Report - Mayor's Task Force on Housing Affordability: 2012 Oct 2 › 20121002 › documents ›...

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

Report Date: September 25, 2012 Contact: David McLellan Contact No.: 604.871.6939 RTS No.: 9762 VanRIMS No.: 08-2000-20 Meeting Date: October 2, 2012 TO: Vancouver City Council

FROM: Deputy City Manager

SUBJECT: Final Report from the Mayor's Task Force on Housing Affordability

RECOMMENDATION

A. THAT Council receive the final report from the Mayor’s Task Force on Housing Affordability (Bold Ideas Towards an Affordable City), including the results of the re:THINK HOUSING competition and the web-based Place Speak survey attached as Appendix B, and thank the members of the Task Force for their work.

B. THAT Council direct staff to implement the action plan in Appendix A, including immediate action to undertake a business plan and feasibility study for a City Housing Authority.

C. THAT Council direct staff to begin immediate implementation of Action 1,

providing an interim rezoning policy that allows for consideration of rezoning applications immediately in certain specific existing residential or mixed use areas (not industrial, office or mixed employment areas) as outlined in 1.2 below.

REPORT SUMMARY This Council report presents the final report from the Mayor’s Task Force of Housing

Affordability (Bold Ideas Towards an Affordable City) for Council consideration, which includes a summary of the results of the re:THINK HOUSING competition and the web-based Place Speak survey. This staff report also seeks Council direction to implement the priority City actions identified in the body of the report and in the attached priority action plan (Appendix A).

RR-2

Final Report from Mayor's Task Force on Housing Affordability - 9762 2

COUNCIL AUTHORITY/PREVIOUS DECISIONS

Council passed a resolution to establish a Mayor’s Task Force on Housing Affordability in December 2011, which was to provide recommendations to Mayor and Council for priority actions that may be taken by the City to create low-income housing, affordable rental housing, and affordable home ownership.

CITY MANAGER'S/GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS The Mayor’s Task Force on Housing Affordability has been a vital initiative that will

assist the City in developing solutions to one of our most significant challenges. Many hours of inquiry and discussion, plus the years of experience of Task Force members, have produced a notable report that has many good recommendations for Council. This report seeks Council direction to prioritize the actions the City will take in response to the Task Force report, ensuring that staff can focus their attention and resources most effectively in implementation.

REPORT Background/Context

The City of Vancouver’s core mission is “to create a great city of communities which cares about its people, its environment and the opportunities to live, work and prosper.” Challenges with housing affordability and homelessness have emerged as significant barriers to achieving this mission. Over the past several years, Council has made rapid progress in addressing these challenges, particularly in reducing street homelessness and encouraging the supply of affordable market rental housing. In July 2011, the City’s Housing and Homelessness Strategy was adopted, outlining actions to address housing affordability across the housing continuum. The Strategy included two key goals:

1. End Street Homelessness by 2015 2. Increase affordable housing choices for all Vancouverites

In December 2011, Council passed a resolution to create the Mayor’s Task Force on Housing Affordability. The mandate of the Task Force was to examine conditions that exist in Vancouver which may act as barriers to the creation of affordable housing, the steps necessary to protect existing affordable housing, and to identify opportunities for increasing the supply of affordable housing. The Task Force sought to:

Develop innovative recommendations from an evidence-base that will help Vancouver become a more sustainable, diverse, and affordable city

Focus on affordability solutions for those households with moderate incomes (which currently range from $21,500 to $86,500)

In June 2012, following several months of research, analysis, facilitated discussion and input from various sources, the Task Force published an Interim Report. The Interim Report outlined four key recommendations for Council, housing stakeholders and the public to consider:


Increase the supply and diversity of housing; Enhance the City’s and the community’s capacity to deliver affordable rental and

social housing; Protect the existing social and affordable rental stock, and explore opportunities to

renew and expand that stock; and, Streamline and create more certainty and clarity in the regulation process, and

improve public engagement. Following the publications of its Interim Report, the Task Force considered public feedback on the report through a variety of strategies including:

The re:THINK HOUSING ideas competition A web-based Place Speak survey of the community on the recommendations in the

report The final report from the Task Force, attached as Appendix B, incorporates several of the ideas generated through the public engagement. In particular, two concepts that were popular with the public and the Task Force jury that judged the re:THINK competition are included in this Council report as priority actions (Thin Streets and Co-Housing). A summary of the re:THINK HOUSING ideas competition and of the Place Speak survey are included in the Task Force final report.

Strategic Analysis The final report of the Mayor’s Task Force on Housing Affordability proposes four primary recommendations, each with several implementation actions and approaches associated with them. Some of the recommendations suggest relatively minor changes that will enable the delivery of greater housing diversity and affordability, while others propose fundamental changes to the way the City does business. Some recommendations are relatively quick and straightforward to implement, while others are complex and will unfold over a period of several years. Staff recommends that Council consider and accept the final report from the Task Force. Staff also seek Council direction to implement the priority action plan included as Appendix A. The following sections present the final recommendations of the Mayor’s Task Force, followed by the priority actions the City will take to implement them, pending Council approval. Recommendations of the Mayor’s Task Force on Housing Affordability This section outlines the four high level recommendations of the Task Force, excerpted from its Final Report. These recommendations remain largely unchanged from the Interim Report of the Task Force, which received generally positive public feedback. Task Force Recommendation 1: Increase supply and diversity of affordable housing

Density increases in appropriate locations create important opportunities to enhance housing affordability and diversity. The City should accelerate planning programs that increase density in large developments (e.g. Marine Gateway, South East False Creek,


East Fraser Lands) and transit oriented locations, and those that increase housing diversity in residential neighbourhoods, including the creative use of underutilized city land, such as streets. Improving housing affordability and diversity should be a primary focus of these planning initiatives.

Task Force Recommendation 2: Enhance the City’s and the community’s capacity to deliver affordable rental housing and social housing

Create a new City-owned entity to deliver affordable rental and social housing by using City lands. Mobilize the community to support affordable housing through community land trusts and alternative financing models.

Task Force Recommendation 3: Protect existing social and affordable rental and explore opportunities to renew and expand the stock

Protect existing non-profit, social and co-operative housing that may be under threat and continue to protect the affordable market rental stock using the community planning process to focus on strategies to repair, renew and expand the stock neighbourhood by neighbourhood.

Task Force Recommendation 4: Streamline and create more certainty and clarity in the regulatory process, and improve public engagement

Enhance certainty, efficiency and transparency of approval processes and clarify regulations in order to reduce development costs and enhance affordability.

City of Vancouver Action Plan: Implementing the Recommendations of the Mayor’s Task Force on Housing Affordability This section outlines a City of Vancouver Action Plan and describes the priority actions that the City will take to implement Task Force recommendations, pending Council approval. These actions were drawn from the Task Force final report and are considered to be those that should be given a high priority as they will have the greatest impact on affordability. The Action Plan includes two types of actions:

1. Priority Actions for Immediate Implementation – these actions have the potential to make a significant contribution to housing affordability and can be initiated quickly. They were identified as high priorities by the Task Force members.

2. Additional Actions for Implementation – these actions are no less important than the

Priority Actions, but require additional work and time to implement and complete (i.e. 2 to 5 years).


1. Priority Actions for Immediate Implementation:

Action 1: Implement an Interim Rezoning Policy that increases affordable housing choices across Vancouver’s neighbourhoods

Immediately implement an Interim Rezoning Policy that allows for consideration of rezoning applications in certain specific existing residential or mixed use areas (not industrial, office or mixed employment areas) as outlined in 1.2 below. The policy will be able to provide immediate and on-going opportunities for affordable housing.

The intent of this Interim Rezoning Policy is to encourage innovation and enable real examples of ground-oriented affordable housing types to be tested for potential wider application that will provide on-going housing opportunities. This policy will demonstrate the “transition zone” concept identified by the Task Force, where ground-oriented affordable housing types provide a transition between higher density arterial streets and single family areas. The Interim Policy will be published in a bulletin and made available on the City website.

Rezoning applications will be considered when the following criteria regarding affordability and form of development are met:

1.1 Affordability

Projects must demonstrate an enhanced level of affordability beyond that provided through the delivery of a generally more affordable housing type alone. Applicants will be expected to demonstrate their ability to maximise the level of affordability in the project. Projects that would be considered are:

where 100% of the residential floor space is rental housing where units are sold for at least 20% below market value and include a secure

mechanism for maintaining that level of affordability over time (e.g. resale covenant, 2nd mortgage, etc.)

innovative housing models and forms of tenure such as co-housing, when they can demonstrate enhanced affordability as determined by the City

where a Community Land Trust model is employed to secure increasing affordability over time.

AND

1.2 Form of Development/Location

Subject to urban design performance (including consideration of shadow analysis, view impacts, frontage length, building massing, setbacks, etc.) and demonstration of a degree of community support, projects that would be considered are: Within approximately 100 metres of an arterial street (i.e. 1.5 blocks), ground-

oriented forms up to a maximum of 3.5 storeys, which is generally sufficient height to include small house/duplexes, traditional row houses, stacked townhouses and courtyard row houses.


Fronting on arterials that are well served by transit and within close proximity (i.e. a five minute walk or 500 metres) of identified neighbourhood centres and local shopping areas, mid-rise forms up to a maximum of 6 storeys

Staff recommends that the interim policy be reviewed with a report back to Council after 20 rezoning applications are processed. At that point, staff may make recommendations to expand or revise the criteria above in order to enhance housing options and affordability. If approved by Council, this policy would replace the Neighbourhood Housing Demonstration Project. As such, the Neighbourhood Housing Demonstration Project policy will be repealed.

Action 2: Implement the Thin Streets concept identified through the re:THINK HOUSING ideas competition

Identify and implement at least one Thin Streets pilot project through each of the Community Plans currently underway in the Marpole, Grandview-Woodland and the West End (in the West End, the concept will likely be implemented using lanes rather than streets). In addition to providing more affordable housing, Thin Streets projects may contribute to traffic calming and neighbourhood improvement. In communities that are not currently undergoing community planning, the City will develop a process through which Thin Streets projects can be initiated, possibly building on the City’s Green Streets program.

Action 3: Develop an operational and organizational model for a City Housing Authority, including a business plan.

This work will outline a new operational and organizational model for a City-owned Housing Authority, and will provide detailed analysis of the implications of this approach for the City, including:

- Guiding Principles – what are the principles that will guide the City’s role in housing?

- Mandate - what is the role of the Housing Authority? - Governance - how will it be structured and how will decisions be made? - Assets and Financing - what will it own and how will it access funding? What

will be its capacity to raise capital? What are the tax implications of the Housing Authority model?

- Leadership and Staffing - what types of positions/people does it need to be successful?

Action 4: Use current community planning programs to increase the supply of affordable housing

The City will ensure community plan processes currently underway in the West End, Grandview-Woodlands, Marpole and the Downtown Eastside identify areas appropriate for growth and enable those areas to generate affordable housing through density increases.


These plans should also maximize the opportunity to create transition zones between arterials and single family neighbourhoods through these planning programs, and in Phase 3 of the Cambie Corridor Plan.

Action 5: Revise and clarify Council’s inclusionary housing policies (i.e. the 20% Policy) to emphasize a flexible and creative approach to the delivery of affordable housing in large developments.

The intent of this inclusionary housing policy is to create opportunities for affordable housing when large site rezonings occur. The priority for this policy will continue to be to secure at least 20% of the units in large developments as social housing for low-income households, pending the availability of funding through CACs and other sources at the time of rezoning. When sufficient funding to achieve 20% of units as social housing is not available in a timely way, the City will consider flexible options to achieve a minimum of 20% of units as affordable housing for low to moderate income households, including, but not limited to:

Market rental housing owned and operated by a non-profit housing provider; Market rental housing that is privately owned and operated; Innovative housing models that can demonstrate a significant level of

affordability (e.g. affordable homeownership models). Clear title to a site that could accommodate 20% of the units in the

development as affordable housing in cases where the City has a reasonable expectation of being able to develop the site in a timely way;

Offsite provision of affordable housing.

