+ All Categories
Home > Documents > REOPENINGV. "s^l!pp *£' ir ??!p* WWP f* «H, r ' \ Si-^f. — h **s **• » * ^t' - •* . ^7*5...

REOPENINGV. "s^l!pp *£' ir ??!p* WWP f* «H, r ' \ Si-^f. — h **s **• » * ^t' - •* . ^7*5...

Date post: 09-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
V. " s ^l!pp *£' >- ir ??!p* WWP f* «H, r ' \ Si-^f. h **s **• » * ^t' - •* . -'•> ^7*5 „„ r "$ W <»l* i^S' V»J K «L > < 3'* -«£.\. > .- . ttfefcx. •,'xr: " •' > vM-'ftn •&*¥> l » f , <|VV %#* ,/• ^ ^ ^Jjui *c 4 f v hti£F w W «fe COUNTY *** *"•* $r •*»*«< - * *• / >L >-, n*$. - r $ , ; . *-? > „.<* *. V1, #:-'-: J <*«a;^ * J t - 1 1 * v /IV*., *f VOLUME 15. NUMBER 82. BISMARCK, - - WILLIAMSPORT. NORTH DAKOTA, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 21. 1898. *1.50 PER YEAR. IN ADVANCE. WEBB BROTHERS, oauujEEta xa/r DRY GOODS, •:~ > y~<'- ~ -* 1 * . (Rents' jurnisftings, "Ca&tes' ^urntsfpngs, furniture. J tDall paper, m$&0 Carpets.' £te., €tc, <£tc. REOPENING W. S. DE GRAFF 1 STILL SELLING SHOES The big fire cleared me but of boots and shoes. However, I have received and opened in the west end -of the.;^i£lgf v >' -i ; >• Ik*; Has reopened his store in east |of Brans- man's store, where he is ready for btukness with an entire new stock of •• - ' Shoes, Gents' Furnishings^ Hats, Caps, Trunks, Bags, Tele- scopes, Etc., Ete,^|? Will duplicate eastern prices on any article car- ried in my extensive stock, as I have bought at spot-cash prices. WEBB BROS. BLOCK ft new .and complete assortment of everything in I selected them personally of the manufac- turers. bought thein for casfti With my insurance money , fend they will be sold at a small profit. Come In and price my goods. " - \ 3 W.S.DEGRAFF, BISMARCK, N. D. THOS. McQOWAX, Prop. RATES: 1.00 Per Day. THE CUSTER HOUSE, 4-&HBI8MARCK, JV. *¥h« patienajs et tha Missis sspaol&iig lOYltad +• I would like to see Mr. Boutillit-r succeed. He is good citizen, quite temperate and law-abiding. 1 underxUnd that Mr. H. D. Connor is backing him—at least, to •ome extent. 1 am inclined to think that Mr. B. ia a poor collector. 1 am informed tbal he hat quite a number of bills due him outstanding, some ef which he will, perhaps, never get. I mould feel lite giving Aim credit sparingly. Respectfully, H. A. Armstrong. It would be interesting to know how many other Emmons county settlors the state s attorney has "bsckcapped" to the sneaking bunybodies known as "com- mercial agencies" that seeks to piy into the affairs of private citizens. The writer gets a number of these inquiries every year, and be.at once turns them over to the parties inquired about, for tbey'best know the condition of their own business. Yet-some people say. that a sneak and a backcapper should be elected because, forsootn, the other man is "a stranger." An Illegal Tax Levy, During Mr. Armstrong's term as audi- tor he put on the books a county general fuod tax levy for 18B3 of 8 4 mills on the dollar and for 1894 of 7.3 mills on the dollar. Tet the law stated plainly that 0 mills was the highest that could be levied for that fund. And this wholly illegal tax came out of the tax-payer. We give this item to show that while in the audi- tor's office Mr. A. did just as he pleased, regardless of tax laws. Biamarok, N. D. FRANK a ORAMBS. (Successor to Henry W. Gramb*), - •DEALER IN- SHELF AND HEAVY HARDWARE. /• When In Bismarck to see : SEMUNG & NEW STOCK OF GOODS, Consisting of Men's, Boys' Mid Children's Cloth- ing; Gents' Furnishing Goods, such as Hats, Caps, Gloves, Mittens, Duck Goods, Mackintoshes, Fur Coata,. E$Q. Everything new and up to date. One price to all, and that the right epie. You will save mon?y by calling at ;their store in the Dakota Block and comparfng goods and prices. SEMLINC A HOOVER, Dakota Block, Main Street. 1 tei,7 Barb Wire, Nails, Windmills, Pumps E<«. High-Grade Bicvcles, S40 to SIOO. ^ Bismarck, - - - - - - North Dakota. S w *• ^4^ x * Always in the lead with the largest and best assortment at the lowest prices. ' ^ i $5.00 We still have a fejr'of Ihoae salts M fVV Bays a good budnesasoit In black fw>W or colon. $6.60 HmianhbargainaoSared in any AA Btogla or doabl*^>r«ast«d salt*, not •W •• notlM In anv aopply house. ,00 ^mvwt*c&H uSI'M I do for ISM. yon i yon Double-breasted and cutaways; others ask 9U.00 and llft .00 fbr tbe $9.00 •ante aulla. ft 1A fVl ^ Dr " n * ^ prlee la a beauty; VX'ViW 0*11 and M«jtbem; we aan aave you money at S10.00. r oupiaadaiK they verUkWrn In any rare < never« $12.50 •tore tor leas than tlS .00. flo.«l K< you a day worsted autt from $10.00 WU to «IE>.00 that will surprlae you. ^ Do not buy a Fur Coat until you have^ ^ seen ours. We have canvas coats, sheep pelt-lined, (both short anduls- , . ^ terb), goat, dog skin, oalf, Siberian ' J bufluo, wombat, Wild oat and coon 8kin. u These coats were bought before js the advance for cash. WON Uli BA R GAIN 8 A good gsssaJ Waad underwear, only. pargannent.... Ooodbaavy marloo SztcafaaaTy wool flmad ahdarwear 66c ^6c i line of ilaw and. mlHaos an (aultleas Id every raapect.- _ »" eotiafrom^lLOO to 18.00; Uw bast in "stoMyr"" b °) rs from them And Nothing But The Truth, Regarding the State's Attorney of This County. Statements Every One of "Which Can Be i Proven in Court. ? Men's aaauraa aaala. best all wool sooka arer shown . On account of lack of space we have only mentioned a liow of the many § ^bargains which our store is noted for. ^ -it you contemplate sending away, do not dp it untQ you have i At the old stand. <£&£• ym. R. L. BEST BISHABOK, GO. •s, N. D. ^ - 4jL .'Jfr M i' > The editor of the Record has for sev- eral years been antagonistic to tbe present state's attorney. He has an- tagonized him because he has known him to be dishonest and crooked in his methods. There could have been no other reason, because neither of the two men has ever sought tbe office wanted by the other. It is much more pleasant to get along in peace with every one; but' the publisher of a newspaper owes ..cer- tain "duties to the people, among sucb duties being the making public of every- thing that should be known concerning, the luitbfulneas and honesty of those who aspire to public office. Tbe people have no other means of obtaining full knowledge of such matters except through their .local newspapers. There- fore, In this article, we shall give some of the facts that have caused us to denounce Mr. H. A. Armstrong as crooked and dis- honest, knowing full well the punish- ment that the law of libel inflicts ia case we cannot prove our charges. The Cherry U nt * Ratfeeirr. * In 1884 two directors of