IL
JR
19-045
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
DATA COLLECTION SURVEY
ON PROMOTION FOR
GLOBALLY COMPETITIVE INDUSTRY
FINAL REPORT
MAY 2019
JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA)
NOMURA RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LTD.
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
(BAPPENAS)
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
DATA COLLECTION SURVEY
ON PROMOTION FOR
GLOBALLY COMPETITIVE INDUSTRY
FINAL REPORT
MAY 2019
JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA)
NOMURA RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LTD.
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
(BAPPENAS)
i
Table of Contents
0. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 0.1. Objectives of the Study ......................................................................................................... 1 0.2. Timeline ................................................................................................................................ 1 0.3. Overview of Phase 1 ............................................................................................................. 1 0.4. Overview of Phase 2 ............................................................................................................. 2 0.5. Further steps .......................................................................................................................... 3
1. Overview of the study ............................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Background of the study ....................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Objective of the study ........................................................................................................... 9 1.3. Target areas ......................................................................................................................... 10 1.4. Target Industry .................................................................................................................... 10 1.5. Stakeholders of the Study ................................................................................................... 10 1.6. Schedule of the Study ......................................................................................................... 11 1.7. Scope of the Study .............................................................................................................. 11 1.8. General approach of the study ............................................................................................ 12 1.9. Methodology of Global Value Chain Analysis .................................................................... 13
1.9.1. Methodology of Global Value Chain (GVC) Analysis ................................................ 13 1.9.2. Methodology of supply chain analysis ........................................................................ 14 1.9.3. Methodology of value chain analysis .......................................................................... 15
2. National Development Planning ............................................................................................. 16 2.1. National Development Planning System ............................................................................ 16 2.2. Development Plan ............................................................................................................... 16 2.3. Economic Policy Packages ................................................................................................. 17
3. Transportation machinery ....................................................................................................... 19 3.1. Current status of the industry .............................................................................................. 19 3.2. Current status of automotive policy .................................................................................... 21
3.2.1. Past policy review ....................................................................................................... 21 3.3. Current Policy Review ........................................................................................................ 22 3.4. Supply Chain and Value Chain Analysis and its implication .............................................. 27
3.4.1. Supply Chain Analysis and its implication ................................................................. 27 3.4.2. Value Chain Analysis and its implication .................................................................... 30 3.4.3. Spatial supply chain analysis ...................................................................................... 32
3.5. Potential/constraint ............................................................................................................. 34 3.5.1. Potential ...................................................................................................................... 34
ii
3.5.2. Challenges from spread of x-EVs ............................................................................... 36 3.5.3. Challenges from Competitions from region and outside of region ............................. 37 3.5.4. Challenges from competitions for attracting investment in technology areas and
upstream value chain activities ................................................................................................... 38 3.6. Future vision 2025 and challenges ...................................................................................... 40
3.6.1. Becoming Export Hub of MPVs, Small Cars, and Trucks for Emerging Market ....... 40 3.6.2. Becoming R&D&D hub of MPVs, Small Cars and Trucks ........................................ 42
3.7. Policy scenario .................................................................................................................... 43 3.7.1. Policy Implementation ................................................................................................ 44 3.7.2. Promote agglomeration of auto parts industry and strengthen cost competitiveness .. 44 3.7.3. Product development and technology development and its Policy Measures ............. 48
4. Electrical and electronics industry .......................................................................................... 50 4.1. Current status of E&E industry ........................................................................................... 50
4.1.1. Overview of the sector ................................................................................................ 50 4.1.2. Current status of B to C electronics ............................................................................ 54 4.1.3. Current status of B to B electronics ............................................................................ 58 4.1.4. Current status and challenges of industrial policy on E&E industry .......................... 59
4.2. Potential and Constraints .................................................................................................... 59 4.2.1. Potential of E&E industry in Indonesia ...................................................................... 59 4.2.2. Challenges and constraints for further development ................................................... 62
4.3. Future vision 2025 and challenges ...................................................................................... 63 4.3.1. Future supply chain and value chain of E&E sector ................................................... 63 4.3.2. Core concept of Indonesian version of Industry 4.0 ................................................... 64 4.3.3. Development scenario of Indonesian version of Industry 4.0 ..................................... 65
4.4. Policy scenario .................................................................................................................... 67 4.4.1. Vision and scenario ..................................................................................................... 67 4.4.2. Policy program and KPI .............................................................................................. 70 4.4.3. Policy measures to achieve KPIs ................................................................................ 73
4.5. Electric Commerce and Industry 4.0 ................................................................................... 79 4.5.1. A brief overview of the Electric Commerce in Indonesia ........................................... 79 4.5.2. A case of EC incorporated in the manufacturing supply chain ................................... 80 4.5.3. Potentiality and challenges of EC in the context of Industry 4.0 ................................ 81
5. Food Processing Industry ........................................................................................................ 82 5.1. Current status ...................................................................................................................... 82
5.1.1. Overview of the sector/Industrial Outlook .................................................................. 82 5.1.2. Current status and challenges of industrial policy on food processing industry ......... 85
iii
5.1.3. Supply chain and value chain analysis ........................................................................ 86 5.2. Potential/constraint ............................................................................................................. 88
5.2.1. Potential of Food Processing industry in Indonesia .................................................... 88 5.2.2. Challenges and constraints for further development ................................................... 91 5.2.3. Challenges from intraregional and extra-regional Competition .................................. 91
5.3. Future vision 2025 and challenges ...................................................................................... 94 5.3.1. Reference for Future Food Industry Vision ................................................................. 94 5.3.2. Vision for Indonesia’s Future Food Industry............................................................... 96
5.4. Policy scenario .................................................................................................................... 97 5.4.1. Policy scenario ............................................................................................................ 97 5.4.2. Policy program and KPI .............................................................................................. 98 5.4.3. Policy measures to achieve KPIs .............................................................................. 100
6. Infrastructure and Logistics .................................................................................................. 105 6.1. Infrastructure Development Planning Framework ............................................................ 105
6.1.1. Institutions................................................................................................................. 105 6.1.2. Infrastructure Development Plans ............................................................................. 106
6.2. Current Situation and Issues in Infrastructure and Logistics ............................................ 106 6.2.1. Roads ........................................................................................................................ 106 6.2.2. Railway ..................................................................................................................... 108 6.2.3. Sea Transportation .................................................................................................... 111 6.2.4. Civil Aviation ............................................................................................................ 114 6.2.5. Logistics .................................................................................................................... 116
6.3. Tentative Policy Action Idea in Infrastructure and Logistics ............................................ 118 6.3.1. Concept ..................................................................................................................... 118 6.3.2. Upgrade Sea Toll Road Program to Strengthen Supply Chain for Non-Java Industrial
Agglomerations ......................................................................................................................... 118 6.3.3. Development of Java Automotive Industrial Belt ..................................................... 119
7. Current status and issues of industrial human resources ....................................................... 120 7.1. Current status and issues of educational institutions ......................................................... 120 7.2. Current status and problems of industrial human resources in industry ........................... 124 7.3. Issues and Current Policies in Industrial Human Resources ............................................. 125 7.4. Direction for Realization of Vision in 2025 ...................................................................... 128
8. Review of JICA’s past cooperation ....................................................................................... 131 8.1. Outline .............................................................................................................................. 131 8.2. Findings ............................................................................................................................ 132
9. Policy packages ..................................................................................................................... 135
iv
9.1. Overview of policy packages ............................................................................................ 135 9.2. Implement industrialization plan (Inter-ministerial Committee) ...................................... 135 9.3. Local Enterprise/SME Development ................................................................................ 137 9.4. Promotion of R&D&D local and foreign investment ....................................................... 140 9.5. Human resource upgrade .................................................................................................. 141 9.6. Logistical infrastructure Upgrade ..................................................................................... 142 9.7. Export environment improvement .................................................................................... 143
9.7.1. Achievements of Economic Policy Package ............................................................. 143 9.7.2. Monitoring system to focus on competitiveness of export........................................ 144
9.8. Industrial Dialogue ............................................................................................................ 145 10. Collection of data of Indonesian companies ......................................................................... 147
10.1. Objective and requirements of the data survey ................................................................. 147 10.2. Nationwide Survey ............................................................................................................ 147
10.2.1. Scope of target enterprises ........................................................................................ 147 10.2.2. Area of Nationwide Survey ....................................................................................... 148 10.2.3. Questionnaire of Nationwide Survey ........................................................................ 149 10.2.4. Results of Nationwide Survey ................................................................................... 149
10.3. Tegal Survey ..................................................................................................................... 150 10.3.1. Target scope of Tegal Survey .................................................................................... 150 10.3.2. Questionnaire of Tegal Survey .................................................................................. 151 10.3.3. Result of Tegal Survey .............................................................................................. 151
10.4. Empirical analysis on supply chain and production network of Indonesian companies ... 151 11. Implementation of Pilot Project to support plan, implementation and monitoring of industrial
policies through inter-ministerial coordination ................................................................................. 153 11.1. Preparation and work plan ................................................................................................ 153 11.2. Framework of plan, implementation and monitoring of industrial policies through
inter-ministerial coordination ........................................................................................................ 154 11.2.1. Establishment of Inter-Ministerial Committee (Policy Coordination Board (PCB)) 154 11.2.2. Establishment of Working Group (WG) ................................................................... 163
11.3. Tax incentives for RD&D and industrial human resource development ........................... 164 11.3.1. Outline of WG and PCB ........................................................................................... 164 11.3.2. Tax Incentive on R&D&D ........................................................................................ 165 11.3.3. Tax incentive on human resource development (HRD) ............................................ 168
11.4. Financing Program for SME on Industrial Innovation...................................................... 170 11.4.1. Outline of WG and PCB ........................................................................................... 170 11.4.2. Recommended policy measure ................................................................................. 171
v
11.4.3. Discussion issues at pre-KINAS ............................................................................... 178 11.5. Development of Biofuel and Ecosystem ........................................................................... 179
11.5.1. Outline of WG ........................................................................................................... 179 11.5.2. Background of biofuel technology development policy ........................................... 180 11.5.3. Discussion and result of WG ..................................................................................... 184
11.6. Review of progress of the pilot project ............................................................................. 186 11.7. Lessons and recommendations .......................................................................................... 187
11.7.1. Proposal of topics and process of recommendation .................................................. 187 11.7.2. Call of KINAS meetings ........................................................................................... 188 11.7.3. Discussion and agreement in KINAS meetings ........................................................ 188
12. Final meeting and recommendations .................................................................................... 189 12.1. Inter-ministry policy forum ............................................................................................... 190
12.1.1. Achievements ............................................................................................................ 190 12.1.2. Further potential approach ........................................................................................ 190
12.2. Local enterprise / SME development ................................................................................ 191 12.2.1. Achievements ............................................................................................................ 191 12.2.2. Further potential approach ........................................................................................ 191
12.3. Promotion of R&D&D local and foreign investment ....................................................... 192 12.3.1. Achievements ............................................................................................................ 192 12.3.2. Further potential approach ........................................................................................ 192
12.4. Human resource upgrade .................................................................................................. 192 12.4.1. Achievements ............................................................................................................ 192 12.4.2. Further potential approach ........................................................................................ 192
12.5. Logistical infrastructure upgrade ...................................................................................... 194 12.6. Promotion of business friendly environment .................................................................... 195
13. Annex .................................................................................................................................... 197 13.1. Empirical analysis on supply chain and production network of Indonesian companies ... 197 13.2. Agenda of Industrial Dialogue .......................................................................................... 218
13.2.1. Meeting Agenda of 1st Industrial Dialogue ............................................................... 218 13.2.2. Meeting Agenda of 2nd Industrial Dialogue .............................................................. 219 13.2.3. Meeting Agenda of 3rd Industrial Dialogue ............................................................... 220 13.2.4. Meeting Agenda of 4th Industrial Dialogue ............................................................... 221
13.3. Micro data survey ............................................................................................................. 222 13.3.1. List of Nationwide Survey ........................................................................................ 222 13.3.2. List of Tegal Survey .................................................................................................. 227 13.3.3. Questionnaire of Nationwide Survey ........................................................................ 228
vi
13.3.4. Questionnaire of Tegal Survey .................................................................................. 251 13.4. Reference .......................................................................................................................... 278
vii
List of Figures
Figure 1 GDP Growth of ASEAN countries ................................................................................. 5 Figure 2 GNI per capita of ASEAN countries .............................................................................. 6 Figure 3 GDP and Employment by Economic Sectors as of 2015................................................ 7 Figure 4 GDP per employee by economic sectors ........................................................................ 8 Figure 5 Level shift of Share of Industry in GDP as compared with Income Level ..................... 9 Figure 6 Flow of the Study ......................................................................................................... 11 Figure 7 General approach of the Study ..................................................................................... 13 Figure 8 Image of Global Value Chain Analysis ......................................................................... 14 Figure 9 Example of further detailed supply chain ..................................................................... 14 Figure 10 Example of value chain .............................................................................................. 15 Figure 11 Development Planning System of Indonesia .............................................................. 16 Figure 12 Changes in automotive production, import and export, and sales in Indonesia .......... 20 Figure 13 Automotive Industry Roadmap (2018-2035) .............................................................. 24 Figure 14 Automotive Production Target (2018-2035) ............................................................... 24 Figure 15 Outline of Low Cost Green Car (LCGC) Policy ........................................................ 25 Figure 16 MOLINA Project ........................................................................................................ 27 Figure 17 Current Status of Supply Chain in Indonesia.............................................................. 28 Figure 18 Current Status of Supply Chain in Indonesia.............................................................. 29 Figure 19 Current Status of Suppliers in Indonesia .................................................................... 30 Figure 20 Current status of value chain in Indonesia .................................................................. 31 Figure 21 Current status of value chain in Indonesia .................................................................. 31 Figure 22 Current Status of Midstream of Value Chain of local suppliers in Indonesia ............. 32 Figure 23 Greater Jakarta industrial land price ........................................................................... 33 Figure 24 Minimum wages in Jakarta, Semarang and Surabaya ................................................ 33 Figure 25 Java Automotive Industrial Belt ................................................................................. 34 Figure 26 Vehicle Penetration of major ASEAN countries ......................................................... 34 Figure 27 Light Vehicle Market forecast of Major ASEAN countries (2005-2025) ................... 35 Figure 28 MPV market status and forecast of major ASEAN countries (2011-2024) ................ 35 Figure 29 Market of C and D segments in the region .............................................................. 36 Figure 30 Future steps of x-EVs Penetration .............................................................................. 37 Figure 31 Potential threat from China and India ......................................................................... 38 Figure 32 Ease of Doing Business of Indonesia and Thailand (2019) ........................................ 39 Figure 33 Investment policy in comparison with Thailand ......................................................... 40 Figure 34 Incentives for investment promotion in Thailand ....................................................... 40 Figure 35 Major challenges/issues of Indonesia becoming export hub ...................................... 42
viii
Figure 36 Major challenges/issues of Indonesia becoming R&D&D hub .................................. 43 Figure 37 Policy Implementation and its Policy Measures ......................................................... 43 Figure 38 Trainers’ Training Program under AHRDIP ............................................................... 46 Figure 39 Categories of E&E sector ........................................................................................... 50 Figure 40 Number of production of Flat Panel Display TV in major Asian countries (2016) .... 51 Figure 41 Number of production of Room Air Conditioner in major Asian countries (2016) .... 52 Figure 42 Number of production of Smart Phone in major Asian countries (2016) ................... 52 Figure 43 Number of production of Printer in major Asian countries (2016) ............................. 53 Figure 44 Categorization of electronics products by location selection factors .......................... 54 Figure 45Top 5 E&E items that has trade deficit in 2015 ........................................................... 55 Figure 46 Top 5 E&E items that has trade deficit in 2015 .......................................................... 56 Figure 47 Supply chain analysis for E&E sector (B to C) .......................................................... 57 Figure 48 Supply chain analysis for E&E sector (B to C) .......................................................... 58 Figure 49 Drivers of process automation in automotive sector .................................................. 60 Figure 50 Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) and sensor technology ....................... 61 Figure 51 Types of x-EV and electronic components ................................................................. 61 Figure 52 Development scenario of B to B electronics and challenges ...................................... 63 Figure 53 Future supply chain of E&E and its relationship with automotive industry ............... 64 Figure 54 Future value chain of E&E ......................................................................................... 64 Figure 55 Core concept of Indonesian version of Industry 4.0 ................................................... 65 Figure 56 Scenario of automation machinery sub-sector development ...................................... 65 Figure 57 Necessary market growth of robotics in ASEAN to attract production ...................... 66 Figure 58 Virtuous cycle of electronics sector development ...................................................... 67 Figure 59 Development scenario for Factory and Product IoT in Indonesia .............................. 69 Figure 60 List of suggested policy program and KPIs ................................................................ 71 Figure 61 List of policy program and policy measures ............................................................... 73 Figure 62 Trend of the size of EC market in Indonesia and forecast .......................................... 79 Figure 63 Share of EC companies in Indonesia (Page view base in April 2017) ........................ 80 Figure 64 Business model of Salim Group including EC (elevenia) .......................................... 81 Figure 65 Provinces where the Agriculture, Hunting, and Fisheries is the major industry with
more than 40% of the labor market* ................................................................................... 82 Figure 66 Major ASEAN countries’ export of food products ..................................................... 84 Figure 67 Relative Yield (Indonesia/Thailand) ........................................................................... 85 Figure 68 Examples of Supply Chain / Production Process of Indonesia’s food industry .......... 87 Figure 69 Supply Chain / Production Process of food industry (using raw material produced
locally) ................................................................................................................................ 88
ix
Figure 70 Per Capita Packaged Food Sales................................................................................. 89 Figure 71 Halal Packaged Food Market (2010) .......................................................................... 90 Figure 72 Break down of Distribution Channels for Packaged Food ......................................... 91 Figure 73 Impact of Trade/Investment liberalization / Harmonization ....................................... 92 Figure 74 Example of Thailand’s facilitation of multi-sector (public-private) collaboration .. 96 Figure 75 Development scenario for Food Processing/Export Center in ASEAN ...................... 97 Figure 76 Policy program and KPI ............................................................................................. 99 Figure 77 MOTr Organization Chart ........................................................................................ 105 Figure 78 MPWH Organization Chart ...................................................................................... 105 Figure 79 Location of Major Highways and Industrial Area .................................................... 107 Figure 80 Highways in Jakarta Urban Area .............................................................................. 107 Figure 81 Trans Java Highway Network. .................................................................................. 108 Figure 82 Railway Network on Java Island .............................................................................. 109 Figure 83 Jakarta MRT Routes ................................................................................................. 110 Figure 84 Tanjung Priok Port Layout ........................................................................................ 113 Figure 85Current 15 Routes of Sea Toll Road Program ........................................................... 114 Figure 86 Logistics Performance Index (2016) of Indonesia and Other ASEAN Countries .... 117 Figure 87 Indonesian school system and overview of higher vocational education institutions
.......................................................................................................................................... 121 Figure 88 Changes in enrollment rate by education level in Indonesia (total number of people)
.......................................................................................................................................... 122 Figure 89Enrolment ratio for tertiary education for major countries in Asia ............................ 123 Figure 90 Outline of SMK-industry collaboration program ..................................................... 126 Figure 91 Overview of PEDP (as of the end of 2017) .............................................................. 127 Figure 92 PEDP participating schools ...................................................................................... 128 Figure 93 Issues and challenge of the industrial human resources ........................................... 129 Figure 94 Image of the pilot project .......................................................................................... 130 Figure 95 Inter-ministerial Committee...................................................................................... 136 Figure 96 Example of structure of the policy coordination forum ............................................ 137 Figure 97 Supporting local business and SMEs policy based on stages of grow-up ................ 138 Figure 98 Proposed preferential financial scheme .................................................................... 138 Figure 99 Comparison of SME finance promotion between Indonesia and Thailand .............. 139 Figure 100 Policy measures and ministries in charge for R&D&D promotion ........................ 140 Figure 101 Model Case project on Industry-government-university collaboration (Draft) ...... 141 Figure 102 Upgrade Sea Toll Road Program ............................................................................ 142 Figure 103 Development of Java Automotive Industrial Belt................................................... 143
x
Figure 104 Scope of target enterprises of the data survey for supply chain and production
network analysis................................................................................................................ 148 Figure 105 Comparison of 3 different types of coverage of target enterprises ......................... 148 Figure 106 Location of Tegal .................................................................................................... 150 Figure 107 Structure of KINAS at the beginning of the pilot project .................................... 153 Figure 108 Involvement of Legal Bureau ................................................................................. 155 Figure 109 Pragmatic overviews of Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy .......................... 156 Figure 110 Case Example of Industry-Academia-Government collaboration policy ............... 156 Figure 111 Policy for 10 major industries in Thailand .............................................................. 157 Figure 112 Policy decision process of Thailand .................................................................... 158 Figure 113 Policy decision process of Malaysia ....................................................................... 158 Figure 114 10 priority issues of Making Indonesia 4.0 ............................................................. 160 Figure 115 Conceptual structure of KINAS proposed by BAPPENAS .................................... 161 Figure 116 Preliminary procedure of decision making under KINAS (designed by BAPPENAS)
.......................................................................................................................................... 162 Figure 117 GERD and GDP per capita ..................................................................................... 165 Figure 118 R&D expenditure by sector in comparison with other countries ............................ 166 Figure 119 Incentive scheme of Malaysia ................................................................................. 166 Figure 120 Incentive scheme of Thailand ................................................................................. 167 Figure 121 Comparison of labor productivity in manufacturing sector .................................... 168 Figure 122 Comparison of tax deduction scheme for HRD ...................................................... 169 Figure 123 Typical case of structure of banking interest rate ................................................... 171 Figure 124 Distribution of Gross profit ratio of medium-sized manufacturing enterprises ...... 172 Figure 125 Ratio of amount actually borrowed as compared with planned amount (%) .......... 173 Figure 126 Recommended financial scheme ............................................................................ 174 Figure 127 Scheme of program management ........................................................................... 177 Figure 128 Comparison of alternative energy resources ........................................................... 181 Figure 129 Comparison of alternative energy resources ........................................................... 181 Figure 130 Forecast Maximum Blending ................................................................................. 183
xi
List of Tables
Table 1 Target Indicators in RPJMN ........................................................................................... 17 Table 2 Economic Policy Packages............................................................................................. 18 Table 3 Changes in automotive production, import and export, and sales in Indonesia ............. 20 Table 4 Annual production capacity of major automotive companies in Indonesia .................... 21 Table 5 History of Indonesian Automotive Policy ...................................................................... 22 Table 6 National Industrial Policy 2015-2019 (KIN).................................................................. 23 Table 7 Outline of TKDN or Local Content ............................................................................... 25 Table 8 Outline of Low Carbon Emission Plan (LCEP) and Low Carbon Emission Vehicle
(LCEV) ............................................................................................................................... 26 Table 9 x-EV Policy of Indonesia, Thailand, and Malaysia ........................................................ 27 Table 10 Top 5 Automotive products in trade deficit (2015) ...................................................... 28 Table 11 Image of Training Course in Politechnic D4 ................................................................ 47 Table 12 Sales of home appliances in Indonesia ......................................................................... 54 Table 13 E&E items that has trade surplus more than 1 m USD in 2015 ................................... 56 Table 14 Incentive scheme by BOI of Thailand .......................................................................... 77 Table 15 Global ranking of Indonesia’s Agricultural production (2013) .................................... 83 Table 16 Global ranking of Indonesia’s Processed Food Export amount (2014) ........................ 83 Table 17 Domestic and Foreign Sales of major domestic food processing companies ............... 87 Table 18 Examples of Restrictions prohibiting innovation and growth of Indonesia’s food
Industry ............................................................................................................................... 90 Table 19 Comparison of incentives provided in other countries (in Thailand, China, Vietnam) 93 Table 20 Comparison of Visions for the Food Industry (Thailand vs Indonesia) .................... 95 Table 21 Road Classification by Region ................................................................................... 106 Table 22 Traffic Volume on Some Highway Sections in Jakarta .............................................. 108 Table 23 Schedule Container Trains ......................................................................................... 111 Table 24 Freight Volume on Rail .............................................................................................. 111 Table 25 Port Classification ...................................................................................................... 112 Table 26 Loaded and Unloaded Cargos by Region and Type ................................................... 112 Table 27 Airport Classification ................................................................................................. 114 Table 28 Airlines operating scheduled domestic flights (2017) ................................................ 115 Table 29 Airlines operating scheduled domestic cargo flights (2017) ...................................... 115 Table 30 Domestic Air Transportation ...................................................................................... 116 Table 31 International Air Transportation ................................................................................. 116 Table 32 Existing Six Industrial Agglomerations in Java Island............................................... 119 Table 33 Outline of higher education institutions in Indonesia................................................. 123
xii
Table 34 Challenges on human resources from perspective of the industry ............................. 125 Table 35 PEDP overview (at start) ............................................................................................ 127 Table 36 Outline of JICA cooperation projects ......................................................................... 133 Table 37 Proposed policy packages .......................................................................................... 135 Table 38 Overview of Industrial Dialogue # 4 .......................................................................... 145 Table 39 Results of response among target samples ................................................................. 149 Table 40 Distribution of effective responses by districts .......................................................... 151 Table 41 Regulatory frameworks on industrial policy governance ........................................ 159 Table 42 Pro-cons of two options of legal formalization of KINAS ......................................... 163 Table 43 Outline of WG on Tax Incentive ................................................................................ 164 Table 44 Outline of PCB on Tax Incentive ............................................................................... 165 Table 45 Proposed incentive for R&D ...................................................................................... 167 Table 46 Proposed Tax deduction scheme for HRD ................................................................. 169 Table 47 Outline of WG on Financing Program for SME on Industrial Innovation ................. 170 Table 48 Outline of PCB on Financing Program for SME on Industrial Innovation ................ 170 Table 49 Recommendation on target investment projects ......................................................... 175 Table 50 Impact of innovation .................................................................................................. 177 Table 51 Result of cost benefit calculation ............................................................................... 178 Table 52 Outline of WG on Development of Biofuel and Ecosystem ...................................... 179 Table 53 Target of Co2 reduction .............................................................................................. 180 Table 54 Recommendation of MG level for B100 .................................................................... 182 Table 55 Comparison of Green Fuel and Bio Fuel (FAME) ..................................................... 182 Table 56 Progress check table (as of March 2019) ................................................................... 186 Table 57 Achievements and further potential approach ............................................................ 196
xiii
List of abbreviation
Abbreviation Full name in EnglishABS Anti-lock braking systemADAS Advanced driver assistance systemADB Asian Development BankAEC ASEAN Economic CommunityAFTA ASEAN Free Trade AreaAPPI Indonesian Electrical Manufacturers AssociationAPROBI Biofuel Manufacturer Association of IndonesiaASEAN Association of South East Asian NationsAUV Asian Utility VehicleMOM Ministry of Manpower
Ministry of National EducationBAPPEDA The Regional Development Planning AgencyBAPPENAS State Ministry of National Development Planning BoardBEV Battery Electric VehicleBHD Bio-Hydrogenated DieselBKF Fiscal Policy AgencyBKPM Investment Coordinating BoardBLK Job Training CenterBOI The Board of InvestmentBPOM Food and Medicine Regulatory AgencyBPS Statistic IndonesiaCAD Computer Aided DesignCAE Computer Aided EngineeringCAO Cabinet OfficeCBU Completed built units
CMEA Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs of the Republic ofIndonesia
CNG Compressed natural gasCPO Crude Palm OilCV Commerical vehicleECU Engine control unitEV Electric VehicleFAME Fatty Acid Methyl EsterGabel EMC & Indonesia Electronics Producers Association
GAIKINDO The Association of Indonesia Automotive Industries
GAPMMI Indonesian Food and Beverage Producers Association
GERD Gross Expenditure on Research and DevelopmentGHG Green House GasGIAMM Association of Automobile and Motor Equipment IndustriesGOI Government of IndonesiaGVC Global Value ChainHEV Hybrid Electric VehicleHRD Human Resource DevelopmentI4.0 Making Indonesia 4.0
xiv
Abbreviation Full name in EnglishIMDIA Indonesia Mold & Dies Industry AssociationISPO Indonesian Sustainable Palm OilIVO Industrial Vegetable OilJAMA Japanese Automotive Manufacturer AssociationJICA Japan International Cooperation AgencyJJC The Jakarta Japan ClubKADIN Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and IndustryKEIN The National Economic and Industrial CommitteeKINAS National Industrial CommitteeKUR People's Business CreditLCEP Low Carbon Emission PlanLCEV Low Carbon Emission VehicleLCGC Low Cost Green Car
LPEM FEB UI Economic and Social Research – Faculty of Economics andBusiness, University of Indonesia
MENR Ministry of Energy and Natural ResourcesMG MonoglycerideMOA Ministry of AgricultureMOEC Ministry of Education and CultureMOF Ministry of FinanceMOI The Ministry of IndustryMOLINA Mobil Listrik Nasional
MOMAF Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
MOMT Ministry of Manpower and TransmigrationMOPW Ministry of Public Works
MOPWHS Minister For Public Works and Human Settlements
MORTHE Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education
MOTr Ministry of Transportation
MOT Ministry of TradeMPV Multi Purpose VehicleNIA National Interest AccountNPL Non Performing LoanOEM Original Equipment ManufacturePCB Policy Coordination BoardPFI Participating Financial InstitutionPMU Project Management UnitPSO Subsidized DieselR&D Research and DevelopmentR&D&D Research and Design and DevelopmentRPJMN National Medium Term Development PlanSUN Government BondTKDN Tingkat Kandungan Dalam NegriWB World BankWG Working GroupWTO World Trade Organization
1
0. Executive Summary
0.1.Objectives of the Study The Study is to review current situation of industrial development in Indonesia from
comprehensive perspectives, and analyze issues and problems for accelerating further development,
and demonstrate a position of Indonesia in international division of industrial labor through Global
Value Chain analysis, and clarify promising supply chain process and value chain for further
development
Through the result of the points above, design the concept plans for mid-term and long term
cooperation program for industrial promotion and agglomeration.
This study conducted in-depth analysis of three major sectors, (i) Transportation machinery, (ii)
Electrical and electronic, and (iii) Food processing
0.2.Timeline The Study comprises of Phase 1 and Phase 2.
Phase 1: Research and Recommendations (from April 2017 to May 2018)
Phase 2: Pilot Project (from May 2018 to June 2019)
In Phase 1, results of the Study are shared to Government of Indonesia to receive feedback
through 4 times of Industrial Dialogue.
In Phase 2, Study Team supports start of National Industrial Committee (KINAS) which is a new
framework to facilitate inter-ministerial policy making. In particular, Study Team prepare various
policies to be discussed at Working Group (WG) which is echelon 2 level as well as Policy
Coordination Board (OCB) which is echelon 1 level, arrange those meetings, and compile discussed
issues into policy brief.
0.3.Overview of Phase 1
(1) Recommendations to 3 sectors
The Study drafted current status & potential and vision in the future. Then policies to achieve
those visions are recommended.
Automotive
Potential is to increase local content ratio of upstream in the value chain to be competitive.
Specifically, policy to facilitate development (triple helix and human resource development),
promotion of suppliers, Java automotive industrial belt (to resolve over congestion of
JABODETABEK), and improvement of business environment (such as more favorable regulations
1
2
for entrance of foreign SME) are recommended.
Electrical and Electronics
The fourth industrial revolution as well as IOT and trend towards EV would be opportunity for
Indonesia. To address such potential, first step is promotion of Factory IOT, developed human
resource of IT engineer and setup of special economy zone to attract suppliers. This would pave
ways to Product IOT such as electronics parts as a second step.
Food processing
Potential includes expanding export business based on advantage of economies of scale and
improving the Value Added of Processed Food. To address the opportunity, business environment
(procurement of resources and registration of products), business matching, and coordination with
FDI are recommended.
(2) Policy package
Recommendations to the 3 sectors are compiled as policy package which includes; (i)
inter-ministerial forum, (ii) local enterprise/SME development, (iii) promotion of R&D&D of
local/foreign investment, (iv) human resource upgrade, (v) logistical infrastructure upgrade, and (vi)
promotion of export friendly environment.
(3) Key achievements of Phase 1
First, organize Industrial Dialogue 4 times to share the results and recommendations of the study.
Minister of BAPPENAS and Minister of MOI provided keynote speeches at 4th Industrial Dialogue
(April 17th 2018) where KINAS is confirmed to start.
Second, results of the Study contribute to RPJMN 2020-2024 as valuable inputs to background
study
0.4. Overview of Phase 2
(1) Background of Pilot Project to support KINAS
It is confirmed that KINAS will be established to implement roadmap of Making Indonesia 4.0
(I4.0) under inter-ministerial policy making framework at 4th Industrial Dialogue.
I4.0 is comprehensive strategy of industrial policy focusing on key 5 sectors (Automotive,
electronics, food & beverage, textile & garment, and chemical) and 10 priority issues
JICA Study Team stay at a project office located at MOI where a local staff/researcher work in
full-time to support WG and PCB as project management unit and think tank.
2
3
- Study Team prepare 3 policy recommendations to be discussed at KINAS during the pilot
project.
(3) Tax incentive for R&D&D and Human Resource Development
- Proposed tax incentive to facilitate R&D&D and human resource development (HRD) in
private sectors.
- The tax incentive includes Taxable income deduction (as much as 2 times of costs for HRD and
3 times of costs for R&D&D) and accelerated depreciation (2 times faster than the regular one)
for investment aiming at R&D&D and HRD.
- Agreement at PCB led to stage of drafting regulation (such as Presidential instruction).
(4) Finance program for SME in industrial innovation
- It is necessary for the government to support financing investment to raise competitiveness
because financial markets of Indonesia is much smaller than neighbor countries and cost of
funds is higher.
- Proposed two step loan focusing on medium-sized enterprises in investing for innovation.
- In accordance with result of PCB, the policy is on stage to formulate mode of budgeting before
drafting regulations.
-
(5) Development of Biofuel and Ecosystem
- Indonesia is a leading country in developing biodiesel. Besides, Indonesia is enriched with
natural resources input to biodiesel, therefore, it is recommend to introduce high technology
biofuel and increase weight of bio in fuel.
- Japanese company proposed cooperation in technology and experimental verification.
- After discussion at WG, it is under way to specify policy options in Indonesian Government.
0.5.Further steps
This is to recommend potential approaches to address remaining issues, for Automotive and
electrical & electronics sectors in particular, based on results of Phase 1 and achievements of Phase 2
(1) KINAS for more effective policy making and implementation
- Formal establishment of KINAS for I4.0 and involvement of ministries which are not yet
participating in pre-KINAS
- Formulate concrete policy measures to upgrade global competitiveness of industries.
- KINAS should be upgraded under the Law of Industry as a basis for continuity, since industrial
development takes a long time.
3
4
(2) Local enterprise/SME development
- Target SMEs to become good suppliers by applying tax incentive, financial program, business
matching, and experts consulting for synergy impacts
- Create list of potential SME supplies in I4.0 for matching between local SMEs and Japanese
companies
(3) Promotion of R&D&D investment
- Develop curriculum for “designing” capability by collaboration between business and
academics such as tech-universities and polytechnic
- Implement a model case of industry-government-university collaborative in national projects
such as x-EV and biofuel technology according to Automotive Roadmap.
- Utilize Innovation Center under development to enhance practical R&D&D.
(4) Human Resource upgrade
- Utilize KINAS for I4.0 to facilitate collaboration between MOI and MORTHE
- Develop curriculum of skills required for I4.0 (especially for electronics, robotics, system
engineering) through collaboration with industry
(5) Promotion of Java Automotive Industrial Belt
- Develop industrial estates near Patimban and Kendal Port, especially for the automotive sector,
where Zoning system and sub-sector targeting of investment incentive scheme will be effective.
- Model case of industry-government-university collaborative and SME business matching might
be coordinated.
(6) Improvement of business/export environment for Indonesia 4.0
- Promote GVC connected Indonesia 4.0 industry, an industrial complex, especially export
processing zone (bonded area) in the vicinity of international ports and airports should be
established.
- Policy measures including incentive for investment in Indonesia 4.0 related sector, relaxation of
regulation on intermediate goods will be effective.
4
5
1. Overview of the study
1.1. Background of the study
Indonesian economy performed well by its stable economic growth since 2005, even over the
period of global financial market turmoil around 2008, among neighboring ASEAN countries such
as Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam as well as Indonesia. Besides, Indonesia is highlighted
by its potential market characterized by large population and growing middle income consumers.
(Unit: YoY %)
Source: World Development Indicators, World Bank
Figure 1 GDP Growth of ASEAN countries
Government of Indonesia aims to raise per capita income from US$ 3,700 (2015) to US$ 29,000
by 2045 (Vision 20451). To reach high income country level, further economic growth at steady and
higher rate is required. Further acceleration of economic growth is required to reach to such target.
1 President Joko Widodo’s statement in March 2017 saying that Indonesia will become the world’s fourth largest economy by 2045.
5
6
(Unit: constant 2010 USD)
Source: World Development Indicators, World Bank
Figure 2 GNI per capita of ASEAN countries
Manufacturing sector shares is 21% of the total GDP and it is the largest weight. It also constitutes
13% in terms of total employment. Share of the manufacturing industry is also projected to increase
to 32 percent by 2045 to achieve the target of per capita income of US$ 29,0002.
2 Minister of BAPPENAS at 2nd International Conference on Indonesian Economy & Development (ICIED), August 14).
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Cambodia Indonesia Malaysia Philippines Thailand Vietnam
6
7
GDP by economic sectors
Employment by economic sectors
Source: ADB, Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2016
Figure 3 GDP and Employment by Economic Sectors as of 2015
7
8
In recent years’ trend, however, manufacturing has not performed well. Manufacturing slowed its
growing pace in terms of GDP per employee and fell behind Transportation & Communication and
Construction.
(Unit: million Rp)
Source: ADB, Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2016
Figure 4 GDP per employee by economic sectors
Significance of the slowdown of manufacturing growth is highlighted in comparison with the
other Asian countries. Manufacturing share in GDP started to decline in Indonesia before it reaches
5,000 USD of GNI per Capita, which is considered the tipping point for developing countries before
embarking into further structural transformation into a more service-based economy. This decline
in Indonesia is much earlier than what had happened in Thailand and Malaysia. Further raising
concerns of a stagnation in Indonesian income per capita growth.
8
9
Source: Tran Van Tho (2015)
Figure 5 Level shift of Share of Industry in GDP as compared with Income Level
For higher manufacturing industry growth, the industry must be restructured towards high
value-added and technology-intensive sectors. Looking at global and regional trend, it shall be noted
that regional integration and free trade continues to disseminate, highlighted by ASEAN Economic
Community (AEC) which started as of December 31 of 2015. This trend may change/restructure
location strategy of global enterprises and industrial structure in Southeast Asia region accordingly.
