Report Zambia SAIRLA stakeholder meeting Solwezi Sept...

Bringingevidencetobearonnegotiating

ecosystemserviceandlivelihoodtrade-offsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationinTanzania,EthiopiaandZambiaaspartofthe

SAIRLAprogramme

SolweziDistrict,Zambia:Stakeholder

WorkshopSeptember29th2016Workshopreport

ReportpreparedbyPatriciaMasikati,LorraineChilipa,EvansMutonga,HowardTemboandPetaniHamazakaza

2

Tableofcontents1. Introductionsandwelcome.................................................................................................31.1Expectations.......................................................................................................................31.2Workshopobjectives..........................................................................................................41.3Introductiontotheproject................................................................................................4

2. Welcomenotebyspecialguest............................................................................................63 Gatheringperspectives........................................................................................................83.1 Feedback......................................................................................................................8

4 SustainableAgriculturalIntensification(SAI)-relevantpracticesinSolweziDistrict..........................................................................................................................................95 StakeholderApproachtoRiskInformedandEvidenceBaseDecisionMaking(SHARED)....................................................................................................................................126 RootcauseanalysisforbarrierstoadoptionofSAIpractices............................................13

Resultsofrootcauseanalysis.............................................................................................137 Stakeholdermapping.........................................................................................................158 Closeandnextsteps...........................................................................................................189 Appendices.........................................................................................................................19Appendix1.WorkshopAgenda–September29,2016,Solwezi,Zambia..............................19Appendix2.ListofParticipants–SolweziStakeholderMappingWorkshop.........................20Appendix3.StakeholderNetworkSurveyTool......................................................................21Appendix4.StakeholderProfileInformationandBaselineDataCollectionTool.................22

Suggestedcitation:MasikatiP,ChilipaL,MutongaE,TemboH,Hamazakaza,P.2016.SolweziDistirct,Zambia:StakeholderWorkshopSeptember29th2016.WorkshopReport.Fortheproject:Bringingevidencetobearonnegotiatingecosystemserviceandlivelihoodtrade-offsinsustainableagriculturalintensificationinTanzania,EthiopiaandZambiaaspartoftheSAIRLAprogram.WorldAgroforestryCentre(ICRAF),Kenya.Disclaimer:NeitherDFID,norWYG,northeUniversityofGreenwich-NaturalResourcesInstituteareresponsibleforthecontentinthisdocument.

TheSustainableIntensificationofAgriculturalResearchandLearninginAfrica(SAIRLA)ProgrammeisaUKDepartmentforInternationalDevelopment-fundedinitiativethatseekstoaddressoneofthemostintractableproblemsfacingsmall-holderfarmersinAfrica-howtoengageinthemarketeconomyandtodeliversustainableintensificationofagriculture,thatis,whichavoidsnegativeimpactsontheenvironment.SAIRLAwillgeneratenewevidencetohelpwomenandpoorAfricansmallholderfarmersdevelopenvironmentallyandfinanciallysustainableenterprisesandboostproductivity.Theresearchwillfocusnon-exclusivelyon6countries(BurkinaFaso,Ethiopia,Ghana,Malawi,TanzaniaandZambia),thuscomplementingotherresearcheffortsintheseregions.

3

1. IntroductionsandwelcomeEvansMutongawelcomedtheparticipants.Asanicebreaker,participantswereaskedtotake3-5minutes and ask their neighbour their names, organisation andworkshop expectations.Introductionswereconductedasgroupand itwasannounced that theguestofhonourwillofficiate the meeting later in the morning. Mr Howard Tembo, Chief Agriculture ResearchOfficer (CERO) from Zambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI)-HQ Lusaka, presented theoverallprojectobjectivesandworkshopagenda(Appendix1).LorraineChilipapresentedtherules of engagement. The total number of participants was 32, representing a variety oforganizations(seelistofparticipantsinAppendix2).

1.1ExpectationsParticipants were asked to share their workshop expectations with the group, which wererecordedonaflipchartandreferredtothroughoutthemeetingtogaugehowwellwewereachievingthem.

Figure1:Recordingofworkshopexpectationsfromtheparticipants.