The application of these options will be at the City’s discretion, and emphasis will continue to be placed on the achievement of social housing for low-income households wherever possible.

This policy is consistent with Council’s Sustainable Large Development Rezoning Policy and is intended to provide more clarity to applicants applying for rezoning of large sites under that policy.

Action 6: Identify additional City-owned lands that may be underused and undertake planning work to bring these sites forward for affordable housing development.

The identification of the next phase of City sites for affordable housing will be undertaken following the completion of the current RFEOI/RFP process for affordable housing on City land (More Homes: More Affordability project). The current RFEOI/RFP process is expected to inform future affordable housing initiatives on City land. Planning work is required to ensure the potential of these sites is maximized. This planning work can be done through area plans, or through site specific rezonings initiated by the Director of Planning, depending on the context of the City-owned lands.


2. Additional Implementation Actions:

Action 7: Increase housing supply and options in strategic locations throughout the City

Staff will develop and initiate planning programs that have the greatest potential for contributions to affordable housing supply. Prioritization of areas for planning programs will begin immediately and will be integrated with the work on the Regional Context Statement (RCS). The RCS will start to identify a framework for future planning in the City and will be complete by Summer 2013. Detailed Terms of Reference for the programs will also be reported to Council prior to the start-up of each program. These programs will focus on delivering housing supply and affordable options at key transit nodes and corridors, identified neighbourhood centres and local shopping areas. Planning work will focus not only on the specific station sites and arterials, but on carefully defined transition zones adjacent to the key areas of change. In these “transition zones”, opportunities for ground-oriented housing that scales down from higher density forms on and near arterials to adjacent single family neighbourhoods will be explored. It is expected that housing forms identified in the Community Visions, as well as the new housing types being created through the Norquay Neighbourhood Centre Plan will inform this work. The programs will be aligned with other City initiatives including the Housing and Homelessness Strategy, Greenest City Plan, Economic Action Strategy, Healthy City Strategy, Regional Context Statement and social development goals. Further, the Terms of Reference are expected to signal the City’s expectations with regards to financing amenities in potential new areas of development. It is expected that these planning initiatives will be launched following the completion of the current Community Plan programs at the end of 2013. This timeline fits well with the current work on the Regional Context Statement and allows the existing Community Planning teams to be redeployed to these new planning initiatives, which will benefit from lessons learned during the current Community Plans.

Action 8: Increase the supply of additional secondary rental units

In order to increase the supply of secondary rental units, the City will undertake the following initiatives:

Expand the laneway house initiative to allow laneway houses in additional single family zones (RS zones)

Explore the feasibility of laneway houses in duplex zones (RT zones). Expand the zoning districts and housing forms in which secondary suites are

permitted to include additional ground oriented housing types (e.g. duplexes, row houses, etc).

Consult with industry on revisions to the Vancouver Building Bylaw, requiring all new ground oriented housing to be built “suite ready.” Pending the outcome of the consultation, implement the necessary revisions Vancouver Building Bylaw amendments.


Action 9: Create opportunities for the development of more co-housing projects

In conjunction with the co-housing projects that will be considered under the Interim Rezoning Policy identified in Action 1, the City will review and explore removing regulatory barriers to the development of additional co-housing projects.

Action 10: Enhance the City’s family housing requirements to encourage more 3 bedroom units in new development

The City will update and expand its current family housing guidelines to stipulate the inclusion of homes with 3-plus bedrooms in developments, particularly in lower floors of projects where they will be more affordable. Since the inclusion of 3-bedroom units has financial impacts on projects, the City will explore cost offsets to facilitate the development of more 3-bedroom units.

Action 11: Support the development of Community Land Trusts (CLT) and new financing mechanisms

The City will work with partners to support existing community land trusts and explore opportunities to establish new community land trusts. The Mayor’s Task Force on Housing Affordability defines a CLT as, “a community-based non-profit corporation created to acquire and hold land over the long term for the benefit of a community and provide secure affordable access to land and housing for community residents”.

The City will similarly work with key financial and community partners to explore new social financing mechanisms and opportunities.

Action 12: Evaluate the impacts of expiring federal operating agreements and develop options to preserve affordability and take advantage of opportunities to renew and expand the stock

The City will work with partners to evaluate the impact of expiring federal operating agreements on non-profit and co-operative housing and analyse options for mitigating impacts, including identifying redevelopment opportunities. For projects on City-owned land, criteria for evaluating the optimal use of City land to leverage housing opportunities will be established, including negotiating lease rates with non-profits in order to protect affordability and engaging with government and non-profit partners to find solutions.

Action 13: Evaluate the City’s rental protection regulations (Rate of Change)

The current rental protection regulations will be evaluated through the Community Plan process currently underway and at a City-wide level, with the goal of preserving affordability and housing stability, while identifying opportunities to renew and expand the stock.


The evaluation will include a consultant study to identify and test potential retention and redevelopment scenarios. The study should further the City’s understanding of the following: - economic feasibility of rental retention and replacement options - comparative levels of affordability achievable in new units vs. levels preserved

through investment or maintenance of existing units - the anticipated rate of redevelopment and impact on tenants Following the evaluation, the City will develop new or amended rate of change policies and guidelines for Council to adopt (these could be included in the community plans or created as separate policy). As part of the work to preserve and upgrade the existing rental housing stock, the City will also explore the establishment of new financial tools (e.g. a revolving loan fund with partners) for the upgrading and maintenance of rental buildings, with an emphasis on sustainability and liveability.

Action 14: Develop and implement rezoning and permit process improvements

The City will develop and implement improvements that recognize the priority nature of projects which meet the City’s Affordable Housing goals, including creating inter-departmental teams, running concurrent rezoning and development processes whenever appropriate, utilizing project facilitation services, exploring alternate public notification processes including social media, and increasing clarity during the community amenity contribution process. This action is aligned with the Vancouver Services Review project to improve Permitting and Licensing processes at the City, and will benefit from the work underway through that project.

Action 15: Take steps to provide applicants more certainty in the City’s approach to financing the infrastructure and amenities needed to accommodate growth.

Where a community planning policy is implemented using a privately initiated site-specific rezoning approach, the City will explore areas where the CAC amount can be pre-determined prior to the rezoning process, in combination with a negotiated CAC approach where it continues to be appropriate. Where community planning policy is implemented using a City-initiated, district schedule rezoning approach: identify areas where a new district schedule could use a density bonusing system

to achieve public benefits and seek Council direction to develop a pilot project for implementation of this district schedule.

monitor the outcomes of development projects to determine what effect this zoning approach has on the speed and pace of redevelopment compared to non-bonus density zones and to what extent the certainty and associated cost savings are passed on to new occupants.

This staff report and the attached Action Plan outlines the City’s priorities for implementing the recommendations of the Mayor’s Task Force on Housing Affordability. However, the Task


Force report recommends several innovative concepts that are not specifically included in this report (e.g. building on top of transit stations, encouraging the use of new construction methods and materials, etc.). These concepts will continue to be considered through the implementation of the Action Plan in the City’s ongoing work on affordable housing and community planning. Implications/Related Issues/Risk (if applicable)

Financial The proposed action steps discussed in this report are within the City’s jurisdiction and can be mostly integrated into existing work programs and processes. For example, the community plans already underway in four neighborhoods provide an excellent platform to operationalize the recommendations of the Task Force. These community plans are expected to complete by the end of 2013. At that time, community planning teams can be re-deployed to the next planning initiatives, identified as having the greatest potential for affordable housing delivery. The result of these planning initiatives will then inform future initiatives, where efficiencies can be adopted. The Action Plan timing and resource requirements are contained in Appendix B. If this Action Plan is approved by Council, where applicable, implementation will be built into the City’s long-term financial planning processes, such as the 10-year Capital Strategic Outlook, 3-year Capital Plans and operating budgets. CONCLUSION This Council report presents the final report from the Mayor’s Task Force on Housing Affordability (Bold Ideas Towards an Affordable Future), including the results of the re:THINK housing competition and the web-based Place Speak survey. Based on the Task Force report, the priority actions set out in this Council report are considered by staff to be the priority actions the City can take at this time to improve housing affordability.

* * * * *

A

P

Action

#

City o

PRIORITY ACTIO1 Implem

that inchoice

2 Implem

3 DeveloorganiHousin

4 Use cuprograafford

5 ReviseinclusiPolicy)

f Vancouver Pr

ONS FOR IMMEDment an Interimncreases affordaes in Vancouver’

ment the Thin S

op an operationzational model

ng Authority

urrent communiams to increase able housing

e and clarify theionary housing p) to enhance fle

riority Actions

DIATE IMPLEMEm Rezoning Policable housing ’s neighbourhoo

Street concept

nal and for a City-owne

ity planning the supply of

e City’s policies (20% exibility

Project Start

NTATION cy

ods

Immediate

Immediate

ed Q4 2012

Underwa

Immediate

Project Completio

ely Ongoin

ely Q4 201

2 Q4 201

ay Q4 201

ely Q1 201

on

Key Deliv

g Affordablprojects ienabled

3 At least 3underway

3 Options rCouncil

3 New comadopted waffordablpolicies

3 Adopt newpolicy forrezonings

verable

le housing immediately

3 pilot projects y

report to

munity plans with clear le housing

w inclusionary r large s

Priorit

Work Alread

Rezoning poCouncil cons

Community Marpole, GrWoodland a

Terms of Reconsultant sdrafted

Community Marpole, GrWoodland aEnd; Phase Corridor PlaCorridor PlaExisting 20%through OffiDevelopmenand rezoninprojects

tyActionP

dy Underway

olicy drafted forsideration

Plans in randview-nd the West En

eference for study has been

Plans in randview-nd the West 3 Cambie

an; Broadway an % policy appliedficial nt Plan Areas ngs of major

Plan

Link to HouHomelessneGoals

r Expand planto enhance housing opt

d

Expand planto enhance housing opt Increase hodiversity uti Pursue a neto improve housing deli

Expand planto enhance housing optenabling act10 year targmarket rent

A key enabldeliver our for social anhousing

using and ess Strategy

nning framewor affordable ions


using supply & ilizing city land

ew business modaffordable ivery

nning framewor affordable ions; A key tion to deliver ogets for social atal housing ing action to 10 year targetsnd market renta

1

rk

rk

del

rk

our and

s al

A

6 Identifthat mplanniforwardevelo

ADDITIONAL IM7 Increa

strateg

8 Increasecond

9 Create

developrojec

10 Enhancrequir

fy additional Cimay be underuseng works to brird for affordablopment

MPLEMENTATIONase housing suppgic locations th

ase the supply odary rental unit

Expand lanewadditional singExplore feasibhousing in dupExpand the zohousing formssuites (e.g. roConsult with irevisions to BB“suite readine

e opportunities opment of morects

ce the City’s faements

ty-owned land ed and begin ng these sites le housing

N ACTIONS ply and options roughout the C

of additional ts ay housing to gle family zonebility of lanewayplex zones oning districts a for secondary

ow houses) ndustry on BL to require ess”

for the e co-housing

mily housing

Immediate

in ity

CommencQ1 2014

s y

and

Underwa

Immedia(through

pilot projectsQ1 2013

ely Q2 201(upon

completiof curre

RFEOI/RF

ce 4

TBD

ay Q1 2013lanewa

house repback

Additionwork tofollow

immediat

te h

s)

TBD

3 Q1 201

3 ion nt FP)