The transformation might influence positively to Indonesia due to prolonged population bonus
period of Indonesia which may push up the position of Indonesia as a production location in Asia.
However, in order to take advantage of this opportunity, Indonesia must further facilitate industrial
competitiveness and productivity.
1.2.Objective of the study
Under the background mentioned above, this study has the following purposes:
(1) Review current situation of industrial development in Indonesia from comprehensive
perspectives, and analyze issues and problems for accelerating further development
(2) Demonstrate a position of Indonesia in international division of industrial labor through Global
Value Chain analysis, and clarify promising supply chain process and value chain for further
development
(3) Through the result of the points above, design the concept plans for mid-term and long term
cooperation program for industrial promotion and agglomeration.
9
10
(4) Discuss designed concept plans with the Government of Indonesia through Industrial Dialogues,
and compile a future cooperation plan
1.3.Target areas
Target area of the study includes all the area in Indonesia, especially industry accumulation areas.
1.4.Target Industry
The Study intends to target three industries of Transportation Machinery, Electrical and Electronic,
and Food Processing Industry. These are selected based on several selection criteria, such as GDP
share, growth rate, share in export goods, labor absorption capacity, and projected impact to the
Indonesian economy going forward.
1.5.Stakeholders of the Study
Stakeholders of the Study at Japanese side include, but not limited to, Japan International
Cooperation Agency (JICA), Resource Persons from research institutions and universities, Embassy
of Japan, Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO), Business Enterprise and Business
Association such as Jakarta Japan Club (JJC).
The Indonesia’ main counterpart for the Study is Ministry of National Development Planning
(BAPPENAS). Ministry of Industry (MOI) is also a main counterpart during latter part of this Study
which is a pilot project (explained later). Other stakeholders of Indonesia include, but not limited to,
relevant entities such as Coordinating Ministry of Economic Affairs (CMEA), , Ministry of Trade
(MOT), Ministry of Finance (MOF), Ministry of Education and Culture, Investment Coordinating
Board (BKPM), Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Ministry of Maritime and Fisheries,
Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Transportation, Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher
Education, Central Bank of Indonesia, and Food and Medicine Regulatory Agency (BPOM).
Business Association such as Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KADIN), Association
of Indonesia Automotive Industries (GAIKINDO), Association of Automobile and Motor Equipment
Industries (GIAMM), Indonesian Electrical Manufacturers Association (APPI), and Indonesian Food
and Beverage Producers Association (GAPMMI) also participated the discussion in Industrial
Dialogue.
10
11
1.6.Schedule of the Study Duration of the Study is May 2017 – June 2019.
1.7.Scope of the Study
The Study comprises of 3 stages after pre-research and Inception Report (IC/R).
In 1st Stage, there are 3 groups of work, such as “Review of target industries”, “Review of needs
for industrial Human Resource Development”, and “Review of JICA’s past cooperation” to identify
current situation and challenges of industrial promotion. Besides, there is another work, “Collection
of data of Indonesian companies”, for the preparation of “Empirical analysis on supply chain and
production network of Indonesian companies”
In 2nd Stage, the Study will extract promising segment (process and function) based on
international division of labor and global value chain analysis. The 2nd Stage also includes Empirical
analysis on supply chain and production network of Indonesian companies which is conducted by a
Japanese Professor.
In 3rd Stage, the Study will design concept plans for mid-term and long term cooperation program
for further industrial development based on findings of the Study and discussion in Industrial
Dialogue. The Study will support GOI in implementing proposed policies under inter-ministerial
coordination as a Pilot Project. Study Team supports tentative National Industrial Committee as a
project management unit and think tank.
Figure 6 Flow of the Study
11
12
1.8.General approach of the study
The study aims at proposing Policy Package related to the selected 3 industries, such as
automotive, electrical & electronics, and food processing industries. Towards this goal, the Study
implements the following steps.
First, the Study analyzed current status of the 3 industries, including 1) overview of historical
development, 2) supply chain and value chain analysis (explained later), 3) current status and future
potential of markets, 4) global position of Indonesia in the international division of labor, and 5)
industrial policy of Indonesia (in comparison with peer competing countries).
Second, the Study compiles collected data and information to future potential and remaining
constraints to materialize such potentials in each of the 3 industries.
Third, the Study proposes future vision towards 2025 of each of the 3 industries, which include
target level which represents growth and competitive status of the industries in global supply chain
and value chain context, as well as a certain policy scenario to reach to that target level.
Fourth, based on the set target level and constraints identified to achieve the potentials, the Study
complied recommended policy measures under policy programs which address the policy scenarios.
Current promotional policies/restrictions of Indonesia and comparable policies/regulations observed
in the peer countries are also reviewed for developing the policy measures.
Fifth, the Study compiles those policy measures proposed per each of the 3 industries to Policy
Packages by functional classification such as Local enterprises/SME development, Promotion of
Research, Design and Development, and so on.
Findings and recommendations up to the 2nd steps which proposes the Vision towards 2025 are
discussed and confirmed in the 2nd Industrial Dialogue held in August 11th 2017.
Policy Measures and Policy Packages were discussed and confirmed in the 3rd Industrial Dialogue
held on January 17th 2018.
Implementation structure and Pilot Project where the Study Team may support inter-ministerial
coordination is scheduled to be discussed in the 4th Industrial Dialogue in April 2018.
12
13
Figure 7 General approach of the Study
1.9.Methodology of Global Value Chain Analysis
1.9.1. Methodology of Global Value Chain (GVC) Analysis
In this Study, “global value chain” (GVC) means each industry’s international division of labor in
terms of processes and functions. In this context, GVC analysis adopts the following procedure in
general: analyze the trends in each industrial sector and identify the promising supply chain process
in the promising sector; and narrow down what value chain is more promising in the process.
In the meantime, “Supply chain” is a chain of materials and parts that are supplied to downstream
process of manufacturing. Supporting industry is contributing to various functions of supply chain.
“Value chain” is a sequence of value within a company/factory from upstream such as R&D to
downstream like sales and services. In summary, GVC analysis in this study will try to identify
specific functions of supply chain and value chain that should be focused for further industrial
development.
13
14
Figure 8 Image of Global Value Chain Analysis
1.9.2. Methodology of supply chain analysis
The study breaks down supply chain by each sub-products in the target industry such as
transportation machinery, electrical and electronic, and food industries. The following chart shows
an example of such break down.
Figure 9 Example of further detailed supply chain
The study tried to specify missing links in the supply chain per categorized parts, items and
processes. Initial step to find out such missing link is to pay attention on products that are mainly
relying on imports (products that have large trade deficit). Then, among those imported products, the
study identified which products/processes can be replaced by domestic production rather than
imports, by conducting interview and in-depth discussions with the industry.
14
15
1.9.3. Methodology of value chain analysis
Value chain analysis is to try to identify which process has higher potentiality of location in
Indonesia. The potentiality depends on availability factors to determine location as shown in the next
chart. The location may also depend on strategy of production by global manufacturing enterprises.
Figure 10 Example of value chain
If the main function of value chain in Indonesia remains only on production with cheap labor
force, then the value added in the country will remain low. But if companies located in the country
will expand its activity to other functions, such as R&D or design, it will create jobs for highly
educated people. The study will try to identify which process has higher potentiality of location in
Indonesia through discussion interview with the industry.
15
16
2. National Development Planning
2.1.National Development Planning System By the introduction of direct presidential election, national development planning system has
changed from centralized development planning under the President to democratic planning system
which requires approval by the People’s Consultative Assembly. This is based on the Law on
National Development Planning (Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional) in 2004 and central
and local governments prepare various long and medium-term plans (Figure 1). A new President is
mandated to prepare a “Medium-Term National Development Plan” for his/her tenure of office.
Source: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (Japan) Homepage.
Figure 11 Development Planning System of Indonesia
2.2.Development Plan Based on the above system, “National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN) 2005-2025 was
drawn up and it envisaged the Indonesia in 2025 as “a country that is developed and self-reliant, just
and democratic, and peaceful and united”.
Under the President Joko Widodo and Vice President Jusuf Kalla Administration, BAPPENAS
prepared its “Mediem Term National Development Plan (Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah
Nasional: RPJMN) 2015-2019” in 2014 and succeeded the basic concept of the above long-term
development plan. There are nine national development agendas in the RPJMN of which
manufacturing sector development is a part of the 6th agenda: Increasing Productivity of the People
and Competitiveness in the Global Market.
The RPJMN states the following targets for the industrial sector for the planning period:
16
17
Annual growth rate of the national economy to be reaching 8.0 % by 2019;
Annual growth rate of the manufacturing sector to be reaching 8.6 % by 2019 and
contributes to 21.6% of GDP; and
New 9,000 middle and large industries and 20,000 small industries to be established.
Table 1 Target Indicators in RPJMN
Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
1. GDP Growth Rate 5.1 5.8 6.6 7.1 7.5 8.0
2. Manufacturing Growth Rate 4.7 6.0 6.9 7.5 8.1 8.6
3. Manufacturing Contribution to GDP 20.7 20.8 21.0 21.1 21.3 21.6
4.Actual GDP Growth Rate 4.98 4.88 5.03 5.07 -- --
Source:
1- 3 : The Indonesian Medium-Term National Development Plan 2015-2019
4 : The Indonesian Central Bureau of Statistics
BAPPENAS prepares the RPJMN which incorporate the technocratic aspects of the development
planning and also the vision and mission of the newly elected cabinet of Joko Widodo and Jusuf
Kalla. According to the RPJMN, Central Government formulates National Action Plan ’ Rencana
Kerja Pemerintah’ (RKP) for which each Ministry prepares Ministerial Strategic Plan (RENSTRA
KL) and Ministerial Working Plan (RENJA KL).
2.3.Economic Policy Packages Along with the above Medium-term Development Plan, the GOI issued a series of Economic
Policy Packages for quick impact on economy. As of August 2018, sixteen Economic Policy
Packages (Table below) have been disclosed and they are mostly related to deregulation on
government procedures and tax rate reduction. The Coordinating Ministry of Economic Affairs
(CMEA) under the Presidential leadership is dealing with the economic policy package preparing
with related ministries and agencies.
17
18
Table 2 Economic Policy Packages
Note: JICA Survey Team named some titles. Source: CMEA and News Articles on Jakarta Post etc.
No. Date Title Objective Contents
1
2015/9/9 Encouraging National IndustryCompetitiveness
Restoring and improving industrial actives,eliminating industrial restrictions that weighon the consumers and diminishing the burdenin regulatory and bureaucracy. Etc.
Reregulation, de-bureaucratization, and fiscalincentives in order to pursue the real sector.
22015/9/29 Simplification of investment
proceduresInvestment promotion Flexibility in the service of investment for 3 hours
within industrial area. Etc.
3
2015/10/7 Investment cost reduction Investment promotion 1. The price reduction in fuel ammunition, electricityand gas2. The extension on loan recipients in Kredit UsahaRakyat (KUR)3. Simplification of licenses of land in investmentactivities
42015/10/15 Support to domestic business and
improvement of labor-welfareMitigation of labor problems by creation ofjob opportunity and improvement of workingenvironment
1. The improvement of labor-welfare policy2. The low-cost and extensive KUR policies
5
2015/11/2 Tax and interest rate reduction Development of real estate, banking andinfrastructure sectors
1. The cutting on the income tax rates2. Eliminating double taxation3. Deregulation in Sharia banking
6
2015/11/6 Deregulation on landdevelopment
Industrial promotion on remote areas by SEZscheme.
1. Allocating the economy in margin areas through thedevelopment of Special Economic Zones (SEZ)2. The easy process of licensing raw materials onmedicine imports3. The provision of the sustainability of water forsociety in justice
7
2015/12/21 Tax relief Economic development by tax reduction 1. Tax relief for those who had been worked in labor-intensive industry for 2 years.2. Easy access to capital makes the land certificatesfast
8
2015/12/28 None Streamlining of public administration 1. One Map Policy2. Encourage the certainty in business aviation3. New refinery for energy defense
9
2016/1/27 None Rural electrification etc. 1. Acceleration of the construction of electricityinfrastructure2. Ensure the stock and price of beef3. Accelerate the logistic from rural to urban
102016/2/12 Foreign Direct Investment
deregulation and protection ofMicro and SME.
Investment promotion Revision of Negative Investment ListProtection of micro, small and medium enterprises andcooperatives.
11
2016/3/29 None Promotion of growth industries 1. The development of pharmaceutical industry andmedical devices2. Real estate investment fund3. Risk control to accelerate the flow of goods at port
122016/4/28 Evolution of Indonesia's Ease of
Doing Business policyImprovement of ranking on Ease of DoingBusiness
Evolution of Indonesia's ease of doing business policy
132016/8/23 Low cost housing promotion Streamlining of public administration related
to low cost housing construction.Reduction of necessary permit from 33 to 11.
14
2016/11/10 Electric commerce Road Map In 2020, 1,000 technopreneurs will becreated and the value business of aroundUS$ 10 billion will be reached.
1. Funding, 2. Tax incentive, 3. Consumer protection, 4.Education and human resource, 5. Tax incentive, 6.Communication infrastructure, and 7. Cyber security.
15
2017/6/15 Logistics Improvement of logistics sector 1. Transportation insurance2. Reducing costs for logistic service providers3. Strengthening the Indonesia National Single Window(INSW) authority4. Reducing the number of prohibited and restrictedgoods
16
2017/8/31 Acceleration of businesslicensing
Deregulation 1.Single submission system:2.Integrate business licensing services3.Utilize information technology4.Enhance cooperation/coordination amonggovernment agencies on central and local levelAdditional (2018/11/16): 1. Expanding 100% FDI in 54sectors (total 95 sectors), 2. expanding eligible sectorsfor tax holiday, etc.
18
19
3. Transportation machinery
3.1.Current status of the industry After the automotive market in Indonesia had experienced a sharp drop due to the currency crisis
in 1997 and the collapse of Soeharto regime in 1998, the market continued to decline many times as
a result of currency devaluation and the steep rise in fuel prices, and had been floundering around
400 – 600 thousand units per annum since 2000. However, since 2008, both political and economic
stability was achieved under Yudhoyono's administration, and this stability positively limited the
damage of economic downturn triggered by so called “Lehman Shock”, resulting in a high growth
rate of domestic sales which pushed up the market size of Indonesia to exceed that of Thailand in
2011 and became the largest in the region. The domestic sales increased steadily since the first half
of 2010s and reached its highest record of 1.23 million units in 2013. Although domestic sales
decreased to 1.01 million units in 2015, with the recovery of economic growth resulting from the
stabilization of USD-Rupiah rate and interest rates as well as stimulating public investment by the
government, the sales recovered to 1.06 million units in 2016, which is 4.8% larger than the previous
year.
As the automotive production in Indonesia has traditionally concentrated on the domestic market
while the import of completed automobiles has been suppressed, the production has been closely
related with the changes in the domestic market. In 2014, in addition to the expansion of domestic
market, the export number exceeded 200 thousand units for the first time, resulting in the highest
production record of 1.30 million units. Although the production decreased to 1.01 million units in
2015, it recovered to 1.17 million in 2016, which is 7% larger than the previous year.
Since 2014, the export number has increased from 100 thousand to 200 thousand. This is mainly
because Toyota group, which held the top market share, expanded production in Indonesia as an
export base for some models such as SUV, with support from the government to increase the export
value of Indonesian manufacturing products.
19
20
Table 3 Changes in automotive production, import and export, and sales in Indonesia (Units)
Source: GAIKIDO data
Shown below are domestic sales by category and market share by company.
Source GAIKIDO data
Figure 12 Changes in automotive production, import and export, and sales in Indonesia
Sales Import Production Export2005 533,917 31,760 500,710 17,805 2006 318,904 33,663 296,008 30,974 2007 433,341 55,112 411,638 60,267 2008 603,774 72,646 600,628 100,982 2009 483,548 32,678 464,816 56,669 2010 764,710 76,520 702,508 85,796 2011 894,164 76,173 837,948 107,932 2012 1,116,101 124,835 1,053,270 173,371 2013 1,229,901 154,014 1,208,211 170,907 2014 1,208,028 104,503 1,298,523 202,273 2015 1,013,291 82,306 1,098,780 207,691 2016 1,062,716 75,571 1,177,797 194,397 2017 1,079,534 88,683 1,216,615 231,169
20
21
Table 4 Annual production capacity of major automotive companies in Indonesia
Source: GAIKIDO data
3.2. Current status of automotive policy
3.2.1. Past policy review Indonesia automotive policy is understood in three periods; “Import substitution and localization”,
“Trade and industry liberalization”, and “Competitive advantage strategy”.
Indonesian automotive industry has long been protected during the import substitution period,
however in this period, the basis of industry has been shaped by development of local automotive
assembly makers, majority of which formed a Joint Venture (JV) with local companies, and local
Tier 1 suppliers which also formed JV with local companies.
After the economic crisis during the end of Soeharto era and the WTO panel decision that put an
end to “National Car Program” on the basis of contravention of Trade-Related Investment Measures
(TRIMMs) rules, Indonesia automotive industry policy entered to new stage, which is New
Automotive Policy, characterized by trade and industrial liberalization policy. Local content policy
was abolished and foreign capital regulation was relaxed, paving way for more competitive
21
22
industrial environment. Against the backdrop of regional trade liberalization of AFTA and the said
liberalization policy, the Indonesia automotive industry has increased dependence on import from
the region, especially from Thailand, which exported CBU (completed built units; mainly small
passenger cars) as well as core components. The weak market environment up to 2010 and few
initiatives from the government after the failure of “National Car Policy” eroded drive for local
investment, leading to weaker industrial competitiveness in the region, especially against Thailand.
On the other hand, Thailand, the long term rival of Indonesia, has become the regional hub of the
automotive industry through successful launch of “Detroit of Asia Policy” (a policy to promote
transfer of automotive production, mainly 1 ton pickups, from Japan and others) in early 2000, and
the launch of “Eco Car Policy” (promotion of production of small passenger cars in 2005).
Table 5 History of Indonesian Automotive Policy
3.3.Current Policy Review Currently, the Indonesia automotive policy is consisted of the following;
National Industrial Policy
In Jun 2015, Government announced National Industrial Development Plan 2015-2035 (RIPIN),
which has targeted 10 industries as priority sectors, including transport equipment sector,
electronics/ ICT, textile, leather, shoe industry, food industry, etc. Based on RIPIN, medium term
industry policy dubbed as National Industry Policy 2015-2019 (KIN), was due to start from 2015,
but it did not take effect until 2018. In Feb 2018, President regulation No.2 2018 of National
Industry Policy 2015-2019 (KIN) was issued to re-set policy for the remaining years of 2018 and
22
23
2019. In KIN, detailed measures for transport equipment sector and other 5 sectors was announced.
The focus of the KIN in automotive sector are HRD through training, apprenticeship, and
certification, raw material supply development such as steel and petrochemical, and development of
technology in collaboration with research and test institutes, and green & sustainable technology
development as shown on the table below.
Table 6 National Industrial Policy 2015-2019 (KIN)
Source: National Industrial Policy 2015-2019 (KIN)
Automotive Industry Roadmap (2018-2035)
Based on the previous National Industrial Policy in 2008, MOI, Indonesia government
announced Automotive Industry Roadmap (2010-2025) and aimed to be the production base of
MPVs, PC, HEV, CV, as well as design base of MPV s and small passenger cars. The Roadmap
stressed upon production expansion of MPV which derived from locally produced AUVs (Asian
Utility Vehicle) such as Toyota Kijang, Suzuki Carry, Isuzu Panther, etc. The Raodmap showed
target of total production of 2,590,000 units, production for local market, and export, however
detailed policy measures to achieve the targets were not announced. Though the official ministry
decree has not been finalized yet and still in progress of drafting, the new roadmap (2018-35) was
drafted in 2018 based on the new National Industrial Policy 2015-2019 (KIN) and “Making
Indonesia 4.0” announced in Mar 2018. The new Roadmap shows basic strategy for the industry to
23
24
become the hub for ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) as well as for EV. In the initial period of the
Roadmap until 2021, Indonesia will pursue industrial upgrading and export base expansion of ICE,
while, after the mid period from 2025 onward, Indonesia aims to produce local EVs.
Source: MOI “Making Indonesia 4.0”
Figure 13 Automotive Industry Roadmap (2018-2035)
The new Roadmap draft sets target of production of 4 million vehicles by 2035 with export of 1.5
million units, and plans to raise production volume ratio of LCEV (Low Cost Emission Vehicle)
such as EVs and hybrids from 10% in 2020 to 30% in 2035.
Note: LCEV (Low Carbon Emission Vehicle), LCGC=Low Cost Green Car Source: Ministry of Industry, Automotive Industry Roadmap Draft (2018-2035)
Figure 14 Automotive Production Target (2018-2035)
Low Cost Green Car (LCGC) Policy
In order to develop local industry to decrease dependence on import of cars and auto parts, and
also to promote more fuel efficient and affordable cars in market, Indonesia government has
announced LCGC policy from 2013. The policy promoted local production of 1L class passenger
cars through incentives, namely exemption of luxury tax to zero. The policy was effective as it
attracted investment from 5 Japanese OEMs with investment value of 3 billion USD. Furthermore,
24
25
the policy aimed to attract new investment from major suppliers as the policy required localization
of 80% including engine and transmission parts in 5 years after start of production, totaling around
3.5 billion USD. The number of suppliers increased during the period including new Japanese Tier 1
suppliers such as ADVICS and NHK Springs.
Figure 15 Outline of Low Cost Green Car (LCGC) Policy
TKDN (Tingkat Kandungan Dalam Negeri) or Local Content Policy
Indonesia government announced local content/TKDN policy in 2011 to increase local contents to
more than 25%. Though TKDN is applied for all types of vehicles, presently, it is strictly applied to
LCGC only with a target to increase localization to more than 80%, as LCGC enjoys special tax
exemption. However, the local content policy has certain limitation in developing local industry as it
only defines localization of final product, but does not refer to local contents of parts and
components (refer to the table below). In reality, though localization of mass produced models such
as MPVs reached more than 80%, the net local content is much lower as parts and components has
large import contents.
Table 7 Outline of TKDN or Local Content
Source: Perindustrian RI No. 16/M-IND/PER/2/2011
25
26
Low Carbon Emission Plan (LCEP) and Low Carbon Emission Vehicle (LCEV)
After start of LCGC policy, the government announced LCEP, targeting passenger cars larger than
LCGC to promote environmental cars like hybrid cars. However, LCEP never truly took effect, due
to lower interests of OEMs compared to LCGC, and due to unclear conditions and limited
incentives.
The Indonesian government is now considering LCEV to replace LCEP, which will promote low
Co2 emission vehicles such as hybrid, EV, and CNG vehicles. LCEV has not been finalized yet but it
sets high Co2 emission standard, no less than 28km/L.
Table 8 Outline of Low Carbon Emission Plan (LCEP) and Low Carbon Emission Vehicle
(LCEV)
EURO4
As reported by the end of March 2017, the Government of Indonesia officially launched a policy
to certify the implementation of Euro4 emission standard. The plan came into effect in October 2018
for passenger cars and will be introduced in April 2021 for diesel trucks. The introduction of Euro 4
is expected to facilitate cars exports from Indonesia, as it is in harmonization with international
standards.
x-EV policy
In light of high dependence of fossil fuel and increase in net import of oil, DEN (Indonesia
National Energy Council) has proposed reduction of dependence on fossil fuel and EV promotion
policy with 2 millions of CNG/ LPG, HEV/EV, 2.1 million of electric scooter, and installation of
1,000 quick charging stations by 2025. Also, National EV project, or MOLINA project, was
implemented in cooperation with 9 universities in Indonesia, consisting of Institute of Technology
Bandung (ITB), Institute of Technology Surabaya (ITS), etc. However, no comprehensive x-EV
policy has been announced yet. Clear policy directions of x-EV policy are expected to come out in
line with the Automotive Industry Roadmap draft (2018-35), which will be announced by 2019. At
least until then, Indonesia x-EV policy will lag behind other major ASEAN countries such as
26
27
Thailand and Malaysia, which already announced certain investment and vehicle incentive policies
as shown below. On the other hand, as Indonesia government people such as MOI acknowledge that
Co2 reduction contribution by EV needs to take into account Well to Wheel comparison, the
government is also considering promotion of other x-EV such as mild hybrid, full hybrid, and
alternative fuel such as bio fuels.
Figure 16 MOLINA Project
Table 9 x-EV Policy of Indonesia, Thailand, and Malaysia
Source: based on NRI Study
3.4. Supply Chain and Value Chain Analysis and its implication 3.4.1. Supply Chain Analysis and its implication
Findings
Recently, the increase in automotive production in the country has attracted investment in auto
parts and the number of automotive suppliers has increased significantly; according to GIAMM
(Automotive Part and Components Industry Association of Indonesia), the number of suppliers has
increased from 145 in 2010 to 237 in 2016. However, based on the results of supply chain analysis
as shown in the figure below, while local content ratio of vehicle is around 70-90% for MPVs, that
of subcomponents is as low as 50-60% and raw material import dependence is very high. Trade
27
28
balance also shows negative for major auto parts. Therefore the Net Local Content (Total cost of
parts / material – Direct/Indirect import of parts/ material) of major models in Indonesia is
considered around 50%, whereas that of Thailand has reached around 70%.
Source: based on interviews by JICA team
Figure 17 Current Status of Supply Chain in Indonesia
When considering the trade balance of automotive parts, there is a large import of parts for the
production of completed automobiles. In particular, intermediate parts, i.e. components, accounts for
a considerable part of the import, making it difficult to identify the main import constituent in many
cases.
Table 10 Top 5 Automotive products in trade deficit (2015) HS Code Items related to automotive Trade balance
(million US$) 870899 Auto parts -568 392690 Chassis spring and leaf spring -309 870421 diesel engine less than 5ton -228 840991 Gasoline engine for HS87 -188 840991 Rubber air tire -186
Source: UN Comtrade Data
More detail look by auto parts and structure is shown on figure below; highly localized parts are
colored in light blue color, lowly localized parts in pink color, and partially localized in grey color. It
can be observed from the Figure below that while unit and major parts are localized, components
and materials are still not localized. Major components that are not much localized are precise
machining components such as bearing, bolt, gears, piston rods, and electric/electronic components
such as actuators, sensors, and ECUs. It is also often mentioned by OEMs that most of advanced
safety units and electronic control units depend on imports as Indonesia has limited basis in
electronics and advanced control system.
As of raw materials, hot rolled steel (HR), steel rod, major plastic material such as PP and ABS
are all imported. Though it is expected that localization of steel will be somewhat improved by the
start of production of galvanized alloy (GA) & cold roll coil (CRC) by JFE steel and Krakatau
28
29
Nippon Steel Sumikin, localization of other raw material will face more challenges due to large
amount of investment needed.
Source: based on interviews by JICA team
Figure 18 Current Status of Supply Chain in Indonesia
JICA survey team has identified ECU, ABS (anti-lock braking system), electric/electronics parts
(actuator and sensor) and precision parts as critical parts that have high potential for localization due
to increasing demand for higher performance of cars in local market. Also, demand for electric/
electronics parts will significantly increase due to future electrification of powertrain (internal
combustion engine replaced by hybrid, plug in hybrid, and electric cars) and introduction of ADAS
(advanced driver assistance system) and future proliferation of Connected Car.
Implication
In order to overcome current issue of weak linkage of supply chain and to avoid future loss of
industrial competitiveness, it is desirable to first increase more investment incentives for tier 2, 3 to
increase their local production, resulting to increase in Net Local Content. As shown from the table
below, the number of tier 2 & 3 suppliers are much smaller compared to those in Thailand. Number
of suppliers (tier1 to 3) in Indonesia can be increased to more than 2,000 suppliers from current
1,500 suppliers, considering potential increase of vehicle production in Indonesia
29
30
Figure 19 Current Status of Suppliers in Indonesia
3.4.2. Value Chain Analysis and its implication Findings of upstream value chain analysis
Based on value analysis as shown in Figure below, value chain in Indonesia still has many missing
links especially in upstream and also in midstream. Upstream function in Indonesia is almost null as
local R&D&D capability is still in very early stage. Despite some OEMs set up some R&D&D
facilities, such as Astra Daihatsu, many of them are positioned as satellite office and their main task
is still limited to localization of parts with less than 100 persons. A Japanese OEM, who has set up
R&D&D facility in Indonesia, mentioned that most of the work is application design of exterior and
interior parts for minor changes of models, whereas design work for full model changes are mostly
done in Japan. As for suppliers, there is hardly any R&D&D facility in Indonesia, whereas a number
of global tier 1 suppliers such as DENSO, Bosch, Toyota Boshoku, NHK Springs, etc. have already
set up product engineering and testing facilities in Thailand.
The same can be said for process design capability in midstream in the same figure below.
Thailand serves as leading process design / engineering center in the region. For example, Toyota
has set up TPS learning center, called Global Production Center (GPC) in Thailand to teach “Kaizen
activities” in the region. Many Japanese OEMs also has production preparation team in Thailand to
support start of production of new models in the region.
30
31
Figure 20 Current status of value chain in Indonesia
Implication
It is expected that with expansion of emerging market, more R&D&D function, especially product
planning and body design that need to take into account unique tastes of local users, is expected to
be shifted to location closer to the market. As Indonesia’s market potential is very large and unique
products for Indonesia market such as small MPVs with 7 seaters are developed for the market,
Indonesia has potential to become a design hub for MPVs and other light commercial cars. Since
Thailand has already localized 30-40% of R&D&D function in Thailand, Indonesia can also start
from localization of R&D&D of upper body.
Figure 21 Current status of value chain in Indonesia
31
32
In order to develop future R&D&D capability, it is recommended to provide R&D&D investment
incentives to increase investment. Also, it is also necessary to develop human resource for R&D&D
through close cooperation between technical universities and OEMs, as such cooperation will help
courses taught at universities more practical and more accommodating to business needs.
Findings of midstream value chain analysis: suppliers
If we highlight on value chain of suppliers including tier1 and tier2 suppliers, development of
midstream value chain is critical for increasing competitiveness as shown on Figure 24. Based on
JICA survey study, local suppliers are still at the level of C and D in process engineering capability
and needs to increase Kaizen and process capability first, then eventually use more automation in
future
Figure 22 Current Status of Midstream of Value Chain of local suppliers in Indonesia
3.4.3. Spatial supply chain analysis In addition to the two abovementioned issues, based on the results of spatial value analysis, spatial
expansion of the automotive supply chain, most of which is currently aggregated in Jakarta and its
vicinity, is critical to overcoming future bottlenecks in development of automotive industry.
Although the automotive industry in Indonesia has seen in a relatively steady growth in the past
several years, more than 90 percent of automotive and related industries are located in the
JABODETABEK (Greater Jakarta) area. This over-aggregation has resulted in not only steep rises in
the land price and minimum wages of major industrial areas, but also severe traffic congestion in
such areas. In the long term, difficulty in transportation and logistics would have an adverse effect
on the future production growth of the supply chain, making it difficult to achieve the goal of over
2.5 million cars (hypothetical figure). Moreover, vastly increased cost stemming from the surges in
32
33
land prices and wages would eventually lead to a grave loss in industrial competitiveness in the
international level.
In order to address the current problems in cost and transportation and the long-term risks that will
arise from them, the supply chain needs to be developed and expanded spatially. One of the solutions
might be to expand industrial development from concentration in Jakarta to be scattered across the
Northern part of Java Island from through Surabaya. In addition to the existing supplier
agglomeration in JABODETABEK, new agglomerations might be considered to be developed in
Tegal, Semarang and Surabaya to form the “Java Automotive Industrial Belt” in the medium- and
long-term plans.
Figure 23 Greater Jakarta industrial land price
Figure 24 Minimum wages in Jakarta, Semarang and Surabaya
33
34
Figure 25 Java Automotive Industrial Belt
3.5. Potential/constraint 3.5.1. Potential
Indonesia has already reached the Motorization stage as GDP per capita reached close to 4,000
US$ income level. From motorization stage to Penetration to General Household stage, the speed of
penetration is expected to accelerate with higher income elasticity as shown on the penetration path
of Thailand and Malaysia on the figure below. Therefore, the growth of Indonesian automotive
market is expected to accelerate in the next 5- 10 years to reach 2 million units by 2025, if average
GDP growth of Indonesia is around 6-7% as high as Thailand and Malaysia at the penetration stage.
However, if GDP growth of Indonesia is around 5% or lower, the market is expected to reach around
1.7 million units by 2025. In any of the case, Indonesian automotive market will remain the largest
market in ASEAN, increasing the gap with 2nd largest market in ASEAN, Thailand, which will grow
modestly to around 1 million units.
Source: NRI based on IMF data, land transport department data of each country
Figure 26 Vehicle Penetration of major ASEAN countries
Tangerang Jakarta rta
Bogor gBekasi Karawang
Semarang Surabaya
JABODETABEK
Tegal
Existing agglomeration
New agglomeration New agglomeration
34
35
Source: NRI forecast
Figure 27 Light Vehicle Market forecast of Major ASEAN countries (2005-2025)
Indonesia also has potential to become major production hub of small MPVs and small commercial
vehicles, as it has the largest MPV market in Asia Pacific Region including India and Australia.
Figure 28 MPV market status and forecast of major ASEAN countries (2011-2024)
However, in order to become export competitive, small MPVs produced in Indonesia may need to
be developed to match with global market trends. Firstly, technology of small MPVs produced in
Indonesia needs to be upgraded to global standards conforming to more stringent emission standards
due to serious environment pollution in emerging market, low CO2 emission standards, and
advanced safety standards so that these vehicles can be exported in various market. Secondly,
35
36
models produced in Indonesia need to accommodate to tastes of other markets, by refining exterior
and interior designs. In this regard, Indonesia can somewhat emulate success of 1 ton pickup in
Thailand, which has refined 1 ton pickup model to more passenger car-like design with more
advanced features and thus has become the largest production hub of 1 ton pickup in the world.
Policy to develop new export models other than MPVs and small cars and trucks, shall be
considered as well with aim to expand export market. For example, Indonesia market of C segment
and D segment of passenger cars, which are mostly comprised of sedans like Toyota Carolla Altis,
Honda Civic, Toyota Camry, and Honda Accord, is starkly small compared to other markets in the
region due to higher luxury tax for sedans compared to other segments: 30% for sedans versus 10%
for MPVs with engine displacement of 1500cc or less. For example, Australia, one of the largest
potential export markets in the region, has more than 300,000 units in C-Segment car and
D-Segment car combined, while market of small cars and MPVs are 100,000 units and 15,000 units
respectively. Provided that the models produced in Indonesia be exported to major markets, some
special tax incentives may be considered for specific segments that can be exported from Indonesia.
Source: Regional sales data compiled by NRI
Figure 29 Market of C and D segments in the region
3.5.2. Challenges from spread of x-EVs Despite its potential, Indonesia automotive industry may face major constraints. Firstly, the
effect of future electrification of powertrain or x-EVs, which will put Indonesia at
disadvantage. Electrification of powertrain will proceed sooner or later in following steps as shown
on figure below due to stricter global Co2 emission regulations. It may be difficult for Indonesia to
export x-EVs as the infrastructure of electronics/ electric industry is weak. Also, Indonesia cannot
- 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000
Indonesia
Malaysia
Thai
Vietnam
Philippines
Australia
Other (Luxury Sedan) Seg D Seg C
36
37
enjoy economy of scale as market condition of Indonesia is still somewhat premature for the spread
of x-EVs due to higher cost compared to conventional powertrain, and due to limited purchasing
power of households to replace current conventional powertrain by x-EVs. Government will also
may find it difficult to allocate enough budget for infrastructure development of charging stations
and electric supply grids in the initial phase of x-EV penetration, let alone to provide direct subsidies
for purchase of x-EVs.
It is therefore preferable for Indonesia to introduce realistic and long-term x-EVs policy to
gradually build up infrastructure and eco-systems that can accelerate spread of x-EVs based on long
term point of view, once the cost of x-EVs comes down to a level comparable to conventional
powertrain. For example, Indonesia may need well aligned investment policy and vehicle luxury tax
policy to gradually localize major parts corresponding to the development steps of x-EVs as
mentioned on the figure below; luxury tax will be lowered for x-EVs at early stage of each step with
requirement for certain localization.
Figure 30 Future steps of x-EVs Penetration
Indonesia may also further explore on using bio-fuels or alternative fuels, such as bio diesel,
ethanol, and natural gas to replace gasoline, as the country has large stock of natural resources to be
used for fuel. It will facilitate Indonesia to reduce dependence on gasoline during the transition
period of switching from conventional powertrain to x-EVs.
3.5.3. Challenges from Competitions from region and outside of region Secondly, Indonesia may face challenges of competitions in the region as well as outside of
the region like China and India, as free trade agreement such as AEC and ASEAN -China Free
Trade Agreement will take full effect in coming years. China may build up huge excess production
capacity of cars in future, which will trigger export drive to neighboring countries, as it happened
37
38
with other manufacturing products like steel. Development of Indian automotive industry is also
spectacular in recent years as the domestic market expands, which may be threat to Indonesia due to
its strong cost competitiveness and recent export promotion policy. In order to cope with challenges
from neighboring countries, Indonesia needs to strengthen cost competitiveness through
development of supply chain. As mentioned in supply chain analysis, Indonesia needs to improve
Net Local Content through localization of components and parts in order to be cost competitive.
Figure 31 Potential threat from China and India
3.5.4. Challenges from competitions for attracting investment in technology areas and upstream value chain activities
Thirdly, Indonesia’s investment policy has not been very successful in attracting investments
especially in high technology sectors like car electronics or highly specialized processing at the level
of Tier2 and Tier 3 suppliers, compared to countries like Thailand. Moreover, Indonesia lags behind
furthermore for attracting investment in upstream value chain activities such as R&D&D as many
OEMs have chosen Thailand as regional R&D&D hub for automotive industry. This is partly due to
regulatory factors in Indonesia, which do not offer much incentives for investment in small scale but
highly specialized technology or for investment in areas as R&D&D.
As shown in the figure below, Indonesia is ranked 73 among 190 economies in the Ease of Doing
Business, according to 2019 World Bank annual ratings, and lags behind major countries in the
region, such as Thailand at 27 and Malaysia at 15.
If compared with Thailand as shown in the figure below, Indonesia lags notably in “Starting new
business” and “Enforcing contracts”. It may be particularly difficult for smaller companies to invest
in such investment environment due to limited resources to overcome these hurdles.
38
39
Source: World Bank “Ease of Doing Business 2019”
Figure 32 Ease of Doing Business of Indonesia and Thailand (2019)
Looking more closely at investment policy as shown below, it can be said that Thailand
investment policy is more sector specific and activity based, while Indonesia investment target is
broad and is focused on attracting large-investment. Notably, Thailand offers “Merit based
incentives”, additional incentives on top of the activity based incentives if investor contributes in
enhancing competitiveness, such as R&D&D. In contrast, Indonesia offers fairly limited incentives
for R&D&D.
