Report onInsurance Issues for Stratas
A report published as part of the Strata Property Law Project—Phase Two
Report on Insurance Issues
for Stratas
A Report Prepared for the British Columbia Law Institute by the Members of the
Strata Property Law (Phase Two) Project Committee
BCLI Report no. 86 March 2019
Disclaimer Theinformationandcommentaryinthispublicationisnotofferedaslegaladvice.Itrefersonlytothelawatthetimeofpubli-cation,andthelawmayhavesincechanged.BCLIdoesnotundertaketocontinuallyupdateorreviseeachofitspublicationstoreflectpost-publicationchangesinthelaw.TheBritishColumbiaLawInstituteanditsdivision,theCanadianCentreforElderLaw,disclaimanyandallresponsibilityfordamageorlossofanynaturewhatsoeverthatanypersonorentitymayincurasaresultofrelyinguponinformationorcom-mentaryinthispublication.Youshouldnotrelyoninformationinthispublicationindealingwithanactuallegalproblemthataffectsyouoranyoneelse.Instead,youshouldobtainadvicefromaqualifiedlegalprofessionalconcerningtheparticularcircumstancesofyoursituation.______________________________________________©2019BritishColumbiaLawInstituteTheBritishColumbiaLawInstituteclaimscopyrightinthispublication.Youmaycopy,download,distribute,display,andoth-erwisedealfreelywiththispublication,butonlyifyoucomplywiththefollowingconditions:
1. Youmustacknowledgethesourceofthispublication;
2. Youmaynotmodifythispublicationoranyportionofit;
3. YoumustnotusethispublicationforanycommercialpurposewithoutthepriorwrittenpermissionoftheBritishCo-lumbiaLawInstitute.
CoverphotographbySpencerWatsononUnsplash.CoverdesignbyShaunaNicholson.ThesematerialscontaininformationthathasbeenderivedfrominformationoriginallymadeavailablebytheProvinceofBrit-ishColumbiaat:http://www.bclaws.ca/andthisinformationisbeingusedinaccordancewiththeQueen’sPrinterLicense—BritishColumbiaavailableat:http://www.bclaws.ca/standards/2014/QP-License_1.0.html.Theyhavenot,however,beenproducedinaffiliationwith,orwiththeendorsementof,theProvinceofBritishColumbiaandTHESEMATERIALSARENOTANOFFICIALVERSION.
British Columbia Law Institute 1822EastMall,UniversityofBritishColumbia,Vancouver,BC,CanadaV6T1Z1
Voice:(604)822-0142Fax:(604)822-0144E-mail:[email protected]:https://www.bcli.org
-----------------------------------------------
TheBritishColumbiaLawInstitutewascreatedin1997byincorporationundertheprovin-cialSocietyAct.Itsstrategicmissionistobealeaderinlawreformbycarryingout:
• thebestinscholarlylawreformresearchandwriting;and
• thebestinoutreachrelatingtolawreform.
-----------------------------------------------
ThemembersoftheInstituteare:
ThomasL.Spraggs(Chair) AndreaL.Rolls(Vice-chair)MargaretH.Mason,QC(Treasurer) OliverA.Fleck(Secretary)Dr.ElizabethAdjin-Tettey Hon.MarionJ.AllanEmilyL.Clough Dr.TeshW.DagneJenniferA.Davenport MathewP.GoodTejasB.V.Madhur DylanT.MazurSusanM.Mercer BrentB.OlthuisLisaA.Peters,QC Dr.JanisP.Sarra
ThemembersemeritusoftheInstituteare:
Prof.JoostBlom,QC ArthurL.Close,QCProf.RobertG.Howell D.PeterRamsay,QC
-----------------------------------------------
ThisprojectwasmadepossiblewiththesustainingfinancialsupportoftheLawFoundationofBritishColumbiaandtheMinistryofJusticeforBritishColumbia.TheInstitutegratefully
acknowledgesthesupportoftheLawFoundationandtheMinistryforitswork.
-----------------------------------------------
Introductory Note
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas Insuranceisofvitalimportanceforallpropertyowners.Thispointisequallyvalidforownersofsingle-familyhomesandownersofstratalots.Butstrata-propertyownersfacecomplexissuesthatotherownersdon’tface.Managingtheseissuesisoneofthemajortasksofstrata-propertylaw.Thisreportrecommendswaystoenhancethelegalframeworkgoverninginsuranceissuesforstrataproperties.Thereportrecommendsexpandingtheinsuranceman-dateonstratacorporationstoincludedirectors-and-officersinsurance,anewap-proachtodealingwithliabilitytopayastratacorporation’sinsurancedeductibleincaseswhereanownerisresponsibleforaclaim,andenhancedreportingandinfor-mation-sharingprovisions.Thereportalsocontainsdraftlegislationandregula-tions,whichillustratehowthereport’srecommendationscouldbeimplemented.ThisreportisthefourthreportpublishedinBCLI’sStrataPropertyLawProject—PhaseTwo.BCLI’sworkonstrata-propertylawreachesbacktophaseoneofthisproject,whichconcludedin2012withrecommendationstoexamineselectedareasofstrata-propertylawandtomakerecommendationsforlegislativereformthatwillsupportthenextgenerationoftheStrataPropertyAct.OnbehalfoftheboardofdirectorsoftheBritishColumbiaLawInstitute,IwanttothankthemembersoftheStrataPropertyLaw(PhaseTwo)Committeefortheirhardworkonthisreportandtheirongoingcommitmenttotheproject.BCLIfullysupportstheirrecommendationsandendorsesthisreport.
ThomasL.SpraggsChair,BritishColumbiaLawInstituteMarch2019
Strata Property Law (Phase Two) Project Committee
TheStrataPropertyLaw(PhaseTwo)ProjectCommitteewasformedinfall2013.Thisvol-unteerprojectcommitteeismadeupofleadingexpertsinstrata-propertylawandpracticeinBritishColumbia.Thecommittee’smandateistoassistBCLIindevelopingrecommenda-tionstoreformstrata-propertylawintheareasselectedforstudyinthisphase-twoproject.Theserecommendationswillbesetoutinfinalreportsforeacharea.Themembersofthecommitteeare:
PatrickWilliams—chair (Partner,ClarkWilsonLLP)
VeronicaBarlee(Jul.2014–present) (SeniorPolicyAdvisor,HousingPolicyBranch,MinistryofNaturalGasDevelop-mentandResponsibleforHousing)
LarryButtress(Oct.2013–Jun.2016) (DeputyExecutiveOfficer,RealEstateCouncilofBritishColumbia)
GarthCambrey (RealEstateInstituteofBritishColumbia)
TonyGioventu (ExecutiveDirector,CondominiumHomeOwnersAssociation)
IanHolt(Oct.2016–Apr.2017) (Realtor,Re/MaxRealEstateServices)
TimJowett (SeniorManager,E-BusinessandDeputyRegistrar,LandTitleandSurveyAuthority)
AlexLongson(Jul.2016–present) (SeniorComplianceOfficer,RealEstateCouncilofBritishColumbia)
JudithMatheson(Oct.2013–Oct.2016) (Realtor,ColdwellBankerPremierRealty)
ElaineMcCormack (Partner,WilsonMcCormackLawGroup)
SusanMercer(Sep.2016–present) (NotaryPublic)
DougPage(Oct.2013–Jul.2014) (DirectorofLegislation,HousingPolicyBranch,MinistryofNaturalGasDevelop-mentandResponsibleforHousing)
DavidParkin (AssistantCitySurveyor,CityofVancouver)
AllenRegan (Vice-President,BaysidePropertyServicesLtd.)
GarrettRobinson(Apr.2017–present) (Realtor,Re/MaxCrestRealty—Westside)
StanleyRule(Oct.2013–Sep.2016) (Lawyer,SabeyRuleLLP)
SandyWagner (PresidentoftheBoardofDirectors,Van-couverIslandStrataOwnersAssociation)
EdWilson (Partner,LawsonLundellLLP)
KevinZakreski(stafflawyer,BritishColumbiaLawInstitute)istheprojectmanager.
Formoreinformation,visitusontheWorldWideWebat:https://www.bcli.org/project/strata-property-law-phase-two
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements................................................................................................................xiExecutiveSummary.............................................................................................................xiii
Chapter1.Introduction.........................................................................................................1AnOverviewofInsuranceandStrataProperties.........................................................................................1AbouttheStrataPropertyLawProject—PhaseTwo.................................................................................3ThePhase-TwoProject’sSupporters................................................................................................................4TheStrataPropertyLaw(PhaseTwo)ProjectCommittee......................................................................5ConsultationPaperonInsuranceIssuesforStratas...................................................................................5AnOverviewofthisReport....................................................................................................................................5Chapter2.Strata-PropertyBasics......................................................................................7Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................7TheEssentialElementsofaStrataProperty..................................................................................................7TheThreeGenerationsofStrata-PropertyLegislation.............................................................................8
Introduction......................................................................................................................................................................8StrataTitlesAct1966–74............................................................................................................................................8StrataTitlesAct/CondominiumAct1974–2000...............................................................................................8StrataPropertyAct2000–present...........................................................................................................................9
TheOwner-Developer...........................................................................................................................................10CreationofaStrataPropertybyDepositofaStrataPlan......................................................................10KindsofStrataPlans..............................................................................................................................................11StrataLots..................................................................................................................................................................11CommonProperty,LimitedCommonProperty,andCommonAssets.............................................12
Commonproperty.........................................................................................................................................................12Limitedcommonproperty........................................................................................................................................13Commonassets..............................................................................................................................................................15
TheStrataCorporation.........................................................................................................................................15TheFundamentalsofStrata-CorporationGovernance...........................................................................16
Bylawsandrules...........................................................................................................................................................16Annualgeneralmeetingsandspecialgeneralmeetings..............................................................................17Thestratacouncil..........................................................................................................................................................19Budgetsandfunds........................................................................................................................................................19
CommonExpenses..................................................................................................................................................20UnitEntitlement......................................................................................................................................................21
Whatisunitentitlementandhowisitused?....................................................................................................21Howisunitentitlementdetermined?..................................................................................................................21Whenisunitentitlementdeterminedandwhereisitfound?...................................................................23
TheDutytoRepairandMaintainProperty.................................................................................................23Commonpropertyandcommonassets...............................................................................................................23Stratalots..........................................................................................................................................................................25
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
viii British Columbia Law Institute
DisputeResolutionandtheCivilResolutionTribunal............................................................................26Chapter3.InsuranceandStrataProperties.................................................................27Introduction...............................................................................................................................................................27BackgroundonInsuranceandInsuranceLaw...........................................................................................27
Insurancedefined.........................................................................................................................................................27Distinguishingprinciplesofinsurancelaw........................................................................................................28
Strata-PropertyLegislationandInsurance..................................................................................................29Whydoesstrata-propertylegislationdealwithinsuranceandhowdoesittacklethesubject?29
LegislativeHistoryinBritishColumbia.........................................................................................................32Evolutionoflegislationthroughthreegenerationsofstrata-propertylegislation..........................32First-generationact:1966–74.................................................................................................................................32Second-generationact:1974–2000......................................................................................................................33Third-generationact:2000–present....................................................................................................................33
TheStrataPropertyAct’sProvisionsonInsurance..................................................................................33Propertyinsurancerequiredforstratacorporation.....................................................................................33
Scopeofrequirement....................................................................................................................................33Definitionof“fixtures”..................................................................................................................................34Fullreplacementvalue..................................................................................................................................36Majorperils........................................................................................................................................................36
Liabilityinsurancerequiredforstratacorporation.......................................................................................37Descriptionofthelegislation.....................................................................................................................37
Otherinsuranceastratacorporationmayobtain..........................................................................................38Descriptionofthelegislation.....................................................................................................................38
Stratacorporationhasaninsurableinterestinpropertyitmustinsure.............................................39Descriptionofthelegislation.....................................................................................................................39
Stratacorporationmustreviewandreportoninsurancecoverage......................................................41Descriptionofthelegislation.....................................................................................................................41
Namedinsuredsincludestratacorporation,owners,tenants,andoccupiers...................................41Descriptionofthelegislation.....................................................................................................................41Clearidentificationofbroadgroupofnamedinsureds..................................................................42Theno-subrogationrule...............................................................................................................................42
Paymentandapplicationofinsurancemoney.................................................................................................44Descriptionofthelegislation.....................................................................................................................44
Deductible........................................................................................................................................................................45Insurancedeductibleischaracterizedasacommonexpense.....................................................45Stratacorporationmayrecoverdeductiblepaymentfromresponsibleowner..................46Stratacorporationapprovalnotrequiredforpaymentofdeductible.....................................48
Owner’sinsurance........................................................................................................................................................48Descriptionofthelegislation.....................................................................................................................48Ownersinbare-landstrataplans.............................................................................................................49
Contribution....................................................................................................................................................................51Descriptionofthelegislation.....................................................................................................................51
Chapter4.IssuesforReform.............................................................................................53Introduction...............................................................................................................................................................53IssuesforReform—TheInsuranceMandate...............................................................................................53
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute ix
ShouldtheStrataPropertyActrequirestratacorporationstoobtaindirectors-and-officersinsurance?..............................................................................................................................................................54Briefdescriptionoftheissue.....................................................................................................................54Discussionofoptionsforreform..............................................................................................................55Thecommittee’srecommendationforreform...................................................................................56
Whatamountofcoverageshouldastratacorporationberequiredtoobtainforitsmandateddirectors-and-officersinsurance?...............................................................................................................57Briefdescriptionoftheissue.....................................................................................................................57Discussionofoptionsforreform..............................................................................................................57Thecommittee’srecommendationforreform...................................................................................57
Shouldthedefinitionof“majorperils”intheStrataPropertyRegulationbeamendedtoincludeearthquakes?.........................................................................................................................................................58Briefdescriptionoftheissue.....................................................................................................................58Discussionofoptionsforreform..............................................................................................................58Thecommittee’srecommendationforreform...................................................................................59
Shouldthedefinitionof“majorperils”intheStrataPropertyRegulationbeamendedtoincludeoverlandflooding?..............................................................................................................................................60Briefdescriptionoftheissue.....................................................................................................................60Discussionofoptionsforreform..............................................................................................................61Thecommittee’srecommendationforreform...................................................................................61
IssuesforReform—InsuranceDeductibles.................................................................................................61Introduction....................................................................................................................................................................61Noteongovernanceissuesforstratas.................................................................................................................63ShouldtheStrataPropertyActexpresslyassignresponsibilityforaninsurancedeductibletoa
responsibleowner?............................................................................................................................................64Briefdescriptionoftheissue.....................................................................................................................64Discussionofoptionsforreform..............................................................................................................65Thecommittee’srecommendationforreform...................................................................................67
ShouldtheStrataPropertyActrequirestrata-lotownerstohaveinsurancethatcoverspaymentofadeductibleunderastrata-corporationpolicy?..........................................................68Briefdescriptionoftheissue.....................................................................................................................68Discussionofoptionsforreform..............................................................................................................68Thecommittee’srecommendationforreform...................................................................................69
IssuesforReform—NamedInsureds.............................................................................................................69Shouldsection155oftheStrataPropertyActbeamended?.....................................................................71
Briefdescriptionoftheissue.....................................................................................................................71Discussionofoptionsforreform..............................................................................................................71Thecommittee’srecommendationforreform...................................................................................72
IssuesforReform—ReportingandAdministration.................................................................................72ShouldtheStrataPropertyActrequirestratacorporationstoobtainanappraisalforthe
purposeofdeterminingadequacyofproperty-insurancecoverage?..........................................73Briefdescriptionoftheissue.....................................................................................................................73Discussionofoptionsforreform..............................................................................................................73Thecommittee’srecommendationforreform...................................................................................73
Howfrequentlyshouldanappraisalforthepurposeofdeterminingadequacyofproperty-insurancecoverageberequiredtobecarriedout?.............................................................................74Briefdescriptionoftheissue.....................................................................................................................74Discussionofoptionsforreform..............................................................................................................74Thecommittee’srecommendationforreform...................................................................................74
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
x British Columbia Law Institute
ShouldtheStrataPropertyActrequireastratacorporationtoinformtheownersandtenantsassoonasfeasibleofanymaterialchangeininsurancecoverage?..............................................75Briefdescriptionoftheissue.....................................................................................................................75Discussionofoptionsforreform..............................................................................................................75Thecommittee’srecommendationforreform...................................................................................76
IssueforReform—TheStandardUnit............................................................................................................76Briefdescriptionoftheissue.....................................................................................................................76IBCcommentary..............................................................................................................................................77Thecommittee’srecommendationforreform...................................................................................80
Chapter5.DraftLegislationandRegulations..............................................................83Draftlegislation..............................................................................................................................................................83Draftregulations............................................................................................................................................................88
Chapter6.Conclusion..........................................................................................................89
AppendixA—ListofRecommendations........................................................................91AppendixB—BiographiesofProject-CommitteeMembers...................................93
PrincipalFundersin2018...............................................................................................101
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute xi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TheBritishColumbiaLawInstitutethanksthemembersoftheStrataPropertyLaw(PhaseTwo)ProjectCommittee,withoutwhoseongoingdedicationthisprojectwouldnothavebeenpossible.Committeemembershavegenerouslysharedtheirtimeandexpertiseoverthecourseoftheproject.AdditionalacknowledgmentisduetoPatrickWilliams,whohastakenontheaddedresponsibilityofservingascommit-teechair.BCLIalsothanksallthoseindividualsandorganizationsthatparticipatedinthepub-licconsultationthatprecededthisreport.Theirresponsesandcommentshelpedthecommitteeinshapingandevaluatingthefinalrecommendationscontainedinthisreport.Forpublicizingtheconsultationpaperthatprecededthisreport,BCLIthankstheAdvocate,theCanadianBarAssociation—BCBranch,theCondominiumHomeOwnersAssociation,andtheVancouverIslandStrataOwnersAssociation.MembersoftheInsuranceBrokersAssociationofBritishColumbiaandtheInsur-anceBureauofCanadagenerouslygavetheirtimetomeetwiththeStrataPropertyLaw(PhaseTwo)ProjectCommitteeasitwasinitiallydevelopingitstentativerec-ommendationsfortheConsultationPaperonInsuranceIssuesforStratas.BCLIandthecommitteewouldliketothankIBABCandIBCandthefollowingindividuals:
• KenDeDecker,Chair,NationalCondominiumActReviewWorkingGroup,InsuranceBureauofCanada;
• TrudyLancelyn,InsuranceBrokersAssociationofBritishColumbia;
• MirandaLee,InsuranceBureauofCanada;
• GordonLi,InsuranceBrokersAssociationofBritishColumbia&CapriCMW;
• PatrickNorth,InsuranceBrokersAssociationofBritishColumbia&GNKIn-surance;
• ScottPreston,InsuranceBrokersAssociationofBritishColumbia&SeaFirstInsurance;
• RanaShamoon,InsuranceBureauofCanada;
• SteveStorrey,BFLCanada;
• SarahThompson,InsuranceBrokersAssociationofBritishColumbia&HubInternationalCoastal.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
xii British Columbia Law Institute
TheviewsexpressedinthisreportarethoseofBCLIandthecommitteeandtheymaynotreflecttheviewsofanyofthelistedindividuals,IBABC,orIBC.TheStrataPropertyLaw(PhaseTwo)ProjecthasbeenmadepossiblebysupportfromtheRealEstateFoundationofBritishColumbia,theNotaryFoundationofBrit-ishColumbia,theMinistryofMunicipalAffairsandHousingforBritishColumbia,theRealEstateCouncilofBritishColumbia,theRealEstateInstituteofBritishColumbia,StrataPropertyAgentsofBritishColumbia,theAssociationofBritishColumbiaLandSurveyors,theVancouverIslandStrataOwnersAssociation,andtheCondominiumHomeOwnersAssociation.BCLIthanksalltheseorganizationsfortheirgenerouscontributionstotheproject.BCLIalsothankstheVancouverlawfirmClarkWilsonLLPforhostingcommitteemeetings.Finally,thestaffofBCLIhaveplayedakeyroleindesigning,managing,andexecut-ingtheworkleadinguptothisreport.JimEmmerton(executivedirectortoJune2015)andKathleenCunningham(executivedirectorJune2015topresent)havebothprovidedexecutiveplanningandmanagementfortheproject.KevinZakreski(stafflawyer)istheprojectmanager,andwasalsoresponsiblefordraftingthisreportandtheconsultationpaperthatprecededit.He,GregBlue,QC(seniorstafflawyer),andValerieLeBlanc(stafflawyer)havecontributedtosupportingpro-ject-committeemeetings.Andthefollowingstaffmembershavealsocontributedtotheresearchandadministrationforthisproject:EmilyAmirkhani(UniversityofVic-toriaLawCoopstudent),AlexandreBlondin(researchlawyer),GurinderCheema(summerlawstudent),AllisonCurley(summerlawstudent),RaissaDickinson(manager,communityengagement),EricHou(summerlawstudent),RachelKelly(researchlawyer),ShaunaNicholson(legalassistant),SergioOrtega(UniversityofVictoriaLawCoopstudent),ElizabethPinsent(officeadministrator),andBénédicteSchoepflin(socialmediacoordinator).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute xiii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Insuranceisapressingconcernforallhomeowners.Itisnolessimportantforpeo-plewhosehomesarelocatedwithinastrataproperty.Butinsurancegeneratessomecomplicatedlegalissueswithinstratapropertiesthatdon’tarisewithinasingle-familyhome.Thisisbecausetheone-to-onerelationshipofhomeownertoinsurerisrefractedinastratapropertyintoamorecomplexsetofrelationshipsinvolving(ataminimum)strata-lotowners,theirinsurers,thestratacorporation,anditsinsurers.ExperienceinBritishColumbiaandelsewherehasshownthatlegislationisneces-sarytocoordinatetheserelationships.ThisreportexamineshowtheStrataPropertyActandtheStrataPropertyRegulationareperformingincarryingoutthattask.Itcontains11recommendationsforre-formingtheactandtheregulation,toimprovehowtheyfunctioningoverningin-suranceinstrataproperties.About the Strata Property Law Project—Phase Two ThisisthefourthreportpublishedinBCLI’sStrataPropertyLawProject—PhaseTwo.Thephase-twoprojectbuildsontheconsultationandresearchcarriedoutinphaseoneoftheproject.ItaddresseslegislativereformoftheStrataPropertyAct,withthegoalofpromotingthedevelopmentofthenextgenerationoftheact.Previ-ousreportshaveconsideredterminatingastrata,complexstratas,andgovernanceissuesforstratas.Our supporters and the project committee TheStrataPropertyLawProject—PhaseTwohasbeenmadepossiblebyprojectfundingfromtheRealEstateFoundationofBritishColumbia,theNotaryFoundationofBritishColumbia,theMinistryofMunicipalAffairsandHousingforBritishCo-lumbia,theRealEstateCouncilofBritishColumbia,theRealEstateInstituteofBrit-ishColumbia,StrataPropertyAgentsofBritishColumbia,theAssociationofBritishColumbiaLandSurveyors,theVancouverIslandStrataOwnersAssociation,andtheCondominiumHomeOwnersAssociation.BCLIiscarryingouttheStrataPropertyLawProject—PhaseTwowiththeassistanceofavolunteerprojectcommittee.Thecommitteeismadeupofadiverserangeof
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
xiv British Columbia Law Institute
expertsinthestrata-propertyfield.Its13currentmembershailfromthelegalandnotarialprofessions,owners’organizations,thestrata-managementandreal-estateprofessions,andthepublicsector.Consultation Paper on Insurance Issues for Stratas Thisreportwasprecededbythecommittee’sConsultationPaperonInsuranceIssuesforStratas,whichwaspublishedinSeptember2018.TheconsultationpaperwasmadeavailableviatheBCLIwebsite.Itspublicationmarkedthebeginningofathree-monthconsultationonthecommittee’stentativerecommendations.Thisconsultationattractedahighlevelofresponse,garneringatotalof90respons-es.Boththevolumeofresponsesandthequalityofthecommentshelpedtheprojectcommitteeinrefiningitsproposalsanddecidingonthefinalrecommendationscon-tainedinthisreport.Content of the report Introduction Thereportcontainssixchapters,includingitsbriefintroductoryandconcludingchapters.Theintroductorychaptergivesanoverviewoftheprojectandasummaryofthereport’srecommendations.Strata-property basics Thereport’ssecondchaptercontainsageneraloverviewofstrata-propertylaw.Thisdiscussionispitchedatreaderswhoareunfamiliarwiththedistinctivetermsandconceptsfoundinthisbodyoflaw.It’sintendedtoprovidethesereaderswithjustenoughinformationaboutthecreationandoperationofstratapropertiestoallowthemtoworktheirwaythroughthechaptersthatfollow.Insurance and strata properties Athoroughreviewofpart9oftheStrataPropertyActformsthesubjectofthere-port’sthirdchapter.Part9containstheact’slegalframeworkforinsuranceinstrataproperties.Afterbrieflyrecountingthelegislativehistoryofpart9,thechaptergivesadetailedreviewofitscomponentparts.Thesecomponentsincludethefollowingprovisions:
• legislativerequirements—thatis,mandates—onthestratacorporationtoobtainpropertyandliabilityinsurance;
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute xv
• anenablingprovision,allowingthestratacorporationtoobtaininsuranceotherthanthatrequiredbythelegislation;
• aprovisionconfirmingthestratacorporation’sinsurableinterestinthepropertyitmustinsure;
• reviewingandreportingrequirementsimposedonthestratacorporation;
• aprovisionspellingoutthenamedinsuredsonthestratacorporation’sin-suranceandestablishingarulepreventingsubrogatedclaimsbythestratacorporation’sinsurersagainstthosenamedinsureds;
• aprovisionregulatingthepaymentandapplicationofinsurancemoney;
• provisionsregardingdeductiblesinthestratacorporation’sinsurance;
• anenablingprovisionforstrata-lotownerstoobtaintheirowninsurance;
• aprovisionregulatingcontributionsbythestratacorporation’sandtheowners’insurers.
Issues for reform Whilethecommitteereviewedallofpart9oftheact,itsrecommendationsforre-formconcernonlythoseareaswherethecommitteesawaneedforimprovements.Theseareasconsistofthefollowingfourtopics.
• Theinsurancemandate:thecommitteerecommendedaddingarequire-menttothestratacorporation’sinsurancemandatetoobtaindirectors-and-officerscoverage.Thecommitteealsoconsideredmandatingcoveragefortwoperils(earthquakesandoverlandfloods)thataren’tcurrentlywithinthescopeofthemajorperilsthatmustbecovered.
• Insurancedeductibles:thecommitteemadetworecommendationscon-cerningdeductibles:(1)amendingthelegislationtoexpresslyassignre-sponsibilityforaninsurancedeductibletoaresponsibleowner;and(2)requiringstrata-lotownerstoobtaintheirowninsurancethatcoverspaymentofadeductibleunderastrata-corporationpolicy.
• Namedinsureds:thecommitteecanvassedrecentcaselawonthisprovi-sion.Initsview,legislativechangeisn’trequiredtoensurethatitcontinuestofulfilitsmainpurpose,whichconsistsofestablishingtherulepreventingsubrogatedclaimsagainstnamedinsureds.
• Reportingandadministration:thecommitteerecommendedthattheleg-islationrequirestratacorporationstoobtainappraisalstodeterminetheadequacyoftheirproperty-insurancecoverage;thatthefrequencyofsuch
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
xvi British Columbia Law Institute
appraisalsbe(ataminimum)onceeverythreeyears;andthatthestratacorporationberequiredtoinformownersandtenantsofanymaterialchangeinthestratacorporation’sinsurancecoverage.
Finally,thisreportconsidersadoptionofthestandard-unitconceptasafeatureofBritishColumbia’slegislation,atopicwhichwasframedasaquestionfordiscussionintheconsultationpaper.ThestandardunitisanideausedinotherCanadianjuris-dictionstodeterminethescopeofastratacorporation’sproperty-insuranceobliga-tions.AdoptingthisconceptinBritishColumbiawouldrepresentasignificantchangeinthisprovince’slaw.Afterreflectingonthecommentsreceivedonitsques-tionfordiscussionandonrecentdevelopmentselsewhereinCanada,thecommitteerecommendedthatfurtherstudyandconsultationbedevotedtothisissue.Draft legislation and regulations Thereportcontainsachaptersettingoutdraftlegislationandregulations,whichareintendedtoillustratehowthecommittee’srecommendationscouldbeimplementedbyamendmentstotheStrataPropertyActandtheStrataPropertyRegulation.Conclusion Thisreport’sfinalrecommendationswillbesubmittedtotheprovincialgovernment.TheprovinceofBritishColumbiaregularlyupdatesstratalegislation.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 1
Chapter 1. Introduction An Overview of Insurance and Strata Properties Insuranceandhomeownershipgohandinhand.Formanypeople,owningahomeisthemostimportantinvestmentmadeintheirlifetimes.Butit’saninvestmentthatisbesetbyrisks.Firesorinclementweathercandamageordestroyabuilding.Anac-cidentonahomeowner’spropertycanresultinaweightysettlementorcourtjudg-ment.Alloftheserisksandmorehavethepotentialtoerodeordepletethehome-owner’sinvestment.Themainwaytoblunttheforceoftheserisksisbyinsurance.Thesocialpurposeofinsuranceistoserveas“amechanismforspreadingtheriskofloss.”1Peoplewhofacerisks“canteamupwithothersinthesameposition”and“contributetoafundfromwhichmoneywillbeavailabletopayforlosseswhentheyoccur.”2Homeown-ershaveaparticularlystrongincentivetoobtaininsurancetoprotecttheirinvest-ment.Thisincentiveisnolessstrongforahomeownerwhosehomeislocatedwithinastrataproperty.Butwhentheinterplayofinsuranceandstratapropertiesisexam-inedforlegalissues,thisincentiveisn’ttheonlythingthatshinesthrough.Whatbe-comesreadilyapparentisthatthissubjectisgovernedbyitsownlegalframework,whichmakesupasignificantpartofBritishColumbia’slawsonstrataproperties:theStrataPropertyAct3andtheStrataPropertyRegulation.4Whyisthislegalframeworknecessary?Itowesitsexistencetothefactthatsomeofthemostchallengingissuesinthestrata-propertyfieldconcerninsurance.“Insur-ance”is,asanearlycommentatoronstrata-propertylawputit,“probablythemostdifficultsubject,technically,forthelegislativedraftsman,thedeveloper,andtheowners.”51. CraigBrownetal,InsuranceLawinCanada,vol1(Toronto:ThompsonCarswell,2002)(loose-
leafrelease2010–1)at§1.1.
2. Ibid(commentingfurtheronthenatureofinsurance:“Eachcontribution,or‘premium,’ismuchlessthanthepotentiallossthecontributorfaces.Thisispossiblebecausethelossescoveredbythesystemarerandomlosses.Amongarelativelylargenumberofpeoplefacingsimilarrisks,onlyarelativefew(whoseidentityisunknown)attheoutsetwillactuallysufferloss.Thecon-tributionsofthemanypayforthelossesofthefew.”[footnoteomitted]).