Theworkshopexpectationsfromtheperspectiveoftheparticipantsinclude:§ To better understand the roles of the various stakeholder regarding sustainable

agriculturalintensification(SAI)§ TogetviewsandlearnmoreonSAI§ Tounderstandhowtheorganizationswillbelinkedtotheotherorganizationsandhow

thesameprogramisgoingtohelpKansanshiFoundationimproveitsoperations§ TolearnmoreaboutSAIinSolwezidistrict§ TodevelopafullunderstandingoftheSAIRLAproject§ Tolearnmoreandshareexperienceswithothers

4

§ TolearnwhattheMinistryofAgriculturehaspreparedforfarmersintheproject§ HearwhatorganizationsaredoingonSAI§ Tolearnandunderstandwhatisinvolvedaboutthewholeprogram§ TolearnaboutactivitiesthatwillbeinvolvedinSAI§ ToknowhowtheprojectwillbedoneinZambia,whatarethebenefitstofarmersand

projectimplementation§ Tousetheknowledgegainedtoimprovetheirfarmingactivities§ ToknowandunderstandwhatSAIis,sinceitisthefirsttimesomepeoplearehearing

thetermandtoshareinformationwiththosenotpresent§ Tocreateanopportunityforpartnershipinagriculture§ Expecttoseeaclearimplementationroadmapaftertheworkshop§ Let’sputmucheffortonvaluechangetowardsnewagriculturetechnologies§ Successfulworkshopthroughcontributionsfromdifferentstakeholders§ Tofindfastlabourforsoyabeangrowersandforinputstoarriveintime§ Tohaveattractiveratesandbepaidintime

1.2WorkshopobjectivesMr Tembo gave the meeting objectives and also highlighted the linkages with the existingICRAF-ledVIP4FSproject,fundedbyACIAR:

• Introducetheprojecttotargetedstakeholdersateachactionsite• IdentifykeystakeholdersengagedinthevariousaspectsofSAI• Captureinformationonthekeystakeholders,theirrolesandconnectivityinrelationtoSAI

andvaluechainswhereappropriate• IntroducetheStakeholderApproachtoRiskInformedandEvidenceBasedDecisionMaking

(SHARED)approach• InitiatediscussionontheSAIinterventionsateachsite• Capturebaselineinformationfortheproject• ConductSocialNetworkAnalysis(SNA)

1.3 IntroductiontotheprojectPatricia Masikati introduced the project highlighting the importance of the project incomplementingeffortsbytheVIP4FSproject.ThepresentationbeganbybrieflydescribingtheVIP4FS project and its main objective (To identify principles and drivers that can supportinnovationplatformstoimprovefoodsecuritybyconnectingmoresmallholderfarmerswithmarkets).ActivitiesthattheVIP4FSprojecthasalreadyundertakenwerealsohighlightedandtheseinclude:

• TheinceptionworkshopinLusakaandalsofieldvisitsinSolwezi• Scopingstudies• Household,producer,processorsurveys• Visitstoprojectsites• Valuechainselection• Stakeholdermappingworkshop

5

IntroductiontotheSAIRLAprojectstartedthroughadetailedexplanationoftheprojecttitleemphasizingonevidence,ecosystems,trade-offsandsustainableintensification.SAIRLAProjectAim:tobuildaninterdisciplinaryresearchprogrammetoincreasetheuptakeofcontext-appropriateSAIinnovationsinEastandsouthernAfricathroughevidencegeneration,dataanalyticsandthedevelopmentofinnovativetoolsforstakeholderengagementwith

evidence.It was also explained that the project is part of a larger programme: the SustainableAgricultural Intensification Research and Learning in Africa (SAIRLA) funded by the UKDepartment for Integrated Development fund and managed by WYG and University ofGreenwich. The overall programme is being implemented in six countries in Africa and theproject ledby theWorldAgroforestryCentre (ICRAF) isworking in three countries: Zambia,EthiopiaandTanzania.The project has a research focus and aims to address two key research questions.PrimaryQuestion:Howcan the trade-offs between increasedproductionandenvironmental impactbeanalysedandmanagedacrossdifferentscales?Secondary Question:What are the key policy processes?How canengagement structures,tools and metrics help decision makers create an enabling environment for resource-poorsmallholders, especially women and young people, to sustainably intensify agriculturalenterprises?BeforeshowingtheslidesontheprojectdefinitionofSAI,participantswereaskedtoshowbyraisingtheirhandsthosewhocoulddefineSAI.Onlyaboutfourparticipantsliftedtheirhands.Generally, their definition was for sustainable agriculture, highlighting practices related toincreased production per unit area sustainably. The project definition of SAI was thenpresented as approaches that increase food production in response to the demand of agrowingpopulationwhileconservingcriticalecosystemservices.TheneedforinterdisciplinaryapproachinSAIwashighlighted:• It is widely agreed that to accomplish these aims, a truly interdisciplinary approach is