Cherry Groye district culled an election on the quiet to vote $8,000 of bonds to build two school- houses.; The school laws were weak in a good many placea in those days. The fact that an election was, to be held was kept from tbe Record editor, although at that time bis pre-emption waa in that district, and he had a vote there. The bonds were voted, most of tbe people of that district not'knowing that an election was to take place. Then the bonds were divided between the two directors, each taking a contract to build a school-bouse. One of. them.,ran away with bis $1,500 and- the other , nut up a school-house worth $800 or (400 thai was not needed and has seldom been used. The director who engineered the bond'scheme wat a personal friend of Mr. Armatrong, visited him frequently in his office while the plan for bonds was being matured, and was-also- excused.at)d defended by him afterward, and tbe director i| his per- sonal friend and supporter to tbfa day. After tbe steal had been accomplished, one xWy' tbe' writer, in Armstrong's presence, spoke of tbe two directors as two rascals, when Mr. A. becapne Migry 'Mdr*fakh^ '"l.f yuu called me a rascal 1 would make you prove, in".- To which we replied: "The two men are unedu- cated. Tbey know, nothing of the law. They could not have arranged this bond business so as to keep witbiu the law un- less tbey bad legal advice. And 1 believe that a lawyer who v would advise and * ,teaU * blgB "' r g£' \C' ' of tbe three." The writer has never had any faith in H. A. Armstrong oiuce tb«t day. This matter may be "old.—as Mr. A. s friends claim—to some people, but it is new to a'good many'who have come here since 1884. Besides, we are not aware that the statute of limitations, in a moral way, excusea dishonesty. And the present state's attorney, although at that time priding himselt on his honesty and good moral^ and being a leading citizen— never said, and never h;is said, a word in condemnation of the Chefry drove steal that the settlers in tbat district have been paying interest on to this day. The Bribery Matter. In 1892 an attempt was made to bribe tbe voters of Selz precinct. The sum of $60 was offered for 76 votes in tbat pre- cinct for Armstroug, $60 for 76 votes fur Lock, and $60, for 76 votes for Brindle against Streeler. There is only circumstan- tial evidence as to Armstrong in this case. But Mr. A. was at the same house with tbe pariy when they left to do tbe bribing. Does it seem likely that he did not know what was being done in his interest? And is it probable tbat a man who was not running for office- furnished $60 with which to buy votes for Armstrong? Even if old, these statements are just as much facts now as they were in '82, and any man' connected with the bribery is just as unworthy to bold office now as he was then. Throwing Out el Sels Precinct. When the votes came, in from Selz— from tbe people who wouldn't sell their rights as citizens -the canvassers at Wllliamsport, wbo were! all friends and supporters of Armstrong, threw out the votes of the precinct Mr. Armstrong was, in private talk and in the news- papers, a firm supporter and excuser of the men who threw out the entire vote of a precinct thai had gone against them But the district court compelled Mr. A.'i friends to count the Totes;' Olveea H«lthkar M A Sesd Sen«>Off.» One day Mr. Armstrong called J. L. Bouiillier into bis office and told Mm he bad an inquiry from a commercial agency as to his financial standing, and that he would give him "a good send-off." Alter Boutillier found out what was in the letter, he tackled Armstrong about it, aod in tbi county building, in the presence of several witnesses, Mr. A.-denied thai lie had urit' iot a letter *f the Hud charged. Mr. Bou- tillier, it may be stated, was an old settler, a neighbor of Armstrong, aod had always supported him in esticils and convention. Following is the "good send-off" that Armstrong gave Bouiillier: Office of H. A. Armstrong, State's At- torney Emmons County, Williamspc N, D., Dec. 28tb, *<88,—tinow. Church A Co., Minneapolis. Minn.: Dear Sirs': Tour favor of the 28d fast., asking information as to the financial condition of i. L Bou- iillier, is at hand. I know Mr. B. very well, indeed. He is, I think, honest. That is, he' is not what is known as * dead-beat. His probable resources ara S uite limited. He ia ia debt pretty hear y. Ar to his doing a good business, 1 would say tbat I do not consider, him a success aa a merchant. He is pretty fairly' well to do, but then is too mnch of. the time that he is out of Uie staple articles, such as sugar, coal oil, etc. This ia due perhaps, to the fsct that heihaa not better credit. I notice that he ia quoted rather low in the reports, 1 cannot say that he is prompt in psying his bills. At least, 1 have held cleims against bim that hs was not prompt in^ajrftg. Panonally, Mr. FernaK Wanti to See Kins Mr. O. 8. Fernald is tax-commissioner ef the Northern Pacific railroad com- pany. He ia the man whose duty it is to try to get railroad taxes cut down, or thrown off, or in any other way to get such action as will allow his company to crawl out of paying its share of the taxes necessary for running the county. What Mr. A., who was then county auditor, wrote to Mr. Fernald, the Record does not know. But one thing we do know— Mr. A. is the only county officer who has ever had a free ticket sent bim by tbe Northern Pacific railroad company with a request that he come to St. Paul to "talk over matters." Certainly the rail road officers do not treat Auditor Brad dock that way. They don't send him passes to go to St. Paul to consult with their officers. We give tbe followiug letter, which Mr. A. forgot and left with a lot of other pwpers when he went out of the auditor's office: Korthem Paciflo Railroad Company, Of fioe of Tax Commissioner, St. Paul, Minu., Jan. 28, 1888. —H. A. Armstrong, Esq., Williamsport, N. D.: Dear Sir: Yours of the 24th hut. to hand, and I herewith in- close you trip pass No. 18,989, in your fa- . from Bismarok to 8t. Paul and return, good until Feb. 28th, in order that you may be able to oome down here tbat < may con- anlt.you about the bostness'Written in your faver of the 24th. Hoping to see you soon, I am yoors, very .truly, O..S. FtUitD. Skins Ik* Treaewrer. When Mr. Merrill, a atraigbtforward honest citizen of Winona, was electet treasurer, it was understood that H. W Allen -a man against whose honesty t word hss never been said before or since —was to be .bis deputy. Mr. Alien waa to meet Mr. Merrill at WillL-imsport on a certain day and