLINICAL RESULTS
SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
SMILE is better than Femtolasik because of :
1.1. Better biomechanics
2.2. Better accuracy
3.3. Corneal nerve density
4.4. Centration of laser treatment
5.5. Corneal sensation
6.6. Less higher order aberrations and less spherical aberration
WWW.GOES.BE
PRK
STABILITYNO FLAP
+/- NO ECTASIAPAINHAZE
LASIK
FAST RECOVERYNO PAINNO HAZEECTASIA
FLAP
RELEX SMILEFAST RECOVERY
NO FLAP+/- NO ECTASIA
NO PAINNO HAZE
REFRACTIVE OUTCOME AT 1 M
WWW.GOES.BE
1%
4%
17%
26%
40%
9%
2%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Go
es
Eye
Ce
ntr
e
< -2,0
0
-2,00
to -1
,51
-1,50
to -1
,01
-1,00
to -0
,51
-0,50
to -0
,126
+- 0,1
25
+0,126
to +
0,5
+0,51
to +
1,00
+1,01
to +
1,50
+1,51
to +
2,00
> +2,
00
± 0.50 D: 84%± 1.00 D: 97%
D: Refractive outcome - Percentage within Attempted
1 m (228)
month (eyes)