DIRECTORATE FOR ROADS OF VIETNAM
PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT 3
-------------------
REPORT on
ENVIRONMENTAL impact assessment REPORT
Subproject of nh39-1 IMPROVEMENT,
trieu duong - hung ha section (km42+714 – km64+000)
and 3 bridges: nai, dong tu and go
belonging to component c of
VIETNAM ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT PROJECT
(REPORT AMENDED AND READJUSTED BY APPRAISAL COMMISSION AT MEETING DATED on
September, 5th 2013 at ministry of Natural Resource and Environment)
Hanoi, September 2013
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
DIRECTORATE FOR ROADS OF VIETNAM
PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT 3
-------------------
REPORT on
ENVIRONMENTAL impact assessment REPORT
Subproject of nh39-1 IMPROVEMENT,
trieu duong - hung ha section (km42+714 – km64+000)
and 3 bridges: nai, dong tu and go
belonging to component c of
VIETNAM ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT PROJECT
(REPORT AMENDED AND READJUSTED BY APPRAISAL COMMISSION AT MEETING DATED on
September, 5th 2013 at ministry of Natural Resource and Environment)
PROJECT EMPLOYER Project MANAGEMENT UNIT
CONSULTANT AGENCY
Hanoi, September 2013
Environmental impact assessment report
1
CONTENTS
Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 12
1. Project Origin .................................................................................................................... 12
2. Legal and Technical Bases for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) .............. 15
2.1. Legal and Technical Documents ...................................................................................15
2.2. Applicable Technical Regulations and Standards .......................................................18
2.3. Sources of Reference Documents and Data ..................................................................19
2.4. Source of Documents, Data created by the Project Owner .....................................20
3. Methodology for Environmental Impact Assessment .................................................. 20
4. Organization of Environmental Impact Assessment Implementation ....................... 23
Chapter I. BRIEF Desription OF PROJECT ..................................................................... 25
1.1. Name of Project .......................................................................................................... 25
1.2. Project Owner ............................................................................................................. 25
1.3. Project Location ......................................................................................................... 25
1.4. Main Contents of the Project .................................................................................... 30
1.4.1. Project Components .....................................................................................................30
1.4.2. Objectives ........................................................................................................................31
1.4.3. Investment Content – Component C ........................................................................31
1.4.3.1. Quantity, Scale of the Project’s Work Items ......................................................... 31
1.4.3.2. Auxiliary Work Items ...................................................................................................... 40
1.4.4. Construction Method, Quantity of the Project Works .......................................46
1.4.4.1. Land Acquisition ................................................................................................................ 46
1.4.4.2. Key Construction Measure ............................................................................................ 46
1.4.4.3. Construction Quantity ...................................................................................................... 50
1.4.5. List of Machinery and Equipment ............................................................................54
1.4.6. Input Material .................................................................................................................55
1.4.7. Implementation Schedule ...........................................................................................55
1.4.8. Investment Cost .............................................................................................................55
1.4.9. Organization of Management and Implementation of the Project ...................56
1.4.9.1. Management and Implementation .............................................................................. 56
1.4.9.2. Implementation Procedure ............................................................................................. 56
CHAPTER II. NATURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC
cONDITIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA ........................................................................ 58
2.1. Natural Conditions .................................................................................................... 58
2.1.1. Geographical and Geological Conditions ...............................................................58
2.1.1.1. Geographical Conditions ................................................................................................ 58
Environmental impact assessment report
2
2.1.1.2. Geological Conditions ..................................................................................................... 58
2.1.1.3. Hydro-geological Conditions ........................................................................................ 59
2.1.2. Meteorological Conditions ........................................................................................ 59
2.1.2.1. Features of Meteorological Conditions .................................................................... 59
2.1.2.2. Special Weather Phenomena ......................................................................................... 63
2.1.3. Hydrological Conditions ............................................................................................ 64
2.1.3.1. Hydrological Features of Rivers in the Project Area ......................................... 64
2.1.3.2. Hydrological Features along the Route .................................................................... 64
2.1.3.3. Flooding and Floods in the Project Area ................................................................. 65
2.1.4. Natural Resources ........................................................................................................ 65
2.1.4.1. Water Resources ................................................................................................................. 65
2.1.4.2. Wetland ecosystems .......................................................................................................... 67
2.1.5. Quality and Components of the Physical Environment ..................................... 67
2.1.5.1. Selection of Location, Parameter and Frequency for Measurement,
Sampling ................................................................................................................................................. 67
2.1.5.2. Ambient Air Quality ......................................................................................................... 72
2.1.5.3. Noise Level ........................................................................................................................... 73
2.1.5.4. Vibration Level ................................................................................................................... 74
2.1.5.5. Surface Water Quality...................................................................................................... 75
2.1.5.6. Underground Water Quality .......................................................................................... 77
2.1.5.7. Sediment Quality ................................................................................................................ 78
2.1.5.8. Soil Quality ........................................................................................................................... 79
2.2. Socio-economic Conditions....................................................................................... 79
2.2.1. Economic Conditions .................................................................................................. 84
2.2.1.1. Economic Conditions of the Localities in the Project Area ............................ 84
2.2.1.2. Economic Conditions along the Project Route ..................................................... 84
2.2.1.3. Current State of Transportation ................................................................................... 84
2.2.2. Social Conditions ......................................................................................................... 86
2.2.2.1. Social Conditions of the Localities in the Project area ...................................... 86
2.2.3.2. Social Conditions along the Project Route ............................................................. 87
2.3. Summaries of data base in project area ....................................................................... 92
CHAPTER III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT................................... 96
3.1. Identification of Environmental Impact ................................................................. 96
3.2. Impact Assessment in the Pre-construction Phase of the Project .................... 101
3.2.1. Comparison between Alternatives with and without Project Implementation
(zero-option) ............................................................................................................................... 101
3.2.2. Impacts due to Land Acquisition ........................................................................... 102
3.2.2.1. Impact factor ...................................................................................................................... 102
3.2.2.2 Assessment ........................................................................................................................... 103
3.2.3. Impact due to Demolition and Ground Leveling ............................................... 107
Environmental impact assessment report
3
3.2.3.1. Impact on Air Environment ........................................................................................ 107
3.2.3.2. Impact on Community Health .................................................................................... 107
3.2.3.3. Impact on the Environmental Landscape .............................................................. 110
3.3. Impact Assessment of Subjects Affected by the Impact Sources Arising from the
Activities of the Project in the Construction Phase ......................................................... 111
3.3.1. Impact on Air Environment .....................................................................................112
3.3.1.1. Waste / Waste-generating Activity .......................................................................... 112
3.3.1.2. Impact Assessment .......................................................................................................... 120
3.3.2. Impacts due to noise and vibration .........................................................................122
3.3.2.1. Impact Source / Source-generating Activities..................................................... 122
3.3.2.2. Impact Assessment .......................................................................................................... 124
3.3.3. Impact to Water, Sediment Environment ..............................................................129
3.3.3.1. Waste / Waste-generating Activities and Impact Factors .............................. 129
3.3.3.2. Impact Assessment .......................................................................................................... 134
3.3.4. Environmental Impact to Groundwater ..................................................................140
3.3.4.1. Waste / Waste-generating Activities ....................................................................... 140
3.3.4.2. Impact Assessment .......................................................................................................... 140
3.3.5. Impact on the Soil Environment .............................................................................140
3.3.5.1. Impact Source / Source-generating Activities..................................................... 140
3.3.5.2. Impact Assessment .......................................................................................................... 141
3.3.6. Impact on Ecosystems ................................................................................................143
3.3.6.1. Impact Source / Source-generating Activities..................................................... 143
3.3.6.2. Impact Assessment .......................................................................................................... 144
3.3.7. Traffic ..............................................................................................................................145
3.3.7.1. Impact Factor ..................................................................................................................... 145
3.3.7.2. Impact Assessment .......................................................................................................... 145
3.3.8. Impact on the Landscape of the Historical ............................................................148
3.3.8.1. Impact Factor ..................................................................................................................... 148
3.3.8.2. Impact Assessment .......................................................................................................... 148
3.3.9. Impact by Concentration of Workers ......................................................................148
3.3.9.1. Impact Factor ..................................................................................................................... 148
3.3.9.2. Impact Assessment .......................................................................................................... 148
3.3.10. Waste and Waste Processing Requirement .........................................................149
3.3.10.1. Type of Arising Wastes .............................................................................................. 149
3.3.10.2. Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 149
3.4. Impacts in the Operation Phase ............................................................................. 156
3.4.1. Air Environment ..........................................................................................................156
3.4.2. Impact on Sound Environment ................................................................................161
3.4.3. Impact of Overflow Runoff ......................................................................................163
3.4.3.1. Impacts of Agricultural Land Fragmentation ...................................................... 165
Environmental impact assessment report
4
3.4.3.2. Local Flood Impact ......................................................................................................... 166
3.4.3.3. The positive impact of project .................................................................................... 167
3.5. The impact of the Risks and Incidents .................................................................. 168
3.5.1. Technical Issues ........................................................................................................... 168
3.5.2. Risk of Fire and Explosion ....................................................................................... 168
3.5.3. Labor Safety ................................................................................................................... 168
3.5.4. Natural Disasters (Storms, Heavy Rain) ............................................................... 169
3.5.5. Incident Caused by Detecting Mines ..................................................................... 169
3.6. Commenting on the Level of Detail, the Reliability of the Assessment........... 169
3.6.1. The Level of Detail of the Assessment ................................................................... 169
3.6.2. Reliability of the Assessment .................................................................................. 170
3.6.2.1. Of the Forecasting Methods ........................................................................................ 170
3.6.2.2. About the Method ............................................................................................................ 170
CHAPTER IV. MEASURES FOR PREVENTION, MITIGATION OF ADVERSE
IMPACTS; RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS ............................... 172
4.1. Measures for Prevention, Mitigation of Adverse Impacts of the Project on the
Environment during the Pre-Construction ........................................................................ 172
4.1.1. Mitigation of Impacts due to Land Acquisition, Relocation and Resettlement ........................................................................................................................................................ 172
4.1.1.1. Regarding Impacts due to Relocation and Resettlement ................................ 172
4.1.1.2. Regarding Impacts due to Permanent Acquisition of Agricultural Land 173
4.1.1.3. with regard to the impact caused by temporary misappropriation of land
for agricultural production. ........................................................................................................... 174
4.1.1.4. Regarding Impacts due to Relocation of Irrigation Ditches .......................... 175
4.1.1.5. Assessment of the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual
Impacts .................................................................................................................................................. 175
4.1.2. Mitigation Measures for Impacts of Site Demolition and Levelling .............. 177
4.1.2.1. Dust Control during Demolition of Houses.......................................................... 177
4.1.2.2. Dust Control during Site Levelling .......................................................................... 177
4.1.2.3. Noise Control during Demolition of Houses ....................................................... 177
4.1.2.4. Noise Control during Site Levelling ........................................................................ 178
4.1.2.5. Mitigation of Impacts on Environmental Landscape ....................................... 178
4.1.2.6. Assessment of the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual
Impacts .................................................................................................................................................. 178
4.1.3. Request for Completing Preparatory Work for Official Construction .......... 179
4.2. Measures for Prevention, Mitigation of Adverse Impacts of the Project on the
Environment during Construction ..................................................................................... 179
4.2.1. Mitigation of Impacts on Ambient Air Quality .................................................. 179
4.2.1.1. General Regulations ........................................................................................................ 179
Environmental impact assessment report
5
4.2.1.2. Control of Dust Spread in Digging Access Road to Bridges and Storing
Materials ............................................................................................................................................... 180
4.2.1.3. Control of Emission from Construction Vehicles (Horizontal) .................. 181
4.2.1.4. Regarding Dust Arising during Transporting Waste Materials or Soil.... 181
4.2.1.5. Monitoring of Dust Pollution ..................................................................................... 182
4.2.1.6. Assessment of the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual
Impacts .................................................................................................................................................. 182
4.2.2. Mitigation of Impacts on Community due to Noise Pollution .........................183
4.2.2.1. General Regulations ....................................................................................................... 183
4.2.2.2. Mitigation Impacts due to Noise ............................................................................... 183
4.2.2.3. Assessment on the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual
Impacts .................................................................................................................................................. 184
4.2.3. Mitigation of Impacts on Surface Water Environment and Sediment ..........184
4.2.3.1. Regarding Impacts Generated from the Construction of Routes, Access
Road to Bridges ................................................................................................................................. 184
4.2.3.2. Regarding Impacts Generaged from Construction of Bridges ..................... 186
4.2.3.3. Regarding Impacts Generated from the Activities of the Construction Site .................................................................................................................................................................. 188
4.2.3.4. Assessment on the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual
Impacts .................................................................................................................................................. 190
4.2.4. Regarding Impacts on Groundwater ..........................................................................191
4.2.4.1. Description of Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 191
4.2.4.2. Location and Implementation Time ........................................................................ 191
4.2.4.3. Assessment on the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual
Impacts .................................................................................................................................................. 191
4.2.5. Regarding Impacts on Soil Environment ..............................................................191
4.2.5.1. Regarding Risk of Soil Pollution due to Oily Discharge and Solid Waste .................................................................................................................................................................. 191
4.2.5.2. Regarding Risk of Soil Spillage and Sedimentation of Eroded Soil due to
Rain during Excavation ................................................................................................................. 191
4.2.5.3. Regarding Local Flood Risk caused by the Excavation/ Storage of
Material, and Wasted Soil, Rock of the Project .................................................................. 193
4.2.5.4. Prevention and Treatment of Soil Compression ................................................ 193
4.2.5.5. Assessment on the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual
Impacts .................................................................................................................................................. 194
4.2.6. Regarding Impacts on Ecosystems .........................................................................194
4.2.7. Regarding Impacts on Transportation ...................................................................194
4.2.7.1. Regarding the Risk of Road Traffic Disruption during Construction of
Expanded Route and Intersections with Hung Nhan Bypass ........................................ 194
4.2.7.2. Regarding the Risk of Road Traffic Accidents and Damage to Public
Facilities during Transportation of Materials, Soils and Rocks ................................... 196
4.2.7.3. Assessment on the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual
Impacts .................................................................................................................................................. 197
Environmental impact assessment report
6
4.2.8. Regarding the Impacts on Historical Relic Linh Son Phu Cau and National
Historical Culture on Mausoleum and Temple of Chancellor of Tran Dynasty Tran
Thu Do and his Wife - Linh Tu Quoc Mau Tran Thi Dung ........................................... 198
4.2.9. Regarding Impacts due to Concentration of Workers .......................................... 199
4.2.10. Waste Management and Treatment ................................................................... 199
4.2.10.1. Establishing and Implementing Waste Management Plan during
Construction ........................................................................................................................................ 199
4.2.10.2. Assessment on the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual
Impacts .................................................................................................................................................. 200
4.3. Measure for Prevention, Mitigation of Adverse Impacts of the Project on
Environment in the Operation Phase ................................................................................. 201
4.3.1. Regarding to the Impacts on Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem.............. 201
4.3.2. Mitigation of Impacts causing Fragmentation of Production Land .............. 201
4.4. Measures for Prevention and Response to Risks and Incidents .......................... 202
4.4.1. Response to Technical Incidents .............................................................................. 202
4.4.2. Prevention of Fire/Blasting Incidents .................................................................... 203
4.4.3. Prevention of Safety Labor ...................................................................................... 203
4.4.4. Prevention of Incidents due to Natural Disasters (Storms, Heavy Rains,
Floods, etc.) ................................................................................................................................. 203
4.4.5. Demining ....................................................................................................................... 204
CHAPTER V. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM .......................................................................................................................... 205
5.1. Environmental Management Program (EMP) .................................................... 205
5.1.1. Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 205
5.1.2. Summary of Environmental Management Program ......................................... 206
5.1.3. Organization Mechanism and Roles of Relative Agencies ............................. 218
5.1.3.1. In the Preparation and Construction Phases of the Project ............................ 218
5.1.3.2. In Operation Phase of the Project ............................................................................. 221
5.1.4. Essential Base for the EMS operation ...................................................................... 221
5.2. Environmental Monitoring Program .................................................................... 222
5.2.1. Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 222
5.2.2. Basis of Environmental Quality Monitoring ....................................................... 223
5.2.3. Contents of Environmental Monitoring Program .............................................. 223
5.2.4. Monitoring Indicators ................................................................................................... 224
5.2.4.1. Monitoring Project Completion Indicator ............................................................. 224
5.2.4.2. Monitoring Compliance with Mitigation Measures .......................................... 224
5.2.4.3. Community-based Monitoring ................................................................................... 225
Environmental impact assessment report
7
5.2.4.4. Environmental Quality Monitoring Indicators.................................................... 225
5.2.5. Monitoring Report System ...........................................................................................229
5.3. Capacity Building and Training ............................................................................... 231
5.3.1. Analysis and determination of training demands ...................................................231
5.3.2. Proposed Programs on Capacity Building on Environmental Management ..233
5.4. Costs Estimated ....................................................................................................... 234
5.4.1. Legal Document for Cost Estimated .........................................................................234
5.4.2. The costs implement the mitigation measures by the contractor ...................235
5.4.3. Cost for Monitoring ....................................................................................................235
5.4.3.1. Supervision of EMP Implementation by CSC .................................................... 235
5.4.3.2. Cost for Independence Environment Monitoring Consultant (IEMC) ... 235
5.4.3.3. Implementation Cost of the Monitoring Program ............................................. 236
5.4.4. Cost for implementation of capacity building and training.................................237
5.4.5. Cost Estimate for Environmental Treatment Work ...............................................238
5.4.6. Total Cost Estimation ....................................................................................................238
CHAPTER VI. PUBLIC CONSULTATION .................................................................. 241
6.1. Public Consultation at the Request of the World Bank ........................................ 241
6.1.1. Consultation Content..................................................................................................241
6.1.2. Consultation Results ...................................................................................................241
6.2. Public Consultation at the Request of Vietnam .................................................... 254
6.3. Comments Acquisition of Project Owner ............................................................. 264
6.4. The Survey Interviewed Local Residents ............................................................. 266
CONCLUSION, PROPOSALS AND COMMITMENTS ............................................. 270
I. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 270
II. Proposals ........................................................................................................................ 271
III. Commitments ............................................................................................................... 272
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1. Profile Design Result ............................................................................................................ 33
Table 1.2. Cross-Section of Sections inside Residential Areas................................................. 34
Table 1.3. Bridges in the Project ........................................................................................................... 37
Table 1.4. Girder Types ............................................................................................................................. 38
Table 1.5. Protection Consolidated Sections .................................................................................... 39
Environmental impact assessment report
8
Table 1.6. List of Intersections ................................................................................................................ 40
Table 1.7. Borrow Pits and Quarries for the Project .................................................................... 41
Table 1.8. Land Acquisition Quantity .................................................................................................. 44
Table 1.9. Summary of Quantity of Road Work and Intersections .......................................... 51
Table 1.10. Summary of Quantity of Bridge Work ......................................................................... 52
Table 1.11. Summary of Quantity of Go Bridge Work .................................................................. 53
Table 1.13. Main Machinery and Equipment for Road Work and Intersections .............. 54
Table 1.14. Main Machinery and Equipment for Bridge Work ................................................ 54
Table 1.15. Estimated Implementation Schedule for Work-items ............................................ 55
Table 1.16. Total Investment Cost of the Project ............................................................................ 55
Table 2.1. Strata Characteristics of the Project Area ................................................................... 59
Table 2.2. Annual/ Monthly Average Temperature (oC) ............................................................. 60
Table 2.3. Annual/ Monthly Average Relative Humidity (%) .................................................... 61
Table 2.4. Rainfall ........................................................................................................................................ 61
Table 2.5. Average Wind Speed in the Months of the Year (m/s)............................................. 62
Table 2.6. Atmospheric Stability Classification (Pasquill, 1961) ............................................ 63
Table 2.7. Summary of the Thunderstorm of the Year .................................................................. 63
Table 2.8. Statistics of Results Used for Bridge Design .............................................................. 65
Table 2.9. Location of Environmental Quality Survey ................................................................. 68
Table 2.10. Measurement Results of Air Quality ............................................................................ 72
Table 2.11. Measurement Results of Noise Level ........................................................................... 73
Table 2.12. Measurement Results of Vibration level (dB) .......................................................... 75
Table 2.13. Measurement and Analysis Results of Surface Water Quality ......................... 76
Table 2.14. Measurement and Analysis Results of Groundwater Quality ........................... 77
Table 2.15. Analysis Results of Sediment Quality .......................................................................... 78
Table 2.16. Analysis Results of Solid Quality ................................................................................... 79
Table 2.17. Statistics of Socio-economic Features in Communes/ Towns within the
Project Area..................................................................................................................................................... 80
Table 2.18 Vehicle Flow on NH39-1 .................................................................................................... 85
Table 2.19. Sensitive Objects along the Project .............................................................................. 88
Table 2.20. Summaries of Database in Project Area .................................................................... 92
Table 3.1. Identification Matrix of Project’s Environmental Impacts ................................... 97
Table 3.2. Classification of Environmental Impacts .................................................................... 100
Table 3.3. Analysis of Alternatives with and without Project Implementation ................ 101
Table 3.4. Types of Waste Generated in the Pre-construction Phase .................................. 102
Table 3.5. Estimated Damage Caused by Occupation of Agricultural Land ................... 105
Table 3.6. Damage Caused by Permanent Occupation of Pond ............................................ 105
Table 3.7. Generated Waste in the Pre-construction Phase .................................................... 110
Table 3.8. Summaries of Impacts in pre-construction phase ................................................... 110
Table 3.9. Impact Sources Related to Waste and Non-Related to Waste in the
Construction Phase .................................................................................................................................... 111
Table 3.10. Total Amount of Earthwork............................................................................................ 113
Table 3.11. Dust Emission Coefficient of Construction Activity ............................................ 113
Table 3.12. Amount of Dust from Earthwork Activity ................................................................. 113
Table 3.13. Estimated Consumption of Diesel in Construction (Shunt and Vertical
Construction) ................................................................................................................................................ 114
Environmental impact assessment report
9
3.14. Amount of Dust and Toxic Gas of Construction Activity (Horizontal
Construction) ................................................................................................................................................ 115
Table 3.15. Total Amount of Dust and Toxic Gas Generated in the Process of
Construction .................................................................................................................................................. 115
Table 3.16. Predicted Scope of Dispersal of Dust and Gas from Construction Activities ............................................................................................................................................................................. 116
Table 3.17. Amount of Dust and Exhaust Gas from Transportation Activities (Vertical
Construction) ................................................................................................................................................ 119
Table 3.18. Typical Noise Level of Construction Equipment (dBA) .................................... 123
Table 3.19. Calculate Result of the Noise Level at the Source in the Construction
Phase (dBA)................................................................................................................................................... 123
Table 3.20. Vibration Level of some Typical Construction Equipment (Distance of
10m) .................................................................................................................................................................. 123
Table 3.21. Noise Impact Arising from Construction Activities of Project ....................... 125
Table 3.22. Decreasing Vibration Level with Distance from the Construction Activity ............................................................................................................................................................................. 129
Table 3.23. Predicted Annual Amount of Soil Erosion, Corrosion by Rainfall in the
Earthwork Land by the Items of Project ........................................................................................... 130
Table 3.24. Drilling Mud Arising from Construction Activities of Bored Piles .............. 131
Table 3.25. Wastewater Flow and Load from the Maintenance Operation of
Machinery ...................................................................................................................................................... 132
Table 3.26. Load Factor and Amount of Contaminants in Urban Sewage ....................... 133
Table 3.27. Concentration of Pollutants in Sewage .................................................................... 133
Table 3.28. Rainwater Runoff Through the Construction Area of Project ........................ 134
Table 3.29. Common Waste Generated in the Construction Phase ..................................... 150
Table 3.30. The Total Volume of Waste Soil Should Discard ................................................. 151
Table 3.31. Load Factor and Load of Contaminants in Urban Sewage ............................. 152
Table 3.32. Concentration of Pollutants in Waste Water ......................................................... 153
Table 3.33. Wastewater Flow and Load from the Operation and Maintenance of
Machinery ...................................................................................................................................................... 154
Table 3.34. Summaries of impacts during construction stage ................................................ 154
Table 3.35. Summary of the Sources of Impact Incurred in the Operation Phase ......... 156
Table 3.36. Forecast Traffic Through Trieu Duong and Hung Ha Section ...................... 157
Table 3.37. Coefficient of Air Pollution Due to Traffic WHO ................................................ 157
Table 3.38. Emissions from Cars by 2030 Forecast Peak Hours (mg / ms) ..................... 158
Table 3.39. Meteorological Conditions and the Input Data Used in the Calculation.. 159
Table 3.40. Forecast Distribution Pollutants from Vehicle Operations ............................ 159
Table 3.41. The Emission of Dust Swept from the Road ........................................................... 160
Table 3.42. Dust Load from Operating Vehicles .......................................................................... 161
Table 3.43. Forecast Distribution Pollutants from Vehicle Operation .............................. 161
Table 3.44. Average Equivalent Noise Level at Standard Conditions (LA7 TC) ................ 162
Table 3.45. Predicted Noise Levels from Cars .............................................................................. 162
Table 3.46. Results Predicted Decline with Distance (dBA) ................................................... 162
Table 3.47. Noise Impact on Residential Areas in the Operational Phase ....................... 163
Table 3.48. Chemical Characteristics of the Contaminated Soil on the Road ................ 164
Table 3.49. Summary of impacts during operation stage of project .................................... 168
Table 5.1. Summary of Environmental Management Program of the Project ................ 207
Environmental impact assessment report
10
Table 5.2. The Roles and Responsibilities of Relative Agencies ............................................ 219
Table 5.3. Positions of Environmental Quality Monitoring ..................................................... 225
Table 5.4. Summary of Environmental Quality Monitoring Program ................................. 227
Table 5.5. System of Environmental Monitoring Report ........................................................... 230
Table 5.6. Analysis and determination of training demands ................................................... 232
Table 5.7. Proposed programs on capacity building on environmental management . 233
Table 5.8. Cost estimation for Environmental management works ...................................... 235
Table 5.9. Costs Estimation of Monitoring Program .................................................................. 236
Table 5.10. Cost Estimation for Implementation of Capacity Building and Training .. 237
Table 5.11. Cost Estimate for Environmental Treatment Works ........................................... 238
Table 5.12. Total Cost for the Environmental management Plan ......................................... 238
Table 6.1 Pictures of the Public Consultation Meetings ........................................................... 242
Table 6.2. Summaries of Consultation Results and Responses of Project Owner .......... 244
Table 6.3. Summary of Public Consultation Opinions at the Request of Vietnam ......... 255
Table 6.4. Summary and Analysis of Questionnaires .................................................................. 267
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Location ........................................................................................................................ 13
Figure 1.1. Location Map of the Project ............................................................................................ 28
Figure. 1.2. Cross-Section in Section Passing Rural Area ......................................................... 33
Figure. 1.3. Cross-section in Sections in Urban Areas ................................................................ 33
Figure 1.4. Detail of New Pavement .................................................................................................... 35
Figure 1.5. Detail of Enhanced Pavement ......................................................................................... 35
Figure 1.6. Bridge Cross-Section .......................................................................................................... 38
Figure 1.7. Location of Borrow Pits ..................................................................................................... 42
Figure 2.1. Monthly Average Temperature Chart (0C) ............................................................... 60
Figure 2.2. Rainfall Chart ......................................................................................................................... 62
Figure 2.3. Xuan Thuy National Park.................................................................................................. 66
Figure 2.4. Location Chart of Environmental Quality Survey .................................................. 71
Figure 2.5. PM10 Dust and TSP in Project location .................................................................... 73
Figure 2.6. Actual Noise Level in the Project Area ....................................................................... 74
Figure 2.7. Actual Vibration Level in the Project Area ............................................................... 75
Figure 2.9. Transportation network on the Project area ............................................................ 85
Figure 2.10. Images of Received Areas ............................................................................................... 90
Figure 3.1. Area Acquire the Residential Land ............................................................................. 104
Figure 3.2. Canal Relocated section along the road ................................................................... 106
Figure 3.3. Construction Area of Na and Le bridge .................................................................... 121
Figure 3.4. Specification areas are affected by noise pollution in construction stage 127
Figure 3.5. Ponds and irrigation canals affected by construction of earthworks and
horizontal drainage system ...................................................................................................................... 136
Figure 3.6. Construction area of Nai Bridge and Dong Tu bridge ...................................... 137
Environmental impact assessment report
11
Figure 3.7. Area with risk of locality flooding ............................................................................... 143
Figure 3.8. Are around the interchanges of Hung Nhan bypass ........................................... 146
Figure 3.9. The Impact of Activities in the Operational Phase to Water Quality and the
Consequences ............................................................................................................................................... 165
Fig 3.10. Area ofAgricultural Land Fragmentation .................................................................... 166
Figure 4.1. Sitemap of Mitigation Measures of Impacts Causing Agricultural
Fragmentation .............................................................................................................................................. 202
Figure 5.1. Residual Mud Barrier ....................................................................................................... 217
Figure 5.2. Environmental Management System .......................................................................... 219
Figure 5.3. Location Map of Environmental Quality Monitoring......................................... 240
Environmental impact assessment report
12
INTRODUCTION
1. Project Origin
Thai Binh is coastal province in the Red River Delta, North area. Thai Binh Province
border with 5 provinces and city: Hai Duong at the North, Hung Yen at the North-West,
Hai Phong at North-East, Ha Nam at the West and Nam Dinh at the West and West-
South (Figure 1.1). Parallel with the economic growth of whole country, the passengers
and goods transportation system is also increase rapidly that lead to the traffic volume
on the Thai Binh Province area increase. In which, almost the vehicle volume pass the
NH39.
NH.39 starts at the intersection with NH.5 in Pho Noi Town, Hung Yen Province
(Km23+157) and ends at Diem Dien port, belonging to Thai Thuy district, Thai Binh
Province. It passes two provinces which are Hung Yen and Thai Binh and links NH.5,
NH.38, NH.10 and Hanoi-Hai Phong Expressway. NH.39 is considered a main traffic
route with high strategic characteristics, going from Hung Yen to the Thai Binh. In
addition, this is a route which has an important significance in the development of
society, interaction and transportation of passengers and goods among the Northern
provinces. Currently, the volume of passenger vehicles and light trucks on this road
section is quite large. As a result of the strong economic growth and rapid urbanization,
traffic volume on NH.39 is increasing which makes the traffic situation changes very
complex and there are always risks of traffic accidents potentially.
The section NH.39-1 starts from Trieu Duong - Hung Ha District, is in 2 provinces as
Thai Binh and Hung Yen with the beginning point at Km42+714 (intersection with the
PR195) in Hung Yen Province and the ending point at Km64+000 (station of NH39)
in Thai Binh Province.
Currently, the road pavement appears lots of defects such as severe cracks, peeling,
pot-holes, pavement width is from 5 ÷ 6m, and road embankment width is from 7 ÷
9m. The status of the drainage system along route is seriously damaged especially at
the residential sections where longitudinal drainage is hardly installed. As a result, the
pavement is damaged very quickly. Thus, the expansion and rehabilitation of NH.39-1
is extremely necessary to shorten travel time from Hung Yen to Thai Binh and other
provinces.
Environmental impact assessment report
13
Figure 1. Project Location
Project
location
Environmental impact assessment report
14
Subproject component of NH39-1 rehabilitation, Trieu Duong – Hung Ha section
(Km42+714 - Km64+000) and 3 bridges on alignment include Nai, Dong Tu and Go
belong to Component C of Project Vietnam Road Asset Management (hereinafter is
Project) established on the basic of upgrading of the former relevant Projects that
haven’t been implemented because of arranging the capital source. Below are the
Decisions of these projects:
- Decision No.2087/QĐ-GTVT on July 7th
, 2002 of MOT about approval of the
investment project NH.39 sections Km42+655-Km74+450 and Km81+600-
Km108+381 from Trieu Duong to Diem Dien Port in Thai Binh Province;
- Decision No344/QD-BGTVT on February 19th
, 2009 of MOT about approval of
the investment project NH39-1A section Trieu Duong – Diem Dien, Thai Binh
Province;
- Decision No350/QD-BGTVT on February 19th
, 2009 of MOT about approval of
the investment project NH39-1A bridges: Nai, Dong Tu and Go on the NH39, Thai
Binh Province that is in the upgrade and rehabilitation the road network (WB4
project).
Besides, the investment capital for this project has been identified as loans of the
World Bank (WB):
- The Trieu Duong - Hung Ha (from Km44 Km64 ÷) was approved by the Ministry
of Transport Investment projects in 2009 in the WB4 projects list;
- Project management of road assets Vietnam; Component C: Upgrading - there are
3 bridges include of Nai, Dong Tu and Go on the rehabilitation alignment of
NH39-1 (Km44 ÷ Km66), therefore, the Project Owner combine these bridges into
the Project scale for preparation of EIA report.
Project is made and accorded with the Decision No. 1327/QD-TTg of August 24th
,
2009, of Prime Minister about approval the master plan on development of Vietnam's
road transportation up to 2020, with orientations toward 2030;
The Ministry of Transport is the agency making the decision of investment and giving
approval of the project. The Project Owner is the Directorate for Roads of Vietnam.
Project Management Unit 3 is the representative of the Project Owner in charge of
project implementation management.
Implementation of the Environmental Protection Act in parallel with the investment
project formation, the Project Management Unit 3 has prepared an Environmental
impact assessment Report of the Project. For the preparation of the EIA, it is carried out
the environmental surveys and measurement of environmental quality along the length
Environmental impact assessment report
15
of Project and consultations with local community in Project area.
2. Legal and Technical Bases for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
2.1. Legal and Technical Documents
Legal and Technical Documents of Vietnam Government
This is the upgrade and rehabilitation Project that is the object required to be
established the EIA report according to regulation at the Appendix 2 of Decree
29/2011/ND-CP on April 18th
, 2011 of Government regulating strategic environmental
assessment, environmental impact assessment, and environmental protection
commitment. Because of lying in 2 provinces so the Project will be appraised and
approved by MONRE according to the Appendix 3 Decree 29/2011/ND-CP.
a. Legal Basis
In relation to the environment and land use:
o Environmental Protection Act No 52/2005/QH11 was passed by the National
Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, course XI on 29/11/2005 and
came into force on 01/7/2006;
o Law on Land was passed on 26/11/2003 by the National Assembly of the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam, course XIII, 3th
Session;
o Law on Water Resources No 17/2012/QH13 is passed by the National
Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, course X on June 21st, 2012;
o Decree 59/2007/ND-CP of the Government promulgated on April 9th
, 2007
about management of solid waste;
o Decree No.84/2007/ND-CP, dated May 25, 2007, additional regulations on
granting land-use rights certificates; land acquisition; implementing land-use
rights; settling land claims; and orders and procedures for compensation and
resettlement when the State recovers land;
o Government Decree 69/2009/ND-CP, dated August 13, 2009, regulating
additional planning of land-use, land prices, land acquisition, compensation and
resettlement assistance;
o Decree No.29/2011/ND-CP on 18/4/2011 of the Government regulating
strategic environmental assessment, environmental impact assessment, and
environmental protection commitment;
o Decree No.42/2012/ND-CP on May 11th
, 2012 of Government on management
and using the rice field;
Environmental impact assessment report
16
o Circular No. 14/2009/TT-BTNMT on October 1st, 2009 of MONRE detailing
the compensation, support and resettlement and order of and procedures for
land recovery, allocation and lease;
o Circular No. 12/2011/TT-BTNMT on April 14th
, 2011 of MONRE stipulating
hazardous waste management;
o Circular No. 06/2007/TT-BTNMT on 15 Jun. 2007 of MONRE guiding
implementation of some articles in Decree No. 84/2007/ND-CP on 25 May
2007 additionally stipulating the grant of land use right certificates, recovery of
land, exercise of land use rights, order and procedures for compensation, support
and resettlement when land is recovered by the Government and settlement of
land-related complaints;
o Circular No 26/2011/TT-BTNMT dated on 18/07/2011 of MONRE regulated in
detail many articles of Decree No 29/2011/ND-CP on 18 April 2011 of the
Government, which regulated on strategic environmental assessment,
environmental impact assessment and environmental protection commitment
o Circular No. 09/2010/TT-BGTVT of April 06th
, 2010 of MOT on
environmental protection in the development of transport infrastructure and
amending and supplementing a number of articles of the Circular No.
09/2010/TT-BGTVT of the Minister of Transport;
o Circular No 25/2009/TT-BTNMT dated on 16/11/2009 of MONRE on national
technical regulations on the environment;
o Circular No 39/2010/TT-BTNMT dated 16/12/2011 of MONRE regulated
about National Technical Regulation on environment;
o Circular No. 28/2011/TT-BTNMT on 01/8/2011 of MONRE stipulating the
technical standards of environment monitoring of surrounding air and noise;
o Circular No. 29/2011/TT-BTNMT on 01/8/2011 of MONRE stipulating the
technical standards of monitoring inland surface water environment;
o Circular No. 30/2011/TT-BTNMT on 01/8/2011 of MONRE stipulating the
technical standards of monitoring inland underground water environment;
o Circular No. 33/2011/TT-BTNMT on 01/8/2011 of MONRE stipulating the
technical standards of monitoring the soil environment;
o Decision No 04/2008/QD-BTNMT dated on 18/7/2008 of MONRE on
promulgating the National Technical Regulation on Environment;
o Decision No 16/2008/QD-BTNMT on 31/12/2008 of MONRE on promulgating
Environmental impact assessment report
17
the National Technical Regulation on Environment
In relation to project investment:
o Law on Transportation which was passed by the National Assembly of the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam Course XII, 4th
Session on 13/11/2008;
o Law on the Dyke No79/2006/QH11 was passed by the National Assembly of
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam Course XI, 10th
Session on November 11st,
2006;
o Decree No. 11/2010/ND-CP of February 24, 2010, prescribing the management
and protection of road infrastructure facilities;
o Decision No.2087/QĐ-GTVT on 04/7/2002 of MOT about approval of the
investment project NH.39 sections Km42+655-Km74+450 and Km81+600-
Km108+381 from Trieu Duong to Diem Dien Port in Thai Binh Province;
o Decision No. 355/QD-TTg on February 25th, 2013 of Prime Minister on
approving the adjustment strategy for Vietnam's transport development towards
2020, and the orientation towards 2030
o Decision No. 356/QD-TTg on February 25th, 2013 of Prime Minister on
approving the adjustment of development planning of road transport in Vietnam
to 2020 and orientations to 2030
o Decision No344/QD-BGTVT on February 19th
, 2009 of MOT about approval
of the investment project NH39-1A section Trieu Duong – Diem Dien, Thai
Binh Province;
o Decision No350/QD-BGTVT on February 19th
, 2009 of MOT about approval of
the investment project NH39-1A bridges: Nai, Dong Tu and Go on the NH39,
Thai Binh Province that is in the upgrade and rehabilitation the road network
(WB4 project).
o Decision No.967/QD-TCDBVN on June 12nd
, 2013 on setting up the Project
Management Unit 3;
o Decision No972/QD-TCDBVN on June 13rd
, 2013 on adjustment the charge of
investment management of some projects belong to the Directorate for Roads of
Vietnam;
o Statement No 02/TTr-BQLDA2 on January 3rd
, 2012 of PMU2 on asking the
approval of Detail Design stage of Rehabilitation NH39-1 section Trieu Duong
– Diem Dien;
o Statement No.63/TTr-TCDBVN on July 23rd
, 2013 of Directorate for Roads of
Vietnam approving the Project investment Road Asset Management that using
Environmental impact assessment report
18
the loan stock of World Bank;
o Announcement No.304/TB-TCDBVN on December 24th
, 2012 on conclusion of
Vice of General Directorate Nguyen Duc Thang on completing all of adjusted
documents relevant to the investment projects as NH38 and NH39-1 belong to
the VRAMP.
Other relative documents.
b. Technical Documents
Report of “Vietnam Road Asset Management Project; Component C:
Rehabilitation ; Component C1 : Component Project NH.39-1 Trieu Duong – Hung
Ha Section (Km44+000 ÷ Km64+200)”;
Report of “Vietnam Road Asset Management Project; Component C:
Rehabilitation ; Component C1: Component Project NH.39, Nai Bridge and Dong
Tu Bridge”;
The documents, data, information of the natural conditions, natural resources,
environmental quality and socio-economics of Thai Binh Province;
The procedure of EIA in foundation of the feasible project and construction design
GTVT 22TCN 242-98 of MOT;
Handbook of general guide on environmental impact assessment of the projects –
the National Center of Natural Science and Technology, Environment Department,
MONRE, 1/2000;
Meteorology data of the Thai Binh hydrometeorology station;
Survey data of environmental resources, socio-economic of the project area in
January 2013 of the Center for Sustainable Community Development (CSD).
2.2. Applicable Technical Regulations and Standards
QCVN 05:2009/BTNMT: National technical protocols of the surrounding air
quality;
QCVN 06:2009/BTNMT: National technical protocols of some harmful substances
in the surrounding air environment;
QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT, National technical protocols of surface water quality;
QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT, National technical protocols of ground water quality;
QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT: National Technical Regulation on permissible limits of
heavy metals in the soil;
Environmental impact assessment report
19
QCVN 14:2008/BTNMT, National technical protocols of domestic sewage;
QCVN 40:2011/BTNMT: National Technical Regulation on industrial wastewater;
QCVN26:2010/BTNMT, National technical protocols of noise;
QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT: National technical protocols of vibration.
QCVN 43:2012/BTNMT, National technical protocols of sediment quality;
TCVN 7210:2002, Vibration and collision. Vibration due to means of road
transport - allowance limits for public environment and residential areas;
QCVN 07:2009/BTNMT The national technical regulation on hazardous waste
thresholds;
TCVN 6707:2009 - Prevention and warning signs for hazardous waste;
TCVN 6705:2009 - Non-hazardous waste;
TCVN 6706:2009 - Separation of hazardous wastes;
The environmental standards of the International Organizations and the
construction area such as WHO, FAO-ISO-9000, Canadian Standards on Sediment.
Decision No.3733/2002/QD-BYT on Octorber 10th
2002 of Ministry of Health on
applying the 21 standards on labor sanistation.
2.3. Sources of Reference Documents and Data
During the study of EIA Report preparation, many scientific documents and data have
been used and referred. The principal documents for reference are:
Le Thac Can and nnk, Environmental impact assessment: Methodology and Reality
Experience. NXB KHKT Hanoi. 1993
Pham Ngoc Dang, 2003. Air environment. NXB KHKT. 2003
Meteorology data of the Thai Binh hydrometeorology station;
Statistics Yearbook of Thai Binh from 2005 up to now;
Collection of the legal documents: Law and the bylaws, the international
conventions relating to environmental protection that Vietnam committed to
follow; Vietnamese and international standards on the environment are considered
to determine the relationship of them for the project and ensure the legal basis of
the assessment;
Clack and colleagues. Chemical properties of the dirty soil layer on the road. 2000.
Journal of CIWEM
Environmental impact assessment report
20
A.P. Economopoulos. Assessment of sources of air, water and land pollution, Part
one, WHO, Genève;
Here are the published documents and their scientific and practical values have been
acknowledged.
2.4. Source of Documents, Data created by the Project Owner
The environmental survey data of the project area in January 2013 implemented by
CSD under a contract with the Project owner, including the items on environmental
quality of air, noise, vibration, surface water, soil, and sediment. Locations, number,
frequency, measurement time, survey and sampling items are presented in detail in
Chapter 2 - The actual quality of physical environment components, which includes
the environmental quality survey location diagram presented in Figure 2.1. Public
consultation was carried out 02 times at the request of the World Bank and Vietnam
People's Committees at levels of communes, towns, community representatives and
the majority of people affected by the project, details are presented in Chapter 6.
Project content, environmental issues and proposed mitigation measures are introduced
during the consultation process. At the same time, the opinions of consulted resident
were recorded and added to the corresponding content of the reports for each specific
road.
The detailed survey data is done by the methods prescribed by experienced
professionals. Because the time of survey and measurement serving EIA Report of the
project coincides with the time of investment consideration and decision of the project,
the updated data is reasonable.
3. Methodology for Environmental Impact Assessment
The environmental impact assessment has been implemented according to the
approach (Regional approach), which means the research overview to the preliminary
impact assessment, then through the survey results, the environmental impacts are
assessed in detail.
a. Study on Document according to the Direction
The document for the last alternatives with the specific quantitative information
such as: The basic design drawings; topographic survey maps; Geological Survey
mapping; the diagram of the site, the architecture of the categories of works under
the project;
The documentary about traffic (traffic density, traffic jams black spots, the current
state of the roads etc.), mine survey report of materials, waste management, solid
Environmental impact assessment report
21
waste on the in the project and surrounding areas;
Calculate the quantitative parameters relating to specific projects of the investment
based on: the location of the fragment, the quantity needed, the volume of sand
required transportation to, some main roads are used etc.
Gather information about the current state of the ecology and biological diversity,
and determined the level of biodiversity in the area passing routes.
b. Statistical Method
Statistical method is used in order to process the data of natural, metrological,
hydraulic and socio-economic conditions collected at Hung Ha district, Thai Binh
Province and the adjacent areas. It is applied in Chapter 2, the characteristics of natural
conditions (topography, geology and hydrometeorology) and socio-economic status.
c. Detail Survey
Investment alignments, the boundaries of influence, the sensitive spots, circled the
sensitive regions of the impact are chosen and defined.
d. Methods of Control Comparison
Control comparison is used to evaluate the actual status based on comparison of the
measurement data or calculation results with the Allowable limit specified in
Vietnamese Protocols and Standards or of a World Organization. It is applied in
Chapter 2, Actual condition of physical environment components.
e. Method of Quick Assessment
This method is established by the World Health Organization to estimate the quantity
of exhaust fumes and the polluted substances in sewage water of the project. It is
applied in Chapter 3, Estimation of the carrying power and dust concentration, exhaust
gas and sewage from construction activities.
f. Establish and implement monitoring program indicators environment:
Based on the background data, uniform properties, representation, typical of the
investments, the sampling and analyzing the environmental targets (air, noise,
vibration, surface water, sediment, groundwater, and soil) are implemented.
g. Application of several formulas, calculation software (Mathematical
simulation) dedicated to predictions of some environmental impacts arising (Gaussian
model-air pollution; ASJ model-noise pollution ...).
h. Analyze the impacts arising (additional qualitative quantitative parameters)
The effects arising from the process of project implementation (both positive and
Environmental impact assessment report
22
negative) in the design, implementation and monitoring; risk assessment; construction
measures to mitigate and manage risk; management plans, environmental monitoring
details; training program of capacity building; alternate funding plans for
environmental management. This content will be done through:
Calculate and set the table, graph ...
Trend analysis;
Map method and visualization impact: combining map Google Map, AUTOCAD,
MAPINFO;
Matching the criteria and evaluation of pollution levels;
Refer to the actual experience of related projects.
i. Public consultation meeting at ward/communes: include the represents of People
Committees, and Communities in Project area.
j. Send the report to the experts in the field of the environment (senior expert of
the World Bank) to look and ask for opinions;
k. Information dissemination: the EIA report after the technical assessment by the
experts will be deployed widely disseminating information in the forms: published
on Infoshop, at the PMU and in local area development project. The comments will
be reviewed and synthesized in a final report.
l. Method of Sociology Investigation
Investigating, directly interviewing the cadres of the wards, villages relating to the
project about the socio-economic conditions, wastes and requirements, willing of
them relating to the project.
Interview-surveying, directly interviewing the households in the Project Area about
the matters relating to environment protection of the Project.
The results of this method application are used in Chapter 2, Socio-economic
conditions.
m. Measurement and Survey of Environment Quality
The equipments are used to sample and measure the criteria of environment quality are
described below. Sampling positions are located by hand GPS system
Measurement of quality criteria of air environment
o Using POCKET WEATHER TRACKER 4500, Kestrel (USA) to determine the
criteria of temperature, moisture, pressure, wind velocity and wind direction
Environmental impact assessment report
23
o Using DUST TRAK MODEL 8520 AEROSOL MONITOR (Using ) to
determine the dust content TSP and PM10.
o Using MULTI – GAS MONITOR IBRID MX6 (USA) to determine the
content of toxic fumes CO, NO2 and SO2.
Measurement of the noise and vibration criteria:
o Using INTEGRATING SOUND LEVEL METER TYPE 6226, ACO Co. Ltd
(Japan) to measure noise.
o Using VIBRATION LEVEL METER VM-1220E, IMV COPORATION
(Japan) to measure vibration level.
Measurement of the quality criteria of surface water.
o Taking water samples by using water sample taking equipment made in USA.
Processing and maintaining the water sample following TCVN 6663–14:2000,
ISO 5667–14:1998.
o Using WATER QUALITY CHECKER MODEL WQC-22A, of DKK-TOA
CORPORATION (Japan) to determine the liability criteria such as:
temperature, pH, Conductivity, Turbidity, S%o and DO.
The results of this method application is used in Chapter 2, clause of Actual condition
of quality of physical environment components.
n. Method of Data Analysis and Processing in the Laboratory
The analysis methods of water surface and deposit samples were following
Vietnamese Standards on environment in 1995,1998 and 2001. The analysis methods
are presented in details in the Analysis sheets attached in the Appendices. The results
of this method application is used in Chapter 2, clause of Actual condition of
quality of physical environment components.
4. Organization of Environmental Impact Assessment Implementation
The Project’s EIA Report is carried out by the representative of Project owner –
Project Management Unit 3 with the consultancy of CSD.
Representative of Project owner: Project Management Unit 3
Representative by: Mr. Nguyen Ngoc Long Position: General Director
Address: 122, Blog of 12A, Trung Hoa street, Trung Yen urban area, Cau Giay
dist., Hanoi
Tel: 04.37836052 Fax: 04.37836053
EIA Report preparation agency: Center for Sustainable Community Development
Environmental impact assessment report
24
Representative by: Mr. Ho Ngoc Hai Position: Director
Address: 5 – Nguyen Viet Xuan, Hanoi.
Tel: 04. 3852 3090 Fax: 04. 3565 5800
The members directly involving in preparation of EIA Report of the Project are all EIA
knowledgeable experts who are specialized areas: control of air pollution, water
pollution, environmental ecology, environment technology, environmental
managements with the following representative names:
Nguyen DucThang Acting General Directorate
Nguyen Xuan Truong Acting General Director
Dr. Ho Ngoc Hai, Sociologist Director
Dr. Ho Thi Van, Biologist expert
Tran Thi Thanh Binh, Press and media expert
Nguyen Huy Tien, Environmental science expert
1 MA. Pham Van Xuan, Environmental Management –
Environmental geology
expert
2 Engineer. Pham The Giang, Hydrograph – Environment expert
3 MA. Bui Nguyen Pho, Environmental science Expert
4 BSc. Đang Vu Hien, Ecology. Expert
5 MA. Nguyen Dinh, Environmental science Expert
6 BSc. Pham Thanh Hao, Environmental economics Expert
7 BSc. Le Viet Cao, Environment Technology Expert
8 Engineer. Nguyen Hong Van, Environmental economics Expert
9 BSc. Tran Phương Lan, Environmental Management – Law
and policies on environment
Expert
10 BSc. Tran Tuan Anh, Environmental geology. Expert
11 BSc. Ngo Thi Thanh Hoa, Environmental Engineering. Expert
and other collaborators
Environmental impact assessment report
25
CHAPTER I. BRIEF DESRIPTION OF PROJECT
1.1. Name of Project
Subproject component of NH39-1 rehabilitation, Trieu Duong – Hung Ha section
(Km42+714 - Km64+000) and 3 bridges on alignment include Nai, Dong Tu and Go
belong to Component C of Project Vietnam Road Asset Management.
1.2. Project Owner
Project owner: Directorate for Roads of Vietnam
Represented by: Mr Nguyen Duc Thang Position: Acting General Directorate
Address: 106 – Thai Thinh, Dong Da, Hanoi
Telephone: 04.35373672 Fax: 04.38571440
Representative of Project owner: Project Management Unit 3
Represented by: Mr. Nguyen Ngoc Long Position: Acting General Director
Contact Address: 122, Blog of 12A, Trung Hòa Street, Trung Yen urban area,
Cau Giay dist., Hanoi.
Telephone: 04.37836052 Fax: 04.37836053
1.3. Project Location
The Project has total length of around 20.6km spread on 12 communes/towns of 2
provinces Hung Yen and Thai Binh, include of Thien Phien commune (Tien Lu
District) – Hung Yen Province; Tan Le, Hung Nhan, Tan Hoa, Lien Hiep, Thai
Phuong, Phuc Khanh, Hung Ha, Minh Khai, Hong Linh (Hung Ha District) and Dong
Phong, Dong Tan (Dong Hung District) – Thai Binh District.
Beginning point: Km42+714 is in Thien Phien commune, Tie Lu district, Hung
Yen province (at coordinate 20°39'5,91"N; 106° 7'46,41"E);
Ending point: Km64+000 is in Hong Linh commune, Hưng Ha district, Thai Binh
province (at coordinate 20°33'35,49"N; 106°16'16,35"E).