needed.• Recent analyses show that key barriers to adoption of SAI by smallholders in SSA are

associatedwith,institutions,markets,policiesandtechnologies(Reardonetal.,2011).• Addressing these requires that SAI approaches embrace a farmer-centered approach,

encouragingconstructivecommunicationacrossmultiplestakeholders,developmentofaconducive policy environment (Barrett et al., 2002) and creative social learninginnovations, including co-learning with farmers and gender-transformative approaches(Prettyetal.,2011).

Themajorprojectactivitieswerepresentedandalsohowtheyarelinkedandwillbeundertakenthroughaniterativeprocessasshownintheprojectconceptualframeworkbelow:

6

Figure2:ConceptualFrameworkfortheproject,displayedinasimplifiedform.

Theprojectisworkingatmultiplescales,fromthefarmtotheinternationallevel.• Incorporate spatially explicit analyses of indicators of land and soil health aswell as

humanwell-beingacrossscales• The co-production of socio-ecological datasets will be used to conduct multi-scale

trade-offanalysistoinformandprioritizeSAIinterventions.After the introductory presentationMr PetaniHamazakaza asked: “Whichorganizations arecurrentlyengagedinSAI?”

1. Atwhatscalearetheyoperating?We received responses from a few organizations and generally they were talking aboutsustainable agriculture or some components of SA such as conservation agriculture andagroforestry;andgenerallyworkingwithindividualfarmersorfarmergroups:

1. InternationalVoluntaryServices(SVI):Usingtreesforenvironmentalconservationandsoilfertility

2. FarmBusinessAdvisor(FBA)usingcompostforcropproduction3. InternationalDevelopmentEnterprise(IDE),conservationagriculture4. Ministry of Agriculture; residue retention and use of ridges minimum tillage and

informingpolicy5. BARRACKMINEpromotingdiversificationandlookingforpartners6. LUMWANAMINEAgroforestry

2. WelcomenotebyspecialguestThe workshop was officiated and opened by the Acting Provincial Agriculture Coodinator(PACO)MrDennisMunyachusa.ThePACOwaswelcomedbyMrTembotheChiefAgriculture

7

Research Officer (CERO) from Zambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI)-HQ Lusaka. MrTembogaveabriefdescriptionoftheprojectandthiswasfollowedbythePACO’sspeech.Mr Munyachusa welcomed the facilitators and the participants to the workshop andappreciated their commitment and time spent on advancing agricultural production in thedistrictandprovinceatlarge.Hewentontotalkabouttheclimaticconditionsoftheprovincewhich are conducive for diverse agricultural production. However he stressed that despitethese good climatic conditions, the soils are poor and are highly leached and can potentialaffectcropproduction.Howeversoilconditionscanbeamendedthroughuseoforganicandinorganic fertilizersanduseofconservation farmingprices. Hesaid theprovincedoeshavepotentialtobeoneofthecountry’sfoodbaskets.TheactingPACOmentionedthattheprovince,inparticular,Solwezidistrictisfacingacrisisinpopulation increase duemining activities, thereby creating pressure for agriculture tomeetthedemandforfood.Thissituationhaspotentialforbothpositiveandnegativeoutcomes.Thepositivewould come if farmerswouldengage in seriousproductionand supply the crops indemand. However, if production is not done in a sustainable way this can cause landdegradation.Bothproductionandmarketingsectorsinthedistrictstillhavechallengeshencetheimportanceofstakeholders’participationtobringaboutsolutions.Hementionedhowthat thegovernment is promoting agriculture foodproduction throughvariousprojectslikethefarmerinputsupportprogramme(FISP)andsmallholderagribusinesspromotionprogramme(SAPP)throughtheMinistryofAgriculture.Despitetheseeffortsbythegovernment, production levels especially under FISP, are still very low at 2.2 ton/ha whenpotentialyieldscanbegreaterthan6ton/ha.Despitethesechallengesfacedinthedistrictbythevariousstakeholders,theactingPACOencouragedallthestakeholderstoworktogetherinpromotingtheValueChainapproachesforvariouscommodities.