Also, immigration policy may need to align with investment policy through relaxation of visa
requirement for certain category in order to facilitate technology transfer by skilled experts to local
people.
39
40
Source: BKPM and BOI
Figure 33 Investment policy in comparison with Thailand
Figure 34 Incentives for investment promotion in Thailand
3.6.Future vision 2025 and challenges 3.6.1. Becoming Export Hub of MPVs, Small Cars, and Trucks for
Emerging Market
Vision To become a major player in global automotive production
KPI: 2.5 million units of production, including 0.5 million of export and 0.4 million of xEV
40
41
As mentioned before, Indonesia potential domestic market is 2 million under strong GDP growth
scenario. If export is expanded around double of the current status to 500,000 units, total production
will reach 2.5 million units by 2025, overpassing current production level of Thailand, the no.1
leader in the region in terms of vehicle production.
In order to achieve the goal to become a major player in global automotive production, Indonesia
shall maximize its potentials, while minimizing challenges/ issues that limit achievement of
potentials. Firstly, taking advantage of its large domestic market, Indonesia has potential to
become export hub of MPVs and small cars and truck for emerging market. In other words,
Indonesia can increase export through pursuing global niche strategy, focusing on certain product /
segment of the industry as adopted by Thailand during its “Detroit of Asia policy” in early 2000s;
Thailand has focused investment and export effort for 1 ton pickup and has become the largest
export hub of 1 ton pickup.
Recently, Indonesia government has set target of producing 0.4 million of xEVs by 2025. Prospect
of achieving this goal will depend on three major factors: development of infrastructure of changing
stations, purchase incentives for vehicle users, and development of supply chain of key components
such as battery, motor, and power control unit. Developing these factors will need well-coordinated
policy among ministries and strong support from private sectors.
There are a number of challenges/ issues to achieve its potential, arising from weak supply
chain (small number of local suppliers compared to Thailand and lack of suppliers with
specific/high technologies as explained in 2.4.1) missing value chain (lack of local suppliers
capability in engineering, quality and productivity as explained in 2.4.2), mismatch of human
resource (lack of factory management and engineering as will be explained in human resource in 6.),
infrastructure bottleneck (overconcentration of industry in JABODETABEK as explained in 2.4.3),
and lack of investment confidence (less ease of doing business as explained in 2.5.4 ) as shown on
the figure below. In order to realize its potential, policy program needs to be crafted to promote
agglomeration of auto parts industry and strengthen cost competitiveness with higher net local
content (value excluding all imported parts / total cost of goods), while at the same time addressing
major challenges /issues mentioned earlier.
41
42
Figure 35 Major challenges/issues of Indonesia becoming export hub
3.6.2. Becoming R&D&D hub of MPVs, Small Cars and Trucks Indonesia also has potential to become R&D&D hub of MPVs, small cars and trucks, and in
future Indonesian version of x-EV & Bio-Fuel Vehicles. Higher R&D&D capability will make it
easier for the product to timely respond to local market requirement or quality issues and to adjust
specification for local legislations. For example, Toyota set up an R&D&D facility in Thailand to
cover not only domestic market but also major export destinations like ASEAN and South Asia.
There are a number of challenges/ issues to achieve its potential, arising from regional competitions
(Thailand as regional R&D&D hub), resources constraints (lack of R&D&D engineers and unmet
skills of technical university graduates), and lack of collaboration or support within related sectors
(lack of collaboration between universities and business sector, and lack of R&D&D support
services) as shown on the figure below. In order to realize its potential, policy program needs to be
crafted to enhance product development and engineering capability
.
42
43
Figure 36 Major challenges/issues of Indonesia becoming R&D&D hub
3.7. Policy scenario Policy scenario to realize the Future Vision 2025 is summarized as three major policy programs: 1.
policy implementation, 2. Promote agglomeration of auto parts industry and strengthen cost
competitiveness, and 3. Enhance product development and engineering capability.
Figure 37 Policy Implementation and its Policy Measures
43
44
3.7.1. Policy Implementation Policy scenario for the first policy program can be summarized as follows.
(0) Make action plan and strengthen implementation capability
Objective/ KPI
Make action plan which will involve commitment of relevant government agencies and
also in line with future development of automotive industry.
Short term policy actions
Set up a National Industrial Committee which includes a working group for “Automotive
Industry’.
Long term policy actions
Follow up major policies and revise the policy accordingly; conduct PDCA
3.7.2. Promote agglomeration of auto parts industry and strengthen cost competitiveness
Policy scenario for the second policy program can be summarized as follows. Policy Program: Promote agglomeration of auto parts industry and strengthen cost
competitiveness KPI: Increase numbers of suppliers from 1,500 – 2,000
In order to achieve the policy program to promote agglomeration of auto parts industry and
strengthen cost competitiveness, five policy measures are proposed.
(1) Attract investment to auto parts industry
Objective/ KPI
Expand local supplier base to 2000 in order to increase more sourcing for components /
material and promote further localization at sub-components and material level, which
will lead to stronger export competitiveness of cars/ trucks and auto parts.
Short term policy actions
Foreign investment promotion for specific target industry / technology (high precision
parts, forging, etc.) by offering wide range of investment incentives such as: tax
incentives such as tax allowance and tax holiday, foreign workers incentives and
relaxation on initial investment value requirement, etc.;
Make data base of companies and organize supplier exhibitions (exhibition to display
parts that need to be localized in order to match customers and suppliers inside the
country); and
44
45
Make lists of local companies seeking partner and organize matching events for local and
foreign companies (especially SMEs) to bring in technology, market network, and
financial access.
Long term policy actions
Continuous implementation of investment promotion for targeted industry according to
the needs;
Continuous deployment of exhibitions to regions to spread the supplier base outside of
JABODETABEK; and
Set up SME Support/Endowment Fund to upgrade existing facility, change from other
industry, and encourage startups to enter new automotive technologies (connected, etc.)
(2) Raise engineering, quality, and productivity of suppliers
Objective/KPI
strengthen local supplier base by improving the engineering level of suppliers from
subcontract level or Level C,D to self-dependent level to or A,B level as shown on Figure
11) in order to increase export competitiveness of cars/ trucks and auto part
Short term policy actions
Support schemes to promote new equipment introduction for improving quality and
productivity fund
Long term policy actions
Support increasing quality level and productivity of suppliers though human source
training of factory line manager and supervisor level by industry experts on ‘lean
production”, “quality management”, “production preparation” and “specific process”
Indonesia may refer to cooperation between government and private sector in Thailand to
raise human resources under Automotive Human Resource Development Program
(AHRDP) 2006-2011 by JICA and Japanese automotive sector and Automotive Human
Resource Development Institute Program (AHRDIP) 2012-2017 by JETRO and Japanese
automotive sector, which in total raised 1300 trainers and trainees.
45
46
Figure 38 Trainers’ Training Program under AHRDIP
(3) Improve business climate to encourage investment
Objective / KPI
Eliminate trade barrier (TB) & non trade barriers (NTB) to prepare for entry to global
supply chain.
Short term policy actions
Improve procedures for imports and reduce import barriers for common components such
as steel wire, bolt & nuts for final process and assembly, which require strict SNI
(National Standard of Indonesia), despite no local product available that can meet
specification requirement of automotive manufacturers.
Long term policy actions
monitor status and expand the target list for ease of doing business
(4) Creation of Java Automotive Industrial Belt (KPI: create 5 new agglomerations*)
Objective
Disperse overconcentration of automotive industry in JABODETABEK and raise
competitiveness through utilizing cheaper labor and lower land costs.
Short term policy actions
Development of infrastructure in coordination with automotive agglomerations such as
Tegal-Cirebon, Ceper, Semarang, and Surabaya
46
47
Develop automotive related companies (SMEs) in the existing agglomerations of
automotive and machinery processing industry such as Tegal-Cirebon, Semarang, and
Surabaya..
Long term policy actions
Create new automotive industry agglomerations which are connected to new Patimbang
port under development and Semarang port under expansion: Subang near Patimbang
port and Kendal near Semarang port through attraction of new investment and
development of local industry.
*Notes5 (new agglomerations): Subang (near New Patimbang Port), Tegal-Cirebon, Ceper,
Semarang, Surabaya
(5) Industrial human resource development -factory engineers with high production site management
capability
Objective/KPI
Increase the skill level and the number of factory engineers from 5,000 to 15,000 who can
respond to current and future higher technical and managerial requirements.
Short term policy actions
Make base plan for improving Polytechnic course (curriculum, budget, professors) to
include factory management courses and other necessary courses are shown below.
Table 11 Image of Training Course in Politechnic D4
Designation of model schools and initial trial implementation.
Long term policy actions
Full implementation of the new courses to new and existing Polytechnic
47
48
3.7.3. Product development and technology development and its Policy Measures
Policy Program Enhance product development and engineering capability
KPI: R&D&D localization ratio to increase from 0% to 30%
Three policy measures are recommend to achieve policy program for product development and
technology development.
(6) Promotion of R&D&D Investment and transfer of R&D&D capability to local through incentives
for R&D&D
Objective/KPI
Attract foreign investment from OEMS and parts makers to strengthen value chain by
increasing number of R&D&D facilities from 0 to 70 [OEM20, parts 50])
Short term policy actions
To offer R&D&D investment incentives (duty exemption, tax reduction, tax incentives
for trainees of local staffs in Japan) on par with Thailand which has succeeded in
attracting R&D&D investment.
To ease visa grant for experts related to R&D&D in order to facilitate knowledge and
skill transfer from parent company to local R&D&D facility.
Long term policy actions
Continue incentives and lead to even higher value chain through development of
collaboration between industry and universities in advanced technology such as xEV,
alternative fuel, connected, raw material development.
Enhancement of innovation capability in universities, government institutes, and local
companies including start-ups that can participate in innovation of leading global
automotive companies is prerequisite for achieving the long term policy actions.
(7) Collaboration between tehnology university/poliytechnic and auto industry to developrequired
skills
Objective/KPI
Develop HR required for development of R&D&D and increase the number of R&D&D
engineers to 5,000 persons.
Short term policy actions
48
49
Show strong commitment and concrete plan from the side of government and universities
to raise a large number of engineers (at least 5,000) with knowledge and skills sets
required by automotive sector.
Start from creating practical D&D courses stressing on CAD/ CAM skills, CAE, and
failure analysis, as D&D will come first before R(research): Planning and curriculum
design for technology universities to offer more practical courses; and
Promote collaboration between private sector and technical universities in order to
accommodate skills and knowledge required in automotive sector: teaching staffs from
private sectors sent to universities and to collaborate in improving curriculum more suited
for requirement of industry.
Long term policy actions
Continue collaboration between private sector and universities and develop it to higher
level such as technology innovation in new areas involving R of R&D&D.
Develop Center of Excellence (CoE) in order to attract global companies to collaborate
with universities in R, and raise research level to be the" Best CoE in the region" for
certain research filed.
Research field in CoEs must be carefully selected and coordinated to follow global
technological trends and to meet requirement of global companies.
(8) Support expansion of D&D supporting service such as Computer Aided Engineering and material
evaluation
Objective/KPI
Increase bottom base of supporting industry related to R&D&D from almost zero to 50
new companies in order to facilitate R&D&D activities
Short term policy actions
Relax regulations for D&D support service as foreign investment is still restricted to
below 50% as it is regarded as service sector and promote investment in D&D support
services by relaxing rules for maximum foreign capital ratio
Long term policy actions
Continue relaxation of regulations such as relaxing visa for foreign engineers with high
skills, if the skilled labor force is not sufficient.
49
50
4. Electrical and electronics industry
4.1.Current status of E&E industry 4.1.1. Overview of the sector
Electric and Electronics (E&E) industry can be categorized into two major sub-sectors, namely,
consumer electronics (Business to Consumers; B to C) and industrial electronics (Business to
Business; B to B). B to C type of business includes home appliances such as refrigerator and
washing machine, smart phone and personal computer and its peripheral devices and others. B to B
type of business includes electronics parts, industrial machines (factory automation machinery),
power generator and others.
.
Figure 39 Categories of E&E sector
Location selection for production of these products varies depending on the nature of items. In
general, B to C products and electronics parts are mass production items. Production of these items
tends to be centralized to enjoy a scale merit and to be located in a cost competitive country.
Industrial machines, such as factory automation machinery (mechatronics), are medium-sized mass
production products (not large volume like consumer products). Production of industrial machines of
multinational companies tends to stay in their home country, while they sell their products in various
countries. They invest in a foreign country only when the destination country’s market becomes
large enough. For heavy electric machinery, number of production volume is even smaller than
industrial machines and the production of these products by multinational companies tend not to be
decentralized.
For major home appliances, such as refrigerator and washing machine, products are designed to
50
51
suit to the lifestyle of local market. In addition, those products are heavy and large with hollow
inside, which means high logistics cost. Thus, manufacturers tend to decentralize the product
location. In Indonesia, Japanese companies such as Panasonic and Sharp have factory of these
products, but it is difficult for them to export to other countries, due to the unique design for the
local market and high logistics cost.
In terms of the number of production in Asia region, China is overwhelmingly large in many types
of electronics products. For ASEAN countries, it depends on the type of product. For Flat Panel
Display TV, Malaysia and Viet Nam have large numbers of production. For Room Air Conditioner,
Thailand stands out and Malaysia follows. For Smart Phone production, Viet Nam is prominent.
Indonesia has certain amount of numbers, but it is because of the regulation of the government and it
does not necessarily reflect the global competitiveness of the country. For printers, Viet Nam,
Thailand and the Philippines have large volume of production. Indonesia also has certain amount of
production, but some manufacturer is shifting production of final product from Indonesia to the
Philippines.
Source: Fuji Chimera Research Institute, Inc. (2017), “Comprehensive Survey of the World Wide Electronics Market 2017” Figure 40 Number of production of Flat Panel Display TV in major Asian countries (2016)
51
52
Source: Fuji Chimera Research Institute, Inc. (2017), “Comprehensive Survey of the World Wide Electronics Market 2017” Figure 41 Number of production of Room Air Conditioner in major Asian countries (2016)
Source: Fuji Chimera Research Institute, Inc. (2017), “Comprehensive Survey of the World Wide Electronics Market 2017”
Figure 42 Number of production of Smart Phone in major Asian countries (2016)
52
53
Note: The number includes both page printer (laser printer) and inkjet printer. Source: Fuji Chimera Research Institute, Inc. (2017), “Comprehensive Survey of the World Wide Electronics Market 2017”
Figure 43 Number of production of Printer in major Asian countries (2016)
Audio visual products and communication device such as TV, smart phone, printer, in general, do
not have significant difference of design of the products across countries. Thus they tend to be
produced in one place and be exported to other countries. Manufactures of these products pursue an
economy of scale, i.e., high cost competitiveness. Among ASEAN countries, Viet Nam is becoming
the hub for this type of products. It is reported that South Korean large companies are shifting
production from Thailand to Viet Nam. In Indonesia, industrialized area is limited to
JABODETABEK and the wage rate is soaring there. Thus, Indonesia does not have a global
competitiveness.
For home appliances like air conditioner, refrigerator or washing machine, design or products may
differ from country to country depending on the usage and lifestyle of each country. They are large
and heavy and the transportation cost is high. So the production of home appliances tend to be
decentralized. Only high-end products can be produced in one place and exported to other countries.
Thailand and Malaysia have advantages in Air Conditioner and currently Viet Nam is growing in
making refrigerator for the regional market.
53
54
Figure 44 Categorization of electronics products by location selection factors
4.1.2. Current status of B to C electronics
Market situation
Along with the rise in national income in Indonesia, demand for home appliances such as
refrigerators, air conditioners, washing machines, etc. has been growing rapidly. Especially,
refrigerators and air conditioners are now available for purchase within monthly income, which has
led to increased demand. In addition to rising incomes, improvement of electricity infrastructure at
home is leading to rapid demand increase. The penetration rate of refrigerators, air conditioners, and
washing machines is 40%, 20%, and 20%, which is still low, and sales growth is expected to
continue in the future ("Indonesia Handbook 2015 edition" p198).
Table 12 Sales of home appliances in Indonesia
Year
Refrigerator Washing machine Air conditioner Sales units
Growth rate
Sales units
Growth rate Sales units
Growth rate
2005 1,855 -3.10% 662 -8.80% 800 8.00% 2006 1,725 -7.01% 690 4.23% 692 -13.50% 2007 2,125 23.19% 920 33.33% 933 34.83% 2008 2,326 9.46% 1,159 25.98% 1,060 13.61% 2009 2,489 7.01% 1,227 5.87% 1,225 15.57% 2010 3,026 21.57% 1,491 21.52% 1,610 31.43% 2011 3,223 6.51% 1,637 9.79% 1,794 11.43% 2012 3,411 5.83% 2,358 44.04% 2,006 11.82%
54
55
Year
Refrigerator Washing machine Air conditioner Sales units
Growth rate
Sales units
Growth rate Sales units
Growth rate
2013 3,597 5.45% 2,698 14.42% 2,188 9.07% Note: Sales units 1,000 Source: Indonesia Handbook 2015 edition
Source: Indonesia Handbook 2015 edition
Figure 45Top 5 E&E items that has trade deficit in 2015
As for the domestic production, refrigerators and washing machines have high domestic
production ratio due to high transportation costs, while air conditioners of compact size, of which
transportation expenses are cheap, are relying on import from overseas such as Thailand and local
production in Indonesia is small.
According to the trade statistics of electrical and electronics products, imports are increasing for
mobile phone, electrical equipment and facility, and semiconductor. On the other hand, exports are
increasing in harness, audio visual equipment and battery.
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
refrigerator washing machine airconditioner
Penetration rate 40%
20%
20%
55
56
Source: Compiled from UN Comtrade data
Figure 46 Top 5 E&E items that has trade deficit in 2015
Table 13 E&E items that has trade surplus more than 1 m USD in 2015
Source: Compiled from UN Comtrade data
Global competitiveness
Due to domestic market growth, local production of large and heavy home appliances such as
refrigerator and washing machine uniquely designed for the local market will continue to grow.
However, some high-end products for all ASEAN market may be produced in other country and
imported to Indonesia. In fact, some Japanese and South Korean companies concentrate their factory
in Viet Nam and export products from there to other ASEAN countries. These high-end products are
higher value added and they can bare the logistics cost. To realize such global supply chain,
HS code Article Trade balance(million USD)
854430 Ignition wiring sets and other wiring sets of a kind used in vehicles, aircraft or ships 605.6
852871Reception apparatus for television, whether or not incorporating radio-broadcastreceivers or sound or video recording or reproducing apparatus; not designed toincorporate a video display or screen
568.2
852190 Video recording or reproducing apparatus; other than magnetic tape-type 447.5853221 Electrical capacitors; fixed, tantalum 209.4
852872Reception apparatus for television, whether or not incorporating radio-broadcastreceivers or sound or video recording or reproducing apparatus; incorporating acolour video display or screen
202.0
850650 Cells and batteries; primary, lithium 189.4850610 Cells and batteries; primary, manganese dioxide 170.9
850710 Electric accumulators; lead-acid, of a kind used for starting piston engines, includingseparators, whether or not rectangular (including square)
161.9
853222 Electrical capacitors; fixed, aluminium electrolytic 155.1851640 Smoothing irons; electric 148.6851020 Hair clippers; with a self-contained electric motor 108.4
56
57
manufacturers look for cost competitive location and among ASEAN countries, Viet Nam became
the hub.
For small appliances, including smart phone, tablet, TV, PC peripherals are smaller and lighter
than major home appliances. In addition, localization of product design is less important for these
products. As a result, “hub and spoke” type of supply chain is common for them. China, Taiwan, Viet
Nam and the Philippines are those hub and they export to other countries. Cost competitiveness and
the scale of production is crucially important for this type of products.
Electronics companies located in Indonesia is enjoining expanding domestic market but facing
difficulties for export competitiveness, due to rapidly rising wages. Lack of upstream suppliers and
skilled human resource is also obstacle for the sector to further develop their business. This will be
analyzed again in supply chain and value chain analysis.
Supply chain analysis
As of today, final products of home appliances are assembled domestically, but many of
components, parts and materials necessary for production are dependent on imports. For
multinational companies, they are motivated to establish assembly factories to sell their products in
the domestic market, but not much development have been seen in upstream side. Electronics parts
are mostly imported from China, Taiwan, Japan, Malaysia and Singapore. Quality, productivity and
cost competitiveness need to be enhanced for the upstream development in Indonesia.
Source: Based on discussion interviews with industry
Figure 47 Supply chain analysis for E&E sector (B to C)
For example, in Malaysia, electronics was one of the main focus industries of the country and has
been developing human resource for the sector more than 30 years. As a result, there is an
accumulation of industry and human resource there. Mechanical and electronics parts are produced
there. Even though the cost of production is getting higher, Malaysia still maintain their
competitiveness by utilizing skilled labor force.
Value chain analysis
For the value chain, function in Indonesia is mostly concentrated in mass production. Not much
necessity for manufacturers to operate upstream function. Some of the companies are shifting from
57
58
mass production to process engineering, since they are losing cost competitiveness of the final
product. Process engineering includes equipment, jig, mold & die development.
Figure 48 Supply chain analysis for E&E sector (B to C)
Implication from supply chain and value chain analysis
For major players of B to C electronics, they are assembling final products in Indonesia to sell
them in local market, rather than export to other countries. For those companies, there are not much
necessity and motivation of doing further operation in terms of supply chain and value chain.
To enhance the competitiveness of the sector, Indonesia needs to develop human and technology
resources. This may be realized in B to B electronics, which will be discussed in the next section.
4.1.3. Current status of B to B electronics
Market situation
As described above, electronics parts are imported from China, Taiwan, Malaysia and other
countries. Even though the market for those electronics parts are expanding, it is globally optimal for
manufacturers to import the products.
For industrial machines, the market size has been limited until recently. However, due to the rapid
rise of wages, process automation is also rapidly being introduced, especially in automotive sector.
According to the discussion interview with industry, annual sales volume of factory automation
machinery is about 500 units per year, whereas the same in Thailand is 1,200 units and in China is
15,000 units. Robot machines in field (stock) is estimated about 7,000 in Indonesia whereas 20,000
in Thailand.
Market share structure is that Yaskawa is 30%, followed by Daihen, Panasonic and Fujitsu etc.
Most of those already installed robots are welding robots for automotive. Robots for painting is also
increasing. So far, almost no handling robots and semi-conductor related robots has been seen in the
field.
Global competitiveness
As there has not been much accumulation of B to B electronics in Indonesia, there is no global
58
59
competitiveness. Human and technology resource development has been limited. If Indonesia will
enhance the sector, rapid catch-up is needed.
Supply chain and value chain analysis
For B to B electronics, there is virtually no supply chain in the country. In terms of value chain,
mostly sales, service and maintenance functions of industrial machine and its replacement parts and
disposable supply are located.
Implication from supply chain and value chain analysis
Even though the business chance for factory automation in automotive sector is rapidly expanding,
the supply chain and value chain in Indonesia is still very limited and only sales, service and
maintenance functions are located. However, this sub-sector can be a trigger for further development
of the E&E industry. .
4.1.4. Current status and challenges of industrial policy on E&E industry
Industrial policy on E&E sector in Indonesia has been relatively open to international business
involvement. However, human resource and technology development for E&E has not yet developed
enough for sustainable growth.
For smart phone, the Government of Indonesia mandates to manufacture locally at least 20% of
units sold in the local market. To comply with this regulation, smart phone makers established
assembling factories in Indonesia. However, these production is not based on the global
competitiveness of the country.
4.2.Potential and Constraints 4.2.1. Potential of E&E industry in Indonesia
Industrial machines – high potentiality of process automation
Among sub-sectors of E&E industry, there will be more opportunities in B to B electronics to be
globally competitive, since the market expansion and investment by private sector is more probable
due to the robust growth of automotive sector.
As described in the chapter on transportation machinery industry, automotive industry has already
announced further investment of production capacity in coming years. To realize rapid increase of
production volume, manufacturers need to increase productivity. If they rely only on manual labors,
training will take time and they will not be able to make it by the start of operation. While shifting
existing employees to become highly skilled work force who will manage automated production line,
59
60
low value added process should be operated by automation machinery.
Automotive sector is concentrated in Jabodetabek area where wage has been soared rapidly in past
10 years. If those employees continue low value added operation, the productivity will be quite low.
The sector has to enhance skills of employees and replace those low value added operation by
automation machinery.
In addition, automotive industrial policy is aiming to increase exports including Australia as a
targeted destination. However, to be qualified for a global-level market, products should be higher
quality. Some processes of automotive manufacturing need automation, since manual operation will
not realize the global-level quality.
Figure 49 Drivers of process automation in automotive sector
Electronics parts – car electronics
Electronics parts in automotive (car electronics) are increasing for driving support, safe driving,
autonomous driving and internet connection of a car. In terms of auto parts manufacturing in
ASEAN, Thailand is advanced. However, car electronics is still new and even Thailand is not
overwhelmingly advanced in this field. There will be equal chance in ASEAN countries and
Indonesia will also be able to take an initiative in car electronics.
60
61
Source: Texas Instruments
Figure 50 Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) and sensor technology
Various types of electric vehicles will also use more electronics parts and components. Not only
pure battery electric vehicle, but also hybrid vehicle will need electronics parts. Even if those x-EVs
will not be launched in the market soon, development of electronics parts should be prepared in
advance.
Source: NRI
Figure 51 Types of x-EV and electronic components
Potential electronic components for Indonesia could be Electronic Control Unit (ECU), battery
assembly (low to high capacity lithium, 48V battery system), motors, sensors, camera and others.
61
62
4.2.2. Challenges and constraints for further development
If Indonesia focuses on B to B electronics, the development scenario will be described in the
figure below. The starting point is market expansion of industrial electronics, i.e., a trend of rapid
introduction of mechatronics in automotive factories. For service and maintenance reasons,
replacement parts makers and/or disposable supply companies will start after sales services. Once
the size of the market will become large, these companies may establish factory in Indonesia. If the
size of the Indonesian market will become the largest among ASEAN countries, then industrial
electronics companies will also establish factory in Indonesia.
There will be important and difficult challenges for Indonesia to become industrial electronics hub
in ASEAN. As there is virtually no high quality industrial machinery in Indonesia, the country has to
depend on foreign technology until domestic industry will grow in the future.
Factory automation equipment such as robot is not a mass production like consumer electronics. If
a company invest in a factory, it needs a large market to recover the investment. So far, China has
become a large enough market to establish a factory, so several electronics companies invested in
China. Each member state of ASEAN is rather small. Industrial manufacturers will most likely invest
in only one country in ASEAN and will export to other countries. As of today, the number of robots
for production process is much larger in Thailand. The future potential and the speed of growth will
be larger in Indonesia, but the country needs to compete with Thailand to attract investments.
In the course of attracting production of factory automation equipment in Indonesia, attracting
supporting industry is also important. Supporting industry includes replacement parts, disposal
suppliers, programing and system integration for production process and service maintenance
engineering etc.
The other challenge is training of engineers with practical skills. Engineers in E&E industry is
generally in short and this is one the obstacles for further development of the sector. For industrial
electronics, engineers in mechatronics, automation, process engineering and IC design will be
needed. Human resource development needs long time to upgrade the skill level of engineers. They
are already hard up and it is not too late to expand the education of E&E field.
62
63
Source: NRI
Figure 52 Development scenario of B to B electronics and challenges
4.3.Future vision 2025 and challenges 4.3.1. Future supply chain and value chain of E&E sector
Future vision of electric and electronics industry until 2025 is to upgrade quality and productivity
of manufacturing by “Factory Internet of Things (IoT)” and “Product IoT”. This could be regarded
as the “Indonesian version of Industry 4.0”
Judging from the current status of E&E industry, domestic market oriented manufacturing, such as
localized refrigerator or washing machine will survive, since the local market will continue to grow.
However, this sub-sector is based on the domestic (closed) market and they are not necessarily
globally competitive. The most promising sub-sector of E&E is industrial machine that will
contribute to the expansion of automotive sector. In terms of supply chain, it will start with
downstream such as programming and maintenance and operation. Accumulation of these function
will be a base for manufacturing of industrial machine in the future.
63
64
Source: NRI
Figure 53 Future supply chain of E&E and its relationship with automotive industry
In terms of value chain, sales and engineering services (including system integration of production
line, installation of machines, equipment and facility, calibration, operation and maintenance etc.)
will be the functions necessary for the first step of Industry 4.0 (factory IoT) in Indonesia and there
are good potentiality. Engineering service requires replacement parts for maintenance of industrial
machinery. In a long run, this will call for investment of parts manufacturing and then production of
final products.
Source: NRI
Figure 54 Future value chain of E&E
4.3.2. Core concept of Indonesian version of Industry 4.0
Industry 4.0 (I4.0) includes innovation for higher quality and productivity allowing manufacturing
sector in Indonesia to be globally competitive. I4.0 will create employment of higher responsibility
and productivity which is appropriate for highly skilled and higher wage employees in
JABODETABEK. I4.0 may not replace existing employment, as it can supplement human resource,
i.e. factory automation will be introduced for additional production capacity. In Indonesia, I4.0 can
be adopted starting from automotive, diffused to other sectors later on.
64
65
Source: NRI
Figure 55 Core concept of Indonesian version of Industry 4.0
4.3.3. Development scenario of Indonesian version of Industry 4.0
Factory IoT
Starting from installment of automation machinery and service maintenance, gradually enhance
production of parts and machinery. There are already sales and service offices of some industrial
machine manufacturers and replacement parts and disposable supply makers.
Source: NRI
Figure 56 Scenario of automation machinery sub-sector development
Critical mass for inviting production of factory automation machinery is about 15,000 machine
sales per year (for robotics), which is equal to the market size of China today. Currently, 1,200
machines in Thailand and 500 machines in Indonesia per year. To become the number one market in
ASEAN, Indonesia needs annual increase of 30 to 40% per year.
65
66
Source: NRI
Figure 57 Necessary market growth of robotics in ASEAN to attract production
Product IoT
Car electronics is expected to grow when automotive is more “electronized.” Among electronics
parts for automotive, some of them, such as wire harness, connectors and motors are mostly labor
intensive products. In JABODETABEK region, companies are losing cost competitiveness due to
rapid rise of the wage. If logistics cost is not too expensive and lead time is short enough, they may
be relocated in Eastern part of Java island, otherwise they will be relocated out of the country.
For higher value added products such as camera, sensors, radar and Engine Control Unit (ECU),
China, Taiwan, Singapore and Malaysia are the strong competitors of Indonesia. To compete with
these countries, Indonesia needs to introduce automated production process to be productive and
train more engineers with practical skills in electronics.
For virtuous cycle of electronics sector development, it is important for Government of Indonesia
to disseminate clearly that the government will focus on implementation of Industry 4.0 with
significant budget and commitment on specific target achievements by effective policy actions.
Commitment of the government is very important to promote investments, since companies are
becoming more risk averse under uncertain future of the global market.
66
67
Source: NRI
Figure 58 Virtuous cycle of electronics sector development
4.4.Policy scenario
4.4.1. Vision and scenario
The future vision for E&E industry is to upgrade quality and productivity of
manufacturing by "Factory IoT" and "Product IoT" (Indonesian version of Industry 4.0). To
realize this goal, the country needs to become a factory automation production hub in ASEAN.
Now is the time for introducing and promoting factory IoT, or automation process in
production line of automotive and electronics industry. Especially in automotive industry,
production line is expanding and higher production quality is required for further development
of the sector. Some production process cannot be upgraded with only manual labor, such as
painting or spot welding. These processes may be replaced by automation machinery.
Automation machinery is already introduced and widespread in Thailand. However, OEMs
have excess capacity in Thailand and there is not much room for further expansion at this
moment. At the same time, wage is soaring and the cost competitiveness is getting lower. In this
context, manufacturers tend to introduce automation machinery to replace employees in
Thailand. In Indonesia, the production capacity of OEM is still expanding and parts
manufacturers are following the trend. It will be more likely for manufacturers to introduce
automation machinery in newly expanded production lines rather than replacing existing labor
force.
Currently, Thailand is much advanced in introducing automation machinery, since the high
cost (wage) factor is even severer than in Indonesia. If this current trend continues, then
Thailand will become the number one and only one production hub of automation machinery in
ASEAN. Indonesia has more potentiality to become the hub, since the market is larger and the
67
68
size of production will be also larger than Thailand. However, without proactive support by
government policy, the country will be left behind. Judging from the tendency of automation
machinery companies’ investments in foreign countries, they may establish a factory if the
market size will become as large as China. For each ASEAN member state’s market, it will be
difficult or take very long time to become the similar size. Automation machinery company will
chose the largest market country as a hub of production in ASAEN and will export to other
member states. Looking at the current progress and projected future trajectory, if there is
significant policy change in other countries, Thailand has a good chance to become the hub.
To promote factory IoT, the first step is to create a large market of industrial automation
machinery in Indonesia. Then to enhance sales and support services of industrial automation,
which will become a cluster of replacement parts and disposable suppliers. Training of
engineers is also needed to support the industry. Based on the market expansion, accumulation
of supporting industry and a pool of practically skilled engineers, industrial automation
machinery manufacturers may invest and setup factories in Indonesia.
Training of engineers in electronics will also contribute to promote electronics parts
especially for car electronics. Automation machinery will be first introduced in automotive
sector and then also in electronics sector to become globally competitive. If this scenario will be
realized, then Indonesia will have more potentiality to develop consumer electronics products
as well.
68
69
Figure 59 Development scenario for Factory and Product IoT in Indonesia
69
4.4.
2.
Polic
y pr
ogra
m a
nd K
PI
The
who
le p
ictu
re o
f pol
icy
mat
rix is
show
n in
the
belo
w fi
gure
.
70
71
To achieve the goal of future vision of E&E industry, three pillars of policy program are
needed, which are;
- Promotion of facility investments,
- FDI promotion to introduce new technology, proactive support for technology transfer
and cultivation of supporting industry, and,
-Training of IoT engineers.
Figure 60 List of suggested policy program and KPIs
Promotion of facility investment
The first pillar is to promote investments in automation machinery for automotive and
electronics. As it is already explained in previous sections, if Indonesia would like to become a
hub of automation machinery production hub in ASEAN, the market size should be the largest
among ASEAN member states. The Survey Team assume that the critical mass for investment
in factory of automation machinery will be 15,000 units sales per year, which is the current
market size of China, according to discussion interviews with manufacturers. If the market size
of ASAEN reaches that size, manufacturers will consider to invest in one of the member states.
At that time, if the market size of Indonesia will have the largest share in ASEAN, say, almost
the half of total ASEAN market, it is more likely for them to invest in Indonesia. Thus the key
performance indicator (KPI) will be 7,000 units sale pear year in Indonesia. To promote and
stimulate the market, proactive policy measures will be needed.
Investments in automation machinery is highly important for Indonesia to become globally
competitive. It will support rapid expansion of automotive sector, upgrade the quality of
assembling products made in Indonesia and will create more well-paid jobs. If the productivity
71
72
of workers remains the same while wage is rising, then they industry will lose competitiveness.
Installment of automation machinery will lead to create more jobs for skilled labor force, such
as engineers and technicians. This is important step for Indonesian industry to adapt to the
current domestic labor market and to be sustainable in global completion.
Introduction of new technology, proactive support for technology transfer and cultivation of
supporting industry
The second pillar is to introduce new technology, proactive support for technology transfer
and cultivation of supporting industry. Factory automation requires cutting-edge and reliable
technology which is currently lacking in Indonesia. The country needs to rely on foreign
technology first and then transfer the technology to local companies. Without relying on foreign
technology, the quality and productivity will not increase, but it should be well designed to
transfer the technology to local companies. To do so, proactive business matching between
foreign and domestic companies and training of engineers are crucially important.
“Supporting industry” of automation machinery includes replacement parts and disposable
suppliers (such as rare gas). As of today, the market size of Indonesia is about 500 unit sales per
year and there are about 10 to 15 supporting industry companies for mainly operation support
and maintenance reasons. If Indonesia to expand the market up to 7,000 unit per year, 150 to
200 companies will be needed to support the automated production lines. Thus, one of the KPIs
will be 200 companies of supporting industry, both foreign and domestic. For car electronics
companies, it is just started and there is no good benchmark country. It will consists of key
devices such as semiconductor and component modules. KPI will be 50 companies to be
established in Indonesia, which will be rather high target, but the survey team assume that in 10
years, Thailand and the Philippines will also try to attract car electronics companies and strong
commitment of the government will be needed.
Training of IoT engineers
The third pillar is to train IoT engineers. Even if foreign companies bring in cutting-edge
technology, it will not be transferred if there is no engineers who can adopt it and apply to local
companies. Human resource development takes long time and it is not too late to foster
engineers. In terms of factory IoT, process engineers and programmers for production line
building will be needed. According to discussion interviews with industry people, currently 100
to 150 engineers are working in this field, but the country will need 1,500 to 2,000 engineers to
support the largest market in ASEAN. For product IoT, especially for car electronics, engineers
such as IC designing (System on Chip will become more important) and mechatronics will be
needed. KPI may be the same to process engineers.
72
73
4.4.3. Policy measures to achieve KPIs
Development and announcement of specific policy measures for roadmap of Indonesian version
of Industry 4.0
An important point for policy measure is for the Government of Indonesia to formally
announce and promote Indonesian version of Industry 4.0, in which automation machinery is
promoted. If the government shows their long term policy and strong commitment to promote
Industry 4.0, then it will greatly help companies to make decision on investment. Clear message
and concrete policy measures to support Industry 4.0 is the first policy measure to be
implemented.
Figure 61 List of policy program and policy measures
Essence of roadmap of Industry 4.0 is that it should be practical, executable and well
designed for sustainable development of Indonesian industry, of which foreign industry players
might facilitate more efficient learning process and a necessary condition for Indonesia to
achieve its policy objective. An important aspect, however, is technology transfer from foreign
industry players through local industry players. But it will not materialize if the Indonesian
industry ecosystem is not sufficiently prepared. Higher level of engineers who have good
73
74
experience in a real business situation will be needed to understand the technology and
knowhow. If there will be more such experienced engineers, some of them might spin-out from
foreign companies and will establish a domestic company. Proactive support by the government
is needed to realize for this technology transfer scenario, otherwise there is limited incentive for
private sector to voluntarily transfer their technology. The roadmap should carefully design and
show a long term scenario and policy measures to realize the goal.
[Policy actions for short term 2018 to 2019]
The roadmap of Indonesian version of Industry 4.0 should be developed and announced. It
should be carefully designed, based on realistic scenario and executable policy support for next
10 years. It should contain information on which companies – both domestic and international –
can make decisions of investment in factory IoT (or automation machinery, robots and
mechatronics) and product IoT. Necessary information will be the following;
Clear and concrete image of the goal and target of Industry 4.0 in 10 years;
Necessary technology to realize Industry 4.0;
The future ideal manufacturing process in major sectors such as automotive and
electronics;
Future vision of industrial structure of major sectors, i.e., division of roles between
foreign and domestic companies in contribution to the industrial development;
Measures of technology transfer from foreign companies to local companies?