Including realignment section (Hung Nhan bypass) from Km47+930 to Km49+960.
The Project is the main road in the area, connecting traffic network of Thai Binh
province with other important traffic corridors, mainly passing the province’s
agricultural land area, some sections pass residential areas along the route. The Project
has correlation following objects:
Environmental impact assessment report
26
Transport: In the Project area, travelling is mainly on the existing NH39 and access
roads to villages. The projected route crosses roads like PR195, PR224, PR455,
PR223, and PR226, etc.
Surface water source: Along the roadsides and the Project area there are large
rivers such as the Lao Khe, the Thai Su, and several irrigation canals, ponds. This
is the source providing surface water for irrigation in the Project area. Water
quality of the rivers, canals, and ponds may be affected by the Project’s
construction activities;
Reservation park: Along the alignment there is no ecological reservation zone. The
nearest natural reservation park is Xuan Thuy National Park, about 45km from the
route. Construction activities may affect land ecosystems and aquatic systems in
ponds, rivers.
Residential, urban areas: Population density is high along the Project’s route, 100%
is Kinh ethnic group, with density is 900 people per 1 km2. Highly populated
points are Km44+000 - Km44+200, Km44+400 - Km44 +900, Km45+100 -
Km45+800 (right side), Km45+800 - Km46+100, Km47+700, Km47+950,
Km51+200 - Km52+200, Km52+400 - Km52+900, Km53+100 - Km53+700,
Km54+100, Km55+100, Km56+150 - Km56+700, Km56+800 - Km57+500,
Km57+650, Km57+800, Km58+080, Km58+300 - Km59+400, Km59+900,
Km61+300 - Km61+600. The families living next to the existing roadside will be
affected by the Project’s construction activities
Economic entities: Economic activities of people are mainly trading and farming.
Trading is not large of scale but brings in rather stable income for households with
house at roadside. Project construction may affect to business activities of the
households.
Historical, cultural works: In the project area, there are some historical or cultural
relics such as Pagoda at Km46+900, pagoda at Km48+900, Family Temple at
Km56+620, Linh Son Tu Phu Cau historical relic (Km52+700)... National historical
and cultural relics – Mandarin Tran Thu Do museum and Queen Endower Tran Thi
Dung shrines (Km52+500). Those works are located in scope of 20 - 2000m from
the project site and will be affected by the Project’s construction activities.
Education, health, administrative and public utilities: Along the Project site there
are works such as Tran Thu Do Secondary School (Km46+300), Hung Ha townlet
medical station, Hung Ha post office, Hung Ha District Party Committee office,
Office of Hung Ha Town People’s Committee (Km59+600), Hung Ha bus station
(Km58+850), etc. Those works are located in scope of 20 - 100m from the Project
Environmental impact assessment report
27
Site. They can be directly affected by the Project’s activities due to be near the
scope of project area.
Location map of the project and Environment Quality Survey Points are presented in 1.1.
Environmental impact assessment report
28
Figure 1.1. Location Map of the Project
Project aligment
Bridge
Residential area
Temple, School, and PC
office
Interchange
Legend
Starting point Km42+650
Ending point Km64+000
Hung Nhan bypass
Environmental impact assessment report
29
Environmental impact assessment report
30
1.4. Main Contents of the Project
1.4.1. Project Components
Component Road assets management
Component Maintenance
Component Improvement
Component Strengthening Program
A1: Setting-up of the road database framework A2: Collecting data A3: Development of road asset management system A4: Development of road asset management plan
B1: Completion of PBC legal framework
B2: PBC including:
NH5: Ha Noi – Hai Duong Section (Km11-93)
QL2: Ham Yen – Ha Giang (Km175-Km283)
NH18: Noi Bai – Sao Do (Noi Bai – Bac Ninh Section, Km-1-590 – Km31+650 and Bac Ninh - Sao Do Section, Km0-Km46)
B3: Periodic maintenance
NH48: Section Km0-Km20 and Km38-Km64
NH6: Section Hoa Binh – Son La (Km78-Km303)
B4: Assessment and comparison of maintenance method B5: Supervision consultant of maintenance component
C1: Improvement
094 bridges of over 25m: Trang Thua, Cong Neo, Trang, Cap bridges (NH38B); Nai, Dong Tu, Go bridges (NH39); Sat and Bun bridges (NH38)
NH39-1: Trieu Duong – Hung Ha Section (Km44-Km64)
NH38: Quan Goi – Yen Lenh Section (Km33+963 – Km52+716)
NH39: Vo Hoi – Diem Dien Section (Km91-Km107+522)
C2: Land acquisition
C3: Supervision consultant of improvement component
D1: Reforms and renovation of human resource for DRVN
D2: Implementation of Road Maintenance Fund
D3: Development of standard drawings on infrastructure facilities
D4: Audit
Environmental impact assessment report
31
1.4.2. Objectives
The project is implemented aiming at following objectives:
Improvement of efficiency of Northern transport service;
Reduction of traffic accident;
Enhancement of institutional framework and finance for sustainable maintenance
activity of Vietnam’s road network.
1.4.3. Investment Content – Component C
1.4.3.1. Quantity, Scale of the Project’s Work Items
The project shall be studied and invested to: Improve, enlarge the NH39-1 section with
total length of about 20.6km, with following key items:
Construction of Hung Nhan bypass (Km47+930 - Km49+960), L=2.03Km);;
Section Km63+320 – Km64+000: adjust the alignment to the right, however it try
still savage maximum the land area of road scope in the left to mitigate the
embankment (according to the Announcement No.304/TB-CDBVN on December
24th
, 2012);
Remain sections is still improve and enlarge both 2 sides on the existing
background;
02 intersections at Km47+930 – beginning of Hung Nhan bypass and Km49+960 –
end of Hung Nhan bypass;
Construction of 04 new bridges on the alignment, Nai bridge (Km48+217), Le
bridge (Km50+120). Nai (Km52+662) and Dong Tu bridge (Km55+362); Go
bridge (Km88+100)
Construction of drainage system, electricity, landscaping and traffic safety systems.
a. Actuality of NH39-1
Alignment: existing alignment is mostly in Hung Ha district, particularly through
residential areas in the towns as Hung Nhan, Hung Ha. Horizontal alignment is
narrow with small radius horizontal curves.
Surface road: include 1 pavement layer by bitumen thick 12cm and above the
granular foundation layers has the thick 15cm. On the surface road, there are many
damages as creacks, peeling pavement, potholes... section Km61- Km67 were
asphalt distributed. The width of pavement is 5 – 6m on the embankment with the
width of 7 – 9m. Status of drainage system is bad especially some section pass
Environmental impact assessment report
32
through the resident area that without the drainage system lead to the surface of
these section is damaged quickly, and this is need to repair.
The bridge: a total of five bridges: Nai, Le, Nai, Dong Tu and Go. The current state
of the bridge are summarized below
o Le bridge at Km48 + 251.22 built in 1977, reinforced concrete board with 5.5m
of width.
o The Nai bridge at 600 + Km48 built in in 1977, reinforced concrete board with
5.5m of width.
o Nai bridge at Km52+662 built in 1977, reinforced concrete board with
width/length equivalent 7.5/7.5, with bridge span: 34m + 3.5 + 12 + 3.5 + 7.5,
maximum load 13 t.
o Dong Tu bridge at Km55 + 366 built in 1977, reinforced concrete board with
width/length equivalent 9/28m, bridge span: 3x9m, maximum load 13T.
o Go bridge at Km88 + 164 built in 1983, reinforced concrete board with
width/length equivatlent 7/30m, bridge span: 3x10m, maximum load 10T.
The culvert: there are 32 culverts in this alignment, almost still works fine. Some
culverts were filled up or sedimentation in the upper or lower.
Intersection: intersection along the level with the horizontal line.
Road safety: no paint marking, signage and pickets almost are damaged.
b. Road Work
b1. Scale
The alignment has total length of 20.18km, Broad-bed = 12m according to class III of
highway, the sections go through the residential areas are applied the urban road
standards with designed velocity Vtk = 80km/hr (for section passing residential areas,
Vtk=60km/hr).
b2. Profile
Trieu Duong - Hung Ha section’s profile mostly follows the existing one, one of main
controls for the alignment’s profile is the existing road pavement elevation. In sections
passing residential areas, the profile is designed to match the existing road as much as
possible to avoid bad impacts on local people’s houses.
Result of profile design is shown in Table 1.1.
Environmental impact assessment report
33
Table 1.1. Profile Design Result
No. Gradient (%) Length (m) Ratio (%)
1 0 < id < 0.5 16880.5 93.43
2 0.5 < id < 1.0 1187.96 6.57
3 1.0 < id < 4.0 0 0.00
Total 18068.46 100
b3. Cross-section
Cross-section of the section outside residential area: Bpavement =7m, Bn= 12m (fig. 1.2)
Carriageway : 2 x 3.5m = 7m
Paved shoulder : 2x2m = 4m
Soil shoulder each side : 0.5x2m = 1m
Figure. 1.2. Cross-Section in Section Passing Rural Area
Cross-section of section inside residential area is presented in fig. 1.3
Figure. 1.3. Cross-section in Sections in Urban Areas
12.00
14.50 - 18.00
Environmental impact assessment report
34
Table 1.2. Cross-Section of Sections inside Residential Areas
Station Left
shoulder
breadth
(m)
Left
roadside
breadth
(m)
Pavement
breadth
(m)
Right
roadside
breadth
(m)
Right
shoulder
breadth
(m)
Total
breadth
(m)
Location From Km To Km
43+950 44+435 0.5 0.0 14.0 2.0 0.0 16.5
Tan Le
44+435 45+060 0.0 2.0 14.0 2.0 0.0 18.0
45+060 45+240 0.5 0.0 14.0 2.0 0.0 16.5
45+240 46+100 0.5 0.0 12.0 2.0 0.0 14.5
56+022 56+126 0.0 2.0 14.0 0.0 0.5 16.5
56+126 56+707 0.0 2.0 14.0 2.0 0.0 18.0
56+707 57+105 0.0 2.0 14.0 0.0 0.5 16.5
57+105 59+400 0.0 2.0 14.0 2.0 0.0 18.0
59+400 59+730 0.5 0.0 14.0 2.0 0.0 16.5 Hung Ha
townlet 59+730 59+930 0.0 2.0 14.0 2.0 0.0 18.0
59+930 60+114 0.5 0.0 14.0 2.0 0.0 16.5
b4. Embankment structure
The embankment is filled with sand at K > 0.95, for the layer with 50cm of thickness
at the bottom is compacted with K > 0,98 and using geotextile for separation. Filling
both sides of slope with minimum of 1.0 meter, filling cover soil have to be obtainable
plasticity index higher or equal to 7.
When the natural ground has horizontal gradient less than 20%, organic soil layer with
0.5m of thickness is excavated to remove (for standard section) or 0.5 – 1m of
thickness (for sections go through the pond, lake, canal, etc.). When the natural
ground’s gradient is 20%-50%, benching excavating is done before filling soil.
Designed road slope’s gradient is 1/n=1/1.75.
b5. Soft soil treatment
Some major soft soil treatment solutions are:
- Solution I: PVD with 6m – 15m depth x @1.3m from Km44+142 – Km58+100
with a total length of 5,781m (Table on total results soft soil treatment by the PVD
is copied and attached in Appendix 2 – Diagram of Technical Drawing)
- Solution II: Handling replaced by sand excavation depth H = 2.5 m, from Km43
+950 - Km56 +150 with a total length of 2,060m (Table on total results soft soil
Environmental impact assessment report
35
treatment by the PVD is copied and attached in Appendix 2 – Diagram of
Technical Drawing)
b6. Pavement structure
The project applies 04 structures including: 01 new pavement structure and 03
enhanced overlay structures.
For section at the ends of Trieu Duong bridge: 7cm Asphalt concrete binder course
paving.
For enhanced section: using 3 to 4 layer structure with corresponding thickness of
27. 42cm.
For extended part and new section: using 4-layer structure with 52cm thickness.
Figure 1.4. Detail of New Pavement
Asphalt concrete surface coarse : t = 5cm
Tackcoat 0.5 kg/m2
Asphalt concrete binder coarse : t = 7cm
Prime coat 1.0 kg/m2
Crushed Stone Aggregate Class I : t = 15cm
Crushed stone Aggregate Class II : t = 25cm
Embankment K98 : t = 50cm
Figure 1.5. Detail of Enhanced Pavement
AC surface coarse : t = 5cm
Tackcoat 0,5 kg/m2
AC binder coarse : t = 7cm
Prime coat 1.0 kg/m2
Crushed Stone Aggregate Class I: t = 15cm
Crushed Stone Aggregate Class II: t=0 cm
(Type B1) and 15cm (type B2)
Existing pavement
b7. Traffic safety works
Traffic safety works are designed according to "Road Signal Rules and 22TCN 273-
01”, including:
52
cm
27
-42 cm
Environmental impact assessment report
36
Road markings: reflective thermal plastic paint it used so that travelers can spot the
markers in any weather conditions;
Signs: traffic signs are arranged sufficiently on the road, especially at intersections,
sections near residential area.
c. Bridge work
Construction of 05 bridges: new Nai bridge (Km48+600), new Le bridge (Km48+251),
Nại bridge (Km52+700), Dong Tu Bridge (Km55+320) and Go bridge (Km88100)
(table 1.3).
c1. Scale and Specification
The bridges are designed as permanent RC and pre-stressed RC bridge with:
13m breadth (Fig 1.6), designed speed Vtk=80km/hr.
Designed frequency: P = 1%
Navigation clearance: river class VI , clearance breadth 10x2.5m
Bridge designing standard: 22TCN 272-05;
Design of structures for earthquake resistance: TCXDVM 375:2006;
Load and Impact Design standard: TCVN 2737:1995;
Designed live-load: HL93 and axle load XB80;
Bridge approach roads: plain road class III.
c2. Superstructure
Kinds of beam and bridge spans are presented in table 1.3.
Environmental impact assessment report
37
Table 1.3. Bridges in the Project
NO. Bridge name River/
Canal Station
Bridge
breadth
(m)
Span
layout
(m)
Length
(m)
Girder
structure
Foundation
structure Notes
1 Le bridge Cau Le
river Km48+251 13.0 1x15 27.10 Slab girder 35x35
People living at two ends of the new
bridge; the bridge end towards Trieu
Duong has some ponds, crop garden
around
2 Nai bridge Nai river Km48+600 13.0 1x20 32.10 Slab girder 35x35
People living at two ends of the new
bridge; Surrounding is rice field, fruit
garden
3 Nại bridge Sa Lung
river Km52+700 13.0 12+20+12 50.2
Hollow Slab
girder
CKN
D =1.5
People living at two ends of the new
bridge; the bridge end towards Trieu
Duong has some ponds,
4 Dong Tu
bridge
Hoang
Nguyen
river
Km55+320 13.0 9+20+9 44.2 Hollow Slab
girder
CKN
D =1.5
Population at two bridge ends are
scarce;
ON left side of approach road to Trieu
Duong is rice field
5 Go bridge Hoai river Km88+100 13.0 9+20+9 44.2 Hollow Slab
girder
CKN
D =1.5
People living at both abutment of new
bridge;
Along the right side of approach roads
there are ponds
Environmental impact assessment report
38
Figure 1.6. Bridge Cross-Section
Table 1.4. Girder Types
No. Type Scope of using (m)
min max
1 Pre-stressed Slab girder 12 20
2 PCI 24 33
3 Pre-stressed Super-T girder 38 40
c3. Substructure
Abutment structure: designing as cast in-situ U-shape RC wall, straight wall to
reduce water flow occupation.
Pier structure: solid body RC pier with tapered tip or of round column type. Piers
with great height, body size varies depending on its height.
Footing structure: Elevation of footing on natural ground (on land case) and in river
bed after general erosion is min. 0.5m.
Foundation structure: Depending on geological condition and load transmitted
from the superstructure, below foundation types are used:
Shallow foundation: Applies when good rock layer is next to the natural ground;
Earth drilled pile foundation: Using 1.0m; 1.2m; 1.5m and 2.0m diameters
Pre-cast RC pile foundation: applies 0.35m x 0.35m. 0.4m x 0.4m. 0.45m x
0.45m types.
c4. Auxiliary structure
Bridge bearing:
13000/2=6500
2500
13000/2=6500
500 500
2.5% 2.5%
Deck slab 100mm
Water proof 4mmAsphalt concrete 70mm
Girder slab
3500 25003500
Environmental impact assessment report
39
With L12m spans, elastic buffer bearings are used.
For spans of 12mL33m length, rubber bearing pad with steel plate of the
corresponding load.
With Super T girder, using pot type bearing of corresponding load.
Expansion joint:
For spans L12m using expansion joints from sliding steel sheet.
For girder with span length of 12mL33m, using expansion joint in rail type
having displacement 5cm to 10cm.
With Span L >33m using expansion joint of serrated/pectinate steel.
Bridge overlay:
AC surface course, t = 70mm
Waterproof is thin film directly spread on concrete t=4mm.
Drainage:
Drainage for viaducts should collects water to abutment or pier positions, for
river crossing spans, draining water directly to river.
c5. Design of Protection consolidation
For widely excavated sections, in positions with frequent water level (sections along
canals, ponds, etc.), slope is consolidated with mortared stone (table 1.5).
Table 1.5. Protection Consolidated Sections
No. Beginning
station -
End
station L (m) No.
Beginning
station -
End
station L (m)
1 Km51+560 - Km51+609 49 8 Km56+063 - Km56+125 62
2 Km54+730 - Km54+752 22 9 Km58+191 - Km58+274 83
3 Km54+748 - Km54+816 68 10 Km58+283 - Km58+305 22
4 Km54+834 - Km54+869 35 11 Km58+311 - Km58+331 20
5 Km54+872 - Km54+924 52 12 Km58+381 - Km58+450 69
6 Km54+932 - Km54+968 36 13 Km62+170 - Km62+500 330
7 Km54+974 - Km54+989 15 14 Km63+320 Km64+000 680
Total 1.543
Environmental impact assessment report
40
d. Intersection
The Project will have 02 intersections constructed in the area of Hung Nhan bypass
(table 1.6.). At the intersections, there will be traffic guiding islands, median strip, U-
turn lane, signs, speed humps and road markings as designed to diverse traffic to
ensure traffic in the Project site.
Table 1.6. List of Intersections
No
.
Intersection Station Type Note
1
Intersection at
Beginning of Hung
Nhan bypass
Km47+930 Y-type
Scarcely populated. Surroundings of
the Intersection are mostly empty land
and some ponds.
2
Intersection at the
end of Hung Nhan
bypass
Km49+960 Y-type
No population near the intersection,
mostly empty land. A transformer
station is in 100m distant from it.
e. Drainage system
On the route, there will be 37 culverts, including 33 pipe culverts and 4 box
culverts. Among which, 18 culverts are new and 19 culverts are replaced with new
ones, dimensions of the culverts have been agreed by local authority.
For sections passing residential zones, drainage system is designed as longitudinal
culverts with aperture D=0.75m below the sidewalk
(Statistical talbe on the drainage system and culvert system will be copied and attached
in Appendix 2 – Diagram of Technical Drawing).
1.4.3.2. Auxiliary Work Items
a. Construction site
Area of 06 construction sites will be arranged in construction:
Nai bridge (Km48+600): with 1.500m2
Nại bridge: with area of 1.500m2
Dong Tu bridge: with area of 1.500m2
Go bridge: with area of 800m2
Bypass construction site (Km48+000): with area of 1.000m2
Road expansion and improvement site (Km54+500): with area of 1.000m2
Environmental impact assessment report
41
It is planned to set up items in a jobsite including: site huts (about 50 workers),
machine gathering yard, stock piling yard. Specific scale of the items will be clarified
in the next steps.
b. Material Supply
b1. Natural materials
Quarries and borrow pits and locations of borrow pits which are able to provide
materials for the Project are presented in table 1.7.
Table 1.7. Borrow Pits and Quarries for the Project
No. Borrow pit Location Material type Reserves (m3)
Distance to the
Project
1
Kien Khe
quarry
La Mat, Kien
Khe townlet,
Thanh Liem
district, Ha Nam
province
Industrial
limestone (clean
limestone)
200,000
m3/year 45km from NH1A
2
Nguyen Ly
quarry
Tran Xa hamlet,
Nguyen Ly
commune, Ly
Nhan district, Ha
Nam province
Filling sand 3000 - 4000
m3/day
3
Thanh Nghi
soil borrow-
pit
Thanh Nghi
commune, Thanh
Liem district, Ha
Nam province
Filling soil 2,500,000m3 52km from NH1A
4 Yen Lenh
material yard -
Crushed stone,
coarse sand - 12km
5
Trieu Duong
material yard -
Crushed stone,
coarse sand, fine
sand
- 2km
6
Quan Su
material yard -
Crushed stone,
coarse sand, fine
sand
- 23.6km
7 Thai Ha
material yard -
Coarse sand, fine
sand - 33.65km
Environmental impact assessment report
42
Figure 1.7. Location of Borrow Pits
GHI CHÚ
Tuyến Dự án
Bãi vật liệu
Mỏ vật liệu
Environmental impact assessment report
43
Environmental impact assessment report
44
b2. Semi-Products
Semi-products are materials produced, processed from plants such as crushed stone
aggregates, asphalt concrete, precast components, etc. after being inspected and
accepted for their commodity, shall be transported to the jobsite for construction.
Cement concrete will be purchased from licensed companies, plants in Thai Binh
province and transported to the jobsite by specialized mixer. Asphalt concrete is
bought from licensed mixing plants in Thai Binh province.
Primary survey shows that Thai Binh province now has readily some large-scale
batching plants, ready to meet construction demand of the Project, including:
Shengli Steel Factory’s Concrete Mixing Plant (Bach Dang Company no. 204);
Vicomark Thai Binh Concrete Mixing Plant (Vicomark Company);
Vinaconex 3 Concrete Mixing Plant (Vinaconex Company).
c. Dumping Rubbles from Construction
Waste rubbles in construction will be concentrated in guarded temporary stockpiling
yards within the job site, then transported to dumping site of the province where the
Project locates. However, dumping site has not been determined specifically in the
step of investment project establishment. The Employer shall undertake to get written
agreement with local authorities on rubble dumping site location in the next steps of
the Project.
d. Land acquisition and resettlement
d1. Land acquisition
The Project shall occupy land along two sides of the road: existing residential land of
local people being used to build houses, gardens, ponds, etc.; in order to construct the
Project’s items. Land acquisition quantity in details is presented in table 1.8.
Table 1.8. Land Acquisition Quantity
No Item Unit Quantity
I Everlasting acquisition Land
1 Land compensation m2 [HH] 45.465 [582]
- Housing area m2 [HH] 13.447 [362]
- Agricultural land m2/ [HH] 20.258 [229]
+ Annual tree land m2
19.489
+ Garden m2
577
Environmental impact assessment report
45
No Item Unit Quantity
+ Aquaculture land m2
192
- Other lands m2
11.760
2 Housing compensation m2 525,05
- Level 4 m2 327,05
- Level3 m2 116,3
- Level 2 m2
81,7
II Temporary acquisition m2 7.300
There are a total of 582 households affected, among them there are:
- 362 households affected Aboriginal land with an area of 13,447 m2.
- 229 households affected agricultural land with total area of 20,258 m2.
- 86 households have affected agricultural land (20% or more) and 10% of the
vulnerable groups.
- 82 households affected the entire Indian land residents but only 7 affected the
entire House to relocate relocation to an area of the House is 322m2, 20 households
affected the part with the total area is 203m2. The rest have no home on the
Turkish soil.
d2. Resettlement Plan
According to the survey results, the number of households displaced by the project is
7. All households are to receive compensation, aid and grants to handle resettlement.
However, to ensure that households will not be difficult to buy land and build new
homes as well as moving to new accommodation, communal administration and
resettlement plan should assist households to relocate to the new place in the process
of buying land for indigenous populations, House construction, the legal papers related
to own the land and homes. Households will be support costs connected living
facilities such as water supply, electricity and communication systems ... (Source:
resettlement plan report by investment consulting co., Ltd and EPC environmental
protection founded in June 2013).
g. Power, water sources for the Works
g1. Water source
For construction: water is mostly used for washing wheels and spraying to prevent
dust in construction area of the Project and in jobsite. It is planned that Project will
work with water supply company of the province to negotiate water source. The
water source will be from a general source through separate connection to the
Environmental impact assessment report
46
jobsite and construction areas.
For living activities of workers: life water quantity is based on water standard
applicable to construction workers at jobsite according to Standard TC 20TCN
4474 – 87 “water standard used for meal preparation” which is 25 liter/person/day
and according to TC 20TCN33 – 85 “water standard for bathing and washing”,
which is 45 liter/person/day.
g2. Power source for the Works
The construction unit will work with the province electricity company to negotiate
power source for life activities of the jobsite and construction. This power source will
be from general source of the province through separate connection to the jobsite and
construction areas.
1.4.4. Construction Method, Quantity of the Project Works
1.4.4.1. Land Acquisition
According to Article 33, Decree no. 69/2009/ND-CP dated 13/08/2009 of the
Government providing additional regulation on land use planning, land price, land
recovery, compensation, support and resettlement, land acquisition and resettlement
under a Project is separated from the investment project and assigned to relevant
provincial people’s committee to implement independently.
The Employer is responsible to provide timely, sufficiently necessary documents and
project, package schedule, by each construction phase, as well as disbursement plan to
ensure completion of land acquisition as scheduled.
Land acquisition and resettlement funding source shall be provided by PMU2 and
taken from State Budget.
After completion of land acquisition, relevant Provincial People’s Committee will
hand over the site to the Employer to construct work items.
1.4.4.2. Key Construction Measure
a. Site preparation
The work is implemented for construction activities. Main contents are:
Demolition of houses and grading: On the land area recovered by Provincial
People’s Committee and handed over to construct the Works, the Employer will
demolish permanent structures such as houses, irrigation works, etc.
Preparation of job site, service road: Including grading, sand filling; installation of
Environmental impact assessment report
47
items such as equipment service station, site huts, etc.
Site preparation activities shall be completed before construction of the works.
b. Canal relocation
Before construction of the Works, the Project will carry out adjustment of canal
sections crossing the Project with total length of about 754m (earth canal, in figure
1.8).
Canal relocation will be implemented and completed before farming season;
Temporary canal leads water from upstream to downstream will be set up before
dam is built;
After temporary canal is finished, leading water from upstream to downstream, a
dam will be built to stop the water to create construction site;
Build irrigation works at existing flow location. After completion of the works at in
the position of previous water flow, the flow is diverted to original position, the
temporary canal is filled and recovered to original condition.
c. Traffic diversion option
During construction, the expanded sides of the road will be constructed first, traffic
will be maintained on the existing road. After finishing the expansion parts, the vehicle
flow will be diverted to the expanded lane, and construction will be carried out on the
existing road. Thus, it will limit effect on the traffic thus traffic diversion is still keep
the existing condition.
Besides, the Project also has items designed to ensure traffic safety such as signs,
especially at intersections, locations near residential areas.
d. Construction of expansion road and intersection
Including construction activities in below sequence:
Construction of embankment: Excavation, filling of expanded embankment to the
designed elevation with machines such as clamshell excavator, motor-grader,
compactor, roller, etc. and soft soil treatment;
Pavement construction: Construction of expansion of the existing road first, when
spreading new AC surface course, embankment and pavement of the existing road
will be executed.
e. Construction of Hung Nhan bypass
Hung Nhan bypass will be constructed in following sequence:
Environmental impact assessment report
48
Construction of embankment: Excavation, filling embankment to designed
elevation with machines such as clamshell excavator, motor-grader, compactor,
roller, etc. and soft soil treatment;
Pavement construction: Spreading crushed stone aggregate base and then spreading
asphalt with equipment such as roller, asphalt spreader, water spraying tank truck,
and dump truck.
f. Bridge construction
f1. Abutment construction
Site preparation: Determination of abutment foundation location; grading and sand
filling; establishment of pile center;
Construction of pile system:
o Earth-drilled piles: Establishment of pile location, lowering casing; drilling to
make hole; lowering the reinforcing steel cage; casting concrete; withdrawing
casing;
o RC pile: Positioning pile location; pile driving with vibratory hammer;
reinforcement with bamboo spikes;
Foundation pit execution: Excavation of foundation pit; hammering pile end;
spreading loose stone, crushed stone; casting concrete;
Construction of abutment footing: installation of formwork, re-bar; casting
concrete, soil filling to the designed elevation;
Construction of abutment body, abutment wing wall: Installation of scaffolding,
re-bar, casting concrete;
Finishing.
f2. Pier construction
Including key construction methods of approaching pier according to below sequence:
Site preparation:
o Sand filling;
o Construction of water prevention enclosure: executing service road; staking
positioning spike; installation of inside support frame; sheet piling;
Construction of earth drilling pile systems: Positioning pile location; lowering
casing; drilling to make hole; lowering the reinforcing steel cage; casting concrete;
withdrawing casing;
Environmental impact assessment report
49
Foundation pit execution: Excavation of foundation pit; hammering pile end;
spreading loose stone, crushed stone; casting concrete to level;
Construction of pier footing: installation of scaffolding, re-bar; casting concrete,
removal of formwork and scaffolding; soil filling of foundation pit.
Construction of pier body: Installation of scaffolding and formwork, re-bar,
casting concrete;
Finishing: removal of scaffolding, formwork; soil filling, finishing the pier
f3. Construction of superstructure
f3.1. Construction of one-span bridge
Including main steps as follows:
Casting girder; preparation of vehicles and service road behind the abutment;
moving equipment into locations; transporting girders to the service road behind
abutment;
Using girder launching device, installation of scaffolding, formwork, casting
traverse beam concrete;
Construction of deck slab, parapet, finishing.
f3.2. Construction of multi-span bridge
Including main steps as follows:
Casting girder; preparation of vehicles and service road behind the abutment;
moving equipment into locations; transporting girders to the service road behind
abutment;
Moving crane to its position behind the abutment; using crane to install girder in
the first position; installation of scaffolding, formwork and casting traverse beam
concrete;
Preparation of service road at the first installation location; moving the crane to the
new installation location; installation in similar way as the above steps.
Installation of parapet, joints; finishing.
f4. Culvert construction
Box-culverts construction
- Leveling the ground and define the culvert location.
- Filling surrounds the circle to prevent the water
Environmental impact assessment report
50
- Dig the Foundation hole ceiling to climb by mechanical design in combination with
handwork;
- Construction formwork pile head banging, and installment, poured concrete
basement drain;
- Erection of formwork, reinforcement steel and poured concrete wall drain and a
grate;
- Construction of the wing wall, embankment soil on either side carry the tribute
in order of each layer with the average thickness 30 cm ÷ 50 cm, has a check up
of the class;
- Installation of a transition, the perfect tribute.
Circle culvert construction
Leveling the ground and define the culvert location.
Where the sugar is processed primarily land before construction of the drain claw
is placed on the nature. In those positions do not have the background processing
then proceeded to drain the nail treatment with bamboo stakes or replace surface if
necessary;
The burn drains were built in the factory or the factory and shipped out to the
school;
Stop the crane installation of gas drain;
Dig the Foundation hole ceiling to climb by mechanical design in combination with
handwork;
Wing walls constructed drain, embankment soil on either side carry the tribute in
order of each layer with thickness on average 30 ÷ 50 cm, has a check up of the
class;
Complete the drain.
1.4.4.3. Construction Quantity
Summary of main quantities of major items of the Project is represented in table 1.9 -
1.12 (for bridgework).
Environmental impact assessment report
51
Table 1.9. Summary of Quantity of Road Work and Intersections
No. Item Unit Road Work
A1 Embankment
1 Soil excavation m3 90.54
2 Organic excavation m3 100460.86
3 Benching excavation m3 8353.30
4 Filling K95 m3 144263.95
5 Filling K98 m3 60475.51
6 Separating geotextile (15kN/m) m2 231955.30
7 Excavation of existing pavement m3 478.16
8 Grading K98 m3 14351.40
9 Road form excavation m3 1669.57
10 Sticky soil filling m3 53722.10
11 Sodding m2 82135.23
A2 Pavement
1 5cm AC surface course m2 246444.74
2 Tackcoat 0.5kg/m2 m
2 246444.74
3 7cm AC binder course m2 246444.74
4 Prime coat 1.0kg/m2***
m2 246444.74
5 Crushed stone class I 15cm m3 35721.70
6 Crushed stone class II 15cm m3 2915.04
7 Crushed stone class II 25cm m3 43483.08
8 Crushed stone leveling class I m3 5576.47
9 Crushed stone leveling class II m3 5265.92
A3 Intersection
1 AC binder course 7cm m2 2262.00
2 Prime coat 1.0kg/m2 m
2 2262.00
3 Crushed stone class I 15cm m3 271.44
4 Embankment K98 thickness 30cm m3 339.30
A4 Drainage
1 RC pipe culvert D0.75 m 8170.00
2 RC pipe culvert D1.00 m 515.72
3 RC pipe culvert D1.25 m 20.10
4 RC pipe culvert D1.50 m 13.41
5 Box culvert BxH=2.0x2.0 m 27.60
6 Box culvert BxH=3.0x3.0 m 54.30
7 Traverse tunnel m 80.50
Environmental impact assessment report
52
No. Item Unit Road Work
8 Catch basin ea. 344
9 Curb, side ditch m 12328
10 Sidewalk m2 19259
11 RC pipe culvert D0.75 m 8170.00
A5 Soft soil
1 Sand replacement m3 74200
2 PVD m 1078.159
3 Geotextile (15kN/m) m2 27
4 Bamboo pile @0.25m, H=2.5m ea. 1665.725
5 Medium-size sand blanket m3 37818
6 Surcharge m3 34.416
7 Pavement structure replacement filling m3 35642
8 Surcharge removal (surcharge + leveling fill for pavement structure) m3 70058
9 Settlement fill (K95) m3 18909
10 Surface settlement measurement ea. 239
11 Settlement depth measurement (2 points following depth) ea. 64
12 Water pressure measurement (2 points following depth) ea. 56
13 Monitoring well ea. 36
14 Measurement of horizontal displacement (wood pile 10x10x170cm) ea. 918
A6 Canal relocation
Soil canal B=1m m 3612
Soil canal B=4m m 620
Table 1.10. Summary of Quantity of Bridge Work
Ord Item Unit Nai bridge Le bridge Nại bridge
Dong Tu
bridge
A Superstructure:
1 Concrete m3 158.01 223.09 429.29 362.70
2 Steel T 26.60 44.16 68.03 54.25
3 Rubber bearing set 52.00 52.00 78 78
B
Substructure
(abutment and pier)
1 Concrete m3 428.16 419.46 324.06 203.38
2 Steel T 33.74 32.55 30.19 21.37
3 Bored pile m 0 0 657 444
4 Excavation m3 2941.06 8203.48 332.6 557.2
5 Filling m3 1499.67 1339.56 1.363 1.536
Environmental impact assessment report
53
Table 1.11. Summary of Quantity of Go Bridge Work
No. Items Unit Quantity
A Superstructure::
1 Concrete of bridge surface m3
118.8
2 Concrete of curb m3
26.9
3 Concrete of bearing m3
0.9
4 Concrete G-15Mpa m3
9.1
5
Production and installation of bridge prestressed
beams (L=9m) Each 26
6
Production and installation of bridge prestressed
beams (L=20m) Each 13
7
Reinforcement steel of bridge deck, curb, the
transitional d<18mm ton 16.14
8
Reinforcement steel of bridge deck, curb, the
transitional d>18mm ton 0.85
9 Bearings - rubber bearings of a single beam Each 78
10 Asphalt Concrete surface course m2
528
11 Waterproofing layer m2
456
12 Install the drainage pipe Each 14
13 Steel fence Ton 1.57
B Substructure (abutment and pier)
1 Concrete of abutment and pier m3
183.5
2 Bored pile D1,5m m 440
3
Reinforcement steel of abutment and pier
D<=18mm Ton 16.03
4 abutment and pier D>18mm Ton 5.34
5 Excavation of foundation pit m3
425.6
6 Excavation of foundation in water environment m3
160.3
7 Particle material filling m3
810.05
8 Riprap reinforcing m3
165.4
Table 1.12. Summary of Quantity of approach roads of Go Bridge
No. Items Unit Quantity
A Road-bed and soft soil treatment
1 Filling of normal embankment on main road m3 1,221.86
2 Normal embankment m3 1,470.59
3 Excavation of inappropriate materials m3 405.72
4 Road form excavation m3 591.24
5 Creation of grant m3 76.22
B New road surface and strengthen road surface
Environmental impact assessment report
54
1 Crushed stone of the bottom foundation m3 921.82
2 Crushed stone of the top foundation m3 839.12
3 Prime coat m2 4,209.36
4 Tack coat m2 3,591.40
5 Asphalt Concrete surface course m3 179.57
6 Asphalt Concrete binder course m3 294.66
1.4.5. List of Machinery and Equipment
Machinery and equipment planned to be used in construction of the road, intersections
and bridges are shown in table 1.13 and table 1.14.
Table 1.13. Main Machinery and Equipment for Road Work and
Intersections
Ord Equipment Unit Bypass
road
Main
road Total
1 Bulldozer 110CV shift 1410 10322 11732
2 Grader 110CV shift 59 18 41
3 Dump truck 10T shift 1160 10222 11382
4 Road Sprinkler 5m3 shift 171 25 196
5 Air compressor600m3/h shift 43 201 244
6 Excavator 16m3 shift 9 211 220
7 Tire roller 16T shift 387 1034 1421
8 Tire roller 25T shift - 339
9 Spreader 50-60m3/h shift 15 72 87
10 Vibratory roller 25T shift 171 25 196
11 Steel wheeled roller 10T shift 253 537 790
12 AC finisher 130-140cv shift 39 241 280
13 Shovel 2.3m3/bucket shift 42 260 302
14 Pressurized Bitumen
Distributor 7T shift 87 400 487
Total 3890 24128 28018
Table 1.14. Main Machinery and Equipment for Bridge Work
Ord Item Unit
Nai
bridge Le bridge
Nại
bridge
Dong Tu
bridge
1 Crane 16T Shift 407 353 281 255
2 Crane 25 T Shift 101 67 102 73
3 Crane 30T shift 43 43 43 43
4 Roller 16T shift 5 5 5 4
5 Concrete pump truck
50m3/h
shift 137 119 137 124
Environmental impact assessment report
55
Ord Item Unit
Nai
bridge Le bridge
Nại
bridge
Dong Tu
bridge
6 Driller ED (bored pile) shift 116 77 116 77
7 Roller 10T shift 2 2 1 1
8 Bulldozer 110CV shift 2 3 2 2
9 Dump truck 10T shift 6 11 56 155
Total 819 680 743 734
1.4.6. Input Material
The quantity of construction material is mainly corresponding to the work items of
roads, intersections and bridges as shown in above-captioned table 1.13, table 1.14.
1.4.7. Implementation Schedule
Estimated construction time for the project road is 24 months, for Nai Bridge and Le
bridge is 9 months, Nại bridge and Dong Tu bridge is 12 months (table 1.15).
Table 1.15. Estimated Implementation Schedule for Work-items
1.4.8. Investment Cost
The project’s total investment cost is shown in table 1.16.
Table 1.16. Total Investment Cost of the Project
No. Work item Cost (VND)
I Total construction investment cost
1 Construction cost
2 Cost of land acquisition
3 Cost of project management
4
Cost of project construction investment
consulting service
5 Other cost
6 Contingency
Work-item First year Second year
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Hung Nhan bypass
NH39-1 expansion and
rehabilitation
Nai bridge and Le bridge
Nại bridge and Dong Tu
bridge
Environmental impact assessment report
56
No. Work item Cost (VND)
II Environmental cost 2,977,716,984
1 Environmental management program 1,981,000,000
2 Environmental monitoring program 726,015,440
1.4.9. Organization of Management and Implementation of the Project
1.4.9.1. Management and Implementation
Project’s employer (Project owner): Directorate for Roads of Vietnam
Project management: Project Management Unit 3
Project formation consultant: Thang Loi Co., ltd. (TEC).
1.4.9.2. Implementation Procedure
a. Investment preparatory
Project Management Unit 3 has planned the investment project with consultancy of the
TEC and submits to the Ministry of Transportation for approval; at same time,
prepared of an EIA report to submit the Ministry of Natural Resource and
Environment for approval with consultancy of Center for Sustainable Development
Support (CSD).
b. Investment implementation
After the investment decision was issued, the project owner has carried out the detailed
design work of the project in consultation with design consultants. For environmental
aspects, the project owner has prepared an Environmental Management Plan in
consultation with environmental experts. Contents of the Environmental Management
Plan include details of the mitigation measures and design of environmental treatment
facilities which have been mentioned in the EIA report after it is approved by Natural
Resource and Environment. Concurrently, the environmental specification is prepared
as the basis for the construction units building their own environmental management
plan (following the packages). Compensation and resettlement no longer belong to the
project and subprojects shall be established individually conducted by the district
People's Committee under direction of Thai Binh and Hung Yen Provincial People's
Committee. The project owner is responsible to ensure that provide full funding for the
compensation, assistance and resettlement.
In the process of construction, construction units shall implement the environmental
protection measures. The project owner shall supervise that implementation of
environmental protection measures of the construction units and will hire the
Environmental impact assessment report
57
environmental consultant to carry out environmental monitoring. Periodic monitoring
results are reported to the Department of Natural Resources and Environment of the
Thai Binh and Hung Yen province.
c. After construction completion
After completion, the Project will be handed over to Ministry of Transport, the agency
made the decision of investment.
The environmental quality monitoring during the warranty period will be operated by
operation units and funds shall be from the budget of the Project. Supervision and
monitoring results will be periodically reported to the Department of Natural
Resources and Environment of Thai Binh and Hung Yen province by 6 month/time.
Environmental impact assessment report
58
CHAPTER II. NATURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC
CONDITIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA
2.1. Natural Conditions
2.1.1. Geographical and Geological Conditions
2.1.1.1. Geographical Conditions
In terms of nature, the project area’s terrain is characteristic of the Red River Delta
region of Vietnam. The terrain along the route is relatively flat with a slope of less
than 1%, altitude varies from 1-2m above sea level, lower from the Northwest to the
Southeast. The surface is cleaved by canal and river system with flooded dike, ponds
and the terrain is mainly field with developed irrigation system. Altitude of the fields
is relatively low at around 0.5-1.0m. Irrigation system has high shoreline, which is 0.5-
1m higher than the fields. Thus, despite being near the river, the storm-water runoff
drainage in the region is always complex.
In terms of humanity, the project area is located in the territory of 12 communes/
towns of Hung Yen and Thai Binh provinces, including: Thien Phien commune (Tien
Lu district); Tan Le town, Hung Nhan town, Tan Hoa commune, Lien Hiep commune,
Thai Phuong commune, Phuc Khanh commune, Hung Ha town, Minh Khai commune,
Hong Linh commune (Hung Ha district) and Dong Phong commune, Dong Tan
commune (Dong Hung district). Population is gathered in clusters, hamlets along the
roads, mostly in towns and sparser in agricultural areas. Economic activities are
diversified, including such sectors as household business taking advantage of road
surface, agriculture and common labors, etc.
2.1.1.2. Geological Conditions
Comparing the geological drilling results and other reference data in the geological
map of Thai Binh at the rate of 1/200,000 (F-48-XXIX), the strata includes river-sea,
river- swamp sediments and marine sediments of the low-lying areas. The strata of
foundation soil along the route to a depth of 17m can be categorized into six types,
including filled soil. A strata characteristic of the project area is presented in Table 2.1.
Environmental impact assessment report
59
Table 2.1. Strata Characteristics of the Project Area
No. Strata
layer Allocation Composition Thickness
1 Layer E All drills Clay from solid to very solid 0.6 ÷ 2.5m
2 Layer 1 Km 44+000 ÷
Km 64+000
Brownish grey lean clay of rigid
plastic 0.5 ÷ 3m
3 Layer 2 Km 44+000 ÷
Km 57+000
Sandy lean clay and dark grey mud of
weak to very weak 0.8 ÷ 8.6m
4 Layer 3 Km 44+000 ÷
Km 64+000
Clay sand with dark grey dust of very
weak 2.5 ÷ 13m
5 Layer 4 Lean clay and grey mud of very weak
6 Layer 5 Km 56+000 ÷
Km 64+000 Sand with silty clay, dark grey, weak
7 Layer
TK Dark brown loose sand 2.0m
Source: Interpretation of the Project
Thus, the common formations in the project area are clay from soft to average, organic
or inorganic, medium-density sand, followed by solid clay, then medium-grained to
coarse sand. The area has 2 soft soil layers: layer 2 and layer 4. In which, layer 2 is
allocated at the beginning of the route, and layer 4 is widely allocated on the whole
route.
2.1.1.3. Hydro-geological Conditions
Ground water exists at a depth of 2 ÷ 3 m below the natural ground surface. Water
levels are unstable and subject to seasonal changes. In the rainy season, the water level
may rise close to the surface.
Shallow groundwater can be affected by contaminated surface water during
construction of the foundation piers, abutment.
2.1.2. Meteorological Conditions
2.1.2.1. Features of Meteorological Conditions
The project area is located in the Northern delta climate featured by cold winter with
low rainfall and hot, humid and rainy summer.
The features of meteorological conditions in the project area are analyzed below based
on the statistics of Thai Binh Meteorological Station.
Environmental impact assessment report
60
Temperature (table 2.1 and figure 2.1): Annual average temperature in the project area
is 23.5°C, maximum monthly average temperature is 29.5°C (July), minimum monthly
average temperature is 14.9°C (January). Temperature amplitude between the hottest
and coldest months is 14.6°C. Typical monthly average temperature is presented in
Table 2.2. Monthly average temperature evolution is illustrated in Figure 2.2.
Table 2.2. Annual/ Monthly Average Temperature (oC)
Year I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Năm
2008 15 13.3 20 23.8 26.4 28 29 28.3 27.1 25.9 21.2 19.2 23.1
2009 15.4 21.4 20.4 23.3 26.1 30.4 29.4 28.9 27.6 25.4 20.8 19.1 24.0
2010 17.4 19.8 20.8 22.4 27.4 30 30.1 27.7 27.5 24.4 23 19.2 24.1
2011 12.4 16.8 16.4 22.6 26 28.8 29.3 28.4 26.7 23.6 22.9 16.8 22.6
2012 14.4 15.8 19.3 24.7 27.9 29.4 29.5 28.4 27.3 25.4 23 18.8 23.7
Average 14.9 17.4 19.4 23.4 26.8 29.3 29.5 28.3 27.2 24.9 22.2 18.6 23.5
Source: Thai Binh Meteorological station (2008 – 2012)
Figure 2.1. Monthly Average Temperature Chart (0C)
Humidity (table 2.2): Air humidity is the factor that influences the metabolism of air
pollutants and microclimatic factors badly affecting human health. The humidity is
relatively high, about 87% on annual average. The wettest period is from February to
April, the spring with average humidity of 88 - 90%. The dry period is only within 2
months (November, December), coinciding with the dry northeast monsoon, the driest
month is November with average humidity of 83%. Monthly average relative humidity
is presented in Table 2.3.
Environmental impact assessment report
61
Table 2.3. Annual/ Monthly Average Relative Humidity (%)
Year I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Average
2008 87 80 89 91 88 88 82 89 90 87 80 86 86
2009 80 91 91 92 89 91 84 87 88 86 77 83 87
2010 91 89 88 94 91 81 81 90 89 80 86 82 87
2011 79 89 88 89 87 87 87 88 89 88 84 76 86
2012 91 91 90 90 88 81 82 87 85 86 88 86 87
Average 86 88 89 91 89 86 83 88 88 85 83 83 87
Source: Thai Binh Meteorological station (2008 – 2012)
Rain and evaporation (table 2.3, table24 and figure 2.2): Annual average rainfall in the
area is 1800 - 1900mm with an average number of rainy days is 140 - 145 days, in
which the number of days of light rain, drizzle is about 60 - 65. The rainy season lasts
for 6 months, from May to October, which accounts for 80% of annual rainfall.
Rainfall increases from the early to mid-season, maximum in September with an
average rainfall of 338 mm. In addition, there are rainstorms in Thai Binh with
unexpected heavy rains accompanied by strong winds and lightning storms.
Rainstorms usually occur from February to November and mainly from May to
September.
The remaining six months, from November to April of the following year, are the low
rainfall season. The months in early winter are the least rainy period. Minimum
rainfall fell in December or January with a rainfall of 28.7 ÷ 30.15 mm. The features
of rainfall, evaporation in the study area are presented in tables 2.4, 2.5 and illustrated
in figure 2.2.
Table 2.4. Rainfall
Year I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Năm
2008 106 16 16 12 83 241 129 166 436 74 193 0 1472
2009 3 1 113 240 120 60 294 148 377 60 377 60 1853
2010 1360 12 18 43 75 123 222 314 160 78 0 9 2414
2011 9 7 88 18 140 261 229 175 718 62 32 27 1766
2012 28 21 22 77 284 142 254 71 1 6 5 14 925
Average 301 11.4 51.4 78 140 165 226 175 338 56 121 22 1686
Source: Thai Binh Meteorological station (2008 – 2012)
Environmental impact assessment report
62
Figure 2.2. Rainfall Chart
Wind and wind direction (table 2.5): In winter (from September to March of the
following year), the wind blows in the northeast direction, in summer (from March to
July), the wind usually blows in the southeast direction. The southeast wind prevailed
during the year, followed by the northeast wind. The other directions only appear
interwoven with low frequency and not forming a system. The annual average wind
speed is 2m/s, the average wind speed during the summer months is 1.9m/s, the
average wind speed during winter months is 2.1m/s. In summer, the strongest winds
occur on the occurrence of thunderstorms and hurricanes. Wind speed can reach
40m/s.
The average wind speed in the months of the year is presented in Table 2.6.
Table 2.5. Average Wind Speed in the Months of the Year (m/s)
Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Thai
Binh 2.2 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.1
Source: Thai Binh Meteorological station
Wind is the most important factor that impacts on the spread of pollutants in the air.
The higher the wind speed, the further pollutants are transported away and the smaller
concentrations of pollutants because toxic gas is diluted with clean air. In contrast,
with the low wind speed or windless, pollutants will concentrate near sources of waste.
Atmospheric stability: Atmospheric stability in the Project area is defined as class B
(unstable) during the day, based on the average wind speed (table 2.6); and solar
radiation during the day and cloud cover at night by Pasquill classification (table 2.7).
Environmental impact assessment report
63
Table 2.6. Atmospheric Stability Classification (Pasquill, 1961)
Wind speed
at
10m high
(m/s)
Daytime incoming solar radiation Nighttime cloud cover
Strong
(ho > 60o)
Moderate
(ho=
35o60o)
Slight
(ho=
15o35o)
Cloudy
with cloud
cover> 4/8
Unclouded,
with cloud
cover <4/8
< 2 A A÷B B÷C - -
2 A-B B C E F
3-4 B B÷C C D E
5-6 C C-D D D D
>6 C D D D D
Note:
A: very unstable.
B: unstable.
C: slightly unstable.
D: neutral.
E: slightly stable.
F: stable.
ho: solar angle.
Atmospheric stability decides the possibility to raise pollutants high.
2.1.2.2. Special Weather Phenomena
Every year, storms and tropical depressions do not directly appear in Thai Binh as they
do in coastal areas, but the impact of rain caused by storms is very large. In October
2012, Son Tinh storms influenced heavily, causing damage on both property and
people of the province. According to the statistics, damage caused by Son Tinh storm
is about 2,662 billion.
Table 2.7. Summary of the Thunderstorm of the Year
Year I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Total
2008 0 0 3 3 6 15 8 9 11 1 6 0 62
2009 0 1 3 4 10 0 7 12 18 0 0 0 55
2010 0 0 0 4 6 8 8 18 10 2 0 0 56
2011 0 0 0 2 5 12 0 0 10 0 0 0 29
2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 11 0 1 0 0 24
Average 0 0 1 3 5 7 7 10 10 1 1 0 45
Source: Thai Binh Meteorological station
Environmental impact assessment report
64
2.1.3. Hydrological Conditions
2.1.3.1. Hydrological Features of Rivers in the Project Area
Thai Binh has four relatively large rivers, namely Hoa river, Luoc river, Tra Ly river
and a downstream part of the Red River.
Hoa River is located in the north and northeast of the province with a length of about
35km
Luoc River (distributary of the Red River) is located in the north and northwest with a
length of about 53km
Tra Ly River (level-1 distributary of the Red River) flows through a half of the
province from west to east with a length of about 65 km.
The Red River downstream is located in the western and southern direction with a
length of about 67 km
These rivers create four large estuaries: Diem Dien, Ba Lat, Tra Ly and Lan. Being
near the East Sea, they are influenced by the tidal regime. In summer, water level
quickly raises with large flow and high silt content; in winter, flow decreased
significantly with little sediment as well as salt water affect inland from 15 ÷ 20km.
Although regional topography of NH39-1 is quite flat, it is not affected by the water
regime in the river because it was protected by dikes.
