Reliane Infra Presentation on Infrastructure and Urban Mobility - Challenges Faced

7/31/2019 Reliane Infra Presentation on Infrastructure and Urban Mobility - Challenges Faced

1/117

Urban Mobility India Conference & Exhibition 2011(3rd to 6th December 2011)

Presenter - Anil Gupta

(President & Head Infrastructure)

Challenges faced by private parties in planningdesign and operation of rail / guided transit"

5th December 2011


2/117

Slide 2


3/117

Slide 3


4/117

Slide 4

Roads & Sea Link

Metros

Cement

Airports

Power Sector

Distribution

Transmission

Trading

Generation

R InfraPresence

Infrastructure Sector

RInfra Overview


5/117

Slide 5

PAN India Presence

Maharashtra

Maharashtra: 15 projects1 Road, 2 Metros, 1 Sea Link,

5 Airports, 1 Real Estate,

1 Cement plant , 1 Generation,

2 Transmission & 1 Distribution

Goa : 1 project

Goa Power Generation Plant

Gujarat : 2 projects1 Road Project &

1 Transmission Project

Rajasthan : 1 project1 Road Project

Tamil Nadu: 6 projects6 Road Projects

Delhi: 3 projects1 Road Projects, 1 Metro & 1 Distribution

Andhra Pradesh & Orisaa: 3 projects1 Ultra Mega Transmission Project ,

1 Hyderabad Real Estate &

1 Samalkot Power Generation Plant

Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh &

Chattisgarh & Haryana,: 3 projects1 Ultra Mega Transmission Project

1 Road Project , 1 Cement Plant

Kerala : 1 project

BSES Kerala Power Generation Plant

Karnataka : 1 project

Wind Farm Generation Plant

Punjab & Himachal Pradesh

: 1 project1 Transmission Project

37 Projects I 17 States I 8 Sectors


6/117

Slide 6

Infrastructure

Businesses

Roads 11 ` 120 Bn

Metros 3 ` 160 Bn

Sealink 1`

46 Bn

Airports 5 ` 5 Bn

Total 22 380 Bn

Cement 2 ` 47 Bn

BusinessNo. of

projects

Project Cost

Bn

Infrastructure Portfolio

Largest private sector infrastructure developer on ownership basis


7/117

Slide

Details Delhi Metro Mumbai Line-1 Mumbai Line-2

Project Cost(Rs. Bn)

28.8 23.6 110.0

Debt: Grant:Equity

70:0:30 51:27:22 64:21:15

Length (km) 23 11 32

CoD Feb 2011 Q4FY12 Within 5 years

ConcessionPeriod*

30 years 35 years 35 years^

Shareholding

Ridershipin lacs

(on 1st yr Operation)

0.36 (Yr 2012) 7.0 (Yr 2012) 14.0 (Yr 2016)

7

Metro Rail Portfolio

* Including construction period ^ Could be extended for further 10 years

3 Projects I 66 kms I Project Cost - ~ 160 Bn

Expectedridership

over 21Lacs

[66 km]

Expectedridership

over 21Lacs

[66 km]


8/117

Slide 8

Project Delhi Airport Express

Project Cost Rs. 2,878 Crs

Length 23 km, largely underground.

Stations 6 nos, 5 underground and 1

elevated.

Concession Period 30 years(incl. Construction

period)

Travel time from New Delhi to Airport reduced

to 18 mins.


Length 23 km, largely underground.

Stations 6 nos, 5 underground and 1

elevated.

Concession Period 30 years(incl. Construction

period)

Travel time from New Delhi to Airport reduced

to 18 mins.

1st PPP Metro Project to be operational in India.

High Speed Metro , tops speed of 120kmph.

Connecting Airport, Dwarka Subcity, Dhaula Kuan,

Aero City to New Delhi/CP.

Provides check in facility within city at New Delhi &

Shivaji Stadium station, Dhaula Kuan (Passenger

only)

Have brought Delhi to league of selected cities

having such a facility.

1st PPP Metro Project to be operational in India.

High Speed Metro , tops speed of 120kmph.

Connecting Airport, Dwarka Subcity, Dhaula Kuan,

Aero City to New Delhi/CP.

Provides check in facility within city at New Delhi &

Shivaji Stadium station, Dhaula Kuan (Passenger

only)

Have brought Delhi to league of selected cities

having such a facility.


9/117

Slide

Metro Line - 1

9

Project Mumbai Metro One


Length 11.4 km (Elevated)

Stations 12 nos.