Policy support (policy package) to be implemented by the government, which include
measures and process to secure the budget support.
Effective public dissemination plays important role in securing support, not only for all
government agencies, but also to obtain the understanding and commitment from business
leaders—both national and international.
[Policy actions for mid and long term 2020 to 2025]
Policy package should be consistently implemented over years. Manufacturing sector takes
long term to be competitive, since accumulation of technology, facility and human resource are
needed. If the policy will not continue for some years, then private sector cannot be confident of
the future of industrial development of that country and investment will be inactive.
To be consistent for long term, setting up a steering committee to secure the budget for
policy package and monitor the implementation and achievement by high-level and
inter-ministry members.
74
75
Taxation scheme for promoting facility investments
In addition to the policy announcement, preferential taxation scheme for Factory IoT
investment will be also effective. For example, exemption of import duty on the cutting-edge
automation machinery and approval of deductible expenses for donated machinery to technical
universities and polytechnic schools will accelerate new investments. As currently Indonesia
domestic market has not matured yet, the state-of-the-art automation machinery will be
imported in majotiy as there is not yet exist equivalent producers in Indonesia.
Important thing for the first step is to expand the domestic market and relaxation of import
duty will be effective to promote automation machinery in Indonesia. Companies sometimes
sell their old machinery and then install new one with better capacity. Even though these old
ones are not the latest, but they may be still better than current machinery in technical
universities and polytechnic schools.
[Policy actions for short to long term 2018 to 2025]
To implement reduction or exemption of import tariff on factory automation machinery
and equipment. For the first step, Indonesia has to import cutting-edge machinery from foreign
countries.
Other scheme will be implementation of investment acceleration tax system, such as
accelerated depreciation system or approval of income deduction of donated machinery to
technical university and/or polytechnic schools.
Local business development by technology transfer from foreign companies
Local business development is the most important and difficult part of policy measures.
Manufacturing industry needs accumulation of technology, high quality manufacturing facility
and human resource. Technology should be first introduced from foreign countries. Facility
investment is crucially important, since the quality of product is determined by the quality of
machinery. However, high quality machinery is generally expensive and it will take long time
for companies to recover the investment. It is difficult for medium and small enterprises to
invest in high-end machinery. Human resource training is also burden to medium and small
enterprises. Business matching with foreign companies, policy support for facility investments
and human resource training are inevitable for local business development.
[Policy actions for short term 2018 to 2019]
When the government promote foreign direct investments, it is also important to promote
75
76
business matching with local companies. Potential investors in the near future will be medium
and small companies with high technologies and some of them may need local partner for better
localized operation. Local companies need to be transferred the latest technology, otherwise
there will be little development of the industry.
Japanese governmental organization such as JETRO has already made a list of Indonesian
companies. It should be fully utilized when the Government of Indonesia will conduct FDI
promotion in foreign countries.
For local small and medium companies, they claim that they cannot find a business chance
with large companies including foreign companies. Thus, reverse exhibition, where large
companies show their procurement needs and potential purchase goods, will be effective for
local companies to know what sort of business chance is existing in the country. By cooperating
with industrial associations and/or foreign organizations such as JETRO, reverse exhibition
should be organized for business matching.
[Policy actions for mid and long term 2020 to 2025]
For local companies to be included in a global value chain, introduction of higher
technology is needed, which can be realized by installment of cutting-edge machineries.
However, especially for small and medium companies, invest in expensive machinery is such a
burden to business management, especially when the future of business development is not
clear. Sometimes large companies require large production capacity to deliver products in a
large quantity. SMEs may need to merge together to realize such large operation. So financial
support for invest in cutting-edge machinery and/or in merger and acquisition among
companies will be effective.
Foreign Direct Investment Promotion: Target Sector Will be Automation Machinery and Its
Parts, Components and Disposable Suppliers, System Integrator for Factory Automation, as
well as Electronics Components for Automotive
Efficient and productive manufacturing system needs cutting-edge technology. Until
domestic industry will become competitive enough, Indonesia needs to promote foreign direct
investment in some specific sub-sectors, namely, automation machinery, its parts and
components, disposables suppliers and car electronics parts and components companies.
[Policy actions for short term 2018 to 2019]
For those targeted sub-sectors, more preferential incentives and lower requirement for
minimum investment amount will be effective, since not all of them are large multinational
companies. Currently, Thailand prepares generous incentive for investment with higher level of
76
77
technology.
Table 14 Incentive scheme by BOI of Thailand
Source: BOI, Thailand
IoT specialist who will promote foreign direct investments will be needed to define and
assess the type of investments and determine whether the government to offer the most
preferential incentive or not.
[Policy actions for mid and long term 2020 to 2025]
Investment promotion in industrial cluster in foreign countries will be effective. In about
10 years ago, the Board of Investments of Thailand went around local parts of Japan to promote
investments by those local medium and small companies with high technology. Some of the
mechatronics companies are located in Kyushu region or somewhere other than large cities
such as Tokyo or Osaka. IoT specialist will contribute to promote investment by giving advice
to potential investors from specialist view point and by giving feedbacks from industry to the
government.
Introduction and rolling out of practical education and training for IoT at technical universities
and polytechnic schools
Industry people from electronics industry point that engineers in electronics are lacking in
Indonesia for further industrial development. For example, in Malaysia, the government
focused on fostering engineers in electronics for more than 30 years and they have produced
77
78
many good engineers who are leading the sector in ASEAN. Panasonic, for example, have
established an R&D center for home appliance in Malaysia for more than 15 years.
For further development of the electric and electronics sector, in addition to good operators,
Indonesia needs more engineers and technicians and it should be aligned with the roadmap of
Industry 4.0. In terms of promotion of production automation, more mechatronics engineers
will be needed who has good knowledge and experience of PLC programming, production line
building etc. For development of product IoT, more focused education and training of
electronics will be needed, for example, logic design of IC for ECU, sensors, motors, camera
etc.
Judging from various opinions from industry and explanations from technical universities
and polytechnic schools, it seems that universities teach fundamentals but not necessarily
applied to real engineering business whereas polytechnic graduates are good at using practical
tools such as three dimensions CAD, but they tend to lack fundamental knowledge of science.
Even some advanced polytechnic schools, training of automation production system is still
introductory level. Training of more practically skilled engineers and technicians will be
needed.
[Policy actions for short term 2018 to 2019]
To upgrade the quality of education and training, training program should be developed,
based on a deep cooperation with the industry and professors, lecturers and trainers need to be
re-trained. Machinery and equipment for education and training may need to be updated to the
latest ones that are currently used in industry. These actions should be implemented in some
selected and advanced schools as the short term goal.
[Policy actions for mid and long term 2020 to 2025]
Once the abovementioned policy actions are proved successful, it should be rolled out to
other training schools throughout the country.
78
79
4.5. Electric Commerce and Industry 4.0
4.5.1. A brief overview of the Electric Commerce in Indonesia This section outlines the Electric Commerce (e-commerce, or EC) in Indonesia, because
EC is incorporated as part of the manufacturing supply chain, especially in its downstream.
EC is emerging with new talents in information and communication technology and these
technologies are likely to contribute to Industry 4.0 by fusing with the manufacturing
industry.
The size of EC market (B to C) in Indonesia is about $ 5.7 billion in 2016. It is expected
to expand steadily in the future, which is expected to be more than twice as high as the
current level of 12.4 billion by 2020. Although the rate of EC in retail sector has increased
year by year, it is 2.3% as of 2016, which is still small compared to the whole retail market. It
is expected to continue to increase in the future, up to 3.8% in 2020.
Note: (E) for estimated data, (F) for forecasted data
Source: eMarketer (2016)
Figure 62 Trend of the size of EC market in Indonesia and forecast
As players involved in the EC industry, there are EC platforms, settlement platforms,
and logistics companies. In the past, the supply chain in the EC sector has been fragmented,
but recently there has been a movement of vertical integration. Logistics company Go-jek
acquired settlement company, for example.
As of April 2017, Lazada has 26% share of EC share in Indonesia. The following
Tokopedia is a provider of platforms for C to C (customer to customer). As for the other
companies, mergers and acquisitions are underway as the EC market is rapidly expanding.
79
80
Source: ecommerceIQ (2017)
Figure 63 Share of EC companies in Indonesia (Page view base in April 2017)
4.5.2. A case of EC incorporated in the manufacturing supply chain Salim Group is a conglomerate with a wide range of business lines including
manufacturing and retail sectors. It links e-commerce with the real economy, and develops
various services.
One such case is processed food of Indofood. Consumers can get benefits when
purchasing processed foods of Indofood through elevenia, an EC of the group. In addition,
consumers can receive the product and make payment Indomaret, the Salim Group retail
store.
In addition, there are automotive manufacturers under the umbrella of Salim Group, and
EC of the group is also used for selling final products through e-commerce and procurement
of parts by automotive manufacturers.
80
81
Source: Based on the discussion interview with elevenia
Figure 64 Business model of Salim Group including EC (elevenia)
4.5.3. Potentiality and challenges of EC in the context of Industry 4.0 The expansion of e-commerce business is considered to have a positive significance for
the development of the manufacturing industry.
As a development scenario of the electrical and electronics industry, Industry 4.0 will be
the key, which means digitalization of the manufacturing industry. Collect and analyze
information from production line, or execute supply chain optimization using information
system will be some of cases of IT aspects of Industry 4.0. By enhancing the connectivity of
products to the Internet (product IoT), the value added of the product could be increased. In
such a situation, there is a possibility to utilize Indonesian's excellent ICT engineers. In fact,
there are cases in which a world-famous Japanese robot maker develops software embedded
to robot products in India, even though the company does not have any production line in
India.
In Indonesia, the diffusion of robots and the introduction of Industry 4.0 are yet to come.
However, even without the production of robots, it is also important to promote software
development to prepare for future Industry 4.0 generation.
At present, graduates from engineering departments at top-level universities tend to be
committed to e-commerce business, rather than manufacturing. In general, those high level
engineers do not have tendency to work in the manufacturing industry. Make them interested
in digitization of the manufacturing industry is a challenge.
On the other hand, many students who are educated at the next level after the university,
such as Polytechnic, have a deep understanding of the manufacturing industry. By extending
their capabilities, it is necessary to realize Industry 4.0.
81
82
5. Food Processing Industry
5.1.Current status 5.1.1. Overview of the sector/Industrial Outlook
Geographic significance of the food processing value chain
The supply chain for food production starts with the agricultural and fishery industry. This
upstream industry of the food processing industry is the major industry and source of employment
outside Java. As evidenced in the following diagram, many provinces outside Java are having more
than 40% of the labor market in the Agriculture, Forestry, Hunting, and Fisheries industries (as
shown in red).
(Source Data from BPS- August National Labor Force Survey, 2016 (* Note) Provinces in red are employing more than 40% of the labor market for the Agriculture, Forestry, Hunting, and Fisheries industries Figure 65 Provinces where the Agriculture, Hunting, and Fisheries is the major industry with
more than 40% of the labor market*
Global competitiveness
The supporting industry in the upstream of Indonesia’s food processing supply chain has a large
production capacity. For example, Indonesia produces many agricultural products, such as palm oil,
coconuts, cinnamon, cocoa, coffee, fruits, sugar cane, etc. in large quantity, ranking among the top of
agricultural production in the world.
82
83
Table 15 Global ranking of Indonesia’s Agricultural production (2013)
Source: FAO-FAOSTAT
However, the food products produced from these world ranking agricultural products, such as
sugars and sugar confectionery, chocolate, etc. are lagging behind Thailand, in terms of exports.
Table 16 Global ranking of Indonesia’s Processed Food Export amount (2014)
Source: Comtrade
Indonesia’s processed food export seems to be quite large among the ASEAN countries, but if we
exclude palm products, export of processed food is less than 1/3 of Thailand’s in 2014. (In terms of
83
84
world ranking of processed food export, Thai ranks 9th, Malaysia ranks 21st, and Indonesia lags
behind their peers, ranking 23rd.)
(Source Comtrade (Note) Export amount of dairy products within HS04 and processed coffee within HS09 was less than 50 million USD for all 5 countries, in 2014. (HS 2 digit code commodities #15 22, 2014)
Figure 66 Major ASEAN countries’ export of food products
There could be many reasons for the lagging processed food exports from Indonesia. However,
interviews with food processors revealed the fact that the quality and quantity of standardized
agricultural products are not enough for the food processors to compete in the export market, with
countries such as Thailand or Philippines, etc.
In addition to Indonesia’s poor quality/standardization compared to Thailand, it seems that the
productivity of the agricultural inputs are lower than Thailand, which could further reduce the
competitiveness of the agricultural inputs and food products produced from these local products..
0
5
10
15
20
25
Indonesia Malaysia Thailand Singapore Viet Nam Philippines
(bil. USD)
15 Animal or vegetable fats and oilsand their cleavage products; preparededible fats; animal or vegetable waxes16 Preparations of meat, of fish or ofcrustaceans, molluscs or other aquaticinvertebrates17 Sugars and sugar confectionery
18 Cocoa and cocoa preparations
19 Preparations of cereals, flour, starchor milk; pastrycooks' products
20 Preparations of vegetables, fruit,nuts or other parts of plants
21 Miscellaneous edible preparations
22 Beverages, spirits and vinegar
84
85
(Source FAO-Stat, 2014 (Production (ton)/Plant Area, 2014)
Figure 67 Relative Yield (Indonesia/Thailand)
5.1.2. Current status and challenges of industrial policy on food processing industry
Main Policy Objective
Food self-sufficiency/food security and reducing volatile food price movements is one of the
priority issues in the current food policy. This can be observed from the fact that supporting food
security is one of the criteria to determine the Priority industry in the Indonesian Medium-Term
Development Plan 2015-2019. Moreover, reaching food self−sufficiency and maintaining it at safe
levels, containing enough nutritional quality and availability for every household is the main policy
objective for food industry stated in the Vision and Mission of RPJPN 2005−2025.
Encouraging the development of manufactured goods and downstream processed food industries
to increase exports of less volatile products is considered as the political challenge for the food
industrial policy.
Focus of food processing policy
The Master Plan of National Industry Development has selected priority industry groups to be
developed in 2015-2035, of which Food industry and Agro-Based Upstream Industry are two
industries selected among the ten priority industry groups.
Furthermore, the following are the types of priority industries which are included in the national
85
86
priority food industry group are: (i) Fish Processing, (ii) Milk Processing, (iii) Freshener Material,
(iv) Vegetable Oil Processing, (v) Fruit & Vegetable Processing, (vi) Flour, and (vii) Sugar Cane
Based Industry. Whereas for Agro-Based Upstream industry group are the following: (i) Oleo-Food,
(ii) Oleo-Chemical, (iii) Chemurgical, (iv) Cattle Feed, (v) Wood Based, and (vi) Pulp and Paper
Industry.
In order to secure food self-sufficiency and price stability, Indonesia has continued to regulate
exports of certain commodities on a voluntary basis (voluntary export restraints). For example,
obtaining a certificate of origin from the Association of Indonesian Coffee Exporters / Indonesia
Coffee Exporters Association (GAEKI) has been a tool to control exports.
5.1.3. Supply chain and value chain analysis
Current status: Supply chain
There are two types of Indonesian processed foods, in terms of global competitiveness. The first
type of Indonesian food products are globally competitive products, produced with economies of
scale, by large corporations who can control the quality of the whole supply chain, and supplied by
imports of high quality ingredients or raw material. For example, Indonesian instant noodles makers
are producing the lowest cost and largest amount of instant noodles in the world, despite the fact that
Indonesia imports all of the basic raw material, wheat, from overseas to produce flour to produce
noodles in Indonesia, not only for the large domestic noodle loving consumer market over 200
million, but also for the export market, in the middle east and African countries, especially for the
Halal market in those countries. However, this type of food processing industry is more on the
exception, rather than the norm.
The second type of Indonesian processed food lack global competitiveness and are supplied by
(low quality) domestic raw materials and the (final) food product is either mostly imported or
produced from imported intermediary material. However, most of these imported food/materials are
manufactured from agriculture products produced in large volume in Indonesia, mostly by small
farmers, collected by different middleman, and exported with limited processing or value adding.
For example, Cacao are exported as raw material, and imported back after processed overseas after
mixing the Indonesian raw materials with higher quality/flavor foreign raw materials and/or
produced under highly controlled factories in foreign countries with economies of scale as
intermediary material (couverture) or final products (chocolate).
86
87
Figure 68 Examples of Supply Chain / Production Process of Indonesia’s food industry
There are already large food producing companies in Indonesia, such as Indofood, Garudafood,
Mayora Indah, as well as Nestle, Unilever, etc. However, Multinationals in Indonesia are focused on
the domestic market, not exports, and large Indonesian food companies have been able to export, but
may shift factories abroad, if Indonesia’s market condition does not improve, especially in terms of
restricted imports of some critical food ingredients such as high quality salt and sugar.
Table 17 Domestic and Foreign Sales of major domestic food processing companies
Source) Table created by NRI, based on annual reports and data of Euromonitor
(Note) Firms highlighted in yellow are Indonesian food companies.
Non-competitive products are found in many food area, including seafood products. According
Procuring ingredients, agricultural products
Post-harvest Processing
Producing Intermediary materials
Cooking/Packaging/Inspection of Final Product
Local inputs Imported
Palm
InstantNoodles
FlourPalm oil
Noodle (Domestic production)
Packaged Instant noodle
(Domestic production)
Wheat(Import 100%)
High quality salt, Flavor (imported)
Home market
Export market
Cacao beansChocolate
Low quality processing
(Not selected / Not fermented)
Cacao butter,Couverture
Cacao powder,Couverture
Home market
(low/mid. quality)Chocolate
(High quality) Chocolate Import
Hi h lit ltHigh quality saltHi h lit ltSingle corporation controls the quality of the input/output at each supply step from upstream to downstream
Market-ing
Supply chain is chopped at each step, and market requirements cannot be shared with upstream playersS hSupply chain is cS l h i iLocal farmer
d dat each step, at h tMiddleman
kket requirements cat i tOEM producer
ot be shahh red withhhhhhh upstreamtt b hhh d ithhh tFinal product producer
Name of companyShare pf packagedfood in Indonesia
(value, 2016)
Sales(Trillion
Rp)in
Indonesiato
ForeignForeign
%Note
PT Indofood Sukses MakmurTbk 7.4% 66.8 61.6 5.2 8% Sales of processed food is 30T.Rp Top ranking export destinations are
Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, Nigeria, China, South Korea, The Philippines
PT Nestle Indonesia 4.0% NA NA NA
PT Frisian Flag Indonesia 3.3% NA NA NA Subsidiary of Koninklijke FrieslandCampina N.V.
PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk 2.4% 40 38 2 0 Export is only to related parties in foreign countries
Garudafood Group 1.8% NA NA NA
PT Ceres 1.7% NA NA NA Formerly subsidiary of Delfi/Petra Foods Ltd., sold to Meiji.
PT Heinz ABC Indonesia 1.7% NA NA NA
PT Sarihusada GenerasiMahardhika 1.7% NA NA NA Subsidiary of Danone Baby and Medical Nutrition N.V.
PT Kalbe Farma Tbk 1.6% 8.4 7.8 0.6 7% Sales and export is counted for only Consumer health & Nutritionals
PT Mayora Indah Tbk 1.5% 18.3 10.1 8.3 45% Sales comprises of food processing and processing of coffee powder,instant coffee, and cocoa beans. Export is mostly to Asia.
PT Nutricia Indonesia Sejahtera 1.5% NA NA NA Nutricia is part of Danone
Indolakto PT 1.5% NA NA NA Was part of Danone, but bought out by Indofood
PT Tiga Pilar Sejahtera FoodTbk (Alam Makmur Sembada 1.4% 3 NA NA Export Candy, Instant noodle, Vermicelli, biscuit, etc.
Salim Ivomas Pratama Tbk 1.4% 14.5 13.5 1.0 7% Sales of Edible oil and fats is 10 T.Rp
Sub total 32.7% 150.6 130.8 17.3 11%
87
88
to interviews with the food processing industry, the weak competitiveness can be attributed to small
scale non-standardized low quality agricultural/marine products, which cannot be used to gain
economies of scale and high cost of transportation, including lack of cold chain. For example,
pineapple juice would be cheaper to produce and imported from the Philippines, where they have
large plantations to produce standardized pineapples, compared to the fragmented pineapple market
in Indonesia, where numerous middleman collects unstandardized agricultural products.
Figure 69 Supply Chain / Production Process of food industry (using raw material produced
locally) Implication from supply chain and value chain analysis
Considering the fact that Indonesia has a large domestic market which consumes large amount of
food products, such as noodles, it may be easy for Indonesia’s food producers to gain economies of
scale, and not having a competitive upstream agricultural sector, per se, would not be a serious
challenge. However, if the objective is to expand and to penetrate into a highly competitive global
food products market, then the current mode of production will no longer be sufficient.
If food companies, can control the supply chain and the quality of raw materials, and utilize
economies of scale in the domestic market, and coordinate with farmers to produce more
standardized products, with higher economies of scale and quality, there can be more food products
to become further competitive in the export market, while being more able to provide food security
through higher efficiency in production/distribution.
5.2.Potential/constraint 5.2.1. Potential of Food Processing industry in Indonesia
Potential: Growth of Domestic Consumption of packaged and Halal food
Indonesia’s domestic sale of packaged food is about 1/2 of Malaysia or Thailand, per capita, but
Producing agricultural products
Post harvest Processing/
Manufacturing Intermediary materials
Palm Fruit, Coconuts Palm oil, Coconut oil Margarine Branded/Packaged Cake/DrinksCoffee bean, Cacao
bean SelectedFermented beans,
roasted/Grinded bean, Cacao liquor, cacao butter, cacao powder, Couverture
Chocolate/Cocoa products,drinks, dishes
Sugar cane crude sugar (fine) Sugar Cube/Packaged sugarSeafood (prawn, tuna) frozen prawn/ tuna, (Seasoned prawn/ tuna) Cooked/frozen/canned/retort fish
seaweed half-purified carragee-nan, agar solution
Purified carrageenan,agar solution
AgarSFood
produced from
local raw materials
Mostly involved Partially involved Not much involved
Domestic productionNo selection/grading
Domestic production
Low value added
Domestic production
for domestic use
Foreign Production(Value/brand
added)
Foreign market product
(high value added)
Domestic productmass market
Foreign productionForeign
Production(Value added)
ExportHome market
Import
Export Export
Cooking/Inspection/Packaging/Final Product
Market-ing
88
89
due to the growth of per capita income, the packaged food purchased are able to increase both in
terms of volume and quality, and is projected to double within 14 years.
Source) Graph created by NRI, based on data from Euromonitor
Figure 70 Per Capita Packaged Food Sales
However, the total amount of food consumption by the whole population, especially, Halal food
consumption, in Indonesia is about 4 times larger than Malaysia, and 28 times larger than Thailand,
due to the large size of Muslim population which amounts to about 200 million. If Indonesia firms
can dominate the domestic halal market, Indonesia’s food processing industry has a large potential to
grow, through economies of scale.
0
50
100
150
200
250
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
(USD)
Malaysia
Thailand
Indonesia
89
90
(Source) Graph created by NRI, based on data from Euromonitor and Pew Research
Center
Figure 71 Halal Packaged Food Market (2010)
Constraint: Regulations restricting industrial growth
Many restrictions on trade and investment are bottlenecks for the food processing industry to
develop a competitive supply chain for the domestic/world food market.
Restrictions on distribution are limiting opportunities for improvement in productivity, innovation
and competitiveness in the supply chain from upstream (agriculture) to downstream (retail/export
market) Table 18 Examples of Restrictions prohibiting innovation and growth of Indonesia’s food
Industry Type of
restriction Sector Content of Restriction
Foreign Investment to Indonesia
Cacao and Coffee, post-harvest processing Foreign ownership 95% allowed, but with more than 20% of raw material has to be coming from own plantation.
Transportation Only up to 49% ownership is allowed
Department Store For floor size 400-2000 , foreign ownership up to 67% is allowed but within shopping mall.
Small supermarket (<1200 ), minimarts (<400 ), Convenience store
Foreign investment is not allowed (100% owned by Indonesian)
Import quota High quality food ingredients (such as 99.9% refined/pure salt, sugar, etc.)
Import quota exists for high quality ingredients (such as 99% salt, sugar, etc.), for industrial use, which limits the production/export of competitive food processed in Indonesia, as domestic refined salt/sugar, etc. cannot match the quality/purity and cost provided by imports.
(Source) Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia, Number 44 Year 2016, etc.
0
5
10
15
0
50
100
150
200
Thailand Malaysia Indonesia
(bil.USD)(mil.) Muslim Population (2010,Left Axis)Halal Packaged Food Market(2010, Right Axis)
90
91
5.2.2. Challenges and constraints for further development
Development of Distribution Industry
Domestic distribution is migrating to modern trade as rising middle class consumers require more
value added/healthier products from efficient/high quality distributors. The large buying power of
the modern trade distributors shall enforce competition among Indonesia’s suppliers while enhancing
governance among productivity and quality control. Therefore, the growth of Modern Trade
distributors, shall facilitate the improvement of efficiency and competitiveness of the food
processing value chain in Indonesia.
Source) Graph created by NRI, based on data from Euromonitor
Figure 72 Break down of Distribution Channels for Packaged Food
5.2.3. Challenges from intraregional and extra-regional Competition
Potential & constraint: Trade Liberalization
Market integration will open export opportunities for the globally competitive firms, but will
intensify competition within the domestic market.
Trend to seek liberalization and harmonization of trade and investment regulations shall
continue, increasing foreign food manufacturers’ access to Indonesia’s market and domestic
competition.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2016 2011 2016 2011 2016
Indonesia Malaysia Thailand
Other Channel
Modern Grocery Retailers (Hypermarkets, Supermarkets, Convenience Stores)
Traditional Grocery Retailers
(%)
91
92
If the local manufacturers (and their upstream food material suppliers) cannot improve their
value added nor productivity, their ability to reinvest in the supply chain will decrease and
eventually, the whole supply chain’s competitiveness will decrease further and may
eventually, run out of business.
Figure 73 Impact of Trade/Investment liberalization / Harmonization
Challenges: Foreign export drive and investment policy competition
As mentioned before, Indonesia may face challenges of competitions in the region (e.g. Thailand,
Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, etc.) as well as outside of the region (e.g. China and India), as free
trade agreement such as AEC and ASEAN -China Free Trade Agreement will take full effect in the
coming years. China may build up huge excess production capacity of food products in the future,
which will trigger export drive to neighboring countries, as it happened with other manufacturing
products such as steel. Development of India’s food industry, including halal export, is also expected
in the near future as Indonesia’s domestic market expands, and each country will be willing to utilize
their agricultural sector to address their domestic unemployment issues.
This regional competition may be a threat to Indonesia due to their strong cost competitiveness
and their recent export promotion policy. As shown below, many neighboring countries have been
implementing incentives for production investment in general. Malaysia has been promoting their
halal food products and have introduced a fast track for halal certification issuance within 3 days.
However, multinational foreign firms tend to focus on supplying to the domestic market after their
FDI has been completed, as mentioned above. In light of this tendency, Thailand has been
implementing an interesting tariff free policy for re-exportation, which shall be discussed in further
detail in the next section.
• Market more open and easier for Global Sourcing
• Competition becomes tougher throughout the supply chain
• Food Products must be innovative to meet consumer’s needs and lifestyle in each market.
• ASEAN Economic Community (AEC)• General Standards for Labelling Prepackaged Food• Maximum Level for Food Additives for Prepared Foodstuff Products• Principles and Criteria for The Establishment of Maximum Level for
Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed• Food Safety Policy• Principles and Guidelines for National Food Control Systems• General Principles of Food Hygiene• Guidelines for the Design, Operation, Assessment and Accreditation of
Food Import and Export Inspection and Certification Systems• Guidelines for Food Import Control Systems• Guidelines for Food Reference Laboratories• Principles for Food Import and Export Inspection and Certification
• (new) Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) • Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)• EU-Indonesia FTA• Other bilateral FTAs
Trade/Investment liberalization and HarmonizationImpact on Industry
(Ref.) Indonesia Food & Beverages Industry Outlook,GAPMMI (2017)
92
93
Table 19 Comparison of incentives provided in other countries (in Thailand, China, Vietnam)
In order to cope with challenges from neighboring countries, Indonesia needs to strengthen cost
competitiveness through development of supply chain. As mentioned in supply chain analysis,
Indonesia needs to improve the quality and productivity of local agricultural content through
investment and cooperation within the whole value chain in order to be globally cost competitive.
As mentioned before, Indonesia, with its large population (over 260 million people) and halal food
demand in the ASEAN region has an enormous competitive advantage in terms of potential domestic
(halal) food market, as this could be used for economies of scale in food production.
In order to reach and surpass the export level of Thailand’s processed food, which is about 16
billion USD, Indonesia needs to more than triple or quadruple their exports, to become the No.1
exporter in the region in terms of processed food.
In order to achieve this goal to become a major player in global food production market, Indonesia
should maximize its potentials, while solving challenges/ issues that limit achievement of potentials.
Firstly, taking advantage of its large halal domestic market, Indonesia has potential to become export
hub of halal food, especially for emerging markets. In other words, Indonesia can increase export
through pursuing global economies of scale strategy, focusing on investment and export, as has been
the case for Thailand. There are a number of challenges/ issues to achieve its potential, arising from
weak supply chain (lack of large scale high productivity local raw material suppliers compared to
Thailand and lack of suppliers with specific/high technologies/standardization), missing value chain
(lack of local suppliers capability in engineering, quality and productivity), mismatch of human
resource (lack of marketing/distribution network), infrastructure bottleneck (to utilize the
Country
Incentives
Thailand(for business eligible for investment promotion)
China(for business eligible for investment promotion)
Vietnam(for incentive investment
sectors)
Tax
ince
ntiv
es corporate tax
Corporate income tax can be exempted 3 years up to 8 years
Corporate income tax 25 canbe reduced to 10 , (various revenue items can be deducted)
Preferential tax rates, duration of entitlement to such rates exist.Investor’s losses after tax finalization, can be carried forward up to five years
import duties
Exemption of import duties on machinery and raw materials used in production for export
Exemption of Import duties on machinery/equipment for own factory
Exemption of import duty on equipment, materials, means of transportation and other goods for project implementation.
Non
-tax
ince
ntiv
es
LandPermit to own land (where foreign ownership is prohibited, in general)
(Land cannot be owned by foreign firms)
Cannot own land, but exempted from payment of or a reduction of land rent and land use fees
Gov
ernm
ent
prom
oter
s The Office of the Board of Investment (BOI) is responsible for promoting investment, both into Thailand and overseas.
Government agencies provide country information on macro economy, business investment environment, legal and government system, etc. State owned FIs provide financial support for FDI
Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI) and Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) promote FDI
93
94
agricultural and fishery resources outside of Java island) , and lack of investment incentives (less
ease of importing materials/machines and free export) as shown in the figure above. In order to
realize its potential, policy program needs to be crafted to promote agglomeration/corporatization of
the upstream industry (agriculture and fishery) and strengthen cost competitiveness with higher net
local content (value excluding all imported parts / total cost of goods), while at the same time
addressing major challenges /issues mentioned above.
5.3.Future vision 2025 and challenges 5.3.1. Reference for Future Food Industry Vision
Thailand’s Vision for the Food Industry
Thailand has positioned food processing industry as the key strategic sector for economic
development and has coherent policies to become the “world’s kitchen”. In contrast, Indonesia only
has ministry-wise, product-wise and very long term goals, such as the Ministry of Agriculture’s long
term goal of becoming the major supplier of staple food for the world by 2045. Although Indonesia
has a priority to achieve food security/self-sufficiency, we believe that concurrently developing a
strategy for globally competitive food value chain would have synergies for the self-sufficiency
policy and also for keeping food price affordable, by increasing per capita income (by adding more
value to a wide range of products) and reducing price (in line with improvement in productivity).
Increasing economies of scale, speeding up productivity investment and R&D for import substitution,
are part of the expected synergies which will be needed in the very near future, to face stiffer import
competition from FTAs that are coming effective, which could make food competitiveness
irreversible, long before 2045.
In order to reach their vision, Thailand has been relatively open to imports of food ingredients.
While there are high tariffs applied to imports competing with some of the locally produced products,
products can be imported tariff-free if the final product is for re-exportation. This tariff-free policy
for raw material and machinery for re-exportation use is one of the striking differences between the
Thai and Indonesian food trade policies. Indonesia does not seem to have a coherent free tariff policy
for re-exportation to encourage export, while not disturbing the domestic industry which could be
under jurisdiction of several ministries (such as, Trade, Agriculture, Marine Affairs and Fishery,
Industries). Moreover, the quota and tariff for high quality ingredients (salt, sugar) to be used by
food processers for exports, are determined several months in advance, which makes the food
processors difficult to adjust to the fluctuating world market. Although the government has assisted
the domestic salt and sugar industry to develop refineries which are already producing high quality
refined salt and sugar, the products which such government led facilities can currently produce, has
94
95
not yet reached the purity level required for export and has not been able to match the price of
imported ingredients at such refined level.
Moreover, Thailand provides many types of tax incentives, such as 50% reduction on corporate
income tax for limited time, without limiting the beneficiaries’ size, with a strategy to enhance FDIs.
Indonesia, in contrast, only provides corporate income tax exemption for small firms. Compared to
Thailand, Indonesia’s tax incentives could have a smaller impact on exempted tax revenue, but it
would only limit opportunities for FDIs which have higher level of technology investment and larger
employment capacities, with larger tax revenue (after the exemption period). Coordinated/coherent
tax policies to enhance productivity investment should also have a synergy effect on the
self-sufficiency policy.
Table 20 Comparison of Visions for the Food Industry (Thailand vs Indonesia)
Thailand’s Multi-sector collaboration
(Case)Thai government has been facilitating collaboration with educational and research institutes
for the food industry, as below. This type of collaboration among agencies shall be applied in
Indonesia
CountryFood Policies Thailand Indonesia (current status) (Challenges)
Vision/Target“Kitchen of the World”• world top 5 food exporter• largest exporter of halal• Thailand 4.0 (incl. food)
No coherent cross-ministerial vision to develop a globally competitivefood value chain industry (focus on self sufficiency, no synergy with exporting)
Coordinate ministries to catch-up /surpass Thai
Res
trict
ions
/Tar
iffs
Tariffs / quotas /Local Content requirement
Exemption on raw materials & machinery for “export” production
Import of certain high quality ingredients, critical to value added products, is limited by quota / tariff De-regulation is
necessary to unleash the full potential of food product export
Export tax / Restrictions None
There are registration requirements and taxes for exporters of certainexport items (eg. Coffee)
Foreign currency NoneExchange of more than USD 100,000 per month requires approval from central bank
Tax
Ince
ntiv
es
Corporate Income tax exemption
50% reduction up to 8 years
Only small enterprises are entitled to a 50% discount.
Effective Tax incentives should be provided to enhance investment for productivity
Deduction on utility costs Double deduction None
Deduction on infrastructure cost
Allowed for qualified cost (eg. construction) None
95
96
Figure 74 Example of Thailand’s facilitation of multi-sector (public-private) collaboration
5.3.2. Vision for Indonesia’s Future Food Industry In light of the above advanced vision in Thailand, and the current mid-term goal of food security,
Indonesia should envision its own future food processing industry as follows.
Future Vision: To become the largest food processing/ export center in ASEAN
Future vision of food processing industry until 2025 is to upgrade the quality and productivity of
the whole food processing value chain, and “become the largest food processing/ export center in
ASEAN”, not merely for the food security of its nation, but also for the food security of the world.
By developing such large and competitive industry, the food value chain is expected to become
one of Indonesia’s major source of income from the world, as well as a source to balance its trade
and stabilize Rupiah’s purchasing power in world trade.
KPI: Triple production, Quadruple export, Quintuple added-value by 2025
The target KPI3 to achieve the above vision by 2025 is to improve productivity/efficiency and
Triple production, Quadruple export to catch up with Thailand, and Quintuple added-value by
3 These growth figures are in nominal figures (not discounting for inflation) based on data from the Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia (2014, 2017). the annual growth rate of gross output for food and beverage production (excluding palm oil) has been around 17% during 2011-2014. Likewise, growth rate of value added of food and beverage production (excluding palm oil) has been around 28%, during 2011-2014. However, growth of export during 2011-2014 has been only 6.4%, but in order to reach the level of Thailand by 2025, Indonesia needs to stretch their efforts to double their growth rate (to around 12%, from the level of 2014).
(Source) Thai PR.net http://www.thaipr.net/general/489561
OverviewObjective: Facilitate research linkages among Academics, Governments, and Industries for the strategic development of new products truly relevant to market demandsMajor Roles of Each Linkage:
Governments: provide funds, tax incentives, and real estatesAcademics: provide advanced research and bright students and eventually technology transferIndustries: provide real-world problems, commercialization opportunities, and seed funds
Execution & ImplementationInitiated by Department of Industrial Promotion (DIP, in MoI) since late 2012, following the approach, widely used in the NetherlandsOrganization: Government led, infrastructure-wise, working as big committeeRegional specialization: Northern (vegetables and processed fruits), North-eastern (meat production), Southern (fisheries, pineapples, coconuts)
ResultsMore than 120 participating entrepreneurs being enabled to convert research results into commercial success. Innovative agricultural processed food products tagged with "commercially viable" each year. e.g. :
Durian drink, Food supplement jelly, Rice diet for fast weight loss, Vegetables mix in tablet form, Powdered wine, Instant pumpkin soup, Rice pies with Thai food ingredient, Rainbow noodles using colourfulvegetables, fruits and noodles, Gac fruit sauce rich in β-carotene and lycopene, etc.
THAILAND FOOD VALLEY Project
96
97
upgrading the products and quality of the whole value chain, by 2025.
5.4.Policy scenario 5.4.1. Policy scenario
Indonesia’s food products utilizing economies of scale are competitive in global markets.
Value-added products will be in greater demand due to the growing middle-income, but will face
competition from foreign imports. If Indonesia food processors could take further advantage of their
economies of scale from their large domestic market, and improve the value added of the processed
food products, Indonesia has a large potential to grow in terms of industrial food production.
Having discussions with the industry participants, three priority challenges emerged which needs
to be addressed in order to reach its potentials and overcome the constraints;
1) Accelerate growth of export business based on scale of domestic market
Import restrictions on key ingredients limits export growth
Improve quality/productivity/ scale of domestic raw materials
2) Improving the Value Added of Processed Food
Food standards are not well implemented/enforced
Product development & investment is not enough to improve quality and productivity
Develop and deliver higher quality food materials
3) Upgrading the Logistical Infrastructure
Improve speed, cost and quality (e.g. cold chain, electricity) of logistical infrastructure
Figure 75 Development scenario for Food Processing/Export Center in ASEAN
Domestic demand:
580
Import: 40
Export:60
(Data) Unit: trillion IDR. Source: data from BPS and Comtrade for 2014, excluding Palm oil/products
(Note) Low priced products includes instant noodles.
