Report on BENCHMARKING OF IRRIGATION SYSTEMS

IN MAHARASHTRA STATE 2010-11

WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

Government of Maharashtra, India September 2012

Details of photographs on cover page: 1. Mula dam. 2. Wheat crop in the month of January of an adivasi farmer in Melghat under Mandva MI.

REPORT ON BENCHMARKING OF IRRIGATION PROJECTS IN

MAHARASHTRA STATE 2010-11

* * * * * * * *

WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA, INDIA

September 2012

This report is also available on www.mahawrd.org and www.mwrdc.org

FOREWORD

Government of Maharashtra has made a large investment in Water Resources Projects. These are multipurpose projects. Increase in demand of domestic and industrial use due to growth of urbanization and industrialization has resulted into lesser availability of water for irrigation. As irrigation use entails about 70 percent of the total storage, a marginal improvement in the efficiency of water use in irrigation will result in saving substantial quantity, resulting in enhanced food and fiber production. Increasing water use efficiency and reducing the losses, is the need of the hour and is being achieved in a phased manner through benchmarking of Irrigation Projects.

For analyzing and improving performance of water resources projects, benchmarking is being carried out since 2001-02. Benchmarking in irrigation sector is a more complex task, as it is subject to site specific characteristics. It has now become a part of strategic management of the department.

The projects selected for Benchmarking are of major, medium and minor category and from various regions of the State, representing various agro-climatic zones. The report of benchmarking, which includes indicator wise performance, is prepared on the basis of data collected and analyzed in Maharashtra Water Resources Development Centre, Aurangabad.

In Maharashtra there are 86 major, 258 medium and 3108 state level minor projects fully or partially completed up to June 2010. Total irrigation potential created at the end of June 2010 is 47.37 lakh hectares. In order to comply with the commitment in State Water Policy about transparency in water use and to identify the areas of problems in seeking objective set in the project planning, benchmarking of selected projects in the State was in practice since last 9 years. For the current year, 1335 projects having five year past data are included for benchmarking.

Lastly, I appeal all project authorities to use benchmarking as an effective management tool to improve the current performance level of the irrigation projects.

I appreciate sincere efforts taken by Director General, WALMI Aurangabad, Chief Engineer, MWRDC, Aurangabad and his team for preparation of this report.

Comments & suggestions on this report will be appreciated.

(D. P. Shirke) Secretary (WRM & CAD)

Maharashtra Water Resources Development Centre, Aurangabad

Team Associated with Benchmarking Report

Name Designation

Shri S.P.Bhargodeo Executive Engineer

Shri C.P. Kalse Executive Engineer

Shri G.V.Vyawahare Executive Engineer

Shri H. L. Kulkarni Executive Engineer

Smt. R. S. Patil Assistant Engineer Grade-I

Smt. M. V. Tornale Assistant Engineer Grade-I

Shri T.C. Metkar Assistant Engineer Grade-I

Shri. S. G. Deshpande Sub divisional Officer

Shri S. D. Joshi Assistant Engineer Grade -II

Shri. B. A. Chivate Assistant Engineer Grade –II

Shri S. M. Bhosle Sectional Engineer

Shri K. K. Barbind Sectional Engineer

Shri P. R. Bahalaskar Sectional Engineer

Shri S. A. Mulani Sectional Engineer

Shri M. S. More Tracer

Shri S.M. Kedare Dafter Karkoon

Shri A.B. Naybal Dafter Karkoon

Shri. N.A. Bansode Dafter Karkoon

Shri R. R. Kulkarni Typist

Shri L. R. Jadhav Typist

Smt. M. S. Tupe Typist

ABBREVIATIONS

Avg Per Average performance BCM Billion Cubic Metre CADA Command Area Development Authority CBIP Central Board of Irrigation & Power

CCA Culturable Command Area CRT Converted Regular Temporary CWC Central Water Commission DIRD Directorate of Irrigation Research & Development FAO Food & Agriculture Organisation FY Avg Five year average

GCA Gross Command Area GOI Government of India GOM Government of Maharashtra Ha Hectare HW Hot Weather ICID International Commission on Irrigation & Drainage IMD Indian Meteorological Department

INCID Indian National Committee on Irrigation & Drainage IPTRID International Programme for Technology and Research

in Irrigation and Drainage ISP Irrigation System Performance IWMI International Water Management Institute LY Last Year m Metre

M cum/ Mm3 Million Cubic Metre Mha Million Hectare MKVDC Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation mm Millimetre MMISF ACT Maharashtra Management of Irrigation Systems by

Farmers Act, 2005

MWIC Maharashtra Water & Irrigation Commission MWRDC Maharashtra Water Resources Development Centre

MWSIP Maharashtra Water Sector Improvement programme NLBC Neera Left Bank Canal NRBC Neera Right Bank Canal O & M Operation & Maintenance Past Max Maximum value observed in Past five years Past Min Minimum value observed in Past five years

PIM Participatory Irrigation Management PIP Preliminary Irrigation Programme PLBC Paithan Left Bank Canal PRBC Paithan Right Bank Canal PWD Public Works Department Sq Km Square Kilometre

State Tar State Target TY This Year WALMI Water and Land Management Institute, Aurangabad

WRD Water Resources Department

WUA Water Users’ Association AIC Akola Akola Irrigation Circle, Akola AIC A’bad Aurangabad Irrigation Circle, Aurangabad. BIPC Buldhana Buldhana Irrigation Project Circle, Buldhana CADA Command Area Development Authority CIPC Chandrapur Chandrapur Irrigation Project Circle, Chandrapur

JIPC Jalgaon Jalgaon Irrigation Project Circle, Jalgaon KIC Kolhapur Kolhapur Irrigation Circle, Kolhapur KIC Ratnagiri Konkan Irrigation Circle, Ratnagiri NIC Nagpur Nagpur Irrigation Circle, Nagpur NIC Nanded Nanded Irrigation Circle, Nanded NIPC Dhule Nashik Irrigation Project Circle, Dhule

NKIPC Thane North Konkan Irrigation Project Circle, Thane PIC Pune Pune Irrigation Circle, Pune SIC Sangli Sangli Irrigation Circle, Sangli TIC Thane Thane Irrigation Circle, Thane UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha Project Circle, Amravati WIC Washim Washim Irrigation Circle Washim YIC Yavatmal Yavatmal Irrigation Circle, Yavatmal

C O N T E N T S

Sr. No.

Description Page No.

1 Executive Summary 1

2 Chapter – 1 : Introduction 3

3 Chapter – 2 : Overall status of State performance 12

4 Chapter – 3 : Benchmarking of Irrigation Projects 17

5 Chapter – 4 : Performance Indicators 19

Major Projects : Indicators I to XII 23

Medium Projects : Indicators I to XII (Except indicator IX, X) 91

Minor Projects : Indicators I to XII (Except indicator IX, X, XI, XII_NI)

169

6 Chapter – 5: Action taken for improvement of performance 181

7 Chapter – 6: Benchmarking of Water Users’ Associations 182

8 Chapter -7: Project wise review of major and medium projects

206

9 Chapter -8: Benchmarking of WALMI 263

10 Chapter-9 Benchmarking of MERI 276

11 Chapter-10 Benchmarking of META 282

12 Appendices

Appendix I - Abstract of guide lines issued by GOM for Benchmarking of Irrigation Projects

289

Appendix II - State target values for indicators 290

Appendix III–Indicator wise average performance calculations

293

Appendix IV -Overview of projects selected for Benchmarking.

294

Appendix V - River Basins and Agro Climatic Zones of Maharashtra.

304

Appendix VI -Abstract of Water rates for irrigation, domestic and industrial use.

309

Executive Summary

The methodology and main performance Indicators for Benchmarking are adopted as per the guidelines issued by Indian National Committee on Irrigation & Drainage (INCID) in 2002.

Benchmarking of Irrigation projects was initiated in the year 2001-02. Initially, the exercise was conducted for 84 projects in 2001-02 with 10 indicators. The number of projects increased to 254 in 2002-03 with 11 indicators. Instead of presenting the data of all these projects individually, an irrigation circle was considered as a unit for evaluation of performance. It was observed that some of the characteristics of projects under a circle are not identical and to make the comparison still on better grounds, projects under a circle in a plan group are grouped together and comparison is made with other projects in that plan group. Project wise performance is also included for major and medium projects.

In carrying out the Benchmarking exercise, following categorization of irrigation schemes into similar types have been done for comparison.

Sr. No

Category

As per INCID Adopted in the State

A Type of control for Supply of water

Fixed proportional division, manual control, automatic control

Manual control,

B Type of management Government agency, farmer managed

Government agency and WUA

C Method of allocation and distribution of water

Supply-oriented arranged-demand, on demand

On demand

D

Water Availability Abundant, Scarce Highly deficit to Abundant

E Water Source Surface water, groundwater or both.

Surface water

F Size Major, Medium, Minor All sizes This is the tenth consecutive report of benchmarking of irrigation projects in

the State with 1335 projects and 12 indicators. The plan group wise number of projects selected for benchmarking during 2010-11 is as follows. Sr. No.

Plan Group Major Medium Minor Total

1 Highly Deficit 1 30 155 186 2 Deficit 13 63 281 357 3 Normal 23 40 299 362 4 Surplus 3 26 147 176

5 Abundant 10 12 232 254

Total 50 171 1114 1335

Methodology The data presented in this report is based on information collected from each of the circle in-charge of the project. The following process was used in development of this report.

• The data about water use and area irrigated is correlated with water accounts of 2010-11 of relevant projects.

• The presentation for every indicator is done with past-past (5 year average), recent past (2009-10) and present year (2010-11) in order to compare the performance with predecessors as well as own performance of last year.

• Based on performance for 2010-11, indicator wise average performance is found out for the plan group of circles under consideration, setting aside the exceptionally high/low values.

• For financial indicator of output per unit irrigated area and output per unit irrigation water supply, prices of 1998-99 are considered to obviate effect of price rise.

Benchmarking of WUA Till June 2010, potential to the tune of 4.737 Mha of State level projects is

created. By the end of April 2011 in all 2959 WUA were in full operation with

operational area of 11.56 lakh hectares. Besides this the number of WUA which have been registered during 2010-11 was 144, covering an area of 0.54 lakh hectares. The WUAs include those registered under Maharashtra Co-operative Act, 1960 and Maharashtra Management of Irrigation Systems by Farmers Act, 2005.

During this year 12 WUA on 7 major projects are selected for Benchmarking with 9 indicators. Observations:

• The annual irrigation water supply per hectare in major projects improved over last year. For Medium & Minor projects, water utilised is nearly as per state norm.

• The potential utilization in respect of major projects decreased from 1.07 to 0.80 as compared to last year. This is because of increase in NI use from 4763 Mcum (2009-10) to 5876 Mcum this year.

• The output per unit irrigated area reduced in both major and medium projects in 2010-11. This is because of protective rotations given to the standing Crops in some projects due to less availability of water, resulting in reduced productivity.

• The output per unit water supplied reduced in major as well as medium projects as compared to 2009-10. This is due to reduction in Irrigation System Performance in all regions except Pune & Nagpur this year.

• The cost recovery ratio lowered as compared to last year in Major & Medium projects. This is mainly due to no assessment & recovery on well irrigation in command area of the projects.

• The O & M cost per unit irrigated area in major & medium projects increased over last year, as the expenditure for rehabilitation of systems in some of the projects increased as they are included in MWSIP.

• Revenue per unit water supply decreased in all categories of projects. This is due to decrease in NI recovery in some projects, viz. Pus, Pench, Bor, Mula, Kukadi, Krishna, Khadakwasla, Bhatsa, Lower Pus, Adan, Navargaon, Pakadiguddam, etc.

• The recovery of non irrigation water supply reduced in case of Major Projects as compared to last year as the recovery could not be achieved in above mentioned projects.

Chapter - 1

INTRODUCTION

1.0.0 Benchmarking is a very powerful management tool for analyzing and improving the performance of water resources projects. It is widely accepted all over the World. IPTRID, IWMI, ICID, World Bank & FAO advocate use of benchmarking for evaluation of performance.

For evaluation and improvement of performance of water resources projects, Government of Maharashtra has undertaken the benchmarking exercise in the State since 2000-01.

Benchmarking of selected 12 Water Users’ Associations on 7 major projects under different irrigation circles is also carried out for last 5 years. Objectives, indicators, proformae for data collection and indicator values are given in detail in chapter 6 of this report. This will be helpful for improving the performance of WUA.

Maharashtra is the first State in India, to introduce the Benchmarking technique for Irrigation Projects & now with our experience and Central Water Commission’s follow-up other States are also adopting it.

The methodology and main performance indicators for Benchmarking are adopted as per the guidelines issued by Indian National Committee on Irrigation & Drainage (INCID) in 2002.

The year wise indicators for benchmarking along with their Domain are enlisted below:-

Year Domain Performance Indicator

1. System Performance i) Annual irrigation water supplied per unit irrigated area

2. Agricultural Productivity

i) Output per unit irrigated area, ii) Output per unit irrigation water supplied

3. Financial Aspects i) Cost Recovery Ratio ii) Total O&M cost per unit area iii) Revenue per unit volume of water supplied iv) Maintenance cost to revenue ratio v) Man days for O&M per unit area vi) Total O&M cost per unit volume of water supplied

2001-02

4. Environmental Aspects i) Land damage index 2002-03 System Performance i) Potential Created and Utilized

ii) Equity Performance

2003-04 Financial Aspects Assessment Recovery Ratio a. Irrigation b. Non-irrigation

2008-09 System Performance I (a) Annual area irrigated per unit water supplied.

Some indicators are added / deleted during course of time. The changes are as follows.

2002-03 One Indicator deleted Maintenance Cost to Revenue Ratio

Two Indicators added 1. Potential Created and Utilized. 2. Equity Performance

2003-04 One Indicator added Assessment Recovery Ratio I. Irrigation II. Non-irrigation

2006-07 One Indicator deleted Mandays per unit area

2008-09 One Indicator added I (a) Annual area irrigated per unit water supplied.

Initially, the exercise was conducted on 84 projects with 10 indicators.

The number of projects increased to 254 in 2002-03 with 11 indicators. Instead of presenting the data of all projects individually, an irrigation circle was considered as a unit for evaluation of performance. Here also, it was observed that some of the characteristics of projects under a circle are not identical and to make the comparison still on better grounds, projects under a circle in a plan group are considered together for comparison.

Details of year wise number of projects selected for Benchmarking is as follows.

No. of Projects.

Year:

Major Medium Minor Total

No. of Indicators

Year of publication

2001-02 30 26 28 84 10 March 2003

2002-03 49 142 63 254 11 March 2004

2003-04 49 143 69 261 12 March 2005

2004-05 49 144 69 262 12 February 2006

2005-06 49 144 69 262 12 March 2007

2006-07 49 144 69 262 11 March 2008

2007-08 48 145 69 262 11 March 2009

2008-09 48 145 69 262 11 March 2010

2009-10 50 166 1052 1268 11 April 2011

2010-11 50 171 1114 1335 12 Sept 2012

1.1.0 Maharashtra at a glance

Maharashtra occupies main portion of the Indian Sub-continent. The

geographical location of the State is bounded between latitude 16.4o

to 22.1o

N and longitude 72.6o

to 80.9o

E and has an area of 307.71 thousand sq km, which is about 9.4 percent of the total geographical area of India. The State has

720 Km long coastline along Arabian Sea. The western hill ranges are almost parallel to this coastline. The State is divided into two physiographic regions of Konkan and rest of the State (Deccan Plateau). The Deccan Plateau spread over on the east side of Ghat has west-east slope. In general, the altitude of the plateau varies between 300 to 600 m. Maharashtra is bounded by Gujarat, Dadra & Nagar Haveli on north-west, Madhya Pradesh on north, Chhattisgadh on east and Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Goa on south.

1.2.0 Physiography

The State is divided into five major regions physiographically:

i) Konkan strip on western side (ii) Sahyadri ranges iii) Plateau on eastern side (iv) Hilly ranges of Satpuda and adjacent area on north and (v) Hilly and forest region of north-south Wainganga basin to the east of State.

1) Konkan Strip

The narrow strip of land extending from Damanganga basin in north to the border of Goa State in south is the Konkan. It has Sahyadri ranges on east and Arabian Sea on west. The Konkan strip is about 53 to 60 km wide and 500 km long along north-south. The widest stretch is about 100 km. Width decreases as one proceeds towards south. The region becomes hilly and altitude increases from the coastline towards east.

2) Sahyadri Ranges

These continuous mountain ranges extend almost parallel to the western coastline. It is known as Western Ghat. The average height of Sahyadri in Maharashtra is 900 m. It is more in the north and decreases towards south.

3) Eastern Plateau Region (Deccan Plateau)

The height of this plateau goes on decreasing from 600 m on western side to 300 m in the Wainganga basin on east. This region is formed from lava of igneous rocks. All the districts of Khandesh, Marathwada2, Western Maharashtra and the western districts of Vidarbha3

fall in this region. (1. Khandesh includes Dhule, Nandurbar & Jalgaon districts 2 Marathwada includes Aurangabad, Jalna,

Parbhani, Nanded, Osmanabad, Latur, Hingoli & Beed districts 3 Vidarbha includes Akola, Washim, Amravati, Yeotmal, Wardha, Nagpur, Bhandara, Gondia, Chandrapur, Buldhana & Gadchiroli districts.)

4) Satpuda Ranges and Tapi – Purna basin on North

Satpuda hill ranges lie on the northern boundary of the State. This region is spread over in the districts of Amravati, Akola, Jalgaon and Dhule.

5) Eastern Region Consisting of Wainganga basin

Eastern region comprises of eastern side of the State and flat paddy field region lies along both the banks of the river at an elevation of about 300 m. On the eastern side of this flat region along the Maharashtra - Chhattisgadh boundary are the hills of different geological formations other than the Deccan Trap. Many eastern tributaries of Wainganga originate from this hill range. The height of this hilly plateau is around 800 m.

Detailed information with regard to river basins, availability of water resources, climate, rainfall, agro climatic zones, etc of Maharashtra is given in Appendix-IV.

1.3.0 Rainfall during 2010-11

In the State generally the Rainfall starts on 7th June by South West Monsoon.

In the year 2010 the rainfall started on 10th June 2010 and got spread throughout the State up to 16th June 2010.

In monsoon there was an average rainfall of 121%. Out of total 357 talukas in the State, 55% talukas received excessive rainfall, 41% received average rainfall & only 4% (15) talukas received inadequate rainfall. Out of these 15 talukas, five are from Nashik district, two from Nandurbar and remaining, one each from Sindhudurg, Dhule, Jalgaon, Pune, Kolhapur, Nanded, Amrawati and Yavatmal district.

1.4.0 Irrigation Development during Post-independence Period

Maharashtra State came into existence in 1960. The increasing population was facing shortage of food grains. This has led to the need of increasing agricultural production. By giving priority to agricultural development, attempt has been made to achieve irrigation development in a planned manner.

Hardly, 0.274 Mha, irrigation potential was created in the State during preplan period i.e. before 1950. Agriculture has been the prominent occupation to

provide food and fiber to the growing population of the State. Adequate, timely and guaranteed water supply is of paramount importance in agriculture production and irrigation development plays a key role in alleviating rural poverty. The State has created 4.737 Mha irrigation potential using surface water resources by June 2010 through 86 major, 258 medium and state sector 3108 minor irrigation projects. The created irrigation potential, through local sector projects and other resources, has been estimated as 1.420 Mha.

1.4.1 Supply System

Generally supply of water for irrigation is through distribution network of canals off-taking either from dam or from pick-up-weir. The distribution network consists of main canal, branch canal, distributory, minor and field channels. The open canals are either lined or unlined, but mostly the systems are unlined. Recently water is also supplied for irrigation through piped distribution network in some projects.

Water is supplied to irrigators, individuals as well as WUA via distribution network through outlets. In addition, there are individual, co-operative, Govt. owned lifts on reservoirs, rivers and canals. In most of the projects, major area is under

gravity irrigation and small part under lift irrigation. Some projects are specially lift irrigation projects with storage reservoir or storage in the form of barrages or series of Kolhapur type weirs downstream of reservoir. In most of the major & medium irrigation projects, water reserved for non irrigation (domestic and industrial) use varies from 15 % to 25 %.

The supply of water for domestic and industrial purpose is mostly made through pipeline either from reservoir, main canal or from river.

The projects selected for Benchmarking are having major area under flow irrigation with small percent under lift irrigation. The lifts are on main canals as well as reservoirs. Most of the medium projects supply irrigation water for eight monthly cropping pattern i.e., Kharif & Rabbi and very small quantum for Hot Weather or perennial crops. There is a tendency amongst farmers to use the water saved in Kharif and Rabbi season for Hot Weather or Perennial crops.

1.4.2 Present Organizational Set up

The organizational set up for irrigation management comprises of section office at the lowest level looking for an area of about 3000 to 4000 ha. The section office is headed by a sectional officer having staff for O&M of the area. The subdivision dealing with four to five sections is headed by AE-I, Sub divisional Officer/Engineer and works under the control of division. Thus the division is looking after four to five subdivisions with sixteen to twenty five sections and headed by the Executive Engineer in charge of the irrigation projects. The management circle headed by the Superintending Engineer controls three to four divisions. The regional head of the Superintending Engineers (four to five circles) is either Chief Engineer or CE & the Chief Administrator.

The Superintending Engineers in-charge of irrigation circles are responsible for full utilization of the water stored in reservoir and maintenance of public utilization system, as well as recovery of water charges through their subordinate offices. The organization chart of department is enclosed at the end of this chapter (i.e.Chapter 1).

1.4.3 Crops Irrigated

There is significant variation in crops within the regions as well as in projects under a region. Details of principal crops grown in different regions and plan group wise are as below.

Region Plan group Principal crops grown

Eastern Vidarbha Abundant & Surplus Kharif Paddy, HW Paddy

Western Vidarbha Normal Cotton, Wheat, Gram, Sunflower,

Orange

Marathwada Normal & Deficit Cotton, Wheat, Rabi Jawar

Gram, Sunflower, Soyabean, Groundnut, Sugarcane, Banana

North Maharashtra Normal Rabi Jawar, Maize, Wheat, Bajara, Cotton, Vegetables

Grapes, Sugarcane, Banana

Western Maharashtra Normal & Abundant Maize, Wheat, Vegetables, Pomegranates, Sugarcane

Konkan Abundant Paddy, Vegetables, Mango

1.4.4 Management of Systems

The irrigation systems are constructed and mostly managed by the GOM. Operation and maintenance of irrigation projects is looked after by irrigation divisions, which are administratively controlled by circle office. GOM has taken a policy decision to supply water for irrigation through Water Users’ Associations only. Accordingly the MMISF Act was passed by the Government in year 2005.

Irrigation management of area under jurisdiction of WUA is being transferred to them. Waghad Project in North Maharashtra region was handed over to Federation of WUA for irrigation management.

To corroborate the process of handing over the culturable command area (6,68,850 Ha) of selected 286 projects to the WUA within stipulated time frame, Maharashtra Water Sector Improvement Project has been taken up with the help of World Bank.

1.4.5 Area under modern irrigation methods

Area under drip irrigation in the State by March 2011 was 6.96 Lakh Ha. The region wise area under drip irrigation is as follows:

Sr. No.

Region Area under Drip irrigation in ha.

(up to March 2011)

Percentage of Region with state area

1 Konkan 12813 1.84 2 Nashik 222326 31.92 3 Pune 214880 30.86 4 Aurangabad 143110 20.55

5 Amravati 86988 12.49 6 Nagpur 16340 2.34

Maharashtra State 696457 100 Ref: Irrigation Status Report September 2011

1.5.0 Present Status of Irrigation Utilization

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50A

rea

in

Lac

Ha

Irrigation Potential Created 47.3746.3444.8643.3141.3240.0339.1338.6338.1237.69

Irrigation on Canals 18.4116.5618.2518.9718.3516.1712.5912.4413.1812.5

Irrigation on Wells 11.148.879.078.678.465.974.44.415.244.58

Total Irrigation 29.5525.4327.3227.6426.8122.1416.9916.8518.4217.08

2010-112009-102008-092007-082006-072005-062004-052003-042002-032001-02

(Ref: Irrigation Status report 2010-11 page 17)

In spite of various measures taken so far, there is a gap between potential created and utilized.

The overall reasons for less utilization are as follows

i) Low water yield in the reservoirs ii) Diversion of irrigation water to non irrigation uses iii) Tendency of farmers to grow high water intensive cash crops like sugarcane, banana iv) Reduction in storage capacity due to silting v) Lapses in assessment of the irrigated area in the command vi) Non accounting of irrigated area outside the command (influence area) vii) Poor maintenance of the infrastructure due to financial constraints viii) Non participation of beneficiaries in irrigation management. ix) Absentee landlords x) Lack of infrastructure for transportation, storage & marketing of Agriculture produce.

Year wise data of potential created and actual utilisation is exhibited in graph. From this information, it is clear that till the year 2004-05, actual maximum utilisation (canal + wells) was 48% of the potential created. Under utilisation has always remained a point of concern. Therefore, based on past experience, circle wise targets are fixed from 2006-07. In the year 2010-11, the percent of utilization of created irrigation potential is 62%.

1.6.0 Participation of Beneficiaries in Water Resources Management

National Water Policy 2002 and Maharashtra State Water Policy 2003 advocate Participatory Irrigation Management. In view of these, water users associations are being setup in command areas of various projects in different parts of the State. By the end of April 2011 in all 2959 WUA were in full operation with operational area of 11.56 lakh Ha. Besides this the number of WUAs which have been registered during 2010-11 was 144 covering an area of about 0.54 lakh Ha.

Looking at the slow pace of PIM in last decade and to bridge the gap between irrigation potential created and its actual utilization and to optimize the benefits by ensuring proper use of surface & ground water by increased efficiency in distribution, delivery, application and drainage of irrigation systems and for achieving this objective, to give statutory recognition to the constitution & operation of WUA, an act has been passed by the State legislature. The act is known as "Maharashtra Management of Irrigation Systems by Farmers Act, 2005”.As per this act, all the beneficiaries in the command of distributaries / minor will become the members of WUA, once the area is notified under the act.

welcome

Typewritten Text

10

2) SE, CIPC

Chandrapur

2) SE, WIC

Washim

1) SE, NIC

Nagpur

1) SE, AIC

Akola

DG, WALMI,

Aurangabad

CE, WRD

Aurangabad

1) SE, NIC

Nanded

2) SE, AIC

Aurangabad

3) SE, OIC

Osmanabad

3) SE, JPC,

Aurangabad

1) SE, JIPC

Jalgaon

2) SE, CADA

Jalgaon

2) SE, CADA

Beed

2) SE, BIPC

Buldhana

3) SE, NIPC

Dhule

1) SE, TIC

Thane

1) SE, SIPC

Satara

1) SE, PIC

Pune

1) SE, CADA

Nashik

CE, WRD,

Amravati

CE, WRD

Nagpur

CE, WRD,

(SP) Amravati

1) SE, CADA

Aurangabad

1) SE, UWPC

Amravati

1) SE, CADA

Nagpur

CE,

Pune (WR)

C E, WRD,

NMR, Nashik

CE & Chief

Administrator

CAD Aurangabad

CE, TIPC,

Jalgaon

Organisation Chart of Irrigation Management

Secretary (WRM & CAD) Mantralaya (Mumbai)

2) SE, Gosi (K)

LIC Bhandara

2) SE, KIC

Ratnagiri

2) SE, CADA

Pune

2) SE, SIC

Sangli

CE, Gosi (K)

Nagpur (WR)

CE, WRD,

Konkan Region

Mumbai

CE,

(SP) Pune

2) SE, DIRD,

Pune

1) CE,

MWRDC,

Aurangabad

4) SE, SKIPC,

Oros,

Sindhudurg

4) SE, BIPC,

Parli (V)

3) SE, CADA

Solapur

3) SE, NKIPC

Kalwa, Thane

3) SE, YIC

Yaotmal

11

Chapter 2

Overall Status of Performance of State

Indicator–I: Annual Irrigation Water Supply per Unit Irrigation Unit: Cum/Ha

Irrigation water supplied for major projects in the State is higher in 2010-11 as compared to 2009-10. However, it is 35 percent on higher side of the State norm i.e.7692. For Medium and minor projects water utilized is nearly as per norm i.e.7692 for Medium & 6667 for minor projects.

Indicator –II: Potential created and Utilized: unit: Ratio

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

Major 0.85 0.91 0.88 0.8 1.07 0.8

Medium 0.72 0.65 0.73 0.74 0.71 0.58

Minor 0.81 0.89 0.71 0.63 0.75 0.71

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

The indicator value in respect of major projects decreased from 1.07 to 0.8 as compared to last year. Utilization of potential in medium projects has drastically reduced from 0.71 to 0.58 this year. However, in minor projects there is reduction in indicator value from 0.75 to 0.71.

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Major 9830 10977 8289 10253 9141 10251 Medium 8345 7362 8449 7447 7001 7705 Minor 9738 7399 6910 6575 5242 5816

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Indicator-III: Output per Unit Irrigated Area: Unit: Rs/Ha

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

Major 35553 35201 36348 36730 37350 29188

Medium 42613 29302 26855 28249 38152 24229

Minor 34480 21015 36176 22571

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

The output per unit irrigated area decreased in both major and medium projects in 2010-11,because of protective rotations given to the standing Crops in some projects due to less availability of water, resulting in reduced productivity.In major & medium projects the output is up to the State target. The Indicator is not considered for minor projects since last year. (Please refer page no. 293 for State target values.)

Indicator – IV: Output per Unit Irrigation Water Supply: Unit: Rs/Cum

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Major 4.49 4.32 5.01 5.25 6.34 3.6

Medium 2.34 4.53 4.78 4.84 7.46 3.1

Minor 3.9 3.75 5 3.84

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Though the output per unit water supplied decreased in major as well as medium projects as compared to 2009-10, it is up to the State target. The Indicator is not considered for minor projects since last year.

Indicator –V: Cost Recovery Ratio: Unit: Ratio

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

Major 0.63 1.2 1 0.95 1.52 0.66

Medium 0.43 0.3 0.64 0.39 0.45 0.38

Minor 0.83 0.35 0.34 0.23

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

The recovery of water charges is decreased as compared to last year in both major & medium projects and it is below the State target . This is mainly due to no assessment & recovery on well irrigation in command area of the projects. The Indicator is not considered for minor projects since last year.

Indicator-VI: O&M Cost Per Unit Irrigated Area: Unit: Rs/ha

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Major 3590 1815 4620 3687 2567 3921

Medium 2372 2989 3178 3305 2284 3720

Minor 5035 1847 1962 3574

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

The O&M cost per unit irrigated area increased over past year’s value for both major and medium projects and it is on higher side of State norm, as the expenditure for rehabilitation of systems in some of the projects increased as they are included in MWSIP. In case of both major & medium projects the indicator value is thrice the State target. The Indicator is not considered for minor projects since last year.

Indicator – VII: O&M Cost Per Unit Water Supply: Unit: Rs/Cum

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Major 0.36 0.18 0.4 0.28 0.33 0.36

Medium 0.34 0.43 0.22 0.37 0.36 0.44

Minor 0.9 0.32 0.35 0.45

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

The performance has increased over last year for major projects and it is more than twice the State target (0.16).The O&M cost per unit water supplied for medium projects is increased from Rs.0.36/cum to Rs.0.44/cum it is nearly three times the State target (0.16). The Indicator is not considered for minor projects since last year.

Indicator – VIII: Revenue Per Unit Water Supply: Unit: Rs/cum

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Major 0.23 0.22 0.24 0.3 0.49 0.16

Medium 0.15 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.16 0.1

Minor 0.75 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.09 0.07

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

The performance is reduced in case of all major, medium and minor projects for current year. In major projects the revenue is near by to the State target(0.18). For medium projects, the indicator value is much below the State target(0.18). In case of minor projects the performance is slightly lowered as compared to last year and it is below 50% of the State target (0.19).

Indicator – XII: Assessment Recovery Ratio (Irrigation): Unit: Ratio

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Major 0.22 0.49 0.4 0.37 0.54 0.54

Medium 0.67 0.43 0.51 0.33 0.56 0.6

Minor 0.81 0.43 0.51 0.56

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

The performance of major and medium projects is same as that of last year’s performance and it is below 60% of the State target (1.00). In case of minor projects the indicator value for irrigation & non-irrigation is calculated combinedly, hence it is not mentioned. (The reasons being insufficient staff for recovery & poor response for payment of water charges by beneficiaries).

Indicator – XII: Assessment Recovery Ratio (Non Irrigation): Unit: Ratio

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

Major 0.81 0.84 0.88 0.73 0.93 0.79

Medium 0.81 0.82 0.86 0.79 0.83 0.86

Minor 0.94 0.75 0.97 0.79

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

There is no such difference in the performance of major and medium projects for current year and still it is below the State target (1.00). The reasons are mentioned in executive summery.

Chapter - 3

Benchmarking of Irrigation Projects

Benchmarking can be defined as a systematic process for securing continual improvement through comparison with relevant and achievable internal or external norms and standards.

3.1.0 Background

This is the Tenth consecutive report of benchmarking of irrigation projects in the State with 1335 projects and 12 indicators. The plan group wise number of projects selected for Benchmarking during 2010-11 is as follows.

Sr. No.

Plan Group

Major Medium Minor Total

1 Highly Deficit

1

30 155 186

2 Deficit 13 63 281 357 3 Normal 23 40 299 362

4 Surplus 3 26 147 176

5 Abundant 10 12 232 254 Total : 50 171 1114 1335

3.2. 0 About this report

Following 12 indicators are selected for benchmarking in 2010-11.

Sr. No.

Indicator No

Title of Indicator

System Performance

1 I Annual Irrigation Water Supply Per Unit Irrigated Area 2 I a Annual Area Irrigated per unit of water Supplied 3 II Potential Created and Utilised Agricultural Productivity 4 III Output (Agricultural Production) Per Unit Irrigated Area

5 IV Output (Agricultural Production) Per Unit Irrigation Water Supply Financial Aspects

6 V Cost Recovery Ratio 7 VI Total O&M Cost Per Unit Area

8 VII Total O&M Cost Per Unit Volume Of Water Supplied 9 VIII Revenue Per Unit Volume Of Water Supplied 10 XII(I) Assessment Recovery Ratio Irrigation XII (NI) Assessment Recovery Ratio Non Irrigation Environmental Aspects

11 X Land Damage Social Aspects

12 XI Equity Performance

Indicator values for “Last year LY” in this report may be different from values for “This year TY” in the report for 2009-10 due to addition or transfer of projects amongst circles.

3.3.0 Methodology

The data presented in this report is based on information collected from each of the circle in-charge of the project.

Following process was used in developing the report.

• Irrigation projects of different categories viz. major (CCA more than 10000 Ha), medium (CCA more than 2000 Ha and below 10000 Ha) and minor (CCA less than 2000 Ha) are considered.

• Data is collected in template files from the concerned project authorities and analysed in MWRDC office. An explanatory note containing detailed instructions about working out the figures of different indicators was issued to field officers.

• The data about water use and area irrigated is co-related with water accounts (2010-11) of relevant projects.

• The presentation for every indicator is done with past-past (5 year average), recent past (2009-10) and present year (2010-11) in order to compare the performance with predecessors as well as own performance of last year.

• The draft report is scrutinised in MWRDC, Aurangabad & Mantralaya, Mumbai.

• Reasons for deviation from last year’s performance and State norm are called from each circle.

• Based on performance during the year 2010-11, indicator wise average performance is evaluated for the plan group of circles under consideration, setting aside the exceptionally high/low values (Appendix III).

• State targets for indicator No III & IV are set as per plan group. However, for other Indicators, State target value is common for all plan groups. The targets are different for major, medium & minor projects for indicator no I, I a, VI, VII, & VIII.

• For financial indicator of output per unit irrigated area and output per unit irrigation water supply, prices of year 1998-99 are considered to obviate effect of price rise.

• Some circles are not having all types of projects i.e., major, medium or minor projects; therefore, only relevant circles are shown in graphs of each indicator. Thus total of circles may not tally in relevant graphs, for example for major projects category, there are only 17 circles.

• Indicator wise performance of the State is given in chapter 4.

3.4.0 Overview of Irrigation Projects

An overview showing details such as sub basin, designed storage, command

area, crops grown, etc. is enclosed as Appendix IV.

3.5.0 Benchmarking of WUA

Till June 2010, potential to the tune of 4.737 Mha has been created at State level. By April 2011, in all 2959 WUA are formed for an area of 11.56 lac Ha. Out of these, 1559 WUA are formed as per MMISF Act 2005, with an area of 6.75 lac Ha and remaining 1400 WUA are formed as per Maharashtra Co-operative Act of 1960 with an area of 4.81 lac Ha. Benchmarking of 12 WUA with 9 indicators is carried out.

Chapter - 4

Performance Indicators

4.0.0 As stated earlier, Chapter 3 of this report provides an idea about indicators relevant with the five domains, mentioned below.

a. System Performance

b. Agricultural Productivity

c. Financial Aspects

d. Environmental Aspects

e. Social Aspects

4.1.0 System Performance

Providing facility of water for irrigation and other purposes is the main function of the project authorities. The water distribution system is influenced by physical, climatic, economic and other factors. In particular, the prevailing climatic conditions largely determine both, the available water resources and the crop water requirements in any season. The main task of the project in-charge is to manage the system so as to optimise the use of available resources in order to meet sanctioned quota in an effective and efficient manner.

4.1.1 Annual Irrigation Water Supply per Unit Irrigated Area

Annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area is the total quantity of water supplied for irrigation in all the seasons of a year compared to the total area irrigated in Kharif, Rabi & HW on canal, reservoir and river during irrigation year.

Annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area varies with water availability, cropping pattern, climate, soil type, system conditions, system management etc.

As a measure of efficiency of irrigation system, State target of 7692 cum/ha is set for major and medium projects and 6667 cum/ha for minor projects.

4.1.2 Annual Area irrigated per unit of water supplied (Ha./Mm3)

Area irrigated per unit of water supplied during Rabbi season as 150 ha/Mcum and during H/W season is 110 ha/Mcum is set as target.

4.1.3 Potential Utilized & Created

This is the ratio of potential utilized (crop area measured) to created irrigation potential of the project. Crop area irrigated on canal, reservoir, wells, river in the command area is considered as potential utilization.

The irrigation potential created through large investments should be fully utilized. However, the utilization is governed by the availability of water in the reservoirs. Therefore, calculation of effective irrigation potential is made proportionate to availability of water for irrigation in that year.

4.2.0 Agricultural Productivity

In Maharashtra, more than 55% population depends on agriculture, thus production per unit area as well as per unit water is vital for State’s economy.

For this domain the indicators chosen are

1) Output per unit irrigated area.

2) Output per unit irrigation water supply.

4.2.1 Output per Unit Irrigated Area

Output per unit irrigated area is the output in rupees of agricultural production from irrigated area. Here the area irrigated means potential utilized.

As the population grows, the land holding per capita goes on reducing. Secondly, there are some constraints to bring additional lands under irrigation. Thus it is important that the output per unit area has to be increased with efficient water and land management, improved seeds and adoption of latest Agriculture technology.

The efforts have to be made to increase output by diversification of cropping pattern, better farm practices and judging the market needs. However, water is the only input in agriculture on which service provider has control. Therefore to have an idea about trend of production in the command, which depends upon timely supply of water in adequate quantity, this indicator has been adopted. The yield data for the year of various crops is collected from agriculture department. The market prices are obtained from Agricultural Produce Market Committees located in each taluka. In respect of sugarcane, prices are obtained from sugar factories in the command area and for cotton, from Cotton Federation. The prices of 1998-99 are considered as base prices for all the remaining years & output is worked out accordingly. The plan group wise targets set for different categories of projects are given in Appendix-II.

4.2.2 Output per Unit Irrigation Water Supply

Output per unit irrigation water supply is value in Rupees of agricultural production from irrigated area compared to total quantity of water supplied for irrigation. The output per unit irrigation water supply is an indicator of optimal use of water.

4.3 Financial Performance

Any system is to be termed as economically self-sustainable if the yearly O&M expenditure incurred on the project is met from its own revenue.

In Maharashtra, the water charges are recovered for all uses to encourage efficient water use. Presently, the practice of volumetric supply is in use for WUA, Domestic and Industrial water supply.

The indicators chosen for financial performance are given below.

1) Cost Recovery Ratio

2) Total O&M Cost per unit area

3) Total O&M Cost per unit Volume of Water Supplied

4) Revenue per unit water supplied

5) Assessment Recovery Ratio (Irrigation & Non Irrigation)

4.3.1 Cost Recovery Ratio

It is the ratio of recovery of water charges to the cost of providing the service. Recovery of water charges and O&M cost incurred during the period of irrigation year i.e. 1st July 2010 to 30th June 2011 is considered. Secondly the operation cost includes the salary of technical & ministerial staff working on irrigation management irrespective of its establishment type (i.e. Regular Temporary/Converted Regular Temporary/Work Charged/Daily rated). It is imperative to devise water rates and mechanism for recovery of water charges for irrigation use in such a manner to meet, at least, annual cost of management, O&M of system and recovery of some portion of capital investment on the projects in order to make the system self sustainable. Theoretically the cost recovery ratio should be at least equal to one.

Due to the efforts taken at all levels the recovery of water charges has improved and the O&M cost is comparatively low. This has resulted in enhancing the cost recovery ratio more than one.

4.3.2 Total O&M Cost per Unit Area

Total O&M cost per unit area is the ratio of total O&M cost incurred for management of the system and area irrigated (potential utilised) during the irrigation year. The total O&M cost includes cost of maintenance as well as all types of establishment charges. The annual maintenance cost incurred does not include cost of modernization and special repairs. Establishment charges include salary paid to staff working up to a management section.

The O&M cost per unit area should be as minimum as possible.

GOM has prescribed yearly O&M norms per hectare excluding establishment cost. The O&M cost per unit area is more in projects where there is less irrigation compared to created potential.

4.3.3 Total O&M Cost per Unit Water Supplied

Total O&M cost per unit water supplied is obtained by dividing total O&M cost by total quantity of water supplied for irrigation and non-irrigation use during the year.

Total O&M cost per unit volume of water supplied should be as minimum as possible to achieve economy in supply.

4.3.4 Revenue per Unit Water Supplied

It is the ratio of total revenue and quantity of water supplied for irrigation & non irrigation use during the irrigation year.

Revenue per unit volume of water supplied is very important measure as every drop of water is to be used efficiently and economically. The ratio also gives an idea about revenue realized against actual water supplied. The indicator will have more importance once the water is supplied on volumetric basis.

4.3.5 Assessment Recovery Ratio

This indicator is split up into two components viz.

a) Irrigation

b) Non Irrigation

In case of both the uses, there are arrears of water charges in many projects due to some or other reasons, one of the reasons being postponement of recovery during draught years.

It is the ratio of recovery of water charges during the irrigation year 2010-11 and assessment of charges for Kharif & Rabbi of 2010-11 for irrigation and for Hot Weather of 2009-10. For non-irrigation purpose assessment for water used during the year 2010-11 is considered.

The purpose of introducing this indicator is to check whether the water charges assessed during the irrigation year (1 July to 30 June) are totally recovered or not. For this indicator, recovery of arrears is not considered.

4.4 Environmental Aspects

4.4.1 Land Damage Index

Land damage index is expressed as percentage of land damaged to irrigable command area of the project.

The lands under irrigation become saline or waterlogged due to excessive use of water resulting in low productivity. This problem is faced in areas where high water intensive crops are grown year after year with unscientific methods of irrigation like flooding. Water logging and salinity occur in soils with poor drain ability. In Maharashtra, black cotton soil, which is highly impervious, is found on extensive area. Directorate Irrigation Research & Development, Pune is regularly monitoring & taking remedial measures for reclamation of damaged lands in commands of projects.

4.5 Social Aspects

4.5.1 Equity Performance

Most of the schemes are gravity systems with canals and distribution system. The command area is divided equally as head, middle & tail reaches. Equity performance means ratio of sum of actual area irrigated in all three seasons (canal flow and lifts on canal) to projected irrigable command area in head, middle and tail reaches. It is expressed as percentage. This indicator gives clear picture as to whether or not the irrigation facility is provided equitably to head; middle & tail reach farmers in command area.

The benefit of irrigation should be given to the beneficiaries in head, middle & tail reach equitably. Ideally for equity, this ratio should be equal to one for head, middle as well as tail reaches.

Major Projects

Benchmarking Observations 2010-11

Major Project

Indicator I: Annual Irrigation Water Supply per Unit Irrigated Area

Highly Deficit plan group:-

CADA Solapur: In Bhima (Ujjani) project, water is utilized for irrigation at the rate of 7851 cum/Ha. Improvement in performance is observed over last four years.

Deficit plan group:

AIC Akola: Katepurna project is under MWSIP. Even though losses are reduced, annual water use per unit irrigated area is more than 2 times state target. In Nalganaga project, it is slightly more than state target

BIPC Buldhana: In Wan project annual water use per unit irrigated area is nearly 2 times state norm and more than last 5 years water use per unit area irrigated.

CADA Aurangabad: In Jayakwadi project Stage-I (PLBC), water use per unit irrigated area increased to 13009 cum/ha, which is near to 2008-09 (13238 cum/ha). Last year it was 10630 cum/ha.

CADA Beed: In Majalgaon project water use increased to 19840 cum/ha (nearly 2.6 times of State norm). It was 11199 cum/ha last year. This year’s water use is highest of last six years. In spite of decrease in perennial crops from 86% to 58% this year, water use increased by 77%. Maximum utilisation in HW season may be one of the reasons for increase. Since last 6 years (from 2005-06) project authorities have not taken any action to reduce the water use and to achieve State norm.

In Manjra project, the water use increased from 9217 cum/ha (2009-10) to 9779 cum/ha, in spite of 15% decrease in perennial crops, it was 8208 cum/ha in 2007-08.

In Lower Terna project, water use increased from 4018 to 8970 cum/ha as compared to last year, single rotation due to lesser availability of water last year resulted into less water use per unit irrigated area.

In Jayakwadi project Stage-I (PRBC), the water use per unit irrigated area increased from 4353 to 20228 like 2008-09 (20119 cum/ha). Last year there was only one rotation in Rabi season to the standing crops because of lesser availability, whereas this year 3 & 5 rotations were given in Rabi & HW season respectively.

CADA Jalgaon: In Girna project, though the water use per unit irrigated area reduced from 8696 cum/ha (2009-10) to 7237 cum/ha (2010-11). The field officers succeeded to reduce the water use per unit area from 14748 cum/ha to 7237 cum/ha in last five years. Consistency is expected in future also.

CADA Nashik: In Chankapur project, the annual water use per unit irrigated area just increased from 5960 cum/ha (2009-10) to 5968 cum /ha (2010-11).

NIC Nanded: In Vishnupuri project, water use decreased from 7826 to 6835 cum/ha this year as compared to last year which is within the State norm. This is due to reduction in perennial crops from 45% to 19% this year.

In Manar project, water use increased from 9169 to 13719 cum/ha as compared to 2008-09. There was no irrigation due to lesser availability of water in 2009-10. Water use in 2006-07 & 2007-08 was nearer to State norm.

In Purna project, water use increased from 6011 to 15198 cum/ha this year. There was single protective rotation in Rabi & HW season each last year, whereas this year 3 & 5 rotations are given in Rabi & HW season respectively.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: In NM express canal, water use decreased from 17261 to 14632 cum/ha compared to last year. Still it is higher than the State norm.

AIC Akola: Even though the area of cash crops is less in case of Pus Project water use per unit irrigated area is 3 times state target. Accurate measurement of irrigated area is necessary.

CADA Jalgaon: In Hatnur project, the water use per unit irrigated area increased from 9581cum/ha (2009-10) to 13104 cum/ha (2010-11) which is 1.7 times more than the State target. The field officers are required to take efforts for improvement in the performance.

CADA Nagpur: In Lower Wunna Project complex water use is 19281 cum/Ha. during the current irrigation year. It is more than last five years average, last year’s value, plan group average and state target due to more use of water.

CADA Nashik: The overall indicator value increased from 8614 cum/ha to 11923 cum/ha as compared to last year.

In Bhandardara project, the water use per unit irrigated area increased from 11552 cum/ha (2009-10) to 18612 cum/ha (2010-11) which is 2.4 times higher than the State target. Efforts should be taken by the field officers to reduce water use per ha duly taking necessary remedial measures for minimizing leakages in disnet system and supply of water by volumetric basis duly forming water users associations.

In Kadawa project, the water use is consistently more than the State target. As compared to last year it again increased from 23541 cum/ha to 24039 cum/ha which is 3.1 times more than the State norm. As per field officers, more water use/ha is due to more conveyance losses in the canal system. Remedial measures are being taken in hand i.e. selective lining, pitching etc to improve the performance.

In Mula project, the water use/ha increased from 9032 cum/ha (2009-10) to 12515 cum/ha (2010-11) and is 1.6 times higher than the State norm. As the water is supplied to irrigation by volumetric basis all over the command area of the project, proper care should be taken by the field officers to have the economical use of water so that the indicator value should not exceed the State norm.

In Waghad project, the water use/ha reduced from 6393 cum/ha (2009-10) to 6243 cum /ha (2010-11). As water is supplied fully on volumetric basis on this project, care should be taken by the field officers that the indicator value remains within State norm in future also.

In Gangapur project, though the water use per unit area increased from 2730 cum/ha (2009-10) to 4847 cum/ha (2010-11) it is 63% less than the State norms. Efforts should be taken by the field officers to increase utilization of water for irrigation.

In Darna project, though the water use per unit irrigated area increased from 3766 cum /ha (2009-10) to 4388 cum/ha (2010-11) it is far below the State norm. Efforts should be taken by the field officers to increase utilization of water for irrigation.

CADA Pune: In Kukadi Project, the annual irrigation water supply per unit area was 9272 cum/Ha. There was slight improvement over last year. Water utilization was more compared to State norm.

In Ghod Project, the water utilization was 8768 cum/Ha. Slightly more as compared to last year’s value of 8520 cum/Ha.

CIPC Chandrapur: Actual water use per unit area irrigated on Bor project is 21342 cum/Ha, which is more than last five year average, last year value and state target.

NIC Nanded: In Upper Penganga Project, water use per unit irrigated area increased from 5320 to 15431 compared to last year. There was less availability of water last year and hence a single protective rotation in HW was given. This year 3 & 5 rotations are given in Rabi & HW season respectively. It is seen from 2005-06 that efforts are not being taken to achieve State norm as water use per unit irrigated area is very high, nearly double the norm.

PIC Pune: In Khadakwasla, NRBC & NLBC the water utilization was 8518, 8252, 9683 cum /Ha respectively, increased as compared to last year’s 7345, 7524, 9261 cum/Ha & State target.

In Pawana Project, the water utilization was 5396 cum/Ha. The water use decreased by over 5 Mcum and area irrigated was also less by 400 hectares compared to last year.

In Chaskaman Project, the water utilization was 7258 cum/Ha. The water use decreased by 4.5 Mcum, the area irrigated remaining more or less the same.

UWPC Amravati: Annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area is twice the state target.

YIC Yavatmal: In Arunavati project measurement of area irrigated on wells specially perennial crops is more than area on canals lifts, this seems to be doubtful and might be the main reason for considerable increase in annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area which is 4.2 times state target .

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Performance of Itiadoh project is better as compared to Pench and Bagh projects under this circle. Water use in Itiadoh project is 5751 cum/ha, whereas for Pench and Bagh projects it is 8006 cum/ha and 8824 cum/ha respectively. In Pench and Bagh project Water use is slightly higher than state target.

Abundant plan group:

CADA Pune: In Krishna Project, the water utilization for irrigation was 12804 cum/Ha, decreased over last year’s value of 14669 cum/Ha. However, the water utilization was more than State norm. The field officers are advised to do needful to reduce the water utilization per unit area.

CIPC Chandrapur: In Asolamendha & Dina projects water use is 3458 cum/ha which is less than state target and better than last year as well as last five years average.

SIC Sangli: Water use for irrigation in Tulshi (11233 cum/ha.) & Dudhganga (11398cum/ha.) was nearly 150% of State norm.

TIC Thane: Water use for irrigation in Bhatsa, Kal-Amba & Surya was 29919, 47459 & 10566 cum/ha respectively. Though the water use improved in Surya, it has increased by more than 50% of that during last year in Bhatsa & Kal-Amba.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 8487 8015 7851 9734 7094 7851Deficit AIC Akola 6416 6929 12583 7816 5972

BIPC Buldhana 8965 11610 15908 11610 8210CADA Abad 10582 10630 13009 13238 8541CADA Beed 11452 7998 14812 15240 8052CADA Jalgaon 13855 8696 7237 14749 8696CADA Nashik 5502 5960 5968 6119 4338NIC Nanded 11480 6479 13264 13970 6479

Normal AIC Abad 8445 17261 14632 14862 5133AIC Akola 10123 6026 22373 21110 6026CADA Jalgaon 11239 9581 13104 14433 8499CADA Nagpur 12619 11823 19281 16840 8996CADA Nashik 10971 8614 11923 12868 8614CADA Pune 9474 9873 9143 11244 7937CIPC Chandrapur 17455 16579 21342 18444 16406NIC Nanded 15190 5320 15431 19785 5320PIC Pune 9491 7898 8542 12010 7898UWPC Amravati 14980 11804 19709 20665 5696YIC Yavatmal 13602 2440 31962 24600 2440

Surplus CADA Nagpur 10583 10837 7810 11806 9097 7810Abundant CADA Pune 14035 14669 12804 16784 11585

CIPC Chandrapur 5475 3965 3458 6578 3965SIC Sangli 8580 9200 8403 10367 6662TIC Thane 25222 27331 48884 30443 18712

11826

15548

8222

7692

Indicator IMajor Projects

Annual Irrigation Water Supply per unit Irrigated Area (cum/ha)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000C

AD

A S

olap

ur

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

cum

/ha

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Indicator IMajor Projects

Annual Irrigation Water Supply per unit Irrigated Area (cum/ha)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

Bhi

ma

Cha

naka

pur

Vis

hnup

uri

Girn

a

Low

er T

erna

Man

jra

Nal

gang

a

Jaya

kwad

i (P

LBC

)

Man

ar

Pur

na

Wan

(Am

rava

ti)

Kat

epur

na

Maj

alga

on

Jaya

kwad

i PR

BC

UG

C O

zerk

hed

Dar

na

Gan

gapu

r

Paw

ana

Wag

had

Cha

skam

an

NR

BC

Kha

dakw

asla

Gho

d

Kuk

adi

NLB

C

Pal

khed

Mul

a

Hat

nur

NM

C E

xpre

ss M

ukan

e

Upp

er P

enga

nga

Bha

ndar

dara

Low

er W

unna

Upp

er W

ardh

a

Bor

Pus

Kad

va

Aru

nava

ti

Itiah

doh

Pen

ch

Bag

h

Aso

la M

endh

a

Din

a

War

na

Rad

hana

gari

Tula

shi

Dud

hgan

ga

Kris

hna

Bha

tsa

Kal

Sur

ya

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

cum

/ha

FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Plangroup Circle Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 8487 8014 7851 9734 7094 7851Deficit CADA Nashik Chanakapur 5502 5960 5968 6119 4338

NIC Nanded Vishnupuri 7576 7826 6835 7996 6304CADA Jalgaon Girna 13855 8696 7237 14749 8696CADA Beed Lower Terna 6373 4018 8970 7186 4018CADA Beed Manjra 10992 9217 9779 15227 8208AIC Akola Nalganga 6353 6351 10114 6946 3605CADA Abad Jayakwadi (PLBC) 10582 10630 13009 13238 8541NIC Nanded Manar 9472 0 13719 12921 0NIC Nanded Purna 13565 6011 15198 18390 6011BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amravati) 8965 11610 15908 11610 8210AIC Akola Katepurna 6478 0 17595 8919 0CADA Beed Majalgaon 15043 11199 19840 18074 11199CADA Beed Jayakwadi PRBC 10370 4353 20228 18439 4353

Normal CADA Nashik UGC Ozerkhed 8868 3922 4178 11932 3922CADA Nashik Darna 10634 3766 4388 12850 3766CADA Nashik Gangapur 5081 2730 4847 6997 2730PIC Pune Pawana 7866 6515 5396 18647 4986CADA Nashik Waghad 9149 6393 6243 10675 6393PIC Pune Chaskaman 10993 7668 7258 34308 6701PIC Pune NRBC 7977 7524 8252 8442 7524PIC Pune Khadakwasla 10893 7345 8518 21588 7345CADA Pune Ghod 8452 8520 8768 9512 7628CADA Pune Kukadi 9809 10355 9272 11850 7987PIC Pune NLBC 12018 9261 9683 15448 9261CADA Nashik Palkhed 9969 6781 10845 16291 6652CADA Nashik Mula 11476 9032 12515 13428 9032CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 11239 9581 13104 14433 8499

AIC AbadNMC Express Mukane 8445 10037 14632 14862 5133

NIC Nanded Upper Penganga 15190 5320 15431 19785 5320CADA Nashik Bhandardara 12471 11552 18612 15574 10494CADA Nagpur Lower Wunna 12619 11823 19281 16840 8996UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha 14980 11804 19709 20665 5696CIPC Chandrapur Bor 17455 16579 21342 18444 16406AIC Akola Pus 10123 6026 22373 21110 6026CADA Nashik Kadva 24007 23541 24039 29907 20459YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 13602 2440 31962 24600 2440

Surplus CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 10467 7019 5751 13254 7019CADA Nagpur Pench 11851 12649 8006 13219 9686CADA Nagpur Bagh 7192 7891 8824 8044 6418

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur Asola Mendha 5847 2755 2919 7254 2755CIPC Chandrapur Dina 5127 4961 3930 5943 4474SIC Sangli Warna 7995 8999 6449 10649 6453SIC Sangli Radhanagari 7929 7776 7967 10640 6190SIC Sangli Tulashi 11256 9446 11233 17935 8559SIC Sangli Dudhganga 10096 11638 11398 12777 7503CADA Pune Krishna 14035 14669 12804 16784 11585TIC Thane Bhatsa 21839 19867 29919 26493 17751TIC Thane Kal 28126 31514 47459 31514 6667TIC Thane Surya 25199 30452 100566 43329 17556

15548

7810

8221

Indicator IMajor Projects

Annual Irrigation Water Supply per unit Irrigated Area (cum/ha)

11826

7692

Indicator I(a): Annual Area irrigated per unit of water supplied

Highly Deficit plan group:

CADA Solapur : In Bhima project, the annual area irrigated per unit of water supplied was 127 Ha/Mcum like last year.

Deficit plan group:

CADA Aurangabad: The performance of Jayakwadi (PLBC) again declined from 94 to 77 Ha/Mcum, compared to last year and nearly equal the value of 2008-09 i.e. 76 ha/Mcum.

CADA Beed: There is an overall decline in performance from 124 ha/Mcum to 68 ha/Mcum in comparison with last year. In PRBC, indicator value decreased drastically from 230 to 49 ha/Mcum, because of protective rotation last year in view of lesser availability, in Lower Terna, it reduced from 249 to 111ha/Mcum, whereas in Majalgaon project, the value attained this year (50 ha/Mcum) is the lowest of last five years, last year it was 89 ha/Mcum.

NIC Nanded: In Vishnupuri project, last four year’s constant value (125 to 128 ha/Mcum) of this indicator increased this year to 146 ha/Mcum, whereas in Manar, it was 73 ha/Mcum, as there was no irrigation last year due to non-availability of water. In Purna project, indicator value suddenly decreased to 66 Ha/Mcum from last year’s 166 Ha/Mcum, due to single protective rotation given in each season last year.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: The performance of NM express canal slightly improved from 58 to 68 ha/ Mcum compared to last year.

CADA Nagpur: The performance of Lower wunna project has declined over last year i.e. from 85 Ha./Mm3 to 52 Ha./Mm3

CIPC Chandrapur: The performance of Bor project has declined over last year i.e. from 60 Ha./Mm3 to 47 Ha./Mm3

NIC Nanded: In Upper Penganga project, performance declined to 65 ha/Mcum. It was 188 ha/Mcum last year, due to a single protective rotation in view of lesser availability of water.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: During this year Itiadoh project as attend maximum value of 174 Ha./Mm3 where as in Bagh project performance has declined from 127 Ha./Mm3 to 113 Ha./Mm3. In Pench project performance has improved from 79 Ha./Mm3 to 125 Ha./Mm3.

Abundant plan group:

CIPC Chandrapur: The performance of Asolamendha project has declined over last year i.e. from 363 Ha./Mm3 to 343 Ha./Mm3. But in case of Dina project there is improvement from 202 Ha./Mm3 to 254 Ha./Mm3.

SIC Sangli: In Warna project, the performance improved over last two years. Radhanagari had consistency in performance for last two years, whereas in Tulshi, the performance declined over last year.

TIC Thane: In all the three projects, the irrigated area per unit of water supplied is lowest compared to 2008-09 & 2009-10.

In all the three projects decline in performance is observed. It is more so in Kal-Amba & Surya.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10TY 2010-1 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 118 125 127 141 103 127Deficit BIPC Buldhana 112 86 63 122 86

CADA Beed 87 124 68 124 66NIC Nanded 87 154 75 154 72CADA Abad 94 94 77 117 76AIC Akola 156 144 79 167 128CADA Jalgaon 72 115 138 115 68CADA Nashik 182 168 168 231 163

Normal YIC Yavatmal 74 410 31 410 41AIC Akola 99 166 45 166 47CIPC Chandrapur 57 60 47 61 54UWPC Amravati 67 85 51 176 48CADA Nagpur 79 85 52 111 59NIC Nanded 66 188 65 188 51AIC Abad 118 58 68 195 67CADA Jalgaon 89 104 76 118 69CADA Nashik 91 116 84 116 78CADA Pune 106 101 109 126 89PIC Pune 105 127 117 127 83

Surplus CADA Nagpur 94 92 128 110 85 128Abundant TIC Thane 40 37 20 53 33

CADA Pune 71 68 78 86 60SIC Sangli 117 109 119 150 96CIPC Chandrapur 183 252 289 252 152

95

71

162

130

Indicator I aMajor Projects

Annual Area Irrigated per unit of Water Supply (ha/M

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

CA

DA

Sol

apur

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Bee

d

NIC

Nan

ded

CA

DA

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

YIC

Yav

atm

al

AIC

Ako

la

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

CA

DA

Nag

pur

NIC

Nan

ded

AIC

Aba

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

PIC

Pun

e

CA

DA

Nag

pur

TIC

Tha

ne

CA

DA

Pun

e

SIC

San

gli

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

ha/M

cum

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Indicator I aMajor Projects

Annual Area Irrigated per unit of Water Supply (ha/Mcum)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Bhi

ma

Jaya

kwad

i PR

BC

Maj

alga

onK

atep

urna

Wan

(Am

rava

ti)P

urna

Man

arJa

yakw

adi (

PLB

C)

Nal

gang

aM

anjra

Low

er T

erna

Girn

aV

ishn

upur

iC

hana

kapu

rA

runa

vati

Kad

vaP

us Bor

Upp

er W

ardh

aLo

wer

Wun

naB

hand

arda

raU

pper

Pen

gang

aN

MC

Exp

ress

Muk

ane

Hat

nur

Mul

aP

alkh

edN

LBC

Kuk

adi

Gho

dK

hada

kwas

laN

RB

CC

hask

aman

Wag

had

Paw

ana

Gan

gapu

rD

arna

UG

C O

zerk

hed

Bag

hP

ench

Itiah

doh

Sur

ya Kal

Bha

tsa

Kris

hna

Dud

hgan

gaTu

lash

iR

adha

naga

riW

arna

Din

aA

sola

Men

dha

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

ha/M

cum

FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Plangroup Circle Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 118 125 127 141 103 125Deficit CADA Beed Jayakwadi PRBC 96 230 49 230 54

CADA Beed Majalgaon 66 89 50 89 55AIC Akola Katepurna 154 0 57 174 0BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amravati) 112 86 63 122 86NIC Nanded Purna 74 166 66 166 54NIC Nanded Manar 106 0 73 123 0CADA Abad Jayakwadi (PLBC) 94 94 77 117 76AIC Akola Nalganga 157 157 99 277 144

CADA Beed Manjra 91 108 102 122 66CADA Beed Lower Terna 157 249 111 249 139CADA Jalgaon Girna 72 115 138 115 68NIC Nanded Vishnupuri 132 128 146 159 125CADA Nashik Chanakapur 182 168 168 231 163

Normal YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 74 410 31 410 41CADA Nashik Kadva 42 42 42 49 33AIC Akola Pus 99 166 45 166 47CIPC Chandrapur Bor 57 60 47 61 54UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha 67 85 51 176 48CADA Nagpur Lower Wunna 79 85 52 111 59CADA Nashik Bhandardara 80 87 54 95 64NIC Nanded Upper Penganga 66 188 65 188 51

AIC Abad NMC Express Mukane 118 100 68 195 67CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 89 104 76 118 69CADA Nashik Mula 87 111 80 111 74CADA Nashik Palkhed 100 147 92 150 61PIC Pune NLBC 83 108 103 108 65CADA Pune Kukadi 102 97 108 125 84CADA Pune Ghod 118 117 114 131 105PIC Pune Khadakwasla 92 136 117 136 46PIC Pune NRBC 125 133 121 133 118PIC Pune Chaskaman 91 130 138 149 29CADA Nashik Waghad 109 156 160 156 94PIC Pune Pawana 127 153 185 201 54CADA Nashik Gangapur 197 366 206 366 143CADA Nashik Darna 94 266 228 266 78CADA Nashik UGC Ozerkhed 113 255 239 255 84

Surplus CADA Nagpur Bagh 139 127 113 156 124CADA Nagpur Pench 84 79 125 103 76CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 96 142 174 142 75

Abundant TIC Thane Surya 40 33 10 57 23TIC Thane Kal 36 32 21 150 32TIC Thane Bhatsa 46 50 33 56 38CADA Pune Krishna 71 68 78 86 60SIC Sangli Dudhganga 99 86 88 133 78SIC Sangli Tulashi 89 106 89 117 56SIC Sangli Radhanagari 126 129 126 162 94SIC Sangli Warna 125 111 155 155 94CIPC Chandrapur Dina 195 202 254 224 168CIPC Chandrapur Asola Mendha 171 363 343 363 138

130

Indicator I aMajor Projects

Annual Area Irrigated per unit of Water Supply (ha/Mcum)

97

92

105

71

Indicator II: Potential created & utilised

Highly Deficit plan group:-

CADA Solapur: In Bhima (Ujjani) Project, utilized irrigation potential was 77%. Utilization increased over last four years. However, the area irrigated on canals was only 44133Ha. (23%), that from reservoir lifts was 60382 (31%, exceeding the permissible percentage) & 90056Ha. was on river lifts (46%).

Deficit plan group:

AIC Akola: In Katepurna project, which is under MWSIP, 35% of potential is utilized in spite of 100% availability of water.

BIPC Buldhana: In Wan project only 21% of potential is utilized while 32% of water is not utilized.

CADA Aurangabad: In Jayakwadi project (PLBC), the ratio decreased from 1.99 (2009-10) to 1.24. As potential on reservoir is not included in created potential of project, the ratio exceeded the norm.

CADA Beed: In all four major projects viz. Majalgaon, Manjra, Lower Terna & PRBC, the overall ratio increased to 0.72 as compared to last year’s 0.62. Especially in PRBC, more utilised potential under wells & nallas in command area (19565 ha) than that of canal (5176 ha) improved overall ratio of circle. In spite of having 100% availability of water in the reservoirs of Majalgaon & Lower Terna, potential utilised is very less i.e. 26 & 28% respectively.

CADA Jalgaon: In Girna project, full effective potential is utilized since last year.

CADA Nashik: In Chankapur project, there is consistency in full utilization of effective potential since last two years.

NIC Nanded: Purna project had indicator ratio of 0.72. In Manar, last two year’s low yield affected the ratio (0.39), whereas Vishnupuri Project achieved the norm.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: In NMC express canal, the ratio increased from 0.18 (in 2009-10) to 0.50.

AIC Akola: In Pus project 72% of created potential is utilized.

NIC Nanded: Upper Penganga project had indicator ratio 0.72. It was zero last year due to less availability.

CADA Jalgaon: In Hatnur project, the utilization is just reduced from 0.97 to 0.90 as compared to last year.

CADA Nashik: Though the overall value of the indicator is lowered from 1.67 to 1.41as compared to last year, all major projects except Darna (0.61) achieved the State norm.

CADA Nagpur: In Lower Wunna Project complex utilization of irrigation potential is more than last year’s performance and state target also.

CIPC Chandrapur: Bor project was expected to irrigate 100% of the created potential as storage was nearly 100%. But utilized irrigation potential is only 34% of expected utilization.

CADA Pune: In Kukadi Project, the utilized potential was 1.04%. There was consistency of good performance for last five years. In Ghod Project, the ratio was 1.29.

PIC Pune: In Khadakwasla Project, the ratio works out to 1.13 as against 1.25 of last year. In NRBC & NLBC the ratio was 1.19 & 2.58 respectively. In Pawana Project, the ratio was same as for last year. i.e. 0.39, far below the State norm. The field officers are advised to take efforts to improve the performance. In Chaskaman project, the ratio was 0.78, with decline over last year’s performance of 0.94.

UWPC Amaravati: In Upper Wardha project 45% of potential is utilized.

YIC Yeotmal: In Arunavati project 27% of potential is utilized in spite of availability of water.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Utilisation of created potential in Pench, Bagh and Itiadoh projects is satisfactory.

Abundant plan group:

CADA Pune: In Krishna Project, the ratio was 1.03 similar to last year (1.04). The potential created increased by 200 hectares whereas the utilisation was less by 313 hectares.

CIPC Chandrapur: Utilisation of created potential in Asolamendha and Dina projects is 1.22.

TIC Thane: The ratio in Bhatsa, Kal-Amba & Surya was 0.28, 0.13 & 0.13 respectively. In all the three projects, the utilization decreased over last year. Lesser utilization in spite of good availability of storage needs to be taken seriously by the field officers.

SIC Sangli: In Tulshi project, the utilization decreased over last year. In Warna only 664Ha. were irrigated on canals against created potential of 3881Ha. Moreover, in Dudhganga also utilization was very low i.e. 2088Ha. out or 11894Ha. In Warna & Dudhganga the area irrigated on river lifts was 23841 & 12564Ha. respectively.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 0.59 0.55 0.77 0.76 0.50 0.77Deficit AIC Akola 0.24 0.19 0.56 0.75 0.13

BIPC Buldhana 0.26 0.10 0.21 0.33 0.00CADA Abad 1.02 2.12 1.24 2.12 0.57CADA Beed 0.49 0.38 0.56 0.72 0.30CADA Jalgaon 1.03 1.81 1.18 1.81 0.75CADA Nashik 1.16 1.25 1.14 6.14 0.89NIC Nanded 0.92 0.61 0.68 1.50 0.61

Normal AIC Abad 0.34 0.18 0.50 0.54 0.18AIC Akola 0.50 0.56 0.72 0.76 0.27CADA Jalgaon 0.73 0.97 0.90 1.77 0.46CADA Nagpur 0.79 0.69 2.01 0.84 0.69CADA Nashik 1.48 1.67 1.41 1.67 1.26CADA Pune 1.09 1.14 1.08 1.55 0.89CIPC Chandrapur 0.40 0.41 0.34 0.42 0.37NIC Nanded 0.86 0.00 0.75 1.45 0.00PIC Pune 1.59 2.16 1.28 2.16 1.29UWPC Amravati 0.33 0.42 0.45 0.47 0.17YIC Yavatmal 0.24 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.83 0.85 1.03 0.94 0.66 1.00Abundant CADA Pune 1.10 1.04 1.03 1.29 0.96

CIPC Chandrapur 1.03 1.60 1.22 1.60 0.89SIC Sangli 0.60 0.96 1.56 0.96 0.43TIC Thane 0.40 0.28 0.17 0.61 0.28

0.72

0.72

1

0.79

Indicator IIMajor Projects

Potential Created and Utilised

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

CAD

A So

lapu

r

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC A

mra

vati

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar Past Max Past Min

Indicator IIMajor Projects

Potential Created and Utilised

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

Bhi

ma

Wan

(Am

rava

ti)M

ajal

gaon

Low

er T

erna

Kat

epur

naM

anar

Pur

naM

anjra

Nal

gang

aV

ishn

upur

iC

hana

kapu

rG

irna

Jaya

kwad

i (P

LBC

)Ja

yakw

adi P

RB

CA

runa

vati

Bor

Paw

ana

Upp

er W

ardh

aN

MC

Exp

ress

Muk

ane

Dar

na Pus

Upp

er P

enga

nga

Cha

skam

anH

atnu

rK

ukad

iM

ula

Kha

dakw

asla

NR

BC

Pal

khed

Kad

vaG

hod

UG

C O

zerk

hed

Gan

gapu

rW

agha

dLo

wer

Wun

naN

LBC

Bha

ndar

dara

Pen

chIti

ahdo

hB

agh

Sur

ya Kal

Bha

tsa

Tula

shi

Aso

la M

endh

aR

adha

naga

riK

rishn

aD

udhg

anga

Din

aW

arna

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

Fy Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 State Tar

Plangroup Circle Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 0.59 0.55 0.77 0.76 0.50 0.77Deficit BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amravati) 0.26 0.10 0.21 0.33 0.00

CADA Beed Majalgaon 0.44 0.15 0.26 0.69 0.15CADA Beed Lower Terna 0.38 0.85 0.28 0.85 0.18AIC Akola Katepurna 0.47 0.00 0.35 0.59 0.00NIC Nanded Manar 0.71 0.00 0.39 0.85 0.00NIC Nanded Purna 1.06 1.59 0.72 2.30 0.68CADA Beed Manjra 0.64 0.87 0.79 0.87 0.45AIC Akola Nalganga 0.16 0.75 0.81 0.75 0.00NIC Nanded Vishnupuri 0.74 0.18 1.08 1.34 0.18CADA Nashik Chanakapur 1.16 1.25 1.14 6.14 0.89CADA Jalgaon Girna 1.03 1.81 1.18 1.81 0.75CADA Abad Jayakwadi (PLBC) 1.02 2.12 1.24 2.12 0.57CADA Beed Jayakwadi PRBC 0.49 0.63 1.52 0.96 0.23

Normal YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 0.24 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.00CIPC Chandrapur Bor 0.40 0.41 0.34 0.42 0.37PIC Pune Pawana 0.48 0.39 0.39 1.00 0.27UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha 0.33 0.42 0.45 0.47 0.17AIC Abad NMC Express Mukane 0.34 0.18 0.50 0.54 0.18CADA Nashik Darna 0.83 0.71 0.61 1.37 0.00AIC Akola Pus 0.50 0.56 0.72 0.76 0.27NIC Nanded Upper Penganga 0.86 0.00 0.75 1.45 0.00PIC Pune Chaskaman 0.77 0.94 0.78 0.94 0.60CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 0.73 0.97 0.90 1.77 0.46CADA Pune Kukadi 0.96 1.06 1.04 1.46 0.77CADA Nashik Mula 1.22 1.30 1.09 1.36 1.06PIC Pune Khadakwasla 0.90 1.25 1.13 1.25 0.48PIC Pune NRBC 2.03 3.44 1.19 3.44 1.19CADA Nashik Palkhed 1.46 1.39 1.23 1.78 1.08CADA Nashik Kadva 1.02 0.75 1.27 1.20 0.75CADA Pune Ghod 1.82 1.46 1.29 2.41 1.46CADA Nashik UGC Ozerkhed 1.99 2.99 1.46 2.99 0.74CADA Nashik Gangapur 1.89 2.07 1.49 2.87 1.34CADA Nashik Waghad 1.73 1.94 1.58 2.16 1.10CADA Nagpur Lower Wunna 0.79 0.69 2.01 0.84 0.69PIC Pune NLBC 2.21 2.60 2.58 2.60 1.91CADA Nashik Bhandardara 2.98 3.19 2.80 3.82 1.67

Surplus CADA Nagpur Pench 0.76 0.80 0.90 0.91 0.53CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 1.00 1.00 1.29 1.00 0.99CADA Nagpur Bagh 0.95 1.00 1.32 1.01 0.81

Abundant TIC Thane Surya 0.32 0.21 0.13 0.68 0.21TIC Thane Kal 0.70 0.40 0.13 1.00 0.40TIC Thane Bhatsa 0.35 0.31 0.28 0.47 0.27SIC Sangli Tulashi 0.68 0.64 0.48 1.56 0.52CIPC Chandrapur Asola Mendha 0.97 1.61 0.96 1.61 0.77SIC Sangli Radhanagari 0.97 0.96 0.97 1.01 0.91CADA Pune Krishna 1.10 1.04 1.03 1.29 0.96SIC Sangli Dudhganga 0.48 1.89 1.51 1.89 0.31CIPC Chandrapur Dina 1.08 1.60 1.59 1.60 0.97SIC Sangli Warna 0.48 0.77 7.42 0.95 0.20

0.79

1

Potential Created and Utilised

Indicator IIMajor Projects

0.72

0.72

1.00

Indicator III: Output per unit irrigated area (Rs/Ha)

Highly deficit Plan group:

CADA Solapur: In Bhima project, the agricultural output was Rs.49453.3/Ha. It was double the State norm consecutively for last five years.

Deficit plan group:

AIC Akola: In Katepurna and nalganga project output per unit irrigated area is more than state norm but less than last year.

BIPC Buldhana: In Wan project output per unit irrigated area is less than state target due to rabbi crops.

CADA Aurangabad: In Jayakwadi Project (PLBC), agricultural output decreased from Rs. 36429/ha (2009-10) to Rs. 29272/ha due to decrease in perennial crops.

CADA Beed: In Majalgaon project, output decreased to Rs.38200 /ha as compared to last year’s Rs 42640/ha, it is due to decrease in perennial crops from 86% to 58% this year, in Manjra also it has decreased from Rs. 47528/ha to Rs 45197/ha due to decrease in perennial crops from 79% to 63%. In Lower Terna, output increased from Rs.27978/ha to Rs.33094/ha due to increase in perennial crops over last year.

In Jayakwadi Project (PRBC), the agricultural output decreased from Rs. 33219/ha (2009-10) to Rs. 12109/ha due to decrease in perennial crops.

CADA Jalgaon: In Girna project, the output/ha reduced from Rs.15219/ha (2009-10) to Rs. 11798/ha (2010-11) which is about 47% of the State norm. The reduction in output is due to reduction in Rabi, Two Seasonals and perennial crops. Field officers are required to take efforts to improve the performance of the indicator as the output per ha is 66 to 84 % below the State norm since last five years.

CADA Nashik: In Chankapur project, the output per ha is slightly increased from Rs.21647/ha (2009-10) to Rs. 21830/ha (2010-11) which is just near (95%) the State norm. The increase in output is due to increase in total irrigated area from 7922 ha to 8581 ha as compared to last year.

NIC Nanded : In Vishnupuri Project, agricultural output increased slightly from Rs 19126/ha (2009-10) to Rs.21166/ha, because of increase in Cotton, Chilies and HW Groundnut compared to last year, whereas it slightly reduced in Purna Project Rs.20931 from Rs. 20948/ha. In Manar project, agricultural output increased from Rs18977/ha (2008-09) to Rs 23722/ha. There was no irrigation hence output was nil last year.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: In Nandur Madhameshwar express canal, output increased from Rs 17968/ha to Rs 23388 because of increase in two seasonal, HW & perennial crops, which was nil last year.

AIC Akola: Output per unit irrigated area in Pus project is increased compared to last year and more than state target.

CADA Jalgaon: In Hatnur project, the output /ha is increased from Rs. 41818/ha (2009-10) to Rs. 42658/ha (2010-11) and it is on higher side of the State norm. There is consistency of higher output since last five years.