Flow regime in the river is divided into two distinct seasons, namely flood and dry
seasons. Flood season lasts from June to October, the dry season lasts from November
to May of the following year. Flow in July, August and September accounts for about
60-70% of the annual flow.
In addition, there are also many small rivers and irrigation canals forming flow
networks crisscrossed the province. Most of the irrigation canals have control gates;
when flood flowing into the river raises high, culvert gate is closed so that river water
cannot flow into the fields.
2.1.3.2. Hydrological Features along the Route
The project area mainly includes low-lying fields covered by dykes, so in the rainy
season with strong flood, river water is often higher than field water.
The fields’ ditch system takes the river water through culverts with stop-log gates, so
the water in the rainy season is mainly drained by driving power, and self-drained a
part to the river through culverts under the dykes in case of low river water.
Statistics of results used for bridge design of the project is presented in table 2.8.
Environmental impact assessment report
65
Table 2.8. Statistics of Results Used for Bridge Design
No. Bridge Section H1%,
(m)
H2%,
(m)
H4%,
(m)
H
clearance,
(m)
Qmax,
m3/s
1 Nại bridge Km52+700 2.00 1.90 1.82 0.41 36
2 Dong Tu Km55+320 1.94 1.84 1.76 0.41 49
3 Nại Briage Km52+700 2.00 1.90 1.82 0.41 36
4 Dong Tu
Bridge Km55+320 1.94 1.84 1.76 0.41 49
5 Gọ Brodge Km88+100
2.1.3.3. Flooding and Floods in the Project Area
The project area is influenced by two major rivers: Diem Hoa and Tra Ly, along which
there is a flooded dike system. The dike system of rivers has created two different
hydrological regimes, which are interior field hydrology and river hydrology. In the
flood season, the floods is big, prolonged, in case of coinciding with heavy rains in the
plains, will cause major flooding in the interior fields because the pumping station
does not work (or is not allowed to operate). However, if the river floods do not occur
simultaneously with rain in the fields, rice paddies will be drought, dikes are flooded
and vice versa.
According to the survey results of flooding in the area carried out in the establishment
of project, interior field flooding is usually caused by heavy rain associated with the
river water levels, which cause slow drainage. The big floods occurred in 1971, 1978,
1985 and 1996. In which, the largest flood was in 1971 with the water level of 6.99 m.
In the remaining years, the water level ranges from 5.5 ÷ 6.0m
2.1.4. Natural Resources
2.1.4.1. Water Resources
The project is not located within national parks or nature reserves. The nearest nature
reserve is Xuan Thuy National Park, about projects (Figure 2.4).
Environmental impact assessment report
66
Figure 2.3. Xuan Thuy National Park
Flora
In the project area, there is common flora such as:
The agricultural ecosystem accounts for the leading role. The short-term crops such as
rice, vegetables, beans, etc. are main food and foodstuff for people, cattle and poultry.
Alternating agricultural ecosystems in the project area are other species of shrubs,
vegetation’s along the coast and rivers/canals as bill goat-weed, pandanus, etc.; several
trees grown for wood as raw materials for light industry, traditional crafts such as
rattan, bamboo, eucalyptus, etc.; shade trees such as panama berry, Indian almond, and
flamboyant; some fruit trees planted in the garden and around the houses in the
residential areas such as orange, banana, jackfruit, mango, longan, etc.
Importance: the general flora is not diversified, no endemic, mainly banana species
characteristics, longan, etc.
Fauna
In the project area, there are common fauna such as:
QL39-
1
VQG Xuân
Thủ y
45K
m
Environmental impact assessment report
67
Mammals: including common species living in the rice fields and in residential areas
such as bats, field mice, etc. Some household pets such as dogs, cats, pigs, and
chickens, etc.
Birds: birds who can observe are kingfishers, cuckoo birds, whiskered bulbul, magpie-
robin, munia, etc.
Reptiles, amphibians: the common species of this habitat are lizards, snakes,
amphibians, frogs etc. living in the fields or along the canals. Some species live in the
garden and around the residential areas such as geckos, toads, bull-frogs, etc.
2.1.4.2. Wetland ecosystems
Wetland ecosystems occupy significantly in the project area, including rivers, canals,
ponds and wetlands area. Except the flow of rivers and canals, the ponds are the
natural and artificial water area. Aquatic fauna system has the different behavior such
as eating well, eating at the bottom and living in the middle layer. The threat of this
ecosystem is the migration of invasive alien aquatic species, pollution, eutrophication
and sensitive to a number of environmental changes.... These fragile ecosystems,
vulnerability, tolerance limits, dependent on natural processes, particularly sensitive to
human activities.
2.1.5. Quality and Components of the Physical Environment
The elements regarding natural resources, environmental quality and socio-economic
factors in the project have been also surveyed, measured and analyzed. The
environmental survey chart of project is presented in figure 2.6.
2.1.5.1. Selection of Location, Parameter and Frequency for Measurement,
Sampling
The locations for environmental quality survey in the project area were selected on the
basis of:
Selected locations represent the current environmental state of the area;
Characteristics of emission sources;
Sensitive characteristics of the receiving objects.
The measurement locations are presented in Table 2.7, in which:
Ambient air quality was measured at 03 locations. Measured parameters: Dust (TSP
and PM10) emissions (SO2, NO2, CO) and the micro-climate factors (temperature,
humidity, wind speed, wind direction and pressure). Frequency of measurement:
continuous for 16 hours, from 6 ÷ 22h, measuring every one hour.
Environmental impact assessment report
68
The noise level was measured at 04 locations, coinciding with the locations for
ambient air quality measurement. Measured parameters: Leq, L10, L90. Frequency of
measurement: 16 hours for each location, from 6 ÷ 22h, measuring 3 times every one
hour.
Vibration level was measured in 04 locations, coinciding with the locations for noise
level measurement. Measured parameters: Acceleration, velocity and frequency.
Frequency of measurement: continuous for 16 hours (from 6 ÷ 22h), 1 hour 1 times,
measuring 3 times every one hour and from 22pm to 6am of the next morning, and
measuring 3 times every two hour.
Quality of surface water was measured, sampled at 4 rivers (1 section, 1 hydro unit, 1
water stratum, once a day. Measured and analyzed parameters: temperature, pH,
turbidity, DO, TSS, oil, Coliform, E. coli (8 parameters).
Sediments were sampled in the same locations for sampling the surface water.
Analyzed parameters: heavy metals (Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, As). Frequency of sampling: At
each location, samples were taken once.
Ground water quality was measured, sampled at 04 locations being well water in
residential areas. Measured and analyzed parameters: temperature, pH, turbidity, DO,
hardness (CaCO3), TS, Fe, As, Coliform and E. coli (10 parameters). Frequency of
sampling: At each location, samples were taken once.
Quality of the soil sampled at 4 locations being agricultural land along the route.
Analyzed parameters: heavy metals (Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, As). Frequency of sampling: At
each location, samples were taken once.
Table 2.9 presents the locations for measuring and surveying the environmental quality
and current state at the time of measurement.
Table 2.9. Location of Environmental Quality Survey
Location Symbol Coordinate Weather Period Traffic and socio-
economic features
I. Air, noise, vibration
Trieu Duong
Bridge end
(Km44+000)
KK1
O1; R1
20°38'52"N;
106°07'50"E Sunny
Jan
2013
Paved NH39, 7-9m
wide. Density of traffic
vehicles is not high,
mainly trucks and
motorcars. At Trieu
Duong Bridge end,
people live on the right
Nai Bridge
(Km48+217)
KK2
O2, R2
20°36'24"N;
106°10'36"E Sunny
Jan
2013
Dong Tu KK3 20°35'52"N; Sunny Jan
Environmental impact assessment report
69
Location Symbol Coordinate Weather Period Traffic and socio-
economic features
Bridge
(Km55+360)
O3, R3 106°12'07"E 2013 route, and spare in Nại
bridge and Dong Tu
bridge, at the Go
location the the
population density is
high. Main economic
activities are farming
and small business.
Go Bridge
(Km88+100)
KK4
O4, R4
20o31’08”N;
106o24’44”E Sunny
Jan
2013
II. Surface water sediment
Le Bridge
(Km50+120)
Nm1;
TT1
20°36'23"N;
106°09'14"E Sunny
Jan
2013
Water from rivers and
canals is used for
irrigation purposes.
There is no waterway
transportation.
Nai Bridge
(Km48+217)
Nm2;
TT2
20°36'24"N;
106°10'39"E Sunny
Jan
2013
Dong Tu
Bridge
(Km55+360)
Nm3;
TT3
20°35'54"N;
106°12'02"E Sunny
Jan
2013
Go Bridge
(Km88+100)
Nm4;
TT4
20o31’08”N;
106o24’44”E Sunny
Jan
2013
III. Ground water
Tran Van
Quyen
Thanh Trieu
hamlet, Tan Le
commune,
Hung Ha
district
Nn1 20°38'46"N;
106°8'22"E Sunny
Jan
2013
Bore well, 20 ÷ 30
meters deep.
Nguyen Quang
Hai
Phuc Xa
hamlet, Lien
Hiep commune,
Hung Ha
district
Nn2 20°58'43"N;
106°8'17"E Sunny
Jan
2013
Hoang Thi
Quyen
La Junction,
Minh Khai
commune,
Nn3 20°36'26"N;
106°10'19"E Sunny
Jan
2013
Environmental impact assessment report
70
Location Symbol Coordinate Weather Period Traffic and socio-
economic features
Hung Ha
district
Dong Phong
commune Nn4
20o30’47”N
106o24’33”E Sunny
Jan
2013
IV. Soil
Tran Van
Quyen
Thanh Trieu
hamlet, Tan Le
commune,
Hung Ha
district
Đ1 20°38'46"N;
106°8'22"E Sunny
Jan
2013
Agricultural land,
growing wet rice for
two crops.
Nguyen Quang
Hai
Phuc Xa
hamlet, Lien
Hiep commune,
Hung Ha
district
Đ2 20°58'43"N;
106°8'17"E Sunny
Jan
2013
Hoang Thi
Quyen
La Junction,
Minh Khai
commune,
Hung Ha
district
Đ3 20°36'26"N;
106°10'19"E Sunny
Jan
2013
Dong Phong
commune Đ4
20º31’01”N
106º24’34”E Sunny
Jan
2013
Environmental impact assessment report
71
Figure 2.4. Location Chart of Environmental Quality Survey
Environmental impact assessment report
72
2.1.5.2. Ambient Air Quality
a. Comparison Basis
QCVN 05:2009/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality.
b. Assessment
Measurement results are presented in table 2.10 and illustrated in figure 2.5. Detailed
results are presented in Appendix 3 – Results of survey of environmental quality.
Table 2.10. Measurement Results of Air Quality
Symbol Location Measurement
period
Average
value
Concentration (μg/m3)
PM10 TSP CO NO2 SO2
KK1
Trieu Duong
Bridge end
(Km44+000)
Jan 2013
1h 0.568 0.676 4.071 0.128 0.161
24h 0.477 0.570 2.945 0.089 0.125
KK2 Nai Bridge
(Km48+217) 1/2013
1h 0.570 0.683 4.150 0.131 0.164
24h 0.487 0.581 2.997 0.091 0.128
KK3 Dong Tu Bridge
(Km55+360) 1/2013
1h 0.597 0.741 4.385 0.135 0.176
24h 0.513 0.617 3.195 0.095 0.136
KK4 Go Bridge
(Km88+100) 1/2013
1h 0.121 0.231 4.211 0.132 0.170
24h 0.104 0.195 3.075 0.093 0.132
QCVN 05:2009/BTNMT 1h - 300 - 300 30.000
24h 150 200 150 200 -
In comparison with QCVN 05:2009/BTNMT, it can be seen that:
Total suspended particles (TSP) and PM10 dust: Average dust concentration per 24h
measured at locations is 2.4 ÷ 3 times higher than the permissible limits.
The concentration of emissions (CO, SO2, NO2) is less lower than the permissible
limits.
c. Cause of pollution
Dust pollution in the measured locations at the measurement time is caused by bad
roads with soil and sand spilled on the roads. Besides, this is the main bus route from
Hung Yen to Thai Binh and vice versa, dust swept up by the tires on the road.
Environmental impact assessment report
73
Figure 2.5. PM10 Dust and TSP in Project location
2.1.5.3. Noise Level
a. Comparison basis
QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT: National technical regulation on noise.
b. Assessment
Measurement results are presented in table 2.11 and illustrated in figure 2.6. Detailed
results are presented in Appendix 3 - Results of survey of environmental quality.
Table 2.11. Measurement Results of Noise Level
Symbol Location Average
value
Noise level (dBA)
Leq L10 L90
O1 Trieu Duong Bridge
end (Km44+000) 6h ÷ 21h 61.4 72.7 59.3
O2 Nai Bridge
(Km48+217) 6h ÷ 21h 61.9 73.3 59.7
O3 Dong Tu Bridge
(Km55+360) 6h ÷ 21h 60.6 71.6 58.2
Impact screening: Dust and gas emissions will increase during construction along
the route effect on the areas with high of population density.
The road goes into operation will become one source of pollution emissions to the
ambient air environment.
Environmental impact assessment report
74
Symbol Location Average
value
Noise level (dBA)
Leq L10 L90
O4 Go Bridge
(Km88+100) 6h ÷ 21h 54.7 63.4 45.3
QCVN26:2010/BTNMT 6h ÷ 21h 70 - -
21h ÷ 6h 55 - -
In comparison with QCVN26: 2010/BTNMT, noise level in all measured locations is
lower than the permissible limits. Thus, noise pollution will not happen in the project
area.
Figure 2.6. Actual Noise Level in the Project Area
2.1.5.4. Vibration Level
a. Comparison basis
TCVN 7210:2002 - Vibration and Shock. Vibration emitted by roads traffic.
Maximum limits in the environment of public and residential areas.
b. Assessment
Measurement results are presented in table 2.12 and illustrated in figure 2.7. Detailed
results are presented in Appendix 3 – Results of survey of environmental quality.
Impact screening: Noise will increase in both the construction process and
operation; affect highly populated areas, especially works like temples, schools,
health centers etc.
Environmental impact assessment report
75
Table 2.12. Measurement Results of Vibration level (dB)
Symbol Location Average
value
Q5e
Laeq Lveq Frequency
R1 Trieu Duong Bridge end
(Km44+000) 6h ÷ 22h
48.5 34.5 1-90Hz
R2 Nai Bridge (Km48+217) 6h ÷ 22h 49.0 33.1 1-90Hz
R3 Dong Tu Bridge (Km55+362) 6h ÷ 22h 48.4 32.6 1-90Hz
R4 Go Bridge (Km88+100) 6h ÷ 22h 50.8 34.4 1-90Hz
TCVN7210:2002 6h ÷ 22h 70 - -
In comparison with TCVN 7210:2002, the vibration level in the project area is lower
than the permissible limits.
Figure 2.7. Actual Vibration Level in the Project Area
2.1.5.5. Surface Water Quality
a. Comparison basis
QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT - National technical regulation on surface water quality.
b. Assessment
Measurement and analysis results of surface water quality in the project area are
presented in table 2.13; and attached in Appendix 3 – Results of survey of
environmental quality.
Environmental impact assessment report
76
Table 2.13. Measurement and Analysis Results of Surface Water Quality
Location
Parameters
toC pH Turbidity DO TSS Oil
E.
Coli
Total
Coliform
0C - NTU mg/l mg/l mg/l MPN/100ml
Diem
Truong
Bridge
Nm1 31.2 7.2 35 4.62 16 0.12 140 75
Nại bridge Nm2 29.8 7.4 29 4.3 11 0.18 210 39
Dong Tu
Bridge Nm3 30.2 6.8 31 3.89 14 1.14 180 68
QCVN
08:2008/
BTNMT
B1 - 5.5÷9 - ≥4 50 0.1 100 7.500
B2 - 5.5÷9 - ≥2 100 0.3 200 10.000
Note: QCVN08: 2008/BTNMT - National technical regulation on surface water
quality;
Class B1: Using for irrigation purposes or other purposes having similar water
quality requirements or the using purposes as Class B2;
Class B2: Navigation and other purposes with low water quality requirements.
In comparison with QCVN08:2008/BTNMT Class B1, we can see that:
Physio-chemical elements: pH,TSS are within the permissible limits.
Biochemical elements (DO): The concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO) in most of
the samples reached the permissible limits.
Oil: There is incipient oil pollution in the rivers, canals. Oil concentration is 1.2-1.8
times higher than the permissible limits;
Micro-organic elements (E. coli, total coliform): Coliform content at all locations are
less than the permissible limits. Contents of E.Coli are 1.4-2.1 times higher than the
permissible limits for the Class B1 water.
Thus, the surface water quality in the rivers and canals in the project area meets
QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT class B1, except for incipient oil pollution and contaminated
by E. Coli (in the rivers).
Environmental impact assessment report
77
2.1.5.6. Underground Water Quality
a. Comparison basis
QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT - National technical regulation on underground water
quality.
b. Assessment
Measurement and analysis results of groundwater quality in the project area are
presented in table 2.14; and attached in Appendix 3 – Results of survey of
environmental quality.
Table 2.14. Measurement and Analysis Results of Groundwater Quality
No. Parameter Unit Nn1 Nn2 Nn3 QCVN 09:2008
/BTNMT
1 Temperature oC 31.2 31.4 30.8 -
2 pH - 7.2 7.1 6.8 5.5 ÷ 8.5
3 Turbidity NTU 12 8 10 -
4 DO mg/l 4.23 3.16 2.89 -
5 Hardness mg/l 4.6 4.6 4.8 500
6 TS mg/l 260 200 240 -
7 Fe mg/l 8.12 7.89 9.82 5
8 As mg/l 0.002 <0.001 0.001 0.05
9 E, Coli MPN/
100ml
4 KPHĐ 4 KHP
10 Coliform 21 15 18 3
In comparison with QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT, we can see that:
Physio-chemical elements (pH, TS, hardness: within the permissible limits;
Impact Screening: In the construction stage, surface water at locations near or
crossing roads will be able to be polluted. In the operation stage, the wastewater in
the drainage canal system, may be polluted by oil-waste and will spread into
receiving canal system.
Environmental impact assessment report
78
Heavy metals: Except Fe with 1.6-2 times higher concentrations than the permissible
limits. Concentrations of heavy metals are lower than the permissible limits;
Micro-organic elements (total coliform and E. coli): Coliform pollution was detected
in all groundwater samples.
c. Causes of pollution
Groundwater taken from the upper aquifer of surface water, rivers, canals. River water
pollution by E. coli is directly caused by groundwater pollution in the project area due
to these elements. Groundwater pollution by Fe is the common state of the Northern
regional groundwater.
2.1.5.7. Sediment Quality
a. Comparison basis
QCVN 43:2012/BTNMT – National technical regulation on sediment quality.
b. Assessment
Analysis results of sediment quality in the project area are presented in table 2.15 and
Appendix 3 – Results of survey of environmental quality.
Table 2.15. Analysis Results of Sediment Quality
No. Location Cu Pb Zn Cd As
mg/100g
1 TT1 3.52 4.35 8.16 0.06 0.72
2 TT2 4.68 4.52 7.32 0.12 0.71
3 TT3 6.74 3.64 7.68 0.09 0.67
4 TT4 3.70 4.64 8.90 0.07 0.77
Sediment Quality
Criteria 8.6 17 54 0.3 1.7
Impact screening: The construction of abutments, piers with bored pile technology
will be able to affect groundwater quality near the construction site by contaminants
spills over walls of drilling pipes
Environmental impact assessment report
79
In comparison with sediment criteria of QCVN 43:2012/BTNMT – National technical
regulation on sediment quality, concentrations of heavy metals are all lower than the
permissible limits.
2.1.5.8. Soil Quality
a. Comparison basis
QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT – National technical regulations on the permissible limits of
heavy metals in soil.
b. Assessment
Analysis results of quality of agricultural land are presented in table 2.16, detailed in
Appendix 3 – Results of survey of environmental quality.
Table 2.16. Analysis Results of Solid Quality
No. Criteria Unit Đ1 Đ2 Đ3 QCVN 03:2008
/BTNMT
1 Cu mg/100g <0.05 0.08 <0.05 5
2 Pb mg/100g 0.11 0.06 0.09 7
3 Zn mg/100g 0.21 0.15 0.18 20
4 Cd mg/100g <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.2
5 As mg/100g <0.05 0.10 0.08 1.2
In comparison with QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT, we can see that concentrations of heavy
metals are all within the permissible limits.
2.2. Socio-economic Conditions
We have conducted surveys of socio-economic features in the project area of 9
communes/ towns of Hung Ha district, Thai Binh province, including: Tan Le town,
Hung Nhan town, Tien Duc commune, Lien Hiep commune, Thai Phuong commune,
Phuc Khanh commune, Hung Ha town, Minh Khai commune, Hong Linh commune in
September 2012. Statistics of socio-economic features are presented in table 2.17.
Socio-economic investigation sheets are copied and enclosed in the Appendix.
Impact screening: During construction of the road will generate dust, exhaust gas,
waste water site (if are not closely managed) cause poverty soil, reducing crop
productivity along the route area.
Environmental impact assessment report
80
Table 2.17. Statistics of Socio-economic Features in Communes/ Towns within the Project Area
No. Items Unit
Tan
Le
town
Hung
Nhan
town
Tien Duc
commune
Lien
Hiep
commune
Thai
Phuong
commune
Phuc
Khanh
commune
Hung
Ha
town
Minh
Khai
commune
Hong
Linh
commune
1
Population of
households
- Household household 3,500 1,360 3,350 2,774 1,865 1,775
- Population person 13,508 5,370 10,400 9,800 6,116 7,100
-
Average
person/
household per./household
4 4 3 4 3 4
- Male % 49 50.8 49.5 51.5 50 49
- Female % 51 49.2 50.5 48.5 50 51
-
Natural
population
growth rate %
1.40 1.20 1.50 1.40 0.70 1.10
2 Ethnic group
- Kinh household 3,500 1,360 3,350 2,774 1,865 1,775
- Muong household
- Khmer household
3 Income
Occupation
Environmental impact assessment report
81
No. Items Unit
Tan
Le
town
Hung
Nhan
town
Tien Duc
commune
Lien
Hiep
commune
Thai
Phuong
commune
Phuc
Khanh
commune
Hung
Ha
town
Minh
Khai
commune
Hong
Linh
commune
- Agriculture household 3325 1088 2000 2220 1585 1420
- Forestry household
-
Commercials
& services household 105 136 335 360 280 266
-
Traditional
crafts household 70 55
- Official household 68 165 55 53
Other household 68 795 139 36
Income
-
Average
income
mil. VND/
per./ month 1,2 5 1,1 1,7 0,8 1,2
-
Poor
household
percent %
7.9 0.8 10 5.7 5.9 5
4 Land use 810.5
- Total area ha 810.5 368 667.78 535 547.9 570
-
Agricultural
land ha 410.5 263 432 385 372 410
- Forestry land ha
- Housing land ha 105 40.8 59 83.2 35.3 53.2
Environmental impact assessment report
82
No. Items Unit
Tan
Le
town
Hung
Nhan
town
Tien Duc
commune
Lien
Hiep
commune
Thai
Phuong
commune
Phuc
Khanh
commune
Hung
Ha
town
Minh
Khai
commune
Hong
Linh
commune
-
Special used
land ha
- Unused land ha 105
- Surface land ha 190 50 29.6 106.8
Other ha 64.2 126.78 66.8 111
5 Culture
-
Temple/
pagoda works 18 11 10 9 7
- Church works 5 2
- Other works 2
-
Ranked
historical
relic works
2 1 6
6
Living
activities
-
Use of
electricity % 100 100 100 100 100 100
-
Use of tap
water %
- Use of well % 100 100 100 100 100 100
Environmental impact assessment report
83
No. Items Unit
Tan
Le
town
Hung
Nhan
town
Tien Duc
commune
Lien
Hiep
commune
Thai
Phuong
commune
Phuc
Khanh
commune
Hung
Ha
town
Minh
Khai
commune
Hong
Linh
commune
water
7 Infrastructure works
- School works 5 3 4 10 5 4
-
Medical aid
station works 1 1 1 1 1 1
- Market works 2 1 2 1 1
Source: Socio-economic data investigated by Transport Engineering Design Joint Stock Incorporated (TEDI) in January 2013.
Environmental impact assessment report
84
2.2.1. Economic Conditions
2.2.1.1. Economic Conditions of the Localities in the Project Area
Localities within the project area mainly do farming, accounting for 80% of which,
rice cultivation activities is essential. In addition to rice, local people also grow many
other agricultural trees as corn, sweet potatoes, cassava, soybean, etc.; vegetables,
fruits as sapodilla, grapefruit, longan, litchi, mango, etc. People raise pigs, chickens,
buffaloes, cows and poultry such as chickens, ducks, etc. In addition to agricultural
activities, local people also deal in commercials & services of 10% (people take
advantage of their house near the road for business, concentrated in Tan Le town,
Hung Nhan town, Hung Ha town), traditional crafts of 5%, the rest are other industries
such as construction, common occupation, etc. accounted for 5%. Average income in
the locals is about VND 1,000,000/month/person, higher than that of the Red River
Delta in 2006 (VND 653,000/month/person).
2.2.1.2. Economic Conditions along the Project Route
Many economic activities take place along the project route, mainly agricultural
activities, accounting for 60%; trading, services are diversified, including vehicle
repairing, café, grocery, construction materials, phone repairing, etc. Business
households earn high income from VND 5-7 million per month. Those who doing
agricultural activities, traditional crafts earn less with VND 2-3
million/household/month.
2.2.1.3. Current State of Transportation
The road transportation in the project area include NH39 and inter-commune road
system.
NH39 started at intersections with NH5 in Noi street, Hung Yen (Km23 +157) and
ends at Diem Dien port, Thai Thuy district, Thai Binh. NH39 passes through Hung
Yen and Thai Binh provinces; and connecting NH5, NH38, NH10, Hanoi-Hai Phong
Expressway, etc. NH39 in project area is the main route in the area, connecting with
other roads. The route is asphalted, 7 ÷ 9m wide. Many section of the road is degraded
with rough surface and many potholes. Traffic density is not high, with the main
vehicles of motorcycles (48.5%), bikes (28.5%), passenger cars and trucks account for
lower proportion (16.4%) (table 2.18).
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
85
Table 2.18 Vehicle Flow on NH39-1
Unit: vehicle/ day
Passenger
car Truck Bike Motorbike Total
Flow 497 186 1188 2022 4171
% 11,9 4,5 28,5 48,5 100
Source: Vehicles counted on the project
The inter-commune road system mainly includes concrete/ brick roads, graded soil
roads, asphalt roads, etc.
In general, the local transportation is quite convenient, ensuring smooth travelling of
local people.
Figure 2.9. Transportation network on the Project area
QL10
QL39
-1
QL39
B
ĐT21
6
ĐT21
9
Environmental impact assessment report
86
2.2.2. Social Conditions
2.2.2.1. Social Conditions of the Localities in the Project area
Social conditions of the communes within the project area include:
Land: Agricultural land accounts for an average rate of 60% (much higher than that of
the whole country with 28.49%), special used land accounts for about 20% (higher
than that of the whole country with 4.33%); housing land accounts for around 6%
(higher than that of the nationwide residential land with 1.85%), unused land accounts
for 14% (lower than that of the whole country with 15.45%).
Population: In the communes of the project, there are 4 persons per household on
average, population density is about 900 people per km2, which is lower than the
average population density of the Thai Binh in 2008 (1.201 person/km2) . Percentage
of female population is 52% on average, higher than that of the whole country
(50.84%); natural population growth rate is 1.2% on average; each commune has about
1.5 percent of households with disabled person, 2.4% of households subject to
policies.
Living standard and ethnicity: Living standard of people in the project’s communes is
pretty average with about 4% of rich, 32% of well-off, 60% of average and 4% of poor
(less than the poverty rate of the Red River Delta region (2006), about 8.8%). Nearly
100% people in the localities are Kinh people (99%), there are a small number of
households belonging to ethnic minorities, such as: Chinese, etc. In spite of indigenous
peoples, but they are sparse and scattered. Although Kinh and Chinese people later
settled, they account for the relatively large number of ethnic groups. Their settlement
is always associated with the construction of belief and religion in accordance with the
specific cultural practices, however, the number of religious works in this area is not
much.
Culture and religion: about 70% of households follow Buddhism; 30% of households
follow Catholic and other religions. In these localities, there are cultural works,
historical relics such as Linh Son Tu Phu Cau (100m from the project), National
cultural historical relic cluster - Temple worshipping General Tran Thu Do, Temple
for worshipping National Mother Tran Thi Dung, etc.
Educational level of people: The majority of people go to secondary schools, the
number of people with college/ university degrees account for about 10%.
Health, living conditions: The health of people is quite good, with a small number get
infectious diseases, tuberculosis, and eye diseases. Living conditions of the local
people is very convenient with 100% of households using electricity, about 100% of
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
87
households using water from wells and rainwater. Now when it rains, local flooding
happen less thanks to the fact that drainage works pretty well. Waste generated is
about 6m3/day, daily collected by garbage trucks.
Technical infrastructure: Infrastructure system in the communes in the project area,
including kindergartens, elementary schools, secondary schools, high schools
(percentage of schools in the 1,000 people of the communes in the project area is 0.5
higher than the percentage of schools per 1,000 people in the country (0.47)), offices,
factories, medical aid stations; markets, etc. are all located at convenient locations
accessible to people and 0.1-2km away from the project area.
2.2.3.2. Social Conditions along the Project Route
Population and ethnic minorities: Population is crowded, mainly gather at Km44+000
÷ Km44+200, Km44+400 ÷ Km44 +900, Km45+100 Km45+800 (right route),
Km45+800 ÷ Km46+100, Km47+700, Km47+950, Km51+200 ÷ Km52+200,
Km52+400 ÷ Km52+900, Km53+100 ÷ Km53+700, Km54+100, Km55+100,
Km56+150 ÷ Km56+700, Km56+800 ÷ Km57+500, Km57+650, Km57+800,
Km58+080, Km58+300 ÷ Km59+400, Km59+900, Km61+300 ÷ Km61+600. There
are about 4 persons per household on average; 100% are Kinh people. Female
population accounts for 51%; about 1.5% of poor households live near the project
area.
Cultural-historical works: the project area has such historical relics as Linh Son Tu
Phu Cau (100m from the project), National cultural historical relic cluster - Temple
worshipping General Tran Thu Do, Temple for worshipping National Mother Tran Thi
Dung, etc.
Medical/ educational facilities: There are Pham Kinh An kindergarten, Hung Nhan
town primary school, Tran Thu Do secondary school, Hung Ha town medical aid
station along the project route. These works are 100-200m from the project route.
Agencies, enterprises: There are some agencies, enterprises near the project area such
as Hung Ha district Party Committee, Hung Ha town People’s Committee, Hung Ha
bus station, Hung Ha post office, etc. These works are 0.2-1km from the project area.
Living conditions and community services: In general, technical – social infrastructure
for living activities in the project area is stable and safe. People’s Committees, schools,
markets, medical aid stations, etc. are all located at convenient position easily
accessible to people. 100% of households use electricity, well and rainwater. Waste is
self-treated by people in their garden or collected at local garbage gathering places.
b. Sensitive objects along the project
Environmental impact assessment report
88
The sensitive objects presented in table 2.19 are those who are likely influenced by the
project’s activities.
Table 2.19. Sensitive Objects along the Project
No. Objects/ Section Distance
(m)
Remarks
1 Residential area Km44+000 ÷
Km44+200 10
Gathered on the right route
2 Residential area Km44+400 ÷
Km44 +900 10
Crowded
3 Residential area Km45+100 ÷
Km46+100 10
Gathered on the right route
4 Residential area Km47+700 10 Sparse
5 Residential area Km47+950 10
Crowded
6 Residential area Km51+200 ÷
Km52+200 10
7 Residential area Km52+400 ÷
Km52+900 10
8 Residential area Km53+100 ÷
Km53+700 10
9 Residential area Km54+100 10 Scattered
10 Residential area Km55+100 10
Crowded
11 Residential area Km56+150 ÷
Km56+800 10
12 Residential area Km57+600 10
13 Residential area Km58+080 10
14 Residential area Km58+300 ÷
Km59+400 10
15 Residential area Km59+900 10
16 Residential area Km61+300 ÷
Km61+600 10
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
89
No. Objects/ Section Distance
(m)
Remarks
17 Residential area at Go bridge
abutment
10
18 Pham Kinh An kindergarten 40
19 Hung Nhan town primary school 50
20 Tran Thu Do secondary school 60
21 Hung Ha town medical aid station 80
22 Hung Ha Party Committee 80
23 Hung Ha town People’s Committee 100
24 Hung Ha post office Km58+040 80 Gathered on the right route
25 Historical relic as Linh Son Tu Phu
Cau
100
26 Temple Km46+900 40
27 Temple Km48+900 80
28 Family temple Km56+620 30 Gathered on the right route
Depending on the specific objects, there will be different impacts generated, including
(without limitation) the followings:
Pollution of air, noise and vibration during the construction and operation in areas with
high population density and special areas;
Intersecting local roads, causing difficulty in travelling;
Affecting the cultural and religious works during construction.
Environmental impact assessment report
90
Figure 2.10. Images of Received Areas
Hung Nhan residential area
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
91
Schools along the road
Pham Kinh An kids garden Hung Nhan town Primary school
Tran Thu Do secondary
school
Pham Kinh An secondary school
The objects along the road
Hung Ha town PC office Hung Nhan hospital
Environmental impact assessment report
92
2.3. Summaries of data base in project area
Based on the collected information, the characteristic of socio-economic and natural
conditions and environmental at the specific section are summarized in the table 2.20.
This information will form the basis for the analysis of impacts and alternatives, and
recommendations for the design of technical.
Table 2.20. Summaries of Database in Project Area
Data items Project database
Commune/town/ward: Thien Phien commune, Tan Le town, Hung Nhan town, Tien
Duc commune, Lien Hiep commune, Thai Phuong commune,
Phuc Khanh commune, Hung ha town, Minh Khai commune,
Hong Linh commune, Dong Phong commune, Dong Tan
commune.
The objects along the road
Dong Tu pagoda Hung Ha bus station
Van Nam pagoda Hung Ha medical center
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
93
Data items Project database
District: Tien Lu/ Hung Ha
Province: Thai Binh/ Hung Yen
Location: From 20°39'5,91"N; 106° 7'46,41"E
to 20°33'35,49"N 106°16'16,35"E
Natural condition
Topography The topography along the route is relatively flat with the
gradient is less than 1%, the variability height is from 1 to 2 m
compared with sea level, lower from North-West to South-
East
Climate Northern Plains climate has the cold winters, low rainfall and
humid summers and rainy
Hydrology The project area is influenced by two major rivers: the Diem
Ho and Tra Ly rivers. Along the rivers there are flood control
dike system.
Inner field canal system is very dense, plays a major role for
irrigation
agriculture.
Geology and
Geotechnical
The project route mainly passing through the area agricultural
land,
The common formations in the Project area is high from soft
clay to the organic clay, sand with medium density, linings by
hard clay and then are medium to coarse grained sand.
Resource Current construction material mining will be used for the
proposed project. The quarry, land, and building sand beach
business also located along the river bank in the project area
average of about 25km.
organisms Natural vegetation, crops and aquatic ecosystems agriculture
plays a key role;
The fauna includes species of pets, birds and reptiles, frogs
Protected Area The Nearest is Xuan Thuy National Park, about 45km from
the project route.
Current status of environmental resources
Environmental impact assessment report
94
Data items Project database
Air quality Polluted with dust pollution exceeds of 2.4 - 3 times permitted
limits
Noise, vibration Noise, vibrations are within permitted limits
Surface water quality Having an early stage of oil pollution, exceeding 1.2 ÷ 1.8
times permitted limits
Ground water quality Pollution of iron at a concentration of exceeding 1.6 ÷ 2 times
permitted limits, Coliform contamination in all groundwater
samples.
Sediment quality Content of heavy metals in sediments are less than permitted
limits
Soil quality Content of heavy metals in the soil are less than permitted
limits
Environmental
management system
at local
Local EMS fairly complete, with the participation of the
Department of Natural Resources and Environment, the
District Unit of Natural Resources and Environment. At the
commune level has also formed part of the staff and / or
specialized issues of urban management and environmental
sanitation.
Socio-economic condition
Population-Income Regarding population scale in the project area average of 4
persons per household. The standard of living of the people
are pretty average with the 4% rich households, 32% of
wealthier households, average household 60% and 4% of poor
households
Land used The dependence on rice fields are still large, mostly
agricultural land (60%)
Infrastructure Pretty complete (electricity, water, garbage collection,
transportation ...)
Profession It is mainly agriculture, business services
Culture Along with a number of temples, churches near the line,
scattered along the route.
Public Health Health care system is divided into two main levels: The
infirmary - medical stations at the town level and the
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
95
Data items Project database
Provincial General Hospital.
Environmental impact assessment report
96
CHAPTER III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
3.1. Identification of Environmental Impact
Impact identification has been made on the basis of the assessments of the current state
of the natural environment, socioeconomic conditions in Project area and the opinions
of locals.
The environmental impacts are classified into 3 categories namely strong, medium and
small:
A strong impact could destroy an element of the environment or could make the
environment strongly deformed. Such an impact could affect all components of the
project if the adequate mitigation measures are not likely to be accepted;
A medium impact will partly reduce the value or benefit of an environmental factor
and it will be felt by a part of the community;
A small impact may be a small change in the value or benefit of an environmental
factor and it will be felt by a limited group of individuals.
For each phase (pre-construction, construction and operation), there will be an identity
matrix of impact. In each phase, types of activity create the impacts that will be
determined by each environmental factor. The level of strong, medium and small
impact will be marked respectively with 3, 2 and 1. Positive effects are also mentioned
and the level of impact will also mark with corresponding points but in parentheses.
The identity matrix of environmental impacts in three phases (pre-construction,
construction and operation) of the project is presented in Table 3.1.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
97
Table 3.1. Identification Matrix of Project’s Environmental Impacts
Activity of project
Affected subjects
Natural environment Natural
environment Natural environment
Air
envir
onm
ent
qual
ity
Sound e
nvir
onm
ent
Surf
ace
wat
er
Sed
imen
t
Gro
undw
ater
Agri
cult
ura
l la
nd
Res
iden
tial
lan
d
Spec
iali
zed l
and
Ero
sion -
sed
imen
tati
on
Ter
rest
rial
eco
syst
em
Subm
erged
eco
syst
em
Eco
nom
y
Agri
cult
ure
Aquac
ult
ure
Busi
nes
s
Irri
gat
ion
Tra
ffic
Tra
ffic
saf
ety
Publi
c uti
liti
es
Res
iden
tial
Publi
c hea
lth
Inco
me
Qual
ity o
f li
fe
His
tori
cal
monum
ent
Soci
al c
ondit
ion
PRE-CONSTRUCTION STAGE
Clearance -2 -2 -3 -2
Houses demolition -1 -1 -1 -1
Graders for construction
sites preparation and road
service
-1 -1 -1 -1
CONSTRUCTION STAGE
I. Construction of bridge
1.Lower part -1 -2 -2 -2 -3 -2 -1 -2 -2 -1
2.Upper part -1 -2 -2 -2 -2 -1 -2 -1
3. Finishing and clearance -2 -2
II. Construction of NH39-
Environmental impact assessment report
98
Activity of project
Affected subjects
Natural environment Natural
environment Natural environment
Air
envir
onm
ent
qual
ity
Sound e
nvir
onm
ent
Surf
ace
wat
er
Sed
imen
t
Gro
undw
ater
Agri
cult
ura
l la
nd
Res
iden
tial
lan
d
Spec
iali
zed l
and
Ero
sion -
sed
imen
tati
on
Ter
rest
rial
eco
syst
em
Subm
erged
eco
syst
em
Eco
nom
y
Agri
cult
ure
Aquac
ult
ure
Busi
nes
s
Irri
gat
ion
Tra
ffic
Tra
ffic
saf
ety
Publi
c uti
liti
es
Res
iden
tial
Publi
c hea
lth
Inco
me
Qual
ity o
f li
fe
His
tori
cal
monum
ent
Soci
al c
ondit
ion
1, Hung Nhan bypass
1. Project section -3 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -1 -2 -2 -2 -1
2. Bypass section -2 -2 -2 -1 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -3 -1
II. Related activities
1. Storage of material and
waste -3 -2 ? -2 ? ? -2
2. Mixing plant operation -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2
3. Construction activities -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2
4.Transportation and mining
exploitation activities -2 -3 -2 -2 -2
5.Vehicle maintenance
activities -3 -2 -3 -3 -2
6. Workers gathering -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2
OPERATION STAGE
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
99
Activity of project
Affected subjects
Natural environment Natural
environment Natural environment
Air
envir
onm
ent
qual
ity
Sound e
nvir
onm
ent
Surf
ace
wat
er
Sed
imen
t
Gro
undw
ater
Agri
cult
ura
l la
nd
Res
iden
tial
lan
d
Spec
iali
zed l
and
Ero
sion -
sed
imen
tati
on
Ter
rest
rial
eco
syst
em
Subm
erged
eco
syst
em
Eco
nom
y
Agri
cult
ure
Aquac
ult
ure
Busi
nes
s
Irri
gat
ion
Tra
ffic
Tra
ffic
saf
ety
Publi
c uti
liti
es
Res
iden
tial
Publi
c hea
lth
Inco
me
Qual
ity o
f li
fe
His
tori
cal
monum
ent
Soci
al c
ondit
ion
Operation of vehicles -1
New bypass and the new
upgrading and expansion
road appeared
+1 +3 -1 -1 +3 -2 +2 -1
Rain water run off -1 -1 -1
Level of impact: strong impact (3); medium impact (2); small impact (1). Negative impact (-); positive impact (+)
Environmental impact assessment report
100
Based on the above of matrix of environmental impacts, the basically impacts are
identified and will be considered in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2. Classification of Environmental Impacts
Impact Time Scope Importance level
Pre-construction stage
Clearance, resettlement Permanence Regional High
Land acquisition Permanence Regional High
Trees relocation Short-term localized Small
Utilities relocation Short-term localized Medium
Deterioration of ambient air quality Short-term localized Medium
Public health Short-term localized Medium
Landscape Short-term localized Small
Construction stage
Deterioration of ambient air quality Temporary localized Medium
Phát sinh ồn, rung Temporary Regional Medium
Public health Temporary Regional High
Impact on quality of surface water and
sidement Temporary localized Medium
Impact on groundwater quality Temporary localized Medium
Impact on soil quality Permanence localized Medium
Impact on eco-system Temporary localized Medium
Impact on traffic Temporary Regional High
Socio-economic Temporary localized Medium
Impact on eco-tourisms Temporary localized Medium
Impac on house and structure Temporary localized Medium
Wasstes generation Temporary Regional Medium
Damages of public facilities Temporary Regional Medium
Operation stage
Productvie land division Permanence Regional Medium
Dust and noise impacts on residential area Permanence localized Small
Rain water run off Temporary Regional Medium
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
101
3.2. Impact Assessment in the Pre-construction Phase of the Project
3.2.1. Comparison between Alternatives with and without Project
Implementation (zero-option)
The core issue of Socio-Economic, traveling needs and traffic safety, and environmental
and resettlement issues have been analyzed of comparable performance, and in case the
project is not implemented (zero-option). The comparison results are presented in Table
3.3.
Table 3.3. Analysis of Alternatives with and without Project
Implementation
Key issues With project implementation Without project implementation
Socio-economic The limit on the transport speed,
time for shipping of goods
(agricultural products) increased
the transport cost, not encouraging
socio-economic development of
each location and the whole area.
The Project completion will create
favorable conditions for cargo operations,
circulation (both homeless and time). It
stimulates the activity of the regional
Economic development, thereby improving
people's living standards.
Traveling needs
and traffic safety
In the absence of project
implementation, vehicle traffic
flow through the area continues to
increase over time, the traffic was
going to be difficult due to the
cross section can not meet the
traffic demand on the route . Also
not safe for vehicles to operate.
After rehabilitation, the project will
facilitate travel for work, living and
working in the region; improve transport
capacity and connectivity between localities
in the region; improve traffic safety.
Environment Because the road surface is rough,
narrow and dirty, slow movement
of vehicles will increase the
problem of dust pollution, noise
and the risk of traffic accidents.
During the construction process,
environmental issues will appear such as
dust, noise ... This condition will cease
upon completion of construction.
After the rehabilitation is complete, cars
on the road will run smoothly, reducing
congestion means reducing emissions
thereby mitigating the environmental
problems related to dust and noise from
the absence of real project
The issue of land
acquisition and
resettlement
There is no social problems
caused by land acquisition and
resettlement
Land occupation will result in involuntary
resettlement and other socio-economic
issues.
Comments: If the project is implemented, it will bring many benefits for socio-
Environmental impact assessment report
102
economic future. During project implementation, a number of issues of environmental
and social will arise. However, it is possible to prevent or limit these issues through
programs (i) environmental impact assessment (EIA), Environmental Management
Plan (EMP), and (ii) Action Plan resettlement (RAP). The proposed project feasibility
and implementation of investment project implementation is essential.
Sources of impacts related to waste and not related to the waste arising from activities
in the pre-construction phase are shown in Table 3.4.
Table 3.4. Types of Waste Generated in the Pre-construction Phase
No Activity Waste / Impact factor Time Space
Sources of impacts related to waste
1 Demolition, clearance Dust, waste (brick, mortar, wood,
leaves, iron), garbage. 1 week Along the project
2 Site pre-construction Dust, waste (packaging, paper bark,
wood chips) 1 month 06 sites
Sources of impacts not related to waste
1 Land occupied Occupation of residential land,
agricultural land and ditches.
Permanent or
temporary (24
months).
Along the project
2 Demolition of existing
construction Noise 1 week Along the project
3 Leveling of site
surface Noise 1 month 06 sites
3.2.2. Impacts due to Land Acquisition
3.2.2.1. Impact factor
According to the Inventory of Loss (IOL) that was conducted by resettlement team in
the first quarter 2013, there are 582 households (HHs) and public works would be
affected by Subproject; of which:
There are 362 household are affected on residential land with a total area of
13,447m2.
There are 8 households would be affected on garden land with a total area of 577m2.
There are 229 households would be affected on productive land with a total area of
20,258m2.
There are 86 households would be affected with more than 10 % of the productive
land.
There is 7 households would be fully affected on house and with total area of
322m2.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
103
The project would be affected on pond land with a total area of 538m2
The project will improve 4,212m of irrigation canal.
3.2.2.2 Assessment
a. Impact on population due to emigration and resettlement
Socio-economic characteristics of emigrated households were presented in chapter II.
In general, the living condition of emigrated households is relatively stable. When they
are emigrated and have to resettle, they will face the involuntary resettlement issues
and the loss, including:
Homeless and community relationship: Because of perennial settlement in the
locality so when they are emigrated, they will lose their inherent community and
ethnic relationship;
Loss of livelihood: Current households living along the NH39-1 have good and
stable income by taking advantage of the pavement for business. As of emigration,
many of them will be faced with the change of habit and practice, they might have
to rent business premises so that the business situation of these households will be
more difficult and with higher risk and after a period of time they could not afford
to continue their business.
Loss of community resources: the emigrants are living in peace and the conditions
are very well as road, electricity, water. Access to public facilities such as market,
school, health center, People Committee... is quite convenient. As emigrated, these
resources could be lost;
Disturbance of daily activities: The new immigrants will have to adapt and get used
to the new environment, for students they might have to go further or to change
school.
Survey results also showed that emigrated households were supposed to have adequate
compensation. Due to characteristic of the rural population, each family owns a large
area of land, they can easy resettlement at same place by appropriate compensation cash.
In addition, the number of households are affected the whole house is not large (7
households) and reserve land fund at local is large enough to meet the demand for
household relocation.
Relocation and resettlement is still a need to have a negative impact mitigation measures
accordingly.
Environmental impact assessment report
104
Figure 3.1. Area Acquire the Residential Land
Impact level: High
b. Reducing of Agricultural Land and Pond
There are 229 households would be affected on productive land with a total area of
20,258 m2. In which, there are 143 households would be affected less than 10% of
area(62.5%), 53 households would be affected from 10 to 30% of area (23.4%), 24
households would be affected from 30 to 70% of area (10.5%), 9 households would
be affected more than 70% of area. There are 8 households would be affected on
garden land with total area is 577 m2.
There are 4 households would be affected on pond with total area is 538 m2 in
Hung Nhan town, Phuc Khanh commune, and Minh Khai commune.
By rapid assessment method, the level of damage caused by permanent occupation of
agricultural land and pond has been identified (Table 3.5 and 3.6). Accordingly the
level of damage is calculated by the product of the following factors: occupied land
area, the productivity of rice (or pond), the occupied time and the announced unit price
of rice (fish pond).
Hung nhan bypass
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
105
Table 3.5. Estimated Damage Caused by Occupation of Agricultural Land
Area (ha) Loss of production (ton/year) Loss of economy (million dong/year)
Everlasting acquisition 20.26ha 425.46 3,190
Temporary acquisition 0.73ha 5.11 40.88
Note:
Productivity of paddy equivalent of Thai Binh province is 7 tons/ha/season (www.chinhphu.vn);
Rice price in Thai Binh province is from 7500 ÷ 8.000 dong/kg (www.luagao.com,
www.sonnptnt.thaibinh.gov.vn).
Table 3.6. Damage Caused by Permanent Occupation of Pond
Area (m2) Loss of production (ton of fish/year) Loss of economy (million dong/year)
192 0.13 2.86
Note:
Fish productivity of Thai Binh province is 6.8 tons/ha/season.
Average price of fish in the project area is 22,000 dong/kg.
Source: www.thaibinh.gov.vn
Thus, the level of damage of agricultural land occupation is 3.190 million dong/year,
of fish pond occupation is 160.6 million dong/year. So the occupied households would
lose a part of income and also change the structure of industry of localities.
For agricultural households, permanent loss of productive land means loss of
livelihood, not only in the short-term but also in the long-term over generations
because that land is non-replicate productive asset.
It can be seen that the damage caused by reduced income from occupied rice land
area is negligible compared to the socio-economic benefits that the project brings.
If the compensation policy is satisfactory and in accordance with people's wishes
and sympathy, the impacts of agricultural land occupation of the project will be
minimized to the lowest level.
Impact level: High
c. Reducing of green space, impact on local environmental
The project is expected to occupy about 596 fruit (longan, doi, mango, na, banana...)
and all kinds of other trees (teak tree, eagle, sesame buds, peach...).
These plants have economic value than ecological value. Although the area was cleared of
trees are distributed along the alignment and not focusing on specific areas, but the total
area of the greening of the area will be reduced, affecting the environment and landscape.
Environmental impact assessment report
106
Impact level: Small
d. Impact on Irrigation System
The project will relocate 4,212m of irrigation ditch. Irrigation ditches with a width of 1
÷ 4m are for the purpose of water supply for agricultural activities in the project area
and the surrounding area.
Ditch relocation activities will potentially interrupt the irrigation water supply, thus
affecting agricultural activities. However, according to the regulations, the traffic
construction projects are not allowed to interrupt the irrigation water supply.
Therefore, for this project, designing of ditch improving was an investment content.
Accordingly:
Ditch improving activity will be conducted in the period of low rainfall and
completed before the rainy period to minimize the influence of sowing season;
Temporary ditch will be done before the construction of cofferdam that prevent
the flow at the construction site;
Construction of irrigation works in the old flow position. After the completion of
works at the old flow position, the water flow was transferred back to the original
position. Temporary ditches are filled up and the surface is revert as the initial status.
Above contents are the investments content of the project and included in the contract
of construction contractors. This entire operation takes place within the clearance area
of the project. The cost for this activity is under the funding of the project and was
raised in total investment cost. Thus, the supply of irrigation water is almost
uninterrupted by ditch improving operation. Damage caused by interrupting irrigation
water for agriculture has been eliminated.
Impact level: Medium
Figure 3.2. Canal Relocated section along the road
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
107
3.2.3. Impact due to Demolition and Ground Leveling
3.2.3.1. Impact on Air Environment
a. Waste / waste-generating activity
In the pre-construction phase, the source of the impact on the quality of the air
environment is dust, arising from:
Demolition operation of 6,640m2 of houses (tabernacle, tile roof and building);
Ground leveling works at space at the Site bridges (Nai bridge, Nai bridge, Dong
Tu bridge) and the site roads (Km48+000; Km54+500).
b. Assessment
b1. Degradation of air environment quality due to dust pollution from house
demolition activities - impact requires mitigation measures
Dust arising from the demolition of the old building including the settles dust and
suspended dust, but it is very difficult to quantify due to dependent on demolition
measure, weather condition... Experience shows that, in the demolition area of civil
engineering, the dust usually worth exceed the permissible limit according QCVN
05:2009/BTNMT from 2 ÷ 3 times but settle quickly and exist in a short time.