Next phafor affordconfirmed

Next areaprogramsclear hou

3 - ay port

nal o

w tely

Laneway secondarypermittedground or

Dependenidentified

4 Review ofcompleterecommeenhancem

se of City sites dable housing d

a planning s initiated with using objectives

housing and y suites d in additional riented housing

nt on needs d through pilots

f guidelines e; Council endations for ments

Priorit

Identificatiowith potentaffordable hongoing

s

DevelopmenContext Stainform prior(completion

g

Work alreadexpand lanenew single fdistricts

s Privately iniapplication Housing prosubmitted High DensityFamilies witguidelines a

tyActionP

on of City sites tial for housing is

nt of Regional atement to rities n Q2 2013) dy underway to eway housing tofamily zoning

itiated rezoning for a Co-oject has been

y Housing for th Children are in place

Plan

Increase hodiversity uti

A key enabldeliver our for social anhousing

o

Expand planto enhance housing opt

g Encourage aacross all nethat enhanc Ensure housdiverse pop

using supply & ilizing city land

ing action to 10 year targetsnd market renta


a housing mix eighbourhoods ces quality of lif

sing needs of ouulation are met

2

s al

rk

fe

ur t

11 SuppoCommfinanc

12 EvaluafederaCity-le

13 Evaluaregula

14 Developermit

15 Take scertainfinancamenigrowth

rt the developmunity Land Trusing mechanisms

ate the impacts al operating agrease expiry and

ate the City’s reations (Rate of C

op and implemet process impro

teps to providenty in the City’sing the infrastrties needed to h

ment of sts and new s

of expiring reements and develop option

ental protectionChange)

ent rezoning andovements

e applicants mors approach to ructure and accommodate

Immedia

ns

Immedia

n Underwa

d Underwa

re Underwa

te Ongoin

te Q2 201

ay Q4 201

ay Ongoin

ay On-goin

g Partners to use CLdevelop nfinancing

3 Risk assescomplete

3 Council recommeenhancemChange re

g P&L redecomplete

ng Appropriadeterminnegotiatedensity bapproach

are empoweredLT model and new social g tools

ssment ed

endations for ments to Rate oegulations

sign process e

ate use of pre-ed CACs,

ed CACs, and bonus hes

Priorit

d Discussions with existinLand Trusts

Social housiproject; Nelease renew

of

Consultant s

Permits andprocess redeunderway

Implementeexisting plan(e.g. Comm

tyActionP

with partners g Community

ng inventory egotiations on wals

study underway

d Licensing esign is

ed through nning programs

munity Plans)

Plan

Provide strosupport par

Support parhousing stab

y On-going prexisting ren

Increased efcertainty suprofit and ppartners

s Increased efcertainty suprofit and ppartners

ong leadership atners

rtners to enhancbility

rotection of thental stock

fficiencies & upports our nonprivate sector

fficiencies and upports our nonprivate sector

3

and

ce

e

-

-

Mayor’s Task Force on Housing aFFordabiliTy

bold ideas Towards an aFFordable ciTy

APPENDIX B

02 ForewordbytheCo-Chairs

04 TheChallenge

07 EnhancingAffordability

08 TaskForceRecommendations

24 PublicConsultationandFeedback

28 re:THINKHousingIdeasCompetition

34 SummaryandNextSteps

36 Appendices

THe Mayor’s Task Force on Housing aFFordabiliTy aiMs To Make VancouVer a More liVeable, susTainable, and aFFordable ciTy.

A messAge from the tAsk force co-chAirs

02 mAyor's tAsk force on housing AffordAbility 2012

dear citizens of Vancouver,

OnbehalfoftheMayor’sTaskForceonHousingAffordability,itiswithpleasurethat

wepresentourfinalreport.Webegantoexplorehousingaffordabilitytogetherback

inJanuary2012,producedaQuickStartsreportinMarchandaninterimreportinJune.

Ourfinalreportrepresentstheculminationofourworkonthemosteffectivewaysto

improveaffordabilityinVancouver.

Weknowthatmanypeopleacrossawiderangeofincomesfaceaffordabilitychallenges

inourcity,fromthosewithlittleincomeandnohousingtothosewithahigherincome

butwhostruggletofindaffordable,suitableandadequatehousing.Wehavefocused

oureffortsonaddressingaffordabilityforlowtomiddleincomehouseholdsinVancouver,

includinglowerincomesinglesandcoupleswithcriticalneedsforsuitablerental

accommodation;singlesandcouplesstrugglingtobuytheirfirsthome;familieswith

childrenwantingtoliveinthecityratherthanhavingtomovetothesuburbs;and

empty-nestersandseniorswishingtodownsizetheirhomeswithouthavingto

leavetheirneighbourhoods.

TheTaskForcefocusedonaffordabilitysolutionsformoderateincomehouseholds

earningbetween$21,500andacombined$86,500butacknowledgedthathousing

challengesfacedbylowincomehouseholds(earninglessthan$21,500)continueto

beacriticalpublicpolicyconcernforalllevelsofgovernment.However,itnotedthat

theCity,alongwithothernon-profitandgovernmentpartners,isalreadystrongly

committedtoactioninthisareathroughrecommendationsadoptedbyCouncilin

itsHousingandHomelessnessStrategy.Thesehouseholdsatthelowestendofthe

incomerangearenotthemainfocusofthisreport.

Ourfinalreportbuildsonourearlierpolicyrecommendationsbyincorporatinginput

fromthere:THINKHousingIdeasCompetition,aswellastheonlinepublicsurvey.

Boththecompetitionandthesurveyprovidegoodindicationsofthetypesofhousing

peoplewanttoseeinVancouverandthedifferentwaysinwhichwecanachieveit.

Webelievethatthisreportprovidesablueprintforbothshortandlong-termpolicy

directionstosignificantlyincreaseaffordablehousingoptionsinVancouver,and

encourageCityCounciltoembracetherecommendationsandtakeactiononthe

mostpressingpolicyissueinVancouvertoday–thelackofaffordablehousing.

Yourssincerely,

Mayor gregor robertson & olga ilich

Co-Chairs,Mayor’sTaskForceonHousingAffordability

03

imAge to come...

Vancouver faces severe housing challenges:

½ VancouverhasthehighesthousingpricesinCanada,andthevastmajorityofhouseholdsinVancouverhaveincomeswellbelowthoserequiredtopurchaseevenamodestcondo.

½ Vacancyratesintherentalstockarechronicallylow,averagingjust0.9%overthepast30years.

½ Themajorityofthecity’spurpose-builtrentalstockwasbuiltinthe1960sand1970sandisbadlyinneedofrenewal.

½ Nearly40%ofVancouverhouseholdsspendmorethan30%oftheirincomeonhousing.

½ Thesituationisevenmoreseriousforyounghouseholdsdecidingwheretosettledownandraiseafamily.Nearly50%ofhouseholdsheadedbypeopleundertheageof34spendmorethan30%oftheirincomeonhousing.

TheTaskForcerecognizesthathomelessness,lowincome

andsupportivehousingcontinuetobecriticalissuesfacing

Vancouver.TheCity’s Housing and Homelessness Strategy

2012–2021 outlinesanapproachtoaddressingtheseissues

andsignificantprogressisbeingmade(e.g.thecompletion

of563newsocialandsupportivehousingunitssince2010

andanadditional1,411unitsalreadycommittedorunder

construction).

Vancouveralsoneedsarangeofhousingoptionsforits

middleandmoderateincomeearners–thosemaking

between$21,500(singleincomehousehold)andup

to$86,500peryear(forbothsingleanddualincome

households).Formanyofthesehouseholds,incomesare

toolowtobeabletoaffordthecostsofownership.Low

vacancyratesandrisingrentalratesmeanthatevenfinding

affordablerentalhousingisachallenge.Peopleandfamilies

inthisincomerangehavebeenthemainfocusofthework

oftheTaskForce.

HowVancouveritesdecidetoaddressthesechallenges

isfundamentaltothefutureofourcity.Shouldwesimply

letthemarketdecidewhatkindofcitywewantandwho

getstolivehere?Orshouldwetaketheactionsneeded

toincreasethediversityofaffordablehousingoptions,

andmaintainthevibrancy,diversityandeconomic

competitivenessofourcity?ThisTaskForcebelieves

thatwecanandshouldtakeactiontocreatemore

affordablehousingforfuturegenerationsinVancouver.

the chAllenge


Housing and HoMelessness sTraTegy: Housing conTinuuM

shelters non-market rental (social Housing)

condossros Purpose -built rental

other ownership

supportive Housing

secondary suites

rented condos

ending homelessness rental housing ownership

Mayor’s Task Force on Housing affordability

’’John Tylee DirectorofPolicy&Research,VancouverEconomicCommission.

“Vancouver’seconomydependsonattractingandretainingtalent.Affordablehousingofalltypes,includingmarketrental,isessentialtotheCity’scurrentandfuturecompetitiveness.


07

enhAncing AffordAbility

Onewaytoimprovehousingaffordabilityistoincreasesupplyandcompetitionbetweenhousingproviders.Manyoftheinitiativesidentifiedinthisreportseektoincreasethesupplyofhousingthatcanbedeliveredatalowerpricepoint.Lowerdevelopmentcostsonlytranslateintolowerpricesandrentswhenthereissufficientsupplyandcompetitioninthemarketplace.

CurrentlyinVancouver,housingexistsintwo

majorforms–singlefamilyhomesonsinglelots

andapartmentbuildings(largelystrataandsome

purpose-builtrental).Thereislittleinthecontinuum

ofhousingbeyondthesetwoformstomeettheneeds

offamiliesandsmallerhouseholds.Anumberofthe

initiativesproposedinthisreportspeaktotheneedto

broadenthechoicesofhousingform,achievegreater

densityand,byextension,increasethediversityand

affordabilityofhousing.

Ourregulatoryframeworkdoesnotallowmanyof

thechoicesinhousingformfoundacrossthecountry

andevenwithintheMetroregion.Rowhouses,

stackedtownhousesandotheroptionssuchas

lanewayhousingthataddresstheneedsoffamilies

toaccessgreenspaceathomeandliveincomplete

neighborhoodsareapriorityidentifiedbytheTask

Force.AcrossVancouver,therearemanyareaswhere

thisdiversityofhousingtypeswouldbeagoodfit

ifzoningweremorepermissive.

Similarly,increasingdensityinmixed-useareas

withanemphasisontransit-orienteddevelopment

providesmanybenefits,includinglowertransportation

costs,proximitytojobs,andeasyaccesstopublic

amenitiessuchaschildcare,schools,parks,aswellas

destinationssuchasshops,restaurantsandservices.

Otherinitiativesoutlinedinthereportseektoachieve

immediateandlong-termaffordabilitybyincreasing

rentalstock.Here,theCitycantakestepstolockin

affordabilityforthelongterm,usingbothfinancial

andregulatorytools.

TheviewoftheTaskForcewasthatsimplifying

land-useregulationswhereappropriate,and

facilitatingamoreflexibleandcreativedialogue

betweendevelopersandtheCitywillresultin

morehousingdiversitythatcanhelpsolveour

affordabilitychallenges.

tAsk force recommendAtion 01

increase suPPly and diVersiTy oF aFFordable Housing


09

density increases in appropriate locations create

important opportunities to enhance housing affordability

and diversity. The city should accelerate planning

programs that increase density in large developments

(e.g. Marine gateway, southeast False creek, east Fraser

lands) and transit-oriented locations, and those that

increase housing diversity in residential neighbourhoods,

including the creative use of underutilized city land, such

as streets. improving housing affordability and diversity

should be a primary focus of these planning initiatives.

increase housing choice in low density residential areas

TheReportfromtheRoundTableonBuildingFormand

Design(theGellerReport)recommendsincreasingthe

supplyofseveraldifferenttypesofhousingtobroadenthe

choices,especiallyforfamilieswithchildren.TheCityshould

implementzoningandregulatorychangestoencourage

thesehousingforms:

½ addingmoretransitionzones,similartoNorquay

NeighbourhoodCentre,thatscaledownfromhigh-density

housingneararterials,commercialcentresandtransithubs

toground-orientedmediumdensityhousing(e.g.stacked

townhouses,rowhouses,townhouses,etc.)inthetransition

zoneadjacenttosingle-familyneighbourhoods.