CADA Nagpur: In case of Lower Wunna project, output per unit area irrigated is 14175 Rs/ha as similar to last year. But it is less than state target.

CADA Nashik: In all the projects, the output/ha is above State norm. There is consistency in higher output since last three years.

CADA Pune: In Kukadi Project, the output per hectare was Rs. 33839. It was decreased over last year. In Ghod Project, a slight increase was observed.

CIPC Chandrapur: Output per unit area on Bor Project is 17585 Rs/ha, which is less than last year, last five year average, state target.

NIC Nanded: In Upper Penganga Project, the output decreased from Rs. 30010/ha (2009-10) to Rs. 21869/ha because of 6% decrease in perennial crops.

PIC Pune: In Khadakwasla Project, the output increased to Rs. 46298 as compared to last year’s output of Rs. 43194. The increase in output was mainly due to increase in area under Hot Weather vegetables.

In NRBC the output was Rs. 27109/ Ha which is just above the State target. In N.L.B.C. output was Rs.41121/Ha. It was decreased over last year however, it was above the State norms.

In Pawana Project, the output was Rs. 48341 which was decreased as compared to last year’s value of Rs.94443/Ha. It was due to decrease in area & yield under cash crops like sugarcane, fruit crops & vegetables.

In Chaskaman, output still decreased from Rs.14380/Ha to Rs.14043 over last year. The utilised potential decreased by 1376 hectares but the output decreased by Rs. 279 lakhs. The decrease in output is mainly due to decreased area under Kharif and Rabbi Vegetable crops.

UWPC Amaravati: Performance is as per the sate target but decreased over last year.

YIC Yeotmal: Output per unit irrigated area in Arunavati project is very less.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Output per unit irrigated area on Bagh, Itiadoh & Pench projects have reduced as compared to last year and its five years average.

Abundant plan group:

CADA Pune: In Krishna Project, there was slight increase from Rs. 24219 to Rs. 24258/Ha. But it is below State norm.

CIPC Chandrapur: Output per unit irrigated area on Asolamendha and Dina projects have exceptionally reduced than state target similar to last year and its five year’s average.

SIC Sangli:The agricultural output per unit area in Radhanagri, Tulshi, Warna , & Dudhganga was Rs.46446, 48140, 67696 & 63132 respectively. Most of the area irrigated in these projects, is under sugarcane. However, the productively & rate of sugarcane in Warna & Dudhganga is more than Tulshi & Radhanagari.

TIC Thane: The agricultural output per unit area in different projects under this circle was as under.

Project Output in Rs./ha.

Bhatsa 2,06,998 Kal-Amba 31,149 Surya 54,993

In Kal-Amba, major production is of paddy, whereas in Bhatsa & Kal-Amba, it is of other fruit crops fetching more income. Moreover, the rates for fruit crops in Surya, are three times more than those in Bhatsa, resulting in higher output in Surya in comparison to Bhatsa.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 45906 43061 49453 52374 43061 49453 21000Deficit AIC Akola 34758 34896 32001 42150 16658

BIPC Buldhana 15091 18289 20308 20593 8850CADA Abad 27174 36429 29272 36429 20282CADA Beed 30332 39656 27333 47369 19300CADA Jalgaon 16537 15219 11798 19250 15219CADA Nashik 24064 21647 21830 35543 21647NIC Nanded 23971 20598 21386 35801 19187

Normal AIC Abad 21259 17968 23388 25191 17968AIC Akola 36477 27734 33885 60864 24877CADA Jalgaon 46916 41818 42658 77415 36315CADA Nagpur 9927 14823 14175 14823 1871CADA Nashik 55541 57006 76625 68973 40213CADA Pune 28832 34259 32859 45757 19262CIPC Chandrapur 20892 19921 17585 24650 17535NIC Nanded 24704 30010 21869 30010 21749PIC Pune 33095 33248 32655 36048 30298UWPC Amravati 28111 30047 27971 37535 24058YIC Yavatmal 21180 26531 4981 27839 16524

Surplus CADA Nagpur 28834 21896 19422 46835 21896 19422 25000Abundant CADA Pune 24797 24219 24258 26705 23352

CIPC Chandrapur 20376 2450 2450 24602 2450SIC Sangli 56922 58042 58622 64516 50324TIC Thane 47046 86826 286435 86826 35582

23000

26000

32000

23418

25203

28443

Indicator IIIMajor Projects

Output per unit Irrigated Area

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

CA

DA

Sol

apur

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs/

ha

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Indicator IIIMajor Projects

Output per unit Irrigated Area

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

Bhi

ma

Girn

aJa

yakw

adi P

RB

CW

an (A

mra

vati)

Pur

naV

ishn

upur

iC

hana

kapu

rM

anar

Jaya

kwad

i (P

LBC

)K

atep

urna

Nal

gang

aLo

wer

Ter

naM

ajal

gaon

Man

jraA

runa

vati

Cha

skam

anLo

wer

Wun

na Bor

Upp

er P

enga

nga

NM

C E

xpre

ss M

ukan

eN

RB

CU

pper

War

dha

Gho

dK

adva

Bha

ndar

dara

Kuk

adi

Pus

Mul

aN

LBC

Hat

nur

Gan

gapu

rK

hada

kwas

laP

awan

aD

arna

Wag

had

Pal

khed

UG

C O

zerk

hed

Pen

chIti

ahdo

hB

agh

Aso

la M

endh

aD

ina

Kris

hna

Kal

Rad

hana

gari

Tula

shi

Dud

hgan

gaW

arna

Bha

tsa

Sur

ya

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs/

ha

FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 StateTar

Plangroup Circle Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 45909 43063 49453 52374 43063 49453 21000Deficit CADA Jalgaon Girna 16537 15219 11798 19250 15219

CADA Beed Jayakwadi PRBC 23319 33219 12109 49897 9280BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amravati) 15091 18289 20308 20593 8850NIC Nanded Purna 24776 20948 20931 42361 17635NIC Nanded Vishnupuri 24407 19126 21166 26031 19126CADA Nashik Chanakapur 24064 21647 21830 35543 21647NIC Nanded Manar 19683 0 23722 20424 0CADA Abad Jayakwadi (PLBC) 27174 36429 29272 36429 20282AIC Akola Katepurna 34721 0 30029 47049 0AIC Akola Nalganga 34795 34896 33002 45215 17633CADA Beed Lower Terna 28301 27978 33094 30760 25052CADA Beed Majalgaon 33669 42640 38200 42640 31467CADA Beed Manjra 38802 47528 45197 64528 10602

Normal YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 21180 26531 4981 27839 16524PIC Pune Chaskaman 16245 14380 14043 23664 14380CADA Nagpur Lower Wunna 9927 14823 14175 14823 1871CIPC Chandrapur Bor 20892 19921 17585 24650 17535NIC Nanded Upper Penganga 24704 30010 21869 30010 21749AIC Abad NMC Express Mukane 21259 17968 23388 25191 17968PIC Pune NRBC 28337 26963 27109 30249 26963UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha 28111 30047 27971 37535 24058CADA Pune Ghod 23568 29126 29448 29126 20462CADA Nashik Kadva 39114 42292 30669 55917 30303CADA Nashik Bhandardara 31412 27603 31194 40756 27603CADA Pune Kukadi 30559 36106 33839 53569 18625AIC Akola Pus 36477 27734 33885 60864 24877CADA Nashik Mula 30521 31971 36145 33478 23416PIC Pune NLBC 36262 43194 41121 43194 28355CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 46916 41818 42658 77415 36315CADA Nashik Gangapur 45439 47745 45188 65707 25485PIC Pune Khadakwasla 46243 43711 46298 58000 42982PIC Pune Pawana 59068 94443 48341 94443 41597CADA Nashik Darna 45661 40330 52414 46334 40330CADA Nashik Waghad 149306 144696 119147 190886 88552CADA Nashik Palkhed 88417 83563 165158 123845 45023CADA Nashik UGC Ozerkhed 149136 183389 303695 185460 53408

Surplus CADA Nagpur Pench 30995 22841 19066 56908 22072CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 25380 19950 19914 33250 19950CADA Nagpur Bagh 25493 19987 19950 33250 19987

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur Asola Mendha 20701 2450 2450 24500 2450CIPC Chandrapur Dina 20069 2450 2450 24700 2450CADA Pune Krishna 24797 24219 24258 26705 23352TIC Thane Kal 37029 33226 31149 100000 31214SIC Sangli Radhanagari 57299 58668 46446 67344 44974SIC Sangli Tulashi 56519 54257 48140 72396 41868SIC Sangli Dudhganga 61387 71699 63132 71699 54652SIC Sangli Warna 53957 49379 67696 64638 49379TIC Thane Bhatsa 95961 201272 206998 201272 40143TIC Thane Surya 21250 30387 549933 30387 0

23000

26000

25000

32000

Output per unit Irrigated Area

Indicator IIIMajor Projects

23418

25203

19422

28443

Indicator IV: Out put per unit irrigation water supply (Rs/cum)

Highly Deficit plan group:

CADA Solapur: In Bhima (Ujjani) project, output per unit water supply was Rs.5.68, owing to optimum utilization of water. There is improvement over the past.

Deficit plan group:

AIC Akola: In Katepurna and Nalganga project output per unit water supply is slightly less and considerably more than state target respectively.

BIPC Buldhana : In Wan project output per unit water supply is less than state target.

CADA Aurangabad: In Jayakwadi project (PLBC), indicator value decreased from Rs 8.28 to 4.50 /cum, due to more number of rotations given this year against single protective rotation last year.

CADA Beed: Last year’s lesser availability in all the reservoirs restricted number of rotations given for irrigation; whereas this year there was 100% storage in three of the four projects resulting in decrease in overall indicator value from Rs 8.98 /cum (2009-10) to Rs 3.23/cum.

CADA Jalgaon: In Girna project, the output per unit irrigation water supply increased from Rs.9.46 (2009-10) to Rs.9.58 and is 3.2 times higher than the State norm. There is improvement in the performance since last two years.

CADA Nashik: In Chankapur project, the output per unit irrigation water supply is on higher side (Rs. 10.53/ cum) as compared to State norm as the water use per unit irrigated area has not exceeded the State norm i.e. water is utilized for irrigation precisely.

NIC Nanded: Output per unit of water supply in Manar project was Rs 2.33/cum, last year it was nil due to no irrigation.

In Vishnupuri Project, maximum irrigation on reservoir lifts & utilised potential by wells in command area (2965 hectares against last year’s 512 hectares) resulted in increasing indicator value from Rs 1.95 /cum (2009-10) to Rs 3.38/cum.

In Purna project, output decreased from Rs 4.06/cum to Rs1.55/cum, as there was protective single rotation applied both in Rabi & HW season each last year.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: In Nandur Madhameshwar express canal, output per unit water supply increased to Rs 1.60/cum as compared to last year’s Rs1.04/cum, this is because of increase in perennial crops, against nil last year.

AIC Akola: Output per unit water supply is more than state target but less than last year performance in pus project.

CADA Jalgaon: In Hatnur project, though the output per unit irrigation water supply is reduced from Rs.13.74/cum (2009-10) to Rs. 10.21/ cum, it is on higher side of the State norm, mainly due to cash crops (Banana & Sugarcane) in the command.

CADA Nagpur: In Lower Wunna Project output per Unit Irrigation Water Supply is decreased from Rs.1.90 to Rs.1.48 as compared to last year.

CADA Nashik: In all the projects, the output per unit irrigation water supply is quite high as compared to the State norm due to cash crops in the command, as such the overall value of the indicator increased from 13.69 to 15.65 as compared to last year.

CADA Pune: In Kukadi Project, the output works out to Rs. 7.56/cum. There was improvement over last year due to increased efficiency of water use and total output by Rs. 11 crores.

In Ghod Project, output was slightly less (Rs.5.77/cum) than last year (Rs. 6.99/cum). The water use increased by 10 Mcum and total output decreased by Rs. 10 crores.

CIPC Chandrapur: In Bor Project output per Unit Irrigation Water Supply is decreased from Rs.1.62 to Rs.1.11 as compared to last year and state target.

NIC Nanded: In Upper Penganga project, the value of indicator drastically reduced from Rs 308.30/cum (2009-10) to Rs 2.88/cum this year, because of more water use through rotations in Rabi & HW season as compared to last year’s single protective rotation in HW to Left Bank Canal only.

PIC Pune: In Khadakwasla Project, the output was as high as Rs. 10.22/cum. However, the decrease was due to increase in water use over last year.

In NLBC, the output decreased from Rs. 9.80 to Rs. 8.99/cum this year. The water use increased by 11 Mcum and total output decreased by about Rs. 2 crores.

In NRBC, the output increased from Rs.8.07 to 8.65/cum. The water use increased by 10 Mcum and total output increased by about Rs. 5 crores.

In Pawana, the output decreased from last year’s Rs. 10.57 to Rs. 7.52/cum this year. In spite of decrease in water use, the output per cum decreased due to reduction in productivity.

In Chaskaman project, output decreased from Rs.3.83 to 3.72/cum over last year.

The overall performance of projects under this circle was above the State target.

UWPC Amaravati: High water use per unit area irrigated but comparitively slight increase in this indicator above the state norm value.

YIC Yeotmal: In Arunavati project output per unit water supply is very less than state norm as well as last year performance as annual water supply is more.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Output per Unit Irrigation Water Supply of Pench, Bagh and Itiadoh Projects is slightly increased than last year but less than the state target.

Abundant plan group:

CADA Pune: In Krishna Project, the output increased from Rs. 3.72 to Rs. 4.29/cum., and attained the State target. The increase is mainly due to decrease in water use by 66 Mcum.

CIPC Chandrapur: Output per Unit Irrigation Water Supply of Asolamendha and Dina Projects is very much less than the state target as similar to last year.

SIC Sangli: The output per unit water supply in Radhanagri, Tulshi, Warna & Dudhganga was Rs. 3.69, 2.47, 7.57 & 3.62 respectively. In Tulshi & Dudhganga, the output is less than State norm due to more water use per hectare. In

Radhanagari, though the water use is within the State norm, the output is less because of lesser productively & lower rate for sugarcane.

TIC Thane: The output per unit water supply in Bhatsa, Kal-Amba & Surya was 7.01, 0.66 & 11.49 respectively. In Kal-Amba, the value decreased over last year due to wateruse on higher side.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 4.68 4.70 5.68 5.35 4.26 5.68 2.69Deficit AIC Akola 4.10 10.72 4.29 5.75 2.41

BIPC Buldhana 1.36 2.80 2.61 2.80 0.74CADA Abad 3.67 8.28 4.50 8.28 2.41CADA Beed 2.59 6.30 3.13 6.30 1.69CADA Jalgaon 3.26 9.46 9.58 9.46 2.31CADA Nashik 12.03 12.64 10.53 12.83 10.93NIC Nanded 2.51 3.40 1.85 3.88 1.62

Normal AIC Abad 2.52 1.04 1.60 4.18 1.21AIC Akola 2.79 5.25 3.51 5.25 2.18CADA Jalgaon 10.55 13.74 10.21 13.74 6.72CADA Nagpur 1.14 1.90 1.48 1.90 0.28CADA Nashik 11.84 13.69 15.65 13.87 9.04CADA Pune 5.98 7.03 7.12 11.38 3.83CIPC Chandrapur 1.62 1.62 1.11 1.83 1.26NIC Nanded 3.33 308.30 2.88 308.30 2.55PIC Pune 6.32 9.26 8.76 9.26 4.50UWPC Amravati 2.88 3.52 3.63 4.62 2.35YIC Yavatmal 1.65 10.87 0.34 10.87 0.89

Surplus CADA Nagpur 2.85 2.13 2.75 5.15 2.08 2.75 3.25Abundant CADA Pune 3.74 3.72 4.29 4.14 3.18

CIPC Chandrapur 3.74 0.62 0.71 4.77 0.62SIC Sangli 4.13 4.21 4.65 4.53 3.88TIC Thane 1.90 3.18 7.21 3.18 1.33

4.22

2.99

3.38

4.16

3.28

2.08

Indicator IVMajor Projects

Output per unit Irrigation Water supply

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

CAD

A So

lapu

r

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC A

mra

vati

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs.

/cum

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Indicator IVMajor Projects

Output per unit Irrigation Water supply

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00Bh

ima

Purn

aJa

yakw

adi P

RBC

Man

arW

an (A

mra

vati)

Maj

alga

onKa

tepu

rna

Low

er T

erna

Vish

nupu

riJa

yakw

adi (

PLBC

)M

anjra

Nal

gang

aG

irna

Cha

naka

pur

Arun

avat

iBo

rLo

wer

Wun

naN

MC

Exp

ress

Muk

ane

Upp

er P

enga

nga

Pus

Upp

er W

ardh

aC

hask

aman

Bhan

dard

ara

Mul

aKa

dva

Gho

dPa

wan

aKu

kadi

NR

BCN

LBC

Hat

nur

Khad

akw

asla

Gan

gapu

rD

arna

Wag

had

Palk

hed

UG

C O

zerk

hed

Bagh

Penc

hIti

ahdo

hD

ina

Kal

Asol

a M

endh

aTu

lash

iD

udhg

anga

Rad

hana

gari

Kris

hna

Bhat

saW

arna

Sury

a

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs.

/cum

FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Pa

Plangroup Circle Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 4.68 4.69 5.68 5.35 4.26 5.68Deficit NIC Nanded Purna 2.46 4.06 1.55 4.44 1.35

CADA Beed Jayakwadi PRBC 2.36 19.82 2.31 19.82 1.26NIC Nanded Manar 2.07 0.00 2.33 3.31 0.00BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amravati) 1.36 2.80 2.61 2.80 0.74CADA Beed Majalgaon 2.10 4.55 2.77 4.55 1.57AIC Akola Katepurna 4.06 0.00 2.94 5.20 0.00CADA Beed Lower Terna 4.09 6.05 3.26 6.05 3.16NIC Nanded Vishnupuri 3.15 1.95 3.38 3.80 1.95CADA Abad Jayakwadi (PLBC) 3.67 8.28 4.50 8.28 2.41CADA Beed Manjra 3.30 5.51 4.57 5.58 1.15AIC Akola Nalganga 4.15 5.75 5.44 7.30 2.54CADA Jalgaon Girna 3.26 9.46 9.58 9.46 2.31CADA Nashik Chanakapur 12.03 12.64 10.53 12.83 10.93

Normal YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 1.65 10.87 0.34 10.87 0.89CIPC Chandrapur Bor 1.62 1.62 1.11 1.83 1.26CADA Nagpur Lower Wunna 1.14 1.90 1.48 1.90 0.28AIC Abad NMC Express Mukan 2.52 1.79 1.60 4.18 1.21NIC Nanded Upper Penganga 3.33 308.30 2.88 308.30 2.55AIC Akola Pus 2.79 5.25 3.51 5.25 2.18UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha 2.88 3.52 3.63 4.62 2.35PIC Pune Chaskaman 2.27 3.83 3.72 5.67 0.72CADA Nashik Bhandardara 5.41 5.35 5.08 7.65 3.96CADA Nashik Mula 5.07 5.45 5.20 7.40 3.99CADA Nashik Kadva 6.53 5.34 5.43 8.57 5.34CADA Pune Ghod 5.48 6.99 5.77 7.16 3.22PIC Pune Pawana 7.53 10.57 7.52 12.24 2.23CADA Pune Kukadi 6.12 7.04 7.56 14.03 3.50PIC Pune NRBC 6.37 8.07 8.65 8.07 4.74PIC Pune NLBC 6.58 9.80 8.99 9.80 4.91CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 10.55 13.74 10.21 13.74 6.72PIC Pune Khadakwasla 6.80 14.03 10.22 14.03 3.83CADA Nashik Gangapur 16.08 46.46 22.68 46.46 8.19CADA Nashik Darna 16.11 23.67 32.80 176.24 8.67CADA Nashik Waghad 39.04 42.93 37.41 52.15 22.82CADA Nashik Palkhed 29.56 40.65 58.09 40.65 16.04CADA Nashik UGC Ozerkhed 70.37 120.46 229.47 120.46 32.16

Surplus CADA Nagpur Bagh 3.56 2.53 2.31 5.16 2.53CADA Nagpur Pench 2.82 1.98 2.59 5.77 1.89CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 2.42 2.75 4.47 3.26 1.88

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur Dina 3.91 0.49 0.62 5.48 0.49TIC Thane Kal 1.30 1.05 0.66 1.76 1.03CIPC Chandrapur Asola Mendha 3.58 0.89 0.84 4.65 0.89SIC Sangli Tulashi 3.55 3.92 2.47 4.23 2.79SIC Sangli Dudhganga 3.38 4.07 3.62 4.07 2.41SIC Sangli Radhanagari 4.51 4.79 3.69 5.03 3.98CADA Pune Krishna 3.74 3.72 4.29 4.14 3.18TIC Thane Bhatsa 4.39 10.13 7.01 10.13 1.86SIC Sangli Warna 4.44 3.86 7.57 5.00 3.86TIC Thane Surya 0.90 1.00 11.49 1.46 0.00

In Upper Penganga, Darna, Waghad & Ozerkhed projects the area under well irrigation is excessively high, resulting in higher output per unit irrigation water supply.

3.28

2.08

2.75

2.69

3.38

3.25

4.22 4.16

Output per unit Irrigation Water supply

Indicator IVMajor Projects

Indicator V: Cost Recovery Ratio (Revenue / O & M Cost)

Highly Deficit plan group:

CADA Solapur: In Bhima (Ujjani) project, cost recovery ratio was 0.63, lower than the State norm. However, there is improvement over last years as the recovery improved by over Rs. 2 crores & cost decreased by over Rs.1 crore.

Deficit plan group:

AIC Akola: In Katepurna project recovery from irrigation and nonirrigation is increased resulting slight increase in the ratio than last year but lower than state norm. In Nalganga ratio is very low.

BIPC Buldhana: Cost recovery ratio is less than sate norm as operation cost for irrigation is more than recovery.

CADA Aurangabad: In Jayakwadi Project (PLBC), the ratio increased from 2.69 to 3.68, as O & M cost for irrigation reduced to Rs. 2117.21 lakh compared to last year’s 2513.41 lakh as well as increase in revenue both for irrigation & non-irrigation (Rs 6803 to Rs 7932 lakh) this year.

CADA Beed: Increase in O & M cost both for irrigation and non-irrigation in this year compared to last year with no difference in revenue collection resulted into overall decrease in ratio from 0.25 to 0.14. Especially O & M cost in PRBC increased from Rs 492.42 lakh to Rs 1015.65 lakh.

CADA Jalgaon: In Girna project, the ratio remained same (0.16) as compared to last year. The field officers are required to be vigilant to minimize O & M cost and to increase the irrigation revenue to have better performance of the indicator.

CADA Nashik: In Chankapur project, the ratio lowered from 1.28 (2009-10) to 0.41, which is below the State norm. This is mainly due to increase in O & M cost from Rs. 94.32 lakhs to Rs. 482.35 lakhs compared to last year.

NIC Nanded: In all the three projects namely Vishnupuri, Manar & Purna, reduction in O & M cost for non-irrigation and increase in revenue from both, irrigation & non-irrigation compared to last year resulted in increase in ratio from 0.12 to 0.18.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: In NM express canal, the ratio decreased from 9.77 (2009-10) to 4.58 this year, as revenue collection decreased from Rs. 10.75 lakhs to 7.32 lakhs, with little increase in O & M cost Rs 1.10 lakh to Rs 1.6 lakh this year.

AIC Akola: Cost recovery ratio in Pus project is 1/5th of state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: In Hatnur project, the ratio is above State norm (2.90). From Hatnur, major water use is for non irrigation purposes and therefore, the ratio for the project is always more than one. The performance declined this year compared to last year, mainly due to decrease in revenue by about Rs. 2 crores, however, the increase in O & M cost was over Rs. 24 lakhs.

CADA Nagpur: In lower Wunna Project recovery is more as compared to cost as similar to last year. Therefore its cost recovery ratio is more than state norms.

CADA Nashik: Though the overall ratio increased from 0.72 to 0.84 as compared to last year, it is still below the State norm.

In Bhandardara project, though the ratio slightly increased from 0.45 (2009-10) to 0.46 still it is below the State norm. This is due to increase in annual revenue

from Rs. 506.34 lakhs to Rs. 575.72 lakhs and increase in annual O & M cost from Rs. 1124.35 lakhs to Rs. 1259.52 lakhs as compared to last year.

In Mula project, the ratio lowered from 0.22 (2009-10) to 0.17 and it is below State norm.

In Ozerkhed project, though the ratio just increased from 0.12 (2009-10) to 0.13.

In Palkhed project, the ratio increased from 0.56 to 0.68, mainly due to decrease in O & M cost by Rs. 135 lakhs.

In Waghad project, the ratio reduced from 0.15 (2009-10) to 0.11. This is due to decreased annual revenue from Rs. 30.71 lakhs to Rs. 23.80 lakhs and increased O & M cost from Rs. 199.62 lakhs to Rs. 212.25 lakhs as compared to last year. The rehabilitation of disnet is undertaken under Maharashtra Water Sector Improvement Programme and therefore the cost seems to be so high.

In Darna project, the ratio was above State norm for last four years. However, this year it was 0.76. This is due to reduction in annual revenue from Rs.390.44 Lakh to Rs.353.76 Lakh and increase in annual O & M cost from Rs.370.88 Lakh to Rs.465.02 Lakh as compared to last year.

In Gangapur project, the ratio increased from 3.77 (2009-10) to 5.23. The revenue increased by Rs. 14.7 crores, while the increase in O & M cost was Rs. 1.23 crores.

In Kadwa project, due to high O & M cost, the ratio is far below the State norm (0.01).

CADA Pune: In Kukadi Project, revenue decreased from Rs. 300 lakhs to 199.75 lakhs and O & M cost was doubled over last year, resulting in lowering the ratio to 0.07 from 0.12 last year. In Ghod Project, ratio increased from 0.50 to 0.55 this year.

CIPC Chandrapur: In Bor Project as similar to last year, rabbi seasonals are predominant with nominal perennial crops. So recovery is appreciably low as compared to cost.

NIC Nanded: In Upper Penganga project, indicator value increased from 0.09 to 0.13, as compared to last year. This is because of increase in revenue by about 50% of last year’s collection with just 7% increase in O & M cost.

PIC Pune: In Khadakwasla, N.L.B.C and Pawana Projects, the cost recovery ratio was 1.82, 1.34 and 11.69 respectively. All the three projects show increase in the ratio over last year. The performance was above the State target. In Pawana, the increase is remarkable on account of increase in revenue from Rs. 41.57 crores to Rs. 46.39 crores and decrease in O & M cost from Rs. 5.17 crores to Rs. 3.97 crores.

UWPC Amaravati: Cost recovery ratio in Upper Wardha project is less than state norm.

YIC Yeotmal: Water use and operation cost is high, measured irrigated area is very less, resulting in to low cost recovery ratio.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: As per last year in Bagh and Itiadoh Projects kharif seasonals are predominant without any perennial crops. As the water charges for kharif seasonals

are very much less than perennial crops, recovery is appreciably low as compared to cost.

In Pench project performance looks to be very good as compared to state norm as similar to last year due to considerable NI water use and recovery on that part. Further expenditure on maintenance of the system is nil.

Abundant plan group:

CADA Pune: In Krishna Project, ratio decreased from 0.39 to 0.27 because of reduced revenue (from Rs. 741.54 to 735.35 lakhs) & increased O & M cost (from 1922.63 to 2702.48 lakhs.)

CIPC Chandrapur: In Dina project expenditure on maintenance of the system is Rs. 136.14 lac and recovery of water charges is only 17.12 lac. There fore the cost recovery ratio has come down to 0.10.

In Asolamendha project expenditure on maintenance of the system is Rs. 24.77 lac and recovery of water charges is only 7.86 lac. There fore the cost recovery ratio has come down to 0.15.

SIC Sangli: The ratio declined in Radhanagri & Warna compared to last year. There is slight improvement in Tulshi, however, it is below the State norm.

TIC Thane: In Bhatsa project, the ratio is 53.77, as most of the water supply is for non-irrigation purpose.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 0.66 0.56 0.63 0.81 0.49 0.63Deficit AIC Akola 0.35 0.14 0.19 0.54 0.14

BIPC Buldhana 0.57 0.70 0.66 0.70 0.22CADA Abad 1.91 2.69 3.68 2.79 0.61CADA Beed 0.60 0.25 0.14 0.84 0.13CADA Jalgaon 0.36 0.16 0.16 0.52 0.16CADA Nashik 2.10 1.28 0.41 4.08 1.28NIC Nanded 0.20 0.12 0.18 0.29 0.12

Normal AIC Abad 4.21 9.77 4.58 9.77 0.00AIC Akola 0.38 0.18 0.21 0.63 0.18CADA Jalgaon 3.06 3.25 2.90 5.11 0.51CADA Nagpur 1.69 3.42 2.43 3.42 0.55CADA Nashik 1.09 0.72 0.84 1.70 0.58CADA Pune 0.22 0.19 0.16 0.35 0.18CIPC Chandrapur 0.15 0.13 0.10 0.29 0.07NIC Nanded 0.17 0.09 0.13 0.23 0.09PIC Pune 1.76 1.79 1.67 2.67 0.75UWPC Amravati 0.47 0.28 0.27 0.76 0.28YIC Yavatmal 0.63 0.00 0.07 0.18 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.17 1.53 1.18 1.53 0.04 1.18Abundant CADA Pune 0.36 0.39 0.27 0.78 0.25

CIPC Chandrapur 0.23 0.06 0.10 0.44 0.06SIC Sangli 1.44 3.11 2.19 3.11 0.60TIC Thane 2.19 9.97 8.57 11.44 0.32

0.39

0.53

0.59

1

Indicator VMajor Projects

Cost Recovery Ratio

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

CAD

A So

lapu

r

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC A

mra

vati

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FYAvg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar PastMax PastMin

Indicator VMajor Projects

Cost Recovery Ratio

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

Bhim

aM

anar

Nal

gang

aM

ajal

gaon

Jaya

kwad

i PR

BCLo

wer

Ter

naG

irna

Purn

aKa

tepu

rna

Vish

nupu

riC

hana

kapu

rM

anjra

Wan

(Am

rava

ti)Ja

yakw

adi (

PLBC

)Ka

dva

Cha

skam

anAr

unav

ati

Kuka

diBo

rW

agha

dU

GC

Oze

rkhe

dU

pper

Pen

gang

aM

ula

Pus

Upp

er W

ardh

aN

RBC

Bhan

dard

ara

Gho

dPa

lkhe

dD

arna

NLB

CKh

adak

was

laLo

wer

Wun

naH

atnu

rN

MC

Exp

ress

Muk

ane

Gan

gapu

rPa

wan

aBa

ghIti

ahdo

hPe

nch

Din

aAs

ola

Men

dha

Kris

hna

Tula

shi

War

naSu

rya

Rad

hana

gari

Dud

hgan

gaBh

atsa Ka

l

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 StateTar Past Max

Plangroup Circle Project FY Avg LY- 2009-TY- 2010-Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 0.66 0.56 0.63 0.81 0.49 0.63Deficit NIC Nanded Manar 0.07 0.01 0.04 0.13 0.01

AIC Akola Nalganga 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.24 0.04CADA Beed Majalgaon 0.33 0.17 0.07 0.88 0.12CADA Beed Jayakwadi PRBC 0.78 0.11 0.09 0.94 0.11CADA Beed Lower Terna 0.15 0.21 0.12 0.21 0.07CADA Jalgaon Girna 0.36 0.16 0.16 0.52 0.16NIC Nanded Purna 0.16 0.08 0.17 0.24 0.08AIC Akola Katepurna 0.56 0.21 0.30 0.95 0.21NIC Nanded Vishnupuri 0.38 0.22 0.32 1.11 0.03CADA Nashik Chanakapur 2.10 1.28 0.41 4.08 1.28CADA Beed Manjra 0.43 0.62 0.45 0.85 0.12BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amravati) 0.57 0.70 0.66 0.70 0.22CADA Abad Jayakwadi (PLBC) 1.91 2.69 3.68 2.79 0.61

Normal CADA Nashik Kadva 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.07 0.03PIC Pune Chaskaman 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.12 0.05YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 0.63 0.00 0.07 0.18 0.00CADA Pune Kukadi 0.13 0.12 0.07 0.21 0.09CIPC Chandrapur Bor 0.15 0.13 0.10 0.29 0.07CADA Nashik Waghad 0.18 0.15 0.11 0.26 0.13CADA Nashik UGC Ozerkhed 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.22 0.09NIC Nanded Upper Penganga 0.17 0.09 0.13 0.23 0.09CADA Nashik Mula 0.25 0.22 0.17 0.34 0.22AIC Akola Pus 0.38 0.18 0.21 0.63 0.18UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha 0.47 0.28 0.27 0.76 0.28PIC Pune NRBC 0.77 0.75 0.43 1.04 0.52CADA Nashik Bhandardara 0.63 0.45 0.46 1.00 0.45CADA Pune Ghod 0.63 0.50 0.55 1.67 0.29CADA Nashik Palkhed 0.74 0.56 0.68 1.09 0.51CADA Nashik Darna 1.14 1.05 0.76 2.87 0.61PIC Pune NLBC 1.21 1.23 1.34 2.22 0.63PIC Pune Khadakwasla 1.69 1.76 1.82 2.20 0.89CADA Nagpur Lower Wunna 1.69 3.42 2.43 3.42 0.55CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 3.06 3.25 2.90 5.11 0.51AIC Abad NMC Express Mukane 4.21 9.77 4.58 9.77 0.00CADA Nashik Gangapur 4.35 3.77 5.23 19.78 0.92PIC Pune Pawana 5.06 8.05 11.69 24.22 0.91

Surplus CADA Nagpur Bagh 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.15 0.00CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 0.01 0.09 0.09 0.25 0.00CADA Nagpur Pench 1.49 2.03 1.60 2.10 0.72

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur Dina 0.20 0.04 0.09 0.47 0.04CIPC Chandrapur Asola Mendha 0.28 0.14 0.15 0.41 0.14CADA Pune Krishna 0.36 0.39 0.27 0.78 0.25SIC Sangli Tulashi 0.20 0.32 0.43 0.32 0.12SIC Sangli Warna 0.72 1.09 0.69 1.20 0.49TIC Thane Surya 1.44 1.13 1.86 4.00 0.60SIC Sangli Radhanagari 1.77 5.11 3.82 5.11 0.65SIC Sangli Dudhganga 2.66 6.76 6.76 10.38 0.72TIC Thane Bhatsa 2.11 67.74 53.77 67.74 0.20TIC Thane Kal 7.83 18.61 69.68 18.61 0.08

0.59

1.00

Cost Recovery Ratio

Indicator VMajor Projects

0.39

0.53

1.18

Indicator VI: - Annual O & M Cost per unit area (Rs/ha)

Highly Deficit plan group:-

CADA Solapur: In Bhima (Ujjani) project, the O & M cost per unit area was Rs.2043 which is low compared to last year, mainly due decrease in the O & M cost, area irrigated being almost the same for the two years.

Deficit plan group:

AIC Akola: In Katepurna project O and M cost per unit irrigated area is 10 times more than state norms. Two years before, there was no storage of water in the dam. In Nalganga project ratio is 2 times state norm and lowered compared to last year.

BIPC Buldhana: In Wan Project O & M cost per unit irrigated area is 3 times state norm but lowered than last year.

CADA Aurangabad: In Jayakwadi project (PLBC), the O & M cost per unit area decreased from Rs 3460/ha to Rs 1840/ha, due to decrease in O & M cost (Rs. 2533.41 lakh to Rs.2158.21 lakh) and increase in utilised potential (73131 to 117275 ha) as compared to last year. It is still 1.5 times the norm.

CADA Beed: Overall O & M cost per unit area of projects under this circle & plan group decreased from Rs 8274/ha (2009-10) to Rs 6155/ha. This is mainly due increase in utilised potential by 133%, whereas O & M cost increased by only 33% as compared to last year. Especially in PRBC, though O & M cost increased from Rs 492.42 lakh to Rs 1015.65 lakh (nearly doubled), utilised potential also increased from 6562 ha to 24741 ha (nearly four times).

CADA Jalgaon: In Girna project, though the O&M cost per unit irrigated area decreased from Rs. 2801 to Rs. 2673, in spite of increase in O & M cost by Rs. 235 lakhs, the ratio decreased due to increased area under irrigation by 1186 hectares over last year.

CADA Nashik: In Chankapur project, the O & M cost per unit irrigated area increased from Rs 1192 to Rs.5621, mainly due to increase in O & M cost by Rs. 388 lakhs, in spite of increase in area under irrigation by 704 hectares over last year.

NIC Nanded: Last year’s low yield in Purna & almost dry Manar project resulted in increase in the overall O & M cost per unit area of the circle, whereas this year 100% yield in all the three projects helped utilisation of more irrigation potential (62906 ha against last year’s 17073 ha), which helped in lowering down the O & M cost from Rs 14444/ha to Rs 4133/ha this year.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: In Nandur Madhameshwar express canal, indicator value decreased from Rs.136/ha (2009-10) to Rs 61/ha. As it is an ongoing project, pursuance for sanction to the section offices from the Government be done by the Project Authorities.

AIC Akola: In Pus project, the ratio is Rs 2165.81/ha, which is slightly more than state norm but 15 times lowered than last year.

CADA Jalgaon: In Hatnur project, the O & M cost increased from Rs.3108/ha (2009-10) to Rs. 3300/ha and is on higher side (2.6 times) of State norm.

CADA Nagpur: In Lower Wunna project O&M cost per unit area is Rs 1766/ha which is better than last year but more as compared to state norm. Expenditure

incurred on maintenance of the system is Rs.65 lac which is less as compared to previous year.

CADA Nashik: In all the projects, the O&M cost per unit irrigated area is on higher side of State norm since last year. The indicator value increased from Rs.2350/ha to Rs. 2919/ ha as compared to last year mainly due to increase of O & M cost in Mula and Kadwa projects. Remedial measures should be taken to improve the performance duly minimizing the O & M cost.

CADA Pune: In Kukadi Project, the O & M cost per unit area was Rs. 3194.

In Ghod Project, the O & M cost per unit area increased from Rs. 1982. Though the area irrigated increased by 712Ha, O & M cost increased by 58 lakhs, resulting in increase in the ratio.

CIPC Chandrapur: In Bor project O&M cost per unit area has come to Rs.3775/Ha of ICA. This is so because establishment cost per unit area is Rs.193.62/Ha of ICA. Due to more expenditure on establishment indicator value is more than state average.

NIC Nanded: In Upper Penganga, the indicator value decreased from Rs 9741/ha to Rs 3162, main reason being increase in utilised potential by 233% and increase in O & M cost by only 8% as compared to last year.

PIC Pune: In Khadakwasla Project, the O & M cost per unit area increased to Rs. 3227 mainly due to lesser utilization of potential.

In N.L.B.C. the O & M cost was Rs. 720/Ha, slightly lower than last year’s Rs. 759/Ha. In NRBC, the cost was Rs. 1067/Ha, which increased over last year because of increase in operation cost to more than double.

In Pawana, the value decreased from Rs.25145 to Rs.19407/Ha, due to decreased O & M cost.

In Chaskaman project, the ratio decreased from Rs. 2836/Ha to Rs.2256/Ha, due to decreased O & M cost.

UWPC Amaravati: O and M cost per unit irrigated area In Upper Wardha project is nearly 2 times state norm.

YIC Yeotmal: O and M cost per unit irrigated area In Arunavati project is 2 times state norm.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: In Bagh, Itiadoh and Pench projects expenditure on maintenance works out to Rs.165/Ha of ICA, Rs.280/Ha of ICA and Rs.752/Ha of ICA respectively. Due to heavy expenditure on maintenance along with similar expenditure on establishment leads to higher values of O&M cost per unit area (Rs 2201/ha).

Abundant plan group:

CADA Pune: In Krishna Project, the O & M cost per unit area increased this year from Rs. 2543 to Rs. 3590/Ha. Though the area irrigated was less by 288 Ha, the rise in O & M cost was Rs. 780 lakhs.

CIPC Chandrapur: The O&M cost per unit irrigated area is Rs 1173/ha which is less than last year’s value and state norm also.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 1615 2184 2043 2184 1278 2043Deficit AIC Akola 8210 20359 7083 27317 5046

BIPC Buldhana 2366 8510 4598 8510 1183CADA Abad 1871 3460 1840 3460 988CADA Beed 8065 8274 6155 32151 3477CADA Jalgaon 1812 2801 2673 2801 1374CADA Nashik 1307 1191 5621 1603 832NIC Nanded 3593 14444 4133 14444 2376

Normal AIC Abad 70 136 61 136 52AIC Akola 3019 32403 2166 32403 1519CADA Jalgaon 3475 3108 3300 5071 2189CADA Nagpur 2674 3298 1766 3577 1837CADA Nashik 1994 2350 2919 3159 1493CADA Pune 1583 2803 3031 2803 834CIPC Chandrapur 2997 3831 3775 4927 2049NIC Nanded 2989 9741 3162 9741 2058PIC Pune 1470 1350 1491 3044 1047UWPC Amravati 1407 2210 2232 2515 658YIC Yavatmal 393 0 2574 1007 0

Surplus CADA Nagpur 14323 2327 2201 56450 2094 2201Abundant CADA Pune 2861 2543 3590 4389 1602

CIPC Chandrapur 752 1205 1173 1205 528SIC Sangli 2027 1298 1456 3703 1298TIC Thane 48147 31334 26314 124990 9204

4586

2642

8133

1250

Indicator VIMajor Projects

O&M Cost per unit area

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000C

ADA

Sola

pur

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC A

mra

vati

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs.

/ha

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Indicator VIMajor Projects

O&M Cost per unit area

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000Bh

ima

Jaya

kwad

i (PL

BC)

Girn

aPu

rna

Nal

gang

aM

anjra

Wan

(Am

rava

ti)Ja

yakw

adi P

RBC

Cha

naka

pur

Low

er T

erna

Vish

nupu

riM

anar

Maj

alga

onKa

tepu

rna

NM

C E

xpre

ss M

ukan

eN

LBC

NR

BCLo

wer

Wun

naBh

anda

rdar

aPu

sU

pper

War

dha

Cha

skam

anU

GC

Oze

rkhe

dW

agha

dPa

lkhe

dG

hod

Arun

avat

iG

anga

pur

Upp

er P

enga

nga

Kuka

diKh

adak

was

laH

atnu

rM

ula

Bor

Kadv

aD

arna

Paw

ana

Itiah

doh

Bagh

Penc

hAs

ola

Men

dha

Dud

hgan

gaR

adha

naga

riD

ina

War

naTu

lash

iKr

ishn

aBh

atsa Ka

lSu

rya

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs.

/ha

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Min Past Max

Plangroup Circle Project FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 1616 2190 2043 2190 1278 2043Deficit CADA Abad Jayakwadi (PLBC) 1871 3460 1840 3460 988

CADA Jalgaon Girna 1812 2801 2673 2801 1374NIC Nanded Purna 3318 9262 3035 9262 2333AIC Akola Nalganga 7545 9697 4434 15619 3630CADA Beed Manjra 4873 5244 4567 6825 3022BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amravati) 2366 8510 4598 8510 1183CADA Beed Jayakwadi PRBC 11535 9192 4920 81008 1359CADA Nashik Chanakapur 1307 1191 5621 1603 832CADA Beed Lower Terna 5853 8069 5716 8069 4633NIC Nanded Vishnupuri 4366 25905 5884 25905 2021NIC Nanded Manar 3873 0 6662 19966 0CADA Beed Majalgaon 6466 11434 9932 11434 4470AIC Akola Katepurna 8855 0 12297 6539 0

Normal AIC Abad NMC Express Mukan 70 136 61 136 52PIC Pune NLBC 795 759 720 1591 410PIC Pune NRBC 720 639 1067 1240 560CADA Nagpur Lower Wunna 2674 3298 1766 3577 1837CADA Nashik Bhandardara 1565 1691 2103 3128 1096AIC Akola Pus 3019 32403 2166 32403 1519UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha 1407 2210 2232 2515 658PIC Pune Chaskaman 3110 2836 2255 3842 2687CADA Nashik UGC Ozerkhed 1331 2126 2331 3264 882CADA Nashik Waghad 1470 2001 2370 2001 1122CADA Nashik Palkhed 1535 2590 2410 2590 827CADA Pune Ghod 1169 1982 2464 2806 323YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 393 0 2574 1007 0CADA Nashik Gangapur 4780 2134 2913 17740 1346NIC Nanded Upper Penganga 2989 9741 3162 9741 2058CADA Pune Kukadi 1719 3098 3194 3098 992PIC Pune Khadakwasla 3222 3030 3227 5127 2392CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 3475 3108 3300 5071 2189CADA Nashik Mula 1929 2624 3473 2624 1667CIPC Chandrapur Bor 2997 3831 3775 4927 2049CADA Nashik Kadva 1721 2374 3948 2374 1167CADA Nashik Darna 3149 7961 8494 31855 1340PIC Pune Pawana 28769 25145 19407 52310 7940

Surplus CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 42240 2132 1408 167318 2132CADA Nagpur Bagh 24563 1542 1490 103066 1542CADA Nagpur Pench 2525 2588 2723 4015 1560

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur Asola Mendha 626 596 561 864 488SIC Sangli Dudhganga 1651 749 724 6866 429SIC Sangli Radhanagari 2149 1259 1091 3455 939CIPC Chandrapur Dina 871 1706 1709 1706 546SIC Sangli Warna 1816 1390 2050 2385 1194SIC Sangli Tulashi 4771 3914 3436 7363 3097CADA Pune Krishna 2861 2543 3590 4389 1602TIC Thane Bhatsa 121481 10514 4559 474677 2670TIC Thane Kal 6485 9322 4923 400000 4957TIC Thane Surya 30954 67421 67517 67421 11621

1250

Indicator VIMajor Projects

O&M Cost per unit area

4586

2642

2201

8133

Indicator VII: Annual total O & M cost per unit water supplied (Rs/cum)

Highly Deficit plan group:-

CADA Solapur: In Bhima (Ujjani) project, the O & M cost reduced slightly over last year.

Deficit plan group:

AIC Akola: O and M cost per unit water supplied in Katepurna and Nalganga project is more than state norm but lowered than last year.

BIPC Buldhana: On Wan Project performance is higher than state norm.

CADA Aurangabad: In Jayakwadi project (PLBC), the indicator value decreased from Rs 0.60/cum to Rs 0.25/cum, due to increase in total utilisation of water (321.93 Mcum to 763.253 Mcum) by 137% & decrease in O & M cost by 15% as compared to last year. Availability this year was 59% as against 24% last year.

CADA Beed: In all the four projects, O & M cost per unit water supplied reduced because of more water use compared to last year. The overall indicator value of the circle decreased from 0.85 to 0.59. Especially in PRBC, utilisation of water is nearly 12 times (11 Mcum to 129.54 Mcum), whereas O & M cost is doubled (603.16 to 1217.23 lakh) than that last year. In Lower Terna project, there was slight decrease in O & M cost, but water use was nearly 2.5 times this year as compared to last year.

CADA Jalgaon: In Girna project, the O & M cost increased from Rs. 1.24/cum (2009-10) to Rs. 1.51/cum, which is 9.4 times more than the State norm. The cost increased from Rs. 0.22 to Rs. 1.51 in last two years. The field officers are required to take remedial measures to improve the performance duly minimizing the O & M cost.

CADA Nashik: In Chankapur project, the O & M cost increased from Rs. 0.24/cum to Rs. 1.10/cum over last year. It is 6.8 times the State norm. The field officers are required to take remedial measures to improve the performance duly minimizing the O & M cost.

NIC Nanded: Overall value of this indicator reduced from Rs 1.16/cum to Rs 0.33/cum. In Manar project, last year’s less water use hiked O & M cost per unit of water supplied to Rs 55.37/cum, which came down to Rs 0.65/cum due to 95 Mcum of water use as against 0.61 Mcum and 80% increase in O & M cost over last year. In Purna project, O & M cost per unit of water supplied reduced to Rs 0.22/cum from Rs 0.84/cum, whereas in Vishnupuri project, it came down to Rs. 0.61/cum from Rs 1.45/cum as compared to last year.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: In NM express canal, O & M cost per unit of water supplied was 0.01, as it is an ongoing project and management staff is not available.

AIC Akola: The ratio on Pus is just higher than state target. .

CADA Jalgaon: In Hatnur project, though the O&M cost per unit water supplied reduced from Rs. 0.46/cum (2009-10) to Rs.0.39/cum, the decrease is mainly due to increased water use by 33 Mcum. Still it is 2.4 times the State norm.

CADA Nagpur: The ratio on Lower Wunna project is Rs 0.17/cum, close to the state target.

CADA Nashik: In all the projects, the O & M cost per unit water supplied was above State norm. The indicator value increased from Rs. 0.44/cum (2009-10) to Rs.0.46/cum. Field officers are required to take necessary steps to improve the performance.

CADA Pune: In Kukadi Project, the cost was Rs. 0.70/cum, which increased over last year’s value of Rs. 0.57/cum, because of increase in expenditure on maintenance.

In Ghod Project, the indicator value was Rs. 0.45/cum, same as per last year. The performance of both the projects was low due to higher maintenance expenditure.

CIPC Chandrapur: The ratio on Bor project is Rs 0.24/cum which is above the state target.

NIC Nanded: In Upper Penganga project, O & M cost per unit of water supplied decreased from Rs. 2.03/cum to Rs. 0.41/cum because of more utilization of water (67.25 Mcum to 359.16 Mcum) as compared to last year, with no increase in O & M cost .

PIC Pune: In Khadakwasla, NRBC and Chaskaman Projects, the O & M cost per unit water supply was Rs. 0.23, 0.32, and 0.58 respectively.

In Pawana & NLBC, the ratio was 0.14 & 0.15. In Pawana project, water use for non-irrigation purposes increased by 118 Mcum over last year, due to reasons specified in earlier indicators.

UWPC Amravati: Though maintainance cost is nil in Upper Wardha project. Due to Increase in operation cost, ratio increased than state norm.

YIC Yeotmal: In Arunavati project maintainance cost is nil. The ratio is as per state norm.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: The ratio on projects in this circle is Rs 0.25/cum which is more than last year and above the state target.

Abundant plan group:

CADA Pune: In Krishna Project, the O & M cost was Rs. 0.63/cum, which increased from 0.39/cum of last year, because of increase in expenditure on maintenance over last year and reduction in water use.

CIPC Chandrapur: The ratio on projects in this circle is Rs 0.34/cum which is more than last year and above the state target.

TIC Thane: The O & M cost per cubic metre of water supplied for irrigation in, Surya was as high as Rs. 0.77.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 0.16 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.12 0.22Deficit AIC Akola 0.63 1.36 0.72 1.60 0.39

BIPC Buldhana 0.19 0.77 0.46 0.77 0.09CADA Abad 0.22 0.60 0.25 0.60 0.14CADA Beed 0.62 0.85 0.59 1.79 0.26CADA Jalgaon 0.29 1.24 1.51 1.24 0.21CADA Nashik 0.22 0.24 1.10 0.30 0.15NIC Nanded 0.33 1.16 0.33 1.16 0.20

Normal AIC Abad 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00AIC Akola 0.22 1.18 0.22 1.18 0.14CADA Jalgaon 0.31 0.46 0.39 0.46 0.18CADA Nagpur 0.28 0.38 0.17 0.48 0.15CADA Nashik 0.33 0.44 0.46 0.46 0.24CADA Pune 0.32 0.54 0.64 0.54 0.20CIPC Chandrapur 0.23 0.31 0.24 0.39 0.15NIC Nanded 0.34 2.03 0.41 2.03 0.22PIC Pune 0.20 0.24 0.25 0.29 0.14UWPC Amravati 0.13 0.23 0.25 0.31 0.06YIC Yavatmal 0.03 0.00 0.17 0.05 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 1.21 0.19 0.25 4.59 0.17 0.25Abundant CADA Pune 0.42 0.39 0.63 0.66 0.20

CIPC Chandrapur 0.14 0.30 0.34 0.30 0.09SIC Sangli 0.14 0.09 0.11 0.28 0.09TIC Thane 0.42 0.21 0.12 1.25 0.08

0.71

0.32

0.30

0.16

IndicatorVIIMajor Projects

O&M cost per unit of Water supplied

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30C

ADA

Sola

pur

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC A

mra

vati

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs.

/cum

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

IndicatorVIIMajor Projects

O&M cost per unit of Water supplied

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30B

him

aP

urna

Jaya

kwad

i (P

LBC

)M

anjra

Wan

(Am

rava

ti)Lo

wer

Ter

naV

ishn

upur

iM

anar

Maj

alga

onJa

yakw

adi P

RB

CN

alga

nga

Kat

epur

naC

hana

kapu

rG

irna

NM

C E

xpre

ss M

ukan

eP

awan

aN

LBC

Low

er W

unna

Aru

nava

tiP

usK

hada

kwas

laB

orU

pper

War

dha

NR

BC

Bha

ndar

dara

Gan

gapu

rH

atnu

rU

pper

Pen

gang

aM

ula

Gho

dP

alkh

edC

hask

aman

Kad

vaW

agha

dK

ukad

iD

arna

UG

C O

zerk

hed

Bag

hP

ench

Itiah

doh

Bha

tsa

Dud

hgan

ga Kal

Rad

hana

gari

Tula

shi

Aso

la M

endh

aW

arna

Din

aK

rishn

aS

urya

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs.

/cum

FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Plangroup Circle Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 0.16 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.12 0.22Deficit NIC Nanded Purna 0.30 0.84 0.22 0.84 0.21

CADA Abad Jayakwadi (PLBC) 0.22 0.60 0.25 0.60 0.14CADA Beed Manjra 0.36 0.43 0.36 0.51 0.27BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amravati) 0.19 0.77 0.46 0.77 0.09CADA Beed Lower Terna 0.75 1.33 0.52 1.33 0.59NIC Nanded Vishnupuri 0.39 1.45 0.61 1.45 0.19NIC Nanded Manar 0.39 55.37 0.65 55.37 0.20CADA Beed Majalgaon 0.38 0.84 0.68 0.84 0.24CADA Beed Jayakwadi PRBC 1.03 1.78 0.69 3.94 0.20AIC Akola Nalganga 0.84 1.40 0.70 2.05 0.48AIC Akola Katepurna 0.52 1.49 0.72 1.49 0.32CADA Nashik Chanakapur 0.22 0.24 1.10 0.30 0.15CADA Jalgaon Girna 0.29 1.24 1.51 1.24 0.21

Normal AIC Abad NMC Express Mukane 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00PIC Pune Pawana 0.36 0.31 0.14 1.60 0.08PIC Pune NLBC 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.28 0.07CADA Nagpur Lower Wunna 0.28 0.38 0.17 0.48 0.15YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 0.03 0.00 0.17 0.05 0.00AIC Akola Pus 0.22 1.18 0.22 1.18 0.14PIC Pune Khadakwasla 0.21 0.27 0.23 0.27 0.17CIPC Chandrapur Bor 0.23 0.31 0.24 0.39 0.15UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha 0.13 0.23 0.25 0.31 0.06PIC Pune NRBC 0.15 0.18 0.32 0.18 0.13CADA Nashik Bhandardara 0.23 0.30 0.32 0.30 0.17CADA Nashik Gangapur 0.40 0.37 0.33 1.39 0.10CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 0.31 0.46 0.39 0.46 0.18NIC Nanded Upper Penganga 0.34 2.03 0.41 2.03 0.22CADA Nashik Mula 0.30 0.41 0.43 0.41 0.23CADA Pune Ghod 0.27 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.07CADA Nashik Palkhed 0.37 0.80 0.57 0.80 0.20PIC Pune Chaskaman 0.41 0.72 0.58 0.72 0.18CADA Nashik Kadva 0.28 0.30 0.68 0.36 0.22CADA Nashik Waghad 0.36 0.55 0.69 0.55 0.31CADA Pune Kukadi 0.33 0.57 0.70 0.57 0.21CADA Nashik Darna 0.73 1.03 1.43 3.06 0.21CADA Nashik UGC Ozerkhed 0.61 1.26 1.55 1.26 0.44

Surplus CADA Nagpur Bagh 3.78 0.19 0.17 21.20 0.19CADA Nagpur Pench 0.18 0.18 0.26 0.35 0.10CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 3.88 0.29 0.32 14.24 0.20

Abundant TIC Thane Bhatsa 0.39 0.03 0.01 1.50 0.01SIC Sangli Dudhganga 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.30 0.03TIC Thane Kal 0.17 0.16 0.06 0.40 0.12SIC Sangli Radhanagari 0.15 0.10 0.08 0.30 0.06SIC Sangli Tulashi 0.28 0.13 0.18 0.48 0.13CIPC Chandrapur Asola Mendha 0.11 0.22 0.19 0.22 0.08SIC Sangli Warna 0.15 0.11 0.22 0.21 0.07CIPC Chandrapur Dina 0.17 0.34 0.44 0.34 0.09CADA Pune Krishna 0.42 0.39 0.63 0.66 0.20TIC Thane Surya 0.76 1.12 0.77 1.30 0.38

IndicatorVIIMajor Projects

0.71

0.30

0.16

O&M cost per unit of Water supplied

0.32

0.25

Indica tor VIII: Revenue per unit of water supplied (Rs/cum)

Highly Deficit plan group:

CADA Solapur: In Bhima (Ujjani) project, the revenue was Rs. 0.14/cum. There is improvement over last four years.

Deficit plan group:

AIC Akola: In Katepurna project revenue collection increased causing lowering the ratio than last year but slightly greater than state target. In Nalganga revenue collection is similar to last year but increase in water supply lowered ratio to 0.02Rs /cum.

BIPC Buldhana: Increase in water supply decreased ratio than last year but greater than state target in Wan project.

CADA Aurangabad: In Jayakwadi project (PLBC), the revenue per unit of water supply decreased from Rs 1.60/cum to Rs 0.91/cum, this is because of double the quantity utilised (425.15 to 868.24 Mcum).However, the revenue collection increased by 17% ( RS 6803 lakh to 7932 lakh) as compared to last year.

CADA Beed: In all the four projects the indicator value decreased compared to last year, resulting in overall decrease in indicator value from Rs 0.21/cum to Rs 0.08/cum. In Lower Terna & Jayakwadi PLBC, it was Rs 0.06/cum as compared to last year’s Rs 0.27/cum & Rs 0.20/cum respectively. In PLBC, though there was increase in revenue collection (from Rs. 66.84 to Rs. 103.86 lakh), utilisation of water was more than 5 times that of last year. In Majalgaon it reduced to Rs 0.05/cum from Rs 0.14/cum, whereas in Manjra it was reduced to Rs 0.16/cum from Rs 0.26/cum.

CADA Jalgaon: In Girna project, the ratio increased from 0.20 (2009-10) to 0.24 and is on higher side of the State norm.

CADA Nashik: In Chankapur project, the improvement was from 0.31 (2009-10) to 0.45. The performance is better as compared to State norm consistently for last five years.

NIC Nanded: Overall value of this indicator reduced from Rs. 0.14/cum (2009-10) to Rs. 0.06/cum. In Purna project, the indicator value decreased from Rs 0.07/cum (2009-10) to Rs 0.04/cum.

In Manar project, it has dropped to Rs. 0.02/cum, it was Rs. 0.72/cum last year because of very less water use (0.61 Mcum) & revenue of Rs. 4.41 lakh against water use of 95 Mcum & revenue of Rs 22.09 lakh this year. In Vishnupuri project, though water use doubled compared to last year, revenue of non-irrigation use was not collected proportionately, hence value of indicator reduced to Rs 0.20/cum from Rs 0.31/cum.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: In NM express canal, revenue per unit of water supplied reduced by 50% of last year’s value & came down to Rs 0.02/cum this year.

AIC Akola: As compared to last year, no change in revenue but increase in water supply lowered ratio to 0.05 in Pus project.

CADA Jalgaon: In Hatnur project, though the ratio lowered from 1.49 (2009-10) to 1.14.

CADA Nagpur: In Lower Wunna project revenue per unit area is Rs 0.40/cum naturally more than state norms.

CADA Nashik: The revenue per unit water supplied was above State norm in Gangapur, Darna, Ozerkhed & Palkhed projects for last three years. However, the ratio is below State norm (varying from 0.01 to 0.14) in Bhandardara, Kadwa, Mula and Waghad projects.

CADA Pune: In Kukadi Project, revenue was Rs. 0.05/cum which shows slight decrease over last year (Rs. 0.07/cum), but it was far below the State norms.

In Ghod project, the revenue was Rs. 0.25/cum. which shows slight increase from Rs. 0.23/cum of last year.

CIPC Chandrapur: In Bor project recovery of water charges for irrigation is very much less than assessment. Further perennial crops are also less in the command area resulting in lesser amount. Therefore revenue per unit water supply is very less than state norm.

NIC Nanded: In Upper Penganga, revenue per unit of water supply decreased to Rs 0.05/cum from last years value Rs 0.18/cum, this is due to increase in water use more than 5 times of last year’s use but revenue collection did not increase proportionately.

PIC Pune: In Khadakwasla, revenue was Rs. 0.43/cum, decreased from Rs. 0.48/cum of last year, because of increase in water use. In NLBC & NRBC the revenue per unit water supply was Rs. 0.20 & 0.14, same as per last year.

In Pawna Project, the value decreased from Rs. 2.48 to Rs. 1.62/cum. due to increase in quantum of water used. However, the revenue did not increase proportionately.

UWPC Amravati: In Upper Wardha project the ratio is nearly 3 times lower than state norm.

YIC Yeotmal: In Arunavati project the ratio is only Rs 0.01 /cum. Performance is inversed than last year.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: As non irrigation water supply and recovery on its part is considerably high in Pench project revenue per unit area is more than state norm. Where as In Bagh and Itiadoh projects there is not much recovery for non irrigation water supply with considerably less recovery for irrigation water supply resulting in lesser value of revenue per unit water supply.

Abundant plan group:

CADA Pune: In Krishna Project, the performance improved from Rs. 0.15 to Rs. 0.17 /cum over last year.

CIPC Chandrapur: On Asolamendha & Dina projects this year also, less recovery for irrigation water supply resulting in lesser value of revenue per unit water supply. (Rs. 0.04/cum)

SIC Sangli: The revenue per cubic metre of water supply, in Tulshi needs improvement.

TIC Thane: The ratio in all the three projects is good compared to State target. In Bhatsa project, it declined over past.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 0.10 0.13 0.14 1.27 0.85 0.14Deficit AIC Akola 0.22 0.19 0.14 4.19 1.25

BIPC Buldhana 0.11 0.54 0.30 5.39 0.21CADA Abad 0.42 1.60 0.91 16.00 1.55CADA Beed 0.37 0.21 0.08 15.00 0.42CADA Jalgaon 0.10 0.20 0.24 1.99 0.86CADA Nashik 0.46 0.31 0.45 6.25 3.06NIC Nanded 0.06 0.14 0.06 1.39 0.43

Normal AIC Abad 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.49 0.00AIC Akola 0.08 0.21 0.05 2.10 0.54CADA Jalgaon 0.96 1.49 1.14 15.80 2.02CADA Nagpur 0.48 1.29 0.40 12.95 2.01CADA Nashik 0.36 0.32 0.38 4.69 2.64CADA Pune 0.07 0.10 0.10 1.02 0.60CIPC Chandrapur 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.59 0.23NIC Nanded 0.06 0.18 0.05 1.80 0.35PIC Pune 0.34 0.43 0.41 4.34 2.20UWPC Amravati 0.06 0.06 0.07 1.83 0.40YIC Yavatmal 0.02 0.89 0.01 8.88 0.01

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.21 0.29 0.29 2.90 1.40 0.29Abundant CADA Pune 0.15 0.15 0.17 1.65 1.37

CIPC Chandrapur 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.43 0.19SIC Sangli 0.20 0.27 0.24 2.71 1.52TIC Thane 0.91 2.06 1.03 20.60 3.08

0.16

0.05

0.18

0.15

Indicator VIIIMajor Projects

Revenue per unit of water supplied

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

CA

DA

Sol

apur

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

CB

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jalg

aon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CA

DA

Jalg

aon

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

CC

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC

Am

rava

tiY

ICY

avat

mal

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

CC

hand

rapu

r

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs.

/cum

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Indicator VIIIMajor Projects

Revenue per unit of water supplied

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

Bhim

aN

alga

nga

Man

arP

urna

Maj

alga

onJa

yakw

adi P

RB

CLo

wer

Ter

naM

anjra

Vis

hnup

uri

Kat

epur

naG

irna

Wan

(Am

rava

ti)C

hana

kapu

rJa

yakw

adi (

PLB

C)

Kad

vaA

runa

vati

NM

C E

xpre

ss M

ukan

eB

orC

hask

aman

Upp

er P

enga

nga

Kuk

adi

Pus

Mul

aU

pper

War

dha

Wag

had

NR

BC

Bha

ndar

dara

NLB

CU

GC

Oze

rkhe

dG

hod

Pal

khed

Low

er W

unna

Kha

dakw

asla

Dar

naH

atnu

rP

awan

aG

anga

pur

Bag

hIti

ahdo

hP

ench

Aso

la M

endh

aD

ina

Tula

shi

War

naK

rishn

aD

udhg

anga

Rad

hana

gari

Bha

tsa

Sur

ya Kal

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs.

/cum

FY Avg TY- 2010-11 LY- 2009-10 StateTar Past Min Past Max

Plangroup Circle Project FY Avg LY- 2009-1TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 0.10 0.13 0.14 1.27 0.85 0.14Deficit AIC Akola Nalganga 0.08 0.09 0.02 1.55 0.58

NIC Nanded Manar 0.03 0.72 0.02 7.18 0.10NIC Nanded Purna 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.70 0.35CADA Beed Majalgaon 0.13 0.14 0.05 2.15 0.45CADA Beed Jayakwadi PRBC 0.35 0.20 0.06 0.98 0.06CADA Beed Lower Terna 0.11 0.27 0.06 2.74 0.50CADA Beed Manjra 0.16 0.26 0.16 2.65 0.45NIC Nanded Vishnupuri 0.15 0.31 0.20 3.14 0.07AIC Akola Katepurna 0.29 0.31 0.22 6.90 1.22CADA Jalgaon Girna 0.10 0.20 0.24 1.99 0.86BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amravati) 0.11 0.54 0.30 5.39 0.21CADA Nashik Chanakapur 0.46 0.31 0.45 6.25 3.06CADA Abad Jayakwadi (PLBC) 0.42 1.60 0.91 16.00 1.55

Normal CADA Nashik Kadva 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.07YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 0.02 0.89 0.01 8.88 0.01AIC Abad NMC Express Mukane 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.49 0.00CIPC Chandrapur Bor 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.59 0.23PIC Pune Chaskaman 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.73 0.17NIC Nanded Upper Penganga 0.06 0.18 0.05 1.80 0.35CADA Pune Kukadi 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.66 0.32AIC Akola Pus 0.08 0.21 0.05 2.10 0.54CADA Nashik Mula 0.08 0.09 0.07 0.91 0.58UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha 0.06 0.06 0.07 1.83 0.40CADA Nashik Waghad 0.07 0.09 0.08 0.85 0.46PIC Pune NRBC 0.12 0.14 0.14 1.35 0.93CADA Nashik Bhandardara 0.14 0.13 0.14 1.72 1.25PIC Pune NLBC 0.17 0.20 0.20 2.03 1.50CADA Nashik UGC Ozerkhed 0.08 0.15 0.21 1.53 0.55CADA Pune Ghod 0.17 0.23 0.25 2.25 1.10CADA Nashik Palkhed 0.27 0.45 0.39 4.54 1.47CADA Nagpur Lower Wunna 2.84 1.29 0.40 4.50 1.29PIC Pune Khadakwasla 2.62 0.48 0.43 3.90 0.48CADA Nashik Darna 14.71 1.09 1.09 29.25 1.09CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 6.81 1.49 1.14 15.80 2.02PIC Pune Pawana 13.91 2.48 1.62 20.97 2.48CADA Nashik Gangapur 14.65 1.38 1.73 22.52 1.38

Surplus CADA Nagpur Bagh 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.92 0.10CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.68 0.19CADA Nagpur Pench 0.27 0.36 0.41 3.89 1.89

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur Asola Mendha 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.33 0.26CIPC Chandrapur Dina 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.59 0.13SIC Sangli Tulashi 0.06 0.04 0.08 0.82 0.42SIC Sangli Warna 0.11 0.12 0.15 1.19 0.90CADA Pune Krishna 0.15 0.15 0.17 1.65 1.37SIC Sangli Dudhganga 0.24 0.28 0.27 2.85 1.84SIC Sangli Radhanagari 0.27 0.50 0.31 4.97 1.87TIC Thane Bhatsa 4.07 2.08 0.62 9.81 2.57TIC Thane Surya 1.09 1.26 1.43 15.04 7.89TIC Thane Kal 1.35 2.95 4.53 29.55 0.16

0.15

0.18

Revenue per unit of water supplied

Indicator VIIIMajor Projects

0.16

0.05

0.29

Indicator X: Land Damage Index:

Highly Deficit plan group:

CADA Solapur: In Bhima (Ujjani) project, percentage of land damage decreased over last year.

Deficit Plan group:

CADA Aurangabad: In Jayakwadi project (PLBC), the land damage increased from 1228 ha to 1998 ha, resulting in increase in ratio from 0.71 to 1.16.

CADA Beed: In Jayakwadi project (PRBC), the affected area remained as per last year i.e. 387ha. In Manjra, it increased from 408 ha to 487 ha, whereas in Lower Terna it was 15.55 ha as against nil last year. Thus overall ratio of land damage index of the circle increased from 0.47 to 0.53, as compared to last year.

NIC Nanded: In all the three projects the land damage index is nil.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: In NM express canal, there is no land damage area observed.

CADA Nashik: In Bhandardara, Mula, Kadawa, Gangapur, Darna & Ozerkhed projects, the indicator value was 0.61, 0.49, 0.27, 0.12, 0.14 & 0.17 respectively.

CADA Pune: In Kukadi Project, land damage was 0.13% this year, same as per last year.

CADA Nagpur & CIPC Chandrapur: This year also, in Bor project 30 Ha. land was reported as damaged presenting in to 0.19% as land damage index. In lower wunna project complex 23 Ha. area was reported as damaged. So land damage index works out to 0.11%.

NIC Nanded: In Upper Penganga project, there is slight increase in land damage area from 260 ha (2009-10) to 281 ha, resulting in increase in ratio from 0.27 to 0.29.

PIC Pune: In NLBC, the land damage index was 2.14, same as last year. The field officers are required to monitor the damage. In NRBC, the damage increased from 0.6 to 0.79 over the last year.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: This year also, in Pench project complex, 28.68 Ha. was reported as damaged, resulting into 0.02% land damage index.

Abundant plan group:

CADA Pune: In Krishna Project, the land damage ratio was 0.94%, this year also.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 2.27 2.55 2.03 0.00 0.00 2.03Deficit AIC Akola 0.20 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00

BIPC Buldhana 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Jalgaon 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00NIC Nanded 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Beed 0.56 0.47 0.53 0.00 0.00CADA Abad 0.99 0.71 1.16 0.00 0.00

Normal CADA Jalgaon 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00YIC Yavatmal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00UWPC Amravati 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AIC Abad 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Nagpur 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00CADA Pune 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00CIPC Chandrapur 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00NIC Nanded 1.85 0.27 0.29 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik 0.39 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.00PIC Pune 0.76 0.59 0.69 0.00 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02Abundant TIC Thane 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

CIPC Chandrapur 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli 0.59 0.76 0.92 0.00 0.00CADA Pune 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.00

0.85

0.28

0.00

0.93

Indicator X Major Projects

Land Damage Index

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

CA

DA

Sol

apur

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

CB

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Jalg

aon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Jalg

aon

YIC

Yav

atm

alU

WP

CA

mra

vati

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

CC

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

CA

DA

Nas

hik

PIC

Pun

e

CA

DA

Nag

pur

TIC

Tha

ne

CIP

CC

hand

rapu

r

SIC

San

gli

CA

DA

Pun

e

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Perc

ent l

and

dam

age

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Indicator X Major Projects

Land Damage Index

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

Bhi

ma

Man

arV

ishn

upur

iP

urna

Cha

naka

pur

Girn

aM

ajal

gaon

Nal

gang

aW

an (A

mra

vati)

Kat

epur

naLo

wer

Ter

naJa

yakw

adi P

RB

CJa

yakw

adi (

PLB

C)

Man

jraG

hod

Hat

nur

Pus

Cha

skam

anK

hada

kwas

laA

runa

vati

Paw

ana

Upp

er W

ardh

aN

MC

Exp

ress

Muk

ane

Wag

had

Pal

khed

Low

er W

unna

Gan

gapu

rK

ukad

iD

arna

UG

C O

zerk

hed

Bor

Kad

vaU

pper

Pen

gang

aM

ula

Bha

ndar

dara

NR

BC

NLB

CB

agh

Itiah

doh

Pen

chS

urya

Aso

la M

endh

aD

ina

Dud

hgan

gaTu

lash

iB

hats

aK

alW

arna

Kris

hna

Rad

hana

gari

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Perc

ent l

and

dam

age

TY- 2010-11 LY- 2009-10

Plangroup Circle Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 2.55 2.00 2.03 0.00 0.00 2.03Deficit NIC Nanded Manar 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NIC Nanded Vishnupuri 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00NIC Nanded Purna 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik Chanakapur 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Jalgaon Girna 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Majalgaon 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AIC Akola Nalganga 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amravati) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AIC Akola Katepurna 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Lower Terna 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Jayakwadi PRBC 0.72 1.00 0.72 0.00 0.00CADA Abad Jayakwadi (PLBC) 0.71 1.00 1.16 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Manjra 1.72 1.00 2.06 0.00 0.00

Normal CADA Pune Ghod 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AIC Akola Pus 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00PIC Pune Chaskaman 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00PIC Pune Khadakwasla 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00PIC Pune Pawana 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AIC Abad NMC Express Mukane 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik Waghad 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik Palkhed 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00CADA Nagpur Lower Wunna 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik Gangapur 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00CADA Pune Kukadi 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik Darna 0.14 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik UGC Ozerkhed 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00CIPC Chandrapur Bor 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik Kadva 0.27 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00NIC Nanded Upper Penganga 0.27 2.00 0.29 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik Mula 0.49 1.00 0.49 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik Bhandardara 0.63 1.00 0.61 0.00 0.00PIC Pune NRBC 0.60 1.00 0.79 0.00 0.00PIC Pune NLBC 2.14 2.00 2.14 0.00 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur Bagh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Nagpur Pench 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00

Abundant TIC Thane Surya 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CIPC Chandrapur Asola Mendha 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00CIPC Chandrapur Dina 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli Dudhganga 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli Tulashi 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00TIC Thane Bhatsa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00TIC Thane Kal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli Warna 1.07 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00CADA Pune Krishna 0.94 1.00 0.94 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli Radhanagari 0.00 2.00 4.14 0.00 0.00

0

Land Damage Index

Indicator X Major Projects

0.85

0.28

0.02

0.93

Indicator XI: Equity performance-ratio

Highly Deficit plan group:

CADA Solapur: In Bhima project, the water seems to be allocated judiciously.

Deficit plan group:

AIC Akola: In Katepurna project irrigated area is less in head reach as compare to tail reach.

BIPC Buldhana: As compare to last year area irrigated in head reach is less

CADA Aurangabad: In Jayakwadi project (PLBC), the potential utilization in tail reach is more (0.38) than that in head & middle reach, last year it was more in head reach because of lesser availability of water.

CADA Beed: In Majalgaon project, the ratio in head reach increased from 0.05 to 0.20, whereas in middle & tail reaches, it increased from 0.05 to 0.08 compared to last year. In Manjra project the ratio in head & middle is better (0.50 to 0.57) as compared to last year. In Lower Terna, the potential utilization was more in head reach and nil in tail reach like last year, whereas in Jayakwadi (PRBC), the potential utilization in Middle is more (0.20) than that of head & tail reach (0.08).

CADA Jalgaon: In Girna project, the indicator values for head, middle & tail reach are 0.11, 0.09 & 0.09 respectively.

CADA Nashik: In Chankapur project, the distribution of water in head, middle and tail reach was done judiciously.

NIC Nanded: In all the three projects namely Manar, Vishnupuri, & Purna, the ratio in head reach is more than that of middle & tail.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: In NM express canal, ratio in head reach is (0.10) more than that of middle (0.05) & tail (0.04).

AIC Akola: Area irrigated in middle reach is 3 times tail reach and nearly 2.5 times head reach.

CADA Jalgaon: In Hatnur project, the indicator values for head, middle & tail reach are 0.07, 0.08 & 0.08 respectively.

CADA Nagpur: In Lower wunna project complex 31%, 28% and 28% area has been irrigated at Head and middle & tail reach.

CADA Nashik: In Bhandardara project, the indicator values for head, middle & tail reach are 0.49, 0.48 & 0.50 respectively.

In Ozerkhed project, the indicator values for head, middle & tail reach are 0.29, 0.48 & 0.22 respectively. The water should be distributed judiciously.

In Palkhed project, the indicator values for head, middle & tail reach are 0.15, 0.26 & 0.13 respectively. The water should be distributed judiciously.

In Waghad project, the indicator values for head, middle & tail reach are 0.21, 0.52 & 0.35 respectively.

In Gangapur project, the indicator values for head, middle & tail reach are 0.06, 0.08 & 0.24 respectively.

In Kadwa project, the indicator values for head, middle & tail reach are 0.12, 0.12 & 0.25 respectively

CIPC Chandrapur: In Bor project 25%, area has been irrigated equally in Head, middle and tail reaches.

NIC Nanded: In Upper Penganga project, the ratio ranged between 0.20 to 0.26.

UWPC Amravati: In Upper Wardha project even though having 100% availability while last year it was 53% equity performance in all the reaches is less than last year.

YIC Yeotmal: In Arunawati project equity performance is same in all reaches.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: In projects under this circle 86% & 93%, 74% area has been irrigated at Head and middle & tail reach.

Abundant Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: In projects under this circle 85% & 88%, 90% area has been irrigated at Head and middle & tail reach.