3. SBC1998,c43.
4. BCReg43/2000.
5. RCBRisk,“CondominiumsandCanada”(1968)18:1UTLJ1at56.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
2 British Columbia Law Institute
Thedifficultyappearstoresideintheexceptionaldemandsthissubjectplacesonthelawtocoordinateadiverserangeofactorsandstrikeacarefulbalancebetweenanelaborateandcomplexsetofinterests.Thesedemandsappearattwolevels.Atthefirst,operationallevel,therelativelysimplerelationshipofinsurertohome-ownerisrefractedintoarelationshipbetweenmultipleplayers.Amongtheseplay-ersisthestratacorporation,whichactsasacollectiveadministratorforthestrataproperty,onbehalfofitsowners.Aswillbeseen,stratacorporationsaresubjecttolegislativemandatestoobtaincertainformsofinsurance.Butnothingintheseman-datespreventsanindividualownerfromobtaininginsurance.Further,thelegalframeworkrecognizesthatotheractorsmaybeatplayinsomestrataproperties,suchastenantsandwhattheactreferstoas“occupants”(“aperson,otherthananownerortenant,whooccupiesastratalot”).6Finally,giventhefinancialrealitiesofhomeownership,anotherplayerexistswhoislikelytotakeakeeninterestinthestrataproperty’sinsurancearrangements:themortgagelender.Allofthisleadstothesignatureissueforthisreport,whichconcernsdesigninglawsthatstriveto“eliminat[e]thetwinevilsofoverlappingpoliciesandgapsincoverage.”7Atthesecond,conceptuallevel,strata-propertylawandinsurancelawarebothso-phisticated,detailed,andcomplexbodiesoflaw.TheStrataPropertyActcontainsover300sections.Commentatorshavestressedthesignificant,far-reachingimpactthisstatute(andthoselikeitinotherjurisdictions)hashadonreal-propertylaw.86. Supranote3,s1(1)“occupant.”Toroundoutthislistofplayersintheinsurancefieldforstrata
properties,itshouldbenotedthatsomestrataswillhaveonefurtherplayer:asection.Sectionsareakindofsubstratacorporation,whichcropupmostfrequentlyinmixed-usestratas.TheStrataPropertyActallowsthecreationofsectionsinlimitedcircumstancestorepresentthedif-ferentinterestsofspecifiedgroupsofowners(seeibid,s191).Theactgoesontograntsectionscertaincorporatepowers,oneofwhichisthepowerto“obtaininsuranceonly(a)againstperilsthatarenotinsuredbythestratacorporation,or(b)foramountsthatareinexcessofamountsinsuredbythestratacorporation”(ibid,s194(4)).Whilesectionsdon’tfigureintomuchofthediscussioninthisreport,theywereoneofthemainsubjectsoftwoearlierpublicationsinthisproject.SeeBritishColumbiaLawInstitute,ConsultationPaperonComplexStratas(2016),online:<www.bcli.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/2016-08-31_BCLI-Consultation-Paper-on-Complex-Stratas-FINAL.pdf>[perma.cc/A43A-3NN7];BritishColumbiaLawInstitute,ReportonComplexStratas,Report81(2017),online:<www.bcli.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2017-06-19_BCLI-SPL-Ph2-Report-on-Complex-Stratas-FINAL.pdf>[perma.cc/NZZ8-JQMP](seeespeciallyrecommendation(12),whichrecommendsexpandingasection’spowertoobtaininsuranceat77–79).
7. PatrickJRohan,MelvinAReskin,&MichaelPSanchirico,“RecentDevelopmentsintheFieldofInsuranceforCondominiumProjects”(1974)48:4StJohn’sLRev1084at1092.
8. Seee.g.DonJManderscheid,“CondominiumContributions:AMatterofPriority”(1999)37:4Al-taLRev973at974(describingstrata-propertylegislationashaving“usheredinatotallyalien
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 3
BritishColumbia’sInsuranceAct9issimilarlylengthy(itrunstoabout170sections).Andthisactisonlyonepartofanintricatewebofstatutes,regulations,andcaselawwhichmakeupinsurancelaw.It’sreadilyapparentthatasignificanteffortwouldbeneededtoensurethatthesetwodistinctbodiesoflawaligntogetherforseamlessapplication.“Thestratacorporationconceptdoesnotfitneatlyintoanumberofin-suranceconceptsandprinciples,”asaleadingpracticeguideforstratapropertiesexplains,soanoverridinggoaloftheStrataPropertyAct’sinsuranceprovisionsisto“makeadjustmentsforthispurpose.”10
About the Strata Property Law Project—Phase Two ThisReportonInsuranceIssuesforStratasispartoftheBritishColumbiaLawInsti-tute’songoingStrataPropertyLawProject—PhaseTwo.BCLIbegantheStrataPropertyLawProject—PhaseTwoinsummer2013.Theproject’sgoalsaretostudyselectedareasofstrata-propertylaw,identifyissuescallingforreformofthelaw,andrecommendchangestotheStrataPropertyActtoaddressthoseissues.Thephase-twoprojectbuildsonBCLI’sStrataPropertyLawProject—PhaseOne,whichwascompletedin2012.Overthecourseofthephase-oneproject,BCLIcar-riedoutinitiallegalresearchandfocusedconsultationwithleadingexpertsinthestrata-propertyfield.TheresultsofthisresearchandconsultationwerepublishedinBCLI’sReportonStrataPropertyLaw:PhaseOne,11whichrecommendedthatBCLIundertakealaw-reformprojecttoexaminethefollowingsubjects:(1)fundamentalchangestoastrata;(2)complexstratas;(3)selectedgovernanceissues;(4)commonproperty;(5)selectedland-titleissues;(6)selectedinsuranceissues;(7)leaseholdstratas.
conceptoflandownership”[footnoteomitted]);CathySherry,“LessonsinPersonalFreedomandFunctionalLandMarkets:WhatStrataandCommunityTitleCanLearnfromTraditionalDoctrinesofProperty”(2013)36:1UNSWLJ280at314(“whenusinglegislationtocreatenovelformsofpropertywhichaccommodatehighdensitydevelopment,wemustbeconsciousofthewaysinwhichwearestrayingfromorthodoxrulesorpropertyandtheconsequencesofthedi-vergence”).
9. RSBC2012,c1.
10. ContinuingLegalEducationSocietyofBritishColumbia,ed,BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual(Vancouver:ContinuingLegalEducationSocietyofBritishColumbia,2008)(loose-leaf2018update)at§15.1.
11. Report70(2012),online:<www.bcli.org/sites/default/files/2012-11-30_BCLI_Report_on_Strata_Property_Law--Phase_One.pdf>[perma.cc/FBV8-J9C7].
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
4 British Columbia Law Institute
Thefirstsubjectinthephase-twoprojectwaspartiallyaddressedintheproject’sfirsttwopublications,theConsultationPaperonTerminatingaStrata12andtheRe-portonTerminatingaStrata.13TheLegislativeAssemblyofBritishColumbiaimple-mentedthisreport’srecommendationsinfall2015.14Complexstratas,theproject’ssecondsubject,werethefocusofafurthertwopubli-cationsforthisproject:theConsultationPaperonComplexStratas15andtheReportonComplexStratas.16Governanceissueshavebeenaddressedbytwopublications,theConsultationPaperonGovernanceIssuesforStratas17andtheReportonGovernanceIssuesforStratas.18Andaconsultationpaperhasbeenpublishedthatcombinesthreesubjects:commonproperty,selectedland-titleissues,andfundamentalchangestoastrata(thatis,theremainingissueswithfundamentalchangesthatweren’taddressedinthecommit-tee’searlierworkonterminatingastrata).19Unfortunately,thetimeandresourcesavailabletotheprojecthaveruledouttheplannedreviewofitsseventhsubject,leaseholdstrataplans.
The Phase-Two Project’s Supporters TheStrataPropertyLawProject—PhaseTwohasbeenmadepossiblebyprojectgrantsfromtheRealEstateFoundationofBritishColumbia,theNotaryFoundation12. (2014),online:<www.bcli.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2014-05-15_BCLI-
Consultation-Paper-on-Terminating-a-Strata-FINAL.pdf>[perma.cc/XK58-9PLF].
13. Report79(2015),online:<www.bcli.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2015-02-20_BCLI-SPL-Ph2-Report-on-Terminating-a-Strata-FINAL.pdf>[perma.cc/GW7W-VCBX].
14. SeeNaturalGasDevelopmentStatutesAmendmentAct,2015,SBC2015,c40,ss37–55(inforce28July2016).
15. Supranote6.
16. Supranote6.
17. (2018),online:<www.bcli.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2018-03-13_BCLI-Consultation-Paper-on-Governance-Issues-For-Stratas-CONSULTATION-FINAL.pdf>[per-ma.cc/3A57-2889].
18. Report85(2019),online:<www.bcli.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Report-on-Governance-issues-final-report-WEB.pdf>[perma.cc/BRQ5-L6ZB].
19. SeeConsultationPaperonCommonProperty,LandTitles,andFundamentalChangesforStratas(2018),online:<www.bcli.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2018-12-07_BCLI-CP-on-Common-Property-Land-Titles-and-Fundamental-Changes-for-Stratas-FINAL-reduced.pdf>[perma.cc/A2EQ-H5XB].
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 5
ofBritishColumbia,theMinistryofMunicipalAffairsandHousingforBritishCo-lumbia,theRealEstateCouncilofBritishColumbia,theRealEstateInstituteofBrit-ishColumbia,StrataPropertyAgentsofBritishColumbia,theAssociationofBritishColumbiaLandSurveyors,theVancouverIslandStrataOwnersAssociation,andtheCondominiumHomeOwnersAssociation.
The Strata Property Law (Phase Two) Project Committee
Incarryingoutthephase-twoproject,BCLIisgratefultohavetheassistanceofanexpertprojectcommittee.BriefbiographiesofcommitteemembersmaybefoundinappendixB.20
Consultation Paper on Insurance Issues for Stratas ThisreportwasprecededbytheConsultationPaperonInsuranceIssuesforStratas,whichwaspublishedinSeptember2018.21Publicationoftheconsultationpaperopenedathree-monthwindowforthepublictocommentonthecommittee’s10ten-tativerecommendationsforreformandonequestionfordiscussion.Theconsultationpapergarnered90responses,whichisahighlevelofresponseforaBCLIlaw-reformpublication.Responseswerefullyconsideredincraftingthisre-port’sfinalrecommendations.Thecommitteethankseveryonewhoprovidedare-sponseinthisconsultation.Theireffortshelpedthecommitteetotestandrefineitsthinkingontheissuesforreformfoundinthisreport.
An Overview of this Report Whilethecommitteereviewedallofpart9oftheStrataPropertyAct,itsrecommen-dationsforreformfocusonfourareas:
• theinsurancemandate:thecommitteerecommendedaddingarequirementtothestratacorporation’sinsurancemandatetoobtaindirectors-and-officerscoverage;thecommitteealsoconsideredmandatingcoveragefortwoperils(earthquakesandoverlandfloods)thataren’tcurrentlywithinthescopeofthemajorperilsthatmustbecovered;
20. See,below,at93–100.
21. (2018),online:<www.bcli.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2018-09-14_BCLI-Consultation-Paper-on-Insurance-Issues-For-Stratas-FINAL.pdf>[perma.cc/S84T-3JYK].
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
6 British Columbia Law Institute
• insurancedeductibles:thecommitteemadetworecommendationsconcern-ingdeductibles:(1)amendingthelegislationtoexpresslyassignresponsi-bilityforaninsurancedeductibletoaresponsibleowner;and(2)requiringstrata-lotownerstoobtaintheirowninsurancethatcoverspaymentofadeductibleunderastrata-corporationpolicy;
• namedinsureds:thecommitteecanvassedrecentcaselawonsection155oftheactbutdidnotrecommendanychangestothatprovision;
• reportingandadministration:thecommitteerecommendedthatthelegisla-tionrequirestratacorporationstoobtainappraisalstodeterminetheade-quacyoftheirproperty-insurancecoverage;thatthefrequencyofsuchap-praisalsbe(ataminimum)onceeverythreeyears;andthatthestratacor-porationberequiredtoinformownersandtenantsofanymaterialchangeinthestratacorporation’sinsurancecoverage.
Finally,thisreportconsidersadoptionofthestandard-unitconceptasafeatureofBritishColumbia’slegislation,atopicwhichwasframedasaquestionfordiscussionintheconsultationpaper.ThestandardunitisanideausedinotherCanadianjuris-dictionstodeterminethescopeofastratacorporation’sproperty-insuranceobliga-tions.AdoptingthisconceptinBritishColumbiawouldrepresentasignificantchangeinthisprovince’slaw.Afterreflectingonthecommentsreceivedonitsques-tionfordiscussionandonrecentdevelopmentselsewhereinCanada,thecommitteerecommendedthatfurtherstudyandconsultationbedevotedtothisissue.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 7
Chapter 2. Strata-Property Basics Introduction Strata-propertylawhasahighlyoriginalcastofcharactersandconcepts.Itstermsandideasarehowthelawcreatesstrataproperties’distinctivecombinationofown-ershipandmanagementofproperty.Understandingtheseconceptsisanecessarypartofanalyzingthelegalissuesthatcanariseinastrataproperty.Whoisresponsibletorepairproperty?Howdodecisionsgetmadeinacollectiveofpropertyowners?Howareexpensesdividedupamongtheseowners?Whatroledothebylawsplayinestablishingthegoverningnormsofthecommunity?Whatismeantbysuchtermsascommonproperty,stratalot,andunitentitlement?Thean-swerstotheseandsimilarquestionswilloftenfiguredeeplyintotheanalysisofanygiveninsuranceissueinastrataproperty.Thischapter’sgoalistoacquaintreaderswithbasicstrata-propertytermsandcon-cepts.Itispitchedatreaderswhoarenewtothesubjectorunfamiliarwithstratapropertiesandismeanttogivethemjustenoughinformationtofindtheirwaythroughthechaptersthatfollow.
The Essential Elements of a Strata Property Strataproperties22arealegaldevicethataccommodatesindividualownershipofaninterestinlandwithinacollective,multi-unitstructure.Thelawcontainsmanysuchdevices.Whatsetsastratapropertyapartfrom,say,acooperative,ajointtenancy,atenancyincommon,oralong-termlease,arethefollowing“twoessentialelements”:
• thedivisionofpropertyintounits,tobeindividuallyowned,andcommonelements,tobeownedincommonbytheownersoftheunits;and
• anadministrativeframeworktoenabletheownerstomanagetheproperty.23
22. Formanypeoplethenamestratapropertyitselfisthefirststumblingblockthat’sencounteredin
adiscussionofthisareaofthelaw.BritishColumbiaistheonlyjurisdictioninCanadathatusesthisname.Itssignificanceismainlyhistorical:itreflectstheoriginsofthisprovince’slawinleg-islationthatwasenactedfirstinAustralia.OtherCanadianprovincesandterritoriesdrewonAmericanlawtocreatetheirlegislation.SotheyadoptedtheleadingAmericanword,condomini-um.Thetwotermsactuallydescribethesameconcept.Nothinginlawturnsontheuseofoneortheother.
23. OntarioLawReformCommission,ReportontheLawofCondominiumReport11(1967)at3.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
8 British Columbia Law Institute
Theseessentialelementsexistwithinabodyoflawthat“reflectsthecombinationofseverallegalconcepts”—especiallyconceptsdrawnfromreal-estatelaw,easements,andcorporatelaw.24
The Three Generations of Strata-Property Legislation
Introduction Itmightbepossibletoachievethiscombinationofrulesandessentialelementsbycarefullyexecutedeasementsandagreements.ButthroughoutCanada,theUnitedStates,andAustralia,stratapropertieshavebeenfosteredbylegislation.BritishColumbiaisnoexceptiontothisapproach.Thisprovincehassupportedthecreationandadministrationofstratapropertiesbylegislation,whichcanbeseenasdevelopinginthreedistinctgenerations.Strata Titles Act 1966–74 InApril1966,BritishColumbiabecamethefirstjurisdictioninCanadatoenactstra-ta-propertylegislation.Thefirst-generationact,calledtheStrataTitlesAct,camein-toforceinSeptemberofthatyear.25Thefirst-generationactwasskeletallegislation.Itdidlittlemorethanenablepeopletocreateandadministerstrataproperties.Strata Titles Act/Condominium Act 1974–2000 In1974,thesecondgenerationofthelegislationappeared.26Thesecond-generationactretainedtheframeworksetoutinthefirst-generationactandenhanceditbyaddingnewprovisionsdedicatedtoconsumerprotectionandaddressingconcernsabouttheadministrationofstrataproperties.
24. ShawCablesystemsvConcordPacificGroup,2007BCSC1711atpara6,LeaskJ(quoting2475813
NovaScotiaLtdvRodgers,2001NSCA12atpara5,CromwellJA).
25. SBC1966,c40.
26. StrataTitlesAct,SBC1974,c89.SeealsoStrataTitlesAmendmentAct,1977(No2),SBC1977,c64(containingamajorsetofamendmentstothe1974act).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 9
In1979,thenameofthelegislationwaschangedtoCondominiumAct.27Thesecond-generationactiscommonlyknownbythisname.Strata Property Act 2000–present Thethirdgenerationofstrata-propertylegislation,theStrataPropertyAct,wasen-actedinJuly1998.28TheStrataPropertyActwasonlybroughtintoforceafteratransitionalperiod,whichlasteduntil1July2000.Althoughitpreservesmuchoftheframeworkputinplacebythefirsttwogenera-tionsofthelegislation,theStrataPropertyActalsocontainsalargenumberofprovi-sionsnotfoundinpreviousacts,makingitafarmorecomprehensivestatutethanitstwopredecessors.PartsoftheStrataPropertyActhavebeensignificantlyamendedin2009,292012,30and2015.31Thesechangesprimarilyrelatetofinancialplanning,disputeresolution,andtermination;theydon’tdirectlyaddressinsuranceissues.TheStrataPropertyActisprobablythemostdetailedandsophisticatedlegislationofitskindinCanada.Itcontainsanarrayoflawsonsubjectsthataren’taddressedinequivalentstatutesfoundintheotherprovincesorterritories.32Buttheactwasalso27. RSBC1979,c61.
28. Supranote3.
29. SeeStrataPropertyAmendmentAct,2009,SBC2009,c17.
30. SeeCivilResolutionTribunalAct,SBC2012,c25.
31. SeeNaturalGasDevelopmentStatutesAmendmentAct,2015,supranote14.
32. SeeAlberta:CondominiumPropertyAct,RSA2000,cC-22(seealsoCondominiumPropertyAmendmentAct,2014,SA2014,c10,s55[partlyinforce]);Saskatchewan:TheCondominiumPropertyAct,1993,SS1993,cC-26.1;Manitoba:TheCondominiumAct,SM2011,c30,CCSMcC170;Ontario:CondominiumAct,1998,SO1998,c19(seealsoProtectingCondominiumOwnersAct,2015,SO2015,c28,Schedule1[partlyinforce]);Québec:arts1038–1109CCQ;NewBrunswick:CondominiumPropertyAct,SNB2009,cC-16.05;PrinceEdwardIsland:Condomini-umAct,RSPEI1988,cC-16;NovaScotia:CondominiumAct,RSNS1989,c85;NewfoundlandandLabrador:CondominiumAct,2009,SNL2009,cC-29.1;Yukon:CondominiumAct,RSY2002,c36;NorthwestTerritoriesandNunavut:CondominiumAct,RSNWT1988,cC-15(duplicatedforNu-navutbys29oftheNunavutAct,SC1993,c28).Asthisreportwasbeingpreparedforpublica-tion,AlbertaannouncedplanstobringthebulkoftheprovisionsoftheCondominiumPropertyAmendmentAct,2014,withassociatedregulations,intoforcevariouslyon1July2019and1Jan-uary2020.SeeAlberta,NewsRelease,“Makingcondosabetterplacetolive:Newruleswillin-creasetransparencyandimprovecondominiumgovernanceinAlberta”(14December2018),online:<www.alberta.ca/release.cfm?xID=62241C77ECC2B-ED28-41CB-20BBFFBAB3B1DB03>[perma.cc/5ZG4-MEUX][AlbertaNewsRelease](announcingproposedamendmentstotheCon-
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
10 British Columbia Law Institute
consciouslydraftedtoprovideenhancedflexibilitytocertainkindsofstratas.Thisqualitycanmakeitdifficulttodiscusstheact’sprovisions,asit’softennecessarytonotebothageneralruleandaseriesofexceptions.Forthesakeofsimplicity,thepagesthatfollowwillfocusonthegeneralprovisionsandwilltouchonexceptions,wherenecessary,infootnotes.
The Owner-Developer Thepersonwhostartsthestratificationprocessiscalledanowner-developer.Beforesomeonebecomesanowner-developer,thatpersonisanownerofland33whowantstodevelopitasastrataproperty.Thatpersonisresponsibleforshep-herdingtheprojectthroughtheprocedureforstratifyingland.Afterthisprocessiscomplete,theowner-developerholdsalltitlesinthedevelopment,whicharegradu-allysoldofftopurchasers.Theowner-developercanhaveadecisiveinfluenceoverboththeoriginalconcep-tionandtheongoingoperationofastrataproperty.Manyofthekeydecisionsthataremadeinsettingupastratapropertyoriginatewiththeowner-developer.Thesedecisionscanreverberatelongaftertheowner-developerhasleftthescene.
Creation of a Strata Property by Deposit of a Strata Plan
Thestratificationprocessbeginswiththedepositinthelandtitleofficeofastrataplan.Thestrataplanhasbeendescribedas“thefundamentaldocumentthatdividespropertyintostratalotsandcreatestitleineachofthosestratalots.”34Itisadocu-
dominiumPropertyRegulation,AltaReg168/2000,online:<www.alberta.ca/assets/documents/condominium-property-regulation.pdf>[perma.cc/Q6KE-SCF7]).
33. Andhere’sthefirstexceptiontonote:insomecases,itisn’tthelandownerbutratheralesseeunderalong-termgroundleasewhoactsastheowner-developer.Theactcallsthesecasesleaseholdstrataplans.Forsimplicity’ssake,thisreportwillfocusonthemuchmorecommoncaseofalandownerdevelopingastratapropertyandwilldownplaytherarerleaseholdstrataplan.Thatsaid,thereisnothinginlawthatpreventsthecommittee’sproposalsfromextendingtoleaseholdstrataplans.
34. ChowvTheOwners,StrataPlanNW3243,2015BCSC1944atpara5,SmithJ.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 11
mentpreparedbyaqualifiedlandsurveyor,whichisrequiredtocontainspecificde-tailsandmeetexactingtechnicalstandards.35
Kinds of Strata Plans ThereareessentiallytwokindsofstrataplansundertheStrataPropertyAct.Oneiscalledabare-landstrataplan.Itconcernsthesubdivisionofland.36Theotherkindofstrataplanisn’tnamedintheact,butit’scommonlycalledabuild-ingorconventionalstrataplan.37Thiskindofstrataplandealswiththesubdivisionofabuilding.Thisisthemorecommonkindofstrataplan.Amongthethingsthatastrataplandoes,oneofthemostimportantistodistinguishbetweenthetwobuildingblocksofastrataproperty:stratalotsandcommonprop-erty.
Strata Lots Astratalotisthelegislation’snamefortheunitinastratapropertythatisindividu-allytitledandowned.Acommonexampleofastratalotisanapartmentinaresiden-tialstrataproperty.Butitisimportanttobearinmindthatnothinginstrata-propertylawrestrictsstratalotstoapartmentsorresidentialuses.Stratalotsmaybetownhouses,shopsusedforcommercialpurposes,industrialplants,recreationalcottages,orparkinglots.Solongastheyareidentifiedassuchonastrataplan,stratalotsmaybealmostanythingwithintheingenuityofanowner-developer.But,thatsaid,theactdoes,inmanyplaces,distinguishbetweenstratalotsbasedontheiruses.Thisdistinctionturnsonwhetherornotthestratalotisusedforresiden-
35. SeeStrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s244.
36. Seeibid,s1(1)“barelandstrataplan”(“means(a)astrataplanonwhichtheboundariesofthestratalotsaredefinedonahorizontalplanebyreferencetosurveymarkersandnotbyreferencetothefloors,wallsorceilingsofabuilding,or(b)anyotherstrataplandefinedbyregulationtobeabarelandstrataplan.”).Regardingparagraph(b),notethattodatenoregulationsonthispointhavebeenadopted.
37. SeeAdrienneMMurray,“TheBasicsofStrataPropertyLaw,”inContinuingLegalEducationSo-cietyofBritishColumbia,ed,StrataProperty—2006Update:MaterialspreparedfortheContinu-ingLegalEducationseminar,StrataPropertyFundamentalsforLawyers,heldinVancouver,B.C.,onOctober20,2006(Vancouver:ContinuingLegalEducationSocietyofBritishColumbia,2006)1.1at1.13;MikeMangan,TheCondominiumManual:AComprehensiveGuidetoStrataLawinBritishColumbia,3rded(Vancouver:StrataPublishing,2010)at17;BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§1.14.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
12 British Columbia Law Institute
tialpurposes.Residentialstratalotisadefinedterm,meaning“astratalotdesignedorintendedtobeusedprimarilyasaresidence.”38Stratalotsusedforanyotherpurposearereferredtoasnonresidentialstratalots.Whetherastratalotisaresi-dentialstratalotoranonresidentialstratalotcanhaveabearingonhowcertainprovisionsrelatingtoproperty,expenses,andgovernanceareappliedtoit.
Common Property, Limited Common Property, and Common Assets
Common property TheStrataPropertyActessentiallytakesatwo-prongedapproachtodefiningcom-monproperty.39Thefirstprongbasicallyclassifieseverythingthatisn’tpartofastratalotascom-monproperty:“‘commonproperty’means(a)thatpartofthelandandbuildingsshownonastrataplanthatisnotpartofastratalot.”Thisdefinitionisfairlyeasytograspintheabstract.Someconcreteexamplesofthingsthatcouldfitthisdefinitioninclude“hallways,stairwells,roofs,balconies,attics,elevators,patios,parkingstalls,”andeventheunderlyinglandinabuildingstrataplan(butnotinabare-landstrataplan).40Thesecondprongofthedefinitiontacklescasesinwhichitwouldbedifficulttoap-plyasimpleandclear-cutdistinctionbetweenbeingpartofastratalotorpartofthecommonproperty.Itisaimedatalonglistofspecificbuildingcomponentsandsys-temsforservices(“pipes,wires,cables,chutes,ductsandotherfacilitiesforthepas-sageorprovisionofwater,sewage,drainage,gas,oil,electricity,telephone,radio,
38. Supranote3,s1(1)“residentialstratalot.”SeealsoEastBarriereResortLtdvTheOwners,Strata
PlanKAS1819,2017BCCA183.
39. Seesupranote3,s1(1)“commonproperty.”
40. BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§3.2.Regardingtheunderly-inglandinabare-landstrataplan,“partsofthelandaredividedintoseparatestratalots,andthestrataplanwillnottypicallyshowthebuildingsoneachstratalot.Inthiscase,theentirebuild-ing,whetherconstructedbytheownerdeveloperorbythestratalotowner,onthebarelandstratalot(includingtheexteriorportionsofthebuildingandtheinteriorpipes,wiring,andoth-ermechanicalsystems)willformpartofthestratalot.Thecommonpropertywillbelimitedtoaccessroads,sidewalks,andrecreationalfacilitiesshownonthestrataplan,aswellasanyoftheundergroundservicesandthephysicalplantifcapableofservicingmorethanonestratalot.”(Ibid.)
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 13
television,garbage,heatingandcoolingsystems,orothersimilarservices”).41Thesethingsmaybecommonpropertybydefinition,dependingonthelocationofthethingortheusageofthething.42Andit’satthispointthatthesecondprongoftheact’sdefinitionofcommonpropertysplitsintotwobranches.Thefirstbranchdealswithlocation.It’sconcernedwithboundarycases.Thedefini-tionfocusesattentiononwhetherthecomponentorsystemlistedearlierislocated“withinafloor,wallorceiling”thatitselfformsaboundary
• betweenastratalotandanotherstratalot,
• betweenastratalotandthecommonproperty,or
• betweenastratalotorcommonpropertyandanotherparcelofland.43Theeffectofthisbranchofthedefinitionistobringtheseboundarycaseswithinthescopeofcommonproperty.Thesecondbranchdealswithuse.Evenifanyofthethingslistedabove(pipes,wires,etc.)findsitself“whollyorpartiallywithinastratalot,”it’sstillwithinthedef-initionofcommonpropertyifitis“capableofbeingandintendedtobeusedincon-nectionwiththeenjoymentofanotherstratalotorthecommonproperty.”Courtde-cisionsconsideringthisbranchofthedefinitionhaveconcludedthatifthecompo-nentorsystemis“connected”toothercomponentsorsystemsthatserviceotherstratalots44orisotherwisepartofan“integratedwhole,”45thenitshouldbeconsid-eredcommonproperty.Asaleadingpracticeguidehasnoted,thisapproach“leave[s]veryfewsuchfacilitieswithinacondominiumoutsideofthe‘commonproperty’ofthatcomplex.”46Limited common property Withinthescopeofcommonproperty,theactembedstheconceptoflimitedcom-monproperty.Thisiscommonpropertythathasbeen“designatedfortheexclusive
41. StrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s1(1)“commonproperty.”
42. SeeBritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§3.2(“Whetheraparticu-larpartofasystemorservice,suchasawire,pipe,orduct,constitutespartofthecommonpropertyisdeterminedbythelocationofthepartorbytheusageofthepart.”).
43. Supranote3,s1(1)“commonproperty.”
44. TaychukvOwners,StrataPlanLMS744,2002BCSC1638atpara28,GrayJ.
45. FudgevOwners,StrataPlanNW2636,2012BCPC409atpara48,WoodsProvCtJ.
46. BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§3.2.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
14 British Columbia Law Institute
useoftheownersofoneormorestratalots.”47Sometypicalexamplesofthingsthatmightbelimitedcommonpropertyareabalconyforanapartmentinahigh-risetower,apatioforatownhouseorground-floorapartment,andaparkingspaceinaparkinglot.Butitshouldbeborneinmindthattheseitemsarenotnecessarilylimitedcommonpropertyandtheydon’texhaustthecategoryoflimitedcommonproperty.Thedefi-nitionofthetermisgeneralandopen-ended.Thekeytoknowingwhethercommonpropertyislimitedcommonpropertyisthedesignation.Therearetwowaystomakethisdesignation.Itmaybemadeontheoriginalstrataplanoranamendmenttothatstrataplan.48Oritmaybemadebyaresolutionofthestratacorporation,passedbya3/4vote,andfiledinthelandtitleofficealongwithasketchplan.49Courtcaseshaveconsideredthenatureofastrata-lotowner’sinterestinadesigna-tionoflimitedcommonproperty.Aleadingcasehasdescribedit“asaspecialcate-goryofpropertyoverwhichtheunitownerhasasubstantialdegreeofcontrolandsomethingapproachingabeneficialinterest.”50Thekeywordinthispassagemightbeapproaching,asalatercasehasemphasizedthebalancebetweentheownerben-efitingfromadesignationandtheotherstrata-lotowners:
Itisclear,however,thattheunitholderisnotthebeneficialownerofthelimitedcom-monproperty.Theotherownersretainmorethansimplelegaltitle.Theyretainabun-dleofrightsandresponsibilitiesassetout,interalia,inss.71–75oftheStrataPropertyAct.Thisisconsistentwiththecommunalnatureofcommonproperty.51
Acommentatorhasconcludedthat,onthestateofthecaselaw,“[a]nowner’sinter-estin[limitedcommonproperty]isnoteasilydefinedwithintheparametersoftra-ditionalpropertylaw.”52
47. Supranote3,s(1)(1)“limitedcommonproperty.”
48. Ibid,s73(a)–(b).
49. Ibid,ss73(c),74.Thesketchplanreferredtointhetextmustbeonethat“(a)satisfiestheregis-trar[oflandtitles],(b)definestheareasoflimitedcommonproperty,and(c)specifieseachstra-talotwhoseownersareentitledtotheexclusiveuseofthelimitedcommonproperty”(ibid,s73(2)).
50. MourevTheOwners,StrataPlanNW2099,2003BCSC1364atpara22,GrobermanJ.
51. YestalvNewWestminster(Cityof),2012BCSC925atpara28,MasterMuir.
52. BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§3.3.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 15
Common assets Finally,theactalsocharacterizessomepropertyascommonassets.Thedefinitionofcommonassetscontainstwocategories.Thefirstis“personalpropertyheldbyoronbehalfofastratacorporation.”53Examplesofthiscategoryincludeitemsofpropertylikefurnitureinalobbyorexerciseequipmentinagym.Thesecondcategoryis“landheldinthenameoforonbehalfofastratacorporation,thatis(i)notshownonthestrataplan,or(ii)shownasastratalotonthestrataplan.”54Anexampleof(i)isanyoffsitelandownedorheldonbehalfofthestratacorporation.Anexampleof(ii)isacaretaker’ssuiteinaresidentialbuildingwhichisastratalot.