Grant (VGF) Rs. 650 Cr.

Concession Period 35 years(incl. Construction period)

Expected Traffic 7 Lakhs per day in the opening year

East West to East travel time to reduce from 90mins to 20 mins


Length 11.4 km (Elevated)

Stations 12 nos.

Grant (VGF) Rs. 650 Cr.

Concession Period 35 years(incl. Construction period)


East West to East travel time to reduce from 90mins to 20 mins

Versova Andheri Ghatkopar Project


10/117

Slide

Metro Line - 2(Charkop-Bandra-Mankhurd Metro Project ) Project Cost Rs. 11,551 Crs

Length 33 km

Stations 28 nos.

GoI/GoM to provide Rs 2,298 Crs as Viability Gap Funding

(VGF)

Concession Period 35+10 yrs (incl.5 yrs Construction)


To provide North - South Connectivity

Direct connectivity to all the Suburban Rail Lines -

Western, Central & Harbour

Reduces Travel time by 90 minutes

10

Project Metro Line - 2


11/117

Slide 11


12/117

Slide 12

PlanningPlanning DesignDesign ExecutionExecution OperationOperation

Implementation/Operation Framework

Due Diligence Logistics

Type of structure

Intermodal Integration

Due Diligence

Logistics

Type of structure


Depot Route finalization

Phase Commissioning

Depot

Route finalization

Phase Commissioning

Clearances pre -

construction

Right of Way

Safety issues

Public interface

Utilities

Clearances pre -

construction

Right of Way

Safety issues

Public interface

Utilities

RAMs requirements Operation hours

Training

Depot issues

Intermodal integration

Safety

RAMs requirements

Operation hours

Training

Depot issues


Safety

11 22 33 44

Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges


13/117

Slide 13


Implementation/Operation Framework

Due Diligence Logistics

Type of structure


Due Diligence

Logistics

Type of structure


11

Challenges


14/117

Slide

Due diligence by Concessioning Authority before awarding/ inviting ofbids. Few examples:

Delhi Airport Express

1) Original plan was with at-grade siding at Palam, this would have facilitated thematerial movement and access during construction

2) Long inter-station distances(7 km) without evacuation passage duringemergency.

Mumbai Metro-1

1) Depot Ownership was not with Concessioning authority

2) Final available depot land different from original DPR (shape & size)

Mumbai Metro-2

1) Both the depot lands falling in CRZ.areas

2) Part of the elevated viaduct infringing the Aircraft landing funnel

3) Railway approvals for crossing Railway tracks/ lands.

4) Lack of clarity on the Commercial Space utilisation.

5) Location of the DN Nagar station (MCGM Land) and Bandra Station (Relief

and Rehabilitation issues).

14

Due Diligence

Implementation / Operation Framework



15/117

Slide 15

Layout of Dwarka Depot(as planned earlier )

Delhi Airport Metro Express


Depot land location changed by DMRC

Due to change in land in-fructuous works had to be done e.g.:

Geo-technical investigations

Depot Layout planning

Constraint leading to 3 trains in the line

Original Location

Changed

Location


16/117

Slide

Layout of Charkop car shed showingCRZ areas

16

Mumbai Metro Line 2

Total depot area 18.7 hectare

Challenges

82% (16.2 ha) falls under CRZ

No heavy maintenance allowed

Proposed construction on stilt

Leads to cost & time over run

Un-hygenic work environment



17/117

Slide 17

Layout of Mankhurd Depot showing CRZ areas

Mumbai Metro Line 2

Total depot area 24 hectare

Challenges


Zero maintenance allowed on CRZ-1

Depot on stilt as no alternate land

Leads to time & cost over run



18/117

Slide18

Infringement of aircraftfunnel near Juhu Station

Mumbai Metro Line 2

18



19/117

Slide 19

Mumbai Metro Line 2


Viaduct

Infringement of aircraft funnelnear Juhu Station


20/117

Slide

Railway Clearances

Mumbai Metro Line1

Railway Clearances Andheri Steel Bridge

Long approval process & has implication on design and planning

Mumbai Metro Line 2

Railway Clearances Uncertainties at Kurla crossing

Ambiguity about the height of Metro track at Kurla.

It can be at 7 mtrs or 22 mtrs above ground level.

Implications:

On vertical profile upto 2 kms on either side

Additional cost impact

In-principle approval is still awaited on this matter.