Estimated range that dust concentration reaches the permissible limit is from 30 ÷ 40m
far from the demolition area. However, Project’s major demolition is a temporary
house and house with one floor so dust emission from demolition is not big. Dust will
be generated from shoveling demolition materials being transported for disposal. Dust
generation time is about 01 weeks in each area.
b2. Degradation of air environment quality due to dust pollution from ground
leveling activities - impact requires mitigation measures
Dust arising from the ground leveling activities: On sunny and windy days, the amount
of dust generated from leveling activities is significant, often exceed the permissible
limit according to the QCVN 05:2009/BTNMT from 1.5 ÷ 2 times, limited in the
bridge construction sites (Nai bridge, Nai bridge, Dong Tu bridge) and the road
construction site (Km48+000; Km54+500). Range that dust concentration reach the
permissible limit is from 25 ÷ 35m, from outer edge of the site and depending on the
weather. Emitting dust time is around 01 month.
Impact level: Medium
3.2.3.2. Impact on Community Health
a. Impact source / source-generating activity
Environmental impact assessment report
108
In the pre-construction phase, public health can be affected by dust and noise arising from
demolition and ground leveling activities.
b. Assessment
b1. Impacts on public health due to dust from demolition activities.
The remaining households are not relocated that near the demolition area (Km44+000 -
Km44+200, Km44+400 - Km44 +900, Km45+100 Km45+800 (right side),
Km45+800 - Km46+100, Km47+700, Km47+950, Km51+200 - Km52+200,
Km52+400 - Km52+900, Km53+100 - Km53+700, Km54+100, Km55+100,
Km56+150 - Km56+700, Km56+800 - Km57+500, Km57+650, Km57+800,
Km58+080, Km58+300 - Km59+400, Km59+900, Km61+300 - Km61+600) in scope
of 30 to 40m will be affected by dust from demolition activities exceed the permissible
limit according QCVN 05:2009/BTNMT from 2 ÷ 3 times. Dust pollution can create
respiratory and eye diseases. Impact time is in 01 weeks.
Impact level: Medium
b2. Impacts on public health due to dust from ground leveling activities.
The households near the bridge sites (Nai bridge, Nai bridge, Dong Tu bridge, Go
bridge) and the road construction site (Km48+000; Km54+500). In scope of 25 to 35m
will be affected due to dust from ground leveling activities, exceed the permissible
limit from 1.5 ÷ 2 times. Impact time is in 01 month.
Impact level: Medium
b3. Noise from Demolition Activity
Noise arising mainly from demolition activities of houses.
With two types of equipment used are bulldozers and trucks, level of noise arising
from demolition activities has been predicted from 84.8 ÷ 94dBA according to the
following formula:
L = 10lg n
i
Li.1,010
In which:
L is the total noise level.
Li is the noise level of source i.
n the total number of noise sources.
Source: Pham Ngoc Dang 2003. Air environment. Science and Technology Publishing House,
2003
To predict the decrease of noise level by distance from the demolition operation, use the
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
109
formula:
L= 10 lg )()( 1
1
2 dBr
r a for noise arising from road construction site.
In which:
L: reduction of noise at a distance r2 from the noise source.
r1: distance of the sound level specified for noise-source (r1 = 8 m).
a: coefficients mention the impact of noise absorption of terrain (a = 0.1 - grass ground).
Source: Pham Ngoc Dang 2003. Air environment. Science and Technology Publishing House,
2003.
Calculated results show that, at the distance of 20m, 40m and 80m the corresponding
noise spread level is (77.8 ÷ 87) dBA; (72.8 ÷ 82) dBA and (67.8 ÷ 77) dBA.
Noise concentrated in the demolition area, exceed the permissible limit according to
QCVN26:2010/BTNMT (70dBA) in the range of 60 ÷ 400m and lasted for 01 week at
each site.
The result predicted by the method of rapid assessment shows that noise level from the
demolition activity exceed the permissible limit according to QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT
in the range of 80m. The affected objects are the remaining residential district which is
not emigrated near the demolition area (Km44+000 ÷ Km44+200, Km44+400 ÷
Km44+900, Km45+100 ÷ Km45+800 (right line), Km45+800 ÷ Km46+100,
Km47+700, Km47+950, Km51+200 ÷ Km52+200, Km52+400 ÷ Km52+900,
Km53+100 ÷ Km53+700, Km54+100, Km55+100, Km56+150 ÷ Km56+700,
Km56+800 ÷ Km57+500, Km57+650, Km57+800, Km58+080, Km58+300 ÷
Km59+400, Km59+900, Km61+300 ÷ Km61+600).
Impact level: Medium
b4. Noise from site ground leveling activity
Using graders and rollers for ground leveling. By similar calculation of noise from
demolition activity, the source of these two machines operation is identified from
about 80.8 ÷ 93.1 dBA; simultaneously determined the level of noise reduction in the
distance 20m, 40m and 80m respectively (73.8 ÷ 86) dBA; (68.8 ÷ 81) dBA and (63.8
÷ 76) dBA. The noise level only reached permissible limit in the range of 300m, if
using the equipment that have a large noise emission. Potential noise is in 01 month of
pre-construction phase, but appears only by equipment operating.
Noise level from site pre-construction activity exceed the permissible limit according
to QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT in the range of 40m. The affected objects are residential
districts at Km47+950.
Environmental impact assessment report
110
Impact level: Medium
3.2.3.3. Impact on the Environmental Landscape
a. Waste / waste-generating activity
Waste-generating activity in the pre-construction phase is the house demolition and
ground leveling of construction site. Table 3.7 presents the forecasting result of the
amount of generated waste and garbage.
Table 3.7. Generated Waste in the Pre-construction Phase
No Activity Content Quantity Generated area Estimated
time
1
House demolition Waste (concrete,
brick, wood..)
3,320m3 House demolition
position along the
project line
01 week
2 Ground leveling,
equipment installation
Garbage (wood,
paper, iron…)
Difficult
to quantify
05 construction
sites
01 month
b. Assessment
The risk of environmental landscape pollution by solid waste - processing required
The types of generated waste, if they're not collected and processed, could be
dispersed into the surrounding environment causing environmental landscape
pollution and create favorable condition for pest species (rat, cockroache... )
development. However, the types of generated waste in this phase are the types of
non-hazardous waste and required to be processed in accordance with the Decree No.
59/2007/ND-CP dated 09/04/2007 on solid waste management, in which:
The amount of waste produced after the house demolition will be stored within the
clearance of the project to re-use for works which do not require high-quality, such
as temporary road or ground leveling in the civil works near the project area;
Waste required to be processed through contract with local environmental units and
transferred to the local landfill.
Impact level: Small
The impacts in the construction preparation phase are summarized in Table 3.8.
Table 3.8. Summaries of Impacts in pre-construction phase
Impacts Location Time/frequency Impact level
Relocation, resettlement Along the road
Temporary High
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
111
Impacts Location Time/frequency Impact level
Reducing of agricultural
land and production land Along the road
Permanence
High
Impacts on trees Along the road Permanence Small
Impacts on irrigation Along the road Temporary Medium
Impacts on ambient air Along the road, site 1week - 1 month Medium
Impacts due to noise Along the road, site 1week - 1 month Medium
Public health Along the road 1week - 1 month Medium
Landscape Along the road Temporary Small
3.3. Impact Assessment of Subjects Affected by the Impact Sources Arising
from the Activities of the Project in the Construction Phase
According to the requirements specified in Appendix 2.5, Circular 26/2011/TT-
BTNMT, this section content is the analysis and evaluation of the impacts arising from
the activities of construction phase. In the case of this project, the major activities,
including: (1) road construction (road widening, bypass) and intersections, (2) the
bridge construction activities on the line; and (3) the related activities.
Table 3.9 presents a summary of identified result of impact sources related to waste
and non-related to waste in the construction phase.
Table 3.9. Impact Sources Related to Waste and Non-Related to Waste in
the Construction Phase
A Impact sources related to waste
No Activity Type of waste
I Construction of the main works
1 Execution of upgrading, expanding,
renovating, intersections, drainage
dust, soil, waste solid, oil
2 Bridge on the line dust, soil, waste solid
II Auxiliary activities
1 Storage of material/waste soil Dust
2 Equipment maintenance waste oil and sewage
3 Worker camp Sewage and garbage
4 Construction equipment Dust and exhaust gas
5 Material and soil transportation Dust and exhaust gas
6 Mixing plant operation Dust, solid waste and sewage
B Impact sources non-related to waste
I Construction of the main works Impact factor
Execution of upgrading, expanding,
Environmental impact assessment report
112
renovating, intersections, drainage
Road-bed excavation and filling Digging and road noise, vibration, sedimentation,
local inundation, loss of traffic safety
Culvert construction Irrigation interruption
Bridge construction
Lower part Noise, vibration, sedimentation, turbidity
Upper part Noise
II Auxiliary activities
Storage of material/waste soil Local inundation
Mixing plant operation Noise
Concentration of workers Competition and conflict
Activities of equipment construction
(horizontal construction )
Noise, loss of traffic safety, ground compression
Activities of material transportation
(vertical construction)
Noise, congestion, loss of traffic safety, damage
to public facilities, ground compression
3.3.1. Impact on Air Environment
3.3.1.1. Waste / Waste-generating Activity
Waste-generating activities potentially affect air environment quality, including:
Earthworks of road-bed and foundation pit rise the dust
Related activities, including:
o Activities of storage construction material and waste: Dust generated from the
dump (does not have a defined position dump);
o Activities of construction equipment (horizontal construction ) giving rise of
dust and toxic gases (NO2, SO2, CO and HC);
o Activities of mixing plant in the construction site giving rise of dust;
o Activities of material transportation (vertical construction) giving rise of dust
and toxic gases (NO2, SO2, CO and HC).
a. Dust generated during earthworks
The amount of dust generated from earthwork activities depends on the the excavated
soil component, moisture and weather condition. Estimated concentration of dust
generated from earthwork activities based on:
The total amount of earthwork (Table 3.10);
The dust emission coefficient of the World Health Organization (Table 3.11);
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
113
Table 3.10. Total Amount of Earthwork
No Item Quantity (m
3)
Excavated soil Filled soil/sand Total
I Road and intersection
1 Hung Nhan bypass 4,687.50 22,147.74 26,835.24
2 NHL39-1 (expanding section) 111,052.43 34,7767.9 458,820.29
II Bridge
1 Nai bridge 2,941.06 1,499.67 4,440.73
2 Le bridge 8,203.48 1,339.56 9,543.04
3 Nai bridge 332.6 1,363 1,695.6
4 Dong Tu bridge 557.2 1,536 2,193.2
5 Go bridge 1,581.9 3,502.5 5,084.4
Table 3.11. Dust Emission Coefficient of Construction Activity
No Impact source Emission coefficient
1 Dust due to excavation, covering the ground being blown up (sand
dust).
1 100g/m3
2 Dust due to the loading and unloading of construction materials (soil,
rock, sand, etc.).
0.1 1g/m3
3 Spillage of sand, soil transporting arising dust. 0.1 1g/m3
Source: Quick assessment document of WHO
Calculated result presents in Table 3.12
Table 3.12. Amount of Dust from Earthwork Activity
No Item Quantity (kg) Space
(1) Time
(2) Amount (mg/m.s)
Min Max m Month Min Max
I Road and intersection (3)
1 Hung Nhan bypass 3 270 200 2 0.011 0.900
2 NHL39-1 (expanding
section) 6 491 200 2 0.019 1.639
II Bridge
1 Nai bridge 5 453 27.10 6 0.044 3.720
2 Le bridge 11 973 32.10 6 0.079 6.749
3 Nai bridge 2 173 50.2 9 0.006 0.511
4 Dong Tu bridge 3 224 44.2 9 0.009 0.751
5 Go Bridge 6 519 420 8 0.003 0.223
Note: (1) The scope of bridge construction including 10m from the bridge abutment
Environmental impact assessment report
114
(2) Time of foundation pit excavation is by 2/3 of the total execution time
(3) Time of road construction earthwork is about 2 months/200m
b. Dust and toxic gases arising from the operation of construction machinery and
equipment (horizontal construction )
Horizontal construction activity is understood as the operation of means and equipment
used for construction within the clearance area. Forecast of the total volume and dust
load, toxic gases arising from the consumption of the machinery and equipment
(horizontal construction ) based on:
Diesel consumption for construction activities (Table 3.13);
The emission coefficient of the World Health Organization: 1 truck sized 3.5 - 16
tones while consumption of 1 ton of diesel will emit into the atmosphere about 4.3
kg TSP; 20S kg SO2 (S is the sulfur content in diesel, by QCVN 01:2007/BKHCN
S = 0.05%); 55kg NO2; 28kg CO and 12kg HC;
Scope and execution time of each item (Table 3.14).
Table 3.13. Estimated Consumption of Diesel in Construction (Shunt and
Vertical Construction)
No Item
Estimated diesel consumption (ton of diesel)
Horizontal
construction (1)
Vertical
construction (2)
Total
I Road and intersection
1 Hung Nhan bypass 103 57 160
2 NHL39-1 (expanding section) 666 561 1227
II Bridge
1 Nai bridge 29 7.6 36.6
2 Le bridge 24 2.7 26.7
3 Nai bridge 25 0.3 25.3
4 Dong Tu bridge 21 0.5 21.5
5 Go bridge 88 17.5 105.5
Note: (1) Horizontal construction: operation of construction machinery and equipment;
(2) Vertical construction: operation of transportation.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
115
3.14. Amount of Dust and Toxic Gas of Construction Activity (Horizontal
Construction)
No Item
Fuel
demand Space Time
(*) Amount (mg/ms)
(ton diesel) (m) (month) TSP SO2 NO2 CO HC
I Road and intersection
1 Hung Nhan bypass 103 2030 24 0.012 <0.001 0.155 0.079 0.034
2 NHL39-1 (expanding
section) 666 20180 24 0.008 <0.001 0.107 0.054 0.023
II Bridge
1 Nai bridge 29 27.10 6 1.024 0.002 1.452 6.669 2.858
2 Le bridge 24 32.10 6 0.716 0.002 2.216 4.660 1.997
3 Nai bridge 25 50.2 9 0.318 0.001 1.415 2.069 0.887
4 Dong Tu bridge 21 44.2 9 0.303 0.001 1.568 1.974 0.846
5 Go bridge 88 440 12 0.109 0.051 0.389 0.707 0.303
(*)Dust arising from the horizontal construction operation takes place mainly during the
earthwork period
c. The total amount of dust and toxic gas from the earthwork and horizontal
construction activity
Because of the items will be constructed at the same time in the same range space,
the total amount of dust and toxic gas generated within each construction item of
the project will be the sum of the amount of dust and toxic gas arising calculated
separately for each activity (Table 3.15).
Table 3.15. Total Amount of Dust and Toxic Gas Generated in the Process
of Construction
No Item Space Time
(*) Amount (mg/ms)
(m) (month) TSP SO2 NO2 CO HC
I Road and intersection
1 Hung Nhan bypass 2030 24 0.4678 <0.001 0.155 0.079 0.034
2 NHL39-1 (expanding
section) 20180 24 0.837 <0.001 0.107 0.054 0.023
II Bridge
1 Nai bridge 27.10 6 2.598 0.002 1.452 6.669 2.858
2 Le bridge 32.10 6 3.732 0.002 2.216 4.660 1.997
3 Nai bridge 50.2 9 0.562 0.001 1.415 2.069 0.887
Environmental impact assessment report
116
No Item Space Time
(*) Amount (mg/ms)
(m) (month) TSP SO2 NO2 CO HC
4 Dong Tu bridge 44.2 9 0.380 0.001 1.568 1.974 0.846
5 Go Bridge 44 12 0.33 0.051 0.389 0.707 0.303
Based on the total amount of dust, gas generated in the construction of each item to
determine the average concentration at any point in the Sutton model.
Sutton diffusion model.
u.
2
hzexp
2
hzexp.E8,0
Cz
2
z
2
2
z
2
(mg/m
3)
In which:
C: concentration of pollutants in the air (mg/m3);
E: amount of contaminants from waste source (mg/m.s);
In case this project, the dominant wind direction is Northeast in winter and Southeast in
summer; create the angle with curve of 45o and 45
o so the pollutant amount is adjusted in
turn is E*=E.sin45o and E.sin45
o;
z: height of the calculation point (m) (z=1.5m);
h: height of the road surface than the surrounding ground (m) (h=2.m);
u: average wind speed (m/s) (winter and summer respectively utb=2.1m/s and 1.9m/s);
z: diffusion coefficient of pollutant under the z (m).
Pollution diffusion coefficient values z according to vertical (z) with the stability of
the atmosphere in the Project area is B, is determined by the formula:
z = 0.53.x0.73
(m)
Where: x is the distance of the point calculated from original sources, with wind blowing, m
Results are presented in Table 3.16.
Table 3.16. Predicted Scope of Dispersal of Dust and Gas from
Construction Activities
Work Item Season Concentration distribution by distance (*) QCVN 05,
06 : 2009 5m 10m 25m 50m 100m
I. Road and intersection
Hung
Nhan
bypass
TSP Winter 0.080 0.064 0.041 0.026 0.016
0.2 Summer 0.093 0.075 0.048 0.031 0.019
SO2 Winter <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
0.125 Summer <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
NO2 Winter 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.1
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
117
Work Item Season Concentration distribution by distance (*) QCVN 05,
06 : 2009 5m 10m 25m 50m 100m
Summer 0.006 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.001
CO Winter 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.003
5 Summer 0.016 0.013 0.008 0.005 0.003
HC Winter 0.006 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.001
1.5 Summer 0.007 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.001
NH39 - 1
expanded
section
TSP Winter 0.142 0.115 0.074 0.047 0.029
0.2 Summer 0.166 0.134 0.086 0.055 0.034
SO2 Winter <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
0.125 Summer <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
NO2 Winter 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001
0.1 Summer 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001
CO Winter 0.009 0.007 0.005 0.003 0.002
5 Summer 0.011 0.009 0.006 0.004 0.002
HC Winter 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001
1.5 Summer 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.001
II. Bridges
Nai
bridge
TSP Winter 0.442 0.358 0.229 0.146 0.090
0.2 Summer 0.515 0.417 0.267 0.171 0.105
SO2 Winter <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
0.125 Summer <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
NO2 Winter 0.049 0.040 0.026 0.016 0.010
0.1 Summer 0.058 0.047 0.030 0.019 0.012
CO Winter 1.134 0.918 0.587 0.376 0.232
5 Summer 1.323 1.071 0.685 0.439 0.271
HC Winter 0.486 0.393 0.252 0.161 0.099
1.5 Summer 0.567 0.459 0.294 0.188 0.116
Le
bridge
TSP Winter 0.635 0.514 0.329 0.210 0.130
0.2 Summer 0.740 0.599 0.383 0.245 0.151
SO2 Winter <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
0.125 Summer <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
NO2 Winter 0.075 0.061 0.039 0.025 0.015
0.1 Summer 0.088 0.071 0.046 0.029 0.018
CO Winter 0.792 0.641 0.410 0.263 0.162
5 Summer 0.925 0.748 0.479 0.307 0.189
HC Winter 0.340 0.275 0.176 0.113 0.069 1.5
Environmental impact assessment report
118
Work Item Season Concentration distribution by distance (*) QCVN 05,
06 : 2009 5m 10m 25m 50m 100m
Summer 0.396 0.321 0.205 0.131 0.081
Nai
bridge
TSP Winter 0.096 0.077 0.049 0.032 0.020
0.2 Summer 0.112 0.090 0.058 0.037 0.023
SO2 Winter <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
0.125 Summer <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
NO2 Winter 0.048 0.039 0.025 0.016 0.010
0.1 Summer 0.056 0.045 0.029 0.019 0.011
CO Winter 0.352 0.285 0.182 0.117 0.072
5 Summer 0.411 0.332 0.213 0.136 0.084
HC Winter 0.151 0.122 0.078 0.050 0.031
1.5 Summer 0.176 0.142 0.091 0.058 0.036
Dong Tu
bridge
TSP Winter 0.065 0.052 0.033 0.021 0.013
0.2 Summer 0.075 0.061 0.039 0.025 0.015
SO2 Winter <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
0.125 Summer <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
NO2 Winter 0.053 0.043 0.028 0.018 0.011
0.1 Summer 0.062 0.050 0.032 0.021 0.013
CO Winter 0.336 0.272 0.174 0.111 0.069
5 Summer 0.392 0.317 0.203 0.130 0.080
HC Winter 0.144 0.116 0.074 0.048 0.029
1.5 Summer 0.168 0.136 0.087 0.056 0.034
Go
bridge
TSP Winter 0.045 0.038 0.028 0.017 0.011
0.2 Summer 0.05 0.042 0.031 0.019 0.012
SO2 Winter 0.007 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.002
0.125 Summer 0.008 0.006 0.005 0.003 0.002
NO2 Winter 0.053 0.044 0.033 0.020 0.013
0.1 Summer 0.059 0.049 0.037 0.022 0.014
CO Winter 0.097 0.081 0.061 0.037 0.024
5 Summer 0.107 0.089 0.067 0.041 0.026
HC Winter 0.042 0.035 0.026 0.016 0.01
1.5 Summer 0.046 0.038 0.029 0.017 0.011
(*) Distance from the edge of construction area
From the quantitative results of concentration of dust and gas arising from the
construction activities and the scope of spread of these substances, we can see that in
the edge of construction area:
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
119
Construction of Hung Human bypass, NH39-1, Nai bridge, Dong Tu bridge would
give rise of dust and toxic gas with concentrations less than the permissible limit
according QCVN05, 06/2009/BTNMT;
Construction Nai bridge would give rise of dust with concentration exceed the
permissible limit according to QCVN 05:2009/BTNMT about 1.1 - 1.2 times in the
winter, from 1.2 - 2.5 times in the summer; at the construction location of Le
bridge, the concentration of dust exceed the permissible limit as 1.1 - 3.1 times in
the winter and from 1.2 – 3.6 times in the summer. Concentration of dust only
meets the permissible limit in the scope of between 30 - 50 m.
d. Dust from transport activities
The transportation means of material / waste rock usually produces 02 types of waste
sources, including: dust and gases from the engine and the dust swept up from the road.
d1. Dust and exhaust gas arising from the combustion engine
Amount of dust and exhaust gas arising from transport operations of waste and material of
the project is calculated similar to the case of horizontal construction. The average
transport distance is taken by 25km. Calculation results are presented in Table 3.17.
Table 3.17. Amount of Dust and Exhaust Gas from Transportation
Activities (Vertical Construction)
No Item
Fuel
demand
Scope of
transport Time
(*) Amount (mg/ms)
(ton diesel) (m) (month) TSP SO2 NO2 CO HC
I Road and intersection
1 Hung Nhan bypass 57 25,000 24 0.001 <0.001 0.007 0.004 0.002
2 NHL39-1 (expanding
section) 561 25,000 24 0.005 <0.001 0.069 0.035 0.015
II Bridge
1 Nai bridge 7.6 25,000 6 <0.001 <0.001 0.004 0.002 0.001
2 Le bridge 2.7 25,000 6 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000
3 Nai bridge 0.3 25,000 9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
4 Dong Tu bridge 0.5 25,000 9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
5 Go bridge 17.5 12.000 12 0.001 0.007 0.01 0.005 0.002
(*)Transport activity concentrate mainly on the earthwork period
The Sutton diffusion model is used to forecast the emission range of toxic gases from
material transport activities similar to earthwork activities and horizontal construction.
Prediction results showed that the concentration of emissions arising from combustion
Environmental impact assessment report
120
many times less than the permissible limit so it does not cause air pollution.
d2. Dust swept from the road
Dust swept up from road by the tires in transport cannot be quantified due to lack of
input data such as transport volume of each car, the humidity of material, the covering
of material transport, the level of cleanliness of the vehicle (wheel). By the experience
of supervising of construction traffic in operating phase on urban routes showed that
transport activity of material and waste rock-soil give rise to dust, averagely exceed
the permissible limit according to QCVN 05: 2009/BTNMT from 2 ÷ 3 times, on the
windy and sunny day, arising dust could exceed the permissible limit to 4 times, if
there is no effective preventive measures. Dust concentration only reached the
permissible limit in the range > 80m from road transport, by the wind direction.
3.3.1.2. Impact Assessment
a. Degradation of air environment quality by dust from earthwork construction
activity and horizontal construction
Air environment quality in the position of construction of Nai bridge will be reduced by
dust exceed the permissible limit from 1.2 - 2.2 times in the winter, from 1.2 – 2.5 times in
the summer; at the construction location of Le bridge , concentration of dust exceed the
permissible limit as 1.1 - 3.1 times in the winter and from 1.2 – 3.6 times in the summer.
Pollution is not serious (<5 times the permissible limit). Concentration of dust only meets
the permissible limit in the range between 30 - 50 meters from the construction site.
Impact level: Medium
b Degradation of air environment quality by dust swept from the road from
material transport operation
Air environment along the transport route of material (NH39-1, PR224, PR455, PR223,
PR226, other inter-village and inter-communal roads etc) will be contaminated by dust
with average concentration exceed the permissible limit according to QCVN05:
2009/BTNMT from 2 ÷ 3 times, on windy and sunny day, arising dust might exceed the
permissible limit up to 4 times. Dust concentration only reached the permissible limit in
the range > 80m from transport road, down the wind direction.
Impact level: Medium
c. Impacts on residential and agricultural eco-system due to dust pollution
Based on the results predicted dust levels, see that the Residents near the approach
road at Trieu Duong direction of Le bridge and agricultural eco-system along the
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
121
approach road of Nai bridge (Km48+600) and Le Bridge (Km48+251) will be
affected by dust pollution with less serious conditions (<5 times of permissible limit).
Dust pollution during the construction appeared in summer and winter.
Dust pollution affects people's health, may appear the diseases on the respiratory tract
and eyes. In addition dust pollution can affect productivity and may delay the
germination process of rice plants. The impact can extend beyond during the
construction period.
Impact level: Medium
Figure 3.3. Construction Area of Na and Le bridge
d. Impact to trading and production due to dust contamination
Affected object is the current households living along the 2 on the main project. These
objects will not be relocated and turning into the households near the road after the
New Nai bridge area New Le bridge area
Residential area
Rice field
Rice field
Environmental impact assessment report
122
Clearance stage finish.
At present, the rate of business activity-trade among these objects has not high.
However, after being turned into the road surface, the households will have the
opportunity to build the business shop to trade in changing the economic structure,
bring substantial revenue stream. According to the investigation results in the project
phase, the business at stores in areas such as catering, cafe, drink, drug stores,
clothing, grocery, mobile phones ... can bring income level from 3 ÷ 10 million per
month. However, the commercial business operations in the project area during the
construction phase will risk being affected by dust pollution with range up to 140 m
from the area digging the road. Dust pollution will hinder business activities –
psychological services ...
Impact Level: Medium
3.3.2. Impacts due to noise and vibration
3.3.2.1. Impact Source / Source-generating Activities
a. Noise arising from the operation of machinery and equipment during
construction
The noise level in the discontinue construction phase, appear only when operating
construction equipment. In the scope of the project, the noise level generated by a
combination of equipment, construction machinery participating in construction of
items, including:
Construction of lines with the combination of bulldozers, compactors, grab
buckets, pavers, rollers, graders, trucks;
Construction of the bridges on the route with a combination of cranes, welding
machines, concrete pumps, vibrators, trucks;
Concrete mixing with combination of mixers and trucks.
Noise arising in the construction of each section of the project is determined based on
the typical noise level of construction equipment (Table 3.18) and the formula for
synthetic noise:
L = 10lg n
i
Li.1,010
In which:
L is the total noise level.
Li is the noise of source i.
n the total number of noise source.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
123
Source: Pham Ngoc Dang 2003. Air environment. Science and Technology Publishing House,
2003
Table 3.18. Typical Noise Level of Construction Equipment (dBA)
Grader and compactor
Grader 8093
Roller 7375
Paving
Spreader 8688
Truck 8394
Compactor 7477
Excavation & Transport
Bulldozer 80
Clamshell 7293
Truck 8394
Scraper 8093
Construction
Crane 7577
Welder 7182
Concrete Pump 8184
Concrete vibrator 76
Air compressor 7487
Pneumatic tools 8198
Bulldozer 80
Truck 8394
Source: Environmental Protection Committee of U.S. Noise from construction equipment and
machinery NJID, 300.1, 31 - 12 - 1971.
Table 3.19 presents the results of noise level calculating arising from each principal
and auxiliary items of the project according to the situation of the most concentrated
level of simultaneous facilities and construction machinery.
Table 3.19. Calculate Result of the Noise Level at the Source in the
Construction Phase (dBA)
No Item Main equipment Noise level (dBA)
I Construction of road
- Excavation and transport. Bulldozer, clamshell, truck. 85 96.6
- Grader and compactor. Grader, roller. 80.8 93.1
- Pavement. Scraper, compactor, truck. 87.9 95
- Clearance and landscape. Bulldozer, clamshell, truck. 80.6 93.2
II Construction of bridge
- Structural construction. Crane, welder, concrete pump and
vibrator, pile driver, truck 87.5 96.3
- Clearance and landscape. Bulldozer, clamshell, truck. 80.6 93.2
III Mixing plant operation Mixer, truck 90 ÷ 96
b. Vibration emission from construction activities
Due to vibration are evaluated by desultory events, not the average of the events, so
the vibration source level is taken as the largest vibration level of one of the
machineries, equipments involved. Typical vibration emission level of the construction
equipment presented in Table 3.20.
Table 3.20. Vibration Level of some Typical Construction Equipment
(Distance of 10m)
Environmental impact assessment report
124
No Type of vehicle vibration level reference (in the vertical direction, dB)
1 Excavators 80
2 Bulldozer 79
3 Freighter vehicle 74
4 Roller 82
5 Air compressor 81
3.3.2.2. Impact Assessment
a. Noise impact arising from construction
Noise impact on sensitive subjects determined based on:
The noise attenuation by distance is calculated according to the following formula:
L= 10 lg )()( 1
1
2 dBr
r a (applied to the road source)
In which:
L: reduction of noise at a distance r2 from the noise source
r1: distance of the typical sound-source level (r1 = 8m)
a: coefficient mentioned the impact of noise absorption by terrain (a = 0.1 - ground
grass, no obstruction)
Source: Pham Ngoc Dang 2003. Air environment. Science and Technology Publishing
House, 2003.
The noise attenuation over the range of trees (Section 3.1.3.2); in case of
project, averaging takes z = 4, the distance between the tree length is 2.5m; =
0.15. As a result, Lcx = 7.5dBA.
The noise reduction through a brick wall: Surround of permanent buildings such as
schools, temples ... there’s the brick wall fence, give effect of reducing the noise
impact level of about 12dBA.
Results are presented in Table 3.21.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
125
Table 3.21. Noise Impact Arising from Construction Activities of Project
No Subject / location Distance (**)
(m)
Exceed the permissible limit according to QCVN
26/2010/BTNMT (dBA) Nearest construction
item Min (6-21h) Max (6-21h) Min (21-6h) Max (22-6h)
1
KDC (Km44+000 ÷ Km44+200, Km44+400 ÷
Km44 +900, Km45+100 ÷ Km46+100, Km47+700,
Km47+950, Km51+200 ÷ Km52+200, Km52+400 ÷
Km52+900, Km53+100 ÷ Km53+700, Km54+100,
Km55+100, Km56+150 ÷ Km56+800, Km57+600,
Km58+080, Km58+300 ÷ Km59+400, Km59+900,
Km61+300 ÷ Km61+600)
10 0 2.2 10.1 17.2 NH39-1(expanded
section), bypass line
2 KDC (Km48+250, Km48+600, Km52+700,
Km55+300) 10 0.0 3.5
9.7 18.5 Bridge road
3 Residential are near the Go bridge
10 0 2.2 10.1 17.2 Approach road of Go
bridge
4 Pham Kinh An kindergarten (*) 40 5.0 12.1 - -
Construction of
NH39-1 line
5 Primary School of Hung Nhan town (*) 50 4.1 11.2 - -
6 Tran Thu Do Secondary School (*) 60 3.3 10.4 - -
7 Health center of Hung Ha town (***) 80 2.1 9.2 12.1 19.2
8 Hung Ha District Commissioner (*) 80 2.1 9.2 - -
9 People Committee of Hung Ha town (*) 100 1.1 8.2 - -
10 Hung Ha Post Office Km58+040(*) 80 2.1 9.2 - -
11 Historical monument such as Linh Sơn pagoda, Cau 100 1.1 8.2 - -
Environmental impact assessment report
126
No Subject / location Distance (**)
(m)
Exceed the permissible limit according to QCVN
26/2010/BTNMT (dBA) Nearest construction
item Min (6-21h) Max (6-21h) Min (21-6h) Max (22-6h)
palace (*)
12 Pagoda at Km46+900(*) 40 5.0 12.1 - -
13 Pagoda at Km48+900(*) 80 2.1 9.2 - -
14 Ethnic church Km56+620(*) 30 6.2 13.3 - -
(*) Special Zone
(**) The distance to the edge of the road
(***) With the exception of hospital, other special areas are inactive at night.
Environmental impact assessment report
127
Based on the sensitivity to noise, identified two groups affected, including:
Common area: During the day, the residential areas will not be affected by noise
pollution when using machines with low-level sound source, will be affected by
noise impact exceed the permissible limit from 2.2 ÷ 3.5dBA when using high-
level sound source. At night the noise impact these objects exceed the permissible
limit from the 9.7 ÷ 18.5 dBA. In which the noise level caused a strong impact on
residents living in first block, the noise level has been limited in the behind block
due to the front block. The effect does not take place continuously, only when
operating the equipment.
Special area: During the day, special areas will be affected by noise with noise
level exceeding the permissible limit 1.1 ÷ 13.2 dBA. At night, Hung Ha township
health center will be affected by noise with noise level exceed the permissible limit
from 12.1 dBA (when using the machinery with low noise level) to 19.2 dBA
(when using the machinery, equipment with high level of sound sources). The
effect does not take place continuously, only when operating the equipment
Impact level: Medium
Figure 3.4. Specification areas are affected by noise pollution in
construction stage
Van Nam pagoda KDC Km44+200
Environmental impact assessment report
128
Pham Kinh An secondary school Interchange of Hung Nhan bypass
KDC Km55+300
Dong Tu pagoda
Environmental impact assessment report
129
b. Due to vibration effects
To predict the level of vibration attenuation with distance, using the formula:
L = L0 – 10log (r/r0) – 8.7a (r – r0) (dB)
In which:
L is the vibration in dB at a distance "r" meters to the source;
L0 is vibration in dB measured at a distance "r0" meters away from the source. Vibration at a
distance r0 = 10m often recognized as vibration source;
a is intrinsic vibration reduction coefficient wit clay foundation about 0.5.
Forecast results are presented in Table 3.22.
Table 3.22. Decreasing Vibration Level with Distance from the
Construction Activity
Item
Maximum value
of vibration at
source (r0=10m)
(dB)
Vibration level at the distance (*)
(dB)
r=10m r=12m r=14m r=16m
Operation of construction
machinery and equipment 82 39.1 29.9 20.8 11.8
TCVN 6962:2001, the permissible level of 75dB from 7 19h and the background level from
22 6 pm.
DIN 4150, 1970 (Germany), 2mm/s: no damage; 5mm/s: mortar damaged; 10mm/s: have the
ability to damage the bearing detail; 20 40mm/s: damage to bearing detail.
(*)The distance from the edge of the road
Compare the results predicted with the permissible limit in QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT
show that the largest vibration arising from construction earthworks is rollers. The
residential areas are located 10m from the edge of the road at least should not be
affected. Impact is negligible.
Impact level: Small
3.3.3. Impact to Water, Sediment Environment
3.3.3.1. Waste / Waste-generating Activities and Impact Factors
The following activities created generated waste with potentially affect to water,
sediment object in the project area, including:
From the construction activities of upgrades, renovation and expansion of the road:
o Construction of earthwork through ponds, channel causing water encroachment
and give rise to TSS, turbidity; causing land overflow and sediment of erosion
products.
Environmental impact assessment report
130
o Construction of drainage systems cause land overflow and sediment of erosion
products
From active construction of bridges on the route:
o The sediment caused by erosion;
o Drilling mud arising from construction activities of bored pile abutment and
piers located in and close the edge flow (Nai and Dong Tu bridge, Go bridge);
o Construction of the lower part of bridge arising solid waste;
o Construction of the upper part bridge with the risk of spillage of solid waste;
o The required clearance of river after construction by garbage and the solid waste.
From the construction site activities:
o Operation of vehicle maintenance stations generates waste oil;
o Operation of worker camps rise garbage;
o Spillage runoff through surface swept the dirt;
o Operation of cement concrete mixing plant generates waste water.
a. Mud flow caused by erosion at the construction site
In the process of construction of foundation, pavement has been not yet asphalt, slopes
have been not yet planted with grass or stone, the rainfall will cause erosion. On the
basis of the project area rainfall, slope and soil composition, applied the soil erosion of
hill without trees for not reinforced road is 2.5 cm / year and the soil is piled in
construction of the bridge abutment is 0.4% (Nguyen Thi Ngoc An. Ecosystems and
Environment. Agriculture Publishing House, 1997), to predict the relative amount of
potential soil erosion arising in the construction area (Table 3.23).
Table 3.23. Predicted Annual Amount of Soil Erosion, Corrosion by
Rainfall in the Earthwork Land by the Items of Project
No Item Area
(m2)
Pit earthwork
Total of potential
soil erosion
(tons / year)
Potential soil
erosion per
meter
(tons / year)
I Road
1 Hung Nhan bypass 26 3,478 0.89
2 NH39 - 1 expanded
section 12 5,559 0.37
II Bridge
Environmental impact assessment report
131
No Item Area
(m2)
Pit earthwork
Total of potential
soil erosion
(tons / year)
Potential soil
erosion per
meter
(tons / year)
1 Nai bridge 2,941.06 19
2 Le bridge 8,203.48 45
3 Nai bridge 332.6 4
4 Dong Tu bridge 557.2 5
5 Go bridge 5,084 203.6 0.48
b. Drilling mud arising from construction activities of bored piles
The foundations of the piers of Nai and Dong Tu bridge, Go bridge were constructed
by technology of bored piles using bentonite. Pursuant to the pile size and quantity of
each abutment bored piles and piers, determined the amount of bentonite-mixed soil
and spillage bentonite arising in the process of Nai bridge construction is 1,625m3 and
of Dong Tu bridge construction is 1,098m3, Go bridge is 1,087m
3 (Table 3.24).
Table 3.24. Drilling Mud Arising from Construction Activities of Bored
Piles
No Item Bentonite-mixed soil (1)
(m3) Spillage bentonite
(2) (m
3) Total
1 Nai bridge 1,161 464 1,625
2 Dong Tu bridge 785 314 1,098
3 Go bridge 777 310.8 1,087.8
Total 2,723 1088.8
Note:
(1) Defined as the volume of drilling in the ground;
(2) In the process of construction of bored piles using bentonite by means of reverse circulation
construction there will be about 60% of the original bentonite is recycled through the recirculation
tank, in addition to the small part penetrated into the soil in the drill hole, the 40% remaining is
lost in the form of spillage liquid.
c. Solid waste scattered in the upper part of bridge construction
When construction of the upper part of the bridge there will appear the risk of spillage of
solid waste into the below river. Generally, solid waste includes the following categories:
broken concrete, mortar, wood chips or even scrap iron and steel, plastic, wrapping
equipment, household waste. With such components, the type of solid waste entirely may
cause adverse impact to water quality and sediment of the river or channel.
d. Solid waste that is not collected after construction
Environmental impact assessment report
132
Including steel crank around piers and materials of works temporarily in the flow, due
to the construction of the upper part... of the Nai bridge, Le bridge and Dong Tu
bridge. These materials are likely to cause pollution of the river and channel sediment.
e. Oil and waste oil arising from the maintenance operation
Oil and waste oil generated at the site is available from three sources:
Waste oil from routine change oil transportation facilities and equipment;
Domestic oil maintenance motorcycle;
Oil cloth from the operation of motorcycles and general maintenance activities.
Waste oil waste oil is expected on every media (7 liters / replace) and cycle instead
(117 car shifts /time change). According to the calculation results, the amount of all
vehicle construction projects is 30,994 cases of car; the amount of waste oil was
1854.34 liters of waste oil with 77.26 liters of waste oil / month. Waste oil will be
contained in the camps where the motorcycle gathering in the site layout.
Vehicle maintenance activities may take place at the yard motor in the field supply of
11 m3 / day wastewater containing oil (table 3.25). Oil content in the permissible limit
according QCVN 40/2011/BTNMT, column B when poured into the water used for
irrigation (Cmax = C x Kq x Kf ).
Hazardous solid waste arising from activities change oil, maintenance of equipment.
The waste is hazardous solid wastes containing oil (oil cloth, cover ...). There are also
a number of hazardous solid wastes such as light bulbs, batteries ... However, this
amount is very small and are also collected. It is difficult to quantify this waste due to
their amount depends on the number of machines and equipment used, the intention of
the contractor has carried out maintenance of machinery and equipment at the site or
not... Experience shows that a large amount of them are not. This type of waste is
generated every day in the public sector construction.
Table 3.25. Wastewater Flow and Load from the Maintenance Operation of
Machinery
Waste type Discharge
(m3/ day)
Concentration of contaminants
COD (mg/l) Oil (mg/l) SS (mg/l)
Maintenance of machinery 2 20 30 – 50 80
Cleaning of machinery 5 50 80 1.0 2.0 150 200
Cooling of machinery 4 10 20 0.5 1.0 10 50
Total 11 30 ÷ 49 0.6 ÷ 1.3 81 ÷ 124
QCVN 40:2011/BTNMT, column A C=50 C=5 C=50
QCVN 40:2011/BTNMT, column B C=100 C=10 C=100
Environmental impact assessment report
133
Note: A specified column C values of the parameters of pollutants in industrial wastewater is discharged
into the receiving water is used for drinking water supply purposes; column B specified C value of the
pollution parameters in the industrial waste water discharged into the receiving water is not used for water
supply purposes.
f. Domestic sewage
Domestic sewage from worker camps, including water from water used for preparing
meals (VNA) and from water used for washing, cleaning (VTG). Based on the level of
water applied to the construction workers in the field in TC 20TCN 4474 - 87 "norms
water used for preparing meals" is 25 liters / person / day and by TC 20TCN33 - 85
"norms water used for washing "is 45 liters / person / day and 80% of water use will be
discharged into the environment, the amount of sewage in the environment is 2.8 m3
(corresponding to 50 workers).
Based on the load factor of the contaminants in urban sewage of the World Health
Organization, WHO, 1993. Volume 1. "The rapid assessment method of
environmental pollution" has identified the pollutant load in the environment resonate
with 50 workers (Table 3.26) and the concentration of the contaminant (Table 3.27) in
wastewater activities of the project construction workers.
Table 3.26. Load Factor and Amount of Contaminants in Urban Sewage
No Contaminant Load factor (g/person/day) Load (kg/day)
1 BOD5 45 ÷ 54 4,5 ÷ 5,4
2 Total of solid (TS) 170 ÷220 17 ÷ 22
3 Coliform 106 ÷ 10
9 10
8 ÷ 10
11
Table 3.27. Concentration of Pollutants in Sewage
No Parameter Pollutant concentration (mg/l) Cmax (QCVN
14:2008/BTNMT) Non-treatment Through septic tanks
1 BOD5 281.2 337.5 62.5 125 60
2 TSS 437.5 906 31.2 134.5 1,200
3 Total Coliform (MNP/100ml) 0.6.107 0.6.10
10 – 5,000
Note: Cmax = C. K
CBOD = 50mg/l, CTSS = 100mg/l (applied column B, Table 1, QCVN 14:2009/BTNMT - water
not used for drinking water supply)
K = 1.2 - the basis of production of less than 500 people.
We can see, as soon as sanitary wastewater was pre-treated by septic tanks, sewage
contaminants in the from worker camps still exceeded Cmax by QCVN 14:2008 /
BTNMT with K = 1.2 with manufacturing facilities under 500 people many times
Environmental impact assessment report
134
when waste water type B according QCVN 08:2008 / BTNMT (Table 3.25). Note
that if the septic tank BOD5 concentration is about 4.5 times higher; COD - about
four times; and TSS - about 14 times. This type of waste generated daily in worker
camps in the 24 months of construction.
g. Runoff flow through the surface of the site
In the scope of the project, storm water runoff through the construction area will carry
the dirt on the surface; the mud within the site also can stream storm water runoff and
escape. This is the source of impact on the community. Rainwater runoff through
surface construction sites are limited rainfall intensity method (TCXDVN 51/2008):
Q = q. F. C.N
In which:
Q: calculation discharge (m3/s);
q: rain intensity (l/s.ha);
F: basin surface area (ha), (for the Project F=0,2ha);
C: flow coefficient. c = 0.32 with P = 2; c = 0.34 with P = 5; c = 0.37 with P = 10; c = 0.4
with P = 25; c = 0.44 with P = 50);
N: rainfall distribution coefficient, (on the surface, N = 1);
Rainfall intensity calculated (q) is determined by the formula: q= A(1+ClgP)/(t+b)n
In which:
q: rain intensity (l/s.ha);
t: precipitation calculation time (minutes); in the case of storm water runoff on the surface
of t there is no drainage system in the range of 8 ÷ 12 minutes, averaging 10 minutes;
P: periodic repeat of the calculation rain (year);
A,C,b,n- parameter determined by the local rainfall conditions (under Appendix II,
TCXDVN 51/2008, in the Pacific region: A = 5220; C = 0.45; b = 19 and n = 0.81).
The result of the calculation of storm water runoff at the site shown in Table 3.28.
Table 3.28. Rainwater Runoff Through the Construction Area of Project
Cycle repeat of the calculation rain (P) 2 5 10 25 50
Rainfall intensity q (l/s.ha) 387.5 448.6 494.9 556.0 602.2
Water discharge Q (m3/s) 124 152 183 222 265
3.3.3.2. Impact Assessment
a. Risk of spillage land and sediment erosion products in the construction of
earthworks and construction of horizontal drainage system
Environmental impact assessment report
135
When digging, this risk appears:
Spillage land; and
Sedimentation soil surface products not reinforced to prevent soil at the construction
site background with water (due to rain or water make wet).
Spill potential erosion products entering the pond, ditches will affect the water supply
for irrigation and fish farming in the following aspects:
Reduced water from agricultural land led by heart settle to the bottom of ponds, canals;
Increased suspended solids by diffuse soil sedimentation in water bodies.
Ponds, irrigation canals may be impacted including: pond (Km44+880, Km45+850,
Km45+960, Km47+620, Km47+700, Km48+100, Km48+200, Km51+020, Km51+140,
Km51+240, Km51+340, Km51+400, Km51+840, Km52+080, Km52+900, Km53+460,
Km53+480, Km53+720, Km54+010, Km54+840, Km54+900, Km56+100, Km58+200,
Km58+300, Km58+400, Km61+380, Km61+900, Km62+300), irrigation canal
(Km53+000, Km53+070, Km54+370, Km54+500, Km54+660, Km57+910,
Km59+450, Km59+960, Km61+600).
These are potential risks during the construction of the expansion of NH39 - 1 and Hung
Nhan bypass.
Impact level: Medium
Environmental impact assessment report
136
Figure 3.5. Ponds and irrigation canals affected by construction of
earthworks and horizontal drainage system
b. The risk of water pollution, sediments and river ecosystems Sa Lung river
and the river Hoang Nguyen, Hoai river by construction of bored piles in and
adjacent flow - required mitigation measures
The foundations of the piers of Nai bridge and Dong Tu bridge, Go bridge will be
constructed by bored piles using bentonite. Soil and bentonite and bentonite spill
arising in the process of building the bridge as liquefied mud by continuous pumping
water in drilling time. Under construction, construction activities abutment cylinder
with a bored pile construction technology that uses bentonite must be conducted within
or by earth or steel fins to ensure no spillage of contaminants into the environment and
all the liquefied soil and bentonite although and spilled bentonite required to be
collected and handled according to recommendations of the following forms:
For unless (open) land: Land and liquid bentonite spite and bentonite spill will be
pre-treated in a yard. Preliminary to dry and transport gradually to dump in the
regulations;
Pond Km51+840 Pond Km52+080
Canal Km51+700
Environmental impact assessment report
137
For piers in or adjacent flow: Land and liquid bentonite despite and spilled bentonite
or will be transferred to barges transferred or posted to the dump yard on the banks
to dry and then transported transfer to pour in the prescribed place.
However, in many cases, due to failure to adhere to the construction, drilling mud
spilled into the environment, even being discharged directly into the environment. Soil
and bentonite and bentonite spill if the infiltrated water Sa Lung river and Hoang
Nguyen river, Hoai river will increase the suspended solids in the water. Aquatic
organisms in the region will die due to asphyxiation. Due to poor mobility, benthic risk
of asphyxiation caused not only death but also can be destroyed by burying;
Impact level: Medium
Figure 3.6. Construction area of Nai Bridge and Dong Tu bridge
Thai Su river Nai Bridge
Environmental impact assessment report
138
c. The risk of water pollution, solid waste sediments by rivers in the bridge
construction - required mitigation measures
When construction on the bridge will appear the risk of spillage of solid waste flow at
the bottom. Generally, solid waste includes the following categories: broken concrete,
grout, wood chips or even scrap steel, plastic, wrapping equipment, household waste.
With such components, the type of solid waste entirely may cause adverse impacts to
water quality and sediment of river flow when they enter.
Impact level: Medium
d. The risk of pollution of surface water and sediment of the river by solid waste
not collected after construction
After construction, reverting the river flows, including the collection's steel crank
around the piers in the flow of materials and temporary works in the river, across the
construction of the lower part, the part due to the construction of the ... is not a
complete implementation will be causing water pollution and river sediments. This
risk is only lost when the revert is done perfectly.
Impact level: Medium
e. The risk of penetrating oil and waste oil from motorcycle maintenance stations
Dong Tu bridge
Environmental impact assessment report
139
in the layout - required mitigation measures
As stated above, due to the concentration of waste oil in waste water maintenance in
permissible limit by QCVN 40:2011 / BTNMT the risk of oil pollution will be
evaluated according to two sources:
Waste oil from routine change oil;
Rags from maintenance activities.
With a reason Project waste oil from entering the river will flow because his look
water pollution. Rag top after a time will settle to the bottom, outside pollute bottom
sediments, oil from rags to come out from and diffusion out of the water, make
strawberry wine on the surface of the water, pollute the water. Source of waste oil is
toxic to aquatic species in the country. Through the food chain, the oil will accumulate
from the low-level organisms (algae, phytoplankton) to the high-level creatures (fish
species, fish ...).
In addition, because the project area irrigation ditch systems are connected with each
other so as to penetrate the river water, the oil will spread and spread out the field area
through the irrigation ditch system. Water pollution by oil causing damage not only to
objects adjacent farming, but also more distant objects.
The risk of pollution-long lifetime to serve the construction site, even longer lasting if
no measures to collect clean oil and oil rags when detected they appear in the heart of
the river.
Impact level: Medium
f. Risk of waste water penetration from worker camp area - required mitigation
measures
At each worker camps in the site layout will be about 50 workers. Estimated at each
camp will be respectively 2.8 2,8m3 of waste water and solid waste 25kg activities
(for details see section waste management). Wastewater concentrations of BOD5,
COD and TSS exceed Cmax by QCVN14: 2008/BTNMT with K = 1.2 for production
facilities less than 500 several times when waste water B QCVN 08:2008 / BTNMT.
Impact level: Medium
g. Risk of spills of contaminants from the surface of the site due to stormwater
runoff - required mitigation measures
When surface runoff, with a flow of 0.124 ÷ 0.265 m3/s, rain likely that swept away
many of the contaminants down to the lower area outside the site, including water
resources. With diverse waste components on the surface of the site, surface water in
Environmental impact assessment report
140
the river (the Sa Lung river, Hoang Nguyen river, Le rivers, Nai river), water channels
and ponds near the contaminated site risk by oil, organic matter, solids, heavy metals
and floating objects. Effects appear in the rainy period of the year.
Impact level: Medium
3.3.4. Environmental Impact to Groundwater
3.3.4.1. Waste / Waste-generating Activities
Foundation for Nai bridge and Dong Tu bridge and Go bridge will be by bored piles
bentonite technology. As work progresses the abutment piers located in the and flush
flow will use U, I, V-shaped steel sheet piles to form a blockade to prevent water and the
layout of machinery and equipment for construction carried out within fin. Water exists
in the siege during construction with small volume, containing the contaminants from
the construction of bored piles, such as oil, grease, etc.
3.3.4.2. Impact Assessment
Groundwater pollution by sewage overflows wall drill and impacts require the
mitigation measures
Layers of water of good quality and high volume caught at depths of about 20 - 40m.
This is drinking water of the local population in the project scope.
To protect the geology below the floor collapsed when the impact from construction
activities taking place at the top, will use the casing. Diameter of the casing will be
larger borehole diameter 5 - 10cm. Length deep in the soil of the casing will be about
5m - 7m. During construction, surface water contamination in the siege will overflow
gap between the casing and drill down deep plot. When entering the ground water, the
contaminants will leach stumbled complex and polluting local groundwater in place pile
construction and can also be dispersed in the groundwater from the construction site
pile.