½ Identifyopportunitieswheredensificationthroughsuch

housingformsastownhouses,rowhousesorstacked

townhouses,mightbeappropriateinlow-density

residentialareas.

½ Createopportunitiesforsecondarysuitesandlaneway

housesinsuchatransitionzone,andelsewhere,toensure

thatnewmedium-densityhousingcontributestooptimizing

affordabilityforrentersandhomeowners.

½ Incentivizeaminimumstandardofsuite-readystatus

inallnewground-orientedhousing(single-familyhomes,

medium-densityhousingwhereappropriate),makingit

easierforhomeownerstoaddsecondarysuites.

increase supply in locations with good transit links

TheCity’sSecuredMarketRentalHousingPolicyrecognizes

theimportanceofrentalhousingintransit-orientedlocations.

TheCityshouldaccelerateplanstoincreasedensityintransit-

orientedlocationsandrelatedneighbourhoodcentres,witha

focusonachievinghousingaffordabilityandfamilyhousing

(afocuson3+bedroomunits).Thisworkshouldbuildon

theCambieCorridorPlan,whichrequires20%market

rentalhousingforanyrezoningalongthecorridor.

a creative inclusionary housing policy

TheTaskForcerecognizesthatdevelopingnewcomplete

communitiesonlargesitesprovidesperhapsthebest

opportunitytoincreasethesupplyofaffordablehousing.

TheTaskForcediscussedanumberofopportunitiesto

enabledifferentkindsofhousinginlargedevelopments

throughpartnershipsbetweentheprivatesector,non-profit

sectorandtheCity.Amorecreativeinclusionaryhousing

policyformajorprojectsshouldbedevelopedtoensurethat

developersofnewneighbourhoodsarerequiredtoprovide

eitherrentaloraffordableownershipunitsinamixthatbetter

matchesthebroadneedsofthecommunity,particularlylow

andmoderateincomehouseholds.

TheCity’scurrentinclusionaryzoningpolicyrequires

developerstosetaside20%oflandforaffordablehousing.

Whilethisapproachcreatestheopportunityforaffordable

housingdevelopment,overthepastdecadesithasdepended

onseniorgovernmentfundingtobuildtheaffordablehousing

units,fundingwhichoftenhasnotmaterialized.Inthecontext

ofthecurrentfiscalclimateatseniorlevelsofgovernment,

adifferentapproachwillbeneededtodeliveraffordability.

01 increase suPPly and diVersiTy oF aFFordable Housing

Task Force recoMMendaTions


identify underutilized land for creative housing options

There:THINKHousingIdeasCompetitiondrewanumber

ofsubmissionsthatofferednewwaystousecitylandfor

developingnewaffordablehousing.Theproposalfor

“ThinStreets”,whichwonaTaskForceJuryaward,provides

awaytointroducemodesthousingdevelopments,suchas

duplexesandrowhouses,intosingle-familyneighbourhoods

byusingunderutilizedcitystreets.TheCityshouldidentify

opportunitiesforaThinStreetspilotproject,ideallythrough

theexistingneighbourhoodplanningprocesses,toenable

thisproposal.

other ideas for increasing housing supply and diversity of affordable housing:

Expandopportunitiesforhousingpartnerships,focusing

onentitiesthathavepotentialorunderusedland(e.g.

churches,healthcarefacilities,post-secondaryinstitutions,

etc).ContinuetobuildontheworkoftheCity’sSecure

MarketRentalHousingPolicythatincentivizesconstruction

ofpurpose-builtrentalunitsthroughadensitybonus,DCL

waiver,parkingrelaxationsandotherregulatorytools.

Explorethefeasibilityofenablingthedevelopmentof

rentalhousingwithincertainlimitedareascurrentlyzoned

forindustrialuse,suchasthewesternedgeoftheFalse

CreekFlatsthatisadjacenttoasignificantnumberof

publicamenitiesaswellasrapidtransit.TheTaskForce

acknowledgedthestrongCouncilcommitmentand

regionalpolicyinplacetoprotecttheviabilityofexisting

job-producingspace.However,therearesomelocations,

wellservedbytransit,whichcouldcontributetotheviability

oftheindustriallandsbyprovidingaplaceforaffordable

rentalhousingtargetedtopeoplewhoworkorstudynearby.

Asabalancetothisapproach,theTaskForcesuggested

thattheCityshouldalsoexploreopportunitiestointroduce

appropriateemploymentspaceinresidentialareasthatare

ontheedgesofcommercialandindustrialareas.

Beopenmindedandexpandtheopportunitieswhere

newhousingsupplycanbesituated:buildontopof

existingbuildings(includingcivicfacilities);lookinto

conversionsofunderusedparkinglotsorthedevelopment

ofsecondarysuitesfromancillaryandstoragespacein

existinghousingstock.

Acrossalloftheseoptions,takeintoaccountfamilyneeds

andotherconsiderationssuchasaccessforpeoplewhoface

mobilityissuesandotherchallenges.GivenVancouver’s

changingdemographics,theCityshouldconsidersetting

atargetofunitsinlargenewdevelopmentsthatarefully

accessibleforpersonswithdisabilities.

affordability considerations:

Thisrecommendationhaspotentialforasignificantimpact

onhousingsupplyandaffordability.Itwillincreaserow

housesandtownhousesforfamilies,includesecondary

suitesinmoretypesofhousingandcouldenable

opportunitiesforsocialhousingandlong-termaffordable

marketrentalhousing.

11


enHance THe ciTy’s and THe coMMuniTy’s caPaciTy To deliVer aFFordable renTal and social Housing


13

create a new city-owned entity to deliver affordable

rental and social housing by using city lands. Mobilize

the community to support affordable housing through

community land trusts and alternative financing models.

enhance the city’s capacity to deliver affordable rental and social housing

TheCity’sconsiderablelandassetsareacriticalcomponent

inaddressingtheaffordabilitychallengeandoverthe

last50years,citylandhasplayedakeyroleinenabling

affordablerentalhousing.TheCityshouldleaselandata

nominalfeetofacilitatethecreationofnewsocialhousing

andnewaffordablerentalhousing.City-ownedlandshould

bebroughtforwardtotestthelevelofaffordabilitythatcan

becreatedbythenon-profitandprivatesectorsworking

togetherusingCitysites.Thesesitesshouldpreferablybe

smallerandmedium-sizedsites,whicharezonedandready

togo,enablingaquickerdeliveryofunits.Afair,openand

transparentprocessshouldbeusedtoidentifypotential

non-profitandprivatepartners.Basedontheexperience

oftheShortTermIncentivesforRental(STIR)program,

andwiththeadditionalcontributionoflandatnominal

costthroughalong-termlease,theTaskForcefeelsthat

theCitycanuserigorouscriteriatoevaluateproposalsand

partnershipsdesignedtoachievesustainedaffordability.

Followingafullevaluationoftheunitsandlevelof

affordabilityachieved,theCitycouldestablishanongoing

programforcommitmentoflandthroughlongtermleases

forthecreationofsocialandaffordablerentalhousing.

ItisencouragingtoseethattheCityhasalreadybegun

anRFEOIforsixsitesofcity-ownedhousingtobeleased

fornewaffordablehousing,andshouldcontinuethis

processinthefuture,withadjustmentsbasedonthe

firstRFEOIasneeded.

TheCityshouldbeproactiveinmeetingtheaffordable

housingneedsofthecommunitybycreatinganewCity-

ownedhousingentitytofacilitatedevelopmentofsocial

andaffordablehousing.ACity-ownedentity,suchasa

HousingAuthority,couldenabletheCitytodeliveronits

objectivesforsocialandaffordablerentalhousing.While

ultimatelyresponsibletoCityCouncil,itwouldbegoverned

byitsownboardwithaclearmissionstatementtodevelop

socialandaffordablehousingwithinacertainrangeof

affordability.Therearenumerousexamplesofmunicipalities

acrossCanadathathaveestablishedsuchanentity(Metro

Vancouver,Edmonton,Winnipeg,andTorontoforinstance).

Thisentityshouldbeanarm’s-lengthsubsidiarycompany

thatwouldbegivenamandateandauthoritytoactasa

catalystandfacilitatorforaffordablehousingdevelopment

onbehalfoftheCity.Theauthorityshouldhavetheabilityto:

½ respondnimblytoemergingpartnershipopportunities

withtheprivatesector,non-profitsocietiesandsenior

governments.

½ consolidatealloftheCity’snon-markethousingportfolio

underoneadministrativeentity,streamliningand

standardizingoperations.

½ channelCitycapitalgrantstonot-for-profithousing

societiesforprojectssupportingaffordablehousing

anddecreasinghomelessness,and

½ usetheskillsofanexperiencedBoardtooptimizethe

returnontheCity’sinvestmentinthiscriticalareaof

publicpolicy.

Mobilizing the community for affordable Housing a community land Trust

Acommunitylandtrustisanon-profitcorporationcreated

toacquireandholdlandoverthelongtermforthebenefit

ofacommunityandprovidesecureaffordableaccessto

02 enHance THe ciTy’s and THe coMMuniTy’s caPaciTy To deliVer aFFordable renTal and social Housing


mAyor's tAsk force on housing AffordAbility 201214

landandhousingforcommunityresidents.Asuccessful

modelleveragesdonationsoflandandfundingfrom

privateandnon-profitpartnerstostimulatethecreation

ofaffordablehousingoptions.Itwouldbemanagedbyan

independentboardofdirectors.TheCity’srolewouldbeto

removeobstaclestothesuccessofsuchanapproach,offer

policysupportasneeded,andpartnerwhenappropriate.

Typicallyalandtrustcouldacquireandassembleland,

andalsobethebeneficiaryofrevenuestreamsgenerated

bytheselectivesaleoflandandassets. alternative financing

ThedeliveryofaffordablehousinginVancouvercould

befurtherenhancedbythedevelopmentofnew

financingmechanisms.Newandevolvingmodelsshould

beinvestigatedforcommunity-basedfinancingagencies

foraffordablehousingthroughpartnershipswithnon-

profits,foundations,unions,religiousorganizationsand

philanthropicindividualstodeterminepossibleapplication

withinVancouver.Typicallythesepartnershipsprovide

long-termandinexpensivecapitaltocreatenewhousing,

toundertakesubstantiverenovationsofexistingstock,

orprovidere-mortgagingoptions.Suchpartnershipsact

asethicalinvestmentvehicles,committedtoproviding

financingatlessthanmarketreturnsfornon-profits

undertakingaffordablehousingprojects.

other ideas that could enhance the city’s and community’s capacity to deliver affordable rental and social housing:

Reviewandidentifyanyregulatorybarrierstothecreation

ofnewco-housingdevelopments,particularlythosegeared

towardsseniors.

LobbythroughtheBigCityMayor’sCaucusandUBCM

forfederalandprovincialtaxincentivestoenablethe

developmentofnewmarketrentalhousingandadvocate

tofederalandprovincialgovernmentsforsufficient

fundingforsocialhousing.UsetheCity’sinfluence

toworkwithseniorgovernments,pensionfunds,

privatefinancialinstitutions,privatedevelopersand

non-profitsocietiestosecuresourcesoflowinterest

financeandcapitalforaffordablehousing.Work

withimmigrantandinvestorcommunitiestoexplore

waystochannelaportionofoverseasandinward

investmenttowardcreatingaffordablehousing


½ LeasingCity-ownedlandatnominalratesremoves

akeybarriertohousingaffordabilityintheCity–

thehighpriceofland.