The Strata Corporation Inadditiontodividinglandintostratalotsandcommonproperty,depositingastra-taplaninthelandtitleoffice“establishes”astratacorporation.55Thisstratacorpo-rationisthemajorcomponentofthesecondessentialelementofastrataproperty(“anadministrativeframeworktoenabletheownerstomanagetheproperty”).56Itisthevehiclebywhichstrata-lotownersareabletoadministertheirstrataprop-erty.Theactsaysthatthepurposeofastratacorporationistotakeresponsibilityfor“managingandmaintainingthecommonpropertyandcommonassetsofthestratacorporationforthebenefitoftheowners.”57Ownershipofcommonpropertyandcommonassetsisinthehandsofthestrata-lotowners,collectively.58Themember-shipofthestratacorporationismadeupof“theownersofthestratalotsinthestra-taplan.”59Thestratacorporationisthemeansforcoordinatingtheseownerstomakeeffectiveandtimelycollectivedecisions.53. Supranote3,s1(1)“commonasset.”
54. Ibid,s1(1)“commonasset.”
55. Ibid,s2(1)(a).
56. SeeOntarioLawReformCommission,supranote23at3.
57. Supranote3,s3.
58. Seeibid,s66(“Anownerownsthecommonpropertyandcommonassetsofthestratacorpora-tionasatenantincommoninashareequaltotheunitentitlementoftheowner’sstratalotdi-videdbythetotalunitentitlementofallthestratalots.”).Theactdoesn’tallowthelinkbetweenownershipofastratalotandownershipofashareinthecommonpropertytobebroken.Seeibid,s251(2)(“Anownermustnotdealwiththeowner’sshareinthecommonpropertyandcommonassetsofthestratacorporationseparatelyfromtheowner’sstratalotexceptasex-presslyallowedbythisAct.”).
59. Ibid,s2(1)(b).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
16 British Columbia Law Institute
The Fundamentals of Strata-Corporation Governance
Bylaws and rules Astratacorporationisrequiredtohavebylaws.60Bylawsareathird-ordersetoflawstogovernstrataproperties,rankinginprioritybelowtheactanditsregula-tions.61Thatsaid,formanyissues,the“bylaws,morethananyotherdocument,di-recttheconductofowners,tenantsandoccupants”andvisitors.62Bydefault,thelegislationprovidesstratacorporationswithasetofstandardby-laws.63Butstratacorporationsarefreetoamendthesestandardbylawsortocreatetheirownbylaws,solongasthesebylawamendmentsareapprovedbya3/4vote,arefiledinthelandtitleoffice,anddonotconflictwiththeStrataPropertyAct,theStrataPropertyRegulation,oranyotherenactmentorlaw.64Bylawsmayaddressthefollowingtopics:
• “thecontrol,management,maintenance,useandenjoymentofthestratalots,commonpropertyandcommonassetsofthestratacorporation”;65
• “theadministrationofthestratacorporation.”66
60. SeeStrataPropertyAct,ibid,s119(1).
61. Seeibid,s121.
62. Murray,supranote37at1.1.2.
63. Seesupranote3,s120.
64. Seeibid,ss126–128(rulesonbylawamendment),120(1)(filingamendmentsinthelandtitleoffice),121(unenforceablebylaws).Onthelastpoint,inadditiontobeingunenforceableduetoaconflictwithanenactmentoralaw,abylawisunenforceabletotheextentit“destroysormod-ifies”oneoftheeasementsforsupport,services,orsheltercreatedundertheactor“prohibitsorrestrictstherightofanownerofastratalottofreelysell,lease,mortgageorotherwisedisposeofthestratalotoraninterestinthestratalot”(ibid,s121(1)(b)–(c)).Ofcourse,thereareex-ceptionstothelastpoint,whichallowastratacorporationtoputinplacerentalrestrictions,re-strictionsonthesaleofastratalot,oragerestrictions,allofwhichmustconformstrictlytode-tailedrequirementscontainedintheact(seeibid,s121(2)).
65. Ibid,s119(2).
66. Ibid,s119(2).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 17
Unlikebylaws,rulesareoptionalforastratacorporation.Rulesarealsomorelim-itedinscopethanbylaws,astheymayonlygovern“theuse,safetyandconditionofthecommonpropertyandcommonassets.”67Rulescan’tbeusedtogovernstratalotsortoaddresstheadministrationofastratacorporation.Annual general meetings and special general meetings Theactrequiresmanystrata-corporationdecisionstobemadebytheownerscollec-tively.Thesedecisionsaretypicallyidentifiedasonescallingfora“resolution”asev-idenceofthedecision.Resolutionsareconsideredandeitheradoptedorrejectedatgeneralmeetingsofthestratacorporation.Stratacorporationsarerequiredtohaveatleastonegeneralmeetingayear—called,appropriately,anannualgeneralmeeting.68Thestandardbylawscontaintheorderofbusinessfortheannualgeneralmeeting’sagenda.69Stratacorporationsmayalsohaveanynumberofspecialgeneralmeetings.70Theactcontainsadetailedandexactingsetofprovisionsonthecallingandconductofgeneralmeetings.71Forthepurposesofthisdiscussion,it’sonlynecessarytotakesomenoticeofhowtheactdealswithvoting.Votesareultimatelyhowdecisionsatgeneralmeetingsgetmade.Thebasicpositionismajorityrule—whattheactcallsmajorityvote.72Aresolutionpassedbyamajorityvoteisonethatwasapprovedbymorethanhalfofthevotescastbyowners—or
67. Seeibid,s125.
68. Seeibid,s40.Thereisanexceptiontothisrequirement:ifalleligiblevotersagree,theymayconsentinwritingtothemainbusinessofthemeeting(namelypassingabudgetandelectingastratacouncil)andmaywaive,eachbyawrittendocument,theholdingofanannualgeneralmeeting(seeibid,s41).
69. Seeibid,ScheduleofStandardBylaws,s28.
70. Seeibid,s42.
71. Seeibid,ss45–50,53–58.SeealsoReportonTerminatingaStrata,supranote13at63–71;GerryFanaken,UnderstandingtheCondominiumConcept:AnInsightfulGuidetotheStrataPropertyAct(Coquitlam,BC:PaigeCondominiumServices,2013)at36–48,52–55;Mangan,supranote37at101–114;BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§§6.36–6.74.
72. Seesupranote3,s1(1)“majorityvote”(“meansavoteinfavourofaresolutionbymorethan1/2ofthevotescastbyeligiblevoterswhoarepresentinpersonorbyproxyatthetimethevoteistakenandwhohavenotabstainedfromvoting”).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
18 British Columbia Law Institute
theirproxyholders,ifthereareany—atthegeneralmeeting.73Inotherwords,thequestionisdecidedbythemajorityofowners(andproxyholders)presentatthemeetingandnotabstainingfromvoting.Somedecisionsrequireapprovalbymorethanamajorityofvoters.Themostcom-monformofthiskindofapprovaliswhattheactcallsa3/4vote.74Aresolutionispassedbya3/4votewhenatleast75percentofthevotescastatageneralmeetingareinfavourofit.75Incertainexceptionalcases,theactdemandsthataresolutionbesupportedbyaunanimousvoteinorderforittobeapproved.76Aresolutiononlymeetsthisthresholdwhenallstrata-lotownersvoteforit.So,unlikeresolutionspassedbyamajorityvoteora3/4vote,aresolutioncan’tbepassedbyaunanimousvoteifitissupportedjustbyalltheownerswhoturnuptothegeneralmeetingandvoteforitifthereareotherownerswhodon’tattendthemeeting(inpersonorbyproxy)orwhoabstainfromvoting.Finally,ifthevoteisonwhattheactcallsa“winding-upresolution”77(toterminatethestrata—thatis,thecancelthestrataplan
73. Theactdoesn’tactuallyrefertoownersvoting;itstermiseligiblevoters.Thistermreflectstwo
concerns:(1)sometimesanowner’svoteforastratalotmaybeexercisedbysomeoneotherthananowner,suchasatenant(seeibid,s54(b)),amortgagee(seeibid,s54(c)),aparent,guardian,orotherrepresentative(seeibid,s55),oracourt-appointedvoter(seeibid,s58);and(2)insomecases,anownermaylosetherighttovoteiftheownerisindefaultofcertainpay-mentsowingtothestratacorporationandthestratacorporationistherebyentitledtofilealienagainstthatowner’sstratalot(seeibid,ss53(2),116(1)).Theseareallexceptionalcases,soforbrevity’ssakethetextwillsimplyrefertoownersvoting.
74. Seeibid,s1(1)“3/4vote”(“meansavoteinfavourofaresolutionbyatleast3/4ofthevotescastbyeligiblevoterswhoarepresentinpersonorbyproxyatthetimethevoteistakenandwhohavenotabstainedfromvoting”).
75. Aspecialrulecomesintoplayif“aresolutionrequiredtobepassedbya3/4voteispassedatanannualorspecialgeneralmeetingbypersonsholdinglessthan50%ofthestratacorporation’svotes”(ibid,s51(1)).Underthisrule,“[w]ithintheoneweekfollowingthevote,personsholdingatleast25%ofthestratacorporation’svotesmay,bywrittendemand,requirethatthestratacorporationholdaspecialgeneralmeetingtoreconsidertheresolution”(ibid,s51(3)).Ifthatspecialgeneralmeetingattractsaquorumofowners,andiftheresolutionisnotpassedagainbya3/4voteatthatmeeting,thenthestratacorporationmaynotimplementtheresolution(seeibid,s51(10)).
76. Seeibid,s1(1)“unanimousvote”(“meansavoteinfavourofaresolutionbyallthevotesofalltheeligiblevoters”).
77. Ibid,s1(1)“winding-upresolution”(“meansaresolutionreferredtoin(a)section272(1),or(b)section277(1).”).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 19
andwindupthestratacorporationunderpart16),78thenitmaybepassedbyan80-percentvote.79The strata council Astratacorporationmusthaveastratacouncil.80Thestratacounciliselectedateachannualgeneralmeeting,withitsmembersusuallycomingfromthestrata-lotowners.81Thestratacouncilhasbeendescribedasbeing“effectivelyaboardofdirectors”82and“somewhatanalogoustoafourthlevelofgovernment.”83Thesedescriptionsre-flecttheact’sbasicposition,whichisthatthe“powersanddutiesofthestratacor-porationmustbeexercisedandperformedbya[strata]council.”84Asaruleofthumb,thismeansthatthestratacouncilhastheauthoritytomakedecisionsre-spectingthestratacorporation,exceptforthosedecisionswheretheactcallsforaresolutionatageneralmeeting.85Budgets and funds Theactrequiresthestratacorporationto“establish,”andthestrata-lotownersto“contribute,bymeansofstratafees,”tothefollowingtwofunds:
78. Seeibid,ss272–89.
79. Seeibid,s1(1)“80%vote”(“meansavoteinfavourofaresolutionbyatleast80%ofthevotesofalltheeligiblevoters”).
80. SeeStrataPropertyAct,ibid,s25.
81. Seeibid,s28(1).Whilestrata-councilmembersareinfactdrawnoverwhelminglyfromtheranksofowners,thelegislationactuallyallowsthreegroupspresumptivelytobestrata-councilmembers:(1)owners;(2)individualswhorepresentcorporateowners;and(3)tenantswhohavebeenassignedanowner’srighttovote(ibid,s28(1)).Further,theactallowsstratacorpo-rationstoadoptbylawsthatallowotherclassesofpeopletobestrata-councilmembers(ibid,s28(2)).
82. Mangan,supranote37at39.
83. Fanaken,supranote71at21.
84. Supranote3,s4.
85. SeeMurray,supranote37at1.1.4(“WheretheActdoesnotreferenceavotebytheowners...theactivityordutymaybeperformedbythestratacouncilwithoutinputfromtheowners.However,wheretheActrequiresavoteoftheowners,thedecisiontobemadeisnotoneforthestratacouncilaloneandcanonlybemadewiththeapprovaloftheownersbasedonthevotingthresholdsetoutinthatsection.”).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
20 British Columbia Law Institute
• “anoperatingfundforcommonexpensesthat(i)usuallyoccureitheronceayearormoreoftenthanonceayear,or(ii)arenecessarytoobtainadepre-ciationreport”;86and
• “acontingencyreservefundforcommonexpensesthatusuallyoccurlessof-tenthanonceayearorthatdonotusuallyoccur.”87
Theactaddressestheestablishmentofthesefunds,raisingoftheircontributions,expendituresfromthem,andaccountingforthoseexpenditures.88Atthecentreofthesefunctionsisthestratacorporation’sannualbudget.89Amongotherthings,theannualbudgetmustcontain“theestimatedexpendituresoutoftheoperatingfund,itemizedbycategoryofexpenditure;thetotalofallcontributionstotheoperatingfund;thetotalofallcontributionstothecontingencyreservefund;eachstratalot’smonthlycontributiontotheoperatingfund;[and]eachstratalot’smonthlycontri-butiontothecontingencyreservefund.”90
Common Expenses Manyofthedecisionsthatastratacorporationhastomakeconcernspendingmon-eytopayforexpenses.Theactmakesthestrata-lotownerscollectivelyresponsibleforwhatitcallscommonexpenses,whichitdefinesasexpenses
• relatingtothecommonpropertyandcommonassetsofthestratacorporation,or
• requiredtomeetanyotherpurposeorobligationofthestratacorporation.91Commonexpensesoftenrelatetothefirstbulletpointandare,ineffect,theflipsideofowningpropertyincommon.Thestratacorporationhasalegalobligationto“re-pairandmaintaincommonpropertyandcommonassets.”92
86. Supranote3,s92(a).
87. Ibid,s92(b).
88. Seeibid,ss92,93,95–100,103–109.
89. Seeibid,s103.
90. StrataPropertyRegulation,supranote4,s6.6(1)(c)–(g).
91. Supranote3,s1(1)“commonexpenses.”
92. Ibid,s72(1).See,below,at23–26(furtherdiscussionofthedutytorepairandmaintainproper-ty).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 21
Althoughthestratacorporationisresponsibleforcommonexpenses,93payingforrepairs—asforallcommonexpenses—ultimatelycomesfromcontributionsfromstrata-lotowners.Howthesecontributionsaredeterminedleadstoconsiderationofoneoftheact’sfoundationalconcepts,unitentitlement.
Unit Entitlement What is unit entitlement and how is it used? Atbottom,unitentitlementisanumber.Eachstratalotinastratapropertyisas-signeditsownunit-entitlementnumber.Theactusesunitentitlementinawaythattiesthisconceptintooneofthedefiningcharacteristicsofastrata.Thisdefiningcharacteristicistheuniquestrataproperty–ownershipmodel,whichcombinesindividualownershipofstratalotswithsharedownership,amongstrata-lotowners,ofastrata’scommonpropertyandcommonassets,andsharedresponsibilityforthedebtsandliabilitiesofthestratacorpora-tion.Specifically,unitentitlementisusedin“calculations”that“determine”eachstratalot’sshareof:
• commonproperty;
• commonassets;
• commonexpenses;and
• liabilitiesofthestratacorporation.94How is unit entitlement determined? Theacthasadetailedsetofrulesonhowtodeterminetheunitentitlementofastra-talot.Whichrulesapplyinagivencasedependson(1)theuseofthestratalotand(2)thekindofstrataplanatissue.Theactdistinguishesbetweenresidentialandnonresidentialuses,andcontainsaspecialruleformixed-usestratas.Themethodsfordeterminingtheunitentitlementofastratalotare:93. Seesupranote3,s91.
94. Ibid,s1(1)“unitentitlement.”SomejurisdictionsgoevenfurtherthanBritishColumbiaanduseunitentitlementtodetermineastratalot’svotingrightsanditsshareofresidualpropertyaftertermination.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
22 British Columbia Law Institute
• forresidentialstratalots:oneof(a)thehabitableareaofthestratalot,(b)awholenumberthatisthesameforallresidentialstratalots,or(c)anumberthat“allocatesafairportionofthecommonexpensestotheownerofthestratalot,”intheopinionofthesuperintendentofrealestate,whomustapproveanyuseofoption(c);95
• fornonresidentialstratalots:oneof(a)thetotalareaofthestratalot,(b)awholenumberthatisthesameforallnonresidentialstratalots,or(c)anumberthat“allocatesafairportionofthecommonexpensestotheownerofthestratalot,”intheopinionofthesuperintendentofrealestate,whomustapproveanyuseofoption(c);96
• formixed-usestratas:“[i]fthestrataplanconsistsofbothresidentialandnonresidentialstratalots,”thenunitentitlement“mustbeapprovedbythesuperintendentasfairlydistributingthecommonexpensesbetweentheownersoftheresidentialstratalotsandtheownersofthenonresidentialstratalots.”97
Forresidentialandnonresidentialstratalots,inmostcasesunitentitlementisde-terminedusingoption(a).Ineffect,thismeansthatthesizeofthestratalotdeter-minesitsunitentitlement.Itisslightlymorecomplicatedthanthat,becausetheactreliesontwodifferentstandardsfordeterminingthesizeofastratalot.Forresidentialstratalots,thesizeofastratalotisdeterminedbymeasuringitshab-itablearea.Thisisadefinedterm,98whicheffectivelylimitsunitentitlementtolivingareasinastratalot,excludingthingslike“patios,balconies,garages,parkingstallsorstorageareasotherthanclosetspace.”99Fornonresidentialstratalots,sizeisdeter-minedbythetotalareaofthestratalot.100
95. Ibid,s246(3)(a).
96. Ibid,s246(3)(b).
97. Ibid,s246(5).
98. Seeibid,s246(4).SeealsoBarrettvTheOwners,StrataPlanLMS3265,2017BCCA414.
99. StrataPropertyRegulation,supranote4,s14.2.
100.Totalareaisn’tadefinedterm;itsimplytakesitseverydaymeaning.SeeBritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§2.39(“‘totalarea’includesallofthoseareaslistedasexcludedfrom‘habitablearea’ofaresidentialstratalot”).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 23
Inbothcases,option(a)requiresunitentitlementtobe“determinedbyaBritishCo-lumbialandsurveyor.”101Theserulesonlyapplywhenthestrataplanisaconventional(building)strataplan.Forbare-landstrataplans,aspecialrulecomesintoplay.102When is unit entitlement determined and where is it found? Theunitentitlementofastratalotmustbedeterminedattheoutsetofthestratifica-tionprocess.Theactrequiresthe“personapplyingtodepositastrataplan”toin-cludetheunitentitlementsofthestratalotsinthestrataplan.103Theseunit-entitlementnumbersaregroupedtogetherasascheduletothestrataplan,calledtheScheduleofUnitEntitlement.104Thisscheduleisthedefinitivesourceoftheunitentitlementofastratalotinthatstrataplan.
The Duty to Repair and Maintain Property Strata-propertylawhasadetailedframeworkforallocatingresponsibilitytorepairandmaintainproperty.Thissystemdependsontheinterplayoflegislation,regula-tions,andstrata-corporationbylaws.Common property and common assets Eventhoughthestrata-lotownerscollectivelyownthecommonpropertyandcom-monassets,theStrataPropertyActmakesthestratacorporationresponsiblefortheirrepairandmaintenance.Astheactprovides,“thestratacorporationmustre-pairandmaintaincommonpropertyandcommonassets.”105Theactgoesontosetouttwoexceptionstothisbasicduty.106Theseexceptionsal-lowastratacorporationtomakeastrata-lotownerresponsibleforthemaintenance101.Supranote3,s246(3)(a),(b).
102.Ibid,s246(6)(“Theunitentitlementofastratalotinabarelandstrataplanmustbe(a)awholenumberthatisthesameforallofthestratalotsinthestrataplan,or(b)anumberthatisap-provedbythesuperintendentandthatinthesuperintendent’sopinionallocatesafairportionofthecommonexpensestotheownerofthestratalot.”).
103.Ibid,s246(2).
104.Seeibid,s246(2).Thescheduleisaprescribedform.SeeStrataPropertyRegulation,supranote4,FormV.
105.Supranote3,s72(1).
106.Seeibid,s72(2).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
24 British Columbia Law Institute
ofcommonproperty.Inbothcases,theactrequiresthestratacorporationtoadoptabylawthatmakestheownerresponsibleforrepairandmaintenancetothecommonproperty.Thefirstcasedealswith“limitedcommonpropertythattheownerhasarighttouse.”107Thestandardbylawsthatapplybydefaulttoastratacorporationgiveanex-ampleofhowresponsibilitytorepairandmaintainlimitedcommonpropertymaybedividedbetweenthestratacorporationandastrata-lotownerwhohastherighttousethelimitedcommonproperty.Thestandardbylawsprovide,asageneralproposition,that“[a]nownerwhohastheuseoflimitedcommonpropertymustre-pairandmaintainit,exceptforrepairandmaintenancethatistheresponsibilityofthestratacorporationunderthesebylaws.”108Thebylawsgoontodealwiththeexception,byprovidingthatthestratacorporationmustrepairandmaintainlimitedcommonpropertyintwodefinedcircumstances.Thefirstcircumstanceconcernsthefrequencyoftherepairormaintenance.Ifit’srepairsormaintenancethat“intheordinarycourseofeventsoccurslessoftenthanonceayear,”thenit’sthestratacorporation’sresponsibilitytocarryitout.109Thesecondcircumstanceconcernsthetypeofpropertythatmustberepairedormain-tained.Thestratacorporationmustrepairandmaintainlimitedcommonpropertyinallcases(“nomatterhowoftentherepairormaintenanceordinarilyoccurs”)ifthepropertyisanyofthefollowing:
• thestructureofabuilding;
• theexteriorofabuilding;
• chimneys,stairs,balconiesandotherthingsattachedtotheexteriorofabuilding;
• doors,windowsandskylightsontheexteriorofabuildingorthatfrontonthecom-monproperty;
• fences,railingsandsimilarstructuresthatenclosepatios,balconiesandyards.110Becausethislistiscontainedinabylawitcanbeamendedbyastratacorporation.
107.Ibid,s72(2)(a).
108.Ibid,ScheduleofStandardBylaws,s2(2).
109.Ibid,ScheduleofStandardBylaws,s8(c)(i).
110.Ibid,ScheduleofStandardBylaws,s8(c)(ii).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 25
Thesecondcaseinvolves“commonpropertyotherthanlimitedcommonproper-ty.”111Similartothefirstcase,forthesecondcasethelegislationsaysthatastratacorporationmayassigntheresponsibilitytorepairandmaintainsuchcommonpropertytoastrata-lotownerifthestratacorporationisenabledtodosobyaby-law.Butthelegislationalsoattachesanimportantconditiontothesecondcase.Itprovidesthatthestratacorporationmayadoptsuchabylawforcommonpropertyotherthanlimitedcommonproperty“onlyif[thecommonpropertyis]identifiedintheregulationsandsubjecttoprescribedrestrictions.”112Inpractice,thisconditionhasturnedthesecondcaseintoadeadletter.Thisisbecausethenecessaryenablingregulationhasneverbeenadopted.Strata lots Thebasicpresumptionofstrata-propertylawisthatstrata-lotownersareresponsi-bleforrepairsandmaintenancetotheirstratalots.Thispresumptionflowsfromtheirownershipinterestinthestratalots.ButtheStrataPropertyActallowsforthispresumptiontobedisplaced.Itprovidesthata“stratacorporationmay,bybylaw,takeresponsibilityfortherepairandmaintenanceofspecifiedportionsofastratalot.”113Thestandardbylawsthatapplybydefaulttoastratacorporationgiveanexampleoftheextenttowhichastratacorporationmayberesponsibleforrepairingandmain-tainingastratalot.Asastartingplace,thestandardbylawsprovidethat“[a]nownermustrepairandmaintaintheowner’sstratalot,exceptforrepairandmaintenancethatistheresponsibilityofthestratacorporationunderthesebylaws.”114Theby-lawsgoontoidentifyspecifiedportionsofastratalotthatastratacorporationmustrepairandmaintain.Theyprovidethatastratacorporationmustrepairandmain-tainastratalot—solongasthatstratalotis“inastrataplanthatisnotabarelandstrataplan”115—butthatduty“isrestrictedto”thefollowingportionsofastratalot:
• thestructureofabuilding,
• theexteriorofabuilding,
• chimneys,stairs,balconiesandotherthingsattachedtotheexteriorofabuilding,
111.Ibid,s72(2)(b).
112.Ibid,s72(2)(b).
113.Ibid,s72(3).
114.Ibid,ScheduleofStandardBylaws,s2(1).
115.Ibid,ScheduleofStandardBylaws,s8(d).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
26 British Columbia Law Institute
• doors,windowsandskylightsontheexteriorofabuildingorthatfrontonthecom-monproperty,and
• fences,railingsandsimilarstructuresthatenclosepatios,balconiesandyards.116Becausethislistiscontainedinabylawitcanbeamendedbyastratacorporation.
Dispute Resolution and the Civil Resolution Tribunal Finally,resolutionofdisputesisanimportantpartofstrata-propertylaw.InBritishColumbiaitisparticularlyimportantbecausetheprovincehasrecentlyembarkedonanewapproachtostratadisputeresolution.ThecentrepieceofthisnewapproachistheCivilResolutionTribunal.Thetribunal’smandateis“toprovidedisputeresolutionservicesinrelationtomattersthatarewithinitsauthority,inamannerthat”
• isaccessible,speedy,economical,informalandflexible,
• appliesprinciplesoflawandfairness,andrecognizesanyrelationshipsbetweenpar-tiestoadisputethatwilllikelycontinueafterthetribunalproceedingisconcluded,
• useselectroniccommunicationtoolstofacilitateresolutionofdisputesbroughttothetribunal,and
• accommodates,sofarasthetribunalconsidersreasonablypracticable,thediversityofcircumstancesofthepersonsusingtheservicesofthetribunal.117
Sinceitsinception,thetribunal’sauthorityhasextendedtomostkindsofstratadis-putes.118Thetribunalhasbeenacceptingstrata-disputeclaimssince2016.Giventhatit’sstillearlydaysforthetribunal,thisprojecthasn’tmadeanattempttoaddressreformsconcerningdisputeresolution.Buttheexistenceandoperationofthetribunalisanimportantpartofstrata-propertylawinthisprovince,andshouldbeborneinmindwhilethisreportfocusesoninsurance.
116.Ibid,ScheduleofStandardBylaws,s8(d).
117.CivilResolutionTribunalAct,supranote30,s2(2).SeealsoTheOwners,StrataPlanBCS1589vNacht,2018BCSC455atpara9[Nacht],FuntJ(descriptionoftheCivilResolutionTribunal).
118.SeeCivilResolutionTribunalAct,supranote30,s3.6.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 27
Chapter 3. Insurance and Strata Properties Introduction Insuranceissubjecttoasophisticatedanddetailedbodyoflaw.119Likestrata-propertylaw,insurancelawishometoadistinctivesetofideasandterms.Forthisreport’spurposes,it’snotnecessarytogiveanoverviewofinsurancelawtothesamescaleastheoverviewofstrata-propertylawinthepreviouschapter.Insur-ancelawcanbeseenasatreewithmanyseparatebranches,whichcoverareassuchaspropertyinsurance,liabilityinsurance,marineinsurance,andmotor-vehiclein-surance.Thepartsofinsurancelawthatarerelevanttostratapropertiesarelargelycontainedinpart9oftheStrataPropertyAct.120Sothischapter’sfocusisalmosten-tirelyontheprovisionsofpart9.Thatsaid,thereisatight-knitgroupofconceptsthatsupportsallthebranchesofin-surancelaw.Abriefreviewoftheseconceptssetsthestageforthischapter’sover-viewofpart9.
Background on Insurance and Insurance Law Insurance defined TheInsuranceActdefinesinsurancetomean“theundertakingbyonepersontoin-demnifyanotherpersonagainstlossorliabilityforlossinrespectofacertainriskorperiltowhichtheobjectoftheinsurancemaybeexposed,ortopayasumofmoneyorotherthingofvalueonthehappeningofacertainevent.”121Eventhoughthistechnical,legaldefinitionmaynotcaptureeveryconceivableinsur-anceproductthatcouldenterthemarket,122itdoesmakeanumberofsignificantpoints.
119.SeeDenisBoivin,InsuranceLaw,2nded(Toronto:IrwinLaw,2015)at56(“Canadianinsurance
lawisamixtureoffederal,provincial,andterritoriallegislation,regulations,directives,commonlaw,andcustom.”).
120.Seesupranote3,ss149–162.SeealsoStrataPropertyRegulation,supranote4,ss9.1–9.3.
121.Supranote9,s1“insurance.”
122.SeeBoivin,supranote119at25–54(generaldiscussionoftherangeofinsuranceproductsavailableinCanada).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
28 British Columbia Law Institute
• “Undertakingbyoneperson”:asamatteroflegalclassification,insuranceisabranchofthelawofcontracts;123butinsurancecontractsarehighlyregulatedunderalegalframeworkthatoftendepartsfromthemainprinci-plesofcontractlaw.124
• “Toindemnifyanotherperson”:underacontractofinsurance,a“financiallosswillbemadegood,”but“nomorethan[thatloss]willbepaid”;inotherwords,insuranceisn’tsupposedtobeusedto“engineerlosssoastoprofitfromit.”125
• “Againstlossorliabilityforlossinrespectofacertainriskorperil”:thebedrocksocialpurposeofinsuranceistoshifttheriskofloss,primarilyfromanindividualpersontoabroadergroup.126
Distinguishing principles of insurance law Buildingonthisdefinitionofinsurance,aleadingCanadiantextbookhassaidthatin-surancelawismarkedbyasetof“distinguishingprinciples.”127
• Utmostgoodfaith:Incontrasttogeneralcontractlaw,underinsurancelawtheprincipleofbuyerbewareislargelydisplaced—particularly,asregards
123.SeeBrown,supranote1at§1.2.SeealsoJesuitFathersofUpperCanadavGuardianInsuranceCo
ofCanada,2006SCC21atpara27,LeBelJ(“Insurancepoliciesformaspecialcategoryofcon-tracts.”).
124.SeeBoivin,supranote119at56(“fewindustrieshaveattractedtheattentionoffederalandpro-vincialgovernments,legislatures,andcourtsasmuchastheinsuranceindustryhas”).
125.Brown,supranote1at§1.2(c).
126.SeeBrown,ibidat§1.1(“Insuranceisamechanismforspreadingtheriskofloss.Housesburndown.Jewelleryisstolen.Shipssink.Courtsorderpeopletopaydamages.Peoplewhofacethepossibilityofoccurrencessuchasthesecanteamupwithothersinthesameposition.Theycancontributetoafundfromwhichmoneywillbeavailabletopayforlosseswhentheyoccur.Eachcontribution,or‘premium,’ismuchlessthanthepotentiallossthecontributorfaces.Thisispos-siblebecausethelossescoveredbythesystemarerandomlosses.Amongarelativelylargenumberofpeoplefacingsimilarrisks,onlyarelativefew(whoseidentityisunknown)attheoutsetwillactuallysufferloss.Thecontributionsofthemanypayforthelossesofthefew.”[footnoteomitted]);BarbaraBillingsley,GeneralPrinciplesofCanadianInsuranceLaw,2nded(Toronto:LexisNexisCanada,2014)at1(“Fromthepointofviewofapersonbuyinginsurancecoverage,insuranceisaboutprotectingoneselffromfinancialloss.Fromasocietalpointofview,however,insuranceisfundamentallyaboutspreadingtheriskofloss.”).