be appointed deputy treasurer, and on that day he came. But Armstrong got hold of -Mr. Merrill, end tbe result was that Mr. A.'s bfotber-in- law, Mr. S. E. Kurtz, waa appointed deputy. . The Record claimed then tbat, while filling the position of auditor, Mr. Armstrong would also run tbe treasurer's offiue. These are two offices which the law supposes are to be a check one upon thie- other, as. they have to. receipt fre qbentiy for pnpws passing (from one to the other. The Record aUo claimed that the people paid Armstrong well for doing the work of auditor, and tbat he had no right to take time which the people paid for to tun tbe treuaurer's office. He denied to dozens of persons tbat he had anything to do with the treasurer's office, ana would not get a cent for .any assis tance tbat he Alight give Mr. Kurtz. The following letter from Mr. Merrlll--also forgotten by Armstrong when he left tbe county building—shows whether or not he told the truth: Cranberry Biver, Wis., Feb. 7, Friend Armstrong: Tour letter has just reached me. * * In regard to your pay, I will say that it was my understanding at the time I saw you, previous to the ai pointment of Mr. Kurtz aH deputy, that 1 waa to work for the same amount I paid you. and that I waa to pay you to iuatruet him. But you made a contract with bim lving him three-fourtns of my salary, id not kick; but I thought tbat, if biw por tion amounted to more than (600, he should settle with you. Now, I do not know (he amount we have received from the county Mr. Kurtz has attended to the buai ness, but somewhere near $1,100. That would give him over t800. it' ibis state, ment is correct, I think he can afford to pay you. * * Jakes D. Mebbill, Iron River, Wis. After Mr. Kurtz bad been appointed deputy, and Mr. Allen had gone liomi Armstrong turned to auother couuty officer ana said: "If Mr> Allen wants anything, let bim come and see me. fine state of affairs, isn't it. when a man wanting any official position must go to the great Boss to ask for it I Refer It to the State's Attorney In a letter to the treasurer of this county, in 1898, Mr. G. S. Fernald, tbe aforesaid railroad tax commissioner, asks to be allowed to pay tbe taxes on a part of a section describe as a whole on the tax list, so tbat tbe part could* be sold and a deed given, which deed could not be recorded wbiie taxes were owing. In bis letter to the treasurer, Mr. Fernald, the same man who sent Armstrong, the audi tor, a pass on which to go to St. Paul, ssys: "1 feel quite sure that, if you would refer this matter to your county attorney^ he would advise you tbat that would be the proper course to pursue. Will vou kindly advise me if you cannot do this?" Evidently Mr. Fernald bad "faith" in the county attorney. Appear* Against at Osantr Officer. In the summer of 1897, while Judge attorney to advis>! and defend the county officers in their public capacity, and pays him for doing so. Wanl» to Blsnalse a Case. In the summer of 1807 an assault was made in tbe Williamsport postoffice by Robert Dickson and bis son on F. H Cotton. The latter was struck with a cigar-clipper and badlv bruised- There was no doubt as to the evidence. There was no question that the attack was pre- meditated, for to two men who asked tbe elder Dickson why be had raised a row in the postoffice he replied: "Be- csuse we couldn't catch bim anywhere else." The Dicksons were held to the district court, under bond. Soon after, Mr. Cotton went to Minneapolis) to re- mtiin for several months, telling Arm- strong he would be present when court met. When the case came before tbe court, tbe Dicksons' lawyer moved to dis- miss it. Tbe state'a attorney, instead of opposing tbe motion, aitreed to it, and said: *'As the prosecuting witness. Mr. Cotton, is not here, and as 1 do not think there would be evidence sufficient for conviction if be were here, I will not op- jose dismissal " But Judge Winchester tnew something of the facta in connec- tion with tbe case, and he refused to al low it to be dismissed at tbat time. Mr. Cotton saw that be could not get justice through Armstrong against the Dicksons, wbo were the lawyers political friends and supporters, so he let the esse drop. The following letters explain themselves. Tbey show that Mr. Armstrong, tbe sworn public prosecutor of this county, asked the prosecuting witness to consent to a postponement of tbe case, as be said be was very busy; that tbe witness, to ac- commodate the attorney, conaented. Fur- thermore, as an inducement to Cotton to have it postponed, tbe attorney wrote tbat one of defendant's witnesses would be out of tbe county if the case was put over to tbe spring term of 1898. Then be allows the case tol>e dismissed because the prosecuting witness is not present. The letters of Mr. Cotton show that be was ready to come at once if be was needed. Following are the letters. The italics are our own:. Minneapolis, Minn., No'V. l&0t._ . R. Streeter, Williamsport, N. D.: Dear Sir: I see by the Record that Mr. Armstrong moved the discharge of the Dicksons be- cauoe I waa not tnere. This was quite a surprise to me, as Mr. A. wrote me that he would rather not try the oaae tbia.faH. I send you his letter, that you may see now he acted in the matter. I should have been there but for his letter, as I was ready to go, and I wrote him that 1 would go if he need- ed me. It rather looks to a ban up a tree Out he was in league with the Dioksons to Sauter was here. Mr. Armstrong appeared before bim in a tax matter in the interest of a non-resident land-owner and against a opunty officer. Mr. Armstrong asked Auditor Braddock to certify in tbe case named tbat all taxes bad been paid, on the ground that' certain taxes on the books were not legal. Tbe auditor re fused, and made a certificate only as to the facts, ciaimiug that he had no right .to aettle a point of law. Armstrong sip- plied for. a writ of muudsmus to compel the auditor to certify that the taxes were paid. He did not serve notice on Mr. Braddock until a abort time before tbe hearing of the case. The commissioners war* in session and tbe auditor was rushed with work. But the commission ers let him off and he prepsred his answer. When the case wss called Mr. Braddock came forward and said to tbe count "As there is no state's attorney to appear, for me, 1 will appear M m •elf." And Braddock won bU case. Ti 1 tbe law makes it the duty ioTthe state °? e ft. nlk* upon for testimony—will no doubt be out of the cenntrf. Anumberot •• tax cases will come up at tide term, and will Uike considerable time, [This is the post- script to which Mr. Cotton refers in his let- M®. ter.