Head Middle TailHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 0.14 0.14 0.14Deficit AIC Akola 0.37 0.28 0.25

BIPC Buldhana 0.11 0.09 0.18CADA Abad 0.22 0.27 0.38CADA Beed 0.19 0.18 0.09CADA Jalgaon 0.11 0.09 0.09CADA Nashik 0.12 0.12 0.12NIC Nanded 0.42 0.34 0.24

Normal AIC Abad 0.10 0.05 0.04AIC Akola 0.27 0.60 0.22CADA Jalgaon 0.07 0.08 0.08CADA Nagpur 0.31 0.28 0.28CADA Nashik 0.29 0.35 0.27CADA Pune 0.37 0.37 0.37CIPC Chandrapur 0.25 0.25 0.25NIC Nanded 0.26 0.25 0.20PIC Pune 0.79 0.76 0.72UWPC Amravati 0.18 0.17 0.11YIC Yavatmal 0.10 0.10 0.10

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.86 0.93 0.74Abundant CADA Pune 0.30 0.25 0.27

CIPC Chandrapur 0.85 0.88 0.90SIC Sangli 0.17 0.18 0.18TIC Thane 0.12 0.11 0.13

Plangroup 2010-11Circle

Indicator XI Major Projects

Equity Performance

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

CA

DA

Sol

apur

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

CB

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jalg

aon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CA

DA

Jalg

aon

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

CC

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC

Am

rava

tiY

ICY

avat

mal

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

CC

hand

rapu

r

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

Head Middle Tail

Indicator XI Major Projects

Equity Performance

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

Bhi

ma

Kat

epur

naN

alga

nga

Wan

(Am

rava

ti)Ja

yakw

adi (

PLB

C)

Jaya

kwad

i PR

BC

Low

er T

erna

Maj

alga

onM

anjra

Girn

aC

hana

kapu

rM

anar

Pur

naV

ishn

upur

iN

MC

Exp

ress

Muk

ane

Pus

Hat

nur

Low

er W

unna

Bha

ndar

dara

Dar

naG

anga

pur

Kad

vaM

ula

Pal

khed

UG

C (K

aera

njw

an)

UG

C O

zerk

hed

UG

C(P

uneg

aon)

UG

C(T

isga

on)

Wag

had

Gho

dK

ukad

iB

orU

pper

Pen

gang

aC

hask

aman

Kha

dakw

asla

NLB

CN

RB

CP

awan

aU

pper

War

dha

Aru

nava

tiB

agh

Itiah

doh

Pen

chK

rishn

aA

sola

Men

dha

Din

aD

udhg

anga

Rad

hana

gari

Tula

shi

War

na

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

Head Middle Tail

Head Middle TailHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 0.14 0.14 0.14Deficit AIC Akola Katepurna 0.17 0.20 0.20

AIC Akola Nalganga 0.52 0.40 0.36BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amravati) 0.11 0.09 0.18CADA Abad Jayakwadi (PLBC) 0.22 0.27 0.38CADA Beed Jayakwadi PRBC 0.08 0.25 0.08CADA Beed Lower Terna 0.21 0.09 0.00CADA Beed Majalgaon 0.20 0.08 0.08CADA Beed Manjra 0.50 0.57 0.19CADA Jalgaon Girna 0.11 0.09 0.09CADA Nashik Chanakapur 0.12 0.12 0.12NIC Nanded Manar 0.37 0.22 0.11NIC Nanded Purna 0.50 0.43 0.31NIC Nanded Vishnupuri 0.22 0.18 0.18

Normal AIC Abad NMC Express Mukane 0.10 0.05 0.04AIC Akola Pus 0.27 0.60 0.22CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 0.07 0.08 0.08CADA Nagpur Lower Wunna 0.31 0.28 0.28CADA Nashik Bhandardara 0.49 0.48 0.50CADA Nashik Darna 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik Gangapur 0.06 0.08 0.24CADA Nashik Kadva 0.12 0.12 0.25CADA Nashik Mula 0.51 0.55 0.39SIC Sangli Palkhed 0.15 0.26 0.13CADA Nashik UGC (Kaeranjwan) 0.05 0.09 0.06CADA Nashik UGC Ozerkhed 0.29 0.48 0.22CADA Nashik UGC(Punegaon) 0.50 0.66 1.00CADA Nashik UGC(Tisgaon) 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Nashik Waghad 0.21 0.52 0.35CADA Pune Ghod 0.70 0.67 0.67CADA Pune Kukadi 0.32 0.32 0.32CIPC Chandrapur Bor 0.25 0.25 0.25NIC Nanded Upper Penganga 0.26 0.25 0.20PIC Pune Chaskaman 0.29 0.29 0.29PIC Pune Khadakwasla 0.21 0.21 0.21PIC Pune NLBC 1.00 1.00 1.00PIC Pune NRBC 1.00 1.00 1.00PIC Pune Pawana 0.00 0.00 0.00UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha 0.18 0.17 0.11YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 0.10 0.10 0.10

Surplus CADA Nagpur Bagh 1.00 1.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 0.96 0.97 0.93CADA Nagpur Pench 0.76 0.85 0.59

Abundant CADA Pune Krishna 0.30 0.25 0.27CIPC Chandrapur Asola Mendha 0.75 0.80 0.84CIPC Chandrapur Dina 0.96 0.96 0.96SIC Sangli Dudhganga 0.18 0.17 0.17SIC Sangli Radhanagari 0.00 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli Tulashi 0.00 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli Warna 0.13 0.21 0.20

Plangroup 2009-102010-11Circle

Indicator XI Major Projects

Equity Performance

Indicator XII (A): Assessment Recovery Ratio (Irrigation)

Highly Deficit plan group:

CADA Solapur: In Bhima (Ujjani) project, the ratio is 0.49. It lowered down sizably over last year, and it is lowerst in last four years.

Deficit plan group:

AIC Akola: In Katepurna project decrease in assessment and increase in recovery increased the ratio. In Nalganga project increase in assessment lowered ratio than state norm.

BIPC Buldhana: In Wan project indicator value is less than state norm.

CADA Aurangabad: In Jayakwadi project (PLBC), the ratio though increased from last two year’s value 0.10 to 0.20, it is very much low. Project authorities are required to give proper attention to recover 100% current assessment so as achieve ratio 1.00.

CADA Beed: The overall ratio of this circle increased from 0.10 (2009-10) to 0.51. Manjra, Lower Terna & Jayakwadi (PRBC), almost achieved the State norm, especially in Manjra & Jayakwadi (PRBC), it was very low 0.14 & 0.05 respectively last year. In Majalgaon project, the ratio though increased from 0.00 to 0.27, its performance lowered the overall ratio for the circle though three projects achieved the required norm. Its performance was better (more than 50%) in 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2008-09.

CADA Jalgaon: In Girna project, though the ratio increased from 0.13 (2009-10) to 0.20 still it is far below the State norm.

CADA Nashik: In Chankapur project, the ratio improved from 0.76 (2009-10) to 1.00 and the State norm is achieved.

NIC Nanded: The overall ratio of this circle increased from 0.06 (2009-10) to 0.26. In Manar project, the ratio increased from 0 to 0.33, as there was very less water in reservoir last year compared to 100% yield this year. In Purna the ratio has doubled (0.24) this year as compared to last year’s ratio, whereas in Vishnupuri it decreased from 0.98 to 0.78 this year, in spite of having 100% storage for last four successive years.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: In NM express canal, the ratio decreased from 1.00 to 0.62 over last year.

AIC Akola: In Pus Project the the performance is very poor due to increase in assessment.

CADA Jalgaon: In Hatnur project, the ratio lowered from 0.32 (2009-10) to 0.30, which is far below State norm.

CADA Nagpur: In Lower wunna project complex assessment recovery ratio is 0.32 with an assessment of Rs.22.07 lac.

CADA Nashik: In Bhandardara, Ozerkhed, Darna, Kadwa & Gangapur projects the water charges have been fully recovered. In rest of the projects, about 55 to 93% water charges were recovered.

CADA Pune: In Kukadi Project, the ratio decreased from 0.99 in last year to 0.79.

CIPC Chandrapur: In Bor project assessment is Rs 23.34lac amd recovery of Rs 6.94 resulting into ratio as 0.30.

NIC Nanded: In Upper Penganga project, the ratio decreased from 0.50 to 0.14, in spite of having 100% storage this year.

PIC Pune: Khadakwasla & Pawana achieved the State target of one. In NRBC, NLBC & Chaskman, the ratio increased over last year, it is still below State target.

UWPC Amravati: In Upper Wardha project the ratio is lowered nearly 4 times than last year and state norm.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Assessment recovery ratio is 0.87 for Pench project complex, Itiadoh project & Bagh project complex.

Abundant plan group:

CADA Pune: In Krishna Project, the ratio decreased to 0.38 as compared to 0.49 of last year. The performance was below State target. Field officers are required to take efforts to enhance the performance.

CIPC Chandrapur: For Asolemendha and Dina projects assessment recovery ratio is decreased from 0.49. of last year to 0.30 this year.

SIC Sangli: Improvement over last year is observed in all the four projects.

TIC Thane: In Bhatsa & Kal-Amba, the ratio declined from 1 to 0.07 & from 0.31 to 0.05 respectively over last year.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 0.65 0.80 0.49 0.80 0.43 0.49Deficit AIC Akola 0.14 0.26 0.55 0.26 0.04

BIPC Buldhana 0.32 1.00 0.85 1.36 0.00CADA Abad 0.15 0.10 0.20 1.00 0.10CADA Beed 0.08 0.10 0.51 0.60 0.02CADA Jalgaon 0.38 0.13 0.20 0.53 0.13CADA Nashik 0.78 0.76 1.00 1.00 0.60NIC Nanded 0.24 0.06 0.26 0.87 0.06

Normal AIC Abad 0.43 1.00 0.62 1.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.08 0.15 0.23 0.25 0.01CADA Jalgaon 0.25 0.32 0.30 0.32 0.18CADA Nagpur 0.30 0.58 0.32 1.00 0.15CADA Nashik 0.63 0.73 0.84 0.84 0.41CADA Pune 0.74 0.91 0.76 0.91 0.47CIPC Chandrapur 0.26 0.33 0.30 0.42 0.19NIC Nanded 0.06 0.50 0.14 0.50 0.00PIC Pune 0.68 0.67 0.73 0.72 0.62UWPC Amravati 0.59 1.00 0.29 1.06 0.45YIC Yavatmal 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.54 0.69 0.87 0.69 0.45 0.87Abundant CADA Pune 0.30 0.49 0.38 0.49 0.13

CIPC Chandrapur 0.42 0.49 0.30 0.83 0.23SIC Sangli 0.52 0.70 0.75 0.71 0.35TIC Thane 0.34 0.72 0.11 0.72 0.12

0.51

0.45

1

0.39

Indicator XII -IMajor Projects

Assessment Recovery Ratio (Irrigation)

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

CA

DA

Sol

apur

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

CB

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jalg

aon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CA

DA

Jalg

aon

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

CC

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC

Am

rava

tiY

ICY

avat

mal

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

CC

hand

rapu

r

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar Past Max Past Min

Indicator XII -IMajor Projects

Assessment Recovery Ratio (Irrigation)

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

Bhim

aJa

yakw

adi (

PLB

C)

Girn

aP

urna

Nal

gang

aM

ajal

gaon

Man

arV

ishn

upur

iW

an (A

mra

vati)

Man

jraJa

yakw

adi P

RB

CLo

wer

Ter

naC

hana

kapu

rK

atep

urna

Aru

nava

tiU

pper

Pen

gang

aP

usU

pper

War

dha

Bor

Hat

nur

Low

er W

unna

Mul

aN

RB

CW

agha

dN

MC

Exp

ress

Muk

ane

Gho

dK

ukad

iN

LBC

Pal

khed

Cha

skam

anG

anga

pur

Dar

naB

hand

arda

raU

GC

Oze

rkhe

dK

hada

kwas

laP

awan

aK

adva

Bag

hIti

ahdo

hP

ench Kal

Aso

la M

endh

aK

rishn

aD

ina

Rad

hana

gari

Bha

tsa

Tula

shi

Dud

hgan

gaS

urya

War

na

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg TY- 2010-11 LY- 2009-10 StateTar Past Min Past Max

Plangroup Circle Project FY Avg LY- 2009-1TY- 2010-11Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 0.65 0.80 0.49 0.80 0.43 0.49Deficit CADA Abad Jayakwadi (PLBC) 0.15 0.10 0.20 1.00 0.10

CADA Jalgaon Girna 0.38 0.13 0.20 0.53 0.13NIC Nanded Purna 0.22 0.12 0.24 0.99 0.12AIC Akola Nalganga 0.22 0.26 0.27 0.60 0.09CADA Beed Majalgaon 0.03 0.00 0.27 0.69 0.00NIC Nanded Manar 0.30 0.00 0.29 0.73 0.00NIC Nanded Vishnupuri 0.25 0.03 0.78 0.72 0.03BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amravati) 0.32 1.13 0.85 1.36 0.00CADA Beed Manjra 0.45 0.14 0.99 2.00 0.14CADA Beed Jayakwadi PRBC 0.13 0.05 1.00 0.45 0.05CADA Beed Lower Terna 0.51 0.93 1.00 2.55 0.05CADA Nashik Chanakapur 0.78 0.76 1.00 1.00 0.60AIC Akola Katepurna 0.09 0.00 3.22 0.20 0.00

Normal YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00NIC Nanded Upper Penganga 0.06 0.50 0.14 0.50 0.00AIC Akola Pus 0.08 0.15 0.23 0.25 0.01UWPC Amravati Upper Wardha 0.59 1.06 0.29 1.06 0.45CIPC Chandrapur Bor 0.26 0.33 0.30 0.42 0.19CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 0.25 0.32 0.30 0.32 0.18CADA Nagpur Lower Wunna 0.30 0.58 0.32 1.00 0.15CADA Nashik Mula 0.62 0.57 0.55 0.96 0.43PIC Pune NRBC 0.59 0.55 0.58 0.72 0.50CADA Nashik Waghad 0.90 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.70AIC Abad NMC Express Mukan 0.43 1.00 0.62 1.00 0.00CADA Pune Ghod 0.60 0.69 0.65 2.79 0.36CADA Pune Kukadi 0.82 0.99 0.79 1.00 0.20PIC Pune NLBC 0.73 0.80 0.83 1.00 0.46CADA Nashik Palkhed 0.81 0.69 0.93 1.00 0.60PIC Pune Chaskaman 0.91 0.73 0.93 1.00 0.73CADA Nashik Gangapur 0.73 0.77 1.00 0.98 0.38CADA Nashik Darna 0.64 0.77 1.00 0.98 0.45CADA Nashik Bhandardara 0.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.18CADA Nashik UGC Ozerkhed 0.85 0.71 1.00 1.00 0.71PIC Pune Khadakwasla 0.87 0.87 1.00 0.99 0.80PIC Pune Pawana 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.13 0.31CADA Nashik Kadva 0.15 0.23 1.00 0.63 0.04

Surplus CADA Nagpur Bagh 0.15 0.52 0.41 0.52 0.06CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 0.38 1.18 0.62 1.18 0.24CADA Nagpur Pench 0.77 0.64 1.06 0.88 0.62

Abundant TIC Thane Kal 0.65 0.91 0.05 1.00 0.28CIPC Chandrapur Asola Mendha 0.33 0.58 0.19 0.80 0.16CADA Pune Krishna 0.30 0.49 0.38 0.49 0.13CIPC Chandrapur Dina 0.50 0.42 0.41 0.85 0.26SIC Sangli Radhanagari 0.51 0.55 0.56 0.60 0.41TIC Thane Bhatsa 0.64 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.40SIC Sangli Tulashi 0.49 0.64 0.78 0.64 0.31SIC Sangli Dudhganga 0.41 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.11TIC Thane Surya 0.11 0.41 0.90 0.41 0.02SIC Sangli Warna 0.62 0.79 0.94 0.88 0.38

0.39

1

Assessment Recovery Ratio (Irrigation)

Indicator XII -IMajor Projects

0.51

0.45

0.87

Indicator XII (B): Assessment Recovery Ratio (Non-Irrigation)

Highly Deficit plan group:

CADA Solapur: - In Bhima (Ujjani) project, the ratio declined over last four years from 0.97 to 0.80.

Deficit plan group:

AIC Akola: In Katepurna and Nalganga project the ratio is as per state norm.

BIPC Buldhana: In Wan project ratio is slightly less than state norm.

CADA Aurangabad: In Jayakwadi project (PLBC), the ratio though increased from last two year’s value 0.10 to 0.20, it is very much low. Project authorities are required to give proper attention to recover 100% current assessment so as achieve ratio 1.00.

CADA Beed: The overall ratio of this circle increased from 0.10 (2009-10) to 0.51. Manjra, Lower Terna & Jayakwadi (PRBC), almost achieved the State norm, especially in Manjra & Jayakwadi (PRBC), it was very low 0.14 & 0.05 respectively last year. In Majalgaon project, the ratio though increased from 0.00 to 0.27, its performance lowered the overall ratio for the circle though three projects achieved the required norm. Its performance was better (more than 50%) in 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2008-09.

CADA Jalgaon: In Girna project, the ratio lowered from 0.76 (2009-10) to 0.70.

CADA Nashik: In Chankapur project, 68% water charges were recovered last year. However, the performance improved in 2010-11 as 78 % water charges are recovered.

NIC Nanded: The overall ratio of this circle increased from 0.06 (2009-10) to 0.26. In Manar project, the ratio increased from 0 to 0.33, as there was very less water in reservoir last year compared to 100% yield this year. In Purna the ratio has doubled (0.24) this year as compared to last year’s ratio, whereas in Vishnupuri it decreased from 0.98 to 0.78 this year, in spite of having 100% storage for last four successive years.

Normal plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: In NM express canal, the ratio decreased from 1.00 to 0.62 over last year.

AIC Akola: In Pus project performance is very poor due to less recovery.

CADA Jalgaon: In Hatnur project, 75% water charges were recovered last year. CADA Nagpur: Assessment recovery ratio is similar to last year (0.86).

However, the performance is improved in 2010-11 as 91% recovery is effected.

CADA Nashik: In Bhandardara, Ozarkhed, Palkhed & Kadwa projects, the field authorities have achieved the State target. However, in Darna, Waghad, Gangapur & Mula Projects about 64 to 90% water charges have been recovered.

CIPC Chandrapur: Si milar to last year the 100% recovery has been achieved.

NIC Nanded: In Upper Penganga project, the ratio decreased from 0.50 to 0.14, in spite of having 100% storage this year.

PIC Pune: In Khadakwasla, 98% recovery was achieved. In NLBC & NRBC the achievement was 100% & 99% respectively.

UWPC Amrawati: In Upper Wardha project slight improvement in ratio, but less than state target.

YIC Yeotmal: Increase in assessment lowered ratio to half of state norm.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Lesser value of 81 % recovery has been achieved as compared to last year’s performance (96%).

Abundant plan group:

CADA Pune: In Krishna Project, the ratio increased from 0.79 of last year to 0.82.

CIPC Chandrapur: There is no non irrigation water supply under Asolemendha and Dina projects.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur 0.91 0.85 0.80 0.97 0.85 0.80Deficit AIC Akola 0.84 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.74

BIPC Buldhana 0.69 0.90 0.93 0.93 0.20CADA Abad 0.90 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.57CADA Beed 0.51 0.29 0.48 0.82 0.29CADA Jalgaon 0.89 0.76 0.70 1.00 0.76CADA Nashik 0.98 0.68 0.78 1.39 0.68NIC Nanded 0.63 0.63 0.67 0.85 0.29

Normal AIC Abad 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.38 0.27 0.04 0.69 0.10CADA Jalgaon 0.76 0.75 0.91 1.00 0.64CADA Nagpur 0.59 0.87 0.86 1.00 0.10CADA Nashik 0.89 0.93 0.90 0.93 0.75CADA Pune 0.83 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.46CIPC Chandrapur 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26NIC Nanded 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.05 0.00PIC Pune 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.99 0.84UWPC Amravati 0.88 0.85 0.90 1.00 0.84YIC Yavatmal 0.35 0.70 0.48 0.70 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.89 0.96 0.81 0.96 0.72 0.81Abundant CADA Pune 0.75 0.79 0.82 1.00 0.52

CIPC Chandrapur 1.16 0.00 0.00 1.53 0.00SIC Sangli 0.78 0.81 0.83 0.95 0.68TIC Thane 0.79 0.98 0.97 1.00 0.54

0.74

0.74

1

0.87

Indicator XII-NIMajor Projects

Assessment Recovery Ratio (Non Irrigation)

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

CAD

AS

olap

ur

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

CB

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CAD

AJa

lgao

nC

ADA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

AJa

lgao

nC

ADA

Nag

pur

CAD

AN

ashi

k

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

CC

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PCA

mra

vati

YIC

Yav

atm

alC

ADA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

CC

hand

rapu

r

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar Past Max Past Min

Indicator XII-NIMajor Projects

Assessment Recovery Ratio (Non Irrigation)

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

Bhi

ma

Jaya

kwad

i PR

BC

Pur

naLo

wer

Ter

naM

ajal

gaon

Man

jraJa

yakw

adi (

PLB

C)

Girn

aV

ishn

upur

iC

hana

kapu

rW

an (A

mra

vati)

Man

arK

atep

urna

Nal

gang

aP

usU

pper

Pen

gang

aA

runa

vati

Mul

aW

agha

dLo

wer

Wun

naU

pper

War

dha

Dar

naG

anga

pur

Hat

nur

Paw

ana

Kha

dakw

asla

Gho

dB

hand

arda

raN

RB

CN

MC

Exp

ress

Muk

ane

UG

C O

zerk

hed

Kuk

adi

Bor

Cha

skam

anN

LBC

Kad

vaP

alkh

edIti

ahdo

hB

agh

Pen

chD

ina

Aso

la M

endh

aR

adha

naga

riK

rishn

aW

arna

Bha

tsa

Sur

yaD

udhg

anga

Tula

shi

Kal

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg TY- 2010-11 LY- 2009-10 StateTar Past Min Past Max

Plangroup Circle Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima 0.91 0.85 0.80 0.97 0.85 0.49Deficit CADA Beed Jayakwad 0.32 0.23 0.35 0.61 0.17

NIC Nanded Purna 0.18 0.17 0.39 0.29 0.01CADA Beed Lower Ter 0.66 1.00 0.39 1.00 0.13CADA Beed Majalgaon 0.92 0.75 0.46 1.00 0.70CADA Beed Manjra 0.39 0.24 0.63 2.03 0.19CADA Abad Jayakwad 0.90 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.57CADA Jalgaon Girna 0.89 0.76 0.70 1.00 0.76NIC Nanded Vishnupur 0.97 0.98 0.77 1.00 0.00CADA Nashik Chanakap 0.98 0.68 0.78 1.39 0.68BIPC Buldhana Wan (Amr 0.69 0.90 0.93 0.93 0.20NIC Nanded Manar 0.90 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.00AIC Akola Katepurna 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.75AIC Akola Nalganga 0.69 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.11

Normal AIC Akola Pus 0.38 0.27 0.04 0.69 0.10NIC Nanded Upper Pen 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.05 0.00YIC Yavatmal Arunavati 0.35 0.70 0.48 0.70 0.00CADA Nashik Mula 0.72 0.94 0.64 0.94 0.45CADA Nashik Waghad 0.62 0.60 0.69 1.00 0.06CADA Nagpur Lower Wu 0.59 0.87 0.86 1.00 0.10UWPC Amravati Upper Wa 0.88 0.85 0.90 1.00 0.84CADA Nashik Darna 0.90 0.94 0.90 1.00 0.73CADA Nashik Gangapur 0.95 0.94 0.90 1.00 0.80CADA Jalgaon Hatnur 0.76 0.75 0.91 1.00 0.64PIC Pune Pawana 0.94 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.70PIC Pune Khadakwa 0.97 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.92CADA Pune Ghod 0.93 0.97 0.99 0.99 0.87CADA Nashik Bhandarda 0.41 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.11PIC Pune NRBC 0.96 0.95 0.99 1.02 0.93AIC Abad NMC Expr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00CADA Nashik UGC Ozer 0.95 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.81CADA Pune Kukadi 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06CIPC Chandrapur Bor 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26PIC Pune Chaskama 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85PIC Pune NLBC 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96CADA Nashik Kadva 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92CADA Nashik Palkhed 0.88 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.73

Surplus CADA Nagpur Itiahdoh 0.98 0.00 0.03 1.00 0.00CADA Nagpur Bagh 0.68 0.26 0.55 1.00 0.11CADA Nagpur Pench 0.89 0.96 0.82 0.96 0.72

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur Dina 2.23 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00CIPC Chandrapur Asola Men 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00SIC Sangli Radhanag 0.64 0.59 0.72 0.95 0.58CADA Pune Krishna 0.75 0.79 0.82 1.00 0.52SIC Sangli Warna 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.54TIC Thane Bhatsa 0.71 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.42TIC Thane Surya 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96SIC Sangli Dudhgang 1.00 1.18 1.00 1.18 0.85SIC Sangli Tulashi 1.21 1.00 1.00 3.17 0.89TIC Thane Kal 1.00 1.02 1.00 1.02 0.98

1

Assessment Recovery Ratio (Non Irrigation)

Indicator XII-NIMajor Projects

0.51

0.45

0.87

0.39

Medium Projects

Benchmarking Observations 2010-11

Medium projects

Indicator I: Annual Irrigation Water Supply per unit Irrigated Area (cum/ha)

Highly deficit Plan group:

CADA Beed: Average annual water supplied per unit irrigated area of projects under this circle increased from 8093 to 9396 over last year, which is highest of last five year’s value. In Benitura & Kadi projects there was maximum utilisation of water (16840 & 15707 cum/ha), which is more than double of State norm. In Khandeshwar & Khandala projects, the water use was 7278 & 7320cum/ha respectively, well within the norm.

CADA Pune: In Khairy project, 38% area was irrigated on reservoir lifts. Only 61 hectares out of 2318 hectares (created potential) were irrigated on canal in Hot Weather season. The area on canal is decreasing & that on reservoir lifts is increasing for last five years. In Sina project also same trend was observed.

CADA Solapur: Average annual water supplied per unit irrigated area, in Buddhihal project, was 2393 cum/Ha.only.

PIC Pune: In Mhaswad project, the water use increased by over 25% compared to last year.

Deficit Plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: Annual water supplied per unit irrigated area was 7083 cum.

AIC Akola: Annual irrigation water supply per unit area is more than state norm especially in Morna and Paldhag project.

BIPC Buldhana: In Mun and Torna project the annual irrigation water supply is more than state norm and maximum in last 5 years’ water supply.

CADA Aurangabad: Average water use increased from 5187 to 7339 cum/ha. In Galhati & Ajanta Andhari, it was more than 13000 cum/ha, in spite of water use through reservoir lifts was more than that of canal. In Jui & Dhamna projects, it was very less (2578 & 3081 cum/ha respectively) as compared to State target. Project authorities are advised to be very watchful in measuring actual water use through canal /distributory /minor or by reservoir lifts.

CADA Beed: Average annual water supplied per unit irrigated area of increased from 8185 (2009-10) to 10411 cum/ha this year, which is highest of last five year’s value. Belpara project had maximum water use of 22057 cum/ha usual this year also, which is nearly three times of State target. In Renapur & Sangameshwar projects also water use was very high i.e. 17537 & 18568 cum/ha, In Sangameshwar last year the water use was nearer to State target. The water use in Mahasangvi & Terna project was 5591 & 5870 cum/ha respectively.

CADA Jalgaon: The overall water use per ha for nine projects increased from 7266 (2009-10) to 9081. The field officers are required to improve the performance in all the projects excluding Tondapur, as the indicator values are exceeding the State norm.

CADA Nashik: The water use is well within the State norm for last five years except Ghatshil Pargaon project. The indicator value of Ghatshil Pargaon project increased from 4806 cum/ha (2009-10) to 8255 cum/ha.

NIC Nanded: The average performance of the projects under this circle improved from 4432 cum/ha (2009-10) to 7083 cum/ha this year, and it is well within the norm. Kundrala had water use of 11603 cum/ha this year against last year’s lowest water

use of 2128 cum/ha, whereas in Karadkhed, it was 3094 cum/ha this year, as against no water use last year.

UWPC Amravati: In Shanoor project annual irrigation water supply is 3 times more than state norm. Perennial crops are totally shown on the wells and area irrigated on wells and nalls is 2.5 times area on canals which seems to be doubtful and it may be the reason for lowering the performance.

Normal Plan Group:

AIC Aurangabad: In Shivana Takali, the only project under this circle, the annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area increased from last year’s 12616 to 15098 cum this year, which is nearly double of State norm. It was 14004 cum/ha in 2008-09.

AIC Akola: Though having same cropping pattern of all the medium projects under this circle, Lower Pus has maximum annual irrigation water supply. Average water supply is more than state norm.

CADA Aurangabad: The average water use decreased from 5935 to 5853 cum/ha as compared to last year. The water use is well below the State target for last five years.

CADA Jalgaon: Though the water use reduced from 9138 cum/ha (2009-10) to 7907 cum/ha still it is on higher side of the State norm. Specifically in Aner (8367 cum/ha), Karwand (7914 cum/ha), Malangaon (10257 cum/ha) & Suki (17258 cum/ha) projects, the water use per ha is 1.1 to 2.2 times the State norm. Necessary steps should be taken by the field officers to improve the performance.

CADA Nashik: The overall water use per ha was on higher side of the State norm for last four years except Mandohol project. It is very much essential to use the water for irrigation more precisely specifically in Adhala (13307 cum/ha), Bhojapur (8538 cum/ha) and Alandi (10275 cum/ha) projects to achieve the State target.

CADA Pune: In Visapur, only one rotation was given in Rabbi & Hot Weather each. Therefore, the water use per hectare was less.

CIPC Chandrapur: The water use per ha is 8711 cum/Ha; which is more than state target but less than last year’s value. Water use per Ha in Dham project is excessive but it is very less in Amalnalla project.

JIPC Jalgaon: The water use in Mor project was 22578 cum/ha which is nearly three times the State norm. The field officers are required to minimize the water use per hectare so as to improve the performance.

There was no irrigation use in Bhokar (Mangrul) project as there was no demand for water from the farmers.

The water use in Bahula project was 21258 cum/ha which is nearly three times more than the State norm. The field officers are required to improve the performance.

NIC Nanded: The water use in all the three projects was more than the norm of 7692 cum/ha. In Nagzari it was to 8215 cum/ha, whereas in Dongargaon it is 12188 cum/ha. There was no irrigation last year in any of the projects.

PIC Pune: In Wadiwale & Kasarsai, as the area irrigated is on reservoir lifts & river lifts only, the water use per hectare is very less. Moreover, maximum irrigation was in Kharif.

WIC Washim: Average annual irrigation water supply is more than state norm.

YIC Yeotmal: Average annual irrigation water supply of Adan and Navargaon project is 4.5 times less than state norm.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Water use in this circle is increased as compare to last year. But it is less than state norm.

CIPC Chandrapur: Water use in this circle is within the state norm, further it is decreased as compare to last year water use. But in Punchdhara complex project it is very excessive (21133 cum/Ha.)

Abundant Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: Water use in this circle is 2847 cum/Ha. It is less than the state norm and previous year water use. It is the minimum water use in last 6 years.

KIC Ratnagiri: In Natuwadi, improvement is observed over last three years. However, the water use per unit area irrigated is on very much higher side.

NKIPC Thane: In Hetwane project, the water use for irrigation increased three times during last two years. Moreover, the area irrigated is less than twelve percent of created potential.

SIC Sangli: - The average ratio was 7526 cum/Ha. It is improved over last year. Project wise water use was, Kadavi (6872 cum/Ha), Patgaon (8678 cum/Ha.), Kumbhi (11372 cum/Ha.), Kasari (8042 cum/Ha.), Chikotra (6954 cum/Ha), Jangamhatti (6492 cum/Ha.) & Chitri (4958 cum/Ha.)

TIC Thane: The water use in Wandri was 4972 against 37838 cum/ Ha. in 2009-10.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 7815 8093 9396 8093 7194

CADA Pune 9183 7896 8696 10813 7804CADA Solapur 6882 6585 6174 8577 6499PIC Pune 6438 7235 8683 7235 4941

Deficit AIC Abad 0 0 7083 0 0AIC Akola 6894 14719 10588 8405 6138BIPC Buldhana 8799 5399 16257 11181 1667CADA Abad 6277 5187 7339 8258 5187CADA Beed 7968 8185 10411 8984 7089CADA Jalgaon 7607 7266 9081 7887 7055CADA Nashik 5562 5007 4986 6538 5007NIC Nanded 7055 4432 7083 8080 4432UWPC Amravati 6500 6194 21049 13025 5540

Normal AIC Abad 13388 12616 15098 14004 0AIC Akola 7776 6590 12643 8128 6590CADA Abad 3589 5935 5853 5935 0CADA Jalgaon 9633 9138 7907 11062 7587CADA Nashik 9577 8401 10099 11621 8401CADA Pune 4657 3302 3605 5568 3302CIPC Chandrapur 9460 12116 8711 12116 7716JIPC Jalgaon 31163 31163 21443 11629 11629NIC Nanded 9127 0 10110 9614 0PIC Pune 6316 4904 4931 8096 4904WIC Washim 5375 3765 8746 5878 3745YIC Yavatmal 11877 0 1656 19042 0

Surplus CADA Nagpur 4363 4389 4504 5223 3425CIPC Chandrapur 7199 6079 5532 8639 5665

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur 4953 3451 2847 5731 3451KIC Ratnagiri 181494 207588 193581 304659 21429NKIPC Thane 44898 68136 90210 68136 29717SIC Sangli 23882 7868 7526 97537 6620TIC Thane 19481 21876 49721 21876 16871

9234

5018

5187

8237

10849

7692

Indicator IMedium Projects

Annual Irrigation Water Supply per unit Irrigated Area (cum/ha)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000C

AD

A B

eed

CA

DA

Pun

e

CA

DA

Sol

apur

PIC

Pun

e

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

JIP

C J

alga

on

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

WIC

Was

him

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NK

IPC

Tha

ne

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

cum

/ha

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Solapur Highly Deficit Budhihal 3397 9354 2393 9354 900 7692CADA Solapur Ekrukh 6549 6627 5117 6957 4921 7692PIC Pune Nher 6767 7316 5686 7316 0 7692CADA Solapur Mangi 6780 6133 6234 7164 6133 7692CADA Pune Khairy 5558 5035 6336 7420 3102 7692CADA Solapur Hingani (Pangaon) 7329 6441 6733 9787 6441 7692CADA Solapur Jawalgaon 7577 6876 6909 10558 6261 7692CADA Beed Khandeshwar 6008 6306 7278 6372 5158 7692CADA Beed Khandala 3911 4760 7320 6137 1469 7692CADA Beed Khasapur 5447 6508 7375 6508 3886 7692PIC Pune Andhali 8295 6478 7462 16364 0 7692PIC Pune Ranand 6322 5394 7612 9189 5340 7692CADA Beed Banganga 7202 6403 8088 8881 5651 7692PIC Pune Tisangi 7827 6911 8283 9626 6911 7692CADA Beed Kurnoor 11582 11016 8317 13441 10396 7692CADA Beed Kambli 9877 11698 8333 11739 0 7692CADA Beed Sakat 5728 7193 8506 7193 3057 7692CADA Beed Talwar 8786 8953 8510 14286 6316 7692CADA Beed Turori 5783 0 8805 8000 0 7692CADA Beed Mehakari 11994 12189 8955 13835 0 7692CADA Beed Rooty 14379 7463 9148 28737 0 7692CADA Pune Sina 10515 8923 9166 12468 8923 7692CADA Beed Kada 8448 5432 9598 11000 5432 7692PIC Pune Mhaswad 5578 7668 9779 7668 2384 7692CADA Beed Chandani 6630 6613 10570 11557 765 7692CADA Beed Ramganga 6453 6860 11095 7647 3159 7692CADA Beed Jakapur 6996 0 12459 8045 0 7692CADA Beed Harni 9027 6812 13286 13136 6812 7692CADA Beed Kadi 11784 10108 15707 15362 0 7692CADA Beed Benitura 11730 11687 16840 14096 10429 7692CADA Abad Deficit Jui 5546 7667 2578 7667 0 7692AIC Abad Wakod 0 0 7083 0 0 7692CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 2567 0 2798 3097 0 7692CADA Abad Dhamna 5511 0 3081 6363 0 7692NIC Nanded Karadkhed 7953 0 3094 9034 0 7692CADA Abad Kalyan Girja 7078 1965 3103 10017 1965 7692CADA Nashik Haranbari 5696 4654 4657 7004 4654 7692CADA Nashik Kelzar 4342 4454 4780 5651 3129 7692CADA Abad Gadadgad 5021 3838 5099 8125 3838 7692CADA Beed Mahasangvi 8114 6780 5591 9766 6780 7692CADA Beed Terna 6966 0 5870 8328 0 7692CADA Nashik Nagyasakya 6854 6538 6045 8418 5513 7692CADA Abad Pir Kalyan 4970 0 6252 6692 0 7692CADA Abad Khelna 4625 4363 6273 9592 0 7692CADA Beed Bindusara 9346 8480 6316 13987 7031 7692CADA Abad Girja 6468 8407 6332 9485 5059 7692NIC Nanded Kudala 6221 7027 6497 7795 4584 7692CADA Beed Devarjan 7917 0 6573 11930 0 7692CADA Beed Sakol 5512 0 6651 7168 0 7692CADA Abad Purna Nevpur 2901 6955 6660 6955 1398 7692CADA Abad Lahuki 4707 3103 6771 7278 2601 7692AIC Akola Dnyanganga 6382 0 7407 7072 0 7692NIC Nanded Mahalingi 5458 0 7527 6727 0 7692CADA Abad Jivrekha 6121 0 7569 7330 0 7692CADA Abad Karpara 8009 6508 7730 11856 3218 7692CADA Beed Raigavan 6716 9075 7902 9075 3509 7692CADA Beed Rui 5259 0 7934 7663 0 7692CADA Beed Whati 8992 0 7938 11980 0 7692CADA Abad Anjana Palashi 2842 5328 8123 8833 1573 7692CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 7591 8261 8146 8261 5573 7692CADA Jalgaon Bori 8484 6599 8268 9547 6081 7692CADA Beed Borna 9095 6834 8342 12672 6834 7692

Indicator IMedium Projects

Annual Irrigation Water Supply per unit Irrigated Area (cum/ha)

8237

10849

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Beed Saraswati 8222 9286 8480 11885 6154 7692CADA Jalgaon Burai 6081 7400 8576 7606 5242 7692CADA Jalgaon Agnawati 7400 6183 8590 8582 0 7692CADA Beed Gharni 8336 0 8842 10478 0 7692NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 9522 0 9134 11250 0 7692CADA Jalgaon Manyad 8929 8112 9493 10183 8112 7692CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 10759 6230 9496 11735 6230 7692AIC Akola Mas 5981 2511 9550 6904 0 7692CADA Jalgaon Rangawali 6233 7858 9610 7858 4907 7692CADA Abad Masoli 10105 0 9612 12885 0 7692AIC Akola Uma 6037 0 9719 8875 0 7692CADA Beed Bodhegaon 9681 8592 9945 14400 6140 7692CADA Abad Sukhna 5531 2689 10111 7396 2689 7692CADA Beed Sindphana 5830 5607 10299 8359 4350 7692AIC Akola Nirguna 7580 11356 10373 13190 5270 7692CADA Beed Kundlika 9476 9089 11212 12636 6921 7692CADA Beed Tawarja 8288 0 11382 13160 0 7692NIC Nanded Kundrala 5854 2128 11603 7379 2128 7692CADA Beed Tiru 6502 0 11922 7707 0 7692CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 7297 3316 12781 13205 3316 7692CADA Beed Wan (Beed) 9818 8835 12956 12342 8369 7692CADA Abad Ajantha Andhari 5652 2075 13069 13158 2075 7692CADA Abad Galhati 12429 8122 13079 19632 8122 7692BIPC Buldhana Torna 8920 3674 13218 12232 1481 7692AIC Akola Morna (Akola) 7828 8642 13991 11392 4545 7692AIC Akola Paldhag 6377 6441 15277 7850 0 7692CADA Beed Masalga 6518 0 16479 7877 0 7692BIPC Buldhana Mun 8378 1636 17104 10995 645 7692CADA Beed Renapur 9656 10507 17529 10507 7557 7692

CADA BeedSangameshwar (Dokewadi) 7944 7762 18571 16194 5517 7692

UWPC Amravati Shahanoor 7765 25631 21049 25631 5540 7692YIC Yavatmal Normal Adan 12431 0 1402 23218 0 7692JIPC Jalgaon Bhokar (Mangrul) 0 0 0 0 0 7692JIPC Jalgaon Bahula 9767 9767 21258 9767 9767 7692JIPC Jalgaon Mor 31163 31163 22578 31163 31163 7692CIPC Chandrapur Amal Nala 6460 0 2418 7826 0 7692CADA Pune Visapur 4657 3302 3605 5568 3302 7692CADA Abad Kolhi 7344 4089 3772 10946 0 7692PIC Pune Vadiwale 5456 3680 3972 7587 3680 7692YIC Yavatmal Navargaon 8693 0 4077 8977 0 7692PIC Pune Kasarsai 5641 4849 4178 7183 4669 7692CADA Jalgaon Panzra 6540 8996 5168 8996 5099 7692CADA Abad Ambadi 5493 6058 5506 6235 0 7692CADA Abad Narangi 3627 0 5552 4038 0 7692CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 2575 0 5556 12304 0 7692CADA Abad Tembhapuri 2350 5449 6128 6904 1475 7692PIC Pune Nazare 6267 6611 6997 7076 5505 7692CADA Jalgaon Abhora 8112 6047 7064 10582 5875 7692CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 16281 14636 7542 23499 11462 7692AIC Akola Saikheda 9947 0 7875 14274 0 7692CADA Jalgaon Karwand 6136 8415 7914 8415 4728 7692WIC Washim Ekburji 5623 3673 8214 6570 0 7692NIC Nanded Nagzari 9211 0 8215 10402 0 7692CADA Nashik Ghatshil Pargaon 5841 4806 8255 7620 4657 7692PIC Pune Shetphal 9064 7176 8298 14174 6795 7692CADA Jalgaon Aner 11069 6622 8367 15010 6622 7692CADA Nashik Bhojapur 9588 7942 8538 16958 7942 7692CIPC Chandrapur Dongargaon (Wardha) 11602 8282 8578 17512 8282 7692CADA Abad Dheku 4341 7192 8750 7192 0 7692WIC Washim Sonal 5246 7300 9030 7300 0 7692CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 7040 7805 10257 7988 5962 7692CADA Nashik Alandi 9470 7797 10275 9674 7797 7692NIC Nanded Loni 9519 0 10588 11247 0 7692

10849

9234

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarAIC Akola Borgaon 5496 1558 12123 7692 1558 7692CIPC Chandrapur Pothra 10849 11174 12174 11840 9409 7692NIC Nanded Dongargaon (Nanded) 8781 0 12188 10179 0 7692AIC Akola Koradi 4287 1000 12370 4507 1000 7692CADA Nashik Adhala 9937 9210 13307 13683 8340 7692AIC Abad Shivna Takali 13388 12616 15098 14004 0 7692AIC Akola Lowerpus 9124 6667 16609 11589 6667 7692CADA Jalgaon Suki 21950 25830 17258 37327 8848 7692CADA Nagpur Surplus Khairbanda 1846 1531 1286 2436 1531 7692CADA Nagpur Bagheda 2033 1545 1770 3039 1421 7692CADA Nagpur Sorna 3444 2398 1873 3956 2398 7692CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 2827 2807 2434 3270 2480 7692CADA Nagpur Chandpur 1851 1723 2605 7692 1406 7692CADA Nagpur Chorakhmara 2613 2213 3014 3288 2213 7692CADA Nagpur Rengepar 3352 3592 3026 3832 2751 7692CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 2984 2910 3166 3618 2499 7692CIPC Chandrapur Chandai 5050 3158 3216 7724 3158 7692CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 3606 3080 3321 4469 2003 7692CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 8911 5419 3993 17915 5419 7692CADA Nagpur Managadh 4695 3754 4497 6491 3010 7692CADA Nagpur Chulband 4675 4058 4847 5214 4058 7692CIPC Chandrapur Pakadigundam 4504 0 4916 5901 0 7692CADA Nagpur Pandhrabodi 5489 6620 5839 6620 0 7692

CADA NagpurMakardhokada-Saiki Complex 7517 4800 6891 9066 4800 7692

CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 11396 33035 7081 33035 8068 7692CIPC Chandrapur Labhansarad 5757 3540 7350 6921 3540 7692CADA Nagpur Umri 8151 6461 8503 12435 6141 7692CADA Nagpur Kanholibara 8133 6469 9898 10251 6469 7692CADA Nagpur Mordham 9271 6738 10083 10664 6733 7692CADA Nagpur Kolar 8976 16041 12824 16041 6498 7692CADA Nagpur Chandrabhaga (Nagpur) 10325 10532 13313 11356 8722 7692CADA Nagpur Wunna 9944 3433 17254 14708 3433 7692CIPC Chandrapur Panchadhara 16802 17998 21133 19163 13583 7692CADA Nagpur Khekranala 27545 28096 38716 42338 12569 7692CIPC Chandrapur Abundant Naleshwar 4650 2019 2566 7000 2019 7692CIPC Chandrapur Ghorazari 5132 4148 2994 8255 4148 7692SIC Sangli Chitri 6129 5337 4958 21952 3982 7692SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 5300 5834 6492 5834 4719 7692SIC Sangli Kadavi 8865 9182 6872 9408 7761 7692SIC Sangli Chikotra 7781 5934 6954 706579 5934 7692SIC Sangli Kasari 7825 6763 8042 9208 6763 7692SIC Sangli Patgaon 11033 9659 8678 13201 9659 7692SIC Sangli Kumbhi 119088 10948 11372 624577 7988 7692TIC Thane Wandri 34959 37838 49721 42839 27525 7692NKIPC Thane Hetwane 44898 68136 90210 68136 29717 7692KIC Ratnagiri Natuwadi 185970 207588 193581 304659 21429 7692

5018

5187

Indicator I a: Annual Area irrigated per unit of water supply (ha/ cum).

Highly Deficit Plan Group:

CADA Beed: Annual average area irrigated per unit of water supply in the projects under this circle reduced to 106 ha from last year’s value 124 ha. In Benitura & Kadi project, the indicator value is very low i.e. 59 & 64 ha/Mcum respectively, whereas it is around the State target in Khasapur, Khandeshwar & Khandala.

CADA Solapur : Mangi project attained maximum value of ratio. The overall performance slightly declined for current year. But it is still above State norm.

Deficit Plan Group:

CADA Beed: Average performance of this circle declined over past five year’s and was lowest (96 ha/Mcum) this year. Last year it was 122 ha/Mcum, whereas in 2007-08 & 2008-09 it was 141 ha/Mcum. In Mahasangvi, it is highest (179 ha/Mcum). In Belpara it is very low (45 ha/Mcum) this year, inspite of having 100% storage, only 54 ha out of 1093 ha created potential was irrigated on canals.

CADA Aurangabad: The average performance of the circle reduced from 193 ha/Mcum (2009-10) to 136 ha/Mcum. In Jui project, it was 388 ha/Mcum, because of just 0.75 Mcum of water utilised in three rotations in Rabi season to irrigate 246 ha, whereas in Galhati & Ajanta Andhari it was minimum 76 & 77 ha/Mcum respectively. This shows that measurement of either water use or area irrigated is faulty. Project authorities are advised to be careful in this regard.

NIC Nanded: The average performance of this circle reduced from 226 ha/Mcum (2009-10) to 141 ha/Mcum, similar to 2007-08 & 2008-09. In Kundrala project last year’s 470 ha/Mcum reduced to just 86 ha/Mcum this year.

AIC Aurangabad: Annual area irrigated per unit of water supply was 141 ha.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 128 124 106 139 124

CADA Pune 109 127 115 128 92PIC Pune 155 138 115 202 138CADA Solapur 145 152 162 154 117

Deficit UWPC Amravati 154 161 48 181 77BIPC Buldhana 114 185 62 600 89AIC Akola 145 68 94 163 119CADA Beed 126 122 96 141 111CADA Jalgaon 131 138 110 142 127CADA Abad 159 193 136 193 121NIC Nanded 142 226 141 226 124CADA Nashik 180 200 201 200 153

Normal JIPC Jalgaon 86 86 47 86 86AIC Abad 75 79 66 79 0AIC Akola 129 152 79 152 123NIC Nanded 110 0 99 113 0CADA Nashik 104 119 99 119 86WIC Washim 186 266 114 267 170CIPC Chandrapur 110 94 119 130 94CADA Jalgaon 104 109 126 132 90CADA Abad 279 168 171 386 0PIC Pune 158 204 203 204 124CADA Pune 215 303 277 303 180YIC Yavatmal 84 0 604 174 0

Surplus CIPC Chandrapur 150 201 208 202 121CADA Nagpur 229 228 222 292 191

Abundant KIC Ratnagiri 6 5 5 47 3NKIPC Thane 22 15 11 34 15TIC Thane 51 46 20 59 46SIC Sangli 42 127 133 151 10CIPC Chandrapur 202 290 351 290 174

167

215

242

125

36

130

Indicator I a Medium Projects

Annual Area Irrigated per unit of Water Supply (ha/Mcu

0

50

100

150

200

250

300C

AD

A B

eed

CA

DA

Pun

e

PIC

Pun

e

CA

DA

Sol

apur

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

AIC

Ako

la

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Aba

d

NIC

Nan

ded

CA

DA

Nas

hik

JIP

C J

alga

on

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

NIC

Nan

ded

CA

DA

Nas

hik

WIC

Was

him

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Aba

d

PIC

Pun

e

CA

DA

Pun

e

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CA

DA

Nag

pur

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NK

IPC

Tha

ne

TIC

Tha

ne

SIC

San

gli

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

ha/M

cum

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Beed Highly Deficit Benitura 85 86 59 96 71 130CADA Beed Kadi 85 99 64 100 0 130CADA Beed Harni 111 147 75 147 76 130CADA Beed Jakapur 143 0 80 190 0 130CADA Beed Ramganga 155 146 90 317 131 130CADA Beed Chandani 151 151 95 1308 87 130PIC Pune Mhaswad 179 130 102 420 130 130CADA Beed Kada 118 184 104 184 91 130CADA Pune Sina 95 112 109 112 80 130CADA Beed Rooty 70 134 109 145 0 130CADA Beed Mehakari 83 82 112 97 0 130CADA Beed Turori 173 0 114 222 0 130CADA Beed Sakat 175 139 118 327 139 130CADA Beed Talwar 114 112 118 158 70 130CADA Beed Kurnoor 86 91 120 96 74 130CADA Beed Kambli 101 85 120 123 0 130PIC Pune Tisangi 128 145 121 145 104 130CADA Beed Banganga 139 156 124 177 113 130PIC Pune Ranand 158 185 131 187 109 130PIC Pune Andhali 121 154 134 163 0 130CADA Beed Khasapur 184 154 136 257 154 130CADA Beed Khandeshwar 166 159 137 194 157 130CADA Beed Khandala 256 210 137 681 163 130CADA Solapur Jawalgaon 132 145 145 160 95 130CADA Solapur Hingani (Pangaon) 136 155 149 155 102 130CADA Pune Khairy 180 199 158 322 135 130CADA Solapur Mangi 147 163 160 163 140 130PIC Pune Nher 148 137 176 173 0 130CADA Solapur Ekrukh 153 151 195 203 144 130CADA Solapur Budhihal 294 107 418 1111 107 130UWPC Amravati Deficit Shahanoor 129 39 48 181 39 130

CADA BeedSangameshwar (Dokewadi) 126 129 54 181 62 130

CADA Beed Renapur 104 95 57 132 95 130BIPC Buldhana Mun 119 611 58 1550 91 130CADA Beed Masalga 153 0 61 190 0 130AIC Akola Paldhag 157 155 65 171 0 130AIC Akola Morna (Akola) 128 116 71 220 88 130BIPC Buldhana Torna 112 272 76 675 82 130CADA Abad Galhati 80 123 76 123 51 130CADA Beed Wan (Beed) 102 113 77 119 81 130CADA Abad Ajantha Andhari 177 482 77 482 76 130CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 137 302 78 302 76 130CADA Beed Tiru 154 0 84 185 0 130NIC Nanded Kundrala 171 470 86 470 136 130CADA Beed Tawarja 121 0 88 145 0 130CADA Beed Kundlika 106 110 89 144 79 130AIC Akola Nirguna 132 88 96 190 76 130CADA Beed Sindphana 172 178 97 230 120 130CADA Abad Sukhna 181 372 99 372 135 130CADA Beed Bodhegaon 103 116 101 163 69 130AIC Akola Uma 166 0 103 200 0 130CADA Jalgaon Rangawali 160 127 104 204 127 130CADA Abad Masoli 99 0 104 114 0 130CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 93 161 105 161 85 130CADA Jalgaon Manyad 112 123 105 123 98 130AIC Akola Mas 167 398 105 398 0 130NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 105 0 109 159 0 130

Indicator I aMedium Projects

Annual Area Irrigated per unit of Water Supply

125

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Beed Gharni 120 0 113 139 0 130CADA Jalgaon Agnawati 135 162 116 183 0 130CADA Jalgaon Burai 164 135 117 191 131 130CADA Beed Saraswati 122 108 118 163 84 130CADA Beed Borna 110 146 120 146 79 130CADA Jalgaon Bori 118 152 121 164 105 130CADA Abad Anjana Palashi 352 188 123 636 113 130CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 132 121 123 179 121 130CADA Beed Whati 111 0 126 157 0 130CADA Beed Rui 190 0 126 386 0 130CADA Beed Raigavan 149 110 127 285 110 130CADA Abad Karpara 125 154 129 311 84 130CADA Abad Jivrekha 163 0 132 202 0 130NIC Nanded Mahalingi 183 0 133 214 0 130AIC Akola Dnyanganga 157 0 135 225 0 130CADA Abad Lahuki 212 322 148 384 137 130CADA Abad Purna Nevpur 345 144 150 716 144 130CADA Beed Sakol 181 0 150 210 0 130CADA Beed Devarjan 126 0 152 196 0 130NIC Nanded Kudala 161 142 154 218 128 130CADA Beed Bindusara 107 118 158 142 71 130CADA Abad Girja 155 119 158 198 105 130CADA Abad Khelna 216 229 159 271 0 130CADA Abad Pir Kalyan 201 0 160 447 0 130CADA Nashik Nagyasakya 146 153 165 181 119 130CADA Beed Terna 144 0 170 169 0 130CADA Beed Mahasangvi 123 148 179 148 102 130CADA Abad Gadadgad 199 261 196 261 123 130CADA Nashik Kelzar 230 225 209 320 177 130CADA Nashik Haranbari 176 215 215 215 143 130CADA Abad Kalyan Girja 141 509 322 509 100 130NIC Nanded Karadkhed 126 0 323 166 0 130CADA Abad Dhamna 181 0 325 304 0 130CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 390 0 357 569 0 130CADA Abad Jui 180 130 388 200 0 130CADA Jalgaon Normal Suki 46 39 58 113 27 130AIC Akola Lowerpus 110 150 60 150 86 130AIC Abad Shivna Takali 75 79 66 79 0 130CADA Nashik Adhala 101 109 75 120 73 130AIC Akola Koradi 233 1000 81 1000 222 130NIC Nanded Dongargaon (Nanded) 114 0 82 136 0 130CIPC Chandrapur Pothra 92 89 82 106 84 130AIC Akola Borgaon 182 642 82 642 130 130NIC Nanded Loni 105 0 94 127 0 130CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 142 128 97 168 125 130CADA Nashik Alandi 106 128 97 128 103 130WIC Washim Sonal 191 137 111 216 0 130CADA Abad Dheku 230 139 114 349 0 130CADA Nashik Bhojapur 104 126 117 126 59 130CIPC Chandrapur Dongargaon (Wardha) 86 121 117 121 57 130CADA Jalgaon Aner 90 151 120 151 67 130PIC Pune Shetphal 110 139 121 147 71 130CADA Nashik Ghatshil Pargaon 171 208 121 215 131 130NIC Nanded Nagzari 109 0 122 132 0 130WIC Washim Ekburji 178 272 122 272 0 130CADA Jalgaon Karwand 163 119 126 211 119 130AIC Akola Saikheda 101 0 127 129 0 130CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 61 68 133 87 43 130CADA Jalgaon Abhora 123 165 142 170 95 130PIC Pune Nazare 160 151 143 182 141 130CADA Abad Tembhapuri 425 184 163 678 145 130

36

167

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Abad Narangi 276 0 180 404 0 130CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 388 0 180 700 0 130CADA Abad Ambadi 182 165 182 2950 0 130CADA Jalgaon Panzra 153 111 194 196 111 130PIC Pune Kasarsai 177 206 239 214 139 130YIC Yavatmal Navargaon 115 0 245 148 0 130PIC Pune Vadiwale 183 272 252 272 132 130CADA Abad Kolhi 136 245 265 472 0 130CADA Pune Visapur 215 303 277 303 180 130CIPC Chandrapur Amal Nala 155 0 414 177 0 130JIPC Jalgaon Bhokar (Mangrul) 0 0 0 0 0 130JIPC Jalgaon Mor 32 32 44 32 32 130JIPC Jalgaon Bahula 102 102 47 102 102 130CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 388 0 180 700 0 130CADA Abad Narangi 276 0 180 404 0 130YIC Yavatmal Adan 80 0 713 243 0 130CADA Nagpur Surplus Khekranala 36 36 26 80 24 130CIPC Chandrapur Panchadhara 60 56 47 74 52 130CADA Nagpur Wunna 101 291 58 291 68 130CADA Nagpur Chandrabhaga (Nagpur) 97 95 75 115 88 130CADA Nagpur Kolar 111 62 78 154 62 130CADA Nagpur Mordham 108 148 99 149 94 130CADA Nagpur Kanholibara 123 155 101 155 98 130CADA Nagpur Umri 123 155 118 163 80 130CIPC Chandrapur Labhansarad 174 282 136 283 144 130CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 88 30 141 124 30 130

CADA NagpurMakardhokada-Saiki Complex 133 208 145 208 110 130

CADA Nagpur Pandhrabodi 182 151 171 192 0 130CIPC Chandrapur Pakadigundam 222 0 203 272 0 130CADA Nagpur Chulband 214 246 206 246 192 130CADA Nagpur Managadh 213 266 222 332 154 130CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 112 185 250 185 56 130CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 277 325 301 499 224 130CIPC Chandrapur Chandai 198 317 311 317 129 130CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 335 344 316 400 276 130CADA Nagpur Rengepar 298 278 330 363 261 130CADA Nagpur Chorakhmara 383 452 332 452 304 130CADA Nagpur Chandpur 540 580 384 711 130 130CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 354 356 411 403 306 130CADA Nagpur Sorna 290 417 534 417 253 130CADA Nagpur Bagheda 492 647 565 704 329 130CADA Nagpur Khairbanda 542 653 777 653 410 130NKIPC Thane Abundant Hetwane 22 15 11 34 15 130TIC Thane Wandri 29 26 20 36 23 130SIC Sangli Kumbhi 8 91 88 125 2 130SIC Sangli Patgaon 91 104 115 104 76 130SIC Sangli Kasari 128 148 124 148 109 130SIC Sangli Chikotra 129 169 144 169 1 130SIC Sangli Kadavi 113 109 146 129 106 130SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 189 171 154 212 171 130SIC Sangli Chitri 163 187 202 251 46 130CIPC Chandrapur Ghorazari 195 241 334 241 121 130CIPC Chandrapur Naleshwar 215 495 390 495 143 130

215

242

Indicator II: Potential created and utilized

Highly Deficit Plan Group:

CADA Beed: Average ratio of indicator for the projects under this circle increased from 0.35 to 0.44. In Turori project, though the ratio achieved is 1.00, it has no irrigation on canal, the area irrigated on reservoir lifts (253 ha) & wells in the command area (487 ha) which collectively tallies with the effective irrigation potential of 740 ha. In Khandala & Chandani project, ratio is 0.82. In Ruti project, it slightly increased over last year’s 0.12 to 0.14. It is still far away from the required ratio. Only 247 ha area was irrigated (canal - 63 ha, Reservoir lifts - 104 ha & wells - 80 ha) out of created potential of 1782 ha. Project authorities are advised to take efforts to utilise maximum possible irrigation potential.

PIC Pune: The performance of all the five projects is satisfactory. In Andhali project, the improvement over last year is mainly due to three fold increase in irrigated area.

CADA Pune: In Khairy project, the potential utilised decreased from 1480 to 1260 hectares over last year, resulting in lower performance.

CADA Solapur: The average value of, irrigation potential created & utilized of five medium projects, was 0.66, which is lowest in last five years. In Mangi, the utilized potential included 1225 Ha. on wells & nallas in the command. The area irrigated on canal was 1463 Ha. & on reservoir, 930 Ha. out of created potential of 3117 Ha.

Deficit Plan group:

NIC Nanded: Average ratio of projects under this circle increased from 0.32 to 0.53 as compared to last year. Kudala project had the maximum ratio of 0.88 this year, it was 0.82 last year, whereas in Kundrala & Pethwadaj it was minimum (0.42 & 0.43 respectively). Out of five projects, in three projects there was no irrigation last year.

CADA Beed: The ratio of utilised & created irrigation potential increased from 0.34 (2009-10) to 0.38. In Raigavan it was 0.88, because of 660 ha area irrigated on wells in command area, which is nearly 4 times of area irrigated on canals. Last year there was no irrigation on wells as reported by the field officers. In Belpara project, as per last year the ratio is constant (0.12), though there was 100% live storage this year, only 129 ha area (canals - 54 ha, Reservoir lifts - 75 ha) was irrigated out of created 1093 ha by utilising 100% available water. In Masalga project also the ratio was very low (0.14), there was no irrigation on canal in spite of having 100% live storage this year, utilisation was done only by reservoir lifts i.e. 160 ha. (created potential is 1364 ha). Project authorities are advised to prepare action plan to improve the performance.

CADA Aurangabad: The average performance of projects under this circle slightly improved from 0.74 (2009-10) to 0.78. In Lahuki project, the ratio was 1.92, mainly because of 1645 ha area on wells as against created & ultimate potential of 1092 ha, as well as utilisation on canal (267 ha) & reservoir lifts (185 ha) which is very less compared to wells in command area. Last year there was no irrigation on wells. The ratio in respect of Sukhana, Khelna & Dhamna is also more than 1.00 because of same reason, whereas in Pir Kalyan, Galhati & Masoli the ratio is low (ranging between 0.35 to 0.45).

AIC Aurangabad: The ratio of indicator of this circle is 0.27 this year.

AIC Akola: This year potential utilization is increased.

BIPC Buldhana: potential utilization on Mun & Torna projects increased over last year.

UWPC Amravati: In Shanoor project 27% of created potential is utilized.

CADA Jalgaon: In all the projects except Rangawali (57%) the potential was fully utilized.

CADA Nashik: Though the ratio increased from 0.50 (2009-10) to 0.55, still it is below State target. There is much scope to improve the performance in Haranbari (51%) & Kelzar (49%) projects.

Normal Plan group:

NIC Nanded: The average ratio in projects under this circle was 0.41 this year, last year there was no irrigation due to lesser availability. In Nagzari, it was 0.83 & 0.15 in Loni project.

AIC Aurangabad: The ratio increased from 0.10 to 0.16 as compared to last year.

CADA Aurangabad: The average performance of projects under this circle increased from 0.35 (2009-10) to 0.63 this year. In Narangi project, the ratio achieved (1.87) was maximum and beyond State target, it is due to 1188 ha irrigation (canal – nil, reservoir lifts – 580 ha & wells - 608 ha) as against 636 ha effective irrigation potential. In Dheku project, the ratio (0.14) lowered as against last year (0.19), because of 330 ha utilised potential (canal - 59 ha, reservoir lifts-207 ha & wells - 64 ha) as against 2398 ha effective irrigation potential.

AIC Akola: potential utilized is 54% of created potential.

YIC Yeotmal: In Adan and Navargaon project, water availability was 100%. In these projects, 16% &13%of water remain unutilized respectively. Only 29% potential is utilized.

WIC Washim: With 100% water availability 57% potential is utilized, which is more than last year.

CADA Jalgaon: The potential was fully utilized in all the projects except Karwand (88 %).

CADA Nashik: Out of four projects, the potential was fully utilized only in Alandi project .In Adhala, Bhojapur and Mandohol projects, the potential utilized was 97%, 82% and 72% respectively.

JIPC Jalgaon: Only 6 % potential was utilized in Mor project. Field officers are required to take necessary steps to increase the potential utilization to the maximum possible extent.

Only 44 % potential was utilized in Bahula project. Field officers are required to increase the potential utilization duly forming water users associations.

CIPC Chandrapur: Utilisation of irrigation potential is very less in this circle and the value of the indicator is 0.40 which is improved slightly over last years value of 0.29.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Utilisation of irrigation potential is decreased as compared to last year but it is fairly good as compared to target (0.89 to 0.68).

CIPC Chandrapur: Utilisation of irrigation potential is increased as compared to last year’s value (0.43 to 0.63).

Abundant Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: Ratio of potential utilized to created appears to be 1.65. High value of ratio is attend because irrigation was done mainly in kharif season and while calculating the ratio effective irrigation potential is taken without any logic. Even though the data provided for calculations is not proper.

TIC Thane: The ratio in Wandri was 0.19, which is lower than the lowest performance in last five years.

SIC Sangli: The average ratio for medium projects was 0.52, similar to last year. In Patgaon, Kumbhi & Kadavi the utilization was less than 40%, inspite of 100% availability of storage in these projects.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 0.43 0.35 0.44 0.58 0.35

CADA Pune 0.68 0.87 0.90 1.20 0.46CADA Solapur 0.90 1.24 0.66 1.24 0.68PIC Pune 0.84 0.98 1.10 1.02 0.59

Deficit AIC Abad 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.55 0.11 0.53 0.70 0.19BIPC Buldhana 0.22 0.23 0.36 0.27 0.00CADA Abad 0.85 0.74 0.78 0.99 0.59CADA Beed 0.36 0.34 0.38 0.41 0.32CADA Jalgaon 1.29 1.47 1.40 1.47 1.02CADA Nashik 0.51 0.50 0.55 0.64 0.42NIC Nanded 0.79 0.32 0.53 0.98 0.32UWPC Amravati 0.34 0.40 0.27 0.40 0.24

Normal AIC Abad 0.09 0.10 0.16 0.10 0.00AIC Akola 0.50 0.23 0.54 0.74 0.23CADA Abad 0.70 0.35 0.63 1.02 0.00CADA Jalgaon 1.43 1.63 1.57 1.63 1.23CADA Nashik 0.16 1.17 0.98 1.17 0.00CADA Pune 1.60 1.50 1.38 2.11 1.14CIPC Chandrapur 0.43 0.29 0.40 0.56 0.29JIPC Jalgaon 0.14 0.14 0.21 0.14 0.14NIC Nanded 0.58 0.00 0.41 0.85 0.00PIC Pune 0.84 1.01 1.34 1.16 0.58WIC Washim 0.64 0.12 0.57 1.12 0.12YIC Yavatmal 0.44 0.00 0.29 0.86 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.85 0.89 0.68 1.02 0.75CIPC Chandrapur 0.51 0.30 0.63 0.57 0.30

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur 1.09 1.62 1.65 1.62 0.80KIC Ratnagiri 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.00NKIPC Thane 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.00SIC Sangli 0.51 0.59 0.52 0.59 0.43TIC Thane 0.61 0.49 0.19 0.69 0.49

0.60

0.66

0.38

0.75

0.52

1

Indicator IIMedium Projects

Potential Created and Utilised

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

1.10

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Pu

ne

CAD

A So

lapu

r

PIC

Pun

e

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC A

mra

vati

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

JIPC

Jal

gaon

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

WIC

Was

him

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NKI

PC T

hane

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar PastMax Past Min

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Beed Highly Deficit Rooty 0.09 0.12 0.14 0.12 0.00 1CADA Solapur Budhihal 2.54 5.04 0.17 8.09 0.00 1CADA Beed Jakapur 0.22 0.00 0.20 0.45 0.00 1CADA Beed Kambli 0.13 0.11 0.21 0.28 0.00 1CADA Beed Benitura 0.22 0.31 0.23 0.31 0.13 1CADA Beed Harni 0.57 0.67 0.26 0.82 0.42 1CADA Beed Mehakari 0.12 0.06 0.33 0.23 0.00 1CADA Beed Talwar 0.29 0.23 0.36 0.50 0.00 1CADA Beed Kadi 0.36 0.26 0.36 0.71 0.00 1CADA Beed Kada 0.21 0.23 0.37 0.23 0.00 1CADA Beed Ramganga 0.50 0.34 0.40 0.68 0.34 1CADA Beed Sakat 0.50 0.47 0.44 2.50 0.34 1CADA Pune Khairy 0.75 0.64 0.52 0.98 0.47 1CADA Beed Kurnoor 0.54 0.52 0.53 0.64 0.46 1CADA Beed Banganga 0.47 0.41 0.56 0.54 0.41 1CADA Beed Khandeshwar 0.62 0.53 0.57 0.92 0.47 1CADA Beed Khasapur 0.75 0.66 0.58 0.82 0.66 1CADA Solapur Jawalgaon 0.52 0.89 0.63 0.89 0.33 1PIC Pune Nher 0.55 0.69 0.67 0.69 0.00 1PIC Pune Andhali 0.15 0.21 0.69 0.24 0.00 1CADA Solapur Hingani (Pangaon) 0.77 1.16 0.70 1.16 0.55 1CADA Solapur Ekrukh 2.21 11.57 0.80 37.63 0.95 1CADA Beed Khandala 0.41 0.07 0.82 2.17 0.00 1CADA Beed Chandani 0.91 0.67 0.82 1.91 0.63 1CADA Pune Sina 0.66 0.93 1.00 1.90 0.39 1CADA Beed Turori 0.47 0.00 1.00 0.77 0.00 1PIC Pune Tisangi 0.85 0.92 1.13 1.00 0.61 1PIC Pune Ranand 0.66 1.14 1.15 1.14 0.46 1CADA Solapur Mangi 1.20 1.15 1.16 1.42 1.07 1PIC Pune Mhaswad 1.38 1.49 1.51 8.31 0.78 1CADA Beed Deficit Masalga 0.09 0.00 0.14 0.31 0.00 1CADA Beed Borna 0.32 0.29 0.18 1.80 0.14 1CADA Beed Renapur 0.41 0.28 0.20 0.67 0.22 1CADA Beed Bindusara 0.32 0.29 0.22 0.56 0.21 1CADA Beed Wan (Beed) 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.37 0.16 1UWPC Amravati Shahanoor 0.22 0.06 0.27 0.35 0.00 1AIC Akola Mas 0.51 0.14 0.28 0.71 0.00 1CADA Beed Gharni 0.43 0.00 0.29 0.51 0.00 1AIC Akola Paldhag 0.53 0.16 0.29 0.95 0.00 1CADA Beed Devarjan 0.38 0.00 0.29 0.84 0.00 1CADA Beed Sakol 0.49 0.00 0.29 0.68 0.00 1CADA Beed Tiru 0.48 0.00 0.30 0.78 0.00 1CADA Beed Sindphana 0.57 0.82 0.31 0.90 0.36 1CADA Beed Mahasangvi 0.29 0.24 0.32 0.52 0.23 1BIPC Buldhana Mun 0.20 0.22 0.34 0.25 0.00 1CADA Abad Pir Kalyan 0.57 0.00 0.35 0.70 0.00 1CADA Abad Galhati 0.50 0.57 0.39 1.00 0.25 1CADA Beed Bodhegaon 0.14 0.24 0.40 0.24 0.00 1

CADA BeedSangameshwar (Dokewadi) 0.31 0.60 0.41 0.60 0.12 1

NIC Nanded Kundrala 0.97 0.89 0.42 1.45 0.60 1NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 0.74 0.00 0.43 1.15 0.00 1CADA Abad Masoli 0.54 0.00 0.45 0.86 0.00 1CADA Beed Saraswati 0.36 0.25 0.46 0.45 0.25 1CADA Beed Tawarja 0.35 0.00 0.47 0.41 0.00 1CADA Beed Whati 0.33 0.00 0.47 0.41 0.00 1BIPC Buldhana Torna 0.29 0.35 0.49 0.40 0.00 1CADA Nashik Kelzar 0.50 0.54 0.49 0.55 0.41 1NIC Nanded Karadkhed 0.53 0.00 0.50 0.76 0.00 1

Indicator IIMedium projects

Potential created and utilised

0.75

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Abad Jui 0.54 0.00 0.50 0.70 0.00 1AIC Akola Uma 0.75 0.00 0.50 1.01 0.00 1CADA Nashik Haranbari 0.44 0.43 0.51 0.71 0.32 1CADA Beed Kundlika 0.42 0.42 0.55 0.44 0.39 1CADA Jalgaon Rangawali 1.07 1.11 0.57 1.41 0.70 1CADA Beed Rui 0.31 0.00 0.58 0.35 0.00 1AIC Akola Dnyanganga 0.90 0.00 0.58 1.83 0.00 1CADA Abad Kalyan Girja 0.80 0.96 0.59 1.08 0.56 1CADA Abad Gadadgad 0.78 0.62 0.60 1.18 0.56 1CADA Abad Ajantha Andhari 0.67 0.00 0.64 0.74 0.00 1CADA Abad Anjana Palashi 0.97 0.43 0.66 1.00 0.00 1AIC Akola Morna (Akola) 0.39 0.18 0.68 0.77 0.18 1NIC Nanded Mahalingi 1.02 0.00 0.69 1.28 0.00 1CADA Abad Purna Nevpur 0.89 0.54 0.70 1.00 0.54 1CADA Abad Jivrekha 0.68 0.00 0.73 0.77 0.00 1CADA Beed Terna 0.57 0.00 0.75 0.94 0.00 1CADA Abad Karpara 0.60 0.85 0.75 0.85 0.38 1CADA Beed Raigavan 0.36 0.00 0.79 0.55 0.00 1CADA Nashik Nagyasakya 0.83 0.73 0.82 1.01 0.71 1NIC Nanded Kudala 1.03 0.82 0.88 1.32 0.82 1CADA Abad Girja 1.20 1.09 0.91 1.38 0.54 1AIC Akola Nirguna 0.41 0.26 1.03 0.48 0.27 1CADA Abad Khelna 0.89 0.58 1.11 2.67 0.53 1CADA Jalgaon Bori 1.03 1.39 1.20 4.24 0.75 1CADA Abad Sukhna 1.84 1.41 1.20 3.27 0.61 1CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 1.28 1.54 1.27 1.72 0.74 1CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 0.97 1.87 1.30 1.87 0.66 1CADA Jalgaon Agnawati 1.38 1.29 1.38 4.57 0.00 1CADA Abad Dhamna 0.90 0.00 1.46 1.23 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Burai 1.50 1.54 1.62 1.98 0.94 1CADA Jalgaon Manyad 1.38 1.41 1.81 2.03 0.84 1CADA Abad Lahuki 2.10 0.74 1.92 4.71 0.74 1CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 1.46 1.68 2.22 1.68 1.11 1CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 2.32 0.00 2.78 1.09 0.00 1CADA Abad Normal Dheku 0.56 0.19 0.14 0.78 0.00 1YIC Yavatmal Navargaon 0.26 0.00 0.15 0.39 0.00 1NIC Nanded Loni 0.45 0.00 0.15 0.80 0.00 1AIC Abad Shivna Takali 0.09 0.10 0.16 0.10 0.00 1CIPC Chandrapur Pothra 0.36 0.18 0.21 0.49 0.18 1AIC Akola Borgaon 0.49 0.19 0.31 0.83 0.16 1YIC Yavatmal Adan 0.51 0.00 0.34 1.31 0.00 1CADA Abad Tembhapuri 0.71 0.40 0.35 1.00 0.40 1AIC Akola Lowerpus 0.46 0.15 0.48 0.84 0.14 1WIC Washim Ekburji 0.54 0.45 0.52 0.70 0.00 1NIC Nanded Dongargaon (Nanded) 0.62 0.02 0.57 0.77 0.00 1WIC Washim Sonal 0.70 0.00 0.61 1.16 0.00 1PIC Pune Kasarsai 0.57 0.68 0.67 1.00 0.31 1CADA Abad Kolhi 1.43 0.77 0.71 1.69 0.00 1CIPC Chandrapur Dongargaon (Wardha) 0.59 0.72 0.71 0.72 0.47 1CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 0.49 0.37 0.72 0.90 0.37 1AIC Akola Koradi 1.11 0.00 0.72 1.82 0.00 1CADA Nashik Ghatshil Pargaon 0.86 1.23 0.74 1.23 0.66 1AIC Akola Saikheda 0.32 0.00 0.77 0.44 0.00 1CADA Nashik Bhojapur 0.04 0.72 0.82 0.72 0.00 1NIC Nanded Nagzari 0.78 0.00 0.83 1.15 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Karwand 0.91 1.08 0.88 1.08 0.26 1CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 1.00 0.00 0.93 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nashik Adhala 1.45 1.34 0.97 2.13 1.05 1CADA Abad Ambadi 0.56 0.43 1.12 0.74 0.00 1CADA Nashik Alandi 0.15 1.72 1.21 1.72 0.00 1PIC Pune Nazare 1.04 1.14 1.22 1.48 0.80 1

0.52

0.60

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarPIC Pune Vadiwale 0.86 1.19 1.36 1.27 0.54 1CADA Pune Visapur 1.60 1.50 1.38 2.11 1.14 1CADA Jalgaon Panzra 1.88 2.39 1.39 2.53 0.59 1CADA Jalgaon Aner 1.30 0.95 1.42 2.10 0.95 1JIPC Jalgaon Bhokar (Mangrul) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1JIPC Jalgaon Mor 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.00 1JIPC Jalgaon Bahula 0.55 0.55 0.44 0.55 0.55 1CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 1.00 0.00 0.93 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Narangi 0.96 0.00 1.87 1.00 0.00 1CIPC Chandrapur Amal Nala 0.55 0.00 1.59 0.75 0.00 1CADA Abad Narangi 0.96 0.00 1.87 1.00 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Abhora 1.52 2.04 2.00 2.24 0.27 1CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 1.89 2.39 2.07 2.39 1.35 1CADA Jalgaon Suki 1.27 2.55 2.48 2.55 0.17 1PIC Pune Shetphal 0.93 1.05 2.95 1.91 0.53 1CADA Nagpur Surplus Wunna 0.11 0.20 0.06 0.29 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Khekranala 0.25 0.16 0.11 0.52 0.16 1CADA Nagpur Chandrabhaga (Nagpur) 0.40 0.28 0.19 0.58 0.20 1CIPC Chandrapur Panchadhara 0.30 0.27 0.22 0.34 0.27 1CADA Nagpur Kolar 0.45 0.22 0.25 0.63 0.22 1CIPC Chandrapur Pakadigundam 0.67 0.00 0.32 0.86 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 0.44 0.13 0.33 0.83 0.13 1CADA Nagpur Umri 0.61 0.88 0.34 0.88 0.51 1CADA Nagpur Mordham 0.43 0.52 0.38 0.64 0.31 1

CADA NagpurMakardhokada-Saiki Complex 0.70 1.23 0.56 1.23 0.48 1

CADA Nagpur Managadh 0.67 0.72 0.63 1.24 0.47 1CADA Nagpur Kanholibara 0.62 1.22 0.68 1.22 0.42 1CADA Nagpur Bagheda 1.08 1.68 0.72 7.61 0.66 1CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 0.91 1.51 0.82 1.79 0.58 1CADA Nagpur Khairbanda 1.15 1.29 0.92 1.32 1.00 1CADA Nagpur Chorakhmara 1.10 1.49 0.97 1.49 0.94 1CADA Nagpur Chulband 1.05 1.30 0.98 1.30 0.90 1CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 1.06 1.12 0.99 1.46 0.89 1CADA Nagpur Chandpur 2.02 2.36 1.01 2.45 0.83 1CADA Nagpur Sorna 1.32 2.56 1.35 2.56 1.04 1CADA Nagpur Rengepar 1.06 1.31 1.36 1.31 0.82 1CIPC Chandrapur Chandai 0.40 0.38 1.59 0.43 0.36 1CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 0.83 0.51 1.59 0.95 0.51 1CIPC Chandrapur Labhansarad 0.50 0.29 1.59 0.56 0.29 1CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 1.20 1.71 1.62 1.98 1.00 1CADA Nagpur Pandhrabodi 2.07 2.65 2.18 3.84 0.00 1NKIPC Thane Abundant Hetwane 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.00 1TIC Thane Wandri 0.36 0.33 0.19 0.49 0.30 1SIC Sangli Kadavi 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.40 0.12 1SIC Sangli Kumbhi 0.38 0.38 0.37 1.02 0.27 1SIC Sangli Patgaon 0.39 0.37 0.38 0.75 0.28 1SIC Sangli Chikotra 0.58 0.56 0.50 1.26 0.48 1SIC Sangli Kasari 0.50 0.56 0.59 0.68 0.38 1SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 1.09 0.88 0.82 1.32 0.88 1SIC Sangli Chitri 1.00 1.04 1.11 1.10 0.78 1CIPC Chandrapur Ghorazari 1.08 1.51 1.59 1.51 0.52 1CIPC Chandrapur Naleshwar 1.12 1.91 1.79 1.91 1.00 1

0.66

0.38

Indicator III: Out put per unit irrigated area (Rs./ha)

Highly Deficit Plan group:

CADA Beed: Average output per unit irrigated area of projects under this circle increased from Rs. 28779 to Rs. 38232/ha, which is nearly 1.7 times of the State norm, mainly because of increase in perennial crops as well as yield per hectare in view of sufficient availability of water. In Harni project, the output was Rs. 61896/ha, as compared to last year’s 42076/ha. It is due to increase in area under perennial crops (55 ha) as well as HW groundnut (133 ha). In Kada project, output was Rs. 13637/ha, compared to last two years it increased by double, however, it was Rs. 20659/ha in 2006-07.