Mumbai Metro

20



21/117

Slide

FOOT OVER BRIDGE

EXISTING RAILWAY TRACKS (CST-THANE LINE)

STEEL GIRDER BRIDGE FOR METRO CBM CORRIDOR (LINE-2)AT KURLA STATION YARD

MANKHURDBANDRA

7.0 M

Mumbai Metro Line 2 Original Plan


21

Metro Bridge Originally Planned


22/117

Slide

ExecutionExecution

PROPOSED ELEVATED

CORRIDOR (RAILWAY)

FOOT OVER BRIDGE

EXISTING RAILWAY TRACKS (CST-THANE LINE)

STEEL GIRDER BRIDGE FOR METRO AT KURLA STATIONMANKHURDBANDRA

7.0 M

3.0 M

22 M

Mumbai Metro Line 2 Revised Plan

PlanningPlanning DesignDesign OperationOperation

Metro Bridge proposed to be atheight of a 5 storey building

22


23/117

Slide

Problem of Commercial Development

CA allowed for commercial development above the platform level.

Present rules do not permit.

Development Control Rules (DCR) are under modification since last two years.

Creating Commercial Space above the stations is difficult, since Fire Laws require

separate escape stairs for persons above the platform. This causes huge

constraints on the footpath space.

Mumbai Metro Line 2


23


24/117

Slide

Station with Concourse and Platform

Mumbai Metro Line 2

24


.next


25/117

Slide

CommercialFloor

30m

4.0m

Carriagewayup

Carriagewaydown

4.5m

25m

25m

4.0m

4.0m

Implication of Commercial space

above Platform level

Additional floor above PF requires

extra staircases on the Pathway.

Mumbai Metro Line 2

25


More setback on already constrained

road

Challenges

Infringement with existing structures


26/117

Slide26

Locations where localIssues may affect alignment

Locations where localIssues may affect alignment

26

Infringement with Aircraft funnel path

Challenges

Infringement with EHV lines at 13 nos.locations

Infringement with monorail crossing and roadflyover


Mumbai Metro Line 2

R&R issues at Kurla & BandraDepot on CRZ areas

Railways approval


27/117

Slide

Logistics plays major role in Construction methodology, costing &timelines.

Need for Govt. to identify & make available casting yards ahead of bidding.

This ensures level playing field during bidding but also smoothen theexecution greatly.

Metro -1 :

CA , had provision for 2 nos. casting yards against 1 no. made available.

This had implications on Cost & timelines of project (also, logistics & planning)

We faced logistic issues with U-girders due to RoW availability

Metro -2 : Based on learning from Line-1, moving to segmental approachmethodology.

However, Segmental methodology, requires Continuous stretch of RoW

Location & nos. of casting yards would decide the contracting strategy

27

Logistics




28/117

Slide

Sub Str 1 +Super Str 1,2,3Package

Sub Str 3Package

Contract ing St rategy : ( Based on 3 Cast ing Yards)

V 3Package

Pack age Sect ion

(F rom-T o )

Leng t h

( k m )

Sub Str - 1 Charkop to D N Nagar 9.30

Sub Str - 2 D N Nagar to Juhu 3.25

Sub Str - 3 Juhu to Bandra 6.37

V2 Package Bandra to Kurla 6.75

V3 Package Kurla to Mankhurd 7.44

1

2

3

Sub Str 2Package

V2 Package

28


V1Package


29/117

Slide

SS1Package

SS3Package

Contract ing St rategy : ( Based on 2 Cast ing Yards)

Pack age Sect ion(F rom-To )

Sub Structure 1 (SS1) Charkop to D N Nagar

Sub Structure 2(SS2) D N Nagarto Juhu

Sub Structure 3(SS3) Juhu to BandraSuper Structure I Charkop to Bandra

Sub Structure 4(SS4) Bandra to Kurla

Sub Structure 5(SS5) Kurla to Mankhurd

Super Structure II Bandra to MankhurdSS2 Package

Super

StructurePackage

SS4 & Super Structure IIPackage

SS5 & SuperStructure III Package 29



30/117

Slide 30



Metro-1 : RoW Availability

Non availability of fronts as perplanning hampers the timelines and

thus the Cost of project

100% RoW still not available


31/117

Slide 31

Sr . Part icular RoW Required RoWAvailablePercentage(%)

1 Viaduct 33.71 km 17.3 km 51 %

2 Stat ions 28 stat ions 15 Stat ions 54 %

3 Depot2 depots(43 hectare) Nil 0 %

4Railway BridgesCrossings- Inprinciple approvals

4 crossings 1 crossing 25 %



Metro-2 : RoW Availability (100% by Apr11)

Segmental approachrequires more continuous RoWto prevent idling of girder launching truss


32/117

Slide

Type of Structure

The success of the project is determined by the prompt & efficient

execution of civil engineering structure.