127.Brown,supranote1at§1.2.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 29
thedisclosureofrelevantinformation.Instead,boththeinsuredandthein-sureroperateunderadutytoactingoodfaith.128
• Fortuity:Insurancecoverslossesthatarefortuitous,thatislossesthat“oc-currandomly.”129
• Indemnity:Thisfacetofinsurancelawwasdiscussedintheprevioussec-tion,whereitwasnotedthatitsgoalistodeterpeoplefrombeingindiffer-entto(or,worse,beingontheactivelookoutfor)losses,byremovingthefi-nancialincentivetoengineeraloss.Thisisusuallyreferredtoasmoralhaz-ard.The“avoidanceof[moralhazard]isthemainobjectiveoftheindemnityprinciple.”130
• Consumerprotection:Inviewofthedifferencesinlevelsofsophistication,knowledge,andexpertiseaboutinsurancebetweeninsurancecompaniesandinsurancepurchasers,“muchofinsurancelawhasasanobjectivetheprotectionofconsumers.”131
Strata-Property Legislation and Insurance Why does strata-property legislation deal with insurance and how does it tackle the subject? Provisionsoninsurancehavebeenafeatureofstrata-propertylegislationinNorthAmericasincetheadventofthatlegislationinthe1960s.Onerationalefortheexist-enceoftheseprovisionslinkedinsuranceconceptuallytothedutytorepairproper-ty.Asanearlycommentatornoted,legislation“compel[ling]”thepurchaseofinsur-anceforstratapropertiesisnecessary,giventhe“vitalcommoninterestinhavingrepairsmade.”132Thispointleadstoanothergeneralpointthatisimportanttounderstandingthein-suranceprovisionsoftheStrataPropertyActandtoapplyingtheminpractice.Eventhoughthelegislativedutiestorepairandtoinsuremaybeboundtogetheratthelevelofconceptandrationale,inBritishColumbiathelegislationspellsoutthescope128.Seeibidat§1.2(a).
129.Ibidat§1.2(b).
130.Ibidat§1.2(c).
131.Ibidat§1.2(d).Theauthorsmentionafifthdistinguishingprinciple,“compensation,”buttieitexclusivelytomotor-vehicleinsurance,whichofcourseisn’trelevanttostrataproperties(seeibidat§1.2(e)).
132.Risk,supranote5at59.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
30 British Columbia Law Institute
ofthosedutiesindifferentways.133So,inpractice,“[w]hetherandtowhatextentastratacorporationoranownerhasinsurancehasnothingtodowithwhomustcarryoutorpayforarepair.”134Theothermajorrationaleforinsuranceprovisionsinstrata-propertylegislationwastoaddresstheneedtocoordinatethediverseplayerswhomaybeactiveinplacinginsuranceinastrataproperty.135Rightfromtheoutset,commentatorsandpolicy-makerssawthattherewereessentiallythreewaysinwhichstrata-propertylegisla-tioncouldmanageinsurancecoverage:
• insurancecouldbelefttotheindividualstrata-lotowners;
• insurancecouldbetheexclusiveconcernofthestratacorporation;
• insurancecouldbesubjecttoahybridsystem,inwhichsomeelementsareassignedtothestratacorporationandothersareopentotheowners.136
Eventhoughonecommentatordescribeditas“themostobviousscheme,”137simplyleavinginsurancetothestrata-lotownersnevergainedmuchtraction.Itranagroundonsomeobviousproblems,suchasthedifficultyofcoordinatingadiverserangeofownerstoguaranteesufficientcoverage.138Evenifadequatecoveragecould133.See,above,at23–26(discussionofthescopeofthedutytorepairandmaintainproperty).
134.Mangan,supranote37at265–266[footnoteomitted].SeealsoBritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.4(“Astratacorporation’sobligationtoinsureisbroaderthanitsownershiprightsanditsdutytorepairandmaintain.”);DavidvTheOwners,StrataPlanKAS2955,2018BCCRT498(discussingscopeofstratacorporation’sdutytoinsurepropertyvis-à-visitsdutytorepairandmaintainproperty).
135.Subsidiaryrationalesfortheinsurancemandateincludepromotingeconomicefficiencyandfairnessamongstrata-lotowners.SeeStevensvSimcoeCondominiumCorpNo60(1998),42OR(3d)451at452,[1998]OJNo5843(QL)(DivCt)[Stevens],thecourt(“Therationaleforimpos-ingthedutytoobtaininsuranceonthecorporationistoprovideefficientmeanstoensurethatallownershaveadequateinsuranceatlowcostandtoavoidtheriskofprejudicetootherown-ersthatwouldresultifanownerfailedtoobtaininsuranceandwasunableorunwillingtore-pairhispremisesathisownexpense.”[citationomitted]).
136.SeeRisk,supranote5at57–58;PatrickJRohan,“DisruptionoftheCondominiumVenture:TheProblemsofCasualtyLossandInsurance”(1964)64:6ColumLRev1045at1046–47.
137.Risk,supranote5at57.
138.SeeRohan,supranote136at1048(“Thecondominiumdweller,however,isinaconditionofstructuralandfinancialdependency,becausehecannotunilaterallyinsure(andrecoverthepro-ceedsnecessarytorestore)everysegmentofthebuildingthatmaybeessentialtoaccessanden-joymentofhisparticularunit.Hisinterestbeinglimited,andthefacilitiestobecoveredsovastanddiversified,anindividualcouldnothopetoinsureadequatelywithouttheaidoftheassocia-tionorasubstantialnumberofhisneighbors.”[footnotesomitted]).SeealsoFanaken,supra
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 31
beguaranteed,obtainingitownerbyownerwouldbethemostexpensivewaytoprovideforinsurance.139Authorizingthestratacorporationtobeexclusivelyresponsibleforinsurancewouldavoidtheseproblems.But,intheirplace,newoneswouldlikelyspringup.Itwouldbeverydifficultforthestratacorporationtoaccountforindividualvariationinfur-nishingandoutfittingstratalots.140Individualownerswouldlikelyfinditobtrusiveandadiminishmentoftheirownershipintereststohavetheirchoicesforinsurancecoveragereducedtoasinglestandard,imposedbythewishesofthemajority.141Sothemodelthatemergedwasahybrid,whichcompelledthestratacorporationtoinsurecertainaspectsofthecomplexbutwhichalsoallowedforoverlappingcover-agebetweenthestratacorporationandtheownersforotheraspects.142Asonecommentatorputit,“[i]fanythemeisrevealed,itappearstobeoneofpermissiveduplicationofcoverage.”143Theemergenceofthismodelhasledtosomeperennialconcernsforstrata-propertyinsuranceprovisions.Theseconcernsmaybesummarizedascompellingthelegisla-tiontodothreethings:
• mandatingcoverageincertainareasbythestratacorporation;
note71at120(“Fromacommonsenseperspective,itisnotreasonableorlogicaltoproposethateachownerinacondominium,stratacorporationshouldobtainandmaintaintheirownbasicinsurance.Itwouldbechaotic,unreliableandlikelynotcosteffective.Thelegislators,therefore,clearlyenvisionedasimpleschemewherebythestratacorporationisshoulderedwiththedutytoobtainandmaintaininsuranceonbehalfofitsowners.”).
139.SeeRohan,supranote136at1047(“Thecondominiumunitisanintegralpartofalargerstruc-turewhichmaybeinsuredmosteconomicallyandconvenientlyasanentity....”[footnoteomit-ted]).
140.SeeIrwinDavis,“CondominiumandtheStrataTitlesAct”(1966)9:6CanBarJ469at485–486(“Substantialstructuralchangesorimprovementstooneapartmentincreasingitsvalue,eitherwillnotbecoveredbythepolicyorwillbepaidforinpartbytheotherownersundertheblan-ketpolicy.”).
141.SeeRohan,supranote136at1061(“Thecentralattractionofthecondominiumtothepurchaseristheconceptofhomeownership,albeitahomesurroundedonallsides,aboveandbelow,byotherhomes.Consequently,theverysalespsychologyreliedupontoattractbuyerswilloperatetosuggesttheneedfor,orsatisfactionofhaving,apolicyofinsurance.”[footnoteomitted]).
142.Seeibidat1053–1057.
143.Ibidat1055.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
32 British Columbia Law Institute
• enablingcoverageinotherareasbythestratacorporationandthestrata-lotowners;144
• managinganyoverlapsorgapsincoveragethatmayresult.TheseconcernsareonfulldisplayinBritishColumbia’slegislation.
Legislative History in British Columbia Evolution of legislation through three generations of strata-property legislation BritishColumbiahashadinsuranceprovisionsinitsstrata-propertylegislationrightfromtheact’sinceptionin1966.Thedevelopmentoftheseprovisionshasfollowedafamiliarpattern,whichhasbeenobservedinothersubjectscoveredinthisproject.Attheoutset,policymakerswereawareofpotentiallegalissuesthatneededtobeaddressedinthelegislationbutweren’tcertainaboutbeingabletofillinallthede-tails.Asanearlycommentatoroninsuranceprovisionsinstrata-propertylegislationputit,“thelackofmeaningfulexperienceinthisareasuggeststhatimprovisationislikelyforseveralyears.”145Witheachmajorrevisionoftheact,moreandmorepartsofthelegalframeworkhavetakenshape.First-generation act: 1966–74 BritishColumbia’sfirstgenerationofstrata-propertylegislationcontainedjustonesectiononinsurance.146Thebulkofthisprovisionwasconcernedwithmappingoutwherestrata-lotownersareentitledtoplaceinsuranceinadditiontotheinsuranceplacedbythestratacorporation.
144.InBritishColumbiathereispotentiallyathirdactoratplayinsomestrataproperties,assections
arealsoenabledbythelegislationtoobtaininsurancecoverage.SeeStrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s194(4)(“Asectionmayobtaininsuranceonly(a)againstperilsthatarenotinsuredbythestratacorporation,or(b)foramountsthatareinexcessofamountsinsuredbythestratacorporation.”).
145.Rohan,supranote136at1046.
146.SeeStrataTitlesAct,supranote25,s15.Anargumentcouldbemadethatthisactcontainedmorethanonesectiondealingwithinsurance,totheextentthatenablingprovisionsforthepur-chaseofinsurancewerelistedamongthegeneraldutiesandpowersofthestratacorporation(seeibid,s14(1)(a)–(d)).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 33
Second-generation act: 1974–2000 Thesecond-generationact147alsohadonlyasinglesectiononinsurance,butitslengthandscoperepresentedconsiderableexpansionsfromthefirst-generationact.148Thisprovisionspelledoutthemandateonstratacorporationstoobtainprop-ertyinsuranceandenabledstratacorporationstoobtainotherinsurance.Italsoen-abledthestrata-lotownerstoobtaininsurance.Finally,theactbegantoaddresscomplexquestionsabouttheinterrelationofstrata-corporationandowners’insur-anceandsetoutaprocedurefordealingwithcasesinwhichastratacorporationde-cidesnottorepairpropertydamage.Third-generation act: 2000–present Thethird-generationact,thatis,theStrataPropertyAct,hasadedicatedpart(part9)consistingof13sectionsdealingwithinsurance.149Soit’snotsurprisingthatpart9isconsideredtoexceedthepredecessorlegislationinitslevelofdetailandsophistication.150
The Strata Property Act’s Provisions on Insurance Property insurance required for strata corporation Scope of requirement TheStrataPropertyActrequiresstratacorporationstohave,ataminimum,twokindsofinsurance.151Thefirstispropertyinsurance,whichmustbeplacedonthefollowing:
147.SeeStrataTitlesAct,supranote26.
148.SeeStrataTitlesAct,ibid,s30.Overitstimeinforce,thisprovisionwasultimatelydividedintothreesections.SeeCondominiumAct,RSBC1996,c64,ss54–56.
149.Supranote3,ss149–162.SeealsoStrataPropertyRegulation,supranote4,ss9.1–9.3.
150.SeeAllysonBaker,“Whatastratacorporationneedstoknowaboutinsurance?,”CHOABulletin600-004(March2014)at1,online(pdf):CondominiumHomeOwnersAssociationofBritishCo-lumbia<www.choa.bc.ca/wp-content/uploads/pdf/600/600-004%20Insurance%20Sept%202014.pdf>[perma.cc/TZ74-BL54](“Althoughinsurancere-quirementshavealwaysformedapartofthelegislationgoverningcondominiums,Part9oftheStrataPropertyAct(theAct),inconjunctionwithPart9oftheStrataPropertyRegulation(theRegulation),spellsoutingreaterdetailtheminimumtypesandlevelsofinsurancethataStrataCorporationisrequiredtoobtain.”).
151.Seesupranote3,ss149–150.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
34 British Columbia Law Institute
• commonproperty;
• commonassets;
• buildingsshownonthestrataplan;and
• fixturesbuiltorinstalledonastratalot,ifthefixturesarebuiltorinstalledbytheownerdeveloperaspartoftheoriginalconstructiononthestratalot.152
Definition of “fixtures” Fixtures(referredtointhelastbulletpoint)isatermofart.Tounderstandwhatismeantbyitrequiresashortintroductiontoacornerofpropertylaw.There’safundamentaldistinctioninpropertylawbetweenlandandpersonalprop-erty.Inmostcases,it’sclearwhetheranitemofpropertyislandorpersonalproper-ty(orachattel,tousethetechnicalname).Butsometimesthebrightlinedividingthetwokindsofpropertycangetfuzzy.Fixturesareanexampleofthisphenome-non.Ifsomethingthatwouldordinarilybeclassifiedaspersonalpropertyis“suffi-cientlyattachedtotheland[thenit]maybetransformedintoa‘fixture,’therebyformingpartoftherealty.”153Thecommon-lawtestfordeterminingwhetherpropertyisafixtureiscomplex.154Legalacademicsandothershavecriticizedit.155So,probablyinanefforttoside-steptheuncertaintyoverthemeaningoffixtures,thetermisdefinedintheStrataProper-tyRegulation.Undertheregulation(forthepurposesofthissectiononpropertyin-
152.Ibid,s149(1).Theotherkindofinsurancethatastratacorporationmusthaveisliabilityinsur-
ance.See,below,at37–38.Commonpropertyandcommonassetsaredefinedterms.See,above,at12–15(discussionoftheact’sdefinitionsofcommonpropertyandcommonassets).
153.BruceZiff,PrinciplesofPropertyLaw,6thed(Toronto:Carswell,2014)at117[footnoteomit-ted].
154.Seeibidat118(“Thedeterminationofwhetherachattelhasbeentransformedintoafixtureisamatterofintention,objectivelydetermined.Thatintentionisascertainedbyexaminingthede-greeandobject(sometimescalledpurpose)oftheannexation.Whenachattelisattachedtotheland,howeverslightly,arebuttablepresumptionisraisedthattheitemhasbecomeafixture.Theextentoftheattachmenttendstoaffectthestrengthofthatpresumption.Thepresumptionisreversedifthechattelisrestingonitsownweight;here,itwillbepresumedtoremainachat-tel.Thesolegroundfortherebuttalofthesetwopresumptionsistheobject/purposeofannexa-tion.Thetestiswhetherthepurposeofattachmentwas(a)toenhancetheland(whichleadstoaconclusionthatafixtureexists);or(b)forthebetteruseofthechattelasachattel.”[footnotesomitted]).
155.Seeibidat119(“Attemptstoreconcilethecaselawrelatingtotheapplicationofthelawoffix-turesseempointless.”[footnoteomitted]).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 35
suranceandalatersectiononoptionalinsurancecoverage),156fixturesmeans“itemsattachedtoabuilding,includingfloorandwallcoveringsandelectricalandplumb-ingfixtures,butdoesnotinclude,iftheycanberemovedwithoutdamagetothebuilding,refrigerators,stoves,dishwashers,microwaves,washers,dryersorotheritems.”157Withthisdefinitioninplace,thetermfixturesendsupplayinganimportantroleindefiningthelimitsoftheproperty-insurancemandateonstratacorporations.Thestratacorporation’spropertyinsurancemustonlycoverthesefixtures“ifthefix-turesarebuiltorinstalledbytheownerdeveloperaspartoftheoriginalconstruc-tiononthestratalot.”Asacommentatornotes,“[t]hekeyconsiderationiswhetherthefixturewasin-stalledatthetimeoforiginalconstructionorduringaunitowner’ssubsequentren-ovations.”158Ifthefixturewasinstalledbytheowner-developerduringthestrataproperty’soriginalconstruction,thenit’sembracedwithintheact’smandateonstratacorporationstoobtainpropertyinsurance.Ifitwasn’t(because,forexample,it’sanupgrademadebyasubsequentstrata-lotowner),thenit’snotwithinthemandate’sscope.159Howthisdividinglinemaybelocatedinpracticeisspelledoutinanexamplegivenbyanothercommentator:
assumethatacarpetwasinstalledbytheownerdeveloperatthetimeoforiginalcon-struction.Damagetothatcarpet,clearlylocatedinastratalot,istheresponsibilityofthestratacorporationinsurer.However,ifthestratalotownerreplacesthecarpetthreeyearslaterwithabettercarpetorahardwoodfloor,thestratacorporationhasnore-sponsibilitytoinsurethatreplacementflooring,becauseitisnotafixtureinstalledaspartoftheoriginalconstruction.160
156.SeeStrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s149(2).
157.StrataPropertyRegulation,supranote4,s9.1(1).
158.RyanDix,“AnOverviewofStrataPropertyIssuesinBritishColumbia”(May2013)at5,online(pdf):DoldenWallaceFolickLLP<www.dolden.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/159-An-Overview-of-Strata-Property-Issues-in-British-Columbia-May-2013.pdf>[perma.cc/YX7X-8N37].
159.Notethatnotbeingwithinthemandatedoesn’tmeanthatastratacorporationmayneverinsurethesefixtures.Theactallowsastratacorporationtoplaceinsuranceon“fixturesbuiltorin-stalledonastratalotthatwerenotbuiltorinstalledbytheownerdeveloperaspartoftheorigi-nalconstructiononthestratalot”(supranote3,s152(b)).See,below,at37–39(discussionofotherinsuranceastratacorporationmayobtain).
160.BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.4.SeealsoBaker,supranote150at3(“Ownersshouldbeawarethatalterationsandupgradesmadebypriorownersare
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
36 British Columbia Law Institute
Thiscommentatoralsonotesthat,“[i]npractice,bothinsurersmaycontributetothereplacementorrestorationcosts,withthestratacorporation’sinsurercontributingtotheextentofthevalueoftheoriginalcarpetingandthestratalotowner’spolicycontributingthebalance.”161Full replacement value Thestratacorporation’spropertyinsurancemustbe“onthebasisoffullreplace-mentvalue.”162Fullreplacementvalue“isthecurrentcosttoreplacethedamageditem,withoutanydeductionfordepreciationorwearandtear.”163Although,strictlyspeaking,theactdoesn’trequireit,thissectionhastheeffectofmakingitstronglyadvisableforstratacorporationstoobtainanannualappraisalofthestrataproperty.164Otherwise,thestratacorporationcouldendupbeingunder-insuredbyfailingtocomplywiththisrequirementthatitspropertyinsurancebeonafull-replacement-valuebasis.Major perils Thestratacorporation’spropertyinsurancemust“insureagainstmajorperils...andanyotherperilsspecifiedinthebylaws.”165Majorperilsisdefinedintheregula-tion.Itmeans“theperilsoffire,lightning,smoke,windstorm,hail,explosion,waterescape,strikes,riotsorcivilcommotion,impactbyaircraftandvehicles,vandalismandmaliciousacts.”166
alsotypicallyexcludedfromtheStrataCorporation’sinsurancecoverage.”[emphasisinorigi-nal]).
161.BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.20.
162.StrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s149(4)(a).
163.BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.5.
164.Seeibid(“Whatconstitutesfullreplacementvaluecanonlybeassessedbyconsultingaqualifiedinsuranceappraiser.”).
165.SeeStrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s149(4)(b).SeealsoBritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.6(“A‘peril’canbedescribedasacauseofpropertydam-age.”).
166.Supranote4,s9.1(2).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 37
Liability insurance required for strata corporation Description of the legislation Thestratacorporationmustalsohaveinsurance“againstliabilityforpropertydam-ageandbodilyinjury.”167“Liabilityinsurance,”notesacommentator,“isintendedtodefendandindemnifytheinsuredwithrespecttoclaimsbroughtagainsttheinsuredforinjuryordamagetothepersonorpropertyofathirdpartycausedbyanaccidentornegligence.”168Thesourcesofsuchliabilityarewide-ranging.169Thesesourcesandtheirpotentialtogeneratehigh-valueclaimswillvarywiththetypesofbuildingsthatcomprisethestratapropertyandtheactivitiescarriedonatthestrataproperty.170Thestratacorporation’sliabilityinsurancemustprovidecoverageforatleast$2000000.171Incasesinwhichbothofthestratacorporation’smandatedinsurancepoliciesmayrespondtoaclaim,“[m]ostpoliciesrequirethatastratacorporation
167.StrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s150(1).SeealsoBritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPractice
Manual,supranote10at§15.9(“TheActdoesnotprovideadefinitionofeither[propertydam-ageorbodilyinjury].However,bothareusuallydefinedtermsininsurancepolicies.Whiletheexactdefinitionwillvarybypolicywording,fromaninsuranceperspective,‘propertydamage’istypicallydefinedasdamagetotangibleproperty,while‘bodilyinjury’istypicallydefinedtoin-cludeinjuries,sickness,anddisease.”).
168.BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,ibidat§15.9.
169.SeeThomasJHakala,“CondominiumCasualtyandLiabilityInsurance”(1974)48:4StJohn’sLRev1112at1119(“Sourcesofliabilityarenotdifficulttoforesee.Besidestheusualexposuretotortactionsfromordinarylicenseesandinvitees,theassociationmaybesubjecttoliabilityforinjuriesincurredinconnectionwitheverythingfromthenegligentoperationofcondominiumownedvehiclestoproductdefectsinfooditemsdispensedfromon-premisesvendingmachines.Inlargedevelopmentsequippedwithswimmingpools,restaurants,healthclubs,andplayareas,thesourcesofliabilitywillbeproportionatelymultiplied.Itisapparentthatinallcasesthesourcesofliabilityextendwellbeyondthelimitsofpersonalconductandcareoftheindividualunitowner.”[footnotesomitted]).
170.SeeBonnieSElster,“InsuranceandStrataCorporations,”inStrataProperty—2006Update,supranote375.1.1at5.1.3(“Astratacorporationwouldbewelladvisedtoconsiderobtaininghighercoveragelimits,especiallyifithasrecreationfacilities,suchasaswimmingpool.”).
171.SeeStrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s150(2);StrataPropertyRegulation,supranote4,s9.2.SeealsoBaker,supranote150at2(“[I]ncreasingtheamountofliabilitycoveragefrom$2milliontosomehigherfiguretypicallyresultsinonlyamodestincreaseinpremiumand,asaresult,moststratacorporationsobtainliabilityinsurancecoveragelimitsofatleast$5million.Asthedamagesfromasignificantorcatastrophicinjuryclaimcanexceed$2million,stratacor-porationsarewelladvisedtoconsiderobtaininghighercoveragelimits.”).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
38 British Columbia Law Institute
mustfirstcalluponitspropertyinsurancebeforethecorporation’sliabilityinsur-ancerespondstotheclaim.”172Other insurance a strata corporation may obtain Description of the legislation TheStrataPropertyActdoesn’tplaceanylimitsontheinsurancethatastratacorpo-rationmaywishtoobtain.173Apartfromthepropertyinsuranceandliabilityinsur-ancethatstratacorporationsaremandatedtoobtain,therearemanyotherkindsofinsurancepoliciesthatmayappealtoagivenstratacorporation.OnesuchpolicyismentionedbynameintheStrataPropertyAct.Theactenablesastratacorporationtoobtaindirectors-and-officerscoverage.174“ThepurposeofD&Oinsurance,”explainsaleadingpracticeguide,“istodefendandindemnifywhereaclaimhasbeenmadeagainstastratacouncilmember(typicallybyoneormorestra-talotownersorbythestratacorporationitself)asaresultofmismanagementorer-rorintheexerciseofthemember’sdutiesoncouncil.”175Further,“[t]heinsuranceisintendedtorespondtonegligenceor‘honest’mistakesmadebystratacouncilmem-bersandthereforewillnotrespondwherethememberhasdeliberatelyorreckless-lycausedaloss.”176TheStrataPropertyActalsoexpresslyenablesstratacorporationstoobtaincover-age,iftheywish,forthefollowing:
• aperilorliabilityofthestratacorporationthatisnotreferredtoinsection149[re-quiringstratacorporationtohavepropertyinsurance]or150[requiringstratacor-porationtohaveliabilityinsurance];
• fixturesbuiltorinstalledonastratalotthatwerenotbuiltorinstalledbytheownerdeveloperaspartoftheoriginalconstructiononthestratalot.177
172.Mangan,supranote37at253.
173.SeeBaker,supranote150at4(“TheActdoesnotlimittheStrataCorporation’soptionswithre-specttoinsurancecoverage.”).
174.Seesupranote3,s151(“Thestratacorporationmayobtainandmaintainerrorsandomissionsinsuranceforcouncilmembersagainsttheirliabilityandexpensesforerrorsandomissionsmadeintheexerciseoftheirpowersandperformanceoftheirdutiesascouncilmembers.”).
175.BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.11.SeealsoColemanvGreatAmericanInsuranceCo,2010BCSC1796(extensiveconsiderationofstratacorporation’sdirectors-and-officerspolicy).
176.BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.11.
177.Supranote3,s152.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 39
Thefirstbulletpointraisesotherkindsofinsurancepoliciesthatastratacorpora-tionmaywanttohave.Onecommentatorlistsseveralkindsofpoliciesasbeingamong“commonformsofoptionalcoverage”:
• Boilerandmachineryinsurance(torespondtoclaimsarisingfromtheStrataCorpo-ration’sboilerorothermechanicalorelectricalequipment);
• Crimeinsurance(torespondtoclaimsformisappropriationoffundsbytheStrataCorporation’sagentsandemployees);
• Glasscoverage;
...
• Pollutioncoverage.178Thiscommentatornotesthatstratacorporationsmayalsorelyontheact’senablingprovisionfor“expandingcoveragetoaddresscommonexclusionsinpropertyandliabilitypolicies”—citingcoveragefor“earthquakesorfloods”asanexample.179Thesecondpartoftheenablingprovisionallowsastratacorporationtoobtaincov-eragefor“fixturesbuiltorinstalledonastratalotthatwerenotbuiltorinstalledbytheownerdeveloperaspartoftheoriginalconstructiononthestratalot.”180Thislanguagetiesintothelegislativemandatetoobtainpropertyinsurance,whichislim-itedtothosefixturesthatwerebuiltorinstalledbytheowner-developeraspartoftheoriginalconstructiononthestratalot.Here,theactisallowingastratacorpora-tiontodecideifitwantscoverageinexcessofwhatthemandaterequires.181Strata corporation has an insurable interest in property it must insure Description of the legislation “InCanada,”asaninsurance-lawtextbookputsit,“anagreementwhichpurportstobeaninsurancecontractisnotlegallyenforceableunlesstheinsuredhasaninsura-bleinterestinthesubject-matteroftheinsurance.”182178.Baker,supranote150at5.
179.Ibidat4.
180.Supranote3,s152(b).
181.See,above,at34–36(discussionofthedefinitionoffixturesanditsroleindeterminingthescopeofthelegislativemandate).
182.Billingsley,supranote126at35[footnoteomitted].
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
40 British Columbia Law Institute
Thisrequirementisdesignedtoachievethreegoals,allofwhichflowfromthelargerobjectiveofdifferentiatingbetweenawagerandaninsurancecontract:(1)topreservethepublicpolicyagainstwagering;(2)topreservetheprincipleofindemnity(i.e.,thattheinsuredshouldnotprofituponalossoccurring);and(3)topreventtheinsuredfrombeingtemptedtodestroytheinsuredpropertyortootherwiseintentionallybringabouttheinsured-againstrisk.183
Thetestsfordeterminingwhetheraninsurableinterestispresentcanvarywiththetypeofinsuranceatissue.184Herearethetestsforpropertyinsuranceandliabilityinsurance,thetwotypesofinsurancethattheactmandatesastratacorporationtohave:
• forpropertyinsurance,it’snecessarytohave“moralcertaintyofadvantageorbenefit”fromtheproperty;185
• forliabilityinsurance,“[t]heriskinsuredinaliabilityinsurancecontract—liabilitytothirdparties—isitselfaninterest.”186
Inthestrata-propertyfield,theconcernsraisedbyinsurableinterestrelatemainlytopropertyinsurance.Eventhoughastratacorporationisrequiredtoinsureprop-ertythatitdoesn’town,187anargumentcouldbemadethatitwouldhaveaninsura-bleinterestunderthetestforpropertyinsurance.188Butit’sfarfromabsolutelycer-tainthatthisargumentwouldsucceedinallcases.Rightfromtheinceptionofstratapropertiesinthe1960s,commentatorshavepointedoutthatthelawoninsurableinterestcouldposeseriousproblemsforanylegislativemodelthatreliedonthestratacorporationobtainingpropertyinsur-
183.Ibidat35–36[footnotesomitted].
184.SeeBrown,supranote1at§4.2.
185.KosmopoulosvConstitutionInsuranceCo,[1987]1SCR2at30,34DLR(4th)208,WilsonJ(Beetz,Lamer,LeDain,andLaForestJJconcurring).
186.Brown,supranote1at§4.2(a)(iii).
187.SeeStrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s66(“Anownerownsthecommonpropertyandcommonassetsofthestratacorporationasatenantincommoninashareequaltotheunitentitlementoftheowner’sstratalotdividedbythetotalunitentitlementofallthestratalots.”).
188.Thisargumentcouldbebasedonthestratacorporation’sdutytorepairandmaintainthecom-monpropertyandcommonassets.SeeStrataPropertyAct,ibid,s72.SeealsoRohan,supranote136at1050.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 41
ance.189Giventhedrasticconsequencesofrunningafoulofthelawoninsurablein-terest,theStrataPropertyActremovestheissuefromtherealmofargumentbyflat-lydeclaringthat“[t]hestratacorporationhasaninsurableinterestinanypropertyinsuredundersection149[propertyinsurancerequiredforstratacorporation]or152[optionalstrata-corporationinsurance].”190Strata corporation must review and report on insurance coverage Description of the legislation Theactimposestwoadministrativedutiesonthestratacorporation,asameanstopromotegoodgovernanceandaccountabilitytotheowners.First,thestratacorpo-rationmust“reviewannuallytheadequacyofthestratacorporation’sinsurance.”191Second,itmust“reportontheinsurancecoverageateachannualgeneralmeet-ing.”192Named insureds include strata corporation, owners, tenants, and occupiers Description of the legislation Theactprovidesthat“namedinsuredsinastratacorporation’sinsurancepolicyin-clude”thefollowing:
• thestratacorporation;
• theownersandtenantsfromtimetotimeofthestratalotsshownonthestrataplan;and
• thepersonswhonormallyoccupythestratalots.193Thisprovisionapplies“[d]espitethetermsoftheinsurancepolicy.”Ithastwoimpli-cationsforinsuranceinastrataproperty.Oneisobvious;theotherissubtleandmoredifficulttograsp.189.SeeRisk,supranote5at57(“Thepossibilitythattheassociationmayacquireinsuranceraises
theproblemofinsurableinterest.”[footnoteomitted]).
190.Supranote3,s153.
191.Seeibid,s154(a).SeealsoBaker,supranote150at8(listofsuggested“factorsaStrataCorpo-rationshouldtakeintoaccountinundertakingtheannualreview”).
192.Seesupranote3,s154(b).
193.Ibid,s155.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
42 British Columbia Law Institute
Clear identification of broad group of named insureds Theobviousimplicationofthissectionisthatitclearlysetsoutthebroadgroupthatmakesupthenamedinsuredsinastratacorporation’sinsurancepolicy.Anamedin-suredissimply“thepersonnamedinthecontractofinsuranceastheinsured.”194Anamedinsuredisentitledtoabenefitunderaninsurancepolicy,ifthatnamedin-suredhasavalidclaimunderit.Sothisprovisionmakesthepracticalpointthatabroadergroupthanjustthestratacorporationispotentiallyentitledtobenefitsun-derthepolicy.195Or,toputitanotherway,simplybecausethestratacorporationpaystheinsurancepremiumdoesn’tmeanthatthebenefitsunderthepolicyarelim-itedtothestratacorporation.The no-subrogation rule Thesubtlerpurposeofthisprovisionistoestablishwhatcommentatorshavecalledtheno-subrogationrule.196Inthisway,theprovisionishelpingtoplayanimportantroleinbridgingthedividebetweenfundamentalinsurance-lawandstrata-propertyconcepts.Subrogationis“[t]heprincipleunderwhichaninsurerthathaspaidalossunderaninsurancepolicyisentitledtoalltherightsandremediesbelongingtotheinsuredagainstathirdpartywithrespecttoanylosscoveredbythepolicy.”197Typically,themostimportantoftheserightsis“therighttosueawrongdoerwhocausedthelossinquestion.”198Inthisway,subrogationtiesintosomeofthedistinguishingprinci-plesofinsurancelaw.199
194.AXAInsurance(Canada)vOldRepublicInsuranceCo(1998),38OR(3d)630at637,[1998]OJ
No918(QL)(OntGenDiv),LaxJ.SeealsoMangan,supranote37at228(“Anamedinsuredisapersonthattheinsurancepolicydesignatesastheinsured,bycontrasttosomeonewhomaybecoveredbythepolicybutwhoisnotexplicitlynamed.”[emphasisinoriginal]).