Expand low priced export
business by cost competitiveness
Develop high quality products for the growing middle-income
Enhance import substitution of high quality/value-added
products
Further achieve Economies of scale
Export high quality/ value added products
Current status Challenges and SolutionsPotential
Domestic Production:
600
- Export is less than 1/3 of Thailand- Export is achieved through
significant economies of scale by Top 5 local companies to developing countries
- Food processing is constrained by the production volume, quality and cost of domestic resources
1)Accelerate growth of export business based on scale of domestic market- Import restrictions on key
ingredients limits export growth - Improve quality/productivity/
scale of domestic raw materials
2) Improving the Value Added of Processed Food- Food standards are not well
implemented/enforced- Product development &
investment is not enough to improve quality and productivity
- Develop and deliver higher quality food materials
3) Upgrading the Logistical Infrastructure- Improve speed, cost and quality
(e.g. cold chain, electricity) of logistical infrastructure
- May increase with growing demand for high quality products
- May increase with growing demand for high quality products
97
5.4.
2.
Polic
y pr
ogra
m a
nd K
PI
The
who
le p
ictu
re o
f pol
icy
mat
rix is
show
n in
the
belo
w fi
gure
.
98
99
To address the above issues, the following steering program (0) and 3 policy programs are drafted
with KPIs by 2025, which are:
- 0. Policy implementation
- 1. Expanding export business based on advantage of economies of scale
- 2. Improving the Value Added of Processed Food
- 3. Upgrading the Logistical Infrastructure
Figure 76 Policy program and KPI
1. Expanding export business based on advantage of economies of scale
Products enjoying economies of scale are globally competitive, but export growth is limited by
import restrictions on ingredients, salt, sugar and the quality/productivity of agricultural raw material
The enhance faster growth of processed food export, while improving the productivity, quality and
competitiveness of the raw material sector and whole SC, there are two policy measure that
Indonesia can start to implement:
1. To relax restrictions on impor of high quality ingredients that cannot be produced
competitively in Indonesia for food industry: and
2. To align policies to significantly improve quality, value-added and productivity of the raw
materials to enhance economies of scale and competitiveness of the whole SC
The KPI could be 4 times of 2014 export by 2025, excluding palm products.
2. Improving the Value Added of Processed Food
Production of many agricultural/ fishery products in Indonesia ranks among the highest in the
Policy Program KPI (by 2025)
. Expanding export business based on advantage of economies of scale
2. Improving the Value Added of Processed Food
3. Upgrading the Logistical Infrastructure
Export amount of processed food Target: 4 times of the 2014 export by 2025,
excl. palm products)
Added-Value of processed food Target: 5 times of the 2014 added-value by
2025, excl. palm products)
Long distance delivery time of specific goods (Reduced by 30%
0. Policy implementation Improve achievement rate of policy KPIs
99
100
world. However, quality and productivity of the agricultural products must be improved, in order for
the final product coming out of Indonesia’s food supply chain to compete with foreign/import
products.
The productivity and the value-added of processed food can be further improved by upgrading the
hygiene quality standards and product development functions in Indonesia, as listed below:
1. Enhance efficiency of food standard and halal certification implementation and reduce time
for food registration and upgrade level of food safety;
2. Facilitate collaborations/matching between food processing companies and large scale
distributors/foreign firms, etc. to conduct R&D&D, develop market opportunities (incl.
halal, export) and enhance investment to improve productivity throughout supply chain; and
3. Enhance collaboration/Foreign Direct Investment with foreign entities, for their global value
chain and technology for R&D&D of value added products.
The KPI could be set to 5 times of 2014 food products added-value by 2025, excluding palm
products
3. Upgrading the Logistical Infrastructure
Sea toll road and other government initiatives to improve logistics have been introduced. However,
door to door delivery time and cost of certain processed food are so high that it would be faster and
cheaper to produce and deliver certain processed food from nearby countries.
Reducing the time, cost and temperature for transportation in Indonesia may enhance product
shelf-life and reduce costs for general consumer. This efficiency can be achieved by developing and
streamlining logistical infrastructure which not only include maritime or land transportation, sea port,
electricity facilities, but also include post harvest and cold-chain facilities--especially outside Java
area. The target is to reduce long distance delivery time of specific goods by 30 percent.
5.4.3. Policy measures to achieve KPIs
(1) Relax restrictions on import of high quality ingredients that cannot be produced competitively in
Indonesia for industrial use
The objective is to let export product manufacturer freely decide, and import, the amount and
quality of food ingredient needed for their export products, to seize the opportunity of export growth.
The immediate focus should be on importers of high quality salt, sugar, flavors, ingredients which
are imported for the production of export-oriented food products and which cannot be produced
competitively in Indonesia for industrial use. MoI should identifies and make list of import
100
101
restrictions which need to be relaxed for the growth of export of processed food, with measures to
assure compliance (not for consumer use) in cooperation with Food and Beverages Association
(GAPMMI) and Ministry of Trade. The next step would be for MoI to discuss with Ministry of
Agriculture (MoA), MoT, CMEA for implementing the gradual repeal of related import restrictions,
in line with the progress in competitiveness of ingredients guided by the policies of competitive
SC/VC.
(2) Align policies to radically improve quality, value-added and productivity of raw materials to
enhance economies of scale and competitiveness of SC
There are two sub-policy measures to address the agenda of this policy measure:
Action (2)-1 Introduce mechanism to align policies for enhancing agriculture and food processing
The objective is to align agricultural and food processing policies for the development of efficient
food supply chain which include government’s monopoly on distribution of certain goods which will
be incorporating competent authorities along the supply chain for food processing and distribution,
including the supporting industries, such as MoA, Ministry of Marine and Fisheries (MoMAF), MoT.
Coordinating Ministry of Economic Affairs, together with MoI, MoA and MoMAF to set up
taskforce to align agricultural and food processing policies to enhance productivity, quality and
export and decides on some pilot projects to be promoted of which its progress will be used as the
basis for policy alignment to be decided and implemented.
Action (2)-2 Introduce incentive policies to promote business that integrates SC/VC
The objective is to identify obstacles/challenges for developing a globally competitive SC by
enhancing efficient production, distribution and pricing along the SC through the implementation of
pilot projects. The targeted pilot projects/participants should be producers, processors and
distributors of world ranking raw agricultural products (cocoa, coffee, mango, etc.)
(3) Enhance efficiency of food standard implementation to reduce time for pre-market food
registration and to upgrade national level of food safety
There are two sub-policy measures to address the agenda of this policy measure:
Action (3)-1 Clarify regulations on approval standards and evaluation
The objective is to speed up product approval for food registration to enhance R&D&D and increase
value added with National Food and Drug Agency (BPOM) as the focus agency.
There are three suggested agendas which are as follows: (i) Clarifying required documents and
101
102
approval standards to be in line with international standards. Especially, clarify, announce and
monitor maximum registration time (e.g. 3 months from application), better data submission process
and simplifying documents and procedures, (ii) Increasing number of approval institutions and
evaluators for pre- and post-market food testing, and (iii) Increasing approval evaluators and
training to ensure quality of processed food.
Action (3)-2 Enhance Implementation of Food Standards
The objective is to enhance national level of hygiene quality of food through the investment in
testing equipment in large and medium size food processing firms in order for them to meet higher
standard and criteria. It can be implemented through developing financial incentive scheme for
investment on R&D/testing projects at food processing companies. One option is through the
provision of tax incentive or “Policy bank” loan for investing in equipment / facilities to qualify for
international standards, such as ISO22000/HACCP. In addition to that, monitoring and evaluation of
the implementation of such scheme is important to ensure the achievement of the higher quality food
products.
(4) Facilitate collaborations/ matching between food processing companies and large scale
distributors/foreign firms, etc. to conduct R&D&D, develop market opportunities, (incl. halal,
export) and enhance investment to improve productivity throughout supply chain
There are three sub-policy measures to address the agenda of this policy measure:
Action (4)-1 Set up taskforce for food SC linkage
The objective is to align policies (agricultural, distribution, transportation, food processing, and
trade) to enhance development of efficient and coordinated food supply chains for domestic and
export market. The target entity of this sub-measure is large scale end buyer (foreign buyer, domestic
exporter, modern trade retailer, conglomerate, etc.) as well as local medium and large food
processing company and local small and medium size raw material producer.
Establish policy coordination taskforce for setting up pilot projects and incentive programs to
strengthen R&D&D and productivity by linking the whole food processing SC. Advertise and enlist
volunteers willing to conduct pilot projects where the large scale buyer specifies the conditions of
the food product and the food processing company specifies the required conditions on raw material
and the raw material producers in the region work together with the processing company to find the
ways to deliver the required product. Establish policies and incentives (including financial
incentives) to strengthen R&DD and productivity, by linking the whole SC.
102
103
Action (4)-2 Enhance R&D&D by financial incentives
The objective is to improve productivity by way of increasing capacity and technology aspect in the
whole supply chain through investment in R&D&D, and necessary technology/equipment upgrades.
Target entity is large scale end buyer (foreign buyer, domestic exporter, modern trade retailer,
conglomerate, etc.), and local food processing company (large/medium size), local raw material
producer (medium/small size Farmers, fishermen, etc.). This can be done by developing and
implementing fiscal/financial incentives for R&D&D investment on the pilot projects. Nationwide
rollout program will be done commensurate on the progress of the pilot project.
Action (4)-3 Enhance food research for food processing SMEs
The objective is to facilitate research linkages among Academics, Governments, and Industries (from
upstream to downstream) for the strategic development of new products using/improving local raw
material, local production and addressing needs of growing middle class. The target entities are
small and medium size local food processing company, local raw material producer (farmers and
fishermen) and large scale end buyer (not processer; foreign buyer, domestic exporter, modern trade
retailer and conglomerate.)
(5) Enhance collaboration/Foreign Direct Investment with foreign entities, for their global value
chain and technology for R&D&D of value added products
There are two sub-policy measures to address the agenda of this policy measure:
Action (5)-1 Develop database to identify capacity & needs of farmers/processors
The objective is to develop a platform to enhance business matching and development of global
supply chains for all entities in Indonesia’s food processing supply chain. This will connect farmers
and small size processors and to put it on a visible platform to medium and large size raw material
producers/food processing company as well as foreign business entities, especially one who have
global value chain, advanced technology and high value added products (such as healthy/functional
food, etc.). The activities are to design content of Data Base (DB) that identify the production
product/quality/capacity/needs of medium size farmers/food processors and to develop methodology
of information gathering and maintenance of the access to the DB. This DB will be shared and
updated all the information with domestic and foreign markets.
Action (5)-2 Conduct promotion/exhibitions to further enhance FDI in food processing
The objective is to enhance business matching and development of global supply chains for all
entities (including SME processors) in Indonesia’s food processing supply chain. The activities are
103
104
to conduct promotion activities and host exhibitions in domestic and foreign markets, utilizing and
updating the DB, to enhance foreign entry in line with BKPM/MoT’s on going activities.
International exhibitions shall enhance the opportunity and necessity to improve the packaging
capacity (i.e., upgrading the design and functionality of the package; food preservation, etc.) of
Indonesian food manufacturers, which can appeal to the foreign market.
Especially, focus on matching to produce healthy/functional food, etc. in Indonesia. This can be done
by sharing and updating information in the DB and exhibitions with domestic and foreign markets
through the commercial officers as well as promoting participation in the exhibitions. Institutional
improvement on export facilitators (MoT-DG of National Export Development) is also very
important to the success of the initiatives.
(6) Develop / streamline logistical infrastructure (maritime / land transportation, sea port facilities,
post-harvest facilities, cold-chain, etc. especially outside Java)
There are two sub-policy measures to address the agenda of this policy measure:
Action (6)-1 Coordinate policies for food logistics
The objective is to improve productivity of the supply chain by reduction in delivery time, cost and
loss by policy coordination. The target entities are transportation, public works and cold-chain
infrastructure for the logistics and water supply for food processing supply chain. This can be done
by setting up policy taskforce for improving food specific basic infrastructure and setting up and
prioritizing major logistical route to experiment as pilot projects to verify the impact of investment
in the logistic. Continuing deregulation to address the obstacles for the long run (including
rules/standards for cold chain logistics, as required by the industry) is also important.
Action (6)-2 Improve efficiency in the major logistical routes through social experiments
The objective is to improve productivity of the supply chain by reduction in delivery time, cost and
loss, by verification through establishment of alternative logistic route scenario. The targeted entities
are transportation, public works for the logistics and water supply for food processing SC along the
major logistical routes selected as pilot projects by the policy taskforce.
104
105
6. Infrastructure and Logistics 6.1.Infrastructure Development Planning Framework
6.1.1. Institutions As national government bodies, the Ministry of Transportation (MOTr) and Ministry of Public
Works and Housing (MPWH) handle the infrastructure and logistics. As shown in the Figures, MOTr
consists of General Directorates by transport modes, namely road, sea, air and railway.
Source: MOTr.
Figure 77 MOTr Organization Chart
MPWH consists of General Directorates of Water Resources, Road Construction, Housing
Provisions etc. The main duties in infrastructure and logistics are water supply, road construction and
regional planning.
Source: MPWH.
Figure 78 MPWH Organization Chart
105
106
6.1.2. Infrastructure Development Plans Based on the medium and long term National Development Plans, each ministry prepares
corresponding Medium-Term Plans (RENSTRA) and Implementation Plans (RENJA). In addition,
some plans are prepared by ad-hoc basis, e.g. MOTr prepared “National Transport System Plan
(SISTRANS)” to meet the regional needs and to harmonize transport modes. The MPWH made
“National Toll Road Development Plan” in 2006 to support economic activities by free and toll road
maintenance and development.
6.2.Current Situation and Issues in Infrastructure and Logistics 6.2.1. Roads
Overview
General Directorate of Roads under MPWH administrates National Roads. Provinces and
Municipalities administrate respective road category. The next Table shows the total length of road
by area and category.
Table 21 Road Classification by Region
Source: Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2017.
Highways
The highways have been constructed by public expenditure and private concession. Their
operations such as toll collection are conducted by private companies including state owned
enterprises. Then, each section of highway has toll booth.
Jakarta urban area has two major toll ring roads (Jakarta Inner Ring Road (JIRR) and Jakarta
Outer Ring Road (JORR 65.km)) and several radial routes (Figure below).
In addition, the Jakarta Outer Outer Ring Road (JOORR), also called as Second Jakarta Outer
Ring Road (JORR-2), is currently under construction. The 9.2km southern section of JORR-2 is
currently in service.
106
107
Source: JICA Survey Team
Figure 79 Location of Major Highways and Industrial Area
Jakarta – Cikampek Toll Road connects Jakarta and industrial estates in Bekasi and Karawang.
This is important routes for industries but the traffic volume on it are progressively increasing and is
congested seriously (Figure above and next Table). Consequently, the congestion negatively
influences the productivity of whole industries in the area.
Source: ALMEC Corporation.
Figure 80 Highways in Jakarta Urban Area
107
108
Table 22 Traffic Volume on Some Highway Sections in Jakarta
Source: Jasamarga
Trans Java Highway
Trans Java Highway is a national project of 1,167km Highway connecting Java Island
transversally. The highway has started as stretches from major urban areas such as Semarang and
Surabaya. Since 2000s, the Government introduce concession scheme by private fund and
construction work had been made (Figure below. However, some concessionaires abandoned the
construction in fear of low profitability and fund shortage and state and transferred the scheme to
owned construction companies.
At the end of the year 2017, the 562km section is in use and 606km is under construction. The full
completion is expected in 2019.
Figure 81 Trans Java Highway Network.
6.2.2. Railway Overview
The Directorate General of Railways of MOTr administrates the railway matters and Indonesian
Railway Company (PT. Kereta Api Indonesia: KAI) operates existing railways. The Government
owns 100% of KAI stock and railroad tracks. KAI has rolling stocks and station buildings and
maintains the railroad tracks. Consequently, the railway system is vertically separated.
108
109
Railway Network
Major railway routes are as follows:
Sumatra Island
Medan Rantauprapat
―Padang Pariaman
―Bandar Lampung Lubuklinggau and Palembang,
Java Island
―Jakarta Cirebon Semarang Surabaya
―Jakarta Bandung Yogyakarta Surabaya Malang Banyuwangi
Total business line 4,684km
Source: KAI.
Figure 82 Railway Network on Java Island
Urban Railway Network
Indonesia Commuter Railway Company (PT Kereta Commuter Indonesia) is operating urban
commuter trains as KRL JABODETABEK in Jakarta on the same railroad track as KAI.
There are other urban railways in Jakarta as follows:
(i) Mass Rapid Transit MRT (Under construction): The Phase I of North-South Line has
been put in service in March 2019. JICA finances the Project. Feasibility Study for
East-West Line is in progress.
109
110
Source: PT. Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) Jakarta.
Figure 83 Jakarta MRT Routes
(ii) Light Rail Transit: LRT(Under construction) Two routes are under construction by
private sector. DKI Jakarta plans other 7 routes.
(iii) Railink (Soekarno-Hatta Airport Link): Most section is shared with the commuter line
track. It has been in service since December 2017. Total length is 36 km long. The
Railink Company (PT. Railink. A subsidiary of KAI) operates the line.
Outside of Jakarta, Medan Railink (Medan Airport Line) is operational. The Government also
forecasts the almost additional ten urban railway project including Light Rail Transit (LRT) will
be operational within several years.
Cargo Transportation
KALOG (Kereta Api Logistics) Company, a subsidiary of KAI, operates almost all freight
transportation on rail. The company does the business in the following areas:
(i) Coal transportation (mostly in Sumatra Island)
(ii) General cargo transportation (11 scheduled routes)
(iii) Container transportation (4 scheduled routes. Table below.)
(iv) Parcel transportation (8 scheduled routes. Cargo wagon is attached with passenger
train)
110
111
Especially, the container train has sufficient capacity of 30 wagons and each wagon has 40 ft. long.
The 13.5 scheduled container trains weekly connect Jakarta (Sungai Lagoa Station) and Surabaya
(Kalimas Station) in 18 hours.
Table 23 Schedule Container Trains
Note: JICT: Jakarta International Container Terminal.
Source: KALOG.
Table 24 Freight Volume on Rail
Source: Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2017.
The total cargo volume is gradually increasing and is 35.3 million ton and 11.1 billion ton km in
2016. This means the average length of transportation is 315km and the railway is more preferred
than road transportation.
However, the container tariff on railway and double handling4 cost made container transport on
railway less attractive than container transport on truck.
6.2.3. Sea Transportation Overview
General Directorate of Sea Transportation of MOTr administrates sea transportation and port
matters. Under the Directorate, Indonesia Port Corporation (IPC. State Owned Enterprise. PT
Pelabuhan Indonesia: PELINDO) operate some major port. IPC is divided from I to IV and IPC II
operates Tanjung Priok Port in Jakarta.
4 Loading and unloading operation at the both terminal stations.
111
112
Table 25 Port Classification
Source: MOTr.
Table 26 Loaded and Unloaded Cargos by Region and Type
Source: Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2017.
Tanjung Priok Port
Located in the northern part of Jakarta, Tanjung Priok Port consists of 8 terminals as follows: (i)
Jakarta International Container Terminal (JICT) T1, (ii) JICT T2, (iii) Koja Container Terminal, (iv)
Tangguh Samudera Jaya (TSJ), (v) Koja, (vi) Multi Terminal Indonesia (MTI), (vii) Mustika Alam
Lestari (MAL), and (viii) New Priok Container Terminal (NPCT) 1
112
113
Source: NPCT1 and JICA Survey Team
Figure 84 Tanjung Priok Port Layout
Among these, the NPCT 1 became operational since 2017 by a PPP scheme by Mitsui and
Company Limited and Nippon Yusen Kaisha. With this new terminal addition, the container
handling capacity increased from 3.5million TEU (Twenty Foot Equivalent Unit)/year to 5.1 million
TEU /year.
Patimban Port
Located 120 km east from Jakarta, the Patimban Port Project is in progress with JICA’s financial
support. The project includes container terminal (final capacity 7.5 million TEU/ year), automotive
terminal, and access road improvement. With the port completion, certain part of cargo in Tanjung
Priok is expected to transfer to Patimban Port and current traffic congestion is to be mitigated.
Sea Toll Road Program
MOTr launched Sea Toll Road Program to mitigate the economic gap between Java Island and
other areas by subsidizing cargo tariff on specific routes. MOTr has 15 routes of Sea Toll Road
Program at present.
113
114
Source: MOTr.
Figure 85Current 15 Routes of Sea Toll Road Program
6.2.4. Civil Aviation Overview
General Directorate of Civil Aviation of DOT administrates civil aviation and airport matters.
There are 296 airports in Indonesia. All airports are classified by Airport Operating Certificates
(AOC) in Indonesia (Table below). Among them, 28 airports among them are international and 56
airports have runways with length of 2001m~3000m and 4 airports have runway longer than 3001m.
PT Angkasa Pura (I-II) and other state – owned companies are engaged in actual airport operation.
Table 27 Airport Classification
Source: MOTr.
Some low wetland area such as in Kalimantan has not established sufficient road network within
island and it requires air transportation for daily living goods transportation.
Airlines
Various Low Cost Carriers (LCC) joined the domestic market and 14 airlines are operating
domestic scheduled flight.
114
115
Table 28 Airlines operating scheduled domestic flights (2017)
Note: IATA: International Air Transport Association ICAO: International Civil Aviation Organization Source MOTr.
In addition, three airlines are operating scheduled domestic cargo flights.
Table 29 Airlines operating scheduled domestic cargo flights (2017)
Source: MOTr.
Air Transportation
The air transportation is increasing significantly as next two Tables. Number of domestic
passengers grew at 5.8 % annually from 2012 to 2016.
115
116
Table 30 Domestic Air Transportation
Source: Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2017.
Although passeger volume is growing rapidly, the freigth volume is stable. The growth of
highway network may be substituting air freight transportation within Java Island.
Table 31 International Air Transportation
Source: Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2017.
The international freight volume is fluctuating by year. It seems the domestic economic
conditions are influencing the volume.
6.2.5. Logistics Overview
As shown above, the transportation administration is governed by each mode. Since 2010s, the
World Bank-advocated Logistics Performance Indicator (LPI) has been prepared and published and
various policy and program have been made.
116
117
Source: World Bank LPI Homepage.
Figure 86 Logistics Performance Index (2016) of Indonesia and Other ASEAN Countries
In this context, “Blueprint of National Logistic System Development (SISLOGNAS)” was
approved in March 2012. The concept was included in MP3EI and the connectivity of Six Mega
Economic Corridor were emphasized.
Although these concept and plans have been made, the national administration is based on
transportation mode as ever.
Issues in Logistics
The Survey Team identified the following issues:
Institutional Aspects:
- The Government administration is by mode and the inter-modal link is relatively weak.
- Some government bodies are working both as regulator and operator.
- Custom clearance takes time and the rules are changing frequently without clear
announcement.
Physical Aspects:
- Industrial agglomeration is concentrated in eastern part (Bekasi and Karawang) of Jakarta.
Consequently, it causes severe traffic jam on Jakarta – Cikampek Toll Road.
- All cargoes are concentrated in Tanjung Priok Port. Dwelling time (staying time) of
containers at the port is long and it became controversial.
117
118
- Land transport depends on trucks. Some long distance container transport can be shifted to
railway transport.
- Dry Ports at Chikarang (Bekasi Province) and Gedebage (Bandung City) are underutilization.
- Intercity highway is not well developed.
- Cold chain is not well developed. Some area cannot utilize reefers.
6.3.Tentative Policy Action Idea in Infrastructure and Logistics 6.3.1. Concept
Based on the policy and programs of three industrial sectors and existing situation of
infrastructure and logistics above, the Policy Actions in this sector should consider the following
factors:
- To mitigate the existing traffic congestion in Jakarta suburban areas.
- To establish smooth logistics system from port and inland production points.
- To expand and to develop industrial areas to outside of existing areas efficiently.
- To develop bases of industries outside of Java Island.
For these, existing infrastructure projects, including National Strategic Projects, should be
proceeded as scheduled and more private and public investment in infrastructure are required. In
addition, it is necessary to establish a long term area-wise industrial development policy and plan.
Especially, the area development of the hinterland of Patimban Port is a key issue. The following
two Policy Actions (Tentative) are proposed as 1: Upgrade Sea Toll Road Program to Strengthen
Supply Chain for Non-Java Industrial Agglomerations and 2: Development of Java Automotive
Industrial Belt as below.
6.3.2. Upgrade Sea Toll Road Program to Strengthen Supply Chain for Non-Java Industrial Agglomerations
As described above, Sea Toll Road Program is a national program of sea transportation and is
working effectively. At the same time, part load problem has been identified because eastbound
cargo exceeds westbound cargo.
Based on the existing situation of Non-Java industrial agglomeration, this Policy Action aims to
develop balanced and effective sea routes with the following components:
- Develop a plan to upgrade the Sea Toll Road Program for the improvement of supply chain
of the three industrial sectors. This starts with agro-based industry.
- Examine expected input and output by the industrial agglomerations.
- Reconsider routing, frequency, vessel type and tariff on industrial plan and existing
resources.
118
119
6.3.3. Development of Java Automotive Industrial Belt There is a big opportunity for supply chain of automotive industry to expand itself to the whole
Java Area because the Trans Java Highway is scheduled to be completed by 2019. In addition, the
completion of Patimban Port, Kendal Industrial Park and up speeding of railway will also impact the
supply chain.
Currently, Java Island holds six industrial agglomerations, namely Cilegon, JABODETABEK,
Cirebon/Tegal, Semarang, Ceper/Surakarta and Surabaya (Table Below).
Table 32 Existing Six Industrial Agglomerations in Java Island
Source: JICA Survey Team.
This Policy Action aims to expand existing automotive industries concentrated around Jakarta to
whole Java by preparing integrated develop plan and consists of the following components:
- Detailed marketing study to attract automotive industry for five industrial agglomerations
(except JABODETABEK) (by MOI and IEAI (Industrial Estate Association of Indonesia)).
- Integrated multimodal freight terminal development at each port and surrounding area (by
MPWH and MOTr).
- Development promotion of industrial estates in Central Java taking after Kendal Industrial
Park (KIP. National Strategic Project.) (by KIP and MOI).
- Introduction of tax incentives by zoning for industrial location.
Location Major existing sector Auto related companies Potential for developmentCilegon Petrochemical, steel Material (steel) for Close to raw material supply base
High labor cost accelerate relocation to outside ofJABODETABEK area.Patimban Port will be an export hub port for
Cirebon/ Tegal Ship building, construction None Cheap labor force, machinery suppliers in TegalCheap labor force (50% of Jakarta) , Semarang Portunder development ,modern industrial estatesMore industrial estates are to be developed.Cheap labor forceAgglomeration of casting makers and educationalinstitutions.
Surabaya(ERBANGKERTOSUSILA)
Ship building Prima Group (spring) Collaboration with technology university (ITS)Gateway to East Indonesia
Ceper/ Surakarta Casting Casting makers
JABODETABEK Automotive, electronics OEM, Tier1&2
SemarangLabor intensive industry likegarment, wood & rattanfurniture
Sumitomo Wire harness
119
120
7. Current status and issues of industrial human resources
7.1. Current status and issues of educational institutions
In Indonesia, there are primary, secondary and higher education. There are two types of secondary
education: early (junior high) and late (high). SMK is established as an industrial human resources
training institution, and SMK educates manufacturing know-how and supplies human resources to
the production site.
In the higher education, in addition to the university, Polytechnic is set up. In the university,
research and education of mechanical engineering is carried out mainly by engineering department.
Polytechnics are more practical than universities and are entrusted by manufacturing companies.
These graduates of higher education institutions are engaged in relatively upstream processes, such
as working as designers in various manufacturing industries, or managing production managers in
production management.
120
121
Note: Red frame is the scope of industrial human resource development
Figure 87 Indonesian school system and overview of higher vocational education institutions
The enrollment rate is higher than 80% for secondary education (junior high school, high school,
etc.), more than 30% for higher education (universities, vocational schools, etc.), both of which are
increasing except for the year of 2015, whereby enrollment rate of tertiary education decreased.
Secondary Education
121
122
Source: Based on World Bank World Development Indicator
Figure 88 Changes in enrollment rate by education level in Indonesia (total number of people)
In 2014, Politek (Polytechnic) has 186 schools throughout Indonesia, and approximately 70,000
new students have enrolled. However, the number of institutions and the number of new students are
only 5% to 6% of the institutions of higher education.
Enrollment rate of tertiary education
Enrollment rate of secondary education
122
123
Table 33 Outline of higher education institutions in Indonesia Public Private Total Ratio
Number of institutes
Total 122 3,124 3,246 100% University 63 469 532 16% Institute 13 60 73 2% School of Higher Learning - 1,426 1,426 44% Academy - 1,020 1,020 31% Community College 3 6 9 0% Polytechnic 43 143 186 6%
Number of enrollment (new students)
Total 438,640 1,020,025 1,458,665 100% University 378,311 557,973 936,284 64% Institute 18,496 31,849 50,345 3% School of Higher Learning - 316,444 316,444 22% Academy - 86,249 86,249 6% Community College - - - -
Polytechnic 41,833 27,510 69,343 5%
Source: Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education “Higher Education Statistical Year Book 2014/2015”
Secondary education (junior high school, high school, etc.) exceeds 80%, higher education
(university, vocational school, etc) also exceeds 30%. In this way, the advancement of highly
educated workers has progressed, and the quality of workforce is also improving.
Opportunity of university education is still limited in Indonesia. University graduates are typically
national elites and they do not tend to work for manufacturing sector engineers.
Source: Based on World Bank World Development Indicator
Figure 89Enrolment ratio for tertiary education for major countries in Asia
123
124
7.2. Current status and problems of industrial human resources in industry
The business activities in the target industry are mainly based on simple work centered on
processing and assembly. These companies hire many workers and conduct business activities.
Especially in the automobile industry and the electronics industry, the companies are engaged in
business activities by hiring a large number of workers in an industrial estate near Jakarta.
In recent years, the processing and assembly industries are losing international
competitiveness due to high wages and difficulties in domestic procurement of raw materials
and parts. Some companies, mainly export processing, are withdrawing from businesses such as
closing plants.
From now on, industries are trying to increase high added value from simple work, and to
strengthen international competitiveness. Therefore, in each company, workers have sufficient
experience, working as a skilled worker to improve productivity. Engineers contribute to
sophistication of the production process. In addition, the needs for designers and developers
developing new products are also increasing.
On the other hand, educational institutions in Indonesia are becoming more important to the
quality of education, but there is still a gap between industry and educational institutions.
Workers-level workforce are graduates from secondary educational institutions such as SMK
(junior high school, high school etc). However, they are not educated as the industry demands.
Currently, the government is also working on policies for education in this part (details will be
described later).
Engineers are centered on polytechnic graduates. From the industrial perspective, it is not
possible to train human resources in a practical manner, except for some polytechnics. For this
reason, companies that have educational systems in some companies, such as some major
companies, hire new graduates and educate in-house, but many companies mid-career who have
experience in another company.
The companies located in Indonesia have few cases of product design yet, and the needs for
designers and developers have not become obvious. However, in recent years companies have
started to develop products, and in the future the needs for designers and developers will
increase.
124
125
Table 34 Challenges on human resources from perspective of the industry Type of human resource Researcher/Engineer
Manager Engineer/Technician Worker
Typical institutions
University of Technology Polytechnic Professional school Technical senior secondary school
Current situation and issues
In the future, the needs from the industry will increase. Universities are developing academic researchers, but only few firms are conducting Research. Joint development projects between University and manufactures are mainly done by foreign corporations.
Educational institutions are not practicing human resources development. Target industry, supporting industry in particular, needs to recruit graduates from Polytechnic, but the students prefer to work with large corporations.
Educational institutions are not practicing human resources development. Graduates from Professional school and Technical senior secondary school do not necessarily meet the requirements such as basic skill.
Source: Study team
7.3. Issues and Current Policies in Industrial Human Resources
A Cabinet Order (Presidential Decree No 9, 2016) on the revitalization of educational institutions
was enacted in 2016. In particular, this is aimed at improving SMK, realizing employment rate of
graduates and expanding teachers. Specifically, it aims to cooperate with 355 companies with
845,000 students for 1775 SMKs by 2019. Astra Honda Motor (motorcycle company), Astra
Daihatsu (four-wheel vehicle company), Evercross technology (mobile phone company), Djarum
(tobacco company), Unggul Semesta (machine enterprise), etc. have participated.
125
126
Source: From the Ministry of Industry Presentation Material on the First Industrial Dialogue
(May 17, 2017)
Figure 90 Outline of SMK-industry collaboration program
Following the Presidential Decree of 2016 (No 9, 2016), MoRTHE decided to reform the
vocational educational institution that produces human resources that can be employed and absorbed
in the industrial sector centered on Polytechnic. As a representative, there is the Polytechnic
Education Development Project (PEDP) which is being implemented with the support of Asian
Development Bank (ADB). PEDP is a program aimed at sophistication of equipment and teacher
training for 13 Polytechnic from January 2013. Subsequently, ADB has expanded to 75 million USD,
the Canadian government USD 5 million, the Indonesian government to the budget size of USD 16.7
million, and 40 Polytechnics participate. Initially, PEDP was planned until December 2017, but it
was decided to extend it, and details are being discussed at present.
126
127
Table 35 PEDP overview (at start)
Source: Republic of Indonesia: Polytechnic Education Development Project (ADB September
2012)
Source: Ministry of Higher Education Presentation Material
Figure 91 Overview of PEDP (as of the end of 2017)
127
128
Source: Ministry of Higher Education Presentation Material
Figure 92 PEDP participating schools
7.4.Direction for Realization of Vision in 2025
Some of the Politek graduates are highly appreciated in the sector. They have more practical
knowledge and skills for manufacturing and better sense of engineering for manufacturing. For the
future management persons, Politek graduates could be the candidates. Offering them opportunities
to go back to higher education and/or upgrading the quality of education of Politek so that the
Politek can offer not only diplomat but also degree equivalent to university education.
While enhancing Politek schools, Technical senior secondary schools should be also upgrade their
training program to be more practical.
Even though there will be a huge opportunity in R&D&D, if Indonesia cannot foster capable
researchers and engineers, other ASEAN countries will take initiatives.
Higher educational institutions are producing top leaders in various sectors, but more practical
engineers who will contribute to innovation at product development and The R&D&D are necessary
for upgrading the sector. Some of polytechnic schools are producing good students with practical
skills, but these training should be further upgraded and expanded.
Industry has pointed out the following points to Politek and universities.
128
129
Politek.
Compared with Japan, practical education such as the use of tools such as CAD / CAM and
machine operations such as machine tools can be done. Meanwhile, there is a lack of thinking
oneself, the ability to think principles, the ability to apply, and so on.
University.
Although I understand the theory, I often do not know the site, I am familiar with individual
expertise but I am not good at compounding. For the example, although it is possible to design using
CAD and CAE, considering 3 Dynamics (Material Dynamics, Thermo Dynamics, Fluid Dynamics),
etc., which will be a design that can’t be manufactured and it is very expensive to produce, It is a
design that is not done (it becomes a form but it does not move).
Source: JICA Study team
Figure 93 Issues and challenge of the industrial human resources
In Japan, the Basic Science and Technology Law was amended in 1995, and industry-academia
collaboration was strengthened. In 1998, the TLO Law was formulated, promoting collaborative
research between universities and industries. In 1999, the Bayh-Daw Law was formulated, created a
mechanism that companies can use the research results of the university, and provided support such
as government subsidies. In addition, there has been an increase in becoming a university professor
from industry. There are also cases where companies establish donation courses at universities
MoI and MoRTHE drafts policies to support business-academia collaboration. Promotion
measures (incentive programs), Pilot project, Nation-wide roll-out plan should be drafted. Select
about 3 universities or polytechnics by proposal competition, and have them draft syllabus under the
coordination of MoI and MoRTHE, which facilitates business-academia collaboration and personnel
exchanges. Nation-wide roll-out should be based on the success of the model case projects.
129
130
Source: JICA Study team
Figure 94 Image of the pilot project
130
131
8. Review of JICA’s past cooperation 8.1.Outline
JICA and its predecessor have been supporting Indonesian industrial sector since late 1960s. In
this sector, Indonesia is the largest recipient country of Japanese technical cooperation in the world.
In order to utilize the past experience of cooperation in industrial sector between Indonesia and
Japan, this section briefly reviews some selected projects in the sector. Seventeen projects since 1992
were selected in industrial development and trade promotion sector as below:
Industry Development Subsector
No. Project Title
1 Technical Cooperation for the CVEST Vocational Training Development Project
2 Project on Supporting Industries Development for Casting Technology in Indonesia
3 Study on Strengthening Capacity of SME clusters in Indonesia
4 Study on Human Resources Development for SMEs focused on Manufacturing Industry in
Indonesia
5 Development Study for Small and Medium Industry Promotion (tentative)
6 The Project for Development of Industry based on Local Resources in South Sulawesi Province
7 Project for Welding Technique Improvement
8 Manufacturing Industry Fundamental Technology and Driver Sector Development (Electrical and
Electronic Equipment)
9 Cooperation for Strengthening Clusters (SENTRA) of Small and Medium Industries
10 Project on Small and Medium Industry (SMI) Development based on Improved Service Delivery
in Indonesia
11 Project on Enhancement of Metalworking Capacity for Supporting Industries of Construction
Machinery
Trade Promotion Subsector
No.Project Title
12 Strengthening for Export Promotion Organization
13 Project on Service Improvement of NAFED
14 Project for Administration Improvement of Trade Related Regulations, Systems and Procedures
15 Project for Establishment and Capacity Building of Regional Export Training and Promotion
Centers
16 The strengthening of the Utilization of Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement
(IJEPA)
17 Data Collection Survey on Promotion of Japanese SME's Development to Vietnamese and
Indonesian Industrial Estates (tentative)
131
132
8.2.Findings
Table below shows some factors analyzed from document review. Under the situation, this survey
found followings.
In the industrial subsector, technical cooperation started to transfer the technology element such as
metal processing and casting (Project Numbers 1, 2, 7, 8 and 11).
At the same time, it shifted to cluster approach and human resources development, especially in
Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) sector since 2000s. The Urata Report (“Policy
Recommendation for SME Promotion in the Republic of Indonesia”) in July 2000 influenced this
shift and the Report emphasized the importance of SME development in economic activities. These
Projects (Numbers 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10) supported the SME policy and program development under
MOI.