Figure3:ActingPACO,MrDennisMunyachusa,providingremarksontheproject.

8

3 GatheringperspectivesAkeyicebreakertostartgatheringperspectivesanddiscussionsonSAI,thefollowingactivitywasconducted.MrEvansMutongaaskedparticipantstorespondtothestatement:‘SAIisjustanothernameforwhatwearealreadypracticing.’Participantswereaskedtophysicallymoveandstandnexttothestatementthatbestrepresentstheiranswer/view:“stronglyagree,somewhatagree,neutral,somewhatdisagreeandstronglydisagree”.Participantsateachofthepointswereaskedtoprovidesomeinsightontheirresponsechoice.

Figure4:ParticipantsengagedintheicebreakerdiscussiononthedefinitionofSAI.

3.1 FeedbackThefollowingwerethereasonsprovidedbyeachgroup:

i. Stronglydisagreed(oneparticipant)- Was in between strongly agree and somewhat agree because they argued that not

manyfarmersarecurrentlypracticingSAI- Farmers are producing little from very large areas especially those doing livestock

production- SAIisnotbeingpractised,becauseifitwas,productivitywouldbehigher- Thereisstilluseofnon-environmentalfriendlyagriculturalpractices

ii. Stronglyagreed(nineparticipants)- ConservationAgricultureissimilarandishelpingpeopleunderstandtheimportanceof

sustainableagriculture- Itisjustsustainableagriculturethatwehavebeenpreachingandpracticingforyears,

theonlythingwehavebeenmissing isthe intensificationbutbasicallytheaimisthesametoincreaseproductivity.

- Wearepractisingcropdiversificationandconservation

9

iii. Somewhatagreed(12participants)- AlthoughwearepromotingSA, farmersarestillexpanding their fields,which leds to

deforestation- WearepromotingSAtechnologiesbutthereislowadoption- Farmersensitizationisneeded- Increasedproductiononfarmisoccurringbutnotdoneholistically- Thereislotofroomforimprovement,wehavereceivedtrainingbuthavenotreached

levelofhighproductionduetotheknowledgeitrequires- Fewfarmersarenotaware

iv. Neutral(threeparticipants)- Weareinthetransportbusinessreallydonothavemuchtosay- Amneitherthisorthatside

4 SustainableAgricultural Intensification(SAI)-relevantpracticesinSolweziDistrict

Ingroups,participantswereaskedtoidentifythreetofourSAIpracticescurrentlyongoinginthedistrict.Eachpracticewasrecordedonthetopofacardwiththegender(men,women,both)usingthatpracticealsobeingrecorded.Thebenefitsandanynegativeconsequencesaswellasbarrierstoadoptionwerediscussedinthegroupsandrecorded.

Figure5:OnegroupdiscussingandrecordingkeySAIpractices,benefits,negativeconsequencesandbarrierstoadoption.

Table1. SAIpractices, gender relevant to thepractice,benefits,negative consequencesandbarrierstoadoption

10

SAIpractice Gender(M/F/B)

Benefits Negativeconsequences

Barrierstoadoption

Group1Intercropping Women -Soil

improvement-Reducedcostsofproduction-Improved waterretention.

-Reducedplantpopulation fortargetcrop

-Limitedaccesstoextensionservices-Culture

Conservationagriculture-compostmanureanditsuses

Men -Improvedsoilfertility-Soilimprovement-Reducedcostsofproduction-Improvedwaterretention.

-Smell

-Labourintensive-Timeconsuming-Limitedquantities

Fisheries-fishcagefarming

Both -Highproductivity-Controlledmanagement

-Highcostofproduction-Theft

Useofbamboosinstakingoftomatoes

Men -Reduceddeforestation-Quickestablishment

-Availabilityofbamboo-Takes time togrow

Group2Use of permanentplanting stations(minimumtillage)

Both LesslabourLesscostMountainsoilstructure

-Toomuchweed-Useofherbicides-Destroysoilorganisms

-Highinitialcosts-Traditionalperceptions-Policymatters

Useofagroforestry

Both -Improvesoilfertility-Uselesschemicalfertilizer-Lessharmfultotheenvironment

-Overgrowth(shading)

-Notenoughplantingmaterials-Additionalwork-Takelongtogrow-Treesusemorelandinthefields