—Ed. Reoord.j Tbe above letters lay bare the infamous ;i?;f scheme of tbe state's attorns tomse his >-*5 offlce for the protection of his political supporters. And yet the people of,tbis »« county are asked to continue him In office. oaRMhiiimnaUat OaM. ' Every sttorney who has done land business knows that, if any claimant,. ^ offers to mortgage or sell a claim beforaV proof, he is ia danger of losing his claim. '• % A couple of years ago two men hete,' V Cotton and Reamann, liad adeal in which a timber-claim to be proved up on en- ' i tered into tbe agreement. The claim ;J could not then be proved up, on account of the eight years not. having expired.* ? So tbe parties got Mr. Armstrong to* , \" make out a bona for a deed of the claim when it waa proved up, which he told'- them was all right. But, when tbetim-/^ bcr*r,laim owner came to make proof, Mr, J Armstrong appeared for client to pro-' test the proof, and a part of his objection to the proof was tbe attempt to sell ihaF claim, such attempt to sell being based on tbe bond that Mr. Armstrong bad made out and bad said was "all light." And Reamann lost bis tree-claim. •A3 ;eep me away. Note the postscript [in Armstrong's letter, printed below]. Yours, respectfully, F. a. Minneapolis, Minn., Nov. 11, Judge Winchester, Bismarck, N. D.t Dear Sir: I was very much surprised at Mr. Arm- strong* s action in tbe Dickson case, as it was at his suggestion that I was not flWTe. He wrote me that he would be S6 busy tbat be would rather not try the case nntil next spring. 1 have sent Mr. Streeter the letter, and I hope he will send it to you. The state has a clear caae against the Dicksons. and I will be there at any time to give my testimony. 1 told Armstroug that If I was not there when needed to wire me, and I would be there in twenty-four hours. It looks as though it was Mr. A's plan to keep me away and then discharge his clients, as I believe the Dicksons are his clients. Yours, respectfiuly, F. H. Cotton. Williamsport, N. D., Oct. 10, 1897.—-P. H. Cotton, Minneapolis, Minn.: Dear Sir— I saw Mr. Dickson and spoke to bim about' the trial of bis case. 1 asked bim if be would insist upon its being tried at this term of court. He first said be wanted it tried and through with, but theu he said he wonld not insist upon its being tried. As I have so much on my hands, 1 think I would rather put it off until the spring term. I will, however, leave it to you. It you want to come back, and try it this term, I will move tbe case. Let me bear from you at once, t am veey busy. . Respectfully, yonrs, H. A. Abmsibomo. If it is put off, one of his witnesses— Vlllifiu Jslc* Winchester. Two veers ago Attorney ^NevtQli, of Bismarck, a prominent prohibithraut, was a candidate against Judge Winchester, and wss defeated by a vote of nearly two to one in the district. Armstrong op- B osed Judge Winchester and supported Ir, Newton, which waa all right if he wanted to. But ho had no call to offer public insult to tbe presiding judge nt tbe court of which tbe state's attorney ia himself an officer. In a crowd 1n Bis- marck, in the fall of '99, Mr. Armstrong 'used exactly this language: "The gang is rotten from tbe court down." And yet Judge Winchester has slwsys treated Mr. Armstrong and every one else at court in a kind and considerate manned and be does everything thst he can con' sistenily do to shorten court terms and cut down expenses. He deserved no such attack on the part of Mr. Armstrong, Tries to Rata a Rival Lawyah Several years ago Attorney Lynn and one iiit his ' neighbors got into a dispute over some buy. It was a matter that could easily have been compromised on * money bans or settled by a civil suit. But Armstrong saw there was a chance to crush a competing lawyer. Mr. A. was state'a attorney, and could pursue Lynn at the expense of the taxpayers. A crim- inal case was at once made.of it. Mr. Ab - sent to Bismarck and bronght down the' attorney general of the state to assist him. The «ain wss tried twicer at an ex- pense to the County, of much money. Lynn wss acquitted. The state's sttor* ney wss not so anxious to dismiss tbtt esse as he wss thst of the Dicksons. The lailkawiak Case. Some montha ago two citizena of the Williamsport country had a dispute, and •me, Frank JaiSkowlak, was alleged to hitVe ItVuck tbe other. No warrant of arreat ean be isaned without- the state's attorney's Indorsement. A warrant was issued, Tbe coustable( if a state's attor- ney indorses a warrant, must go at once for a defendant. Mr. Jaiskowiak, who resides here, was 46 miles distant, at work. . He would be home in a few day*. But the constable'a duty, sfletArmstrong indorsed the warrant, was to get the de- fendant, and nothing about delay was SHld to him by the state's attorney, ,?he case was tried by a Jury, which C " standing 8 to * for acquittal. ^1 m, i ?! t- 1 •3 a Jury, which disagreed. Tor acquittal. But still Armstrong would not dismiss the esse* although the prosecuting witness was willing to do so. Jaszkowiak couldn't * spend any more time attending court, so be paid tbe costa—aometbing like $70— wbicb tbe county would otherwise havs paid, as Armstrong could never have con - victed Jaszkowiak before a jury in a mill*' ion years. The reader should remember, however, that when tbe Dickson case was dismissed Mr. Armstrong said noth- ing about defendant paying costs. [Continued on Fourth Page.} •i WHENEVER " You become dissatisfied with y&tir present trad* ing place, give this store a trial. Come here in as exacting a mood as you may see fit, and two 1 to one we can send you away Satisfied with this . Store And its goods and prices. We are winning new Emmons County customers constantly, and hold- ing those we win. Isn't it pretty fair evidence, that this is * I Sfc * A Good Place to Trade? We make a specialty of Blankets and TTnderweari We buy these direct from nianufacturers. ^ Fur Collarettes, new swell 8 $2.50 up to *12.00. . .. .. Ladies 7 All-Wool Jackets, from 16.00 up to $13.50, * - ,' •' |||l Ladies' Capes and Chliiireits* Jackcp Send for our Catalogue. Better yet, ball " see what we can save you on these goods; - Remember, we oarry the largest stock of Shoes and Millinery « Ever shown in the Capital City. Goods to up what we say. That's why we grow* We your trade, and should have ft. •srTW?{ST - .VMja.-;*::* itttXSa. ; V' lli" m* ••ft-*-** iVV&o 't»/. sss&a&iL, Vi L L,
Transcript
Page 1: REOPENINGV. "s^l!pp *£' ir ??!p* WWP f* «H, r ' \ Si-^f. — h **s **• » * ^t' - •* . ^7*5 „ -'•> „„ r"$ W