In the trade promotion sector, the cooperation started in the late 1980s as the support to Indonesia
Export Training Center: (IETC) which continued until mid-2000s. The cooperation saw remarkable
achievements for tackling Asian currency crisis in the late 1990s. Then it expanded the support to
Regional Export Training and Promotion Centers (RETPC) and export promotion through National
Agency for Export Development (NAFED) under Ministry of Commerce. Finally, Ministry of Trade
(MOT) reorganized NAFED to Directorate General of National Export Development (DGNED).
JICA Projects (Number 12~15) continuously supported to establish related institutions for export
development.
“Strengthening of the Utilization of Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA)
(Project Number 16)” supported to solve an issue for the revision of IJPEA in 2014. “Data
Collection Survey on Promotion of Japanese SME's Development to Vietnamese and Indonesian
Industrial Estates (Project Number 17)” in 2012 was aimed to provide information of industrial
estates to Japanese investors. These two projects are relatively independent from the existing stream
of JICA’s cooperation. However, these are aimed to contribute to the bilateral relations between
Japan and Indonesia and this is a new trend of JICA’s cooperation program.
In both subsectors, the external environment changed rapidly through the Asian Financial Crisis in
1997. The change orientated these projects from national focus toward provincial or local focus
along with the Indonesia decentralization process.
132
133
Table 36 Outline of JICA cooperation projects
No. Project Title Type Input Timing C/P Ownership
1Technical Cooperation for the CVESTVocational Training Development Project
D3 level instructors were trained.Staff of planning and management weretrained.
1992 1997Project TypeTechnicalCooperation
14 long term experts23 short term experts18 C/Ps and others.
CEVEST was recognized as an excellent centeramong higher technical training and upgraded toEchelon II training facility. Although CEVEST hadtrained technicians steadily, the number isdecreasing after 2000 by administrative reform,economic downturn and outdated technologies.
CEVEST
Because financialindependency of VocationalTraining Schools is basicallydifficult, external support isrequired regardless ofeconomic situation
2Project on Supporting IndustriesDevelopment for Casting Technology inIndonesia
Institute for Research and Development ofMetal and Machinery Industries(IRDMMIor MIDC)'s service to small and mediumcasting enterprises have been improved.
1999 2005TechnicalCooperation
8 long term experts61 short term experts40 C/Ps and others.
Influenced by Asian Economic Crisis, target groupwas expanded for casting industries for agriculturalmachineries in addition to automotive parts.
MIDC. It created a sense ofsolidarity within C/P and many C/Pvoluntarily wanted furtherimprovement of their technicallevel.
While considering the spread ofMIDC to other technicaldepartments, the monitoring oftechnical services of the foundryand the strengthening the systemfor further provision are to bemade.
3Study on Strengthening Capacity of SMEclusters in Indonesia
Based on the results of three pilot projects,a master plan and action plan to createdynamic clusters are recommended.
2001 2004Development Study
Study Team members.8 members.4 in metal and machineryparts cluster.6 in export orientedcluster.
It was a difficult time for Indonesian SME cluster tosurvive or not towards the globalization by WTOand ASEAN Free Trade Area after the EconomicCrisis.
As a working group for the pilotproject, C/P formulated clusterpromotion strategies and actionprograms together with small andmedium enterprises and providedadvice and adjustment functions in
This led to "Project on Small andMedium Industry (SMI)Development based on ImprovedService Delivery in Indonesia(No.10)."
4Study on Human Resources Developmentfor SMEs focused on ManufacturingIndustry in Indonesia
The current situation and problems of SMEhuman resources development in rural areaswere clarified. The role of the Ministry ofIndustry and DINAS in SME humanresources development was clarified .SMEhuman resources development program tobe provided by DINAS was proposed.
2005 2008Development Study
Input of study team
Based on Urata Report in 2000, JICA conducted"Study on Human Resource Development forSMEs Focused on Manufacturing Industries inIndonesia(2003-04)(Not listed.)" and itsrecommendation led GOI to establish a Committeeof SME Human Resources Development underMOI General Directorate of SME (IKM) andEducation and Training Center (PUSDIKLAT).Under the Committee, GOI created a WorkingGroup and showed strong commitment in this field.
MOI and Provincial GovernmentBureau of Industry andCommerce.
This can be a model program tolocal governments.
5Development Study for Small andMedium Industry Promotion (tentative)
Formation of Development Study Draft-Current situation and problem analysis onpromotion of small and medium enterprisecluster-Pilot project implementation in target area-A comprehensive action plan formulationprogram was proposed.
2008Development Study
Input of study team Similar with above MOI and others.
This resulted in theimplementation of "Cooperationfor Strengthening Clusters(SENTRA) of Small and MediumIndustries." This is the project(No.9) below.
6The Project for Development of Industrybased on Local Resources in SouthSulawesi Province
Processing local resources have beenpromoted by strengthened clusters and theirvalues added.
2009 2012TechnicalCooperation
10 experts.11 trainees in Japan.Provision of equipment.Local cost.
Community Economic Movement Program (CEMP.2004-07) was initiated by South Sulawesi ProvincialGovernment and identified 11 specialty products.The program was positively evaluated in its results,but there were still issued to be solved regarding thesustainability after the program.
At the time of Ex-Ante Evaluation,many C/P left their positions andthe Special Team was notfunctioning.
7Project for Welding TechniqueImprovement
A model program for welding technologyimprovement was introduced, and trainerswere trained accordingly.
2010 2012TechnicalCooperation
22 short term experts.Local cost.
Welding technologies was an important process inmetal working for international competitiveness andthere was not sufficient numbers of weldingworkers and welding engineers with necessaryskills."Strategic Plans of MOI 2010-2014" positioned towelding technology capability to be improved. TheGOI requested as a partial support under theIndonesia – Japan Economic PartnershipAgreement (IJEPA) and the MIDEC(Manufacturing Industry Development Center)Initiative.
The Indonesia Welding Society(IWS), the C/P, had only one full-time staff and its operationalcapability as secretariat to managecertification system is low. IWSdoes not have appropriateinstitutional setup with roles andfunctions.
8
Manufacturing Industry FundamentalTechnology and Driver SectorDevelopment (Electrical and ElectronicEquipment)
Situation of output is not clear. 2010 2012TechnicalCooperation
Short term experts.Operational cost
The GOI positioned electronical and electronicsequipment sector as a priority industry. In order tostrengthen industrial competitiveness in this field, itwas necessary to develop a standard certificationinfrastructure, but the certification and the testingorganizations did not meet their respective capabilityto meet with international standards in accordancewith the International Electrotechnical Commission
Unknow
9Cooperation for Strengthening Clusters(SENTRA) of Small and MediumIndustries
- Current status and issues of micro andsmall business cluster promotion areorganized.- Improve the capacity of C/P institutions toanalyze issues and implementing andmanaging capability through implementationof each survey and pilot projects.- Based on the pilot project, an action planincluding the draft guidelines for monitoringand implementation of central and localgovernments on the promotion of clustersutilizing regional resources are formulated.
2008 2011Development Study
Input of study team
GOI has taken various initiatives with the clusterpromotion approach as the central policy for SMEpromotion and regional industrial promotion.However, strengthening the competitiveness ofsmall and medium-sized enterprises in the rapidlychanging domestic and foreign economicenvironment did not have a visible effect. Inaddition, local governments are did not fully developfrom the conventional sector promotion approach.In order to efficiently and effectively deploy themeasures of cluster promotion nationwide, it wasrequested to establish an implementation systemand establish a method, such as preparing guidelinesat the implementation stage as soon as possible.
General Directorate of SME ofMOI.Target two provinces (West JavaProvince and West SumatraProvince.Ownership is unknown.
Reconsider cluster promotionapproach?
10Project on Small and Medium Industry(SMI) Development based on ImprovedService Delivery in Indonesia
MOI prepared "Technical Guideline -Facilitation of Local Industry Development."
2013 2016
TechnicalCooperationunder LoanProject
Experts
Based on previous studies, improvement andenhancement of service delivery system of SMIs'support by governmental and other organization todevelop clusters was urgent.
Directorate General of SMI ofMOI published Technical Guidelinein 2016.
11Project on Enhancement of MetalworkingCapacity for Supporting Industries ofConstruction Machinery
Technical service providing capability oftargeted metal working organizations formetalworking companies was improved. 2014 2017
TechnicalCooperationProject
Experts (8 fields)Operational cost.Training in Japan.
Among 14 manufacturing sectors under MIDCInitiative, GOI prioritized metal working andrequested technical cooperation to GOJ.
C/P promoted to establish"Association of SupportingIndustries Promotion forConstruction Machinery (tentativename)" in Action Plan draft 1.
Output Factor Analysis Applicability/ Expandability toOther JICA Projects
Duration
133
134
No. Project Title Type Input Timing C/P Ownership
12Strengthening for Export PromotionOrganization
Master Plan to strengthen NAFEDorganization / function was formulated.Through the creation of a master plan andthe implementation of pilot projects,technology transfer to contributes to theimprovement of NAFED's ability to solveproblems was implemented.
2007 2008Development Study
Input of study teamIt was necessary to improve competitiveness ofnon-oil and gas industries.
The National Agency for ExportDevelopment, (NAFED)Ownership is unknown.
13Project on Service Improvement ofNAFED
Presidential Decree in 2010 reorganizedNAFED for Directorate General ofNational Export Development (DGNED).
2010 2015TechnicalCooperationProject
11 experts.Provision of equipment.Training in Japan
It was necessary to realize the output of"Strengthening for Export Promotion Organization(No.12)."
The project made somerecommendation for DGNEDthereafter .
14Project for Administration Improvementof Trade Related Regulations, Systemsand Procedures
Trade related regulation, systems andprocedures are simplified and well-organized with improved efficiency andeffectiveness as well as the establishmentof National Single Window(NSW) System. Trade Rulebook wasdeveloped in January 2007.
2006 2008TechnicalCooperationProject
5 experts.Provision of equipment.Training in Japan.
It was necessary to realize the recommendation of“The Study on Trade Related Systems andProcedures in the Republic of Indonesia(2015) ”
Unknown
15Project for Establishment and CapacityBuilding of Regional Export Training andPromotion Centers
Model RETPCs (Surabaya, Medan,Makassar, and Banjarmasin) provided tradetraining, trade information/ promotionservices to local SMEs.
2002 2006TechnicalCooperationProject
5 long term experts17 short term expertsTraining in JapanEquipment and others.
In decentralization trend, it was necessary toestablish RETPC to expand the results of IETC torural areas.
NAFEDIndonesia Export Training Center(IETC)Regional Export Training andPromotion Center (RETPC)
Further situation of RETCs isunknown.
16The strengthening of the Utilization ofIndonesia-Japan Economic PartnershipAgreement (IJEPA)
MOC, local governments (issuers ofCertificate of Origin (COO)), and privateexporters understood IJPEA preferentialtariff and MOC's capability to verify theeconomic impact by free trade.
2010 2014TechnicalCooperationProject
Experts.Provision of equipment.Training in Japan.
GOI had a willingness to start renegotiation ofIJEPA after five years' entry into effect in 2014.
C/P positively supported to hold 21seminars at 18 locations to raisecapabilities of mainly localgovernment staff about IJEPACOO issuance.
There may be similar need withother countries, especiallyASEAN, which has EPA withJapan.
17
Data Collection Survey on Promotion ofJapanese SME's Development toVietnamese and Indonesian IndustrialEstates (tentative)
It supported Japanese mid-sized and SMEsto deploy overseas and developing countriesto improve technical level.
2012Development Study
Input of study team
In July 2011, the Tokyo Chamber of Commerce andIndustry stated "Support for promoting the use ofoverseas industrial sites for small and mediumenterprises" in "Priority Requests on Measures toSupport International Deployment of SMEs"
None.
Proposal of rental factories forJapanese SMEs. Support byJapanese Yen loan to Viet Nam.
Output Factor Analysis Applicability/ Expandability toOther JICA Projects
Duration
134
135
9. Policy packages
9.1.Overview of policy packages Policy measures proposed in the previous chapters regarding 3 target industries are compiled to
policy packages. This is to ensure that recommendations from this Study can be applied broadly to
the whole industries in order to achieve increase global competitiveness and higher value added of
the whole industrial sectors of Indonesia.
They are the following 6 policy packages.
- Inter ministerial committee
- Local enterprise/SME development
- Promotion of R&D&D local and foreign investment
- Human resources upgrade
- Logistical infrastructure upgrade
- Promotion of export friendly environment
Table 37 Proposed policy packages
Note: Numbers in each columns are those of policy measures recommended in the previous chapters. The following sections will describe each of policy packages.
9.2.Implement industrialization plan (Inter-ministerial Committee) As discussed in chapters of each target industries, most of the recommended policy measures
require inter-ministerial coordination. Therefore, we would like to recommend a policy
135
136
implementation cycle, namely, “Implement industrial plan through the enactment of Inter-ministerial
Committee”, as the first policy package.
This is to apply strong driving force and proactive commitment of relevant government agencies
and deep involvement of industry to all of the implementation steps such as preparation of master
plan/ road map, implementation of the policy, and monitoring the progress of the policy.
Figure 95 Inter-ministerial Committee
The proposed inter-ministerial forum comprises of 3 tiers organizational structures. Working
group is established according to specific industrial plan, road map, and other higher level industrial
policies. Working group is in charge of policy making, implementing and monitoring.
Policy coordination board is to consolidate policies from viewpoints of policy packages’
classification such as local enterprise/SME development, promotion of R&D&D local and foreign
investment, human resource upgrade, logistical infrastructure upgrade, and promotion of export
friendly environment, etc. Policy coordination board shall prioritize various policies with allocation
of budget to maximize the expected benefits as a whole of implemented policies, by reversing
inconsistent policies, by coordinating the timing of implementation among different policies with
similar objectives, and planning supplementary policy to mitigate adverse effects of a certain policy,
under the higher target goal to increase global competitiveness and higher value-added.
Inter-ministerial forum, as the highest organizational level, empowers all the policies in terms of
planning, implementation, and monitoring/evaluation.
136
137
Composition of the each levels might be the followings.
- Policy forum is Minster level and chaired by Vice President.
- Policy coordination board is echelon 1 level, and chaired by Director General of Ministry of
Industry.
- Working groups are echelon 2 level.
Participating line ministries and coordination agencies might be designed as shown in the next
chart.
Source: BAPPENAS
Figure 96 Example of structure of the policy coordination forum
9.3. Local Enterprise/SME Development
This Study reveals that local enterprise/SME development policy has not effectively worked so
far in terms to suppliers to contribute to globally competitive industries, although general MSME
development policies have achieved expanded MSMEs as indispensable players of the national
economy.
In order to accelerate global competitiveness, the government if Indonesia needs to support the
development of local SME through growing SMEs to meet high-volume requirement from clients
through Business Matching, Training/dispatch of expert, and financial support.
Establishment of Master Plan / Road MapHighest Level Policy Making
Coordination, prioritization, planning and budgeting
Policy Executor
Policy Planning, Analysis and Preparation of Recommendations, M&E
National Industrial CommitteeCentral Government, Local Government, Business Sector, Academics and Civil Society
• M of Industry : Chief Excecutive• BAPPENAS : Vice Executive• Coord Min for Economic Affairs• Coord Min for Human Dev & Cultural Aff. • Coord Min for Marine Affairs• M of Finance• BKPM• M of Energy • M of Agriculture• M of Marine and Fisheries• M of Trade• M of Research Tech and Higher Education• M of Manpower• M of Public Works and Housing• M of Transportation• BPOM• Others
Chairman : Vice PresidentWorking Group 1
Subsector Automotive Industry
Working Group 2Subsector Electronic Industry
Working Group 3Subsector Food Processing Industry
Policy Forum
Chairman : Dir Gen M of Industry
Policy Coordination Board
* Minister Level * Echelon 2 level
• BAPPENAS• Coord Min for Economic Affairs• Coord Min for Human Dev & Cultural Aff. • Coord Min for Marine Affairs• M of Finance• BKPM• M of Energy • M of Agriculture• M of Marine and Fisheries• M of Trade• M of Research Tech and Higher Education• M of Manpower• M of Public Works and Housing• M of Transportation• BPOM• Others
* Echelon 1 level
Other Working Group options
Other Working Group options
137
138
Figure 97 Supporting local business and SMEs policy based on stages of grow-up
As for policy means of financial support, it is recommended to develop preferential finance
scheme to focus on specific stage of growing stages such as start-up and upgrading to global
suppliers as well as regional business firms. In this scheme, government-owned banks perform loans
with low interest rate backed by low finance from the government. Target enterprises of this
financial scheme could be SMEs which receive other support programs such as technical assistance
by experts and business matching.
Figure 98 Proposed preferential financial scheme
138
139
Indeed, there is an existing policy measures to support financing SMEs which is Kredit Usaha
Rakyat (KUR), government-supported credit guarantee for SMEs. This is very successful in terms of
coverage of micro and small sized enterprises. However, due to limited amount size, this financial
supports does not meet demands from SMEs in industrial sectors because size of their financial
demands far exceeds the ceiling amount to be guaranteed under KUR.
Those SMEs in industrial sectors shall go to commercial banks seeking for their proper loan
products. However, interest rate applied by commercial banks in Indonesia is significantly higher
than neighbor countries such as Thailand.
Figure 99 Comparison of SME finance promotion between Indonesia and Thailand
For the purpose of industrial promotion, it is recommended to consider new preferential finance
scheme to supply larger sized loan with cheaper interest rate, because KUR is designed to provide
credit enhancement to micro and small-sized business, and credit guarantee for medium-sized
enterprises would require sophisticated risk management scheme based on historical data, which
would take time to star operation.
139
140
9.4.Promotion of R&D&D local and foreign investment
Promotion of R&D&D needs to be furnished as comprehensive packages, involving different
ministries.
In Indonesia there are few promotion policies for R&D&D activities, there are also regulations
such as difficult investment from overseas on R&D&D. In order to activate R&D&D activities
domestically, related ministries and agencies should promote policies such as deregulation on
R&D&D investment, tax incentives for R&D&D activities, promotion of R&D&D with
industry-academia cooperation, human resource development, and so on. For example, R&D&D is
regarded as service industry and thus foreign capital ratio in R&D company is limited in most
cases, whereas Thailand approves 100% foreign owned R&D&D if the sector is promoted by BOI.
Figure 100 Policy measures and ministries in charge for R&D&D promotion
140
141
9.5.Human resource upgrade
As discussed in the chapter of Human resource development, higher educational institutions shall
further accelerate education of more practical engineers who will contribute to innovation at product
development and R&D&D.
In higher education in Indonesia, research and educational activities in the academic field are
active, but cooperation with industry is not active. The proportion of graduates of science and
engineering universities and graduate students finding employment in the industrial field cannot be
said to be high. It is necessary to promote collaboration between industry and universities. It is
important for the government to show policies on industry-university collaboration, to formulate
policies aimed at realizing it and to implement it. For the implementation, it will be promising to
first implement the pilot project and refer to the outcome, and formulate the basic policy and
concrete policy planning.
For practical implementation under Inter-Ministerial coordination, the Study team proposes
“Model Case project on Industry-government-university collaboration” of which steps are described
as follows.
- MoI and MoRTHE drafts policies to support business-academia collaboration.
- Promotion measures (Incentive programs), Pilot project, Nation-wide roll-out plan should be
drafted
- Select about 3 universities or polytechnics by proposal competition, and have them draft
syllabus under the coordination of MoI and MoRTHE, which facilitates business-academia
collaboration and personnel exchanges.
- Nation-wide roll-out should be based on the success of the model case projects.
Figure 101 Model Case project on Industry-government-university collaboration (Draft)
141
142
9.6.Logistical infrastructure Upgrade
As discussed in the chapter of Infrastructure and Logistics, logistical infrastructure such as roads,
highways, railways, sea transportation, port and civil aviation is being accelerated in developing
under development plans such as Medium-Term Plans (RENSTRA), Implementation Plans (RENJA),
and other plans on ad-hoc basis, prepared by ministries in charge such as the Ministry of
Transportation (MOTr) and Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MPWH).
According to views of private business sectors, however, challenges remain in functionality of
the infrastructure as a whole connected chain of various modalities. In particular, utilization of the
developed sea toll road is still low due to lack of cargo from east to west and poor connectivity of
different modality of transportation.
In this regard, it is proposed to implement policy action “Upgrade Sea Toll Road Program to
strengthen Supply Chain for Non-Java Industrial Agglomerations”.
Outline of Policy Action
- Develop plan to upgrade the Sea Toll Road Program for the improvement of supply chain of the
3 industrial sectors (e.g., start with agro-based industry).
- Examination of expected input and output by the industrial agglomerations.
- Reconsider routing, frequency, vessel type and tariff based on industrial plan and existing
resources.
(Note) Based on Industrial estates under National Strategic Project (NSP) and Sea Toll Road Program
Figure 102 Upgrade Sea Toll Road Program
Another critical challenge is deteriorating efficiency of JABODETABEK area in terms of core
supplying agglomeration to auto industry due to high concentration which causes higher cost of land
and labour.
142
143
Therefore, it is recommended to implement policy action “Development of Java Automotive
Industrial Belt” to expand supply chain area from west to east inside Java.
Outline of Policy Action
- Java Automotive Industrial Belt Development Plan
- Strategically place about 5 industrial districts besides JABODETABEK. At that time, consider
securing human resources, efficient logistics, promotion of industry-academia cooperation, etc.
(MOI, IEAI (Indonesian Industrial Park Industrial Association))
- Tax treatment by zoning for new industrial clusters (MOF, MOI, IEAI (Indonesian Industrial
Park Industrial Association))
- Infrastructure development capable of efficient logistics. Specifically, we will develop
infrastructure such as harbors, highways, cargo railroads and multimodal cargo terminals.
Establishment of each port and surrounding areas and wide area access network, (by Ministry
of Public Works and Housing, MOCT)
- Development and improvement of container transport on railway (by MOCT and Kareta Api)
- Development promotion of industrial estates in Central Java as well as Kendal Industrial
Park(KIP) (National Strategic Project) (by KIP, MOI)
-
Figure 103 Development of Java Automotive Industrial Belt
9.7.Export environment improvement
9.7.1. Achievements of Economic Policy Package Trade environment has been improved by the Economic Policy Packages according to views of
Japanese FDIs. Almost all regulations which had been specified by those packages as target of
deregulation, counted up to 215, were eliminated or revised, according to the government
announcement. Achievements of such deregulations have been confirmed in the “Ease of Doing
Business” (EODB) which the World Bank conducts every year. Ranking of Indonesia has been
improved to 72nd in 2018, in continuous uptrend from 120th in 2014, 106th in 2016, and 91st in
2017
Economic Policy Package No. 12 aims at accelerating the ranking of “Ease of Doing Business”
up to 40th place in the world, as well as further shortening procedure time and reducing costs in
143
144
export. Economic Policy Package No. 2 seeks for Interest rate tax cuts for exporters. Economic
policy package No. 7 reduces income tax over the two years of employees of companies exporting
50% or more of sales. The economic package No. 11 expanded government-subsidized loans for
export-oriented small & medium enterprises.
9.7.2. Monitoring system to focus on competitiveness of export In the meantime, in order to further strengthen global competitiveness, it is recommended to
develop specific policy to further support manufacturers of final goods and subcomponents to
procure intermediary goods with required specification.
As discussed in the chapter of transportation machinery, there is still import barriers for common
components such as steel wire, bolt & nuts for final process and assembly, which require strict SNI
(National Standard of Indonesia), despite no local product available that can meet specification
requirement of automotive manufacturers.
Also discussed on the chapter of food processing industry, import quota of intermediary products
is one of the challenges which keep export potential from being fully materialized. Due to such
import quota system, it is difficult for the food processing makers to procure, flexibly according to
market demands, high quality salt, sugar, flavors, and ingredients which are imported for the
production of export-oriented food products and which cannot be produced competitively in
Indonesia for industrial use.
In considering background of the challenges observed as barriers for the components supplied
for automotive industry, there is mismatch of recognizing the issues between regulators and users of
supplied goods. Specification required by users often include their own requirements of standard,
quality control and capacity to ensure stable and continuous supply, which are not considered in
drafting regulation of import restriction.
In the case of food processing, regulators’ concern is misuse of materials imported for industrial
input. However, the users need to meet changing market demands and tend to stay on conservative
side to limit production plan under potential in order to strictly abide by the regulation.
In is recommended to establish a continuous communication including Ministry of Trade,
Ministry of Industry and Business Associations to relax import barriers such as quota and duties
based on common understanding of goods which are not locally available, and to monitor the most
updated capacity of local suppliers, and usage of imported materials with same goal to maximize
global competitiveness and export.
It is a high priority requirement to avoid suspension of supply with high quality for competitive
industry and whole business sectors. In parallel with enhancing capacity of local contents by
promotion of R&D&D, it is necessary to remove barriers in importing intermediary goods with
necessary specification as much as possible.
144
145
9.8.Industrial Dialogue
Progress of the study was shared with Government of Indonesia through 4 times of Industrial
Dialogue. Schedule and agenda of each Industrial Dialogue is shown in Annex.
Among them, the final study result have been comprehensively compiled and shared with
Government of Indonesia in the 4th Industrial Dialogue, where both Minister of BAPPENAS and
Minister of MOI attended and provided key note presentations.
Table 38 Overview of Industrial Dialogue # 4
Date April 17th , 2018
Venue Shangri-La Hotel, Jakarta
Organized by BAPPENAS, JICA
Attendants Total attendants: About 180 (Including 28 from Press)
Of which:
Ministers: 2
Echelon 1: 6
Opening remarks - Leonard V.H. Tampubolon, Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs,
BAPPENAS
- Kawanishi, Hiroyuki, Senior Deputy Director General, Group Director for
Private Sector Development, Industrial Development and Public Policy
Department, JICA
Keynote speech - Bambang Brodjonegoro, Minister of BAPPENAS
- Airlangga Hartarto, Minister of MOI - Kozo Honsei, Minister / Deputy Chief of Mission, Embassy of Japan,
Indonesia
Closing remarks - Leonard V.H. Tampubolon, Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs,
BAPPENAS
- Naoki Ando, Chief Representative, JICA Indonesia Office
In the morning session, results of the JICA Study is shared and discussed.
Minister of BAPPENAS, in his keynote remarks, stressed important role of manufacturing
industry, in order to raise the economic growth rate. For this, productivity must be enhanced through
human resource development which may be significantly improved with further FDI presence, and
larger R&D expenditure by triple helix, as well as improved input from resource/agriculture sector
(for food processing, in particular). He hopes cooperation between the two countries will facilitate
implementation of the recommended policies.
Minister of Industry spoke Indonesia should take advantage of 4th Industrial Revolution to
increase the share of manufacturing to GDP, focus on digitalization to increase productivity. He
145
146
explained about a just-announced roadmap of Making Indonesia 4.0 which highlights 5 sectors and
10 priority issues (more details in the later chapter). He confirmed MOI will establish National
Industrial Committee (KINAS) to pursue Making Indonesia 4.0 (refer to later chapter for details).
In the afternoon session, BAPPENAS and the JICA Team proposed structure and procedures of
KINAS. KINAS will be structured based on various existing law and other regulations. JICA will
support initial operation of KINAS as a think tank. KINAS will be started by organizing working
groups of the 3 industrial sectors such as automotive, electrical & electronics, and food processing.
146
147
10. Collection of data of Indonesian companies
The Study Team implemented data collection survey of enterprises (micro data survey) in the
target industries for “Empirical analysis on supply chain and production network of Indonesian
companies”5.
This analysis is being conducted by a Japanese professor separately from work of the Study Team,
but it is still under a part of the Study. Results and implications suggested from the analysis are
expected to be a significant input to Industrial Dialogue and recommended policy of the Study.
The micro data survey includes two different locational types. First one is Nationwide Survey.
Second one is Tegal Survey of which target area is limited to Tegal Regency (kabupaten).
The survey was outsourced to third party entities, which is University of Indonesia, Institute for
Economic and Social Research (LPEM-FEUI).
The followings describe the data collection of the micro data survey.
10.1. Objective and requirements of the data survey
This analysis aims at clarifying comprehensive inter-enterprises network to analyze tendency of
growth and performance of enterprises depending on position (such as up-stream to down-stream) in
the network.
10.2. Nationwide Survey
In order to avoid duplication with existing micro-survey conducted by BPS and reduce the burden
for the respondents, it is planned to merge newly surveyed data with existing database (as of 2014)
collected and published by BPS. Enterprise survey of BPS covers medium and large sized
enterprises. Therefore, the micro data survey under this study also targeted the same size categories.
10.2.1. Scope of target enterprises
First of all, enterprises producing materials, parts and final products which are specific to either
Transportation machinery or Electrical and Electronic sector are defined, and each of the number of
establishments are 580 and 691 respectively, according to BPS-Statistics Indonesia’s “Manufacturing
Industrial Statistics 2014”. Then, enterprises which supply items or processing common to both
sectors are defines. 3 optional types of classification, from narrow to broader coverage, are defined,
such as “Base in common” 1, 2 and 3.
5 Please see Annex for the study result.
147
148
(Source) The number is based on BPS-Statistics Indonesia “Manufacturing Industrial Statistics 2014”
Figure 104 Scope of target enterprises of the data survey for supply chain and production
network analysis
Base in common 1 is the narrowest which covers only must-items and processing for the target
industries. Base in common 2 further covers broader parts and materials. Base in common 3 covers
all possibly relevant items which may include items mainly used for other industrial sectors and even
for consumer use.
(Source) The number is based on BPS-Statistics Indonesia “Manufacturing Industrial Statistics 2014”
Figure 105 Comparison of 3 different types of coverage of target enterprises
Initial scope of target enterprises includes transportation machinery (580), electrical and electronic
industry (691), and base in common 1 (444), of which total number is 1,336 establishments. Due to
the larger size of missing target enterprises out of the list, the target sectors has been expanded to
Base in common 2 in the later stage of the survey.
10.2.2. Area of Nationwide Survey Nationwide Survey was implemented based on key locations such as Batam, Jakarta, Krawang,
Bogor, Kab Bekasi, Malang, Bandung, Semarang, Surabaya and Sidoarjo, Kota Tangerang, and Kota
148
149
Serang, of which total number of samples in the list reached to 1,3356. This selection of locations is
because most of the enterprises of the target industries are located in Java and Batam.
10.2.3. Questionnaire of Nationwide Survey
Existing enterprise survey by BPS (2014) includes basic profile of the company, workers
composition and wages/salaries, fuel and lubricant input, energy used/sold, other expense, raw
materials input, and goods produced.
Under consideration of merging with the existing BPS data, the micro data survey under this
Study focused on collecting data such as 1) Specification of customers and suppliers and items
sold/purchased and technical support received in the supply chain network, 2) Business service and
outsourcing services such as finance, management/administration, technical design, and testing, and
3) Human resource of technical experts and human resource development.
Details of the questionnaire is attached in the Annex.
10.2.4. Results of Nationwide Survey
After starting the survey, it has been revealed that missing ratio of the target samples are as high as
29%. Therefore, the target segment has been expanded to include Base in Common 2.
At the end of the survey, size of samples sought by the survey was 1,588. Among them, number of
effective samples (to be contacted) was 915 due to reasons such as “sought but not found”,
“foreclosed, relocated and not in category any more”. Among the samples which are contacted, the
number of effective responses was only 262 due to reasons such as “declined to participate”,
appointment process stalled”, and “response was not completed (under process of appointment)”.
Table 39 Results of response among target samples
Source: Nationwide survey
6 This number includes, not only the directory of BPS survey 2014, but also LPEM’s original samples from their previous survey, etc.
Total in the list 1,588Found and contacted 915
Survey Completed 262Declined to Participate 213Appointment 27Appointment Process Stalled 413
Sought but not found 486Foreclosed, Relocated, Not in Category 152
149
150
10.3. Tegal Survey
10.3.1. Target scope of Tegal Survey
Tegal Regency is located in north-west part of Central Java Province. This area is selected for the
micro data survey because 1) metal processing SMEs are developed in Tegal Regency, and 2) the
location itself is expected to have advantage if supporting industries is extended to the east from
JABODETABEK where factories are already overbuilt and cost of input such as wages and land
prices become high.
Figure 106 Location of Tegal
The list which Study Team received from Tegal Regency includes 2,192 industrial entities of
which majority is Micro and Small Sized business entities. Within the Tegal Regency, District of
Talang and Adiwerna holds 72% of the whole entities. Therefore Tegal Survey mainly focused those
2 districts.
Regarding the business sectors, the survey targeted all the industrial sectors with small exclusion
such as “Manufacture of Goods Jewelry of Precious Metals for Personal Purposes” and
“Manufacture of Domestic Non Electric Cooking and Heating Equipment”, etc. which are not
relevant to the target industries of the study.
150
151
10.3.2. Questionnaire of Tegal Survey
Different from Nationwide Survey, There is not preceding survey which can be merged with the
data collected in this survey, questionnaire of Tegal Survey includes basic information such as
profile of business entities, basic financial information and employment data on top of the
information of supply chain network, business services, human resource development and
innovation which are similar to the questionnaire of Nationwide Survey.
The questionnaire of Tegal Survey is attached in Annex.
10.3.3. Result of Tegal Survey
The survey was implemented by directly visiting factories and offices along the main industrial
streets because the address of the directories were not so accurate. Survey team of LPEM-FEUI
visited 562 firms of which 510 firms responded effectively (response rate is 97.7%).
Total number of effective samples is 501. By districts, Talang and Adiwerna share majority.
Table 40 Distribution of effective responses by districts
District Count Percent
ADIWERNA 207 40.6
BUMIJAWA 21 4.1
DUKUHTURI 36 7.1
LEBAKSIU 1 0.2
PANGKAH 1 0.2
SLAWI 3 0.6
TALANG 237 46.5
TARUB 4 0.8
Total 501 100
Source: Tegal Survey
10.4. Empirical analysis on supply chain and production network of Indonesian companies
Collected data through the surveys discussed above are used for the empirical analysis on supply
chain and production network of Indonesian companies conducted by Professor Todo of Waseda
University. He made a presentation titled “Innovation and Management Capability of Firms in
151
152
Indonesia: The Role of Networks among Firms and with the Public Sector” on May 18th, 2018, to
members of Working Group of pre-KINAS (An inter-ministerial coordination framework supported
by Phase 2 of this Study, of which details will be explained in the next chapter). The presentation is
attached in Annex of this report.
The result/findings of the empirical analysis was a valuable insight for discussion among the
government of Indonesia, including policy discussions at pre-KINAS as well as focus group
discussion for RPJMN 2020-2024. The collected data is also used for cost benefit analysis to justify
recommended policy discussed in pre-KINAS.
152
153
11. Implementation of Pilot Project to support plan, implementation and monitoring of industrial policies through inter-ministerial coordination
BAPPENAS and MOI confirmed, at the 4th Industrial Dialogue (April 17th 2018) to establish
National Industrial Committee (KINAS) in order to plan, implement and monitor industrial policies
based on road map of Making Indonesia 4.0 (I4.0) through inter-ministerial coordination. Study
Team was requested to perform a project management unit as well as a think tank to support working
group (WG), echelon 2 level, and Policy Coordination Board (PCB), echelon 1 level. MOI prepared
a project office in MOI building for Study Team.
11.1. Preparation and work plan
JICA Study Team proposed work plan according to request from BAPPENAS and MOI.
Objective of the pilot project is to support starting KINAS. KINAS is recommended to comprise of
three stages, such as Policy Forum which is attended by the ministers of relevant ministries and
chaired by Vice President, Policy Coordination Board (PCB), which is chaired by Deputy Minister
of the Ministry of Industry (MOI) who takes charge of industrial policy. The three Working Groups
(WGs) are supposed to be set up in accordance with the scope of Phase 1 of this study such as
automotive, electrical & electronics, and food processing.
Among those three stages, Study Team is supposed to support PCB and three WGs in the work
plan.
Figure 107 Structure of KINAS at the beginning of the pilot project
Study Team organized the team for the pilot project composing of (i) project members, (ii) local
researchers, and (iii) alliance with academics in Indonesia and resource persons in academics of
153
154
Japan. Under the limited resources, Study Team designed assignment of the members so that at least
one of the members are working onsite closely with MOI and BAPPENAS. Also, Study Team tried
to make most of previous study and insight supplied by academics of Indonesia such as industrial
experts in LPEM in preparation of policy recommendations, and request attendance of those experts
at meetings of KINAS.
Under those assumptions considered in the Work Plan, Study Team proposed a schedule of the
pilot study including 4 times PCB and 8 times WG in the period from April 2018 to March 2019.
As discussed later, however, number/frequency of PCB and WG was reduced due to delay of
formalization of KINAS. Therefore topics discussed in WG and PCB were not separated by
industrial sectors, but based on policy programs throughout the industrial sectors.
11.2. Framework of plan, implementation and monitoring of industrial policies through inter-ministerial coordination
11.2.1. Establishment of Inter-Ministerial Committee (Policy Coordination Board (PCB))
11.2.1.1. Background and bench mark study
This section discuss necessity and case studies of other countries to successfully implement
industrial policies through inter-ministerial coordination. As discussed in the previous chapters, most
of the recommended policy measures require inter-ministerial coordination. Therefore we
recommend a policy implementation cycle, namely, as the first policy package. The proposed
inter-ministerial committee comprises of 3 tiers organizational structures, namely Working Group
(echelon 2 level), Policy Coordination Board (PCB) (echelon 1 level), and Policy Forum (Minister
level).
This concept was further elaborated to be in line with political context of Indonesia and
discussed in the 4th Industrial Dialogue organized on April 17th 2018. Study team introduced some
case examples of other countries which are successful in the 4th Industrial Dialogue. Summary of
those benchmark study will be described in the followings.
1) Case of Japan
In Japan, issues to be decided at Cabinet Meeting shall be cleared at Vice-Ministerial Conference
in advance. In order to reach to agreement at Vice-Ministerial Conference, inter-ministerial
communication at director/sub-director level or Working Group level seek for negotiable results. In
154
155
parallel, Cabinet Office Legal Bureau coordinates policies under discussion to prepare for the
legislation.
Figure 108 Involvement of Legal Bureau
Law on Cabinet Office stipulates Council on economic and fiscal policy and Council for science,
technology and innovation.
Council on economic and fiscal policy
Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy (CEFP) was established for Prime Minister-led
coordinated economic and fiscal policy and grand design of annual budget. Role of CEFP includes
(i) Basic policy for economy, fiscal policy and annual budget, (ii) Coordinating important issues and
consistency and continuity, and (iii) Advise to related ministers to achieve those policies. Topics
discussed include issues towards middle and long-term development such as (i) Development and
growth in middle and long-term, (ii) Vitalization of local economy, (iii) Reconstruction from the
Great East Japan Earthquake, (iv) Promotion of innovation, (v) Globalization, (vi) Decline in the
number of children and work-style renovation, and (vii) Renewal of education system.