Croprotation Both -Lessdiseases-Soilsimproved

-Labour-Lackof

11

knowledge-Notenoughmanpower-Profits-Notenoughland-Notpracticalforlargescalefarmers

Group3Croprotation Both -Improvedsoil

fertility-Reducedpestsanddiseases

-Accesstoseed-Marketchallenges

-Toomanypractices-Lackoftechnicalknowhow

Intercroppingwithagroforestryspecies

Both -Reducedriskofcropfailure-Improvedsoilfertility-Reducedpestinfestation

-Competitionfornutrients-Lossofharvest

-Accesstoseedforagroforestryspecies

Moisturemanagementpracticese.g.mulching

Both -Improvedcropproduction

-Labourintensive-Attractstermites

-Lossofmulchingmaterialsfromfire

Organicfarmingorutilizationofcropresidues

Both -Improvedcropyield-Improvedsoilfertility-Cheaper

-Increasedspreadofweeds-Inadequatequantities

-Accessoravailability-Lackofknowledge

Group4Conservationagriculturebasins

Both -Costsaving(time,labour)-Maximumuseofinput

-Seedrot -Flooding-Mindset

Croprotation Both -Diseasecontrol-Soilfertilityimprovement

-Limitedland-Cropfailure-Croppreference

Integratedfarming

Both -Costeffective-Promotesdiversification

-Knowledgeintensive-Highincidenceofdiseases

12

ItisveryinterestingtoseestakeholdershaveanunderstandingofnegativeimpactsarebroughtaboutbypromotedSAIpractices.Examplesarecroprotation,agroforestryandconservationagriculturebasins.

5 Stakeholder Approach to Risk Informed and Evidence BaseDecisionMaking(SHARED)

PatriciaMasikati,ofICRAF,presentedontheSHAREDapproach,whichis:• Ademanddriven facilitationprocess for co-learningand co-negotiationof actions to

achievemutuallyagreedupondevelopmentoutcomes.• TheSHAREDsupportsthatdecision-makingmustbeinclusive,embracethecomplexity

ofreality,takeintoaccountriskandidentifyinvestmentpriorities.• The SHARED approach includes convening and facilitating the integration of diverse

knowledge systems, sectors and institutions and opportunities for stakeholders tointeractwithandinterrogatetheknowledge,experienceandevidence.

Figure6:FourkeyphasesoftheSHAREDapproach.

TheuniquefeaturesofSHAREDinclude:• Decisionscanbetestedtowardlongtermdesiredoutcomesandimpacts.• Emphasis is placed on scientific and experience based evidence, and a comprehensive

facilitationprocessthatintegratesresearch,practiceandpolicy.• Negotiationsarebasedonamuchstronger foundationalunderstandingof intervention

implicationsandnecessarychangesinbehaviour.Examples of SHARED approach applicationwere given includingwork in Turkana County inKenya.

13

6 RootcauseanalysisforbarrierstoadoptionofSAIpracticesParticipantsagreedonfourkeybarrierstoadoptionofSAIpracticesinthedistrict.Eachgroupaddressedoneof thesekeybarriers.Participantsdrewmaps showing the causesof thekeybarrier. For each cause the question ‘Why?’was asked so the groupsmoved towards rootcauses.Thetakehomemessageofthisexercisewasthatrootcausesneedtobeaddressedwhenconsideringbarrierstoadoption.Belowarepicturesshowingresultsoftheexercisefromthedifferentgroups.

Resultsofrootcauseanalysis

Figure7:Rootcauseoflimitedfarmeraccesstoextensionservices,Group1.

14

Figure8:Rootcauseanalysisofpooraccesstoproductionmeansforwomen,Group2.

Figure9:Rootcauseoftoomanynewpractices/technologies,Group3.

15

Figure10:Rootcauseanalysisaroundhighincidenceofdiseaseinintegratedfarming,Group4.