Effects appear during the construction of bored piles in the abutment piers Nai bridge
and Dong Tu bridge, Go bridge from within and along the flow.
Impact level: Medium
3.3.5. Impact on the Soil Environment
3.3.5.1. Impact Source / Source-generating Activities
The following activities create impact factors likely to influence the soil environment in
the project area, including:
Environmental impact assessment report
141
Digging and storing materials: Erosion by rain, local flooding, land spill;
The school's activities and operation of media: soil pollution, soil compaction;
3.3.5.2. Impact Assessment
a. Soil pollution by waste oil, require mitigation measures
Land occupied temporarily the site and the land around the construction area (Nai
Bridge, Nại Bridge, Dong Tu Bridge, Go bridge) and construction area (Km48+000;
Km54+500) at risk of pollution by waste oil and waste oil if a spill occurs. When
agricultural land has been intensive in-law will interfere with the absorption of the
food of the roots. Modification these lands for cultivation for safe products can be very
expensive in terms of money and time. Potential risk of oil spill treatment during the
24 months of construction, but the consequences of the oil spill to the long-term if
there is no appropriate treatment measures.
Impact level: Medium
b. Soil Pollution by solid waste - require mitigation measures
Also limited in land occupied temporarily the site and the land around the construction
area. Normal solid wastes not leave hazardous and long-term consequences for the
environment as land for waste oil and oil waste. However, for the purpose of use of
land for cultivation, the appearance of solid waste or construction waste can cause land
degradation, to break the structure of the upper layer of the soil, changing the
mechanical properties of soil or cause odors or create conditions for insects,
pathogenic micro-organisms developed. Spatial extent of the impact is not large as for
cases of contaminated soil in the early time range extending similar, a comment is
subject to the indirect effects the growth of plants on land.
Impact level: Medium
c. Product sedimentation potential soil erosion caused by rain in the digging area
and material storage, soil type - required mitigation measures
Agricultural land is very sensitive to the state of sedimentation. When the cover layer 10
cm thick rice crops, especially young rice can damage and even premature death.
Potential for soil erosion in road construction if sediment down the cultivated lands, the
extent of damage (10cm thick coating) and the incidence according to the width of about
3m each party. Potential impacts during construction of the road, concentrated in the
rainy season.
For agricultural land
Environmental impact assessment report
142
The agricultural land around the dump materials will be buried by the spill (fields at the
stations of Km44+000 ÷ Km44+400, Km45+080 ÷ Km45+280, Km51+000 ÷
Km52+480, Km53+900, Km54+500 ÷ Km54+900, Km59+600, Km59+900 ÷
Km61+300, Km61+900 ÷ Km62+180, Km62+300), fruit gardens at the stations of
(Km46+300, Km46+900 ÷ Km47+500, Km54+220, Km54+700, Km58+640,
Km59+300, Km61+400, Km61+400, Km62+550, Km62+780 ÷ Km63+000).
Although the limited scope of influence than in the case of potential sediment erosion
products due to rain, but the impact is larger due to the materials buried structured
should not just kill plants but also alter the mechanical properties of soil. Their potential
impact extends throughout the period of construction of embankment. Due to the
specific location of the dump material can not be clarified in step up investment projects
should not determine the type and location of land affected
For residential land
Limit in residential areas is lower than the construction of roads within the project
route. Sedimentation potential soil erosion will result in wetlands of residential land,
not only adversely affect the environmental landscape but also interfere with
community activities.
Impact level: Medium
d. Degradation of agricultural land due to local flooding
Agricultural lands are at risk of local flooding as the land is located along the route,
which is limited by the high road and the bank.
Risk of flooding takes place when and when not enough rain water drainage system.
Time of the flooding does not extend the project area due to dense canal system, the risk
of soil acidity, reduced fertility, reduced soil microorganisms and affect the balance of
soil biochemical cycle by flooding lasted unlikely. But, in terms of deadly flooding rice
in construction fields Business Activities was serious. Will take measures to minimize
the impact.
Impact level: Medium
Environmental impact assessment report
143
Figure 3.7. Area with risk of locality flooding
e. Impact due to operation of construction means creating the risk of ground
Construction activity on the surface of the growth and movement of the transporter
along the external land for the project will create availability compacted soil. In the
construction process, is difficult to avoid completely the construction means
encroachment into the adjacent agricultural land corridor clearance causing the
ground. Compacted soil becomes recession, pet bottle broken by the structure, porosity
and permeability reduction. Location probability compressed high land is arable lands
along regional lines and construction sites.
Impact level: Medium
3.3.6. Impact on Ecosystems
3.3.6.1. Impact Source / Source-generating Activities
The activities of the project to create the type of waste generated is likely to affect
wetland ecosystems, including:
Construction activity levels in dust;
Works construction Nai bridge, Le bridge, Nai bridge, Dong Tu bridge, Go bridge
rise scattered solid waste;
Works of construction sites give rise to waste oil, waste water, waste water, waste
oil,
Flooded area
Rice field
Hung Nhanh Bypass
Environmental impact assessment report
144
3.3.6.2. Impact Assessment
Impacts on terrestrial ecosystems due to dust pollution are present in Items 3.3.1. Air
pollution. In this items only present the impacts on aquatic ecosystems due to the
construction of the bridge and construction site.
a. Affect aquatic ecosystems due to solid waste generated during the construction
of the bridge’s superstructure - required mitigation measures
When construction horizontal beam dump, beam assembly and pour the deck will
appear the risk of spillage of solid waste flow at the bottom (not counting risk
incidents collapsed). Generally, solid waste includes the following categories: broken
concrete, grout, wood chips or even scrap steel, nylon, wrap equipment, waste The
solid material accumulate on sediment surface to create a favorable environment for
pests, ecological degradation in river water and sediment Le river, Nai river, Sa Lung
river, Hoang Nguyen river, and Hoai river.
Impact level: Medium
b. Affect aquatic ecosystems due to waste oil from the operation of construction
site - required mitigation measures
Waste oil and waste oil is a hazardous waste disposal. Waste if an oil spill occurs,
although the probability of no greater or more likely to happen is spreading oily rags
containing and especially wastewater containing oil discharged into the aquatic
environment near the construction area will affect wetland ecosystems. Wetland
ecosystems may suffocate due to lack of oxygen or poisoning. Source of waste oil is
toxic to aquatic species in the country. Through the food chain, the oil will accumulate
from the low-level organisms (algae, phytoplankton) to the high-level creatures (fish
species, fish ...).
Impact level: Medium
c. The risk of penetration wastes from worker camps in schools
At each worker camps in the water near the site layout will be about 50 workers.
Estimated at each camp will be respectively 2,8m3 of waste water and solid waste
25kg activities (for details see section waste management). Wastewater
concentrations of BOD5, COD and TSS exceed Cmax by QCVN14: 2008/BTNMT
with K = 1.2 for production facilities less than 500 several times when waste water B
QCVN 08:2008 / BTNMT. Component of many solid waste to decompose organic
matter (food scraps) and persistent type (shell, plastic).
Solid waste and waste water are common and waste will be collected and handled in
Environmental impact assessment report
145
accordance with Decree 59/2007/ND - CP on solid waste management. However, if
this waste into surface water sources are not only organic contaminants but also
floating objects. Areas where polluted waste water are at risk of eutrophication, toxic
or die for wetland ecosystems.
Impact level: Medium
3.3.7. Traffic
3.3.7.1. Impact Factor
Road activities in the project area may be interrupted or accident occurs due to factors
arising from the following activities:
Construction to expand, upgrade and renovate the project;
Execute from Hung Nhan bypass;
Construction the new bridges near the old ones;
Construction 02 intersections of the line to Hung Nhan bypass;
Transportation of materials and soil type in QL39-1 and the local roads.
3.3.7.2. Impact Assessment
a. Affect the traffic on existing alignment
The project will be constructed sequentially in the form of extended lane before
construction, transportation is arranged on its present course, after finishing the
extension, construction projects in a half of the cross road, traffic are arranged on the
other half and expand new lanes. Then, the traffic continues to be transferred to the
half-finished road construction and new lane to continue construction of half-remain of
road.
Thus, construction activities of widening the road-bed will occupy a part of existing
road, cause of traffic congestion and latent risk of traffic accidents. The excavation
activities may also cause soil spills, mud on the road, when it rains will cause of
slippery and not be safe the traffic. In addition, the mud spilled into the street cause by
dust and obstruct the vision will be also risk of the traffic unsafe.
The activity that has great impact on transport on the road is construction o road-
surface by concrete cement. This activity is expected to execution by each side and
follows each section to ensure the traffic. However, during the construction stage of
the road, more than half of road will be occupied and the rest is very narrow. Thus
traffic congestion is forecasted to happen even is severely if the passageway is not
ensured and does not have guidance.
Environmental impact assessment report
146
Impact level: High
b. Impacts on movement and living activities of people along the roadsides
The roadbed earthwork activities through the residential areas will obstruct the movement
of the people living along the roadside. The drainage ditches are not complete with full
cover may cause the risk of accidents and affect the lives and health.
The impacts may have potential rick at the residential area (Km44+000 - Km44+200,
Km44+400 - Km44 +900, Km45+100 Km45+800 (right side), Km45+800 -
Km46+100, Km47+700, Km47+950, Km51+200 - Km52+200, Km52+400 -
Km52+900, Km53+100 - Km53+700, Km54+100, Km55+100, Km56+150 -
Km56+700, Km56+800 - Km57+500, Km57+650, Km57+800, Km58+080,
Km58+300 - Km59+400, Km59+900, Km61+300 - Km61+600, Abutment of Go
bridge), especially in some administrative agencies as: Hung Ha town Medical station,
Hung Ha district Party Committee, Hung Ha town PC, Hung Nhan primary school,
Tran Thu Do secondary school etc.
Impact level: Medium
c. Impacts due to construction of 02 intersections
Encroachment of traffic during the construction corridor intersections to arrange the
items as Posts construction materials, vehicles & construction brings up the risk of
traffic jams even unsafe traffic. In addition to increased volume of the project involved
the construction vehicles at intersections and existing roads makes traffic congestion
worse. Potential impacts are during all of construction stage.
Impact level: Medium
Figure 3.8. Are around the interchanges of Hung Nhan bypass
Beginning Interchange Ending Interchange
Environmental impact assessment report
147
d. Impact due to the construction of the new bridge
05 new bridge are proposed to construct at downstream or upstream of the old bridge.
During the construction of the new bridge, remains the old bridge to ensure traffic.
However, due to the flow of car traffic is quite large, in the process of construction of
bridges are hard to avoid completely the construction equipment across the range of
construction and affect the traffic, which can cause traffic jams and traffic safety in the
construction of the bridge.
Impact level: Medium
e. Impact on production and trading
The traffic jams would hinder business activities of trade due to the mentality of
people when passing through the area just wanted to go fast to avoid causing traffic
jams so the amount the client will decrease. Besides, traffic jams and increase the wait
time of traffic participants, affects their work and activities. The risk of jams just
terminate non-operating construction equipment.
Impact level: Medium
f. Impact on road transport activities due to material handling
f1. Increase the risk of traffic accidents due to transportation activities spilled material
to cause mud, slippery
Vehicles for materials, construction waste from the area when the traffic on the route
will glue to put adhesive on the tires. Fall and land on the road will be born of dust and
contact with water will liquefy. Liquid mud on the road surface creating slippery
conditions and increases the risk of traffic safety. Not only collision occurs between
vehicles on the road and construction vehicles, but also can occur between the vehicles
together. This risk may occur in the transport road NH39-1, PR224, PR455, PR223,
PR226, and inter-village roads etc.).
Impact level: Medium
f2. Transportation on low-level road damage to public utilities
In step up investment projects because it is not possible to accurately determine the
inter-village or remote is used to transport waste to the impact on public utilities in
transit are only predictions. Accordingly if you use or remote areas related to transport,
the impact on public utilities mainly:
Damage, sugar degradation during construction;
Damage completely if after construction not revert.
Or damage, indirect damage to local people use daily deal. This frustrating place for
Environmental impact assessment report
148
the duration of construction and longer lasting if or no refund at least as the initial
state.
Impact level: Medium
3.3.8. Impact on the Landscape of the Historical
3.3.8.1. Impact Factor
The value of the Historical monument of Linh Son pagoda Cau palace and National
historical culture area of Tran Thu Do Great tutor and Tran Thi Dung Temple of the
country’s mother near the Project can be harmed by the construction forces.
3.3.8.2. Impact Assessment
Affecting the Historical monument of Linh Son pagoda Cau palace can be
harmed by the construction forces
The historical monument of Linh Son pagoda Cau palace and National historical
culture area of Tran Thu Do Great tutor and Tran Thi Dung Temple of the country’s
mother near the Project. Labor force of the project accidentally or unintentionally
cause harm to the value of action historical relics, including cutting down trees,
damaging the value of the object by:
No respect for the tangible and intangible value of the relic;
Not fully educated on the requirements brought to legally protect the historical
value, especially historical relics have been classified;
Labor management plan of the project closely.
Impact level: Medium
3.3.9. Impact by Concentration of Workers
3.3.9.1. Impact Factor
With a concentration of about 50 workers in each construction site during construction
stage will give rise to problems such as:
Generating infectious diseases;
Generating the conflict;
3.3.9.2. Impact Assessment
a. The risk of spread disease
Sanitary conditions are not good in the tabernacle; the tent in the public sector will
lead to diseases such as dengue fever, eye ... of the workers, then spread into the
Environmental impact assessment report
149
surrounding residential areas. In addition, there is the possibility of the risk of spread
of infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS have indiscriminate sex with prostitutes.
Impact level: Medium
b. Arising conflicts risk
In the project area, in addition to local residents with traditional culture highly local, and
force workers to construction workers for the plant, the company ... Due to the
difference differences in culture and lifestyle, income, food consumption, food should
be easy to give rise to a conflict between the above objects, especially the youth.
Impact level: Medium
3.3.10. Waste and Waste Processing Requirement
3.3.10.1. Type of Arising Wastes
Activities in the process of construction projects generate different types of waste,
including waste and hazardous waste services i.
Common wastes:
o Waste, solid waste from building construction activities;
o Solid waste and waste water from the operation of the worker camps.
Hazardous waste:
o Waste, solid waste from building construction activities;
o Solid waste and waste water from the operation of the worker camps..
These wastes are required to be treated in accordance with the decrees and circulars to
the State's regulations.
3.3.10.2. Assessment
a. The risk of pollution caused by conventional waste-processing requirements
Details about the number, type and composition of the common types of waste
generated are presented in Table 3.29.
Environmental impact assessment report
150
Table 3.29. Common Waste Generated in the Construction Phase
No Activities Arising waste Processing
requirement Type Component Location Time
1 Construction Waste, solid
construction
waste.
Waste rock and
soil and
bentonite –
mixed soil,
paper, scrap
wood,
concrete,
garbage…
Along the
project
24 months.
Decree
59/2007 /
ND-CP
2 Worker
activities
Solid waste
and waste
water
Bottle, cans,
food waste,
organic matter,
suspended
solids, micro-
organism...
Construction
site
24 months.
Common types of waste in construction are classified as follows:
Soil, organic mud from excavation, dredging topsoil may be used to fill the area of
growing tree;
Gravel soil, solid waste from construction materials (brick, tile, mortar, concrete,
adhesive material in excess of the time limit) can be recycled or re-used as backfill
material for the construction works;
The solid waste in the form of glass, steel, wood, paper packaging, reusable.
They will be collected, stored and transported in accordance with the contract between
the Project Owner and the Urban Environment Company. The time of solid waste
storage is not more than 2 days. The solid waste will be transported by specialized
equipment to ensure the requirements of technical and safety standards, which has
been inspected and licensed by the authorities.
During the transportation of solid waste, it must not leak, spillage of waste, causing the
dust, odors emission.
Impact level: Medium
a1. The risk of environmental pollution caused by waste rock and soil - request is
processed
Waste rock and soil is only incidental to construction items excavation and
construction of bored piles, including:
Environmental impact assessment report
151
The roads and intersections: road-bed excavation
The bridges: construction of lower part of bridges on the route.
Table 3.30 Total volume type arise and have to dismantle the construction of above
items.
Table 3.30. The Total Volume of Waste Soil Should Discard
No Item
Volume of waste soil (m3)
Time
(month)
Excavation and filling balance Bentonite
mixed soil
(3)
Bentonite
overflow
(4)
Total Excavated
soil Re-use
(1)
Waste soil
(2)
I Road and intersection 4,687.50 4,218.75 468.75 – – 468,75 24
II Hung Nhan bypass 111,052.43 99,947.19 11,105.24 – – 11,105.24 24
II Bridges
1 Nai bridge 2,941.06 2,646.95 294.11 – – 294.11 9
2 Le bridge 8,203.48 7,383.13 820.35 – – 820.35 9
3 Nai bridge 332.6 299.34 33.26 1,161 464 1,625 12
4 Dong Tu bridge 557.2 501.48 55.72 785 314 1,098 12
5 Go bridge 1,581.9 1,424 157.9 777 310.8 1,245.7 12
Total 12,935.33 2,723 1,088.8 16,747.1
Note:
(1). Reuse of land for the road based on the Demonstration Project; work for the remaining
estimated 90% of the excavated soil arising;
(2). Soil type should be emptied after digging and leveling;
(3). Is determined by the volume of drilling in the ground;
(4). In the process of construction of bored piles using bentonite by means of reverse circulation
construction will be about 60% of the original bentonite is recycled through the recirculation tank, in
addition to the small penetration into the soil in the remaining holes nearly 40% is lost in the form of
liquid spill. Bored pile construction scheme is presented in Appendix 2.
As a result, the entire project will generate approximately 16,7471.1 m3 soil type of
weight lifting, including the following types of land digging and leveling about
12,777.43 m3 of soil and bentonite around 2,723m
3 and liquid spillage bentonite of
1,088.8m3.
Impact level: Medium
a2. The risk of environmental pollution caused by solid waste in construction
This waste arising in each category of construction of the Project, including the
construction activity the lower part and the upper part of the question, complete the
Environmental impact assessment report
152
road, intersections ... this waste composition varied as sludge mill, wood chips, slag,
residue of mortar, concrete legacy ... The predicted amount of waste in each category
of construction is almost impossible to depend on many factors. Construction
supervision experience shows, they are not large but appear daily throughout the
construction period.
Impact level: Medium
a3. The risk of environmental pollution caused by domestic solid waste
Will arrange three cases in the scope of construction. In each case, about 50
construction workers involved. On average, each day each emit 0.5 kg of solid waste,
solid waste activities incurred by the forces of construction waste which is 25kg / 1 the
field. The composition of this waste consists of biodegradable organic waste (food
scraps) and other persistent waste such as cans, plastic, paper ... This type of waste
generated daily during the construction phase.
Impact level: Medium
a4 . The risk of environmental pollution caused by domestic waste water
Domestic waste water from worker camps, including water from water used for
preparing meals (Vna) and from water used for washing, cleaning (Vtg). Based on the
level of water applied to the construction workers in the field in TC 20TCN 4474 - 87
"norms water used for preparing meals" is 25 liters / person / day and by TC 20TCN33
- 85 "norms water used for washing "is 45 liters / person / day and 80% of water use
will be discharged into the environment, the amount of wastewater in the environment
is 2.8 m3 (corresponding to 50 workers).
Based on the load factor of the contaminants in urban sewage of the World Health
Organization, WHO, 1993. Volume 1. "The rapid assessment method of
environmental pollution" has identified the pollutant load in the environment resonate
with 50 workers (Table 3.31) and the concentration of the contaminant (Table 3.32) in
wastewater activities of the project construction workers.
Table 3.31. Load Factor and Load of Contaminants in Urban Sewage
No Contaminant Load factor (g/person/day) Load (kg/day)
1 BOD5 45 ÷ 54 4.5 ÷ 5.4
2 Total of solid (TS) 170 ÷220 17 ÷ 22
3 Coliform 106 ÷ 10
9 10
8 ÷ 10
11
Environmental impact assessment report
153
Table 3.32. Concentration of Pollutants in Waste Water
No Parameter Concentrations of contaminant (mg/l) Cmax (QCVN
14:2008/BTNMT) No treatment Through septic tank
1 BOD5 281.2 337.5 62.5 125 60
2 TSS 437.5 906 31.2 134.5 1,200
3 Total of Coliform (MNP/100ml) 0.6.107 0.6.10
10 – 5,000
Note: Cmax = C. K
CBOD = 50mg/l, CTSS = 100mg/l (applied column B, Table 1, QCVN 14:2009 / BTNMT - water
not used for drinking water supply)
K = 1,2 - the basis of production of less than 500 people.
We can see, as soon as sanitary wastewater was pre-treated by septic tanks, sewage
contaminants in the from worker camps still exceeded Cmax by QCVN 14:2008 /
MONRE with K = 1, two manufacturing facilities under 500 people many times
when waste water type B according QCVN 08:2008 / BTNMT (Table 3.25). Note
that if the septic tank BOD5 concentration is about 4.5 times higher; COD - about
four times; and TSS - about 14 times. This type of waste generated daily in worker
camps in the 24 months of construction.
Impact level: Medium
a5. The risk of environmental pollution caused by waste water from cement
concrete mixing station
At the construction sites will be arranged mixing station with capacity of 50m3/h.
According to norms with capacity 50m3/h, it is required 87m3 of water to wash the
aggregate and 10m3 to mix concrete; 80% of water volume will be reused afer one
time of washing material. Thus, for each batch will generate 0.55 m3 of wastewater
with a high pH (> 12).
With the concrete volume of Project of 118,544.47 m3, it is estimated:
Demand for water use: 64,962m3;
The volume of wastewater: 41,323m3;
The volume of suspended solid waste generated in wastewater: 33.06 tons (estimated
volume of solid suspended solid waste in water from mixing station is 0.08%).
Impact level: Medium
b. The risk of environmental pollution caused by hazardous waste - request is processed
Waste oil waste oil is expected on every media (7 liters / replace) and cycle instead
(117 ca car / time change). According to the calculation results, the amount of all
vehicle construction project is 30,994 cases of car, the amount of waste oil was
Environmental impact assessment report
154
1854.34 liters of waste oil with 77.26 liters of waste oil / month. Waste oil will be
contained in the camps where the motorcycle gathering in the site layout.
Vehicle maintenance activities may take place at the yard motor in the field supply of
11 m3 / day wastewater containing oil (Table 3.33). Oil content in permissible limit
according QCVN 40/2011/BTNMT, column B when poured into the water used for
irrigation (Cmax = C x Kq x Kf = 10 x 1.2 x 1.2 = 14.4).
Hazardous solid waste arising from activities change oil, maintenance of equipment.
The waste is hazardous solid wastes containing oil (oil cloth, cover ...). There are also
a number of hazardous solid wastes such as light bulbs, batteries ... However, this
amount is very small and are also collected. It is difficult to quantify this waste due to
their amount depends on the number of machines and equipment used, the intention of
the contractor has carried out maintenance of machinery and equipment at the site or
not... Experience shows that a large amount of them are not. This type of waste is
generated every day in the public sector construction.
Table 3.33. Wastewater Flow and Load from the Operation and
Maintenance of Machinery
Type of waste water Discharge
(m3/ day)
Concentrations of contaminant
COD (mg/l) Oil (mg/l) SS (mg/l)
Maintenance of machinery 2 20 30 – 50 80
Cleaning of machinery 5 50 80 1.0 2.0 150 200
Cooling of machinery 4 10 20 0.5 1.0 10 50
QCVN 40:2011/BTNMT, column A C=50 C=5 C=50
QCVN 40:2011/BTNMT, column B C=100 C=10 C=100
Note: A specified column C values of the parameters of pollutants in industrial wastewater is discharged
into the receiving water is used for drinking water supply purposes; column B specified C value of the
pollution parameters in the industrial waste water discharged into the receiving water is not used for water
supply purposes.
Impact level: High
The impacts during construction stage are summarized in table 3.34:
Table 3.34. Summaries of impacts during construction stage
Impact Location Time/Frequency Impact level
Air pollution due to dust
and exhaust gas
New Nai bridge area (Km48+600)
Le bridge (Km48+251); 9 months Medium
Road to transport the materials
(QL39-1, ĐT224, ĐT455, ĐT223,
ĐT226, and inter-village roads etc.);
24 months Medium
Environmental impact assessment report
155
Impact Location Time/Frequency Impact level
Bridge sites (Nai bridge, Nai bridge, Le
bridge, Dong Tu bridge, Go bridge) and
Road construction sites (Km48+000;
Km54+500)
24 months High
Impacts due to noise,
The residential areas and objectives
along the road 24 months Medium
Bridge sites (Nai bridge, Nai bridge, Le
bridge, Dong Tu bridge, Go bridge) and
Road construction sites (Km48+000;
Km54+500)
24 months Medium
Impacts due to vibration The residential areas and objectives
along the road 24 months Small
Water surface pollution
Ponds, irrigation canals along the
road; Medium
Cau le river (Km48+251), Sa Lung
river (Km48+600), Thai Su river
(Km52+700), Hoang Nguyen river
(Km55+320), Hoai river
(Km88+100)
9 - 12 months Medium
Groundwater pollution Nai bridge (Km52+700) and Dong
Tu bridge (Km55+320) 12 months Medium
Soil pollution
Bridge sites (Nai bridge, Nai bridge, Le
bridge, Dong Tu bridge, Go bridge) and
Road construction sites (Km48+000;
Km54+500) 24 months
Medium
Agricultural lands, garden lands,
residential lands along the road. Medium
Impact on eco-system
Cau le river (Km48+251), Sa Lung
river (Km48+600), Thai Su river
(Km52+700), Hoang Nguyen river
(Km55+320), Hoai river
(Km88+100)
9 - 12 months Medium
Along the road 24 months Medium
Bridge sites (Nai bridge, Nai bridge, Le
bridge, Dong Tu bridge, Go bridge) and
Road construction sites (Km48+000;
Km54+500)
24 months Medium
Issues on traffic
Along the road 24 months High
02 interchanges of Hung Nhan
bypass 24 months Medium
Environmental impact assessment report
156
Impact Location Time/Frequency Impact level
Road to transport the materials
(QL39-1, ĐT224, ĐT455, ĐT223,
ĐT226, and inter-village roads etc.)
24 months Medium
Impact on landscape, and
historical monuments
Areas of Historical monument of
Linh Son pagoda Cau palace and
National historical culture area of
Tran Thu Do Great tutor and Tran
Thi Dung Temple of the country’s
mother
24 months Medium
Spread of infectious
disease and conflict 11 commune/town 24 months Medium
Environment in the
mining and transportation
of materials
Along the road, minning area, along
the 24 months Small
Waste arising Along the road, Construction site 24 months Medium
3.4. Impacts in the Operation Phase
The main activities within the project are sources of impacts in the operational phase,
including:
Operation of vehicles;
Operate vehicles;
Improve the road and appear the Hung Nhan bypass.
Table 3.35 summarizes the sources of impacts related to waste and waste related
operational stage.
Table 3.35. Summary of the Sources of Impact Incurred in the Operation
Phase
No Related to waste Type of waste likely to arise
1 Activity of vehicle Dust, toxic gases (CO, NO2, SO2, VOC).
2 Activity of vehicle operation Roll-in dust
3 Overflow runoff Dirt on road
No Non related to waste Impact factor
1 Activity of vehicle Noise, vibration;
2 Appear the Hung Nha bypass Separation, local inundation
3.4.1. Air Environment
a. Generated waste
Environmental impact assessment report
157
Activities giving rise to the waste, potentially affecting ambient air quality, including:
Activity of vehicle (dust; toxis gases CO, NO2, SO2, HC);
Operation of vehicle (Roll-in dust).
b. Assessment
b1. Dust and emissions released from the operation of motor vehicles
The estimated amount of environmental pollutants from the air by burning fuel from
the operation of vehicles on the road are made on the basis of:
Cars the forecast data of the project in 2030. In which the traffic flow during peak
hours is equal to 15% of car traffic day and night (Table 3.36).
Table 3.36. Forecast Traffic Through Trieu Duong and Hung Ha Section
Year Type of vehicle Unit Trieu Duong Hung Ha
2030
Car Cars/day 891 659
<16 seats Cars/day 841 601
>16 seats Cars/day 824 302
Light truck Cars/day 1,404 1,107
Medium truck Cars/day 796 541
3 alxes Cars/day 95 196
>3 alxes Cars/day 14 50
Bicyle Cars/day 2, 660 8,139
Motorcycle Cars/day 1,391 3,538
Total PCU 10,542 10,105
Pollution coefficient of the World Health Organization (WHO) (Table 3.37)
Table 3.37. Coefficient of Air Pollution Due to Traffic WHO
Type of vehicle Unit (U) TSP
(kg/U)
SO2
(kg/U)
NOx
(kg/U)
CO
(kg/U)
HC
(kg/U)
1. Car (car and bus)
- Engine <1400 cc
- Engine 1400-2000 cc
- Engine >2000 cc
1000 km
Ton of gasoline
1000 km
Ton of gasoline
1000 km
Ton of gasoline
0.07
0.80
0.07
0.68
0.07
0.06
1.74S
20S
2.05S
20S
2.35S
20S
1.31
15.13
1.33
10.97
1.33
9.56
10.24
118.0
6.46
62.9
6.46
54.9
1.29
14.83
0.60
5.85
0.60
5.1
Medium 1000 km 0.07 2.05S 1.19 7.72 0.83
Environmental impact assessment report
158
Type of vehicle Unit (U) TSP
(kg/U)
SO2
(kg/U)
NOx
(kg/U)
CO
(kg/U)
HC
(kg/U)
2. Truck
- Gasoline truck > 3.5 tones,
- Minivan, diesel engine < 3.5 tones
- Large truck, diesel engine 3.5 -16
tones
- Huge truck, diesel engine >16 tones
- Large bus, diesel engine >16 tones
1000 km
Ton of gasoline
1000 km
Ton of oil
1000 km
Ton of oil
1000 km
Ton of oil
1000 km
Ton of oil
0.4
3.5
0.2
3.5
0.9
4.3
1.6
4.3
1.4
4.3
4.5S
20S
1.16S
20S
4.29S
20S
7.26S
20S
6.6S
20S
4.5
20
0.7
12
11.8
55
18.2
50
16.5
50
70
300
1
18
6.0
28
7.3
20
6.6
20
7
30
0.15
2.6
2.6
2.6
5.8
16
5.3
16
Average 1000km 0.9 4.76S 10.3 18.2 4.2
3. Motorcycle
Engine <50cc, 2-stroke cycle
Engine >50cc, 2-stroke cycle
Engine >50cc, 4-stroke cycle
1000 km
Ton of gasoline
1000 km
Ton of gasoline
1000 km
Ton of gasoline
0.12
6.7
0.12
4.0
0.36S
20S
0.6S
20S
0.76S
20S
0.05
2.8
0.08
2.7
0.30
8
10
550
22
730
20
525
6
330
15
500
3
80
Average 1000km 0.08 0.57S 0.14 16.7 8
Source: WHO, 1993. Assessment of source of air, water and land pollution. A guide to rapid source
inventory Techniques and their use in formulating Environmental control strategies. Part one: Rapid
Inventory Techniques in Environmental Pollution.
National technical regulation on gasoline and diesel (QCVN 1:2007 / BKHCN)
defined S sulfur content in gasoline and diesel used in transport is S = 0.05%
Results are presented in Table 3.38.
Table 3.38. Emissions from Cars by 2030 Forecast Peak Hours (mg / ms)
Year Section Unit CO NO2 SO2 HC TSP
2030 Trieu Duong mg/m.s 2.877 0.117 <0.001 0.441 0.058
Hung Ha mg/m.s 3.395 0.066 <0.001 0.497 0.041
Sutton model applied to the source line has been used to predict emissions of
pollutants from vehicles. Solution of the equation is calculated for the continuous
emission sources and infinite length (while x ) of the form:
Environmental impact assessment report
159
u
hzhzE
Cz
zz
.
2exp
2exp.8.0
2
2
2
2
(mg/m
3)
In which:
C: concentration of pollutants in the air (mg/m3);
E: load of contaminants from waste (mg/m.s);
z: height of the calculation point (m) (m);
h: height of the road surface than the surrounding ground (m) (m);
u: average wind speed (m/s);
z: diffusion coefficient of pollutant under the z z(m).
Meteorological conditions and other input data used in the model are presented in
Table 3.39.
Table 3.39. Meteorological Conditions and the Input Data Used in the
Calculation
No Item Thai Binh province
Summer Winter
1 Wind direction NE SE
2 Wind angle 45o 45
o
3 Height on road above ground 2.5m 2.5m
4 Average wind speed 1.9m/s 2.1m/s
Diffusion coefficient values pollutant z z vertical (z) with the stability of the
atmosphere in the Project area is B, is determined by the formula:
z = 0.53.x0.73
(m)
In which: x is the distance of the points calculated from original sources, with the wind
blowing, m
Forecast results are presented in Table 3.40.
Table 3.40. Forecast Distribution Pollutants from Vehicle Operations
Section Parameter Season Distribution of concentration by distance (mg/m
3) QCVN 05,
06 : 2009 5m 10m 25m 50m 100m
Trieu
Duong
CO Winter 0.33 0.289 0.208 0.145 0.094
5 Summer 0.365 0.32 0.23 0.16 0.104
NO2 Winter 0.013 0.012 0.008 0.006 0.004
0.1 Summer 0.015 0.013 0.009 0.007 0.004
SO2 Winter <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
0.125 Summer <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Environmental impact assessment report
160
Section Parameter Season Distribution of concentration by distance (mg/m
3) QCVN 05,
06 : 2009 5m 10m 25m 50m 100m
HC Winter 0.051 0.044 0.032 0.022 0.014
1.5 Summer 0.056 0.049 0.035 0.025 0.016
TSP Winter 0.007 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.002
0.2 Summer 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.003 0.002
Hung
Ha
CO Winter 0.390 0.341 0.246 0.171 0.111
5 Summer 0.431 0.377 0.272 0.189 0.123
NO2 Winter 0.008 0.007 0.005 0.003 0.002
0.1 Summer 0.008 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.002
SO2 Winter <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
0.125 Summer <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
HC Winter 0.057 0.050 0.036 0.025 0.016
1.5 Summer 0.063 0.055 0.040 0.028 0.018
TSP Winter 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001
0.2 Summer 0.005 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.001
Compare the results predicted with the PERMISSIBLE LIMIT in the QCVN 05:2009 /
MONRE and QCVN 06:2009 / MONRE found that the concentration of dust and
gases (CO, NO2, SO2, HC) arising from the combustion of less than the permissible
limit very many times.
Impact Level: Negligible
b2. Entrained dust tires of cars running on the road
Based on the traffic flow forecast (Table 3.27) and the emission of dust swept from the
World Health Organization (Table 3.32) have identified dust load arising from the
operation of vehicles on the road, the during peak hours (Table 3.41).
Table 3.41. The Emission of Dust Swept from the Road
No Type of road Unit (U) TSP (kg/U)
Paved road
1 Urban road (width < 10m, traffic < 500 cars/day) 1000 km 15
2 Urban road (width >10m, traffic 500 ÷ 10,000 cars/day) 1000 km 10
3 National highway (traffic >10,000 cars/day) 1000 km 4.4
4 Highway (traffic >50,000 cars/day) 1000 km 0.35
Source: WHO, 1993. Assessment of source of air, water and land pollution. A guide to rapid source
inventory Techniques and their use in formulating Environmental control strategies. Part one: Rapid
Inventory Techniques in Environmental Pollution.
Environmental impact assessment report
161
Table 3.42. Dust Load from Operating Vehicles
Year Section Cars in rush
hour (car/h)
emission of dust swept from
the road (kg/1000km.car)
Load of dust swept from
the road (mg/m.s)
2030 Trieu Duong 625 4.4 0.764
Hung Ha 700 4.4 0.856
Using the Sutton similar model in case of dust emissions from vehicle operations have
determined the concentration of dust and emissions arising from the operation of the
line car (dust swept from the road) (table 3.43).
Table 3.43. Forecast Distribution Pollutants from Vehicle Operation
Year Section Season
Distribution of concentration by distance
(mg/m3)
QCVN05:2009
/BTNMT 5m 10m 25m 50m 100m
2030
Trieu Duong Winter 0.088 0.077 0.055 0.039 0.025 0.3
Summer 0.097 0.085 0.061 0.043 0.028 0.3
Hung Ha Winter 0.098 0.086 0.062 0.043 0.028 0.3
Summer 0.109 0.095 0.069 0.048 0.031 0.3
Compare the results predicted with the PERMISSIBLE LIMIT in QCVN05:
2009/BTNMT found that the concentration of dust arising from the book value less
than the permissible limit many times.
Impact level: Small
3.4.2. Impact on Sound Environment
a. Impact factor
Activities operated vehicles on the road rise to noise.
b. Assessment
Noise emissions from vehicles - negligible impact
Formula predicted source noise level:
LA7 = LA7 TC + LAi . (dB) (*)
In which:
LA7 is the average equivalent noise level of the car (at a height of 1.5 m and flow axis 7.5
m);
LA7 TC is the average equivalent noise level of the vehicle at the height of 1.5 m and a flow
axis 7.5 m in standard conditions are driving on a straight and flat road. while 60% are
cars trucks and passenger cars and average running speed of 40km / h.
Environmental impact assessment report
162
LAi s the sum of the corrections for the other cases with these conditions. In the
framework of the project. coefficients of LAi are taken as follows:
o Increase or decrease 10% of trucks and passenger cars LAi = ± 0.8dBA;
o Increase or decrease average speed of vehicle by ±10km/h then LAi = ±1.5dBA;
Source: Pham Ngoc Dang, Air Environment, Science and Technology Publishing House,
2003.
From the vehicle data, the design speed (section 1.4.2.1) and the equivalent noise level
panel of the car with the standard conditions (Table 3.44) predicted source noise level
of the vehicle at a height of 1.5m and how axis lanes 7.5 m in 2035 (Table 3.45).
Table 3.44. Average Equivalent Noise Level at Standard Conditions (LA7 TC)
Vehicle flow (vehicle/h) 40 50 60 80 100 150 200 300 400 500
Noise level LA7 TC (dB) 68 68.5 69 69.5 70 71 72 73 73.5 74
Vehicle flow (xe/h) 700 900 1000 1500 2000 3000 4000 5000 10000
Noise level LA7 TC (dB) 75 75.5 76 77 77.5 78.5 79 80 81
Source: Pham Ngoc Dang, 2003, Air environment. Science and Technology Publishing House
Table 3.45. Predicted Noise Levels from Cars
Section Predicted noise level LA7 (dB)
Trieu Duong 81.5
Hung Ha 80.4
Predicted noise levels decrease with distance is based on the methods mentioned above
(details of the method are presented in Section 3.1.2.2). The results presented in Table
3.46.
Table 3.46. Results Predicted Decline with Distance (dBA)
Year of 2030
Distance (*)
5m 10m 25m 50m
Trieu Duong 78.9 77.3 74.4 71.7
Hung Ha 77.8 76.2 73.3 70.6
(*)The distance from the edge of the road.
According to the results predicted noise levels decrease with distance and decrease
over the range of trees and brick walls (the formula stated in Section 3.1.2.2. Among
them, the number is 4 strips; distance between the strip tree 3m; smoking and diffuse
sound level of greenery is 0.15; noise reduction through brick walls is 12dB) identified
noise impacts to these subjects (Table 3.47).
Environmental impact assessment report
163
Table 3.47. Noise Impact on Residential Areas in the Operational Phase
No Subject Distance (*)
Noise level (dBA) QCVN 26:2010
1
Residential areas at: (Km44+000 -
Km44+200; Km44+400 - Km44
+900; Km45+100; Km46+100;
Km47+700; Km47+950; Km51+200
- Km52+200; Km52+400 -
Km52+900; Km53+100 -
Km53+700; Km54+100; Km55+100;
Km56+150 - Km56+800;
Km57+600; Km58+080; Km58+300
- Km59+400; Km59+900;
Km61+300 - Km61+600), Go bridge
(Km88+100)
10 68.4 70
2 Pham Kinh An kindergarten 40 51.7
55 3 Primary School of Hung Nhan town 50 50.8
4 Tran Thu Do Secondary School 60 50.1
5 Health center of Hung Ha town 80 48.8
6 Hung Ha District Commissioner 80 60.7
70 7 People Committee of Hung Ha town 100 59.7
8 Hung Ha Post Office Km58+040 80 60.7
9 Historical monument such as Linh
Sơn pagoda, Cau palace
100 47.9
55 10 Pagoda at Km46+900 40 51.7
11 Pagoda at Km48+900 80 48.8
12 Ethnic church Km56+620 30 52.8
(*)The distance to the edge of the road
Compare the results predicted with permissible limit in QCVN 26:2010 / BTNMT
found that: noise level emissions from cars less than permissible limit. Impact is
negligible.
Impact level: Small
3.4.3. Impact of Overflow Runoff
a. Impact factor
In the operation phase, storm water runoff will be caught up in the dirt and heavy
metals in contaminated soil on the road.
c. Assessment
Environmental impact assessment report
164
Environment and water ecosystems contaminated by dirt and metals from
overflow runoff
Besides the dirt on the road, the amount of heavy metals in the dirt on the ground layer
detection is dependent on the mode of transport and traffic density proportional to
(Clark and colleagues studied the characteristics chemical layer of dirt on the road).
Table 3.48 presents the results of research on the chemical content in the layer of dirt
on the road.
Table 3.48. Chemical Characteristics of the Contaminated Soil on the Road
No Parameter Content (mg/ kg) No Parameter Content (mg/ kg)
1 pH 6.7 7.6 7 Cr 2 35
2 Oil 5 73 8 Cu 24 310
3 Clo 0,1 4 9 Fe 24 65
4 NO3- 3 386 10 Pb 19 553
5 SO42-
34 2700 11 Ni 2 73
6 Cd 1.3 (average) 12 Zn 90 577
Source: Clark and colleagues, the chemical properties of the contaminated soil on the road, 2000, Journal
of CIWEM
Activities in the operational phase impacts on water quality and the results presented
in Figure 3.2.
It has been calculated that the amount of dirt on the surface due to dry weather
accumulation will reach equilibrium after 10 days. After 10 days, the rate of deposition
similar movement speed caused by the turbulence of the air. The balance is maintained
until appear the phenomenon of "clean". This phenomenon is defined as the wind
speeds exceed 5.8 m / s or rain beyond 7mm/h. Rainfall cleaned very fast dirt on the
road. After 20 - 30 minutes, the concentration of contaminants in runoff when there
will not be significant. By the action takes place in a long period and build up the
quality of water, sediments of rivers and canals along the route are at risk of
contamination.
Environmental impact assessment report
165
Figure 3.9. The Impact of Activities in the Operational Phase to Water
Quality and the Consequences
Impact level: Medium
3.4.3.1. Impacts of Agricultural Land Fragmentation
a. Impact factor
Hung Nhan bypass crosses agricultural land causing fragmentation of agricultural
land.
b. Assessment
Fragmentation of arable fields
Fragmentation caused by Hung Nhan bypass crosses cut through her cultivated fields
fragmentation as states cut through, the farmers in a party very difficult to to the other
side of the way to cultivate daily. In addition, farmers have to invest more resources to
protect as well as to take care of things on it compared to a plot of the same area but
not fragmented. Impacts require mitigation measures.
Public health / Economic development
Bio-productivity
Ecosystem quality
Exhausted
dust Tires Leakage Retrograd
e
Means Asphalt pavement
Pb, Ni Rubber, Zn,
Cd, Pb, PCBs Oil,
grease Ni, oil
Activity in
the
operation
phase
Physical
and
chemical
impact
Ecologic
al
impact
Human impact
Environmental impact assessment report
166
Fig 3.10. Area ofAgricultural Land Fragmentation
Impact level: Medium
3.4.3.2. Local Flood Impact
a. Impact factor
New route is higher up than the old way.
Appear the Hung Nhan bypass.
b. Assessment
The risk of local flooding occur routes - negligible impact
Project of the lower area of Thai Binh province, in periods of heavy rain occurred
inundation in areas along the river. New route is higher up than the old road from 1.5
÷ 2.5 m will prevent water runoff from the area to the other side. Besides, the
appearance of Hung Nhan bypass will create a triangle with the existing road, the
land area is limited by the bypass and existing road, which may be flooded if it rains.
In the design process, project layout and calculate the length as well as the number of
drains (horizontal and vertical) of each region to ensure adequate drainage flow. In
addition, the consultant working with the local position, the drain aperture ensure
drainage requirements. Local flooding impacts are negligible.
Hung Nhan Bypass
Rice field
Rice field
Environmental impact assessment report
167
Impact level: Small
3.4.3.3. The positive impact of project
The project in operation will produce some benefit such as:
The project in operation, traffic in the areas will be more favorable, increasing of
vehicle speed, avoid congestion, reduce time for passenger and shipping products
are convenient, reduce traffic accidents on the existing road. This is a great benefit
that brought by project;
Saving operation cost of vehicles: Operation cost of vehicles depends on the speed
of vehicles and length of the road. This benefit is compared between 02 plans
(Improvement or not improvement of the road). Vehicles must be operated through
the existing traffic system in the region and is calculated based on the difference
between the operating speed of Improvement road and existing road. Average
currently operating speed of the vehicles on the NH39-1 is estimated about 40 -
50km/h and will down to 20 - 30km/h in 2030 when project is not construction.
The speed of vehicles on the road when the project was upgraded is estimated from
60 to 70 km/h in the last year of the project. The increase the speed will save
significant operating costs of the vehicles on the route;
The project should help to improve more transport network of the province;
Project is put into operation will contribute to improve living conditions, develop
the cultural and education due to easily access to public facilities of the people:
People can easily go to the region nearby; pupils can easily go to school...
Contributing to change the environment and landscape of community life. People
would be easier to shipping the products, thereby saving time shipping the products
between localities in Project area, improve the community living standards.
Transport development will promote the industrial development of regional
development projects are more investment, create more jobs and reduce
unemployment. Tourism network development, contributing to improve all forms
of traffic in the region, promoting the process of urbanization and industrialization.
Land along the road will be changed of used purpose and mobilize on land price,
the formation of new residential areas or spontaneity markets, trade and service
area for passers, the plan for socio-economic development of the region. The
evolution of the land areas along the road will have the fast and complex changes if
there is not strategic direction of long-term usage.
Route after putting into operation, a significant portion of agricultural land, farm
land will be transferred to other uses may be business, industrial services, urban
Environmental impact assessment report
168
residential market. The uncontrolled development as the development of
commercial or industrial belt can lead to inefficient use of land along the route.
The impacts in operation stage of project are summarized in table 3.49:
Table 3.49. Summary of impacts during operation stage of project
Impact Location Time/Frequency Impact level
Environment pollution
due to dust, exhaust gas Along the road Permanence Small
Impact due to noise and
vibration Along the road Permanence Small
Rainwater runoff Along the road Permanence Medium
Agricultural land division Hung Nhan bypass area Permanence Medium
Locality flooding Hung Nhan bypass area Permanence Small
3.5. The impact of the Risks and Incidents
3.5.1. Technical Issues
The construction of the berth on the potential risk of incident fueled the work of
engineering, especially in the installation of scaffolding and construction of piers in
the river. Technical problems if there will be a disaster not only a threat to the lives of
the forces participating in the construction.
3.5.2. Risk of Fire and Explosion
During the construction phase, oil is used for the operation of construction equipment.
Gasoline is composed mainly compound carbuahydro (96 ÷ 99%) should be able to
evaporate very fast transient surface. Ignition so easy, especially when mixed into the
air and see the sparks.
3.5.3. Labor Safety
Occupational accidents can happen in any activities in the construction process with
the employer if you fail to comply with on labor safety procedures.
In the process of building the bridge bored pile construction technology, the accident-
prone stage of labor include:
Installation of casing with vibrators;
Drilling machine.
The group main cause of occupational accidents include:
Environmental impact assessment report
169
Deficiencies in the design of technological measures: deficiencies in design
technology measures such as measures to support shuttering, anti-erosion measures
earthen walls... may lead to collapsed construction, labor accidents;
shortcomings in the organization of construction: irrational allocation of shifts,
work arrangements are not in the correct order, overlapping, use of non-standard
materials, cut the construction process...;
Technical shortcomings: machinery, vehicles, tools and a complete lack of
structure or damaged as lack of safety, lack of cover, lack of preventive warning
system...;
Violation of procedures and technical safety;
The risk caused by: transport by car accidents, slip fall on scaffolding, electrical
accidents... On rainy days increasing the risk of accidents is high due to the
slippery ground, prone to electrical problems, subsidence-prone ...
3.5.4. Natural Disasters (Storms, Heavy Rain)
As described in Chapter 2, the annual project area and tropical storm landfall directly
into the coastal provinces, but affected by rain caused by the storm is very large. These
natural disasters can cause problems at construction sites, in particular:
To increase the probability of an accident in the case of construction workers on
the bridge; especially life-threatening construction workers by lightning;
threat to the stability of the structures on high, particularly fueled new structural
construction of a rain storm;
In case of floods, if no preventive measures all construction sites located outside
the river will be flooded. Flooding not only causes damage to the project which
will create huge losses to the surrounding environment due to pollutants (oil,
gasoline, etc.) in the field under flood waters spread over a wide area.
3.5.5. Incident Caused by Detecting Mines
After implementing the clearance and prior to starting construction, the entire Project
will be detected the mine. This activity is potentially explosive incidents, threatening
human lives and their property.
3.6. Commenting on the Level of Detail, the Reliability of the Assessment
3.6.1. The Level of Detail of the Assessment
Identify the impact of the project has been built on the basis of access at each
Environmental impact assessment report
170
operation of the project in three phases of pre-construction, construction and operation
of the Project in the receiving environment project with the specific conditions nature,
natural resources and socio-economic areas. If implementation of the project will
appear the impact of temporary land occupation permanently and occupied and
encroached infrastructure; affect ambient air quality, noise, vibration, water quality,
land ; impact on traffic; impact by focusing workers and waste management control
issues; incidents due to collapsed and flooded ... In the case of non-implementation of
the Project will not appear, but the impact but limited to the socio-economic
development of the project communes.
The level of detail is also reflected in the calculation of emission sources based on data
on vehicles, machinery, materials used; applied technology; personnel comply with
project and according to the standards, standards and norms prescribed in the
legislation of Vietnam, international organizations, experience in construction of the
building society..
3.6.2. Reliability of the Assessment
3.6.2.1. Of the Forecasting Methods
List and the matrix method is used to determine the impact object and the object
affected, and indicate the level of impact, according to set requirements minimized.
Methodology and method is the basis of scientific and realistic.
Forecast-based waste facilities, machinery, materials used; applied technology;
personnel comply with the norms set by the State of Vietnam, the international
organization.
Predicting the impact and scale of the impact is determined based on the sensitivity of
the receiving object and the size of waste source. Assess the level of contamination is
done by the method of comparison between the predicted results with VNS
environment since 1998 and the Environmental QCVN 2008 as well as international
standards provisions applicable to countries development. Methodology is reasonable.
However, because there are many small changes in the implementation of the
contractor's construction and the weather changes ... In addition, a number of
quantitative and semi-quantitative methods applied in the report is the fast method,
together with the input of relative quantitative level, the results of high-precision .
Therefore, the monitoring results from the pre-construction of construction and during
construction will add less predictable impact and adjust the impact has been predicted.
3.6.2.2. About the Method
a. For emissions to air pollution
Environmental impact assessment report
171
Using Sutton model applied to the source line to predict the pollution level in the
estimated amount of dust and waste gases typical for traffic projects in regional
meteorological conditions made for Project both during construction and during
operation of the project is the traditional method. The results predict the concentration
of contaminants in the operational phase has been verified with real data measured at
the time of setting up the project. In general, the observed and predicted data is
relatively consistent. The results predict the toxic emissions from the operation of
vehicles on the road in the forecast is reliable. However, due to a number of input
parameters such as meteorological conditions are taken as the average annual values
??should the relative forecast results. The observed changes in ambient air quality in
the operational phase to the actual car will adjust forecasting results and appropriate
behavior.
b. For noise pollution emissions
Predicted source noise level and noise attenuation by distance follow textbook named
"Environmental Engineering" by Prof., Dr. Pham Ngoc Dang - Science and
Technology Publishing House, 2003. This is the method with high reliability, widely
recognized and applied in Vietnam.
Environmental impact assessment report
172
CHAPTER IV. MEASURES FOR PREVENTION, MITIGATION OF ADVERSE
IMPACTS; RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS
4.1. Measures for Prevention, Mitigation of Adverse Impacts of the Project
on the Environment during the Pre-Construction
4.1.1. Mitigation of Impacts due to Land Acquisition, Relocation and
Resettlement
4.1.1.1. Regarding Impacts due to Relocation and Resettlement
a. Description of mitigation measures
In order to mitigation adverse impacts caused by relocation and resettlement, besides
implement the Plan on Compensation, Support and Resettlement, Project owner need
consider to aspirations of displaced persons.
a1. Implementing the Compensation, Support and Resettlement Plan
The most effective mitigation measures are implementation plan for compensation,
assistance and resettlement. In this measure, the compensation policy is composed in
the manner of taking priority of the donor (WB) with the compensation and support
which will be done for all impacted persons in the compensation list prior to the date
of land acquisition and price is based on the replacement cost.