195.SeeBritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.15(“Thereisacom-monmisconceptionamongcouncils,stratamanagers,andstratalotownersthatonlythestratacorporationitselfisentitledtoaccessthebenefitsofastratacorporation’sinsurancepolicy.”).
196.Seeibidat§15.9;Dix,supranote158at19–20.
197.BryanAGarner,ed,Black’sLawDictionary,10thed(St.Paul:ThomsonReuters,2014)subverbo“subrogation.”
198.Mangan,supranote37at243.
199.See,above,at28–29.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 43
Courtshaveestablishedthatthemainrationaleofsubrogationistosupportthein-demnityprinciple.Asaleadingcaseputit,“avoidingoverpaymentoftheinsuredisthebasisforsubrogation.”200Subrogationalsosupportstheprincipleofgoodfaith.201Butsubrogationisn’tanironlawthatappliesinallcases.Instead,asacommentatornotes,the“lawofsubrogationiscomplexandprovidesforcertainexceptions.”202Animportant“exceptiontotheinsurer’srightofsubrogationoccurswheretheinsuredaccidentallycausesthelossinquestion.”203Howdoesthiscomplexinterplayofruleandexceptionapplytoastrataproperty,whichhasitsowncomplicatedsetofmultipleownershipinterests?Aparticularproblemhereiswhattodowithanownerwhohascauseddamagetotheowner’sstratalotandotherstratalotsorcommonproperty.Anargumentcouldbemadethatthebasicprinciplesofsubrogationshouldprotectthisownerfromasubrogatedclaim.204Butsimplyleavingthemattertobesortedoutinaccordancewiththoseprinciplescouldleadtouncertaintyandconfusion.205Itwouldalsoimposeunneces-sarycostsandunwantedlitigationonthepartiestoinsuranceinthestrata-propertysector.206Inordertoavoidtheseproblems,theStrataPropertyActensuresthatabroadgroupofpeoplewithinastratapropertyhavethebenefitofbeingprotectedagainstsubro-gatedclaims.Itachievesthisresultbydeclaringalistofpersonstobenamedin-sureds.Becausetheyareconsideredbylawtobenamedinsureds,stratacorpora-tions,strata-lotowners,tenants,and“thepersonswhonormallyoccupythestratalots”arebroughtwithinanexceptiontothelawonsubrogation.207
200.CondominiumCorpNo9813678vStatesmanCorp,2007ABCA216atpara27[Statesman],
CôtéJA,leavetoappealtoSCCrefused,[2007]SCCANo456(QL).
201.Seeibid(“reducesthemoralriskofdishonestybytheinsured”).
202.Mangan,supranote37at243.
203.Ibid.
204.SeeStatesman,supranote200atparas46–57;Rohan,supranote136at1070–1072.
205.SeeRohan,ibidat1070.
206.SeeStatesman,supranote200atparas33–35;Owners,StrataPlanNoNW651vBeck’sMechani-calLtd(1980),20BCLR12at16,[1980]BCJNo46(QL)(SC).
207.StrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s155.SeealsoMangan,supranote37at243(“Suppose,forex-ample,thatanowneraccidentallycausesalosscoveredbythestratacorporation’sinsurance,andtheinsurerthenpaysthestratacorporation’slossinaccordancewiththeinsurancepolicy,subjecttoanydeductibleandthepolicylimits.Whilenormallytheinsurercouldrelyonthein-
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
44 British Columbia Law Institute
Payment and application of insurance money Description of the legislation Ifastratacorporationbecomesentitledtoapaymentofinsurancemoney208underapolicy,thentheStrataPropertyActrequiresthatthemoneybepaidintrustasfol-lows:
• totheorderoftheinsurancetrusteedesignatedbythebylaws,or
• ifaninsurancetrusteeisnotdesignated,totheorderofthestratacorporationtobeheldintrustuntilpaidoutundersection157.209
Section157requiresthat,wheninsurancemoneyisreceived“withrespecttodam-agedproperty,”thatmoneymustintheordinarycoursebe“usedtorepairorreplacethedamagedpropertywithoutdelay.”210Theexceptiontosection157isforcasesinwhichthestratacorporationdecidesnottorepairorreplacedamagedproperty.Suchadecisionmustbetaken“byaresolu-tionpassedbya3/4voteatanannualorspecialgeneralmeetingheldnolaterthan60daysafterthereceiptofthemoneyreferredtoinsection156.”211Ifaresolutionispassedundersection157,thentheinsurancetrusteeorstratacor-poration(asthecasemaybe)holdstheinsurancemoneyastrustee“foreachpersonwhohasaninterestinthemoney,includingtheholderofaregisteredcharge.”212Themoneymustbedistributed“accordingtoeachperson’sinterest,”213unlessan
surer’srightofsubrogationtosuethewrongdoer,inthiscase,theinsurercannot.Why?Becausethewrongdoerisanownerandbyvirtueofsection155oftheStrataPropertyAct,anownerisanamedinsuredunderthestratacorporation’sinsurancepolicy.”).
208.SeeInsuranceAct,supranote9,s1“insurancemoney”(“meanstheamountpayablebyaninsur-erunderacontract,andincludesallbenefits,surplus,profits,dividends,bonusesandannuitiespayableunderthecontract”).
209.Supranote3,s156.
210.Ibid,s157.
211.Ibid,s159(1).
212.Ibid,s159(2).
213.Ibid,s159(2)(a).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 45
interestedpersonobtainsacourtorderundertheact’sextensiveenablingprovi-sion.214Theseprovisionsarealegislativeresponsetoaproblemidentifiedearlyon:howtoensurethatthevariousinterestsinastrataproperty—includingmortgagees—areallgivenadequateprotectionintheapplicationofinsurancemoney.215Deductible Insurance deductible is characterized as a common expense Asaleadingcaseonceputit,therealitiesoftheinsurancemarketdictatethatastra-tacorporation’sinsurance“isinvariablysubjecttoadeductible.”216Adeductibleissimply“theportionofthelossthattheinsuredmustpay”firstbeforecollectinganyinsurancemoney.217“Insurersusedeductibles,”asacommentatorhasexplained,“toreducetheiradministrationcostsandobtainpremiumsavingsforpolicyholders.”218Asastartingplaceontheroledeductiblesplaywithintheinsurancesystemforstra-taproperties,theactprovidesthat“thepaymentofaninsurancedeductibleinre-
214.Ibid,s160(“Ifthestratacorporationdecidesnottorepairorreplacethedamagedpropertyand
thestrataplanisnotcancelled,anyofthefollowingpersonsmayapplytotheSupremeCourtforanorderunderthissection:(a)anowner;(b)theholderofaregisteredchargeagainstastratalot;(c)aninsureroflandshownonthestrataplan;(d)anyotherpersonthecourtconsidersanappropriateperson.(2)Onapplicationbyapersonreferredtoinsubsection(1),thecourtmay,byorder,implementaschemetodooneormoreofthefollowing:(a)rebuildsomeorallofthedamagedpropertyortomakesomeotheruseoftheland;(b)providefortheinterestsoftheownersandregisteredchargeholdersonajustandequitablebasis.(3)Thecourtmaymakeanyorderitconsidersadvisabletogiveeffecttothescheme,including,withoutlimitation,orderswithrespectto(a)thepaymentofinsurancemoneyreceivedbythestratacorporation,(b)thedischargeoftheliabilitiesofthestratacorporation,thepersonsliabletocontributetothedis-chargeandtheirshareoftheliability,(c)theamendmentofthestrataplan,(d)thetransferorconveyanceoftheinterestofownerswhosestratalotshavebeenwhollyorpartiallydestroyedtotheotherownersinproportiontotheunitentitlementsofthestratalotsoftheotherowners,andforthecompensationoftheownerswhoseinterestshavebeentransferredorconveyed,(e)thesaleoflandshownonthestrataplan,orthesaleofthecommonassets,and(f)thedistri-butionofanyofthecommonassetsofthestratacorporation.”).
215.SeeRohan,supranote136at1053–1057.
216.Stevens,supranote135at453.SeealsoBritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.24(“Asacommercialreality,moststratacorporationinsurancepolicieshavede-ductiblesthatapplytothevariouscoveragesunderthepolicy.”).
217.Mangan,supranote37at239.
218.Ibid.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
46 British Columbia Law Institute
spectofaclaimonthestratacorporation’sinsuranceisacommonexpense.”219Thismeansthatpaymentofaninsurancedeductibleispresumptivelysomethingthatalltheownersareresponsiblefor,“tobecontributedtobymeansofstratafees.”220Strata corporation may recover deductible payment from responsible owner Buttheactdoesn’tstopatcharacterizinganinsurancedeductibleasacommonex-pense.Itgoesontoprovidethatnothingaboutthischaracterization“limit[s]theca-pacityofthestratacorporationtosueanownerinordertorecoverthedeductibleportionofaninsuranceclaimiftheownerisresponsibleforthelossordamagethatgaverisetotheclaim.”221Thisprovisionmeansthataresponsibleownermayulti-matelyendupbeingliableforaninsurancedeductible.Likemuchoftheframeworkforinsuranceinstrataproperties,thisprovisionfirstappearedintheStrataPropertyAct.Itsrationalehasbeendescribedasclarifyingthelaw.Thesubsection’spurposewasto“[set]outexpresslywhatwasnotpreviouslyaddressedbylegislation,butwasgovernedbycommonlaw.”222Theprovisionhasalsobeendescribedasdeterminingliabilityforaninsurancedeductible“byanalogytotheprevailingpracticeintheinsuranceindustry,whichistoshiftthedeductibleportionofthelosstothepartycausingthelossasameansofcontrollinginsuranceclaimsandinaccordancewiththeprovisionsofthebylawsandrulesoftheparticu-larstratacorporation.”223Commentatorshavenotedthatthisprovisionhaseffectivelybecomeadefaultprovi-sion.224Courtjudgmentsinterpretingtheprovisionappeartohaveleftthedoor
219.Supranote3,s158(1).
220.Ibid,s158(1).See,above,at20–23(generaldiscussionofcommonexpensesandunitentitle-ment).
221.Supranote3,s158(2).
222.TheOwnersStrataCorporationVR2673vComissiona,2000BCSC1240atpara22[Comissiona],LevineJ.
223.Dix,supranote158at26.Onthispointofinsurancelaw’sapproachtodeductibles,itshouldbenotedthatnothingsaidearlierabouttherulebarringsubrogatedclaimswouldapplytoastratacorporation’sclaimagainstanownertorecoveraninsurancedeductible(see,above,at42–43).SeeMangan,supranote37at243–244.
224.SeeDix,supranote158at26(“Thereisnouniversalrule,however,andstratacorporationsmaydesigntheirownparticularscheme.”).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 47
openforstratacorporationstobecomeactiveinthisareabyamendingtheirby-laws.225Whatthishasmeantinpracticeisthatastratacorporationmayapparentlychoosetoadoptan“indemnitybylaw.”226Thewordingofthisbylawcanhaveasignificantpracticaleffectonlitigationoverliabilitytopayaninsurancedeductible.Asseveralcourtcaseshaverevealed,many“indemnitybylaws”usewordsotherthanresponsi-bletodescribewhenanownerwillbeliableforadeductible.Acommentatorhasex-plainedthattheleadingcaseshavedecidedthat“theword‘responsible’hadabroadermeaningthanthelegalconceptof‘causation’(whichwouldberequiredtoprovenegligence)....”227Sowhilethesebylawshaveprovedtobeattractivetostratacorporations,astheyappeartoholdouttheprospectofestablishingliabilityforaninsurancedeductiblewithouttheneedforacourtortribunalproceeding,228judgmentshaveshownthatreferencestotermslikenegligencecanbeenforcedagainstastratacorporation,re-quiringittoclearahigherlegalhurdlethanmereresponsibilitytoestablishliabil-ity.229225.SeeStrataPlanLMS2835vMari(8December2006),Vancouver2004-05746(BCProvCt),aff’d
2007BCSC740[Mari];StrataPlanVR360vJauhar,2016BCPC238[Jauhar];WawanesaMutualInsuranceCovKeiran,2007BCSC727[Keiran];Comissiona,supranote222.SeealsoStevens,su-pranote135at454(“Finally,wewouldobservethatfromapolicypointofview,wewouldre-jecttheanalysisofthemotionscourtjudgewhichhastheeffectofimposingaparticularregimeuponallcondominiums.Asignificantfeatureofthatschemeistheimpositionofsharedliabilitybytheownersforalldeductiblesasthecondominiumcorporationitselfcallonlysatisfyaliabil-ityimposeduponitbyrequiringtheownerstocontributetothecommonexpenses.Theforcedsharingofthedeductibledeprivestheownersasagroupofthediscipliningeffectadeductiblehasuponclaims.Whiletheeffectoftheresultwereachistoopenthepossibilitythatclaimswillbemadeasbetweenownersforthedeductible,acondominiummayavoidthatresultifitwishestodosobymakingappropriateprovisioninitsdeclaration,by-lawsorrules.Itseemstouspref-erabletoleavethequestionofliabilityfordeductibletobedeterminedinthiswaysothatcon-dominiumownersareabletodesignaschemeappropriatetotheirparticularneeds.”).
226.BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.25.
227.Ibidat§15.25,citingMari,supranote225;Jauhar,supranote225;Keiran,supranote225;Comissiona,supranote222.
228.SeeBritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.25(“[M]oststratacorporationswouldprefertoavoidlawsuitsandsimplychargetheamountclaimed(beitthedeductibleorotherinsuredamount)againsttheowner’sstratalot;intheabsenceofabylaw,charginganownertocollecttheuninsuredamountmaynotbejustifiable....”).
229.Seeibid(“Forexample,ifanindemnitybylawadoptedbythestratacorporationreferstoclaimsagainstanownerforonlynegligenceorcarelessness,aclaiminstrictliabilityagainsttheownermaybeprecluded.”).SeealsoStrataPlanLMS2446vMorrison,2011BCPC519[Morrison].ButseeNacht,supranote117atpara22(castingdoubtonthecontinuedvalidityoftheconcluding
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
48 British Columbia Law Institute
Strata corporation approval not required for payment of deductible Finally,thelegislationoninsurancedeductiblesconcludesbyaddressingstrata-corporationdecision-making.Asanoverridingrule,theactprovidesthat“stratacorporationapprovalisnotrequiredforaspeciallevyorforanexpenditurefromthecontingencyreservefundtocoveraninsurancedeductiblerequiredtobepaidbythestratacorporationtorepairorreplacedamagedproperty.”230Thisrulerepre-sentsadeparturefromtheact’sbasicprovisionsondecision-makingandgovern-ance,whichgenerallycallforspecialleviesandpaymentsoutofthecontingencyre-servefundtobeapprovedbyaresolutionpassedbya3/4vote.231Thedepartureappearstobejustifiedbythevitalinterestinhavingrepairsdone(recallthatade-ductiblemustbepaidfirst,beforeanyinsurancemoneymayflowtothestratacor-poration).But“[p]riorapprovalisnecessary,”asacommentatornotes,“whereastratacorporationhaspreviouslydecided,inaccordancewiththeStrataPropertyAct,tonotrepairorreplacethedamagedpropertyinquestion.”232Owner’s insurance Description of the legislation Inadditiontothestratacorporation,astrata-lotownerisalsoentitledtoobtainpropertyandliabilityinsurance.Toaddresspotentialconcernsaboutduplicatingcoverageobtainedthroughthestratacorporation’sinsurance,theStrataPropertyActdealswiththescopeofcoverageavailabletoanowner.233Undertherelevantprovision,astrata-lotownerisentitledto“obtainandmaintaininsuranceforanyorallofthefollowing”:
• lossordamagetotheowner’sstratalotandthefixturesreferredtoinsec-tion149(1)(d)
clauseinthetextbystatingthefollowingquestionsoflawtobedeterminedinsubsequentsu-preme-courtproceeding:“(a)Cantheby-lawsofastratacorporationservetonarrowtheappli-cationofs.158(2)oftheStrataPropertyAct,S.B.C.1998,c.43?...(c)ShouldthedecisionoftheProvincialCourtinStrataPlanLMS2446v.Morrison,2011BCPC519haveapplication?”).
230.Supranote3,s158(3).Thisprovisionapplies“[d]espiteanyothersectionofthisActorthereg-ulations,”butdoesn’tapplywhenthe“stratacorporationhasdecidednottorepairorreplaceundersection159”(ibid,s158(3)).SeealsoWongvTheOwners,StrataPlanLMS2461,2018BCCRT255(provisiondoesn’textendtospeciallevytotopupcontingencyreservefundaf-terpaymentofinsurancedeductible).
231.See,above,at16–20(generaldiscussionofstrata-corporationgovernance).
232.SeeMangan,supranote37at240.SeealsoStrataPropertyAct,supranote3,ss158(3),159.
233.Seeibid,s161.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 49
o againstperilsthatarenotinsuredbythestratacorporation,and
o foramountsthatareinexcessofamountsinsuredbythestratacorporation;
• fixturesintheowner’sstratalot,otherthanthefixturesreferredtoinsec-tion149(1)(d);
• improvementstofixturesreferredtoinsection149(1)(d);
• lossofrentalvalueoftheowner’sstratalotinexcessofinsuranceobtainedandmaintainedbythestratacorporation;
• liabilityforpropertydamageandbodilyinjury,whetheroccurringontheowner’sstratalotoronthecommonproperty.234
The“fixturesreferredtoinsection149(1)(d)”are“fixturesbuiltorinstalledonastratalot,ifthefixturesarebuiltorinstalledbytheownerdeveloperaspartoftheoriginalconstructiononthestratalot,”withfixturesdefinedintheregulationtomean“itemsattachedtoabuilding,includingfloorandwallcoveringsandelectricalandplumbingfixtures,butdoesnotinclude,iftheycanberemovedwithoutdamagetothebuilding,refrigerators,stoves,dishwashers,microwaves,washers,dryersorotheritems.”235Theintentofthisprovisionistocoordinatecoveragebetweenthestratacorporationandstrata-lotowners.It’smeanttoavoidovercoverageorduplicationsincoverage.Toachievethisresult,theprovisionreliesonthedefinitionoffixturestoactasadi-vidinglinebetweenthestratacorporation’spropertyinsuranceandtheowner’sin-surance.236Asacommentatorhasnoted,the“definitionwasdesignedtodifferenti-atebetween‘original’andsubsequently-installedfixtures,andwassupposedtoena-blethepropertyinsurersofthestratacorporationandthestrataunitownertobet-terappreciatetheirrespectiveindemnityobligations.”237Owners in bare-land strata plans Theactprovidesthatastrata-lotownerinabare-landstrataplanisentitledto“ob-tainandmaintaininsuranceonbuildingsorfixturesbuiltorinstalledonthestrata
234.Ibid,s161(1).
235.Supranote4,s9.1(1).
236.See,above,at34–36(discussionofthedefinitionoffixturesandthescopeofastratacorpora-tion’sinsurancecoverage).
237.Dix,supranote158at4.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
50 British Columbia Law Institute
lot.”238Thisprovisionowesitsexistencetothespecialfeaturesofbare-landstrataplans.239Astheleadingpracticeguidepointsout,“[t]heobligationofastratacorporationtoinsurestratalotsinabarelandstrataplanismorelimitedthanisthecaseinacon-ventionalstrataplan.”240Thisisbecauseinmostbare-landstrataplans“[t]hedwell-ingsandotherbuildingsconstructedonthestratalotarenotdepictedonthestrataplan.”Thisfacttakesthemoutsidethescopeofthelegislativemandateonastratacorporationtoobtainpropertyinsurance.241Inrecognitionoftheselimitationsonthemandateplacedonstratacorporations,theactenablesstrata-lotownersinabare-landstrataplantoplayagreaterroleinob-taininginsurance.242Whiletherearepracticalconsiderationsthatsetthisarrange-mentapartfromthetypicalcaseinwhichastratacorporationinabuildingstrata
238.Supranote3,s161(2).
239.Seeibid,s1(1)“barelandstrataplan”(“means(a)astrataplanonwhichtheboundariesofthestratalotsaredefinedonahorizontalplanebyreferencetosurveymarkersandnotbyreferencetothefloors,wallsorceilingsofabuilding,or(b)anyotherstrataplandefinedbyregulationtobeabarelandstrataplan”)(noregulationshavebeenadoptedunderparagraph(b)).Seealso,above,at11(generaldiscussionofkindsofstrataplans).
240.BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.4[cross-referenceomit-ted].
241.SeeStrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s149(1)(c)(legislativemandateapplyingto“buildingsshownonthestrataplan”).Theactalsoprovidesthatthepartofthemandaterelatingto“fix-turesbuiltorinstalledonastratalot,ifthefixturesarebuiltorinstalledbytheownerdeveloperaspartoftheoriginalconstructiononthestratalot”doesn’tapplytoabare-landstrataplan(seeibid,s149(3)).Allthissaid,onpaperastratacorporationshouldbeabletoinsurebuildingsonastratalotinabare-landstrataplanunderitspowertoobtain“optional”insurance(seeibid,s152).ButseeBritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.27(not-ingthatastratacorporationthatobtainedsuchinsurancewouldfindittobeapoorfitwithitslegislativedutytorepairandmaintainpropertyinabare-landstrataplan).
242.Seesupranote3,s161(2)(“DespitethisAct,theInsuranceActoranyotherlaw,anownerofastratalotinabarelandstrataplanmayobtainandmaintaininsuranceonbuildingsorfixturesbuiltorinstalledonthestratalot.”).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 51
planplacesinsurance,243thelegislationappearstogenerateresultsthatmeettheexpectationsofstrata-lotownersinbare-landstrataplans.244Contribution Description of the legislation Part9concludeswithaprovisionthatattemptstomanagethecompetingclaimsthatmayariseagainstastratacorporation’sandanowner’sinsurance.Thisprovisionoverridesanycontrarytermsinaninsurancepolicywithrespecttocontributionsintwosituations:
• first,“neitherthestratacorporation’sinsurancepolicynoranowner’sinsur-ancepolicyisliabletobebroughtintocontributionwithanotherpolicyun-lesstheotherpolicyisissuedonthesameproperty”;245
• second,“neitherthestratacorporation’sinsurancepolicynortheowner’sin-surancepolicyis‘otherinsurance’inrelationtoanotherpolicyunlesstheotherpolicyisissuedonthesameproperty.”246
“Otherinsurance”isatermofartthatrefersto“aclauseintheinsurancecontractwhichredefinesthepolicycoveragewhereotherinsuranceisinplaceforagivenloss.”247
243.SeeBritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.27(“Withstratalots
nottypicallycoveredbyabarelandstratacorporation’sinsurancepolicy,thepolicyislefttocoverthecommonpropertyonly.Stratacorporationsshouldbearinmindthatthecommonpropertyassociatedwithabarelandstrataplanoftenincludesroadways,fences,sewers,andotherservicesandutilities,andthattheavailabilityofinsurancefortheseitemsmustbeex-ploredwhenobtainingthecorporation’sinsurancecoverage.”).
244.SeeBritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,ibid(“Manybarelandstratalotsaresoldbytheownerdeveloperasundevelopedlots,whicharethendevelopedbytheownerofthelot.Thisarrangementcanleadtogreatvariationinthesizes,configurations,andmaterialsusedintheconstructionofthedwellings.Astheoriginalownerhasmuchmorecontroloverthestruc-turesbuiltonthestratalotthaninaconventionalstrataplan,requiringtheowner,ratherthanthestratacorporation,toinsurethestructuresavoidssignificantdisparitiesthatcouldarise,giventhatcommonexpensesareusuallydividedequallybythenumberofstratalots(unitenti-tlementsforabarelandstrataplanareoftensetatoneforeachstratalot).”[cross-referenceomitted]).
245.Supranote3,s162(a).
246.Ibid,s162(b).
247.Billingsley,supranote126at338–39,notingalsothat“[t]heintendedeffectofsuchan‘otherin-surance’clauseistolimittheinsurer’sindemnityobligationwhereanotherinsurancepolicyco-
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
52 British Columbia Law Institute
verstheloss,suchthatthethresholdrequirementofoverlappingcoveragebetweenthepoliciesisnotmet”(ibidat339).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 53
Chapter 4. Issues for Reform Introduction Thecommitteeexaminedeachoftheprovisionsofpart9oftheStrataPropertyActforpotentialissuesforreform.248Lookingdeeper,itdelvedintocommentaryontheact.Thecommittee’sresearchalsoledittomakecomparisonswithlegislationonstratapropertiesandinsuranceinforceelsewhereinCanada.249Finallythecommit-teeexaminedrecentreformworkinAlberta250andOntario.251Bothofthoseprov-inceshaverecentlycompletedmajorprojects,whichfeaturedsomeconsiderationofemergingissuesininsuranceforstrataproperties.Asaresultofthisreview,thecommitteedecidedtofocusattentiononissuesforre-forminthefollowingareas:
• theinsurancemandate;
• insurancedeductibles;
• namedinsureds;
• reportingandadministration;and
• thestandardunit.
Issues for Reform—The Insurance Mandate Thecoreofpart9oftheactistheinsurancemandate—thatis,thelegislativere-quirementthatstratacorporationsmustobtainpropertyandliabilityinsurance.Thisinsurancemandatehasbeenafeatureofthelegislationsincetheadventofthe
248.Seesupranote3,ss149–162.
249.Seesupranote32(listofCanadianstrata-propertylegislation).
250.SeeServiceAlberta,CondominiumPropertyActReview:ConsultationAnalysisReport(June2013),online:<open.alberta.ca>[perma.cc/874W-JPUE][AlbertaReport].
251.SeeCanada’sPublicPolicyForum,GrowingUp:Ontario’sCondominiumCommunitiesEnteraNewEra:CondominiumActReviewStageTwoSolutionsReport(Ottawa:Canada’sPublicPolicyForum,2013),online:<www.ppforum.ca>[perma.cc/2N5D-7VXN][OntarioStageTwoReport];Cana-da’sPublicPolicyForum,Ontario’sCondominiumActReview:StageOneFindingsReport(Ottawa:Canada’sPublicPolicyForum,2013),online:<www.ppforum.ca>[perma.cc/Q5NV-6MRL][On-tarioStageOneReport].
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
54 British Columbia Law Institute
first-generationactin1966(forpropertyinsurance).252WiththeenactmentoftheStrataPropertyActthemandatewasexpandedtoincludeliabilityinsurance.253Theoverridingquestionforthecommitteeinthispartofthereportiswhethertheman-daterequiresfurtherexpansiontoaddressnewareasofconcernorperilscurrentlynotcoveredbyit.Should the Strata Property Act require strata corporations to obtain directors-and-officers insurance? Brief description of the issue Inthestrata-propertyfield,directors-and-officersinsuranceis“[i]nsurancethatprovidescoverageformembersof[stratacouncils]against‘wrongfulacts,’whichmightincludeactualorallegederrors,omissions,misleadingstatements,andneglectorbreachofdutyonthepartofthe[stratacouncil].”254Commentatorshavestressedtheimportanceofdirectors-and-officersinsurancecoverage.255TheStrataPropertyActpayssomeheedtothispoint,byenablingstratacorporationstopurchasethiscoverage.256EquivalentlegislationinotherpartsofCanadagoesevenfurtherthantheStrataPropertyAct.Fourprovinces’actsmandatedirectors-and-officersinsuranceforstra-tacorporations.257Inviewoftheacknowledgedimportanceofthistypeofcoverage,
252.Seesupranote25,s14(1)(a)(“Thedutiesofthestratacorporationincludethefollowing:(a)to
insureandkeepinsuredthebuildingtothereplacementvaluethereofagainstfireandotherrisksasmaybeprescribedunderthisAct,unlesstheownersbyunanimousorspecialresolutionotherwiseresolve....”).
253.Seesupranote3,s150.Anenablingprovisionspecificallymentioningliabilityinsurancewasapartofthesecond-generationact(seesupranote26,s30(1)(b)).
254.InsuranceBureauofCanada,Glossary(lastvisited8August2018)at16,online(pdf):InsuranceBureauofCanada<assets.ibc.ca/Documents/Resources/Glossary.pdf>[perma.cc/6S76-SY8S].
255.SeeMangan,supranote37at253(“Asapracticalmatter,however,D&Oinsuranceisnecessaryforstratacouncilmembers.”).
256.Seesupranote3,s151.
257.SeeAlberta:CondominiumPropertyAct,supranote32,s47(7)(“Inadditiontoplacingandmaintaininginsuranceundersubsection(1),acorporationshallplaceandmaintaininsuranceagainstthefollowing:(a)anyliabilityincurredbyamemberoftheboardoranofficerofthecorporationarisingoutofanyactionoromissionofthememberorofficerwithrespecttocarry-ingoutthefunctionsanddutiesofamemberorofficerexceptasaresultofafailuretocomplywithsection28(2);(b)anyliabilityincurredbythecorporationarisingoutofanyactionoromissionofamemberoftheboardoranofficerofthecorporationwithrespecttocarryingoutthefunctionsanddutiesofamemberorofficer”);Saskatchewan:TheCondominiumPropertyAct,
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 55
shouldBritishColumbiafollowtheseprovinces’leadandadddirectors-and-officersinsurancetoitslegislativemandate?Discussion of options for reform Theoptionsconsideredforthisissueboileddowntotwo:eitheradddirectors-and-officerscoveragetotheinsurancemandateorretainthestatusquo.Thecasefortreatingdirectors-and-officersinsurancelikepropertyandliabilityin-surancerestsonrecognizingthatittooprovidescoverageforasignificantareaofvulnerabilityforstratacorporations.Theactprovidesthatastratacorporationfunc-tionsthroughitscouncil.258Inthisrole,councilmembersareoftenfacedwithmak-ingdifficultdecisions,whichmustmeettherequisitestandardofcare.259Intheab-senceofdirectors-and-officerscoverage,theindividualswhomakeupthestratacouncilmaybepersonallyonthehookforerrorsandomissions.Iftheylackthere-sourcestocoveranylosses,thenthestratacorporationanditsconstituentowners(thepartiesthataremostlikelytohaveclaimsagainstcouncilmembers)260couldfindthemselvessufferingcostlylosses.
1993,supranote32,s65(9)(a)(iii)–(iv)(“Thecorporationshallobtainandmaintain:(a)insur-anceagainstitsliability...(iii)incurredbyamemberoftheboardoranofficerofthecorpora-tionarisingoutofanyactoromissionofthememberorofficerwithrespecttocarryingoutthefunctionsanddutiesofthememberorofficerunlessitisshownthatthememberorofficeractedinbadfaith;and(iv)incurredbyitarisingoutofanyactoromissionofamemberoftheboardoranofficerofthecorporationwithrespecttocarryingoutthefunctionsanddutiesofthememberorofficer”);Manitoba:TheCondominiumAct,supranote32,s187(2)(“Acondominiumcorporationmustobtainandmaintaininsurancefor(a)anyliabilityincurredbyadirectororof-ficerarisingoutofanyactoromissionbyhimorherwithrespecttocarryingouthisorherfunc-tionsandduties,exceptliabilitythatresultsfromabreachofhisorherdutytoacthonestlyandingoodfaithwithaviewtothebestinterestsofthecorporation;and(b)anyliabilityincurredbythecorporationarisingoutofanyactoromissionofadirectororofficerwithrespecttocarryingouthisorherfunctionsandduties.”);Ontario:CondominiumAct,1998,supranote32,s39(“Iftheinsuranceisreasonablyavailable,acorporationshallpurchaseandmaintaininsuranceforthebenefitofadirectororofficeragainstthemattersdescribedinclauses38(1)(a)and(b)ex-ceptinsuranceagainstaliability,cost,chargeorexpenseofthedirectororofficerincurredasaresultofabreachofthedutytoacthonestlyandingoodfaith.”).