7 StakeholdermappingParticipantsworkedingroupstolistthestakeholdersrelatedtoSAIthattheyknewof.Table2.StakeholderslistedbyeachgroupGroup StakeholdernameinEnglish1 - MinistryofAgriculture/ZambiaAgricultureResearchInstitute(ZARI)

- Musika- LumwanaMine- InternationalDevelopmentEnterprise(IDE)- InternationalVoluntaryServices(SVI)- KansanshiMine- ZambiaNationalFarmersUnion(ZNFU)- ZambiaCommercialFarmers- WorldVisionInternational

2 - Farmers/Cooperatives- DistrictAgricultureCoordinator’s(DACO)office- ZARI- ZNFU- Lumwanamine- KansanshiFoundation- IDE- SVI/Peacecorps- DepartmentofLivestockandFisheries- MinistryofCommerce(DCOs)- Agrodealers- Consumers- Departmentofforestry

3 - DepartmentofAgriculture

16

- Farmers- ZARI- Kansanshi- IDE- ZNFU- Lumwanamine- SVI- DistrictCooperativeUnit(DCU)- WVI

4 - Farmers- Lendingagencies- Processors- Householdconsumers- Transporters- Traders- Extensionservices- Agrodealers

Onaflipchartthegroupsdrewthestakeholders,withthesizeofeachcircleindicatingtheimportanceofthestakeholder(biggercirclesmoreimportant).Linesweredrawnbetweenstakeholderstoindicateinteractionwitharrowsusedtoindicatethedirectionoftheinteraction(onewayorbothways).Solidlinesindicatingstrongerinteractionswhilethedottedlinesshowweakinteractions.Theparticipatorystakeholdermappingexerciseaimstogetindividualsandorganizationstostartthinkingaboutnetworks,flowofinformation,collaborationaswellasgaps.ThestakeholdermapspreparedbyeachgroupindicatestherelevantSAIstakeholders,theirimportanceandconnections.

Figure11:ParticipatorystakeholdermappingfromGroup1.

17



18


Individualswerethenaskedtofillasurvey(Appendix3)aboutthestakeholderstheirorganisationinteractswithinrespecttoSAI.ThesedatawillbeusedtoquantitativelyassessandmapstakeholdersworkinginSAI,identifylinkagesaswellasopportunitiesforengagement.TheresultsfromthesesurveyswillbereportedinboththebaselineassessmentandstakeholdermappingMilestoneReports.Duringtheafternoonsessions,participantswereindividuallyinterviewedtodeterminetheirengagementinSAIrelatedpractices,policyandprogrammesandtheiraccesstoinformation.Responseswerecollectedonhardcopysurveys(seeAppendix4).Thesedataareusedinthesocialnetworkanalysis(SNA)tobepresentedintheMilestoneReport.

8 CloseandnextstepsPatriciaMasikati,fromICRAFandMrTembo,ofZARI,closedtheworkshopbythankingallparticipantsfortheircontributionsandengagement.Mr.Tembohighlightedthat:

• Stakeholdernetworkinformationwillbemapped(willshoworganisationname)asabaselineandbeusedtoidentifyentrypointsforfutureactivities

• NextactivityinthefieldwillbeparticipatoryidentificationofSAIinterventionsforpilots(earlynextyear)

• SHAREDworkshopisscheduledformid-latenextyear(2017)Participantswereaskediftherewereanyquestionsorcomments.Participantsprovidedcontactdetailsforsharingprojectdocuments.Themeetingwasclosedwithaprayerfromtheparticipan

19

9 AppendicesAppendix1.WorkshopAgenda–September29,2016,Solwezi,ZambiaSession Time Activity Responsible1 8.30-9.00 Registration, Evans/Lorraine(ZARI)2 9:00–

9:15Openingremarks(PACO)WelcomeandIntroductionofParticipants

Lorraine

2 9.15-10.30 WorkshopObjectivesIntroductionofProject

Patricia/Howard/Petani

10.30-11.00

TeaBreak(interviewswithsomestakeholdersplusgroupphoto)

All

3 11.00-12.00

DiscussiononSAIandidentificationofmainpracticesintheareaanddecisionmakinglevelsandprocesses

PatriciaEvans

4 12.00-13.00

IntroductiontoSHAREDanddecisionmakingprocesses

Patricia

13.00-14.00

Lunch(interviewswithsomestakeholders)

5 14.00-15.30

ParticipatoryexerciseonstakeholdermappingCompletionofstakeholdernetworkformCompleteonepagequestionnaireonstakeholderinformation(includebaselineinterviewswithsomestakeholders)Teabreakincludedinthistime

PatriciaEvansLorraineHoward

15:30-16:00

Teabreak All

6 16.00-16.30

Interviewswithsomestakeholders,Closeandnextsteps

Howard/Patricia

20

Appendix2.ListofParticipants–SolweziStakeholderMappingWorkshop

No Name Gender Organisation Contactnumber(allhave+260)