- Responsibility of the units in relation to land acquisition and resettlement and
implementation budget.
o Following Document No. 1665/TTg-CN on 17/10/2006 of the Prime Minister
on the implementation of land acquisition for transportation project
construction, land acquisition will be separated as sub-projects from project by
People's Committees of Hung Yen and Thai Binh province. People's
Committees of Hung Ha, Dong Hung and Tien Lu districts will implement
these sub-projects under direction of People's Committees of Hung Yen and
Thai Binh provinces through the Board of compensation, assistance and
resettlement of People's Committees of above districts which is established with
chairman of Boards shall be leader of above districts and members must be staff
from the affected communes, and representatives of the affected persons.
o The Project Owner shall assist the Chairman of the Board compensation,
assistance and resettlement to make plans for compensation, assistance and
resettlement; securing adequate budget for timely payment of compensation,
assistance and resettlement (cost for land acquisition is from State Budget
Environmental impact assessment report
173
Fund).
General plan of compensation, assistance and resettlement
o The general plan of compensation, assistance and resettlement of the project has
been made in to a resettlement action plan (RAP). The overall objective of RAP
is to determine the compensation and resettlement program for the project to
ultimately limit the number of people and assets affected by the project to
ensure that all affected people will be compensated for damage with
replacement cost; and, there will be recovery measures to help them improve or
at least maintain the standard of living and their ability to generate income as
before the project.
o The plan of compensation, assistance and resettlement is briefly shown in the
summary table of compensation, assistance and resettlement policies, and
matrix of rights.
o Measures to mitigate the impacts of land acquisition will be applied during land
acquisition period and completed before starting construction.
a2. Consideration of aspirations of displaced people
Taking consideration in arrangement of resettlement areas near the former place for
the involuntary displaced households.
Compensating by money to self-resettlement households, and supervision their
self-resettlement process to ensure that their compensation money is spent right
purpose.
b. Objects and implementation time
Applicable objects: displaced households.
Implementation time: completed before commencement of the project.
4.1.1.2. Regarding Impacts due to Permanent Acquisition of Agricultural Land
a. Description of mitigation measures
Households who agricultural land are permanently acquired face not only income
damage, income loss, but also the difficulties in production recovery or earning new
income sources. Therefore, it is not enough to be compensated by the cost replacing
the acquired land area. Measures for production support and income restoration plan
shall be established and implemented to ensure that the households who are taken their
land can restore their minimum income like before the acquisition. The specific
measures include:
Compensation: total area of permanently acquired agricultural land, as well as
Environmental impact assessment report
174
trees and crops on the land will be compensated with the price calculated at the
time of inventory.
Support for living stabilization:
o For households who lost 30 ÷ 70% of their production land: support for six
months for non-displaced households and 12 months for displaced ones;
o For households who lost more than 70% of their production land: support for 12
months for non-displaced households and 24 months for displaced ones.
Support for agricultural land in residential areas:
o For garden/ pond land in residential areas: support more with 30 ÷ 70% of the
price of the adjacent land plot;
o For agricultural land in residential areas: support more with 20 ÷ 50% of the
price of the adjacent land plot.
Support for career change and job creation: the households who lost their
agricultural land will be supported for career change and job creation in cash with
1.5-5 times higher than the compensation for the agricultural land.
Recruitment: for some simple jobs with low technical requirements, the project’s
Owner encourages the contractor to recruit local labors, in which households losing
their agricultural land will be preferred.
b. Objects and implementation time
Applicable objects: households whose land for rice growing and ponds along the
route are permanently acquired.
Implementation time: completed before commencement of the Project.
4.1.1.3. with regard to the impact caused by temporary misappropriation of land for
agricultural production.
a. Description of mitigation measures
Purpose is reimbursement of the damage caused by temporary misappropriation of
farmland for construction site layout will apply these measures: compensation under
the agreement: Project Owners land lease agreement for the land owners as agreed.
Land rents will be charged for both time constitute the ground temporarily for
construction and land recovery timeout (about 2 years). Revert: When no longer in
use, the temporary loan of land will be cleaned and renovated, restored according to
the original commitment before handover to the owner. Commitment: unite the
commitment to the clean-up, revert or renovating to serve other purposes. This
Environmental impact assessment report
175
commitment will be notarized at the village to secure legitimacy.
b. Objects and implementation time
Applicable objects: Owners of temporary acquisition agricultural lands
Implementation time: need to be finished before constructing the Project.
4.1.1.4. Regarding Impacts due to Relocation of Irrigation Ditches
a. Description of mitigation measures
Aiming to prevent unnecessary impacts that disturb the production activities due to
relocation of irrigation ditches, the project is committed to:
Follow the design procedures: the relocation of drainage will be carried out and
completed prior to construction of the project’s items. While building a new
irrigation ditch system, the old ones is still used to ensure no disruption to people’s
production activities. After the construction is completed, directing the water flow
from the old ditch system to the new ones. Then, the old system will be demolished
to hand over the site for construction.
Provide adequate funds: the project ensures to provide full funds for ditch
improvement (already included in the total investment of the project).
b. Objects and implementation time
Applicable objects: 4,212m improved ditches;
Implementation time: completed before commencement of the Project.
4.1.1.5. Assessment of the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual Impacts
To the best of our knowledge, at any scale, the land acquisition often makes long-term
social impacts, especially in case of relocation and resettlement, although the land is
recovered for national and public interests and the compensation is implemented
according to the compensation, support and resettlement plan with the consent of the
affected person. The fact shows that social contradictions shall be solved if the
Compensation Council can implement the followings well:
Extensively propagating about economic development policy and the compensation
policy of the state to the affected households as well as their obligations and rights;
Publicly notifying compensation price with the details of each affected assets.
Publicly posting the compensation amount for each household;
Making policies to support poor households and those under policies;
Environmental impact assessment report
176
Making policies to reward those who do hand over their site earlier than scheduled;
Establishing job creating and vocational training plan for the affected households at request;
Establishing plans to vulnerable households in dismantling and relocating to new places;
For common labors (usually unskilled ones with unstable jobs): organizing
vocational direction, training with classes for both vocational training and general
education in place to meet the need of employers in the project area. For
disqualified labors that end the age for both learning and working, they will be
requested for low-requirement jobs such as guards, vehicle keepers, cleaners, etc
and learn more at these units. However, these labors cannot be employed at the
same time, so vocational training schools with educational support shall be opened
to form groups of skilled labors.
Guiding the way of spending compensation money: most of people, upon receiving
a large amount from compensation, cannot know how to use such amount properly,
which cause waste and risk of new evils burdening the society. As a result, specific
instructions will be provided on the use of capital, especially instruction on
investment in business and production or savings suitable to each object in order to
stabilize their lives for a long time.
Clearly stating information about the project, the construction schedule to local authorities
and affected households, policy/ plan on compensation, support and resettlement;
Forming mechanisms for affected people to propose their wishes in compensation
as well as complaints and feedbacks;
The settlement of administrative procedures related to relocation is also a matter of
concern because there are still many obstacles that cause people’s lives cannot be
in order, such as: applying for conversion of business type, business licenses,
school transfer for their children, making family register, etc. The facilitation of
administrative procedures is imperative to get the proper concern from leaders to
help people stabilize their lives after the land recovery;
The project ensures adequate and timely budget for site clearance and resettlement.
In addition, in the case of the Project, (i) because local reserve land is abundant, the
most feasible and optimal measure is that households shall be relocated for
resettlement in place according to their aspirations and funds shall be provided timely
for their own resettlement; (ii) measures for minimize the impacts of infrastructure
encroachment are the commitments of the project in accordance with the construction
process not interrupting production activities; the costs for this this task have been
prepared and included in total investment of the Project.
Environmental impact assessment report
177
4.1.2. Mitigation Measures for Impacts of Site Demolition and Levelling
4.1.2.1. Dust Control during Demolition of Houses
a. Description of measures
Spraying water: when demolishing the works on the hot dry days;
Covering by canvas: Canvas shall cover the house demolishing area to prevent
dust from spreading into the surrounding area;
Transporting waste: Non-recycled waste shall be treated under the contracts
signed environmental companies.
b. Location and implementation time
Location: at house demolishing area (along the project route);
Implementation time: 1 week.
4.1.2.2. Dust Control during Site Levelling
a. Description of measures
Spraying water: spraying water at least 2 times per day. Water shall be taken from
rivers, canals near the construction site and from groundwater in the project area.
b. Location and implementation time
Location: at 6 construction sites, including bridges (Nai bridge, Nại bridge and Dong
Tu bridge) and roads (Km48+000; Km54+500).
Implementation time: 1 month.
4.1.2.3. Noise Control during Demolition of Houses
a. Description of measures
With the aim of reducing noise pollution in the residential area, the following measures
shall be simultaneously implemented:
Not demolishing and transporting scrap at night: from 10pm to 6am
Using equipments with low noise emission.
b. Location and implementation time
Location: at residential areas (Km44+000 ÷ Km44+200, Km44+400 ÷ Km44 +900,
Km45+100 Km45+800 (the right route), Km45+800 ÷ Km46+100, Km47+700,
Km47+950, Km51+200 ÷ Km52+200, Km52+400 ÷ Km52+900, Km53+100 ÷
Km53+700, Km54+100, Km55+100, Km56+150 ÷ Km56+700, Km56+800 ÷
Environmental impact assessment report
178
Km57+500, Km57+650, Km57+800, Km58+080, Km58+300 ÷ Km59+400,
Km59+900, Km61+300 ÷ Km61+600);
Implementation time: 1 week.
4.1.2.4. Noise Control during Site Levelling
a. Description of measures
Limitation on levelling time: not levelling the site at night from 10pm to 6am near
sensitive areas.
Limitation on simultaneous operation of equipments: operating only one machine,
roller or grader for levelling. Stopping the engine of unnecessary machines.
b. Location and implementation time
Location: at residential areas Km47+950;
Implementation time: 1 month.
4.1.2.5. Mitigation of Impacts on Environmental Landscape
a. Description of measures
Performing proper categorization and disposal: upon demolition, waste will be
categorized. Those which can be reused as crushed scrap, milled wood will be
collected for fuel.
Collecting and selecting temporary gathering points: the wastes generated shall be
collected and gathered at some points on the construction site. The project will sign
a contract with the environmental unit in charge of waste collection, treatment and
transportation.
b. Location and implementation time
Location: the house demolishing area along the project route and bridges (Nai
bridge, Nai bridge and Dong Tu bridge) and roads (Km48+000; Km54+500).
Implementation time: during the demolishing time (7 days) and preparation of
construction site (1 month).
4.1.2.6. Assessment of the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual Impacts
These measures are highly effective and feasible by simple techniques, dust is no
longer spread; not organizing construction at night shall eliminate noise generated at
source; turning machines off in case of unnecessary under workers’ awareness shall
make noise level at sensitive objects lower than the permissible limits in accordance
Environmental impact assessment report
179
with QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT.
The waste categorization, collection and treatment will limit the amount of soil, rocks
dumped at disposal areas. The waste collection is reasonable and solid waste treatment
measure is consistent with the requirements of the Decree No. 59/2007/ND-CP. The
proposed measures are feasible, effective and residual impacts are insignificant.
4.1.3. Request for Completing Preparatory Work for Official Construction
a. Description of mitigation measures
For the purpose of providing information about the project, the environmental
protection measures of the project for the local community where the project is located
in order to get social consensus, the following measures will be applied:
Disclosing information: After the EIA report of the project has been approved by
the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, the project’s owner will
establish, approve and publicly post the environmental management plan at the
headquarters of the People's Committee of the communes for community
consultation. Contents of the environmental management plan shall comply with
Article 22 of Decree No. 29/2011/ND-CP dated 18 April 2011 of the Government
on providing strategic environmental assessment, environmental impact assessment
and environmental protection commitment. Thereby, local people will update the
project’s information and participate in inspection and supervision of
implementation of the project’s environmental protection measures.
Installing signs: Signs on construction range shall be installed at the entrance of the
project to inform people and not encroaching safe construction corridor. Warning
signs shall be installed on the construction sites to prevent unexpected risks, accidents.
b. Location and application time
Location:
o Disclosing information in 12 communes/ towns.
o Installing signs at the boundary of site clearance and construction site.
Time: before construction.
4.2. Measures for Prevention, Mitigation of Adverse Impacts of the Project
on the Environment during Construction
4.2.1. Mitigation of Impacts on Ambient Air Quality
4.2.1.1. General Regulations
Environmental impact assessment report
180
Aiming is provided the required contents applicable to construction activities in order
to comply with legal requirements on environment protection during construction.
Requirements for vehicles: Vehicles ensure emission standards "TCVN 6438 -
2005 - Road vehicles. Maximum permitted emission limits of exhaust gases."
Through the contracts, the project’s owner requires the contractor to apply this
standard to manage construction vehicles.
Requirements for applicable standards: Limit 0.3mg/m3 of QCVN
05:2009/BTNMT - National technical regulation on ambient air quality is the
criteria applicable to safety of dust concentration at sensitive objects with dust
generation activities of the project during the construction phase.
4.2.1.2. Control of Dust Spread in Digging Access Road to Bridges and Storing
Materials
a. Description of mitigation measures
With the aim to prevent and mitigate dust spread from digging access road to bridges,
the following measures shall be applied:
Spraying water the areas with dust spread: Spraying water to prevent dust spread.
Water shall be taken from surface water in rivers, canals and ponds near the
construction site.
Technical solutions:
1. Spraying water at least 02 times a day.
2. Using standard nozzle instead of normal ones to make the surface equally wet and
prevents muddy condition. Spraying water in multiple times instead of once in large
quantities.
Preventing dust spread at temporary storage yards: Temporary soil storage years
with volume of over 20m3 will be covered to prevent dust spread.
Technical solutions:
1. Covering canvas is made of thick nylon fabric and towards sensitive objects
(residential areas, schools, temples, etc).
2. The canvas is 30cm higher than the yard’s surface.
3. The canvas should be reinforced with pile driven in the ground at least 20cm deep not
to be fallen.
b. Location and implementation time
Location: construction sections of the road foundation along the route, temporary
waste material/ soil yard
Environmental impact assessment report
181
Implementation time: applicable during the construction of road foundation on the
sunny and dry days.
4.2.1.3. Control of Emission from Construction Vehicles (Horizontal)
a. Description of mitigation measures
With the aim of mitigating dust pollution, toxic gases emitted from construction
machines in the project area, the following measures shall be applied:
Using vehicles that meet emission standards as defined in the general regulations.
Maintenance for construction machines and vehicles as in term.
Setting transportation areas: vehicles are only allowed to be used in the
construction scope as regulated (site clearance, service road).
b. Location and implementation time
Location: entire scope of the project and at the site.
Implementation time: within 24 construction months.
4.2.1.4. Regarding Dust Arising during Transporting Waste Materials or Soil
a. Description of mitigation measures
With the aim of mitigating air pollution due to dust generated from vehicles, the following
measures shall be applied:
Using vehicles that meet emission standards and transportation requirements:
o Vehicles must ensure emission standards as defined in the general regulations.
o Transported materials must be covered to prevent dust spread.
Technical solutions:
1. Transported materials will be moistened to enhance dust reduction.
2. Using vehicles with lid for transportation.
3. In case vehicles have no lid, using canvas to cover materials. Using oil canvas and tying
into the truck frame to avoid flying.
Controlling and managing the environment at which vehicles enter/ exit the
construction site: each construction site has a number of gates for transportation.
Vehicles are only allowed to enter at these gates.
Cleaning roads near the entrance to construction sites: vehicles, before
transporting, shall be cleaned from mud, soil on tires at the exit gates by
mechanical methods.
Spraying water at areas with dust spread: spraying water to avoid dust spread.
Environmental impact assessment report
182
Water is taken from rivers, streams near the project area. Spraying frequency is
adjusted at the request of the supervising engineer suitable to each dust generating
source; possibility of cumulative impacts and dependence on sun/ wind level to
ensure that dust generated in the construction sites shall not exceed the permissible
limits.
Using standard nozzle: Using standard nozzle to wet surfaces at which dust can be
generated, but not make the surrounding areas muddy.
b. Location and implementation time
Location: construction sites and material transportation routes
Implementation time: within 24 construction months
4.2.1.5. Monitoring of Dust Pollution
a. Description of mitigation measures
Environmental monitoring during construction: selection and implementation of
monitoring dust at the densely populated or potentially affected places by dust
accumulation. If the dust concentration is beyond the permissible limits, implement
additional measures including: Considering the level of dust emissions of each activity,
enhance control measures from the largest dust activity until the dust at sensitive objects
reaches the permissible limits.
b. Location and implementation time
Location: measure of “Environmental monitoring during construction” is
implemented in the residential area along the Nai bridge (Km48+600) and Le
bridge (Km48+251).
Implementation time: maintaining this activity throughout excavation.
4.2.1.6. Assessment of the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual Impacts
The proposed measures are based on the principle of minimizing dust from the source
not only reduce dust effectively, but also reduce the dust pollution (if any) at sensitive
objects, being residential areas. The proposed measures are highly feasible and
effective. To increase the feasibility of the proposed measures, the cost of
implementation will be included in total investment of the project and content made to
the contractor as well as supervision content of consultant will be based on bidding
terms; under terms in the economic contract, the project will implement control measures
to require contractors as well as the supervision consultant to follow the contract.
Environmental impact assessment report
183
4.2.2. Mitigation of Impacts on Community due to Noise Pollution
4.2.2.1. General Regulations
With the aim of providing the required contents applicable to construction activities to
comply with legal requirements on environmental protection in construction activities;
offering implementation contents to ensure noise reduction without spending
additional cost.
Requirements for applicable standards: Limit on 70dBA and 55dBA during the
day QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT - National technical regulation on noise is the criteria
applicable to safety of noise of impacts generated from the project’s operation
during the construction phase.
Complying with regulations on construction organization: including:
o Arranging machinery/vehicles generating noise at a location with suitable distance
so that the noise spread to residential areas not exceed 70dBA and schools,
temples, etc. no more than 55dBA. Rapid decrease noise level is calculated on the
principle of a double increase in the distance, the noise level reduces 3dBA.
o All vehicles parked at the site will stop the engine;
o All construction equipments and machines will be checked every 3 month on the
noise level and make the necessary repairs and adjustments to ensure safety and
not cause noise exceeding standards under the guidance of United States
Environmental Protection Agency. Noise from construction equipments and
machines - NJID, 300.1, 31 – 12 – 1971;
o Prioritizing the use of machines and vehicles with low sound emission source
object to construction near sensitive to noise;
o Drivers must be well educated to act properly as shutting down vehicles when not
necessary and avoid unnecessary noise action as pressing the air horn when not
needed while the driving vehicles.
o Normally, the fixed equipments such as generators will be place far away from
residential areas, if not they will be placed in the tight box to reduce the noise
(recommended the brick box).
4.2.2.2. Mitigation Impacts due to Noise
a. Description of mitigation measures
Complying with general regulations.
Controlling source noise level, including:
Environmental impact assessment report
184
o Limit to construction at night in the residential areas;
o In the daytime, when the construction is executed at the site 200m from
residential areas, select equipments/ machines with low sound sources;
o Vehicles used for transportation will be limited at the speed of 5km per hour at
positions of material discards and material gathering yards.
Monitoring noise level: monitoring noise level at these sensitive objects -
concentrated residential areas. When the measurement result shows that the noise
level in this area beyond the permissible limits on daytime, strengthening measures
to control noise at source and comply with the general provisions for the
construction activities that cause noise in order to set additional measures, even
temporarily stop working to adjust the measures until the noise level at sensitive
objects reached the permissible limits on daytime, then continue construction work.
b. Location and implementation time
Location:
o Along the construction route of roads, intersections;
o Sensitive objects are residential areas and other objects along the project route
(table 2.17, chapter 2).
Implementation time: 24 months.
4.2.2.3. Assessment on the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual Impacts
The reduction of the noise at sensitive objects is highly effective through the
implementation of the general regulations as well as measures to reduce noise at
source and monitoring noise at receiving objects to take appropriate corrective
measures. In order to ensure the feasibility of the proposed measures, the contents of
the proposed measures for contractors as well as supervision contents for consultant
will be included in bidding terms; according to the terms of economic contracts, the
project will implement control measures to require contractors as well as the
supervision consultant to follow the contract.
4.2.3. Mitigation of Impacts on Surface Water Environment and Sediment
4.2.3.1. Regarding Impacts Generated from the Construction of Routes, Access
Road to Bridges
a. Control of risk of sedimentation or soil spillage during excavation of road
foundation, horizontal drains and material storage
Environmental impact assessment report
185
a1. Description of mitigation measures
With the aim of controlling risk of surface water pollution and reduced irrigation
capacity in the irrigation ditches and located adjacent to or land routes cut through by
sedimentation and erosion during excavation of road foundation, horizontal drains and
material storage, especially for the ponds partly acquired.
Limiting the construction scope: the construction area is limited within site
clearance scope. The temporary organic soil yard will be re-used or soil for
construction of road foundation shall be stored in this area. Arranging soil/ material
yard at least 50m away from water sources during road construction.
Organizing reasonable construction: in case of rain, temporary yard will be
covered with geotextile to prevent rain from causing erosion. The road foundation
shall be executed and calculated to be compacted before the rain.
Placing mud-collecting barriers: at the construction cut through the ponds and
canals, placing barriers to keep sediment just let the water run out. Mud barrier is
placed between the construction location and water sources. The barriers are made
of geotextile, buried deep into the ground at least 10cm and reinforced to avoid
falling. Mud was stopped before the barrier will be cleared so that it will not be
spilled and allow water to drain easily, this kind of mud shall not be used for road
foundation, but treated as disposed soil. In rainy season, the barriers should be
regularly maintained at least every two day to be operated effectively. The barriers
will be removed after the ground has been cleaned.
Creating temporary drains to collect water runoff: arranging temporary drains
between the road construction site and water from ponds, canals and ditches to
collect rainwater runoff. The drains must be large enough to contain all rainwater
runoff; placing nets inside the drain at suitable distance to collect sedimentation.
a2. Location and implementation time
Location: Along the Project route, especially at the ponds, irrigation canals nearby
the construction areas, such as: ponds at the station of Km44+880, Km45+850,
Km45+960, Km47+620, Km47+700, Km48+100, Km48+200, Km51+020,
Km51+140, Km51+240, Km51+340, Km51+400, Km51+840, Km52+080,
Km52+900, Km53+460, Km53+480, Km53+720, Km54+010, Km54+840,
Km54+900, Km56+100, Km58+200, Km58+300, Km58+400, Km61+380,
Km61+900, Km62+300); irrigation canals at the station of Km53+000, Km53+070,
Km54+370, Km54+500, Km54+660, Km57+910, Km59+450, Km59+960,
Km61+600;
Environmental impact assessment report
186
Implementation time: these measures shall be implemented during the excavation
period (16 months)
4.2.3.2. Regarding Impacts Generaged from Construction of Bridges
a. Control of bore mud during construction of bridge abutment, pier with bored
piles technology that use bentonite
a1. Description of mitigation measures
With the aim of preventing the risk of surface water pollution in the project area and
damage to wetland ecosystems because bore mud - soil mixed with bentonite and
betonite spilled in the construction of bored piles using bentonite of bridge abutment,
piers, especially for piers adjacent to the flow edge.
Complying with general regulations: it is strictly forbidden to dispose to the
surrounding environment the bore mud – soil mixed bentonite and bentonite spilled
during the construction of bridge abutment, pier with bored pile technology that
uses bentonite.
Making partitions to prevent the spillage into the surrounding environment:
making steel partitions in the flow direction (for the pier on the flow edge) and soil
partitions on land. The partitions must be higher than the ground so that dirt cannot
be spilled out. Area of the partition frame must be large enough to implement the
entire construction process of the pile of foundation and abutment.
Strictly following soil mixed bentonite and bentonite spill treatment: under
construction process, each pile will have pit storing bentonite for reuse. After each
construction of one pile, holes need to be filled. Therefore, soil and bentonite arise
when drilling holes will be collected and buried in the pits. Bentonite spill and a
soil mixed residual bentonite will be transferred into temporary yard, near the
foundation construction area, abutment within the site clearance, preliminary
drying for easy transport. Then treated as ordinary solid waste, details are presented
in the waste management section below.
a2. Location and implementation time
Location: on the construction site of abutments, piers of Nai bridge, Dong Tu bridge
and Go bridge;
Implementation time: the measures shall be implemented and maintained during the
bored pile construction of each abutment/ pier and all abutments/ piers of Nai
bridge and Dong Tu bridge and Go bridge.
b. Regarding risk of spillage of solid substances during upper part construction
Environmental impact assessment report
187
of bridges
b1. Description of mitigation measures
With the aim of preventing risk of pollution of surface water, wetland ecosystems and
damage to irrigation, the measures for prevention and processing solid substances
dropping during upper part construction of bridges shall be implemented as follows:
Treating garbage, waste during upper part construction of bridges: it is strictly
forbidden to dispose garbage, waste arising from the construction activities to
surface water flow. Arranging trashes, temporary dump near the construction area
for collecting garbage and waste. Then, moving to the centralized waste storage area
of the site for further treatment as stated in the "waste management" section below.
Cleaning the concrete slabs before assembling: the joint positions of the beams,
concrete slabs will be cleaned on land before assembling by breaking and pieces of
excess concrete (mavia). These pieces of concrete are waste collected and treated as
mentioned in the "waste management" section below.
b2. Location and implementation time
The mentioned measures shall be applied on the construction site of bridges as Nai,
Le, Nai, Dong Tu and Go, throughout the upper part construction on bridges (4-8
months).
c. Regarding the risks of scattered solids when construction on the upper part
bridge
c1. Describe the mitigation measures
In order to prevent the risk of contaminating surface water and wetland ecosystems,
damage to irrigation irrigation will apply the preventive measures regard the scattered
solids when construction work on the bridge. In particular:
- Waste disposal, waste as the construction work on the bridge: prohibits the
dumping the waste and waste arising from construction activities flow down
surface water sources. The trash, makeshift dump will be arranged near
construction areas to contain garbage and waste. Then, turning toward the waste
concentration area for further processing such as regulations referred to in section
"waste management" below.
- Clean the concrete slab before suture: The location of the suture of the beams, the
concrete will be cleaned on the shore before installation by smashing and made
those pieces of concrete acknowledges (mavia). The pieces of this concrete is
waste to be collected and disposed of as provided for in the above mentioned
Environmental impact assessment report
188
"waste management".
c2. Location and implementation time
The measures to be applied in the construction of bridges as Nai, Le, Nai, Dong Tu
and Go during construction work of the upper part (4 ÷ 8 months).
d. Clearance, restoration of river beds and banks at bridge construction area
d1. Description of mitigation measures
With the aim of preventing the risk of long-term pollution of river water environment
during bridge construction, the following measures shall be applied:
Cleaning river bed upon construction: removing all the temporary works including
iron, steel, cofferdam, excess concrete by equipments such as excavators, bucket,
crane, etc. After removal, waste will be collected and treated as solid waste at the
site. Details are presented in the waste management section below.
Removing and stabilizing the riverbank after construction: removing all scattered
rocks, cofferdam around piers, along the river and the bridge area and reinforced
the banks in accordance with the design.
d2. Location and implementation time
The said measures shall be applied on Sa Lung river, Hoang Nguyen river, Cau Le
river, Nai rive and Hoai river, after finishing of construction.
4.2.3.3. Regarding Impacts Generated from the Activities of the Construction Site
a. Regarding risk of water pollution by oil in oily discharge from machines and
vehicles maintenance station on the construction site
a1. Description of measures
With the aim of controlling and managing waste oil as hazardous waste in accordance
with current regulations and preventing oil in wastewater from machine and vehicle
maintenance stations on the site; the following measures shall be applied:
Managing waste oil: machine oil shall be periodically replaced, stored in labelling
barrels and placed in the roofed house with high floor to avoid flooding and
waterproof, having barrier bank to easily collect in case of spilling outside. Waste
oil will be further treated as described in the "waste management" section below.
a2. Location and implementation time
The said measures shall be applied on construction sites of Nai bridge (Km48 +600);
bridges Nai, Dong Tu and Go (Km88+100), construction sites of bypass (Km48 +000),
Environmental impact assessment report
189
construction sites of upgraded and expanded road (Km54+500) during the construction
period.
b. Regarding domestic waste from worker camps on the construction site
b1. Description of measures
With the aim of preventing risk of water eutrophication and toxicity of wetland
ecosystems on rivers, canals due to waste from the site huts on each construction site,
the following measures shall be applied:
Treating washing wastewater: washing wastewater will be reused for moisten road
surface or the places where dust can spread on site.
Treating domestic wastewater: on each site, in addition to washing wastewater reused
as mentioned above, the wastewater from canteens will be pre-treated not to create
pollution sources forming organic matters in natural water by the decomposition of
uneaten food. Wastewater from the canteens will be directed to the shallow sand tank
(about 70cm deep), about 10m2 wide to avoid absorbing down the underground water
system after through manholes with nets for collection of solid substances and waste in
holes. After permeable through the sand to flow into the drainage system of the site
before joining the flow. Replace the sand every week. 3m3 of sand replaced each
week can be considered waste after preliminary washing and treated as waste soil.
Using portable toilets: using portable toilets at each site. Waste from portable toilets
will be collected under economic contracts with the urban environment company of
the districts in the project. The contract will be carried out before the project is
prepared for construction.
b2. Location and implementation time
The said measures shall be applied on construction sites of Nai bridge (Km48 +600); bridges
Nai, Dong Tu and Go (Km88+100), construction sites of bypass (Km48 +000), construction
sites of upgraded and expanded road (Km54+500) during the construction period.
c. Regarding risk of pollution from rainwater runoff on the surface of the site
c1. Description of measures
With the aim of controlling dirt penetrated into natural waters by rainwater runoff on
the surface of the site. In addition to measures of "Making temporary drains for
collection of water runoff during the construction near sensitive objects" as section a,
subsection 4.2.3.2, the following measures shall be also applied:
Drainage on site: the elevation of the site will be designed to ensure the collection
of rain water on the surface of the site, not flowing through the area with surface
Environmental impact assessment report
190
contaminants such as petroleum store and does not cause flooding. Surface
drainage system on construction sites includes ditches, canals and manholes.
Rainwater shall be collected and directed to the ditch through manholes with nets
for garbage collection. After water in manholes shall be over flown through the
grass before flowing into the water in the canals.
Inspecting the location of the irrigation ditches and canals: inspecting the location
of irrigation ditch, canals and irrigation system every week to measure the solid
waste collection and other contaminants, to ensure that the contaminants from the
site shall not follow the water infiltrated into irrigation water when opening
culverts. Collected waste will be treated in the order presented in "waste
management" section below.
Clean the surface of the land: collecting the dirt on the ground to prevent the
contamination of the surrounding water.
The surface of the construction site should be sprayed by a crushed stone layer, this
layer reduce dust while being able to filter the dirt on the surface as raining.
c2. Location and implementation time
The said measures shall be applied on construction sites of Nai bridge (Km48 +600);
bridges Nai, Dong Tu and Go (Km88+100), construction sites of bypass (Km48 +000),
construction sites of upgraded and expanded road (Km54+500) during the construction
period, especially in the rainy season.
4.2.3.4. Assessment on the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual Impacts
Most measures are highly effective because they are established on the basis of
prevention eliminating the risk of increasing levels of water pollution by TSS, floating
objects. The measures are also highly feasible because the area is large enough, the
amount of waste is not much. Water flowing from canteens to the environment only
through preliminary treatment to capture the decomposed organic substances is a
appropriate and feasible measure because the construction of wastewater treatment in
aerobic tank in the field is not feasible due to large expenditures on construction and
demolition after construction and create unpleasant odors on site. However, the water
flow were pre-treated and joint into drainage flowing through the grass field before
jointing into surface water have increased cleaning efficiency of organic matters in
wastewater. Many measures comply with regulations on work safety, sanitation and
construction organization. Therefore, the implementation contents for the contractor as
well as the supervision consultant will be included in bidding terms; under the terms of
economic contracts, the project will implement inspection measures to ask the
Environmental impact assessment report
191
contractor as well as supervision consultant to follow the contract. The feasibility of
the proposed measures, thereby, are sure.
4.2.4. Regarding Impacts on Groundwater
4.2.4.1. Description of Mitigation Measures
With the aim of preventing the risk of groundwater contamination in the process of
bored pile drilling using bentonite, another measure shall be also applied:
Using barriers to prevent dirty water overflow the casing: barrier is installed
surrounding the pile of casing when drilling to make the casing of each pile and
maintain in the construction of piles in order to preventing dirty surface water from
casing façade penetrate into drilling hole.
4.2.4.2. Location and Implementation Time
Location: Nai bridge, Dong Tu bridge and Go bridge
Implementation time: during the construction of bored piles.
4.2.4.3. Assessment on the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual Impacts
Mitigation measures are easy to implement. Making barriers will prevent the overflow
casing affecting the groundwater quality. Residual impacts are insignificant.
4.2.5. Regarding Impacts on Soil Environment
4.2.5.1. Regarding Risk of Soil Pollution due to Oily Discharge and Solid Waste
a. Description of measures
Risk of soil pollution caused by oily discharge and solid waste generated from the
construction site could be prevented through solid and toxic waste management
measures (presented in below item “waste management”).
b. Location and Implementation Time
Location: at the construction sites of Nai bridge (Km48+600), Nai bridge, Dong Tu
bridge and Go bridge (Km88+100), bypass (Km48+000) and upgraded and
expanded road (Km54+500).
Implementation time: in 24 months.
4.2.5.2. Regarding Risk of Soil Spillage and Sedimentation of Eroded Soil due to
Rain during Excavation
Environmental impact assessment report
192
a. Description of mitigation measures
In order to prevent risk of burying arable land or causing slippery, muddy soil in
residential areas due to soil spillage or mud sediment due to rain during excavation and
temporary storage of materials, rocks, the following measures shall be applied:
Finishing construction and compacting tightly: in the rainy season, from May to
September, finish construction on each foundation and compacting to avoid erosion by
rain, check the foundation before the rain, if case of erosion, reinforcing more.
Collecting and transporting immediately waste soil/rock to leveling area: collecting
soil / rock on the dump within the permissible limits. Waste soil shall not be stored at
each yard until finish construction, but gradually moving towards the designated
leveling position. Especially, in the rainy season, from May to September,
immediately transport to the leveling positions as defined; the rest shall be continued
covering from rain.
Creating proper dumping sites:
Dumping sites are not allowed at the residential areas or areas with high concentration
of economic activities of which elevation is lower than the construction site elevation.
Within the site clearance, separate dumping sites will be arranged within the organic
soil stored for reuse and waste soil waiting for transportation to the filling positions as
defined. Area of each dump area shall not exceed 25m2 and stored soil shall not higher
than 1.5m to facilitate covering to avoid erosion in case of rains and dust dispersion in
strong winds. The temporary dumping sites of soil and waste soil shall be surrounded
with fences made of geotextile. The geotextile fence shall be buried on the ground of
15cm to 20cm deep and supported by the poles driving deep down firmly.
Installing of mud barrier: not only in the rainy period, the installation of mud barriers
for prevention of sedimentation and soil spill to surrounding area shall be
implemented. Mud barried are installed at the outer edge of the site clearance border to
surrounding land, according to the section of the route not to interfere the construction.
Barrier made of geotextile, buried deep into the ground at least 10cm and reinforced to
avoid falling. After finishing each section, the barrier is taken up, cleaned and re-used
for the next stage.
Cleaning areas with spilled soil: in the event of the mud spill to agricultural land along
two sides of the new route, these areas will be cleaned and returned to the original
state.
b. Location and implementation time
Location: at the construction areas which is placed near the agricultural areas such as
Environmental impact assessment report
193
fields at the stations of (Km44+000 ÷ Km44+400, Km45+080 ÷ Km45+280,
Km51+000 ÷ Km52+480, Km53+900, Km54+500 ÷ Km54+900, Km59+600,
Km59+900 ÷ Km61+300, ruộng Km61+900 ÷ Km62+180, Km62+300), garden of
tree at the stations of (Km46+300, Km46+900 ÷ Km47+500, Km54+220,
Km54+700, Km58+640, Km59+300, Km61+400, Km61+400, Km62+550,
Km62+780 ÷ Km63+000) and residential land along the both sides of Project route.
Implementation time: shall be applied during the excavation of road bed, foundation
pit and area of material storage.
4.2.5.3. Regarding Local Flood Risk caused by the Excavation/ Storage of Material,
and Wasted Soil, Rock of the Project
a. Description of mitigation measures
Preventing the risk of local flooding in the lowlands near the material storage area and
near the digging through the following measures:
Checking the operation of the horizontal drain: the horizontal drain near the
material storage area and the excavation area should be checked and cleaned to
ensure the drainage of water from the flooded rice fields with flooding risk in case
of heavy rains.
Construction of horizontal drain: building horizontal drain in the locations
according to the design before filling the foundation of access roads.
Filling the foundation at the appropriate time: foundation filling should only be
performed after the horizontal drain is found work well.
b. Location and implementation time
These measures will be applied at the lowlands near the material storage area and near
the excavation area during construction.
4.2.5.4. Prevention and Treatment of Soil Compression
a. Description of mitigation measures
Preventing the risk of soil compaction: limit the scope of construction in the scope
of site clearance and service roads by piles. Vehicles are allowed to operate within
this limit only.
Handling in case of negligence: in case of negligence, vehicles encroach beyond
the limited scope, loosen land by ploughing the abused land at least 0.3m deep.
Disposing land acquired temporarily after construction: After construction, in the
area which construction sites are located and service roads on site, in addition to
Environmental impact assessment report
194
cleaning surfaces, loosen land by ploughing it at least 0.5 m deep before handing
over to the owner.
b. Location and implementation time
The said measures shall be applied on construction site and agricultural land along the
project.
4.2.5.5. Assessment on the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual Impacts
Mitigation measures developed on the basis of causes and impacts for the purpose of
reducing immediately from source simultaneously with the processing of the
consequences will be highly effective. Simple techniques are simple, suitable to the
contractors’ capacity. Residual impacts are acceptable.
However, it is inevitable that vehicles shall encroach beyond the defined boundary. In
this case, the project is committed to restoring this land as stated above. On the other
hand, during construction, contractors often avoid implementing many environmental
measures if not directly influence the construction contents due to concerns about the
progress and increased costs. Therefore, to increase the feasibility of the proposed
measures, implementation costs will be calculated to be included in total investment of
the project and the implementation contents will be included in the bidding terms. In
terms of economic contracts, the project will monitor and ask the contractor to comply
with the contract, ensure the feasibility of the proposed measures.
4.2.6. Regarding Impacts on Ecosystems
Measures for mitigation of the impacts on the ecosystem are those for mitigation of
dust pollution, measures for mitigation of solid waste spillage from construction on the
bridge, measures for mitigation of waste oil from the activities on construction sites;
waste from workers’ living activities as mentioned above.
4.2.7. Regarding Impacts on Transportation
4.2.7.1. Regarding the Risk of Road Traffic Disruption during Construction of
Expanded Route and Intersections with Hung Nhan Bypass
a. Description of mitigation measures
With the aim of preventing and limiting traffic disruption on the existing road in case
of old road expansion and the construction Hung Nhan bypass, the following measures
shall be applied:
Complying with general regulations:
Environmental impact assessment report
195
o Only building the old road construction when the new road has been completed,
to ensure the safety of vehicles.
o Do not gather the construction machines of the project on the existing road.
o Do not let the temporary storage area as material, soil/ rock as waste. They are
arranged within the site clearance of the project and at least 7m away from the
existing road. In the case of sedimentation or soil spillage on the existing road,
immediately cleaning and clearing.
o Every day, during the construction of intersections, the existing road within the
project and in a wide range from the edge of the project road on the two sides
will be cleaned. This wide range will be defined by field supervisor based on
stains of t exhe project’s vehicles causing on the existing road.
o The drivers of the project and the construction workers must understand and
comply with regulations on traffic safety and alcohol and drug use.
o Coordinating with local traffic police control of the car on the road.
Regarding the section constructing on the existing NH39-1 (According to the
Circular No.39/2011/TT-BGTVT on May 18th, 2011):
o Execute permission on the existing road: before constructing the NH39-1, the
Project need to agreement in written document of road management agency
(The Road Manager).
o Guaranteed traffic on the alignment: in the course of construction to ensure
smooth traffic on the alignment, the material must be arranged so that they do
not obstruct the vision. With the current alignment, make sure at least one lane
traffic still being on the road during the carpet face and arranged signage, traffic
supervisor either end position.
Placing signs: Signs on guarding the construction area will be located on two sides
along the existing road in the driving position easily observed by the drivers and at
a minimum distance of 150m. Traffic signs are stable under normal traffic
conditions as well as when there are high winds and reflective panels for drivers
easily recognizable at night. Scratches, lacerations, punctures on reflective panels
will be remedied soon to always promote its reflective effects. After the end of
intersection construction, all guarding signs will be removed.
Installing piles and alarm lamp: The piles are placed to limit the scope of the
construction of the existing pavement. is the piles are 75cm high at minimum with
wide base to ensure no damage by travelling vehicles. All the piles are arranged in
white and reflective panels to ensure a clear view both day and night. Pile stable
under normal traffic conditions as well as when there are high winds. On the
Environmental impact assessment report
196
marker lights are blinking A (low flashing lights), B (fast flashing lights) will be
supervising engineer for approval prior to use according to the actual conditions.
Guiding traffic:
o Guide traffic to ensure the rational traffic flow during the existing pavement.
Arrange for the flag bearers, the main responsibility of these people is to guide
the pedestrian in and around the construction area.
o Temporary wooden/concreted bridges are built at the deep excavation places, at
the roads and lanes of the residential areas to people moving conveniently.
o When project implement the construction in the different existing road need
different traffic diversion option and construction time to avoid traffic
congestion.
o It is necessary to making the temporary road in case of could not be
implemented accordance with the traffic diversion option.
b. Location and implementation time
The measures shall be implemented during the construction of upgraded and expanded
section of the route and 2 intersections with Hung Nhan bypass, residential areas
(Km44+000 ÷ Km44+200, Km44+400 ÷ Km44 +900, Km45+100 Km45+800 (at right
alignment), Km45+800 ÷ Km46+100, Km47+700, Km47+950, Km51+200 ÷
Km52+200, Km52+400 ÷ Km52+900, Km53+100 ÷ Km53+700, Km54+100,
Km55+100, Km56+150 ÷ Km56+700, Km56+800 ÷ Km57+500, Km57+650,
Km57+800, Km58+080, Km58+300 ÷ Km59+400, Km59+900, Km61+300 ÷
Km61+600, especially at administrative agencies as Health station of Hung Ha town,
Communist Party Committee of Hung Ha District, People Committee of Hung Ha
Town, Hung Nhan Elementary school, Tran Thu Do Secondary school… during
construction time of project.
4.2.7.2. Regarding the Risk of Road Traffic Accidents and Damage to Public
Facilities during Transportation of Materials, Soils and Rocks
a. Description of mitigation measures
In order to prevent and control the risk of unsafe traffic caused by the spilled material
causing slippery on the national highways and provincial roads and the risk of damage
to the local road with low solid level when the road is used to transport material or
soil/ rock.
For the provincial road and national highway:
o Arranging reasonable transportation time: during peak hours from 6am-8am and
Environmental impact assessment report
197
4pm-6pm;
o Not transporting over the maximum speed;
o Cleaning: spilled soil, rocks shall be cleaned immediately, ensuring not slippery in
case of rain.
When inter-commune roads are used for transportation:
o Asking permission from local authorities: obtaining written consent from local
authorities on temporary use of inter-communes for the right transportation
purposes.
o Organizing reasonable transportation: not transporting materials and soil types
in the winter time people using contemporary and holidays. Project
responsibility to learn, but this time around and is committed to avoid shipping
but this time with a particular region;
o Implementation of sanitary measures and return to original state: make sure you
clean, safe in the process of using and maintaining the road, make sure people go
back to normal, safe and restored to its original state before assigned to the local
board.
b. Location and implementation time
The measures shall be implemented on transportation routes (NH39-1, Province Roads
224, 455, 223 and 226) and inter-hamlet, inter-commune roads during the construction
(24 months).
4.2.7.3. Assessment on the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual Impacts
In fact, it is hard to eliminate the impacts on traffic, especially in areas with high
traffic density. The measures are based on the content of construction, traffic status
every area and level of impact can minimize traffic jams, especially to ensure the
absolute safety of traffic. - Negligible residual impacts.
Measures to minimize the impact of active transport of materials recommended
simple, feasible and highly effective. However, in order to ensure the residual impact
acceptable, the project will work with local authorities publicize contractor's
transportation plan so that people have found not compliant enough plan attached to it
required the construction company strictly implement the mitigation measures have
been approved as well as additional measures as appropriate.
The mitigation measures for the utility community are committed to the project. The
progress of the project depends on the implementation of this commitment. The
feasibility of the proposed measures, therefore, is considered quite high. Residual
Environmental impact assessment report
198
impact is negligible.
4.2.8. Regarding the Impacts on Historical Relic Linh Son Phu Cau and
National Historical Culture on Mausoleum and Temple of Chancellor of Tran
Dynasty Tran Thu Do and his Wife - Linh Tu Quoc Mau Tran Thi Dung
a. Description of mitigation measures
In order to enhance the sense of protection and contribute to improving the relic value,
including material and non-material value of the historical relic, the following
measures shall be implemented:
Education and propaganda: In order to enhance knowledge of historical value of
Linh Son Tu Phu Cau and National historical culture on mausoleum and temple of
Tran dynasty’s chancellor Tran Thu Do and his wife Linh Tu Quoc Mau Tran Thi
Dung (Mother King of Tran dynasty) near the Project, and the respect as well as
protection of material and non-material values of the relic, we will invite
responsible officer of the relic to give a speech to workers who are directly
construct bridge piers on the following contents:
o History of the relic;
o Value of the relic;
o Contents related to relic protection as prescribed in 2001 Cultural Heritage Act;
o Contents related to principles for identifying scope of protection area of the relic as
regulated in Decree No. 92/2002/ND-CP dated 11 November 2002;
o Violations that distort cultural heritage as regulated in Decree No. 92/2002/ND-
CP dated 11 November 2002.
Disseminating construction rules: the construction rules will include the terms
prohibiting violations to the relic and the provisions related to the discipline and
reward. The rules shall be disseminated to each worker in charge of this area.
b. Location and implementation time
The measure is implemented during the construction of the route near the historical
relic Linh Son Phu Cau, and National historical culture on mausoleum and temple of
Tran dynasty’s chancellor Tran Thu Do and his wife Linh Tu Quoc Mau Tran Thi
Dung (Mother King of Tran dynasty) near the Project.
c. Assessment on efficiency of mitigation measures and residual impacts
The advocacy organization educate employees about the value of relics, the provisions
relating to the protection of the heritage values of the State, besides, the rules of
Environmental impact assessment report
199
construction project refers to the prohibitions workers violations with sanctions
implementation will create viable conditions prevent harming the value of ruins.
4.2.9. Regarding Impacts due to Concentration of Workers
a. Description of mitigation measures
Managing workers: Project offers conditions in camps, water, electricity will
ensure that workers living in camps in the health care field during construction.
Registration of temporary residence for workers; education construction workers
respect cultural, religious, and local beliefs prohibit drinking while performing
construction, prohibits gambling in public school and scheduling (hours and hours
of leisure) for workers.
Coordinating with local authorities:
o Coordinate with local authorities, including the Committee of the Vietnam
Fatherland Front and the women for the purpose of promoting public
understanding of social evils, prostitution, and HIV epidemics in the region...
o Coordinate and work closely with local community hygiene as well as
symptoms of the disease appear in the region;
o Coordinate and cooperate with local authorities in preventing and combating
social evils;
Employing local labors: Use the unskilled workers, both women and men, local to
do the job easy. For some jobs require training, the contractors will be selected
from among local workers hired to train for new skills so they can do a good job.
b. Location and implementation time
The measures are implemented during the construction of the project (24 months).
c. Assessment on the efficiency of mitigation measures and residual impacts
These mitigation measures are also the regulations on work safety and sanitation
project in the construction process should be included in the bid contract. This legally
binding will help to implementation fully of the proposed measures.
4.2.10. Waste Management and Treatment
4.2.10.1. Establishing and Implementing Waste Management Plan during
Construction
a. Description of mitigation measures
Establishing waste treatment plan: the project will be responsible for materials
Environmental impact assessment report
200
management and waste generated during the construction of a waste management
plan (QMP). QMP built for regular waste (construction waste, waste) and
hazardous waste (waste oil). During the construction phase, QMP will be the
construction units to use as a construction material for detailed procedures for
managing and reporting on waste generated and moved to the materials used for the
project. QMP is one of the test objects according to the requirements stated in the
environmental monitoring program.
Managing waste: waste is organic soil, excess concrete mortar, soil and bentonite
balance after the re-use and is stored temporarily in the dump or switch to leveling
in the waste dumps will be identify and deal with a local following in the steps of
the project.
Managing garbage and domestic waste: Garbage and solid waste activities after
collection will be categorized and stored at each site. Through economic contracts,
the project will require the contractor to handle all kinds of waste according to
Decree 59/2007/ND-CP dated 09/04/2007 on solid waste management and in
accordance with local economy.
Managing waste oil and oily waste: collected and stored according to the
instructions of the staff are trained in hazardous waste management in the
construction field. Waste oil will be collected and handled in accordance with
Circular 12/2011/TT-BTNMT dated 04.14.2011 on hazardous waste management.
b. Location and implementation time
The measure of “establishing waste treatment plan” “managing waste” and “managing
garbage” is implemented within 24 months of the entire project.
The measure of “managing domestic waste”, “managing waste oil and oily waste” is
implemented within 24 months on 6 construction sites.
4.2.10.2. Assessment on the Efficiency of Mitigation Measures and Residual Impacts
Develop and implement waste management plan during construction of project
commitments and regulations on work safety, sanitation and organization of
construction of a transportation project. Therefore, the project to ensure the
implementation of previous commitments the state management agencies in each local
environment and perform content for contractors as well as content supervision
consultant will be taken on a Terms recordings; under economic terms in the contract,
the project will implement control measures to require contractors as well as the
supervision consultant to comply with the contract. The feasibility of the proposed
measures, so be sure.
Environmental impact assessment report
201
4.3. Measure for Prevention, Mitigation of Adverse Impacts of the
Project on Environment in the Operation Phase
4.3.1. Regarding to the Impacts on Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem
a. Description of mitigation measures
Storm water runoff is an indirect object which creates impact sources related to waste
and not related to waste on basin when it run through the basin surface. Normally, the
amount of dirt on the basin surface is accumulated due to dry weather, which will
reach equilibrium after 10 days. After 10 days, the deposition speed is similar to the
movement speed caused by the turbulence of the air. The balance is maintained until
appear the phenomenon of "clean". This phenomenon is defined according to the
condition of the wind speeds exceed 5.8 m / s or rain exceeds 7mm/hour. Rainfall
cleaned very fast dirt on the surface of the basin. From 20 30 minutes later, the
concentration of contaminants in storm water runoff is negligible.
Thus, the following measures will be applied to prevent the impact caused by storm
water runoff which brings dirt on the road surface to the basin causing water pollution
during operation phase:
Clean the surface periodically and before raining: implement regular cleaning
surface periodically to collect dust and dirt. Thus, the level of pollution in the
runoff from the first rain is very small;
Implementation time: Mitigation measures is maintained in Project’s warranty
period (2 years)
b. Assessment on mitigation measures and residual impacts
Clean the streets to ensure the safety and well operation, profit is one of the goals of
the Project owner. To ensure that the residual impacts may be acceptable, in the
operation phase, the monitoring of surface water quality will be carried out to take
appropriate corrective measures.
4.3.2. Mitigation of Impacts causing Fragmentation of Production Land
a. Description of mitigation measure
Encouraging localities properly consideration and arrangement of land plots: the
measure aim to minimize the impacts of fragmentation of agricultural land. The
project will encourage localities to consider and arrange fragmented plots properly so
that an owner only cultivates their land to one side of the road (figure 4.1).
Environmental impact assessment report
202
Figure 4.1. Sitemap of Mitigation Measures of Impacts Causing
Agricultural Fragmentation
b. Location and implementation time
The measure is implemented on the divided agricultural land.
c. Assessment on the efficiency of mitigation measures and residual impacts
The said mitigation measure is a part of design contents of the Project, so it is highly
feasible and prevents division at source. Residual impacts are insignificant. However,
the measure depends on the ability of land change and land use planning of each
locality.
4.4. Measures for Prevention and Response to Risks and Incidents
4.4.1. Response to Technical Incidents
With the aim of preventing technical incidents when assembling girders, the following
measures shall be applied:
The construction unit must submit the construction organization methods to the
project’s owner for consideration. The project’s owner shall consider details of
such plans based on specialized regulations and approve the most optimal and
safest plan. The construction activities must strictly comply with the construction
process as approved.