V. "s l!pp *£' >-

ir ??!p*

WWP f* «H, r

' \

Si-^f. — h

**s **• » *

^t' - •*

. „ -'•> ^7*5

„„

r"$ W

<»l* i^S' V»J ™ K

«L > „ < 3'* -«£.\. > .- .

ttfefcx. •,'xr: • •" •' • >

vM-'ftn •&*¥> • l » f, <|VV %#* ,/•

^ Jjui *c 4f v hti£F w W «fe

COUNTY *** *"•* $r •

•*»*«< - * *• / -» >L >-, n*$. - r $ ,;. *-? > „.<* *. V1, #:-'-:J<*«a;^ *

J t - 1 1 *v /IV*., *f

VOLUME 15. NUMBER 82.

BISMARCK, - -

WILLIAMSPORT. NORTH DAKOTA, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 21. 1898. *1.50 PER YEAR. IN ADVANCE.

WEBB BROTHERS, oauujEEta xa/r

DRY GOODS, •:~>y~<'- ~ -*1 *

. (Rents' jurnisftings, "Ca&tes' ^urntsfpngs, furniture. J tDall paper,

m$&0 Carpets.' £te., €tc, <£tc.

REOPENING W. S. DE GRAFF 1

STILL SELLING SHOES The big fire cleared me but of boots and shoes. However, I have received and opened in the west end -of the.; i£lgf v • >' -i; >• Ik*;

Has reopened his store in east |of Brans-man's store, where he is ready for btukness with an entire new stock of • •• - '

Shoes, Gents' Furnishings Hats, Caps, Trunks, Bags, Tele­

scopes, Etc., Ete, |? • Will duplicate eastern prices on any article car­ried in my extensive stock, as I have bought at spot-cash prices.

WEBB BROS. BLOCK ft new .and complete assortment of everything in

I selected them personally of the manufac­turers. bought thein for casfti With my insurance money , fend they will be sold at a small profit.

Come In and price my goods. " - \ 3

W.S.DEGRAFF, BISMARCK, N. D.

THOS. McQOWAX, Prop. RATES: 1.00 Per Day.

THE CUSTER HOUSE, 4-&HBI8MARCK, JV. I»

*¥h« patienajs et tha Missis sspaol&iig lOYltad +•

I would like to see Mr. Boutillit-r succeed. He is • good citizen, quite temperate and law-abiding. 1 underxUnd that Mr. H. D. Connor is backing him—at least, to •ome extent. 1 am inclined to think that Mr. B. ia a poor collector. 1 am informed tbal he hat quite a number of bills due him outstanding, some ef which he will, perhaps, never get. I mould feel lite giving Aim credit sparingly.

Respectfully, H. A. Armstrong. It would be interesting to know how

many other Emmons county settlors the state s attorney has "bsckcapped" to the sneaking bunybodies known as "com­mercial agencies" that seeks to piy into the affairs of private citizens. The writer gets a number of these inquiries every year, and be.at once turns them over to the parties inquired about, for tbey'best know the condition of their own business. Yet-some people say. that a sneak and a backcapper should be elected because, forsootn, the other man is "a stranger."

An Illegal Tax Levy, During Mr. Armstrong's term as audi­

tor he put on the books a county general fuod tax levy for 18B3 of 8 4 mills on the dollar and for 1894 of 7.3 mills on the dollar. Tet the law stated plainly that 0 mills was the highest that could be levied for that fund. And this wholly illegal tax came out of the tax-payer. We give this item to show that while in the audi­tor's office Mr. A. did just as he pleased, regardless of tax laws.

Biamarok, N. D. FRANK a ORAMBS.

(Successor to Henry W. Gramb*),

-

•DEALER IN-

SHELF AND HEAVY HARDWARE.

/•

When In Bismarck to see :

SEMUNG & NEW STOCK OF GOODS,

Consisting of Men's, Boys' Mid Children's Cloth­ing; Gents' Furnishing Goods, such as Hats,

Caps, Gloves, Mittens, Duck Goods, Mackintoshes, Fur Coata,. E$Q.

Everything new and up to date. One price to all, and that the right epie. You will save mon?y by calling at ;their store in the Dakota Block and comparfng goods and prices.

SEMLINC A HOOVER,

Dakota Block, Main Street.

1 tei,7

Barb Wire, Nails, Windmills, Pumps E<«. High-Grade Bicvcles, S40 to SIOO. ^

Bismarck, - - - - - - North Dakota.

Sw *•

^ 4 ^ x *

Always in the lead with the largest and best assortment at the lowest prices. ' i

$5.00 We still have a fejr'of Ihoae salts M fVV Bays a good budnesasoit In black fw>W or colon. $6.60 HmianhbargainaoSared in any

AA Btogla or doabl*^>r«ast«d salt*, not •W • •• notlM In anv aopply house.

,00 mvwt*c&H uSI'M I do for ISM.

yon i yon

Double-breasted and cutaways; others ask 9U.00 and llft.00 fbr tbe $9.00

•ante aulla. ft 1A fVl ^Dr "n* prlee la a beauty; VX'ViW 0*11 and M«jtbem; we aan aave you money at S10.00. r

oupiaadaiK they verUkWrn In any

rare < • never« $12.50

•tore tor leas than tlS .00. flo.«l K< V« you a day worsted autt from $10.00 WU to «IE>.00 that will surprlae you.

Do not buy a Fur Coat until you have seen ours. We have canvas coats, sheep pelt-lined, (both short anduls- ,

. terb), goat, dog skin, oalf, Siberian ' J bufluo, wombat, Wild oat and coon

8kin.u These coats were bought before js the advance for cash.

W O N Uli BA R GAIN 8

A good gsssaJ Waad underwear, only. pargannent....

Ooodbaavy marloo

SztcafaaaTy wool flmad ahdarwear 66c ^6c

i line of ilaw and. mlHaos an (aultleas Id every raapect.- _ »" • eotiafrom^lLOO to 18.00; Uw bast in

"stoMyr"" b°)rs from

them

And Nothing But The Truth, Regarding the State's Attorney of

This County.

Statements Every One of "Which Can Be i Proven in Court. ?

Men's aaauraa aaala. best all wool sooka arer shown

. On account of lack of space we have only mentioned a liow of the many

§ ^bargains which our store is noted for. -it you contemplate sending away, do

not dp it untQ you have i At the old stand. <£&£•

ym.