PIC Pune : In Andhali project, the increase in output is mainly due to production of other fruit crops on 60 hectares, increasing the output by Rs. 315 lakh, resulting in doubling the output per hectare over last year.

CADA Solapur: Average output in five medium projects was Rs. 30070/Ha., which declined over last year. However, it is above State target. In Buddhihal project, the output was only Rs.10303/Ha.which is consistently low for last five years.

Deficit Plan group:

NIC Nanded:

The average performance of the projects under this circle increased from Rs. 17507 (2009-10) to Rs. 27201/ha. Out of five projects, in three projects there was no irrigation last year. Kundrala had output of Rs. 32668/ha, whereas in Mahalingi it was Rs. 19781/ha.

CADA Aurangabad: The average performance of the projects under this circle increased from Rs. 26484/ha to Rs. 40178/ha as compared to last year. Gadadgad project had output of Rs. 65102/ha this year also, due to 235 ha perennial crops & 203 ha cotton out of total 708 ha. In Karpara project, output was Rs. 21509/ha which is below the State target (Rs 25000/ha), because of only 43 ha perennial crops out of total 1585 ha utilised potential.

CADA Beed: Output per unit irrigated area in projects under this circle increased from Rs. 32658 to Rs. 43287/ha. In Waghe Babhulgaon, though the output increased from Rs. 8165/ha to Rs. 11451/ha, it is least among other projects.

AIC Aurangabad: Output in Wakod was Rs. 18752/ ha.

AIC Akola: Average output per unit area is more than state norm and last year.

BIPC Buldhana: In Mun project output per unit area is more than state norm and in Torna project it is less than state norm.

UWPC Amravati: In Shanoor project output per unit area irrigated is more than state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: The output/ha reduced from Rs.18706/ha (2009-10) to Rs.14115/ha and is below State norm. Field officers are required to improve the performance in case of Manyad (Rs.10215/ha), Bhokarbari (Rs.11195/ha) & Bori (Rs.10415/ha) projects as the performance of these projects is about 50% of the State norm only.

CADA Nashik: The output/ha in all the projects is lower than the State norm for last three years.

Normal Plan group:

NIC Nanded:

Average output of projects under this circle increased from Rs. 10200/ha to Rs. 31626/ha as compared to last year. Out of three projects, in two projects there was no irrigation last year due to lesser availability.

CADA Aurangabad: The Average output of projects under this circle increased from Rs. 25798/ha (2009-10) to Rs. 26832/ha. Dheku project had output of Rs.33094/ha, whereas in Tembhapuri, it was only Rs. 22728/ha.

AIC Aurangabad: Output in Shivna Takali decreased from Rs. 27956/ ha to Rs. 21540/ha as compared to last year.

AIC Akola: Output per unit area irrigated is more than state norm.

YIC Yeotmal: Due to rabbi crops output per unit area irrigated is nearly 5 times less than state norm.

WIC Washim: Output per unit area irrigated is less than state norm and last year. Performance seems to be decreased over last 5 years.

CADA Jalgaon: The output in Karwand (Rs 14577/ha) & Panzara (Rs 10704/ha) projects is below State target for last three years. Field officers are required to improve the performance of these projects.

CADA Nashik: The output/ha exceeded the State target in all the projects except Mandohol (Rs. 15902/ha).

JIPC Jalgaon: The output per hectare in Mor was Rs.32767 and in Bahula project it was Rs.38577.

CIPC Chandrapur: Average output per unit irrigated area for projects under this circle is less than state norm and nearly same as compared to last year (20587 Rs. /Ha.).

PIC Pune: In Nazare project, the increase in output is mainly due to increase in area under H.W. vegetables & its productivity. However, in Shetphal project, though the total output increased from Rs. 1697 lakhs to Rs. 2639 lakhs, the per hectare output decreased due to large increase in area irrigated (from 2775 to 5667 hectares).

CADA Pune: In Visapur project, the increase in output per hectare is mainly due to increase in area under sugarcane & other fruit crops and decrease in area under Kharif cropping though total utilised potential decreased over last year.

Surplus Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: Average output per unit irrigated area is very much less than state target. But it has been increased from Rs.2198 /Ha. to Rs.3191 /Ha.

CADA Nagpur: Average output per unit irrigated area is improved over last year.

Abundant Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: Average output per unit irrigated area is very much less than state target even though the area irrigated is nearly equal to ICA of the projects(2623 Rs. /Ha.).

NKIPC Thane: In Hetwane project, the improvement is good.

TIC Thane: In Wandri project, output was Rs. 14467/Ha. which is very low compared the State target. It has declined over last two years.

SIC Sangli: Average output for seven medium projects was Rs. 44120/Ha. In Kadavi, it was Rs. 57026/Ha.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 20285 28779 38232 28779 12141

CADA Pune 20291 25161 27808 25161 9740CADA Solapur 28169 35123 33779 35123 16630PIC Pune 22124 22097 24133 25498 19907

Deficit AIC Abad 0 0 18752 0 0AIC Akola 31053 32539 30219 41615 22306BIPC Buldhana 13012 17052 26908 28611 7785CADA Abad 19754 26484 40178 29653 16129CADA Beed 34867 32658 43287 45653 26155CADA Jalgaon 17973 18706 14115 23452 14359CADA Nashik 28701 25859 26737 38139 24669NIC Nanded 22653 17507 27201 28054 17507UWPC Amravati 72333 12068 29252 362176 12068

Normal AIC Abad 21656 27956 21540 27956 0AIC Akola 27751 37976 33369 55380 12706CADA Abad 11475 25798 26832 25798 0CADA Jalgaon 35732 33712 37612 59500 10923CADA Nashik 82456 52877 51897 211074 26897CADA Pune 45673 27929 35036 67506 27929CIPC Chandrapur 21684 20308 20587 23937 18824JIPC Jalgaon 22743 22743 35672 22743 22743NIC Nanded 17750 10200 31626 21436 10200PIC Pune 40471 36257 41920 51323 30365WIC Washim 29205 21580 19346 36543 21580YIC Yavatmal 12768 0 5241 48325 0

Surplus CADA Nagpur 16929 14063 12194 28122 7999CIPC Chandrapur 16102 2198 3191 19083 5698

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur 19590 2450 2623 24500 2450KIC Ratnagiri 37299 46885 47608 98571 26368NKIPC Thane 8631 7350 21678 11635 7350SIC Sangli 49646 58033 43008 58033 42286TIC Thane 32777 23583 14467 54420 4684

30988

28517

23000

25000

40000

28071

7693

25877

31000

Indicator IIIMedium Projects

Output per unit Irrigated Area

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Pun

e

CA

DA

Sol

apur

PIC

Pun

e

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

JIP

C J

alga

on

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

WIC

Was

him

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NK

IPC

Tha

ne

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs.

/ha

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar Past Max Past Min

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Solapur Highly Deficit Budhihal 9250 10427 10303 11963 8174 30988 23000CADA Beed Kada 9817 6117 13637 20659 6117 23000CADA Beed Talwar 8100 9244 15982 9244 6458 23000PIC Pune Mhaswad 18216 13969 16208 23689 13969 23000CADA Beed Kambli 7577 7132 18684 19478 0 23000CADA Beed Banganga 14164 22311 20573 22311 8015 23000CADA Beed Jakapur 37290 0 24280 44873 0 23000CADA Beed Turori 37586 0 24696 58908 0 23000PIC Pune Nher 21828 26579 26463 26579 0 23000CADA Beed Kadi 8296 9294 26885 15149 0 23000PIC Pune Tisangi 26690 23898 26950 37249 22183 23000PIC Pune Ranand 31712 25583 27227 54316 14878 23000CADA Pune Sina 20637 25671 27239 25671 8742 23000CADA Beed Ramganga 17364 35509 27311 35509 7983 23000CADA Pune Khairy 19189 22440 31789 28819 10510 23000CADA Solapur Mangi 23846 24818 32104 27844 16814 23000CADA Solapur Jawalgaon 27249 26508 32942 39424 18821 23000CADA Solapur Ekrukh 31104 33594 34383 42060 19040 23000CADA Beed Khasapur 20735 26420 35041 26977 9743 23000CADA Beed Chandani 21856 19807 35771 27978 16401 23000CADA Beed Benitura 28259 28581 38257 37000 19132 23000CADA Beed Khandeshwar 19660 34271 39134 34271 10417 23000CADA Solapur Hingani (Pangaon) 28859 30527 40621 37935 14534 23000CADA Beed Rooty 12611 17107 40891 17107 0 23000CADA Beed Sakat 19766 28321 42824 28321 7967 23000CADA Beed Mehakari 12804 21556 44150 21556 0 23000PIC Pune Andhali 18598 25456 50861 25621 0 23000CADA Beed Khandala 21219 56983 51022 56983 17321 23000CADA Beed Kurnoor 20840 40609 52648 40609 11853 23000CADA Beed Harni 23556 42076 61896 42076 9953 23000CADA Jalgaon Deficit Manyad 16975 9365 10215 30480 9365 28517 25000CADA Jalgaon Bori 14625 10819 10415 21251 10819 25000CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 11113 10483 11195 16239 8854 25000CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 17827 33604 15000 33604 8149 25000CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 22181 37283 15485 37283 13326 25000CADA Jalgaon Agnawati 24479 18050 17058 33318 18050 25000CADA Jalgaon Burai 16906 15383 17130 33415 13529 25000NIC Nanded Mahalingi 13157 0 19781 17277 0 25000CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 22432 20184 20189 31938 9489 25000CADA Nashik Nagyasakya 20426 18688 20849 24146 17065 25000CADA Abad Karpara 16897 21430 21509 21430 12061 25000BIPC Buldhana Torna 11594 17264 22458 36000 7655 25000NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 18240 0 23672 21968 0 25000CADA Beed Rui 21273 0 23804 24842 0 25000CADA Beed Tiru 36044 0 24211 42657 0 25000CADA Beed Gharni 40356 0 24453 51686 0 25000CADA Jalgaon Rangawali 19947 27065 24852 27065 17464 25000CADA Beed Mahasangvi 10514 11278 25429 15000 6433 25000AIC Akola Paldhag 27633 27233 27277 39523 0 25000CADA Abad Jui 16300 26883 27327 26883 0 25000CADA Nashik Kelzar 33222 28029 27594 59287 22764 25000AIC Akola Mas 23743 16794 27684 26787 0 25000CADA Beed Sakol 41734 0 27705 56259 0 25000CADA Abad Jivrekha 12520 0 27826 15691 0 25000BIPC Buldhana Mun 11293 11518 27964 27419 7824 25000CADA Nashik Haranbari 30131 27910 28970 34725 27910 25000UWPC Amravati Shahanoor 145753 42531 29252 362176 15019 25000AIC Akola Nirguna 43235 31981 30129 77719 22089 25000AIC Akola Morna (Akola) 29788 28178 30139 49417 16765 25000NIC Nanded Kudala 31236 17950 30216 40032 17950 25000NIC Nanded Karadkhed 30937 0 31336 34690 0 25000

Indicator IIIMedium Projects

Output per unit Irrigated Area

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarAIC Akola Dnyanganga 27066 0 32031 40093 0 25000NIC Nanded Kundrala 18990 17224 32668 23563 15928 25000AIC Akola Uma 29061 17769 33363 34971 0 25000CADA Abad Ajantha Andhari 13906 11248 33752 23486 1436 25000CADA Beed Devarjan 58815 0 33768 77483 0 25000CADA Abad Dhamna 18886 0 34452 24006 0 25000CADA Abad Girja 18874 18982 35190 21701 4393 25000CADA Beed Whati 37171 0 35274 56863 0 25000CADA Abad Purna Nevpur 3305 22155 36150 22155 0 25000CADA Abad Khelna 16276 18917 38169 18917 8922 25000CADA Beed Bindusara 10916 14480 38406 15000 6479 25000CADA Abad Kalyan Girja 19400 19384 40191 22898 15219 25000CADA Beed Wan (Beed) 29747 41361 41144 57365 5555 25000CADA Abad Galhati 30528 41725 41176 41725 24215 25000CADA Beed Bodhegaon 29509 38703 43017 41871 16566 25000CADA Abad Lahuki 17453 23945 43922 23945 14795 25000CADA Abad Pir Kalyan 21543 0 44654 29796 0 25000CADA Beed Terna 35974 0 46975 41739 0 25000CADA Abad Masoli 38837 17370 47069 67083 16056 25000CADA Beed Raigavan 37391 112500 47466 112500 3796 25000CADA Beed Masalga 135395 0 48181 451906 0 25000CADA Beed Sindphana 21127 19005 48831 25938 15000 25000CADA Abad Anjana Palashi 2683 24780 49320 24780 0 25000CADA Abad Sukhna 21350 26625 50338 29167 15823 25000CADA Beed Kundlika 30992 33721 51169 34223 25378 25000CADA Beed Renapur 53356 43414 51183 64595 36419 25000CADA Beed Saraswati 27941 40292 51797 40292 24603 25000CADA Beed Borna 33734 33760 52319 37686 22482 25000

CADA BeedSangameshwar (Dokewadi) 36068 44640 57277 95458 17206 25000

CADA Beed Tawarja 50515 0 61396 70475 0 25000CADA Abad Gadadgad 35087 52715 65102 52715 20833 25000YIC Yavatmal Normal Adan 12017 0 925 61358 0 28071 25000CIPC Chandrapur Amal Nala 17015 0 1205 17971 0 25000CADA Jalgaon Panzra 10740 10251 10703 41900 2277 25000CADA Nashik Ghatshil Pargaon 15764 10649 13898 32007 10649 25000CADA Jalgaon Karwand 14953 14717 14577 19771 11778 25000CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 22511 19463 15902 36922 16817 25000WIC Washim Sonal 27128 0 19079 31863 0 25000AIC Akola Koradi 12008 10273 19670 22870 416 25000WIC Washim Ekburji 34213 21325 19751 40757 0 25000NIC Nanded Dongargaon (Nanded) 16706 10200 19849 20404 10200 25000AIC Abad Shivna Takali 21656 27956 21540 27956 0 25000CIPC Chandrapur Pothra 23202 16852 22538 28279 16852 25000CADA Abad Tembhapuri 7976 28953 22728 28953 0 25000CADA Abad Kolhi 17758 23052 23581 23052 0 25000CADA Nashik Adhala 29003 24857 25582 54682 17472 25000CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0 0 26428 0 0 25000CADA Abad Ambadi 18512 18764 28024 19845 0 25000CADA Abad Narangi 0 0 28302 0 0 25000AIC Akola Lowerpus 32265 28872 28322 142459 9409 25000CADA Nashik Bhojapur 35776 29018 28384 56594 27067 25000PIC Pune Nazare 31275 23521 31350 53533 19135 25000CADA Abad Dheku 19617 25742 33094 25743 0 25000CADA Pune Visapur 45673 27929 35036 67506 27929 25000NIC Nanded Loni 17873 0 35545 20192 0 25000CIPC Chandrapur Dongargaon (Wardha) 25294 23025 36320 29989 22436 25000AIC Akola Borgaon 21740 27106 37076 75317 2400 25000NIC Nanded Nagzari 18543 0 38403 27593 0 25000YIC Yavatmal Navargaon 17083 0 38541 29865 0 25000PIC Pune Kasarsai 39559 35495 39571 50819 34446 25000PIC Pune Vadiwale 52739 44591 45130 75847 44591 25000PIC Pune Shetphal 33343 61175 46574 61175 20900 25000CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 13146 11709 47809 24873 9123 25000

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Jalgaon Abhora 65137 71133 48917 94725 43377 25000AIC Akola Saikheda 42005 0 52869 45987 0 25000CADA Jalgaon Aner 25053 36185 53659 36185 9255 25000CADA Jalgaon Suki 114161 60701 58791 830511 34749 25000JIPC Jalgaon Bhokar (Mangrul) 0 0 0 0 0 25000JIPC Jalgaon Bahula 42355 42355 38577 42355 42355 25000JIPC Jalgaon Mor 5798535 5798535 32767 5798535 5798535 25000CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0 0 26428 0 0 25000CADA Abad Narangi 0 0 28302 0 0 25000CADA Nashik Alandi 148800 81810 84651 375972 56594 25000CIPC Chandrapur Surplus Pakadigundam 13704 0 1100 17879 0 7693 31000CIPC Chandrapur Labhansarad 11826 1401 1114 14391 1401 31000CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 15533 2449 1886 19389 2449 31000CIPC Chandrapur Chandai 19357 2304 2306 24547 2304 31000CADA Nagpur Khairbanda 6699 4400 5720 9744 3190 31000CADA Nagpur Pandhrabodi 8178 13914 9337 13914 0 31000CADA Nagpur Mordham 9549 9433 9363 14133 6939 31000CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 27330 10560 9680 94606 1448 31000CADA Nagpur Rengepar 37874 13200 9737 139391 5736 31000CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 14026 11254 10316 22110 7425 31000CADA Nagpur Kanholibara 19343 2128045 10634 2128045 7296 31000CADA Nagpur Sorna 14915 11254 10927 22110 7423 31000CADA Nagpur Chorakhmara 13682 8800 11040 16500 8800 31000CADA Nagpur Managadh 13290 11440 11614 19712 7245 31000CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 10710 8800 13255 15632 6452 31000CADA Nagpur Chandrabhaga (Nagpur) 11300 10151 13501 14352 5889 31000

CADA NagpurMakardhokada-Saiki Complex 12745 28878 13525 28878 496 31000

CADA Nagpur Bagheda 15990 11930 14432 23450 10508 31000CADA Nagpur Chulband 16749 15400 14444 26218 9912 31000CIPC Chandrapur Panchadhara 20663 18858 14963 22916 18858 31000CADA Nagpur Chandpur 38614 11340 15067 1240000 5183 31000CADA Nagpur Kolar 13956 15537 16520 18692 4107 31000CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 15223 58066 19149 58066 6439 31000CADA Nagpur Wunna 30144 20388 20388 67500 18938 31000CADA Nagpur Umri 13903 16025 20415 17757 6715 31000CADA Nagpur Khekranala 10923 19639 21388 19639 2677 31000CIPC Chandrapur Abundant Ghorazari 19272 2450 2450 24500 2450 25877 40000CIPC Chandrapur Naleshwar 20134 2450 2953 24500 2450 40000TIC Thane Wandri 14335 14559 14467 18300 0 40000NKIPC Thane Hetwane 8631 7350 21678 11635 7350 40000SIC Sangli Chikotra 52009 49216 36563 71274 46779 40000SIC Sangli Kasari 40725 56177 40434 59819 797 40000SIC Sangli Chitri 41037 41510 42141 43177 35339 40000SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 41721 33379 43115 59021 32604 40000SIC Sangli Patgaon 59389 61284 44286 94776 44160 40000SIC Sangli Kumbhi 52842 45617 45278 87593 42426 40000SIC Sangli Kadavi 44444 51323 57026 60662 28917 40000

Indicator IV: Output per Unit Irrigation Water Supply Rs. /cum

Highly Deficit Plan Group:

CADA Beed: Average output per unit of water supply in projects under this circle increased from to Rs. 3.68 to Rs. 4.96/cum as compared to last year. Khandala project had highest output of Rs. 9.21/cum this year also. In Jakapur project, output was Rs. 2.15/cum, due to non-availability of water for last two successive years.

PIC Pune: The increase in output per unit water supplied in Nher project was due to increase in efficiency of water use.

Deficit Plan group:

NIC Nanded: Average output per unit of water supply in projects under this circle slightly increased from Rs. 3.43/cum to Rs. 3.61/cum. Out of five projects in three projects there was no irrigation last year. In Karadkhed, it was Rs. 8.09/cum & in Pethwadaj Rs. 2.11/cum.

CADA Beed: The average output per cum of water supply in projects under this circle increased from Rs. 4.01/cum (2009-10) to Rs. 5.06/cum. Raigavan project had output Rs. 11.92/cum this year also, due to 58% perennial crops. In Waghe Babhulgaon, it was minimum Rs. 1.08/cum as against last year’s lowest output of Rs. 1.17/cum.

CADA Aurangabad: The Average output/cum in projects under this circle increased from Rs. 6.73/cum to Rs. 11.56/cum. Kalyan Girija project had the maximum output of Rs.32.71/cum, this is because of area irrigated on wells in command was 4 times of canal irrigation. In Karpara project, output was minimum (Rs 4.40/cum).

AIC Aurangabad: Output in Wakod was Rs. 2.65/cum.

AIC Akola: Average output per unit irrigation water supply is more than state norm.

BIPC Buldhana: Average output per unit irrigation water supply is less than state norm.

UWPC Amravati: Output per unit irrigation water supply in Shanoor project is more than state norm but less than last year.

CADA Jalgaon: Output per unit irrigation water supply is above State target for last three years except Manyad (Rs.2.90/cum).

CADA Nashik: The performance of all projects is above State target for last three years except Ghatshil Pargaon (Rs 1.86 /cum).

Normal Plan Group:

NIC Nanded: The average output per cum of water supply in projects under this circle was Rs. 5.34, there was no irrigation last year due to lesser availability. In Nagzari, output was Rs. 8.13/cum, this is due to 80% area under cotton crop. In Dongargaon project, output was minimum (Rs 2.39/cum), because of more water use (water use - 3.90 Mcum & irrigated area - 320 ha), as well as area on wells was 52% of canal.

AIC Aurangabad: The output in Shivna Takali decreased from Rs. 2.22/cum (2009-10) to Rs. 1.43/cum.

CADA Aurangabad: Output per cum of water supply in projects under this circle slightly increased from Rs. 7.88 to Rs. 9.70 as compared to last year. In Ambadi project, it was Rs. 11.03/cum, due to efficient water use. The area irrigated increased

by 272% (from 564 to 2099 hectares), whereas the increase in water use was only 134% (from 20284 to 5.335 Mcum).

AIC Akola: Average output per unit irrigation water supply is more than state norm and last year.

YIC Yeotmal: Due to less annual water supply per unit area, average output per unit irrigation water supply is more than state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: The overall performance improved from Rs. 17.35/cum (2009-10) to Rs 20.72 /cum and it is above State norm.

CADA Nashik: All the projects except Mandohol (Rs 3.04/cum)) have achieved the State target. Overall output this year was Rs.13.01/cum.

JIPC Jalgaon: The output in Mor project was Rs.1.45 /cum which is below the State norm and in Bahula project it was Rs.4.08 /cum.

CIPC Chandrapur: Average output per cum of water supply is slightly more than state target and it is more than previous year’s value.

PIC Pune: In Shetphal project, the increase in output per unit water supplied was due to efficient water use. The overall output increased by Rs. 942 lakhs with almost same quantity of water used in 2009-10 & 2010-11.

CADA Pune: In Visapur project, though the overall output increased by nearly Rs. 375 lakhs the output per unit water supply decreased over last year due to increase in total water use by 5.88 Mcum.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Average output per cum of water supply is decreased over last year value (2.83).

CIPC Chandrapur: Average output per cum of water supply is very much less than the state norm but it is slightly decreased over the last year value.

Abundant Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: Average output per cum of water supply is very much less than the state norm but it is slightly increased over the last year value.

NKIPC Thane: In Hatawane project, the increase is due to threefold increase in overall output as against 35% increase in water use over last year.

TIC Thane: Output in Wandri is Rs. 0.29 per cum. The output drastically decreased from Rs.1.08/cum.

SIC Sangli: The average output per unit irrigation water supplied of seven medium projects was Rs. 3.72. It is less than the last year’s value & lowers than State norm. In Kadavi the output was Rs.6.35/cum. In Kumbhi it was Rs. 2.25/cum.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 2.72 3.68 4.96 3.68 1.69

CADA Pune 3.02 5.44 5.37 5.44 1.55CADA Solapur 6.16 7.79 9.45 7.79 3.77PIC Pune 4.98 5.14 6.07 5.90 4.42

Deficit AIC Abad 0.00 0.00 2.65 0.00 0.00AIC Akola 3.36 2.80 4.64 5.28 2.94BIPC Buldhana 1.62 4.45 2.45 17.17 0.90CADA Abad 5.39 6.73 11.56 6.73 3.96CADA Beed 4.14 4.01 5.06 4.29 3.88CADA Jalgaon 4.75 7.33 4.96 7.33 3.63CADA Nashik 6.53 6.33 6.67 7.88 5.65NIC Nanded 3.46 3.43 3.61 4.55 2.95UWPC Amravati 12.58 3.72 5.13 21.78 2.50

Normal AIC Abad 1.62 2.22 1.43 2.22 0.00AIC Akola 2.64 5.00 5.34 5.00 2.03CADA Abad 4.53 7.88 9.70 7.88 0.00CADA Jalgaon 11.25 17.35 20.72 17.35 2.97CADA Nashik 2.96 15.85 13.01 43.53 0.13CADA Pune 16.40 15.21 12.84 19.16 14.76CIPC Chandrapur 3.02 3.15 3.37 3.26 2.82JIPC Jalgaon 0.95 0.95 1.45 0.95 0.95NIC Nanded 2.96 0.00 5.34 3.38 0.00PIC Pune 7.17 8.82 10.29 9.18 4.42WIC Washim 4.65 7.05 3.47 9.76 3.81YIC Yavatmal 1.07 0.00 3.68 8.42 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 4.11 3.09 2.83 5.90 2.41CIPC Chandrapur 2.49 1.02 0.60 3.13 1.02

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur 4.03 0.71 0.92 5.16 0.71KIC Ratnagiri 0.21 0.23 0.25 4.60 0.09NKIPC Thane 0.19 0.11 0.24 0.32 0.11SIC Sangli 1.38 4.96 3.72 4.96 0.29TIC Thane 1.72 1.08 0.29 3.06 0.24

1.72

1.08

3.15

4.05

5.40

5.17 2.80

4.07

3.44

Indicator IVMedium Projects

Output per unit Irrigation Water Supply

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00C

ADA

Beed

CAD

A Pu

ne

CAD

A So

lapu

r

PIC

Pun

e

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC A

mra

vati

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

JIPC

Jal

gaon

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

WIC

Was

him

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NKI

PC T

hane

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs.

/cum

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar Past Max Past Min

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Beed Highly Deficit Jakapur 5.60 0.00 2.15 6.64 0.00 5.17 2.80CADA Beed Benitura 2.44 2.45 2.27 4.38 1.59 2.80CADA Beed Kada 1.17 1.23 2.30 2.03 0.76 2.80CADA Beed Ramganga 2.91 5.18 2.32 5.18 1.58 2.80CADA Beed Talwar 1.27 1.03 2.74 2.05 0.56 2.80CADA Beed Banganga 2.26 4.52 2.91 4.52 1.23 2.80PIC Pune Mhaswad 4.26 3.11 3.02 10.76 3.11 2.80CADA Beed Kadi 1.09 0.95 3.52 1.42 0.00 2.80CADA Beed Harni 2.86 5.20 3.63 5.20 1.35 2.80CADA Beed Kambli 0.77 0.61 3.66 1.66 0.00 2.80CADA Beed Khasapur 4.00 4.49 4.46 4.89 1.81 2.80CADA Beed Chandani 3.03 3.15 4.66 19.48 1.27 2.80CADA Beed Rooty 1.00 3.68 4.95 3.68 0.00 2.80CADA Pune Sina 2.80 5.62 5.24 5.62 1.01 2.80CADA Beed Sakat 3.41 3.94 5.35 7.76 1.20 2.80CADA Beed Khandeshwar 3.34 5.54 5.77 5.54 1.65 2.80CADA Solapur Mangi 4.19 4.92 6.18 4.92 3.02 2.80CADA Pune Khairy 4.20 4.55 6.35 7.92 2.36 2.80CADA Beed Turori 6.59 0.00 7.08 9.59 0.00 2.80PIC Pune Tisangi 5.06 6.14 7.21 6.14 4.18 2.80CADA Beed Kurnoor 1.90 3.55 7.64 3.55 1.13 2.80CADA Beed Mehakari 1.40 1.77 8.53 2.37 0.00 2.80CADA Beed Khandala 5.18 11.97 9.21 11.97 3.69 2.80CADA Solapur Jawalgaon 5.10 6.72 10.35 6.72 2.92 2.80CADA Solapur Budhihal 7.56 5.57 10.40 108.47 5.57 2.80PIC Pune Nher 6.02 7.98 11.51 7.98 0.00 2.80CADA Solapur Hingani (Pangaon) 6.96 9.36 12.21 10.66 3.56 2.80CADA Solapur Ekrukh 11.37 14.33 12.54 121.59 6.25 2.80PIC Pune Ranand 9.22 13.34 12.62 14.64 3.69 2.80PIC Pune Andhali 4.47 9.23 26.57 9.23 0.00 2.80CADA Beed Deficit Tiru 4.68 0.00 2.03 6.23 0.00 4.07 3.15CADA Beed Renapur 5.26 2.61 2.10 6.36 2.61 3.15NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 2.07 0.00 2.11 8.30 0.00 3.15BIPC Buldhana Torna 1.65 8.77 2.21 22.48 0.84 3.15BIPC Buldhana Mun 1.39 9.67 2.50 42.50 0.91 3.15NIC Nanded Kundrala 3.57 8.09 2.61 8.09 3.37 3.15CADA Beed Gharni 3.74 0.00 2.75 4.71 0.00 3.15CADA Jalgaon Manyad 3.62 2.76 2.90 6.04 2.68 3.15CADA Beed Masalga 18.02 0.00 2.92 52.74 0.00 3.15NIC Nanded Mahalingi 2.48 0.00 3.02 2.85 0.00 3.15AIC Akola Paldhag 3.28 5.75 3.04 5.75 0.00 3.15CADA Jalgaon Bori 2.95 3.28 3.09 21.31 1.78 3.15CADA Beed Sakol 6.03 0.00 3.48 7.29 0.00 3.15CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 3.02 10.18 3.51 10.18 1.75 3.15CADA Beed Borna 3.35 2.89 3.60 4.39 2.08 3.15AIC Akola Nirguna 3.90 4.09 3.99 6.06 2.31 3.15CADA Beed Wan (Beed) 2.47 3.57 3.99 4.27 0.45 3.15AIC Akola Morna (Akola) 2.53 9.06 4.34 9.06 1.66 3.15CADA Abad Karpara 2.77 4.48 4.40 5.53 1.49 3.15

CADA BeedSangameshwar (Dokewadi) 4.82 7.69 4.46 7.69 2.71 3.15

CADA Beed Whati 3.74 0.00 4.51 5.94 0.00 3.15CADA Nashik Nagyasakya 3.94 3.63 4.65 5.03 3.31 3.15CADA Beed Sindphana 4.69 3.32 4.70 8.66 3.32 3.15AIC Akola Uma 4.04 0.00 4.73 5.11 0.00 3.15CADA Beed Devarjan 5.68 0.00 4.76 8.27 0.00 3.15AIC Akola Mas 2.65 6.69 4.86 6.69 0.00 3.15CADA Beed Mahasangvi 1.46 1.89 4.86 1.89 0.67 3.15

Indicator IVMedium Projects

Output per unit Irrigation Water Supply

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Abad Masoli 3.86 0.00 4.90 6.44 0.00 3.15UWPC Amravati Shahanoor 13.93 1.66 5.13 21.78 1.66 3.15CADA Abad Ajantha Andhari 4.04 10.33 5.24 23.82 0.22 3.15CADA Jalgaon Rangawali 5.36 9.39 5.49 9.39 3.14 3.15CADA Beed Bindusara 1.18 1.71 5.52 1.71 0.80 3.15NIC Nanded Kudala 4.46 1.84 6.18 5.88 1.84 3.15CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 4.85 22.48 6.56 22.48 1.86 3.15CADA Nashik Kelzar 8.99 7.49 6.83 18.95 6.04 3.15AIC Akola Dnyanganga 3.59 0.00 7.01 5.18 0.00 3.15CADA Abad Galhati 4.90 8.70 7.02 8.70 2.83 3.15CADA Beed Kundlika 3.64 4.39 7.16 5.56 2.63 3.15CADA Beed Rui 3.55 0.00 7.24 7.52 0.00 3.15CADA Nashik Haranbari 6.85 7.35 7.67 7.35 6.22 3.15CADA Abad Jivrekha 2.97 0.00 7.88 4.40 0.00 3.15CADA Beed Tawarja 5.54 0.00 8.07 7.01 0.00 3.15NIC Nanded Karadkhed 4.98 0.00 8.09 6.58 0.00 3.15CADA Beed Saraswati 3.52 3.35 8.09 4.73 2.45 3.15CADA Beed Bodhegaon 2.87 3.61 8.46 3.61 1.32 3.15CADA Abad Pir Kalyan 6.97 0.00 8.65 11.99 0.00 3.15CADA Jalgaon Agnawati 18.57 14.17 9.00 53.31 0.00 3.15CADA Jalgaon Burai 4.06 7.14 9.35 7.14 2.80 3.15CADA Abad Sukhna 9.01 10.50 9.99 11.56 4.58 3.15CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 13.89 24.12 10.04 24.12 6.92 3.15CADA Abad Purna Nevpur 1.19 4.36 10.09 4.36 0.00 3.15CADA Beed Terna 4.80 0.00 10.57 6.45 0.00 3.15CADA Beed Raigavan 5.39 12.40 11.91 16.67 0.47 3.15CADA Abad Khelna 8.12 4.15 13.21 43.33 0.00 3.15CADA Abad Girja 7.44 2.26 15.37 11.02 0.53 3.15CADA Abad Jui 8.45 19.05 16.92 19.05 0.00 3.15CADA Abad Gadadgad 12.44 18.08 22.37 18.08 6.05 3.15CADA Abad Anjana Palashi 0.95 4.76 25.21 4.76 0.00 3.15CADA Abad Dhamna 5.40 0.00 27.78 8.25 0.00 3.15CADA Abad Lahuki 10.33 7.72 29.89 16.22 3.31 3.15CADA Abad Kalyan Girja 5.85 15.59 32.71 15.59 3.31 3.15CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 185.34 0.00 35.91 175.42 0.00 3.15CIPC Chandrapur Normal Amal Nala 3.30 0.00 0.50 3.72 0.00 3.44 3.15YIC Yavatmal Adan 0.96 0.00 0.75 14.89 0.00 3.15AIC Abad Shivna Takali 1.62 2.22 1.43 2.22 0.00 3.15CADA Nashik Ghatshil Pargaon 3.08 2.42 1.86 6.87 2.16 3.15CIPC Chandrapur Pothra 2.56 1.76 2.11 3.12 1.76 3.15NIC Nanded Dongargaon (Nanded) 2.06 0.00 2.39 2.72 0.00 3.15AIC Akola Koradi 2.12 10.27 2.52 10.27 0.04 3.15CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 1.92 2.18 3.04 2.72 1.57 3.15WIC Washim Sonal 4.76 1.70 3.06 6.35 0.00 3.15CADA Nashik Adhala 5.90 4.70 4.10 12.31 2.58 3.15AIC Akola Lowerpus 2.49 4.33 4.28 4.33 1.36 3.15WIC Washim Ekburji 4.44 7.33 4.30 9.76 0.00 3.15CADA Abad Dheku 9.27 4.03 4.66 11.80 0.00 3.15CADA Jalgaon Karwand 5.10 4.28 5.11 10.84 1.72 3.15CADA Jalgaon Panzra 5.62 6.22 6.14 7.41 1.48 3.15AIC Akola Borgaon 3.97 23.49 6.30 23.49 1.20 3.15CADA Abad Tembhapuri 4.12 14.66 7.16 14.66 0.00 3.15PIC Pune Kasarsai 6.03 5.94 7.23 7.38 4.43 3.15NIC Nanded Loni 3.60 0.00 7.50 4.03 0.00 3.15CIPC Chandrapur Dongargaon (Wardha) 4.05 5.35 7.60 5.35 2.59 3.15PIC Pune Nazare 7.84 6.18 7.88 10.35 5.21 3.15NIC Nanded Nagzari 3.50 0.00 8.13 4.69 0.00 3.15PIC Pune Vadiwale 9.10 10.70 9.31 10.75 6.14 3.15CADA Nashik Bhojapur 0.36 9.06 10.25 9.38 0.07 3.15CADA Abad Narangi 0.00 0.00 10.44 0.00 0.00 3.15CADA Abad Kolhi 5.12 5.64 10.76 15.06 0.00 3.15

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Abad Ambadi 6.38 4.63 11.03 185.55 0.00 3.15AIC Akola Saikheda 3.14 0.00 12.08 4.26 0.00 3.15CADA Pune Visapur 16.40 15.21 12.84 19.16 14.76 3.15YIC Yavatmal Navargaon 1.96 0.00 13.27 3.72 0.00 3.15CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0.00 0.00 13.74 0.00 0.00 3.15PIC Pune Shetphal 4.93 11.51 18.21 11.51 1.47 3.15CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 5.14 5.27 23.01 8.83 3.77 3.15CADA Jalgaon Aner 5.15 15.87 24.60 15.87 1.72 3.15CADA Nashik Alandi 5.18 44.38 34.01 153.59 0.07 3.15CADA Jalgaon Suki 25.34 32.54 50.58 48.03 1.37 3.15JIPC Jalgaon Bhokar (Mangrul) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.72 3.15JIPC Jalgaon Mor 186.07 186.07 1.45 186.07 186.07 3.15JIPC Jalgaon Bahula 4.34 4.34 4.08 4.34 4.34 3.15CADA Abad Narangi 0.00 0.00 10.44 0.00 0.00 3.15CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0.00 0.00 13.74 0.00 0.00 3.15CADA Jalgaon Abhora 41.84 90.30 65.41 90.30 4.50 3.15CIPC Chandrapur Surplus Labhansarad 2.17 0.40 0.15 2.43 0.40 1.08 4.05CIPC Chandrapur Pakadigundam 3.04 0.00 0.22 4.87 0.00 4.05CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 2.02 0.45 0.47 2.25 0.45 4.05CADA Nagpur Khekranala 0.63 0.74 0.59 1.16 0.25 4.05CIPC Chandrapur Chandai 3.93 0.73 0.72 5.90 0.73 4.05CADA Nagpur Chandrabhaga (Nagpur) 1.80 1.15 1.18 2.30 0.94 4.05CADA Nagpur Wunna 3.85 5.94 1.18 16.59 3.08 4.05CADA Nagpur Kanholibara 2.28 4.40 1.22 4.40 1.12 4.05CIPC Chandrapur Panchadhara 1.95 1.67 1.22 2.37 1.67 4.05CADA Nagpur Kolar 2.00 1.05 1.39 2.97 0.65 4.05CADA Nagpur Pandhrabodi 1.74 2.10 1.60 2.60 0.00 4.05CADA Nagpur Mordham 1.52 1.61 1.68 1.73 1.32 4.05

CADA NagpurMakardhokada-Saiki Complex 2.15 7.41 2.56 7.41 0.13 4.05

CADA Nagpur Umri 2.01 2.64 2.56 2.64 1.53 4.05CADA Nagpur Managadh 2.83 3.05 2.58 6.55 1.45 4.05CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 1.74 1.91 2.78 2.49 1.17 4.05CADA Nagpur Chulband 3.58 3.79 2.98 5.61 1.90 4.05CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 3.89 3.65 3.11 5.06 3.28 4.05CADA Nagpur Rengepar 11.30 3.68 3.22 50.66 1.50 4.05CADA Nagpur Chorakhmara 5.24 3.98 3.66 6.39 3.73 4.05CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 9.67 3.76 3.98 32.82 0.44 4.05CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 3.59 3.02 4.19 5.10 1.78 4.05CADA Nagpur Khairbanda 3.67 2.87 4.45 5.67 1.91 4.05CADA Nagpur Chandpur 21.16 6.58 5.78 620.00 2.73 4.05CADA Nagpur Sorna 4.33 4.69 5.83 6.70 2.02 4.05CADA Nagpur Bagheda 7.87 7.72 8.15 16.50 5.35 4.05NKIPC Thane Abundant Hetwane 0.19 0.11 0.24 0.32 0.11 5.40TIC Thane Wandri 0.41 0.38 0.29 0.66 0.00 5.40CIPC Chandrapur Ghorazari 3.83 0.59 0.82 4.89 0.59 5.40CIPC Chandrapur Naleshwar 4.41 1.21 1.15 5.93 1.21 5.40SIC Sangli Kumbhi 0.25 2.29 2.25 5.75 0.04 5.40SIC Sangli Patgaon 3.16 3.63 2.98 4.95 2.29 5.40SIC Sangli Kasari 3.14 5.22 3.21 5.22 0.06 5.40SIC Sangli Chikotra 5.13 5.70 3.62 6.96 4.35 5.40SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 5.06 3.97 4.47 6.88 3.97 5.40SIC Sangli Chitri 5.46 5.53 5.89 6.51 3.65 5.40SIC Sangli Kadavi 3.43 4.17 6.35 4.61 2.19 5.40

Indicator V: Cost Recovery ratio

Highly Deficit Plan group:

CADA Beed: The average ratio increased from 0.23 to 0.28 as compared to last year. This is due to increase in revenue from NI use. In Banganga, Turori, Kurnoor, Benitura & Kada, revenue collection increased over last year. The ratio in Banganga (1.76) & Benitura (1.59) projects was on higher side because of NI revenue collection of Rs. 11.36 lakh & Rs. 11.00 lakh respectively. In Kambli, Ramganga, Harni, Sakat, Kada, Kadi & Khandeshwar, the ratio was between 0.02 to 0.08 only.

CADA Solapur: Cost recovery ratio in all the five projects, ranged from 0.05 to 0.40. In Mangi, the works are completed though MWSIP. However, in Jawalgaon & Hingni (P), the annual maintenance expenditure was very high. In Ekrukh & Buddhihal, the recovery was very low.

PIC Pune: In Ranand project, the ratio drastically reduced due to large increase in maintenance cost, revenue being almost same for 2009-10 & 2010-11. In Tisangi project, in spite of increase in operation cost from Rs. 9.93 to 18.24 lakhs, the ratio improved on account of increase in revenue for non-irrigation use.

Deficit Plan group:

NIC Nanded: The average ratio increased from 0.08 to 0.12 as compared to last year. Revenue collection against water use for irrigation & non-irrigation purpose is very low in all the projects; Kudala has the maximum ratio of 0.26, whereas in Mahalingi, it is very low (0.03).

CADA Aurangabad: Average ratio of the projects in this circle increased from 0.12 to 0.33 as compared to last year. Masoli project had highest ratio of 5.16, because of Rs. 65.62 lakh NI revenue collection. Jui, Girija & Narangi, achieved 50% of State target, rest of the projects had very low ratio because of less revenue collection.

CADA Beed: Average ratio increased from 0.12 to 0.25 as compared to last year. Only Bindusara project (1.19) achieved the State target. Revenue collection in Masalga & Borna projects was very less. Project authorities are advised to improve the performance of this indicator.

AIC Aurangabad: The ratio for Wakod project is zero, it is because of O & M cost is nil as this project is under construction and no separate management staff is allotted.

AIC Akola: Cost recovery ratio is considerably less than state norm in all the medium projects under this circle.

BIPC Buldhana: Average recovery ratio is less than state norm.

UWPC Amravati: Due to non-irrigation recovery this ratio is slightly more than state norm in Shanoor project.

CADA Jalgaon: The overall cost recovery ratio just increased from 0.22 (2009-10) to 0.23 and is much below the State norm. More attention is required to improve the performance of all the projects.

CADA Nashik: The overall cost recovery ratio reduced from 0.38 (2009-10) to 0.11. Specifically in Ghatshil Pargaon & Nagyasakya projects, much improvement is required as the ratio is only 0.03 and 0.07 respectively.

Normal Plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: The ratio for Shivna Takali was zero, this is due to O & M cost shown is nil against revenue of Rs. 4.20 lakh.

NIC Nanded: There is improvement in this indicator from 0.05 to 0.14 this year but still it is far away from the State target. In Loni project, the ratio is very poor (just 0.01), this is because of total recovery of only Rs. 0.04 lakh against O & M cost of Rs. 65.07 lakh. Inspite of 100% availability in Loni project, out of 1790 ha created potential only 119 ha area was irrigated by canal and 48% of water remained unutilised. Project authorities are advised to utilise 100% available water with proper planning.

CADA Aurangabad: The average ratio slightly increased from 0.16 to 0.19. As per last year (0.60) Narangi project had maximum ratio of 0.51 this year also, whereas in Bor Dahegaon, it was very poor (0.02 only).

AIC Akola: Average cost recovery ratio is less than state norm and last year.

YIC Yeotmal: In Adan and Navargaon project cost recovery ratio is very less.

WIC Washim: There is Improvement in indicator value as compared to last year.

CADA Jalgaon: Though the overall performance improved from 0.17 (2009-10) to 0.32, still it is much below the State target. Efforts are required to improve the performance of all the projects as the indicator value in case of Abhora, Aner, Sonwad, Malangaon, Panzra & Suki projects is 0.12, 0.36, 0.09, 0.05, 0.11 & 0.09 respectively.

CADA Nashik: The ratio just improved from 0.057 (2009-10) to 0.06. There is much scope to improve the performance in all the projects. Field officers are required to take necessary actions in this regard.

CIPC Chandrapur: Cost recovery ratio of projects under this circle is satisfactorily improved. But it is very less in case of Pothra project.

PIC Pune: In Nazare project, the ratio lowered down & that too was below State target mainly due to increase in maintenance cost from Rs. 5.28 lakhs to 63.34 lakhs, recovery remaining more or less same.

CADA Pune: In Visapur project, the ratio still came down due to increase in maintenance cost by Rs. 40 lakhs & decrease in recovery by nearly Rs. 12 lakhs.

Surplus Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: Cost recovery ratio is very much less than the state norm because recovery is very less.

CADA Nagpur: Cost recovery ratio of this circle is decreased as compared to last year.

Abundant Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: Cost recovery ratio is 0.21 i.e. less than the state norm because recovery is very less.

KIC Ratnagiri: In Natuwadi project, cost recovery ratio dropped down to 0.13 from 1.08 over last year due to two & half times increase in maintenance cost, and the recovery of water charges was just 25% of previous year.

TIC Thane: In Wandri, the ratio was 0.21, there is improvement over last year.

SIC Sangli: The average cost recovery ratio for seven medium projects, worksout to 0.87. However, in Kumbhi & Chitri it was 1.79 & 1.55 respectively. In rest of the projects, it was above 0.50.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 0.05 0.23 0.28 0.85 0.00

CADA Pune 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.02CADA Solapur 0.32 0.32 0.21 0.44 0.23PIC Pune 0.55 0.63 0.73 0.70 0.18

Deficit AIC Abad 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.34 0.13BIPC Buldhana 0.37 0.50 0.37 1.00 0.23CADA Abad 0.29 0.12 0.33 0.52 0.12CADA Beed 0.10 0.25 0.28 0.72 0.02CADA Jalgaon 0.32 0.22 0.23 0.56 0.20CADA Nashik 0.65 0.38 0.11 0.93 0.38NIC Nanded 0.20 0.08 0.12 0.34 0.08UWPC Amravati 0.84 1.28 1.05 1.36 0.38

Normal AIC Abad 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.43 0.27 0.14 0.83 0.24CADA Abad 0.30 0.16 0.19 0.55 0.16CADA Jalgaon 0.29 0.17 0.32 0.54 0.17CADA Nashik 0.59 0.05 0.05 0.74 0.05CADA Pune 0.30 0.14 0.08 0.74 0.14CIPC Chandrapur 1.21 0.99 1.40 2.37 0.74JIPC Jalgaon 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00NIC Nanded 0.08 0.05 0.14 0.32 0.03PIC Pune 1.78 2.24 1.53 2.74 0.99WIC Washim 0.29 0.49 0.80 0.49 0.18YIC Yavatmal 0.72 0.00 0.13 1.45 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.94 1.45 0.66 1.45 0.44CIPC Chandrapur 0.07 0.19 0.07 0.40 0.02

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur 0.19 0.10 0.21 0.35 0.10KIC Ratnagiri 0.30 1.03 0.13 1.51 0.03NKIPC Thane 7.09 9.96 6.76 9.96 5.05SIC Sangli 0.66 0.84 0.87 0.84 0.50TIC Thane 0.03 0.06 0.21 0.06 0.02

0.32

1

0.33

0.39

0.37

0.48

Indicator VMedium Projects

Cost Recovery Ratio

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Pu

ne

CAD

A So

lapu

r

PIC

Pun

e

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC A

mra

vati

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

JIPC

Jal

gaon

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

WIC

Was

him

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NKI

PC T

hane

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar-1.0 Past Max Past Min

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Beed Highly Deficit Turori 0.69 0.88 0.00 1.90 0.00 0.32 1.00CADA Beed Kambli 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.44 0.01 1.00CADA Beed Ramganga 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.23 0.00 1.00CADA Beed Harni 0.16 0.19 0.04 0.26 0.00 1.00CADA Pune Sina 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.01 1.00CADA Solapur Budhihal 0.07 0.02 0.05 0.10 0.00 1.00CADA Pune Khairy 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.03 1.00CADA Beed Sakat 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.28 0.00 1.00CADA Beed Kada 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.65 0.02 1.00CADA Beed Talwar 0.07 0.03 0.07 0.21 0.03 1.00CADA Beed Kadi 0.13 0.07 0.08 0.53 0.00 1.00CADA Beed Khandeshwar 0.01 0.08 0.08 0.24 0.00 1.00CADA Beed Jakapur 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.33 0.00 1.00CADA Beed Mehakari 0.08 0.22 0.10 0.22 0.00 1.00PIC Pune Ranand 0.09 1.18 0.11 1.18 0.03 1.00CADA Beed Rooty 0.17 0.10 0.12 1.29 0.00 1.00CADA Solapur Ekrukh 0.82 0.65 0.14 3.13 0.36 1.00CADA Beed Khandala 2.84 0.39 0.15 15.83 0.17 1.00CADA Solapur Jawalgaon 0.24 0.20 0.19 0.32 0.20 1.00CADA Solapur Hingani (Pangaon) 0.24 0.19 0.19 0.48 0.14 1.00CADA Beed Khasapur 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.38 0.00 1.00PIC Pune Mhaswad 0.27 0.37 0.31 0.43 0.04 1.00CADA Beed Chandani 0.05 0.43 0.38 0.93 0.00 1.00CADA Solapur Mangi 0.30 0.51 0.40 0.53 0.16 1.00PIC Pune Andhali 0.15 2.81 0.49 2.81 0.03 1.00CADA Beed Kurnoor 1.14 0.66 0.52 3.23 0.66 1.00PIC Pune Nher 0.76 1.93 0.98 1.93 0.09 1.00CADA Beed Benitura 0.57 0.51 1.49 2.68 0.05 1.00PIC Pune Tisangi 1.15 0.51 1.60 2.65 0.49 1.00CADA Beed Banganga 0.00 0.02 1.76 0.18 0.00 0.33 1.00CADA Beed Deficit Masalga 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.22 0.01 1.00CADA Beed Borna 0.65 1.12 0.01 1.12 0.01 1.00NIC Nanded Mahalingi 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.21 0.00 1.00CADA Abad Karpara 0.13 0.42 0.03 0.42 0.00 1.00CADA Beed Tiru 0.43 0.12 0.04 0.87 0.12 1.00CADA Beed Devarjan 0.19 0.03 0.04 0.54 0.03 1.00CADA Abad Galhati 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.16 0.04 1.00CADA Abad Kalyan Girja 0.24 0.10 0.04 0.51 0.10 1.00NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.32 0.00 1.00AIC Akola Nirguna 0.07 0.02 0.06 0.11 0.02 1.00CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 0.25 0.09 0.07 0.61 0.06 1.00CADA Beed Sakol 0.76 0.03 0.07 4.15 0.03 1.00CADA Nashik Nagyasakya 0.44 0.03 0.07 0.90 0.03 1.00AIC Akola Uma 0.11 0.01 0.07 0.25 0.01 1.00CADA Abad Jivrekha 0.13 0.00 0.07 0.44 0.00 1.00CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 0.13 0.05 0.08 0.35 0.04 1.00AIC Akola Mas 0.08 0.01 0.08 0.12 0.01 1.00AIC Akola Paldhag 0.10 0.05 0.08 0.24 0.02 1.00

CADA BeedSangameshwar (Dokewadi) 0.14 0.05 0.09 0.49 0.05 1.00

CADA Beed Bodhegaon 0.09 0.03 0.09 0.30 0.03 1.00CADA Jalgaon Burai 0.22 0.33 0.10 0.33 0.13 1.00AIC Akola Morna (Akola) 0.08 0.05 0.11 0.13 0.05 1.00CADA Nashik Kelzar 0.67 0.45 0.11 0.94 0.44 1.00BIPC Buldhana Torna 0.20 0.34 0.12 1.00 0.00 1.00CADA Nashik Haranbari 0.73 0.49 0.12 0.94 0.49 1.00CADA Abad Anjana Palashi 0.28 0.11 0.13 16.25 0.00 1.00

Indicator VMedium Projects

Cost Recovery Ratio

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Abad Lahuki 0.12 0.04 0.13 0.33 0.00 1.00CADA Abad Gadadgad 0.21 0.08 0.13 0.32 0.00 1.00NIC Nanded Karadkhed 0.30 0.11 0.15 0.47 0.11 1.00CADA Beed Raigavan 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.18 0.00 1.00CADA Beed Rui 0.01 1.33 0.17 9.08 0.00 1.00CADA Abad Purna Nevpur 0.70 0.12 0.18 49.83 0.00 1.00CADA Jalgaon Manyad 0.32 0.25 0.18 0.86 0.13 1.00CADA Abad Khelna 0.66 0.16 0.19 1.48 0.16 1.00CADA Abad Ajantha Andhari 1.14 0.10 0.19 3.11 0.10 1.00CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 0.31 0.25 0.20 0.58 0.18 1.00CADA Beed Mahasangvi 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.13 0.07 1.00NIC Nanded Kundrala 0.23 0.05 0.22 0.72 0.00 1.00CADA Beed Kundlika 0.32 0.34 0.22 0.43 0.24 1.00CADA Beed Whati 0.15 0.02 0.24 0.79 0.02 1.00CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 0.17 0.18 0.26 0.20 0.10 1.00NIC Nanded Kudala 0.12 0.09 0.26 0.58 0.00 1.00CADA Abad Sukhna 0.31 0.23 0.27 0.48 0.23 1.00CADA Beed Renapur 0.58 0.18 0.28 4.01 0.18 1.00CADA Beed Saraswati 0.09 0.06 0.28 0.33 0.04 1.00CADA Abad Pir Kalyan 0.30 0.26 0.29 0.69 0.09 1.00CADA Beed Sindphana 0.24 0.00 0.30 0.50 0.00 1.00CADA Jalgaon Agnawati 0.21 0.20 0.32 0.42 0.13 1.00CADA Beed Tawarja 0.47 0.27 0.33 0.73 0.27 1.00CADA Jalgaon Rangawali 0.39 0.33 0.35 0.46 0.00 1.00CADA Abad Dhamna 0.07 0.00 0.37 0.31 0.00 1.00CADA Beed Gharni 0.35 0.04 0.38 0.60 0.04 1.00CADA Jalgaon Bori 0.53 0.26 0.38 0.95 0.26 1.00BIPC Buldhana Mun 0.44 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.23 1.00CADA Abad Jui 0.18 0.16 0.49 0.33 0.06 1.00CADA Abad Girja 0.24 0.06 0.50 0.64 0.04 1.00AIC Akola Dnyanganga 0.91 1.09 0.51 1.80 0.33 1.00CADA Beed Terna 0.10 1.32 0.62 3.29 0.02 1.00CADA Beed Wan (Beed) 0.97 0.37 0.87 2.24 0.37 1.00UWPC Amravati Shahanoor 0.83 1.13 1.05 1.36 0.38 1.00CADA Beed Bindusara 0.57 0.51 1.19 1.32 0.09 1.00CADA Abad Masoli 0.25 0.38 5.16 0.80 0.08 1.00AIC Abad Normal Shivna Takali 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 1.00YIC Yavatmal Navargaon 40.20 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00NIC Nanded Loni 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.01 1.00CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0.15 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 1.00CADA Nashik Ghatshil Pargaon 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.03 1.00CADA Nashik Alandi 0.62 0.05 0.04 0.75 0.02 1.00CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 0.35 0.08 0.05 1.13 0.08 1.00CIPC Chandrapur Pothra 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.12 0.05 1.00CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.15 0.03 1.00AIC Akola Koradi 0.27 0.15 0.06 0.51 0.15 1.00CADA Nashik Adhala 0.15 0.08 0.06 0.26 0.08 1.00CADA Abad Kolhi 0.14 0.06 0.06 0.53 0.00 1.00AIC Akola Borgaon 0.55 0.01 0.08 0.90 0.01 1.00CADA Pune Visapur 0.30 0.14 0.08 0.74 0.14 1.00CADA Jalgaon Suki 0.20 0.15 0.09 0.25 0.14 1.00CADA Abad Dheku 0.18 0.04 0.09 1.00 0.04 1.00CADA Nashik Bhojapur 0.70 0.07 0.09 0.75 0.00 1.00YIC Yavatmal Adan 0.48 0.00 0.10 0.60 0.00 1.00CADA Jalgaon Panzra 0.46 0.15 0.11 1.05 0.15 1.00CADA Jalgaon Abhora 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.20 0.11 1.00CIPC Chandrapur Dongargaon (Wardha) 0.15 0.13 0.14 0.58 0.09 1.00NIC Nanded Nagzari 0.28 0.13 0.20 0.81 0.00 1.00AIC Akola Lowerpus 0.49 0.15 0.20 0.93 0.12 1.00

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarAIC Akola Saikheda 0.31 0.18 0.20 0.51 0.18 1.00CADA Abad Ambadi 0.46 0.15 0.20 1.12 0.06 1.00NIC Nanded Dongargaon (Nanded) 0.05 0.02 0.36 0.19 0.01 1.00CADA Jalgaon Aner 0.37 0.24 0.36 0.57 0.24 1.00CADA Abad Tembhapuri 0.51 0.33 0.37 12.83 0.00 1.00PIC Pune Kasarsai 0.37 0.25 0.40 0.60 0.18 1.00WIC Washim Sonal 0.15 0.02 0.48 0.26 0.02 1.00CADA Abad Narangi 1.16 0.65 0.51 6.80 0.00 1.00PIC Pune Nazare 4.50 4.22 0.89 5.20 3.71 1.00PIC Pune Shetphal 0.91 0.92 0.96 1.01 0.76 1.00WIC Washim Ekburji 0.50 0.84 1.04 0.84 0.25 1.00CADA Jalgaon Karwand 0.26 0.21 1.47 0.95 0.12 1.00JIPC Jalgaon Bhokar (Mangrul) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00JIPC Jalgaon Bahula 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00JIPC Jalgaon Mor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0.15 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 1.00CADA Abad Narangi 1.16 0.65 0.51 6.80 0.00 1.00PIC Pune Vadiwale 1.97 3.10 3.00 7.01 0.11 1.00CIPC Chandrapur Amal Nala 2.72 3.32 3.35 7.43 0.85 1.00CADA Nagpur Surplus Bagheda 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.37 1.00CIPC Chandrapur Chandai 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.08 0.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.24 0.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Chandrabhaga (Nagpur) 0.38 1.98 0.06 1.98 0.03 1.00CIPC Chandrapur Labhansarad 0.10 0.03 0.06 0.19 0.03 1.00CADA Nagpur Rengepar 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.44 0.05 1.00CADA Nagpur Chorakhmara 0.21 0.01 0.08 0.91 0.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Managadh 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.30 0.01 1.00CIPC Chandrapur Panchadhara 0.12 0.07 0.08 0.20 0.07 1.00CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.15 0.04 1.00CADA Nagpur Sorna 0.10 0.08 0.10 0.22 0.05 1.00CIPC Chandrapur Pakadigundam 2.05 0.79 0.10 3.80 0.79 1.00CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 0.11 0.03 0.11 0.23 0.03 1.00CADA Nagpur Chandpur 0.31 0.10 0.13 0.51 0.07 1.00CADA Nagpur Umri 0.48 0.82 0.20 0.82 0.21 1.00CADA Nagpur Mordham 0.32 0.71 0.22 0.71 0.05 1.00CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 0.33 0.12 0.23 0.79 0.03 1.00CADA Nagpur Khairbanda 0.29 0.13 0.26 5.56 0.05 1.00CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 0.59 1.11 0.35 1.11 0.22 1.00CADA Nagpur Khekranala 1.09 2.42 0.43 2.42 0.07 1.00CADA Nagpur Chulband 0.26 0.11 0.48 0.86 0.05 1.00CADA Nagpur Kanholibara 1.08 17.62 0.56 17.62 0.15 1.00CADA Nagpur Kolar 1.45 3.05 1.32 3.05 0.67 1.00

CADA NagpurMakardhokada-Saiki Complex 1.09 2.93 1.71 2.93 0.20 1.00

CADA Nagpur Pandhrabodi 0.95 2.00 2.43 2.00 0.57 1.00CADA Nagpur Wunna 5.45 18.38 141.58 43.47 1.00 1.00CIPC Chandrapur Abundant Naleshwar 0.11 0.02 0.12 0.19 0.02 0.48 1.00TIC Thane Wandri 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.01 1.00CIPC Chandrapur Ghorazari 0.27 0.16 0.28 0.54 0.16 1.00SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 1.03 0.94 0.56 1.25 0.78 1.00SIC Sangli Kadavi 0.27 0.21 0.56 0.62 0.21 1.00SIC Sangli Chikotra 0.47 0.38 0.57 0.60 0.38 1.00SIC Sangli Patgaon 0.60 0.62 0.74 1.03 0.39 1.00SIC Sangli Kasari 0.23 0.05 0.83 0.40 0.05 1.00SIC Sangli Chitri 1.46 1.82 1.55 2.29 0.59 1.00SIC Sangli Kumbhi 0.80 1.28 1.79 1.34 0.33 1.00NKIPC Thane Hetwane 7.09 9.96 6.76 9.96 5.05 1.00

Indicator VI: O & M Cost per unit irrigated area. (Rs./ha)

Highly Deficit Plan group:

CADA Beed: Average O & M cost per unit irrigated area of projects under this circle decreased from Rs. 2346/ha (2009-10) to Rs. 1605/ha. This is because of overall increase in utilised potential (nearly 40%) with slight increase (nearly 10%) in O & M cost as compared to last year.

PIC Pune: In Ranand project, the O & M cost increased ten times over last year, potential utilised remaining almost same, resulting in increase in cost per hectare.

CADA Pune: In Sina & Khairy, the O & M cost per unit irrigated area was more than the State target. In Khairy the ratio increased over the past year because of increase of about Rs. 50 lakhs in operation cost & decrease in potential utilised by 273 ha.

CADA Solapur: O & M cost per unit area was Rs.1477. In Jawalgaon & Hingni (P), the utilization of potential was 63% & 70% respectively but due to higher maintenance cost of 60.15 & 68 lakhs, the O & M cost per unit area in the two projects was Rs. 1785 & Rs.1867, resulting in higher ratio compared to last year.

Deficit Plan group:

CADA Aurangabad: The average O & M cost per unit irrigated area of projects under this circle decreased from Rs. 4389 to Rs. 2034. This is because of overall increase in utilised potential (nearly 4 times) with increase (nearly double) in O & M cost as compared to last year. In Pir Kalyan, Dhamna & Jivrekha projects, there was no irrigation last year, whereas this year total 2728 ha area was irrigated in these projects. O & M cost per unit irrigated area in Pir Kalyan was maximum Rs. 5644 & minimum (Rs 840) in Masoli project.

CADA Beed: The average cost per unit irrigated area of projects under this circle though decreased from Rs. 10943 to Rs. 2789 as compared to last year; it is still more than the State target. It was Rs. 41914 in the year 2008-09. This year almost all projects received full storage and hence utlisation of irrigation potential increased (nearly three times). Out of 22 projects, 9 had no irrigation last year. In Masalga project, O & M cost was maximum (Rs 13298/ha), because of only 160 ha area irrigated on reservoir lifts in spite of 100% availability of water & O & M cost of Rs. 25 lakhs. In Sangameshwar project, the indicator value was minimum (Rs 440/ha), whereas in Turori it was nil.

NIC Nanded: Average O & M cost per unit irrigated area of projects under this circle decreased from Rs. 57780 to Rs. 7973/ha as compared to last year. It is still very high compared to State target

In three of the five projects, there was no irrigation last year, total utilisation increased from 205 ha to 2616 ha this year. In Kundrala, indicator value was maximum (Rs 9827/ha) & minimum in Kudala (Rs 4494/ha).

AIC Aurangabad: The O & M cost per unit irrigated area of Wakod, being an ongoing project, was zero.

AIC Akola: O & M cost per unit area irrigated on projects under this circle is 5 times more than state norm but less than last year.

BIPC Buldhana: O & M cost per unit area irrigated of projects under this circle is less than state norm.

UWPC Amravati: In Shanoor project O & M cost is quite less than state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: The overall O&M cost increased from Rs.1221 (2009-10) to Rs.1718 and it exceeded the State norm. In Agnawati (Rs.1467/ha), Bhokarbari (Rs.3952/ha), Bori (Rs.3614/ha), Manyad (Rs.1590/ha) & Tondapur (Rs.3305/ha) projects, O & M cost is on higher side of the State norm, which should be minimized in future.

CADA Nashik: The O&M cost increased from Rs. 1765/ha (2009-10) to Rs. 3447/ha which is 1.95 times the State norm. Hence the O & M cost should be minimized in all the projects in future.

Normal Plan Group:

AIC Aurangabad: The O & M cost per unit irrigated area of Shivna Takali was zero, this is due to O & M cost shown is nil. Project authorities are advised to provide data as per actual site conditions to have correct value of the indicators.

CADA Aurangabad: O & M cost per unit irrigated area of projects under this circle decreased from Rs. 4139/ha to Rs. 1684/ha as compared to last year which is still above the State target. Out of six projects, four are near to State target (Rs 1702 to 810/ha), whereas remaining two, namely Kolhi & Dheku had high O & M cost per unit irrigated area i.e. Rs. 7628 & 6803 respectively. Last year also these two projects had maximum value of this indicator.

NIC Nanded: The average O & M cost per unit irrigated area of projects under this circle decreased from Rs. 705600 to Rs. 8783. Last year due to lesser availability of water irrigation was not possible, hence the value of this indicator was on higher side. This year though there was increase in O & M cost by 1.74 times (Rs70.56 to 122.87 lakh), utilised potential also increased 140 times (10 ha to 1399 ha) as compared to last year.

AIC Akola: Due to heavy expenditure on O & M, cost per unit area is 2 times more than state norm.

YIC Yeotmal: In Adan project the indicator value is more than state target. Project authorities of Navargaon project have not shown the values.

WIC Washim: Progress in the performance over last year and ratio is less than state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: Overall performance was well within the State norm except Malangaon (Rs. 1587/ha) and Sonwad (Rs.1442/ha) projects.

CADA Nashik: Overall performance lowered as compared to last year as the O & M cost increased from Rs. 3512/ha (2009-10) to Rs. 4319/ha. The field officers are required to take necessary steps to reduce the annual O & M cost per unit area.

CIPC Chandrapur: O & M cost per unit irrigated area is decreased over the last year. But still it is very high as compared to state norm Rs.1200 /Ha.

PIC Pune: In Nazare project, the O & M cost per hectare increased & crossed the State target due to very high cost of maintenance in comparison to last five years.

CADA Pune: In Visapur, the ratio was 1.35 times of that in 2009-10. The reason for increase is found to be increase in maintenance cost by over Rs. 40 lakhs and decrease in utilised potential by 677 hectares, compared to last year.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: O & M cost per unit irrigated area is decreased over the last year and slightly higher than the state target.

CIPC Chandrapur: Expenditure per unit irrigable command area is excessive. Therefore O & M cost per unit irrigated area is increased to Rs. 4620 /ha.

Abundant Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: O & M cost per unit irrigated area is slightly decreased over the last year’s value.

NIKPC Thane: In Hetwane project, O & M cost per unit area decreased by Rs. 442 per hectares due to increase in area irrigated & decrease in cost of maintenance. However, it is still very high compared to State target.

KIC Ratnagiri: In Natuwadi project, the ratio was very high (Rs. 23399/ha) moreover, increased by 105% over last year. The reason for increase is increase in maintenance cost from Rs. 11.91 lakhs to Rs. 29.49 lakhs over last year. The potential utilisation is only 126 hectares out of created potential of 2050 ha.

SIC Sangli: O & M cost per unit area was Rs. 1550. Compared with last year an increase is observed. In Patgaon (Rs.3269/Ha.) & Kadavi (Rs. 2983/Ha.), the cost was more due to lesser utilization of potential inspite of 100% availability of water.

TIC Thane: O & M cost in Wandri project was Rs. 3198/Ha.which was Rs. 6867/Ha.last year.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 16580 2346 1605 68446 1179

CADA Pune 3763 2666 3119 8193 2570CADA Solapur 1272 1053 1477 2038 1053PIC Pune 1234 372 576 3841 372

Deficit AIC Abad 0 0 0 0 0AIC Akola 7435 26484 6955 37112 3382BIPC Buldhana 1752 1555 1186 15417 1555CADA Abad 1607 4389 2034 4389 1059CADA Beed 13313 10943 2789 41914 1755CADA Jalgaon 1163 1221 1718 1668 911CADA Nashik 2499 1765 3447 7038 1363NIC Nanded 3067 57780 7973 57780 1623UWPC Amravati 1436 187 702 5807 187

Normal AIC Abad 0 0 0 0 0AIC Akola 4818 69315 2651 69315 1706CADA Abad 1410 4139 1684 4139 0CADA Jalgaon 842 701 723 1481 632CADA Nashik 8122 3512 4319 51224 1491CADA Pune 1237 2838 3583 2838 666CIPC Chandrapur 3557 6640 4831 6640 1391JIPC Jalgaon 0 0 0 0 0NIC Nanded 5122 705600 8783 705600 1129PIC Pune 841 892 1014 1585 492WIC Washim 3152 6790 1087 6790 1601YIC Yavatmal 829 0 3179 1555 0

Surplus CADA Nagpur 1250 1580 1299 1696 618CIPC Chandrapur 12632 7898 4620 44177 2051

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur 1079 1133 1075 1199 888KIC Ratnagiri 25313 11396 23399 198071 3728NKIPC Thane 13333 6400 5958 19388 6400SIC Sangli 2016 1360 1550 2555 1360TIC Thane 5393 6867 3198 6867 4190

3185

2959

7036

2067

3350

1200

Indicator VIMedium Projects

O&M Cost per Unit Area

0

500

1000

1500

2000

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Pu

ne

CAD

A So

lapu

r

PIC

Pun

e

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC A

mra

vati

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

JIPC

Jal

gaon

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

WIC

Was

him

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NKI

PC T

hane

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs.

/ha

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar-1200 Past Max Past Min

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Beed Highly Deficit Turori 1343 0 0 2345 0 2067 1200PIC Pune Nher 4231 226 215 15427 0 1200PIC Pune Mhaswad 537 425 513 1043 357 1200PIC Pune Tisangi 530 450 569 883 372 1200CADA Beed Khasapur 19644 816 794 98674 260 1200CADA Beed Chandani 42369 1256 910 228191 375 1200PIC Pune Ranand 2231 97 930 9363 97 1200CADA Solapur Mangi 1160 724 944 1821 710 1200CADA Beed Sakat 23667 1360 957 137805 435 1200CADA Beed Khandeshwar 22570 1158 1039 129928 444 1200PIC Pune Andhali 6583 383 1169 15720 0 1200CADA Solapur Ekrukh 1355 699 1202 2151 699 1200CADA Beed Kadi 1860 2871 1298 2871 0 1200CADA Beed Harni 898 2088 1312 2088 667 1200CADA Beed Kurnoor 1302 1523 1319 2403 655 1200CADA Beed Banganga 36138 2174 1330 182090 672 1200CADA Beed Jakapur 28040 0 1332 1630 0 1200CADA Solapur Budhihal 1774 1508 1540 6680 1047 1200CADA Beed Khandala 1233 3856 1633 3856 672 1200CADA Solapur Jawalgaon 1547 1076 1785 2777 1076 1200CADA Beed Ramganga 31805 2195 1865 151656 612 1200CADA Solapur Hingani (Pangaon) 1068 1362 1867 1594 514 1200CADA Beed Benitura 1432 3322 1934 3322 476 1200CADA Beed Mehakari 5409 9675 2406 9675 0 1200CADA Pune Sina 3695 2493 2415 14145 2190 1200CADA Beed Talwar 3509 7500 2955 13792 2053 1200CADA Beed Rooty 3633 3572 3259 4193 0 1200CADA Pune Khairy 3981 3587 8046 5592 2965 1200CADA Beed Kada 9741 11558 8123 14202 479 1200CADA Beed Kambli 11299 12491 8765 80609 0 1200

CADA Beed DeficitSangameshwar (Dokewadi) 646 1511 440 1511 90 3350 1200

CADA Beed Rui 102888 0 585 260720 0 1200CADA Beed Terna 42287 0 667 148989 0 1200UWPC Amravati Shahanoor 3129 3002 702 5807 601 1200CADA Jalgaon Rangawali 397 533 786 764 0 1200CADA Abad Masoli 2197 5970 840 5970 1863 1200CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 1172 1058 875 1625 863 1200CADA Beed Gharni 2562 0 885 1887 0 1200CADA Beed Raigavan 135248 41750 929 453746 2856 1200CADA Abad Lahuki 1815 15388 988 15388 1012 1200BIPC Buldhana Mun 1766 1115 1101 17032 1115 1200CADA Abad Dhamna 4197 0 1140 9527 0 1200CADA Jalgaon Burai 459 409 1147 773 326 1200CADA Beed Renapur 692 5451 1147 5451 94 1200CADA Beed Whati 4996 0 1147 1471 0 1200CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 1418 764 1240 2519 764 1200CADA Abad Khelna 1648 3094 1304 3094 1008 1200CADA Abad Girja 1270 19168 1385 19168 474 1200CADA Jalgaon Agnawati 2025 1870 1467 2531 974 1200BIPC Buldhana Torna 1052 615 1545 5400 573 1200CADA Jalgaon Manyad 1144 1075 1590 2336 920 1200CADA Abad Anjana Palashi 936 5840 1674 5840 0 1200CADA Beed Mahasangvi 2386 1694 1965 4327 1137 1200CADA Abad Sukhna 1153 2996 2143 2996 744 1200CADA Beed Sindphana 1516 1803 2252 2446 970 1200CADA Abad Purna Nevpur 423 2829 2359 2829 0 1200CADA Abad Jui 2749 11579 2559 11579 0 1200

Indicator VIMedium Projects

O&M Cost per Unit Area

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Abad Kalyan Girja 1469 3996 2644 3996 520 1200CADA Beed Tiru 1470 0 2728 1358 0 1200CADA Abad Gadadgad 1853 4313 2797 4313 0 1200CADA Beed Tawarja 3754 0 2911 3706 0 1200CADA Beed Saraswati 5072 29412 3060 29412 935 1200CADA Abad Karpara 913 451 3132 2042 451 1200CADA Nashik Nagyasakya 2349 1732 3197 6944 1057 1200CADA Nashik Kelzar 2634 1573 3203 8115 1573 1200CADA Abad Galhati 2044 2360 3273 3018 826 1200CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 1753 2650 3305 2650 676 1200CADA Jalgaon Bori 2239 2663 3614 2663 1667 1200CADA Nashik Haranbari 2496 1888 3687 6617 1301 1200CADA Beed Bodhegaon 6522 7418 3760 9960 4453 1200CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 2505 5067 3952 5067 1541 1200CADA Beed Kundlika 3603 7284 4062 7284 2177 1200NIC Nanded Kudala 3272 37800 4493 37800 1234 1200CADA Beed Sakol 2508 0 5215 2027 0 1200CADA Abad Ajantha Andhari 4567 5941 5231 48385 2055 1200CADA Abad Jivrekha 2535 0 5616 4576 0 1200CADA Abad Pir Kalyan 1892 0 5644 1976 0 1200CADA Beed Devarjan 3757 0 5703 3995 0 1200AIC Akola Dnyanganga 3325 0 6212 9774 0 1200AIC Akola Morna (Akola) 9447 49813 6421 49813 5259 1200AIC Akola Nirguna 9497 26049 6604 26049 6008 1200AIC Akola Mas 11296 29026 7326 29653 0 1200NIC Nanded Mahalingi 3326 0 7364 4389 0 1200CADA Beed Wan (Beed) 5092 11175 7611 11175 2132 1200NIC Nanded Karadkhed 4815 0 8345 4644 0 1200AIC Akola Paldhag 11423 17835 8732 17835 0 1200NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 1708 0 9330 1874 0 1200CADA Beed Bindusara 7333 15809 9493 15809 2890 1200NIC Nanded Kundrala 2408 18920 9827 18920 582 1200CADA Beed Borna 3985 11921 10492 11921 969 1200AIC Akola Uma 6505 374538 10520 374538 0 1200CADA Beed Masalga 17143 0 13298 25184 0 1200YIC Yavatmal Normal Navargaon 34 0 0 118 0 3185 1200AIC Abad Shivna Takali 0 0 0 0 0 1200CADA Jalgaon Aner 680 619 372 1345 386 1200CADA Jalgaon Panzra 332 375 437 1166 146 1200PIC Pune Shetphal 575 774 495 774 354 1200CADA Jalgaon Suki 1328 592 662 7629 592 1200CADA Jalgaon Abhora 1124 706 767 2947 631 1200WIC Washim Sonal 2690 0 776 3111 0 1200CADA Abad Narangi 294 0 827 78 0 1200CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 306 0 870 257 0 1200PIC Pune Kasarsai 1165 1081 925 2177 862 1200PIC Pune Vadiwale 1199 1140 957 3458 281 1200CADA Jalgaon Karwand 1949 1803 1144 7553 707 1200CADA Abad Ambadi 2637 4349 1265 4349 0 1200WIC Washim Ekburji 4266 3848 1559 4274 0 1200CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 810 983 1587 983 556 1200CADA Abad Tembhapuri 377 1365 1702 1365 0 1200PIC Pune Nazare 407 438 1930 513 271 1200AIC Akola Lowerpus 3608 73626 1969 73626 2093 1200CIPC Chandrapur Dongargaon (Wardha) 1602 1585 2126 4595 209 1200AIC Akola Saikheda 4652 0 2244 3738 0 1200CIPC Chandrapur Amal Nala 3419 0 2401 8329 0 1200CADA Nashik Alandi 8397 2660 3201 209986 889 1200CADA Nashik Bhojapur 26410 1404 3360 209986 1172 1200AIC Akola Borgaon 9521 43702 3381 43702 512 1200

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Pune Visapur 1237 2838 3583 2838 666 1200YIC Yavatmal Adan 968 0 3591 1729 0 1200NIC Nanded Nagzari 2347 0 3708 1772 0 1200AIC Akola Koradi 3182 456082 4316 456082 608 1200CADA Nashik Adhala 1701 3854 5290 3854 747 1200CIPC Chandrapur Pothra 3260 6632 5793 6632 1418 1200CADA Nashik Ghatshil Pargaon 3985 8437 5861 8437 1794 1200CADA Abad Dheku 2063 6650 6803 6650 0 1200NIC Nanded Dongargaon (Nanded) 2884 247100 7069 247100 1291 1200CADA Abad Kolhi 3759 14889 7628 14889 0 1200JIPC Jalgaon Bahula 0 0 0 0 0 1200JIPC Jalgaon Bhokar (Mangrul) 0 0 0 0 0 1200JIPC Jalgaon Mor 0 0 0 0 0 1200CADA Abad Narangi 294 0 827 78 0 1200CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 306 0 870 257 0 1200CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 5529 14260 8478 14260 2398 1200NIC Nanded Loni 9207 0 24462 36664 0 1200CADA Nagpur Surplus Kanholibara 605 6855 185 6855 32 2959 1200

CADA NagpurMakardhokada-Saiki Complex 727 675 316 2153 509 1200

CADA Nagpur Pandhrabodi 770 1567 340 1567 0 1200CADA Nagpur Chulband 798 659 650 1416 407 1200CADA Nagpur Khairbanda 548 374 668 1254 20 1200CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 524 118 1039 1332 118 1200CADA Nagpur Kolar 853 1940 1176 1940 414 1200CADA Nagpur Umri 1244 2469 1222 2469 706 1200CADA Nagpur Mordham 1795 2205 1295 10984 673 1200CADA Nagpur Chandpur 1856 1378 1333 44866 466 1200CADA Nagpur Rengepar 943 589 1395 1724 497 1200CADA Nagpur Sorna 1937 2284 1457 2767 985 1200CADA Nagpur Chorakhmara 617 897 1688 1233 279 1200CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 2196 3435 1840 3435 1370 1200CADA Nagpur Khekranala 1549 4289 2222 4289 595 1200CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 1519 6169 2719 6169 798 1200CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 2234 2593 2836 5065 1309 1200CADA Nagpur Wunna 48127 41791 3134 963227 4161 1200CADA Nagpur Managadh 1246 1041 3220 2541 613 1200CIPC Chandrapur Pakadigundam 1643 0 3379 812 0 1200CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 2506 6703 3703 6703 1370 1200CADA Nagpur Bagheda 2538 4612 3831 4612 1204 1200CIPC Chandrapur Labhansarad 2208 8097 4833 8097 1487 1200CIPC Chandrapur Panchadhara 4089 3973 5905 5278 2892 1200CIPC Chandrapur Chandai 48555 6647 6449 210105 2536 1200CADA Nagpur Chandrabhaga (Nagpur) 1789 1679 7077 36063 679 1200SIC Sangli Abundant Kumbhi 1494 611 759 2505 611 7036 1200SIC Sangli Kasari 2162 71 842 3504 71 1200CIPC Chandrapur Ghorazari 829 967 940 1078 610 1200SIC Sangli Chitri 1193 917 969 2437 875 1200CIPC Chandrapur Naleshwar 1505 1475 1330 1918 1251 1200SIC Sangli Chikotra 2286 2808 1889 3689 1631 1200SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 1675 1470 1988 2113 1470 1200SIC Sangli Kadavi 3346 5114 2983 5114 614 1200TIC Thane Wandri 9001 1776 3198 14806 1776 1200SIC Sangli Patgaon 3706 4016 3269 4771 2377 1200NKIPC Thane Hetwane 13333 6400 5958 19388 6400 1200

Indicator VII: O & M cost per unit water supply (Rs./cum)

Highly Deficit Plan Group:

CADA Beed: The average O & M cost per unit water supply of projects under this circle decreased from Rs. 0.24 to Rs. 0.18 as compared to last year. This is due increase in water use by 45% (71.02 to 102.9 Mcum), whereas O & M cost increased by only 9% (Rs 172.24 to Rs. 187.41 lakh). As per last year in Kambli & Kada projects, the ratio was very high (Rs 1.72 & Rs. 1.11 respectively) this year also. It was Rs. 1.07 & Rs. 1.60/cum last year. Out of 22 projects in this plan group nearly 12 projects had O & M cost within the State target. Turori project had nil value of this indicator.

