Date post: | 07-May-2015 |
Category: |
Economy & Finance |
Upload: | paul-mcadam |
View: | 1,006 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Actionable intelligence that drives Revenue & Profit in the eChannel…
© 2010. All rights reserved www.ecomadvisors.com
Paul McAdam
April 26, 2010
Presented at
NACHA PAYMENTS 2010
Replacing Cash & Checks
with P2P Money Movement
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 2
Research Objectives
NACHA and eCom Advisors partnered with FIS and PayPal to:
Understand consumers’ awareness of P2P payments, and their
likelihood to use P2P payment services offered by a financial
institution
Determine consumers’ understanding of the use cases of P2P
payments, the likelihood to use them
Determine consumer receptivity toward a centralized money
movement solution offered by their financial institution (ePayment
Portal)
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 3
Research Methodology
29 question, online survey
1,180 completed surveys
February 23 – 24, 2010
Sample obtained from Survey Sampling International
Estimated error rates: + 2.5% to + 3.1%
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 4
The research was designed to survey “active” online banking customers
100%
88%
14%8%
40%
ActiveOnline Banking
ActiveOnline Bill Pay
ActiveMobile Phone
to AccessOnline Banking
ActiveMobile Phone
to AccessOnline Bill Pay
Have EverSent a
P2P Payment
“Active” defined as use within
the past 30 days
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 5
Survey respondent demographics
18 - 2413%
25 - 3414%
35 - 4423%
45 - 5422%
55 - 6413%
65 or over15%
Age
Male40%
Female60%
Gender
Under 25K 21%
25K – 50K 30%
50K – 75K 23%
75K – 100K 12%
100K+14%
Income
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 6
There is already strong awareness and utilization of P2P payments
66% aware it is possible to send P2P payment to an individual
using a computer
26% aware it is possible to send P2P payment to an individual
using a mobile phone
40% have sent an online P2P payment to another individual
41% have used either online bill payment or a P2P payment
service to send an electronic payment directly to another individual
within the past year
– 24% reported doing this on at least a monthly basis
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 7
PayPal is the only widely recognized P2P payment brand
Consumer awareness of P2P payment services
4%
4%
10%
93%
POPMoney
Obopay
MasterCard Mobile MoneySend
PayPal
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 8
Most consumers are not aware of simpler methods of sending P2P payments
14%
37%
67%
Mobile phone number
Email address
Bank account and routing numbers
Consumer awareness of ability to send P2P using:
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 9
Discussion topics
P2P Payment Concept Test
ePayment Portal Concept Test
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 11
13%
23%
31%
13%
12%
25%
36%
52%
41%
33%
42%
38%
26%
16%
19%
19%
17%
24%
26%
19%
16%
16%
18%
19%
22%
25%
31%
33%
Purchasing items from a garage sale or flea market and paying the seller
Paying your babysitter, house sitter, dog walker, gardener, house painter, etc.
Splitting the mortgage or rent with your roommate, partner or spouse
Paying a friend back for your portion of a dinner bill (splitting check at a restaurant)
Splitting the cost of a gift (e.g. birthday gift, wedding gift, etc.) with co-workers, friends or family members
Sending money out of the country to a family member, friend, associate, etc.
Sending money to a son or daughter in college
Does not apply Definitely/probably would not Might or might not Definitely/probably would use
P2P payment use case scenarios
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 12
48% are likely to use at least 1 of the 7 P2P use case scenarios…
… 21% are likely to use the majority (at least 4 of 7) of the scenarios
21%
48%Likely to use P2P
52%Not
likely to use P2P
10%1 of 7
10%2 of 7
7%3 of 7
7%4 of 7
6%5 of 7
3%6 of 75%
7 of 7
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 13
16%
18%
19%
22%
25%
31%
33%
19%
23%
28%
25%
28%
41%
51%
Purchasing items from a garage sale or flea market
Paying your babysitter, house sitter, etc.
Splitting the mortgage or rent
Splitting a dinner bill
Splitting the cost of a gift
Sending money out of the country
Sending money to a son or daughter in college
Definitely/probably would use with "does not apply to me" removed
Definitely/probably would use
Likelihood to use P2P payments with “does not apply to me” removed
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 14
Younger consumers are clearly much more receptive …
… Receptivity increases slightly with income
Sending
money to a
son or
daughter in
college
Sending
money out of
the country
Splitting the
cost of gift
Splitting a
dinner bill
Splitting the
mortgage or
rent
Paying
babysitter,
house sitter,
etc.