R. L. BEST BISHABOK,

GO. •s,

N. D. ^ -4jL

.'Jfr M i' >

The editor of the Record has for sev­eral years been antagonistic to tbe present state's attorney. He has an­tagonized him because he has known him to be dishonest and crooked in his methods. There could have been no other reason, because neither of the two men has ever sought tbe office wanted by the other. It is much more pleasant to get along in peace with every one; but' the publisher of a newspaper owes ..cer­tain "duties to the people, among sucb duties being the making public of every­thing that should be known concerning, the luitbfulneas and honesty of those who aspire to public office. Tbe people have no other means of obtaining full knowledge of such matters except through their .local newspapers. There­fore, In this article, we shall give some of the facts that have caused us to denounce Mr. H. A. Armstrong as crooked and dis­honest, knowing full well the punish­ment that the law of libel inflicts ia case we cannot prove our charges.

The Cherry Unt* Ratfeeirr. * In 1884 two directors of Cherry Groye district culled an election on the quiet to vote $8,000 of bonds to build two school-houses.; The school laws were weak in a good many placea in those days. The fact that an election was, to be held was kept from tbe Record editor, although at that time bis pre-emption waa in that district, and he had a vote there. The bonds were voted, most of tbe people of that district not'knowing that an election was to take place. Then the bonds were divided between the two directors, each taking a contract to build a school-bouse. One of. them.,ran away with bis $1,500 and- the other , nut up a school-house worth $800 or (400 thai was not needed and has seldom been used. The director who engineered the bond'scheme wat a personal friend of Mr. Armatrong, visited him frequently in his office while the plan for bonds was being matured, and was-also- excused.at)d defended by him afterward, and tbe director i| his per­sonal friend and supporter to tbfa day. After tbe steal had been accomplished, one xWy' tbe' writer, in Armstrong's presence, spoke of tbe two directors as two rascals, when Mr. A. becapne Migry 'Mdr*fakh^ '"l.f yuu called me a rascal 1 would make you prove, in".- To which we replied: "The two men are unedu­cated. Tbey know, nothing of the law. They could not have arranged this bond business so as to keep witbiu the law un­less tbey bad legal advice. And 1 believe that a lawyer who v would advise and

* ,teaU* blgB"' rg£' \C'

'

of tbe three." The writer has never had any faith in H. A. Armstrong oiuce tb«t day. This matter may be "old.—as Mr. A. s friends claim—to some people, but it is new to a'good many'who have come here since 1884. Besides, we are not aware that the statute of limitations, in a moral way, excusea dishonesty. And the present state's attorney, although at that time priding himselt on his honesty and good moral^ and being a leading citizen— never said, and never h;is said, a word in condemnation of the Chefry drove steal that the settlers in tbat district have been paying interest on to this day.

The Bribery Matter. In 1892 an attempt was made to bribe

tbe voters of Selz precinct. The sum of $60 was offered for 76 votes in tbat pre­cinct for Armstroug, $60 for 76 votes fur Lock, and $60, for 76 votes for Brindle against Streeler. There is only circumstan­tial evidence as to Armstrong in this case. But Mr. A. was at the same house with tbe pariy when they left to do tbe bribing. Does it seem likely that he did not know what was being done in his interest? And is it probable tbat a man who was not running for office- furnished $60 with which to buy votes for Armstrong? Even if old, these statements are just as much facts now as they were in '82, and any man' connected with the bribery is just as unworthy to bold office now as he was then.

Throwing Out el Sels Precinct. When the votes came, in from Selz—

from tbe people who wouldn't sell their rights as citizens -the canvassers at Wllliamsport, wbo were! all friends and supporters of Armstrong, threw out the votes of the precinct Mr. Armstrong was, in private talk and in the news­papers, a firm supporter and excuser of the men who threw out the entire vote of a precinct thai had gone against them But the district court compelled Mr. A.'i friends to count the Totes;' Olveea H«lthkarMA Sesd Sen«>Off.» „ One day Mr. Armstrong called J. L. Bouiillier into bis office and told Mm he bad an inquiry from a commercial agency as to his financial standing, and that he would give him "a good send-off." Alter Boutillier found out what was in the letter, he tackled Armstrong about it, aod in tbi county building, in the presence of several witnesses, Mr. A.-denied thai lie had urit' iot a letter *f the Hud charged. Mr. Bou­tillier, it may be stated, was an old settler, a neighbor of Armstrong, aod had always supported him in esticils and convention. Following is the "good send-off" that Armstrong gave Bouiillier:

Office of H. A. Armstrong, State's At­torney Emmons County, Williamspc N, D., Dec. 28tb, *<88,—tinow. Church A Co., Minneapolis. Minn.: Dear Sirs': Tour favor of the 28d fast., asking information as to the financial condition of i. L Bou­iillier, is at hand. I know Mr. B. very well, indeed. He is, I think, honest. That is, he' is not what is known as * dead-beat. His probable resources ara

Suite limited. He ia ia debt pretty hear y. Ar to his doing a good business, 1

would say tbat I do not consider, him a success aa a merchant. He is pretty fairly' well to do, but then is too mnch of. the time that he is out of Uie staple articles, such as sugar, coal oil, etc. This ia due perhaps, to the fsct that heihaa not better credit. I notice that he ia quoted rather low in the reports, 1 cannot say that he is prompt in psying his bills. At least, 1 have held cleims against bim that hs was not prompt in^ajrftg. Panonally,

Mr. FernaK Wanti to See Kins Mr. O. 8. Fernald is tax-commissioner

ef the Northern Pacific railroad com­pany. He ia the man whose duty it is to try to get railroad taxes cut down, or thrown off, or in any other way to get such action as will allow his company to crawl out of paying its share of the taxes necessary for running the county. What Mr. A., who was then county auditor, wrote to Mr. Fernald, the Record does not know. But one thing we do know— Mr. A. is the only county officer who has ever had a free ticket sent bim by tbe Northern Pacific railroad company with a request that he come to St. Paul to "talk over matters." Certainly the rail road officers do not treat Auditor Brad dock that way. They don't send him passes to go to St. Paul to consult with their officers. We give tbe followiug letter, which Mr. A. forgot and left with a lot of other pwpers when he went out of the auditor's office:

Korthem Paciflo Railroad Company, Of fioe of Tax Commissioner, St. Paul, Minu., Jan. 28, 1888. —H. A. Armstrong, Esq., Williamsport, N. D.: Dear Sir: Yours of the 24th hut. to hand, and I herewith in­close you trip pass No. 18,989, in your fa-

. from Bismarok to 8t. Paul and return, good until Feb. 28th, in order that you may be able to oome down here tbat < may con-anlt.you about the bostness'Written in your faver of the 24th. Hoping to see you soon, I am yoors, very .truly, O..S. FtUitD.