Urban environment call for greater adoption of pre-cast

structures.

The logistics of the movement of precast material with restrictions

space can also determine the type of construction.

e.g Delhi with generally wide roads, while U girders could be considered as a

feasible option, for line 2 in Mumbai we have chosen the option of precast

segmental construction.

32



I l i O i F k


33/117

Slide 33


U- Girder handling


Narrow Right of Way constraints

Challenges

Hampering planned execution

Girder movement, during nighthours (4-5 hrs block)

Min. width of 7 mtr on straight road& larger on turns

Length 30 mtr (max.)

Width 5.7 mtr

I l t ti / O ti F k


34/117

Slide

Scheme being adopted for line 2 (segmental construction)

34



Segment :

Width 3 mtr

Length 10 mtr

I l t ti / O ti F k


35/117

Slide 35


Typical section showing clearances required for a Viaduct


36/117

Intermodal Integration Delhi Airport Exp


37/117

Slide 37

Missing

linkbe

tween

Airport

line&DMRC

No IntermodalIntegration planned


Limited & constrained Car Parks near station

Intermodal Integration with other modes missing

(DMRC, DTC buses etc)

Connectivity between Rajiv Chowk and Shivaji Stadium stn



38/117

Slide 38

PROP

OSED

FOB

No Connectivity with NewDelhi Railway Station


DAMEPL Proposed a Foot over Bridge for

passenger convenience, pending with Railway

Subway

Entry

New DelhiStation

Connectivity between Railway stn and New Delhi Station (Airport Exp)


39/117



40/117

Slide 40


Standards in regard to securitydeployment and scale of equipment

StationsIn-TrainOther sensitive installations like depot &Receiving Stations

Standards in regard to luggage transfer and customs facilities etc.

Integration with othertransportation modes and civic

facilities

Other upcoming Metro linesRoads

AirportsCity CentersMono RailsPod Taxis,Bus stand,Railway Stations,Taxistands

Drainage

SewerageHinterland signage


Coordinating agency for facilitationand enforcement



41/117

Slide 41


Statutory approvals(Fire, Height, PTCC, Frequency, Safety, Sub-systems etc) Lack of Clear procedures, documentation & Time

frame for stage approval

(Concept, Design, Final)

Lack of Clear National DesignStandards

Multiple standards

Execution Traffic Diversion

Civic facility DiversionConstruction safety standardsLong tunnels Temporary ventilation

Access

Emergency medical facility

Emergency communication




42/117

Slide 42


DesignDesign ExecutionExecutionPlanningPlanning OperationOperationDesignDesign

Depot

Route finalization

Phase Commissioning

Depot

Route finalization

Phase Commissioning

22

Challenges



43/117

Slide

Depot

43


Depot where the rakes are maintained and stabled is the heart of any Metro

System.

It requires a large area for carrying out the multifarious activities.

Unfortunately in Urban areas the land is at a premium, and the urge of the Govt.

is to limit the size to the minimum.

Both (Line 1 & 2) depots planning has been beset with difficulties & constraints.

Mumbai Line 1 Govt. carved out a chunk of land right in the middle of the depot land and

gave to a builder. This has resulted in a very constricted depot with very

sharp curves and constrained movement of rakes, men and materials.

Mumbai Line 2 Both the depots are embroiled in CRZ issues.

The conditions of no maintenance in CRZ zone can virtually sound the

death knell of the project unless a solution is found.



44/117

Mumbai Metro One


45/117

Slide 45

Design layout - D N Nagar Depot

Land given toprivatedeveloper



46/117


47/117

Mumbai Metro Line 2


48/117

Slide

Layout of Charkop car shed showing

CRZ areas

48

Total depot area 18.7 hectare

Challenges


No heavy maintenance allowed

Proposed construction on stilt

Leads to cost & time over run

Un-hygenic work environment


Mumbai Metro Line-2


49/117

Slide 49

Mankhurd Depot

Challenges


Embroiled in CRZ issues



Mumbai Metro Line 2


50/117

Slide 50

Layout of Mankhurd Depot showing CRZ areas


Challenges


Zero maintenance allowed on CRZ-1

Depot on stilt as no alternate land

Leads to time & cost over run



51/117



52/117

Slide

While ideally the stations should be located at about every one Km.

or so on a typical metro system, but various constraints prevail:

Feasibility from consideration of track alignment as curves and

grades are to be avoided.