PIC Pune: In all the five projects, the cost increased. Moreover, in Andhali & Ranand, the State target is crossed.

CADA Pune: In Khairy, the increase in cost is observed this year also. However, the ratio slightly decreased in Sina over last year.

CADA Solapur: O & M cost per unit water supply was Rs. 0.37. An increase of Rs. 0.15/Mcum over last year was observed. In Buddhihal, it was as high as Rs. 1.55/cum.

Deficit Plan group:

CADA Aurangabad: The average value of this indicator for the projects under this circle decreased from Rs. 0.74/cum (2009-10) to Rs. 0.48/cum. None of the project (except Kalyan Girija & Jivrekha) achieved the State target of Rs. 0.16/cum. In Kalyan Girija & Jivrekha it was Rs. 2.15 & 1.33/cum respectively.

Especially in Kalyan Girija, in spite of having 100% live storage (8.47Mcum), only 1.44 Mcum water was used for irrigation purpose and 23% was unutilised. Though the provision in PIP for NI purpose was 2.19 Mcum, there was no utilisation.

CADA Beed: The average value of this indicator for projects under this circle decreased from Rs. 0.79 /cum to Rs. 0.27/cum as compared to last year. Though it is above the State target, reduction in indicator value is due to decrease in O & M cost by 25% (Rs 540.24 to 407.64 lakh) and increase in water use by more than 100% (72.01 to 151Mcum) as compared to last year. In Devarjan & Borna, indicator value was maximum 0.73 & 0.72, whereas in Sangameshwar & Renapur it was minimum (0.03 & 0.04 respectively).

NIC Nanded: The average value of this indicator for projects under this circle decreased from Rs. 2.09 (2009-10) to Rs. 0.85/cum. It is five times more than the State target. In Mahalingi & Karadkhed projects, the value is around 1.10.

Especially in Mahalingi, there was 3.59 Mcum water use & 39.40 lakh O & M cost incurred. In Karadkhed, O & M cost increased by 26% (Rs 44.97 to 56.67 lakh), whereas water use increased by 94% (2.67 to 5.18 Mcum) as compared to last year.

AIC Aurangabad: The O & M cost per unit of water supply for Wakod was zero.

AIC Akola: O and M cost per unit of water supply is quite higherr than the state norm.

BIPC Buldhana: In Torna project performance is as per state norm. In Mun project it is higher than state norm.

UWPC Amravati: Due to less expenditure the ratio is very low in Shanoor project.

CADA Jalgaon: O & M cost per unit water supply was on higher side of the State norm for last five years. More attention is required specifically in case of Agnawati (Rs. 0.47/cum), Bhokarbari (Rs.1.06/cum), Bori (Rs.0.78/cum), Burai (Rs. 0.55/cum), Kanoli (Rs. 0.41/cum) Hiwara (Rs.0.40/cum), Manyad (Rs. 0.44/cum) & Tondapur (Rs. 1.04/cum) projects to improve the performance.

CADA Nashik: O & M cost per unit water supply is on higher side of the State norm for last five years. Field authorities are required to take necessary steps to improve the performance of all the projects. The O & M cost increased from Rs. 0.38/cum to Rs. 0.69/cum over last year.

Normal Plan Group:

CADA Aurangabad: The average value of this indicator for projects under this circle decreased from 1.02 to 0.46 as compared to last year though it is nearly three times the State target.

In Kolhi project as per last year (Rs1.77/cum) the indicator value was very high (Rs1.62/cum) this year also, this is because of only 38% (0.513 Mcum) utilisation of water for irrigation purpose against PIP provision of 1.335 Mcum and 27% unutilised water by June end.

NIC Nanded: The average value of this indicator for projects under this circle decreased over last two year’s value of Rs. 1.81/cum & Rs. 6.21/cum to Rs. 1.31/cum. It is very high compared to State norm.

In Loni project, there was no water use due to non- availability of water but O & M cost was Rs. 21.20 lakh last year, whereas this year in spite of 100% availability (8.38 Mcum) only 1.26 Mcum water was utilised for irrigation purpose against 6.82 Mcum PIP provision keeping 48% unutilised by June end (48% lost through evaporation). O & M cost incurred was Rs. 65.07 lakh, resulting in indicator value as Rs. 5.16/cum. Project authorities are advised to improve the overall performance of the project.

AIC Akola: Due to excess annual water supply & expenditure O & M cost per unit water supply is more than state norm but remarkable improvement in indicator as compared to last year.

YIC Yeotmal: O & M cost per unit of water supply is more than state norm.

WIC Washim: The ratio is slightly more than state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: O & M cost increased from 0.34/cum (2009-10) to Rs. 0.38/cum which is on higher side of the State norm. Improvement is required in all the projects.

CADA Nashik: In all the projects the O&M cost per unit water supply is on higher side since last three years. The indicator value for this year is Rs.0.91/cum. Remedial measures should be taken to improve the performance in all the projects concerned.

CIPC Chandrapur: Due to excessive water use in the projects under this circle O & M cost per unit water supply is very much above the norms.

PIC Pune: In all the four projects, the cost per unit water supply increased. The increase in Nazare is remarkably high.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: O & M Cost per unit of water supply is decreased as compared to last year and it is still more than state norms.

CIPC Chandrapur: O & M Cost per unit of water supply is decreased as compared to last year and it is still on higher side as compared to state norms.

Abundant Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: O & M Cost per unit of water supply is increased as compared to last year and it is more than two times the state norms.

NKIPC Thane: In Hetwane project, the O & M cost per unit water supply was still Rs. 0.02 as per last year.

KIC Ratnagiri: In Natuwadi project, O & M cost per unit of water increased from Rs. 0.05 to Rs. 0.12 over last year. However, it is within the State target value.

SIC Sangli: The average O & M cost per unit water supply in projects increased from Rs. 0.10 to Rs. 0.13 over last year. In Chitri, Kasari & Kumbhi, it was less than the State norm. However, in Kadavi, it was double the State norm.

TIC Thane: Improvement from Rs. 0.31/cum to Rs. 0.06/cum was observed in Wandri project.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 1.89 0.24 0.18 7.34 0.13

CADA Pune 0.55 0.57 0.60 1.29 0.29CADA Solapur 0.26 0.22 0.37 0.42 0.21PIC Pune 0.26 0.09 0.14 0.68 0.09

Deficit AIC Abad 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.71 1.33 0.97 3.27 0.44BIPC Buldhana 0.18 0.20 0.11 0.40 0.13CADA Abad 0.36 0.74 0.48 0.74 0.22CADA Beed 1.21 0.79 0.27 4.70 0.14CADA Jalgaon 0.26 0.36 0.51 0.36 0.20CADA Nashik 0.41 0.38 0.69 0.85 0.22NIC Nanded 0.38 2.09 0.85 2.09 0.21UWPC Amravati 0.14 0.03 0.08 0.44 0.03

Normal AIC Abad 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.42 2.91 0.41 2.91 0.24CADA Abad 0.41 1.02 0.46 1.79 0.19CADA Jalgaon 0.25 0.34 0.38 0.36 0.18CADA Nashik 0.26 0.99 0.91 0.99 0.23CADA Pune 0.43 1.51 1.31 1.51 0.20CIPC Chandrapur 0.45 0.65 0.68 0.65 0.18JIPC Jalgaon 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00NIC Nanded 0.75 6.21 1.31 6.21 0.18PIC Pune 0.13 0.17 0.22 0.18 0.07WIC Washim 0.42 0.84 0.18 0.98 0.31YIC Yavatmal 0.06 0.00 0.28 0.15 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.28 0.32 0.32 0.42 0.14CIPC Chandrapur 1.78 1.30 0.77 6.24 0.26

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur 0.22 0.33 0.38 0.33 0.16KIC Ratnagiri 0.13 0.05 0.12 1.02 0.02NKIPC Thane 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02SIC Sangli 0.15 0.10 0.13 0.21 0.10TIC Thane 0.27 0.31 0.06 0.35 0.19

0.61

0.55

0.21

0.32

0.50

0.16

Indicator VIIMedium Projects

O&M Cost per unit of Water Supplied

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40C

ADA

Beed

CAD

A Pu

ne

CAD

A So

lapu

r

PIC

Pun

e

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC A

mra

vati

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

JIPC

Jal

gaon

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

WIC

Was

him

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NKI

PC T

hane

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs.

/cum

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar Past Max Past Min

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Beed Highly Deficit Turori 0.11 0.08 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.32 0.16CADA Beed Benitura 0.10 0.24 0.08 0.24 0.04 0.16CADA Beed Harni 0.11 0.26 0.08 0.26 0.06 0.16CADA Beed Jakapur 4.21 0.00 0.09 0.27 0.00 0.16PIC Pune Nher 1.15 0.07 0.09 6.48 0.07 0.16CADA Beed Khasapur 3.26 0.10 0.10 15.65 0.06 0.16CADA Beed Chandani 4.98 0.13 0.10 15.43 0.04 0.16PIC Pune Mhaswad 0.11 0.09 0.10 0.27 0.08 0.16CADA Beed Sakat 3.60 0.18 0.12 20.64 0.06 0.16PIC Pune Tisangi 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.17 0.06 0.16CADA Beed Khandeshwar 3.48 0.18 0.15 13.58 0.08 0.16CADA Beed Kurnoor 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.18 0.05 0.16CADA Beed Ramganga 4.54 0.32 0.16 21.33 0.09 0.16CADA Beed Kadi 0.25 0.29 0.17 0.29 0.00 0.16CADA Beed Banganga 4.75 0.33 0.18 19.13 0.08 0.16CADA Solapur Mangi 0.20 0.14 0.18 0.36 0.12 0.16CADA Solapur Ekrukh 0.32 0.18 0.27 1.18 0.18 0.16CADA Beed Khandala 0.23 0.60 0.27 0.60 0.15 0.16CADA Beed Rooty 0.27 0.77 0.29 0.77 0.00 0.16PIC Pune Andhali 0.84 0.06 0.36 2.27 0.06 0.16PIC Pune Ranand 0.65 0.05 0.43 1.35 0.05 0.16CADA Beed Talwar 0.48 0.66 0.44 2.04 0.15 0.16CADA Pune Sina 0.49 0.54 0.46 1.60 0.25 0.16CADA Beed Mehakari 0.59 0.79 0.47 1.41 0.00 0.16CADA Solapur Hingani (Pangaon) 0.24 0.39 0.52 0.39 0.09 0.16CADA Solapur Jawalgaon 0.29 0.27 0.56 0.43 0.23 0.16CADA Beed Kada 0.89 1.60 1.11 1.60 0.03 0.16CADA Solapur Budhihal 1.45 0.81 1.55 60.57 0.81 0.16CADA Pune Khairy 0.86 0.72 1.60 1.81 0.52 0.16CADA Beed Kambli 1.10 1.07 1.72 4.64 0.00 0.16

CADA Beed DeficitSangameshwar (Dokewadi) 0.08 0.26 0.03 0.26 0.02 0.50 0.16

CADA Beed Renapur 0.05 0.22 0.04 0.22 0.01 0.16CADA Abad Masoli 0.19 0.58 0.07 0.58 0.13 0.16UWPC Amravati Shahanoor 0.20 0.08 0.08 0.44 0.07 0.16CADA Beed Gharni 0.20 5.63 0.09 5.63 0.11 0.16BIPC Buldhana Mun 0.18 0.19 0.10 0.39 0.12 0.16CADA Beed Terna 3.30 0.35 0.11 12.69 0.07 0.16CADA Beed Rui 8.46 0.19 0.12 30.09 0.01 0.16CADA Beed Whati 0.44 8.22 0.14 8.22 0.07 0.16BIPC Buldhana Torna 0.11 0.06 0.15 5.00 0.06 0.16CADA Beed Raigavan 12.69 0.65 0.16 42.41 0.29 0.16CADA Jalgaon Rangawali 0.11 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.00 0.16CADA Beed Tiru 0.13 0.33 0.18 0.33 0.09 0.16CADA Beed Sindphana 0.30 0.23 0.22 0.70 0.17 0.16CADA Beed Bindusara 0.30 0.65 0.29 0.65 0.16 0.16CADA Abad Khelna 0.37 0.35 0.30 0.79 0.10 0.16CADA Beed Mahasangvi 0.30 0.28 0.30 0.52 0.19 0.16CADA Beed Saraswati 0.60 1.76 0.33 1.76 0.18 0.16CADA Beed Tawarja 0.32 2.81 0.33 2.81 0.10 0.16CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 0.50 0.47 0.40 0.99 0.36 0.16CADA Abad Girja 0.42 1.84 0.41 1.84 0.12 0.16CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 0.30 0.27 0.41 0.44 0.16 0.16CADA Abad Sukhna 0.45 1.04 0.41 1.04 0.18 0.16CADA Beed Kundlika 0.34 0.60 0.44 0.60 0.16 0.16CADA Jalgaon Manyad 0.24 0.31 0.44 0.41 0.17 0.16CADA Jalgaon Agnawati 0.80 0.86 0.47 1.35 0.00 0.16

Indicator VIIMedium Projects

O&M Cost per unit of Water Supplied

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Abad Pir Kalyan 0.31 0.61 0.49 0.61 0.11 0.16CADA Beed Wan (Beed) 0.28 0.59 0.53 0.59 0.12 0.16CADA Jalgaon Burai 0.10 0.15 0.55 0.15 0.07 0.16CADA Abad Ajantha Andhari 0.65 0.43 0.55 1.99 0.24 0.16CADA Abad Jui 0.61 0.82 0.56 4.74 0.29 0.16CADA Abad Galhati 0.33 0.49 0.56 0.49 0.15 0.16CADA Abad Purna Nevpur 0.13 0.50 0.58 0.50 0.00 0.16CADA Beed Bodhegaon 0.61 0.59 0.62 0.97 0.34 0.16NIC Nanded Kundrala 0.36 1.80 0.63 1.80 0.11 0.16CADA Abad Karpara 0.14 0.08 0.63 0.25 0.08 0.16CADA Beed Sakol 0.32 4.98 0.64 4.98 0.11 0.16CADA Abad Dhamna 0.93 0.00 0.65 2.31 0.00 0.16CADA Abad Lahuki 0.98 2.07 0.67 2.52 0.58 0.16CADA Nashik Kelzar 0.54 0.37 0.68 1.56 0.32 0.16NIC Nanded Kudala 0.42 2.09 0.68 2.09 0.17 0.16CADA Nashik Haranbari 0.35 0.41 0.69 0.60 0.16 0.16CADA Abad Anjana Palashi 0.26 0.79 0.70 0.79 0.00 0.16CADA Beed Masalga 0.59 0.00 0.70 1.72 0.00 0.16CADA Nashik Nagyasakya 0.45 0.34 0.71 1.45 0.20 0.16CADA Beed Borna 0.34 1.02 0.72 1.02 0.07 0.16CADA Beed Devarjan 0.36 0.00 0.73 0.64 0.00 0.16CADA Jalgaon Bori 0.28 0.40 0.78 0.40 0.18 0.16NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 0.18 4.65 0.80 4.65 0.00 0.16AIC Akola Nirguna 0.84 2.60 0.88 2.60 0.44 0.16AIC Akola Paldhag 0.97 1.62 0.90 51.18 0.48 0.16AIC Akola Morna (Akola) 0.75 3.10 0.90 3.10 0.33 0.16AIC Akola Dnyanganga 0.36 4.08 0.92 4.08 0.15 0.16CADA Abad Gadadgad 0.65 1.48 0.96 1.48 0.00 0.16CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 0.84 1.15 1.04 1.15 0.45 0.16CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 0.59 3.28 1.06 3.28 0.29 0.16NIC Nanded Karadkhed 0.48 1.68 1.09 1.68 0.22 0.16NIC Nanded Mahalingi 0.62 0.00 1.10 0.90 0.00 0.16AIC Akola Mas 1.06 9.81 1.29 9.81 0.45 0.16CADA Abad Jivrekha 0.51 0.00 1.33 1.04 0.00 0.16AIC Akola Uma 0.86 10.75 1.35 10.75 0.49 0.16CADA Abad Kalyan Girja 0.44 3.21 2.15 3.21 0.08 0.16YIC Yavatmal Normal Navargaon 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.61 0.16AIC Abad Shivna Takali 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16WIC Washim Sonal 0.46 3.23 0.12 11.52 0.22 0.16PIC Pune Kasarsai 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.22 0.12 0.16CADA Jalgaon Aner 0.14 0.27 0.17 0.27 0.08 0.16PIC Pune Vadiwale 0.18 0.24 0.18 0.34 0.04 0.16PIC Pune Shetphal 0.08 0.14 0.19 0.14 0.05 0.16CADA Abad Narangi 0.05 34.83 0.22 34.83 0.00 0.16CADA Jalgaon Panzra 0.15 0.22 0.23 0.22 0.09 0.16WIC Washim Ekburji 0.37 0.54 0.25 0.54 0.31 0.16AIC Akola Lowerpus 0.27 10.24 0.30 10.24 0.14 0.16CADA Abad Tembhapuri 0.14 0.69 0.30 0.69 0.00 0.16YIC Yavatmal Adan 0.07 0.00 0.31 0.17 0.00 0.16PIC Pune Nazare 0.08 0.09 0.37 0.11 0.06 0.16CADA Jalgaon Karwand 0.61 0.49 0.37 0.93 0.37 0.16CADA Abad Ambadi 0.53 0.69 0.41 1.22 0.34 0.16CIPC Chandrapur Dongargaon (Wardha) 0.26 0.37 0.44 0.55 0.02 0.16CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0.12 0.00 0.45 0.02 0.00 0.16AIC Akola Koradi 0.46 2.18 0.49 2.18 0.14 0.16CADA Nashik Bhojapur 0.23 0.38 0.49 0.73 0.16 0.16AIC Akola Saikheda 0.32 1.60 0.49 1.60 0.19 0.16CADA Jalgaon Suki 0.28 0.30 0.51 0.52 0.18 0.16CIPC Chandrapur Pothra 0.33 0.48 0.53 0.54 0.16 0.16

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarAIC Akola Borgaon 1.65 8.58 0.57 10.21 0.10 0.16NIC Nanded Nagzari 0.32 2.28 0.58 2.28 0.15 0.16CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 0.30 0.43 0.75 0.43 0.22 0.16CADA Nashik Ghatshil Pargaon 0.77 1.88 0.78 1.88 0.39 0.16CADA Nashik Adhala 0.33 0.69 0.81 0.69 0.17 0.16NIC Nanded Dongargaon (Nanded) 0.34 43.35 0.85 43.35 0.15 0.16CADA Abad Dheku 0.92 1.02 0.94 9.24 0.52 0.16CIPC Chandrapur Amal Nala 0.61 0.00 0.99 1.44 0.00 0.16CADA Jalgaon Abhora 0.72 0.90 1.03 1.38 0.31 0.16CADA Nashik Alandi 0.26 1.44 1.29 1.44 0.23 0.16CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 0.43 1.34 1.31 1.34 0.10 0.16CADA Pune Visapur 0.43 1.51 1.31 1.51 0.20 0.16JIPC Jalgaon Mor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16JIPC Jalgaon Bhokar (Mangrul) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16JIPC Jalgaon Bahula 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16CADA Abad Narangi 0.05 34.83 0.22 34.83 0.00 0.16CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0.12 0.00 0.45 0.02 0.00 0.16CADA Abad Kolhi 0.70 1.77 1.62 1.77 0.42 0.16NIC Nanded Loni 1.85 0.00 5.16 5.99 0.00 0.16CADA Nagpur Surplus Kanholibara 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.20 0.01 0.55 0.16CADA Nagpur Wunna 0.58 0.32 0.02 2.34 0.06 0.16CADA Nagpur Pandhrabodi 0.13 0.15 0.05 0.15 0.00 0.16

CADA NagpurMakardhokada-Saiki Complex 0.12 0.16 0.06 0.32 0.08 0.16

CADA Nagpur Khekranala 0.09 0.16 0.06 0.16 0.03 0.16CADA Nagpur Kolar 0.11 0.12 0.10 0.17 0.07 0.16CADA Nagpur Chulband 0.17 0.16 0.13 0.30 0.08 0.16CADA Nagpur Umri 0.18 0.41 0.15 0.41 0.07 0.16CADA Nagpur Mordham 0.28 0.36 0.22 1.73 0.08 0.16CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 0.15 0.16 0.29 0.30 0.08 0.16CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 0.17 0.04 0.33 0.43 0.04 0.16CADA Nagpur Rengepar 0.28 0.16 0.46 0.47 0.14 0.16CIPC Chandrapur Panchadhara 0.39 0.35 0.48 0.56 0.29 0.16CIPC Chandrapur Pakadigundam 0.26 3.39 0.51 3.39 0.10 0.16CADA Nagpur Chandpur 1.01 0.80 0.51 17.26 0.21 0.16CADA Nagpur Khairbanda 0.30 0.24 0.52 0.71 0.01 0.16CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 0.61 1.12 0.55 1.12 0.34 0.16CADA Nagpur Chorakhmara 0.24 0.41 0.56 0.50 0.09 0.16CADA Nagpur Chandrabhaga (Nagpur) 0.28 0.18 0.60 2.91 0.11 0.16CIPC Chandrapur Labhansarad 0.33 2.29 0.62 2.29 0.14 0.16CADA Nagpur Managadh 0.27 0.28 0.72 0.39 0.17 0.16CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 0.32 1.24 0.76 1.24 0.16 0.16CADA Nagpur Sorna 0.56 0.95 0.78 0.95 0.27 0.16CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 0.79 0.92 1.17 2.04 0.45 0.16CADA Nagpur Bagheda 1.25 2.99 1.69 2.99 0.64 0.16CIPC Chandrapur Chandai 9.85 2.11 2.01 49.48 0.33 0.16NKIPC Thane Abundant Hetwane 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.21 0.16SIC Sangli Kumbhi 0.08 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.03 0.16TIC Thane Wandri 0.24 0.05 0.06 0.46 0.05 0.16SIC Sangli Kasari 0.16 0.01 0.07 0.26 0.01 0.16SIC Sangli Chitri 0.15 0.11 0.13 0.24 0.11 0.16SIC Sangli Chikotra 0.22 0.32 0.18 0.35 0.15 0.16SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 0.19 0.16 0.20 0.27 0.16 0.16SIC Sangli Patgaon 0.17 0.15 0.21 0.26 0.12 0.16CIPC Chandrapur Ghorazari 0.16 0.23 0.31 0.23 0.10 0.16SIC Sangli Kadavi 0.21 0.20 0.32 0.36 0.04 0.16CIPC Chandrapur Naleshwar 0.33 0.73 0.52 0.73 0.26 0.16

Indicator VIII: Revenue per unit water supplied

Highly deficit plan group:

CADA Beed: The projects under this circle slightly decreased from last year’s value Rs. 0.06/cum to Rs 0.05/cum this year. In Banganga project, revenue per unit of water supplied was Rs. 0.32, this is due to collection of NI revenue, including arrears, of Rs.11.36 lakh. Most of the projects had indicator value between 0.01 to 0.05, whereas in Harni it was nil.

CADA Solapur: Revenue per unit water supply improved from Rs 0.07 to 0.08 /cum. over last year. In Ekrukh, it was only Rs.0.04.

PIC Pune: In Andhali & Tisangi, the State target is achieved.

Deficit Plan group:

CADA Aurangabad: The average value of indicator for projects under this circle increased from Rs. 0.09/cum (2009-10) to Rs 0.16/cum this year. Out of 17 projects 12 projects are below State norm. In Masoli project, NI revenue collection (Rs 65.62 lakh) resulted in improving the value of indicator to Rs. 0.38/cum, whereas it was minimum in Karpara & Galhati Rs. 0.02/cum.

NIC Nanded: The average value of this indicator for projects under this circle decreased from Rs. 0.16/cum to 0.10/cum as compared to last year. Kudala & Karadkhed are the only projects which achieved the state norm as per last year, whereas as in Pethwadaj & Mahalingi it is minimum Rs. 0.04/cum i.e. 1/4th of State target.

CADA Beed: The average value of indicator for the projects under this circle decreased from Rs. 0.20/cum (2009-10) to Rs. 0.08/cum. Only Wan (0.46) & Bindusara (0.34) crossed the State target, rest of the projects are far below. Sangameshwar & Masalga had nil indicator value this year.

AIC Akola: Except Dnyanganga revenue per unit of water supplied is less than state norm.

BIPC Buldhana: In Mun and Torna revenue per unit of water supplied is quite less than state norm.

UWPC Amravati: Due to excess annual water supply per unit irrigated area & less irrigation recovery, revenue per unit of water supplied is less than state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: Though the revenue increased from Rs. 0.08/cum (2009-10) to 0.12/cum, still it is below State norm. Specifically in case of Bhokarbari, Burai, Kanoli, Hiwara, Manyad & Rangwali projects, performance was very low (ratio is 0.08, 0.06, 0.03, 0.11, 0.08 & 0.06 respectively). Improvement in these projects is necessary.

CADA Nashik: The revenue reduced from Rs. 0.14/ cum (2009-10) to Rs. 0.07/ cum. It is far below the State norm. Efforts are required to improve the performance specifically in Ghatshil Pargaon (Rs. 0.02/cum), Haranbari (Rs. 0.08/cum), Kelzar( Rs. 0.07/cum) and Nagya Sakya (Rs. 0.05/cum) projects.

Normal Plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: The performance improved from Rs. 0.02 to Rs. 0.03/cum.

CADA Aurangabad: The average value of this indicator for projects under this circle decreased from Rs. 0.16 /cum to Rs. 0.09/cum. Bor Dahegaon had the lowest value

of Rs. 0.01/cum because of just Rs. 0.18 lakh assessment & revenue collection for 2.85 Mcum water use.

NIC Nanded: The average value of this indicator for projects under this circle decreased over last year’s Rs.0.33/cum to Rs. 0.19/cum.

Dongargaon project had maximum revenue per unit of water supplied i.e. Rs. 0.30/cum this year also as per last year (Rs 0.77/cum), whereas in Loni it was minimum Rs.0.06/cum against nil last year.

AIC Akola: Average revenue per unit of water supplied is 3 times less than the state target.

YIC Yeotmal: Due to less recovery revenue per unit of water supplied is less than state norm & last year.

WIC Washim: Performance decreased over last year.

CADA Jalgaon: Though the indicator value increased from 0.06 (2009-10) to 0.12, still it is less than 70 % of the State norm. The improvement in the performance is required in all the projects.

CADA Nashik: The performance remained same (Rs .0.05/cum) as compared to last year and it is far below the State norm. The improvement in the performance is required in all the projects.

JIPC Jalgaon: The revenue in Mor and Bahula project was Rs.0.05/cum, which is far below the State norm.

CIPC Chandrapur: In Amalnala project recovery of Rs. 208.19 lac is done for irrigation and non-irrigation water supply of 6.25 M cum during this year. This has resulted in increasing the revenue per unit water supplied of the circle to Rs. 0.99.

PIC Pune: In Shetphal, the State target was achieved this year.

CADA Pune: In Visapur project, the ratio decreased mainly due to increase in water use from 15.89 Mcum to 21.77 Mcum & decrease in revenue from Rs. 34.79 lakhs to Rs. 22.95 lakhs over last year.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Revenue recovery per unit of water supplied on projects under this circle is 0.22 which is slightly higher state norm.

CIPC Chandrapur: In Chargaon, Panchadhara and Labhansarad projects revenue recovery is very less as compared to supplied water. This has resulted in decrease in revenue per unit of water supplied of the circle to Rs. 0.06 per cum.

Abundant Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: Revenue recovery per unit water supplied in the projects under this circle is very less in comparison with quantity of water supplied which resulted in decreasing the revenue per unit of water supplied to Rs.0.08.

KIC Ratnagiri: In Natuwadi project, the revenue per unit water supplied reduced to one third of that in last year due to increase in water use from 21.69 Mcum to 24.39 Mcum & reduction in revenue from Rs. 12.31 lakh to Rs. 3.94 lakhs.

NKIPC Thane: In Hetwane project also the revenue decreased from Rs. 88.77 lakhs to Rs. 56.83 lakhs & water use increased from 9.53 to 12.90 Mcum resulting in lowering the ratio from Rs. 0.19 to Rs. 0.12 over last year.

TIC Thane: Revenue per unit water supply in Wandri project was Rs. 0.01, which is reduced to half of previous year.

SIC Sangli: Revenue per unit water supply was Rs. 0.11/cum. There is slight improvement over last year. In Kadavi & Chitri projects, the State norm was achieved. In Kasari it was only 0.06

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 0.09 0.06 0.05 3.21 0.34

CADA Pune 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.34 0.19CADA Solapur 0.08 0.07 0.08 1.19 0.63PIC Pune 0.14 0.06 0.10 4.61 0.49

Deficit AIC Abad 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.14 0.25 0.16 4.94 0.57BIPC Buldhana 0.07 0.10 0.04 3.99 0.29CADA Abad 0.10 0.09 0.16 1.47 0.62CADA Beed 0.12 0.20 0.08 1.99 0.75CADA Jalgaon 0.08 0.08 0.12 1.28 0.41CADA Nashik 0.27 0.14 0.07 7.93 1.00NIC Nanded 0.08 0.16 0.10 1.59 0.54UWPC Amravati 0.12 0.03 0.08 2.40 0.33

Normal AIC Abad 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.20 0.00AIC Akola 0.18 0.79 0.06 7.87 0.57CADA Abad 0.12 0.16 0.09 8.19 0.90CADA Jalgaon 0.07 0.06 0.12 1.20 0.38CADA Nashik 0.15 0.05 0.05 1.67 0.17CADA Pune 0.13 0.21 0.10 2.13 0.86CIPC Chandrapur 0.54 0.64 0.99 7.03 4.29JIPC Jalgaon 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.13 0.13NIC Nanded 0.06 0.33 0.19 3.29 0.41PIC Pune 0.24 0.38 0.34 3.84 1.15WIC Washim 0.12 0.41 0.14 4.09 0.66YIC Yavatmal 0.05 0.35 0.04 3.47 0.01

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.27 0.46 0.22 4.65 1.85CIPC Chandrapur 0.13 0.24 0.06 2.43 1.05

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur 0.04 0.03 0.08 0.57 0.26KIC Ratnagiri 0.04 0.06 0.02 4.60 0.10NKIPC Thane 0.26 0.19 0.12 3.66 1.91SIC Sangli 0.10 0.08 0.11 1.51 0.71TIC Thane 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.05

0.11

0.14

0.07

0.07

0.09

0.18

Indicator VIIIMedium Projects

Revenue per unit of Water Supplied

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Pun

e

CA

DA

Sol

apur

PIC

Pun

e

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

JIP

C J

alga

on

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

WIC

Was

him

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NK

IPC

Tha

ne

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rs/

cum

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar-0.18 Past Max Past Min

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Beed Highly Deficit Harni 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.07 0.18CADA Beed Turori 0.07 0.07 0.00 1.42 0.00 0.18CADA Beed Khandeshwar 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.26 0.14 0.18CADA Beed Jakapur 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.36 0.00 0.18CADA Beed Kadi 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.00 0.18CADA Beed Ramganga 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.10 0.18CADA Beed Sakat 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.11 0.18CADA Pune Sina 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.29 0.17 0.18PIC Pune Mhaswad 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.35 0.11 0.18CADA Beed Talwar 0.03 0.02 0.03 2.16 0.18 0.18CADA Beed Khasapur 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.32 0.02 0.18CADA Beed Kambli 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.63 0.00 0.18CADA Beed Chandani 0.27 0.06 0.04 92.00 0.08 0.18CADA Solapur Ekrukh 0.26 0.12 0.04 13.33 0.89 0.18CADA Beed Rooty 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.73 0.00 0.18CADA Beed Khandala 0.66 0.23 0.04 68.67 0.25 0.18CADA Beed Mehakari 0.05 0.18 0.05 1.76 0.00 0.18PIC Pune Ranand 0.06 0.06 0.05 1.06 0.34 0.18CADA Solapur Mangi 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.97 0.41 0.18CADA Beed Kada 0.07 0.03 0.08 2.04 0.23 0.18CADA Solapur Budhihal 0.09 0.02 0.08 27.41 0.19 0.18CADA Beed Kurnoor 0.11 0.07 0.08 2.15 0.57 0.18CADA Pune Khairy 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.84 0.22 0.18PIC Pune Nher 0.87 0.13 0.09 32.73 0.51 0.18CADA Solapur Hingani (Pangaon) 0.06 0.07 0.10 1.14 0.29 0.18CADA Solapur Jawalgaon 0.07 0.06 0.10 0.89 0.54 0.18CADA Beed Benitura 0.06 0.12 0.12 1.20 0.03 0.18PIC Pune Andhali 0.12 0.16 0.18 2.94 0.52 0.18PIC Pune Tisangi 0.11 0.06 0.23 1.85 0.58 0.18CADA Beed Banganga 0.01 0.01 0.32 0.28 0.07 0.18CADA Beed Deficit Masalga 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.09 0.18CADA Beed Sangameshwar (Dokewadi) 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.23 0.05 0.18CADA Beed Borna 0.22 1.14 0.01 11.41 0.02 0.18CADA Beed Renapur 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.40 0.19 0.18CADA Beed Tiru 0.06 0.04 0.01 1.40 0.23 0.18CADA Abad Galhati 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.25 0.11 0.18CADA Beed Rui 0.09 0.25 0.02 2.53 0.01 0.18CADA Abad Karpara 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.47 0.00 0.18BIPC Buldhana Torna 0.02 0.02 0.02 6.75 0.08 0.18CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 0.07 0.02 0.03 2.33 0.18 0.18CADA Beed Devarjan 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.81 0.00 0.18CADA Beed Gharni 0.07 0.24 0.03 2.44 0.60 0.18CADA Beed Raigavan 0.05 0.10 0.03 1.02 0.36 0.18CADA Beed Whati 0.07 0.16 0.03 1.59 0.43 0.18CADA Beed Sakol 0.25 0.13 0.04 9.12 0.57 0.18NIC Nanded Mahalingi 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.41 0.00 0.18NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.47 0.00 0.18BIPC Buldhana Mun 0.08 0.19 0.04 3.91 0.31 0.18CADA Beed Bodhegaon 0.05 0.02 0.05 1.23 0.18 0.18CADA Nashik Nagyasakya 0.20 0.01 0.05 12.98 0.09 0.18CADA Jalgaon Burai 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.50 0.09 0.18AIC Akola Nirguna 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.67 0.40 0.18CADA Beed Sindphana 0.07 0.00 0.06 1.21 0.00 0.18CADA Beed Terna 0.35 0.46 0.06 8.26 0.99 0.18CADA Abad Khelna 0.25 0.06 0.06 9.82 0.50 0.18CADA Jalgaon Rangawali 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.30 0.18CADA Beed Mahasangvi 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.55 0.23 0.18CADA Nashik Kelzar 0.36 0.17 0.07 14.62 1.40 0.18AIC Akola Paldhag 0.10 0.08 0.07 12.75 0.70 0.18CADA Nashik Haranbari 0.25 0.20 0.08 5.69 1.03 0.18UWPC Amravati Shahanoor 0.17 0.09 0.08 2.40 0.87 0.18CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 0.08 0.15 0.08 1.50 0.25 0.18

Indicator VIIIMedium Projects

Revenue per unit of Water Supplied

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Abad Kalyan Girja 0.10 0.32 0.08 3.22 0.30 0.18CADA Abad Lahuki 0.12 0.09 0.08 3.63 0.11 0.18CADA Jalgaon Manyad 0.07 0.08 0.08 1.42 0.29 0.18AIC Akola Uma 0.10 0.06 0.09 4.06 0.49 0.18CADA Abad Anjana Palashi 0.07 0.09 0.09 1.01 0.00 0.18CADA Beed Saraswati 0.05 0.11 0.09 1.10 0.16 0.18CADA Abad Jivrekha 0.07 0.00 0.10 1.54 0.00 0.18AIC Akola Mas 0.09 0.12 0.10 2.77 0.54 0.18AIC Akola Morna (Akola) 0.06 0.17 0.10 1.65 0.44 0.18CADA Beed Kundlika 0.11 0.20 0.10 2.03 0.61 0.18CADA Abad Purna Nevpur 0.09 0.06 0.10 2.35 0.36 0.18CADA Abad Sukhna 0.14 0.24 0.11 2.38 0.87 0.18CADA Beed Tawarja 0.15 0.75 0.11 7.48 0.40 0.18CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 0.09 0.09 0.11 1.93 0.59 0.18CADA Abad Ajantha Andhari 0.74 0.04 0.11 20.15 0.42 0.18CADA Abad Gadadgad 0.14 0.12 0.12 3.04 0.19 0.18CADA Abad Pir Kalyan 0.09 0.16 0.14 1.61 0.37 0.18NIC Nanded Kundrala 0.08 0.09 0.14 1.95 0.01 0.18CADA Jalgaon Agnawati 0.17 0.17 0.15 1.96 0.00 0.18NIC Nanded Karadkhed 0.14 0.19 0.16 1.94 0.99 0.18NIC Nanded Kudala 0.05 0.18 0.18 1.79 0.00 0.18CADA Abad Girja 0.10 0.12 0.20 2.42 0.23 0.18CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 0.26 0.28 0.21 6.04 1.08 0.18CADA Abad Dhamna 0.06 0.00 0.24 1.68 0.00 0.18CADA Abad Jui 0.11 0.13 0.28 2.86 0.79 0.18CADA Jalgaon Bori 0.15 0.10 0.29 2.20 0.66 0.18CADA Beed Bindusara 0.17 0.33 0.34 3.30 0.26 0.18CADA Abad Masoli 0.05 0.22 0.38 2.22 0.14 0.18CADA Beed Wan (Beed) 0.27 0.22 0.46 3.90 2.17 0.18AIC Akola Dnyanganga 0.33 4.44 0.47 44.38 0.51 0.18CADA Abad Normal Bor Dahegaon 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.69 0.00 0.11 0.18CADA Nashik Ghatshil Pargaon 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.51 0.25 0.18AIC Akola Koradi 0.13 0.33 0.03 3.25 0.54 0.18YIC Yavatmal Adan 0.03 0.39 0.03 5.45 0.00 0.18AIC Abad Shivna Takali 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.20 0.00 0.18CIPC Chandrapur Pothra 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.46 0.17 0.18CADA Jalgaon Panzra 0.07 0.03 0.03 1.29 0.22 0.18CADA Jalgaon Suki 0.05 0.05 0.04 1.11 0.28 0.18CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 0.11 0.03 0.04 3.28 0.28 0.18CADA Nashik Adhala 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.69 0.30 0.18CADA Nashik Bhojapur 0.16 0.03 0.05 1.69 0.00 0.18AIC Akola Borgaon 0.92 0.07 0.05 92.00 0.31 0.18AIC Akola Lowerpus 0.13 1.49 0.06 14.88 0.17 0.18CADA Jalgaon Aner 0.05 0.06 0.06 1.43 0.24 0.18WIC Washim Sonal 0.07 0.05 0.06 4.37 0.52 0.18CIPC Chandrapur Dongargaon (Wardha) 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.51 0.14 0.18NIC Nanded Loni 0.08 0.00 0.06 1.82 0.00 0.18CADA Nashik Alandi 0.16 0.07 0.06 1.69 0.06 0.18YIC Yavatmal Navargaon 0.11 0.25 0.07 2.54 0.13 0.18CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.42 0.15 0.18PIC Pune Kasarsai 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.99 0.22 0.18CADA Abad Dheku 0.17 0.04 0.08 92.38 0.42 0.18CADA Abad Ambadi 0.25 0.10 0.08 8.41 0.76 0.18CADA Abad Kolhi 0.10 0.10 0.09 2.55 0.00 0.18AIC Akola Saikheda 0.10 0.29 0.10 2.93 0.51 0.18CADA Pune Visapur 0.13 0.21 0.10 2.13 0.86 0.18CADA Abad Tembhapuri 0.07 0.23 0.11 2.27 0.10 0.18CADA Abad Narangi 0.06 22.56 0.11 225.56 0.00 0.18NIC Nanded Nagzari 0.09 0.29 0.12 2.91 0.01 0.18CADA Jalgaon Abhora 0.09 0.11 0.12 1.54 0.46 0.18PIC Pune Shetphal 0.07 0.13 0.18 1.31 0.54 0.18WIC Washim Ekburji 0.18 0.45 0.26 4.55 0.80 0.18NIC Nanded Dongargaon (Nanded) 0.02 0.77 0.30 7.72 0.02 0.18PIC Pune Nazare 0.35 0.37 0.33 3.94 2.97 0.18PIC Pune Vadiwale 0.36 0.74 0.53 7.36 0.10 0.18

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Jalgaon Karwand 0.16 0.10 0.55 3.51 0.88 0.18JIPC Jalgaon Bhokar (Mangrul) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.69 0.00 0.18CADA Abad Narangi 0.06 22.56 0.11 225.56 0.00 0.18JIPC Jalgaon Bahula 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.18JIPC Jalgaon Mor 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.39 0.39 0.18CIPC Chandrapur Amal Nala 1.66 0.00 3.33 19.63 0.00 0.18CADA Nagpur Surplus Kanholibara 0.08 0.25 0.01 2.50 0.30 0.14 0.18CADA Nagpur Umri 0.08 0.33 0.03 3.35 0.28 0.18CADA Nagpur Khekranala 0.10 0.39 0.03 3.92 0.06 0.18CADA Nagpur Chandrabhaga (Nagpur) 0.11 0.36 0.03 3.65 0.47 0.18CADA Nagpur Chorakhmara 0.05 0.00 0.04 1.09 0.00 0.18CIPC Chandrapur Labhansarad 0.03 0.08 0.04 0.80 0.19 0.18CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.62 0.35 0.18CIPC Chandrapur Panchadhara 0.05 0.03 0.04 1.03 0.25 0.18CADA Nagpur Bagheda 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.36 0.07 0.18CADA Nagpur Rengepar 0.06 0.03 0.04 1.11 0.22 0.18CADA Nagpur Managadh 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.61 0.02 0.18CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 0.06 0.00 0.05 1.40 0.01 0.18CIPC Chandrapur Pakadigundam 0.52 2.68 0.05 26.79 3.93 0.18CADA Nagpur Mordham 0.09 0.26 0.05 2.56 0.50 0.18CIPC Chandrapur Chandai 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.57 0.13 0.18CADA Nagpur Chulband 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.87 0.11 0.18CADA Nagpur Chandpur 0.31 0.08 0.06 88.46 0.38 0.18CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 0.06 0.00 0.07 1.22 0.03 0.18CADA Nagpur Sorna 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.73 0.35 0.18CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 0.03 0.04 0.09 0.51 0.24 0.18CADA Nagpur Makardhokada-Saiki Complex 0.13 0.47 0.10 4.68 0.30 0.18CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 0.09 0.17 0.10 1.72 0.36 0.18CADA Nagpur Pandhrabodi 0.12 0.30 0.12 3.05 0.00 0.18CADA Nagpur Kolar 0.17 0.38 0.13 3.78 0.74 0.18CADA Nagpur Khairbanda 0.09 0.03 0.14 1.73 0.15 0.18CADA Nagpur Wunna 3.17 5.85 2.66 58.48 22.62 0.18TIC Thane Abundant Wandri 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.05 0.07 0.18CIPC Chandrapur Naleshwar 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.60 0.17 0.18SIC Sangli Kasari 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.62 0.00 0.18SIC Sangli Kumbhi 0.07 0.04 0.07 1.10 0.39 0.18CIPC Chandrapur Ghorazari 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.56 0.30 0.18SIC Sangli Chikotra 0.10 0.12 0.10 1.59 0.70 0.18SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 0.20 0.15 0.11 2.29 1.52 0.18NKIPC Thane Hetwane 0.26 0.19 0.12 3.66 1.91 0.18SIC Sangli Patgaon 0.11 0.09 0.15 1.56 0.79 0.18SIC Sangli Kadavi 0.06 0.04 0.18 0.99 0.27 0.18SIC Sangli Chitri 0.22 0.21 0.20 2.90 1.42 0.18

Indicator XI: Equity Performance

Highly Deficit Plan Group:

PIC Pune: In Mhaswad & Tisangi, equity in distribution of water amongst head, middle & tail was achieved.

CADA Solapur: The overall performance of the projects was good. Considering average of all five projects, Equity in distribution of water in head, middle & tail reaches was achieved; however, individually no project could achieve equity in distribution.

Deficit Plan group:

AIC Akola: Area irrigated in head reach is more than middle and tail reach under this circle.

BIPC Buldhana: Area irrigated in middle reach is more than the head and tail reaches in all the medium projects under this circle.

UWPC Amravati: Indicator value decreased in head reach compared to last year.

CADA Jalgaon: The indicator values for head, middle & tail reach are 0.29, 0.22 & 0.19 respectively. The water should be distributed judiciously.

CADA Nashik: The indicator values for head, middle & tail reach is same and is 0.11. Water was distributed judiciously.

Normal Plan group:

AIC Akola: Ratio in middle reach is more than head & tail reach.

YIC Yeotmal: Average equity performance is same in all reaches.

WIC Washim: In head reach ratio is more than tail & middle reach.

CADA Nashik: The ratio for head, middle & tail reach are 0.22, 0.20 & 0.19 respectively.

JIPC Jalgaon: In Mor project, the irrigation is done only in head reach.

In Bahula the ratios for head, middle & tail reach are 0.07, 0.02 and 0.02 respectively.

CIPC Chandrapur: There is nearly equitable distribution of area irrigated in head, middle and tail reaches.

PIC Pune: In Nazare & Shelphal projects, water was distributed equitably. However, in Kasarsai & Wadiwale, as the water use is by individual lifts on river & reservoir, question of equity in distribution does not arise.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: There is slightly more irrigation in middle reach as compare to distribution of area irrigated in head and tail reaches.

CIPC Chandrapur: There is nearly equitable distribution of area irrigated in head, middle and tail reaches.

Abundant Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: There is nearly equitable distribution of area irrigated in head, middle and tail reaches.

SIC Sangli: The irrigation is by lifts on river and therefore, the values for head, middle & tail appear to be nil.

0.14 0.10.1 0.02

0.18 0.20.22 0.020.47 0.050.27 0.140.32 0.360.23 0.030.16 0.510.17 0.060.28 0.170.3 0

0.06 00.3 0.23

0.42 0.450 1

0.61 0.060.28 0.430.37 00.36 0.25

0 00.67 0.910.38 0.40.31 0.48

Head Middle TailHighly Deficit CADA Beed 0.12 0.11 0.04

CADA Pune 0.73 0.76 0.13CADA Solapur 0.09 0.10 0.09PIC Pune 0.28 0.28 0.24

Deficit AIC Akola 0.26 0.22 0.12BIPC Buldhana 0.24 0.68 0.10CADA Abad 0.25 0.16 0.06CADA Beed 0.10 0.08 0.02CADA Jalgaon 0.29 0.22 0.19CADA Nashik 0.11 0.11 0.11NIC Nanded 0.30 0.25 0.15UWPC Amravati 0.12 0.07 0.02

Normal AIC Abad 0.52 0.13 0.07AIC Akola 0.23 0.37 0.13CADA Abad 0.18 0.12 0.04CADA Jalgaon 0.31 0.27 0.18CADA Nashik 0.22 0.20 0.19CADA Pune 0.62 1.00 1.00CIPC Chandrapur 0.24 0.26 0.21JIPC Jalgaon 0.07 0.02 0.02NIC Nanded 0.31 0.23 0.15PIC Pune 0.23 0.23 0.23WIC Washim 0.61 0.28 0.21YIC Yavatmal 0.26 0.25 0.25

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.68 0.79 0.65CIPC Chandrapur 0.47 0.47 0.47

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur 1.00 1.00 1.00KIC Ratnagiri 0.08 0.05 0.05NKIPC Thane 0.11 0.09 0.13SIC Sangli 0.00 0.00 0.00TIC Thane 0.23 0.21 0.10

2010-11Plangroup Circle

Indicator XIMedium projects

Equity Performace

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20C

ADA

Beed

CAD

A Pu

ne

CAD

A So

lapu

r

PIC

Pun

e

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC A

mra

vati

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

JIPC

Jal

gaon

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

WIC

Was

him

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NKI

PC T

hane

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Head Middle Tail

Circle Plan Group Project Head Middle TailCADA Beed Highly Deficit Banganga 0.09 0.32 0.00CADA Beed Benitura 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Chandani 0.06 0.06 0.00CADA Beed Harni 0.20 0.26 0.08CADA Beed Jakapur 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Kada 0.07 0.08 0.02CADA Beed Kadi 0.11 0.09 0.00CADA Beed Kambli 0.07 0.08 0.00CADA Beed Khandala 0.46 0.33 0.15CADA Beed Khandeshwar 0.05 0.04 0.00CADA Beed Khasapur 0.17 0.15 0.00CADA Beed Kurnoor 0.23 0.16 0.22CADA Beed Mehakari 0.08 0.05 0.00CADA Beed Ramganga 0.06 0.18 0.35CADA Beed Rooty 0.07 0.04 0.00CADA Beed Sakat 0.12 0.15 0.00CADA Beed Talwar 0.16 0.11 0.00CADA Beed Turori 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Pune Khairy 1.00 0.07 0.00CADA Pune Sina 0.58 0.95 0.17CADA Solapur Budhihal 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Solapur Ekrukh 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Solapur Hingani (Pangaon) 0.08 0.11 0.16CADA Solapur Jawalgaon 0.05 0.06 0.05CADA Solapur Mangi 0.19 0.16 0.10PIC Pune Andhali 0.26 0.11 0.15PIC Pune Mhaswad 0.23 0.22 0.23PIC Pune Nher 0.11 0.36 0.16PIC Pune Ranand 0.65 0.10 0.20PIC Pune Tisangi 0.42 0.41 0.35AIC Abad Deficit Wakod 0.91 0.00 0.00AIC Akola Dnyanganga 0.28 0.23 0.03AIC Akola Mas 0.20 0.09 0.05AIC Akola Morna (Akola) 0.35 0.23 0.15AIC Akola Nirguna 0.26 0.28 0.31AIC Akola Paldhag 0.18 0.25 0.07AIC Akola Uma 0.33 0.30 0.00BIPC Buldhana Mun 0.24 0.82 0.08BIPC Buldhana Torna 0.24 0.32 0.22CADA Abad Ajantha Andhari 0.11 0.13 0.03CADA Abad Anjana Palashi 0.04 0.06 0.00CADA Abad Dhamna 0.07 0.05 0.00CADA Abad Gadadgad 0.16 0.18 0.12CADA Abad Galhati 0.12 0.06 0.03CADA Abad Girja 0.42 0.15 0.06CADA Abad Jivrekha 0.24 0.17 0.09CADA Abad Jui 0.15 0.11 0.06CADA Abad Kalyan Girja 0.11 0.14 0.02CADA Abad Karpara 0.30 0.27 0.10CADA Abad Khelna 0.35 0.37 0.08CADA Abad Lahuki 0.82 0.23 0.06CADA Abad Masoli 0.63 0.21 0.00CADA Abad Pir Kalyan 0.01 0.02 0.00CADA Abad Purna Nevpur 0.20 0.12 0.16CADA Abad Sukhna 0.34 0.28 0.22CADA Abad Upper Dudhana 0.34 0.26 0.19CADA Beed Belpara 0.07 0.06 0.00CADA Beed Bindusara 0.13 0.11 0.00

Indicator XIMedium projects

Equity Performace

Circle Plan Group Project Head Middle TailCADA Beed Bodhegaon 0.15 0.04 0.00CADA Beed Borna 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Devarjan 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Gharni 0.26 0.17 0.00CADA Beed Kundlika 0.09 0.17 0.09CADA Beed Mahasangvi 0.07 0.07 0.00CADA Beed Masalga 0.41 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Raigavan 0.12 0.09 0.06CADA Beed Renapur 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Rui 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Sakol 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Sangameshwar (Dokewadi) 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Saraswati 0.06 0.07 0.00CADA Beed Sindphana 0.33 0.33 0.18CADA Beed Tawarja 0.13 0.11 0.00CADA Beed Terna 0.08 0.09 0.00CADA Beed Tiru 0.15 0.12 0.10CADA Beed Waghe Babhulgaon 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Beed Wan (Beed) 0.03 0.03 0.00CADA Beed Whati 0.15 0.14 0.00CADA Jalgaon Agnawati 0.03 0.09 0.06CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 0.15 0.12 0.12CADA Jalgaon Bori 0.38 0.28 0.28CADA Jalgaon Burai 0.52 0.26 0.26CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 0.13 0.13 0.11CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 0.22 0.19 0.15CADA Jalgaon Manyad 0.34 0.31 0.26CADA Jalgaon Rangawali 0.27 0.18 0.08CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 0.11 0.13 0.08CADA Nashik Haranbari 0.07 0.07 0.07CADA Nashik Kelzar 0.08 0.08 0.08CADA Nashik Nagyasakya 0.39 0.39 0.39NIC Nanded Karadkhed 0.25 0.23 0.16NIC Nanded Kudala 0.32 0.26 0.13NIC Nanded Kundrala 0.22 0.18 0.12NIC Nanded Mahalingi 0.38 0.31 0.15NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 0.37 0.30 0.19UWPC Amravati Shahanoor 0.12 0.07 0.02AIC Abad Normal Shivna Takali 0.52 0.13 0.07AIC Akola Borgaon 0.11 0.24 0.09AIC Akola Koradi 0.46 0.24 0.07AIC Akola Lowerpus 0.14 0.31 0.11AIC Akola Saikheda 0.39 0.86 0.31CADA Abad Ambadi 0.40 0.61 0.14CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Abad Dheku 0.04 0.03 0.01CADA Abad Kolhi 0.04 0.06 0.00CADA Abad Narangi 0.00 0.00 0.00CADA Abad Tembhapuri 0.27 0.09 0.03CADA Jalgaon Abhora 0.21 0.21 0.18CADA Jalgaon Aner 0.42 0.36 0.33CADA Jalgaon Karwand 0.25 0.23 0.12CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 0.22 0.24 0.16CADA Jalgaon Panzra 0.37 0.26 0.11CADA Jalgaon Sonwad 0.33 0.19 0.43CADA Jalgaon Suki 0.15 0.25 0.10CADA Nashik Adhala 0.25 0.28 0.26CADA Nashik Alandi 0.24 0.20 0.19CADA Nashik Bhojapur 0.25 0.12 0.12CADA Nashik Ghatshil Pargaon 0.27 0.25 0.26CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 0.09 0.14 0.14CADA Pune Visapur 0.62 1.00 1.00

Circle Plan Group Project Head Middle TailCIPC Chandrapur Amal Nala 0.55 0.55 0.55CIPC Chandrapur Dham 0.14 0.14 0.10CIPC Chandrapur Dongargaon (Wardha) 0.29 0.43 0.31CIPC Chandrapur Pothra 0.16 0.20 0.12JIPC Jalgaon Bahula 0.07 0.03 0.03JIPC Jalgaon Bhokar (Mangrul) 0.00 0.00 0.00JIPC Jalgaon Mor 0.19 0.00 0.00NIC Nanded Dongargaon (Nanded) 0.47 0.35 0.23NIC Nanded Loni 0.10 0.06 0.04NIC Nanded Nagzari 0.67 0.52 0.35PIC Pune Kasarsai 0.00 0.00 0.00PIC Pune Nazare 0.26 0.26 0.26

PIC Pune Shetphal 0.91 0.91 0.91PIC Pune Vadiwale 0.00 0.00 0.00WIC Washim Ekburji 0.63 0.21 0.03WIC Washim Sonal 0.59 0.34 0.34YIC Yavatmal Adan 0.30 0.30 0.30YIC Yavatmal Navargaon 0.12 0.10 0.10CADA Nagpur Surplus Bagheda 1.00 1.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 1.00 1.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 1.00 1.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Chandpur 1.00 1.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Chandrabhaga (Nagpur) 0.14 0.08 0.16CADA Nagpur Chorakhmara 1.00 1.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Chulband 0.87 1.00 0.79CADA Nagpur Kanholibara 0.89 0.53 0.35CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 0.08 0.08 0.00CADA Nagpur Khairbanda 0.91 0.95 0.89CADA Nagpur Khekranala 0.08 0.16 0.16CADA Nagpur Kolar 0.09 0.31 0.17

CADA NagpurMakardhokada-Saiki Complex 0.29 0.84 0.29

CADA Nagpur Managadh 1.00 1.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Mordham 0.18 0.17 0.11CADA Nagpur Pandhrabodi 1.00 1.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Rengepar 1.00 1.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 1.00 1.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Sorna 1.00 1.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Tekepar LIS 1.00 1.00 1.00CADA Nagpur Umri 0.21 0.21 0.11CADA Nagpur Wunna 0.00 0.00 0.00CIPC Chandrapur Chandai 0.39 0.39 0.39CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 0.92 0.92 0.92CIPC Chandrapur Labhansarad 0.28 0.28 0.28CIPC Chandrapur Pakadigundam 0.32 0.32 0.32CIPC Chandrapur Panchadhara 0.10 0.16 0.13CIPC Chandrapur Abundant Ghorazari 1.00 1.00 1.00CIPC Chandrapur Naleshwar 1.00 1.00 1.00KIC Ratnagiri Natuwadi 0.08 0.05 0.05NKIPC Thane Hetwane 0.11 0.09 0.13SIC Sangli Chikotra 0.00 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli Chitri 0.00 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 0.00 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli Kadavi 0.00 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli Kasari 0.00 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli Kumbhi 0.00 0.00 0.00SIC Sangli Patgaon 0.00 0.00 0.00TIC Thane Wandri 0.23 0.21 0.10

Indicator XII: Assessment recovery ratio (I)

Highly deficit plan group:

CADA Beed: Average ratio of indicator for projects under this circle decreased from 0.50 to 0.22, which is lowest of last six year’s ratio. Only Talwar project achieved the State target 1.00. Kada & Ruti projects had ratio of 0.78 & 0.81, whereas in Turori it was zero. Project authorities are advised to follow the schedule of assessment and recover the water charges fully.

PIC Pune: In Andhali project, in spite of increased area under perennial crops and assessment, the recovery did not increase proportionately resulting in lowering the ratio.

CADA Solapur: Recovery of water charges for irrigation use in Ekrukh , Buddhihal & Jawalgaon was 89, 89 & 84 percent of assessment. However, due to lower performance of Hingni (P) 15% & Mangi 19% the average for the circle was 43%.

Deficit Plan group:

NIC Nanded: Average ratio of indicator for projects under this circle slightly increased from nil to 0.02 as compared to last year; which is far below the State norm. Out of assessment of Rs. 17.04 lakh, only Rs. 0.29 lakh were recovered. Assessment in Pethwadaj (Rs 0.42 lakh) & Mahalingi (Rs 0.40 lakh) seems to be very low as against area irrigated 748 ha & 465 ha respectively in comparison to remaining three projects (assessment ranging Rs. 3.13 to 7.09 lakh). In Kundrala & Karadkhed projects, ratio is zero, because of no recovery against Rs. 6.00 & 7.09 lakh assessment. Project authorities are advised to take efforts to recover the water charges to improve the performance.

CADA Aurangabad: The average value of this indicator for the projects under this circle increased from 0.51 (2009-10) to 0.57. In Sukhana, Girja, Ajanta Andhari, Kalyan Girija, Pir Kalyan, Dhamna, Jivrekha & Upper Dudhana projects achievement was 100%, whereas in Karpara & Masoli the ratio was zero & 0.03 respectively.

CADA Beed: The ratio for projects under this circle decreased from 1.03 to 0.48 as compared to last year. In Sakol, Tawarja, Devarjan, Raigavan, Belpara, Bindusara & Sindphana, the achievement was 100%, whereas it was between 11 to 20% in Borna, Waghe Babhulgaon & Wan projects and nil in Kundalika.

AIC Aurangabad: Wakod achieved the State target of 1.00

AIC Akola: In Dnyanganga, Mas, Paldhag projects recovery is NIL and this trend is continued since last 3 years.

BIPC Buldhana: Recovery in all medium projects under this circle is equal to assessment.

UWPC Amravati: This ratio decreased over last year.

CADA Jalgaon: The ratio reduced from 0.84 (2009-10) to 0.72. More attention is required by the field officers to improve the performance in all the projects except Manyad (1.00).

CADA Nashik: The ratio improved from 0.60 (2009-10) to 1.00 and attained the State target.

Normal Plan group:

NIC Nanded: The average value increased from 0.00 to 0.02 this year, this shows that field officers are not aware of recovery. In Nagzari, there was no recovery against assessment of Rs. 7.07 lakh & in Loni it was very low (just Rs. 0.04 lakh against Rs. 2.30 lakh assessment).

In Dongargaon project, assessment of Rs. 0.13 lakh for 320 ha area irrigated seems to very low compared to other projects, from which Rs. 0.12 lakh were recovered achieving ratio of 0.92.

CADA Aurangabad: The average ratio of this indicator for projects under this circle increased from 0.17(2009-10) to 0.93. Only Kolhi is the project having very low ratio (0.10), other projects achieved the State norm.

AIC Aurangabad: Shivna Takali retained last year’s value i.e. 1.0

AIC Akola: Low irrigation recovery affected the ratio.

YIC Yeotmal: Irrigation recovery is NIL

WIC Washim: Assessment recovery ratio is quite less than state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: Though the ratio improved from 0.55 (2009-10) to 0.69, still it is much below the State norm. The improvement is necessary specifically in Abhora (0.08), Suki (0.41), Karwand (0.72), Sonwad (0.36) & Panzara (0.61) projects.

CADA Nashik: The overall ratio improved from 0.87 (2009-10) to 0.95. Field officers are required to take necessary steps to improve the performance in Bhojapur project (0.63).

JIPC Jalgaon: The indicator value in Mor project lowered from 0.73 to 0.20. Improvement is required, whereas in Bahula project, there was no recovery for irrigation.

CIPC Chandrapur: There is slight improvement in recovery of irrigation water supply as compared to last year further it is 65% of the target.

PIC Pune: In Shelphal project, the assessment increased from Rs. 18.19 lakhs to Rs. 35.86 lakhs, whereas, the recovery increased from Rs. 18.19 lakh to Rs. 22.56 lakh only. Therefore, the ratio came down to 0.63.

Abundant Plangroup:

KIC Ratnagiri: In Natuwadi project, increase in assessment over last year is observed. However, the recovery was hardly 10% of that in last year, lowering the ratio from 1.00 to 0.07.

In Hetwane, the improvement is due to increase in recovery over last year though total assessment during 2010-11 was slightly less than that in 2009-10.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Assessment recovery of this circle is just 49% of the target. There is slight improvement in the recovery as compared to last year.

CIPC Chandrapur: There is slight decrease in recovery of irrigation water supply as compared to last year further it is 81% of the target.

Abundant Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: Assessment recovery ratio is 64% of the target.

KIC Ratnagiri: In Natuwadi project, increase in assessment over last year is observed. However, the recovery was hardly 10% of that in last year, lowering the ratio from 1.00 to 0.07.

In Hetwane, the improvement is due to increase in recovery over last year though total assessment during 2010-11 was slightly less than that in 2009-10.

TIC Thane: The recovery improved from 36% to 79 % over the last year.

SIC Sangli: In Kadavi & Chitri projects, the recovery was 91% & 83%. However, the average for the circle was 75%.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 0.32 0.50 0.22 0.50 0.18

CADA Pune 0.85 0.97 0.86 2.20 0.42CADA Solapur 0.30 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.13PIC Pune 0.79 0.94 0.93 0.96 0.51TIC Thane 0.20 0.36 0.79 0.36 0.10

Deficit AIC Abad 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.23 0.25 0.39 0.41 0.05BIPC Buldhana 0.53 0.50 0.54 6.25 0.43CADA Abad 0.38 0.51 0.57 0.51 0.27CADA Beed 0.30 1.03 0.48 1.03 0.15CADA Jalgaon 0.59 0.84 0.72 0.84 0.44CADA Nashik 0.70 0.60 1.00 1.40 0.52NIC Nanded 0.27 0.00 0.02 0.60 0.00UWPC Amravati 0.38 0.30 0.30 7.59 0.28

Normal AIC Abad 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.33 0.04 0.10 0.68 0.02CADA Abad 0.38 0.17 0.93 0.93 0.00CADA Jalgaon 0.73 0.55 0.69 1.00 0.55CADA Nashik 0.55 0.87 0.95 0.91 0.09CADA Pune 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.37 0.78CIPC Chandrapur 0.33 0.43 0.65 0.50 0.19JIPC Jalgaon 0.73 0.73 0.20 0.73 0.73NIC Nanded 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.57 0.00PIC Pune 0.98 0.96 0.82 1.37 0.76WIC Washim 0.80 1.00 0.07 2.06 0.72YIC Yavatmal 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.39 0.14 0.49 0.55 0.14CIPC Chandrapur 0.56 1.01 0.81 1.01 0.35

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur 0.50 0.79 0.64 0.79 0.39KIC Ratnagiri 0.53 1.00 0.07 2.32 0.10NKIPC Thane 0.27 0.36 0.63 0.54 0.00SIC Sangli 0.73 0.86 0.75 1.10 0.34TIC Thane 0.20 0.36 0.79 0.36 0.10

0.65

0.58

0.65

0.56

0.58

1

Indicator XII-IMedium Projects

Assessment Recovery Ratio (Irrigation)

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00C

AD

A B

eed

CA

DA

Pun

e

CA

DA

Sol

apur

PIC

Pun

e

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

JIP

C J

alga

on

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

WIC

Was

him

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NK

IPC

Tha

ne

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar-1.0 Past Max Past Min

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Beed Highly Deficit Turori 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.65 1CADA Beed Harni 0.02 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.00 1CADA Beed Khandala 0.53 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.38 1CADA Beed Kurnoor 0.60 0.59 0.09 0.69 0.53 1CADA Solapur Hingani (Pangaon) 0.19 0.15 0.15 0.40 0.08 1CADA Beed Sakat 0.24 0.16 0.16 0.55 0.15 1CADA Beed Benitura 0.12 0.00 0.17 0.36 0.00 1CADA Solapur Mangi 0.24 0.47 0.19 0.47 0.12 1CADA Beed Ramganga 0.32 0.23 0.23 0.77 0.06 1CADA Beed Banganga 0.37 0.31 0.31 0.68 0.06 1CADA Beed Khasapur 0.13 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.02 1CADA Beed Kadi 0.59 0.89 0.38 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Khandeshwar 0.47 0.39 0.39 1.16 0.24 1CADA Beed Jakapur 2.14 0.00 0.42 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Mehakari 0.63 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Kambli 0.43 0.83 0.46 0.86 0.00 1CADA Beed Chandani 0.08 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.02 1PIC Pune Andhali 0.67 0.80 0.72 1.03 0.00 1CADA Beed Kada 0.31 1.92 0.78 1.92 0.00 1CADA Beed Rooty 0.87 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.00 1CADA Solapur Jawalgaon 0.32 0.52 0.84 0.87 0.04 1CADA Pune Khairy 0.77 0.94 0.85 1.00 0.29 1CADA Pune Sina 0.90 1.00 0.86 5.99 0.56 1CADA Solapur Ekrukh 0.36 0.20 0.89 1.00 0.14 1CADA Solapur Budhihal 1.27 0.97 0.89 2.19 0.97 1PIC Pune Mhaswad 0.63 0.95 0.90 1.00 0.24 1PIC Pune Nher 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1PIC Pune Ranand 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.53 1PIC Pune Tisangi 0.94 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.82 1CADA Beed Talwar 0.53 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.07 1CADA Abad Deficit Karpara 0.22 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.14 0.56 1AIC Akola Dnyanganga 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.00 1NIC Nanded Kundrala 0.16 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1NIC Nanded Karadkhed 0.46 0.00 0.00 2.64 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Burai 0.91 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.77 1CADA Beed Kundlika 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 1AIC Akola Mas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1AIC Akola Paldhag 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1NIC Nanded Kudala 0.13 0.00 0.01 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Borna 0.19 0.00 0.11 0.48 0.00 1CADA Beed Wan (Beed) 0.24 0.00 0.20 0.46 0.00 1CADA Beed Renapur 0.59 0.64 0.22 1.00 0.20 1CADA Abad Galhati 0.20 0.74 0.30 0.74 0.06 1UWPC Amravati Shahanoor 0.40 0.39 0.30 7.59 0.28 1CADA Beed Saraswati 0.63 0.00 0.31 0.97 0.00 1CADA Abad Masoli 0.07 0.13 0.33 0.25 0.02 1AIC Akola Morna (Akola) 0.20 0.00 0.37 0.36 0.00 1CADA Beed Terna 0.22 0.00 0.39 0.34 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 0.50 0.88 0.49 1.00 0.30 1NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 0.30 0.00 0.50 0.76 0.00 1CADA Abad Purna Nevpur 0.87 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.66 1AIC Akola Nirguna 0.24 0.09 0.51 0.49 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 1.05 1.00 0.52 2.30 0.87 1BIPC Buldhana Torna 0.29 0.21 0.52 2.86 0.00 1CADA Beed Mahasangvi 0.85 1.00 0.53 1.00 0.69 1BIPC Buldhana Mun 0.55 0.54 0.54 11.00 0.43 1

Indicator XII -IMedium Projects

Assessment Recovery Ratio (Irrigation)

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTar

CADA BeedSangameshwar (Dokewadi) 0.16 0.35 0.54 0.35 0.04 1

CADA Beed Bodhegaon 0.61 0.00 0.54 0.96 0.00 1CADA Beed Masalga 2.77 0.00 0.60 8.64 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Bori 0.66 0.77 0.67 1.00 0.14 1CADA Jalgaon Rangawali 0.47 0.81 0.67 0.81 0.35 1CADA Jalgaon Agnawati 0.45 0.41 0.68 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Rui 0.03 0.00 0.70 0.08 0.00 1CADA Abad Lahuki 0.40 0.31 0.71 1.00 0.31 1CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 0.40 0.56 0.71 0.67 0.00 1CADA Beed Whati 1.25 0.00 0.75 3.22 0.00 1CADA Abad Jui 0.71 0.00 0.81 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Khelna 0.81 0.92 0.86 1.00 0.06 1CADA Beed Gharni 0.60 0.00 0.92 0.64 0.00 1CADA Abad Gadadgad 0.31 0.22 0.93 1.00 0.15 1CADA Abad Anjana Palashi 1.12 0.95 0.94 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Tiru 1.02 0.00 0.96 1.31 0.00 1CADA Nashik Nagyasakya 1.01 0.33 1.00 14.82 0.33 1CADA Abad Sukhna 0.67 0.58 1.00 1.00 0.45 1CADA Beed Sakol 1.01 0.00 1.00 1.53 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Manyad 0.55 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.18 1CADA Beed Tawarja 0.33 0.00 1.00 0.98 0.00 1CADA Beed Devarjan 0.06 0.00 1.00 1.90 0.00 1CADA Beed Bindusara 0.90 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Raigavan 0.43 1.00 1.00 1.10 0.19 1CADA Abad Jivrekha 0.72 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nashik Kelzar 0.69 0.51 1.00 1.72 0.51 1CADA Abad Pir Kalyan 0.72 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nashik Haranbari 0.62 0.77 1.00 0.92 0.33 1NIC Nanded Mahalingi 0.74 0.00 1.00 1.75 0.00 1CADA Abad Kalyan Girja 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.22 1CADA Beed Sindphana 0.63 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.37 1CADA Abad Ajantha Andhari 0.95 0.81 1.00 1.00 0.76 1CADA Abad Dhamna 0.46 0.44 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Girja 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1AIC Akola Uma 0.22 0.00 1.32 0.55 0.00 1YIC Yavatmal Normal Navargaon 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 1NIC Nanded Nagzari 0.26 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1YIC Yavatmal Adan 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 1NIC Nanded Loni 0.28 0.00 0.02 1.00 0.00 1AIC Akola Saikheda 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.23 0.00 1WIC Washim Sonal 0.80 21.00 0.04 21.00 0.00 1AIC Akola Borgaon 0.91 0.00 0.04 1.00 0.00 1AIC Akola Lowerpus 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.17 0.02 1CADA Jalgaon Abhora 0.46 0.20 0.08 1.00 0.20 1CADA Abad Kolhi 0.51 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.00 1WIC Washim Ekburji 0.78 1.67 0.12 1.67 0.00 1AIC Akola Koradi 0.68 0.00 0.22 0.46 0.00 1CIPC Chandrapur Pothra 0.24 0.34 0.33 0.34 0.12 1CADA Jalgaon Suki 0.57 0.32 0.41 0.95 0.32 1CADA Jalgaon Panzra 0.84 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.68 1CADA Nashik Bhojapur 0.56 0.76 0.63 0.76 0.03 1PIC Pune Shetphal 1.01 1.00 0.63 2.53 0.59 1

CIPC ChandrapurDongargaon (Wardha) 0.36 0.46 0.66 0.49 0.10 1

CADA Jalgaon Karwand 1.21 0.55 0.72 2.98 0.55 1PIC Pune Vadiwale 0.91 0.93 0.92 1.00 0.84 1

NIC NandedDongargaon (Nanded) 0.08 0.00 0.92 10.29 0.00 1

PIC Pune Kasarsai 1.05 0.87 0.94 1.53 0.49 1CADA Abad Tembhapuri 0.98 0.96 0.97 1.00 0.97 1

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0.10 0.00 1.00 0.29 0.00 1CADA Abad Ambadi 0.16 0.02 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Narangi 0.67 0.00 1.00 0.81 0.00 1CADA Abad Dheku 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 0.64 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 1AIC Abad Shivna Takali 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1CADA Jalgaon Aner 0.67 0.58 1.00 0.99 0.49 1CADA Nashik Adhala 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1CADA Nashik Alandi 0.54 0.79 1.00 0.94 0.06 1CADA Nashik Ghatshil Pargaon 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 1CADA Pune Visapur 1.04 1.00 1.31 1.37 0.78 1JIPC Jalgaon Bahula 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.41 0.41 1JIPC Jalgaon Bhokar (Mangrul) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1JIPC Jalgaon Mor 0.94 0.94 0.49 0.94 0.94 1CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0.10 0.00 1.00 0.29 0.00 1CADA Abad Narangi 0.67 0.00 1.00 0.81 0.00 1PIC Pune Nazare 0.95 1.00 1.54 1.02 0.73 1CIPC Chandrapur Amal Nala 0.46 0.00 4.04 0.97 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Surplus Khekranala 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.73 0.00 0.65 1CADA Nagpur Kanholibara 0.28 0.06 0.10 0.82 0.01 1CADA Nagpur Kolar 0.23 0.06 0.13 0.46 0.06 1CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 0.50 0.75 0.16 0.91 0.02 1

CADA NagpurChandrabhaga (Nagpur) 0.50 0.10 0.29 0.71 0.10 1

CADA Nagpur Bagheda 0.21 0.05 0.32 2.86 0.05 1CADA Nagpur Sorna 0.60 0.40 0.34 0.84 0.28 1CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 0.43 0.43 0.34 6.94 0.14 1CADA Nagpur Mordham 0.62 0.78 0.35 0.87 0.09 1

CADA NagpurMakardhokada-Saiki Complex 0.47 0.30 0.37 0.59 0.15 1

CADA Nagpur Umri 0.32 0.60 0.39 0.60 0.14 1CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 0.54 0.06 0.40 0.80 0.01 1CADA Nagpur Chandpur 0.52 0.36 0.41 0.79 0.17 1CADA Nagpur Chorakhmara 0.34 0.02 0.50 0.55 0.00 1CIPC Chandrapur Panchadhara 0.38 0.36 0.54 0.47 0.21 1CIPC Chandrapur Chandai 0.47 8.68 0.56 8.68 0.31 1CADA Nagpur Chulband 0.55 0.16 0.58 1.45 0.16 1CADA Nagpur Khairbanda 0.47 0.27 0.60 0.76 0.16 1CADA Nagpur Pandhrabodi 0.66 0.75 0.70 0.84 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Wunna 0.84 0.76 0.71 1.03 0.29 1CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 0.46 0.07 0.82 0.72 0.05 1CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 0.52 1.08 0.89 1.08 0.29 1CADA Nagpur Managadh 0.36 0.60 0.95 0.60 0.08 1CIPC Chandrapur Pakadigundam 0.82 0.00 0.97 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Rengepar 0.63 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.48 1CIPC Chandrapur Labhansarad 0.43 2.23 1.44 2.23 0.21 1CIPC Chandrapur Abundant Naleshwar 0.41 0.25 0.44 0.45 0.25 0.58 1SIC Sangli Chikotra 2.45 0.57 0.57 10.05 0.57 1SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 0.54 1.11 0.59 1.11 0.02 1NKIPC Thane Hetwane 0.27 0.36 0.63 0.54 0.00 1SIC Sangli Patgaon 0.49 0.51 0.73 0.86 0.29 1CIPC Chandrapur Ghorazari 0.55 1.07 0.75 1.07 0.39 1SIC Sangli Kumbhi 0.57 0.69 0.78 0.69 0.37 1TIC Thane Wandri 0.27 0.46 0.79 0.46 0.07 1SIC Sangli Kasari 0.51 0.95 0.81 0.95 0.35 1SIC Sangli Chitri 0.51 0.98 0.83 0.98 0.10 1SIC Sangli Kadavi 0.63 0.74 0.91 0.82 0.43 1

Indicator XII: Assessment recover ratio (NI)

Highly deficit plan group:

CADA Beed: The average indicator ratio of projects under this circle increased from 0.37 to 0.58 as compared to last year. In Kadi, Mehkari, Kambli, Ramganga & Harni projects there was no non-irrigation use of water this year. In Ruti project, assessment for 0.72 Mcum of NI use is not shown by the field officers. In Talwar, Khandala, Khandeshwar, Banganga & Sakat projects there was no recovery against the assessment; hence ratio of this indicator was zero. In Kada, Turori & Benitura, achievement was 100%.