Purchasing
items from a
garage sales
or flea
market
% Likely to Use 51% 41% 28% 25% 28% 23% 19%
18 - 24 153 166 185 185 171 164 173
25 - 34 108 122 128 129 123 134 125
35 - 44 91 98 93 99 101 114 109
45 - 54 92 87 77 85 72 78 89
55 - 64 89 67 84 56 73 51 57
65 & over 62 52 44 48 37 48 40
Under $50,000 93 95 97 96 102 99 89
$50,000 - $99,999 101 96 101 103 91 93 109
$100,000 and over 122 125 109 106 118 121 116
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 15
P2P Payments: Benefits & features most important to consumers
Craft your marketing communications around these points:
Trusted brand behind the P2P service
Online access to complete and secure payment history
Able to easily send a payment in only 2 – 3 clicks
Recipient receives funds electronically within a few moments
Flexibility regarding funding account (DDA or credit card)
Ability to send/receive payments with email address or mobile phone #
Reduces need to write & mail checks and carry cash
27% rated the ability to send P2P payments using their mobile phone
as an important feature
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 16
Computer Mobile Phone
Online
Banking
Bill
Payment
Online
Banking
Bill
Payment
Sending money to a son or daughter in
college33% 34% 55% 63%
Sending money out of the country 31% 33% 55% 70%
Splitting the cost of a gift 25% 27% 51% 63%
Splitting a dinner bill 22% 21% 46% 61%
Splitting the mortgage or rent 19% 19% 41% 51%
Paying your babysitter, house sitter, etc. 18% 23% 48% 61%
Purchasing items from a garage sale or flea
market16% 17% 32% 44%
Mobile banking consumers will be the early adopters
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 17
Type of Mobile Device Owned
Total Survey
PopulationFlip Phone
Slider,
Candy Bar
Smart
phone
Sending money to a son or daughter in
college33% 28% 32% 46%
Sending money out of the country 31% 25% 34% 44%
Splitting the cost of a gift 25% 21% 25% 40%
Splitting a dinner bill 22% 14% 20% 32%
Splitting the mortgage or rent 19% 14% 17% 30%
Paying your babysitter, house sitter, etc. 18% 19% 20% 35%
Purchasing items from a garage sale or
flea market16% 13% 17% 25%
Smartphone owners are the most receptive
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 18
Discussion topics
P2P Payment Concept Test
ePayment Portal Concept Test
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 20
Almost half of consumers would likely use the ePayment Portal
Definitely would not use
10%
Probably would not use
10%
Might or might not use31%
Probably would use29%
Definitely would use20%
Percentage of consumers likely to use ePayment Portal if
offered with current online banking and bill pay service
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 21
70% would likely use P2P payment services within the Portal
38%
45%
49%
62%
66%
70%
75%
88%
Have credit card charged for a P2P or bill payment instead of checking account
Purchase and/or load value onto a gift card
Have debit card charged for a P2P or bill payment to earn debit card rewards
Transfer money to an account I have at a different FI
Receive electronic bills instead of paper statements
Send a P2P payment
Make emergency bill payment to avoid a late fee
Make a bill payment
Payment types likely to use in the ePayment Portal, among those who expressed interest in the Portal
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 22
Computer Mobile Phone
Online
Banking
Bill
Payment
Online
Banking
Bill
Payment
Likelihood of using the ePayment Portal 49% 53% 76% 83%
Likelihood of accessing the ePayment Portal with your mobile phone
16% 25% 59% 74%
Mobile banking consumers will be the early adopters of the ePayment Portal
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 23
ePayment Portal: Benefits & features most important to consumers
Craft your marketing communications around these points:
Convenient -- can make all payments and transfers from one
central location
Online access to complete history of all payment types
Safe and secure because it’s offered through my FI
A time saver
Reduces need to write & mail checks
Reporting tools to help me budget and spend within my means
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 24
Customer incentives/rewards may drive increased ePayment Portal adoption
10% 10%
31%29%
20%
8% 8%
15%
24%
45%
Definitelywould not
use
Probablywould not
use
Mightor mightnot use
Probablywould use
Definitelywould use
More or less likely to use the ePayment Portal
Likelihood to use Likelihood to use with rewards
49% likely to use
the Portal
69% likely to use
the Portal if offered
an incentive
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 25
1%
3%
3%
5%
6%
7%
75%
Coupons/discounts from online retailers
Reduced fees on deposits and/or loans at the bank
Coupons/discounts from retail stores in your community
Preferred interest rates on on deposits and/or loans at the bank
Travel awards
Loyalty points that can be redeemed for merchandise
Cash back awards
Rewards and Incentives consumers identified as most valuable to encourage ePayment Portal use
Cash back awards are the most desired incentive
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 26
Some consumers may switch FI’s to obtain the ePayment Portal
Definitely would switch
10%
Probably would switch
24%
Might or might not switch
34%
Probably would not switch
22%
Definitely would not switch
10%
Among consumers interested in the ePayment Portal, 34% would be willing to switch to a FI that offers the Portal
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 27
Leveraging the research insights:Conclusions and action items
Integrate P2P payments within your online banking and bill-
payment applications
– Emphasize simplicity, payment velocity and recordkeeping
Many of the consumers receptive to the P2P and the ePayment
Portal concepts are Gen X and Y
– Leverage social media to raise awareness and encourage utilization
– Utilize the viral aspects of P2P payments to encourage customers to
build payee lists
Rewards or incentives are not necessary to attract the early
adopters to P2P and the Portal
– But use of rewards/incentives (specifically cash-back rewards) should
be considered to encourage later adopters
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 28
Integrate P2P payments and ePayment Portal services with your
mobile banking services
– Incorporate them into your new mobile banking rollouts
Focus on driving adoption among today’s active mobile banking
and bill pay consumers
– Twice as likely to adopt as traditional online banking and bill payment
consumers
– More forgiving of early rollout glitches than later adopters
Target and market to consumers who own the latest mobile device
technology, in particular Smartphones and iPhones
– Develop apps that enable transactions within 2 or 3 clicks and easy
access to payee lists and transaction history.
Leveraging the research insights:Conclusions and action items
© 2010. All rights reserved Page 29
Contact information
eCom Advisors provides executive consulting and research services to banks, billers, vendors and
investors in financial services technology and online banking, billing and payments. Our
consultants possess 175+ years of direct operating experience, and are considered leading experts
in the industry. We help executives make their most crucial ecommerce management decisions.
Paul McAdameComAdvisors
One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300
Westchester, IL 60154
708.449.7743(office)
630.865.3135 (cell)
Atlanta office
Columbus office
Boston officeChicago office
3340 Peachtree Rd. NE
Atlanta, GA 30326
404.848.7709
5650 Blazer Parkway
Dublin, Ohio 43017
614.734.8372
95 Washington St.
Canton, MA 02021
781.784.1663
1 Westbrook Corp. Cntr.
Westchester, IL 60154630.865.3135