1 JulianaNgandu F Nwandana(IDE) 9774495612 WillyKalota M TransportAssociation 9774206193 NtamboJerry M Farmer/DCU 9639510484 PetanHamazakaza M ZARI 9774409485 SaraChumya F MUSACCO 9754137526 AggieChama F IDE 9558553717 ChiyesoMorgan M Chikango 09683065538 MuyoboShimabale M DACO 09774580619 Martinsitumbeko M PFLC -10 Mtongaevans M agriculture 097830174511 Lorainchilipa F ZARI -12 Abrahammutale M MinistryofCommerce 097724999813 Denismunachusa M Ag/PACO -14 Kasondezimba M ZARI/Ag-PO 095588030515 Landlesskasaro M ZNFU -16 Chrittlershamabenga M MolidAgro 095585537117 Kansonsokelvin M Farmers -18 SydeyMusemangeji M KanshanshiFoundation 09649286219 KutapaEmma F ForestryDeapartment 097779299120 TemboHoward M ZARI-HQ 097780518221 KyanikaAmon M ZambiaCorrectionalServices 097771041622 KasonsoKelvin M Farmer 096999141323 OsbornMutale M ZARI 097853223824 HimangaNsekule M ZARI 097805968925 RoySakahundu M MaphesoFarmergroup 096699891426 RichardChilikima M MinistryofAgriculture 097742990527 PhiriJimmy M ZNS 097946400728 KalubetoErad M SVI 097664935029 ChristopherMukala M LMC 09777353230 FloydChipaela M ZARI -31 JulianaNg’andu F IDE 0977449561

21

Appendix3.StakeholderNetworkSurveyTool.Solwezi District Zambia 29 September 2016 Name: __________________ Organisation representing: ____________ Please provide details on any other organizations or persons your organization works with or is in contact with on sustainable agricultural intensification issues over the past year.

Organizationsorpersonsyourorganizationworkswithorisincontactwithonsustainableagriculturalintensificationissues(listeachstakeholderinitsownlinebelow)

Contacttype:1-Government2-Privatesector(profit)3-NGO4-Academicorresearchorg.5-Farmer’sorganization/union6-Communitybasedorganisation(CBO)7-Media8-Other(specify)

Interactionover(selectallthatapply):1-Policydevelopment2-Policyimplementation3-Researchdevelopment4-Programmeorprojectdevelopment5-Fundraising6–Provisionoftrainingorextension7-Other(specify)

Wheretheorganizationorpersonisbased(headquartered)

Specificlocationsinteractwiththeorganization/person(districtsetc)

Oneortwocontactname(s)withnumber,positionandgender1.Male2.Female

Howvaluableistheinteractionwiththiscontacttoyourorganisation?1.Very2.Moderately3.Notvery

Howoftendoyouinteractwiththem?1-Veryoften(dailyorweekly)2-Often(about1timepermonth)3-Sometimes(2-4timesperyear)4-Rarely(about1timeperyear)

Isinformationshared:1.Fromyoutothem2.Fromthemtoyou3.Both-ways

22

Appendix4.StakeholderProfileInformationandBaselineDataCollectionTool.Person filling this profile:____________________ Date : __ / 09 / 2016 Start time of survey: ______ Country (circle): Ethiopia Tanzania Zambia Locality where individual is based (Eg name of city or town): ______________ Introduce yourself. Explain the following: We are carrying out this questionnaire for ICRAF and its partners to help us understand more about Sustainable Agricultural Intensification (SAI) as it is promoted at both the local and national levels in your country. You may be aware that Sustainable Agricultural Intensification--or SAI for short--has been defined as a form of agricultural production where yields are increased without adverse environmental impacts like deforestation, water pollution, soil erosion, and encroachment on areas not already under agricultural production. Would you be willing to spend approximately about 20 minutes of your time answering my questions? (circle) Yes No

1. What is your full name?

2. Gender Female Male

3. What is your contact number?

4. Do you have an email address? If yes, what is your email address?

5. What is the name of the main organization you work for or represent?

6. What type of organization is this?

Government Private sector (profit) NGO (Non Governmental Organization) Academic or research organization Farmer's organization/union Community based Organization (CBO) Media Other (specify) ___________

7. What your main role (position) in this organization or body?

Director/Chair/Leader Board Member Unit Head/Manager Program/Project/Extension Officer Other (specify) ___________

8. In what particular ways is sustainable agricultural intensification-- defined as intensifying agricultural production without negative environmental impacts--relevant to the work your organization does? (select all that apply)

We are involved in developing country-level agricultural policies We are involved in designing specific agricultural programmes and projects We are involved in managing or implementing agricultural programmes and projects We provide agricultural extension support directly to farmers We carry out research on agriculture Other (specify) ___________

9. To what extent does your organization develop government agricultural policy that may be relevant to SAI?

To a large extent To a medium extent To a small extent Not at all

23

10. To what extent does your organization make decisions on how resources (financial and human) are allocated to the agricultural sector?