CADA Solapur: Recovery improved from 74% to 100% compared to last year. Excepting Buddhihal project where there is no non-irrigation use, the recovery in all the four projects was 100% of assessment.

PIC Pune: In Tisangi, 100% recovery was possible, resulting in achieving the State target.

CADA Pune: In Sina project, the recovery was just 80% of that in 2009-10. Though the assessment this year was slightly less compared to last year, the lesser recovery affected the performance.

Deficit plan group:

CADA Beed: The average ratio of indicator for projects under this circle decreased from 0.57 to 0.46 as compared to last year. In Gharni, Tiru, Masalga, Whati, Raigavan & Bodhegaon projects, there was no recovery against assessment. In Belpara, Borna, Sangameshwar & Sindphana projects there was no non-irrigation water use. In Devarjan, Mahasangvi, Saraswati & Waghe Babhulgaon projects, the achievement was 100%. In Sakol & Rui projects, the ratio was very low i.e. 0.07.

NIC Nanded: The average ratio of indicator for projects under this circle increased from last year’s 0.69 to 0.95. Out of five projects, three had achieved the State norm, one is (0.89) slightly below norm and for Pethwadaj, assessment against NI use is not shown.

CADA Aurangabad: The average ratio improved from 0.71 to 0.91. In Galhati, Gadadgad & Kalyan Girija, there was no non-irrigation use of water this year, whereas the assessment shown in Lahuki project is for the NI use from wells in D/S of reservoir. In Karpara project, assessment for 0.167 Mcum of NI use was not shown by the field officers. In Khelna project, ratio of this indicator is i.e. 0.38. The State target was achieved in Lahuki, Girja, Pir Kalyan, Dhamna, Jivrekha, Purna Nevpur, Upper Dudhana & Anjana Palashi.

AIC Akola: The ratio is quite less than last year.

BIPC Buldhana: Recovery is equal to the assessment.

UWPC Amravati: The ratio is as per state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: The overall ratio is on lower side (57%). Improvement is necessary in case of Bhokarbari (0.56), Bori (0.46), Kanoli (0.07), Rangwali (0.62), Hiwara (0.64) & Tondapur (0.65) projects.

CADA Nashik: The target was fully achieved in Haranbari, Kelzar & Ghatshil Pargaon projects. There was no non irrigation use in NagyaSakya project.

Normal Plan group:

CADA Aurangabad: The average ratio of indicator for projects under this circle increased from 0.55 to 0.63 as compared to last year. The ratio was minimum in Ambadi (0.29), whereas Narangi & Tembhapuri attained the State norm. In Bor dahegaon there was no water use for NI purpose.

NIC Nanded: The average ratio of indicator for the projects under this circle increased from 0.92 (2009-10) to 1.00, similar to 2008-09. Out of three, Nagzari is the only project to have NI use this year.

AIC Aurangabad: Shivna Takali attained the State target of 1.00 this year also.

AIC Akola: Nonirrigation recovery in Koradi & Saikheda is less than assessment resulting in lowering the ratio than state norm.

YIC Yeotmal: In both the Adan & Navargaon project recovery is less.

WIC Washim: Average ratio is less than state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: The ratio lowered from 0.43 (2009-10) to 0.30

CADA Nashik: The ratio remained same (1.00) as compared to last year.

CIPC Chandrapur: Assessment recovery ratio is satisfactory i.e. 97% of the target.

PIC Pune: In Khairy project, in spite of increase in recovery for Rs. 0.12 lakhs to Rs. 2.03 lakhs, the target could not be achieved.

CADA Pune: In Visapur project, there was marginal increase in assessment (from Rs. 5.54 lakhs & Rs. 5.86 lakhs). However, the recovery was even less than that in 2009-10. Thus, the performance was declined.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Assessment recovery ratio is satisfactory i.e. 94%.

CIPC Chandrapur: Assessment recovery ratio is as per state target.

Abundant Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: There was no water supply for non irrigation purpose during this year.

SIC Sangli: The ratio decreased from 89% to 82%. In Chikotra, Jangamhatti & Patgaon, the recovery was 100%. In Kumbhi, however, the ratio reduced from 100% to 49% over the last year.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 0.58 0.37 0.58 0.85 0.23

CADA Pune 0.80 0.81 0.73 1.00 0.67CADA Solapur 0.73 0.74 1.00 0.85 0.62PIC Pune 0.43 0.65 1.00 0.82 0.27

Deficit AIC Abad 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.66 0.78 0.96 0.96 0.19BIPC Buldhana 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00CADA Abad 0.72 0.71 0.91 0.90 0.44CADA Beed 0.39 0.57 0.46 0.57 0.31CADA Jalgaon 0.59 0.56 0.57 0.74 0.37CADA Nashik 1.57 0.98 1.00 5.65 0.90NIC Nanded 0.82 0.69 0.95 1.00 0.69UWPC Amravati 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.82 1.00

Normal AIC Abad 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00AIC Akola 0.92 0.94 0.77 0.98 0.62CADA Abad 0.73 0.55 0.63 1.00 0.55CADA Jalgaon 0.80 0.43 0.30 1.38 0.43CADA Nashik 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40CADA Pune 0.96 1.00 0.38 1.04 0.63CIPC Chandrapur 0.94 0.84 0.97 1.00 0.84JIPC Jalgaon 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00NIC Nanded 0.96 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.89PIC Pune 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99WIC Washim 0.58 0.72 0.56 1.75 0.46YIC Yavatmal 0.55 0.41 0.11 0.95 0.29

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.95 0.93 0.94 1.00 0.93CIPC Chandrapur 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.99 0.88

Abundant CIPC Chandrapur 0.95 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00KIC Ratnagiri 1.06 1.00 1.00 4.25 0.00NKIPC Thane 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.82 0.83SIC Sangli 0.60 0.89 0.82 0.98 0.28TIC Thane 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.97

0.94

0.83

0.86

0.70

1

Indicator XII-NIMedium Projects

Assessment Recovery Ratio (Non -Irrigation)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Pu

ne

CAD

A So

lapu

r

PIC

Pun

e

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC A

mra

vati

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

JIPC

Jal

gaon

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

WIC

Was

him

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NKI

PC T

hane

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar-1.0 Past Max Past Min

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Beed Highly Deficit Khandala 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 1PIC Pune Mhaswad 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Talwar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Sakat 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Rooty 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 1CADA Beed Ramganga 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Mehakari 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Khandeshwar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Solapur Budhihal 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Kambli 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Kadi 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1PIC Pune Ranand 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Harni 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Banganga 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Jakapur 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Chandani 0.72 0.47 0.38 1.00 0.11 1CADA Beed Kurnoor 0.69 0.23 0.39 1.42 0.19 1CADA Beed Khasapur 0.29 0.51 0.51 0.90 0.00 1CADA Pune Sina 0.77 0.77 0.68 1.00 0.64 1CADA Pune Khairy 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Kada 0.79 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Benitura 0.34 0.72 1.00 0.72 0.10 1CADA Solapur Ekrukh 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.49 1PIC Pune Tisangi 0.33 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1PIC Pune Nher 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Turori 0.67 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1PIC Pune Andhali 0.67 0.76 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Solapur Mangi 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Solapur Jawalgaon 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Solapur Hingani (Pangaon) 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 1AIC Akola Deficit Mas 0.94 1.00 0.00 2.45 0.48 0.86 1CADA Beed Gharni 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Burai 0.15 0.64 0.00 0.64 0.00 1CADA Beed Whati 0.22 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Tiru 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Sindphana 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Sangameshwar (Dokewadi) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Raigavan 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 1CADA Beed Masalga 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Nashik Nagyasakya 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Galhati 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1AIC Akola Nirguna 0.95 0.67 0.00 1.00 0.67 1NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Gadadgad 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Borna 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Kalyan Girja 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 1CADA Abad Karpara 0.14 0.10 0.00 0.23 0.00 1CADA Beed Bodhegaon 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Sakol 0.13 0.09 0.07 1.00 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 0.34 0.18 0.07 1.59 0.02 1CADA Beed Renapur 0.26 0.38 0.16 1.00 0.08 1CADA Beed Bindusara 0.31 0.52 0.25 0.52 0.00 1CADA Beed Terna 0.30 0.46 0.35 0.46 0.12 1CADA Abad Khelna 0.53 0.46 0.38 1.00 0.22 1CADA Jalgaon Bori 0.64 0.52 0.46 0.94 0.37 1CADA Beed Rui 0.64 0.45 0.54 1.04 0.45 1CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 0.80 0.75 0.56 0.99 0.33 1CADA Abad Ajantha Andhari 0.79 0.06 0.57 1.00 0.06 1CADA Jalgaon Rangawali 0.75 0.00 0.62 2.38 0.00 1CADA Beed Wan (Beed) 0.69 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.19 1CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 0.91 0.80 0.64 1.00 0.80 1CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 0.60 0.37 0.65 1.00 0.37 1

Indicator XII-NIMedium Projects

Assessment Recovery Ratio (Non -Irrigation)

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarCADA Beed Tawarja 0.75 0.65 0.67 1.00 0.32 1AIC Akola Morna (Akola) 0.61 0.52 0.68 0.83 0.50 1CADA Beed Kundlika 0.67 0.98 0.72 1.00 0.00 1NIC Nanded Karadkhed 0.91 0.74 0.89 1.05 0.74 1CADA Abad Jui 0.48 0.43 0.92 1.00 0.25 1AIC Akola Uma 0.78 0.10 0.95 1.00 0.10 1CADA Abad Masoli 0.94 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.38 1CADA Jalgaon Manyad 0.86 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.14 1CADA Abad Sukhna 0.86 0.90 0.99 1.00 0.08 1CADA Jalgaon Agnawati 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.63 1CADA Beed Saraswati 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Mahasangvi 0.71 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Beed Devarjan 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Purna Nevpur 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Lahuki 0.56 0.38 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Jivrekha 0.34 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Girja 0.74 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Dhamna 0.56 0.63 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Anjana Palashi 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1BIPC Buldhana Torna 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1BIPC Buldhana Mun 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1AIC Akola Paldhag 0.60 0.56 1.00 1.00 0.00 1AIC Akola Dnyanganga 0.64 0.79 1.00 1.00 0.10 1CADA Nashik Haranbari 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1CADA Abad Pir Kalyan 0.72 0.77 1.00 1.00 0.00 1UWPC Amravati Shahanoor 1.07 1.00 1.00 1.82 1.00 1NIC Nanded Kudala 0.66 0.84 1.00 0.84 0.00 1NIC Nanded Kundrala 0.76 0.42 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nashik Kelzar 2.25 0.95 1.00 8.34 0.87 1NIC Nanded Mahalingi 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1WIC Washim Normal Sonal 0.33 0.01 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.70 1CADA Jalgaon Abhora 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1NIC Nanded Dongargaon (Nanded) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Suki 0.69 0.53 0.00 1.00 0.38 1CIPC Chandrapur Dongargaon (Wardha) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Nashik Alandi 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.00 1NIC Nanded Loni 0.99 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Aner 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.00 1YIC Yavatmal Adan 0.54 0.28 0.02 1.01 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Panzra 0.87 0.24 0.03 1.61 0.09 1YIC Yavatmal Navargaon 0.58 0.66 0.27 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Ambadi 0.67 0.21 0.29 1.00 0.21 1CADA Pune Visapur 0.96 1.00 0.38 1.04 0.63 1CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 0.62 0.33 0.39 1.00 0.00 1AIC Akola Saikheda 0.56 0.48 0.46 0.77 0.00 1CADA Abad Kolhi 0.77 0.59 0.61 1.00 0.00 1WIC Washim Ekburji 0.60 0.84 0.61 1.98 0.43 1AIC Akola Koradi 0.68 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Dheku 0.98 0.88 0.96 1.00 0.00 1PIC Pune Nazare 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1AIC Abad Shivna Takali 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1AIC Akola Borgaon 0.98 0.08 1.00 1.00 0.08 1CADA Abad Narangi 0.68 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Tembhapuri 0.94 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.00 1AIC Akola Lowerpus 0.94 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.93 1PIC Pune Kasarsai 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73 1CADA Nashik Ghatshil Pargaon 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 1CIPC Chandrapur Amal Nala 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1CIPC Chandrapur Pothra 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nashik Adhala 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1NIC Nanded Nagzari 0.94 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nashik Bhojapur 0.94 0.00 1.00 0.94 0.00 1PIC Pune Shetphal 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1

Circle Plangroup Project FY Avg LY- 2009-10 TY- 2010-11 Past Max Past Min Avg Per StateTarJIPC Jalgaon Mor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1JIPC Jalgaon Bhokar (Mangrul) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1JIPC Jalgaon Bahula 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Bor Dahegaon 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Abad Narangi 0.68 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Jalgaon Karwand 1.13 0.76 1.00 1.74 0.76 1PIC Pune Vadiwale 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1CADA Nagpur Surplus Umri 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 1CADA Nagpur Rengepar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Khairbanda 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Kanholibara 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CIPC Chandrapur Chandai 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Sorna 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Chorakhmara 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Managadh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CIPC Chandrapur Labhansarad 0.76 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1CIPC Chandrapur Pakadigundam 1.00 0.99 0.00 1.00 0.99 1CIPC Chandrapur Panchadhara 0.06 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Chulband 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Khekranala 0.05 0.07 0.33 0.07 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Pandhrabodi 1.00 1.00 0.49 1.00 1.00 1CADA Nagpur Kolar 0.59 0.58 0.66 1.00 0.40 1CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 0.38 0.16 1.00 0.77 0.03 1CADA Nagpur Wunna 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1

CADA NagpurMakardhokada-Saiki Complex 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.86 1

CADA Nagpur Bagheda 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Chandpur 0.79 0.00 1.00 0.79 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CADA Nagpur Chandrabhaga (Nagpur) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1CADA Nagpur Mordham 0.58 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1CIPC Chandrapur Abundant Naleshwar 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.94 1TIC Thane Wandri 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1CIPC Chandrapur Ghorazari 0.93 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1SIC Sangli Kasari 0.92 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1SIC Sangli Kumbhi 0.54 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.09 1SIC Sangli Kadavi 0.29 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.00 1SIC Sangli Chitri 0.93 0.82 0.98 1.00 0.82 1SIC Sangli Patgaon 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 1SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 0.93 0.66 1.00 1.00 0.66 1NKIPC Thane Hetwane 1.10 1.08 1.00 1.82 0.83 1SIC Sangli Chikotra 0.51 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 1

Minor Projects

Observations of Minor projects

Indicator I: Annual Irrigation Water Supply per Unit Irrigated Area.

Highly Deficit Plan group

CADA Beed: The water use per unit area irrigated was 9091 this year, which is just more than that of State norms.

CADA Solapur: The average performance of this year is 4267 cum/ha. The water use decreased as compared to last year.

SIC Sangli: Annual water use on minor project under this circle is 6632cum/ha. The water use increased as compared to last year.

Deficit Plan group:

AIC Aurangabad: The average value of this indicator had 6698 cum/ha.

AIC Akola: Annual irrigation water supply per unit area is less than state norm.

BIPC Buldhana: Performance of projects under this circle is less than state norm.

CADA Aurangabad: The average value of this indicator was 6467cum/ha, which is within the state target.

CADA Beed: The average value of this indicator had 9389cum/ha this year.

CADA Jalgaon: The water use reduced from 5224 cum/ha to 4858 cum/ha as compared to last year and it is below the State norm.

CADA Nashik: Though the water use increased from 4921 cum/ha to 5386 cum/ha as compared to last year, still it is below the State norm.

NIC Nanded: The average value of this indicator has decreased from 6784 cum/ha, which is nearer to State target.

UWPC Amravati: Indicator value is slightly more than state norm.

WIC Washim: Performance is lowered than last year & state norm.

Normal Plan group:

AIC Akola: Indicator value is less than state norm.

BIPC Buldhana: Annual irrigation water supply per unit area of Adol project is quite less than state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: The water use increased from 5816 cum/ha to 8612 cum/ha as compared to last year and crossed the State norm.

CADA Nagpur: The average annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area is 4662 cum/Ha. which is less than state target and last years value 6831 cum/Ha.

CADA Nashik: The water use increased from 5224 cum/ha to 6230 cum/ha as compared to last year. It is just below the State norm.

CIPC Chandrapur: The average annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area is 9591 cum/Ha. which is satisfactory as compared to state norm. But less than last years value 10318 cum/Ha.

NIC Nanded: The average value of this indicator for this year has 8469 cum/ha, this year.

UWPC Amravati: Indicator value is quite more than state norm.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Annual water use on projects under CADA Nagpur is 4688 cum/Ha which is less than state norm, but some what improved as compare to last year value of 3337 cum/Ha.

CIPC Chandrapur: The average annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area is 3625 cum/Ha.

Abundant plan group

CIPC Chandrapur: The average annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area is 2651 cum/Ha.

SIC Sangli: The average water use is 9254cum/ha., which is more than State norm. However there is slight decreas over last year.

TIC Thane: The average water use is 12790cum/ha.which is higher than the State norm

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 7053 7024 9091 9435 7024

CADA Solapur 5935 5664 4267 6477 5288PIC Pune 5943 5094 6123 7241 5094SIC Sangli 12717 5814 6632 7994 5493

Deficit AIC Abad 7016 5745 6698 11382 5745AIC Akola 7796 7345 4752 7345 3617BIPC Buldhana 8535 7051 5997 8089 6452CADA Abad 5730 5646 6467 6234 1735CADA Beed 7735 7656 9389 8596 6880CADA Jalgaon 5908 5224 4858 6495 5160CADA Nashik 6359 4921 5386 6946 4866NIC Nanded 7197 6785 6784 8129 6215UWPC Amravati 8286 7918 6844 7918 5405WIC Washim 4406 5265 4683 16800 4360

Normal AIC Akola 4764 4721 5014 5693 3683BIPC Buldhana 4999 2342 4553 7316 2342CADA Jalgaon 7463 5816 8612 7810 5425CADA Nagpur 6620 6831 4662 11391 6831CADA Nashik 5772 5224 6230 6114 5276CADA Pune 4087 4073 3819 4418 3396CIPC Chandrapur 6552 10318 9591 10318 5680NIC Nanded 7465 7129 8469 8247 2819PIC Pune 5776 5185 6078 6785 5080UWPC Amravati 9629 9214 7296 10013 6778

Surplus CADA Nagpur 4001 3337 4688 4427 3337CIPC Chandrapur 4751 5283 3626 5283 3612

Abundant CADA Pune 6054 4871 5431 8845 3990CIPC Chandrapur 4175 5045 2651 5045 2934KIC Ratnagiri 17231 19236 92473 25002 15705NKIPC Thane 53907 53199 66914 80174 31900SIC Sangli 11441 10467 9254 12581 10250TIC Thane 18544 17866 12790 20980 14742

4157

5779

6667

6528

6186

6432

Indicator IMinor Projects

Annual Irrigation Water Supply per unit Irrigated Area (cum/ha)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Sol

apur

PIC

Pun

e

SIC

San

gli

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

WIC

Was

him

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NK

IPC

Tha

ne

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

cum

/ha

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Indicator II: Potential Utilised and created

Highly Deficit plan group

CADA Beed: The performance of this indicator decreased to 0.58 this year.

CADA Solapur: The ratio for this indicator is 0.80, it is declined over last year’s value of 1.00.

SIC Sangli: The ratio for this indicator is 0.30,It is declined over last years value of 0.80.

Deficit plan group:

AIC Akola: Potential utilization is 100%

BIPC Buldhana: In Masrul, Mohargaon, Vidrupa projects on an average 70% of created potential is utilized.

CADA Beed: The average ratio of the indicator for this year retained its last year value 0.40.

CADA Aurangabad: The ratio of this indicator was 1.17, as area irrigated on wells in command is more.

CADA Jalgaon: The ratio is one for last five years, which is up to the State target and for current year the ratio is 1.44.

CADA Nashik: The performance lowered as compared to last year. The ratio is 0.67 which is below the State target.

NIC Nanded: The average ratio of this indicator for this year was 0.23.

UWPC Amravati: Average potential utilized of projects under this circle is 40%.

WIC Washim: Average potential utilized of projects under this circle is 100%.

Normal Plan group:

AIC Akola: Only 40% Created potential is utilized.

BIPC Buldhana: On Adol project 100% potential is utilized.

CADA Jalgaon: The ratio is just below the State norm (0.86).

CADA Nagpur: The ratio of potential utilization as compared to created for projects under this circle is 3.5 which to be verified by the field authorities

CADA Nashik: The ratio is one for last five years, which is up to the State target. The current year value is 1.11.

CIPC Chandrapur: The ratio of potential utilization as compared to created for projects under CIPC is 0.30.

NIC Nanded: The ratio has decreased to 0.30 this year.

UWPC Amravati: On projects under this circle only 30% potential is utilized.

Surplus Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: The ratio of potential utilization as compared to created for projects under CIPC is 0.8 which is decreased as compared to last year value of 0.7.

CADA Nagpur: Potential utilisation is as the state target 1.0.

Abundant Plan Group

CIPC Chandrapur: Potential utilisation is on an average 90% in projects under this circle.

SIC Sangli: The ratio is 0.30 and it is declined over last year.

TIC Thane: The ratio is 0.60; it is declined over last year.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 0.60 0.62 0.58 0.73 0.44

CADA Solapur 0.86 0.90 0.75 1.03 0.82PIC Pune 0.49 0.58 0.99 0.67 0.45SIC Sangli 1.13 0.81 0.27 0.97 0.77

Deficit AIC Abad 0.87 0.61 0.33 1.19 0.61AIC Akola 0.47 0.22 1.05 0.60 0.00BIPC Buldhana 0.45 0.22 0.72 0.77 0.22CADA Abad 0.34 0.37 1.17 0.40 0.29CADA Beed 0.41 0.49 0.40 0.49 0.34CADA Jalgaon 1.40 2.10 1.44 2.20 1.00CADA Nashik 0.77 1.00 0.67 0.93 0.66NIC Nanded 0.39 0.32 0.23 0.57 0.29UWPC Amravati 0.39 0.23 0.35 0.55 0.23WIC Washim 1.10 1.10 1.29 2.16 0.89

Normal AIC Akola 0.88 0.87 0.44 0.87 0.63BIPC Buldhana 1.23 0.78 1.66 1.77 0.00CADA Jalgaon 0.62 0.80 0.86 0.84 0.52CADA Nagpur 0.49 0.37 3.51 0.37 0.16CADA Nashik 1.27 1.70 1.11 1.66 1.16CADA Pune 0.66 0.75 0.82 0.75 0.58CIPC Chandrapur 0.58 0.34 0.34 0.81 0.34NIC Nanded 0.40 0.39 0.30 1.53 0.39PIC Pune 0.51 0.72 0.85 0.75 0.48UWPC Amravati 0.21 0.05 0.32 0.36 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.89 1.07 1.01 1.12 0.76CIPC Chandrapur 0.70 0.68 0.75 0.76 0.68

Abundant CADA Pune 0.70 0.72 0.36 0.89 0.69CIPC Chandrapur 0.93 0.90 0.89 0.91 0.90KIC Ratnagiri 0.20 0.16 0.10 0.23 0.12NKIPC Thane 0.07 0.05 0.01 0.10 0.00SIC Sangli 0.32 0.40 0.32 0.50 0.23TIC Thane 0.54 1.40 0.61 1.43 0.50

0.88

0.60

0.65

0.73

0.69

1.00

Indicator IIMinor Projects

Potential Created and Utilised

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

1.10

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Sol

apur

PIC

Pun

e

SIC

San

gli

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

WIC

Was

him

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NK

IPC

Tha

ne

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Indicator VIII: Revenue per unit water supplied

Highly deficit Plan Group

CADA Beed: The average value of indicator for this circle increased from Rs 0.05/cum to Rs 1.39/cum. as compared to last year.

CADA Solapur: Revenue per unit water supply is Rs. 0.10/cum.

It is nearly half of the target.

SIC Sangli: Revenue per unit water supply is Rs. 0.10/cum. It is marginally improved.

Deficit Plan Group:

AIC Akola & WIC Washim: Indicator value of projects under this circle is NIL

BIPC Buldhana: As compared with state norm, performance of projects is very poor.

CADA Beed: The average value of this indicator for minor project under this circle increased from Rs 0.06/cum to Rs 1.55/cum this year.

NIC Nanded: The average value for this indicator has slightly decreased from 0.06 to Rs 0.05/cum as compared to last year. This shows that efforts are not taken by field officers to recover Government revenue.

CADA Aurangabad: The average value of this indicator for minor projects under this circle has decreased by 50% over last year’s value 0.12 and comes to 0.06 this year.

CADA Jalgaon: The indicator value is 0.12.

CADA Nashik: The indicator value is 0.02.

UWPC Amravati: As compared with state norm performance of projects is very poor.

Normal Plan group:

AIC Akola: No revenue collection in 8 selected project under this circle.

BIPC Buldhana: Indicator value is considerably less than state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: The indicator value is 0.13, which is below the State norm.

CADA Nagpur: The average value of this indicator for minor projects under the circle is 0.14 which is below state norm, but improve as compared to last year’s value 0.01.

CADA Nashik: The indicator value is 0.05 which is far below the State norm.

CIPC Chandrapur: The average value of this indicator for projects under this circle is 0.05. But it is still below state norms and increased in comparison with last year’s performance (0.04).

NIC Nanded: The average value of this indicator for minor projects under this circle has decreased from Rs 0.07/cum (2009-10) to Rs 0.03/cum this year.

UWPC Amravati: Average revenue per unit water supplied is nearly half of state norm.

Surplus Plan Group:

CIPC Chandrapur: The average value of this indicator for projects under this circle is 0.04.

CADA Nagpur: The average value of this indicator for projects under this circle is 0.05.

Abundant Plan Group

CIPC Chandrapur: The average value of this indicator for projects under this circle is 0.06 which is improved as compared to last year’s value 0.04.

SIC Sangli, TIC Thane: Revenue per unit water supply is Rs. 0.10/cum. It is nearly half of the target.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 0.36 0.05 1.39 0.02 0.00

CADA Solapur 0.09 0.15 0.10 0.09 0.00PIC Pune 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.00SIC Sangli 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00

Deficit AIC Abad 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00AIC Akola 2.45 0.09 0.01 9.71 0.00BIPC Buldhana 0.17 0.07 0.02 0.57 0.00CADA Abad 0.05 0.12 0.06 0.01 0.00CADA Beed 0.42 0.06 1.55 0.08 0.00CADA Jalgaon 0.12 0.10 0.12 0.26 0.00CADA Nashik 0.05 0.14 0.02 0.02 0.00NIC Nanded 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.08 0.00UWPC Amravati 0.10 0.00 0.07 0.31 0.00WIC Washim 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00

Normal AIC Akola 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00BIPC Buldhana 0.43 0.15 0.03 1.54 0.00CADA Jalgaon 0.07 0.12 0.13 0.05 0.00CADA Nagpur 0.16 0.01 0.14 0.48 0.00CADA Nashik 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.00 0.00CADA Pune 0.06 0.14 0.10 0.00 0.00CIPC Chandrapur 0.09 0.04 0.05 0.28 0.00NIC Nanded 0.05 0.07 0.03 0.08 0.00PIC Pune 0.25 0.47 0.37 0.17 0.00UWPC Amravati 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.00CIPC Chandrapur 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00

Abundant CADA Pune 0.05 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.00CIPC Chandrapur 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.00KIC Ratnagiri 0.08 0.16 0.04 0.10 0.00NKIPC Thane 0.21 0.36 0.39 0.07 0.00SIC Sangli 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.00TIC Thane 0.10 0.18 0.12 0.10 0.00

0.08

0.04

0.19

0.20

0.19

0.10

0.05

0.07

Indicator VIIIMinor Projects

Revenue per unit Water Supplied

0.000

0.050

0.100

0.150

0.200

0.250C

AD

A B

eed

CA

DA

Sol

apur

PIC

Pun

e

SIC

San

gli

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Aba

d

CA

DA

Bee

d

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nas

hik

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

WIC

Was

him

AIC

Ako

la

BIP

C B

uldh

ana

CA

DA

Jal

gaon

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CA

DA

Nas

hik

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC

Am

rava

ti

CA

DA

Nag

pur

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CA

DA

Pun

e

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NK

IPC

Tha

ne

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 StateTar Past Max Past Min

Indicator XII: Assessment recovery ratio (I+NI)

Highly deficit Plan Group

CADA Beed: The average ratio of this indicator for the projects under this circle had nil this year. Project authorities are advised to be careful in assessment & recovery.

CADA Solapur: Ratio is decreased from 0.89 to 0.80 as compared to last year.

SIC Sangli: The recovery decreased as compared to last year.

Deficit Plan Group:

AIC Akola: No recovery of water charges is done.

BIPC Buldhana: Average assessment recovery ratio in masrul, Mohargaon, Vidrupa projects is nearly 1/4th of state norm.

CADA Aurangabad: The average ratio for this indicator decreased from 0.80 to 0.55 as compared to last year.

CADA Beed: The average ratio of indicator for this circle had zero this year.

CADA Jalgaon: The ratio just lowered from 0.84 to 0.83 as compared to last year and it is below the State norm.

CADA Nashik: The ratio is 0.31 which is far below the State norm.

NIC Nanded: The average ratio of this indicator for the projects under this circle had improved this year from 0.10 (2009-10) to 0.88 this year.

UWPC Amravati: In the projects under this circle average assessment recovery ratio is 0.78.

WIC Washim: The ratio is very less on projects under this circle.

Normal Plan group:

AIC Akola: Average assessment recovery ratio is as per state norm.

BIPC Buldhana: In Adol project ratio is very less than state norm.

CADA Jalgaon: The ratio is 0.23, which is far below to State norm.

CADA Nagpur: Average Assessment recovery ratio for irrigation plus non irrigation is 0.51 which is less than last year’s value and state target.

CADA Nashik: The ratio reduced from 0.90 to 0.85 as compared to last year, which is nearer to State norm.

CIPC Chandrapur: Average Assessment recovery ratio for irrigation plus non irrigation is 0.63 which is less than last year’s value and state target.

NIC Nanded: The average ratio for this indicator has increased from 0.02 to 0.83 as compared to last year.

UWPC Amravati: The ratio is as per state norm of projects under this circle.

Surplus Plan Group:

CADA Nagpur: Revenue recovery is less (0.58) as compared to last year (0.63).

CIPC Chandrapur: Revenue recovery is less (0.58) as compared to last year (0.63).

Abundant Plan Group

CIPC Chandrapur: Revenue recovery is less (0.19) as compared to last year (0.18).

TIC Thane: The recovery is as per the Assessment.

SIC Sangli: The ratio decreased from 1.00 to 0.86.

Plangroup Circle FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 Past Max Past Min AVG Per State TarHighly Deficit CADA Beed 0.33 0.76 0.00 0.51 0.23

CADA Solapur 0.68 0.89 0.80 0.51 0.31PIC Pune 0.75 0.86 1.00 0.51 0.51SIC Sangli 1.00 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.85

Deficit AIC Abad 0.66 0.51 0.87 0.51 0.20AIC Akola 0.28 0.83 0.00 0.51 0.05BIPC Buldhana 0.00 0.39 0.32 0.00 0.00CADA Abad 0.84 0.80 0.55 1.00 0.56CADA Beed 0.59 0.47 0.00 0.51 0.38CADA Jalgaon 0.69 0.84 0.83 0.51 0.51CADA Nashik 1.00 0.88 0.31 1.00 0.73NIC Nanded 0.14 0.10 0.88 0.51 0.05UWPC Amravati 0.85 0.00 0.78 0.51 0.51WIC Washim 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.51 0.00

Normal AIC Akola 0.26 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.17BIPC Buldhana 0.00 1.00 0.04 0.00 0.00CADA Jalgaon 0.72 0.90 0.23 0.51 0.34CADA Nagpur 0.00 1.00 0.51 0.51 0.50CADA Nashik 0.71 0.90 0.85 0.51 0.46CADA Pune 0.76 0.94 0.57 0.51 0.51CIPC Chandrapur 0.78 1.00 0.63 0.51 0.41NIC Nanded 0.18 0.02 0.83 0.51 0.01PIC Pune 0.82 0.99 0.98 0.51 0.51UWPC Amravati 0.85 0.00 1.00 0.51 0.45YIC Yavatmal 0.82 0.28 1.00 0.51 0.03

Surplus CADA Nagpur 0.66 0.47 0.52 0.51 0.42CIPC Chandrapur 0.53 0.63 0.58 0.51 0.36

Abundant CADA Pune 0.63 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.45CIPC Chandrapur 0.35 0.18 0.19 0.51 0.17KIC Ratnagiri 0.93 1.00 0.57 0.51 0.51NKIPC Thane 1.00 0.50 0.84 1.00 0.50SIC Sangli 0.61 1.00 0.86 0.51 0.51TIC Thane 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 0.76

0.55

0.65

0.63

0.46

0.69

1.00

Indicator XII-I + NIMInor Projects

Assessment Recovery Ratio (Irrigation+ Non-Irrigation)

0.000

0.200

0.400

0.600

0.800

1.000C

ADA

Beed

CAD

A So

lapu

r

PIC

Pun

e

SIC

San

gli

AIC

Aba

d

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ab

ad

CAD

A Be

ed

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

ashi

k

NIC

Nan

ded

UW

PC A

mra

vati

WIC

Was

him

AIC

Ako

la

BIPC

Bul

dhan

a

CAD

A Ja

lgao

n

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CAD

A N

ashi

k

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

NIC

Nan

ded

PIC

Pun

e

UW

PC A

mra

vati

YIC

Yav

atm

al

CAD

A N

agpu

r

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

CAD

A Pu

ne

CIP

C C

hand

rapu

r

KIC

Rat

nagi

ri

NKI

PC T

hane

SIC

San

gli

TIC

Tha

ne

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Surplus Abundant

Rat

io

FY Avg LY 2009-10 TY 2010-11 State Tar Past Max Past Min

Chapter-5 Action Taken Report

Benchmarking process involves number of steps, right from Indicators

selection to monitoring of results obtained through action taken on deficiencies in last year’s performance. Where the Benchmarking of irrigation projects has been a routine process of performance evaluation, preparation of a comprehensive, problem specific action plan for every individual irrigation project based on the outcome of last year’s performance & its effective implementation plays an important role in securing the desired improvement.

Since last ten years, Water Resources Department is using Benchmarking as

an effective tool to evaluate the performances of irrigation projects. Project wise, Indicator wise results along with probable causes for low performances compared to past achievement as well as State targets are made available to field officers with the intention and directives to prepare and implement a project wise consolidated action plan.

Project authorities are no doubt taking the cognizance of the low performance

and are taking suitable actions to seek the desired improvement in Irrigation Management. But the information gathered so far indicates that instead of preparing a detail, integrated action plan, actions are taken in the form of a single activity.

Not a single action plan is received from Project authorities for the year 2010-

11; hence it is not incorporated in this report.

Chapter 6

Benchmarking of Water Users Association’s

Till the end of June 2010, a potential to the tune of 4.737 Mha has been created in the State. At present, the management of created irrigation potential is done at department level out of which 11.56 lacks ha is managed by 2959 Water Users Associations working on major / medium and minor projects.

Govt. of Maharashtra has categorically taken the decision of handing over the total created potential to the Water Users Associations. To obviate the problems in establishing WUA, an act namely MMISF Act 2005 has been passed in the State Assembly.

At present, Maharashtra Water Sector Improvement Programme (MWSIP) is under implementation through which a potential to the tune of 0.67 Mha on 286 projects shall be handed over to1559 WUAs in the stipulated period. The MMISF act 2005 is made applicable to the projects under MWSIP. Above mentioned act is made applicable to all projects under MWSIP.

For evaluating the irrigation performance of irrigation projects and bringing about necessary improvement in Irrigation Water Management, the State is using Benchmarking as an effective management tool for last ten years.

Considering huge investment through public exchequer, in construction of projects along with large amount of fund investment involved in rehabilitation of irrigation systems before handing over to WUA, evaluation of the performance of WUA using benchmarking is necessary. Benchmarking of WUA will help to determine and bring necessary improvement in the overall functioning. Also it will help the WR Department to ascertain whether the objectives of handing over the Irrigation Management to WUA are attained or not.

6.1 Objectives of Benchmarking of WUA

1. To determine the participation of beneficiaries in working of WUA.

2. To ascertain whether the WUA is getting the water as per sanctioned quota and revenue collected as per the agreement and guidelines or not.

3 To enhance area irrigated and output after the irrigation management is handed over to WUA

4 To determine per ha water use (excluding well/ river lift) in the jurisdiction of WUA.

5 To check the conjunctive use of wells in the command of WUA.

6 To determine the financial status / self-sustainability of WUA.

7 To check whether water is equitably supplied to beneficiaries at head, middle and tail reaches of the canal system under the jurisdiction of WUA.

8 To fix the area of problems so as to take suitable action to bring necessary changes in the working of WUA and improve the performance of a distribution system, ultimately of the project.

9 To create a sense of responsibility/accountability among the office bearers of WUA and discipline among members of the association.

10 Changes in cropping pattern.

11 Adoption in water saving techniques.

12 Gender participation.

13 Upliftment of economically weaker sections of farming community.

6.2 Proforma for data submission for Benchmarking of WUA: For collecting the data for benchmarking of WUA, Proformae are designed in regional language (Marathi). These Proformae in English are shown on subsequent pages of this report. 6.3 Selection of WUA for benchmarking: Looking to the large number of WUA formed so far, initially data of two WUA on major and one from medium & minor project from each circle was collected. Secondly, preference is given to WUA which are functioning for a longer period. Accordingly, data for 12 WUA on 7 major projects from 5 irrigation circles has been analyzed. 6.4 Methodology adopted for Benchmarking: Considering the WUA selected are in limited numbers, benchmarking is carried out by - I) Comparing the performance of individual WUA with State target ii) Comparing the performance of two WUA on the same project, iii) Comparing the performance of two WUA from two different projects but from same plan group. 6.5 Targets: Targets for indicator I to III, VI, VII & IX are shown in Proforma 2 annexed and are self explanatory. Target for indicator IV (Annual water use per unit area irrigated) is 70 percent of that of project (7692 cum/ha) considering 30 % transit losses in canal as the water supplied to WUA is measured at off taking of the concerned Distributory /Minor. Thus target works out to 5384 cum/ha. Target for indicator V (Annual expenditure per ha for irrigation management) for a WUA is evaluated as follows: Total command area of a WUA: 200 ha (Presumption) Salary of Staff and other mandatory expenditure for IWM per annum

S.N. Item Amount 1 Salary of One Canal inspector Rs 36000 2 Salary of One Labour Rs 18000 3 Office Building Rent Rs 6000 4 Maintenance of distribution system Rs 4000

5 Telephone/ electricity bill Rs 12000 6 Report publication etc Rs 3000 7 Stationary Rs 1000 Total Rs 80000

Annual expenditure per unit area irrigated = 80000 200 = Rs 400 / ha

Prescribed format for Information to be submitted for Benchmarking of Water User Association (Proforma 1)

Irrigation Year :

Sanction Quota of WUA as per agreement (TCM)

Actual quota received to WUA (TCM)

Name of Project Name of Circle

Basin No.

Name of Water User Association

Number of beneficiaries in

command of WUA

Number of WUA

members Kharif Rabbi Hot weather Total Kharif Rabbi Hot

weather Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Number of WUA members in total length of channel

Number of WUA members as per actual

area irrigated during the year

Annual crop area measured in command of WUA before

establishment (ha)

Crop area measured

during irrigation year

(ha)

Total area irrigated in irrigation year (ha)

Expenditure on irrigation

management during irrigation year (Rs)

Water cess recovery during

irrigation year (Rs)

Water cess paid to Govt.

during irrigation year

(Rs.)

Annual income during

irrigation year (Rs.) Head Middle Tail Head Middle Tail

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Details of Indicators used for Benchmarking of Water User Association (Proforma 2)

Indicator No.

Indicator Target / Achievement

Purpose of Indicator

Percentage of WUA members to total beneficiaries in Command of WUA

Indicator No. I

(Column 6 /Column 5)* 100

100%

To enhance the extent of coverage in the Irrigation Management of WUA

Percentage of water supplied to sanction quota

Indicator No. II

(Column 14 /Column 10)* 100

100%

To ascertain the actual water quota received as compared to the sanction water quota during the irrigation year.

Ratio of actual area irrigated to the area irrigated before functioning of the WUA

Indicator No. III

(Column 16 /Column 15)

More than 1

To check whether area irrigated is increased or decreased after the formation of WUA.

Annual irrigation water use per unit area irrigated (Cum/ha)

Indicator No. IV

(Column 14 x 1000/Column 17)

Less than 5382 Cum

To check the economic, efficient use of water in irrigation management.

Annual expenditure per ha for irrigation management (Rs/ha)

Indicator No. V

(Column 18 /Column 16)

Rs. 400/ha

To check economy in expenditure for irrigation management.

Ratio of annual expenditure to recovered water charges

Indicator No.VI

(Column 19 /Column 18)

More than 1

To check and decide the self sustainability of WUA.

Ratio of water revenue remitted to Govt. to actual water revenue recovered

Indicator No. VII

(Column 20 /Column 19)

More than 1

To check the actual remittance of water charges to Govt. out of revenue collected.

Annual Output per ha of area irrigated (Rs/ha)

Indicator No. VIII

(Column 21 /Column 16)

As per State target for project BM

To check actual increase in income of beneficiaries due to freedom of crops and participation of farmers in irrigation management.

Equity Performance

Head

(Column 25 /Column 22)

One

Middle

(Column 26 /Column 23)

One

Tail

Indicator No. IX

(Column 27 /Column 24)

One

To check equitable distribution of water in head, middle & tail reaches of WUA. Reaches are defined by equally dividing the total beneficiaries in three reaches namely head, middle and tail.

Circle wise Ancillary information of WUA in Deficit Plan group (Proforma 3)

Sr. No. Item /Circle CADA Beed

Project Majalgaon

Name of WUA Bhagwati Shukleshwar

1 Jurisdiction of WUA Minor No.1 to 7/ Tilsmukh branch/ MRBC

Minor No.8/ GM Branch Canal / MRBC

2 ICA of WUA 555 ha 725 ha

3 Is WUA included in MWSIP? No No

4 Date of handing over of IWM (command area) to the WUA

25-03-1998 9-10-1998

5 No of wells in command area of WUA

a) Before handing over 2 68

b) Total as on today 98 (46wells, 52 Bore wells) 93

6 Subsidy received during the irrigation year Rs.21000 Rs.137100

7 Year for which subsidy is not received

2006-07 to 2009-10 2007-08 to 2009-10

8 Dose the well water was used as an additional source for irrigation during the irrigation year

Yes Yes

9 Area under perennial crops during the irrigation year

237 ha 120 ha

10 No. of staff employed for irrigation management by WUA

3 2

11 Does water supply was on volumetric basis or not

Volumetric basis Volumetric basis

12 Assessment of water charges were on volumetric basis or as per crop area measurement

On volumetric basis On volumetric basis

13

Percentage of actual live storage to the design storage in the reservoir during the irrigation year

100% 100%

14 Reasons for less achievements compared to the set target during the irrigation year

1) Less response from WUA members 2) Due to more number of wells in command ,there was low response to canal irrigation 3) Trend of cultivators towards cash crops

Circle wise Ancillary information of WUA in Highly Deficit & Abundant Plan group

(Proforma 3)

Sr. No.

Item /Circle CADA Solapur SIC Sangli

Project Bhima (Ujani) Warna

Name of WUA Pandurang Nanaksingh

1 Jurisdiction of WUA Dy No.35 On Ujjani LBC

Dy No.1,2,3

2 ICA of WUA 117 ha 111 ha

3 Is WUA included in MWSIP? No No

4 Date of handing over of IWM (command area) to the WUA

12-12-1994 6-8-2004

5 No of wells in command area of WUA

a) Before handing over 50 0

b) Total as on today 61 0

6 Subsidy received during the irrigation year NA Rs.8000

7 Year for which subsidy is not received 2004-05 to 2007-08 2004-05 to 2009-10

8 Dose the well water was used as an additional source for irrigation during the irrigation year

Yes No

9 Area under perennial crops during the irrigation year

159 ha 30 ha

10 No. of staff employed for irrigation management by WUA

2 3

11 Does water supply was on volumetric basis or not

Volumetric basis Volumetric basis

12 Assessment of water charges were on volumetric basis or as per crop area measurement

On volumetric basis On volumetric basis

13 Percentage of actual live storage to the design storage in the reservoir during the irrigation year

100% 100%

14 Reasons for less achievements compared to the state target during the irrigation year

1)The people getting benefit of irrigation from river are not becoming the members of WUAs. 2) There is conjunctive use of wells & canal.

1) Deterioted disnet system. 2) Fill Irrigation potential is not created.

Sr. No.

Item /Circle NIC Nanded

Project Purna

Name of WUA Krishna Godawari

1 Jurisdiction of WUA Malegaon Minor /Dour Minor / camp colony DO No.5 to 9

Kamtha Minor 1,2,3/ Do No.10 to 15

2 ICA of WUA 1036 ha 619 ha

3 Is WUA included in MWSIP?

No No

4 Date of handing over of IWM (command area) to the WUA

3.7.1991 3.7.1991

5 No of wells in command area of WUA

a) Before handing over 92 78

b) Total as on today 141 105

6 Subsidy received during the irrigation year Rs.5081/- Rs.58266/-

7 Year for which subsidy is not received

Nil Nil

8

Dose the well water was used as an additional source for irrigation during the irrigation year

Yes Yes

9 Area under perennial crops during the irrigation year

65 ha 13 ha

10 No. of staff employed for irrigation management by WUA

4 2

11 Does water supply was on volumetric basis or not

Volumetric basis Volumetric basis

12

Assessment of water charges were on volumetric basis or as per crop area measurement

On volumetric basis On volumetric

basis

13

Percentage of actual live storage to the design storage in the reservoir during the irrigation year

100% 100%

14 Reasons for less achievements compared to the set target during the irrigation year

Information not available

Circle wise Ancillary information of WUA in normal plan group (Proforma 3)

Item /Circle CADA Nashik Sr. No.

Project Ozerkhed Ozerkhed Palkhed

Name of WUA Parashari Saptashrangi Sant Muktabai Jai Ambika

1 Jurisdiction of WUA Godagaon Dy on Ozerkhed

canal

Ambe impalgaon Dy on Ozerkhed canal

Dy.14 Palkhed Left Bank

Canal

Dy.10 & 11 Palkhed Left Bank Canal

2 ICA of WUA 520 ha 583 ha 462 ha 534 ha

3 Is WUA included in MWSIP?

No No No No

4 Date of handing over of IWM (command area) to the WUA

01/01/1993 29/07/1995 1/03/2006 01/ 11/2002

No of wells in command area of WUA

a) Before handing over

98 107 379 390

5

b) Total as on today 125 192 391 415

6 Subsidy received during the irrigation year

Rs. 23039/- Rs. 28539/- Rs.26321 Rs.11937

7 Year for which subsidy is not received 2004 -05 2008-09

2008-09, 2009-10

2008-09, 2009-10

8 Dose the well water was used as an additional source for irrigation during the irrigation year

Yes Yes Yes Yes

9 Area under perennial crops during the irrigation year

240 Ha. 150 ha 203 ha 185 ha

10 No. of staff employed for irrigation management by WUA

3 2 1 1

11 Does water supply was on volumetric basis or not

Volumetric basis

Volumetric basis Volumetric

basis Volumetric

basis

12 Assessment of water charges were on volumetric basis or as per crop area measurement

On volumetric basis

On volumetric basis

On volumetric basis

On volumetric

basis

13 Percentage of actual live storage to the design storage in the reservoir during the irrigation year

34 % 43 % 43 % 65 %

14 Reasons for less achievements compared to the set target during the irrigation year

Due to less rain fall in

command area there is less utilization of

water

Due to less rain fall in command

area there is less utilization of

water

. Due to less rain fall in command

area there is less utilization

of water

Due to less rain fall in command

area there is less

utilization of water.

Sr. No. Item /Circle CADA Nashik

Project Mula

Name of WUA Datta Yogeshwar

1 Jurisdiction of WUA Dy No 7 of Mula Right Bank Canal.

Dy No 3, Minor No 2 of Mula Right Bank Canal.

2 ICA of WUA 361 Ha

201 Ha

3 Is WUA included in MWSIP? Yes Yes

4 Date of handing over of IWM (command area) to the WUA

30-06-1989 24-10-1997

5 No of wells in command area of WUA

a) Before handing over 162 112

b) Total as on today 185 109

6 Subsidy received during the irrigation year Rs.75731/- Rs. 36073/-

7 Year for which subsidy is not received

2001-02 to 2007-08 2006-07& 2007-08

8

Dose the well water was used as an additional source for irrigation during the irrigation year

Yes Yes

9 Area under perennial crops during the irrigation year

95 Ha 66 Ha

10 No. of staff employed for irrigation management by WUA

3 2

11 Does water supply was on volumetric basis or not

Volumetric basis Volumetric basis

12 Assessment of water charges were on volumetric basis or as per crop area measurement

Volumetric basis Volumetric basis

13

Percentage of actual live storage to the design storage in the reservoir during the irrigation year

100 % 100 %

14 Reasons for less achievements compared to the set target during the irrigation year

-

Indicator I: Percentage of WUA'S member to total beneficiaries

Plan group Circle Project W U A Value 2009-10 2010-11 Highly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima Pandurang 61 61

Shukleshwar 59 59 CADA Beed Majalgaon

Bhagwati 67 65 Krishna 100 70

Deficit

NIC Nanded Purna Godawari 65 68 Parashari 64 100

Ozerkhed Saptashrangi 53 53 St.Muktabai 54 54

Palkhed Jai Ambika 85 85 Datta 100 100

Normal CADA Nashik

Mula Yogeshwar 100 100

Abundant SIC Sangli Warna Nanaksingh 52 52

Indicator II: Percentage of water supplied to sanctioned water quota

Plan group Circle Project W U A Value 2009-10 2010-11

Highly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima Pandurang 145 104 Shukleshwar 10 60

CADA Beed Majalgaon Bhagwati 17 25 Krishna 17 21

Deficit NIC Nanded Purna

Godawari 61 38 Parashari 22 15

Ozerkhed Saptashrangi 59 17 St.Muktabai 28 16

Palkhed Jai Ambika 9 2

Datta 117 82

Normal CADA Nashik

Mula Yogeshwar 127 128

Abundant SIC Sangli Warna Nanaksingh 108 103

Indicator III: Ratio of Potential Utilisation to maximum Utilisation prior to formation of WUA

Plan group Circle Project W U A Value 2009-10 2010-11

Highly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima Pandurang 2.47 2.17 Shukleshwar 0.3 1.92

CADA Beed Majalgaon Bhagwati 0.21 1.13 Krishna 0.56 1.07

Deficit NIC Nanded Purna

Godawari 0.55 1.14

Parashari 2.2 0.73 Ozerkhed

Saptashrangi 4.73 3.85 St.Muktabai 2.08 2.29

Palkhed Jai Ambika 1.52 1.37

Datta 1.12 0.55

Normal CADA Nashik

Mula Yogeshwar 2.45 1.72

Abundant SIC Sangli Warna Nanaksingh 2.26 2.45

Indicator IV: Annual Irrigation water use per unit area Irrigated (Cum/ha)

Plan group Circle Project W U A Value 2009-10 2010-11

Highly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima Pandurang 3627 2965 Shukleshwar 5776 5501

CADA Beed Majalgaon Bhagwati 10199 2783

Krishna 1378 7201 Deficit

NIC Nanded Purna Godawari 1347 10624 Parashari 1176 695

Ozerkhed Saptashrangi 277 664

St.Muktabai 824 442 Palkhed

Jai Ambika 474 80

Datta 3598 6135

Normal CADA Nashik

Mula Yogeshwar 2642 4110

Abundant SIC Sangli Warna Nanaksingh 7576 6463 Indicator V: Annual expenditure per ha by WUA for irrigation management (Rs /ha)

Plan group Circle Project W U A Value 2009-10 2010-11

Highly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima Pandurang 173 187 Shukleshwar 507 136

CADA Beed Majalgaon Bhagwati 3380 680 Krishna 1329 126

Deficit

NIC Nanded Purna Godawari 532 230 Parashari 287 407

Ozerkhed Saptashrangi 282 503 St.Muktabai 136 61

Palkhed Jai Ambika 74 167

Datta 269 1048

Normal CADA Nashik

Mula Yogeshwar 192 533

Abundant SIC Sangli Warna Nanaksingh 533 523 Indicator VI: Cost recovery Ratio

Plan group Circle Project W U A Value 2009-10 2010-11

Highly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima Pandurang 2.7 1.48

Shukleshwar 3.95 1.37 CADA Beed Majalgaon

Bhagwati 1.01 2.59 Krishna 0.39 10.27

Deficit NIC Nanded Purna

Godawari 0.11 2.03 Parashari 0.45 5.06

Ozerkhed Saptashrangi 2.68 1.64

St.Muktabai 1.47 1.37 Palkhed

Jai Ambika 0.96 2.02 Datta 2.75 1.55

Normal CADA Nashik

Mula Yogeshwar 3.03 0.98

Abundant SIC Sangli Warna Nanaksingh 1.53 3.54

Indicator VII: Ratio of water revenue remitted to Govt. to actual water revenue recovered

Plan group Circle Project W U A Value 2009-10 2010-11

Highly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima Pandurang 0.19 0.90 Shukleshwar 1.00 1.00

CADA Beed Majalgaon Bhagwati 0.00 0.98 Krishna 1.43 0.33

Deficit

NIC Nanded Purna Godawari 4.84 1.93 Parashari 0.99 0.18

Ozerkhed Saptashrangi 0.25 0.15 St.Muktabai 0.47 1.00

Palkhed Jai Ambika 1.08 0.18

Datta 0.5 0.63

Normal CADA Nashik

Mula Yogeshwar 0.6 0.84

Abundant SIC Sangli Warna Nanaksingh 0.31 0.72 Indicator VIII: Annual Out put per ha of area irrigated (Rs/ha)

Plan group Circle Project W U A Value 2009-10 2010-11

Highly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima Pandurang 52781 53236 Shukleshwar 40133 68453

CADA Beed Majalgaon Bhagwati 46900 161305 Krishna 19287 27491

Deficit NIC Nanded Purna

Godawari 8702 20091 Parashari 202124 92082

Ozerkhed Saptashrangi 184061 192719 St.Muktabai 199025 206880

Palkhed Jai Ambika 267334 295627

Datta 56712 61930

Normal CADA Nashik

Mula Yogeshwar 33115 45492

Abundant SIC Sangli Warna Nanaksingh 39133 41169

Indicator IX: Equity performance

Plan Group Circle Project WUA Reach Value

2009-10 2010-11

H 0.58 0.58

M 0.74 0.74 Highly Deficit CADA Solapur Bhima Pandurang

T 0.44 0.44

H 0.45 0.59

M 0.38 0.50 Shukleshwar

T 0.12 0.30

H 0.36 0.92

M 0.64 0.67

CADA Beed Majalgaon

Bhagawati

T 0.27 0.67

H 1.00 1.00

M 1.00 1.00 Krishna

T 1.00 1.00

H 1.00 1.00

M 1.00 0.95

Defiicit

NIC Nanded Purna

Godavari

T 1.00 0.94

H 0.61 0.29

M 0.66 0.37 Parashari

T 0.5 0.44

H 0.96 0.65

M 0.72 1.00

Ozerkhed

Saptashrangi

T 0.57 0.56

H 0.28 0.48

M 0.56 1.00 St. Muktabai

T 0.54 1.00

H 0.59 0.13

M 0.23 0.23

Palkhed

Jai Ambika

T 0.24 0.25

H 0.29 0.15

M 0.37 0.22

Datta T 0.27 0.14

H 0.56 0.32

M 0.74 0.47

Normal CADA Nashik

Mula

Yogeshwar T 0.48 0.30

H 0.80 0.80

M 0.44 0.44 Abundant SIC Sangli Warna Nanaksingh

T 0.22 0.22

6.6 Indicator wise analysis

Data of 2010-11 for benchmarking of WUA was received from some selected WUA in prescribed Proforma and indicator values are obtained. Indicator wise, WUA wise findings along with charts are given in Chart I to IX

Indicator I: Percentage of WUA members to total beneficiaries in command of WUA

All the WUA except Parashari, Datta & Yogeshwar have membership ranging between 52 to 85%. It is opined that, to increase farmers’ participation in irrigation water management & to increase the efficiency of WUA, all beneficiaries should be members of WUA.

Indicator II: Percentage of Water supplied to the sanctioned Water quota

In Pandurang, Yogeshwar & Nanaksingh, water is supplied as per sanctioned water quota. However, in rest of the WUA, the percentage of water supplied ranges from 2 to 82 %.

Indicator III: Ratio of potential utilization to Maximum utilization prior to formation of WUA.

In all the WUA except Parashari (0.73) & Datta (0.55) the ratio is more than 1.

Indicator IV: Annual Irrigation water use per unit area Irrigated (Cum/ha)

The water use per unit irrigated area is nearer to the State norm in Shukleshwar & Datta only. Rest of the WUA will have to improve the performance. Field officers of Krishna & Godawari WUA are required to use the water for irrigation precisely to improve the performance.

Indicator V : Annual expenditure per Ha by WUA for irrigation management

(Rs /ha)

Annual expenditure per ha for irrigation management in Bhagwati, Saptashringi, Yogeshwari, Nanaksingh & Datta exceeds State norm. They should take proper measures to maintain the economic sustainability.

Indicator VI: Cost recovery ratio.

All WUA expect Yogeshwar (0.98) have achieved the State target.

Indicator VII: Ratio of Water revenue remitted to Govt. to Actual water revenue recovered

Shukleshwar, Godawari, Bhagwati & St. Muktabai had paid the recovered water charges to the Govt. The remittance of revenue in rest of the WUAs ranges from 15% to 90%.

Indicator VIII: Annual Output per ha of area irrigated (Rs/ha)

Output per ha of all WUA except Godawari (Rs.20091/ha) appears to be satisfactory as compared to the State norm.

In general, output per ha observed on WUA in normal plan group is more than that observed on WUA in deficit plan group.

Indicator IX: Equity performance

From the available data it reveals that, water was not supplied to all beneficiaries in the command by respective WUA except Krishna & Godawari since last year.

6.7 Action Ahead

1. At present looking to large number of WUA, benchmarking of selected WUA on major projects is possible at State level. After handing over of total irrigation management of projects to WUA, benchmarking of apex (Canal, Dystributory) WUA would be feasible at State level.

2. In case of medium and minor projects which are totally handed over to WUA for irrigation management, benchmarking could be entrusted to concerned Divisions and Sub divisions respectively. In case of major projects, benchmarking of WUA on main canal can be carried out at circle level.

Indicator-I Percentage of WUA members to total beneficiaries

0

20

40

60

80

100

120Pa

ndur

ang

Shuk

lesh

war

Bhag

wat

i

Kris

hna

God

awar

i

Para

shar

i

Sapt

ashr

angi

St.M

ukta

bai

Jai A

mbi

ka

Dat

ta

Yoge

shw

ar

Nan

aksi

ngh

Bhima Majalgaon Purna Ozerkhed Palkhed Mula Warna

CADASolapur

CADA Beed NIC Nanded CADA Nashik SIC Sangli

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Abundant

Perc

enta

ge

Value 2009-10 Value 2010-11

Indicator II: Percentage of water supplied to sanctioned water quota

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Pan

dura

ng

Shu

kles

hwar

Bha

gwat

i

Kris

hna

God

avar

i

Par

asha

ri

Sap

tash

rang

i

St.M

ukta

bai

Jai A

mbi

ka

Dat

ta

Yog

eshw

ar

Nan

aksi

ngh

Bhima Majalgaon Purna Ozerkhed Palkhed Mula Warna

CADASolapur

CADA Beed NIC Nanded CADA Nashik SIC Sangli

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Abundant

Wat

er s

uppl

ied

(%)

Value 2009-10 Value 2010-11

Indicator III: Ratio of Potential Utilisation to maximum Utilisation prior to formation of WUA

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Pan

dura

ng

Shu

kles

hwar

Bha

gwat

i

Kris

hna

God

avar

i

Par

asha

ri

Sap

tash

rang

i

St.M

ukta

bai

Jai A

mbi

ka

Dat

ta

Yog

eshw

ar

Nan

aksi

ngh

Bhima Majalgaon Purna Ozerkhed Palkhed Mula Warna

CADASolapur

CADA Beed NIC Nanded CADA Nashik SIC Sangli

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Abundant

Rat

io

Value 2009-10 Value 2010-11

Indicator IV: Annual Irrigation water use per unit area Irrigated (Cum/ha)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000Pa

ndur

ang

Shuk

lesh

war

Bhag

wat

i

Kris

hna

God

avar

i

Par

asha

ri

Sapt

ashr

angi

St.M

ukta

bai

Jai A

mbi

ka

Dat

ta

Yoge

shw

ar

Nan

aksi

ngh

Bhima Majalgaon Purna Ozerkhed Palkhed Mula Warna

CADASolapur

CADA Beed NIC Nanded CADA Nashik SIC Sangli

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Abundant

Wat

er u

se (C

um/h

a)

Value 2009-10 Value 2010-11

Indicator V: Annual expenditure per ha by WUA for irrigation management (Rs /ha)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Pan

dura

ng

Shu

kles

hwar

Bha

gwat

i

Kris

hna

God

avar

i

Par

asha

ri

Sap

tash

rang

i

St.M

ukta

bai

Jai A

mbi

ka

Dat

ta

Yog

eshw

ar

Nan

aksi

ngh

Bhima Majalgaon Purna Ozerkhed Palkhed Mula Warna

CADASolapur

CADA Beed NIC Nanded CADA Nashik SIC Sangli

Highly Deficit Deficit Normal Abundant

Expe

nditu

re (R

s/ha

)

Value 2009-10 Value 2010-11

Indicator VI: Cost recovery Ratio

0

2

4

6

8

10

12Pa

ndur

ang

Shu

kles

hwar

Bha

gwat

i

Kris

hna

God

avar

i

Par

asha

ri

Sap

tash

rang

i

St.M

ukta

bai

Jai A

mbi

ka

Dat

ta

Yog

eshw

ar

Nan

aksi

ngh

Bhima Majalgaon Purna Ozerkhed Palkhed Mula Warna

CADASolapur

CADA Beed NIC Nanded CADA Nashik SICSangli

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Abundant

Rat

io

Value 2009-10 Value 2010-11

Indicator VII: Ratio of water revenue remitted to Govt. to actual water revenue recovered

0

1

2

3

4

5

6P

andu

rang

Shu

kles

hwar

Bha

gwat

i

Kris

hna

God

avar

i

Par

asha

ri

Sap

tash

rang

i

St.M

ukta

bai

Jai A

mbi

ka

Dat

ta

Yog

eshw

ar

Nan

aksi

ngh

Bhima Majalgaon Purna Ozerkhed Palkhed Mula Warna

CADASolapur

CADA Beed NIC Nanded CADA Nashik SIC Sangli

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Abundant

Rat

io

Value 2009-10 Value 2010-11

Indicator VIII: Annual Out put per ha of area irrigated (Rs/ha)

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000P

andu

rang

Shu

kles

hwar

Bha

gwat

i

Kris

hna

God

avar

i

Par

asha

ri

Sap

tash

rang

i

St.M

ukta

bai

Jai A

mbi

ka

Dat

ta

Yog

eshw

ar

Nan

aksi

ngh

Bhima Majalgaon Purna Ozerkhed Palkhed Mula Warna

CADASolapur

CADA Beed NIC Nanded CADA Nashik SIC Sangli

HighlyDeficit

Deficit Normal Abundant

Out

put (

Rs.

/ha)

Value 2009-10 Value 2010-11

Indicator IX: Equity performance

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

H M T H M T H M T H M T H M T H M T H M T H M T H M T H M T H M T H M T

Pandurang Shukleshwar Bhagawati Krishna Godavari Parashari Saptashrangi St. Muktabai Jai Ambika Datta Yogeshwar Nanaksingh

Bhima Majalgaon Purna Ozerkhed Palkhed Mula Warna

CADASolapur

CADA Beed NIC Nanded CADA Nashik SIC Sangli

Highly Deficit Defiicit Normal Abundant

Rat

io

Value 2009-10 Value 2010-11

Chapter – 7

Project wise Review of Major and Medium Projects

The Benchmarking Reports published for year 2003-04 to 2007-08 consist of the graphical representation of each indicator with circle as a unit. Project wise data for each indicator was not appearing any where in the said reports.

As per directives of Secretary (CAD) it is decided to incorporate project wise

data for last 5 years for all the major and medium projects in the Benchmarking report from year 2008-09.

Accordingly the project wise data for the years 2005-06 to 2010-11 is

incorporated in this report as follows. I) Name of project. II) Designed live storage in Mm3

III) Irrigable Command Area in Ha. IV) Irrigation year V) Year status VI) Live storage available as on 15th October VII) Water used for irrigation in Mm3

VIII) Irrigated Area in Ha. IX) Recovery for irrigation in Rs lac X) Recovery for Non irrigation in Rs lac

XI) Total Recovery for Irrigation & Non irrigation in Rs lac XII) Irrigation system performance in Ha/Mm3

Data for last five years of the above parameters for all major and medium

projects is tabulated here to have a project wise performance at a glance.

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

Irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*1 Katepurna 86.35 8325 2005-06 56.74 23.43 2627 0.00 39.65 39.65 112

2006-07 86.35 28.64 4740 3.10 131.66 134.76 1662007-08 80.50 34.42 5985 3.49 136.16 139.65 1742008-09 15.40 0.00 0 0.45 92.29 92.74 02009-10 13.51 0.00 0 0.00 33.12 33.12 02010-11 Current 86.35 29.68 1687 7.30 101.43 108.73 57

2 Nalganga 69.32 8604 2005-06 5.63 2.48 688 3.61 2.50 6.11 2772006-07 69.32 35.21 5357 1.55 0.28 1.83 1522007-08 32.59 24.89 3946 2.98 1.49 4.47 1592008-09 19.11 10.51 1513 0.87 3.42 4.29 1442009-10 15.83 9.18 1.37 4.29 5.66 9.95 02010-11 Current 56.16 34.65 3426 5.62 2.87 8.49 99

3 Pus 91.26 8215 2005-06 91.26 62.44 2958 0.10 0.95 1.05 472006-07 91.26 69.46 7021 1.01 9.94 10.95 1012007-08 91.26 59.98 7544 1.73 8.60 10.33 1262008-09 75.25 56.32 3917 6.00 14.57 20.57 702009-10 27.92 3.86 418 0.00 82.77 82.77 1082010-11 Current 91.26 63.99 2860 5.04 1.25 6.29 45

4 Upper Wardha 614.80 75000 2005-06 582.86 241.88 12067 22.15 66.44 88.59 502006-07 548.14 281.68 13631 35.57 59.50 95.07 48

548.14 2007-08 548.14 327.04 18342 49.23 80.44 129.66 562008-09 288.39 72.44 7118 39.57 101.24 140.81 982009-10 507.90 302.87 22940 30.99 94.01 125.00 762010-11 Current 564.05 257.83 13082 32.51 121.95 154.46 51

Analysis of Major projects in Maharashtra State (2005-06 to 2010-11)

1

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

Irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*

5 Wan (Buldhana) 81.96 15100 2005-06 81.96 64.05 6963 7.77 6.00 13.77 1092006-07 81.96 67.87 7460 0.00 34.44 34.44 1102007-08 81.96 67.57 8230 2.62 24.07 26.69 1222008-09 72.30 58.57 4263 8.67 73.95 82.62 732009-10 28.32 12.28 1058 7.70 67.82 75.52 862010-11 Current 81.96 30.26 1902 7.80 94.22 102.02 63

6 Arunavati 169.92 20515 2005-06 129.69 66.15 2689 0.00 1.00 1.00 412006-07 168.10 70.91 6061 3.13 2.10 5.23 852007-08 108.68 66.27 5570 1.48 0.00 1.48 842008-09 23.87 2.72 279 0.00 0.00 0.00 1032009-10 17.32 1.63 670 0.00 9.25 9.25 4102010-11 Current 169.56 96.08 3006 0.00 8.17 8.17 31

7 Pench 1374 101200 2005-06 1249.73 765.67 79049 139.52 2056.76 2196.28 1032006-07 1156.94 1028.00 80097 238.91 2113.05 2351.96 782007-08 1069.31 1062.03 80344 225.94 2216.21 2442.15 762008-09 658.17 544.78 52566 64.45 1491.29 1555.74 962009-10 836.00 960.45 75928 117.29 3951.93 4069.22 792010-11 Current 1119.51 614.69 76777 167.77 3084.90 3252.67 125

8 Bagh 268 23740 2005-06 207.78 196.99 30691 12.55 0.14 12.69 1562006-07 186.74 186.00 25966 12.59 0.47 13.06 1402007-08 221.53 241.62 30037 18.77 12.21 30.98 1242008-09 76.06 151.18 23460 1.83 2.50 4.33 1552009-10 96.76 184.78 23416 16.40 2.21 18.61 1272010-11 Current 199.99 258.93 29344 16.40 2.21 18.61 113

2

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

Irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*9 Itiahdoh 318.86 17500 2005-06 287.80 294.75 28488 28.23 21.60 49.83 97

2006-07 271.96 348.91 26325 38.03 1.63 39.66 752007-08 302.98 292.56 28249 45.30 2.43 47.73 972008-09 51.75 178.73 17530 5.32 0.00 5.32 982009-10 116.70 126.20 17980 33.91 0.00 33.91 1422010-11 Current 287.08 125.12 20346 32.17 0.94 33.11 163

10 Asola Mendha 56.38 9919 2005-06 42.63 63.70 11967 8.07 2.17 10.24 1882006-07 36.70 77.63 10702 5.59 2.61 8.20 1382007-08 56.38 69.28 10684 3.05 3.10 6.15 1542008-09 12.66 65.96 9198 14.98 2.38 17.36 1392009-10 8.08 24.77 8990 7.64 0.00 7.64 3632010-11 Current 44.59 27.87 9548 7.86 0.00 7.86 343

11 Dina 55.94 7826 2005-06 34.32 54.15 11060 12.36 1.28 13.64 2042006-07 52.66 67.70 11392 24.08 0.00 24.08 168

68.3 2007-08 46.10 48.29 10794 5.82 1.63 7.45 2242008-09 3.04 58.06 10913 14.54 0.21 14.75 1882009-10 30.36 54.20 10925 7.15 0.00 7.15 2022010-11 Current 27.58 42.84 10901 17.12 0.21 17.33 254

12 Bor 127.42 13360 2005-06 98.90 72.58 4424 2.89 5.15 8.04 612006-07 88.45 79.88 4331 6.66 2.91 9.57 542007-08 127.35 85.27 4716 10.29 0.29 10.58 552008-09 57.44 40.21 2256 5.65 0.21 5.86 562009-10 102.64 64.79 3908 2.37 15.65 18.02 602010-11 Current 125.87 85.43 4003 6.94 2.15 9.09 47

3

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

Irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*13 Lower Wunna 189.18 19500 2005-06 187.87 70.43 7829 7.50 186.23 193.73 111

2006-07 189.18 115.44 6855 10.37 222.08 232.45 592007-08 187.82 101.02 6000 3.58 120.25 123.83 592008-09 126.84 69.42 7185 3.85 71.78 75.63 1042009-10 168.74 68.66 5807 3.52 412.50 416.02 852010-11 Current 189.18 108.51 5628 7.07 470.31 477.38 52

014 Girna 525.06 69350 2005-06 523.55 285.17 19892 48.66 173.97 222.63 70

2006-07 523.55 321.02 21766 38.55 213.48 252.03 682007-08 519.65 378.07 27306 53.83 255.68 309.51 722008-09 484.58 335.64 23063 44.56 258.34 302.90 692009-10 127.18 75.70 8705 11.24 184.70 195.94 1152010-11 Current 169.80 71.58 9891 8.77 172.04 180.81 138

15 Hatnur 255 37838 2005-06 255.00 71.15 6126 14.16 1875.83 1889.99 862006-07 255.00 99.21 6874 7.29 1646.78 1654.07 692007-08 255.00 84.75 6950 9.11 1934.47 1943.58 822008-09 255.00 56.67 6668 7.86 2270.47 2278.33 1182009-10 255.00 72.99 7618 9.96 1936.00 1945.96 1042010-11 Current 255.00 97.48 7439 10.94 2196.04 2206.98 76

16 Chanakapur 76.85 14042 2005-06 76.85 18.59 4285 5.98 171.68 177.66 2312006-07 76.85 18.36 3065 6.78 133.24 140.02 1672007-08 76.85 17.06 2788 7.82 173.19 181.01 1632008-09 76.85 14.22 2452 3.81 189.68 193.49 1722009-10 76.85 13.57 2277 3.62 117.21 120.83 1682010-11 Current 76.85 17.79 2981 4.01 141.51 145.52 168

4

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

Irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*17 Kadva 52.91 10117 2005-06 52.91 49.51 2339 0.26 0.79 1.05 47

2006-07 52.91 41.60 1391 0.60 0.08 0.68 332007-08 52.91 54.18 1965 0.80 0.62 1.42 362008-09 52.91 43.48 2125 5.96 1.16 7.12 492009-10 52.91 52.19 2217 2.70 0.39 3.09 422010-11 Current 47.60 56.80 2362 2.89 0.13 3.02 42

18 Bhandardara 304.10 23077 2005-06 303.73 380.44 24428 24.27 31.59 55.86 642006-07 304.10 276.50 26348 143.95 213.85 357.80 952007-08 304.09 344.02 28554 94.31 174.03 268.34 832008-09 304.10 349.15 26744 57.06 131.72 188.78 772009-10 332.18 343.08 29700 73.45 128.93 202.38 872010-11 Current 407.88 367.92 19768 138.41 378.11 516.52 54

19 Mula 608.82 82920 2005-06 608.82 556.71 48185 107.39 157.82 265.21 872006-07 608.82 497.22 43001 170.96 173.10 344.06 862007-08 608.82 638.35 52735 112.13 155.95 268.08 832008-09 608.82 549.79 40942 128.95 247.45 376.40 742009-10 338.10 445.47 49324 100.65 295.29 395.94 1112010-11 Current 549.08 497.41 39746 81.10 220.76 301.86 80

20 Gangapur 159.42 15960 2005-06 158.48 56.18 11293 17.85 2320.67 2338.52 2012006-07 159.42 51.00 10553 25.18 3389.00 3414.18 2072007-08 157.12 50.08 7196 43.65 3838.91 3882.56 1442008-09 158.54 50.20 7174 25.18 3389.00 3414.18 1432009-10 125.61 27.21 26479 31.63 1783.35 1814.98 9732010-11 Current 157.13 47.04 9705 55.97 3529.05 3585.02 206

5

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

Irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*21 Ozerkhed 60.32 10400 2005-06 60.31 39.95 3348 13.75 7.18 20.93 84

2006-07 60.31 33.16 3064 16.78 7.77 24.55 922007-08 60.11 44.47 4264 15.24 25.14 40.38 962008-09 60.32 41.50 4436 14.84 11.89 26.73 1072009-10 25.17 19.88 5068 15.33 16.52 31.85 2552010-11 Current 19.52 17.76 4252 14.66 17.66 32.32 239

22 Palkhed 21.24 43154 2005-06 6.05 112.76 16951 28.03 266.57 294.60 1502006-07 6.05 98.77 11043 34.11 249.60 283.71 1122007-08 21.24 167.69 13468 32.26 353.70 385.96 802008-09 21.23 179.95 11046 41.47 530.88 572.35 612009-10 5.52 76.04 11213 28.36 452.88 481.24 1472010-11 Current 20.06 97.02 8946 14.17 448.92 463.09 92

23 Waghad 72.2 6750 2005-06 70.84 43.54 4079 9.80 0.53 10.33 942006-07 70.84 42.30 4100 12.18 2.66 14.84 972007-08 70.86 39.88 4504 20.86 9.10 29.96 1132008-09 70.86 45.46 4444 25.77 7.15 32.92 982009-10 54.92 33.63 5260 22.82 5.45 28.27 1562010-11 Current 59.58 28.53 4569 12.52 3.81 16.33 160

24 Bhima 1688.41 205277 2005-06 1688.11 1216.50 171475 260.24 540.91 801.15 1412006-07 1688.10 1960.54 201402 414.34 672.79 1087.13 1032007-08 1675.14 1956.68 206523 802.19 816.06 1618.25 1062008-09 1688.41 1650.33 208735 453.52 984.61 1438.13 1262009-10 1519.00 1609.48 200828 45.32 819.37 864.69 1252010-11 Current 1680.36 1527.60 194571 577.96 1048.84 1626.80 127

6

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

Irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*25 Kukadi 864.39 119166 2005-06 850.56 404.30 50622 15.50 8.90 24.40 125

2006-07 863.20 382.41 47444 66.11 17.49 83.60 1242007-08 702.50 735.05 69938 150.63 43.20 193.83 952008-09 759.11 602.74 50866 142.04 83.42 225.46 842009-10 535.16 426.06 41146 184.83 112.52 297.35 972010-11 Current 576.75 410.67 44289 151.68 35.20 186.88 108

26 Ghod 154.8 20500 2005-06 154.80 141.64 17335 69.56 106.28 175.84 1222006-07 154.80 144.42 18932 40.39 147.34 187.73 1312007-08 154.80 141.34 16645 71.15 224.98 296.13 1182008-09 154.80 169.02 17769 46.15 225.32 271.47 1052009-10 80.19 124.69 14635 46.73 209.68 256.41 1172010-11 Current 154.79 134.57 15347 38.01 202.99 241.00

27 Krishna 602.73 69269 2005-06 602.73 357.36 30136 35.44 174.83 210.27 842006-07 602.11 411.72 26048 113.02 151.01 264.03 632007-08 598.41 449.79 38826 102.12 270.57 372.69 862008-09 602.73 569.89 33954 76.96 158.54 235.50 602009-10 528.05 491.76 33523 114.54 425.10 539.64 682010-11 Current 536.31 425.53 33235 126.47 340.52 466.99 78

28 Radhanagari 219.97 26560 2005-06 219.97 311.50 30327 202.91 496.02 698.93 972006-07 219.97 452.16 42495 120.43 359.21 479.64 942007-08 218.30 307.73 42245 121.23 501.45 622.68 1372008-09 214.67 340.54 42245 128.40 720.00 848.40 1242009-10 217.64 311.67 40079 151.31 700.79 852.10 1292010-11 Current 219.17 323.94 40660 155.77 887.43 1043.20 126

7

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

Irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*29 Tulashi 91.92 4720 2005-06 91.92 35.37 4032 14.15 7.48 21.63 114

2006-07 91.92 43.04 5028 12.30 2.54 14.84 1172007-08 91.92 60.89 3395 9.12 5.75 14.87 562008-09 91.92 37.79 2563 16.45 5.70 22.15 682009-10 96.33 41.99 4445 21.01 6.00 27.01 1062010-11 Current 68.54 53.47 4760 24.05 5.84 29.89 89

30 Warna 779.35 137254 2005-06 773.40 260.92 40433 195.48 78.93 274.41 1552006-07 778.03 351.10 32971 94.21 80.70 174.91 942007-08 746.52 273.55 40529 98.34 170.02 268.36 1482008-09 779.35 296.15 38840 166.03 192.80 358.83 1312009-10 0.00 355.78 39536 190.39 229.72 420.11 1112010-11 Current 777.99 257.50 39926 208.56 222.87 431.43 155

31 Dudhganga 679.11 73340 2005-06 672.67 211.57 28199 123.91 336.40 460.31 1332006-07 674.49 264.97 26698 41.29 322.00 363.29 1012007-08 678.09 233.70 26293 50.87 534.00 584.87 1132008-09 679.11 328.97 25748 25.08 619.76 644.84 782009-10 663.51 305.15 26220 158.56 718.17 876.73 862010-11 Current 679.11 313.02 27462 158.56 718.17 876.73 88

32 Neera (Complex) 932.01 102576 2005-06 918.43 1184.00 127815 162.13 311.04 473.17 108& 2006-07 931.94 1235.17 137872 165.90 363.55 529.45 11233 2007-08 931.93 1235.27 122016 328.62 437.00 765.62 99

2008-09 932.01 1331.25 145858 365.95 351.95 717.90 1102009-10 924.86 1177.22 145883 1026.52 952.32 1978.84 1242010-11 Current 931.93 1199.64 137550 1018.76 1007.84 2026.60 115

8

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

Irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*34 Khadakwasla 793.47 62146 2005-06 778.48 591.62 27405 187.39 2376.24 2563.63 46

2006-07 781.73 347.06 30477 217.08 2116.68 2333.76 882007-08 775.62 362.62 38773 206.47 3013.00 3219.47 1072008-09 793.47 361.47 45245 218.64 3009.00 3227.64 1252009-10 677.08 242.23 32980 195.32 4124.97 4320.29 1362010-11 Current 749.97 317.91 37321 215.36 3895.02 4110.38 117

35 Pawana 241.11 5304 2005-06 235.68 21.99 4410 8.14 2294.61 2302.75 2012006-07 241.11 10.78 1562 10.99 3022.17 3033.16 1452007-08 230.11 10.89 1812 10.41 4479.76 4490.17 1662008-09 241.11 36.96 1982 12.14 4460.33 4472.47 542009-10 240.97 18.36 2818 10.21 4043.19 4053.40 1532010-11 Current 238.94 13.15 2437 10.20 4625.87 4636.07 185

36 Chaskaman 214.5 44170 2005-06 205.15 183.89 5360 12.19 12.06 24.25 292006-07 209.15 33.32 4678 11.61 10.69 22.30 1402007-08 214.50 49.52 5599 17.88 13.93 31.81 1132008-09 214.50 83.45 12454 17.24 7.82 25.06 1492009-10 209.72 95.44 12447 21.81 11.52 33.33 1302010-11 Current 214.50 90.96 12532 25.67 7.48 33.15 138

37 Kal 528.19 12731 2005-06 322.07 116.10 4212 13.15 0.94 14.09 362006-07 398.50 110.02 4585 12.00 12.00 24.00 422007-08 405.21 105.84 4100 15.30 2.00 17.30 392008-09 423.19 103.51 3400 12.70 3263.41 3276.11 332009-10 402.96 66.81 2120 21.17 3656.15 3677.32 322010-11 Current 399.62 49.12 1035 11.33 3557.05 3568.38 21

9

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

Irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*38 Bhatsa 942.1 47860 2005-06 838.63 33.14 1537 4.34 1270.07 1274.41 46

2006-07 810.83 50.40 2839 7.59 1968.55 1976.14 562007-08 787.26 67.98 2566 6.07 2405.65 2411.72 382008-09 782.34 62.84 2667 5.52 8214.07 8219.59 422009-10 624.85 45.28 2279 8.55 16222.43 16230.98 502010-11 Current 812.09 60.95 2037 6.04 5052.67 5058.71 33

39 Surya 286.31 8988 2005-06 158.69 86.66 2000 2.00 1000.00 1002.00 232006-07 216.31 85.00 4300 4.00 1141.00 1145.00 512007-08 175.43 62.85 3580 3.27 1658.96 1662.23 572008-09 172.12 93.57 3683 5.98 1748.55 1754.53 392009-10 216.41 79.42 2608 9.22 1975.00 1984.22 332010-11 Current 263.65 78.04 776 8.98 2037.75 2046.73 10

40 Jayakwadi 2171 183322 2005-06 1927.72 1115.79 100826 197.59 1421.44 1619.03 902006-07 2170.94 1210.14 113086 220.64 2915.73 3136.37 932007-08 2170.94 1183.10 126048 199.06 3515.20 3714.26 1072008-09 2170.94 1548.90 104339 331.79 4892.11 5223.90 672009-10 528.60 321.93 30285 88.46 6692.12 6780.58 942010-11 Current 1275.39 668.30 77434 129.66 5859.59 5989.25 116

41 Majalgaon 312 54737 2005-06 312.00 195.71 10828 36.98 208.64 245.62 552006-07 312.00 216.48 13349 108.23 284.52 392.75 622007-08 260.40 192.10 14979 49.21 86.08 135.29 782008-09 312.00 235.49 15465 86.35 25.39 111.74 662009-10 112.00 52.85 4719 14.53 57.71 72.24 892010-11 Current 312.00 185.54 9352 65.46 23.21 88.67 50

10

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

Irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*42 Manjra 173.32 18223 2005-06 173.32 97.41 9252 93.99 95.36 189.35 95

2006-07 173.32 129.99 13008 81.28 51.29 132.57 1002007-08 173.32 104.55 12738 52.47 86.39 138.86 1222008-09 173.32 119.90 12553 23.21 96.00 119.21 1052009-10 106.15 66.08 7170 27.70 21.84 49.54 1092010-11 Current 176.96 117.36 12001 85.18 155.10 240.28 102

43 Lower Terna 113.95 11610 2005-06 37.52 12.59 2023 6.89 3.41 10.30 1612006-07 91.22 28.11 3926 6.50 0.65 7.15 1402007-08 76.15 30.53 4616 2.03 1.15 3.18 1512008-09 91.22 37.04 5154 17.25 0.96 18.21 1392009-10 27.61 13.81 3436 27.70 21.80 49.50 2492010-11 Current 91.22 32.70 3646 12.67 6.03 18.70 111

44 Vishnupuri 80.79 28340 2005-06 80.79 65.78 10435 25.57 109.44 135.01 1592006-07 39.49 96.20 12031 16.37 159.51 175.88 1252007-08 28.67 87.96 11025 21.16 196.63 217.79 1252008-09 80.02 94.00 12046 11.11 0.00 11.11 1282009-10 80.79 32.15 4108 0.00 1.08 1.08 1282010-11 Current 79.24 78.41 11472 6.76 120.77 127.53 146

45 Manar 138.21 23310 2005-06 138.21 116.87 9045 21.00 2.48 23.48 772006-07 137.08 124.56 15304 28.17 1.90 30.07 1232007-08 134.29 107.84 12495 15.58 8.63 24.21 1162008-09 39.22 8.42 918 2.61 0.00 2.61 1092009-10 7.63 0.00 0 0.00 2.58 2.58 02010-11 Current 138.33 93.67 6828 1.39 1.96 3.35 73

11

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

Irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*46 Purna 890.22 57988 2005-06 499.31 419.50 36975 78.67 3.90 82.57 88

2006-07 890.22 670.33 36451 60.93 2.00 62.93 542007-08 437.70 373.42 23777 31.44 0.97 32.41 642008-09 265.32 219.68 20276 21.20 61.45 82.65 922009-10 57.85 71.14 11834 4.94 23.50 28.44 1662010-11 Current 80.16 555.20 36532 71.02 20.49 91.51 66

47 Upper Penganga 964.09 125495 2005-06 964.09 267.29 22052 8.19 22.17 30.36 832006-07 963.14 369.05 22843 1.07 1.07 2.14 622007-08 871.48 419.20 21188 1.28 2.34 3.62 512008-09 411.27 302.17 23131 42.65 3.45 46.10 772009-10 53.98 1.36 256 42.65 16.59 59.24 1882010-11 Current 964.10 353.34 22898 15.10 4.19 19.29 65

48 NMC Express Canal 0 34203 2005-06 0.00 10.40 2026 0.75 5.24 5.99 1952006-07 0.00 18.28 1230 2.30 0.20 2.50 672007-08 0.00 17.10 852 1.72 1.35 3.07 502008-09 0.00 15.28 1441 2.11 1.98 4.09 942009-10 0.00 13.93 807 3.30 5.35 8.65 582010-11 Current -29.29 38.19 2610 3.33 2.44 5.77 68

NOTE :12

34 Zero value in col. 13 due to non availability of water for irrigation.

Change in col.No.3 of designed live storage in respective years if any is due to revision in designed live storage capicityIn col. No.8 of water used for irrigation is more than col.No. 7 of live storage as on 15th Oct. of respictive year is due to water utilisation in kharif of east Vidharbha Region.Col.No.9 of irrigated area is more than Col.No.4 of ICA is due to increase of area in kharif seasion in east Vidharbha region.