½ AnewhousingentitywithanexpertBoard,charged

withmanagingandcreatingsocialandaffordablerental

housing,couldbuildunitsforresidentsacrossabroad

incomerange.

½ Acommunitylandtrustcouldenablethecreationof

affordablerentalandleaseholdownershipoptionsfor

moderate-incomehouseholdsasasupplementto

Cityandothergovernmentefforts.

½ Acommunity-based-financingagencycouldprovidelower

borrowingratesthatcouldlowerprojectcosts.Accessto

affordablefinancingisacriticalelementofenablingnew

affordablehousingandinvestmentintoexistingunits.

15


ProTecT exisTing social and aFFordable renTal Housing and exPlore oPPorTuniTies To renew and exPand THe sTock


17

Protect existing non-profit, social and co-operative

housing that may be under threat and continue to protect

the affordable market rental stock using the community

planning process to focus on strategies to repair, renew

and expand the stock neighbourhood by neighbourhood.

03 ProTecT exisTing social and aFFordable renTal Housing and exPlore oPPorTuniTies To renew and exPand THe sTock

Protect existing non-profit, social and co-operative housing

Replacinglostaffordablehousingcanbeexpensive

comparedtothecostoffixingitup.TheCityshould

proactivelyworkwithpartnerstofindwaystoenable

upgradingtheaffordablehousingstockbeforethese

buildingsfallintodisrepairanddemolitionbecomesthe

onlyoption.ThemajorityoftheCity’s24,000social,

non-profitandcooperativehousingunitswerebuiltduring

the1960s,1970sand1980s.Manyofthesehousingprojects

aresubsidizedbyfederalgovernmentoperatingagreements,

withthemajorityoftheseagreementsscheduledtoexpire

by2025.

Aconsiderableamountofthishousing(suchasSouth

FalseCreekandChamplainHeights)wasdevelopedon

Citylandunder60yearleases.Manyoftheseproperties

havelessthan25yearsremainingontheirleases,a

challengingsituationasmostfinancialinstitutionswill

notfinancepropertiesthathavelessthan25yearsof

remainingleasetime.Thispreventsneededinvestment

byownersincapitalmaintenanceoftheirunitsand

buildings,thusfurtheracceleratingthedegradationof

thehousingstockandreducingthemarketabilityofthe

units.Thisissuehasbeencompoundedbybuilding

envelopefailureinsomeoftheseproperties.

Strategiesneedtobedevelopedthatdealwiththerenewal

ofthisimportantaffordablerentalhousingstock.Thekey

componentsofanapproachinclude:thecompletionofan

inventoryofallnon-profithousingbyageandconditionto

allowprioritizationofrenewal;examinationofthemeritsof

leaseextensionsandaforumforconsultationwithaffected

partiesthatfocusesonsolutions.

PartnershipmodelsinvolvingtheCity,thedevelopment

community,co-opsandnon-profithousingsocietiesthat

arenearingtheendoftheirmortgagesmayberequiredto

bothrenewoldstockandaddadditionalaffordablehousing

units.Thiscouldbeachievedinanumberofprojectsthrough

infillandcarefullyphasedredevelopment,whileworkingto

protectaffordability.



continue to protect the affordable market rental stock and explore opportunities to repair, renew and expand the stock through community plans

Usecommunityplansasanopportunitytoexploreways

torepair,renewandexpandtheCity’saffordablemarket

rentalhousingstockbytestingthefeasibilityofanumber

ofmaintenance,renovationandredevelopmentscenarios

inareaswhererateofchangeregulationscurrentlyapply

(e.g.RM,FM,andCD-1zones).Thescenarioswouldtypically

relyonthecreationofadditionalbuildingarea(density)

tofundreinvestmentorreconstructionoftherentalhousing

stock.Scenariostoexploreincludeupgradingandrepairing

existingunits,one-for-onereplacementwithnewrental

units,increasingtherentalstockwithmorethan

one-for-onereplacement,andimprovingaffordability

throughone-for-onereplacementwithsocialhousing.

RateofChangeRegulationswerefirstadoptedin1989in

responsetothelossofmorethan2000rentalunitsover

afive-yearperiodthroughdemolitionandconversionto

condominiums.Thecurrentrateofchangerequiresanynew

developmentonasiteofsixormorerentalunitstoreplace,

onaoneforonebasis,alloftherentalunits.Replacement

canbedoneeitheronoroff-site.Withoutthecurrentrate

ofchangepolicy,anestimated14,200unitswouldbeat

riskofredevelopmentby2019.

ThesuccessofRecommendation3willrelyonan

appropriatelyphasedrenewaloftheexistingrentalstock,

toavoiddisplacementoftenants,particularlylowerincome

households.ThedevelopmentofCommunityPlans,currently

underwayinfourdifferentcommunitiesacrossthecity,isan

opportunitytoexploretheseoptions.

Manyofthesehousingprojectsare

subsidizedbyfederalgovernment

operatingagreements,withthe

majorityoftheseagreements

scheduledtoexpireby2025.


Existingpurpose-builtrentalstockisanimportantsource

ofaffordabilityformoderateincomeresidents.Thechallenge

forthecityistofindwaystorenewandexpandthisstockin

awaythatwillminimizetheimpactoncurrenttenantsand

maintainaffordabilityoverthelongterm.

19


sTreaMline and creaTe More cerTainTy and clariTy in THe regulaTory Process, and iMProVe Public engageMenT


21

enhance certainty, efficiency and transparency of

approval processes and clarify regulations in order to

reduce development costs and enhance affordability.

04 sTreaMline and creaTe More cerTainTy and clariTy in THe regulaTory Process and iMProVe Public engageMenT Processes

Fast-track applications for affordable rental housing

Increasecertainty,efficiencyandtransparencyofthe

approvalprocessbystreamliningby-lawsandprocessing.

TheCityshouldbuildontheTaskForceQuickStart

recommendationstoprioritizeprojectsthatdelivergreater

affordability.Delaysthroughthedevelopmentprocesscan

addsignificantlytocostsandanexpeditedprocesscan

generateprojectsavings.

improve public consultation and engagement

Significanteffortsshouldbemadetodevelopsustained

publicsupportfortheeffortstocreatemoreaffordableand

socialhousing.Innovativeandinclusivestrategies,including

theuseofsocialmedia,place-basedpollingandinputalong

withvariousformsofdialogue,videoandprintmaterial,

shouldbeusedtoconveysocialobjectives,understand

publicopinionandbuildsupportforspecificinitiatives.

create more certainty in charges on new development

TheCityshouldconsiderrequestingaVancouverCharter

changetoallowdevelopmentcostleviestocoverawider

rangeofcommunityamenitiessuchasrecreationaland

culturalfacilities.ThiswouldreducetheCity’sreliance

onCommunityAmenityContributions(CAC)tofundthe

amenitiesrequiredtosupportgrowthintheCity.Inthe

absenceofsuchlegislativechange,theCityshouldestablish

fixedCACcontributionstofundsuchamenitieswherever

practicalastheclaritythisbringsinthedevelopment

approvalprocessissignificant.Amorestandardized

approachwouldprovidecertaintytothedevelopment

communityregardingprojectcosts,reducingrisksand

possiblyresultinginlowerfinancingcosts,thus

enhancingaffordability.

TheCityshouldexaminethebroaderuseof‘density

bonusing’thatallowsforprescribedincreasesindensity

withinanexistingzoningbylawinexchangeformeeting

specifiedconditions(e.g.providingaffordablehousingor

otherpublicbenefits).Theexpansionofdensitybonusing

shouldbeinalignmentwithneighbourhoodplans,and

wouldprecludetheneedforarezoningwhichsignificantly

increasestheuncertaintyandthetimeforprocessing

affordablehousingproposals.



AdopttheModelNationalEnergyCodeofCanada

forBuildings(MNECB)andgivedesignerstheoption

offollowingeitherASHRAEorMNECB.

Lookformethodstoremovebarrierstoinnovation

anddesign,butmaintainsafety,including:

½ Usingsprinklersasanalternativetosomeofthe

existingfiresafetyrequirements.

½ Encouragingmorehousinginlanewaysbyproviding

addressesforlanesandlookingintowaysofmaking

surefiretruckshaveaccess(includingconsideration

ofsmallervehicles).

½ Resolvinganyissuesarounddesignandcreation

ofstackedtownhomes.

½ Permittingtheuseofnewerbuildingmaterialsandusing

performance-basedratherthanprescriptiverequirements

whereappropriate.


Lowerdevelopmentcostsonlytranslateintolowerprices

andrentswhenthereissufficientsupplyandcompetition

inthemarketplace.Reducingdevelopmentcostswillnot

necessarilytranslatedirectlyintolowerhousepricesand

rentswithoutspecificmechanismstoensurethosesavings

arepassedontopurchasersandrenters.Itwill,however,lead

toagreatersupplyofabroaderrangeofhousingtypesand

allowmorehouseholdsandfamiliestoliveinVancouver.

other ideas to streamline and create more certainty and clarity in the regulatory process and improve public engagement processes:

DevelopaNEXUSPass-typesystemforapplicants

whohaveaproventrackrecordofsuccessfulprojects.

Thiscouldincludeallowingsuchapplicantstohire

third-partyconsultantstosign-offplansintheearly

stagesonanapplication.

ContinuetoupdateCityofVancouvertechnologyto

supportanefficientpermittingprocessandprovide

ongoingtrainingtoCitystaffandapplicantsonbylaws

andapprovalprocesses.

AmendtheVancouverBuildingBylawforbothnewand

retrofittedbuildingstocodifyalternativesolutionsinregular

usethatarecurrentlyresolvedonacase-by-casebasis.

Thiswouldimproveprocessingtimesforbuildingpermits

aswellasreducethecostofengagingprofessionalservices

tosupportthepermitapplication.

23

TheCityshouldbuildontheTaskForceQuickStartrecommendationstoprioritizeprojectsthatdelivergreateraffordability.

wHen asked abouT THe rePorT’s recoMMendaTions:

city involvement

Support for proactive city involvement in managing

Vancouver’s housing market was reported at 84% across

all neighbourhoods,with100%supportinArbutus-Ridge,

Dunbar-Southlands,Fairview,Grandview-Woodland,

Kensington-CedarCottage,Kerrisdale,Killarney,Marpole,

Oakridge,SouthCambieandVictoria-Fraserview.

Housing needs

Survey respondents reported freehold townhousing/

row housing, 3+ bedroom market rental, and laneway

housing to be the three most-needed accommodation

types in their neighbourhoods. Byneighbourhood,

townhouses/rowhouseswerereportedasneeded

inDowntown,Dunbar-Southlands,Hastings-Sunrise,

Kerrisdale,Kitsilano,MountPleasant,Renfrew-Collingwood,

Shaughnessy,Victoria-Fraserview,andtheWestEnd.

Theneighbourhoodsreportinghighestneedfor

3+bedroommarketrentalpropertieswereFairview,

Grandview-Woodland,Kerrisdale,Kitsilano,MountPleasant,

RenfrewCollingwood,RileyPark,Strathcona,and

Victoria-Fraserview.

Anumberofotheraccommodationtypeswerehighlighted

asurgentlyrequiredinthegeneralcommentssectionsofthe

surveys.Thesewereco-operativehousing,live/workspaces,

sharedequityhousing,non-stratarowhousing,affordable

senioraccommodation,socialhousingandco-housing.

Increasing the provision of co-operative housing appeared

to have widespread support from many respondents.

Thesituationofseniorswasalsohighlighted,bothinterms

oftheneedforaffordablerentalpropertiesforretirees,

andalsotheproblemofarisingpropertytaxburden

onseniorswhowishedtostayintheirownhomes.