258.Seesupranote3,ss4(“Thepowersanddutiesofthestratacorporationmustbeexercisedandperformedbyacouncil,unlessthisAct,theregulationsorthebylawsprovideotherwise.”),26(“SubjecttothisAct,theregulationsandthebylaws,thecouncilmustexercisethepowersandperformthedutiesofthestratacorporation,includingtheenforcementofbylawsandrules.”).
259.Seeibid,s31(“Inexercisingthepowersandperformingthedutiesofthestratacorporation,eachcouncilmembermust(a)acthonestlyandingoodfaithwithaviewtothebestinterestsofthestratacorporation,and(b)exercisethecare,diligenceandskillofareasonablyprudentper-sonincomparablecircumstances.”).
260.SeeBritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.11.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
56 British Columbia Law Institute
Amandatefordirectors-and-officerscoveragecouldalsohavebenefitsoutsidetheinsurancesphere.Itmighthelpwithrecruitmentofstrata-councilmembers,whomaybereassuredtoknowthatthelegislationrequiresthiscoverage.Thedisadvantagesofthisproposedreformarethatitcouldimposeaddedcostsonstratacorporationsandwouldlimittheirflexibilitytomakedecisionsoninsurancecoverage.Verysmallstratacorporations,inparticular,mightstrugglewithanaddi-tiontotheact’sinsurancemandate.Theseconsiderationscouldgivesupporttothestatusquo.Thecurrentprovisioncouldbeseenasstrikingtherightbalancebyenabling,butnotrequiring,directors-and-officersinsurance.Inthisway,ithelpsbringawarenesstotheissue,withoutbindingstratacorporationstoasinglesolution.The committee’s recommendation for reform Whilethecommitteeunderstoodtheconcernsregardingaddedcostsandrigidity,itdecidedthataddingdirectors-and-officerscoveragetotheinsurancemandatewouldonbalancebenefitthestrata-propertysector.Thecommitteeacceptedtheviewthatalackofthiscoveragecouldleaveastratacorporationanditsstratacouncilvulner-abletosignificantlosses.Inviewofthespecialpositionofverysmallstratacorporations,thecommitteedis-cussedproposinganexemptionthatwouldapplytothem.Whileitmaybepossibletodesignsuchanexemptionthecommitteewasn’tconvincedofthewisdomofthisapproach.Evensmallstratacorporationsmaybeexposedtolossesinthisarea.Theymayalsofinditmoredifficulttorecoverfromaloss.Thecommitteealsounderstandsthedirectors-and-officersinsuranceisrelativelyinexpensive,whichlimitstheconcernsaboutitsongoingcosttostratacorporations.Inaddition,thecommitteeunderstandsthat,underthecurrentlegislation,thevastmajorityofstratacorporationshaveoptedtohavedirectors-and-officerscoverage.Inthecommittee’sview,it’sworthwhiletohavethelegislationclosetheremaininggap.Thefactthatthemajorityofstratacorporationsshouldnotnoticeadifferencefromachangeinthelawwasseenasabenefitforthisproposal,asitwouldlimitanypotentialdisruptionflowingfromreform.Finally,itshouldbenotedthebulkofrespondentsinthepublicconsultationfa-vouredamendingtheacttorequirestratacorporationstoobtaindirectors-and-officersinsurance.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 57
Thecommitteerecommends:1.TheStrataPropertyActshouldrequireastratacorporationtoobtaindirectors-and-officersinsurance.What amount of coverage should a strata corporation be required to obtain for its mandated directors-and-officers insurance? Brief description of the issue Thisissueflowsfromthepreviousone.HavingdecidedthattheStrataPropertyAct’sinsurancemandateshouldincludedirectors-and-officersinsurance,thecommitteerealizedthatalogicalfollow-upquestionwouldinvolveitsviewsontheamountofthatcoverage.Discussion of options for reform Proposalsinresponsetothisissuecouldbelimitless.Theissuecallsforcommitmenttoaspecificnumber.Thenumbershouldprovidereasonableguidancetostratacor-porationsonthelevelofcoverageneeded.Itshouldbeinanareainwhichadequatecoverageisavailablebutovercoverageisavoided.The committee’s recommendation for reform Inthecommittee’sview,thenumberthatwouldmeetthesecriteriais$2000000.Thisnumbermatchestheminimumamountofliabilitycoveragethatastratacorpo-rationmustobtain.261Whilethisproposalwassupportedbythemajorityofre-spondentsintheconsultation,itshouldbenotedthataminorityfavouredeitherhavingtheregulationsetoutalowerminimumamountofrequiredcoverageorhav-ingtheregulationbesilentonthisissue(effectivelyleavingtheamountofcoveragetoastratacorporation’sdiscretion).Thecommitteerecommends:2.Forthepurposesofsection151oftheStrataPropertyAct,thestratacorporationmustobtainandmaintaindirectors-and-officersinsuranceforaminimumamountof$2000000.
261.SeeStrataPropertyRegulation,supranote4s9.2.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
58 British Columbia Law Institute
Should the definition of “major perils” in the Strata Property Regulation be amended to include earthquakes? Brief description of the issue Thelegislativemandatetoinsurepropertyrequiresastratacorporationto“insureagainstmajorperils,assetoutintheregulations.”262Theregulationscontainalistofperilsthatmakeupitsdefinitionofmajorperils.263Thelistislong,butitisn’tcom-prehensive.Asonecommentatorhasnoted,“[e]arthquakecoverageisprobablythemostnotableomissionfromthelistofmajorperilsmandatedbytheAct.”264SinceearthquakesposearealthreattopropertyinmuchofBritishColumbia,shouldthelistofmajorperilsthatastratacorporationmustinsureagainstbeexpandedtoincludeearthquakes?Discussion of options for reform Thisissueposesayes-or-noquestionsimilartothatattheheartofthepreviousis-suerelatingtodirectors-and-officerscoverage.Therationaleforbringingearth-quakeswithinthemandateisthattheyrepresentanareaofsignificantvulnerabilityforstrataproperties.Further,stratacorporationsmightnotalwaysappreciatetherisksposedbyearthquakes.DiscussionsofearthquakesinBritishColumbiatendtorevolvearoundtheloomingdangerofagenerationalcatastrophicevent.Whilesuchanearthquakewouldbedevastating(andmaybeinevitable),it’salsoworthnotingthatBritishColumbiaisregularlysubjecttosmaller-scaleearthquakes.Thedamagecreatedbytheseearth-quakesmayescapepublicnoticebecauseitisn’twidespread.Thatsaid,arelativelysmallearthquakecouldeasilycausesignificantdamagetoanystratapropertiesun-luckyenoughtobelocatednearitsepicenter.Thedownsidesofmandatingearthquakecoveragearetheaddedcostsandreducedflexibilitysuchrequirementsimposeonstratacorporations.Earthquakeinsurancemaybeanexpensiveadditionalcostforstratacorporationswithhighdeductiblevalues.Dependingontheirlocation,geology,proximitytowaterandslope-failure
262.StrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s149(4)(b).
263.Seesupranote4,s9.1(2)(“theperilsoffire,lightning,smoke,windstorm,hail,explosion,waterescape,strikes,riotsorcivilcommotion,impactbyaircraftandvehicles,vandalismandmali-ciousacts”).
264.Baker,supranote150at2.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 59
risks,andtypeofconstruction,andthecomplexexclusionscontainedwithinpoli-cies,theviewofthecommitteeiseachstratacorporationshouldintheirowninter-estassessthecost,risk,andtheexclusionstodetermineiftheyshouldpurchaseearthquakecoverage.Thethreatposedbyearthquakesisn’tdistributedevenlyacrossBritishColumbia.Whilecoastalareas(forexample)areatsignificantrisk,otherpartsoftheprovincearen’tsodangerouslyexposed.Stratacorporationsintheseareasmightresentbeingrequiredtopurchasecoverageforarisktheycouldrightlyperceiveasminimal.Finally,requiringearthquakecoveragewouldtakethedecisionoutofstratacorpo-rations’hands.Manystratacorporationsalreadyhaveearthquakecoverage.Anar-gumentcouldbemadethatstratacorporationsarebetterplacedthanlegislatorstodecideonthisfacetofinsurance.The committee’s recommendation for reform Thecommitteewrestledwiththisissue,notingthattherearegoodargumentsonbothsidesofit,informulatingitstentativerecommendationfortheconsultationpa-per.Thattentativerecommendationendedupbeingtheonlytentativerecommen-dationintheconsultationpaperthatfailedtoattractthesupportofamajorityofre-spondents.Inlightofthisconsultationresult,thecommitteetookacarefulsecondlookatthisissueasitdraftedthisreport.Thecommitteenotedthatasignificantminorityofconsultationrespondents(in-cludingrespondentsrepresentinglegalandinsuranceprofessionals)agreedwithitstentativerecommendation.But,thatsaid,amajoritydisagreed,oftencitingthecata-strophicresultsthatwouldaccruetoastratacorporationlackingthiscoverageintheaftermathofamajorearthquake.Thecommitteegavethispointfurtherconsiderationandrevisiteditsreasonsforini-tiallyproposingnottoextendthedefinitionofmajorperilstocoverearthquakes.Thosereasons,inbrief,weretheunequalgeographicdistributionofriskfromearth-quakesandtheviewthatthosestratacorporationsthatwereatriskhadalreadytakenstepstoprotectthemselves.Inthecommittee’sview,thesereasonscontinuedtoswaytheminfavourofnotextendingthedefinitionofmajorperils.Thecommitteecontinuedtobeconcernedaboutmandatinginsurancecoverageinareasthatareatalowriskofhavinganearthquake.Whileonpaperitmightbepos-sibletohavethemandateapplyonlyincertainpartsoftheprovince,thissolutionstruckthecommitteeascomplexandunappealing.Inthemain,strata-propertylawinBritishColumbiaappliesconsistentlytoallstratacorporations.Thecommittee
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
60 British Columbia Law Institute
didn’tfavourmovingawayfromthatprincipletoaccommodateanexpansionoftheinsurancemandate.Inaddition,thecommitteenotedthatthevastmajorityofstratacorporationsinearthquakezonesalreadyhaveearthquakecoverage.Extendingthemandateinthiscasewouldn’tbeanalogoustoextendingitinthepreviousissue,whichconcerneddirectors-and-officersinsurance.Inthatcase,aplausibleargumentcouldbemadethattheholdoutsfromobtainingthiscoveragehavefailedtograsptherisksofman-agingastratacorporationinanincreasinglycomplexlegalenvironment.Stratacor-porationsthatdon’thaveearthquakeinsurance,ontheotherhand,aremorelikelytobelocatedinregionsoftheprovincethatrarelyseeearthquakes.Or,iftheyarelocatedinearthquakezones,somecombinationoftheirorganizationandtheinsur-anceproductsonofferhasstayedtheirhand.Anexampleofthisphenomenonisabare-landstratathatisfacedwithaninsuranceproductthatcontainscomplexex-clusions.Thecommitteewasreluctanttocreatealegislativemandatethatwouldon-ly,ineffect,respondtothesekindsofcases.Intheend,thecommitteeconcludedthatthedecisiontoobtainearthquakecoverageshouldcontinuetorestwithstratacorporations.Asnotedearlier,manystratacoun-cilsalreadydoobtainthiscoverage.Thecommitteealsonotedthatthereareave-nuesfortheownershiptodirectacounciltoobtainsuchcoverage.265Thecommitteerecommends:3.Thedefinitionof“majorperils”intheStrataPropertyRegulationshouldnotbeamendedtoincludeearthquakes.Should the definition of “major perils” in the Strata Property Regulation be amended to include overland flooding? Brief description of the issue Justasearthquakesareonesignificantperilnotcurrentlyincludedintheregula-tion’sdefinitionofmajorperils,sooverlandfloodingisaperilthatalsofindsitself
265.SeeStrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s27(1)(“Thestratacorporationmaydirectorrestrictthe
councilinitsexerciseofpowersandperformanceofdutiesbyaresolutionpassedbyamajorityvoteatanannualorspecialgeneralmeeting.”).Notealsothatastratacorporationthathadamendeditsbylawstolistearthquakesasaperiltobeinsuredagainstwouldalsohavetoobtainearthquakecoverage(seeibid,s149(4)(b)).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 61
outsidethisdefinition.266Shouldthedefinitionbeexpandedtoincludeoverlandflooding?Discussion of options for reform Theoptionsforthisissuearesimilartothosediscussedintheprecedingissue.Likeearthquakes,floodsarecauseforconcerninmanypartsofBritishColumbia.Theycanbedevastatingtoproperty.Sothisisanotherareaofvulnerabilityformanystrataproperties,whichmaycallforextensionofmandatorycoverage.Butthedownsidesofrequiringcoverageisthatitwillcomewithcostsanditwillbindstratacorporationsacrosstheprovince.Stratacorporationsthatperceivethemselvesnottobeatriskforfloodingcouldresenthavingtopayforcoverage.The committee’s recommendation for reform Thecommittee’sconsiderationofthisissuetookonmanyofthepointsconsideredpreviouslyinrelationtoearthquakecoverage.Similartothecommittee’sdecisiononearthquakecoverage,thecommitteedecidedthatcoverageforoverlandfloodingshouldn’tberequired.Inthecommittee’sview,thereistoomuchvariationintheexposureofstratacorporationstoflooddamagetomakeitpartofthelegislativemandate.Further,thosestratacorporationsthataremostatriskappeartobelarge-lydecidingtoacquirethiscoverage.Asmallmajorityofconsultationrespondentsbackedthecommittee’sproposalonthisissue.Butasizableminorityfavouredaddingoverlandfloodingtothedefinitionofmajorperils.Thecommitteerecommends:
4.Thedefinitionof“majorperils”intheStrataPropertyRegulationshouldnotbeamendedtoincludeoverlandflooding.
Issues for Reform—Insurance Deductibles Introduction Inanutshell,theStrataPropertyActmakestwopointsaboutinsurancedeductibles:(1)aninsurancedeductible“isacommonexpensetobecontributedtobymeansof
266.Seesupranote4,s9.1(2).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
62 British Columbia Law Institute
stratafees”;and(2)nothingaboutthischaracterizationasacommonexpense“lim-it[s]thecapacityofthestratacorporationtosueanownerinordertorecoverthedeductibleportionofaninsuranceclaimiftheownerisresponsibleforthelossordamagethatgaverisetotheclaim.”267Althoughthelegislationdoesn’tmentionstra-ta-corporationbylaws,anunstatedthirdpointthatshouldbeborneinmindisthatmanystratacorporationshaveadoptedindemnitybylaws.Thesebylawspurporttoassignliabilityforaninsurancedeductibletoaresponsibleowner.Inmanycases,thelanguageofsuchbylawsuseswordsotherthanresponsibility.Forexample,manyrefertoanegligentowner.Thiswordingsetsadifferentstandardforliabilitythanthatfoundinthestatute,whichwillgoverninanystratacorporationwithsuchaby-law.268Thebulkofthecaselawdealingwithstratapropertiesandinsuranceinvolvesap-plyingthissection.269Claimsrelatingtotherecoveryofaninsurancedeductiblefromastrata-lotownerhavealsoappearedrepeatedlyindecisionsoftheCivilReso-lutionTribunal.270Inaddition,somecommentatorshaveharshlycriticizedthesec-tionanditsinterpretationbythecourtsandapplicationbystratacorporations,withonecallingtheprovision“oneofthemostmisunderstoodsectionsoftheStrataPropertyAct.”271
267.Supranote3,s158.Seealso,above,at45–48(generaldiscussionofinsurancedeductiblesfor
strataproperties).
268.See,above,at46–47.ButseeNacht,supranote117(allowingappealfromCivilResolutionTri-bunalonquestionsoflawconcerningeffectofindemnitybylawsandprecedentialvalueofMor-rison,supranote229).
269.SeeMari,supranote225;Jauhar,supranote225;Keiran,supranote225;Comissiona,supranote222;Morrison,supranote229.
270.SeeCrichtonvTheOwners,StrataPlanKAS431,2017BCCRT33;TheOwners,StrataPlanVR194vMacKinnon,2017BCCRT46;ZhangvTheOwners,StrataPlanBCS1039,2017BCCRT56;ClarkvTheOwners,StrataPlanLMS3938,2017BCCRT62;Daviesv.TheOwners,StrataPlan755,2017BCCRT71;TheOwners,StrataPlanVIS6634vBrown,2017BCCRT86;TheOwners,StrataPlanBCS1589vNacht,2017BCCRT88;GauthiervTheOwners,StrataPlanLMS2768,2018BCCRT6;KeithvTheOwners,StrataPlanK284,2018BCCRT49;TheOwners,StrataPlanNWS3429vOughton,2018BCCRT62;TheOwners,StrataPlanKAS1357vAmos,2018BCCRT105;TheOwn-ers,StrataPlanBCS354vLiang,2018BCCRT171;BowlesvTheOwners,StrataPlanNW227,2018BCCRT484;GrahamvTheOwners,StrataPlanK852,2018BCCRT619;TaylorvTheOwn-ers,StrataPlan1801,2018BCCRT925atparas134–141;RuanvTheOwners,StrataPlanBCS1964,2019BCCRT128.
271.Fanaken,supranote71at124.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 63
ThereissimilarlegislationinforceinmostoftheprovincesandterritoriesofCana-da.272InAlbertaandOntario,thislegislationhasattractedtheattentionoflawre-formers.273Commentatorshavenotedthatamajorfactualcauseofthelitigationoverinsurancedeductibleshasbeenrisingdeductibles,especiallyforclaimsinvolv-ingwaterdamage.274Inframingitsownrecommendations,thecommitteeboreinmindtheexperienceoftheseotherjurisdictionsinwrestlingwithconcernsaboutdisputesoverinsurancedeductibles.Note on governance issues for stratas Readersshouldnotethatthereissomeoverlapbetweenthisreportandthecommit-tee’searlierConsultationPaperonGovernanceIssuesforStratasonthesubjectofin-surancedeductibles.Inthatearlierconsultationpaper,thecommitteeaskedforpub-liccommentonaseriesoftentativerecommendationsinvolvingexpandingthescopeofthestratacorporation’slien.275Thispubliccommenthasledthecommitteetoreexamineoneofitstentativerecommendations.Thetentativerecommendationatissueconcernedextendingthestratacorporation’slientoapplyincasesinwhichanamounthasbeenfoundbyacourt,anarbitrator,ortheCivilResolutionTribunaltobeowingtothestratacorporationwithrespecttoaninsurancedeductible.276Eventhoughthistentativerecommendationwassetoutin272.SeeAlberta:CondominiumPropertyAmendmentAct,2014,supranote32,s55(amendingsec-
tion81oftheCondominiumPropertyAct,supranote32,byrepealingpara(h)andsubstitutingnewpara(h),whichwillenableregulationsaddressinginsurance-deductibleissues),proposedamendmentstoCondominiumPropertyRegulation,supranote32(addingnewsection62.4—inforce1January2020);Saskatchewan:TheCondominiumPropertyAct,1993,supranote32,ss65(5)–(7);Manitoba:TheCondominiumAct,supranote32,s193(1)–(2);Ontario:Condomin-iumAct,1998,supranote32,s105(asamendedbyProtectingCondominiumOwnersAct,2015,supranote32,s91);NovaScotia:CondominiumAct,supranote32,s35(9);NewfoundlandandLabrador:CondominiumAct,2009,supranote32,s58;NorthwestTerritoriesandNunavut:Con-dominiumAct,supranote32,s22(1.2)–(1.4).
273.SeeAlbertaReport,supranote250at35–44;OntarioStageTwoReport,supranote251at24–25,27;OntarioStageOneReport,supranote251at28.
274.SeeGStephenHamilton,“Insurance2013,”inContinuingLegalEducationSocietyofBritishCo-lumbia,ed,StrataProperty—2013Update:MaterialspreparedfortheContinuingLegalEducationseminar,StrataProperty2013Update,heldinVancouver,B.C.,onApril18,2013(Vancouver:Con-tinuingLegalEducationSocietyofBritishColumbia,2013)1.1at1.1.5;Fanaken,supranote71at122.
275.Seesupranote17at49–54.SeealsoStrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s116.
276.Seesupranote17at54(tentativerecommendationno.(31):“TheStrataPropertyActshouldnotenableastratacorporationtoregisteralienonanowner’sstratalotforamountsowingwithre-specttoachargebackforaninsurancedeductibleorexpensesincurredduetodamagewhich
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
64 British Columbia Law Institute
negativeterms(proposingnottoextendthelien),publiccommentonityieldedstrongsupportforachangeinthelaw.Inviewofthisstrongsupportforreform,thecommitteegaveseriousconsiderationtorevisingitspositionontheissue.Reflectiononthispubliccommentandonitsowndiscussionsregardinginsuranceissuesledthecommitteetoafinalrecommendationthatendorsesanextensionofthelien:“TheStrataPropertyActshouldenableastratacorporationtoregisteralienonanowner’sstratalotforamountsowingwithrespecttoachargebackforaninsurancedeductibleorexpensesincurredduetodamagewhicharelessthananinsurancedeductible,ifthechargebackhasbeenfoundvalidbyacourt,anarbitrator,ortheCivilResolutionTribunal.”277Theissuesdiscussedbelowshouldbereadinlightofthisrecommendation.Should the Strata Property Act expressly assign responsibility for an insurance deductible to a responsible owner? Brief description of the issue TheStrataPropertyAct’sprovisionsoninsurancedeductibleshavecreateduncer-taintyandlitigation.Inpart,thisisthenaturalresultofasystemthatappears(1)torelyinlargepartonathird-partydecision-makertoestablishliability(bycallingonastratacorporationto“sueanowner”toestablishliability)and(2)toimplicitlyin-vitestratacorporationstovarythestandardatwhichliabilitywillbeimposedbyamendingtheirbylaws.278SimilarissueswereatplayinOntario’sprojectonreformingitsstrata-propertylaw.AfternotingconcernsthatOntario’sactwas“unclearaboutwhopaysthecorpora-tion’sdeductibleforthedamagedproperty,”itwasrecommendedthat“[t]heActshouldprovidethatanownerisresponsibleforrepaircostsorthedeductibleunderthecorporation’sinsurancepolicy,whicheverislower,asaresultofdamagetooth-erunitsorthecommonelementscausedbyanactoromissionbytheunit’sownerorresident.”279ShouldBritishColumbiaadoptasimilarapproachasawaytodispeluncertaintyandpotentiallyreducelitigationoverinsurancedeductibles?
arelessthananinsurancedeductible,evenifthechargebackhasbeenfoundvalidbyacourtortheCivilResolutionTribunal.”).
277.SeeReportonGovernanceIssuesforStratas,supranote18at59.
278.SeeStrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s158(1)–(2).
279.OntarioStageTwoReport,supranote251at27.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 65
Discussion of options for reform TheadvantagesofadoptingaproposalliketheonediscussedinOntariowerehintedatintheframingofthisissue.Themainvirtueoftheproposalisthatitwouldlend“greaterclarity”tothelaw.280Thespacethatthecurrentlawhasseeminglyprovid-edforstrata-corporationbylawstooccupyhascreatedmuchofthepresentuncer-tainty.Thatspacewouldeffectivelybeclosedoff,asanexpresslegislativeassign-mentofresponsibilitywouldeliminatetherationaleforthesebylaws.Thiswouldbringameasureofcertaintyandconsistencytothelaw.Itwouldalsolikelyhavetheeffectofcuttingdownonlitigationoverinsurancede-ductibles.Litigationtendstothriveonuncertainty.And,inthiscase,theneedforlit-igationisgivenaboostbytheexpressreferenceinthecurrentprovisiontosuingaresponsibleowner.Doingawaywiththatreferenceandsettingoutalegislativestandardforliabilityshouldsignificantlyreducetheincentivetolitigateissuescon-cerninginsurancedeductibles.Finally,it’sworthnotingthatversionsofthisproposalhavebeenadoptedinotherjurisdictions.InadditiontoOntario,281Saskatchewan282andManitoba283havelegis-280.Ibid.
281.SeeCondominiumAct,1998,supranote32,s105(3)(“ifanowner,alesseeofanowner,apersonresidingintheowner’sunitwiththepermissionorknowledgeoftheowner,oranyotherpersonorthingthatisprescribed,throughanactoromissioncausesdamagetoaunit,thecommonel-ementsortheassets,ifany,ofthecorporation,subjecttosubsection(3),andifthecorporationhasobtainedandmaintainedcoverageforthedamageunderaninsurancepolicy,theamountthatisthelesserofthecostofrepairingthedamageandthedeductiblelimitoftheinsurancepolicyshallbeaddedtothecontributiontothecommonexpensespayablefortheowner’sunit”).
282.SeeTheCondominiumPropertyAct,1993,supranote32,s65(“(5)Subjecttosubsection(6),ifaninsurancepolicyobtainedbythecorporationinaccordancewiththissectioncontainsadeducti-bleclausethatlimitstheamountpayablebytheinsurer,theportionofalossthatisexcludedfromcoverageisacommonexpense.(6)Iftheownerofaunit,orapersonresidingintheown-er’sunitwiththepermissionorknowledgeoftheowner,throughanactoromissioncausesdamagetoaunit,theamountdeterminedpursuanttosubsection(7)maybeaddedtothecom-monexpensespayablebytheownerofthatunit.(7)Forthepurposesofsubsection(6),theamountisthelesserof:(a)thecostofrepairingthedamagetotheunit;and(b)thedeductiblelimitoftheinsurancepolicyobtainedbythecorporation.”).
283.SeeTheCondominiumAct,supranote32,s193(“(1)Subjecttosubsection(2),ifaninsurancepolicyobtainedormaintainedbyacondominiumcorporationcontainsadeductibleclausethatlimitstheamountpayablebytheinsurer,theportionofalossthatisexcludedfromcoverageisacommonexpense.(2)If(a)damagetoaunitorthecommonelementsresultsfromanactoromissionofaunitownerorby(i)atenantorotheroccupantofhisorherunit,or(ii)apersonpermittedtobeonthepropertybytheunitownerorbyatenantorotheroccupantofhisorher
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
66 British Columbia Law Institute
lationonthispoint.Albertahasrecentlyannouncedthatitplanstoimplementthisproposalinthenearfuture.284Apotentialdownsideofthisproposalistheeffectitcouldhaveonsomeowners.It’sclearthatmanystratacorporationsinBritishColumbiahavepropertyinsurancewithsomeveryhighdeductibles,particularlyforwaterdamage.Thesedeductiblesmaybetheresultofclaimshistory,marketconditions,orsimplytherealitiesofliv-inginalarge,high-risebuilding.Aresponsibleownerwhoendsuponthehookforsuchadeductiblecouldbefacedwithacripplingdebt,onethatisoutofproportionwithwhatatypicalhomeownerinasingle-familyhomewouldeverhavetoface.Anargumentcouldbemadethatsuchstrata-lotownersarebeingconfrontedwithsomethingthatgoesbeyondtheacknowledgedpurposesofaninsurancedeductible,whichareusuallyseenasdevicestoweedoutsmall-valuenuisanceclaimsandtocrackdownonthepotentialforfraud.285
unit;and(b)theunitownerhasthedutyundersection182torepairafterdamage;thecostofrepairingthedamage,totheextentofthedeductiblelimitunderthecondominiumcorporation’sinsurancepolicy,maybeaddedtothecommonexpensespayableinrespectoftheowner’sunit.”).
284.SeeCondominiumPropertyAmendmentAct,2014,supranote32,s55(amendingsection81oftheCondominiumPropertyAct,supranote32,byrepealingpara(h)andsubstitutingnewpa-ra(h),whichwillenableregulationsaddressinginsurance-deductibleissues—notinforce).InDecember2018,theGovernmentofAlbertaannouncedthatitplannedtoadopttheenablingregulationsreferredtointhissectionbyamendingtheCondominiumPropertyRegulation,supranote32,toaddthefollowingasnewsection62.4:“(1)Acorporationmaypayaninsurancede-ductibleinaninsuranceclaimandrecovertheamountofthedeductiblefromanownersubjecttoandinaccordancewiththissection.(2)Subjecttosubsections(3)and(4),anowner,onre-questbythecorporation,isabsolutelyliabletothecorporationfortheamountofthedeductibleinthecorporation’sinsuranceclaimtoamaximumof$50000fordamagethatoriginatesinorfromtheowner’sunitoranexclusivepossessionareaassignedtotheowner.(3)Anownerisnotliabletoacorporationfortheamountofthedeductibleinthecorporation’sinsuranceclaimwheretheclaimarosefrom(a)adefectintheconstructionoftheunitorexclusivepossessionareaassignedtotheowner,(b)damageattributabletoanactoromissionofthecorporation,amemberoftheboard,officer,employeeoragentofthecorporation,oranycombinationofthem,or(c)normalstructuraldeteriorationofthecommonproperty,themanagedpropertyorthere-alpropertyofthecorporation,otherthanpropertythattheownerwasresponsibletorepairormaintain.(4)Nothinginthissectionshallbeconstruedinamannertoaffectacivilactionorotherremedyatlawofanowneragainstapersonwhoisresponsiblefordamagetoproperty.”Theseprovisionsareslatedtocomeintoforceon1January2020.
285.Butnotethattherehavebeenremarksinthecaselawandcommentaryspeculatingthatastratacorporationthatplacesinsurancewithahighdeductiblecouldbevulnerabletotheargumentthatithasfailedtocomplywiththelegislativerequirementtoobtaininsurance.SeeStevens,su-pranote135at454(“Wewouldaddthatifthedeductiblewasexcessive,itcouldbearguedthatthecorporationhadfailedinitsdutytoobtaininsurance.”);BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.24(“[A]failurebythestratacorporationtoobtainthe
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 67
Anotherdisadvantagecouldflowfromwhatmighttypicallybeseenasoneofthestrengthsoftheproposal.Oneoftheproposal’sgoalsistocutdownonneedlessliti-gationbyprovidingaclearlegislativeallocationofresponsibilityforthedeductible.Insomecases,though,thisauthorizationcouldencouragestratacorporationstooverreach,leavingownersvulnerabletoclaimsofquestionablemerit.Thiscouldleadtomorelitigation,whichwouldbeparticularlyfrustratingfromtheowner’spointofview.Finally,theproposalwouldlimitstratacorporations’flexibility.Thecurrentlawap-pearstoallowstratacorporationssomelatitudeindealingwithinsurancededucti-blesbyamendingtheirbylaws.Thislatitudemaybeusedinsomecasestotailorprovisionsthatconformtoastratacorporation’suniquefeatures.Thisflexibilityhasbeenlaudedinatleastonecourtcase.286The committee’s recommendation for reform Inthecommittee’sview,goodpointsmaybemadeonbothsidesofthisissue.Onbalance,thecommitteefavouredtheproposaltoamendtheactandexpresslyassignresponsibilityforaninsurancedeductibletoaresponsibleowner.Thecurrentlawappearstogivestratacorporationssomeflexibilityinmanagingthisissue,butun-fortunatelythatflexibilityhasbroughtwithituncertaintyandconflict.Adoptingaconsistentstandardinlegislationshoulddispelthatuncertaintyandcutdownontheamountoflitigationoverinsurancedeductibles.Alargemajorityofconsultationrespondentsagreedwiththecommittee’sproposalonthisissue.Thecommitteerecommends:5.Section158oftheStrataPropertyActshouldbeamendedtoallowastratacorpora-tiontodecidetochargebacktoanowner,iftheownerisresponsibleforthelossordamagethatgaverisetotheclaim,thelesserofthefollowingamounts:(a)thecostofrepairingthelossordamage;(b)thedeductiblelimitoftheinsuranceclaim.
lowestpossibledeductibleinthecircumstancesmayprovideadefencetoanownerwherethestratacorporationisseekingtoclaimthedeductibleamountagainstanowner.”).