The project’s owner shall establish plan on vehicles and equipments for addressing
technical incidents, including rescue team; organization and plans (leaders,
implementation order) and necessary address to be contacted in case of emergency,
Plot 1
Plot 2 Plot 3
The project route
House
Potential impacts - households must cross
the roads to do farming at all plots
Plot 1
Plot 3
House
Plot 2
The project route
Mitigation measure - Household receive
new plot and without crossing the roads
Environmental impact assessment report
203
including hospitals in Thai Binh province.
The prevention measures shall be implemented during the construction of bridges.
4.4.2. Prevention of Fire/Blasting Incidents
The following measures shall be applied:
Petroleum, oil used for construction equipments shall be stored in separated
warehouses, away from potential sources of ignition; these warehouses are
equipped with temperature monitoring devices and fire-alarming devices.
Arranging extinguishers, fire water tank, oxygen tank regularly on the site. Fire
prevention/ fighting facilities shall be regularly inspected and maintained.
Training, propagating to enhance workers’ awareness and capacity of fire safety.
The measures shall be implemented during the construction (24 months).
4.4.3. Prevention of Safety Labor
With the aim of preventing accidents during construction, the following measures shall
be applied:
The project’s owner shall set out the rules on labor safety during construction.
Periodic health examination for officers and employees.
Training and providing information on Safety hygienic programs.
Equipping fully for worker with necessary protective equipments;
Using the communication system to ensure labor safety during the project
implementation.
Rescue Plan includes Rescue Team (name and mobile of team leader), Guide on
implementing process and hotlines, emergency addresses in Thai Binh and Hung
Yen province area.
Measures for prevention and response to safety labor shall be conducted for the
project during the construction (24 months).
4.4.4. Prevention of Incidents due to Natural Disasters (Storms, Heavy Rains,
Floods, etc.)
The following measures shall be applied:
Prevention of incidents due to storms, heavy rains:
o Stopping all construction activities in case of rain, storm of level 5 or higher;
o Covering newly-built structures in case of rain, storm by nylon canvas;
o Using the lightning-resistant, earthling system for scaffolding, steel structure
for construction of bridge to avoid lightning.
Environmental impact assessment report
204
Prevention of incidents due to floods:
o In case of flooding (heavy rain, water rises quickly), quickly moving all
construction facilities out of the site. Transporting petroleum, oil, chemicals
first, then machines and equipments.
o Plan on response flood. Detail is preparation the stores for assets, goods in case
of moving.
o Meteorological information is always watched to ready implement the response
plans.
o Contact regularly with rescue units of Army, Police and local Government.
Implementation time: 24 months.
4.4.5. Demining
According the Decision No. 96/2006/QD-TTg issued on May 4, 2006 of the Prime
Minister on management and performance on demining and explosive materials and
Circular No. 146/2007/TT-BQP on guiding the implementation Decision No. 96
2006 QD-TTG; in order to safety in the process of demining, demining work will be
carried out in and around the construction site and implemented by Army Unit which
task on demining through economic contracts with the Project owner.
The area, depth and safety corridor of demining and explosive materials for Project
is implemented to Decision No.95/2003/QD-BQP issued by Minister of Defence
dated August 7, 2003 on promulgating “Technical Standard on detecting, demining
and explosive material”.
Implementation time: before the construction time.
Environmental impact assessment report
205
CHAPTER V. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM
5.1. Environmental Management Program (EMP)
5.1.1. Objectives
The purpose of The Environment Management Program of Project is to set out a
program to manage environmental issues in the preparation and construction of the
works and during the operation phase of the project; including:
Provide a management plan for implementation of the environment impact
mitigation measures which have been approved environmental management agencies
and converted into the terms of the Specifications of the Project;
Ensure a sound management of waste, provide rapid response structures to
environmental issues and incidents and urgently manage and deal with
environmental problems;
Continuously collect the information about changes of environmental quality in
implementation of the Project, in order to timely detect additional negative
environmental impacts and propose proper measures to prevent and mitigate
environmental pollution, according to the TCVN 2001, 2002; QCVN 2008, 2009,
and 2010.
The information collected in the course of environmental management of the
Project must have following basic properties:
The accuracy of the data: the accuracy of the monitored data is assessed by the
similarity between the data and the fact;
The characteristic of the data: data collected at a monitoring point represents a
certain space;
Homogeneity of data: data collected at different locations at different times of
the Project area has the ability to be compared with each other. The
comparability of the data is called the homogeneity of the data;
The ability of continuous tracking over time: to be performed in compliance
with environmental monitoring programs which was identified during the
project implementation;
The synchronization of data: data include enough information about that
element itself and relative elements.
Environmental impact assessment report
206
5.1.2. Summary of Environmental Management Program
The Environment Management Program of the Project is summarized in Table 5.1.
Environmental impact assessment report
207
Table 5.1. Summary of Environmental Management Program of the Project
Ord Project
activities Environment impacts Environmental protection measures and utilities
Expense of Environmental
protection measures and utilities
Time of execution
and completion
Responsibility
for
implementation
Responsibility
for supervision
I Pre-construction of the Project
- Acquisition of
residential
land
364 households are acquired the reasidential land, in which
there are 20 households are affected due to lost a part of
houses and 7 households must be relocation and resettlement.
Compensation as the resettlement action plan, including:
- Compensation for acquired land and utilities at market prices;
- In-place resettlement;
- Resettlement assistance;
- Assistance to recovery of income from agriculture.
Expense for land acquisition is
included in the total investment
cost.
To be completed
before
commencement date
of the project
District
Compensation
and Site
Clearance
Council.
PMU3 and
The
independent
supervision
organization.
- Acquisition of
agricultural
land and ponds
Income damage from agriculture and aquaculture on the
land and ponds acquired.
Permanent loss of income from agriculture and
aquaculture on the land and ponds acquired.
Carry out compensation following the Plan of compensation and
resettlement assistance, including:
- Compensation for acquired land at market prices;
- Assistance to households;
- Assistance to the agricultural land in residential areas;
- Support career change and job creation;
- Recruitment of local labor to the simple tasks of project.
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
- Relocation of
irrigation
ditches
Interruption of water to irrigate the fields in the project area
and surrounding areas.
Implementation of measures to prevent impacts, including:
- Construction following the schedule and design;
- Make sure providing adequate and timely fund for implementation.
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
- Demolition of
houses
Dust pollution resulting from house demolition area
exceeding permissible limits from 2 to 3 times in the range of
30 - 40 meters.
Implementation of dust control measures:
- Watering;
- Covering with canvas;
- Transporting waste.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
Budget for monitoring work is shown
in the table 5.10.
1 week for
demolition
Contractor(s),
under the
contract with
the Employer
PMU3 and
The
independent
supervision
organization.
Noise pollution arising from demolition area exceeding the
permissible limits in the area of 80m affecting residential
who are not relocated near the demolition area.
Implementation of noise control measures include:
- No demolition and transportation of waste at night time: from 22:00 to
6:00.
- Using equipment with low noise emissions.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
Budget for monitoring work is shown
in the table 5.10.
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
Environmental pollution due to waste arising from
demolition.
The proposed measures, include:
- Carrying out appropriate classification and treatment.
- Collecting and selecting the temporary dumping points.
- pollution due to waste arising from demolition
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
- Leveling work Dust pollution arising from the leveling area beyond the
permissible limit from 1.5 to 2.5 in the range from 25 - 35m.
Implementation of dust control measures: Water moisturizing: water
spraying at least 2 times per day.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
Budget for monitoring work is shown
1 month of leveling -ditto- -ditto-
Environmental impact assessment report
208
Ord Project
activities Environment impacts Environmental protection measures and utilities
Expense of Environmental
protection measures and utilities
Time of execution
and completion
Responsibility
for
implementation
Responsibility
for supervision
in the below supervision section.
Noise pollution arising from the leveling area beyond
permissible limit in the range of 40m affecting the residential
area close to the site (Km47+950).
Implementation of noise control measures, including:
- Limiting time for leveling: no leveling work at nighttime from 22:00 ÷
6:00 at the residential area near the construction site.
- Limiting operation of the equipments at the same time.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
Budget for monitoring work is shown
in the below supervision section.
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
Environmental pollution due to waste arising from grading
work (waste, papers, etc.)
The proposed measures, including:
- Carrying out appropriate classification and treatment.
- Collecting and selecting the temporary dumping points.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
- Information
Disclosure
- Request for information
- Social safety.
- Disclosure of information through the Environmental Management Plan
at the offices of the People's Committees at the communes where
community consultation is done.
- Installation of sign boards to identify the scope of construction safety
corridors, avoiding violations, warning and prevention of risks and
accidents.
-ditto-
Before official
construction
implementation
-ditto- -ditto-
II Construction phase
1 Air environment
- Excavation and
backfill
activities and
the leveling
equipments
Dust pollution generating from excavation period of
foundation pits at Nại bridge and Le bridge, in which:
- Nại bridge area: dust concentration exceeds the
permissible limit from 1.2 ÷ 1.5 times in the winter and
from 1.4 ÷ 1.7 times in the summer.
- Le bridge area: dust concentration exceeds the permissible
limit from 1.1 ÷ 2.1 times in the winter and from 1.3 ÷ 2.5
times in the summer.
Dust concentration only reaches the permissible limit in the
range of 30 ÷ 50 meters from the construction site.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Watering on the surface of the excavation and backfill areas.
- Water spraying 2 times per day.
- Using standard water jets instead of normal ones to evenly moisten the
surface and avoid creating muddy conditions.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
Budget for monitoring work is shown
in the Table 5.10.
Construction of
embankment and
foundation pits.
Contractors,
under
contracts with
the employer.
PMU3,
Environment
al
supervision
consultant,
State
agencies
- Material
transportation
activities
Dust concentration exceeds the allowed limit from 2 ÷ 3
times, on the strong windy and sunny days, dust generation
may exceed the allowed limit to 4 times. Dust concentration
is only within the permissible limit in the range > 80m from
transport road centerline, at downwind direction.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Use the vehicles that meet the emission standards and requirements in
transportation;
- Control and management of the environment where vehicles going in and
out the construction site;
- Cleaning the roads near the entrance of the construction sites;
-ditto- 24 months of
construction
-ditto- -ditto-
- Activities of
concrete
mixing plants
Dust concentration exceeds the permissible limit several
times, it is only in the permissible limit at about 200 meters
down the wind from mixing plants.
The proposed measures by prevention and adjustment orientation through
observation, including:
- Preventing dust emission in storage areas of mixing materials.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
24 months of
construction
-ditto- -ditto-
Environmental impact assessment report
209
Ord Project
activities Environment impacts Environmental protection measures and utilities
Expense of Environmental
protection measures and utilities
Time of execution
and completion
Responsibility
for
implementation
Responsibility
for supervision
- Preventing dust emission when materials are unloaded.
- Preventing dust emission from the stone grinding operation.
- Preventing dust emission at the conveyors.
- Preventing dust emission in the silo.
- Implementation of environmental monitoring.
Budget for monitoring work is shown
in the Table 5.10.
2 Sound environment
- Road and
bridge
construction
activities
arising noise
On operating the noise-generating construction equipment, the
following objects shall be affected:
- Special areas (temples, schools and clinics):
o By daytime, noise level exceeds the permissible limit
from 1.1 ÷ 13.2 dBA.
o By nighttime, Hung Ha township clinic will be
affected by noise level which exceeds the permissible
limit from 12.1 ÷ 19.2 dBA.
- Common area (residential):
o By daytime, noise level exceeds the permissible limit
from 2.2 ÷ 3.5 dBA.
o By nighttime, Hung Ha township clinic will be
affected by noise level which exceeds the permissible
limit from 9.7 ÷ 18.5 dBA.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Apply the general principles:
o Arrangement of noise-generating machinery and equipments at a
location which has suitable distance so that, the noise in the
residential areas shall not be greater than 70dBA and noise in
schools, temples and hospitals shall not be greater than 55dBA at
daytime. In case of impossibility, noise barrier sheets shall be
installed (noise level can be reduced of 25dBA on passing those
barriers);
o Shutting down the engines of vehicles when parking on site;
o In daytime, when construction is operated at the site which is about
200m away from residential areas, low sound generating shall be
selected for construction;
o Prioritizing the use of machinery and vehicles with low sound
generation;
o Drivers shall be well educated to have well behavior, avoid actions
that cause unnecessary noise;
- Bored pile drilling work at the location which is about 100 meters away
from residential areas will be done in daytime. In case of impossibility,
drilling work must be implemented at night time by vibratory drilling
equipments.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
24 months of
construction
-ditto- -ditto-
- Activities of
cement
concrete
mixing plants
arising noise
When operating of concrete mixing plants, construction
workers and the households living from 30 ÷ 55m away from
the site will be affected, in particular: the construction
workers: affected by noise arising beyond the permissible
limits of 5 ÷ 10dBA; residents: affected by noise arising
beyond the permissible limits of 11 ÷ 17dBA.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Regular maintaining the mixing devices of mixing plants.
- Workers at the mixing plants will be equipped with muffler helmets.
- Workers are not arranged to work in mixing over 8h/day. Workers shall be
arranged in shifts (4 hours/shift).
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
24 months of
construction
Contractors,
under
contracts with
the employer.
Environment
al
supervision
consultant,
under
contracts
with the
employer.
3 Water and sediment environment
1 Road construction
Environmental impact assessment report
210
Ord Project
activities Environment impacts Environmental protection measures and utilities
Expense of Environmental
protection measures and utilities
Time of execution
and completion
Responsibility
for
implementation
Responsibility
for supervision
- Excavation
and backfill
activities
The risk of surface water and sediment pollution in the ponds
due to soil spilling and deposit of erosion products by TSS
(Total Suspended Solids) and turbidity.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Compensation for damage due to aquaculture interruption.
- Prevention of soil spillage outside the land acquisition area: Setting
barriers to prevent soil spillage beyond the land acquisition area.
- Reinforcement of slopes.
- Cleaning up after construction: soil and everything fell into ponds will be
cleared.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
Budget for monitoring work is shown
in the Table5.10.
The measures are
maintained until
being handed over
(24 months)
-ditto- -ditto-
2 Bridge construction
2.1 Bored pile construction
- At the piers There are potential dangers that drilling mud and bentonite
flowing into Sa Lung and Hoang Nguyen rivers, Hoai river
polluting river water by TSS and turbidity. Flooded HST is
affected by water pollution, causing deaths.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Bentonite from construction activities under the bridge is prohibited to be
discharged to the surrounding area but collected to the temporary storage
yards, dried, then treated as other common solid wastes.
- On construction of bored piles, standard bentonite shall be used (not using
admixtures) and water stoppers shall be installed to prevent the risk of
groundwater pollution.
-ditto- Implementing and
maintaining the
measures during
construction of
each pier, abutment
and all piers and
abutments (about
24 months)
-ditto- -ditto-
2.2 Construction of superstructure
- At positions of
main bridges
crossing Sa
Lung River
and Hoang
Nguyen River
The risk of water pollution due to solid waste dropping down
to Sa Lung and Hoang Nguyen rivers. Ecosystem quality
shall be declined due to water and sediment pollution
condition.
Proposed preventive measures: solid waste dropping when construction of
superstructure and resulting from concrete slabs cleaning will be collected
and put into the bins and temporary dumping areas and shall be treated as
common solid wastes.
-ditto- Construction time
of superstructure
-ditto- -ditto-
2.3 Construction of
temporary
facilities in the
waterflows of
Sa Lung and
Hoang Nguyen
rivers.
The risk of surface water and sediment pollution in Sa Lung
and Hoang Nguyen rivers by solid waste which are not
collected.
Carrying out clearance of the river flow after construction by removal of
temporary facilities, collection of solid wastes in the flows and stabilization
of the river banks.
-ditto- Immediately after
complete
construction of Nại
and Dong Tu
bridges.
-ditto- -ditto-
3 Activities on site
Environmental impact assessment report
211
Ord Project
activities Environment impacts Environmental protection measures and utilities
Expense of Environmental
protection measures and utilities
Time of execution
and completion
Responsibility
for
implementation
Responsibility
for supervision
- Rainwater
runoff
The risk of penetration of dirty runoff rainwater causing
surface water pollution in the ponds adjacent to the
construction sites and farther fields through irrigation ditches.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- On-site drainage system will be designed to ensure collection of rain
water on the surface of the site. Rainwater will not flow through the areas
with surface contaminants such as petroleum storage and will not cause
flooding.
- Checking the stored positions for collection of waste.
- Cleaning the construction site everyday;
- Recommend use one layer of stone chips on land to prevent waste erosion
into water surface, and reduce dust generation.
Costs for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
Budget for monitoring work is shown
in the Table 5.10.
During construction
time, especially in
rainy season (May
÷ September)
-ditto- -ditto-
- Machinery
maintenance
activities
The risk of penetration of used oil and oil-bearing waste from
vehicle maintenance stations polluting surface water in the
ponds adjacent to the site and polluting farther fields through
irrigation ditches.
Proposed preventive measures: used oil and oil-bearing waste from vehicle
maintenance shall be managed and treated following Circular 12/2011/TT-
BTNMT.
Costs for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
24 months of
construction
-ditto- -ditto-
- Activities of
work-force
Domestic wastes from workmen’s site huts can penetrate into
irrigation ditches and ponds polluting the water, sediment.
Proposed preventive measures: domestic wastes shall be collected in tanks;
wastewater is pre-treated by sand tanks; portable toilets shall be installed
inside the site.
.
-ditto- 24 months of
construction
-ditto- -ditto-
-
Activities of
consrete
batching
River water can be polluted as a result of sudden increase of
TSS and pH.
Proposed preventive measures:
- Wastewater from concrete mixing cement plant is treated in the
sedimentation tank, and then re-used to moisten the site;
- pH index at locations of ending up with the natural flows will be checked
daily.
-ditto- 24 months of
construction
-ditto- -ditto-
Groundwater environment
- Bored pile
construction
activities
- The risk of groundwater pollution on a large scale due to
bentonite.
- The risk of groundwater pollution on a large scale due to
dirty water entered into the gaps between the bore holes
and casings.
- Bentonite from construction activities under the bridge is prohibited to be
discharged to the surrounding area but collected to the temporary storage
yards, dried, then treated as other common solid wastes.
- On construction of bored piles, standard bentonite shall be used (not using
admixtures) and water stoppers shall be installed to prevent the risk of
groundwater pollution.
Costs for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
Budget for monitoring work is
15,192,000 VND.
Implementing and
maintaining the
measures during
construction each
pier, abutment and
all piers and
abutments
-ditto- -ditto-
Soil environment
1 Construction activities of the road expansion and rehabilitation
Environmental impact assessment report
212
Ord Project
activities Environment impacts Environmental protection measures and utilities
Expense of Environmental
protection measures and utilities
Time of execution
and completion
Responsibility
for
implementation
Responsibility
for supervision
1.1 Excavation
and backfill,
stockpiling of
materials, and
dumping of
waste soil and
rock.
Paddy land degradation as a result of agricultural land buried
by spillage. Residential land areas and surrounding
environmental landscape will be adversely affected. The
community activities in the residential areas adjacent to the
dumping sites will be hindered.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Completely finishing embankment at each section with well compaction
to avoid erosion due to rain and carrying out checking the embankment
section before every rain;
- Soil type will be collected on the dump within the site and is surrounded
by a railing to prevent spillage. In the event of a spill, the regional
agricultural land will be cleaned and returned to the status quo.
Costs for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
Budget for monitoring work is
10,080,000 VND.
24 months of
construction.
-ditto- -ditto-
1.2 Land spilling
from material
dumping sites
Agricultural land areas are buried and hindering the
community’s activities at the residential land areas adjacent to
dumping sites.
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
1.3 Stockpiling
yard of
materials for
overflow rain
water
prevention.
Causing partial flooding in paddy lands as a result of
stopping runoff spill rainwater and this can cause death rice
in the fields.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Locations of drainage culverts are required to check and clear;
- Cross culverts shall be installed before embankment filling and will be
regularly checked for well operation.
Costs for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
24 months of
construction.
-ditto- -ditto-
2 Operation of
the
construction
equipment
Construction vehicles may encroach into agricultural land
areas adjacent to the land acquisition corridor causing ground
pressing.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Limiting the construction boundary with posts.
- In case of unwanted ground pressing, the area of ground pressing will be
scarified at least 0.3m depth.
Costs for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
24 months of
construction.
-ditto- -ditto-
Ecosystem
- Road
construction
activities
Terrestrial ecosystem (rice and garden crops) will be affected
by dust pollution which will result in reduction of productivity
of rice and garden trees.
Implementation of mitigation measures to the adverse impacts on ambient
air quality and surface water.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project
24 months of
construction
-ditto- -ditto-
- Bridge
construction
activities
Aquatic ecosystem will be affected by solid waste dropping of
and depositing at the beds of rivers.
- Site activities Aquatic ecosystem will be affected by waste oil, solid waste
and waste water generating from the site.
Traffic
1 Road and bridge construction activities
- Road
expansion and
rehabilitation
Impact to traffic interruption on NH.39-1.
Impact on movement and living activities of people
Causing the interruption of traffic at interchanges of Hung
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Complying with safety regulations in construction including NOT
arrangement of storage sites of construction material and equipments that
Costs for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
24 months of
construction.
-ditto- -ditto-
Environmental impact assessment report
213
Ord Project
activities Environment impacts Environmental protection measures and utilities
Expense of Environmental
protection measures and utilities
Time of execution
and completion
Responsibility
for
implementation
Responsibility
for supervision
construction
Construction
of
intersections
Nhan bypass encroaching the traffic corridors.
- Setting the signs, posts and lights inside the construction area for
navigation of traffic and installation of safety warnings. In case of
necessity, traffic guiding men will be arranged.
- Ensuring traffic of residential area to main road;
- Organize the traffic during construction stage.
- Regarding section constructing the existing NH39-1 (according to the
Circular No.39/2011/TT-BGTVT on May 18th
, 2011:
+ Construction permission on the existing road;
+ Ensuring the smooth traffic on the alignment.
2 Activities of material transportation by road
- Material
transportation
on the national
highways and
provincial
roads
Dropping materials resulting from transportation will cause
muddy and slippery and it may cause traffic accidents on the
delivery roads.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Avoiding material transportation in rush hours and complying with the
regulated speed,
- Collecting the dropping materials and cleaning the roads.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
24 months of
construction.
-ditto- -ditto-
- Material
transportation
on low-class
roads
Inter-commune roads will be damaged, degraded indirectly
causing damages to the local people on daily traveling.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- There will be negotiations with local authorities on temporary usage of
the roads for transportation;
- The roads shall be ensured clean and safe in using process and shall be
restored to the original status before hand-over to the local authorities.
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
Landscape - Historical vestiges
- Activities of
workmen
The values historical vestiges of Linh Son Tu Phu Cau
pagoda and National historical culture area of Tran Thu Do
Great tutor can be affected by the labor force of the Project
accidentally or unintentionally cause such disrespecting its
intangible or tangible objects.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Educating and propagandizing to improve understanding of the historical
value Con Chuot Mountains and raising the awareness of respect and
responsibility to protect the value of tangible and intangible of the
heritage.
- Wide spreading the rules of construction and prohibition of violating the
vestige areas.
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
Impacts due to concentration of workmen
- Activities of
workmen
concentration
- The surrounding population areas may be spread of
epidemics and infectious diseases such as dengue fever,
eye diseases and HIV.
- Affecting to the project workers, local communities,
visitors due to the risk of incidental conflicts.
Proposed preventive measures, including:
- Implementing measures to manage workers, including create good
condition of accommodation; temporary residence registration; education
for workers.
- Coordinating with the local authorities and prisons in propaganda against
social evils and ensure security and order.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
Budget for monitoring work is shown
in the below supervision section.
24 months of
construction.
-ditto- -ditto-
Environmental impact assessment report
214
Ord Project
activities Environment impacts Environmental protection measures and utilities
Expense of Environmental
protection measures and utilities
Time of execution
and completion
Responsibility
for
implementation
Responsibility
for supervision
- Prioritizing use of local labor to do the simple works.
Waste and requirement for waste treatment
- Activities
during
construction of
the project
Living quality
Solid waste (soil, construction solid waste, domestic solid
waste, hazardous solid waste); waste water (domestic waste
water), oil and oily waste (waste oil and oily waste water)
Proposed measures, including:
- Making the plan for waste management for all common wastes and
hazardous waste.
- Wastes are stored in the temporary dump sites and moved to filling
locations.
- Garbage and domestic wastes are classified, stored and treated in
accordance with Decree 59/2007/ND-CP and in accordance with local
practice.
- Waste oil and oily waste are collected in a separate containers and treated
according Circular 12/2011/TT-BTNTM.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project.
Budget for monitoring work is shown
in the below supervision section.
24 months of
construction.
-ditto- -ditto-
III Operation phase
Impacts of splitting agricultural land
- The new road
cutting the
agricultural
land.
Project route crossing the parts of agricultural land causing
split of agricultural land.
Encouraging local authorities to consider proper arrangement of the land
pieces so that, one owner only cultivates on his land piece on one side of the
road.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been preparesd by
local authorities
Before project’s
activities
Local
authorities
Local
authorities
Impacts of rainwater runoff
- Rainwater
runoff
Water environmental are polluted by wastes and metals in
rainwater runoff
Pavement is cleaned periodically to collect the dust and wastes. Therefore, the
remained pollution level in the water runoff from the first rain is small.
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project
Project investment
planning stage
Design
consultants,
under
contracts with
the employer
PMU3 and
Verification
consultants
IV Environmental incidents
Construction of
the bridge’s
superstructure
Technical incidents causing utility collapse will threaten the
lives workmen participating in construction.
Comply with regulation on safety; establish the plan of appropriate
construction organization, and plan to coordinate with relative agencies
when there incident
Cost for implementing mitigation
measures have been included in the
total investment cost of the Project
24 months of
construction
Contractors,
under
contracts with
the employer.
PMU3 and
Construction
Surveys
Consultants
Petroleum
storage
Fire incidents in maintenance stations of vehicles and storage
areas supplying fuel for vehicles.
Comply with regulation on fire safety: Fuel will be stored at isolated areas.
Arrangement of fire extinguishers, fire extinguishing water tank at the site.
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
Construction
activities
Labor accidents can occur in any activity of the construction
process if not complying with the work safety procedures.
Establishing the regulations on work safety and planning for emergency aids
when accidents occur.
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
Environmental impact assessment report
215
Ord Project
activities Environment impacts Environmental protection measures and utilities
Expense of Environmental
protection measures and utilities
Time of execution
and completion
Responsibility
for
implementation
Responsibility
for supervision
-ditto- Storms and tropical depressions does not directly hit the
construction areas as other coastal provinces but the impact
of rains caused by storms is very large which could cause
problems in construction such as lightning, causing collapse
of new built structures and floods in the construction site.
Upon the occurrence of storms, construction will be postponed, covering the
structures with canvas, installation of lightning-conductor system. When
floods occur, all vehicles will be moved out of the site. Regular contacting
with local agencies (army and police) for rescuing.
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
Detecting the
landmine
Latent explosive incidents, threaten the human lives and
properties
Minesweeper Work will be done in and around the construction site and is
confirmed safe by defense unit that treatment explosive materials through
economic contract with project owners
-ditto- -ditto- -ditto- -ditto-
Environmental impact assessment report
216
EIA Report
217
Technical characteristics of the environmental treatment utilities
(1) Sediment prevention fence
The geotextile barrier is used to trap sediment substances while water still flowing
through. It consists of a geotextile membrane fixed on wooden or metal piles.
Geotextile barrier is easy for moving on the extent of work progress. The barrier is
maintained by removing sediment substances. On completion of the work, this barrier
is reclaimed and the ground is stabilized.
Residual mud barriers consist of several sections, which are installed at the following
locations:
In the temporary dumping sites (filling soil and unsuitable soil and stone). Stoppers
are arranged as a surrounding fence;
Along the foot of the slopes where the route passing through canals and residential
areas (see Table 5.1).
Residual mud barriers will be installed prior to construction of work items in this area.
Technical specifications of the barriers is shown in Figure 5.1.
Figure 5.1. Residual Mud Barrier
(2) Toilets, mobile waste baskets, hazardous waste containers
At each site, there will be:
01 portable toilet compartment 03;
02 domestic waste plastic basket of 200 liters, with a lid;
02 hazardous waste plastic containers 100 liter, with a lid.
Environmental impact assessment report
218
(3) Wastewater treatment and drainage system
Inside the construction site, a wastewater treatment and drainage system will be
installed, including:
Treatment of wastewater from areas of washing aggregate, concrete mixing and
washing concrete mixers: water from aggregate washing areas and concrete mixing
areas will be directed to a sedimentation tank which has at least two compartments
with minimum size 2m x 2m x 5m, making sure to collect all wastewater from 01
batch of concrete. In front of the inlet, there will be an iron grid for garbage
collection. Treated water in the tank will be reused. Sediment will be collected and
processed as for construction waste.
The system of collecting and draining trenches of wastewater shall have minimum
size of 50cm x 50cm x 30cm is well compacted and lined with geotextile to prevent
erosion.
Sedimentation tanks and drainage ditches shall be built in the pre-construction
phase and regular maintained to ensure good operation in the construction phase of
the project. After construction, they will be filled with soil, then covered with
organic soil of about 1 meter thick to use for agricultural purposes.
5.1.3. Organization Mechanism and Roles of Relative Agencies
5.1.3.1. In the Preparation and Construction Phases of the Project
Proper environmental management during construction requires the involvement of
several stakeholders and agencies, each with different roles and responsibilities
including:
Project owner: DRVN, PMU3;
The agency approved Environmental impact assessment report: Ministry of
Transport;
DONRE of Thai Binh province and relative agencies;
Independent Environmental Monitoring Consultant (IEMC);
Contractor;
Local communities;
World Bank (WB).
EIA Report
219
Figure 5.2. Environmental Management System
The roles of relative agencies are shown in Table 5.2.
Table 5.2. The Roles and Responsibilities of Relative Agencies
No. Company/
Unit
Responsibilities
1 DRVN/ PMU3 DRVN is the Project Owner.
PMU3, representative of the DRVN, will be responsible for monitoring
the overall project implementation, including environmental compliance
WB
DONREs of Thai Binh and Hung Yen provinces
and relative agencies
PMU3
Environmental Unit - EU
(under PMU3)
DRVN
MOT, MONRE
IEMC
CONTRACTOR
Safety and
Environmental Officer
SEO
CONSTRUCTION SITE
Local
Authorities
Local
Communities
CSC
Environmental impact assessment report
220
of the project. PMU3 will have the final responsibility for environmental
performance of the project during both the construction and operational
phases.
2 Environmental
Unit (under
PMU3)
The Environmental Unit is responsible for monitoring the
implementation of WB’s environmental safeguard policies in all stages
and process that applying all the items of the project, such as: biding,
construction contract, consultant contract, data and report assessments,
unusual site examination, co-ordinate all of units, problem solving…
relate to the Environment Management. This unit will consult on
environment to chief of PMU3 in order to the meet demand of WB’s
safeguards.
3 CSC The Construction Supervision consultant (CSC) will be responsible for
supervising and monitoring all construction activities and for ensuring
that Contractors comply with the requirements of the contracts and the
EMP. The CSC shall engage sufficient number of qualified staff (e.g.
Environmental Engineers) with adequate knowledge on environmental
protection and construction project management to perform the required
duties and to supervise the Contractor’s performance. The
Environmental Engineers shall be lead by a Workplace Safety and
Environment Supervisor (SES) who shall have extensive experience (at
least 5 years experience is required) in environmental management,
supervision and monitoring on construction projects and be familiar with
Viet Nam environmental legislatives requirements.
The terms of Reference for the CSC shall be clearly stipulated in the
contract signed between CSC and PMU3.
4 Contractor Based on an approved EMP, the Contractor will be responsible for
establishing an EMP for each construction site area, submit the plan and
receive opinions of relevant agencies, complete reports for approval and
implementation. In addition, it is required that the Contractor get all
permissions for construction (traffic control and diversion, excavation,
labor safety, etc) following current regulations.
The contractor shall be required to appoint a competent individual as the
contractor‘s on-site Safety and Environment Officer (SEO) who will be
responsible for monitoring the contractor‘s compliance with the EMP
requirements and the environmental specifications.
Approved specific EMP and relevant papers will be the basis for
management and supervision in the future.
5 Independent
Environmental
Monitoring
Consultant
(IEMC)
IEMC shall be a professional and experienced unit in the environmental
management field. IEMC will, under the contract scope, provide support
to PMU3 to establish and operate environmental management systems,
offers suggestions for adjusting and building capacity for relevant
agencies during the implementation period and monitor the Contractor’s
EMP implementation plan in both construction and operation stages.
IEMC will also be responsible to support PMU3 to prepare monitoring
reports on EMP implementation and submit these reports to DONRE for
approval.
The IEMC shall have extensive knowledge and experience in
environmental monitoring and auditing to provide independent,
objective and professional advice on the environmental performance of
the project. In order to minimize conflict of interests, the IEMC shall not
EIA Report
221
be working in the same organization performing the EMP work, be part
of the PMU3, Environmental Officer (under PMU3) or the CSC.
6 Ministry of
Natural Resource
and Environment
(MONRE)
- Implement or may assign its professional environmental protection
agency to carry out the activities:
Inspecting and certifying the application of environmental protection
works and measures for project operation;
Inspecting the application of environmental protection measures in
the investment preparation and project construction phases when
necessary;
- Shall detail the inspection and certification of application of
environmental protection works and measures for project operation; and
formulate and promulgate specialized technical guidelines for such
inspection and certification.
7 Department of
Natural
Resources and
Environment
(DONRE)
With the role of state management in the environmental field, DONRE
will be responsible for receiving and verifying environmental monitoring
reports, which are submitted by PMU3. In case of arising problems,
DONRE will directly study, settle all problems and minimize arising
damages, which are generated from project implementation process.
5.1.3.2. In Operation Phase of the Project
After Project is completed and handed over to the functional management units of the
Directorate for Roads of Vietnam (DRVN). These units will be responsible for the
management, operation and maintenance of the work to comply with the existing
regulations, the arising issues related to any agency that shall be responsible for
implementation and report to DRVN.
5.1.4. Essential Base for the EMS operation
To establish a adequate legal base
Update and comply with the requirements in accordance with the legal regulation
on environmental protection and safety of people's health.
Develop and disseminate widely the contents of EMP and environmental
mitigation measures on site.
Prepare all the necessary licenses (licenses of construction, traffic diversion, waste
soil discharge etc.).
Raising environmental awareness for stakeholders
Raise environmental awareness for the workers on the construction site
environment (learning about labor safety and sanitation).
Environmental impact assessment report
222
Regular training field staff on mitigation measures on site.
Propagate, raise people awareness to understand the consequences of
environmental degradation.
Maintain traffic sign system, safety regulations on the construction area.
Maintain a system of information exchange and coordination channels to deal with
the incident
Maintain regularly exchange meetings between stakeholders (PMU3, contractor,
construction supervisors, local representatives).
Maintain report system with records including: hygiene and safety issue on the site,
mitigation measures are implemented, the existing problems need to overcome, etc
through its form as: diary, monthly / quarterly report of CSC, The suggestions of
local authority and community representatives.
Provide the name and phone number of the responsible officials relating to
environmental management, sanitation and safety of the Contractor, CSC and
PMU3 and widely disseminated to the people around the area of the construction
site.
Provide telephone number of hotline (hotline) of the functional agencies such as
traffic inspection, environmental inspection, etc. sea on the project on and around
the construction area.
Participate to solve the arising incidents, the risks and record in writing in
accordance with current regulations.
5.2. Environmental Monitoring Program
5.2.1. Objectives
It is essential to design the monitoring program and monitoring frequency
appropriately to be able to demonstrate both the overall performance of the project
works as well as the short- term impact due to peak construction activities. More
specifically, as the integral and critical part of the EMP, the environment monitoring
program should have the following objectives:
o Determine the actual extent of the impacts;
o Control impacts which are generated from construction process and mentioned
in EIA report;
o Check environmental pollution standards applied to the project during
construction;
EIA Report
223
o Check and supervise implementation of environmental protection solutions
during construction based on EIA report.
o Suggest mitigation measures in case of unexpected impacts;
o Suggest to the Client to coordinate with central and local environmental
organizations to solve pending issues relating to environmental protection under
the scope of the Project;
o Assess the effect of mitigation measures in pre-construction, construction
and operation stages;
o Confirm the impacts forecasted in the EIA.
5.2.2. Basis of Environmental Quality Monitoring
Environmental quality monitoring of the Project area shall comply with the provisions
of law and the following technical conditions
Environmental Protection Law 2005 and the legal documents related to the
environmental impact assessment of the project;
QCVN 2009, 2010 and Canadian sediment standards;
Circular 28/2011/TT-BTNTM defined technical process of monitoring ambient air
and noise environment;
Circular No. 29/2011/TT-BTNMT on 01/8/2011 of the Ministry of Natural
Resources and Environment stipulating the technical standards of monitoring
inland surface water environment;
Circular No. 30/2011/TT-BTNMT on 01/8/2011 of the Ministry of Natural
Resources and Environment stipulating the technical standards of monitoring
inland underground water environment;
Circular No. 33/2011/TT-BTNMT on 01/8/2011 of the Ministry of Natural
Resources and Environment stipulating the technical standards of monitoring the
soil environment;
Environmental pollution forecast by the EIA;
Current status of environmental quality in the project area.
5.2.3. Contents of Environmental Monitoring Program
The environmental monitoring program will be implemented during construction
and operation process at 4 levels:
(i) Monitoring project completion Indicator
Environmental impact assessment report
224
(ii) Monitoring the level of compliance with mitigation measures
(iii) Community-based Monitoring
(iv) Monitoring environmental parameters;
Details of the monitoring program proposed are presented below.
5.2.4. Monitoring Indicators
5.2.4.1. Monitoring Project Completion Indicator
A system of monitoring indicators is proposed to assess implementation of some
project stages. These monitoring indicators which represent characteristics of sub-
project activities can be collected easily based on experiences obtained from similar
WB funded infrastructure investment projects in Viet Nam. Based on initial objectives,
the following activities will be established, including socio-economic effect,
environment, and sustainable development.
These indicators will be stated in the manual which provides guidance on project
implementation. The main environmental indicators related to project investment
effect includes but not be limited by the following matters:
(i) Decrease in the level of pollution load on NH39-1 and related axis roads.
(ii) Decrease in the level of accidents on NH39-1 and related axis roads.
This monitoring will be implemented after road completion. PMU3 will be responsible
for collecting the information necessary to prepare periodical reports on project
completion indicators with the help of a technical consultant.
5.2.4.2. Monitoring Compliance with Mitigation Measures
The monitoring assignments for the Contractor, CSC and IEMC shall be clearly
indicated in their terms of reference and contract documents shall be approved by the
World Bank. CSC will be responsible for submitting monthly reports which state
environmental problems, actions and updated monitoring results. Based on monthly
reports and field monitoring trips, IEMC will be responsible for preparing and
submitting every three months reports to PMU3, which shall include conclusions on
environmental problems and the key implemented mitigation measures. Quarterly
reports, prepared by PMU3, shall comprise the following aspects:
• A priority list of issues as determined in monitoring reports of the previous
months.
• Methods taken by the Contractor to solve relevant.
• Pending matters, proposed solutions and explanation of special circumstances
EIA Report
225
for non-compliance.
IEMC shall provide the necessary technical support and guidance to PMU3 and CSC
during monitoring implementation of mitigation measures and for submitting relevant
reports.
5.2.4.3. Community-based Monitoring
The communities will monitor the project along its construction process in order to
ensure that the contractors will comply with all environmental and social regulations
as well as to reduce the risks on their properties and economic activities, human
health and the environment. According to the information phase, the communities
help to assess the mitigation measures as well as interested in the aspirations of the
people, to contribute to a better environment management mechanism.
Community-based monitoring will form the spirit of voluntary report and mention the
urgent issues. When there is damage to the environment, the community and local
authorities will report to stakeholders.
5.2.4.4. Environmental Quality Monitoring Indicators
The environmental monitoring program will be implemented during 3 stages of the
project including the pre-construction stage (environmental baseline); construction
stage and operation stage (the two years of project execution).
Positions of environmental quality monitoring were selected based on the positions,
which had been measured and surveyed of environmental quality in the time of project
planning as well as in the vulnerable positions which were defined as the objects
impacted by the project in all of three phases: preparation, construction and operation.
The environmental quality monitoring positions of the project are shown in Table 5.3
and Figure 5.3 enough for covering waste resources (areas of construction and
operation) and the affected objects (residential areas and vulnerable objects in the
Project area).
Table 5.3. Positions of Environmental Quality Monitoring
No. Location Symbol
Pre-
construction
stage
Construction
stage
Operation
stage
I Air and Noise environment 4 locations 10 locations 4 locations
1
Residential area at Trieu
Duong bridge (Km44+000 -
NH39-1)
KK1; O1 x x x
Environmental impact assessment report
226
No. Location Symbol
Pre-
construction
stage
Construction
stage
Operation
stage
2
Residential area at Tan Le
commune (Km44+800 -
NH9-1)
KK2; O2 x
3
Residential area at Hung
Nhan town, near the Van
Nam pagoda
(Km46+840 - NH39-1)
KK3; O3 x
4
Interchanges of Hung Nhan
bypass
(Km47+930 - NH39-)1
KK4; O4 x
5
Residential area at Nai
bridge (Km52+662 -
NH39-1)
KK5; O5 x x x
6 Dong Tu pagoda area
(Km55+400 - NH39-1) KK6; O6 x
7
Area near the Hung Ha
medical station
(Km57+480 - NH39-1)
KK7; O7 x
8
Residential area at Minh
Khai commune
(Km59+880 - NH39-1)
KK8; O8 x
9 Ending point (Km64+000 -
NH39-1) KK9; O9 x x x
10 Go bridge KK10; O10 x x x
II Surface water and sediment
environment
5 locations 5 location 5 location
1 Nai bridge Nm1; TT1 x x x
2 Le bridge Nm2; TT2 x x x
3 Nai bridge Nm3; TT3 x x x
4 Dong Tu bridge Nm4; TT4 x x x
5 Go bridge
(Km88+000 - NH39) Nm5; TT5 x x x
EIA Report
227
No. Location Symbol
Pre-
construction
stage
Construction
stage
Operation
stage
III Soil and groundwater 4 locations 4 locations 4 locations
1 Tan Le commune, Hung Ha
district Nn1, Đ1 x x x
2 Lien Hiep commune, Hung
Ha district Nn2, Đ2 x x x
3 Minh Khai commune Nn3, Đ3 x x x
4
Residential area at Go
bridge, Dong Phong
commune
Nn4, Đ4 x x x
Summary of environmental quality monitoring program is presented in Table 5.4.
Table 5.4. Summary of Environmental Quality Monitoring Program
No. Item Pre-construction
stage Construction stage Operation stage
I Monitoring noise
1. Monitoring parameter
Leq
Leq
Leq
2. Monitoring frequency 01 time prior to
construction.
01 location/day,
Measure sixteen times
/day, 3 samples/once
Measure once every
03 months.
01 location/day,
Measure sixteen times
/day, 3 samples/once
Measure once every 06
months.
01 location/day,
Measure sixteen times
/day, 3 samples/once
3. Frequency of taking
samples
4 locations x 16 x 3 10 locations x 16 x 4 x
3 x 2 years of
construction (as
expected)
4 locations x 16 x 2 x
3 x 2 years
4. Standard for
comparison
QCVN 26: 2010/ BTNMT
II Monitoring air quality
1. Monitoring parameter TSP, PM10, CO, SO2,
NO2
TSP, PM10, CO, SO2,
NO2
TSP, PM10, CO, SO2,
NO2
2. Monitoring frequency 01 time prior to
construction.
Measure once every
03 months.
Measure once every 06
months.
Environmental impact assessment report
228
No. Item Pre-construction
stage Construction stage Operation stage
01 location/day,
Measure eight times
/day
01 location/day,
Measure eight times
/day
01 location/day,
Measure eight times
/day
3. Frequency of taking
samples
4 locations x 8 10 locations x 8 x 4 x
2 years of
construction (as
expected)
4 locations x 8 x 2 x 2
years
4. Standard for
comparison
QCVN 05:2009/ BTNMT
III Monitoring surface water quality
1. Monitoring parameter Temperature, pH,
Turbidity, DO, TSS,
Fe, Mn, Pb, oil
Temperature, pH,
Turbidity, DO, TSS,
Fe, Mn, Pb, oil
Temperature, pH,
Turbidity, DO, TSS,
Fe, Mn, Pb, oil
2. Monitoring frequency 01 time prior to
construction, two
times per day
Measure once every
03 months.
Two times per day
Measure once every 06
months.
01 times perday
3. Frequency of taking
samples
4 location x 1 4 location x 4 x 2
years of construction
(as expected)
4 location x 2 x 2 yeas
4. Standard for
comparison
QCVN 08:2009/ BTNMT
IV Monitoring groundwater quality
1. Monitoring parameter Temperature, pH, DO,
turbidity, hardness,
Fe, TS, As, Coliform,
E.Coli
Temperature, pH, DO,
turbidity, hardness, Fe,
TS, As, Coliform,
E.Coli
2. Monitoring frequency 01 time prior to
construction.
Measure once every
03 months.
01 location/day
3. Frequency of taking
samples
4 Location x 1 4 Location x 4 x 2
years of construction
(as expected)
4. Standard for
comparison
QCVN 09:2008/ BTNMT
V Monitoring sediment quality
EIA Report
229
No. Item Pre-construction
stage Construction stage Operation stage
1. Monitoring parameter Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, As Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, As
2. Monitoring frequency 01 time prior to
construction.
Measure once every
03 months.
01 location/day
3. Frequency of taking
samples
5 Location x 1 5 Location x 4 x 2
years of construction
(as expected)
4. Standard for
comparison
QCVN 43:2012/BTNMT
VI Monitoring soil quality
1. Monitoring parameter Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, As
2. Monitoring frequency 01 time prior to
construction.
Measure once every
03 months.
01 location/day
3. Frequency of taking
samples
4 Location x 1 4 Location x 4 x 2
years of construction
(as expected)
4. Standard for
comparison
QCVN 03:2008/ BTNMT
The projects of large infrastructure construction are usually done by successive
construction method according to every specific section. So, in order to ensure
objectiveness, science, practical reflecting the impacts of the process of project
implementation (both of positive and negative), the monitoring program will have to
be adjusted from time to time consistent with the actual construction site and project
progress. Monitoring locations will be established on the basis of the map reference of
monitoring locations which are established during the EIA preparation. In case the
project was started within 1 year (from the time of approval of the EIA report) the
monitoring data can be used directly as the initial data.
5.2.5. Monitoring Report System
In order to exchange information effectively, establish a database for monitoring the
implementation of mitigation measures, and create an effective implementation of
EMP, it is essential to adopt a system of standard report at all levels of management as
shown in the table below.
Environmental impact assessment report
230
Table 5.5. System of Environmental Monitoring Report
No. Issues to be
reported
Monitoring at 1st
level
Monitoring at 2nd
level
Monitoring at 3rd
level
(One duplicate must
be sent to DONRE)
Construction stage
1 Implement
mitigation
measures on site
in accordance
with the EMP
and contract
clauses
Implemented by:
Contractor
Frequency of
report submission:
Monthly
Report sent to:
PMU3
Implemented by:
PMU3
Frequency of report
submission: once
every three months
Report sent to:
DRVN
Implemented by:
DRVN
Frequency of report
submission: once
every three months
Report sent to: MOT,
WB
2 Monitoring and
supervision of
the EMP
compliance in
accordance with
the contract
clauses
Implementation
Unit: Construction
Supervision Team
(CSC)
Frequency of
report submission:
Monthly – Quarterly
Report sent to:
PMU3
Implemented by:
PMU3
Frequency of report
submission: once
every three months
Report sent to:
DRVN
Implemented by:
DRVN
Frequency of report
submission: once every
three months
Report sent to: MOT,
WB
3 Community
monitoring of
EMP
implementation
Implemented by:
Co
mmunity
Monitoring by
community group
Frequency of
report submission:
Monthly
Send report to:
Local authority
Implemented by:
Local
authority
Frequency of
report submission: In
cases of
reflection/complaints.
Report sent to: PMU3
Operation stage
1 Environment
and Traffic
Monitoring
Implemented by:
Functional company of
DRVN
Frequency of report
submission: once
every six months
Report sent to: DRVN
Implemented by:
DRVN
Frequency of report
submission: once every
six months
Report sent to: MOT
EIA Report
231
No. Issues to be
reported
Monitoring at 1st
level
Monitoring at 2nd
level
Monitoring at 3rd
level
(One duplicate must
be sent to DONRE)
2 Traffic
safety
monitoring
Implemented by:
Functional company of
DRVN
Frequency of report
submission: once
every six months
Report sent to: MOT
5.3. Capacity Building and Training
5.3.1. Analysis and determination of training demands
Actual implementation of projects shows that coordination in environmental
management is not always effective because of the following reasons:
• Lack of a unified coordination regime which should be established in the beginning
of project among PMU3, relevant agencies, local authorities at project
wards/communes especially;
• Local staff do not master loans borrowing process of project but carry out practices
involving and following those of domestic projects with limited participation;
• The community does not have obvious awareness on their rights and obligations on
environmental protection or in spite of understanding, there is a lack of regime to
provide feedback;
• Relevant agencies were not always ready in coordinating works during
project implementation. Some agencies assigned their functional staff to coordinate
with the project but this assignment is only temporary and appointed staff do not
master the coordination method as well as necessary procedures for discussion and
contact with PMU3.
• In order to overcome these matters, it is necessary to analyze and assess the
capability and demands of relevant departments/divisions in environmental
management and analyze actual demands for project implementation. Accordingly,
a capacity building and training program will be established to increase the effective
operation of environmental management systems in the future. Some assessments
on training demands in environmental management as well as proposals for a
training program are presented in the following table.
Environmental impact assessment report
232
Table 5.6. Analysis and determination of training demands
No. Subject Preliminary assessment on
capability/awareness
Capacity building/training on
environmental management
1 Environment
team – PMU3
- Have most staff with
University/post university
education, thus it is easy to
them to comprehend new
contents
- Have working experiences in
previous projects but have
not gone into details of the
environmental field.
- Have basic knowledge in
information technology, thus, it
will be convenient for data
management and information
process as well as cooperation
with other agencies.
- Should be further trained on
environmental management process
in project and implementation
methods (from preparation stage of
bidding documents, bid evaluation,
contract signing, monitoring
implementation and acceptance
works, etc.).
- Should increase awareness on critical
roles of EMS
- Should provide with more
knowledge/legal regulations related
to penalty for violations on the
environment.
- Should be provided with
treatment solutions for arising
problems on site.
3 Local leaders - The communes have not been
made sufficiently clear and
understood about the project
process.
- Computer skills are still
limited.
- Awareness on community
organization and monitoring is
not clear. Community
organization and monitoring
have only been implemented
for small projects which are
invested by residents.
- Have no experiences in
community monitoring on a
large scale.
- Should be provided with
preliminary knowledge on
environmental laws and contents
related to coordination in monitoring
among ward/commune authorities in
projects which are executed in the
areas.
- Should be trained on community
monitoring.
- Should have updated information
on project progress and monitoring
and information exchange regime.
- Especially, environmental
management process should be
made clear and comprehended
before, during and after
construction.
4 Community
representatives
- Not been established in the
local area, Thus participants
have not been determined
- Most project areas are rural
ones with cultivation works.
- Should be provided with rights
and responsibilities in
environmental management (as well
as legal regulations.)
- Should be provided with clear
EIA Report
233
No. Subject Preliminary assessment on
capability/awareness
Capacity building/training on
environmental management
Education is limited and
working style is primarily
spontaneous.
- Income of residents is not
high; infrastructure system is
not sufficient; awareness on
rights and responsibilities of
individuals and community on
environmental issues are
limited.
simple methods which will be
applied during project
implementation process.
- Increase the awareness of
community on environmental
management generally and potential
impact of the project in particular.
- Continuously utilize project
information and important points in
EMS as well as operation regime.
5 Contractor - Contractor’s leaders are
qualified and experienced
staffs who are competent in
legal regulations.
- Periodically organize training
courses on environmental
sanitation and labor safety.
- Most Contractors consider
environmental issues as
arising ones with a separate
cost and do not want to
implement them or rectify the
issues.
- Awareness of Contractors on
environmental issues during
construction is limited.
- Should learn about environmental
law and focus on contents related to
roles of local authority and
community supervisors.
- Should comprehend environmental
management process following
requirements of WB’s safeguard
policies (for example, participation
of IEMC, etc.)
- However, for contractors these
requirements will be followed
through project documents and
concrete criteria in bidding
documents as well as construction
contract.