FollowingthereleaseoftheTaskForce’sInterimReportinJune,aPlaceSpeakonlinesurveywasestablishedtoallowmembersofthepublictoprovidefeedbackontheReport’srecommendations.Thesurveywasopenfortwomonths,and151surveyswerecollectedfromlocalresidents,providingasmallsnapshotofhousingaffordabilityopinionsinVancouver.Thefollowingisasummaryofthesurveyresults;completesurveyresultsareincludedintheappendix.

24

PlAcesPeAk housing tAsk force survey rePort


25

using city land

There was strong support that some of the city-owned

land should be targeted for middle income ($21,500-

$86,500) housing, with 83% of respondents reporting

strong/moderate agreement.Therewasminimalvariation

acrossneighbourhoods.Therewereanumberofcomments

regardingthepricebandsandcut-offsformoderatehousing

reportedinthesurveys,withsomerespondentsconsidering

theuppercut-offlow.Morethanonceitwasmentionedthat

afamilywithchildrenon$86,000wasundersignificantly

morefinancialpressurethanano-childrenfamilyonthe

sameincome.

developing around transit hubs

There was 85% strong/moderate agreement reported for

housing developments to be identified around transit hubs,

withminimalneighbourhoodvariation.Commentswere

maderegardingbetterbikeandwalkingprovisions,live-work

spaces,andcreativeintegrationofhousingandamenities

alsobeingimportant.

requiring moderate income housing in new developments

There was 80% strong/moderate agreement reported

across respondents for requiring new housing developments

to provide more moderate-income housing.Therewerealso

suggestionsfromrespondentsthattargetinghousingforkey

serviceworkers,suchasnursesandfirstresponders,should

beconsidered.

Family accommodation requirements

There was approximately 78% agreement reported in

favour of a requirement for new developments to include

3+ bedroom housing in their provisions. Themostreported

interestinthisideawasinDunbar-Southlands,Fairview,

Hastings-Sunrise,Marpole,Oakridge,Renfrew-Collingwood,

RileyPark,Shaughnessy,Strathcona,Victoria-Fraserview,

WestPointGrey.

secondary suite readiness

78% of all respondents thought new housing should be

“suite ready”. Thisrecommendationwasmostfavoured

byrespondentsfromArbutus,Downtown,Grandview-

Woodland,Hastings-Sunrise,Kensington-CedarCottage,

Kerrisdale,Marpole,Oakridge,Renfrew-Collingwood,South

Cambie,andVictoria-Fraserview.Itwasleastfavouredby

respondentsreportingfromDunbar-Southlands,Fairview,

Killarney,RileyPark,ShaughnessyandWestPointGrey.

additional suggestions

Thesinglebiggestissueraisedregardingaffordable

accommodationinVancouverwastheperceivednegative

influenceofforeigninvestmentdrivingupprices.Concerns

werealsoexpressedthatdevelopersprioritisedprofitin

theirprovisionsandhadcreatedaglutofcondosand

luxuryhousingwhenmoremodesthousingwasthepriority.

Developmentandrentcontrolswerementioned.

Intermsoffuturedevelopmenttherewerecallsforrealism,

bothintermsofprivatespaceexpectations,aswellas

parkingprovisionrequirements.Therewereviewsexpressed

regardingtheimportanceofprotectingandimprovingpublic

greenspaceprovisionswithinthecity,soastoreducethe

needforprivategreenspaces.Itwasalsosuggestedthatthe

parkingrequirementprovisionsonnewdevelopmentswere

toohighandplacedanunnecessaryupwardpressureon

newpropertyprices.


Household income

Just over half of all respondents reported being from

households with an annual income of $21,500 – $86,500.

37%ofsurveyrespondentsreportedanannualhousehold

incomeofmorethan$86,500,andinthelowerincome

bracket,Dunbar-SouthlandsandGrandview-Woodland

yieldedsignificantnumbersreportinghousehold

incomesbelow$54,000.

Type of Housing

Market rental and home ownership were the typical

reported tenures with over 80% of respondentsacross

Vancouverfallingequallyintooneorotherofthese

groups.Co-operativelivingwasreportedat6.5%.

Reportedaccommodationsizesrangedfrombachelor-

typesuitestohousesof+3bedrooms,withover50%

ofrespondentsreporting1-2bedroomaccommodation.

affordability of accommodation

Over 46% of all survey respondents reported that 30%

or less of household income was spent on rent or a

mortgage,whileapproximately22%ofrespondents

reportedthattheywerespendingmorethan40%

oftheirhouseholdincomeonrentoramortgage.


Public consulTaTion and Feedback

who gave us feedback?

data sample

Intotal,publicopinionwasvoicedfromacross21

neighbourhoodsofVancouver,rangingfromWestPoint

GreytoKillarney.Reporteddemographicsrevealedanage

rangeof20+toover65,witha45:55maletofemalesplit.

The majority of respondents reported living in a two adult

household without children. Approximatelyaquarterof

respondentsreportedlivinginfamilieswithoneor

twochildren.

27mAyor's tAsk force on housing AffordAbility 2012

Winnerswereselectedbybothajurycomprisedofmembers

oftheMayor’sTaskForceonHousingAffordability,aswell

asbythepublicthroughonlinevoting.Injusttwoweeks,

8,000voteswerecastonline.

ThesubmissionswereevaluatedbytheJuryaccording

tothefollowingcriteria:

affordability: forlowtomiddle-incomehouseholdsin

Vancouver,definedasanindividualhouseholdincome

of$21,500toacombinedhouseholdincomeof$86,500.

green space:mustmaintainorenhancepublicaccessto

greenspace,andshouldadvancecityobjectivesrelated

toGreenestCity2020goals.

Public land:Anyideaspremisedontheuseofpublicland

mustincludetheabilityforpubliccontrolandownership

toremaininplace.

neighbourhood integration: shouldfindwaysofcreatively

connectingwithnatural,historical,andculturalelements

ofneighbourhoods.

community needs: meetthehousingneedsofpriority

groups:

½ lower-incomesinglesandcouplesneedingsuitablerental

accommodation;

½ singlesandcouplesstrugglingtobuytheirfirsthome;

½ familieswithchildrenwhowanttoliveinthecity;and

½ empty-nestersandseniorswishingtodownsizeand

remainintheirneighbourhood.

Financial viability: Ideasshouldbedeliverablewithout

thesaleofpubliclandorfinancialincentives,andenable

long-termaffordabilitywithoutgovernmentsubsidy.

Feasibility:Proposalsfornewformsorsitesofaffordable

housingcanbeinitiatedandbuiltwithinthreeyears,with

preferencegiventothosethatrequire18monthsorless.

TheTaskForceJurywasimpressedwiththenumberof

submissionsandtheparticipationintheonlinevoting.

Whilefewoftheideastouchedonallofthecriteria,there

wasagoodrangeoflargeandsmallscaleproposals–many

ofwhichcouldplayaroleinhelpingtoimplementtheTask

Force’srecommendations.Pickingawinnerineachcategory

waschallengingbecausetherewereseveralideasthatwere

verygoodorsimilarinnature.Inreviewingtheresults,we

arefocusingonthekindsofsubmissionsthatweremade

andwaysinwhichmanycanbemovedforwardtoward

implementationtohelpachievetheCity’sgoals.

re:think housing An oPen ideAs comPetition

InMay2012theCityofVancouverlaunchedanopenideascompetitiononaffordablehousingcalledre:THINKHousing.Duringatwomonthperiod,closeto70applicationsweresubmittedbothlocallyandfromcountriesasdiverseastheNetherlands,Turkey,theUK,Ireland,Austria,Hungary,theUnitedStates,Australia,Singapore,andMexico.


recoMMendaTions FroM THe Jury

alan boniface // nathan edelson // Mark guslits // olga ilich // ken kwan


Wefoundthatmostideasdemonstratedoneormore

ofthefollowingcharacteristics:

½ Creativeuseofpubliclands

½ Innovativeinfillinexistingneighbourhoods

½ Buildingoverexistingdevelopment

½ Alternativeformsofbuildingmanagement

½ Buildingwithdifferentkindsofmaterials

½ Reducingparkingandstorage

Thefollowingisalistofsomeoftheproposalsthatillustrate

theseattributes,andrecommendationsformovingthem

forwardinalignmentwiththeTaskForce’sfinalreport.

creaTiVe use oF Public lands

Itischallengingtocreateaffordablehousinginnew

developmentduetothehighcostsoflandinVancouver.

Thefollowingsubmissionsproposedusingpubliclands,

notonlytoreducehousingcosts,buttoprovideother

importantcommunityamenitiesincludinggreenspace,

foodsecurityandotherservices.

#23 Thin streets: Transformingstreetsintohousingsites

(Jury’sWinner–seebelow)

#37 affordable Housing and Heritage retention:

delamont Park: Infill,heritageretentionandcommunity

spacesalongaportionofaformerCPRrightofway

(Jury’sHonorableMention)

#52 back to school: Developinghousingonornear

schoolgrounds

#111 neighbourhood, affordable housing, green Park:

DevelopinginSouthFalseCreekoverthestreetcarline

along6thAve

next steps

Itissuggestedthatapilotprojectforthe‘ThinStreets’

proposalbeconsideredaspartoftheongoingcommunity

planscurrentlytakingplace.ThinStreetswaschosenas

oneofthreewinningsubmissionsbythejuryduetoits

abilitytobereplicatedacrossthecity,providenewhousing

optionsthatfitwithinsingle-familyneighbourhoods,and

bepartneredwithCityinitiativesalreadyunderway,suchas

the‘StreetstoParks’programtakingplaceinsomeofthe

communityplans.ThelandnecessaryfortheThinStreets

proposalisownedbytheCity,intheformofright-of-ways,

makingitmorefeasibleforprojectdeliverythanother

proposals.

Considerationshouldalsobegiventorequestsfromthe

SchoolBoardorneighboursseekingtodevelopaffordable

familyhousingonornearexistingschoolsgrounds.Over

time,staffshouldalsoreviewthelikelyyieldforaffordable

housingassociatedwithsomeofthespecificareasidentified

inthere-THINKHousingcompetitionincludingDelamont

Park,otherareasalongtheformerCPRRightofWayand

FalseCreekSouth,andreportbacktoCouncilonwhether,

andifsowhen,communityplanningcouldbeinitiated

tofullyexploretheseopportunities.

29

innoVaTiVe inFill in exisTing neigHbourHoods

Thereweremanyproposalstogentlyincreasedensitiesin

singlefamilyneighbourhoods,rangingfromnewdesignsof

buildingstocreativedivisionsofexistinglots.Thediversity

ofideasprovidesarangefortheCitytodrawfromtoenable

targetedformsofdevelopmentthatprovideaffordabilityand

innovativebuildingform.Theseinclude:

#27 Human space: density for community and the

socio-ecological neighbourhood:Usingsidelotstocreate

sharedequityandenableadditionstosingle-familyhomes

(Jury’sWinner-seeabove)

#112 Three degrees of Freedom:locationstofocus

transit-orienteddevelopment(People’sChoiceWinner)

#50 (not) in My back yard: full-sizeddwellingunitunder

courtyard(Jury’sHonorableMention)

#102 courtyard Housing:twohouseson33ftlot;shared

courtyard/watersystems(Jury’sHonorableMention)

#115 The Missing Typologies: Feesimplerowhouse&

33ftlotsidebysideduplex(Jury’sHonorableMention)

#87 urban boardwalk:InfillalongformerCPRrightofway

#20 House idea:foursmallfactorybuiltmodularhouses

on33ftlot

#36 Think small: fourunitsona45x50ftlotinRM-4district

#49 Z House: Zshapedpartywall;sixdwellingunitson33ftlot

#58 re:THink inFill: Keepexistingsinglefamilyhouse;

permitinfillunitonRT-233ftlot

next steps

TheCityshouldreviewtheproposedideasformoderate

increasesindensitiesinexistingneighbourhoods,including

neighbourhoodswherecommunityplansareunderway,

andreportbacktoCounciloutliningthepossibleyieldof

affordablehousing,resourcesrequired,andanyregulatory

changesneeded.Oftheseideas,#27HumanSpace,won

thejuryawardforVibrantNeighbourhoods,PrivateSpace

becauseofitsproposaltousesidelotsforsharedequity,

enablinghomeownerstoinvestinenergyimprovements

andexpansionsofexistinghomeswhilemaintaining

neighbourhoodcharacter.Severalotherswarranted

HonourableMentionfromthejuryastheyuniquely

addressedhousingneedsonalocalscale.Alongwith

astaffanalysis,therecouldalsobeanopportunityto

incorporatesomeoftheseproposalsintoworkdoneon

theTaskForce’srecommendationsforTransitionzones.


building oVer exisTing deVeloPMenT

Itischallengingtoassemblelandforaffordablehousing,

especiallyonsitesthatarewellservedbyrapidtransit.