12

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 131 Morna 41.46 4633 2005-06 15.49 8.35 733 0.00 2.07 2.07 88

2006-07 41.46 19.68 3150 1.19 2.84 4.03 1602007-08 41.46 33.29 3606 4.07 5.19 9.26 1082008-09 8.65 3.82 840 1.21 3.74 4.95 2202009-10 9.84 0.70 81 0.00 3.71 3.71 1162010-11 Current 41.45 19.69 1407 4.87 15.34 20.21 71

2 Nirguna 28.85 5836 2005-06 21.33 16.87 1279 0.00 5.50 5.50 762006-07 28.85 23.84 3293 4.27 1.17 5.44 1382007-08 20.03 14.85 2818 4.11 1.87 5.98 1902008-09 14.48 9.69 1401 1.73 1.09 2.82 1452009-10 9.89 4.13 365 0.42 1.18 1.60 882010-11 Current 28.85 20.58 1984 7.50 4.00 11.50 96

3 Uma 11.68 2241 2005-06 11.68 7.02 791 0.00 0.54 0.54 1132006-07 11.68 9.16 1533 2.12 2.44 4.56 1672007-08 11.68 10.32 2066 4.46 2.81 7.27 2002008-09 0.24 0.00 0 0.26 1.05 1.31 02009-10 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.13 0.13 02010-11 Current 7.24 4.85 499 3.44 1.63 5.07 103

4 Gyanganga 33.93 4249 2005-06 4.69 0.00 0 0.00 5.98 5.98 02006-07 33.93 9.91 1795 0.00 5.04 5.04 1812007-08 22.36 6.35 1428 0.00 53.00 53.00 2252008-09 20.10 7.47 1188 0.00 72.69 72.69 1592009-10 9.34 0.00 0 0.00 57.62 57.62 02010-11 Current 33.93 11.35 1532 0.00 49.70 49.70 135

Analysis of Medium projects in Maharashtra State (2005-06 to 2010-11)

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 135 Paldhag 7.51 1932 2005-06 0.70 0.00 0 0.01 0.50 0.51 0

2006-07 7.51 5.39 922 0.00 0.00 0.00 1712007-08 7.23 4.87 809 0.00 2.62 2.62 1662008-09 7.51 4.09 521 0.00 3.81 3.81 1272009-10 4.83 1.02 186 0.00 0.38 0.38 1822010-11 Current 7.51 6.34 415 0.00 1.03 1.03 65

6 Mas 22.04 4415 2005-06 0.70 0.00 0 0.02 0.81 0.83 02006-07 15.04 11.55 1673 0.00 0.92 0.92 1452007-08 12.96 8.23 1382 0.00 1.02 1.02 1682008-09 7.85 2.64 564 0.00 5.40 5.40 2142009-10 6.03 0.56 223 0.00 0.30 0.30 3982010-11 Current 15.04 9.24 968 0.00 0.00 0.00 105

7 Koradi 20.7 4061 2005-06 15.89 12.09 2700 4.00 3.91 7.91 2232006-07 20.70 16.95 4224 6.29 0.00 6.29 2492007-08 18.47 13.75 3051 0.00 0.54 0.54 2222008-09 1.90 0.43 98 0.02 4.95 4.97 2282009-10 0.35 0.01 11 0.00 5.12 5.12 10002010-11 Current 15.12 15.78 1276 1.17 3.65 4.82 81

8 Shahanoor 46.04 7466 2005-06 46.04 12.53 962 6.98 18.92 25.90 772006-07 46.04 15.49 2796 7.02 38.32 45.34 1812007-08 43.88 17.59 2847 6.82 52.61 59.43 1622008-09 32.93 14.99 2495 7.01 13.44 20.45 1662009-10 36.25 21.87 563 4.93 14.11 19.04 262010-11 Current 42.76 14.25 677 3.22 15.16 18.38 48

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 139 Saikheda 27.18 3116 2005-06 27.18 11.86 831 0.02 0.00 0.02 70

2006-07 27.18 13.87 1482 0.04 1.68 1.72 1072007-08 27.18 13.37 1726 0.13 3.18 3.31 1292008-09 27.18 15.50 1450 1.06 6.92 7.98 942009-10 7.37 0.00 0 0.00 5.56 5.56 02010-11 Current 27.19 10.49 1332 0.10 3.14 3.24 127

10 Borgaon 6.61 2271 2005-06 6.53 5.28 902 0.12 0.09 0.21 1712006-07 6.61 5.49 130 1.13 0.09 1.22 242007-08 6.61 5.71 987 0.10 0.09 0.19 1732008-09 1.69 0.41 182 0.10 0.09 0.19 4442009-10 1.39 0.12 77 0.00 0.09 0.09 6422010-11 Current 6.51 4.74 391 0.15 1.11 1.26 82

11 Sonal 16.92 2447 2005-06 16.92 10.46 1798 6.10 0.00 6.10 1722006-07 16.92 13.81 2507 7.19 0.00 7.19 1822007-08 16.92 13.05 2813 8.81 0.87 9.68 2162008-09 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 1.02 1.02 02009-10 1.11 0.07 10 0.21 0.02 0.23 1462010-11 Current 16.92 12.01 1330 0.16 0.00 0.16 111

12 Ekburji 11.97 2271 2005-06 11.97 0.00 0 0.01 5.98 5.99 02006-07 11.97 8.79 1338 2.41 4.69 7.10 1522007-08 11.97 7.92 1249 2.43 8.25 10.68 1582008-09 9.29 2.82 753 1.02 11.09 12.11 2672009-10 5.24 1.41 385 0.80 15.00 15.80 2722010-11 Current 11.97 5.84 711 0.19 19.40 19.59 122

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1313 Lowerpus 59.63 6600 2005-06 59.63 40.98 7829 7.50 7.62 15.12 191

2006-07 59.63 47.49 4098 0.76 3.50 4.26 862007-08 59.50 40.55 4568 0.92 5.59 6.51 1132008-09 54.30 34.72 4627 3.03 13.02 16.05 1332009-10 8.11 1.30 195 0.37 18.07 18.44 1502010-11 Current 59.63 28.90 1740 1.03 9.93 10.96 60

14 Mun 36.83 7804 2005-06 3.85 0.02 31 0.55 4.68 5.23 15502006-07 36.83 28.79 2618 0.12 0.00 0.12 912007-08 13.31 11.14 1056 9.87 0.71 10.58 952008-09 17.50 16.28 1903 6.02 1.16 7.18 1172009-10 15.55 6.47 1058 5.32 5.20 10.52 1642010-11 Current 36.83 32.70 1912 4.77 5.25 10.02 58

15 Torna 7.9 1465 2005-06 0.50 0.04 5 0.20 0.00 0.20 1252006-07 7.90 5.65 462 0.35 0.00 0.35 822007-08 1.26 0.04 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 6752008-09 6.91 5.23 576 0.00 0.00 0.00 1102009-10 6.28 10.67 1202 0.65 0.07 0.72 1132010-11 Current 7.82 7.05 533 1.02 0.07 1.09 76

16 Adan 67.25 7804 2005-06 67.25 39.35 1695 0.00 0.00 0.00 432006-07 67.25 56.26 4862 0.43 7.38 7.81 862007-08 67.25 41.18 4281 0.48 12.14 12.62 1042008-09 3.81 3.07 745 0.00 0.00 0.00 2432009-10 2.52 0.00 0 0.00 3.67 3.67 02010-11 Current 67.25 4.17 2973 0.00 0.19 0.19 713

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1317 Navargaon 12.47 2056 2005-06 12.47 3.91 577 0.00 0.67 0.67 148

2006-07 12.47 3.15 436 0.00 0.00 0.00 1382007-08 12.17 4.30 479 0.00 1.00 1.00 1112008-09 12.34 4.22 526 0.00 4.66 4.66 1252009-10 2.07 0.00 0 0.00 4.75 4.75 02010-11 Current 12.47 1.27 312 0.00 1.18 1.18 245

18 Bodalkasa 16.45 4047 2005-06 8.73 13.17 4295 7.55 0.00 7.55 32619.73 2006-07 5.93 15.57 4303 4.45 0.81 5.26 276

2007-08 4.04 12.07 4345 14.81 0.07 14.88 3602008-09 1.75 10.05 4023 0.30 0.04 0.34 4002009-10 1.19 9.03 3119 0.41 0.04 0.45 3462010-11 Current 10.09 14.04 4433 10.58 0.02 10.60 316

19 Chorakhmara 20.8 4047 2005-06 13.11 13.24 5409 7.87 0.00 7.87 40920.04 2006-07 9.72 16.65 5064 3.55 0.01 3.56 304

2007-08 2.24 11.74 5064 12.80 0.00 12.80 4312008-09 0.98 9.73 3749 0.03 0.00 0.03 3852009-10 1.11 5.36 2423 0.17 0.00 0.17 4522010-11 Current 14.20 16.77 5562 7.29 0.00 7.29 332

20 Chulband 21.46 3167 2005-06 14.27 16.60 3552 5.60 0.00 5.60 2142006-07 11.39 16.66 3196 3.37 0.00 3.37 1922007-08 18.38 17.72 3533 12.34 0.00 12.34 1992008-09 2.63 13.03 3009 1.40 0.00 1.40 2312009-10 3.57 12.20 3006 2.19 0.00 2.19 2462010-11 Current 14.79 17.02 3512 10.89 0.00 10.89 206

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1321 Khairbanda 15.95 6109 2005-06 11.91 10.48 5647 11.23 0.00 11.23 539

2006-07 15.95 12.76 5239 5.73 0.00 5.73 4102007-08 6.93 9.09 5285 15.52 0.00 15.52 5822008-09 1.23 8.44 5045 1.25 0.00 1.25 5982009-10 1.95 7.82 5110 2.31 0.00 2.31 6532010-11 Current 6.38 6.61 5140 9.01 0.00 9.01 777

22 Sangrampur 3.87 1094 2005-06 2.15 3.35 1161 2.48 0.00 2.48 3472006-07 0.64 3.59 1099 1.29 0.00 1.29 3062007-08 1.17 2.58 1004 3.60 0.00 3.60 3892008-09 0.16 1.96 792 0.01 0.00 0.01 4042009-10 0.27 2.60 925 0.09 0.00 0.09 3562010-11 Current 2.00 2.68 1100 1.26 0.00 1.26 411

23 Managadh 7.05 1700 2005-06 4.90 5.82 1029 0.78 0.00 0.78 1772006-07 4.30 4.85 1008 1.20 0.00 1.20 2082007-08 6.89 3.77 1251 2.31 0.00 2.31 3322008-09 4.04 6.78 1045 0.15 0.00 0.15 1542009-10 0.35 3.49 929 0.81 0.00 0.81 2662010-11 Current 5.36 4.80 1067 2.59 0.00 2.59 222

24 Rengepar 3.57 870 2005-06 1.96 2.71 985 2.67 0.00 2.67 3632006-07 1.42 3.44 943 1.84 0.00 1.84 2742007-08 2.78 2.92 980 2.57 0.00 2.57 3362008-09 0.65 3.62 945 0.79 0.00 0.79 2612009-10 1.38 3.41 948 1.17 0.00 1.17 2782010-11 Current 2.12 2.93 968 1.12 0.00 1.12 330

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1325 Chandpur 28.87 6271 2005-06 13.93 8.43 5998 6.96 0.00 6.96 711

2006-07 11.71 1.00 130 41.00 41.00 82.00 1302007-08 6.86 14.28 6390 9.23 0.00 9.23 4482008-09 0.09 12.23 6448 2.91 0.00 2.91 5272009-10 0.68 11.25 6528 3.48 0.00 3.48 5802010-11 Current 20.40 18.34 7038 7.29 1.23 8.52 384

26 Bagheda 4.53 1798 2005-06 2.62 1.83 1284 0.58 0.00 0.58 7042006-07 1.62 3.62 1192 0.83 0.05 0.88 3292007-08 1.22 3.12 1185 0.95 0.00 0.95 3802008-09 0.13 1.68 1149 0.20 0.00 0.20 6842009-10 0.43 1.49 962 0.10 0.00 0.10 6472010-11 Current 1.56 2.30 1297 0.97 0.04 1.01 565

27 Betekar Bothali 3.66 1315 2005-06 1.79 3.36 769 1.18 0.00 1.18 2292006-07 1.00 3.43 768 1.11 0.00 1.11 2242007-08 1.78 3.30 809 1.28 0.00 1.28 2452008-09 0.00 1.54 767 0.35 0.00 0.35 4982009-10 -0.49 2.36 765 0.52 0.00 0.52 3252010-11 Current 2.21 2.77 833 0.78 0.00 0.78 301

28 Sorna 5.73 933 2005-06 3.70 3.19 966 2.16 0.00 2.16 3032006-07 3.04 3.67 994 2.72 0.00 2.72 2712007-08 2.58 4.12 1042 1.89 0.00 1.89 2532008-09 0.00 3.22 875 0.89 0.00 0.89 2722009-10 -0.44 1.94 807 0.64 0.00 0.64 4172010-11 Current 3.02 2.02 1080 1.07 0.00 1.07 534

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1329 Chandrabhaga 8.26 3181 2005-06 8.26 4.98 571 0.29 0.03 0.32 115

(Nagpur) 2006-07 8.26 6.12 547 1.57 0.33 1.90 892007-08 7.64 6.23 574 2.65 0.33 2.98 922008-09 0.73 0.79 70 0.02 0.21 0.23 892009-10 6.42 3.62 344 0.07 0.22 0.29 952010-11 Current 8.26 5.70 428 0.60 0.16 0.76 75

30 Mordham 4.95 1315 2005-06 4.95 2.92 274 0.47 0.08 0.55 942006-07 4.95 3.62 349 0.96 0.10 1.06 962007-08 4.46 3.37 325 1.75 0.10 1.85 972008-09 0.93 0.68 101 0.02 0.05 0.07 1482009-10 3.50 2.29 340 0.14 0.00 0.14 1482010-11 Current 4.95 2.80 278 0.71 0.14 0.85 99

31 Kesarnala 3.93 780 2005-06 3.93 2.09 214 0.02 0.36 0.38 1022006-07 2.45 1.99 235 0.60 0.47 1.07 1182007-08 3.52 3.40 324 0.99 0.00 0.99 952008-09 0.63 6.57 522 0.05 0.00 0.05 792009-10 3.16 2.29 69 0.45 0.52 0.97 302010-11 Current 1.73 0.79 111 0.18 0.80 0.98 141

32 Umri 5.14 12 2005-06 5.14 2.26 368 0.43 0.00 0.43 1632006-07 3.50 3.07 395 1.14 0.00 1.14 1292007-08 4.51 4.89 393 0.58 0.00 0.58 802008-09 4.76 3.56 450 0.19 0.00 0.19 1262009-10 3.25 2.59 400 0.65 0.00 0.65 1552010-11 Current 5.15 3.23 380 0.44 0.00 0.44 118

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1333 Kolar 31.32 5940 2005-06 31.32 13.31 1232 0.63 9.98 10.61 93

2006-07 27.74 20.75 2814 2.83 9.81 12.64 1362007-08 27.26 21.90 2587 0.62 15.77 16.39 1182008-09 17.65 13.96 2148 0.70 4.92 5.62 1542009-10 31.32 20.23 1261 0.15 13.36 13.51 622010-11 Current 31.32 22.16 1728 0.62 25.38 26.00 78

34 Khekranala 23.81 2610 2005-06 22.14 13.76 325 0.27 0.00 0.27 242006-07 21.72 16.99 522 0.58 0.00 0.58 312007-08 20.86 14.42 517 1.18 0.00 1.18 362008-09 8.68 6.57 522 0.05 0.00 0.05 792009-10 23.19 11.74 418 0.06 0.75 0.81 362010-11 Current 23.39 14.71 380 0.06 2.49 2.55 26

35 Wunna 21.64 1214 2005-06 11.06 0.13 22 0.02 211.26 211.28 1692006-07 6.17 0.36 72 0.05 228.28 228.33 2022007-08 21.30 3.53 240 0.70 250.11 250.81 682008-09 12.39 0.18 44 0.07 259.35 259.42 2442009-10 15.09 0.23 67 0.63 255.90 256.53 2912010-11 Current 13.93 1.16 67 0.05 297.26 297.31 58

36 Kanholibara 20.49 3371 2005-06 19.71 14.72 1436 1.73 0.00 1.73 982006-07 20.48 15.42 1683 3.11 0.00 3.11 1092007-08 20.49 13.05 1675 2.60 0.00 2.60 1282008-09 18.00 13.86 1781 0.02 0.00 0.02 1282009-10 20.33 13.09 2149 0.20 0.00 0.20 1642010-11 Current 20.49 16.99 1716 0.62 0.00 0.62 101

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1337 Pandhrabodi 13.14 862 2005-06 12.01 8.03 1437 3.64 2.71 6.35 179

2006-07 11.16 7.42 1422 2.11 3.50 5.61 1922007-08 11.66 7.60 1427 2.00 4.49 6.49 1882008-09 3.33 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02009-10 3.57 2.77 418 0.15 3.91 4.06 1512010-11 Current 11.07 8.76 1500 2.38 4.49 6.87 171

38 Makardhokda Saiki 25.9 5477 2005-06 15.38 21.92 2490 3.09 2.11 5.20 114Complex 2006-07 25.90 21.11 2890 7.34 2.41 9.75 137

2007-08 25.90 25.02 2760 6.00 5.89 11.89 1102008-09 4.08 1.86 311 0.04 10.74 10.78 1672009-10 3.57 2.77 418 0.15 3.91 4.06 1512010-11 Current 25.90 16.92 2456 2.04 9.58 11.62 145

39 Ghorazari 43.16 3846 2005-06 28.92 6.29 762 1.53 2.12 3.65 1212006-07 19.26 29.60 5912 9.92 1.75 11.67 2002007-08 26.54 34.48 5868 3.38 1.81 5.19 1702008-09 2.77 20.49 5844 0.63 0.18 0.81 2852009-10 3.50 23.24 5603 8.54 0.00 8.54 2412010-11 Current 10.12 17.25 5762 15.43 0.00 15.43 334

40 Naleshwar 10.23 1888 2005-06 5.79 14.35 2840 3.83 0.55 4.38 1982006-07 8.48 19.95 2850 3.89 0.48 4.37 1432007-08 9.36 13.83 2795 1.63 0.18 1.81 2022008-09 0.97 11.88 2876 1.93 0.02 1.95 2422009-10 1.08 5.51 2778 0.98 0.00 0.98 5042010-11 Current 5.88 7.76 3025 4.69 0.00 4.69 390

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1341 Chandai 10.69 2056 2005-06 8.95 10.57 1369 1.53 0.53 2.06 129

2006-07 9.52 5.93 1340 1.80 0.27 2.07 2262007-08 9.52 7.32 1336 0.79 0.42 1.21 1832008-09 1.12 4.89 1178 0.29 0.13 0.42 2412009-10 5.33 3.91 1238 0.99 0.00 0.99 3172010-11 Current 6.63 4.10 1276 2.11 0.00 2.11 311

42 Chargaon 19.87 1500 2005-06 17.73 17.22 1924 1.62 1.41 3.03 1122006-07 18.24 16.44 1825 2.29 0.85 3.14 1112007-08 18.28 16.41 916 1.89 2.26 4.15 562008-09 8.80 11.94 873 2.53 0.07 2.60 732009-10 16.04 5.82 1073 1.08 0.66 1.74 1852010-11 Current 16.61 7.75 1942 3.13 5.00 8.13 250

43 Labhansarad 7.35 2024 2005-06 7.24 6.90 1119 1.21 0.45 1.66 1622006-07 7.35 6.70 1055 2.44 0.65 3.09 1572007-08 7.35 6.07 877 1.01 0.39 1.40 1442008-09 7.35 4.18 949 0.81 0.63 1.44 2272009-10 3.96 1.20 339 0.96 0.00 0.96 2832010-11 Current 7.15 4.18 568 1.77 0.00 1.77 136

44 Amal Nala 24.48 2962 2005-06 21.20 12.45 2017 2.50 174.80 177.30 1622006-07 24.48 16.05 2051 5.21 176.08 181.29 1282007-08 21.20 15.83 2571 2.38 204.81 207.19 1622008-09 16.24 9.98 1768 2.71 189.31 192.02 1772009-10 6.07 0.00 0 1.09 205.23 206.32 02010-11 Current 24.48 6.26 2587 4.77 203.42 208.19 414

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1345 Panchadhara 10.39 1822 2005-06 10.10 6.52 480 0.31 0.00 0.31 74

Complex 2006-07 9.80 9.21 525 0.40 0.00 0.40 572007-08 10.39 9.85 514 1.73 0.13 1.86 522008-09 9.82 9.82 500 1.27 0.11 1.38 512009-10 9.56 7.83 435 1.03 0.00 1.03 562010-11 Current 10.39 7.65 362 1.37 0.00 1.37 47

46 Pothra 34.72 8948 2005-06 34.17 25.34 2343 0.86 0.00 0.86 922006-07 34.58 22.63 2080 2.36 0.90 3.26 922007-08 34.72 24.32 2054 2.71 1.78 4.49 842008-09 23.38 16.55 1759 2.96 2.05 5.01 1062009-10 33.22 17.71 1585 2.39 0.00 2.39 892010-11 Current 34.72 23.24 1909 2.26 1.07 3.33 82

47 Dongargaon (Wardha) 4.44 631 2005-06 4.44 3.52 201 0.03 0.00 0.03 572006-07 4.44 2.81 206 0.31 0.00 0.31 732007-08 4.44 2.87 215 0.62 0.07 0.69 752008-09 4.39 3.38 220 0.51 0.07 0.58 652009-10 2.69 2.26 273 0.49 0.00 0.49 1212010-11 Current 4.23 2.46 287 0.63 0.00 0.63 117

48 Dham 62.51 7090 2005-06 62.51 22.36 1727 2.93 53.65 56.58 772006-07 62.51 30.75 2175 4.97 98.84 103.81 712007-08 62.51 26.45 2732 6.67 151.10 157.77 1032008-09 50.03 22.46 1501 6.79 130.66 137.45 672009-10 60.77 26.51 1892 6.48 200.47 206.95 712010-11 Current 62.51 23.68 1604 3.14 304.15 307.29 68

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1349 Tekepar LIS 0 5841 2005-06 0.00 11.75 2130 21.11 0.00 21.11 181

2006-07 0.00 18.98 3019 29.20 0.00 29.20 1592007-08 0.00 30.37 3700 31.87 0.00 31.87 1222008-09 0.00 35.77 4088 32.16 0.00 32.16 1142009-10 0.00 31.56 3906 24.19 0.00 24.19 1242010-11 Current 0.00 17.54 3557 22.22 0.00 22.22 203

50 Pakdiguddam 11.797 3710 2005-06 11.80 7.09 1201 4.01 32.72 36.73 1692006-07 11.79 8.31 838 5.01 33.81 38.82 1012007-08 8.44 2.81 405 3.21 46.02 49.23 1442008-09 11.80 6.05 1165 4.08 39.04 43.12 1932009-10 2.14 0.00 0 0.40 43.00 43.40 02010-11 Current 11.80 5.86 1191 4.06 0.00 4.06 203

51 Manyad 40.27 4864 2005-06 20.02 16.66 1860 4.03 0.80 4.83 1122006-07 40.27 35.60 4105 0.95 9.48 10.43 1152007-08 40.27 35.10 3941 4.47 3.55 8.02 1122008-09 40.27 35.66 3502 5.55 7.88 13.43 982009-10 40.42 32.82 4046 14.14 10.00 24.14 1232010-11 Current 40.49 33.84 3565 15.45 11.26 26.71 105

52 Bori 25.15 4553 2005-06 11.35 1.35 1515 0.31 7.68 7.99 11222006-07 25.15 16.35 1905 0.07 17.70 17.77 1172007-08 25.15 20.63 2161 7.44 8.91 16.35 1052008-09 25.15 15.00 1662 5.26 24.03 29.29 1112009-10 13.24 10.26 1555 4.33 17.28 21.61 1522010-11 Current 25.15 13.33 1613 4.42 19.06 23.48 121

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1353 Bhokarbari 6.54 1205 2005-06 2.77 1.32 134 0.05 0.21 0.26 102

2006-07 6.54 4.56 406 0.14 1.60 1.74 892007-08 6.54 4.87 415 1.15 0.45 1.60 852008-09 3.14 2.05 192 0.49 1.07 1.56 942009-10 0.28 0.63 101 0.61 0.81 1.42 1602010-11 Current 3.23 2.45 258 0.20 0.88 1.08 105

54 Suki 39.85 5128 2005-06 39.66 23.04 2604 16.16 9.60 25.76 1132006-07 39.85 22.65 872 4.17 6.15 10.32 382007-08 39.85 33.38 945 3.91 4.62 8.53 282008-09 39.85 35.56 926 3.75 10.87 14.62 262009-10 39.85 24.85 962 3.70 6.85 10.55 392010-11 Current 39.85 16.34 947 3.07 0.00 3.07 58

55 Abhora 6.02 1115 2005-06 3.95 3.02 310 4.64 0.00 4.64 1032006-07 6.02 2.91 275 0.41 0.00 0.41 952007-08 6.02 2.35 400 0.87 0.00 0.87 1702008-09 6.02 3.30 355 0.81 0.00 0.81 1082009-10 6.02 2.06 340 0.92 0.00 0.92 1652010-11 Current 6.02 2.09 296 0.26 0.00 0.26 142

56 Agnawati 2.76 605 2005-06 2.18 0.12 22 0.08 0.34 0.42 1832006-07 2.76 0.60 79 0.52 0.89 1.41 1322007-08 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.77 0.77 02008-09 2.76 1.36 158 0.00 3.40 3.40 1162009-10 2.76 0.81 131 0.33 1.63 1.96 1622010-11 Current 2.76 1.34 156 0.59 2.54 3.13 116

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1357 Hiwara 9.6 2231 2005-06 6.11 1.80 262 0.00 1.54 1.54 146

2006-07 9.60 5.19 679 0.09 2.26 2.35 1312007-08 3.78 1.46 262 0.52 5.42 5.94 1792008-09 9.60 6.59 844 0.20 4.86 5.06 1282009-10 9.60 6.17 747 1.30 6.05 7.35 1212010-11 Current 9.60 6.26 768 1.23 7.65 8.88 123

58 Tondapur 4.64 1060 2005-06 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 1.78 1.78 02006-07 4.63 0.35 113 0.02 3.15 3.17 3232007-08 3.10 0.13 74 0.07 2.69 2.76 5692008-09 0.98 0.00 0 0.00 1.52 1.52 02009-10 0.63 0.00 0 0.00 3.81 3.81 02010-11 Current 6.30 0.47 168 0.00 4.46 4.46 357

59 Kanoli 8.45 1363 2005-06 6.59 4.45 602 0.85 13.50 14.35 1352006-07 8.45 5.48 415 1.33 6.92 8.25 762007-08 8.45 8.32 890 1.21 0.41 1.62 1072008-09 8.45 9.13 1331 1.03 2.46 3.49 1462009-10 8.45 3.13 944 1.08 2.10 3.18 3022010-11 Current 8.45 4.78 374 0.64 0.25 0.89 78

60 Burai 14.21 2760 2005-06 14.21 12.68 1667 4.10 0.00 4.10 1312006-07 14.21 13.73 2619 3.49 0.00 3.49 1912007-08 14.21 12.90 3767 2.24 0.00 2.24 2922008-09 14.21 12.57 2368 1.30 0.00 1.30 1882009-10 14.21 8.34 1127 2.00 3.18 5.18 1352010-11 Current 11.17 7.47 871 0.00 0.00 0.00 117

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1361 Malangaon 11.33 1587 2005-06 11.32 6.02 985 2.10 4.37 6.47 164

2006-07 11.32 7.90 1325 2.46 1.20 3.66 1682007-08 11.33 8.34 1090 2.38 0.00 2.38 1312008-09 11.33 7.35 921 1.55 1.81 3.36 1252009-10 11.33 8.18 1048 1.49 0.52 2.01 1282010-11 Current 11.23 9.77 952 2.46 0.72 3.18 97

62 Panzra 35.63 6868 2005-06 35.63 22.82 4032 10.78 7.99 18.77 1772006-07 35.63 22.98 4507 8.86 25.28 34.14 1962007-08 35.63 21.89 2994 9.28 15.27 24.55 1372008-09 35.63 25.93 3538 5.63 0.91 6.54 1362009-10 23.79 18.09 2011 4.96 0.50 5.46 1112010-11 Current 35.72 25.81 4994 2.19 0.51 2.70 193

63 Aner 59.21 7180 2005-06 59.20 33.86 3695 9.54 39.02 48.56 1092006-07 59.20 48.78 3286 14.07 0.00 14.07 672007-08 59.21 45.75 4360 11.01 0.00 11.01 952008-09 59.21 46.62 3106 11.00 0.00 11.00 672009-10 59.20 22.48 3395 14.38 0.00 14.38 1512010-11 Current 59.20 25.47 3044 13.67 0.00 13.67 120

64 Karwand 21.39 4534 2005-06 10.41 5.19 756 9.85 8.25 18.10 1462006-07 21.39 7.64 1281 4.70 13.41 18.11 1682007-08 20.73 9.72 1612 3.00 9.58 12.58 1662008-09 18.04 14.87 3145 2.87 11.09 13.96 2112009-10 20.73 15.77 1874 3.87 10.37 14.24 1192010-11 Current 20.73 15.44 1951 6.27 11.60 17.87 126

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1365 Rangawali 12.89 3124 2005-06 12.82 10.81 2203 3.24 0.66 3.90 204

2006-07 12.89 14.83 1938 2.63 1.83 4.46 1312007-08 12.89 12.16 2052 3.31 0.00 3.31 1692008-09 12.89 14.55 2513 4.80 0.00 4.80 1732009-10 11.83 9.26 1179 3.44 0.00 3.44 1272010-11 Current 12.89 11.59 1206 4.49 2.50 6.99 104

66 Haranbari 33.02 9726 2005-06 33.02 17.95 2563 6.02 8.87 14.89 1432006-07 33.02 16.26 3089 5.54 8.07 13.61 1902007-08 33.02 16.63 2924 4.30 27.27 31.57 1762008-09 33.02 15.80 2554 3.28 21.64 24.92 1622009-10 29.26 14.48 3111 5.05 30.08 35.13 2152010-11 Current 33.02 16.37 3515 6.12 20.31 26.43 215

67 Kelzar 16.20 3394 2005-06 16.20 4.29 1371 4.31 12.02 16.33 3202006-07 16.20 6.26 1512 2.04 13.06 15.10 2422007-08 16.09 7.50 1893 2.65 14.69 17.34 2522008-09 16.20 10.72 1897 4.46 13.38 17.84 1772009-10 12.11 8.07 1812 2.64 12.59 15.23 2252010-11 Current 16.22 9.02 1887 3.59 7.07 10.66 209

68 Nagyasakya 11.24 2400 2005-06 3.99 6.18 886 2.52 8.97 11.49 1432006-07 11.24 9.05 1265 1.37 0.00 1.37 1402007-08 11.24 9.03 1638 3.09 0.00 3.09 1812008-09 11.24 11.55 1372 3.50 0.00 3.50 1192009-10 1.27 8.97 1372 0.82 0.00 0.82 1532010-11 Current 11.24 8.82 1459 3.11 0.00 3.11 165

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1369 Alandi 27.46 6296 2005-06 27.46 19.71 2376 15.60 0.00 15.60 121

2006-07 27.46 20.64 2258 15.00 0.00 15.00 1092007-08 27.46 21.66 2288 15.44 0.00 15.44 1062008-09 27.46 21.02 2173 1.21 0.00 1.21 1032009-10 20.82 15.19 1949 11.06 0.00 11.06 1282010-11 Current 27.46 19.01 1851 7.48 0.00 7.48 97

70 Bhojapur 10.21 4500 2005-06 9.93 9.48 1028 2.45 0.64 3.09 1082006-07 10.10 7.90 829 2.90 2.77 5.67 1052007-08 10.19 9.45 820 2.59 3.71 6.30 872008-09 10.11 16.65 982 0.04 0.00 0.04 592009-10 2.38 8.81 1109 2.00 0.00 2.00 1262010-11 Current 10.13 6.81 798 1.66 5.91 7.57 117

71 Adhala 27.60 3914 2005-06 27.60 25.52 3060 11.70 1.57 13.27 1202006-07 27.60 24.47 2432 6.96 1.63 8.59 992007-08 27.60 22.65 2306 9.62 0.02 9.64 1022008-09 27.60 23.97 1752 0.98 0.00 0.98 732009-10 10.98 21.64 2350 8.00 1.89 9.89 1092010-11 Current 27.60 22.57 1696 6.75 2.21 8.96 75

72 Ghatshil Pargaon 8.50 1660 2005-06 0.00 1.29 277 0.04 0.14 0.18 2152006-07 8.50 6.34 832 0.85 0.00 0.85 1312007-08 7.48 6.13 1117 0.55 0.14 0.69 1822008-09 4.76 5.55 943 0.80 0.25 1.05 1702009-10 1.19 3.72 774 0.95 0.16 1.11 2082010-11 Current 8.50 10.10 1223 1.55 0.14 1.69 121

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1373 Mand Ohol 8.78 2266 2005-06 8.78 6.59 986 0.49 0.31 0.80 150

2006-07 8.78 6.90 602 0.51 0.45 0.96 872007-08 8.78 7.38 576 0.54 0.51 1.05 782008-09 8.78 6.60 500 0.40 1.51 1.91 762009-10 6.39 6.03 412 0.60 0.96 1.56 682010-11 Current 8.55 6.69 887 0.76 2.55 3.31 133

74 Sonwad 14.36 2147 2009-10 5.99 1.76 567 1.25 0.50 1.75 3222010-11 Current 14.36 9.01 960 1.05 0.00 1.05 107

75 Bahula 16.13 4450 2009-10 1.60 4.40 451 0.21 0.00 0.21 1032010-11 Current 15.85 9.37 441 0.00 0.00 0.00 47

76 Mor 7.96 1150 2009-10 7.91 1.34 43 0.74 0.00 0.74 322010-11 Current 7.96 1.62 72 0.42 0.00 0.42 44

77 Bhokar (Mangrul) 6.41 1683 2009-10 6.41 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02010-11 Current 6.41 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

78 Ekrukh 61.16 6944 2005-06 27.49 4.55 654 1.05 10.51 11.56 1442006-07 12.98 2.89 482 2.51 33.82 36.33 1672007-08 0.79 0.31 63 0.57 6.00 6.57 2032008-09 61.15 6.71 1018 0.64 5.42 6.06 1522009-10 9.96 5.02 757 0.35 5.24 5.59 1512010-11 Current 50.33 5.70 1114 3.53 9.20 12.73 195

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1379 Jawalgaon 2005-06 19.11 12.48 1182 1.08 0.12 1.20 95

2006-07 24.39 11.53 1339 2.50 1.54 4.04 1162007-08 17.80 13.38 2137 3.09 3.99 7.08 1602008-09 25.21 11.81 1656 0.37 3.79 4.16 1402009-10 19.18 13.33 1939 3.10 0.00 3.10 1452010-11 Current 29.18 10.73 1553 7.51 3.74 11.25 145

80 Hingani (p) 31.97 6592 2005-06 31.97 13.79 1409 0.62 4.96 5.58 1022006-07 31.97 17.71 2518 3.33 1.48 4.81 1422007-08 31.97 21.77 3105 2.32 2.14 4.46 1432008-09 31.97 10.93 1429 0.93 2.79 3.72 1312009-10 25.58 15.80 2452 1.65 1.81 3.46 1552010-11 Current 31.96 12.12 1800 1.65 1.81 3.46 149

81 Budhihal 19.03 5578 2005-06 0.00 0.03 33 0.08 0.00 0.08 11002006-07 0.00 0.05 60 0.47 0.00 0.47 11112007-08 0.00 1.87 606 1.82 0.00 1.82 3252008-09 3.70 2.13 1061 1.60 0.27 1.87 4982009-10 -0.14 2.98 320 0.58 0.00 0.58 1072010-11 Current 0.00 0.73 305 2.41 0.00 2.41 418

82 Mangi 30.53 4646 2005-06 14.11 12.42 1767 0.30 0.00 0.30 1422006-07 29.94 20.76 3127 4.95 0.68 5.63 1512007-08 17.40 14.49 2026 6.07 7.06 13.13 1402008-09 30.40 21.47 2997 0.49 3.19 3.68 1402009-10 27.91 18.01 2936 6.47 1.15 7.62 1632010-11 Current 30.40 18.79 3013 3.09 0.91 4.00 160

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1383 Kasari 77.96 9995 2005-06 77.96 47.03 6476 19.77 2.30 22.07 138

2006-07 77.96 50.01 7063 19.81 3.81 23.62 1412007-08 77.96 65.10 7437 16.92 6.13 23.05 1142008-09 77.96 73.33 7963 26.74 6.13 32.87 1092009-10 77.96 57.50 8503 0.18 0.00 0.18 1482010-11 Current 77.97 70.28 87 33.00 0.00 33.00 1

84 Patgaon 104.8 10000 2005-06 79.86 55.14 4717 43.77 15.83 59.60 862006-07 98.49 55.80 5170 14.18 5.25 19.43 932007-08 104.77 53.40 5376 13.48 22.74 36.22 1012008-09 104.77 67.93 5146 38.90 15.83 54.73 762009-10 105.99 49.91 5168 18.18 20.18 38.36 1042010-11 Current 105.02 45.84 5282 25.03 24.26 49.29 115

85 Jangamhatti 33.21 4457 2005-06 26.15 23.97 5080 0.60 13.82 14.42 2122006-07 31.88 28.24 5454 5.00 16.52 21.52 1932007-08 26.87 26.74 4836 34.24 39.48 73.72 1812008-09 33.21 33.21 4395 29.07 37.64 66.71 1322009-10 34.83 27.50 4714 36.62 8.42 45.04 1712010-11 Current 33.83 29.23 4502 20.28 13.70 33.98 154

86 Kumbhi 76.5 9170 2005-06 60.18 27.70 4435 20.10 3.00 23.10 1602006-07 60.58 37.79 4731 4.55 7.30 11.85 1252007-08 68.08 52.47 4268 3.96 13.00 16.96 812008-09 76.50 65.67 5659 9.15 38.77 47.92 862009-10 76.03 66.03 6031 8.73 6.85 15.58 912010-11 Current 76.50 65.19 5733 9.42 12.05 21.47 88

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1387 Chikotra 43.05 6863 2005-06 37.32 21.48 3040 20.18 14.47 34.65 142

2006-07 37.31 24.93 3688 19.45 4.75 24.20 1482007-08 37.18 25.45 4085 17.36 0.89 18.25 1612008-09 43.05 29.25 4221 16.00 4.50 20.50 1442009-10 32.89 24.20 4082 14.80 5.71 20.51 1692010-11 Current 37.79 28.44 4090 14.80 5.71 20.51 144

88 Chitri 52.48 9160 2005-06 52.48 44.02 7372 5.31 18.93 24.24 1672006-07 52.48 42.12 10578 12.58 19.91 32.49 2512007-08 52.48 42.50 9136 44.83 40.49 85.32 2152008-09 52.48 49.28 10339 48.34 35.19 83.53 2102009-10 53.41 45.50 8527 66.68 34.37 101.05 1872010-11 Current 52.48 46.37 9353 56.33 41.36 97.69 202

89 Kadavi 70.56 9908 2005-06 69.77 23.13 2491 4.83 1.50 6.33 1082006-07 70.56 15.22 1698 5.01 0.00 5.01 1122007-08 70.56 22.98 2961 9.91 4.21 14.12 1292008-09 70.56 22.93 2437 9.93 8.70 18.63 1062009-10 70.56 21.38 2328 8.78 4.43 13.21 1092010-11 Current 70.56 17 2473.00 13.66 18.09 31.75 145

90 Vadiwale 30.39 4468 2005-06 30.39 24.02 3166 5.40 48.16 53.56 1322006-07 30.39 21.33 2951 1.31 1.25 2.56 1382007-08 29.90 22.04 3411 8.00 59.21 67.21 1552008-09 30.39 30.08 6194 8.97 158.27 167.24 2062009-10 30.39 24.23 6584 10.20 195.60 205.80 2722010-11 Current 29.26 32.04 8066 7.25 182.38 189.63 252

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1391 Nher 11.79 2636 2005-06 11.79 5.08 740 1.30 0.52 1.82 146

2006-07 11.79 4.26 735 2.14 0.39 2.53 1732007-08 11.79 5.62 803 2.85 0.07 2.92 1432008-09 3.46 0.00 0 0.00 0.43 0.43 02009-10 11.79 6.05 827 2.10 2.12 4.22 1372010-11 Current 11.79 4.06 714 2.20 1.53 3.73 176

92 Ranand 6.42 1093 2005-06 4.98 2.38 259 1.17 0.00 1.17 1092006-07 6.42 2.14 291 0.95 0.00 0.95 1362007-08 6.42 1.65 309 1.75 0.00 1.75 1872008-09 6.42 2.37 427 0.80 0.00 0.80 1802009-10 6.42 2.38 442 1.35 0.00 1.35 1862010-11 Current 6.42 2.71 356 1.00 0.00 1.00 131

93 Mhaswad 46.22 4049 2005-06 8.35 6.66 2794 5.75 0.00 5.75 4202006-07 14.41 12.08 2660 1.29 0.00 1.29 2202007-08 44.33 22.70 3357 6.32 0.00 6.32 1482008-09 44.33 30.91 5479 6.38 0.00 6.38 1772009-10 46.12 26.99 3520 9.56 0.00 9.56 1302010-11 Current 44.34 32.72 3346 9.65 0.00 9.65 102

94 Tisangi 24.46 4049 2005-06 24.09 13.70 1869 6.00 5.55 11.55 1362006-07 24.40 17.44 2406 7.56 5.38 12.94 1382007-08 24.46 15.23 1767 10.00 3.00 13.00 1162008-09 24.46 15.19 1578 11.15 1.19 12.34 1042009-10 24.46 14.43 2088 8.46 0.00 8.46 1452010-11 Current 24.18 17.03 2056 5.42 7.59 13.01 121

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1395 Khairy 13.74 2318 2005-06 13.74 7.87 1246 0.68 0.00 0.68 158

2006-07 13.73 3.48 1123 2.16 0.09 2.25 3222007-08 13.74 8.51 1326 2.58 0.20 2.78 1562008-09 12.64 5.70 768 4.14 0.26 4.40 1352009-10 13.75 7.30 1450 4.35 0.12 4.47 1992010-11 Current 13.74 6.04 953 2.47 2.03 4.50 158

96 Sina 52.30 8445 2005-06 9.46 11.82 948 0.79 0.33 1.12 802006-07 52.30 29.53 3107 5.27 0.61 5.88 1052007-08 52.30 46.08 3722 6.80 1.20 8.00 812008-09 52.30 45.71 4273 6.36 1.41 7.77 932009-10 52.30 36.05 4040 6.04 0.51 6.55 1122010-11 Current 52.30 43.90 4790 9.42 0.40 9.82 109

97 Andhali 7.42 1498 2005-06 7.42 0.81 132 0.54 0.00 0.54 1632006-07 7.42 1.62 99 0.61 0.61 1.22 612007-08 7.42 1.23 181 0.41 3.58 3.99 1472008-09 2.18 0.00 0 0.00 1.26 1.26 02009-10 7.43 0.86 133 0.67 2.70 3.37 1552010-11 Current 7.42 1.97 264 0.81 2.90 3.71 134

98 Kasarsai 16.25 4119 2005-06 16.02 8.87 1242 1.35 1.66 3.01 1402006-07 15.82 15.85 1789 2.09 3.85 5.94 1132007-08 14.94 13.07 2127 5.30 6.88 12.18 1632008-09 16.06 14.11 3022 7.29 6.67 13.96 2142009-10 16.06 16.85 3475 4.11 3.30 7.41 2062010-11 Current 16.06 15.10 3614 4.38 4.02 8.40 239

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1399 Nazre 16.65 3195 2005-06 16.65 13.48 2449 11.60 47.60 59.20 182

2006-07 16.80 12.55 1946 12.60 49.80 62.40 1552007-08 16.61 17.34 2451 12.73 51.30 64.03 1412008-09 12.48 9.04 1632 7.44 43.31 50.75 1812009-10 16.62 13.85 2095 3.30 40.97 44.27 1512010-11 Current 16.65 15.48 2212 11.58 55.21 66.79 143

100 Visapur 25.61 5388 2005‐06 25.12 26.03 4675 22.4 0.7 23.1 1802006‐07 25.61 31.74 5844 35.7 0.87 36.57 1842007‐08 25.61 24.65 5750 34.91 1.2 36.11 2332008‐09 25.61 29.9 6448 22.26 0.56 22.82 2162009‐10 5.81 15.89 4812 28.7 5.54 34.24 3032010‐11 Current 24.74 21.777 6041.4 20.71 2.24 22.95 277

101 Shetphal 17.556 1920 2005‐06 12.82 1462 9.07 0 9.07 1142006‐07 18.69 2126 12.07 0 12.07 1142007‐08 28.51 2011.4 15.28 0 15.28 712008‐09 16.11 2371 13.65 0 13.65 1472009‐10 16.93 14.753 2056 18.19 0 18.19 1392010‐11 Current 16.93 14.496 1747 22.56 4.45 27.01 121

102 Wandri 35.94 4088 2005-06 33.94 24.60 800 0.50 0.00 0.50 332006-07 35.94 27.53 1000 2.00 0.00 2.00 362007-08 33.16 26.56 620 1.96 0.00 1.96 232008-09 34.27 25.77 680 1.58 0.00 1.58 262009-10 35.18 25.73 680 2.50 0.00 2.50 262010-11 Current 34.98 19.59 394 2.69 0.00 2.69 20

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13103 Natuwadi 27.23 2050 2005-06 26.69 0.30 14 0.46 0.00 0.46 47

2006-07 27.23 24.54 199 0.58 10.46 11.04 82007-08 26.37 24.89 125 0.17 6.53 6.70 52008-09 26.33 21.97 72 0.54 4.57 5.11 32009-10 26.86 21.69 105 0.78 5.27 6.05 52010-11 Current 26.90 24.40 126 0.08 3.39 3.47 5

104 Hetwane 144.98 1301 2005-06 69.38 3.57 101 0.00 93.67 93.67 282006-07 75.29 2.81 95 0.18 135.69 135.87 342007-08 99.93 4.19 87 0.16 101.14 101.30 212008-09 124.67 4.48 125 0.50 93.38 93.88 282009-10 132.36 9.54 140 0.48 88.77 89.25 152010-11 Current 124.84 12.90 143 0.80 56.41 57.21 11

105 Kurnoor 32.28 3644 2005-06 32.28 24.65 1834 9.59 27.48 37.07 742006-07 20.26 14.16 1362 9.16 26.53 35.69 962007-08 32.28 22.11 1920 7.55 21.22 28.77 872008-09 32.28 19.99 1797 8.06 6.87 14.93 902009-10 26.51 16.37 1486 10.06 3.79 13.85 912010-11 Current 32.28 12.16 1462 1.41 3.50 4.91 120

106 Khandala 5.24 830 2005-06 4.44 2.77 451 1.41 0.00 1.41 1632006-07 0.86 0.83 205 0.53 0.00 0.53 2472007-08 3.17 2.42 569 0.53 0.00 0.53 2352008-09 5.24 2.83 535 1.51 0.00 1.51 1892009-10 0.51 0.44 92 0.28 0.00 0.28 2102010-11 Current 2.22 3.59 491 0.20 0.00 0.20 137

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13107 Turori 6.2 830 2005-06 6.20 2.52 390 0.31 0.58 0.89 155

2006-07 4.61 2.20 360 0.55 3.33 3.88 1642007-08 6.20 2.20 488 0.55 3.33 3.88 2222008-09 1.00 0.88 110 0.00 0.00 0.00 1252009-10 0.09 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02010-11 Current 6.20 2.58 293 0.00 0.00 0.00 114

108 Jakapur 7.96 1584 2005-06 5.46 3.25 404 0.60 0.00 0.60 1242006-07 1.81 1.39 185 0.47 0.00 0.47 1332007-08 2.42 1.59 302 0.47 0.00 0.47 1902008-09 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02009-10 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02010-11 Current 7.96 3.07 246 0.25 0.10 80

109 Mehakari 12.98 4048 2005-06 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02006-07 12.98 3.86 279 0.57 0.00 0.57 722007-08 8.60 6.53 560 0.18 0.00 0.18 862008-09 8.60 2.22 215 0.97 0.00 0.97 972009-10 8.60 2.06 169 0.85 0.00 0.85 822010-11 Current 8.60 4.62 516 2.14 0.00 2.14 112

110 Kadi 5.47 1084 2005-06 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02006-07 5.47 2.12 138 0.04 0.00 0.04 652007-08 5.21 3.11 312 0.04 0.00 0.04 1002008-09 5.21 3.60 277 1.31 0.00 1.31 772009-10 3.14 1.59 157 0.33 0.00 0.33 992010-11 Current 5.85 3.00 191 0.40 0.00 0.40 64

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13111 Kada 8.56 1214 2005-06 2.80 0.73 109 0.03 0.00 0.03 149

2006-07 8.55 1.70 176 0.03 0.34 0.37 1042007-08 8.55 1.87 170 0.01 1.06 1.07 912008-09 8.55 2.38 249 0.52 1.91 2.43 1052009-10 8.55 1.32 243 0.50 0.00 0.50 1842010-11 Current 8.55 2.51 261 0.40 2.09 2.49 104

112 Galhati 13.84 2200 2005-06 NA 3.77 424 0.35 0.00 0.35 1122006-07 13.84 4.86 328 0.25 0.00 0.25 682007-08 10.49 7.21 367 0.76 0.00 0.76 512008-09 7.90 5.90 411 1.40 0.00 1.40 702009-10 11.84 5.18 638 1.09 0.00 1.09 1232010-11 Current 13.84 4.98 381 1.10 0.00 1.10 76

113 Karpara 24.9 2151 2005-06 24.76 12.20 1152 0.82 0.00 0.82 942006-07 24.83 6.93 816 0.79 2.49 3.28 1182007-08 14.26 9.35 789 0.80 0.00 0.80 842008-09 8.37 3.00 934 0.00 0.00 0.00 3112009-10 24.33 8.37 1287 2.33 0.81 3.14 1542010-11 Current 24.90 7.75 1003 0.00 0.00 0.00 129

114 Masoli 27.13 2591 2005-06 27.13 15.00 1706 0.25 2.00 2.25 1142006-07 27.13 16.94 1776 2.02 2.31 4.33 1052007-08 24.50 17.73 1376 1.69 4.27 5.96 782008-09 8.99 6.90 737 1.00 10.00 11.00 1072009-10 0.42 0.00 0 0.18 46.68 46.86 02010-11 Current 27.14 15.72 1635 5.20 65.62 70.82 104

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13115 Terna 19.66 1652 2005-06 19.39 6.58 921 0.79 6.15 6.94 140

2006-07 19.63 8.60 1032 2.49 9.00 11.49 1202007-08 19.39 6.88 1163 3.26 24.91 28.17 1692008-09 19.66 7.64 1147 3.04 28.80 31.84 1502009-10 8.25 0.00 0 0.00 17.02 17.02 02010-11 Current 19.66 5.53 942 2.48 2.63 5.11 170

116 Rui 8.61 1650 2005-06 7.04 1.59 208 0.05 0.75 0.80 1302006-07 6.47 2.14 371 0.00 1.80 1.80 1732007-08 8.41 3.65 530 0.00 1.80 1.80 1452008-09 8.41 1.51 583 0.07 0.00 0.07 3862009-10 1.90 0.00 0 0.00 3.37 3.37 02010-11 Current 8.61 2.39 301 0.14 0.38 0.52 126

117 Raigavan 11.26 1700 2005-06 9.56 5.00 552 1.32 0.00 1.32 1102006-07 6.06 2.71 471 1.28 0.00 1.28 1742007-08 4.21 1.33 379 1.88 0.00 1.88 2852008-09 11.26 4.08 566 2.20 0.00 2.20 1392009-10 1.58 0.36 40 0.25 0.25 0.50 1112010-11 Current 11.26 4.50 570 0.57 0.00 0.57 127

118 Sukhna 18.49 2511 2005-06 15.66 6.37 908 2.17 0.30 2.47 1432006-07 18.49 8.57 1262 4.78 2.26 7.04 1472007-08 16.28 7.87 1852 7.75 9.00 16.75 2352008-09 9.79 8.90 1198 3.20 9.60 12.80 1352009-10 5.81 2.64 985 3.53 3.60 7.13 3732010-11 Current 12.37 9.88 977 7.50 3.26 10.76 99

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13119 Girja 21.25 3443 2005-06 0.00 0.92 97 0.30 0.88 1.18 105

2006-07 16.77 5.68 852 0.00 0.69 0.69 1502007-08 11.91 5.54 1095 2.63 13.25 15.88 1982008-09 15.60 12.10 1765 4.00 5.30 9.30 1462009-10 1.28 1.90 226 0.32 1.37 1.69 1192010-11 Current 21.23 6.18 976 1.92 3.73 5.65 158

120 Lahuki 5.21 1092 2005-06 1.96 0.26 36 0.03 0.00 0.03 1372006-07 4.31 2.81 412 0.06 0.00 0.06 1462007-08 4.31 1.87 339 1.45 0.00 1.45 1812008-09 4.31 1.20 479 1.50 3.00 4.50 3992009-10 1.10 0.45 145 0.44 0.48 0.92 3222010-11 Current 5.22 3.08 455 1.32 1.27 2.59 148

0121 Dheku 11.53 2712 2005-06 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 2.26 2.26 0

2006-07 10.13 2.86 631 0.01 0.00 0.01 2212007-08 5.85 1.62 566 1.02 0.02 1.04 3492008-09 9.99 3.00 768 1.30 0.00 1.30 2562009-10 9.38 2.55 355 0.18 0.18 0.36 1392010-11 Current 10.80 2.35 268 0.18 1.54 1.72 114

122 Kolhi 3.23 472 2005-06 0.39 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02006-07 2.84 1.81 235 0.00 3.39 3.39 1302007-08 1.14 0.18 85 0.01 1.08 1.09 4722008-09 2.92 2.40 222 0.70 0.10 0.80 932009-10 0.74 0.55 135 0.06 1.08 1.14 2452010-11 Current 2.84 0.51 136 0.03 1.00 1.03 267

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13123 Ambadi 11.53 2147 2005-06 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.75 0.75 0

2006-07 7.92 3.85 617 1.00 4.50 5.50 1602007-08 0.00 0.04 118 0.69 7.67 8.36 29502008-09 9.42 2.50 471 0.70 10.20 10.90 1882009-10 7.06 2.28 377 0.21 2.26 2.47 1652010-11 Current 9.43 5.34 969 1.86 3.25 5.11 182

124 Khelna 11.07 2429 2005-06 4.61 1.88 196 0.18 1.50 1.68 1042006-07 11.07 3.27 887 2.85 4.65 7.50 2712007-08 3.87 0.36 54 0.72 3.60 4.32 1502008-09 3.81 0.00 0 0.10 19.60 19.70 02009-10 11.07 4.18 958 2.57 2.00 4.57 2292010-11 Current 11.07 5.69 907 3.38 1.50 4.88 159

125 Gadadgad 4.64 1180 2005-06 3.48 2.40 295 0.45 0.00 0.45 1232006-07 3.61 1.79 432 3.89 0.00 3.89 2412007-08 3.69 1.55 249 0.35 0.00 0.35 1612008-09 4.64 1.70 405 2.20 2.00 4.20 2382009-10 4.64 1.64 427 0.05 0.00 0.05 2612010-11 Current 4.64 2.06 404 2.06 0.00 2.06 196

126 Ajantha Andhari 7.65 1576 2005-06 1.20 0.25 19 0.03 3.30 3.33 762006-07 7.65 3.66 668 1.80 7.89 9.69 1822007-08 2.84 0.83 84 0.08 6.22 6.30 1012008-09 1.08 0.10 60 25.00 2.00 27.00 6002009-10 1.02 0.11 53 0.34 0.25 0.59 4822010-11 Current 5.65 3.42 262 0.24 4.14 4.38 77

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13127 Jui 6.03 2206 2005-06 0.75 0.00 0 0.00 0.11 0.11 0

2006-07 6.03 1.89 303 1.28 0.75 2.03 1602007-08 4.92 2.48 497 1.59 1.46 3.05 2002008-09 2.60 0.00 0 0.50 2.50 3.00 02009-10 1.38 0.23 30 0.00 3.00 3.00 1302010-11 Current 6.04 1.15 446 0.89 8.03 8.92 388

128 Jivrekha 6.13 1064 2005-06 4.78 2.70 545 1.52 0.00 1.52 2022006-07 6.13 3.45 583 1.97 0.00 1.97 1692007-08 1.77 0.85 122 0.47 0.76 1.23 1442008-09 5.14 4.00 543 1.90 1.40 3.30 1362009-10 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02010-11 Current 6.13 3.02 399 0.18 2.11 2.29 132

129 Dhamna 8.51 1280 2005-06 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02006-07 6.30 3.31 520 0.69 0.00 0.69 1572007-08 1.60 2.24 428 0.37 1.72 2.09 1912008-09 0.00 0.50 146 0.10 0.30 0.40 2922009-10 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02010-11 Current 5.05 1.71 555 0.49 4.96 5.45 325

130 Pir Kalyan 12.22 2020 2005-06 11.57 2.83 466 0.58 1.53 2.11 1642006-07 12.22 3.52 526 1.58 0.00 1.58 1492007-08 6.40 1.17 523 2.62 6.45 9.07 4472008-09 12.22 3.50 703 1.70 6.40 8.10 2012009-10 -0.09 0.00 0 0.00 4.63 4.63 02010-11 Current 10.39 2.55 408 0.24 1.15 1.39 160

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13131 Kalyan Girja 8.47 1377 2005-06 8.47 2.40 334 0.73 0.00 0.73 139

2006-07 8.47 4.20 481 3.42 0.00 3.42 1152007-08 5.37 2.09 402 1.64 0.00 1.64 1922008-09 8.30 5.80 576 1.10 1.70 2.80 992009-10 3.55 0.68 346 1.50 0.00 1.50 5092010-11 Current 8.47 1.44 464 1.05 0.00 1.05 322

132 Sakol 10.95 2064 2005-06 10.95 6.81 950 4.79 0.00 4.79 1402006-07 10.95 5.49 1152 2.95 0.00 2.95 2102007-08 5.52 4.48 852 2.77 0.49 3.26 1902008-09 8.34 4.85 970 4.10 0.00 4.10 2002009-10 -0.56 0.00 0 0.61 0.19 0.80 02010-11 Current 10.95 4.74 713 2.13 0.05 2.18 150

133 Tawarja 20.34 3603 2005-06 12.26 8.89 1123 2.26 1.96 4.22 1262006-07 17.30 8.38 1216 2.86 5.49 8.35 1452007-08 11.55 7.89 1093 2.56 13.36 15.92 1382008-09 18.42 8.87 674 3.38 19.80 23.18 762009-10 1.38 0.00 0 2.59 9.53 12.12 02010-11 Current 17.68 11.23 987 3.00 11.00 14.00 88

134 Tiru 15.29 2348 2005-06 15.29 6.91 1149 6.33 0.00 6.33 1662006-07 15.29 8.94 1160 3.08 0.00 3.08 1302007-08 3.18 8.08 1195 2.41 0.00 2.41 1482008-09 11.00 5.59 1036 5.21 6.00 11.21 1852009-10 -4.22 0.00 0 0.94 0.00 0.94 02010-11 Current 15.29 8.37 702 0.70 0.00 0.70 84

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13135 Gharni 22.46 2234 2005-06 22.46 9.57 1326 6.69 2.53 9.22 139

2006-07 22.46 12.90 1231 7.45 2.20 9.65 952007-08 21.91 11.60 1440 5.34 3.00 8.34 1242008-09 22.45 9.55 1236 5.60 1.50 7.10 1292009-10 -1.46 0.00 0 1.41 0.00 1.41 02010-11 Current 22.47 7.04 796 2.66 0.00 2.66 113

136 Vati 8.27 1760 2005-06 8.27 5.35 531 2.35 0.00 2.35 992006-07 8.03 5.50 459 3.05 0.14 3.19 832007-08 8.27 5.06 592 2.21 0.10 2.31 1172008-09 8.27 4.08 641 1.93 3.22 5.15 1572009-10 -0.61 0.00 0 0.71 0.00 0.71 02010-11 Current 8.27 6.10 768 2.18 0.00 2.18 126

137 Masalga 13.59 1364 2005-06 4.76 0.52 78 0.71 0.00 0.71 1512006-07 9.64 2.81 80 0.25 0.00 0.25 282007-08 5.59 0.58 73 0.28 0.00 0.28 1272008-09 3.18 0.40 76 0.95 0.00 0.95 1902009-10 0.00 0.00 0 0.07 0.00 0.07 02010-11 Current 13.60 3.10 188 0.12 0.00 0.12 61

138 Devarjan 10.68 1882 2005-06 10.68 4.76 399 2.79 0.00 2.79 842006-07 10.68 6.26 649 3.06 0.35 3.41 1042007-08 3.98 3.50 627 2.48 0.00 2.48 1792008-09 2.47 2.29 448 1.86 0.00 1.86 1962009-10 -1.27 0.00 0 0.53 0.03 0.56 02010-11 Current 10.68 3.69 562 0.44 0.15 0.59 152

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13139 Kundlika 37.69 2964 2005-06 37.69 10.65 1165 4.73 2.96 7.69 109

2006-07 37.69 15.10 1195 3.52 0.00 3.52 792007-08 37.69 7.48 787 0.79 5.43 6.22 1052008-09 37.69 8.27 1195 3.70 5.20 8.90 1442009-10 37.69 8.28 911 0.00 19.49 19.49 1102010-11 Current 37.69 10.82 965 0.00 6.04 6.04 89

140 Wan (Beed) 19.34 5262 2005-06 19.34 5.49 656 3.78 19.86 23.64 1192006-07 19.34 6.22 682 1.91 16.30 18.21 1102007-08 19.34 4.69 476 1.57 4.11 5.68 1012008-09 19.34 9.17 743 1.63 24.09 25.72 812009-10 16.44 4.17 472 0.00 9.76 9.76 1132010-11 Current 19.32 5.64 435 1.83 31.32 33.15 77

141 Kambli 3.1 972 2005-06 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02006-07 1.37 0.27 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 852007-08 1.37 1.27 120 0.00 0.00 0.00 942008-09 1.37 1.04 128 0.56 0.00 0.56 1232009-10 1.37 0.62 53 0.25 0.00 0.25 852010-11 Current 1.37 0.50 60 0.17 0.00 0.17 120

142 Chandani 21.58 2024 2005-06 15.16 7.65 1316 0.30 0.31 0.61 1722006-07 17.78 1.00 1308 1.00 41.00 42.00 13082007-08 13.66 13.95 1584 1.08 3.24 4.32 1142008-09 16.18 12.47 1079 1.41 2.05 3.46 872009-10 17.53 5.72 865 1.88 3.07 4.95 1512010-11 Current 18.21 9.65 913 1.88 2.51 4.39 95

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13143 Khasapur 13.04 2146 2005-06 13.04 6.82 1755 0.15 0.00 0.15 257

2006-07 13.04 8.92 1488 0.70 0.00 0.70 1672007-08 13.04 8.91 1576 0.91 2.10 3.01 1772008-09 13.04 7.99 1377 1.00 0.00 1.00 1722009-10 13.04 6.84 1051 1.04 1.85 2.89 1542010-11 Current 13.04 9.38 1272 1.04 1.85 2.89 136

144 Sakat 13.48 2355 2005-06 7.83 5.94 970 0.50 0.00 0.50 1632006-07 7.24 5.40 790 0.72 0.00 0.72 1462007-08 6.96 4.45 870 1.16 0.00 1.16 1952008-09 3.93 2.03 665 0.58 0.00 0.58 3272009-10 9.09 5.15 716 0.58 0.00 0.58 1392010-11 Current 13.48 8.15 958 0.58 0.00 0.58 118

145 Rooty 6.57 1862 2005-06 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02006-07 6.50 2.73 95 0.03 1.00 1.03 352007-08 6.57 3.13 151 0.09 1.06 1.15 482008-09 6.57 1.29 187 0.34 0.00 0.34 1452009-10 1.00 134 0.73 0.00 0.73 1342010-11 Current 10.28 2.04 223 1.00 0.00 1.00 109

146 Talwar 3.23 668 2005-06 0.00 0.16 24 0.09 0.00 0.09 1482006-07 3.23 0.90 63 0.04 0.00 0.04 702007-08 3.23 0.98 155 0.04 0.00 0.04 1582008-09 3.23 1.30 140 0.26 0.00 0.26 1082009-10 2.01 0.77 86 0.13 0.00 0.13 1122010-11 Current 3.24 1.30 153 0.47 0.00 0.47 118

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13147 Banganga 4.96 906 2005-06 4.96 3.25 400 0.10 0.00 0.10 123

2006-07 4.96 2.52 365 0.46 0.00 0.46 1452007-08 3.99 2.43 430 0.47 0.00 0.47 1772008-09 4.96 3.22 362 0.40 0.00 0.40 1132009-10 4.97 1.62 253 0.16 0.00 0.16 1562010-11 Current 4.96 3.49 432 0.16 0.00 0.16 124

148 Khandeshwar 8.78 1471 2005-06 0.00 3.43 665 0.50 0.00 0.50 1942006-07 7.76 5.42 886 0.97 0.00 0.97 1632007-08 8.37 6.29 1047 1.30 0.00 1.30 1662008-09 4.49 4.39 689 1.71 0.00 1.71 1572009-10 8.58 4.61 731 0.76 0.00 0.76 1592010-11 Current 8.78 5.63 774 0.67 0.00 0.67 137

149 Ramganga 5.34 963 2005-06 5.33 3.69 489 0.10 0.00 0.10 1332006-07 5.34 2.99 434 0.30 0.00 0.30 1452007-08 4.54 3.77 493 0.88 0.00 0.88 1312008-09 5.33 1.39 439 0.53 0.00 0.53 3172009-10 5.34 2.25 328 0.23 0.00 0.23 1462010-11 Current 5.34 4.55 410 0.23 0.00 0.23 90

150 Belpara 5.82 1093 2005-06 2.11 2.33 153 0.34 0.00 0.34 662006-07 5.37 2.78 132 0.68 0.00 0.68 472007-08 5.37 3.41 119 0.60 0.00 0.60 352008-09 1.53 0.87 115 0.32 0.00 0.32 1322009-10 1.52 1.99 114 0.07 0.00 0.07 572010-11 Current 5.82 3.86 175 0.66 0.00 0.66 45

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13151 Benitura 11.47 2293 2005-06 11.47 4.13 293 0.05 1.00 1.05 71

2006-07 3.95 1.42 118 0.05 0.79 0.84 832007-08 5.47 2.72 261 0.25 3.81 4.06 962008-09 11.47 6.47 583 0.05 2.00 2.05 902009-10 6.77 4.97 425 0.00 6.70 6.70 862010-11 Current 11.47 6.64 394 0.25 9.00 9.25 59

152 Bindusara 7.112 1288 2005-06 7.11 2.14 153 0.71 12.92 13.63 712006-07 7.11 1.32 192 0.88 8.00 8.88 1452007-08 5.70 2.34 290 1.12 2.83 3.95 1242008-09 7.11 2.30 216 0.10 1.35 1.45 942009-10 7.11 1.73 204 0.81 15.58 16.39 1182010-11 Current 7.11 0.96 152 0.90 14.64 15.54 158

153 Bodhegaon 3.65 990 2005-06 3.72 1.23 95 0.64 0.00 0.64 772006-07 3.72 1.19 85 1.46 0.00 1.46 712007-08 3.73 1.08 75 0.35 0.00 0.35 692008-09 Nd 1.40 228 0.97 0.00 0.97 1632009-10 2.60 1.77 206 0.37 0.00 0.37 1162010-11 Current 3.65 1.82 183 1.17 0.00 1.17 101

154 Borna 8.972 1376 2005-06 8.97 3.80 443 0.49 0.00 0.49 1172006-07 8.97 3.66 384 0.23 0.00 0.23 1052007-08 8.97 2.11 195 0.05 0.00 0.05 922008-09 Nd 2.51 198 0.43 0.00 0.43 792009-10 5.66 2.97 434 0.00 0.00 0.00 1462010-11 Current 8.97 3.69 442 0.17 0.00 0.17 120

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13155 Harni 11.17 1680 2005-06 6.47 5.63 471 0.00 0.00 0.00 84

2006-07 4.99 3.77 287 0.00 0.00 0.00 762007-08 2.98 2.57 367 0.00 0.00 0.00 1432008-09 11.17 5.21 705 0.20 0.00 0.20 1352009-10 2.49 2.03 298 0.10 0.00 0.10 1472010-11 Current 11.18 7.39 556 0.22 0.00 0.22 75

156 Mahasangvi 5.88 1943 2005-06 5.88 3.70 450 0.98 1.15 2.13 1222006-07 5.88 4.03 445 0.79 0.45 1.24 1102007-08 5.88 4.17 427 0.92 0.24 1.16 1022008-09 5.88 4.49 630 1.15 0.00 1.15 1402009-10 5.88 2.80 413 0.80 0.00 0.80 1482010-11 Current 5.88 2.84 508 0.62 1.51 2.13 179

157 Renapur 20.55 2445 2005-06 Nd 5.63 544 1.06 0.58 1.64 972006-07 20.07 9.04 891 2.29 0.93 3.22 992007-08 8.13 3.79 501 0.71 0.51 1.22 1322008-09 9.55 3.57 375 0.83 0.86 1.69 1052009-10 10.67 3.58 341 0.47 1.69 2.16 952010-11 Current 18.24 10.61 604 0.45 0.96 1.41 57

158 Sangameshwar 15.04 3350 2005-06 15.03 6.51 402 0.16 0.00 0.16 622006-07 15.23 7.17 537 0.09 0.00 0.09 752007-08 15.03 7.52 1363 0.05 0.00 0.05 1812008-09 15.04 6.95 1217 0.38 0.00 0.38 1752009-10 15.04 7.84 1010 0.96 0.00 0.96 1292010-11 Current 15.04 17.51 943 0.54 0.00 0.54 54

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13159 Saraswati 6.21 1230 2005-06 6.21 3.72 313 0.60 0.00 0.60 84

2006-07 4.04 2.34 315 1.02 0.00 1.02 1352007-08 6.07 2.88 468 1.70 0.00 1.70 1632008-09 Nd 3.72 480 1.19 0.00 1.19 1292009-10 5.36 2.60 280 1.41 2.55 3.96 1082010-11 Current 6.21 2.90 342 0.95 2.55 3.50 118

160 Sindphana 7.348 1782 2005-06 7.36 2.21 508 2.04 0.00 2.04 2302006-07 7.36 5.35 640 4.65 0.00 4.65 1202007-08 7.36 4.45 748 5.40 0.00 5.40 1682008-09 4.87 2.59 584 2.90 0.00 2.90 2252009-10 4.42 3.60 642 2.00 0.00 2.00 1782010-11 Current 7.35 5.65 549 367.00 0.00 367.00 97

161 Dongargaon (Nanded) 8.81 830 2005-06 8.80 5.45 535 0.72 0.09 0.81 982006-07 8.47 5.43 609 0.71 0.00 0.71 1122007-08 8.47 5.38 609 0.00 0.00 0.00 1132008-09 8.47 4.49 610 1.54 0.00 1.54 1362009-10 6.17 0.00 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 02010-11 Current 8.47 3.90 320 0.12 0.00 0.12 82

162 Loni 8.38 1377 2005-06 8.10 3.18 283 0.20 0.00 0.20 892006-07 8.21 4.80 482 0.01 0.00 0.01 1002007-08 8.12 4.41 558 1.55 0.00 1.55 1272008-09 8.12 4.13 423 0.84 6.69 7.53 1022009-10 4.54 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02010-11 Current 8.38 1.26 119 0.04 0.00 0.04 94

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13163 Nagzari 6.56 960 2005-06 6.39 2.86 377 0.32 2.00 2.32 132

2006-07 6.56 3.62 413 0.87 1.62 2.49 1142007-08 6.45 4.38 440 1.72 3.58 5.30 1012008-09 6.45 4.19 403 1.61 6.69 8.30 962009-10 4.82 0.00 0 0.00 2.84 2.84 02010-11 Current 6.44 3.13 381 0.00 3.67 3.67 122

164 Mahalingi 4.78 784 2005-06 4.78 4.18 719 1.10 0.00 1.10 1722006-07 3.05 3.29 703 0.49 0.00 0.49 2142007-08 0.81 1.04 178 0.13 0.00 0.13 1712008-09 1.29 1.18 176 0.00 0.00 0.00 1492009-10 -0.70 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02010-11 Current 4.79 3.50 465 0.04 0.23 0.27 133

165 Pethwadaj 9.04 1478 2005-06 9.03 8.28 736 3.71 0.00 3.71 892006-07 9.04 8.07 916 2.71 0.00 2.71 1132007-08 9.04 7.21 807 2.46 0.00 2.46 1122008-09 2.86 0.29 46 0.53 0.00 0.53 1592009-10 0.81 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02010-11 Current 9.04 6.83 748 0.21 0.00 0.21 109

166 Kudala 4.35 567 2005-06 4.35 3.60 515 0.25 0.00 0.25 1432006-07 4.35 3.14 685 1.27 0.00 1.27 2182007-08 2.18 3.16 529 0.56 0.42 0.98 1672008-09 4.29 3.77 484 1.76 5.66 7.42 1282009-10 1.42 0.78 111 0.00 1.90 1.90 1422010-11 Current 4.35 2.04 314 0.04 2.66 2.70 154

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13167 Karadkhed 11.01 1780 2005-06 11.01 3.96 445 0.95 3.25 4.20 112

2006-07 11.01 5.61 621 1.19 2.73 3.92 1112007-08 7.91 3.35 557 1.24 5.95 7.19 1662008-09 7.78 4.17 543 2.95 8.38 11.33 1302009-10 4.53 0.00 0 0.00 4.90 4.90 02010-11 Current 10.99 2.63 850 0.00 6.12 6.12 323

168 Kundrala 10.41 1012 2005-06 10.41 5.35 725 0.36 1.68 2.04 1362006-07 10.41 6.93 1259 0.46 1.87 2.33 1822007-08 5.31 2.23 372 0.71 2.68 3.39 1672008-09 3.65 1.51 301 1.59 3.47 5.06 1992009-10 2.50 0.27 125 0.00 1.08 1.08 4632010-11 Current 10.42 4.71 406 0.00 5.82 5.82 86

169 Anjana Palashi 2005-06 NA 0.53 60 0.20 0.00 0.20 1132006-07 13.74 2.18 1386 0.50 1.00 1.50 6362007-08 5.28 2.73 1147 1.19 1.67 2.86 4202008-09 7.40 2.09 364 1.30 0.00 1.30 1742009-10 5.65 1.87 351 1.04 0.30 1.34 1882010-11 Current 13.74 2.51 309 0.60 2.19 2.79 123

170 Purna Nevpur 2005-06 NA 1.07 243 0.30 0.00 0.30 2272006-07 9.34 2.07 1484 0.74 0.00 0.74 7172007-08 5.11 2.86 1470 1.42 7.31 8.73 5142008-09 9.34 5.39 1381 1.29 1.70 2.99 2562009-10 9.34 3.86 555 0.72 1.68 2.40 1442010-11 Current 9.34 3.49 524 0.60 3.42 4.02 150

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13171 Narangi 2005-06 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

2006-07 11.39 3.38 916 0.00 0.00 0.00 2712007-08 9.27 3.78 936 0.24 2.30 2.54 2482008-09 11.39 0.95 384 0.22 1.77 1.99 4042009-10 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 3.83 3.83 02010-11 Current 3.26 3.22 580 0.52 2.92 3.44 180

172 Tembhapuri 2005-06 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA2006-07 19.01 2.89 1959 0.77 0.00 0.77 6782007-08 7.23 3.10 1531 0.62 0.00 0.62 4942008-09 14.85 1.00 145 0.60 1.37 1.97 1452009-10 14.17 2.73 501 1.93 4.28 6.21 1842010-11 Current 17.13 3.83 625 1.72 5.97 7.69 163

173 Shivana Takli 2005-06 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA2006-07 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA2007-08 15.05 0.62 120 0.57 0.00 0.57 1942008-09 34.85 7.59 542 0.73 0.00 0.73 712009-10 19.10 5.45 432 0.90 0.17 1.07 792010-11 Current 36.45 11.40 755 1.04 2.70 3.74 66

174 Waghe Babhulgaon 3.74 769 2005-06 NA NA2006-07 NA NA2007-08 0.00 02008-09 0.00 02009-10 3.74 1.24 178 0.00 0.00 0.00 1442010-11 Current 3.74 1.95 172.00 0 3.82 3.82 0

Sr. No.