Skins Ik* Treaewrer. When Mr. Merrill, a atraigbtforward

honest citizen of Winona, was electet treasurer, it was understood that H. W Allen -a man against whose honesty t word hss never been said before or since —was to be .bis deputy. Mr. Alien waa to meet Mr. Merrill at WillL-imsport on a certain day and be appointed deputy treasurer, and on that day he came. But Armstrong got hold of -Mr. Merrill, end tbe result was that Mr. A.'s bfotber-in-law, Mr. S. E. Kurtz, waa appointed deputy. . The Record claimed then tbat, while filling the position of auditor, Mr. Armstrong would also run tbe treasurer's offiue. These are two offices which the law supposes are to be a check one upon thie- other, as. they have to. receipt fre qbentiy for pnpws passing (from one to the other. The Record aUo claimed that the people paid Armstrong well for doing the work of auditor, and tbat he had no right to take time which the people paid for to tun tbe treuaurer's office. He denied to dozens of persons tbat he had anything to do with the treasurer's office, ana would not get a cent for .any assis tance tbat he Alight give Mr. Kurtz. The following letter from Mr. Merrlll--also forgotten by Armstrong when he left tbe county building—shows whether or not he told the truth:

Cranberry Biver, Wis., Feb. 7, Friend Armstrong: Tour letter has just reached me. * * In regard to your pay, I will say that it was my understanding at the time I saw you, previous to the ai pointment of Mr. Kurtz aH deputy, that 1 waa to work for the same amount I paid you. and that I waa to pay you to iuatruet him. But you made a contract with bim lving him three-fourtns of my salary, id not kick; but I thought tbat, if biw por

tion amounted to more than (600, he should settle with you. Now, I do not know (he amount we have received from the county

Mr. Kurtz has attended to the buai ness, but somewhere near $1,100. That would give him over t800. it' ibis state, ment is correct, I think he can afford to pay you. * * Jakes D. Mebbill,

Iron River, Wis. After Mr. Kurtz bad been appointed

deputy, and Mr. Allen had gone liomi Armstrong turned to auother couuty officer ana said: "If Mr> Allen wants anything, let bim come and see me. fine state of affairs, isn't it. when a man wanting any official position must go to the great Boss to ask for it I

Refer It to the State's Attorney In a letter to the treasurer of this

county, in 1898, Mr. G. S. Fernald, tbe aforesaid railroad tax commissioner, asks to be allowed to pay tbe taxes on a part of a section describe as a whole on the tax list, so tbat tbe part could* be sold and a deed given, which deed could not be recorded wbiie taxes were owing. In bis letter to the treasurer, Mr. Fernald, the same man who sent Armstrong, the audi tor, a pass on which to go to St. Paul, ssys: "1 feel quite sure that, if you would refer this matter to your county attorney^ he would advise you tbat that would be the proper course to pursue. Will vou kindly advise me if you cannot do this?" Evidently Mr. Fernald bad "faith" in the county attorney. Appear* Against at Osantr Officer.

In the summer of 1897, while Judge

attorney to advis>! and defend the county officers in their public capacity, and pays him for doing so.

Wanl» to Blsnalse a Case. In the summer of 1807 an assault was

made in tbe Williamsport postoffice by Robert Dickson and bis son on F. H Cotton. The latter was struck with a cigar-clipper and badlv bruised- There was no doubt as to the evidence. There was no question that the attack was pre­meditated, for to two men who asked tbe elder Dickson why be had raised a row in the postoffice he replied: "Be-csuse we couldn't catch bim anywhere else." The Dicksons were held to the district court, under bond. Soon after, Mr. Cotton went to Minneapolis) to re-mtiin for several months, telling Arm­strong he would be present when court met. When the case came before tbe court, tbe Dicksons' lawyer moved to dis­miss it. Tbe state'a attorney, instead of opposing tbe motion, aitreed to it, and said: *'As the prosecuting witness. Mr. Cotton, is not here, and as 1 do not think there would be evidence sufficient for conviction if be were here, I will not op-jose dismissal " But Judge Winchester tnew something of the facta in connec­tion with tbe case, and he refused to al low it to be dismissed at tbat time. Mr. Cotton saw that be could not get justice through Armstrong against the Dicksons, wbo were the lawyers political friends and supporters, so he let the esse drop. The following letters explain themselves. Tbey show that Mr. Armstrong, tbe sworn public prosecutor of this county, asked the prosecuting witness to consent to a postponement of tbe case, as be said be was very busy; that tbe witness, to ac­commodate the attorney, conaented. Fur­thermore, as an inducement to Cotton to have it postponed, tbe attorney wrote tbat one of defendant's witnesses would be out of tbe county if the case was put over to tbe spring term of 1898. Then be allows the case tol>e dismissed because the prosecuting witness is not present. The letters of Mr. Cotton show that be was ready to come at once if be was needed. Following are the letters. The italics are our own:.

Minneapolis, Minn., No'V. l&0t._ . R. Streeter, Williamsport, N. D.: Dear

Sir: I see by the Record that Mr. Armstrong moved the discharge of the Dicksons be-cauoe I waa not tnere. This was quite a surprise to me, as Mr. A. wrote me that he would rather not try the oaae tbia.faH. I send you his letter, that you may see now he

acted in the matter. I should have been there but for his letter, as I was ready to go, and I wrote him that 1 would go if he need­ed me. It rather looks to a ban up a tree Out he was in league with the Dioksons to

Sauter was here. Mr. Armstrong appeared before bim in a tax matter in the interest of a non-resident land-owner and against a opunty officer. Mr. Armstrong asked Auditor Braddock to certify in tbe case named tbat all taxes bad been paid, on the ground that' certain taxes on the books were not legal. Tbe auditor re fused, and made a certificate only as to the facts, ciaimiug that he had no right .to aettle a point of law. Armstrong sip-plied for. a writ of muudsmus to compel the auditor to certify that the taxes were paid. He did not serve notice on Mr. Braddock until a abort time before tbe hearing of the case. The commissioners war* in session and tbe auditor was rushed with work. But the commission ers let him off and he prepsred his answer. When the case wss called Mr. Braddock came forward and said to tbe count "As there is no state's attorney to appear, for me, 1 will appear M m •elf." And Braddock won bU case. Ti

1 tbe law makes it the duty ioTthe state

°?e ft. nlk* upon for testimony—will no doubt be out of the cenntrf. Anumberot •• tax cases will come up at tide term, and will Uike considerable time, [This is the post-script to which Mr. Cotton refers in his let- M®. ter.—Ed. Reoord.j