Therewereseveralproposalstobuildoverexisting

development.SomeoftheseareoverSkyTrainlines;

othersoverstreetsorheritagebuildings.TheTaskForce

isconcernedthatwhatappearstobe“free”landwillface

highcostsforconstructiontoaccommodateservices,

seismicandparkingrequirements.However,suchlocations

couldputmoreworkerswithineasyaccesstojobs,enhance

neighbourhoodcentresandprovidedensityneededtohelp

conserveheritagebuildings.

#56 bridge Housing: Usingdensitybonusingtodevelop

overexistingbuildings(Jury’sWinner-seebelow)

#14 stitch city: Linearhousingovertransitandarterials

#24 captain Helmet: Buildingovertransit,parkinglot

andarterials

#53 Viaduct Village:BuildingoverViaducts

#85 Vangate:BuildingoverSkyTrainlines

next steps

TheCityshouldinitiatediscussionswithTransLinktosee

whethertherearerealisticopportunitiestopilothousing

developmentaboveaportionofoneoftheguideways–

especiallynearSkyTrainStationsthatcouldyieldtransit-

orienteddevelopment.Thejurychose‘BridgeHousing’

asoneofthethreewinnersduetoitsfocusonmedium-

densityadditionstoexistingstructures,whichcould

increasehousingaroundtransithubswhilepreserving

thesocialandculturalfabricofexistingcommunities.

Althoughtherearechallengesfromaconstruction

perspective,theproposalincludesregulatorychange

withintheCity’sscope,suchasdensitybonusing.

Considerationshouldbegiventoproposalsfrom

privatedevelopersonacase-by-casebasistobuild

overotherexistingstructuresfollowingany

opportunitiesidentifiedbyTransLink.

building wiTH diFFerenT kinds oF MaTerials or MeTHods

Therehavebeensignificantbreakthroughsintheuseof

containers,concreteandwoodproductswhenbuilding

multi-unithousing.Someofthesecansignificantlyreduce

thecostsoflabourand/ormaterialsinconstruction;

othershaveresultedingreaterenergyefficiencyand

loweroperatingcosts.Manyoftheseoptionshavebeen

successfullytriedinothercitiesandcanbereadilyapplied

onceregulationsareadjusted;othersareinnovative

andneedtobetestedinVancouver.Thosethatare

successfulmayleadtonewindustrialmethodsthatcould

beproducedaspartofouremerginggreeneconomy.

re:THINKHousingsubmissionsthatinvolvedusing

differentformsofmaterialsincluded:

#83 community condos: Containerhousingontemporary

sites(Jury’sHonorableMention)

#76 cargo Park: ContainerhousingnearCityHall

(People’sChoiceWinner)

#16 going Massive:Usingtimbermassivebuildingmaterials

#63 kits Point:ModularhousingatKitsPoint

#93 existenxe Maximum: Tallanddeepunitsself-built

overtime

#108 Passivhaus: energy-efficientwoodprefabhouses

next steps

TheCityshouldreviewtheproposedideasforusing

newmaterialsandconstructionmethodsandreport

backtoCounciloutliningthefeasibilityoftheiruseinnew

affordablehousingdevelopments.Thisshouldincludean

analysisofhowthevariousmaterialsimpactaffordability,

aswellasoptionsforpilotprojectswithintheCity.

alTernaTiVe ForMs oF building ManageMenT

Withhousingpricesoutofreachforagrowingnumber

ofpeople,thereisamovetowardscreativeoptionsofhome

ownershipandbuildingmanagement.Securityoftenure,

accesstosharedspaceandtheabilitytopreventlandvalue

speculationareconsideredaspreferableattributesbymany

whodonothavethefinancialabilityforoutrightownership.

Variousformsofnon-marketmanagement,including

co-housing,weresubmittedthroughthere:THINKHousing

project.Itisimportanttonotethattwoofthefourpeople’s

choiceawardswenttoco-housingprojects.Someofthe

re:THINKhousingsubmissionsthatinvolvedalternative

formsofbuildingmanagementinclude:

#38 self-Managed low-income Housing: Trainingaddicts

inrecoverytoconstructandmanagetheirownhomes

(Jury’sHonorableMention)

#70 co-Housing with a Twist: Co-housing(common

ownershipofhousing(People’sChoiceWinner)

#89 Home Together: Regulatorychangestoenable

Co-operativeCo-housing(People’sChoiceWinner)

#65 smart sHare housing: Twounitssharekitchen,

diningandlivingrooms

next steps

TheCityshouldreviewtheregulatoryframeworkaround

co-housingandco-operativesandidentifyanybarriersto

enablingthesetypesofdevelopments,aswellashowto

achieveaffordability.AspartoffutureRFEOIsforlong-term

leasesforCityland,theCityshouldconsiderincluding

co-housingorself-managedhousingprojectsinrequests

fornewaffordablehousingprojects.

exPanding coMMuniTy aMeniTies and reducing Parking & sTorage

Thedeliveryofnewcommunityamenitiesiscrucialto

enablingstrong,vibrantneighbourhoodsthroughout

Vancouver.Withstrategicincreasesindensity,particularly

alongarterials,thereisagrowingimportancetodeliver

communityamenitiesthatareaccessibletopeoplewho

donotliveinsingle-familyhomesthathaveaccessto

large,openprivatespaces.Severalre:THINKproposals

werepremisedonaffordabilitythroughamoreinnovative

approachtodeliveringcommunityamenitiesinnew

developments.Theserangedfromreductioninparking

andstoragespace,increasingcourtyardandshared

publicspaces,andenablingmoresharedutilities

andappliances.Someoftheseincluded:

½ #57 VibrenT city:Amalgamatecommunitybenefits

onpublicland

½ #94 Vancouver department of social economics:

Sharingsocialbenefitstoenablelowerhousingcosts

½ #114 smaller Footprint: Sharingappliances,tools,

cars,bikes,andotheritems

next steps

TheCityshouldcontinuetoencourageinnovativeideas

thatimproveaffordabilitythroughsharingofamenities,

vehiclesandappliances,aswellasseekoutopportunities

toreduceregulatoryrequirementsforparkingandstorage,

asappropriate.

conclusion

Re-THINKHousinghasresultedinasignificantnumberof

ideasthattheMayor’sTaskForceofHousingAffordability

juryandthegeneralpublichavefoundtobeworthyof

furtherconsideration.Severaloftheseideaslookpromising

andcouldbepursuedwithlittleifanyregulatorychange;

thosethathavecredibleproponentsandfinancialbacking

shouldbesupportedforimplementation.Othersmightyield

aconsiderableamountofaffordablehousing,butrequire

significantpublicinvestmentorregulatorychange,and

shouldbeassessedtodeterminewhetherandhowthey

mightbestbefacilitatedinatimelyway.Weencouragethe

Citytoactonthesuggestionsasoutlinedbythejury,and

tocontinuetorevisitthesubmissionsinthecomingyears

asawaytoinspirenewideasandsolutionsforaffordable

housinginthefuture.


33

Mayor’s Task Force Jury awards

building bold Public:

#56BridgeHousing–IanMcDonald,Vancouver,Canada

Vibrant neighbourhoods Public:

#23ThinStreets:TurningAsphaltintoAffordableHousing

–ChristinaDeMarco,TedSebastian,CharlesDobson,

Vancouver,Canada

Vibrant neighbourhoods Private:

#27HumanSpace:DensityforCommunityandthe

Socio-EcologicalNeighbourhood–AndrewNeuman,

Vancouver,Canada

Honourable Mentions as selected by the Mayor’s

Task Force Jury:

#83CommunityCondos–TamiReilly,NorthVancouver,

Canada

#37AffordableHousingandHeritageRetention:

DelamontPark–SeanMcEwen,Vancouver,Canada

#38Self-ManagedLowIncomeHousing–LaneWaker,

Vancouver,Canada

#50InMyBackyard–d’ArcyJones,Vancouver,Canada

#102CourtyardHousing:ASustainableCommunityModel

onStandardPrivateLotsinVancouver–CherylWan,

RichmondHill,Canada

#115TheMissingTypologies–RobynFenton,

Vancouver,Canada

PeoPle’s cHoice awards

Atthesametimemorethan8000peopleparticipatedin

anonlinesurveytodeterminethePeople’sChoiceAwards.

building bold – private land

#112ThreeDegreesofFreedom:Atransit-orientedplan

todepressurizehousinginVancouver’ssemi-urbanareas

–TheodoreLimandStephanieLiou,Vancouver,BC

building bold – public land

#76Cargopark–DanielPetrocelli,KavoshMaleki,

ChrisCarrasquillaToronto,Ontario

Vibrant neighbourhoods

– private land

#89HomeTogether,fromtheVancouverAssociationof

CollectiveHousingEnthusiasts–AndrewMartin,Carolyn

Shaffer,SarahRossandTravisClyne

Vibrant neighbourhoods – public land

#70Co-HousingWithaTwist–JoanneLundandCommittee

To view the winning submissions, please visit:

www.rethinkhousing.ca/winners.php

re:THink Housing ideas coMPeTiTion winners

all oF THe recoMMendaTions in THis rePorT sPeak To THe need For THe ciTy To Take an innoVaTiVe and MulTi-Pronged aPProacH To solVing THe issue oF Housing aFFordabiliTy.

ThemembershipoftheTaskForceprovidedarich

sourceofadviceandexperiencefortheCityinitswork

inthisimportantareaofpublicpolicy.Thereisnoone

silver-bulletsolutionand,asisevident,achievingour

goalswillrelyonacombinationofeffectivelanduse

policies,innovativestructuresdesignedtoleverage

expertiseandfunding,andthereductionofunnecessary

expenseintheCity’sregulatoryprocess.

Thisreportprovidesablueprintforthepoliciesand

programstheCityshouldundertake,bothintheshort

andlong-term,toprotectexistingaffordablehousing

andunlockthecreationofnewaffordablesupply.

Giventhenegativeimpactsthatexpensivehousing

hasonourcity–whetheritisforcingpeopleinto

longercommutes,livinginsubstandardhousing,or

limitingeconomicopportunity–weurgeCityCouncil

tobeboldandembracetherecommendationswehave

laidout,withadeterminationtoseethemthrough.

Thehealth,prosperity,andfuturesuccessofourcity

dependsonit.

summAry And next stePs

Acknowledgements

TheworkbytheMayor’sTaskForceonAffordableHousing

couldnothavebeenmadepossiblewithoutsignificant

contributionsfromavarietyofCitystaff,external

organizationsandindividualexperts.TheTaskForcewould

firstliketorecognizetheworkdonebyCitystafftoprovide

researchandanalysisfortheTaskForce’sQuickStarts,

InterimandFinalreports:Dr.PennyBallem,CityManager;

DaveMcLellan,DeputyCityManager;andAbiBond,Dennis

Carr,EdnaCho,CoryDobson,DanGarrison,JimdeHoop,

DiannaHurfordandVickiPotterintheCity’sHousing,

Planning,andSocialPolicydepartments.