Prime Minister Koizumi desterilized “Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy” as top-down
decision making platform for policies which shall have inter-ministerial influences. This is to make
top-down decision with priority and budget simultaneously. Deadline to finalize discussion paper to
be submitted to the council forces middle-to-high level officials (in related ministries) to reach to
agreement on controversial policies (otherwise, it would be your fault). Experts (Resource Person)
are often composed of highly respected academic and business persons, which make process and
results of policy making trustworthy.
155
156
Figure 109 Pragmatic overviews of Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy
Industry-Academia-Government collaboration policy
Cabinet Office (CAO) stipulated Science and Technology Basic Act which is base for specific
laws such as Act on the Promotion of Technology Transfer from Universities to Private Business
Operators. CAO also organizes Council for Science, Technology and Innovation chaired by Prime
Minister to discuss critical and inter-ministerial issues.
CAO established Industry-Academia-Government Collaboration Promotion Conference. This
conference works as reward system to facilitate innovation projects under
industry-academia-government collaboration. Each of the relevant Ministries reward individual
projects which are celebrated at Industry-Academia-Government Cooperation Summit
Figure 110 Case Example of Industry-Academia-Government collaboration policy
156
157
Under such coordination scheme, specific projects are planned and conducted by individual
ministries such as Ministry of Trade, Economy and Industry (METI), Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Ministry of Environment (MOE), Ministry of Agriculture,
Forest and Fisheries (MAAF), and Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW),.
2) Case of Thailand
Ministry of Industry (MOI) has announced 10 major industries for upgrading Thai industry,
dubbed as First & New S-Curve, which has become pillars for industrial policy. The policy was
crafted and announced by MOI in Nov 2011 by May 2011. The policy has been strongly embraced
by The Board of Investment of Thailand (BOI), which is under Prime Minister Office, to attract new
investments by offering comprehensive and competitive incentives.
Figure 111 Policy for 10 major industries in Thailand
Thailand has crafted Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV)/P Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV)
Promotion Policies in 2017, under leadership of MOI, Office of Industrial Economics (OIE) and BOI
in coordination with concerned ministries. The policy is based on the “First S-Curve and New
S-Curve, which has been crafted by coordination between OIE, Energy Policy and Planning Office,
Ministry of Energy (EPPO), and Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) upon receiving policy
direction from Office of Prime Minister. OIE, BOI, MOI organized a Working Group (WG) and
invited all concerned ministries for revision of the policy. Finally, each ministry was assigned to
make regulations; MOI, BOI, and MOI
157
158
Figure 112 Policy decision process of Thailand
3) Case of Malaysia
In Malaysia, Prime Minister Department (JPM) played a leading role to craft National
Automotive Policy Framework through inter-ministerial coordination. The National Automotive
Policy Framework was suggested by Cabinet Committee chaired by PM and was crafted by Prime
Minister Department in Oct 2005. Ministry of International Trade & Industry (MITI) and its think
tank, Malaysia Automotive Institute (MAI), took leading role of drafting comprehensive National
Automotive Policy (NAP) based on the Framework. Finally, the Policy was reported to Cabinet
Committee, and then submitted for Cabinet decision.
Figure 113 Policy decision process of Malaysia
158
159
11.2.1.2. Development of National Industrial Committee (KINAS)
According to BAPPENAS (Presentation at the 4th Industrial Dialogue), there are several
legislative documents which are related to inter-ministerial policy making/implementation for the
purpose of industrial development.
First is Law on Industry among which Article 112 stipulates the National Industrial Committee.
This Committee is to support the industrial development objective as referred to in Article 3 of the
Law. And it is said that further provisions on the organizational structure and work procedure of the
National Industrial Committee shall be stipulated in a Presidential Regulation. Article 113 of the
Law says that the National Industrial Committee may form a working group consisting of relevant
experts in Industrial sector from government, Industrial association, academic field and/or general
public.
Second one is Presidential Regulation No. 8/2016 which stipulates The National Economic and
Industrial Committee (KEIN). KEIN is tasked to convey strategic advice in determining national
economic and industrial policy to the President, with notes to Steering Committee of which chair is
Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs.
Third one is Presidential Instruction No. 7/2017 which requires ministries and non-ministerial
government institutions to report to related Coordinating Ministers in every formulation, enactment
and implementation of policy. For cross-sector policies that are strategic, important, and have broad
implications nationally, the proposing Minister and Head of Government Institutions shall submit
written policy proposal to the President through related Coordinating Minister to be discussed in a
Cabinet Meeting to obtain a Decision.
Fourth one is Presidential Decree No. 17/2017 (Synchronization for the Process of National
Development Planning and Budgeting) which stipulates a joint role for the MOF and Bappenas in
the budget formulation process.
Table 41 Regulatory frameworks on industrial policy governance Legislative document Relevant key stipulation
Law No.3/2014 (Law on Industry)
Article 112 (1) “In order to support the Industrial development objective as referred to in Article 3, a National Industrial Committee shall be established.”
Presidential Regulation No. 8/2016 (The National Economic and Industrial Committee: KEIN)
Stipulate The National Economic and Industrial Committee (KEIN) which is advisory role to President.
Presidential Instruction No. 7/2017 (Coordinating Minister)
Regarding policy with strategic/nationwide impact or cross- sector policies, written policy proposals should be submitted to the related Coordinating Minister.
G Presidential Decree No. 17/ 2017 (Synchronization of National Development
Stipulate Minister of BAPPENAS shall coordinate in financing of projects and integrated expenditure utilization for National Priority Programs/Projects.
159
160
Legislative document Relevant key stipulation Planning and Budgeting Process) (Source) Based on “The 4th Industrial Dialogue: Concept of National Industrial Committee” (April 17th 2018, BAPPENAS), and various meetings with BAPPENAS
Minister of Industry confirmed to establish National Industrial Committee to implement Making
Indonesia 4.0 Roadmap which was presented at Indonesia Industrial Summit 2018, April 4-5 2018.
Making Indonesia 4.0 is a roadmap for industrial development. The Roadmap chose 5 regionally
competitive manufacturing sectors which have the most potential under the 4th Industrial Revolution
for Indonesia. Those are Food and beverage, Textile and apparel, Automotive, Chemical, and
Electronics. The Roadmap also listed up 10 national cross sectoral priorities to accelerate its
manufacturing sector development with consideration that major factors slowing down industry
improvement initiatives are often cross-sectoral. Those 10 national priorities compose of (i) Reform
material flow, (ii) Redesign industrial zones, (iii) Embrace sustainability, (iv) Empower SMEs, (v)
Build nationwide digital infrastructure, (vi) Attract foreign investment, (vii) Upgrade human capital,
(viii) Establish an innovative ecosystem, (ix) Incentivise technology investment, and (x) Reoptimize
regulations and policies.
Figure 114 10 priority issues of Making Indonesia 4.0
160
161
Minister of Industry aims at pursuing the Roadmap by making use of the National Industrial
Committee (KINAS).
Figure 115 Conceptual structure of KINAS proposed by BAPPENAS
BAPPENAS and MOI coordinated to start KINAS. Considering it will take months to a year to
formalize KINAS by Presidential Regulation, BAPPENAS and MOI agreed to start from practical
trial which includes Working Group discussion and PCB discussion. JICA Study Team supports this
trial as a function of PMU and Think tank.
161
162
Figure 116 Preliminary procedure of decision making under KINAS (designed by BAPPENAS)
According to preliminary procedures of KINAS, Study Team closely work with BAPPENAS and
MOI. Followings are main tasks of Study Team.
- Recommend policy measures to be discussed at WG based on the recommendations of Phase1
in coordination with Academics including Japan and Indonesia,
- Support MOI/BAPPENAS in drafting Policy Recommendation document, and
- Support MOI/BAPPENAS in preparing WG and PCB.
It is supposed to pass final policy recommendation agreed through the process of KINAS to
process of drafting regulation. According to a JICA expert at Ministry of Law and Human Rights, the
followings are standard steps of drafting regulations.
1. Relevant Line Ministry drafts regulations such as Law, Government Regulation, Presidential
Regulation, and Minister Regulation, etc.
2. The relevant Line Ministry holds inter-ministerial meeting of which members are specified the
Line Ministry to review/revise the draft.
3. Ministry of Law and Human Rights checks/examines the draft in terms of consistency with
existing regulations.
4. Relevant Coordinating Ministry resolves and finalize the draft if there is any dispute.
Regulation on KINAS
MOI held intensive discussion meetings at practical level towards the end of year 2018. The
discussion focused to decide on the two options in terms of base which the presidential regulation
162
163
shall rely on. First option is to rely on Article 112 of the Law on Industry, while the second one is not
to rely on the Law but rely on the Roadmap of Making Indonesia 4.0. Pros-cons of those two options
are summarized in the following table.
Table 42 Pro-cons of two options of legal formalization of KINAS Options Option1: Presidential regulation to
materialize the National Industrial Committee (Original concept of BAPPENAS)
Option2: Presidential regulation to implement the Roadmap of Making Indonesia 4.0
Legal base Based on Article 112 of the Law on Industry
Independent on Article 112 of the Law on Industry. The presidential regulation shall include formal authorization of the Roadmap of I4.0.
In relation with the Roadmap I4.0
KINAS covers broader scope of I4.0, which is same as objective of the Law on Industry, while KINAS may, for the coming years, focus on implementation of the Roadmap of I4.0.
KINAS (or another name of committee) aims at solely implementing the Roadmap I4.0.
Advantage/disadvantage It could be more sustainable platform to pursuit the Law on Industry.
Convenient as a Showcase of making Indonesia 4.0. Pros and Cons on the Roadmap itself might influence on strength of inter-ministerial coordination.
In the result, the second option was prioritized. It is still a remaining option to establish KINAS
basing on Article 112 of the Law on Industry, according to BAPPENAS.
11.2.2. Establishment of Working Group (WG)
Under the circumstances discussed above, due to the delay of legislation of KINAS, WG is
decided to be held not by sectors, but by policy measures considering limited resources of relevant
ministries who attend and get involved in discussion under pre-KINAS. Being requested to
recommend policies to be discussed and proposed in the pre-KINAS, Study Team advised optional
topics to BAPPENAS and MOI such as promotion of R&D&D, local enterprise/SME development,
Human resource upgrade, logistical infrastructure upgrade, and promotion of export/business
friendly environment which are the key recommendations in Phase 1.
As a result of intensive discussion with BAPPENAS and relevant Directorates of MOI with
consideration to the priorities proposed in Making Indonesia 4.0, the following three topics are put
forth to WG meetings, of which two topics are discussed in PCB meetings.
163
164
11.2.2.1. Tax incentives for R&D&D and industrial human resource
development (HRD)
MOF happened to be drafting regulations on tax incentive to facilitate R&D and HRD to respond
to policy direction of the President. MOF shared the draft with BAPPENAS. The objective and
mode of such tax incentive is quite similar to one of the Study Team’s recommendations which are
based on bench mark study of Thailand in Phase1.
11.2.2.2. Financing Program for SME
Preferential finance scheme for SMEs aiming at strengthening suppliers and increasing local
contents is one of the recommendations in Phase 1. The concept is slightly modified to (i) focus on
medium-sized enterprises rather than general focus on SMEs, and (ii) focus on investment for
innovation.
11.2.2.3. Development of Biofuel and Ecosystem
JICA Team identified willingness of Japanese business to coordinate with Indonesia in
developing and commercializing more sophisticated biofuel than that is used currently and planned
in the near future. Further upgrade of biofuel would be in line with Indonesia’s roadmap of
automotive industry and I4.0 as well. In this regards, Study Team proposed sub-WG with attendance
from MOI and Japanese enterprises.
11.3. Tax incentives for RD&D and industrial human resource development
11.3.1. Outline of WG and PCB
Working Group on RD&D Incentive and Human Resource Development Incentive Program for
the Industrial Innovation was held on July 16th 2018.
Table 43 Outline of WG on Tax Incentive Date July 16th 2018 Location BAPPENAS, Room SS4 Attendant institutions
BAPPENAS: - Directorate of Industry, Tourism, Creative Economy - Directorate for Small Medium Enterprises and Cooperation MOI: - Planning Bureau - Agency for Industrial Research and Development (BPPI) - Secretariat of Directorate General of Small, Medium & Multi-various
Industry (IKM), MOF - Fiscal Policy Agency (BKF)
164
165
CMEA BKPM Bank Indonesia ERIA LPEM
Policy Coordination Board was held on October 22th 2018.
Table 44 Outline of PCB on Tax Incentive Date October 22th 2018 Location Attendant institutions
Bpk Leonardo Tampubolon, Deputy of Economy of BAPPENAS Bpk Harris Munandar, Secretariat General of MOI BAPPENAS: - Directorate of Industry, Tourism, Creative Economy MOI: - Planning Bureau MOF: - Fiscal Policy Agency (BKF) BKPM CMEA Bank Indonesia
11.3.2. Tax Incentive on R&D&D
Indonesia has the lowest R&D investment as a percentage of gross GDP, in terms of Gross
Expenditure on Research and Development (GERD) according to GDP per capita. Indonesia's
GERD is lower than Vietnam and India.
Figure 117 GERD and GDP per capita
Indonesia has a small amount of private sector R&D investment. Private sector R&D investment
is 78% in Japan, 70% in Thailand and 50% in Malaysia, but only 9% in 2016 in Indonesia. Most of
165
166
Indonesia's R&D investment is government-related. From now on, it is necessary to promote private
sector R&D investment like other countries in Asia.
Figure 118 R&D expenditure by sector in comparison with other countries
ASEAN countries are working on promoting R&D investment. In Malaysia, R&D investment is
promoted by incentives for investment including R&D investment, incentives for preferential
industries, and incentives for Pioneer Status.
Figure 119 Incentive scheme of Malaysia
166
167
Thailand is also promote R&D investment through various incentives by BOI.
Figure 120 Incentive scheme of Thailand
The WG and PCB discussed on R&D incentives in Indonesia, referring to the efforts of
neighboring countries. The points of discussion are as follows.
- Should be the largest incentive in ASEAN countries. However, there is concern about the
decrease in tax collection.
- Should the target be only domestic companies or include foreign investment companies.
- Handling of incentives by obtaining patents. There are many non-patentable R&D.
- Grant incentives when they are put into practical use as an outcome of R&D.
- Grant incentive for R&D activity by industry-academia collaboration.
- Period of giving incentives.
Following the above argument, the PCB suggested the following. MOF will implement this as a
ministerial order in response to this recommendation.
Table 45 Proposed incentive for R&D
Target Tax deduction
Cost of RD&D Deduct taxable income by 300% of R&D&D costs for calculation of
corporate income tax
Can be carried forward up to 5 years
Asset acquisition for
R&D&D
Accelerate depreciation years by half (Category I: 1 year, Category II: 2
years, Category III: 4 years, Category V: 5 years)
167
168
11.3.3. Tax incentive on human resource development (HRD)
Indonesia has less than half of the other countries in labor productivity of major Asian countries.
Low labor productivity is mainly due to low skills. In order to improve Indonesia's low labor
productivity, promotion of human resource development is required.
Figure 121 Comparison of labor productivity in manufacturing sector
In Indonesia, there is an incentive system for internship and vocational training. Similar schemes
exist in Thailand and Malaysia. There is no big difference between the incentive systems in these
three countries. In Indonesia, there are not many companies who know this system, and the actual
use is not many. Problems in Indonesia's system have been pointed out, such as its classification
becoming finer. Therefore, KINAS (JICA Study Team) suggested changing the framework and
making it easier to use as in other countries.
168
169
Figure 122 Comparison of tax deduction scheme for HRD
The WG and PCB discussed the incentives for HRD in Indonesia. The main points are as
follows.
- Should be a system that is cheap and easy to use in ASEAN countries.
- Targets not only domestic companies but also foreign investment companies
Following the above argument, the PCB suggested the following. MOF will implement this as a
ministerial order in response to this recommendation.
Table 46 Proposed Tax deduction scheme for HRD
Target Tax deduction
Cost of HRD Deduct taxable income by 200% of HRD costs for calculation of corporate
income tax for either of the following cases;
Asset acquisition for
HRD
Accelerate depreciation years by half (Category I: 1 year, Category II: 2
years, Category III: 4 years, Category V: 5 years)
169
170
11.4. Financing Program for SME on Industrial Innovation
11.4.1. Outline of WG and PCB
Working Group on Financing Program for SME on Industrial Innovation was held on August 16th
2018.
Table 47 Outline of WG on Financing Program for SME on Industrial Innovation Date August 16th 2018 Location Ministry of Industry, Lt. 2, Ruang Rajawali Attendant institutions
BAPPENAS: - Directorate of Industry, Tourism, Creative Economy - Directorate for Small Medium Enterprises and Cooperation MOI: - Planning Bureau - Agency for Industrial Research and Development (BPPI) - Directorate of Resilience and Industrial Business Climate (KIUI,
BPPI) - Secretariat of Directorate General of Small, Medium & Multi-various
Industry (IKM), - Directorate of Small and Medium Food Industries, Wood Products
and Furniture (IKM), - Directorate of Small and Medium Industries for Chemical, Clothing,
Various and Craft (KSAK, IKM) CMEA Ministry of Cooperative & MSME Bank Indonesia Bank Exim
Policy Coordination Board was held on February 14th 2019.
Table 48 Outline of PCB on Financing Program for SME on Industrial Innovation Date February 14th 2019 Location Hotel Bidakara Attendant institutions
Bpk Leonardo Tampubolon, Deputy of Economy of BAPPENAS Bpk Harris Munandar, Secretariat General of MOI BAPPENAS: - Directorate of Industry, Tourism, Creative Economy MOI: - Planning Bureau MOF: - DG Financing and Risk Management (DJ PPR) - Fiscal Policy Agency (BKF) CMEA OJK Bank Indonesia Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI) Bank Mandiri
170
171
11.4.2. Recommended policy measure
Following policy recommendation is compiled by JICA Study Team (as think tank of
pre-KINAS) based in accordance with results of discussion of WG and PCB.
11.4.2.1. Background of supply side
Indonesia is highlighted with small size of financial market as represented by monetary
aggregate (M2 / GDP) (39.6%) compares to Malaysia (137.1%), Thailand (127.4%) and Vietnam
(117.0%). This disadvantage is structural, mainly caused by evacuation of financial assets to after the
financial crisis in late 1990s. The small sized financial market causes structural over-demand on
supply of funds. Accordingly, high historical volatility of financial assets, particularly that of
sovereign debt securities and rupiah, upheaves risk premium. These financial and macro economy
conditions entail very high cost of funds which includes cost of equity (=return on capital required
by shareholders) and cost of debt.
Figure 123 Typical case of structure of banking interest rate
Accordingly, finance to SMEs in Indonesia is small (6.9% as of 2017) as compared with the peer
countries (Malaysia: 21.6%, Thailand: 41.9%, Vietnam: 26.6%, as of 2014). Although
government-owned commercial banks are dominant in the banking system, they are commercial
banks listed in stock market, which limits their capacity to perform preferential loans to customers.
Besides, liquidity position of total commercial banks are always tight. Therefore, loans by
commercial banks are only selective with high interest rate.
It can be said that Indonesia faces more market failure in terms SME finance than the peer
countries. Government intervention to SME finance is focusing on financial inclusion of micro and
small businesses in Indonesia rather than support for growth and innovation of medium-sized
enterprises. For example, maximum size of credit guarantee for SMEs supported by government is
much smaller than the peer countries.
- In Thailand, credit guarantee is available up to THB 40million (Rp16 billion). Guaranteed loan
outstanding is 2.05% as %GDP, and manufacturing account for 22.3% in 2014.
171
172
- In Malaysia, Credit Guarantee Corporation Malaysia Berhad (CGCMB) and Syarikat Jaminan
Pembiayaan Perniagaan Berhad (SJPP) provides guarantee in RM 50 million (Rp180B), and
RM 5 million (Rp18B), respectively. Total guaranteed loan outstanding is 6% as % GDP.
- In Indonesia, Kredit Usaha Rakyat (KUR) supports “first-time borrower” with ceiling amount
of Rp 500 million, and processing industry only account for 5.6% in 2017. Guaranteed loan
outstanding is 0.98% as %GDP. KUR is very successful in terms of outreach to non-bankable
small businesses, as a policy means for financial inclusion. But it is difficult to recognize KUR
as a policy of financing to industrial development.
On top of credit guarantee for SMEs, various financial programs are provided/supported by
government in the neighbor countries. In Malaysia, for example, Special Funds by Bank Negara
Malaysia, Malaysian Technology Development Corporation (MTDC), and Malaysian Industrial
Development Finance Berhad (MIDF) support various demands such as increase of production
capacity, technological innovation, automation of factory/services, and export penetration, etc. In
Indonesia, as already discussed, state-owned commercial banks are not able to perform roles of
policy loan programs.
11.4.2.2. Background of demand side
Looking at demand side, medium-sized enterprises face financial difficulties. According to
statistical assessment based on enterprise micro data of BPS, cost of debt is too high as compared
with their typical operating profit ratio to justify new investment financed by external debt.
Availability of funds in terms of size is also a challenge. Among medium-sized enterprises who
borrowed loan in 2016, borrowed amount was smaller than planned for about half of the borrowers,
according to survey implemented in 2017.
Source: Enterprise survey under JICA Study for globally competitive industry 2017 Note: Transportation machinery, Electrical & Electronic and their supporting industries
Figure 124 Distribution of Gross profit ratio of medium-sized manufacturing enterprises
172
173
Source: Enterprise survey under JICA Study for globally competitive industry 2017 Note: Transportation machinery, Electrical & Electronic and their supporting industries
Figure 125 Ratio of amount actually borrowed as compared with planned amount (%)
11.4.2.3. Necessity of financial support to medium-sized manufacturing
business
Having viewed those analysis above, it is necessary to develop government intervention to
support medium-sized enterprises in financing for growth and innovation.
One of the possible options of policy measures might be expanding KUR to cover larger sized
loan amount to match financial demands of medium-sized enterprises for growth and innovation.
However, it shall be noted that capacity for credit appraisal, monitoring and risk management for the
expanded coverage would be quite different from those being currently implemented for ample
numbers portfolio comprising only small-sized loans focusing on retail vendor business. Actually, it
is not credit risk but rather long-term funds and low interest rate that commercial banks would need
in order to extend loans with appropriate size and moderate interest rate for medium-sized
manufacturing enterprises.
11.4.2.4. Recommendation on financial scheme
Study Team, as a think-tank of pre-KINAS, drafted recommendation of Financing Program for
the Industrial Innovation. This aims at supporting medium-sized enterprises doing innovation and
technology development. This section will discuss about financial scheme to mitigate difficulties
observed in financing medium-sized manufacturing enterprises discussed previously, before
elaborating target projects in next section.
According to interviews and statistics, typical interest rate of bank loan applied for business
enterprises are:
- 6% (cost of funds) + 5% (margin) =11%.
Cost of funds is represented by weighted average of debt of banks, such as deposit and bonds.
Margin generally comprises of operation and administrative costs, compensation for loss caused by
173
174
default/downgrade, and profit required by equity market/shareholders.
Proposed scheme aims at facilitating medium-to-long term loans with preferential loan interest
rate, while retaining flexibility of participating commercial banks to decide loan conditions applied
to their customers according to the banks’ policy and strategy, and maximizing incentive upon the
banks to facilitate disbursing the preferential loans to customers.
MOF disburses loan with subsidized interest rate (3% under current market) to National Interest
Account (NIA), a revolving fund account opened at each of the participating banks. The Banks can
mix funds from NIA and their own funds for each of loans to customers (end borrowers). The
portion from NIA shall be served to end borrowers with maximum 3 % of margin on the borrowed
rate (3%+3% = 6% for end borrowers). Maturity of the loan to NIA is 3 years and it can be rolled
over upon maturity. The subsidized interest rate 3% is only applied for portion which is used for
disbursement to end borrowers, while interest rate applied for the idling portion of NIA shall be
commercial rate of 3 years debt in wholesale market. This would incentivize the banks to accelerate
disbursement to end-borrowers. Credit risk of the end borrowers are fully taken by the banks. If
loans under this program fall into non-performing loan (NPL), the amount attributed to the portion
shall be replaced by the banks’ own funds.
Figure 126 Recommended financial scheme
11.4.2.5. Recommendation on target project
Objective of this financial program is to increase value added of industry by supporting
medium-sized industrial enterprises in implementing investment aiming at products/services
innovation and/or process innovation, in particular. Products/services innovation may aim at
expansion of business fields (products, services, industrial sector of customers, etc.). Process
innovation may aim at increasing value-added of a certain business filed by speed-up, cost-down,
174
175
precision-up, and process changes, etc.
Table 49 Recommendation on target investment projects Type of loan Purpose Eligible usage of proceeds
Investment for growth
Expansion of production capacity through product innovation and/or process innovation.
Purchase of machinery and equipment, plant/logistics building, etc. Land acquisition is excluded. Additional working capital to operate the invested capitals.
Commercialization of R&DD
Utilize R&D&D successfully completed and implement new investment for (1) product innovation and/or process innovation, or (2) meet/ compliant with new globally recognized standard.
Purchase of machinery and equipment, plant/logistics building, or/and intangible capital (such as software). Land acquisition is excluded. Additional working capital to operate the invested capitals.
Technology Acquisition
To acquire registered intellectual property with significant sales volume in the country of origin. Usage of funds shall be the followings; Licensing or acquisition of technology, Purchase of proprietary or directly related manufacturing equipment
Purchase (1) copyright license and/or acquiesce industrial property rights (patent, industrial design of product, trademark, geographical indication, method and layout design, trade secret) directly to improve manufacturing process, (2) Purchase of proprietary or directly related manufacturing equipment
HALAL Technology Development
HALAL certification is prerequisite. Invest for expansion of production capacity and/or product/process innovation in one of the following sectors. -Food & Beverage -Ingredients and Additives Cosmetics & Personal Care -Pharmaceutical & Nutraceuticals -Innovative Halal Products and Services
Purchase of machinery and equipment, plant/logistics building, or/and intangible capital (such as software). Land acquisition is excluded. Additional working capital to operate the invested capitals.
Sustainable Technology Development
Sustainable reporting is prerequisite. Invest for expansion of production capacity and/or product/process innovation in one of the following activities. - Implementing green building and/or efficient site/plant location management - Developing renewable energy or increasing energy efficiency - Developing collective water management or increasing water efficiency - Developing recycling process and circular waste management - Improving Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) and pollution remedy (water, air quality) - Switching suppliers or increasing efficiency of materials and logistics
Purchase of machinery and equipment, plant/logistics building, or/and intangible capital (such as software). Land acquisition is excluded. Additional working capital to operate the invested capitals.
175
176
Type of loan Purpose Eligible usage of proceeds - Other innovative sustainable products / services
Participating Financial Institutions (PFIs) shall check eligibility in purpose and usage of proceeds
through their regular appraisal and monitoring procedures.
Purpose:
- PFI shall check it in assessment of business plan related to applied investment project and such
business plan will contribute to product innovation and/or process innovation.
Eligible usage of proceeds:
- PFI shall check usage of proceeds at disbursement and appropriate operation through regular
monitoring.
11.4.2.6. Recommendation on program management
MOI and MOF in coordination handle the program. Study team recommended principles such as;
- Avoid too much burden of participating banks, and
- Programs shall flexibly respond to market demand and other situation.
According to such principles,
- Annual budget shall depend on planning report submitted by the banks,
- Check of eligibility is left to the banks in accordance with internal policies of each banks,
- Activity report submitted by the banks shall be comprehensive but not necessarily in details.
Separately, MOI/MOF can conduct onsite examination and check details based on documents
and onsite of the end-borrowers if necessary,
- Annual report shall evaluate achievements and challenges in the past year and supply
implications for the next year’s program (size of amount, target investment project, sectors,
etc.)
-
176
177
Figure 127 Scheme of program management
11.4.2.7. Cost and benefit analysis
Assumption for calculation of benefit
According to micro survey of manufacturing enterprises, it is identified that medium-sized
enterprises which implemented innovation is;
- 1.2 times larger value added per workers.
- 1.8 times larger capital per workers.
Table 50 Impact of innovation
Source: BPS Enterprise survey 2014, and Enterprise survey under JICA Study for globally competitive industry 2017 with scope of Transportation machinery, Electrical & Electronic and their supporting industries
Assumption for calculation of cost
It is recommended to set 3% for 3 years loans to NIA opened at each PFIs.
Using Government Bond (SUN) 3-years market rate, 7.8% as of September 2018, as reference of
market interest rate, cost of the financing scheme shouldered by the government is calculated as
7.8% - 3% = 4.8%.
Sales annualgrowth
Value added/workers
Sales/workers
Capital/workers
JICA survey4.4% 98,463 179,226 41,303
0.0% 80,296 173,521 22,323
N/A 1.23 1.03 1.85
Total assets excluding land and building<10,000 Rp million or Annual sales<50,000 Rp million
BPS, Rp thousandJICA Survey
Innovation experienceSize criteria
(a)/(b)
(a)Implememted productinnovation in past 3 years(b)No innovation
177
178
The results of cost and benefit analysis is shown in the next table. Among total number of target
enterprises which is 14,540, it is assumed that 40% of them apply to this program. With some further
assumptions described in footnote of the table, it is estimated that total loan amount disbursed from
NIA is 3,680 billion and cost of finance (negative margin shouldered by the government) is
estimated to be 179 billion. On the other hand, benefits include 3,241 billion additional value added,
2,087 billion additional gross profit, and 261 billion additional corporate income tax.
Table 51 Result of cost benefit calculation
(Note)
- Total number of establishments: Based on BPS “annual manufacturing survey” 2014,
conditioned by "Total assets excluding land and building <10,000 or Annual sales < 50,000”.
- Potential borrowers: ratio of "not implementing innovation" in 2017 JICA survey is applied to
the BPS data.
- Capital investment per establishments: Assume potential borrowers match same level of capital
per worker as those implementing innovation if they implement investment for innovation.
- Additional sales, value added: Assume potential borrowers match same level of sales per
worker and value added per worker as those implementing innovation
- Workers per establishments: Average value of BPS statistics
- Total loan amount: 40% of potential borrowers apply this program. Loan to value is 80%. Of
which the loan amount, 70% originates from NIA, while 30% is from banks’ own funds.
- Additional gross profit: Value added minus wages
- Cost of interest rate: Difference between 3 years government bond yield and lending rate from
MOF
- Additional tax: Assuming 50% of gross profit is profit before tax, subject to 25% of income tax.
11.4.3. Discussion issues at pre-KINAS
11.4.3.1. Main discussion issues at WG
WG held on August 16th 2018 discussed and agreed necessity of such financial support, and
agreed on (i) Funds for NIA shall originate from government budget rather than Bank Indonesia
(proposal as of WG is suggesting funds from Bank Indonesia), (ii) BAPPENAS and JICA Team shall
Items
Total numberofestablishment
Potentialborrowers
Capitalinvestmentperestablishment
Additionalsales perworkers
Additionalvalue addedper workers
Workers perestablishment
Total loanamount
Additionalvalue added
Additionalgross profit
Cost ofinterest rate
Cost ofinterest Additional tax
Unit number number Rp million Rp million Rp million number Rp billion Rp billion Rp billion % point Rp billion Rp billion14,540 6,109 2,689 21 18 79 3,680 3,421 2,087 4.86% 179 261
Size criterial
Total assets excluding land and building<10,000 Rp million or Annual sales<50,000 Rp million
178
179
make details with broader coverage of discussion with relevant government agencies and
commercial banks before submitting the proposal to PCB.
11.4.3.2. Main discussion issues at PCB
Study Team updated the proposal with detailed procedures as well as cost benefit analysis requested
during various meetings after the WG.
PCB confirms and supports the recommendation, with request on further elaborate and design of the
scheme, such as;
- Confirm mode and method to disburse from the government budget,
- Consideration of risk management (including necessity of credit guarantee by government),
- Further elaboration of definition of innovation (target investment) towards details, and
- Consider to further decrease the interest rate applied to the end customers.
11.5. Development of Biofuel and Ecosystem
11.5.1. Outline of WG Working Group (WG) on “Biofuel Development Technology was held on In February 15th,
2019. The WG was proposed by the think tank/JICA study team in order to encourage government /
private sector discussion on future development of biofuel. Toyota has expressed interest in joining
discussion as presenter at the WG to present their views on potential of biofuel in Indonesia and on
future biofuel technology development. In total 19 people joined the meeting as shown below.
Table 52 Outline of WG on Development of Biofuel and Ecosystem Date February 15th , 2019 Location 7th Floor, Director’s room, BAPPENAS Attendant institutions
BAPPENAS: - Directorate of Industry, Tourism, Creative Economy - Directorate of Energy, Mineral, Mining MOI: - Maritime Industry, Transportation, Defense Planning Bureau - Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources – Bioenergy - Toyota Daihatsu Engineering & Manufacturing Co., Ltd.(TDEM)
from Thailand, Toyota Motor Manufacturing Indonesia (TMMIN)
179
180
11.5.2. Background of biofuel technology development policy 11.5.2.1. Background and issues
Indonesia adopts B20, the highest blending level of biodiesel in the world, while other countries
such as Thailand and EU sets maximum blending at B7. There are two major factors behind biofuel
technology development policy in Indonesia.
1) Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission commitment by Indonesia government.
The first factor is reduction of GHG. At COP 21 held in Dec 2015, President Jokowi pledged
commitment to reduce GHG 29% from BAU (Business As Usual) and 41% with International
assistance in 2030. Transport sector contributes around 30% of total Co2 emission after increasing
from 20% in 2007 due to rapid growth of vehicle market in the last decade. In order to achieve 29%
Co2 reduction, transport sector needs to reduce 85MtCO2e (4-wheel 31MtcCo2e). According to
APROBI (Biofuel Manufacturer Association of Indonesia), B20, bio diesel with CPO (Crude Palm
Oil) 20%, has reduced 8.8 MT Co2e in 2016.
Table 53 Target of Co2 reduction
Source: Compiled from Indonesia government material on GHG
2) Energy security
The second factor for biofuel development is energy security. Reduction of import dependence of
energy is priority for the country as it is primary cause of trade deficit. Biodiesel can replace
imported oil by CPO to certain extent according to the level of CPO blending. According to
APPROBI, biodiesel development started in 2005, when Indonesia had become net importer of oil.
Since then, there has been strong pressure to increase its blending level in order to address growing
trade deficit due to increase in energy consumption. According to the interview with the automotive
company, biofuel has potential to contribute to reduction of fuel import in a much shorter period and
in larger volume compared to other alternative energy sources such as electric vehicles (EV)., etc as
it can be applied to existing vehicles in use without much modification of engines as summarized
below; on the contrary, EV not only needs to import battery and other key components for assembly,
it also requires huge budget to invest in infrastructure.
180
181
Source: JICA/NRI survey
Figure 128 Comparison of alternative energy resources
In view of the benefits that biofuel can bring to the nation, Ministry of Energy and Natural
Resources (MENR) has made it mandatory to gradually raise biodiesel blending, starting from B3
(non-PSO:non- subsidized diesel) , B7 (PSO: subsidized diesel) in 2010, and then to B15 in 2015.
According to the MEMR regulation No. 12/2015 and roadmap of biofuel, MEMR made it mandatory
to raise blending to B20 by 2016 (delayed to 2018 for non-PSO) and B30 by 2020.
Note: PSO (subsidized fuel) and non-PSO (non-subsidized fuel) Source: JICA/NRI survey based on MENR materials and interviews to industry
Figure 129 Comparison of alternative energy resources
11.5.2.2. Major issues of current biofuel policy
The major issues of the current biofuel policy are summarized as below;
181
182
1) Challenge of current FAME (Fatty Acid Methyl Ester) to address required level of biofuel
quality
- The more the concentration of biodiesel, the more stringent quality for B100 is required for
quality concerning specifications such as oxidative stability and monoglyceride (MG) level; for
example, MG level, which causes freezing of fuel at low temperature, needs to be reduced from
current level of 0.8% for blending with diesel to make B20, while 0.4% for B30 according to
JAMA (Japanese Automotive Manufacturer Association).
Table 54 Recommendation of MG level for B100
Source: JAMA
2) Details of roadmap beyond B30 has not been specified yet
- According to biofuel roadmap by MENR, green fuel will be developed after B30, but no
specification for green fuel as been determined yet.
- It is challenging for higher content of bio fuel beyond B30 to achieve required fuel quality by
using existing technology of FAME.
3) Cost of Green fuel is expected to be more costly than FAME
- According to biofuel roadmap by MENR, green fuel will be developed after B30, but the
technology for green fuel is still under development and is not commercialized yet.
- The cost of green fuel is expected to be much higher than biofuel, as it requires hydrogen and
equipment for hydrogenic process.
Table 55 Comparison of Green Fuel and Bio Fuel (FAME)
Green-fuel (BHD) Biofuel (FAME)
Definition Green-fuel is a type of biofuel that does not
contain oxygen atom and consists of
hydrocarbons in the same class with
hydrocarbons in the equivalent fuel through
hydrogenic process.
Green fuel for diesel is called BHD
(Bio-Hydrofined or Hydrogenerated diesel)
and bio gasoline for gasoline.
Biofuels are produced through a process
known as sesterification, a process in which
fats and oils from plants and other living
creatures are broken apart to yield very long
molecules (ester group) that contain oxygen
atom
Advantage The process can completely eliminate oxygen The process of FAME is simple and
10 15 20B10 0.5% NG 0.8% NG 0.8% NG B20 0.46% NG 0.6% NG 0.6% NG B30 0.5 0.6% NG
182
183
atoms and the quality is equivalent to regular
diesel.
investment required is quite small
Disadvantages The cost for hydrogen and hydrogenic
process is high, leading to higher fuel cost;
more than 10% higher than regular diesel.
Biodiesel freezes at warmer temperatures due
to remains of monoglycerite and is less stable
during long term storage (lower oxidative
stability)
Source: compiled from MENR material and other open internet sources
11.5.2.3. Potential of Biofuel for Indonesia
Despite technology challenges for biofuel, Indonesia has huge potential as biofuel producer due
to its rich reserve of COP and other plants. According to analysis by the automotive maker,
Indonesia is capable to achieve B50 and can satisfy nearly 50% of diesel demand by 2020. On the
contrary, Thailand can achieve only up to B20 due to limited supply of CPO. If Indonesia can
successfully develop high quality and cost competitive biofuel, Indonesia can maintain as major
global producer and exporter of biofuel in the long future.
Source: ERIA “Study on Asia Potential of Biofuel Market” 2014
Figure 130 Forecast Maximum Blending
In order for Indonesia to become the most competitive global biofuel producer, Indonesia may
need to put in effect following measures;
1) Speed up development of biodiesel beyond B30 by adopting readily available and affordable
technology
- Some argue that Indonesia may rather develop transitional biofuel technology between FAME
and BHD; technology that can minimize cost up while improving biofuel quality, before
moving to highly costly green fuel or BHD.