286.SeeStevens,supranote135at454(“Whiletheeffectoftheresultwereachistoopenthepossi-bilitythatclaimswillbemadeasbetweenownersforthedeductible,acondominiummayavoidthatresultifitwishestodosobymakingappropriateprovisioninitsdeclaration,by-lawsorrules.Itseemstouspreferabletoleavethequestionofliabilityfordeductibletobedeterminedinthiswaysothatcondominiumownersareabletodesignaschemeappropriatetotheirpar-ticularneeds.”).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
68 British Columbia Law Institute
Should the Strata Property Act require strata-lot owners to have insurance that covers payment of a deductible under a strata-corporation policy? Brief description of the issue Therearerealconcernsthatrisinginsurancedeductiblescouldharmstrata-lotowners.Thispotentialforharmmightevenbeexacerbatedbythepreviousrecom-mendation.Oneresponsetothisharmmightbetoencouragewhatmanystrata-lotownershavealreadydone:takeouttheirowninsuranceagainsttheprospectofhav-ingtopaythestratacorporation’sdeductible.AproposalforlegislationtoimplementthisrequirementwasconsideredrecentlyinAlberta.Aspartofitslaw-reformproject,ServiceAlbertaasked“[s]houldtheActre-quireunitownerstogetcondominiumunitowners’insurancethatalsocoversthepaymentofanydeductibletheownermayberequiredtopayonaclaimmadeunderthecorporation’sinsurancepolicy?”287Discussion of options for reform Themainadvantagetothisproposedreformisthatitprovidesapracticalmeanstosupportthebroaderreformsthatthecommitteeiscontemplatingforinsurancede-ductiblesinstrataproperties.Thosereformscouldbeseverelyundercutiftheyweretodepend,inthefaceofrisingdeductibles,onstrata-lotownerspayingoutoftheirownpockets.Insuranceforownersisaneffectivewaytohelpensurethatthesystemworksforall.Inaddition,requiringownerstoobtainthisinsurancelikelywouldn’tbearadicaldeparturefromthecurrentsituation.Manyownersalreadyhavesuchinsurance,ei-therbecausetheyhavedecidedindependentlytoobtainitorbecauseitisoneoftheconditionsimposedthroughamortgage.
287.Supranote250at43–44.InDecember2018,theGovernmentofAlbertaannouncedthatit
plannedtoimplementtheproposalbyamendingtheCondominiumPropertyRegulation,supranote32,toaddthefollowingasnewsection60.2:“Acorporationmay,bybylaw,(a)requireownerstopurchaseinsurancewithrespecttodeductiblesthatmaybepayabletoacorporationundersection62.4inrespectofacorporation’sinsurancepolicy,(b)specifytheparticularsofinsurancetobepurchasedforthepurposesofclause(a),and(c)specifytheproofanownermustprovidetothecorporationrespectingtheinsurancepurchased.”(Inforce1January2020.)
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 69
Themaindownsideofthisproposalisthatitcouldprovetobedifficulttoenforce.Itwouldlikelybeachallengeforastratacorporationtoknowwhetherornotanown-erhadsuchinsurance.Butevenifitdid,theremayberelativelyfeweffectivemeanstocompelanownertocarryinsuranceagainstadeductibleclaim.Butwithoutanef-fectiveenforcementmechanism,anylegislativeprovisioncouldendupbeingnoth-ingmorethanapapertiger.Theproposalwouldalsohavetheeffectofimposingsomecostsonstrata-lotownersandlimitingsomeoftheirfreedomtoact.Strata-lotownerswholiveinstrataprop-ertieswithrelativelysmallinsurancedeductiblesmightresentthismandateforthesereasons.The committee’s recommendation for reform Thecommitteedecidedthatmandatingthisinsurancecoverageforownerswouldbeausefulwaytoshoreupitsbroaderreformsforinsurancedeductiblesandtopro-videneededprotectionforstrata-lotownersandstratacorporationsalike.Thecommitteewasconcernedabouttheproblemofenforcingsucharequirement.Initsview,thebestwaytoensurecomplianceistomaketherequirementapartofthestandardbylawsforstratacorporations.Thisapproachmightalsoaddresssomeoftheconcernsabouttherigidityofrequiringownerstopurchaseinsurance,asitleavesopentheprospectthatastratacorporationmightdecidetoamenditsbylawsandremovetherequirement.Whileasizablemajorityofconsultationrespondentsagreedwiththecommittee,asignificantminorityofrespondentstookissuewiththecommittee’sproposedre-form.Thecommitteerecommends:6.AnewstandardbylawshouldbeaddedtotheScheduleofStandardBylawsthatre-quiresastrata-lotownertohaveinsurancethatcoverspaymentofadeductibleunderastrata-corporationpolicy.
Issues for Reform—Named Insureds TheStrataPropertyActliststhepeoplewhoareconsideredtobenamedinsuredsinastratacorporation’sinsurancepolicy.Theprimarypurposeoftheprovisioncon-tainingthislististoextendprotectiontothestratacorporation,strata-lotowners,
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
70 British Columbia Law Institute
tenants,andoccupantsofastratalot(thelistednamedinsureds)frombeingsuedbyaninsurerhavingasubrogatedclaim.288Thisprovision(section155oftheact)wasflaggedforconsiderationinphaseoneofthisproject.289Atthattime,itwasnotedthatthesupremecourt’srecentdecisionintheEconomicalMutualcase290hadcausedsomepublicanxietyandconcern.Asabriefdiscussionofthecasereveals,thisanxietydidn’trelatetotheprovision’smainpurpose(articulatingtheno-subrogationrule)butratherrelatedtoasubsidiaryis-sue:thescopeofinsurancecoverageaffordedtoanamedinsured.EconomicalMutualinvolvedalawsuitfordamagescommencedby“threeinfantplaintiffs”againsttheownerofastratalot“who[was]allegedtobeliablefornegli-genceasasocialhost.”291Theplaintiffswereinjuredinamotor-vehicleaccident,whichoccurredafteraguestatapartyheldattheowner’sstratalotleftthepartyand“allegedlycausedamotorvehicleaccidentwhenhisvehiclecollidedwithavehi-cle”inwhichtheplaintiffsweretravelling.292Thelawsuitallegedthattheownerwas“negligentbecausehefailedtosupervisetheamountofalcohol[thedriver]wasservedandconsumedatthegathering,andhefailedtotakestepstoensurethatup-onleavingthegathering[thedriver]wouldnotoperateamotorvehicle.”293Theownerwasinsured“underahomeowner’spolicyissuedbyEconomical.”294Inthisapplication,Economicalaskedfor“adeclarationthat[Aviva,thestratacorpora-tion’sinsurer]isobligedtoparticipateinthedefenceofclaims.”295ThecourtdeniedEconomical’sapplication.Asacommentatornoted,“theunderlyingstratacorporationpolicy(whichwastypicalofmanystratacorporationpolicyword-ings)providedforliabilitycoveragepursuanttoacommercialgeneralliabilitypolicy
288.Seesupranote3,s155.Seealso,above,at41–43(furtherdiscussionofsection155andtheno-
subrogationrule).
289.Seesupranote11at25.
290.EconomicalMutualInsuranceCovAvivaInsuranceCoofCanada,2010BCSC783[EconomicalMu-tual].
291.Ibidatpara1,PitfieldJ.
292.Ibidatpara2.
293.Ibidatpara3.
294.Ibidatpara4.
295.Ibidatpara1.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 71
writtenfor‘forprofit’corporations.”296Byitsterms,thispolicyprovidedcoverageasfollows:“[i]fyouaredesignatedintheDeclarationsas:a.Anindividual,youandyourspouseareinsureds,butonlywithrespecttotheconductofabusinessofwhichyouarethesoleowner.”297Thishighlightedclauseprovedtobecriticaltotheout-comeofthecase.Itsetthelimitsofcoverageundertheinsurancepolicyand,asthecourtconcluded,nothinginsection155anditslistofnamedinsuredscouldbereadasremovingthepolicy’scondition,expandingthelimitsthatthisconditionplacedoninsurancecoverage,andrequiringcoverageoftheownerasanamedinsuredfullstop.298EventhoughtheresultinEconomicalMutualcanbeseenasjustified,thereasoningthatbroughtthecourttothatresultandthefactsofthecaseappeartohavecausedsomeanxietyinthestratasector.Thisanxietyseemstoplayintoafearthatpartici-pantsinthestratasectormaybeunderinsured.Should section 155 of the Strata Property Act be amended? Brief description of the issue InviewoftheseconcernsstirredupbytheEconomicalMutualcase,shouldsec-tion155beamended?Discussion of options for reform Thisissuediffersfrommostoftheotherissuesconsideredinthisreport.Itleadstoamuchmorediffuseandopen-endedinquiry.EconomicalMutual—andparticularlythereactiontoit—couldbeseenascreatingadiscussionontheneedtoclarifysection155.Amendmentsaddingmoredetailtothelawcouldmakeitmorecertain.Greatercertaintyanddetailmighthelpstratacorpo-rationsinfindingappropriateinsuranceproducts.296.BritishColumbiaStrataPropertyPracticeManual,supranote10at§15.9.
297.EconomicalMutual,supranote290atpara17[emphasisadded].
298.Ibidatpara21(“CompliancewiththeSPAissomethingforwhichtheofficersanddirectorsoftheStrataCorporationareresponsible.Theiromissiontofulfilltheirdutiesowedtoanyonein-cluding[theowner]asoneofitsmembers,maygiverisetoaclaimagainstthem.Nosuchclaimhasbeenadvancedinthiscase.Totheextentthatitisdeficient,thecontractofinsurancecannotbevariedoramendedtoensurethatitcomplieswiththeSPA.Thepolicyprovidesonlythecover-agethattheinsurerhasagreedtoprovide.IfthecoveragewhichtheStrataCorporationobtainedisinadequate,ornotincompliancewitharequirementimposedbytheSPA,thatisanissuebe-tweentheStrataCorporationandMr.RattanasanowneranddoesnotimposeadutytodefendonAviva.”[emphasisadded].).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
72 British Columbia Law Institute
Thatsaid,theremaybesomedownsidestoconsiderinamendingsection155.Thesection’sprimarypurposerelatestotechnicalrulesonsubrogation.299Thesectionappearstobefulfillingthispurpose.Further,anargumentcouldbemadethatEco-nomicalMutualprimarilyraisesissuesthatcouldbebestaddressedbyeducation,notlawreform.The committee’s recommendation for reform Whilethecommitteewasgenerallywaryofproposinglegislativereforminresponsetoasinglecourtdecision,itdecidedthatEconomicalMutualraisesseveralconcreteissuesthathelptobringreformintofocus.Itistroublingtoseeastratacorporationwithaninsurancepolicythatappearedonitsfacetobeill-suitedtothenatureofastratacorporation.Thecommitteewasinterestedincanvassingthepublicforitsviewsonthisconcernandonthesectiongenerally.Thecommitteeitselfdecidedthatlegislativereformshouldn’tbepursuedinre-sponsetoEconomicalMutual.Inthecommittee’sview,thecaseraisesissuesthatprimarilycallforaneducationaloranunderwritingresponse.Thecommitteewasalsoconcernedthatamendingsection155inresponsetoEconomicalMutualcouldunsettletheunderstandingofwhatthestratacorporation’sliabilityinsurancewasintendedtocover.Themajorityofconsultationrespondentsfavouredthecommittee’sproposalonthisissue.Butaminoritydisagreed,sayingthattheywereopentolegislativereformsinresponsetoEconomicalMutual.Thecommitteerecommends:
7.Section155oftheStrataPropertyActshouldnotbeamended.
Issues for Reform—Reporting and Administration Thereareanumberofprovisionsintheactthatsupporttheinsurancemandateandthatdealwithcommunicationofinformationoninsurancefromthestratacorpora-tiontostrata-lotowners.Thissectionofthereportexaminesproposalstofine-tunethesereportingandadministrationprovisions.
299.See,above,at42–43.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 73
Should the Strata Property Act require strata corporations to obtain an appraisal for the purpose of determining adequacy of property-insurance coverage? Brief description of the issue Byrequiringpropertyinsuranceonfull-replacement-valuebasis,theStrataPropertyActeffectivelycallsforstratacorporationstodoanappraisalofthepropertyinor-dertodeterminetheappropriatelevelofcoverage.Buttheactdoesn’tgothefurtherstepofmakingitanactualrequirement.Eventhoughthevastmajorityofstratacor-porationsdoobtainappraisals,somedonot,whichleavesthempotentiallyexposedtobeingundercovered.Wouldcreatingalegislativerequirementtoobtainanap-praisalhelptoreducethisdanger?Discussion of options for reform Thisissuepresentsastraightforward,yes-or-nopairofoptions.Theadvantageofalegislativerequirementisthatitcandrivehomethepointthatanappraisalisnecessary.Evenifmoststratacorporationshavealreadyabsorbedthispoint,it’simportanttorecallthatBritishColumbiahasastrikingdiversityofstratacorporations.Itisn’tdifficulttoimagineself-managedstratacorporationsthathavefailedtograspthenecessityofobtaininganappraisal.Theproposalwouldsetaclearminimumstandardunderthelaw.Theotheroptionistoretainthestatusquo.Underthecurrentlaw,moststratacor-porationssimplygoaheadandobtainanappraisal,withoutbeingrequiredtodoso.Amongthosethatdonotmaybestratacorporationsthathavetakenthemeasureoftherisksanddecidednottoproceedwithanappraisal.Alegislativerequirementwouldrobthesestratacorporationsofsomeflexibilityindecision-making.Inaddi-tion,enforcementofthislegislativerequirementwouldbedifficult.The committee’s recommendation for reform Thecommitteefavoursestablishingalegislativerequirementtoobtainanappraisal.Itwouldsetaclearminimumstandardandhelptoprotectstratacorporationsagainstthedangerofbeingunderinsured.Asolidmajorityofconsultationrespond-entsfavouredthisproposal.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
74 British Columbia Law Institute
Thecommitteerecommends:8.Section149(4)(a)oftheStrataPropertyActshouldbeamendedbyaddingthewords“asdeterminedbythemostrecentappraisal”after“fullreplacementvalue.”How frequently should an appraisal for the purpose of determining adequacy of property-insurance coverage be required to be carried out? Brief description of the issue Thisissuebuildsuponthepreviousone.Ifastratacorporationisrequiredtoobtainanappraisal,thenshouldthelawgiveguidanceonhowfrequentlyanappraisalmustbecarriedout?Discussion of options for reform Thisissueisratheropenended.Atabasiclevel,eachstratacorporationshouldas-sessitsownneedforanappraisal,sincethestratacorporation’sparticularcircum-stanceswillbethebestguide.Astratacorporationthat,forexample,recentlycom-pletedmajorupgradesshouldobtainafreshappraisal.Thatsaid,givingguidanceonthefrequencyofappraisalswouldsupportthelegisla-tiverequirementtoobtainone.Eventhoughsomelevelofarbitrarinesswouldbeinvolvedinestablishingaprecisenumber,itwouldhelptomakethelegislativere-quirementclearer.The committee’s recommendation for reform Thecommitteeconsiderednumbersintherangeofonetofiveyears.Ultimately,itsettledonthreeyearsasanacceptableminimumstandard.Thecommitteenotedthatthisperiodwouldmatchtheperiodgenerallyapplicabletodepreciationre-ports.300Inthecommittee’sview,theprovisionsettingouttheperiodforrenewingappraisalsshouldbelocatedintheregulation.Theprocessofamendingregulationsissimplerthantheprocessforamendinglegislation.Itmaybenecessarytodrawonthispro-cess,toensurethatthisprovisionremainsinsyncwithdevelopmentsintheproper-tyandinsurancemarkets.
300.SeeStrataPropertyAct,supranote3,s94(2);StrataPropertyRegulation,supranote4,s6.2(7).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 75
Whilethemajorityofconsultationrespondentsfavouredthecommittee’sapproach,asignificantminoritydidwanttoadoptalongerperiodintheregulation.Thecommitteerecommends:
9.Thefrequencyofappraisalsshouldbedeterminedbyregulation.Theregulationshouldinitiallysetthisfrequencyataminimumofthreeyears.Should the Strata Property Act require a strata corporation to inform the owners and tenants as soon as feasible of any material change in insurance coverage? Brief description of the issue TheStrataPropertyActrequiresthestratacorporationto“reportontheinsurancecoverageateachannualgeneralmeeting.”301SomeCanadianprovincesgoevenfur-therinrequiringstratacorporationstoinformownersaboutinsuranceissues.InOntario’sstrata-propertyreviewtheauthorsrecommendedaddingrequirementstoOntario’slegislationfor“promptnotificationofowners”ofanyincreaseinanin-surancepolicy’sdeductibleandif“theboardcannotobtaindirectorsandofficersli-ability,errorsandomissionsinsurance.”302Ontariorecentlyamendeditslegislationtoimplementthisrecommendation.303ShouldBritishColumbiafollowOntario’sleadandrequirethestratacorporationtogivenoticeofmaterialchangesininsurancecoverage?Discussion of options for reform Themainadvantageofthisproposedreformisthatitwouldsupportoneofthekeyfeaturesofinsurancelegislationforstratacorporations:itscoordinatingfunctionforstratacorporations,strata-lotowners,andotherpotentialactorsintheinsurancefield.Whiletheexistinglawcallsforareportoninsuranceattheannualgeneralmeeting,theremaybematerialchangesbetweenmeetings.Thisopensupthepossi-bilityforgapsincoveragetoappear.Increasingtheflowofinformationfromthestratacorporationtoothersshouldreducethisrisk.
301.Ibid,s154(b).
302.OntarioStageTwoReport,supranote251at23.
303.SeeCondominiumAct,1998,supranote32,s105.1(addedtothelegislationbyProtectingCon-dominiumOwnersAct,2015,supranote32,Schedule1,s92).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
76 British Columbia Law Institute
Thedownsideofthisproposalisthatitdoescreateanadditionaladministrativeburdenforstratacorporations.The committee’s recommendation for reform Thecommitteefavouredrequiringstratacorporationstoinformownersandtenantsofmaterialchangesininsurancecoverage,promptlyafterthechangeoccurs.Initsview,suchaprovisionwillhelptoreducegapsininsurancecoverage.Thecommit-teedecidedthattenantsshouldbeincludedintheprovisionbecausetheyare,byvir-tueoftheact,namedinsuredsonthestratacorporation’sinsurance.304Thevastmajorityofconsultationrespondentsagreedwiththecommitteeonthisis-sue.Thecommitteerecommends:10.Section154oftheStrataPropertyActshouldbeamendedtorequireastratacor-porationtoinformtheownersandtenantsassoonasfeasibleofanymaterialchangeininsurancecoverage,includinganincreaseinanydeductible.
Issue for Reform—The Standard Unit Brief description of the issue Definingthescopeofthestratacorporation’sproperty-insuranceobligationsvis-à-visthoseofastrata-lotownerisasignalissueforlegislationoninsuranceinstrataproperties.TherehavebeenconcernsraisedaboutwhetherBritishColumbia’sap-proachinsection149oftheStrataPropertyAct—coupledwiththelegislativedefini-tionoffixturesintheregulation—isclearenoughtodispeluncertaintiesandpoten-tiallegalissues.305Otherprovinceshaveaddressedtheseconcernsbyadoptinganapproachbasedonastandardunit(stratalot).306Thisapproachattemptstodescribe,insomedetail,the
304.Seesupranote3,s155(b).
305.SeeDix,supranote158at4.
306.SeeSaskatchewan:TheCondominiumPropertyAct,1993,supranote32,ss47(1)(k.1),65(3);TheCondominiumPropertyRegulations,2001,RRScC-26.1Reg2,s11.1;Manitoba:TheCondo-miniumAct,supranote32,s182(6);Ontario:CondominiumAct,1998,supranote32,ss43(5)(h)and56(1)(h);99(6)(repealedbyProtectingCondominiumOwnersAct,2015,supranote32,s89—notinforce);NovaScotia:CondominiumAct,supranote32,s11(2)(2A);Condominium
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 77
baselinefeaturesofastratalotwhichwouldbecoveredbythestratacorporation’sinsurance.Movingtoastandard-unitapproachwouldbeasignificantchangeforBritishCo-lumbialawattheleveloflanguageandconcept.Butitcouldalsorepresentamajorsubstantivechangeinthelawaswell.Whiletherearemanywaystoimplementthestandard-unitconcept,theonemostcommonlyusedseesthestratacorporationbe-ingresponsibleforinsuringabareshellofastratalot.Thiswouldsignificantlyalterthedivisionbetweenstrata-corporationinsuranceandowners’insurancethatiscurrentlyinplaceinBritishColumbia.Inviewoftheconceptualandsubstantivechangesthatwouldbewroughtbyadopt-ingthestandard-unitconcept,thecommitteewasreluctanttotakeapositiononthisapproachbeforeconsultingwiththepublic.SointheConsultationPaperonInsur-anceIssuesforStratasitframedthisissueasaquestionfordiscussion.Thisap-proachmeantthattheissuewaspresentedwithoutatentativerecommendationfromthecommitteeandwasleftasaratheropen-endedquestion.Asameanstostimulateresponsesfromthepublic,thecommitteeobtainedadetailedsubmissiononthestandard-unitconceptfromtheInsuranceBureauofCanada,whichwasre-producedintheconsultationpaper.Thissubmissionisagoodintroductiontothestandard-unitconcept,soithasalsobeenreproducedinthepagesofthisreportthatfollow.IBC commentary IBC recommendation for standard definition of strata lot in law
A standard definition of residential strata lot will result in consistency across British Co-lumbia concerning responsibility to repair and maintain, and to confirm the insurance requirements for strata lot owners and the strata corporation. Section 149 of the Strata Property Act requires strata corporations to secure property insurance for common property, common assets, buildings shown on the strata plan, and original “fixtures” installed by the developer as part of the original construction on the strata plan. “Fixtures” are defined in section 9.1 of the Strata Property Regulation:
Regulations,NSReg60/71,s54(1A);NewfoundlandandLabrador:CondominiumAct,2009,su-pranote32,s56(4)–(5).InDecember2018,theGovernmentofAlbertaannouncedthatitwouldbeimplementingthestandard-unitconcept.SeeproposedamendmentstotheCondominiumPropertyRegulation,supranote32,ss20.2(1)(s)and(2),60.1(c),61.1,61.2,62.1,62.2(inforce1January2020).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
78 British Columbia Law Institute
Definitions for section 149 of the Act
9.1 (1) For the purposes of section 149 (1) (d) and 152 (b) of the Act, “fixtures” means items attached to a building including floor and wall coverings and electrical and plumbing fixtures, but does not include, if they can be removed without damage to the building, refrigerators, stoves, dishwashers, micro-waves, washers, dryers or other items.307
The definition is intended to clarify who (the strata corporation or the owner) is respon-sible for insuring the fixtures installed at the time of the original construction. Issues emerge when strata lot owners replace original fixtures with upgraded fixtures (consid-ered “improvements” in other jurisdictions). Some have interpreted section 149 of the Act and section 9.1 of the Regulations as obliging a strata corporation to maintain insur-ance on all original fixtures installed by the developer, while the strata lot owner would insure any improvements or upgraded fixtures. The current situation makes insurance claims difficult to process, as there may be a mis-understanding among insureds about which policy applies for which part of the loss in cases where original fixtures are replaced, altered or upgraded. This can lead to drawn-out disputes between corporations, owners, and insurance providers. Defining the standard strata lot as being a bare shell (the bare floors, ceilings and unfin-ished interior walls308 of the strata lot) is the most straightforward approach to clarify and confirm the insurance requirements for owners and strata corporations. All strata lot units in a structure would then be finished to the same construction standards, en-suring consistency in the construction quality of the standard strata lots. All additional finishes inside the strata lot not covered in the standard definition would then be con-sidered “improvements.” Strata unit owners would have full control over the improve-ments inside the unit, such as paint colours, cabinets, floor coverings/finishes, applianc-es and lighting fixtures. The change described above would eliminate the current confusion over whose insur-ance responds (the corporation’s or the owner’s) when a claim arises in a situation where owners have made upgrades to their fixtures. It would clarify that the unit owner would be responsible for repairs following damage to the improvements, and the strata corporation would be responsible for repairs following damage to the strata lots and common property.
307.Supranote4,s9.1(1).
308.Thebarewallswouldconsistoftheunfinishedinteriorwallsofthestandardunit,suchasun-painteddrywall.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 79
This change would require amendments to the sections of the legislation concerning the corporation’s insurance requirements and the regulation concerning fixtures. IBC and its members do not foresee significant changes to the owner policies in the event the government standardizes the definition of a “strata lot” consistent with that described above. Standard definition of strata lot in bylaws
IBC does not recommend allowing for the standard definition to be defined by the strata corporation’s bylaws . . . . That would put a technical onus on strata corporation board members to draft bylaws on what constitutes a standard definition of a strata lot, which has implications for the financial responsibilities of all parties in the corporation. It is un-fair to consumers to delegate the power of determining financial responsibility to board members who may lack sufficient expertise in drafting such technical rules. Allowing the standard definition to be defined by the strata corporation’s bylaws would also result in inconsistency from one corporation to another, which would create confu-sion for corporations and owners about their respective financial responsibilities. The absence of a clear definition in legislation or regulation leaves owners vulnerable to the discretion of their strata corporation, which may assign to strata lot owners the respon-sibility for repairs that would otherwise be considered common property, if standard-ized. Further, inconsistency in such rules creates confusion for owners with respect to their insurance needs. When owners are unsure about their responsibilities, the likelihood of overlapping insurance coverages, under insurance, or the complete lack of insurance, are greatly increased. Generally, purchasing a strata lot represents a tremendous in-vestment for consumers, and insurance helps protect that investment. Defining a stand-ard strata lot in law makes it easier for owners to understand their responsibilities and assess their insurance needs. Consistent and clear rules would also allow government and strata corporations to focus their resources on educating consumers on the financial risks they face as owners, and ways they can manage those risks. Rather than delegating this power to a strata corporation’s board, IBC encourages the government to establish immutable rules on what constitutes a standard strata lot so that there is a clear delegation of financial responsibility, which will better protect con-sumer investments.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
80 British Columbia Law Institute
The committee’s recommendation for reform Thecommitteehaswrestledwiththisissuesincebeforethepublicationofthecon-sultationpaperthatprecededthisreport.Aftertheclosingofthatconsultationpa-per’sconsultationperiod,thereweretwomoredevelopmentsrelatingtothestand-ard-unitconceptthatthecommitteehadtoconsider.First,thereweretheresultsfromthecommittee’squestionfordiscussion.Thesere-sultsshowedstrongsupportfortheconcept,withessentiallyafive-to-onemajorityindicatingthattheyfavouredBritishColumbiaadoptingthestandardunit.Com-mentsfrommanyrespondentsshowedthattherewasconsiderableenthusiasminsomequartersforthisconcept.Insum,itwasseenasawaytoimproveadifficultar-eaofthelaw.Second,inDecember2018,Albertaannouncedthatithadreachedamilestoneinitsunfoldingreformprocessbypublishingproposedregulationstosupportlegislativeamendmentsthatithadpassedin2014.309Amongtheseproposedregulationswasaversionofthestandard-unitconceptthatwentfarbeyondanyotherjurisdictioninCanadaintermsofdetailandsophistication.310WhileAlberta’sannouncementcameverylateinthisproject’sreviewofinsuranceissues(itappearedasthecommitteewasreviewingadraftofthisfinalreport),thecommitteewasabletogivetheproposedregulationsaninitialconsideration.Thecommitteewasintriguedbywhatitread.Theproposedregulationsappeartoholdouttheprospectofmakingconsiderableprogressonsomeofthemostvexingissuesinstrata-propertylaw.Thatsaid,Alberta’sproposedregulationsalsodrivehomejustwhatlevelofdetailandsophisticationwouldlikelybecalledfortoimplementthestandard-unitconceptinBritishColumbia.Adoptingthisapproachwouldbeamajorchangeinthisareaofthelaw,sothecommitteewaswaryofleapingintoit.Adaptingsolutionsdevelopedelsewhereissomethingthatshouldonlybedoneaftercarefulstudy.BritishColum-bia’sstrata-propertysectorislargerandmorediversethansectorsfoundinotherprovinces.Inaddition,theStrataPropertyActhasprovisionsthatlackequivalentsinthelegislationofotherprovinces.Bothoftheseareaswouldhavetobemanagedcarefullyinimplementingthestandard-unitconcept.
309.SeeAlbertaNewsRelease,supranote32.