Theprocessofoperatingseveralworkinggroupsaswell

astheTaskForceJuryrequiredprofessionalfacilitation

andsageadvice.MembersoftheTaskForcewouldlike

torecognizetheskillfulfacilitationanddirectionfrom

ShaunaSylvesterandDr.LaurieAndersonoftheSFU

PublicSquare,aswellasSeanRuthen,whorepresented

AIBCasaprofessionaladvisertotheTaskForceJury

duringthere:THINKHousingIdeascompetition.

ProvidingoutsideadviceontheTaskForce’spolicy

foundationswerelocaldeveloperandarchitectMichael

Geller,whochairedtheRoundtableonBuildingFormand

Design,aswellasmembersoftheAcademicRoundtable,

whichincludedProf.ErickVillagomez,FounderandPrincipal,

MetisDesign(RoundtableChair);Prof.AnthonyPerl,Director

ofUrbanStudies,SFU;Prof.PennyGurstein,Directorof

SchoolofCommunityandRegionalPlanning,UBC;Prof.

LeslieVanDuzer,DirectoroftheSchoolofArchitectureand

LandscapeArchitecture;Prof.EmeritusMichaelA.Goldberg,

SauderSchoolofBusiness;Prof.EmeritusStanHamilton,

SauderSchoolofBusiness;Assoc.Prof.ElvinWyly,Assoc.

ProfGeographyDepartment,UBC;Dr.ThomasHutton,

ProfessorSchoolofCommunityandRegionalPlanning;

andAndrewYan,BingThomArchitects.TheTaskForce

wouldliketothankthemforvolunteeringtheirtimeand

experiencetoresearchandgatherinformationonhousing

trends,policies,andprogramsfortheFinalReport.

Engagingthepublicinadialogueonhousingissues

involvedabroadgroupoftalentedpartners,andincluded

communityplanevents,anIdeasJam,videos,anon-line

survey,aswellasthelaunch,promotion,andorganization

ofthere:THINKHousingIdeascompetition.TheTaskForce

wouldliketothankandrecognizecommunityplanners

LilRonalds,HollySovdiandAndrewPask;mediaand

onlinepartnersGenWhyMedia,DesignNerds,TruthFool

Communications,MeganSheldon,AdjacentMedia,

SpacingMagazine,PlaceSpeak,andGravit-eTechnologies;

communityeventhostsSteveBurgess,MorganBrayton,

NaomiSteinberg,ElderJoeCalder,ElderVictorGueirn,

andElderStanHumchitt;re:THINKRevealperformersShiral

Tobin,TyeeBridge,LukeBrocki,andEvelynLau;andevent

venuesTheHive,TheWISEHall,DenmanTheatre,Metro

Theatre,andRoundhouseCommunityCentre.Thesupport

oftheseorganizationsandindividualswasinstrumental

forengagingVancouveritesonwhataffordabilitymeansto

them.Overseeingthisworkwerethededicatedstaffinthe

City’sCorporateCommunicationsdepartment,including

MairiWelman,AmandaMitchellandTracyVaughan.

Finally,theTaskForcewouldliketothankallofthemembers

ofthepublicwhotookthetimetoprovidetheirthoughts,

ideasandopinionsonhousing,beitthroughattending

events,completingtheonlinesurvey,orsubmittingideas

forthere:THINKHousingcompetition,allofwhichthe

TaskForcereviewedandstudiedintheprocessof

completingitswork.

35

alan boniface

DialogConsultingArchitects

John d’eathe

RealEstateCounsellor

nathan edelson

42ndStreetConsulting

leonard george

Tsleil-WaututhNation

Marg gordon

BritishColumbiaApartmentOwners

&ManagersAssociation

Mark guslits

MarkGuslits&AssociatesInc.

colleen Hardwick (nystedt)

NewCityVentures

Howard Johnson

BaptistHousing

ken kwan

SUCCESS

Michael lewis

CanadianCentreforCommunityRenewal

raymond louie

CityCouncil

eric Martin

BosaDevelopmentCorporation

geoff Meggs

CityCouncil

karen o’shannacery

LookoutSociety

al Poettcker

UBCPropertiesTrust

Peter simpson

GreaterVancouverHomeBuilders’Association

bradford Tone

ToneManagement

The Task Force organized itself initially into smaller themed groups:

Finance:Long-termaffordability

Flow: Cityprocessesandpolicies

Form: Designflexibility

Partnership: Government,private,non-profit

andco-opsectors

AttherequestoftheCo-chairs,eachgrouplookedforone

ortwoinitiativesthatcouldsignificantlyimpactaffordability;

theyarelistedinthesectiononrecommendations.

APPendices

aPPendix 1: Task Force MeMbersHiP and work

Co-chairedbyVancouverMayorGregorRobertsonandformerprovincialcabinetministerOlgaIlich,whoservedasMinisterof

TourismandthenMinisterofLabourfromJune2005untilJune2008andwhohasbeeninvolvedinthehousingfieldformost

ofhercareer,withastrongfocusonthedevelopmentofsocialandfamilyhousing.TheTaskForcemembershipisdrawnfrom

anumberoforganizationsrelevanttothehousingsectorandincludes:architects,designers,builders,non-profitassociations,

apartmentowners,academics,andprivate,non-profitandpublicsectorpropertydevelopers.


Fast-track applications:

½ Fast-trackapplicationstobuildaffordablerentalorowned

housingforthosewithlowtomiddleincomesthroughan

interdepartmentalCitystaffteamwiththeabilitytoensure

theseapplicationsaregivenpriority.

use an inclusionary Housing Policy:

½ UsetheCambieCorridorasamodelfortheapplication

ofinclusionaryzoningtofast-trackthedevelopment

ofaffordablerentalhousingthrough:

» rapiddevelopmentofapracticalimplementation

strategyforinclusionaryzoningrelatedtorentalhousing

inplaceonthecorridor;and

» developmentofastandardizedapproachonthe

corridor,withanexpeditedprocessingtime,forthe

deliveryofCommunityAmenityContributions(CACs).

½ TheCity’sland-useplanfortheCambieCorridorhas

openednewareasoftheCityforrapidtransitoriented

development,whichinturnhasspurredasignificant

amountofdevelopmentinterest.TheTaskForcehas

identifiedtheaboveissuesascriticalinadvancing

affordablerentalhousinginVancouverandspecifically

ontheCambieCorridor.

leverage city assets:

½ ExploretheviabilityofusingCity-ownedlandtoleverage

partnerships,includingpartnershipswithnon-profitand

co-ops,forthecreationofaffordablerentalhousing.

wield influence:

½ Usethebroadandinfluentialmembershipofthe

TaskForcetoadvocate:

» withthefederalgovernmentontheneedforenhanced

taxincentivesandfinancingmechanismsforthe

constructionofnewrentalhousingandtheprotection

andrehabilitationofexistingrentalhousing;and

» withtheprovincialgovernmentontheneedto

streamlineapprovalprocessesforthedeliveryof

fee-simplerowhousing.

Inturningitsattentiontoseniorlevelsofgovernment,

theTaskForcerecognizesitsimportantroleinenabling,

throughanumberofmechanismsbeyonddirectfunding,

theprotectionofexistingrentalhousingaswellasthe

creationofnewrentalhousing,andindiversifyingthe

rangeofhousingoptionsintheCity.

aPPendix 2: Quick sTarTs – released MarcH 2012

Inthelead-uptothisInterimReport,theTaskForcedevelopedalistofQuickStartactionsfortheCity.TheTaskForce

recommendedthattheCityimmediatelytakeactiononthesestraightforwardpoliciesandinitiativestoputVancouver

onthepathtoamorecreative,yetfocusedapproachtocreatingandmaintaininghousingaffordabilityinVancouver.

37

aPPendix 3: glossary

affordable HousingcanbeprovidedbytheCity,

government,non-profit,communityandfor-profitpartners.

Itcanbefoundordevelopedalongthewholehousing

continuum,andincludeSROs,marketrentalandaffordable

homeownership.Thedegreeofhousingaffordabilityresults

fromtherelationshipbetweenthecostofhousingand

householdincome.Itisnotastaticconcept,ashousing

costsandincomeschangeovertime.

affordable rental/secure Market rental/Purpose built

rental Housingareapartmentsand/orbuildingsthatare

builtwiththeintenttoberentedintheprivatemarket.

Regulationspreventthemfrombeingseparatedandsold

asseparatestratas.

community amenity contribution (CACs)arein-kind

orcashcontributionsprovidedbydeveloperswhenCity

Councilgrantsadditionaldevelopmentrightsthrough

rezonings.CACscanhelpaddresstheincreaseddemands

thatmaybeplacedonCityfacilitiesasaresultofarezoning

(fromnewresidentsand/oremployees),aswellasmitigate

theimpactsofarezoningonthesurroundingcommunity.

Examplesofin-kindamenitycontributionsincludeaffordable

housing,childcarefacilitiesorparkspaceincorporatedinto

thenewdevelopment.Cashcontributionsmaybeputtoward

amenitiessuchasthese,andothersincludinglibraries,

communitycentres,transportationimprovements,cultural

facilitiesandneighbourhoodhouses.Cashcontributionsare

generallyappliedtooff-siteamenitiesinthesurrounding

community.

condominiums arebuildingsinwhichunitsofpropertyare

ownedindividually,whilethecommonpropertyisowned

jointlybyalloftheowners.

development cost levy(DCLs)areagrowth-related

chargeonallnewdevelopment.Theyareappliedona

persquarefootbasisandarepayableatBuildingPermit

issuance.DCLsaregovernedbyrulessetoutinthe

VancouverCharter.DCLsareaveryimportantsource

ofrevenueforcivicfacilities.DCLscollectedfrom

developmenthelppayforfacilitiesmadenecessaryby

growth.FacilitieseligibleforDCLfundinginclude:parks,

childcarefacilities,replacementhousing(social/non-profit

housing),andengineeringinfrastructure.

income range considered by the Task Force: TheTask

Forcefocusedonaffordabilitysolutionsformoderate

incomehouseholdsearningbetween$21,500(singleincome

household)andupto$86,500(forsingleanddualincome

households).

Moderate income Householdsarethosemakingbetween

$21,500(singleincomehousehold)andupto$86,500

peryear(forbothsingleanddualincomehouseholds)

other ownershiprefersprimarilytosinglefamily

homesandrowhouseformsthatarenotownedas

strataproperties(e.g.condominiums).

rented condominiumsareinvestor-ownedcondominium

(strata)unitsrentedontheprivatemarket.

secondary suitesaretypicallyadditionalunitswithin

thestructureofaprincipalsinglefamilyresidence

(oftenbasementapartments),orarelock-offsuitesin

townhousesandapartments.

social Housing/non-market Housingishousingfor

lowandmoderateincomesinglesandfamilies,usually

subsidizedthroughavarietyofmechanisms,including

seniorgovernmentsupport.ThecurrentmodelinVancouver

isaself-containedunit,withprivatebathroomandkitchen,

ownedoroperatedbygovernmentoranon-profit.Therents

varytoallowamixofresidentshavingdifferentincomes

andcanrangefromthevalueofthesheltercomponentof

incomeassistanceto30%ofatenant’sincomeincluding

marketrents.


½ vancouver.ca

453West12thAvenue

Vancouver,BCV5Y1V4

Tel.6048737000

Date post:	04-Jul-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

Report - Mayor's Task Force on Housing Affordability: 2012 Oct 2 › 20121002 › documents ›...

Documents