11. To what extent is your organization involved in the development and design of agricultural programmes, projects, and interventions?


12. To what extent is your organization involved in disseminating information on improved agricultural methods?


13. Over the past 12 months--that is, since September of last year--have you either read, participated in a workshop or training, or accessed information from another source on how to intensify agricultural production without harming the environment?

Yes No (many of the stakeholders at local level may say no here, in which case move to question 23 and then go to projects and then the stakeholder network survey)

14. What type of information were you able to access in particular? (select all that apply)

General background information on SAI Information on specific SAI practices relevant for specific areas of your country Evidence on the effectiveness of one or more specific SAI interventions, such as that generated from an impact study Other (specify)_____________

15. What was the source of this information on SAI? (select all that apply)

Brochure/pamphlet on SAI with a specific focus on your country Brochure/pamphlet on SAI that does not specifically focus on your country General (non-research) report on SAI specifically focused on your country General (non-research) report on SAI not particularly focused on your country Research report on SAI for research undertaken in your country Research report on SAI for research undertaken in another country Training session or workshop on SAI Internet information on SAI (word form) Online video Television program Other (specify) ___________

16. Did this information specifically discuss or present how the SAI interventions in question affect men and women differently? If yes How in particular did this information describe how the SAI intervention(s) affects men and women differently? (select all that apply)

Yes No General description on how SAI may potentially affect men and women differently Findings from a qualitative case study on how SAI affects men and women differently Disaggregated quantitative data on how SAI affects men an women differently Other (specify) ___________

17. Did this information describe how the SAI interventions in question affect other specific social groups differently, such as rich versus poor farmers or farmers in one particular geographical area versus another? If yes How in particular did this information discuss

Yes No General description on how SAI may potentially affect different groups of farmers differently Findings from a qualitative case study on how SAI affects different groups of farmers differently Disaggregated quantitative data on how SAI affects

24

or present how the SAI intervention(s) affected these other social groups of farmers differently? (select all that apply)

different groups of farmers differently Other (specify) ___________

18. To what extent did you find this information on SAI trustworthy and reliable (that is, credible)?


19. To what extent did you find this information relevant and applicable to the work of your organization?


20. Has your organization incorporated any of this information on SAI into its work over the last 12 months, that is, since September of last year? If yes In what particular ways did your organization do this? (select all that apply)

Yes No It was used in the design of government/ organizational policy and/or strategy on agriculture It was used in the design of one or more specific programmes or projects It was used in the design of one or more specific interventions under an existing programme or project It was used to inform the training of or direct extension given to farmers It was used to inform design of extension materials to be delivered to farmers Other (specify) ___________

21. Has any of the information/evidence on how SAI affects men or women differently been factored into your oganization's work over the past 12 months? If yes In what particular ways did your organization do this? (select all that apply)


22. Has any of the information/evidence on how SAI affects particular groups of farmers (other than men and women) differently been factored into your organization's work over the past 12 months? If yes In what particular ways did your organization do this? (select all that apply)


23. Is your organization or group involved in any agricultural programmes, projects or initiatives for which sustainable agricultural intensification may be relevant?

Yes No

25

I am now going to ask you questions about the specific programmes, projects, or initiatives that you organization is involved with that may be directly work on SAI or for which SAI may be relevant. Programmes, Projects, Initiatives (capture as many as possible) Initiative 1 Initiative 2 Initiative 3 Initiative 4 What is the name of this programme, project or initiative?

What are the specific objectives of this programme, project or initiative?

Is this programme, project or initiative already working directly on SAI? If not To what extent do you think that the integration of SAI issues into this programme, project, or initiative is important?

What is the budget of this particular programme, project or initiative?

Date post:	04-Oct-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times

Report Zambia SAIRLA stakeholder meeting Solwezi Sept...

Documents