Tbe above letters lay bare the infamous ;i?;f scheme of tbe state's attorns tomse his >-*5 offlce for the protection of his political supporters. And yet the people of,tbis »« county are asked to continue him In office.

oaRMhiiimnaUat OaM. ' Every sttorney who has done land

business knows that, if any claimant,. offers to mortgage or sell a claim beforaV proof, he is ia danger of losing his claim. '• % A couple of years ago two men hete,' V Cotton and Reamann, liad adeal in which a timber-claim to be proved up on en- ' i tered into tbe agreement. The claim ;J

could not then be proved up, on account of the eight years not. having expired.* ? So tbe parties got Mr. Armstrong to* , \" make out a bona for a deed of the claim v» when it waa proved up, which he told'-them was all right. But, when tbetim-/^ bcr*r,laim owner came to make proof, Mr, J

Armstrong appeared for • client to pro-' test the proof, and a part of his objection to the proof was tbe attempt to sell ihaF claim, such attempt to sell being based on tbe bond that Mr. Armstrong bad made out and bad said was "all light." And Reamann lost bis tree-claim.

•A3

;eep me away. Note the postscript [in Armstrong's letter,

printed below]. Yours, respectfully, F. a. Minneapolis, Minn., Nov. 11,

Judge Winchester, Bismarck, N. D.t Dear Sir: I was very much surprised at Mr. Arm­strong* s action in tbe Dickson case, as it was at his suggestion that I was not flWTe. He wrote me that he would be S6 busy tbat be would rather not try the case nntil next spring. 1 have sent Mr. Streeter the letter, and I hope he will send it to you. The state has a clear caae against the Dicksons. and I will be there at any time to give my testimony. 1 told Armstroug that If I was not there when needed to wire me, and I would be there in twenty-four hours. It looks as though it was Mr. A's plan to keep me away and then discharge his clients, as I believe the Dicksons are his clients.

Yours, respectfiuly, F. H. Cotton.

Williamsport, N. D., Oct. 10, 1897.—-P. H. Cotton, Minneapolis, Minn.: Dear Sir— I saw Mr. Dickson and spoke to bim about' the trial of bis case. 1 asked bim if be would insist upon its being tried at this term of court. He first said be wanted it tried and through with, but theu he said he wonld not insist upon its being tried. As I have so much on my hands, 1 think I would rather put it off until the spring term. I will, however, leave it to you. It you want to come back, and try it this term, I will move tbe case. Let me bear from you at once, t am veey busy.

. Respectfully, yonrs, H. A. Abmsibomo.

If it is put off, one of his witnesses—

Vlllifiu Jslc* Winchester. Two veers ago Attorney ^NevtQli, of

Bismarck, a prominent prohibithraut, was a candidate against Judge Winchester, and wss defeated by a vote of nearly two to one in the district. Armstrong op-

Bosed Judge Winchester and supported Ir, Newton, which waa all right if he

wanted to. But ho had no call to offer public insult to tbe presiding judge nt tbe court of which tbe state's attorney ia himself an officer. In a crowd 1n Bis­marck, in the fall of '99, Mr. Armstrong 'used exactly this language: "The gang is rotten from tbe court down." And yet Judge Winchester has slwsys treated Mr. Armstrong and every one else at court in a kind and considerate manned and be does everything thst he can con' sistenily do to shorten court terms and cut down expenses. He deserved no such attack on the part of Mr. Armstrong,

Tries to Rata a Rival Lawyah Several years ago Attorney Lynn and

one iiit his ' neighbors got into a dispute over some buy. It was a matter that could easily have been compromised on * money bans or settled by a civil suit. But Armstrong saw there was a chance to crush a competing lawyer. Mr. A. was state'a attorney, and could pursue Lynn at the expense of the taxpayers. A crim­inal case was at once made.of it. Mr. Ab ­sent to Bismarck and bronght down the' attorney general of the state to assist him. The «ain wss tried twicer at an ex­pense to the County, of much money. Lynn wss acquitted. The state's sttor* ney wss not so anxious to dismiss tbtt esse as he wss thst of the Dicksons.

The lailkawiak Case. Some montha ago two citizena of the

Williamsport country had a dispute, and •me, Frank JaiSkowlak, was alleged to hitVe ItVuck tbe other. No warrant of arreat ean be isaned without- the state's attorney's Indorsement. A warrant was issued, Tbe coustable( if a state's attor­ney indorses a warrant, must go at once for a defendant. Mr. Jaiskowiak, who resides here, was 46 miles distant, at work. . He would be home in a few day*. But the constable'a duty, sfletArmstrong indorsed the warrant, was to get the de­fendant, and nothing about delay was SHld to him by the state's attorney, ,?he case was tried by a Jury, which C " standing 8 to * for acquittal.

^1

m,

i ?!

t-1

•3

a Jury, which disagreed. Tor acquittal. But still

Armstrong would not dismiss the esse* although the prosecuting witness was willing to do so. Jaszkowiak couldn't * spend any more time attending court, so be paid tbe costa—aometbing like $70— wbicb tbe county would otherwise havs paid, as Armstrong could never have con ­victed Jaszkowiak before a jury in a mill*' ion years. The reader should remember, however, that when tbe Dickson case was dismissed Mr. Armstrong said noth­ing about defendant paying costs.

[Continued on Fourth Page.}

•i

WHENEVER "

You become dissatisfied with y&tir present trad* ing place, give this store a trial. Come here in as exacting a mood as you may see fit, and two 1

to one we can send you away

Satisfied with this . Store And its goods and prices. We are winning new Emmons County customers constantly, and hold­ing those we win. Isn't it pretty fair evidence, that this is

* I

Sfc *

A Good Place to Trade? We make a specialty of

Blankets and TTnderweari We buy these direct from nianufacturers.

F u r C o l l a r e t t e s , n e w s w e l l 8

$ 2 . 5 0 u p t o * 1 2 . 0 0 . . . . . .

Ladies7 All-Wool Jackets, from 16.00 up to $13.50, * - ,' •' |||l Ladies' Capes and Chliiireits* Jackcp Send for our Catalogue. Better yet, ball "

see what we can save you on these goods; -Remember, we oarry the largest stock of

Shoes and Millinery « Ever shown in the Capital City. Goods to up what we say. That's why we grow* We your trade, and should have ft.

•srTW?{ST -.VMja.-;*::*

• itttXSa. ; V' lli"

m*

••ft-*-** iVV&o 't»/.

sss&a&iL,

Vi

LL,

Recommended