Space constraints as a station for an elevated alignment leaves

a complex footprint on the ground due to its piers, lift wells,

staircases and escalators.

52

Route Finalisation - Station Locations



53/117

Mumbai Metro-2 : Phased Commissioning


54/117

Slide

Phase 1

Phase 2

1

2

3

Phase 3

54




55/117

Slide 55

PlanningPlanning DesignDesign ExecutionExecution OperationOperationExecutionExecution

Clearances pre -

construction

Right of Way

Safety issues

Public interface

Utilities

Clearances pre -

construction

Right of Way

Safety issues

Public interface

Utilities

33

Challenges



56/117

Slide 56

A major issue that the private concessionaire has to contend

with is the approvals from a multifarious number of agencies/

bodies.

Approvals before project commencement Approvals for Project Commissioning

Clearances pre-construction



57/117



58/117

Slide

Broadly there are 2 types of approval required :

Approvals for Project Commissioning

CMRS (Commissioner for Metro Rail Safety)

Approval required for running the Metro Rail.

Buildings Permissions / Local Municipal

Authority For discharge of sewerage, stormwater and supply of drinking & fire fighting water to

the stations.

EIG (Electrical Inspector General)- Approvals are

required for all electrical systems installed for the

running of the Metro Rail.

Safety, Health & Environment Approvals

required for proper functioning of the infrastructure

at the stations for general public at large

IE (Independent Engineer) Approvals required

that all the construction and infrastructure is as per

best industries practices

MoR / RDSO Approvals required from Ministry

of Raliways and RDSO for proper functioning of the

infrastructure at the stations for general public at

large

Fire Final fire NOC is required for the operations

of the stations and via ducts from the Local FireAuthority.

Lift Inspector Approval required for

commissioning of the lifts and escalators to the

stations

Clearances pre-construction1/2

58




59/117

Slide

The Right of way can have a serious impact on the

planning of the type of structure and of the scheduling.

E.g . in the vicinity of Navrang Cinema on Mumbai Line 1 with

access to site only from one direction, we have been forced to

do sequential working one at a time at each pier and

superstructure as advance construction of substructure would

have left no space for the movement of cranes for the erection

of girders.

59

Right of Way (RoW)



60/117


61/117


62/117

P bli I f



63/117

Slide 63

Public Interface PlanningPlanning DesignDesign ExecutionExecution OperationOperation

To limit inconvenience to citizens

Challenges

To maintain flow of traffic, limit jams

Safety of local people and workers

Interference by NGOs/political parties



64/117

Slide 64

Lack of defined process and ownership of utility shifting

It is suggested that, Concessionaire is given an advance payment

to expedite the work through agencies.

In Line-2 , there are 11 locations where EHV lines are infringing

with our proposed alignment.

Relocating the towers, involves land acquisition and is a protracted

process

In Mumbai, shifting of Utilities can be undertaken only in fair season

(non monsoon), which puts pressure on the project timelines.

Utilities


Need for :1)Dedicated corridor for shifting underground cables2)Need of GIS mapping of underground utility network.


65/117


66/117

Mumbai Metro One Complex Utilities

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation


67/117

Slide 67

A typical section showing undergroundutilities:1.Live Sewer Lines2.Electricity Cables

Tata Power : 2 nos.

Reliance Energy: 6 nos.

3.Water Pipe lines4.Storm water drain5.Gas Pile line


Airport Express Metro- Tunnel Work

Pl i

D i

E ti

O ti


68/117

Slide 68

Concreting in long tunnels for track works

Challenges

Concrete Choking in pipe , leading to waste

Spent hours in clearing to restart the work

Distressing and Final Parameter Checking in Progress



69/117


70/117


71/117


72/117

B id L h 183

Mumbai Metro One - Andheri Steel Bridge

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation


73/117

Slide 73

Bridge Length : 183 mtrs

No. of spans : 3 nos. Span length : 61 mtr. Height(rail level): 8 mts Weight (steel) : 1275 metric tonne

Artists impression

Mumbai Metro One -WEH Bridge

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation


74/117

Slide

Positioned at a height of 22 metersfrom ground

Positioned at a height of 22 metersfrom ground

Crossing over busiest westernexpress highway

Crossing over busiest westernexpress highway

Highly skilled and precision jobHighly skilled and precision job

Contemporary Constructionmethodology

Contemporary Constructionmethodology

Cable Stay Bridge TechnologyChallenge

Cable Stay Bridge TechnologyChallenge

74

Existing Express way

Main road underExpress way


75/117


76/117

Restrictive RoW

Mumbai Metro One

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation


77/117

Slide 77

Andheri Stn Area

RoW of 18 mtr against plan of 27 mtrs.