5.3.2. Proposed Programs on Capacity Building on Environmental Management
Based on an analysis of current capabilities, experiences and actual demands in project
implementation, a capacity building and training program for relevant agencies is
established as shown in the table below:
Table 5.7. Proposed programs on capacity building on environmental
management
Training
content
Subject to be
trained
Number of
trainees
Training
time
Organization
unit
Budget
Leaning on
Labor safety
and
Contractor’s
workers and
technical staff
All workers
and staff on
site
Prior to
construction
and following
Contractor in
coordination with
Institute of Labor,
Paid by
Contractor
Environmental impact assessment report
234
Training
content
Subject to be
trained
Number of
trainees
Training
time
Organization
unit
Budget
environmental
sanitation
legal
regulations
War invalids and
Social Affairs
Learning on
general
environmental
management
process
Staff of PMU3
and public
utility
companies
5 persons Prior to
construction
PMU3 in
coordination with
IEMC
Paid by
PMU3 or to
be included
in a package
on training
Learning on
Process of
CEMP
Environmental
staff under ward
PC in the
project area
22 persons
(2 district
staff + 20
town/
commune
staff)
Prior to
construction
Training
consultant under
Contract on
capacity building
and training for
relevant agencies.
Included in
Contract on
training
consulting
Learning on
Process of
SEMP
CSC’s staff in
charge of
environmental
10
trainees
Prior to
construction
PMU3 in
coordination with
CSC
In the
Contract of
CSC
5.4. Costs Estimated
5.4.1. Legal Document for Cost Estimated
The norms, unit price, policy regulations apply to preliminary estimation of funds
investing in the construction and operation of the environment, environmental
management include:
Circular No.04/2010/TT-BXD on May 26th, 2010 of MOC on guiding to establish
and management the investment construction cost;
Circular No.33/2007/TT-BTC on April 9th
, 2007 of MOF guiding the settlement of
completed projects funded with state capital;
Cost Estimate Norms for constructing 2012 (construction part), promulgated with
the Dicision No. 1091/QD-BXD on December 26th
, 2011 of MOC;
Basic Construction Price of Thai Binh and Hung Yen Province;
Circular No.232/2009/TT-BTC on December 9th
, 2009 of MOF Circular No.
232/2009/TT-BTC dated December 9, 2009 of the Ministry of Finance on the
collection rates, regime for collection, management and use of preventive health
fee and border health quarantine fee;
Circular No.08/2005/TTLT-BNV-BTC on January 5th, 2005 guiding the
EIA Report
235
implementation of the regime of nighttime and overtime work payments applicable
to public employees and servants;
Decree No.103/2012/ND-CP on December 4th, 2012 of the Government
stipulating region-based minimum wage levels for laborers working for companies,
enterprises, cooperatives, cooperative groups, farms, households, individuals and
agencies, organizations employing laborers;
Other relevant documents of State, MOT and other Ministries.
5.4.2. The costs implement the mitigation measures by the contractor
The cost for organization, training, dissemination, procurement, operation of
equipment, and labor for implementation of mitigation measures in and out of the site
in accordance with the requirements of EMP and the subproject bidding and
contractual document requirements are integrated in the construction package.
Contractors will be responsible to study, prepare alternatives and offer cost estimation
for these activities. It is considered as one of the criteria for assessing the capability of
the Contractor in the future and compliance level of the Contractor.
5.4.3. Cost for Monitoring
5.4.3.1. Supervision of EMP Implementation by CSC
The contractor when participate into tendering of construction supervision consultant
(CSC) package for NH39-1 project is responsible for proposing the organization of for
monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures by contractors. CSC will be
required staffing and specific work plan in order to serve the management of sanitation
and safety in and around construction site. The budget for this task will be proposed in
the contract with the construction supervision consultant.
5.4.3.2. Cost for Independence Environment Monitoring Consultant (IEMC)
PMU3 shall sign a contract with IEMC for the duration of the construction process of the
project. IEMC shall implement assignments of all project components according to the TOR.
Table 5.8. Cost estimation for Environmental management works
Unit: VND
No Item Unit Quantity Unit price Amount
I Pre-construction stage 22.050.000
1 Environmental management staff
(1 person)
month 1 21.000.000 21.000.000
Environmental impact assessment report
236
No Item Unit Quantity Unit price Amount
2 Other costs % 5 21.000.000 1.050.000
II Construction stage 176.400.000
1 Environmental management staff
(1 person)
month 8 21.000.000 168.000.000
2 Other costs % 5 168.000.000 8.400.000
III Operation stage 88.200.000
1 Environmental management staff
(1 person)
month 4 21.000.000 84.000.000
2 Other costs % 5 84.000.000 4.200.000
Total 286.650.000
5.4.3.3. Implementation Cost of the Monitoring Program
Based on the above-mentioned monitoring program the estimated costs for
implementing this program are presented in the following table.
Table 5.9. Costs Estimation of Monitoring Program
Unit: VND
No Items Pre-construction
stage
Construction
stage (within 2
years as expected)
Operation stage Total
amount
L1 Cost L1 Cost L1 Cost
1 Monitoring
air quality 4 15,520,000 4 124,160,000 4 62,080,000 201,760,000
2 Monitoring
noise 4 9,984,000 4 79,872,000 4 39,936,000 129,792,000
3 Monitoring
quality 4 3,092,000 4 24,736,000 4 12,368,000 40,196,000
4 Monitoring
groundwater 3 1,899,000 3 15,192,000 17,091,000
5 Monitoring
sediment
quality
4 1,680,000 4 13,440,000 15,120,000
6 Monitoring
soil quality 3 1,260,000 3 10,080,000 11,340,000
EIA Report
237
7 Other cost 49,157,391 482,299,128 133,770,480 665,226,999
Total 82,592,391 749,779,128 248,154,480 1,080,525,999
Notes: The above cost estimate excludes VAT tax. Other costs include costs for
manpower, traveling, preparation of survey reports, etc.
Total estimated cost for implementation of a monitoring program is 1,080,525,999
VND. For the purpose of effective implementation, the monitoring program
implementation can be combined with the contract established with IEMC.
5.4.4. Cost for implementation of capacity building and training
The cost estimation for implementation of capacity building and training is presented
in the following table:
Table 5.10. Cost Estimation for Implementation of Capacity Building and
Training
Training
contents
Subject to be
trained
Number of
trainees
Cost rate
(VND)
Source of cost
Learning on
labor safety
and
environment
sanitation
Workers and
technicians
of
Contractors
All workers
and
construction
staff
on site (500
turns of
persons as
expected)
150 x
200,000
= 30,000,000
Paid by
contractor, this
cost is included in
the contract of
construction
Learning of
general
environmental
management
process
PMU’s staff
in charge of
construction
packages
5 persons 5 x 3,000,000
=
15,000,000
This cost should
be included in the
contract signed
with IEMC
Learning on
CEMP
Environmen
tal staff
under
ward/commu
ne PC in the
project area
22 persons
(2 district
staff + 20
town/comm
une staff)
22 per, x
1000,000/per,
=
22,000,000
Included in the
Contract signed
with training
consultant or
IEMC
Environmental impact assessment report
238
Training
contents
Subject to be
trained
Number of
trainees
Cost rate
(VND)
Source of cost
Learning on
SEMP
Staff in
charge of
labor safety
and
environment
al sanitation
under CSC
10 trainees 10 per, x
1000,000/per,
=
10,000,000
In the Contract of
CSC
Total cost 77,000,000
5.4.5. Cost Estimate for Environmental Treatment Work
The following table is present Cost Estimate for Environmental Treatment Works:
Table 5.11. Cost Estimate for Environmental Treatment Works
Unit: VND
TT
Environmental treatment
facilities Unit Quantity Unit price Amount
1 Standard water jet Each 5 500.000 2.500.000
2 Residual mud barrier m 3000 25.000 75.000.000
3 Portable toilet Each 5 54.000.000 270.000.000
4 Mobile waste basket Each 10 1.150.000 11.500.000
5 Hazardous waste container Each 10 1.600.000 16.000.000
6 Temporary sedimentation basin
- At the bridge construction area
(where bore piles are implemented) Each 4 12.000.000 48.000.000
- At the canteen area Each 5 2.300.000 11.500.000
- At the maintenance area Each 5 8.000.000 40.000.000
7 Water collector ditches m 1400 100.000 140.000.000
Total 614.500.000
5.4.6. Total Cost Estimation
Apart from costs, which have been calculated in relevant packages/contracts, one more
cost element will be required for EMP as follows:
Table 5.12. Total Cost for the Environmental management Plan
EIA Report
239
No. Content Cost
1 Cost for Independent Monitoring Consultant 286.650.000
2 Cost for monitoring program implementation 1.080.525.999
3 Cost for capability building and training 77.000.000
4 Cost for the environmental treatment facilities 614.500.000
Total 2.058.675.999
5 Contingency (10%) 205.867.600
Total 2.264.543.599
The above cost rate is estimated based on current unit price and Consultant’s
experiences. Because the project will be implemented over many years, price
fluctuation will be unavoidable. A contingency amount should be prepared for any
unavoidable price or cost increase during project implementation.
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
240
Figure 5.3. Location Map of Environmental Quality Monitoring
Ghi chú:
Không khí (KK), ồ n (O), rung (R)
Nước mặ t (NM), trầm tích (TT)
Nước ngầm (NN)
Đấ t (Đ)
KK1, O1, R1, NN1
NM1, TT1, Đ1, NN1
KK2, O2, R2, NM2
NN2, Đ2
NN3, Đ3
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
241
CHAPTER VI. PUBLIC CONSULTATION
6.1. Public Consultation at the Request of the World Bank
6.1.1. Consultation Content
According to the guidelines of the World Bank (WB) - Project belongs to group B, so
it needs to organize the public consultation. The participants include: households in the
project area, local government representatives, staffs on environmental, transportation,
cadastral etc; and organizations (as Women's Association, Farmers' Association, Youth
Union, Veterans, etc.). The project owner includes: representatives of the project
owner and environmental consultantcy. The main content of the meeting as follows:
Provide basic information about the project to the community;
Provide information about the major expected impact of the project on the
environment;
Collect feedback on the project of participants.
6.1.2. Consultation Results
1) Pictures of the public consultation meetings were organized:
Currently, PMU No.2 has organized total of 11 public consultation meetings in 11
communes belongs to 3 districts: Hung Ha and Dong Hung, Thai Binh province; and
Tien Lu district - Hung Yen province. The time of public consultation meetings as
follow:
- January 27, 2013: Public consultation meeting in Hung Nhan and Phuc Khanh towns;
- January 28, 2013: Public consultation meeting in Tan Le and Thai Phuong communes;
- January 29, 2013: Public consultation meeting in Lien Hiep commune and Hung Ha
town;
- January 30, 2013: Public consultation meeting in Minh Khai and Hong Linh
communes;
- January 31, 2013: Public consultation meeting in Tan Hoa commune;
- March 11, 2013: Public consultation meeting in Dong Phong commune;
- February 4, 2013: Public consultation meeting in Thien Phien commune.
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
242
Table 6.1 Pictures of the Public Consultation Meetings
No. Pictures Notes
1
Project Staffs welcome and
guide to participants
2
Participants observe documents,
project aligment map.
3
Introduce the project:
Representative of consultantcy
introduce the project and
environmental impacts at Lien
Hiep commune’s meeting.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
243
No. Pictures Notes
4
People expressed their opinions
5
Group Discussion:
Socio and environmental
experts of the project collect
opinions of local
communication by way group
discussion.
2) Consultation results
After hearing the representatives of the project to introduce the project scope, alignment,
intersections, NH39-1 upgrade plan and construction plan of 3 bridges are Nai, Dong Tu
and Go, as well as the impact of the project on environment and proposed mitigation
measures, the participants came up with a lot of questions as well as their contribution to
the project, mainly focusing on the following issues:
All localities and consultant agree to support project implementation in order to
improve the quality of roads and regional economic development.
About the project implementation time: they fear the project will be "suspended", so
the local authorities as well as the people desire that the project will be soon
completely implemented.
Clearance: people required project owner to allocate the capital, complete the site
clearance prior to construction in order to avoid the extension of the construction
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
244
time and long-term environmental impacts.
Drainage issue: people worry about drainage issue during the construction, so they
require the project owner to be very interested in design of drainage system in
residential areas to avoid inundation and houses flooding.
The sanitation issue: most people have suggested project owner to pay attention to
the issue of environmental sanitation, ensure traffic during the construction of
project, and avoid messy gathering material, sp ge waste spreading without being
collected, influence to environment and traffic of participants.
For execution time: people proposed the project owner to avoid the construction at
night, affecting people.
Impact on irrigation: the government and people proposed the project owner to take
care of irrigation system to ensure the water supply for agriculture.
The opinions of participants are summarized in Table 6.2. Minute of the consultations is
attached at Appendix 5 - Public consultation.
Table 6.2. Summaries of Consultation Results and Responses of Project
Owner
No Full name The issues people care about and
encourage
Answer of Project
Representative - Consultants
Unit
1 Hong Linh commune
- Mr. Pham Van Dong –
Vu Dong hamlet
Impact on the natural
environment is for granted,
especially the impact of dust.
The measures of the project are
relatively complete, but they
must be applied strictly in the
construction process.
In populated areas it needs to
research to fully design the
drainage system, avoid house
flooding by road construction.
The project owner is
committed to implement all
the mitigation measures
mentioned in the EIA report.
The project owner acquired
the opinions and directed the
design consultancy to study
the adequate design of
drainage system, avoid the
house flooding.
Mr. Dao Van Hung –
Vu Dong hamlet
Project owner has to allocate the
capital, complete the site clearance
prior to construction in order to avoid
the extension of the construction time
and long-term environmental impacts
The project owner acquired
the opinions and will perform
in the specific
implementation step.
Mr. Pham Van Cong –
Vu Dong hamlet
In the communal area there are
many business households. During
The project owner acquired
the opinions and will perform
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
245
No Full name The issues people care about and
encourage
Answer of Project
Representative - Consultants
Unit
the construction, the project is not
permitted to store the materials in
residential areas, avoid the impact
on the business households.
in the construction phase.
Mr. Duong Hong Ky -
Chairman of the
Committee of
Fatherland Front of
commune
Government and people sympathize
and support the implementation of
the project to improve the quality of
roads and regional economic
development.
2 Lien Hiep commune
Mr. Dao Trong Giap –
Vice Chairman of
People's Committee of
commune
People’s aspiration is to
implement the project as soon
as possible to improve the
NH39 route, create the
favorable traffic condition for
economic development.
As construction of the road, it
needs to be very interested in
the drainage system design in
dense residential areas.
The project owner acquired
the opinions and directed the
design consultancy to study
the adequate design of
drainage system, avoid the
house flooding and
inundation.
Mr. Nguyen Van Co –
Nua hamlet
People support the project
implementation because of the
economic benefits that project
brings. Project owner needs to
apply measures to minimize the
environmental impact, avoid
many measures but not done.
In dense residential areas on the
NH39, it needs to have drains
in both sides of road to avoid
flooding by heavy rains.
The project owner acquired the
opinions and directed the
design consultancy to study
the adequate design of
drainage system, avoid the
house flooding and inundation.
Mr. Luong Dinh Co –
Nua hamlet
The given mitigation measures
of project are quite sufficient.
The project must be very
interested in the issues: traffic
safety, ensure agricultural
irrigation, adequate
compensation to residents prior
to construction.
The project owner acquired
the opinions and committed
to implement all the
mitigation measures
mentioned in the EIA report.
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
246
No Full name The issues people care about and
encourage
Answer of Project
Representative - Consultants
Unit
Ensure the progress of the
project, not too long to create
long-term impacts.
Mr. Dao Trong Giap Commune people sympathize
and support the implementation
of the project to improve the
quality of roads and regional
economic development..
Propose the project owner to
apply strictly the mitigation
measures to minimize the
effects of dust, noise, waste on
the life as well as the
production and business
activities of the people.
Recommend to implement the
project soon and ensure the
most rapid progress
The project owner owner
acquired the opinions and
committed to implement all
the mitigation measures
mentioned in the EIA report.
3 Tan Le commune
Mr. Nguyen Xuan Cu
– Bui Xa hamlet
People’s aspiration is to
implement the project as soon
as possible to improve the
NH39 route, create the
favorable traffic condition for
economic development as well
as expand social and cultural
relations in the project area.
Proposed the project owner to
study on the drainage issue in
the area because the current
route located between
residential areas and the river
drainage area.
The project owner owner
acquired the opinions and
committed to implement all
the mitigation measures
mentioned in the EIA report.
The project owner acquired
the opinions and directed the
design consultancy to study
the adequate design of
drainage system, avoid the
house flooding and
inundation.
Mr. Tran Van Quyen The people are very supportive
for the implementation of
project because of the
economic benefits that the
project will bring.
Proposal for construction to
The project owner acquired
the opinions and has
developed specifically in
methods of construction.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
247
No Full name The issues people care about and
encourage
Answer of Project
Representative - Consultants
Unit
expand the road passing
through residential areas should
finish each side of the road and
then continue to the other side
to ensure the daily commute for
people.
Mr. Nguyen Trong
Hiep – Thanh Trieu
hamlet
Recommend project owner to
implement strictly the
mitigation measures of
environmental impact.
Ensure the progress of the
project, does not take long time
thus create the long-term
effects.
The project owner is
committed to implement all
the mentioned mitigation
measures, at the same time
will also be included in the
contract with the construction
contractor.
Mr. Nguyen Quang
Vuong – Vice
Chairman of People's
Committee of
commune
People and commune
authorities agreed to support
the project. Recommend project
owner to implement strictly the
mitigation measures of
environmental impact.
Recommend to implement
project soon and ensure
progress, avoid prolonged then
affect life as well as business of
people.
The project owner is
committed to implement all
the mentioned mitigation
measures, at the same time
will also be included in the
contract with the construction
contractor.
4 Minh Khai commune
Mrs. Hoang Thi Duyen The impacts on people’s
economy and life are very
significant, proposed the
project owner must take
specific measures to support
and restore the lives of
emigrated people.
When construction it needs to
ensure environmental
sanitation.
The project owner is
committed to implement all
the mentioned mitigation
measures
Mr. Tran Thanh Oai –
Tu La hamlet
People support the project
because it is the policy of the
State. However, we also wish
The project owner is
committed to implement
soon.
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
248
No Full name The issues people care about and
encourage
Answer of Project
Representative - Consultants
Unit
project owner to rapidly
implement and avoid falling
into suspended situation so that
people can settle their life.
Mrs. Lam Thi Hoi When construction it is not
allowed to digging up and
down to the side in place of the
people.
Avoid construction at night as
this will affect people's lives.
The project owner acquired
and would included this
opinion in the contract with
the construction contractor,
require the construction
contractor to seriously
implement and will have
specific fine sanctions.
Mr. Nguyen Minh Duc
– Chairman of People's
Committee of
commune
The government and people
sympathize and support the
implementation of the project
aims to improve the quality of
roads and regional economic
development.
Recommend the project owner
to implement soon, quickly and
thoroughly construction.
Information about the project
has to be opened and spacious
for people to know and support
the project.
Propose the project owner to
apply strictly the mitigation
measures to minimize the
effects of dust, noise, waste on
the life as well as the
production and business
activities of the people.
The project owner is
committed to implement all
the mentioned mitigation
measures
5 Hung Ha town
Mrs. Hoang Thi Lien –
Dong Tu 1 quarter
The impacts on people’s
economy and life are very
significant, proposed the
project owner must take
specific measures to support
and restore the lives of
The project owner is
committed to implement all
the mentioned mitigation
measures.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
249
No Full name The issues people care about and
encourage
Answer of Project
Representative - Consultants
Unit
emigrated people.
When construction it is not
allowed to digging up and
down to the side in place of the
people.
Mr. Nghiem Dinh
Bang – Dong Tu 1
quarter
The town people are looking
forward to early
implementation of the project
to improve traffic conditions in
the town. When construction it
needs to be quickly,
thoroughly, avoid prolonged
cause many environmental
pollution impacts on the
population.
The project owner is
committed to implement soon
Mr Ha Huu Hien –
Nhan Cau 1 quarter
Construction should be
definitely not preventing the
entrance to the shops because
the town is a busy trading
business.
The project owner acquired
and would include this
opinion in the contract with
the construction contractor,
require the construction
contractor seriously
implement.
Mrs Nguyen Dang
Khoa – Nhan Cau 1
quarter
Recommend to strictly
implement measures to reduce
environmental pollution. To be
applied from the beginning to
the end of construction. After
construction it needs to clean
and avoid waste soil to
influence people's traffic.
The project owner is
committed to implement all
the mentioned mitigation
measures.
Mr. Nguyen Huu Huan
- Vice Chairman of
People's Committee of
commune
The government and people
sympathize and support the
implementation of the project
aims to improve the quality of
roads and regional economic
development.
Recommend the project owner
to implement soon, quickly and
thoroughly construction.
The project owner is
committed to implement all
the mentioned mitigation
measures.
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
250
No Full name The issues people care about and
encourage
Answer of Project
Representative - Consultants
Unit
Information about the project
has to be opened and spacious
for people to know and support
the project.
Propose the project owner to
apply strictly the mitigation
measures to minimize the
effects of dust, noise, waste on
the life as well as the
production and business
activities of the people.
6 Thai Phuong
commune
Mr. Nguyen Duy Bich
– Ngan Xa hamlet
Expectations of the people as
early implement the project to
improve NH No.39, create the
comfortable traffic conditions, to
develop economic.
It needs to have measures to
minimize impacts on lively and
people’s income.
Althrough the environmental
impacts are negligible, the
project also applies the
measures to avoid the impacts
on peoples along the road.
Mr. Dao Van Hien –
Ngan Xa hamlet
Due to the project will be
constructed throught the field
area so impacts on natural
environmental area small and
can be overcome.
It needs to note that during
construction stage have to neatly
conduct, ensure that don’t affect
to product on the rest fields of
peoples. Construction activities
don’t over site boundry.
Mr. Luong Dinh Co –
Nua hamlet
Curently, people are not to
assign field when have families
generate demographic, there are
cases where 1 house only have 1
field while raising three more
people. Project recover land will
impact on lively, it needs to have
The social impact will be
studied and proposed specific
supporting measures to each
household.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
251
No Full name The issues people care about and
encourage
Answer of Project
Representative - Consultants
Unit
specific supporting measures and
appropriate to each household.
7 Hung Nhan town
Mrs. Le Thi Hai – Me
quarter
Impacts caused by dust and
noise are remarkable and much
affect to the people livelihoods.
Propose the Project owner must
consider the mitigation measures
for these impacts.
Recover the agricultural land
will be affected to the people
living. Propose the Project
owner need to give support
measures to these affected
households.
The mitigation measures for
impacts on natural and socio-
economical will be studied and
detailed in the project’s EIA
report. The project owner
commits to implement strictly
these mitigation measures.
Mr. Do Van Loc –
Thach quarter
People support the project
because of economic benefits.
However, the project owner
needs to balance project benefits
and environment protection
issues.
The project owner will study
and reconsider the measures in
order to protection benefits of
affected people.
Mr. Tran Van Hieu –
Thach quarter
Clearance will be implemented
clearly and disclosed according
to current regulations and insure
the Project’s construction
schedule.
Not prolonged the construction
timing to avoid waste of State
funds and affected to people’s
life.
The project owner commits to
implement clearly the
clearance with internal and
external supervisors.
The project owner commits to
implement construction
according to schedule and
ensure the quality of work.
Mr. Do Van Huyen –
Vice Chairman of
People Committee
The local government agrees and
supports the project. Propose the
project implement strictly the
environmental impact mitigation
measures.
Unavoidable impacts need the
supported and mitigated
measures to the lowest level.
Compensation and support
policies of project are required
according to Law and
regulations of Vietnam and
Donor.
8 Tan Hoa commune
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
252
No Full name The issues people care about and
encourage
Answer of Project
Representative - Consultants
Unit
Mr. Do Khac Thu –
Luong hamlet
Obstrution of drainage can cause
flooding in resident area.
Propose the project owner must
calculate, design the appropriate
drainage.
The project owner acquired the
opinions and directed the
consultancy to study the
adequate design of drainage
system, avoid making
inundation to households.
Mr. Tran Quang Hop –
Luong hamlet
Propose the project owner
adequately compensate for
recovered land households and
giving the support mesasures for
joblessness and landlessness
households.
Regulations of Vietnam and
donor (World Bank) show that
the resettlement plan will must
be ensured the living standard
of replaced households are as
same as or better than before.
Mrs. Nguyen Thi
Tuyen – Luong hamlet
In the operation phase, dust
emission caused by increase of
vehicle flow will affect to
households living near the route.
Propose the project owner set up
the mitigation measures for this
impact.
The impact caused by dust
pollution in the operation
phase and these mitigation
measures will be assessed
detail in EIA report. Project
owner commits implement
strictly these measures.
9 Phuc Khanh commune
Mrs. Pham Thi Lenh –
Huong Xa hamlet
In the construction phase, the
environment issues are
important. Propose the
constructors use all safety
measures to ensure health for
people.
Propose Project owner
implement according to the
schedule with spirit of equality
and fair.
The mitigation measures for
impacts on natural and socio-
economical will be researched
and detailed in the project’s
EIA. The project owner
commits to implement strictly
these mitigation measures.
Project owner commit
implement according to
schedule.
Mr. Nguyen Xuan Do
– Huong Xa hamlet
Propose the project owner
implement as soon as possible.
Propose place 2 culverts at 2
alignment sides as 2 directions;
01 from West to River Cua Co;
and from East to River Pho Le.
Project owner commits
implement according to
schedule.
Horizontal culverts must be
ensured drainage. Positions of
these culverts are agreed of
local government and
approved by MOT.
Mrs. Nguyen Thi Nga Disclose the construction Information of construction
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
253
No Full name The issues people care about and
encourage
Answer of Project
Representative - Consultants
Unit
– Huong Xa hamlet schedule to People. schedule will be notified to
people after the detail design
will be approved.
Mrs. Ha Thi Hai –
Huong Xa hamlet
Propose project is implemented
quickly and quality; place 2
curverts at 2 sides of road to
protect the road and ensure the
healthy of local people living
near the road.
Ensuring drainage at 2 sides of
alignment, design on drainage
system of project is agreed by
local government.
10 Dong Phong commune
Mrs. Vu Thi Oanh Construction of Go bridge will
affect to movement of people or
not?
When Go bridge is
constructed, there will be the
traffic safety option for
pedestrian in existing road,
detail is presented in EIA
report.
Mr. Nguyen Ngoc
Oanh – Vice Chairman
of People Committee
Propose the project owner clarify
about the compensation for land
without Certificate of Land Use
Right? Compensation for land
only is lost a part but area of
remain part is not enough to live
on?
Regarding the compensation
for land without CLUR will be
implemented according to the
regulations of State (Decree
69/2009-NDCP and Decree
197/2004-NDCP).
Mr. Pham Van Duan –
Chairman of
Fatherland Front
Committee
Propose the project owner study
on properly position and aperture
of irrigation drainage.
The project owner acquired the
opinions and directed the
consultancy to study the
adequate design of drainage
system to avoiding affects to
the local irrigation actions.
11 Thien Phien commune
Mr. Pham Van Giao –
Chairman of People
Committee
Propose the project owner
implement strictly the mitigation
measures to impacts caused by
dust and noise.
In the construction phase,
propose the project owner have
to install the residual mud
barriers to preventing mud
flowing down to fields, houses;
The mitigation measures for
impacts on natural and socio-
economical will be researched
and detailed in chapter 4, EIA
report.
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
254
No Full name The issues people care about and
encourage
Answer of Project
Representative - Consultants
Unit
install warning light to warning
for pedestrial.
Mr. Dao Van Thang –
Chairman of
Fatherland Front
Committee
Clearance need to be
implemented quickly and
according to regulation, notify
soon the scope of land
acquisition to people know
whether they loss the land or not,
remove or not, and how much
area of land they loss.
In the construction phase,
propose the project owner apply
project’s information to local
government to coordinate.
Clearance was setted up a
standalone subproject and
implemented by Compensation
Committees of Districts belong
to project area. Boundary of
land acquisition will be
notified soon by these
Committees.
Project will disclose the EMP
at local government office as
regulated in Law on
Environmental Protection “to
People know, People check
and People supervision”.
Mrs. Nguyen Thi
Duyen
Not implementing at the night.
Implementing strictly the
measures to mitigate the noise.
The mitigation measures for
impacts on natural and socio-
economical will be researched
and detailed in chapter 4, EIA
report.
6.2. Public Consultation at the Request of Vietnam
Implementation of the Law on Environmental Protection, The project owner has sent a
dispatch No. 342/BQLDA2-PID1 dated 4/3/2013 on public consultation operation
during the EIA report of the project of upgrading of NH39 Trieu Duong - Hung Ha
under Component C – VRAMP project to 12 communes, informed on the basic content
of the project, the negative impacts of the project on the environment, mitigation
measures and suggested the localities contribute opinions by official letter, in addition to
know the aspiration as well as their environmental proposals for the project.
The project owner has received the feedbacks from the People Committee and
Fatherland Front Committee of 11 communes. Dong Tan commune’s authority did not
reply the project’s dispatch, therefore, as provision at point d - clause 1- article 15 of
Decree 29/2011/ND-CP, is regarded as agreement with the Investment Plan of Project
owner. Feedback minutes are copied and attached at Appendix 5- Public Consultation.
The summaries of public consultation, opinion at the request of Vietnam are
reprensented in Table 6.3.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
255
Table 6.3. Summary of Public Consultation Opinions at the Request of
Vietnam
No Commune/
Town Opinion
Public consultation opinions
About the
negative impacts
of the project on
the natural and
social
environment
About the
measures to
minimize the
negative
environmental
impacts
Recommendations
for the Project
owner
1 Minh Khai
commune
People’s
Committee
The effects are
presented in EIA
report are
relatively adequate
Agree with the
mitigation measures
in the report,
especially to
mitigation measures
of impacts on air and
noise pollution.
Ensure reasonable
compensation and
assistance for the
people.
Implement openly
and transparently
avoid conflict
among the public.
Disclosure full
information.
Ensure
environmental
sanitation.
Fatherland
Front
Agree Agree Suggest state
organizations
funding for the
project so that the
contractor-has
enough fund to
implement
project.
Ensure the
security in Minh
Khai commune
during project
implementation.
2 Hung Ha
town
People’s
Committee
Agree with the
effects mentioned
in the summary
document
Agree with the
mitigation measures
in the report,
especially to
mitigation measures
of impacts on air and
Agree to support
the project,
however, in the
construction
phase, the safety
of pedestrians
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
256
No Commune/
Town Opinion
Public consultation opinions
About the
negative impacts
of the project on
the natural and
social
environment
About the
measures to
minimize the
negative
environmental
impacts
Recommendations
for the Project
owner
noise pollution. must be ensured.
Propose
construction
project owners to
complete work, in
close
collaboration with
local authorities
in the process of
project
implementation.
Fatherland
Front
Affect health, life,
people, daily life,
travelling,
business,
manufacturing,
trade,
transportation and
travelling
problems, causing
internal conflict
and disunity
among people
Promptly start
project, upgrading
the quality of the
route, as well
consulting work to
stabilize people's
lives, enabling
people to save
convenient trading
business, fast
construction,
compact, where to
compact it.
Construction
time: quick, short.
Compensastion
act: correct,
sufficient and
promply;
accordance with
the Law and local
custom in order to
stable people’s
livelihood.
Ensuring the
urban landscape.
3 Hong Linh
commune
People’s
Committee
Agree Agree with the
mitigation measures
presented in the
summary report
Project is
impelemented
soon.
Ensuring the
drainage system
while constructing
project;
Ensure
environmental
sanitation;
Construction on
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
257
No Commune/
Town Opinion
Public consultation opinions
About the
negative impacts
of the project on
the natural and
social
environment
About the
measures to
minimize the
negative
environmental
impacts
Recommendations
for the Project
owner
time, ensure the
safety of people.
Fatherland
Front
Welldone the
survey, design
and compensation
and clearance.
Speed up the
construction,
assuring quality.
Ensure good
sanitation, social
policies.
When
constructing the
connector roads,
sewers in hamlets,
project needs
ensure to drainage
for serving
agricultural
production.
4 Lien Hiep
commune
People’s
Committee
Agree Agree Set reasonable
drainage (sewer)
and avoid
flooding which
may affect
people's lives.
Construction on
schedule and
avoid
situation”suspend
ed” Project.
Fatherland
Front
Compensation
cost is applied
with regulated
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
258
No Commune/
Town Opinion
Public consultation opinions
About the
negative impacts
of the project on
the natural and
social
environment
About the
measures to
minimize the
negative
environmental
impacts
Recommendations
for the Project
owner
cost by State.
Ensuring the
construction of
the project is not
effected to traffic,
cultivation, and
environmental
sanistation.
5 Tan Le
commune
People’s
Committee
Agree Agree Implement the
project soon to
avoid confusion
for the affected
households.
Ensure sanitation,
security during
the
implementation
process.
Fatherland
Front
Recommend
PMU strictly
implement the
provisions on
compensation to
people whose
land is taken by
project to ensure
people’s right.
During the
implementation
process,
constructors need
to connect with
local government
to solve radically
the conflict if any.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
259
No Commune/
Town Opinion
Public consultation opinions
About the
negative impacts
of the project on
the natural and
social
environment
About the
measures to
minimize the
negative
environmental
impacts
Recommendations
for the Project
owner
Ensure
environmental
sanistation.
6 Thai
Phuong
commune
People’s
Committee
Agree Agree The affected
households
mostly are
farming
households,
therefore when
project is
constructed, their
cultivation
activities and also
job will be
affected (delayed
or lossen).
Propose the
project owner
must apply
policies according
to regulations of
State on living
stablization
assistance.
Agree Agree Propose in the
construction
phase, PMU must
mitigate the
natural and socio-
economical
impacts at the
lowest level,
ensure traffic
safety during
construction
phase, and
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
260
No Commune/
Town Opinion
Public consultation opinions
About the
negative impacts
of the project on
the natural and
social
environment
About the
measures to
minimize the
negative
environmental
impacts
Recommendations
for the Project
owner
implement strictly
compensation
policies.
7 Hung Nhan
Town
People
Committee
Agreement with
impacts that
presented in
summary
document.
Agree Ensure
environmental
sanitation.
Ensure the
construction
schedule.
Coordinate
strictly with local
government in
construction
process.
Fatherland
Front
Committee
Agree Agree Comply with
commitments
mentioned in EIA
report.
Propose project
will be soon
implemented and
compledted.
8 Tan Hoa
commune
People
Committee
Agree Agree Comply with
commitments
mentioned in EIA
report.
Propose the
project owner
have to
reasonable
compensation
policies for
removed
households.
Ensure the
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
261
No Commune/
Town Opinion
Public consultation opinions
About the
negative impacts
of the project on
the natural and
social
environment
About the
measures to
minimize the
negative
environmental
impacts
Recommendations
for the Project
owner
drainage to avoid
flooding and
effect to living
quality of people
near the project
route.
Fatherland
Front
Committee
Agree Agree Using local labor.
There is rules and
policy on worker
management to
avoid conflicting
with the local
people.
9 Phuc
Khanh
People
Committee
Agree Agree Ensure the
drainage in
construction
phase and in
operation phase.
Ensure the safety
for worker and
security at the
local.
Fatherland
Front
Committee
Agree Agree Compensation
cost for revoked
works is
accordance with
regulates of
Vietnam and
donor.
Coordinate with
local government
to limit
conflicting and
solve conflicting
situations.
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
262
No Commune/
Town Opinion
Public consultation opinions
About the
negative impacts
of the project on
the natural and
social
environment
About the
measures to
minimize the
negative
environmental
impacts
Recommendations
for the Project
owner
10 Dong
Phong
commune
People
Committee
Agreement with
impacts that
presented in
summary
document.
Agree Ensure
environmental
sanitation.
Ensure the
construction
schedule.
Coordinate with
local government
to solve arising
native impacts.
Fatherland
Front
Committee
Agreement with
impact assess in
construction phase.
Agreement with
mitigation measures
mentioned in EIA
report.
Noting to the
impacts on noise
and dust to avoid
affecting to
households
nearby.
11 Dong Tan
commune
People Committee and Father Front Committee received the PMU2’s Pulic
consultation documents on April 2, 2013 (delivery note is attached at
Appendix 5) without feedbacks of Dong Tan commune, as provision at point
d, clause 1, article 15 of Decree 29/2011/ND-CP, Government of Dong Tan
commune is regarded as agreement with the Investment Plan of Project
owner.
12 Thien
Phien
commune
People
Committee
Noise of
construction
machines, dust,
and sand arising
from construction
area that will
affect to health of
people nearby. In
addition,
construction
actions will
prevent the trade,
production of these
Applying the noise
mitigation measure
for construction
machines, using the
material that arising
dust is the lowest;
reasonable
construction
schedule and
implement
construction as each
part to avoid
prolonging.
Preparation of
machines,
vehicles, material,
workers in the
shortest time.
Ensure the life of
people living near
2 sides of road if
they are affected,
project have to the
reasonable
compensation and
support measures.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
263
No Commune/
Town Opinion
Public consultation opinions
About the
negative impacts
of the project on
the natural and
social
environment
About the
measures to
minimize the
negative
environmental
impacts
Recommendations
for the Project
owner
households.
Father
Front
Committee
Agree Agree Resonable
compensation
plan for the
affected
households.
Ensure the
construction
schedule.
Ensure
environmental
sanitation, limit
arising the dust
and noise.
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
264
Through the exchange, the local authorities of communes have proposed many ideas to
contribute to the project, expressing their concern to the environmental impacts of the
project, which mainly focus on the following matters:
In the pre-construction phase:
o Work closely with local authorities in the process of project implementation,
compensation, site clearance compensation must be done fast, timely in accordance
with the policy, the State's compensation regime. Compensation for land
acquisition must be completed before starting construction to avoid prolonged
construction status due to lacking free up space, affecting the surrounding
environment.
o Design an appropriate drainage system, stroked lines connecting the local
population, not to affect the movement of people, of families living on either road
sides as well as the local irrigation system.
In the construction phase:
o Sanitation: localities all recommended that local sanitation must be ensured during
the construction process. They require project to set up plans for collecting and
treating waste in construction, avoiding spillage that may pollute unhygienic
environment; measures must be taken to minimize dust and not to affect the
population;
o Public Health: local authorities concern that people's health could be affected by
dust. They requested the project to seriously implement measures to minimize the
impact of dust; reduce noise as committed in the consultation document of the
project;
o Traffic Safety and Labor Safety: the localities request a plan for traffic diversion,
specific signs, signboards, reasonable construction plan to avoid congestion and
traffic accidents. Ensure traffic safety for people around the project area as well as
ensuring safety for workers.
o Almost all localities request project proposal to implement fast, on time, do
completely, and avoid prolonged status.
6.3. Comments Acquisition of Project Owner
With these comments, in the public consultation as required by the World Bank in
January 2013, the project owner has collected opinions, and directed a project
consultancy considering integration into the project, in addition, project owners and
environmental consultancy agency had specific responses at each meeting - presented
in detail in Table 6.2.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
265
The responses of public consultation as well as exchanging opinions of People's
Committee and residential representatives (through Fatherland Front) at the public
consultation at the request of the U.S. in March, 2013 were acquired by the Project
Owner and integrated to solve for each object affected to ensure feasible mitigation
measures, in particular:
In the pre-construction phase:
o On the issue of land acquisition and resettlement: According to Document
1665/TTg-CN dated 17/10/2006 of the Prime Minister on the implementation of
managing site clearance of traffic construction projects, Provincial People’s
Committee will set up independent sub-projects from projects which are approved
by the district People's Committee through the Council of compensation for land
acquisition & resettlement. Project owner is responsible for ensuring
implementation of the compensation funds for land acquisition & resettlement. In
terms of the project, currently plan for land acquisition & resettlement is made for
submission to the Government of Vietnam and the World Bank. In this plan, the
policies of the World Bank and the law of Vietnam are both incorporated,
simultaneously satisfying the principle: those affected by the project will be
compensated at least as much as or greater than what they are damaged.
o Drainage matter: the Project owner has acquired and made specific solutions to
designing drainage systems such as: the entire route will build four new bridges; 18
culverts and 19 culverts to strengthen the aperture as well as ensure drainage water
for irrigation in the region.
o The connecting with the public roads: Project owner has directed consulting to set
up a project to seriously implement the design the end point of these connection
sections.
In the construction phase
o Problem sanitation, public health: The Project owner commit to comply with the
mitigation measures set out in the environmental impact assessment report. At the
same time the project will coordinate with local public to disclose the activities,
impacts and mitigation measures of the project for people to know.
o Traffic Safety Issues and the Labor Safety: Project Owner will include in the terms
of the contract the construction contractor labor safety. In the process of
construction, traffic diversion will be strictly implemented, avoiding traffic
congestion caused by construction.
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
266
6.4. The Survey Interviewed Local Residents
In the 1st round of consultation, the project owner sent coupons interviewing 312
households who attended at the meetings. These housholds are directly affected
households from the project. Table 6.4 summarizes and analyses the questions from
the questionnaire.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
267
Table 6.4. Summary and Analysis of Questionnaires
No Item Minh
Khai
Hung
Ha
town
Hong
Linh
Lien
Hiep
Tan
Le
Thai
Phuong
Hung
Nhan
town
Tan
Hoa
Phuc
Khanh
Dong
Phong
Thien
Phien Total %
I Project knowledge
1 Number of people 50 17 18 43 20 14 45 15 45 25 20 312 100
2 People who have not known 6 0 3 2 4 1 5
7 8
36 12
3 People who have known 44 17 15 41 16 13 40 15 38 17 20 276 88
- From People’s Committee 5 10 9 2 2 5 40 15 38 17 20 163 52
- From mass media
- From other people 39 7 6 39 14 8
113 36
II Opinions about project’s environmental impacts
2.1 In construction phase
1 Air pollution 45 15 18 42 18 13 32 15 37 10 15 260 83
2 Noise pollution 41 10 18 12 19 12 30 15 40 12 18 227 73
3 Construction waste 35 12 15 42 15 11 42 15 37 15 16 255 82
4 Land Acquisition 42 16 12 43 18 10 28 15 45 9 20 258 83
5 Arising conflicts 20 10 15 35 19 8 19 12 36 21 20 215 69
6 Travelling activities 48 12 10 16 12 9 43 10 35 25 20 240 77
2.2 In exploitation phase
7 Air pollution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 15 10 0 33 11
8 Dust pollution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 11 0 29 9
III Opinions about other environmental impacts that may occur during Project implementation
Environmental impact assessment report
BAN QUẢN LÝ DỰ ÁN THĂNG LONG
268
No Item Minh
Khai
Hung
Ha
town
Hong
Linh
Lien
Hiep
Tan
Le
Thai
Phuong
Hung
Nhan
town
Tan
Hoa
Phuc
Khanh
Dong
Phong
Thien
Phien Total %
IV Opinions about Project benefits
Improve route quality 50 17 18 43 20 14 45 15 45 13 20 300 96
Reduce traffic congestion 30 10 15 20 11 4 38 12 40 22 18 220 71
Reduce traffic accidents 50 17 13 35 11 5 31 10 38 12 16 238 76
Develop society, culture and
education 45 17 17 42 16 13 28 11 25 8 15 237 76
Develop economy due to
improved good transportation
in the region
49 17 15 41 20 14 32 9 31
13 241 77
V
Opinions about other
benefits 50 17 18 43 20 14 45 15 45
20 287 92
Environment Impact Assessment Report
269
About the project: 88% of households were aware of the project through various forms
such as through local government, through the newspapers and through a variety of
sources, while 12% did not know anything about the project.
On the positive effects brought by the project: 96% of the people were aware that
benefits gained from improving the quality of roads are good; 71% expected to reduce
traffic congestion; 76% assumed that upgrading roads would reduce traffic accidents;
76% assumed the complete project would contribute to the social, cultural, educational
and economic development. 77% assumed that economy would develop thanks to the
enhancement of the circulation of goods in the region.
On the negative effects brought by the project during the construction phase: Apart from
the positive impacts, the people interviewed also found that the project would generate
negative impacts such as environment and public health impacts due to air pollution
during the construction (83%); Impact on public health due to noise pollution during
construction (73%); Impact on water quality construction waste (82%); Impact on daily
life and business activities due to land acquisition, relocation and resettlement (83%);
Impact on daily life due to arising conflicts with the workers (69%); Impact on traffic
operations on the route in the construction sector (77.0%).
On the negative effects brought by the project in the operation phase: 11% and 9% of
people surveyed said the upgraded route will not exert impact on the atmospheric
environment and public health due to air and noise pollution.
Environmental impact assessment report
270
CONCLUSION, PROPOSALS AND COMMITMENTS
I. Conclusion
1. Impacts corresponding to each activity in the operation stage of the Project have
been fully identified. The assessment of impacts on each object according to the
factors from the operations has been maximally identified. Scale of main impacts
caused by the project’s activities on environment is in the following descending
order:
Impacts due to land occupation, especially permanent occupation of residential
land which is the strong impact, directly affecting households’ lives;
Impacts on population due to air pollution, noise, vibration and on agricultural
activities, ponds due to spill of materials when digging and filling road foundation,
which badly affect human health and local community activities;
Impacts on water environment due to the construction of project route, bridges,
and activities of the construction sites are main impacts on water environment,
sediment, including quality of water, sediment and irrigation capacity of rivers,
canals, ponds as well as groundwater in the project area;
Impacts on road traffic due to encroachment by construction vehicles and muddy/
slippery by erosion sediment during digging and filling, which cause traffic
congestion and unsafe;
These are strong impacts, which have been analyzed in details to set out appropriate
mitigation measures. However, some impacts have not been exactly determined their
level, spatial/ time scale because the information is unclear, the assessment is only
limited in analysis under the general framework, including (i) location of temporary
waste material/soil yards and storage time; (ii) arrangement of specific items during
construction.
2. The mitigation measures proposed to the main impacts (impacts due to land
occupation, impacts on water environment, population and traffic) and other impacts
that are highly feasible and effective. However, in order to ensure that the residual
impacts are acceptable, environment at waste sources and affected objects (including
air, noise, vibration, quality of surface water, groundwater, soil, and sediment) shall
be monitored to take appropriate adjustments. More specifically:
In terms of impacts due to land occupation: Establishing an overall plan on
compensation, support and resettlement in accordance with Circular No.
14/2009/TT-BTNMT dated 1 October 2009 of the Ministry of Natural
Environment Impact Assessment Report
271
Resources and Environment. The compensation must be carried out to each
household publicly, fairly at reasonable price based on the price framework of
the Government and People's Committees of provinces/cities taking into
consideration the local actual situation and compensation price of the projects
that have been implemented in the same area to determine the compensation
price.
Land environment: Sedimentation and spillage in the agricultural areas along the
route and the residential/ traffic land shall be monitored in the construction stage to
assess the accuracy of the forecasts and set out appropriate additional measures,
minimize damages;
Water environment, sediment should be monitored in the project’s stages to
confirm that the project’s activities do not significantly affect the quality of river
water and sediment quality;
Air, noise, vibration should be monitored in the project’s stages;
Environmental incidents: technical incidents, fire/ explosion and ship accidents,
traffic accidents are potential, so it is necessary to establish a safety plan on
traffic organization and implement this plan under supervision to ensure
residual impacts acceptable.
Environment management and monitoring shall be implemented in all three
stages: preparation, construction and operation. The project’s owner is
responsible for environment management and monitoring; provide funds for
these activities fully and timely. The costs for environmental protection are
estimated at VND 4,425 billion, included in total investment of the Project.
3. Community consultations were conducted in accordance with safety policies of the
Vietnamese LAW on Environmental protection. Participants are representatives of
People’s Committee and local communities (Fatherland Front) of 12 communes/
town within the project area.
4. After the project’s EIA report has been approved by the Ministry of Natural Resources
and Environment, the project’s owner shall establish an environmental management
plan, environmental specifications in the detailed design stage as the basis for
implementing the environmental management plan of the construction units.
II. Proposals
The project requires cooperation and support of Department of Natural Resources and
Environment in Thai Binh and Hung Yen provinces as well as People’s Committee
and Fatherland Front Committee of communes within the project area together with
Environmental impact assessment report
272
local authorities to implement the environmental protection plan during the project
implementation.
III. Commitments
1. Implementing the environmental management/ supervision program as proposed in
Chapter IV, including measures for mitigation of negative impacts, prevention and
response to environmental incidents; construction of environmental treatment
works and implementation of environmental monitoring after the project’s EIA
report has been approved by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.
The project’s owner commits to provide full funding for these activities.
In the course of construction, the following standards and Vietnamese/ international
standards on environment must be complied; ensuring quality of air, surface water,
groundwater and sediment consistent with Vietnamese/ international standards on
environment, including:
a. Law on Environmental Protection dated 29 November 2005 of the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam;
b. Decree No. 80/2006/ND-CP dated 9 August 2006 of the Government detailing
and guiding a number of articles of the Law on Environmental Protection;
c. Decree No. 21/2008/ND-CP dated 28 February 2008 of the Government
amending and supplementing a number of articles of Decree No. 80/2006/ND-
CP dated 9 August 2006 detailing and guiding a number of articles of the Law
on Environmental Protection;
d. Decree No. 29/2011/ND-CP dated 18 April 2011 on providing strategic
environmental assessment, environmental impact assessment and
environmental protection commitment;
e. The Government’s Decree No. 59/2007/ND-CP dated 9 April 2007 on solid
waste management;
f. Circular No. 26/2011/TT-BTNMT detailing a number of articles of the
Government’s Decree No. 29/2011/ND-CP dated 18 April 2011 on providing
strategic environmental assessment, environmental impact assessment and
environmental protection commitment;
g. Circular No. 12/2011/TT-BTNMT dated 14 April 2011 stipulating hazardous
waste management;
h. Complying with environmental standards in 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, etc.;
Vietnamese standards on environment in 2008, 2009, 2010, including:
Environment Impact Assessment Report
273
o QCVN05:2009/BTNMT - National technical regulation on ambient air
quality;
o QCVN06:2009/BTNMT - National technical regulation on hazardous
substances in ambient air;
o QCVN26:2010/BTNMT - National technical regulation on noise;
o TCVN7210:2002, Vibration and shock. Vibration emitted by roads traffic.
Maximum limits in the environment of public and residential areas;
o QCVN27:2010/BTNMT - National technical regulation on vibration;
o QCVN03:2008/BTNMT - National technical regulation on the allowable
limits of heavy metals in the soils;
o QCVN08:2008/BTNMT - National technical regulation on surface water quality;
o QCVN09:2008/BTNMT - National technical regulation on underground water
quality;
o QCVN 43:2012/BTNMT, National technical regulation on sediment quality;
o QCVN14:2008/BTNMT - National technical regulation on domestic
wastewater;
o QCVN40:2011/BTNMT - National technical regulation on industrial wastewater.
i. Complying with criteria on measurement and analysis methods (as mentioned
in the Preface);
j. Industry standards on road design.
2. Commitments on community
a. Respecting the values of local community and continuously exchanging,
consulting with local people in the tasks that affect environment in the project area;
b. Coordinating with Compensation Council and People’s Committee of districts/
communes related to the project to settle issues on land occupation, relocation,
resettlement, occupation and relocation of infrastructure works under Decision
No. 69/2009/ND-CP and prevailing regulations of the Ministry of Construction
in accordance with its rights and obligations;
c. Continuously improving pollution mitigation measures by supervision, monitoring,
inspection and review. Strictly complying with regulations on informing, notifying
the implementation of contents of the EIA report as approved and requirements of
the approved decision under Decree No. 29/2011/ND-CP dated 18 April 2011 on
providing strategic environmental assessment, environmental impact assessment
Environmental impact assessment report
274
and environmental protection commitment and Circular No. 26/2011/TT-BTNMT
detailing a number of articles of Decree No. 29/2011/ND-CP dated 18 April 2011
on providing strategic environmental assessment, environmental impact
assessment and environmental protection commitment;
d. Commitment to well managing of wastes;
e. Coordinating with local authorities on employment, health protection,
maintenance of order and security in the project area;
f. Ensure irrigation water not be interrupted;
g. Ensure not to cause power failure that disrupts socio-economic activities of the
localities;
h. Strictly implementing regulations on environmental management and protection
of Thai Binh and Hung Yen provinces;
i. Working together with local authorities to obtain written consent on the disposal
location prior to the construction.
3. Commitments on compliance with general regulations on environmental protection
related to stages of the Project, including:
a. Commitments on environmental protection solutions/ measurements in the
preparatory stage and construction, then official operation as presented in items
4.1 and 4.2 of Chapter IV;
b. Commitments on environmental protection solutions/ measurements shall be
implemented in the period upon the Project is put in official operation, as
presented in item 4.3;
c. The project’s owner commits to settle all claims of the community on
environment of the Project in accordance with the laws on claims,
denunciations and regulations defined in Chapter XIV "Inspection, settlement
of violations, claims/ denunciations and compensation for environmental
damage” of 2005 Law on Environmental Protection. Commitments on
compensation in case of incidents, problems regarding site clearance;
d. Commitments on compensation, land recovery and return, roads and irrigation
ditches temporarily occupied by the project.
e. Commitment to compensate for environmental pollution environmental issues in
regards to the environmental risk caused by the project;
f. Committed to making circular 39/2009/TT-BGTVT on ensuring traffic when the
expansion of roads are mined.