310.SeeproposedamendmentstotheCondominiumPropertyRegulation,supranote32(addingnewss20.2(1)(s)and(2),60.1(c),61.1,61.2,62.1,62.2—inforce1January2020).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 81
Intheend,thecommitteedecidedfurtherstudyandconsultationiswarranted.Giv-enthelatestageofthisproject,thecommitteeisn’tinapositiontocarryonwiththiswork.Andgiventhescaleoftheworkrequired,theprovincialgovernmentisthelog-icalorganizationtotakeoverthistask.Finally,thecommitteenotesthatAlberta’sregulationsareslatedtocomeintoforcein2020.Awatchfuleyeshouldbekeptonhowthesereformsunfoldinthatprov-ince.Thecommitteerecommends:11.ThegovernmentofBritishColumbiashouldundertakefurtherstudyofandconsul-tationsonadoptingthestandard-unitconcept.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 83
Chapter 5. Draft Legislation and Regulations
Draft legislation
StrataProperty(InsuranceIssues)AmendmentAct,2019HERMAJESTY,byandwiththeadviceandconsentoftheLegislativeAssemblyoftheProvinceofBritishColumbia,enactsasfollows:1 Section149(4)(a)oftheStrataPropertyAct,S.B.C.1998,c.42,isamended
byaddingthewords“asdeterminedbythemostrecentappraisal”after“fullreplacementvalue.”
recommendationno.(8)
Comment: The committee recommended this amendment to section 149 of the act in order to set a clear minimum standard in the legislation. This standard is grounded in what is occurring in practice. Most strata corporations obtain appraisals to ensure that their mandated property insurance is “on the basis of full replacement value,” as sec-tion 149 (4) (a) currently directs. But the committee understands that a significant num-ber of strata corporations are failing to obtain appraisals. This failure puts those strata corporations at risk of being underinsured. By making an appraisal a legislative require-ment, this draft provision will reduce that risk. 2 ThefollowingsectionisaddedtoPart9:
Appraisal
149.1 (1) Astratacorporationmustobtain,onorbeforethefollowingdates,anappraisalofthepropertythatmustbeinsuredundersection149:
(a) forthefirsttime,(i) thedatethatiswithin6monthsofthedateofdeposit
ofthestrataplaninalandtitleoffice,or
(ii) theprescribeddate,inallothercases;(b) ifthestratacorporationhas,beforeorafterthecominginto
forceofthissection,obtainedanappraisal,thedatethatistheprescribedperiodafterthedateonwhichthatappraisalwasobtained.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
84 British Columbia Law Institute
(2) Anappraisalundersubsection(1)mustbecarriedoutbyaper-sonwhoisqualifiedandinsuredasanappraiserinBritishCo-lumbia.
recommendationnos.(8),(9)
Comment: This draft provision is meant to work hand-in-hand with the previous draft provision. That earlier provision established the legislative requirement to obtain an ap-praisal; this provision deals with one of the practical questions that will face strata corpo-rations as they comply with that legislative requirement. The draft provision is meant to answer this question: How often must a strata corporation obtain an appraisal in order to remain in compliance with the legislation? The simple answer to that question is “every three years.” Getting to that answer in the way that the committee wants to implement it is a rather more complex undertaking. The committee favours setting out the applicable three-year period in a regulation. (This is done, below, in a draft provision that the com-mittee recommends adding to the Strata Property Regulation as section 9.11 (3).) The process of amending regulations is more straightforward and less time-consuming than the process of amending legislation. This is a particular advantage for provisions contain-ing time periods, as changing circumstances in the future might call for a simple change to the time period. For this reason, it’s very common to find time periods in regulations and less common to find them in legislation. But a regulation must be enabled by a legis-lative provision. This draft section along with draft section 6 (b), below, accomplish that task. This draft section creates the legislative framework for obtaining an appraisal. It is drafted to encompass the full range of strata corporations in existence now and into the future and to put them on the same footing. The draft section is modelled on an existing provision that creates a legislative requirement to obtain a depreciation report (see Strata Property Act, section 94). Like that provision, this draft provision sets out the minimum standard, which is to require an appraisal every three years. There is nothing the draft provision that would prevent a strata corporation from obtaining more-frequent apprais-als. 3 Section151isamended
(a) byrenumberingthesectionassection151(1)andbystrikingout“may”andsubstituting“must”,and
(b) byaddingthefollowingsubsection:(2) Theinsurancemustbeofatleasttheamountrequiredinthe
regulations.
recommendationnos.(1),(2)Comment: This draft provision implements the committee’s recommendation requiring strata corporations to obtain directors-and-officers insurance. Section 151 of the act en-
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 85
ables strata corporations to obtain this insurance. Paragraph (a) of the draft amendment simply changes that existing provision from one with a permissive verb (may) to one with a mandatory verb (must). Paragraph (b) deals with the minimum amount of coverage, which the committee recommended should be $2 000 000. The committee recommend-ed that the actual amount be stated in the regulations (see, below, draft regulations, which propose adding a new section 9.21 to the Strata Property Regulation). Stating the figure in a regulation would be consistent with the law’s approach for other types of man-datory insurance. This draft provision, along with draft section 6 (a), below, enable the adoption of a regulation. 4 Section158(2)isrepealedandthefollowingsubstituted:
(2) Subsection(1)doesnotlimitthecapacityofthestratacorpora-tiontodecidetochargebacktoanowner,iftheownerisrespon-sibleforthelossordamagethatgaverisetoaninsuranceclaim,thelesserofthefollowingamounts:
(a) thecostofrepairingthelossordamage;(b) thedeductiblelimitoftheinsuranceclaim.
recommendationno.(5)
Comment: This draft provision is intended to replace the current section 158 (2) of the act, which provides that the characterization of an insurance deductible as a common expense in subsection (1) “does not limit the capacity of the strata corporation to sue an owner in order to recover the deductible portion of an insurance claim if the owner is re-sponsible for the loss or damage that gave rise to the claim.” In place of an authorization to “sue” an owner, this draft provision will authorize a strata corporation to charge back to a responsible owner the lesser of the deductible amount or the cost of repairing the loss or damage. This change is intended to clarify and simplify the law, which has become enmeshed in litigation and obscured by the proliferation of strata-corporation bylaws that purport to supplement the current section 158 (2) by setting out distinct standards of lia-bility in these cases. 5 Section154isamended
(a) inparagraph(a)bystrikingout“and”,
(b) inparagraph(b)bystrikingout“meeting.”andsubstituting“meeting,and”,and
(c) byaddingthefollowingparagraph:
(c) informtheownersandtenantsassoonasfeasibleofanymaterialchangeininsurancecoverage,includinganin-creaseinanydeductible.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
86 British Columbia Law Institute
recommendationno.(10)
Comment: This draft provision amends the act’s provision on review and reporting on insurance coverage. Section 154 of the act already requires a strata corporation to re-view the adequacy of its insurance coverage each year and to report on that coverage at each annual general meeting. To those two requirements this draft provision adds a third: a requirement to promptly inform owners and tenants of material changes in insur-ance coverage. This draft provision is modelled on a similar provision in Ontario’s legisla-tion. 6 Section292isamended
(a) inparagraph(2)(q)byadding“andtheminimumamountoferrorsandomissioninsuranceundersection151”after“section150”andbystrik-ingout“andthepaymentofaninsurancedeductiblereferredtoinsec-tion158”;and
(b) insubsection(3)byaddingthefollowingparagraph:(c.1) prescribingaperiodforthepurposesofsection149.1(a)or(b);.
recommendationnos.(2),(9)
Comment: This draft provision amends section 292 of the Strata Property Act, which lists the subjects on which the act enables the power to make regulations. The draft pro-vision adds two new subjects to the list, to enable the implementation of two committee recommendations. These recommendations concern setting out the minimum amount of directors-and-officers insurance and the frequency of obtaining appraisals. Draft regula-tions setting the minimum amount at $2 000 000 and the prescribed period at 3 years are found, below, as proposed new sections 9.11 and 9.21 of the Strata Property Regulation. The draft provision also removes the authorization to make regulations regarding “the payment of an insurance deductible referred to in section 158.” This regulation-making power has never been used. It is removed because it is inconsistent with the proposed amendments to section 158. 7 TheScheduleofStandardBylawsisamendedbyaddingthefollowingsec-
tion:Insurance
7.1 Anownermustobtainandmaintaininsuranceagainstliabilityforpaymentofthedeductiblelimitofthestratacorporation’spropertyin-surancepolicy.
recommendationno.(6)
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 87
Comment: This draft provision adds a new section to the standard bylaws, which is in-tended to appear among the other duties of owners, tenants, occupants, and visitors. The new bylaw would create a requirement on strata-lot owners to obtain and maintain insurance against liability for payment of an insurance deductible. This requirement is in-tended to respond to a problem that could arise in the wake of the committee’s proposal to clarify the law on responsibility for insurance deductibles (see, above, draft legislation, section 4). Many strata corporations have seen their deductibles, particularly for damage caused by water ingress, rise significantly. An owner who isn’t adequately insured against this risk could face a crippling liability. Requiring the owner to be insured reduces the risk. But the problem with such a requirement is enforcement. While there is no com-plete answer to this enforcement problem, in the committee’s view making such insur-ance coverage the subject of a standard bylaw holds out the best hope of counteracting the problem. Commencement
8 ThisActcomesintoforcebyregulationoftheLieutenantGovernorinCouncil.
recommendationno.n/a
Comment: This is a standard provision found in British Columbia legislation. It gives the cabinet (formally designated as the “Lieutenant Governor in Council”) the power to con-trol the timing of when the legislation comes into force. A transitional period would help to ensure that people in the strata sector are prepared for the changes that this legislation will bring.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
88 British Columbia Law Institute
Draft regulations Ontherecommendationoftheundersigned,theLieutenantGovernor,byandwiththeadviceandconsentoftheExecutiveCouncil,ordersthattheStrataPropertyRegulation,B.C.Reg.43/2000,isamendedassetoutintheattachedschedule.
SCHEDULE 1 Part9oftheStrataPropertyRegulation,B.C.Reg.43/2000,isamendedby
addingthefollowingsections:Appraisals
9.11 (1) Thedateprescribedforthepurposesofsection149.1(a)(ii)oftheActwithrespecttoastratacorporationthatisformedafterthecomingintoforceofthatsection,isthedatethatis3yearsafterthedateonwhichthesectioncomesintoforce.
(2) Forthepurposesofsection149.1(b)theprescribedperiodis3years.
recommendationno.(8)
Comment: This draft regulation sets the frequency of appraisals required under the committee’s draft section 149.1, above. It sets out a requirement to obtain an appraisal at least once every three years. This requirement is set out in the regulation because regulations are simpler to amend. This quality makes it simpler to adjust the requirement if future circumstances were to favour a longer or shorter period.
Minimum errors and omissions insurance
9.21 Forthepurposesofsection151oftheAct,thestratacorporationmustobtainandmaintainerrorsandomissionsinsuranceforaminimumamountof$2000000.
recommendationno.(2)
Comment: This draft regulation is intended to set the minimum level of directors-and-officers insurance. It’s meant to work hand-in-hand with provisions in the draft legislation setting a requirement for strata corporations to obtain directors-and-officers insurance (see, above, at draft section 3 (a)) and enabling a regulation to set the minimum amount (see, above, at draft sections 3 (b) and 6).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 89
Chapter 6. Conclusion Insuranceisakeyconcernforstratacorporations,strata-lotowners,andothers.TheinsuranceprovisionsintheStrataPropertyActareavaluableandimportantpartofthatact.Thisreporthasrecommendedimprovementstothoseinsuranceprovisions.Whilethereportdoesn’trecommendfundamentallychangingthemodelusedtogovernin-suranceandstrataproperties,itdoesrecommendfine-tuningtheoperationofthatmodel.ThecommitteebelievesthattakingupitsproposedreformstotheStrataPropertyActandtheStrataPropertyRegulationwouldbenefitallparticipantsinthestrata-propertysector.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 91
APPENDIX A
ListofRecommendationsThe insurance mandate 1.TheStrataPropertyActshouldrequireastratacorporationtoobtaindirectors-and-officersinsurance.(54–57)2.Forthepurposesofsection151oftheStrataPropertyAct,thestratacorporationmustobtainandmaintaindirectors-and-officersinsuranceforaminimumamountof$2000000.(57)3.Thedefinitionof“majorperils”intheStrataPropertyRegulationshouldnotbeamendedtoincludeearthquakes.(58–60)4.Thedefinitionof“majorperils”intheStrataPropertyRegulationshouldnotbeamendedtoincludeoverlandflooding.(60–61)Insurance deductibles 5.Section158oftheStrataPropertyActshouldbeamendedtoallowastratacorpora-tiontodecidetochargebacktoanowner,iftheownerisresponsibleforthelossordamagethatgaverisetotheclaim,thelesserofthefollowingamounts:(a)thecostofrepairingthelossordamage;(b)thedeductiblelimitoftheinsuranceclaim.(64–67)6.AnewstandardbylawshouldbeaddedtotheScheduleofStandardBylawsthatre-quiresastrata-lotownertohaveinsurancethatcoverspaymentofadeductibleunderastrata-corporationpolicy.(68–69)Named insureds 7.Section155oftheStrataPropertyActshouldnotbeamended.(71–72)
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
92 British Columbia Law Institute
Reporting and administration 8.Section149(4)(a)oftheStrataPropertyActshouldbeamendedbyaddingthewords“asdeterminedbythemostrecentappraisal”after“fullreplacementvalue.”(73–74)9.Thefrequencyofappraisalsshouldbedeterminedbyregulation.Theregulationshouldinitiallysetthisfrequencyataminimumofthreeyears.(74–75)10.Section154oftheStrataPropertyActshouldbeamendedtorequireastratacor-porationtoinformtheownersandtenantsassoonasfeasibleofanymaterialchangeininsurancecoverage,includinganincreaseinanydeductible.(75–76)The standard unit 11.ThegovernmentofBritishColumbiashouldundertakefurtherstudyofandconsul-tationsonadoptingthestandard-unitconcept.(76–81)
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 93
APPENDIX B
BiographiesofProject-CommitteeMembersPatrickWilliamsisapartneroftheVancouverlawfirmClarkWilsonLLPandamemberofthefirm’sStrataPropertyGroup.HeisalsoamemberoftheAlternativeDisputeResolutionPracticeGroup.Patrick’spracticefocusesonassistingstratacor-porations,developers,andstrata-lotownerswithdisputeresolution.Heisanexpe-riencedandqualifiedarbitratorandmediatorwhohasmanagednumerousstrata-property,real-estate,andconstructiondisputes.Patrickhaswrittenandpublishedmanyarticlesonissuesimpactingthestrata-propertyindustry,includingconstruction-relatedproblemsexperiencedbyowners,propertymanagers,anddevelopers.Heisaregularcontributortoindustryperiodi-calsandregularlydeliverspresentationsandseminarstoindustrygroups,stratacorporations,andpropertymanagers.Hehasalsopublishedarticlesregardingtheuseandbenefitofarbitrationandmediationasanalternativetocourtandisafre-quentguestinstructorforthemediationcomponentoftheProfessionalLegalTrain-ingCourserequiredtobetakenbyallarticledstudentsinBritishColumbia.PatrickreceivedhisdisputeresolutiontrainingthroughtheContinuingLegalEduca-tionSocietyofBritishColumbiaandtheBritishColumbiaArbitrationandMediationInstitute.HeobtainedhisBachelorofCommercedegreein1973andhisBachelorofLawsdegreein1974,fromtheUniversityofBritishColumbia.VeronicaBarlee(committeememberJuly2014–present)isaseniorpolicyadvi-sorwiththeprovincialgovernment’sOfficeofHousingandConstructionStandards.Forthepastsevenyears,Veronicahasworkedonstratalegislation,regulations,pol-icies,andissues.StratahousingisavitaleconomicdriverandakeyhousingchoiceinBritishColumbia,providingalmost25%oftheprovince’shousingstock.Veroni-ca’sprofessionalbackgroundincludesextensivepolicy-developmentandmanage-mentexperienceintheprivate,public,andnot-for-profitsectors,includingsmallbusiness,fundraising,forest-firefighting,andcommunityservices.HerMBAfromtheUniversityofAlbertaisaugmentedbyongoingprofessionaldevelopmentinpoli-cydevelopment,stakeholderconsultation,publicengagement,andinformationmanagement.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
94 British Columbia Law Institute
LarryButtress(committeememberOctober2013–June2016)wasfirstlicensedundertheRealEstateActinBritishColumbiain1980.Workingforhisfamily’ssmall,independentreal-estatecompany,hesoldresidentialandmulti-familyrealestate,assistedinthecompany’sproperty-managementportfolio,andachievedhisagent’squalificationsin1982.ThatsameyearhebeganworkingwiththeRealEstateBoardofGreaterVancouverasthemanagerofitsMultipleListingService.In1986,heearnedhisDiplomainUrbanLandEconomicsandbecameamemberoftheRealEs-tateInstituteofBritishColumbiaandtheRealEstateInstituteofCanada.In1988,hewasappointedasREBGV’sexecutiveofficer,apositionhehelduntil1995.In1995,hejoinedJCITechnologiesInc.asdirectorofreal-estateservices.Hesuccessfullyne-gotiatedthatcompany’spreferredsupplieragreementwiththeCanadianRealEstateAssociationthatledtothedevelopmentofmls.ca,nowREALTOR.ca,thelargestandmostfrequentlyvisitedreal-estatewebsiteinCanada.LarryjoinedstaffattheRealEstateCouncilofBritishColumbiain1998asitsman-ager,industrypractice.HehasbeenanactiveparticipantintheCanadianRegulatorsGroupaschairofitsInternetAdvertisingGuidelinesTaskForce,chairofitsElec-tronicTransactionsTaskForce,andvice-chairofitsAgencyTaskForce.In2003–04,Larryalsoservedasthedistrictvice-presidentoftheCanadianDistrictofARELLO,theAssociationofRealEstateLicenceLawOfficials.LarryrecentlyretiredasthedeputyexecutiveofficeroftheRealEstateCouncilofBritishColumbia.J.GarthCambreyhasover28yearsofexperienceintheproperty-managementin-dustryinBritishColumbia.GarthcurrentlysitsontheRealEstateCouncilofBritishColumbia,wasthefoundingdirectorandpastvice-presidentofStrataPropertyAgentsofBCandwasapastdirectorandvice-presidentoftheProfessionalAssocia-tionofManagingAgents(PAMA).HeisanactivememberoftheRealEstateInstituteofBritishColumbiaandisinvolvedwithvariousindustryassociationsandcommit-tees.GarthhasbeenappointedbytheSupremeCourtofBritishColumbiaasanad-ministratorundertheStrataPropertyActon17occasionsandholdsaCharteredAr-bitratordesignationwiththeADRInstituteofCanada,actingasanarbitratorinstra-tadisputes.GarthisalsoinvolvedinvariousadvisorygroupswiththeBritishCo-lumbiagovernment,providingsupportandadvicewithrespecttoprovinciallegisla-tion,includingtheCivilResolutionsTribunalAct.TonyGioventuistheexecutivedirectoroftheCondominiumHomeOwnersAssoci-ationofBritishColumbia(CHOA),aconsumerassociationinBritishColumbiawithover200000memberscomprisingstratacorporations,owners,andbusinessmem-berswhoservethestrataindustry.TonyistheweeklyCondoSmartscolumnistforTheProvince,TheTimesColonist,and24HoursVancouver.Since2002,Tonyhaswrittenover1000columnsandinformationbulletinsdedicatedtostratalivingand
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 95
istheco-authorofAPracticalGuidetoBylaws:TheStrataPropertyAct,andUnder-standingGovernance:StrataRulesoforderandproceduresinBritishColumbia.Tonyhasservedasadirector/committeememberfortheHomeownerProtectionOffice,BCBuildingEnvelopeCouncil,CanadianStandardsAssociation,theRealEstateCouncilofBritishColumbia,andcontinuestoplayanactiveroleinresearchandde-velopmentofbuildingstandards,legislationforstratacorporations,andconsumerprotection.WithofficesinNewWestminster,Victoria,andKelowna,CHOAprovidesservicetoitsmembersthroughouttheprovince,promotinganunderstandingofstrataliving,andtheinterestsofstrata-propertyowners.Onaveragetheassociationfields300inquiriesadayfromowners,strata-councilmembers,managersandagents,andde-liversover100seminarsannuallyonavarietyofstrata-relatedtopicsincludinggov-ernance,operations,andadministration.IanHolt(committeememberOctober2016–April2017)startedhiscareerinre-al-estatesalesin1993.Heiscurrentlyareal-estateagentwithRe/MaxRealEstateServicesinVancouver.Ianspecializesandhassoldmanystratapropertiesthrough-outhiscareer.IanisamemberoftheRealEstateBoardofGreaterVancouverandtheCanadianRealEstateAssociationandislicensedwiththeRealEstateCouncilofBritishColumbia.IanhasbeenanMLSMedallionClubmemberfor19yearswiththeRealEstateBoardofGreaterVancouver.From2006to2008,IanwasaVancouverWestsideDivisionboardmemberoftheRealEstateBoardofGreaterVancouver.From2008tothepresent,IanhasbeenanactivememberoftheGovernmentRela-tionsCommitteeattheRealEstateBoardofGreaterVancouver.TimJowettstartedwiththeVancouverlandtitleofficein1988andhasprogressedthroughtheyearsfromanexamineroftitleintohiscurrentpositionofseniorman-ager,E-businessanddeputyregistrarwiththeNewWestminsterlandtitleofficeattheLandTitleandSurveyAuthorityofBritishColumbia.TimcurrentlyoverseestheE-businessteam,agroupofspecialistexaminerswhoareresponsibleforthepublishedpractices,statutoryproceduresandfunctionalityre-latedtotheelectronicfilingsystem.Theteam’sworkinvolvesvariousenhance-ments,changes,andupdatestothesystemsandprocessesthatarebeingdoneinanefforttosupporttheneedsofstakeholders.Hisrolealsoentailsansweringquestionsfromavarietyofstakeholders,primarilylawyers,notaries,landsurveyors,andemployeeswithlocalgovernments.Timhaspresentedandisakeyparticipantatvariousmeetingsandconferencesonland-titleissueswiththesestakeholders.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
96 British Columbia Law Institute
AlexLongson(committeememberJuly2016–present)startedhiscareerinrealestatein2005,shortlyafteremigratingfromtheUnitedKingdom,wherehehad20years’experienceintheautomotive-engineeringindustryworkingasatestengineerforFordMotorCompany.Hebecamelicensedforstratamanagementin2006withabrokerageintheOkanagan,andsubsequentlybecamelicensedforrentalmanage-mentandasamanagingbrokerin2009.In2012,hejoinedthestaffoftheRealEs-tateCouncilofBritishColumbiaandinhisroleasseniorcomplianceofficerheinves-tigatescomplaints,advisesandeducateslicenseesontherequirementsofthelegis-lation,andsupportstherealestatecouncil’sStrataManagementAdvisoryGroup.HehasalsobeenaguestspeakertotheStrataPropertyAgentsofBritishColumbiaandtheBritishColumbiaRealEstateAssociation,andiscurrentlyaresourcetotheRealEstateCouncilofAlbertafortheCondominiumManagersImplementationAdvisoryCommittee.JudithMatheson(committeememberOctober2013–October2016)startedhercareerinrealestatein1980.Sheiscurrentlyareal-estateagentwithColdwellBankerPremierRealty.Judithhassoldthousandsofstratapropertiesasresales,aswellashavingworkedformanyofthetopstratadevelopersinBritishColumbia.SheisrankedinthetopsevenpercentofrealtorsworldwidewithColdwellBanker,andisaColdwellBankerPremierRealtyTopProducer.JudithisamemberoftheRealEstateBoardofGreaterVancouverandtheCanadianRealEstateAssociation,andislicensedwiththeRealEstateCouncilofBritishCo-lumbia.SheisanMLSMedallionClubMember,RealEstateBoardofGreaterVancou-verQuarterCenturyClubMember,andanAffiliateMemberofLuxuryHomes.com.JudithhasbeenawardedtheColdwellBankerUltimateServiceAward,theColdwellBankerPresidentsCircle,theColdwellBankerDiamondSociety,theColdwellBankerSterlingSociety,andtheColdwellBankerTop50inWesternCanada.ElaineMcCormackisafoundingmemberofthelawfirmWilsonMcCormackLawGroup.Forover20yearsshehasassistedstratacorporations,individualowners,andmanagementcompaniesinthegovernanceanddispute-resolutionprocessesofstratalife.Shepreparesbylawsandprivacypolicies,resolutions,andcontracts.Shehasalsorepresentedclientsincourtandinhuman-rightsmatters.Elaineisactivelyinvolvedineducatingmembersofthestratacommunity.Shefre-quentlydesignsanddeliversseminarsfortheProfessionalAssociationofManagingAgentsandpresentlyservesontheeducationcommitteeofPAMA.Shehaswrittenanddeliveredthelatestfull-daycourseentitled“RealEstateE&OInsuranceLegalUpdateforStrataManagers”usedfortheRelicensingEducationProgramforstrata
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 97
managers.ShealsofrequentlydeliversseminarsfortheCondominiumHomeOwn-ers’AssociationofBritishColumbiaandhaswrittenmanyarticlesfortheCHOANews.SheisapastdirectoroftheBritishColumbiaArbitrationandMediationInsti-tute(BCAMI)andcurrentlysitsontheaccreditationcommitteeofBCAMIfortheQArbdesignation.AsaCharterArbitrator,Elainefrequentlyadjudicatesdisputesandusesthisexperi-enceinturnwhenadvocatingforclientsbeforefellowarbitrators.SheisamemberoftheMediateBCCivilRosterandhasreceivedmediationtrainingthroughtheBrit-ishColumbiaJusticeInstitute,theContinuingLegalEducationSocietyofBritishCo-lumbia,andMediateBC.ElainehasalsobeencounselinseveralseminalSupremeCourtofBritishColumbiadecisionsinvolvingsuchdiversestrataissuesastheen-forcementandvalidityofagebylawsandrentalbylaws,thetransitionalprovisionsbetweentheCondominiumActandtheStrataPropertyActwithrespecttoallocationofrepaircosts,andclaimingdamagesforimproperlycalculatedstratafees.Elaine’sdegreesanddesignationsincludeaBAwithamajorinEnglish,minorinLawandtheLiberalArtsfromtheUniversityofCalgaryin1988,anLLBfromtheUniver-sityofBritishColumbia,andaCArbdesignationfromtheADRInstituteofCanadaInc.in1998.SusanMercer(committeememberSeptember2016–present)startedhercareerasanotarypublicin1986inSidney,BC.Duringheryearsofpractice,shespecializedinreal-estatetransactions,whichincludedmanystrataproperties.Asaresult,sheisveryawareofvariousissuesfacedbystrata-propertyowners,aswellasbystrata-propertymanagers.Shehasalsobeeninvolvedinstrata-propertydevelopment.Susanhasservedvariouscommunityandprofessionalboardsandfoundations.ShealsoservedontheBCLIRealPropertyReformProjectCommitteefrom2008–12.In1986,SusanreceivedhercertificationasanotarypublicfromtheUniversityofBritishColumbia.Atthattime,shebecamethefirstrecipientoftheannualBernardHoeterAwardforhighestmarksachievedontheBCNotarystatutoryexams.SheisalsoagraduateoftheUBCUrbanLandEconomicsDiplomaProgram(2002),receiv-ingtwobursariesrecognizingherexcellentmarksuponcompletionoftheprogram.DougPage(committeememberOctober2013–July2014)isthemanagerofhousingpolicyintheBritishColumbiagovernment’sOfficeofHousingandConstruc-tionStandardsandisaformercondoowner.BritishColumbia’sstratalegislationandregulationsarenowoneofhismainresponsibilities.Hehasworkedfor25yearsinvariousaspectsofthehousingfield,includingstintswiththeUrbanInstitutein
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
98 British Columbia Law Institute
Washington,DC,theUSDepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopment,BC’sTreasuryBoardstaff,andwithalargeprivatedeveloperandmanagerofapartmentbuildings.DoughasaBAfromDartmouthCollegeandanMAinurbangeographyandadiplomainurbanlandeconomics,bothfromtheUniversityofBritishColum-bia.HeisamemberoftheRealEstateInstituteofBritishColumbia.DavidParkinistheassistantcitysurveyorfortheCityofVancouver.Hehasbeenworkinginthelandsurveyingprofessionforover30yearsindifferentcapacitiesinWhistlerandtheVancouverLowerMainland.HeobtainedhisBachelorofScienceinSurveyingEngineeringfromtheUniversityofCalgaryin1992andwascommis-sionedasaBritishColumbiaLandSurveyorin1995.HeisapractisingmemberoftheAssociationofBritishColumbiaLandSurveyors.DavidwasemployedbyUnderhillGeomaticsLtd.for15yearsandworkedasapro-jectlandsurveyorandwasresponsibleformanagingandsupervisingtheday-to-dayoperationsandprojectsoftheVancouveroffice.HispreferredareasofpracticewhilewithUnderhill’swerelargerdevelopmentprojectsthatincludedtheprepara-tionofair-spacesubdivisionsandstrataplans.Inhiscurrentcapacityastheassistantcitysurveyor,Davidreviewsconventionalandair-spacesubdivisionapplications,subdivisionsofexistingstrataplansandstatutoryrightofwayplans,andagreementsrelatedtocommercialandresidentialdevelopments.AllenReganisthevicepresidentandmanagingbrokerforBaysidePropertySer-vicesLtd.HehasbeenwithBaysidesinceApril1999.Baysideprovidesmanagementservicestoapproximately145stratacorporationsthroughoutthelowermainland,aswellasapproximately40rental-apartmentbuildings.Intotal,Baysidemanagesabout12000strataandrentalunits.PriortoworkingatBayside,Allenheldposi-tionsinthecommercialreal-estatefieldwithGWLRealtyAdvisorsasregionaldirec-torforBritishColumbiaandwithO&YEnterpriseasgeneralmanagerforBritishColumbia.AllenhasaBCommfromtheUniversityofBritishColumbiainurbanlandeconomics(1979)andislicensedinBritishColumbiafortrading,rental,andstratamanagement,allasamanagingbroker.AllenisalsoontheboardofdirectorsoftheStrataPropertyAgentsofBritishColumbia.GarrettRobinson(committeememberApril2017–present)startedhiscareerinreal-estatesalesin1993.HeiscurrentlyarealtorwithRe/MaxCrestRealtyWestsideinVancouver.GarrettisamemberoftheRealEstateBoardofGreaterVan-couverandtheCanadianRealEstateAssociationandislicensedwiththeRealEstateCouncilofBritishColumbia.Garretthaspreviouslybeenasubcommitteememberof
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 99
the2009StrataPropertyActReviewthatwasheadedbyAdrienneMurray.GarretthasbeenanMLSMedallionClubmemberfor18yearswiththeRealEstateBoardofGreaterVancouver.Garrettisapastdirector(threeterms)fortheVancouverWestsideDivisionoftheRealEstateBoardofGreaterVancouver.Garrettisastrata-propertyownerandactiveinday-to-daystrata-councilactivity.StanRule(committeememberOctober2013–September2016)isapartnerattheKelownalawfirmofSabeyRuleLLP.HehasbeenpracticinginKelownasinceshortlyafterhewascalledtothebarin1989.Hispreferredareasofpracticearewills,trusts,estates,andestatelitigation.Stanwritesalegalblogentitled“RuleofLaw.”HehasbeenaguestspeakerattheTrialLawyersAssociationofBritishColumbia,theCanadianBarAssociationOkana-ganwillsandtrustsandtheVictoriawillsandtrustssubsections,theOkanaganfami-lylawsubsection,theKelownaEstatePlanningSociety,theVernonEstatePlanningSociety,andhehaspresentedpapersateightcontinuinglegaleducationcourses.StanisadirectoroftheBritishColumbiaLawInstitute.Heisthetreasurerofthena-tionalwillsandestatessubsectionoftheCanadianBarAssociation.HeisamemberandformerchairoftheOkanaganwillsandtrustssubsection,andamemberandaformerpresidentoftheKelownaEstatePlanningSociety.HeisalsoamemberoftheSocietyofTrustandEstatePractitioners.HerecentlyparticipatedasamemberoftheBritishColumbiaLawInstituteProjectCommitteeonRecommendedPracticesforWillsPractitionersRelatingtoPotentialUndueInfluence.SandyWagnerrepresentsstrataownersinmanyareasofpublicconcernaspresi-dentoftheboardofdirectorsoftheVancouverIslandStrataOwnersAssociation.VISOA’smandateiseducation,empowerment,andassistanceforBritishColumbiastrataowners,andhasprovidedfront-lineservicetothemfor45years.ShehasbeenadirectorofVISOAsince2007andhasledtheassociationaspresidentforthepastsevenyears,duringwhichtimeithasgrownsignificantlybothinmem-bershipandinvisibility.SandycurrentlyeditstheVISOABulletin,aquarterlynewsmagazinedistributedtonearly10000VISOAmembers,andleadsVISOA’sworkshopgroup,providingeducationalfull-dayworkshopsonstratabestpractices.SheisalsopartoftheCivilResolutionTribunalstaff.Previously,SandywasamemberoftheCivilResolutionTribunalWorkingGroup(acommitteeworkingonproceduralmattersfortheCRT)andavolunteerontheStra-taManagementAdvisoryGroup(workingwiththeRealEstateCouncilofBritishCo-lumbiatoprovideeducationandinformationforstratamanagers).
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
100 British Columbia Law Institute
EdWilsonisapartnerwiththeVancouverlawfirmLawsonLundellLLPandhaspracticedinthereal-estateandmunicipal-lawfields,withaspecialtyinreal-estatedevelopment,forover30years.EdwasamemberoftheCanadianBarAssociation’sstratapropertycommitteethatworkedwithgovernmentindevelopingthecurrentStrataPropertyAct.EdhasbeenactivelyinvolvedwiththeContinuingLegalEduca-tionSocietyofBritishColumbia.Hehastaughtmorethan15CLEBCcourses,includ-ingcoursesonstrata-propertylaw,resortdevelopment,real-estatedevelopment,anddepreciationreportsforstratacorporations.EdisalsoamemberoftheUrbanDevelopmentInstitute’slegalissuescommittee.
Report on Insurance Issues for Stratas
British Columbia Law Institute 101
PRINCIPAL FUNDERS IN 2018 TheBritishColumbiaLawInstituteexpressesitsthankstoitsfundersin2018:• LawFoundationofBritishColumbia
• MinistryofAttorneyGeneralforBritishColumbia
• NotaryFoundationofBritishColumbia
• RealEstateFoundationofBritishColumbia
• RealEstateCouncilofBritishColumbia
• RealEstateInstituteofBritishColumbia
• StrataPropertyAgentsofBritishColumbia
• AssociationofBritishColumbiaLandSurveyors
• VancouverIslandStrataOwnersAssociation
• CondominiumHomeOwnersAssociation
• MinistryofMunicipalAffairsandHousingforBritishColumbia
• CoalitionofBCBusinesses
• BCGovernmentEmployeesUnion
• HealthEmployeesUnion
• MinistryofLabourforBritishColumbia
• LawFoundationofOntarioAccesstoJusticeFund
• AGE-WELLNCE(AgingGracefullyacrossEnvironmentsusingTechnologytoSupportWellness,EngagementandLongLifeNCEInc.)
• MinistryofSocialandFamilyDevelopment,AdultProtectionService,Singa-pore
BCLIalsoreiteratesitsthankstoallthoseindividualsandorganizationswhohaveprovidedfinancialsupportforitspresentandpastactivities.
Supported by