Challenges

Heavy vehicular & pedestrian traffic owing toproximity to andheri station

RoW of 18 mtr leading to separate utility building


78/117


79/117

Constrained & Narrow RoW

Mumbai Metro One

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation


80/117

Slide 80

Ghatkopar Station

Station overcongested area

..1/2

RoW of 18 mtr leading to separate utility building

Challenges

Heavy vehicular & pedestrian traffic owing toproximity to Ghatkopar station

Close proximity to adjoining structures

Utility Building

Constrained & Narrow RoW

Mumbai Metro One

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation


81/117

Slide81

Densely crowded& narrow lane

81

Ghatkopar Station ..2/2


82/117


83/117

Cons t r a ined RoW ow ing t o

Mumbai Metro One

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation


84/117

Slide 84

Densely crowded routedense ly c row ded st ree t


85/117


86/117

Mumbai Metro 2

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation


87/117

Slide 87

High Voltage & various other lines infringing the proposedalignment

HT

Tower

Mumbai Metro 2

High Voltage lines infringing

ith d li t

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation


88/117

Slide 88

with proposed alignment7 locations showing EHV lines

infringing with proposedalignment between Bandra to

Mankhurd

7 locations showing EHV linesinfringing with proposed

alignment between Bandra toMankhurd


89/117



90/117

Slide 90

PlanningPlanning

DesignDesign

ExecutionExecution

OperationOperationOperationOperation

RAMs Requirements

Operation hours

Training

Depot issues

Security

Inter-modal integration

RAMs Requirements

Operation hours

Training

Depot issues

Security

Inter-modal integration

44

Challenges

OperationOperation

RAMs requirements

Operation hours

Training

Depot issues


Safety

RAMs requirements

Operation hours

Training

Depot issues


Safety

44

Challenges

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation

Delhi Airport Metro Express Operational Challenges

RAMS Requirement


91/117

Slide 91

RAMS Requirement

Stringent compliance norms for a Private Operator.

Provision for penalties in case of default , threat of

termination of Concession agreement for a Private Operator.


System Availability 99.94%

Other Metros

Less stringent norms

No such punitive provisions for Government Metro Operators

..additional system capacity and redundancy

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

OperationOperating Hours



92/117

Slide

Concession Agreement Requirementsfor Operating Hours

Passenger Service Operating Hours:

CA requires 20 hours passenger services daily

Currently at 18 hours from 0530 hrs to 2330 hrs.CA : Concession Agreement

92

Very Short maintenance period(white hours


93/117

Slide 93

Training Train Operator Certification

Train OperatorCertifications

DMRC Delhi Airport

Interview Selection Interview One or more Selection Interview

Psychometric Test Written Psychometric test CADAT for low-speed

Computer Aided Drivers' AptitutudeTest (CADAT) for trains above 105

kmph by RDSO

Passing marks 60% 75%

Train Simulator 80 hrs 6 weeks

Train Handling OnTest Track

40 Kms 1 week (Minimum 90 Kms.)

Train Handling(revenue service)

4 weeks 4 weeks (Minimum 400 Kms.)

Mumbai Metro Line-1 No clarity on Train Operators

Certification as of nowMumbai Metro Line-2


94/117

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation

Training



95/117

Slide 95

No existing Running system in India

Majority of staff new

Very little time for acclimatization

Direct training to staff (No time to train the Trainers)

Section unavailable for training due to intensive testing

No Operator willing to take the risk

Continuously changing scenario

Large number of skill sets to be trained

Training


96/117

Airport Express Metro- Depot Work

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation

Ch ll


97/117

Slide 97

Single Line, Single Entry

Challenges

Steep ramp at entry & exit

No space to achieve isolation

Unsuitable shape of plot(Dwarka Depot )


In sufficient

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation


98/117

Slide 98

Depot layout revised according to new land plan and submitted to DMRC

DMRC instructed to revise depot layout in order to integrate the function area with property area

Layout revised to avoid shunting neck, falling into ramp area. Shunting neck could have been adjusted withoutchanging the layout if DMRC had agreed to provide small additional land near to the ramp.