Project Designed live storage

in Mm3

ICA in ha

Irrigation Year

Year status

Live Storage as on

15th oct

Water used for irrigation

in Mm3

Irrigated area in ha

Recovery Irrigation

Rs. In lakhs

Recovery Non-

Irrigation Rs. In lakhs

Total recovery

Irrigation + Non

irrigation in Lakhs

Annual Water supply

ha/Mm3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13175 Bor Dahegaon 11.47 1600 2005-06 NA NA

2006-07 11.47 1.90 135.00 0.00 0.00 NA NA2007-08 2.98 1.50 209 0.00 0.00 0.00 1392008-09 5.70 2.34 204 0.15 0.15 0.30 872009-10 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02010-11 Current 11.42 2.85 513 0.18 0.00 0.18 180

176 Upper Dudhana 13.02 3401 2005-06 NA NA2006-07 9.99 3.05 438.00 NA NA2007-08 5.32 2.44 292 0.00 1202008-09 4.83 4.09 395 0.00 972009-10 0.84 1.20 231 0.05 0.92 0.97 1932010-11 Current 8.94 6.91 1007 2.09 2.86 4.95 146

177 Wakod 11.4 2217 2005-06 NA NA2006-07 1.35 186.00 0.37 0.00 NA NA2007-08 2.19 0.75 153 0.00 0.00 0.00 2042008-09 3.46 0.17 50 0.17 0.00 0.17 2942009-10 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 02010-11 Current 2.65 1.11 157 0.17 0.00 0.17 141

NOTE :123

4

Change in col.No.3 of designed live storage in respective years if any is due to revision in designed live storage capicityIn col. No.8 of water used for irrigation is more than col.No. 7 of live storage as on 15th Oct. of respective year is due to water utilisation in kharif.

Col.No.9 of irrigated area is more than Col.No.4 of ICA is due to increase of area in kharif seasion.

NA : Not available

Chapter 8

BENCHMARKING OF WATER AND LAND MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (WALMI), AURANGABAD

(2010 – 11) 8.0 INTRODUCTION

WALMI, Aurangabad (Maharashtra) is a premier training institute in the of its kind in India established on 1st October 1980 as an autonomous registered society under Water Resources Department, Government of Maharashtra for imparting the training in IWM.

8.1 OBJECTIVES

The main objectives of the institute are:

♦ To provide in-service training of interdisciplinary nature to staff engaged in Irrigation Water Management and Land Development in Water Resources and Agriculture Departments

♦ Action and adaptive research pertaining to Irrigation Project Commands.

♦ Providing consultancy services, production of training materials (in print and electronic media), conducting seminars / workshops and organizing farmers’ training programmes

Training is imparted by highly qualified, experienced and well-trained faculty members. WALMI has five faculties:

♦ Faculty of Engineering

♦ Faculty of Agriculture

♦ Faculty of Science (Computer Applications & Hydraulics)

♦ Faculty of Social Sciences

♦ Faculty of Integrated Watershed Development & Management

The faculty consists of core faculty and senior field officers on deputation to WALMI. It is one of the vital factors of this institute’s strength and performance. 8.2 BENCHMARKING OF WALMI

The benchmarking technique is introduced for the performance evaluation of the irrigation systems in the State of Maharashtra. Benchmarking is a continuous process of measuring one’s own performance and practices against the best competitors and is a sequential exercise of learning from other’s experience. The guidelines are available on the categories of performance indicators for Irrigation Systems. The benchmarking of WALMI, Aurangabad, which is a premier training institute in IWM is carried out by developing the performance indicators based on the activities of the institute. The performance is also compared with the requirement wherever possible. WALMI has developed its own performance indicators on the basis of its functioning and objectives of the institute, as below:

1) Institutional performance 2) Qualitative performance 3) Environmental aspects 8.2.1 Institutional Performance

The institutional performance of the WALMI is assessed based on the following four indicators:

a) Annual training workload (trainee days)

The annual training workload is compared with the planned training workload and achievement for last five years average.

b) Annual training workload of long term courses (Participants)

The number of participants actually participated in long term courses (14 week’s duration) are compared with the potential strength of the long term courses for last five years average.

c) Annual Farmers’ training workload (Participants)

The number of participants actually participated in different farmer’s training programmes are compared with the average participants of last five years.

8.2.2 Qualitative Performance

The overall quality of institute’s activities is assessed based on the following

indicators: a) LTC Course evaluation b) Research activities c) Revisions & Development of publications d) Papers presented & published (state, national & international level)

8.2.3 Environmental Aspects Environmental indicators will give information about involvement of

participants in the training activities to acquire the knowledge, skills and attitudes for their jobs. It will also indicate the conduciveness of environment in the institute.

a) Referencing WALMI Library b) Visitors in WALMI

8.3 ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE OF WALMI

(i) Annual training workload (trainee days)

Annual training workload (trainee days) in 2010-11 are the highest as compared to average workload of the last five years. The average training workload of the last five years is about 31095. The actual training workload of last 5 years is ranging between 25786 to 34537. In almost all the years except 2006-07 the achievements are more than the planned trainee days. (Fig.1) (ii) Annual training workload of long term courses (participants)

The number of participants actually attending the LTC for all the years were more than the planned strength (Fig.2). This is because of efforts taken by the Institute and making it mandatory for all the nominated participants.

(iii) Annual Farmers’ training workload (participants)

This indicator shows the year wise number of farmers participated in the courses during last five years (Fig.3). In all the years up to 2008-09 the participation of farmers in the training programmes is more than the planned. However it is less than the planned from 2009 to 2011 due to poor response of farmers in MWSIP Courses. Special efforts are being taken to match the target number of farmers. More courses are planned on the field during 2011-12 for the farmers. (iv) End of course evaluation

In the method of end of course evaluation, the trainee officers are asked to give rating for various questions related to training. The average rating of end course evaluation for long term courses during 2010-2011 is 4.5, which indicates that overall quality of training as excellent (Fig.4). It is the highest amongst average rating of last 5 years. (v) Research activities

This activity is now taken up as supplemental activities along with the training activities of the Institute. (Fig. 5).

(vi) Revisions & Development of publications

This can not be assessed exactly on yearly basis. The (Fig. 6 ) shows the actual status of this activity. (vii) Papers / Articles presented & published (state, national & international

level)

The total number of publications of papers/articles by the faculties are 17 which is less than the average publications of last five years (30). This shows that the average publications of papers/articles published by the faculty are around 30 per year (Fig.7). The faculties are being motivated in this regard.

(viii) Referencing WALMI Library

This indicates that use of library is increasing among the faculties, training participants and visitors (Fig.8).

(ix) Visitors in WALMI

The visitors in WALMI are increasing year after year which is a good indicator for the capabilities of the WALMI (Fig.9).

Annual Training Workload (Trainee days)

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

Trai

nee

day

s

Planned 29926 30630 24792 30302 30020 29134 34572

Achieved 30410 25786 34366 34537 30377 31095 35339

2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 5 Yrs Avg 2010‐11

Figure No 1

Annual Training Workload of Long‐term Courses(LTC)(Participants)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Part

icip

ants

Planned 120 120 120 160 160 136 160

Achieved 126 151 181 174 175 161 163

2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 5 Yrs Avg 2010‐11

Figure No.2

Annual Farmers Training Workload(Participants)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Part

icip

ants

Planned 300 480 1270 1970 2360 1276 2630

Achieved 1055 658 2093 3990 1578 1875 1195

2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 5 Yrs Avg 2010‐11

Figure No.3

Course Evaluation

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Rati

ng

Av. Rating for LTC 3.85 4.06 4.23 3.99 3.99 4.02 4.5

2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 5 Yrs Avg 2010‐11

Figure No.4

Research Activities

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Num

ber

Research Studies in hand 7 6 1 5 7 5 6

Research Studies completed 10 3 3 1 4 4 1

2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 5 Yrs Avg 2010‐11

Figure No.5

Revisions & Development of Publications

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Num

ber

Revisions 3 2 0 0 0 1 0

New Publications 1 3 0 0 0 0.8 0

2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 5 Yrs Avg 2010‐11

Figure No.6

Papers / Articles presented & published(State/National & International Level)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Num

ber

Papers 5 19 14 27 21 17 8

Articles 28 9 8 12 9 13 9

Total 33 28 22 39 30 30 17

2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 5 Yrs Avg 2010‐11

Figure No. 7

Referencing WALMI Library

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000N

umbe

r

Reading Material issued 2489 2332 2113 1693 1355 1996.4 2197

Reading material consulted 20084 10374 17666 17292 12213 15525.8 11869

Total 22573 12706 19779 18985 13568 17522.2 14066

2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 5 Yrs Avg 2010‐11

Figure 8

Visitors in WALMI

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Num

ber

Officers & VIPs 711 465 160 45 425 361 55

Students 1920 1845 3450 2900 2700 2563 1996

Farmers 2974 2430 1750 1500 1600 2051 1267

Total 5605 4740 5360 4445 4725 4975 3318

2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 5 Yrs Avg 2010‐11

Figure 9

Chapter 9

BENCH MARKING OF

MAHARASHTRA ENGINEERING RESEARCH INSTITUTE, NASHIK

1.0 INTRODUCTION:

Maharashtra Engineering Research Institute, Nashik was established in April 1959. At present it comprises nine research divisions. The Institute is headed by Director General.

The Institute is largely dealing with basic research activities and field problems of applied research pertaining to various projects. Being state Research Institute, its jurisdiction is spread over the entire Maharashtra State covering Water Resources and Public Works Department.

1.1 OBJECTIVES:

The main objectives of the institute are –

i) To provide facility of testing related with Quality Control. Services for Testing of construction material like soil, Cement, Bricks,, Tiles, R.C.C. pipes, Aggregate, Steel, Rocks, asphalt and also concrete, masonry etc. for projects under Government and private schemes.

ii) To Study hydraulic performance of components of Irrigation projects as per necessity to help the design organization. (Back water study & model study)

iii) To provide services regarding instrumentation in dams.

iv) To act as a nodal agency regarding Seismic activities in the State.

v) To carry sedimentation survey for reservoirs.

vi) To provide services for crop mapping in commands of irrigation Projects using remote sensing method.

Applied /basic research studies are carried out in the Institute related to the points mentioned above.

1.2 Applied research problems are mainly referred by the field officers and Central Design Organization. Problems of basic research are either “Self sponsored” or entrusted with the Institute by Government of India through various committees related to Water Resources Department and Ministry of Surface Transport (MOST), under different research schemes.

1.3 In addition to the usual activities of research and testing, this Institute has following assignment:

a) Inspection of quality control laboratories established on Major and Medium projects.

b) Periodical calibration of various equipments of the field laboratories.

c) Assistance to the Maharashtra Engineering Training Academy, Nashik by delivering lectures, arranging practical and demonstrations, in the laboratories of MERI to the trainees.

d) Compilation, editing and publication “ºlÉÉ{ÉiªÉ’’ journal (“Sthapatya’’)

e) Compilation, editing and publication of Seismicity Journals.

2

f) Participating in the activities at the Indian Standards Institute, CBIP, IRC, New Delhi. etc.

The nine research divisions in the Institute are as follows:

1) Hydrodynamics Research division No. 1

2) Reservoir Sedimentation Survey Division.

3) Soil Mechanics division No. 1

4) Material Testing Division.

5) Structural Research and Physics Division

6) Seismic Data and Analysis Division.

7) Instruction Research Division.

8) Remote Sensing and Geo-Informatics Division.

9) Highway Research Division No.1

2.0 BENCHMARKING OF MERI.

2.1 Performance Indicators.

Benchmarking is a systematic process for securing continual improvement through comparison with relevant and achievable internal or external norms and standards. The overall aim of Benchmarking is to improve the performance of an organization as measured against its mission and objectives. Benchmarking implies comparison either with previous performance and desired future targets, or performance of similar organization, performing similar functions.

MERI, being Research Institute has developed its own performance indicators named as below.

i. Basic/Applied study.

ii. Testing work.

iii. Technical Research Paper

iv. Expenditure and Revenue, Earned.

Performance of MERI during last five years against norms is shown below in the form of graphs.

BASIC/APPLIED STUDY

19

3627

3932

01020304050

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11Year

Nos

Norms

TESTING WORKS

02000400060008000

1000012000140001600018000

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11YEAR

NO

S

TESTING WORKS NORMS

TECHNICAL PAPERS

0246810121416

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11YEAR

NO

S

EXPENDITURE & REVENUE EARNED

020040060080010001200140016001800

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

YEAR

Expe

nditu

re &

Rev

enue

(

Rs.

La

kh)

Expenditure Revenue

Chapter 10

BENCH MARKING OF

MAHARASHTRA ENGINEERING TRAINING ACADEMY (META), NASHIK

1.0 Introduction:

A proposal to establish a staff training college was initiated as long back as

1959. As the activities of the two departments of Irrigation & Planning and Building &

Construction went on increasing and expanding after the adoption of 5 year plans,

the need for meeting the shortage of trained technical staff became more and more

acute. The directly recruited Engineering officers were being trained by attaching

them to various Circles and Divisions. However, due to heavy workload and

increasing responsibilities in the field, proper attention to the systematic training of

these new recruits was not possible and they had to be left on their own study, learn

and pickup things by themselves. This was not considered to be a desirable feature

and hence the two Engineering departments (I&P and B&C) therefore decided to

systemize the training by establishing Staff training college.

Engineering Staff College, Nasik was opened on 20th May, 1964 to work on

seasonal basis to impart training to direct recruits of Maharashtra Service of

Engineers Class I and II & also promotees to these cadres vide government

Resolution No. TGO/4357/66258-E (4) dated 8th July 1964. First such course

proposed for the purpose was of 3 months duration. It started on 17th July, 1964 and

was inaugurated by Hon. Shri. Shankarrao Chavan, Minister I&P and B&C

Department. The college remained functioning up to 31st January 1965. It however

was reviewed again for second course for MSE Class I & II direct recruit and started

functioning from 4th May, 1965 as per orders contained in GR No.TGO 1063/40350-

E(4) dated 26th April 1965 and has since then being working continuously all the year

round.

Three regional training centres were established at Aurangabad, Nagpur in

the year 1983 and at Pune in the year 1984 headed by Executive Engineer and

Principal. The Regional Training Centre at Aurangabad and Nagpur is headed by

Executive Engineer (Civil) and Regional Training Centre at Pune is headed by

Executive Engineer (Mech.) from Water Resources Department. In the beginning

only training part was looked after by this Institute. In due course the work of

Professional Examination was also allotted to this Institute. In the year 1987 one post

of Superintending Engineer from WRD was elevated to Chief Engineer and the

whole Institute was brought under his control. In the year 1999 Govt. of Maharashtra,

Irrigation Dept., vide Resolution No. CRI 1098 /13/99 / P5 / Mantralaya, Mumbai 32

dated 1st Feb.1999 created new post of Director General MERI Nashik and

Engineering Staff College Nashik was brought under his control. In the year 2007,

the name of the Engineering Staff College was changed as Maharashtra Engineering

Training Academy with effect from 08/01/2007.

PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATION SECTION, M.E.T.A., NASHIK.

The Professional Examination for AEE/SDE/SDO/AE-I/Junior Engr./Civil

Engineering Assistants are conducted by Maharashtra Engineering Training

Academy (META), Nashik. The examination for AEI/DE are being held since 1982.

While Junior Engineers examination is held since 1984. The Departmental

examination for Civil Engineering Assistants is held by META since 2004.

The professional Examination for D.E. & J.E. level are conducted for Civil,

Mechanical & Electrical wings of Water Resources & Public Work Departments.

Engineers from Zilla Parishad/ Municipal Corporations / Maharashtra Industrial

Development Corporation also can appear for these examinations by paying

examination fee. The above examinations are conducted according to the rules

mentioned in Public works manual (1984 edition)

Every newly appointed Engineer has to pass the professional examination

within stipulated time period of 3 years.

1.1 Objectives:

The objectives can be summarized as under,

• To impart fundamental training to the University graduates recruited to

Maharashtra Service Engineers Class-I and II through Maharashtra Public

Service Commission so as to supplement their university education with

knowledge of rules, procedures and practical working of the two

Engineering departments.

• To train officers promoted from the ranks of Assistant Engineer Grade II /

Sectional Engineer to gazette posts.

• To impart fundamental training to the overseers within one year of

appointment with the same objectives as for M.S.E. class I and II recruits.

• To refresh and update the knowledge of in service Engineers from Junior

Engineer to Superintending Engineer in subjects of prime importance viz.

soil mechanics, concrete, masonry , administration and management etc.

as per the requirement.

• To conduct the professional examinations for in-service technical officers

of WRD and PWD.

1.2 Training Courses Conducted by META

The calendar of META for training courses starts from 1st June to 31st July of

every year. In general 50 to 60 courses for Sub Divisional Engineer/ officers and

above cadres are conducted at META Nashik whereas average 50 courses are

conducted at Regional Training Centres at Pune, Aurangabad and Nagpur for

Assistant Engineer Grade II, Sectional Engineers and Junior Engineers. The

subjects / topics covered in training courses are generally 50% technical and 50%

non technical which cover Personal Management, Administration, Advance

Management, Finance and Accounts.

1.3 Benchmarking of META

1.3.1 Performance Indicators.

Benchmarking is a systematic process for securing continual improvement

through comparison with relevant and achievable internal or external norms and

standards. The overall aim of Benchmarking is to improve the performance of an

organization as measured against its mission and objectives. Benchmarking implies

comparison either with previous performance and desired future targets, or

performance of similar organization, performing similar functions.

Performance of META during last five years against norms is shown below in

the form of graphs.

Statement showing the number of training courses and number of Engineers

trained.

Year META

Nasik

RTC

Aurangabad

RTC

Nagpur

RTC

Pune

No. of

training

courses

No. of

Engineers

trained

2006-07 64 46 36 37 183 5940

2007-08 80 33 41 39 193 6760

2008-09 71 44 50 52 217 8618

2009-10 59 35 41 41 176 6133

2010-11 79 28 41 43 191 7244

Professional Examination Section M.E.T.A., NASHIK.

The Professional Examination for Deputy Engineer / Junior Engineer are

conducted for newly appointed engineer in order to assess their technical capability

for working in respective Govt. departments. The main objective of these

examination is to make these engineers technically perfect in order to work more

efficiently on field.

Professional Examination for Assistant Executive Engineers/ Assistant

Engineer Grade-I / Deputy Engineers.

(Last 5 years)

Year Total Admitted Candidates

Total Passed Candidates

2006 57 35 2007 24 08

2008 - Exam was not held 2009 198 137 2010 151 81

Professional Examination for Jr. Engineers (Last 5 years)

Year Total Admitted Candidates

Total Passed Candidates

2006 767 267

2007 - - 2008 761 119 2009 - - 2010 955 257

No.of E ng ineers T rained

5940

6760

8618

6133

7244

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

No.of

E ngineers

T rained

Training Cost /Trainee/Day

1235

1015 956

15781731

1890

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

YEAR

In R

s.

Target (5760)

META PERFORMANCE

Year No.of

Training

Courses

No.of

Engineers

trained

Trainee

Days

Total

Cost

(In

lakh)

Training

cost in

Rs./Trainee/

Day

Revenue

Earned in

Rs. Lakh

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

2006-07 183 5940 18607 188.86 1015 2.12

2007-08 193 6760 24828 237.35 956 4.76

2008-09 217 8618 34224 540.05 1578 4.88

2009-10 176 6133 25917 448.62 1731 1.49

2010-11 198 7244 23282 440.02 1890 9.36

No.of Training Courses Conducted

183193

217

176

198

0

50

100

150

200

250

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

No.of Training

Courses

.

Year wise Passed Candidates (Jr. Engrs.)

0

250

500

750

1000

Year

Num

ber

Total Admitted Candidates Total Passed Candidates

Total Admitted Candidates 767 761 955

Total Passed Candidates 267 119 257

2006-07 2008-09 2010-11

Year wise Passed Candidates (AEE, AE-I, SDE, SDO)

0

100

200

Year

Num

ber

Total Admitted Candidates Total Passed Candidates

Total Admitted Candidates 57 24 198 151

Total Passed Candidates 35 8 137 81

2006-07 2007-08 2009-10 2010-11

APPENDICES

Appendix-I Abstract of guidelines issued by GOM for

Benchmarking of Irrigation Projects

Governments of Maharashtra, Water Resources Department vide Letter No. CDA 1004/(369/2004) CAD (works) dated 08.11.2004 issued guidelines while preparing Benchmarking report for the year 2003-04. Subsequently, additional instructions for the year 2004-05 were issued vide letter No. CDA 1004/ (369/2004) CAD – works dated 2.9.2005. Following procedure is adopted for preparation of benchmarking report (2010-11) based on guidelines.

1) Benchmarking is taken in hand after validation of data and linking it with

water audit data and data submitted to Government for Irrigation Status Report 2010-11.

2) All Projects included in report for 2009-10 are considered for 2010-11.

Additional projects of major, medium &minor having 5 year data is considered for 2010-11.

3) Indicators No. IX Man days for O & M per unit area is deleted as per

suggestion of core group. 4) In equity performance the head, middle and tail reaches are decided

dividing the command area in to three equal parts. 5) Potential Utilised and Created is linked with availability of water. Effective

potential of each project is decided based on availability of water for irrigation during the year.

6) Agricultural output is calculated at 1998-99 prices. The five year average values from 2005-06 to 2009-10 and values for 2009-

10 are considered for comparison, for all the indicators. Absurd (nil or very high values) are not considered while calculating the average.

Revenue means the actual recovery from Irrigation, non-irrigation water cess,

fishery, galper, tourism etc.

Appendix-II State target values for indicators 2010-11

Fixing Target Values:

The State targets set for indicators mentioned in Chapter IV were introduced from the year 2002-03 and are decided based on studies and past performance. It is obvious that project size, available water storage in reservoir and agro-climatic, geographical, social conditions are different for different regions. Therefore, there will be difference in performance of irrigation projects but to improve overall State performance and for simplicity, single target for each indicator for the State is defined. Performance of projects in a circle against each indicator is collective performance.

In 2003-04, the values of some of the indicators are revised and for financial

indicator of output per unit irrigated area and output per unit irrigation water supply, fixed prices of 1998-99 are considered to obviate effect of price rise. Also, for better monitoring and looking to the number of projects, the analysis is carried out considering irrigation circle as a unit and projects therein within similar plan groups of sub-basins.

The State target values set for Indicator I, III & IV are different; for different

categories of the projects viz. (a) major & medium, (b) minor. For other Indicators, the targets are uniform for all types of projects. I) Annual Irrigation Water Supply per Unit- Irrigated Area:

Irrigation system performance in Rabi and Hot weather season is 150 ha/Mm3

and 110 ha/Mm3 respectively. As there are Rabi and Hot weather crops in most of the major and medium project, average Irrigation system performance is (150 +110)/2=130 ha/Mm3.

Thus the water requirement per unit area = 1000000/130 = 7692 m3/ ha.

In case of minor project as there are no crops irrigated in Hot weather the

water requirement per unit area = 1000000/150 = 6666.67 m3 / ha. Say 6667 m3 / ha.

Hence in broad sense the water requirement per unit area works out to 7692 m3per ha. in case of major and medium projects and 6667 m3 per ha. in case of minor projects. II) Potential Created and utilized:

Utilization of created potential depends upon availability of water for irrigation. This availability further depends upon available yield & extent of Non Irrigation uses. Therefore, percentage of water available in the reservoir that can be used for irrigation should be the target for the project. The availability of water in different reservoirs is taken from water audit data for the year 2009-10.

III) Output per unit area:

The target is decided based on five years experience in 2004-05. The same targets are used for 2010-11.

The category wise values( Rs./ha) for different plan groups are as follows.

Plan group Major Medium Minor

Highly deficit 21000 23000 16000

Deficit 23000 25000 21000

Normal 26000 25000 21000

Surplus 25000 31000 27000

Abundant 32000 40000 36000

IV) Output per unit Water Supply (Rs./Cum):

Plan group Major Medium Minor

Highly deficit 2.69 2.80 2.40

Deficit 2.99 3.15 3.15

Normal 3.38 3.15 3.15

Surplus 3.25 4.05 4.05

Abundant 4.16 5.40 5.40

V) Cost Recovery Ratio:

Target is same for all categories and it is 1.

VI) Total O & M Cost Per Unit Area( Rs./ha): Total O & M cost includes maintenance cost as well as operation cost of the

irrigation system. M & R charges are considered as per Govt. norms and establishment charges are taken for staff working in a section office for irrigation water management.

Major Medium Minor

M & R 200 150 100 Establishment charges 1050 1050 1050

Total 1250 1200 1150

VII) Total O & M Cost Per Unit Water Supplied(Rs./Cum) :

Total O & M cost per unit water supplied for irrigation and non-irrigation use is considered as follows.

Major Medium Minor

(1250/7692) 0.16 (1200/7692) 0.16 (1150/6667) 0.17 VIII) Revenue Per Unit of Water Supplied (Rs./Cum):

The targets are fixed 10 percent more than O & M cost per unit of water supplied.

Major Medium Minor

0.18 0.18 0.19 The State targets for Revenue per unit of water supplied for irrigation is kept

as Rs. 0.18/m3, however, for NI use the target is Rs. 0.9/ m3 as charges of NI use are higher than irrigation use.

IX) Mandays For O & M Per Unit Area: The Indicator is deleted. X) Land Damage Index:

There is no target for this indicator. However, the percentage of land damaged to total ICA of the project should be minimum for all the projects.

XI) Equity Performance (head, middle and tail)

The head, middle and tail reaches is decided based on dividing the command in to 3 equal parts.

XII-I) Assessment Recovery Ratio (Irrigation)

State target is 1

XII-NI) Assessment Recovery Ratio (Non-Irrigation)

State target is 1

Appendix-III

Indicator wise average performance calculations

Indicator

Assumptions

Indicator – I: Zero value and values exceeding 3 times the State target are excluded.

Indicator – I a: –do-

Indicator – II: Zero value is excluded and values exceeding State

target are considered as 1.

Indicator – III: Values exceeding twice the State target are excluded.

Indicator – IV: –do-

Indicator – V: Zero value is excluded and values exceeding State

target are considered as 1.

Indicator – VI: Zero value and values less than 50% of the State target are excluded.

Indicator – VII: –do-

Indicator – VIII: Zero value and values exceeding twice the State

target are excluded.

Indicator –X: Actual figures are taken in to account

Indicator – XII (I): . –do-

Indicator – XII (NI): –do-

Live Storage

Mm3

Water use for

Irrigation Mm3

Water use for

Non irrigation

Mm3

Proposed Handed over

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15

18AA Bhima 500 1517.20 1444.70 116.43 1977 198035 182683 384 1 to 2.5 Sorghum, Wheat, Groundnut, Sugarcane

119609 27309

10 Katepurna 950 86.35 49.45 32.65 1972 11187 8325 30 1.5 to 2 Wheat, Peas, Cotton, Sunflower.

11187 7166

10 Nalganga 737 69.32 53.21 6.51 1963 9165 8604 31 1 to 2 Gram, Wheat, Cotton 9165 7493CADA Aurangabad

2 Jayakwadi (PLBC) 755 2171.00 1064.96 329.04 1975-76 183560 141640 355 1.5 to 2 Cottton, Wheat, Sorghum, Sunflower

CADA Beed2 Jayakwadi (PRBC) 700 2171.00 331.39 29.68 1976-77 53910 41682 99 1.57 Cotton,Wheat,Sorghum,

Sugarcane2 Majalgaon 840 312.00 680.28 46.88 1989-90 64295 54737 132 1 to 2 Wheat, Sorghum, Cotton,

Sugarcane21929 10597

4 Manjra 685 173.32 185.64 85.67 1980-81 23690 18223 80 2.03 -do- 5147 32594 Lower Terna 710 113.95 62.50 21.05 1997-98 14513 11610 63 1 to 1.5 Sorghum, Wheat,

Sunflower, Groundnut, GramND

11 Girna 743 525.06 549.66 0 1962-63 79293 69350 195 3 Sugarcane, Banana, Cotton, Wheat, Sorghum

15936 116

11 Chankapur 1067 76.85 146.59 0 1973 19173 14042 48 0.5 Bajri, Two seasonals, Paddy, Sorghum, Groundnut, Wheat, Gram

1861 0

CADA Solapur

AIC Akola

CADA Jalgaon

CADA Nashik

Highly deficit

Deficit

118070 47482

Area covered under WUA Ha

Culturable Command Area Ha

Irrigable command area Ha

No. of villages in

benefit zone

Main crops

Appendix-IVOverview of Projects selected for Benchmarking (Major Projects)

DesignedPlan Group

/SB No

Circle/ Project Avg. Annual Rainfall

mm

Year of Commence

ment of Irrigation

Avg. farm size Ha

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15

2 Vishnupuri 910 80.79 275.18 54.37 1990 37785 28340 46 2.06 -do- 1069 03 Purna 685 890.22 732.33 68.67 1968-69 78485 57988 232 1 to 2 Cottton, Wheat, Sorghum 24459 4486

4 Manar 850 138.21 198.06 5.94 1968 27745 23310 96 1.55 Wheat, Gram, Sugarcane, Cotton, Groundnut, Sorghum

4523 4523

10 Wan 891 81.96 78.57 20.08 1998-99 22525 15100 54 1.5 -do- 22525 11675

6 Arunawati 913 169.92 121.65 15.62 1995 24135 20515 73 2 to 3 Cotton, Wheat, Sugarcane 24135 366

AIC Akola6 Pus 945 91.26 100.35 19.06 1972 13678 8215 40 1.5 to 3 Sugarcane, Sorghum,

Wheat, Gram, Cotton, Groundnut.

11814 0

CADA Jalgaon13 Hatnur 743 255.00 500.12 90.53 1983 47360 37838 82 1.2 Sugarcane, Banana,

Groundnut7282 0

1 Bhandardara 3175 304.10 419.00 0 1926 63740 23077 110 4 to 5 Sorghum, Wheat, Grass, Maize, Sunflower, Sugarcane

9300 705

1 Mula 500 608.92 540.27 87.90 1972 138792 82920 160 4 to 5 . 91719 286681 Ozerkhed 746 60.32 31.59 2.19 1985 14856 10400 35 0.8 Wheat, Sorghum, Gram 7849 21431 Palkhed 661 21.40 82.90 46.85 1976 60704 43154 144 0.8 Gram, Sorghum 50345 141441 Waghad 964 72.20 36.53 3.50 1981 9642 6750 23 0.6 Paddy, Onion, Vegetables,

Groundnut, Bajri, Wheat, Gram, Sorghum

9557 9429

1 Darna 550 202.43 135.73 66.67 1918 88822 33170 146 2 Sugarcane, Sorghum, Bajri, Wheat, Gram, Fruits

7906 6691

1 Gangapur 500 159.42 86.78 117.07 1954 21900 15960 92 1.3 -do- 3239 18341 Kadwa 533 52.91 61.96 8.46 1997 15523 10117 42 0.47 -do- 465 345

CADA Nashik

NIC Nanded

BIPC Buldhana

YIC YavatmalNormal

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15

17 Kukadi (Complex) 790 864.39 951.29 0 1978 224699 156278 269 0.8 to 1 Wheat, Sorghum, Bajri, Vegetables, Sugarcane, Groundnut, Gram

57358 29369

17 Ghod 515 154.80 202.86 2.54 1965 41460 20500 54 1 Sugarcane, Sorghum, Bajri, Wheat, Grain

12155 301

CIPC Chandrapur

7 Bor 1327 127.42 109.29 6.35 1967 24055 13360 77 1.5 to 2 Cotton, Wheat 18169 10761NIC Nagpur

7 Lower Wunna 1330 189.18 148.00 29 1991 21591 19500 109 2.5 Cotton, Wheat, Gram, Soybean, Sugarcane

17325 413

NIC Nanded6 Upper Penganga 825 964.09 782.69 15.16 1984-85 139438 125495 356 1 to 2 Cottton, Wheat, Sorghum, 23589 7355

PIC Pune17 Khadakwasla

(Complex)911 808.65 602.55 204 1970 83302 62146 96 0.5 to 5 Sorghum, Bajri, Maize,

Wheat, Sugarcane83302 3180

17 Pawana 2210 241.11 96.50 168.32 1975 7468 6365 30 0.5 to 2.5

Paddy, Sorghum, Bajri, Maize, Wheat, Sugarcane

ND

18 Bhatghar Dam N.L.B.C.

1953 666.00 386.58 33.92 1893 68767 60656 87 1 to 2 Sorghum, Wheat, Bajri, Sugarcane 68767 1252

18 N.R.B.C. (Veer Dam)

1067 266.44 860.99 0 1938 181266 65506 214 1.7 Sugarcane, Sorghum, Bajri, Wheat, Other Perenials 181266 390

UWPC Amravati7 Upper Wardha 840 548.14 302.78 99.72 1994-95 83300 75000 279 1.5 Cotton, Wheat, Hy. Jowar,

Chilli, Groundnut83300 340

CADA Nagpur8 Bagh (Complex) 1325 268.96 214.44 0 1971 0 0 0 1 to 2 -do- 29703 35118 Pench 1138 1374.00 689.00 243 1976 126913 101200 407 1 to 2 Paddy, Cotton, Chilly,

Wheat, Gram, Sunflower, Soybean

126913 11180

8 Itiadoh 1336 318.86 412.04 0 1971 22752 17500 100 1 to 2 Paddy 22752 2123

CADA Pune

Surplus

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15

15 Krishna 872 602.73 602.73 0 1978-85 81400 74000 146 1 to 2 Sugarcane, Sorghum, Wheat, Gram

30058 8243

9 Asolamendha 1147 56.38 52.00 0 1918 37945 9919 67 1.5 to 2 Paddy 10317 09 Dina 1315 67.54 55.94 0 1974 12494 7826 66 1.5 to 2 -do- 12494 0

15 Radhanagari 3638 219.97 203.87 24.35 1955 35422 26560 91 0.5 to 1.5

Sugercane, Paddy, Wheat, Vegetables

47288 366

15 Tulashi 1870 91.92 91.92 42.50 1978 5711 4720 23 0.5 to 2 -do- 4495 015 Warna 2092 779.35 578.05 6.46 1986-87 123463 96919 332 0.8 -do- 148972 015 Dudhganga 2636 679.11 622.11 57 1993-94 46976 38388 125 1 to 2 Sugarcane, Paddy, Wheat 61032 2000

21 Surya 2286 285.31 145.42 31.06 1981-82 30547 14696 64 0.25 Paddy 400 021 Bhatsa 2589 942.10 511.86 389.03 1985-86 29378 23000 149 0.39 -do- ND22 Kal-Amba 3020 528.13 156.41 54.70 1973-74 9558 7965 127 0.20 -do- 351 0

ND= No Data

TIC Thane

AbundantCADA Pune

CIPC Chandrapur

SIC Sangli

Proposed Handed over

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16

19 Banganga 685 4.96 6.35 0.59 1975 964 906 545 5.00 1 to 3 Groundnut, Sorghum, Sunflower, Wheat

540 0

19 CADA Beed Chandani 770 21.58 20.59 3.11 1966 2891 2024 1716 10.00 2 to 3 Sorghum, Sunflower, Wheat, Pulses

300 0

19 CADA Beed Jakapur 770 7.96 7.43 0.00 1979 1600 1584 1500 4.00 2 to 3 -do- No Data No Data19 CADA Beed Kada 589 8.56 8.38 0.18 1970 1804 1214 1407 5.00 1 to 1.5 Soghum, Wheat, Groundnut,

Sugarcane, Maize, SunflowerNo Data No Data

19 CADA Beed Kadi 589 5.47 5.47 0.00 1965 1190 1084 578 4.00 0.5 to 4 Soghum, Wheat, Groundnut, Sugarcane, Sunflower

No Data No Data

19 CADA Beed Kambli 589 3.1 3.10 0.00 1958 1047 972 1013 5.00 1 to 1.5 Soghum, Wheat, Groundnut, Sugarcane, Maize, Sunflower

No Data No Data

19 CADA Beed Khasapur 770 13.04 13.30 2.55 1954 3575 2146 1372 15.00 2 to 3 -do- No Data No Data19 CADA Beed Khendeshwar 685 8.78 11.28 0.00 1981 1710 1471 810 10.00 1 to 3 Groundnut, Sorghum,

Sunflower, WheatNo Data No Data

19 Khandala 770 5.24 5.24 0.00 1974 1328 830 1300 2.00 2 to 3 -do- 296 019 CADA Beed Kurnoor 770 32.28 32.18 4.81 1968 6414 3644 4331 9.00 2 to 3 Groundnut, Sugarcane,

Sorghum, Sunflower, Wheat628 270

19 CADA Beed Mehakari 589 12.98 12.98 0.00 1966 5007 4048 2780 8.00 1 to 1.5 Soghum, Wheat, Groundnut, Sugarcane, Maize, Sunflower

617 0

19 CADA Beed Ramganga 685 5.34 6.50 0.00 1977 1017 963 585 7.00 1 to 3 Groundnut, Sorghum, Sunflower, Wheat

1017

19 CADA Beed Rooty 589 6.57 6.09 0.48 1938 1943 1862 1059 5.00 1 to 1.5 Sorghum, Wheat, Vegetables, Sugarcane

No Data No Data

19 CADA Beed Sakat 770 13.48 15.17 0.00 1994 3140 2355 923 9.00 2 to 3 -do- 697 019 CADA Beed Talwar 589 3.23 3.23 0.00 1960 760 668 530 4.00 0.5 to 1.5 Soghum, Wheat, Groundnut,

Sugarcane, Maize, SunflowerNo Data No Data

19 CADA Beed Turori 770 6.2 5.73 1.70 1984 900 830 900 8.00 2 to 3 -do- No Data No Data

19A Mangi 500 30.40 27.50 0 1966 4000 3117 1577 21 0.5 to 4 Sorghum, Groundnut. Sugarcane, Maize, Sunflower

931

19 CADA Beed Ekrukh 500 61.15 43.21 15.95 1871 6858 2610 2000 11 1 to 1.5 Sorghum, Wheat, Vegetables, Sugarcane

No Data No Data

18 AA Buddhihal 500 27.95 15.08 0.00 1966 5448 4251 1883 8 0.5 to 1.5 Sorghum, Wheat, Groundnut, Sugarcane, Maize, Sunflower

5444 0

19 CADA Solapur Hingni (P) 500 32.00 37.83 1.68 1977 6482 5629 5000 15 1 to 1.5 -do- 5714 2228

Overview of Projects selected for Benchmarking (Medium Projects)

CADA Solapur

Avg. farm size ( ha)

Main crops

Highly DeficitCADA Beed

Irrigable command

area (ha)

Total No. of

farmers

No. of villages

in benefit zone

Area covered under WUA (ha)

Plan group/ SB No

Name of Circle Designed Water use

for Non irrigation

(Mm3)

Year of Commence

ment of Irrigation

Culturable Command

Area (ha)

Circle/ Project Avg. Annual Rainfall (mm)

Designed Live

Storage (Mm3)

Designed Water use

for Irrigation

use (Mm3)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 1619 CADA Solapur Javalgon 500 29.18 29.37 6.15 1997 5372 5341 4500 13 1 to 1.5 -do- 4635 1245

19 Khairy 682 13.74 17.83 0 1989 2718 2318 1150 14 2 Sorghum, Bajri, Wheat, Groundnut

2318 0

16 PIC Pune Nher 508 11.79 11.79 0 1886 4324 2636 3440 18 1 Bajari, Sorghum, Wheat other Non Perennial

4324 0

19 PIC Pune Sina 562 52.3 67.09 0.2 1984 9677 8445 9500 26 1 Sorghum, Bajri, Wheat, Maize, Kadwal

8445 0

18 Mhaswad 533 46.21 46.21 0 1881 5804 4049 2500 11 1 Sorghum, Bajri, Groundnut 5804 018 PIC Pune Ranand 538 6.42 1.83 0 1953 3886 1093 1100 6 Kadwal, Wheat, Sorghum 3886 018 PIC Pune Tisangi 508 24.46 24.46 0 1965 5068 4049 2697 0 1 Sorghum, Bajri, 5132 0

10 Dnyanganga 732 33.93 33.80 8.69 1971 4494 4249 2962 21 1.5 to 2 Wheat, Gram, Cotton 4494 15810 AIC Akola Mas 696 22.04 21.48 8.09 1982 6107 4415 2900 22 2 to 3 -do- 6100 011 AIC Akola Morna 827 41.46 46.50 0.00 1972 6464 4633 2228 29 1 to 3 Wheat, Gram, Cotton,

Hy.Jawar6539 1935

11 AIC Akola Nirguna 812 28.85 34.50 0.00 1979 6377 5836 4574 20 1 to 2 Wheat, Gram, Cotton, Hy.Jawar, Groundnut

6377 2565

10 AIC Akola Paldhag 766 7.51 10.40 0.37 1978 3082 1932 1534 14 1 to 2 Wheat, Gram, Cotton 3032 56310 AIC Akola Shahanur 1440 46.04 41.12 12.45 1990 9330 7466 7347 47 1.27 Cotton, Sorghum, Wheat,

Gram, Orange9330 0

10 AIC Akola Uma 818 11.68 10.23 0.92 1982 3007 2241 1996 21 1 to 3 Wheat, Gram, Cotton, Hy.Jawar

3007 267

10 Mun 761 36.83 45.10 0.00 1992-93 9735 7804 2782 32 2.5 Cotton, Chilly, Sunflower 9735 010 BIPC Buldhana Torna 711 7.9 7.75 0.11 1994-95 1725 1465 753 7 2.5 -do- 1725 0

11 Ajintha Andhari 650 7.65 5.27 2.38 1984 1967 1578 500 3 3.93 -do- 294 03 CADA Aurangabad Dhamna 677 8.51 8.34 0.15 1973 1682 1280 510 8 2.5 -do- 696 0

11 CADA Aurangabad Gadadgad 840 4.64 3.97 0.67 1971 1448 1180 820 4 1.77 -do- 1449 14492 CADA Aurangabad Galhati 598 13.84 7.08 4.34 1964 2812 2200 1200 12 1 to 2 Sorghum, Wheat, Cotton, Tur No Data No Data

3 CADA Aurangabad Girija 762 21.25 14.66 6.57 1990 3443 3443 4447 10 0.77 -do- 2309 2783 CADA Aurangabad Jivrekha 668 6.13 6.14 0.00 1964 2589 1064 908 6 2.5 -do- 1318 03 CADA Aurangabad Jui 647 6.03 6.22 2.00 1960 2636 2206 880 14 2.5 -do- 434 03 CADA Aurangabad Kalyan 567 12.22 7.35 3.03 1986 2693 2020 800 9 3 -do- 850 03 CADA Aurangabad Kalyan Girija 663 8.47 8.42 0.00 1972 1557 1377 420 9 3 Wheat, Sorghum, Sunflower 1655 03 CADA Aurangabad Karpara 760 24.9 21.03 2.80 1974 2862 2151 1980 7 1.5 -do- No Data No Data3 CADA Aurangabad Khelna 650 11.07 4.74 6.33 1967 4935 2429 1210 11 4.08 -do- 590 03 CADA Aurangabad Lahuki 688 5.31 3.72 1.59 1977 1323 1092 1384 4 0.96 -do- 484 02 CADA Aurangabad Masoli 780 27.13 23.44 3.94 1982 3502 2591 2067 7 1.5 -do- 805 5103 CADA Aurangabad Sukhana 688 18.49 16.56 1.93 1968 3136 2511 1150 14 2.73 -do- 1735 0

4 Devarjan 838 10.680 7.12 0.00 1997 2853 1882 920 7 2.04 Sorghum, Wheat, Gram, Sunflower

No Data No Data

4 CADA Beed Gharni 716 22.460 23.78 0.00 1969 3542 2834 1347 14 2.10 Sugarcane, Groundnut, Sorghum, Cotton, Maize, Paddy, Vegetable, Wheat, Gram

3542 0

BIPC Buldhana

CADA Aurangabad

CADA Beed

PIC Pune

DeficitAIC Akola

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 162 CADA Beed Kundlika 753 37.690 37.83 0.33 1988 3927 2964 1009 13 3.91 Sugarcane, Groundnut,

Sorghum, Bajri, Cotton, Sunflower

287 287

4 CADA Beed Masalga 673 13.590 11.54 0.00 1996 1678 1364 790 11 1.73 Sorghum, Bajri, Cotton, Sunflower, Groundnut

1664 0

4 CADA Beed Raigavhvan 770 11.260 8.57 0.28 1992 2267 1700 1261 8 1.30 -do- 1370 04 CADA Beed Rui 770 8.610 5.80 1.72 1994 1893 1650 250 7 1.20 -do- No Data No Data4 CADA Beed Sakol 850 10.950 8.40 0.00 1996 2174 2064 945 7 2.18 Sorghum, Chilli, Groundnut,

Maize, Paddy, Vegetables, Wheat, Gram

No Data No Data

4 CADA Beed Tavarja 744 20.340 10.98 3.92 1983 4907 3603 2105 19 1.72 Sorghum, Sunflower, Wheat No Data No Data4 CADA Beed Terna 770 19.663 10.84 4.81 1964 1928 1652 1469 9 1.50 Sugarcane 100 04 CADA Beed Tiru 684 15.290 21.19 0.00 1978 2654 2348 1741 14 1.40 Sorghum, Chilli, Groundnut,

Maize, Paddy, Vegetables, Wheat, Gram

2625 2625

4 CADA Beed Vhati 880 8.270 9.93 0.00 1983 1809 1760 829 7 2.15 Sorghum, Chilli, Groundnut, Maize, Paddy, Vegetables, Wheat, Gram, Fodder

1005 0

4 CADA Beed Wan 533 19.34 19.31 7.64 1967 7125 5262 4630 22 1.54 Sorghum, Wheat, Sunflower, Cotton, Groundnut

265 0

11 Agnawati 743 2.76 2.90 0.58 1987 960 605 375 3 0.75 -do- 480 013 AA CADA Jalgaon Bhokarbari 694 6.54 8.15 0.00 1993-94 1790 1205 603 5 1.5 -do- No Data No Data13 AA CADA Jalgaon Bori 694 25.15 31.30 7.08 1985-76 6504 4553 2277 15 2 -do- 839 013 AA CADA Jalgaon Burai 500 14.21 19.23* 0.87 1984-85 2981 2760 2524 5 1 Wheat, Cotton, Gram, Bajri,

Sorghum, Onion, Maize1297 155

13 AA CADA Jalgaon Kanoli 660 8.45 10.50 0.00 1974-75 1620 1363 1500 8 1 to 2 Wheat, Cotton, Gram, Bajri, Sorghum

449 0

11 CADA Jalgaon Hiwara 810 9.6 12.30 0.00 1997 2923 2231 608 3 0.8 -do- 1580 011 CADA Jalgaon Manyad 750 40.27 45.30 0.00 1973-74 6500 4864 4245 12 2 Sugarcane, Banana, Cotton 1908 0

13 AA CADA Jalgaon Rangavali 1055 12.89 23.05* 0.00 1983-84 5130 3134 1400 21 2 to 2.5 Sorghum, Wheat, Cotton, Vegetables

1261 0

13 AA CADA Jalgaon Tondapur 763 4.64 4.77 0.85 1998 1597 1060 712 2 0.8 -do- 380 0

4 G.Pargaon 685 8.5 12.36 0.00 1984 2142 1660 1792 15 3 to 4 -do- 747 011 CADA Nashik Haranbari 795 33.02 47.66 0.00 1988-89 12966 9726 11150 55 0.5 Paddy, Sorghum, Groundnut,

Wheat, Gram, Sugarcane632 491

11 CADA Nashik Kelzar 687 16.2 16.51 0.00 1988-89 5583 3394 2594 19 0.5 Bajri, Two seasonals, Paddy, Sorghum, Groundnut, Wheat, Gram

630 630

11 CADA Nashik Nagya Sakya 528 11.24 13.72 0.00 1992.93 2400 2400 2125 11 0.5 Paddy, Sorghum, Groundnut, Wheat, Gram, Sugarcane

0 0

4 Karadkhed 650 11.01 11.34 6.56 1976 2510 1780 1298 11 1.93 -do- 1652 16522 NIC Nanded Kudala 700 4.35 5.54 1.38 1974 676 567 428 5 1.23 -do- No Data No Data

CADA Nashik

NIC Nanded

CADA Jalgaon

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 164 NIC Nanded Kundrala 630 10.41 12.81 4.21 1981 1265 1012 784 7 1.61 Wheat, Gram, Sugarcane,

Cotton, Groundnut, Sorghum1277 1277

4 NIC Nanded Mahalingi 775 4.78 4.06 1.68 1980 1015 784 568 6 1.8 -do- 1449 7844 NIC Nanded Pethwadaj 850 9.04 13.52 1.31 1977 1970 1478 1985 13 1 -do- No Data No Data

YIC Yevatmal6 Adan 798 67.25 69.67 11.14 1979 10067 7804 14000 32 0.56 Cotton, Tur, Sugarcane,

Groundnut10067 0

7 Nawargaon 1067 12.47 13.28 2.71 1999 2574 2056 2680 15 0.56 -do- 2574 0

6 AIC Akola Borgaon 988 6.61 10.86 0.35 1992 3028 2271 980 16 1.5 to 3 Groundnut, Cotton, Sorghum, Wheat, Gram, Pulses

3028 3028

6 AIC Akola Ekburji 986 11.97 9.08 0.76 1964 2625 2429 1700 11 1 to 2 Wheat, Gram 2625 06 AIC Akola Koradi 660 20.7 15.12 0.00 1981 5067 4061 4125 26 1 to 2 Cotton, Sorghum, Wheat,

Groundnut5067 127

6 AIC Akola Lower Pus 852 59.63 70.50 2.42 1990 7606 6600 1653 29 2 to 4 Sugarcane, Cotton, Sorghum, Wheat, Gram, Pulses, Vegetables

6740 0

6 AIC Akola Saikheda 1098 27.18 24.77 4.38 1972 3895 3116 1132 18 1.5 to 3 Cotton, Sorghum, Wheat, Gram, Pulses, Vegetables

3239 0

10 AIC Akola Sonal 860 16.92 17.95 0.00 1981 3496 2447 2347 46 1 to 2 Hy. Jawar, Sunflower, Cotton, Wheat, Gram

3293 764

1 Ambadi 650 9.42 6.92 2.50 1979 2375 2147 1050 10 2.26 -do- 1467 01 CADA Aurangabad Dheku 600 11.53 6.55 5.60 1961 3564 2712 1725 15 2.07 -do- 580 01 CADA Aurangabad Kolhi 600 3.23 2.63 0.60 1967 1056 472 350 4 3.02 -do- 472 0

13 A Abhora 750 6.02 7.13 0.00 1985 1403 1115 450 2 0.8 -do- 580 013 A CADA Jalgaon Aner 970 59.21 79* 8.50 1976 9201 7180 3402 10 0.5 Wheat, Groundnut, Cotton 2154 013 A CADA Jalgaon Karvand 960 21.39 21.39 0.62 1968 7027 4534 2200 14 0.4 -do- 1899 013 A CADA Jalgaon Malangaon 780 11.32 15.02 0.00 1972 2674 1587 2675 15 0.5 -do- 647 012 CADA Jalgaon Panzara 780 35.63 72.66* 0.71 1976 7328 6868 6500 25 0.8 Maize, Bajra, Wheat 1231 0

13 A CADA Jalgaon Suki 774 39.85 45.47 0.00 1985 8647 5128 1467 8 0.9 Groundnut, Pulses, Sorghum, Cotton

5124 3639

7 CADA Nagpur Wunna 1100 21.64 9.49 11.55 1968 2000 1214 279 10 1.33 Wheat, Cotton, Orange, Gram, Vegetables

2000 0

1 CADA Nashik Adhala 500 27.6 38.74 0.00 1977 6427 3914 3646 16 3 to 4 Sorghum, Wheat, Grass, Bajri, Groundnut, Maize

1512 0

1 CADA Nashik Alandi 614 27.46 21.00 5.67 1985 7408 6296 2000 18 3 Vegetables, Grapes, Sorghum, Sugarcane, Wheat, Gram

1837 0

1 CADA Nashik Bhojapur 393 10.22 8.15 2.55 1973 4580 4500 4000 24 1.7 Bajri, Wheat, Sorghum, Gram 500 0

1 CADA Nashik Mand Ohol 600 8.78 13.16 0.00 1983 2833 2266 2830 15 3 to 4 Sorghum, Wheat, Grass, Maize, Sunflower, Sugarcane

2427 0

CADA Nashik

CADA Aurangabad

CADA Jalgaon

CADA Nagpur

Normal

AIC Akola

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16

7 Amalnalla 1218 24.48 19.52 0.00 1981 4710 2962 1280 22 1.5 to 2 Wheat, Cotton, Gram 3771 07 CIPC Chandrapur Labhansarad 1103 7.35 5.87 0.00 1987 2024 2024 725 11 1.5 to 2 Wheat, Cotton, Soybean 2024 07 CIPC Chandrapur Panchdhara 1103 10.39 8.43 0.00 1976 2262 1822 1375 14 1.5 to 2 Cotton, Wheat 2667 19747 CIPC Chandrapur Pothral 1100 34.72 34.72 0.00 1984 10910 8948 1821 33 1.5 to 2 -do- 10910 0

6 NIC Nanded Loni 1150 8.38 9.51 0.91 1981 1835 1377 1788 7 1.02 -do- No Data No Data6 Dongargaon 1150 8.81 11.55 0.00 1983 1008 830 561 5 1.8 -do- 1008 10086 NIC Nanded Nagzari 1150 6.56 6.18 2.92 1983 1260 960 269 6 4.68 -do- 665 0

17 PIC Pune Vadiwale 2845 30.39 22.18 0 1990 5564 5000 4415 26 0.15 to 1 Paddy, Wheat 5564 0

8 Bageda 1146 4.535 4.11 0.00 1974 1887 1798 1296 10 0.85 Paddy 2566 6798 CADA Nagpur Betekar Bothali 1186 3.666 3.67 0.00 1989 1266 1315 672 4 0.75 -do- 1266 08 CADA Nagpur Bodalkasa 1281 19.73 16.45 2.73 1917 14665 4047 6283 36 0.21 -do- 9839 08 CADA Nagpur Chandpur 1200 28.87 28.87 0.00 1916 10117 6271 8274 40 0.9 -do- 10117 6178 CADA Nagpur Chorkhamara 1267 22.04 20.80 0.00 1917 13246 4047 1210 25 0.35 -do- 13246 08 CADA Nagpur Chulband 1384 21.46 16.82 0.00 1976 3378 3167 2929 21 1.1 -do- 3378 08 CADA Nagpur Kanholibara 1004 20.49 22.03 4.73 1976 4815 3371 1217 22 3 HW Groundnut, Cotton,

Soybean, Wheat, Gram, Vegetables

6025 0

8 CADA Nagpur Kesarnala 979 3.93 4.28 0.00 1976 937 780 126 7 1.6 -do- 937 08 CADA Nagpur Khairbanda 870 16.48 12.22 0.00 1915 11271 6109 6400 31 -do- 112267 08 CADA Nagpur Khekranala 963 23.81 29.54 0.00 1987 3810 2610 1829 14 1.5 Cotton, Wheat, Gram, Orange,

Sugarcane, HW Groundnut, Soybean, Vegetables.

3144 0

8 CADA Nagpur Kolar 978 31.32 41.23 1.21 1984 8088 5940 2829 43 2.1 -do- 8088 08 CADA Nagpur Makardhokada-Saiki 963 25.9 27.37 1.45 1980-81 5835 5477 2625 29 1.33 Paddy, Cotton, Chillies, Wheat,

Sorghum, Gram, Soybean, Vegetables

3512 0

8 CADA Nagpur Managadh 1609 7.05 7.83 0.00 1970 3390 1700 1006 11 0.35 -do- 3390 08 CADA Nagpur Mordham 1016 4.95 4.91 0.05 No data 1423 1315 406 8 2.1 Orange, Wheat, Gram,

Vegetables, Cotton1423 0

8 CADA Nagpur Pandharabodi 1290 13.14 14.51 2.15 1974-75 1044 862 754 12 2.18 Paddy, Chillies, Wheat, Gram, Soybean, Sunflower.

1030 0

8 CADA Nagpur Rengepar 1138 3.57 5.86 0.00 1977 1305 870 1044 7 0.75 -do- 1305 08 CADA Nagpur Sangrampur 1281 3.868 8.87 0.46 1969 1536 1094 1409 7 -do- 1194 08 CADA Nagpur Sorna 1255 5.733 5.73 0.00 1972 1553 933 943 8 0.75 -do- 1553 08 CADA Nagpur Umari 1064 5.14 5.85 0.00 1971-72 1802 1195 749 8 2 Wheat, Cotton, Orange, Gram,

Vegetables, Groundnut1902 0

8 Chandrabhaga 1016 8.262 8.25 0.02 1974-75 3181 2604 106 15 2.1 Orange, Wheat, Gram, Vegetable, Cotton

3181 0

8 Chandai 1205 21.58 9.28 0.00 1983 2565 2056 1.12 14 1.5 to 2 -do- 2565 08 CIPC Chandrapur Chargaon 1285 19.87 11.98 0.00 1983 1946 1500 8.799 12 1.5 to 2 Paddy, Wheat 884 0

CIPC Chandrapur

NIC Nanded

PIC Pune

SurplusCADA Nagpur

CIPC Chandrapur

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16

7 CIPC Chandrapur Dongargaon(Wardha) 1100 4.44 3.17 0.00 1974 972 631 328 9 1.5 to 2 -do- 608 6089 Ghorazari 1285 43.16 35.00 0.00 1923 12868 3846 7181 65 1.5 to 2 Paddy 4961 09 CIPC Chandrapur Naleshwar 1147 10.23 4.29 0.00 1922 5035 1888 3097 23 1.5 to 2 -do- 2329 0

23 Natuwadi 3632 27.230 27.23 0.00 1984 2139 2050 3629 18 0.02 to 0.05 Paddy, Groundnut, Pulses, Mango

2050 0

15 Chikotra 1074 43.06 43.05 0.00 2001 6833 5630 1326 27 1 to 2 Sugercane, Paddy, Wheat, Vegetables

6833 0

15 SIC Sangli Chitri 1524 52.73 64.45 0.00 2001-02 9160 5850 2590 54 0.55 -do- 9160 015 SIC Sangli Jangamhatti 2190 33.21 26.37 6.84 1996-97 4450 3700 8000 10 0.1 Sugercane, Maize,Chilly

Wheat,Potato, GrouNo Datanut4457 0

15 SIC Sangli Kadavi 3418 70.56 70.56 0.00 2001 9908 9219 2211 52 0.8 -do- 9908 015 SIC Sangli Kasari 4560 77.96 61.57 0.00 1989 9995 5458 3197 61 1 to 1.5 Sugercane, Paddy, Wheat 9995 015 SIC Sangli Kumbhi 4985 76.5 74.81 1.68 2001 9170 8711 1773 51 0.10 to 1 Sugercane, Wheat,

Groundnut, Sunflower9170 0

15 SIC Sangli Patgaon 3486 104.77 78.58 26.19 1996 10000 8100 3525 44 1 to 2 Sugercane, Paddy, Wheat 10000 0

21 TIC, Thane Rajanala 339.140 32.00 0.00 1958-59 3050 2542 0.00 0.20 Paddy 40021 Wandri 2540 35.938 35.94 0.00 1984.85 3066 2044 1526 17 0.25 -do- No Data No Data

CIPC Chandrapur

KIC Ratnagiri

SIC Sangli

TIC Thane

Abundant

Appendix-V River Basins & Agro- Climatic zones of Maharashtra

River Basins

The State is mainly covered by the basins of Krishna, Godavari and Tapi except the west-flowing rivers of Konkan strip. A small portion on north comes under Narmada basin. There are in all 380 rivers in the State and their total length is 19269 km. Most of the land is undulating and hilly. Comparatively, continuously hilly plateau lands are very few. Because of this, flow canal systems in Maharashtra are very expensive, though there are large numbers of suitable sites for building water storage reservoirs.

Number of rivers originates from Sahyadri at about 500 to 700 m elevation and flow westward to Arabian Sea through the Konkan strip. Damanganga, Surya, Vaitarna, Ulhas, Karla, Kundalika, Kal, Savitri, Vashishthi, Shastri, Gad, Karli, Tillari and Terekhol are the prominent rivers. These rivers are of shorter length holding fair amount of water during monsoon but run totally dry during summer. The natural calamities such as land erosion, salt water intrusion, land subsistence etc. are often inflicted upon Konkan.

Tapi and Narmada are the two west-flowing rivers coming from Madhya Pradesh and flowing down to Gujarat State through Maharashtra. Narmada forms 54 km long common boundary of the State along northern border. Total length of Tapi in Maharashtra is 208 km. These rivers and tributaries have rendered the land of Khandesh fertile.

Wainganga flows in north-south direction. The length of Waiganga in Maharashtra is 476 km. Godavari is the principal east-flowing and longest river in Maharashtra (968 km).

South-east flowing Bhima and mainly north-south flowing Krishna are the major rivers of South Maharashtra. The length of Bhima in Maharashtra is 451 km. It joins Krishna on the Karnataka-Andhra Pradesh boundary near Raichur.

Krishna rises near Mahabaleshwar. Krishna is 282 km long in the State. Basin-wise water availability – (Maharashtra – India) Sr. No

Basin Geographical Area (Mha)

Culturable Area (Mha)

Average Annual Availability

(BCM)

75% Dependable Yield (BCM)

Permissible Use As Per Tribunal Award

(BCM)

1 Godavari 15.430 11.256 50.880 37.300 34.185

2 Tapi 5.120 3.731 9.118 6.977 5.415

3 Narmada 0.160 0.064 0.580 0.315 0.308

4 Krishna 7.010 5.627 34.032 28.371 16.818

5 West flowing Rivers

3.160 1.864 69.210 58.599 69.210

Total: 30.88 22.542 163.820 131.562 125.936

Sub-basin wise planning

As per the recommendations laid down in the National Water Policy – 2002 and Maharashtra Water and Irrigation Commission’s Report, the State Water Policy has been adopted by GOM in 2003.

The objectives of the Maharashtra State Water Policy are to ensure the sustainable development and optimal use and management of the State’s water resources, to provide the greatest economic and social benefit for the people of the State of Maharashtra and to maintain important ecological values within rivers and adjoining lands.

The Maharashtra State Water Policy mentions that -

‘To adopt an integrated and multi-sectoral approach to the water resources planning, development and management on a sustainable basis taking river basin/sub basin as a unit.’

The water resources of the State shall be planned, developed, managed with a river basin/ sub basin as a unit, adopting multicultural approach and treating surface and sub-surface water with unitary approach.’

The geographical area of the State is 308 lakh ha and cultivable area is 225 lakh ha. This geographical area is divided mainly into five major river basins of Godavari, Krishna, Tapi, Narmada and basin groups in Konkan. There are 22 narrow basins of west flowing rivers in Konkan.

The Maharashtra Water and Irrigation Commission has proposed delineation of five river basins basically into 25 distinct sub basins for planning of water resources development in the State. The categorisation of sub basins proposed is solely on the basis of natural availability of water. The basic characteristics of sub basins are dictated by the hydrological regime, which in turn, is a function of climate, rainfall distribution and the draining area.

The sub basins are as follows:

Sr.

No.

River Basin

Names of Sub basins Abbreviated name Categorisation for planning on

the basis of availability of natural water

I Godavari 1) Upper Godavari (Up to Paithan Dam)

Upper Godavari Normal

2) Lower Godavari (D/S of Paithan Dam)

Lower Godavari Deficit

3) Purna (including Dudhana) Purna Dudhana Deficit

4) Manjra Manjra Deficit

5) Godavari-Sudha-Swarna Remaining Godavari

Normal

6) Painganga Painganga Normal

7) Wardha Wardha Normal

8) Middle Wainganga Middle Wainganga

Surplus

9) Lower Wainganga Lower Wainganga Abundant

II Tapi 10) Purna (Tapi) Purna Tapi Deficit

11) Girna Girna Deficit

Sr.

No.

River Basin

Names of Sub basins Abbreviated name Categorisation for planning on

the basis of availability of natural water

12) Panzara Panzara Normal

13) Middle Tapi Middle Tapi Deficit

III Narmada 14) Narmada Narmada Surplus

IV Krishna 15) Upper Krishna (West) Upper Krishna (W)

Abundant

16) Upper Krishna (East) Upper Krishna (E) Highly Deficit

17) Upper Bhima (Up to Ujjani) Upper Bhima Normal

18) Remaining Bhima Remaining Bhima Normal

19) Sina-Bori-Benetura Sina-Bori-Benetura

Highly Deficit

V West Flowing

20) Damanganga-Par Damanganga-Par Abundant

Rivers in 21) North Konkan North Konkan Abundant

Konkan 22) Middle Konkan Middle Konkan Abundant

23) Vashishthi Vashishthi Abundant

24) South Konkan South Konkan Abundant

25) Terekhol – Tillari Terekhol – Tillari Abundant

Categorization of sub basins for planning, on basis of naturally available quantum of water, is given below:

Sr. No. Plan Group Per ha availability (m3)

Percent of cultivable area of State

i) Highly Deficit Area Below 1500 13

ii) Deficit area 1501-3000 32

iii) Normal area 3001-8000 34

iv) Surplus area 8001-12000 06

v) Abundant area Above 12000 15

A graph showing basin wise availability of water is appended herewith.

The performance of a circle (herein called service provider) very much depends upon the availability of water, which in turn is governed by the type of sub-basin in which the project is located. Some circles are having projects located in more than one category of plan group of sub-basins. Therefore, these circles will appear more than once, in graphical representation of indicators.

Climate

Maharashtra is having mostly a seasonal climate. Four distinct seasons are noticeable in a year viz. (1) Monsoon: The rains start with the south - west winds. Mainly it rains during the four months from June to September, but it often extends up to October. (2) Post-monsoon season: October to mid December is a fair weather season with meagre rains. These are the initial months of the post-monsoon, Rabi

crops and the condition of later depends upon the weather during these months. (3) Winter: It is generally a period of two or two-and-a-half months, from mid-December until end of February. Most of the Rabi crops are harvested during these months. (4) Summer: It lasts for at least three months - March to May.

There is considerable variation in weather and rainfall among the five different geographical regions of Maharashtra.

1 The coastal districts of Konkan experience heavy rains but mild winter. The weather, however, is mostly humid throughout the year.

The maximum and minimum temperatures here range between 270C and 400C and 140C to 270C respectively. The relative humidity is 81% to 95% during June to August while 30% to 65% during January - February.

2 The western parts of Nashik, Pune, Satara and Kolhapur districts show a steep reduction in rainfall from the mountainous regions towards the East. The maximum temperature ranges between 260C to 390C and the minimum temperature between 80C to 230C. The relative humidity is 81% to 99 % in August and only 20% to 39% in March.

3 The eastern part of the above four districts together with Ahmednagar, Sangli, Solapur, Aurangabad, Jalna, Beed and Osmanabad districts fall under the rain shadow of Sahyadri Mountains and therefore the beginning and end of the rainy

Water Availability per ha of Culturable Area

8335

2957

2820 4

644

3218

3595

8293

89902

3112

9063

44341

29118

40243

48761

35688

59766

41870

5809

6768

2131

1811

2122

1197

2374

6332

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

Upper

Godavari

Low

er

Godavari

Purn

a D

udhana

Manjra

Rem

ain

ing G

odavari

Pain

ganga

Ward

ha

Mid

dle

Wain

ganga

Low

er

Wain

ganga

Purn

a T

api

Girna

Panjra

Mid

dle

Tapi

Narm

ada

Upper

Krishna (

W)

Upper

Krishna (

E)

Upper

Bhim

a

Rem

ain

ing B

him

a

Sin

a-B

ori-B

enitura

Dam

anganga-p

ar

Nort

h K

onkan

Mid

dle

Konkan

Vashis

thi

South

Konkan

Tere

khol-T

illari

Subbasin

cu

m

Availability per ha.of CCA Avail 1500 Avail 3000 Avail 8000 Avail 12000

Values Exceeding 16000

season is quite uncertain in these parts. The rainfall is also meagre. The climate is extreme. The summer temperature is high (maximum temperature 360C to 410C) but winter temperature is low (minimum temperature. 100C to 160C). The relative humidity in August is between 82% to 84% but only 19% to 26% in April. The rainfall increases as we go towards east viz. Parbhani, Nanded and Yavatmal. Many a times the eastern winds during the end of monsoon cause precipitation here.

4 Likewise the Tapi basin, the southern parts of Satpuda ranges and Dhule-Jalgaon districts towards west is low rainfall part like that of rain shadow region. But towards east Buldhana, Akola and Amravati districts experience a heavy rainfall. Summer temperature in this region is quite high (390C to 430C) and minimum winter temperature is found to be 120C to 150C. Relative humidity between May to August is 82% to 87% whereas in March-April it is 12% to 31%.

5 The Wainganga basin on east of Maharashtra and the hilly region still farther east is, on the whole, a zone having good rainfall, but as it is some what low lying area, the climate is even more extreme. The summer temperature is very high (390C to 450C) while it is cooler in winter as compared to other regions (120C to140C).

Rainfall

Maharashtra gets rain both from the south-west and the north-east monsoon winds. The proportion of the rainfall derived from the north-east monsoon increases towards east.

The average rainfall of the State is approximately 1360 mm. nearly 88% of the total average rainfall occurs between June to September, while nearly 8% occurs between October to December and 4% after December. There is a considerable variation in the reliability of the rains in different parts of the State.

The steep decline in the rainfall to east of Sahyadri is strikingly noticeable. In the 30 to 50 km wide belt the average rainfall is observed to be less than 650 mm (as low as only 500 mm at some places). Thereafter, the rainfall increases steadily towards east and the average rainfall in the easternmost districts is observed to be 1400 mm.

The pre-monsoon rain during March to May is maximum in Western Maharashtra (5%) while in Marathwada it is 4%, in Vidarbha it is 3% and the minimum is in Konkan (1%).

The number of average annual rainy days is maximum 95 in Konkan, 55 in Vidarbha, 51 in Western Maharashtra and the minimum 46 in Marathwada.

Out of the total cultivable land in Maharashtra about 53% is under Kharif and about 30% is under Rabi crops. These mostly comprise of food grains and oilseeds. The rainfall during June to September affects both the Kharif and the Rabi crops. That is why the regularity of rainfall during this period is of importance. But it is seen that there is considerable fluctuation in the number of rainy days as well as the amount of rainfall from year to year. The fluctuation in rainfall is observed to be 25%, 40% and between 20% to 30% in Konkan, Central Maharashtra and Vidarbha respectively. Crop management on fields during this period thereby becomes quite difficult.

Appendix – 6 (A) Crop wise, Season wise rates based on area

Extract of Government (WRD) G.R. of water rates Dated – 29/06/2011

(Rs./ha)

Revised Rates Sr. No.

Crops Kharif Rabi HW

Remarks

Kharif 1. Food Grains & Other

Kh 240 -- --

2. Groundnut 350 700* * Rate in rabi of Prolonged kharif season

3. Vegetables & Onion 600 -- -- 4. Rice 240 480* -- * Rate in rabi of Prolonged kharif

season Rabi

5. Vegetables -- 1200 -- 6. Wheat -- 470 -- 7. Other Rabi -- 350 --

Two Seasonal 8. Chilly, Ginger, Pulse

(Tur) 120 240 360

9. Cotton 450 900 1350 HW

10. Vegetables -- -- 1800 11. Groundnut -- 1050 12. Rice -- -- 720

Perennials 13. Sugarcane, Banana 1050 2100 3140 Total 6290 14. Horticulture 790 1580 2350 Total 4720

Appendix – 6 (B) Water rates for Farm – Private lift irrigation scheme

Extract of Government (WRD) G.R. of water rates Dated – 29/06/2011

(Rs./ha)

Sugarcane / Banana

Horticulture Other Crops Sr. No.

Source of water supply

Flow Drip Flow Drip Kharif Rabi HW 1. Assured water supply-

Major / Medium reservoir / Storage tank having no canals

1500 1150 1150 860 85 120 240

2. Controlled water supply with conveyance losses- Controlled portion of river down stream of dam / canal lift / K.T. weir with backup of avajal reservoir

1150 860 860 650 40 60 120

3. Partially assured water supply- Small reservoir with canals / K.T. weir without backup of reservoir / Any uncontrolled portion of river without any K.T. weir or river in command area without any K.T. weir or barrage

750 580 580 430 35 35 60

4. Reservoir constructed by water user’s / Proportionate expenditure shared by water user’s - Expenditure shared by water user’s in Proportionate of project or constructed dam / Bandhara / Kachcha Bandhara / K.T. weir

500 380 380 290 -- 20 20

Note: Leakages to be borne by service provider.