Due to delay in finalization of layout, Depot works were put on hold for 2 months

DMRC Line 3 Viaduct

In sufficientwidth

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation




99/117

Slide 99



100/117

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation



101/117

Slide 101

Risk Sharing

Revenue

Accidents

Projected Traffic V/s Actual

External causes

Sub-optimal use of resources due to

short route lengths

Major Accidents & Breakdowns

Major Repairs and Overhauls

Sensitive to major disruptions Migration of key officials

Interoperability in case of contiguous sections/extensions

Lack of uniform minimum Operation, Safety & Reliability standards

Resources alignment with Railways, DMRC forDisaster Management

Planning

Planning Design

Design Execution

Execution Operation

Operation

Ticketing (with DMRC);



102/117

Slide 102

ConnectivityTicketing (with DMRC);Last mile (bus, rickshaw etc);Car parking

Bedding in periodRemoval of repeat failures;

Closure of punch lists/open item lists;Transfer of knowledge, spares etc from suppliersQuality management from projects into operations.

Security Same as the Airports (more than the metro)

Awareness Marketing / advertisements etc local, national & international

Effective & EfficientOrganization

Support requirements including training: org should matchridership wherever possible, multi-skilling etc

Safety Primary Goal Transition from project safety to operational safety, closeworking with National Disaster Authority

Performance Tracking Aligned to CA, back to back with suppliers; emulateinternational best practices


103/117

Slide 103

Enabling Frameworks


104/117

Slide 104

Policy &

Regulatory

Policy &Regulatory

FinancialFinancialCommercial

Viability

CommercialViability

OthersOthers

Tramway Vs Metro act

Training standards

Certification body Tariff

Taxation

Levy of penalties

Testing & accreditation

Tramway Vs Metro act

Training standards

Certification body Tariff

Taxation

Levy of penalties

Testing & accreditation

Timely project

completion

VGF support Project Funding

Revenue realization

Timely project

completion

VGF support Project Funding

Revenue realization

Traffic (Forecast/ actual)

Tariffs

Non Fare box revenue Cost & Time over run

Traffic (Forecast/ actual)

Tariffs

Non Fare box revenue Cost & Time over run

Environment

Timely Clearance

Security (private/CISF) Public perception

Stakeholders

Environment

Timely Clearance

Security (private/CISF) Public perception

Stakeholders

11 22 33 44

Policy & Regulatory

Policy & Regulatory Financial

FinancialCommercial

Viability

CommercialViability

Others

Others

Enabling Frameworks

L k f l it i P li F k Metro Act V/s Tramway Act


105/117

Slide 105

Lack of clarity in Policy Frame-work Metro Act V/s Tramway ActApplicability for PPP Projects (Authority splitbetween Concessioning Authority andConcessionaire)

Concessionaire to be made party to any

amendments to Acts / Rules

Powers and Liabilities as per Metro Act Concessioning AuthorityConcessionaireThird Party / Contractor

Security Policy Framework missing e.gDelhi Airport Metro Express , the cost of CISF was not planned as CAhad provision for private Security by the concessionaire.

Policy for Metro Railway Security

Clarity on Cost

Training Standards Model guidelines DurationContentTests

Competency Certification standards Model guidelines for competencycertification.(Key Officials, TO, Shunting drivers, Controllers, points man etc)

Minimum Qualification

MedicalPsychologicalRefresher / Retraining

Policy & Regulatory


FinancialCommercial

Viability

CommercialViability

Others

Others

Enabling Frameworks

Staff classification & Working Hour Classification of staff


106/117

Slide 106

Staff classification & Working Hourregulation Model Guidelines

Classification of staffHours of working and rest period

Alcohol and drug testing standard Breath test levels

Tariff uniformity Provision for Inflation linked tariff increasePower to commercial establishments in station

Taxation Project and construction equipmentElectricity dutyLocal taxesProperty taxesOctroi issues, local duties

Construction in vicinity of ROW

Model guidelinese.g Petrol storage tank

Administrator for alignment against unsafe construction(Especially over the Tunnels): Concessionaire orConcessioning Authority

Rules/Guidelines for Metro railway endorsement forconstruction in vicinity

Should be informed

upfront about taxexemptions

Policy & Regulatory


FinancialCommercial

Viability

CommercialViability

Others

Others

Enabling Frameworks


107/117

Slide 107

Passengers amenities Model

Guidelines for Assistance byEmergency Services / Police etc.

Model Disaster Management PlanAssistance of state emergency services in case ofemergencies

Carriage of Luggage (Accompanied/Unaccompanied) Model rules /

guidelines

Size & shapeFire ArmsPetsLiability for lost, damaged or late transfer

Fare fixation Flexibility to fix fares and fare products

Levy of Penalties Missing penalties: Overstay, Defacing of MetroProperty


108/117


109/117

Policy & Regulatory


FinancialCommercial

Viability

CommercialViability

Others

Others

Enabling Frameworks


110/117

Slide 110

Traffic Forecasted Vs Actual

Tariffs Provision for Inflation linked tariff revision

Non fare box revenue For improving project viability, non fare revenue is

stream is must for the bidder

e.g. Retail, Real Estate, Advertisement etc

Critical for success of a PPP project

Policy & Regulatory


FinancialCommercial

Viability

CommercialViability

Others

Others

Enabling Frameworks

Environment


111/117

Slide 111

EnvironmentGovt. support for fast track approvalsRelaxation in norms & policies for special Infra Projects like Metros

Timely Clearances

Propose to have a single window clearance system to avoid delays

Security (CISF/ Private)e.g Delhi Airport Metro Express , the cost of CISF was not plannedas CA had provision for private Security by the concessionaire.

Public Perception

Stakeholders Support from NGOs, Local bodies, citizens must


112/117

Slide

Execution Challenges

112

Large number of interfaces with civil structures constructed by DMRC

Airport Express Metro - Challenges .1/2


113/117

Slide 113

Large number of interfaces with civil structures constructed by DMRC.

Very long length for concreting in tunnels

leading to repeated choking of concrete.

requiring clearing tons of wasted concrete from inside tunnels.

Flooding of tunnels with tons of earth despite temporary flood protection measures.

Simultaneous working by all contractors in constricted space of tunnels & stations.

Handing over of civil strictures by DMRC in an unplanned and unpredictable

sequence making impossible to plan system's work in advance.

Last minute surprises due to major changes in civil structures.

Track occupancy and access management getting extremely critical in the final

Airport Express Metro - Challenges .2/2


114/117

Slide 114

Track occupancy and access management getting extremely critical in the final

stages of project commissioning.

Multiple variety of rail borne construction vehicles requiring elaborate manualprocedures to ensure operational safety in the transition to full operation phase.

Situation changing by hour requiring very close coordination.

New staff not accustomed to rail borne operation and the dangers of roll down. OTE (Over the track exhaust) ducts raising and alignment requiring high precision.

RHEDA track for all the 3 variety of tunnels and via duct with severe limitation on

loading.

RHEDA Tracks First time in the country, behavior not known

For speed >250 kmph;Train max. speed:120kmph

Check-In & Baggage Handling System Implemented 1st time in the country. Integration of two, a highly complex process

Labour Shortages/unavailability affecting planned activities

Mumbai Metro One - Challenges


115/117

Slide 115

Land availability for Casting Yard & Labour Camps in proximity.

Obtaining approvals from various agencies like Railways, Commissioner of

Railway Safety, Traffic Police, MCGM, PWI, MPCB etc.

Frequent and substantial changes in Project planning and timelines on

account of uncontrollable factors:

RoW delay Very constrained RoW

Constraints on account of traffic clearances

Complex network of underground utilities

Over ground structures/ encroachments on the RoW

Constraints in Traffic Diversions and barricading

Non availability of access/ delay in work due to other agencies

Conclusions

There is need for exercise of greater due dilligence by the concessioning authority

before inviting bids


116/117

Slide

before inviting bids.

There is need for quicker decision making/actions on the part of Govt. agencies to

facilitate the project. A single window clearance is required for all approvals. The Concessioning authority

should be empowered or a nodal committee formed to expedite approvals.

Cap on VGF (presently 40% of project cost) needs to be eased.

A minimum guaranteed fare revenue should be assured to the concessionaire. The

Govt. should also share some of the risk rather than the private player absorbing

everything.

Infrastructure project inputs should get some sort of relief from taxes/levies at least tothe same level that the Govt. executing them would have got.


117/117

Q&A

Date post:	05-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	romeotango
View:	216 times
Download:	0 times

Reliane Infra Presentation on Infrastructure and Urban Mobility - Challenges Faced

Documents