183
184
- Indonesia government, academia and private companies can strengthen collaboration and
jointly conduct cost / benefit studies of all future bio technologies available in order to select
affordable and applicable technology for Indonesia.
2) Develop a quality system / standards to control fuel quality from upstream to downstream
- As biofuel quality often degrades due to condition of storage and transport, Indonesia can
develop fuel quality standards for each process and quality monitoring system using IOT (eg.,
easy check of quality through portable devices., etc and traceability using sensors., etc )
3) Establish competitive process to reduce green gas emission.
- Biofuel is regarded as Co2 emission neutral fuel, but certain countries and environmental NGOs
claim that development of palm oil plantation itself actually caused deforestation and
destruction of peats in major oil producing countries like Indonesia and Malaysia.
- In order to respond to these criticism, Indonesian government established Indonesian
Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) to provide guidelines on Co2 emission for palm oil plantation
- The system to minimize green gas emission may need to be developed further for the whole
process from plantation, CPO collection, and CPO processing for biodiesel.
By achieving 1), 2) and 3), Indonesia can become the most competitive exporter of biofuel as
well as regional leader in creating sustainable eco system for biofuel.
11.5.3. Discussion and result of WG At the WG, there were three major speakers. First is Toyota (TDEM and TMMIN), which
recommended on future clean biodiesel. Second is Director of Maritime Industry, Transportation,
and Defense of Ministry of Industry. And third is BAPPENAS.
1) Toyota’s View
Toyota Daihatsu Engineering and Manufacturing (TDEM) has presented its view on clean
biodiesel. Toyota defines clean biodiesel as which can achieve Co2 emission level on par with
Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) if measured in WWT (Well to Wheel) and PM2.5 emission on par
with normal air if DPF (Diesel particular filter) is used.
2) MOI’s view
MOI expressed view on future biofuel plan and green fuel using industrial vegetable oil.
- Even if Indonesia had strategy to produce biodiesel, the maximum development would be B40
for now (instead of B50 as proposed by Toyota).
- Currently, Indonesia has developed biodiesel with target to implement B30 in 2020. But after
that, MOI will focus on developing green fuel using the industrial vegetable oil (IVO).
184
185
- IVO is also using a hydrogenated process, similar with gasoline and diesel. But the chemical
property is similar with petrol-based oil and without heavy contaminant (such as Sulfur).
Source of IVO can be CPO, jatropha, trunks and other oils from vegetables.
- MOI concern for lowering emission is not priority, but the fast development of IVO is put in
emphasis. Therefore, it is important to endorse IVO to increase energy sustainability, increasing
local endowment and energy security.
- As long as Toyota support the new biofuel technology, H-FAME, MOI will also support biofuel
development with this technology.
3) BAPPENAS’ view
BAPPENAS has commented on Toyota and MOI and proposed future direction to MOI.
- Development for green fuel will unlikely achieve the economy of scale – compared to CPO
- In the process, it is OK to include small farmers (for inclusivity) but for the industrial scale, the
CPO-based for biofuel and green fuel should be endorsed to increase energy resilience and local
empowerment
- Directed to MOI that BAPPENAS will support MOI for both ways, or even for one of biofuel
(B-50 or green fuel). The national development planning (RPJMN) target is to achieve green
industry in 2024. Therefore, MOI should support the production of renewable energy.
4) Conclusion and future actions in WG
MOI, BAPPENAS, and Toyota agreed on the significance of developing new biofuel technology
through collaboration between government, university, and private company. The concrete next
actions could not be discussed in details but following steps and tasks were agreed for future
collaboration.
- The pilot project for the technology to be implemented next year (2020). The development
should be step-by-step, first of all developing B40 pilot project (2020), then B50 (after B40
succeed),
- Meanwhile, Toyota Indonesia (TMMIN) and Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources –
Bioenergy (EBTKE) will assess the investment cost of the new technology of H-FAME
(crystallization), and compare with the cost of current technology of FAME (additional
distillation)
- Further discussion will be held regarding collaboration strategy (with JICA) on biofuel and
green fuel development, especially for RD&D
11.5.3.1. Implication on JICA policy proposal
JICA Study Team’s purpose of holding small WG for biofuel was to facilitate discussion between
policy makers and stakeholders for policy decision making and implementation. As biofuel involves
185
186
many different government organizations such as MOI, MEMR (EBTKE), and Ministry of Research,
Technology, and Higher education (RISTEKDIKTI) and BAPPENAS, and different stakeholders
such as OEMs, biofuel makers such as APROBI, and academia for R&D&D, it is desirable to have
several places/ channels for policy discussion. The small WG on biofuel has successfully opened
opportunity for discussion between responsible ministry, especially MOI and Toyota on the new
biofuel technology. Since the WG has agreed on collaboration, the next step will be to design more
concrete collaboration scheme, which will be discussed among stakeholders and government policy
makers.
It may be fruitful if more extended WG is held next time with invitation for other participants
such as RISTEKDIKTI, academia such as ITB and association (GAIKINDO), and other technology
cooperation organization to discuss on future technology collaboration schemes for biofuel.
11.6. Review of progress of the pilot project
Study Team monitor the progress of the pilot project (Phase 2) and report periodically to JICA
based on the schedule updating table we shown in the next table.
Table 56 Progress check table (as of March 2019)
It is successful to implement pilot trial in operation of KINAS as far as it is bottom up approach.
Study Team may suggest some of the key challenges faced during the process of the pilot project as
follows.
1) Institutionalization of KINAS
There is argument between KINAS based on Law on Industry and KINAS only based on Making
Topics Jul-Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March & Succ MinistriesKINAS MOI
BAPPENAS
RD&D/HRD MOI, BAPPENASCMEA, BKF
Arrange meeting MoRTHE, BKPM
SME MOI, BAPPENASBKF, MOCS
Informal discussion Policy draft arrange meeting BI, MOSOE
Bio-Fuel MOI, BAPPENASCMEA, MOEMR
Study arrange for WG MoRTHE
MOI, BAPPENASCMEA, MOT
Study Study Custom Office
Others End of Aug 12/5 FGD RPJMN 2020-2024
JICA Report
MOCS:Ministry of Cooperative and SMEMOSOE:Ministry of State Owned Enterprises
Export/FDIpromotion forI4.0
Renewal of MOIinternalorganization
Oct22 PCB Update→MOI→MOF
MOF is drafting Ministerial Regulation→MoLHRJul16 WG
Aug16 WG
KINAS Presidential regulation MOI→Ministry of Law and Human Rights (MoLHR) Presidential regulation
Feb14 PCB Discuss with MOF
Feb15 Sub-WG
Draft in FR
MOI
FGD
Wrap up
186
187
Indonesia 4.0. However, conflict between political decision and preference based on government
officials and academics might not necessarily ruled out because such challenges are often observed
in other countries as well.
2) Agenda setting for WG
As Making Indonesia 4.0 is yet to be detailed, Study Team proposes policy measures to be
discussed in pre-KINAS in coordination with academics such as LPEM. This approach took time by
explaining issues and receiving feedback with many directorates, resource persons and private
sectors.
3) Preparation for KINAS meetings
It is a challenge to be forced to change the meeting schedule many times before it is finally fixed.
Besides, attendance of echelon 2 officials in WG and echelon 1 officials in PCB is not necessarily
high. This may be due to priority of those meetings for invited members is not always high because
KINAS is not yet formalized.
4) Role of WG and PCB
In terms of policy planning, background and necessity of proposed policies and best choice of
optional policy measures are not necessarily understood by the members. In terms of
institutionalization (draft for regulation) of such policies, it seems not to be enough to well elaborate
in discussion on relationship between the recommended policies and existing regulations.
11.7. Lessons and recommendations
11.7.1. Proposal of topics and process of recommendation First, it is found, at least under bottom up approach, that the PCB meeting needs to discuss
proposed policies in broader scope from necessity of the intervention, choice of policy measures, to
mode of formalization. This tends to make issues to be focused vague, hence, the PCB conclusions
may not be the final one but results in requesting further investigations to the proposing body. Top
down approach might enable the higher committee (Forum or PCB) to decide on necessity of
government intervention and to order the lower body to discuss design of policy measures.
Secondly, capacity of making policy recommendations shall be enhanced. Sectioning silo even
within MOI might disturb developing consensus of ministry as a whole. In this regards, experience
of intensive discussion on key initiatives of Roadmap of Making Indonesia 4.0 may contribute to
developing mode of consensus building.
Thirdly, it is recommended to discuss one policy recommendation continuously by core members
including private sectors. Also standardization of process of policy making, such as (i) issues
development, (ii) information collection (checking previous studies and interview of resource
persons), (iii) communication with beneficiaries and counter-beneficiaries, issues streamlining, and
187
188
policy draft, for example), would be helpful to fasten the process and make it easier to share goals
and schedule among the members/higher officials.
11.7.2. Call of KINAS meetings Under the pilot project, schedule of the meetings are often postponed and attending
ministries/agencies are limited regardless of broadly assumed scope of attendants. This challenges
might be mitigated under officially formalized KINAS for I4.0.
In order to further encourage and motivate invited ministries and agencies to attend the meetings
with deeper preparation for serious discussion, it is necessary to ensure and disseminate significance
and issues to be discussed in the meetings.
11.7.3. Discussion and agreement in KINAS meetings First, it is recommended to involve legal experts such as Ministry of Law and Human Rights in
the policy making. Under the pilot project, attendants of the KINAS meetings are not necessarily
sure on consistency between recommended policies and existing laws and other regulations. This
would make it difficult to reach to agreement on choice of policy measures.
Secondly, stipulation of rules on operation of KINAS meetings would be helpful in upgrading
significance of KINAS meetings, and in facilitating serious and positive discussion. Such rules may
include (i) attending persons are supposed to represent the ministry or agency, (ii) mode of
participation in the decision making when the members absent, (iii) agreed conclusion in the
meetings would bind all the composing member ministries/agencies
188
189
12. Final meeting and recommendations
Initially, it was planned to conduct an industrial dialogue at the end of the third survey. However,
at request of BAPPENAS, instead of industrial dialogue, warp-up meeting was held.
Therefore, as an alternative measure, JICA Study Team assessed the progress and achievement of
industrial policy measures recommended in the third survey, and made a list of policy measures that
have not been yet considered in detail. Those remaining policy measures are summarized as “Further
potential approach”. As far as possible, the study team discussed with departments in charge of
relevant ministries and agencies about the contents of the approach that can be implemented in the
future. This section summarizes the progress, the contents of the approach that can be taken in the
future, and the results of discussions.
Some of the policy measures recommended by the Study Team in April 2018 have been already
discussed among relevant ministries and policy briefs have been scrutinized during the third survey.
Starting with the establishment of inter-ministry working groups and policy coordination board,
some important developments have been achieved.
Lunch Meeting: Wrap Up Meeting for Globally Competitive Industry 2017-2019
Venue: Al Nafoura Upper Level Restaurant, Le Meridien Hotel, Jakarta
Date/ Time: March 26th, 2019/ 12.00-14.00
Attended by BAPPENAS, MOI, JICA, Study Team
189
190
12.1. Inter-ministry policy forum 12.1.1. Achievements
As for the inter-ministry policy forum, working groups (WGs, composed of echelon II members
from relevant ministries) and Policy Coordination Board (PCB, composed of echelon I members
from relevant ministries) have been conducted for several policy issues. A forum, to which ministers
participate, has been cautiously considered in Ministry of Industry (MOI) and the orientation of the
forum has been decided. It will be realized by an executive order.
Concrete policy measures for five sectors and ten priority issues pointed out in the report of
“Making Indonesia 4.0” have been also being continuously discussed in MOI and it is expected to
hold WG and PCB for each theme.
12.1.2. Further potential approach So far, the Ministry of Industry has been preparing for the inter-ministry forum to be established
as a committee with a limited period and role, with the sole purpose of realizing Making Indonesia
4.0. However, the significance of the policy making process across ministries has been fully
recognized through pilot activities of WGs and PCBs. For this reason, it is desirable to establish as a
permanent organization based on the Law of Industry, not limited to Making Indonesia 4.0.
In the pilot activities of WGs and PCBs, multiple ministries have participated and active
discussions have been made. However, ministries such as the Ministry of Higher Education and
Science and Technology, the Ministry of Transport, and the Ministry of Public Works and People's
Housing, have not yet actively participated in the meeting, although they seem to have an important
relationship with the policy content. It is important that more relevant ministries gather and discuss
in those meetings.
190
191
The Ministry of Industry is currently examining the realization of Making Indonesia 4.0.
However, in formulating concrete policies aiming at the realization of a globally competitive
industry, it is expected that the contents of external experts who are familiar with the target sector
will also be incorporated to create more advanced content.
12.2. Local enterprise / SME development 12.2.1. Achievements
The financial scheme of investment funds for SMEs was discussed in the PCB and progressed to
the point where policy briefs were scrutinized in BAPPENAS. The legislation in the near future is
expected.
12.2.2. Further potential approach Until today, Indonesia's industrial policy has tended to focus on the protection of small and
micro-sized enterprises, and it has been difficult to form a financial scheme for the investment of
medium-sized enterprises. However, it is medium-sized companies that are likely to participate in
the global supply chain, improve Indonesia's industrial value added, and contribute to export
promotion in the future. Compared to small and micro enterprises, medium-sized enterprises have
higher potentiality to realize global-level quality and production quantities. However, even
medium-sized companies do not have sufficient financial resources, and they cannot make the
necessary investment in the production, and currently they are not able to improve the quality of
their products. Therefore, the implementation of this policy measure is expected to encourage the
improvement of the level of local companies in Indonesia.
With this regard, Ministry of Industry's Industrial Resource Access and International Promotion
Bureau pointed that “if a medium-sized company is incorporated into the global supply chain,
business opportunities will be increased for small and micro enterprises that supply to those
medium-sized companies. In this way, small and micro-sized enterprises will be indirectly integrated
into the global supply chain. Therefore, support for medium-sized enterprises will lead to the
development of small and micro-sized enterprises, too. "
As a further potential approach, holding a reverse trade fair (reverse exhibition) in order for
medium-sized enterprises to find business opportunities will be effective. In the reverse trade fair,
SMEs can understand business opportunities by observing displays of large companies’ needs and
requirements on parts, processing technology and quality levels and discussions with those potential
customers. Based on these information, medium-sized companies can make decision on of capital
investment if necessary. In this sense, it is an event of business matching. It will contribute to solve
issues that large companies do not know where there is a medium-sized company with potential, or
that medium-sized companies do not know what products, quantity, quality, delivery time are
191
192
required by potential client.
12.3. Promotion of R&D&D local and foreign investment 12.3.1. Achievements
Regarding the incentive system for Research and Development and Design (R&D&D)
investment, the policy brief was reviewed in the PCB, and the examined contents were sent from the
Ministry of Industry to the Ministry of Finance and legislation is being expected.
12.3.2. Further potential approach There are still two major issues concerning R&D&D. First, in the both sectors of transportation
equipment and electrical and electronics, particularly design capability is expected to develop.
Therefore, training of engineers with high design capability is required. In Vietnam and the
Philippines, there are many examples of digital drawing creation and digital design simulation on
computer using CAD and CAE. Such improvement in the capability of engineers necessary for
design development is required.
Another issue is the implementation of research and development that contributes to industry.
Making Indonesia 4.0 aims to improve the global competitiveness of the Indonesian industry by
improving productivity and quality. For that purpose, for example, innovation in production
technology, research and development for achieving global quality level, and material development
that contributes to new product development are required. While centered on universities, it is
required to fully receive the opinions and needs of the industry and to further promote technological
development for industrial development. Some portion of national research and development funds
may be spared and utilized for technology development directly contributing to the industrial
development.
12.4. Human resource upgrade 12.4.1. Achievements
With regard to the incentive system for investment in training of industrial human resources, a
policy brief was reviewed in the PCB, and the contents examined were sent from the Ministry of
Industry to the Ministry of Finance. After reviewing by the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights,
legislation and enforcement are expected.
12.4.2. Further potential approach Industrial human resource development still has many issues. Firstly, graduates of engineering
colleges of high quality universities tend to find a job in sectors where compensation is higher than
manufacturing. In Thailand or in the Philippines, higher education has been popularized and
192
193
enrollment rate for higher education became higher. Those university graduates are finding
employment in a variety of sectors, including manufacturing. On contrary, engineers who have
graduated from higher education are still scarce in Indonesia, and they tend to enter into sectors
other than manufacturing, such as mineral resources, energy, and finance. On the other hand,
polytechnics graduates receive practical training that can be used in the actual manufacturing field
and are contributing to the sector. However, in general, they are weak in basic scientific knowledge
and thus it is difficult for them to apply their knowledge to further development of the business. An
important factor in promoting Making Indonesia 4.0 is, for example, an initiative to raise
productivity autonomously at a factory, with ingenuity by each engineer or technician. Or it is to
perform more value-added functions such as design and development. However, current Polytechnic
education and training has generally not reached to such a level.
Secondly, in order to raise manufacturing competitiveness to an international level, producing
products of higher quality is necessary for Indonesia to compete with products of leading countries
such as Thailand. For this reason, there is a high possibility that automation systems will be
sequentially introduced in processes (such as painting and spot welding in the automobile industry)
where high quality cannot be realized by manual labor. However, in the current education and
training in polytechnic, in most cases, equipment and training contents such as production machines
are outdated, compared to the level at the actual industrial field.
In order to improve such a situation, it is necessary to improve collaboration with industry, in
particular, to improve the contents of education and training of Polytechnic, and to modernize the
machineries and equipment used for education and training. In addition, it is important for engineers
and technicians who graduated from Polytechnics to work as key persons to support the
advancement of the manufacturing industry by learning basic scientific knowledge at universities
while working and reinforcing and applying to the business.
During the course of discussion on the incentive scheme for human resource development
investment, investment for current employee's training including attending night class of higher
education became not eligible for the incentive, due to the reason that it is a duty of a company to
train their employees. Training of employees for the current business of the company is already
being conducted by each company. On the other hand, basic knowledge such as taught in universities
cannot always be taught in companies. In addition, it is not easy for companies to support individual
employees to learn such basic knowledge of science of higher education level, since it will take a
long time to monetize such investment into the human resource. To support engineers and
technicians of Polytechnic graduates who are already working in industry to acquire basic
knowledge at night class of universities etc., or support university graduates to brush up knowledge
while working is important for strengthening the global competitiveness of the manufacturing
industry in the future.
193
194
For this reason, it will be important to expand the night-time courses, to provide a scholarship for
those who study while working, or to provide incentives to companies that make it easy for
employees to do such studies.
Regarding the review of the contents of education and training in Polytechnic, the lack of
engineers, especially in the electronics sector, is frequently pointed out in both the transport
machinery and electrical and electronics sectors. Learning of technology development such as
product IoT, and technology used for electronic parts of the ever-increasing automobile are required.
Automobiles also require engineers for design and development, where mechanical engineers are
required. From the viewpoint of improving the production process, mechatronics, factory automation,
and engineers for production IoT are considered to be required. Focus technical areas are required to
be grasped through continuous dialogue between industry and education and training institutes, and
adapted to the actual needs.
12.5. Logistical infrastructure upgrade Of the three target sectors, the automotive industry is concentrated in the JABODETABEK area.
However, the area is heavily congested, labor costs are rising, and cost competitiveness is very weak.
In fact, with the progress of industrial infrastructure development such as extension and
construction of expressways and development of Patimban Port, the location of companies is
gradually shifting to the eastern part of Java. In Central Java, the labor cost is still sufficiently
competitive, so infrastructure development that facilitates industrial activities will be developed
toward the central and eastern parts of Java Island, and industrial estate development with an
emphasis on the automotive sector. By giving priority to industrial human resource development,
innovation and research and development centers focusing on automotive including electronics used
for automotive in such areas, it is expected to form a highly competitive and robust industrial cluster.
In this way, forming the “automotive industry belt” in the region from the west to the central part
of Java Island, and in the long run to Surabaya will strengthen Indonesia's global and export
competitiveness. In addition, if an automotive industrial cluster is formed, more location of
electronic parts adopted for automobiles is also expected.
While the Indonesian government places emphasis on development outside Java, on the other
hand, it is also expecting industries in Java to upgrade the competitiveness of the country. In the
context of industrial area development, northern part of Java Island is considered to be very
important to form an integrated industrial cluster of production, industrial human resource
development, innovation and R&D as an “Java Automotive Industrial Belt”.
The Ministry of Industry’s Regional Industry Bureau is currently in the process of redefining the
industrial zone within Java. The formation of automotive industry belt was recognized as an
effective measure in a discussion with the Bureau. In particular, as there are many sea ports in the
194
195
northern part of Java, resources from, for example, Sulawesi will be transported to the belt by
domestic sea transportation it would be expected to be used as input for the automotive industry.
12.6. Promotion of business friendly environment The weakness of automotive sector of Indonesia is upstream processes in the supply chain. This
is considered to be attributable to the fact that the investment of foreign SMEs has been stagnant,
since the minimum investment amount for granting investment incentive is too high for
medium-sized but highly competitive foreign companies. As a result, technology transfer to local
companies has not been occurred and industrial agglomeration like Thailand has not been formed
yet.
The electrical and electronics sector of Indonesia once grew significantly in export processing
zones such as Batam Island, but has since lost its global competitiveness as Batam Island's cost
advantage diminishes. However, in conjunction with the development of the automobile industry in
central Java, along with the development of industrial infrastructure and industrial estates in central
Java, there will be a good possibility of restoring competitiveness again through the establishment of
export bonded processing zones. As with the automotive sector, it is necessary to improve the
business environment while confirming the needs of the industry for industrial human resource
development, innovation, and research and development.
As for food processing, production areas that spread throughout Indonesia are considered to be
sufficiently price competitive. However, due to quality issues, it has not sufficiently reached
overseas markets. It is important to improve quality and brand power by reviewing import quotas,
quality assurance, and the globally recognized halal certification system.
These discussion above is summarized in a following table.
195
Tabl
e 57
Ach
ieve
men
ts a
nd fu
rthe
r po
tent
ial a
ppro
ach
Polic
y pa
ckag
e A
chie
vem
ents
Fu
rthe
r po
tent
ial a
ppro
ach
Inte
r-min
iste
rial f
orum
- T
wo
PCB
mee
tings
wer
e he
ld a
lread
y.
- A fo
rum
is b
eing
con
side
red
by M
OI.
- R
oadm
ap (
polic
y m
easu
res
for
Indo
nesi
a 4.
0) i
s be
ing
cons
ider
ed b
y M
OI
- Es
tabl
ishm
ent
of
KIN
AS
as
a pe
rman
ent
com
mitt
ee u
nder
the
law
of i
ndus
try.
- In
volv
emen
t and
com
mitm
ent o
f m
inis
tries
not
ye
t par
ticip
atin
g to
cur
rent
PC
B a
nd W
Gs
- C
oncr
ete
polic
y m
easu
res
for
real
izin
g In
done
sia
4.0.
Lo
cal e
nter
pris
e/SM
E de
velo
pmen
t - P
olic
y br
ief o
n fin
anci
al s
chem
e fo
r inv
estm
ents
by
SMEs
has
bee
n ex
amin
ed i
n PC
B.
It is
bei
ng
refin
ed b
y B
APP
ENA
S.
- H
oldi
ng b
usin
ess
mat
chin
g (s
uch
as r
ever
se
exhi
bitio
n et
c.)
Prom
otio
n of
R&
D&
D lo
cal a
nd
fore
ign
inve
stm
ent
- Pol
icy
brie
f on
ince
ntiv
e sc
hem
e fo
r inv
estm
ents
in
R&
D&
D h
as b
een
exam
ined
in P
CB
. It i
s exp
ecte
d to
be
sent
from
MO
I to
MO
F.
- Com
preh
ensi
ve p
olic
y pa
ckag
e fo
r pro
mot
ion
of R
&D
&D
shou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
in d
etai
l and
im
plem
ente
d.
Hum
an re
sour
ce u
pgra
de
- Pol
icy
brie
f on
ince
ntiv
e sc
hem
e fo
r inv
estm
ents
in
HR
D h
as b
een
exam
ined
in P
CB
. It i
s ex
pect
ed to
be
sen
t fro
m M
OF
to M
inis
try o
f Law
and
Hum
an
Rig
hts.
- C
oncr
ete
polic
y m
easu
res
for
foste
ring
rese
arch
ers
and
engi
neer
s by
ac
adem
ic-b
usin
ess
coor
dina
tion
and
re-e
duca
tion
to b
e co
nsid
ered
. Lo
gisti
cal i
nfra
stru
ctur
e up
grad
e - D
iscu
ssed
with
rele
vant
age
ncie
s.*
- D
evel
opm
ent
of J
ava
Aut
omot
ive
Indu
stria
l B
elt
Prom
otio
n of
bus
ines
s frie
ndly
en
viro
nmen
t - D
iscu
ssed
with
rele
vant
age
ncie
s.**
- Spe
cial
exp
ort e
nviro
nmen
t for
I4.0
(ex:
exp
ort
proc
essin
g zo
ne).
Not
e:*
Dire
ctor
ate
of In
dustr
ial Z
one
of M
OI;
**D
irect
orat
e of
Indu
stria
l Res
ourc
es A
cces
s and
Inte
rnat
iona
l Pro
mot
ion
of M
OI
196
197
13. Annex
13.1. Empirical analysis on supply chain and production network of Indonesian companies
197
198
198
199
199
200
200
201
201
202
202
203
203
204
204
205
205
206
206
207
207
208
208
209
209
210
Differences by skill levels
26
210
211
211
212
212
213
213
214
35
• Firms benefit more from distant partners.
214
215
215
216
216
217
217
218
13.2. Agenda of Industrial Dialogue 13.2.1. Meeting Agenda of 1st Industrial Dialogue
1st Industrial Dialogue for
The study on Promotion for Globally Competitive Industry
Date: Monday, 15th May, 2017
Time: 03:00 PM to 05:30 PM
Location: SG4 Conference Room in BAPPENAS 15:00 Welcome and introductions Mr. Leonardo A.A. Teguh Sambodo,
Director of Industry, Tourism and Creative Economy BAPPENAS
15:05 Opening Message Dr. Leonard V.H. Tampubolon, Deputy Minister for Economic Affairs BAPPENAS
15:10 Message from JICA Mr.Keiji Katai Senior Deputy Director, Industrial Development and Public Policy Department JICA Headquarter
15:15
1 Presentation: Introduction of the Survey Outline
JICA Survey Team Nomura Research Institute
16:00 2 Presentation: How can Indonesia escape from a middle-income trap?
Yasuyuki Todo, Ph.D. Waseda University and Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry
16:45 Discussion 17:30 Closing Message Mr. Naoki Ando
Chief Representative JICA Indonesia Office
218
219
13.2.2. Meeting Agenda of 2nd Industrial Dialogue
2nd Industrial Dialogue for
The Study on Promotion for Globally Competitive Industry
Date: Friday, 11th August, 2017
Time: 8:00 – 11:30
Location: The Gallery, Pullman Hotel, 2nd Floor
Time schedule of Industrial Dialogue (Grand Session)
Time Agenda Speaker
8:00-8:30 Registration N/A
8:30-8:35 Opening remarks Dr. Leonard V.H. Tampubolon,
Deputy Minister of Economic
Affairs, BAPPENAS
8:35-8:50 Keynote speech Dr. Yuri Sato, JETRO
8:50-9:10 Industrial Development Plan Leonardo A.A. Teguh Sambodo,
Ph.D, Director of Industry,
Tourism, and Creative Economy,
BAPPENAS
9:10-10:10 Future Visions of Selected Industries
-Background and purpose of the Study
-Transportation Machinery Industry
-Electrical and Electronic Industry
-Food Processing Industry
Survey Team
10:10-10:25 Break N/A
10:25-11:25 Discussion All participants
11:25-11:30 Closing remarks Haris Munandar, Ph.D, Secretary
General, Ministry of Industry
219
220
13.2.3. Meeting Agenda of 3rd Industrial Dialogue
3rd Industrial Dialogue Grand Session for
The Study on Promotion for Globally Competitive Industry
Date: Wednesday, 17th January, 2018
Time: 9:00 – 11:30
Location: MALUKU, Shangri-La Hotel, Grand Floor
Time schedule of Industrial Dialogue
Time Agenda Speaker
8:30:9:00 Registration N/A
9:00-9:05 Opening remarks Leonard V.H. Tampubolon,
Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs, BAPPENAS
Shinichi Tanaka, Director Team 1,
Private Sector Development Group, Industrial
Development and Public Policy Department, JICA
9:05-10:00 Presentation
Recommendation on Policy
Measures and Policy
Package
Survey Team
10:00-10:15 Coffee break N/A
10:15-11:25 Discussion All participants
11:25-11:30 Closing remarks Leonardo A.A. Teguh Sambodo, Ph.D,
Director of Industry, Tourism, and Creative
Economy, BAPPENAS
Shunsuke Takatoi,
Senior Representative, JICA Indonesia Office
11:30 –
13.00
Lunch All participants
220
221
13.2.4. Meeting Agenda of 4th Industrial Dialogue
4rd Industrial Dialogue Grand Session for
The Study on Promotion for Globally Competitive Industry
Date: Tuesday, 17th April, 2018
Time: 8:30 – 15:00
Location: Ballroom C, Shangri-La Hotel, Jakarta (2nd Floor (lobby floor))
Time Agenda Speaker 8:30:9:00 Registration N/A 9:00-9:30 Opening remarks Leonard V.H. Tampubolon,
Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs, BAPPENAS Kawanishi, Hiroyuki Senior Deputy Director General Group Director for Private Sector Development Industrial Development and Public Policy Department, JICA
9:30-10:00 Keynote speech Bambang Brodjonegoro Minister of BAPPENAS
10:00-10:30 Keynote speech Airlangga Hartarto Minister of Industry
10:30-10:45 Keynote Speech Kozo Honsei Minister / Deputy Chief of Mission, Embassy of Japan , Indonesia
10:45-11:00 Coffee break N/A 11:00-11:40 Presentation:
JICA study result JICA study team
11:40-12:00 Discussion All participants 12:00-13.00 Lunch All participants 13:00-13:30 Presentation:
Case Study JICA study team
13:30-14:00 Presentation: Committee Plan
Leonardo A.A. Teguh Sambodo Director of Industry, Tourism, and Creative Economy, BAPPENAS
14:00-14:45 Discussion All participants 14:45-15:00 Closing remarks Leonard V.H. Tampubolon,
Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs, BAPPENAS
221
222
13.3. Micro data survey
13.3.1. List of Nationwide Survey Target establishments by industrial sectors -1-
Source: Compiled from BPS-Statistics Indonesia “Manufacturing Industrial Statistics 2014”
222
223
Target establishments by industrial sectors -2-
223
224
Target establishments by industrial sectors -3-
224
225
Target establishments by industrial sectors -4-
225
226
Target establishments by industrial sectors -5-
226
227
13.3.2. List of Tegal Survey
Target establishments by industry and location
Description of ISIC talang adiwerna Balapulang
dukuhturi
Dukuhturi
Dukuhwaru
Kedungbanteng
kramat Lebaksiu Margasari
Pagerbarang
Pangkah Slawi Suradadi surodadi Talang Tarub Warureja Total
Casting of Iron and Steel Industry 17 1 3 2 23Casting of Non-Ferrous Metals Industry 19 3 2 49 73M anufacture of Metal Home Appliancenot Kitchent Appliances and equipment table 1 3 1 5Machining, Treatment and Coating of Metals Industry 89 1 3 12 45 5 5 5 17 12 109 2 1 306Manufacture of Agricultural and Forestry Machine 1 14 3 2 88 108Manufacture of Bicycles Equipment and WheelchairIncludedPedicab 1 1 6 8Manufacture of Bodies (Coachwork) For Motor Vehicles andManufacture Of semi motor vehicles 3 3 1 2 9Manufacture of Chain, Springs and Screw 6 1 1 8 16 32Manufacture of Components and Supplies Motorcycles ofTwo and Three Wheels 39 2 3 1 2 1 98 7 153Manufacture of Cutlery, Hand Tools For Agricultural 20 2 3 22 47Manufacture of Cutlery, Hand Tools For Carpentry Cut 1 1Manufacture of Domestic Electric Appliances 1 2 3Manufacture of Domestic Non Electric Cooking and HeatingEquipment 9 19 28Manufacture of Equipment, Supplies and Parts Ship 3 2 1 86 92Manufacture of Fabricated Structural Metal Products OtherThan Aluminium 52 8 2 9 6 17 7 5 2 29 7 1 81 6 232Manufacture of Furniture For Operations, Mediccal and Dental 1 2 1 4Manufacture of general Hardware 14 1 1 2 4 38 2 62Manufacture of General Printing 7 8 10 8 5 38Manufacture of Goods Jewelry of Precious Metals forPersonal Purposes 2 34 40 76Manufacture of Kitchen Appliances and Equipment of TableMetals 25 8 33Manufacture of Machine and Tools For Metal-Working 5 1 3 1 10Manufacture of Machinery For Food, Beverage and TobaccoProcessing 1 2 1 4Manufacture of Machinery For Mining, Quarrying andConstruction 3 3 17 23Manufacture of Metal Furniture 10 1 4 1 10 26manufacture of Other Electrocal Equipment 25 2 2 2 38 17 86Manufacture of Other General Purpose Machine 1 2 2 18 2 89 114Manufacture of Other Lighting Equipment 1 1 3 5Manufacture of Other Metal Products N.E.C 13 1 1 3 1 3 100 122Manufacture of Others Pumps, Compressors, Tabs and Valves 7 1 89 1 98Manufacture of Pails, Cans, Drums and Similar Containers ofMetal 5 5Manufacture of Parts and Accessories For MotorVehicles 3 2 1 6Manufacture of Preparation of Base Metal Not Iron 18 7 25 50Manufacture of Refriagerator machine 3 1 4Manufacture of Safety Deposit Box, Goods of Filling Theoffice and Kinds 1 1Manufacture of Sewing, Washing and Dryer 1 1Manufacture of Weighing machine 2 8 10Manufacture of Wiring Devices 1 1Non-Ferrous Metal Extrusiin Industry 1 1Pipes Non-Ferro Metal Industry 2 2Products of Plastics For Technical/Industrial Purposes 1 1 2Manufacture of Fabricated Structural Aluminium Products 1 3 4Manufacture of Fabricated Structural Steel Products 1 1 2Manufacture of Tanks, Reservoirs and Containers of Metal 2 2manufaxture of weapns and ammunition 5 5Locomotive Industry and Railway Car 1 2 1 4Car Repair 3 5 7 15Repair And Care Of Motorcycles 14 5 3 1 3 1 15 1 43 7 32 21 3 149Computer Repair Services and Equipments 1 1 2 1 1 6Communication Equipment Repair Service 18 15 3 11 1 7 11 16 3 2 87Repair Services Consumer Electronic Equipment 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 14Total 1 457 23 5 64 12 3 112 42 69 18 129 30 21 1 1,130 68 7 2,192
227
228
13.3.3. Questionnaire of Nationwide Survey
228
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
ID R
espo
nden
SURV
EY JA
RIN
GAN
USA
HA D
AN R
ANTA
I PAS
OKA
N P
ADA
INDU
STRI
ALA
T TR
ANSP
ORT
ASI,
ELEK
TRO
NIK
DAN
PEN
DUKU
NGN
YA D
I IN
DON
ESIA
/SU
RVEY
FO
R
PRO
DUCT
ION
NET
WO
RK A
ND
SUPP
LY C
HAIN
IN
TRAN
SPO
RTAT
ION
, ELE
CTRO
NIC
S AN
D IT
S SU
PPO
RTIN
G
INDU
STRY
IN IN
DON
ESIA
Lata
r B
elak
ang
dan
Tu
juan
Sin
gka
t/B
ack
gro
un
d
In
tegr
asi
ekon
omi
glob
al m
elal
ui i
ndus
tri
mem
iliki
beb
erap
a ko
mpo
nen
yaitu
ad
anya
ran
tai n
ilai d
an ja
ring
an p
rodu
ksi,
skal
a ra
ntai
nila
i dan
jari
ngan
pro
duks
i, ak
tor
prod
uksi
dan
man
ajam
en o
rgan
isas
i. Set
iap
tingk
atan
pad
a ko
mpo
nen
ini
men
entu
kan
tingk
at
inte
gras
i in
dust
ri
deng
an
ekon
omi
glob
al.
Indu
stri
al
at
tran
spor
tasi
, lis
trik
, da
n el
ektr
onik
dan
indu
stri
pen
duku
ngny
a m
erup
akan
sal
ah
satu
ind
ustr
i pr
iori
tas
dala
m K
ebija
kan
Indu
stri N
asio
nal.
Sur
vey
ini
bert
ujua
n un
tuk
men
geta
hui t
ingk
at in
tegr
asi g
loba
l ket
iga
indu
stri
ters
ebut
. Sec
ara
spes
ifik,
in
tegr
asi i
ni d
iliha
t mel
alui
str
uktu
r pe
rmod
alan
, pem
biay
aan
dan
inve
stas
i, su
plai
ba
han
baku
dan
dis
trib
utor
dan
kon
sum
en,
dan
peng
alam
an r
iset
, in
ovas
i da
n te
knol
ogi y
ang
dila
kuka
n ol
eh p
erus
ahaa
n.
Glo
bal
econ
omic
int
egra
tion
thro
ugh
indu
stri
es h
as s
ome
com
pone
nts
i.e v
alue
ch
ain
and
prod
uctio
n ne
twor
k, p
rodu
ctio
n ac
tor,
and
org
aniz
atio
n m
anag
emen
t.
Each
leve
l of
thes
e co
mpo
nent
s de
term
ine
the
leve
l of
indu
stri
al in
tegr
atio
n w
ith
glob
al
econ
omy.
Th
e in
dust
ry
of
tran
spor
tatio
n m
achi
nery
, el
ectr
icity
, an
d el
ectr
onic
s an
d th
eir
supp
ortin
g in
dust
ries
is
am
ong
prio
ritie
s of
N
atio
nal
Indu
stri
al P
olic
y.
This
sur
vey
is a
imed
to g
et d
escr
iptio
n on
the
glob
al in
tegr
atio
n of
the
men
tione
d in
dust
ries
. Spe
cific
ally
, th
is s
urve
y ca
ptur
es t
he in
dust
ry in
the
as
pect
of i
nves
tmen
t, p
rodu
ctio
n in
put
and
outp
ut, ex
chan
ges
of in
form
atio
n an
d re
sear
ch a
nd d
evel
opm
ent.
Pet
un
juk
Um
um
b
agi
Res
po
nd
en/
Gen
eral
In
stru
ctio
ns
for
Res
po
nd
ent
Jeni
s pe
rtan
yaan
yan
g di
ajuk
an d
alam
kue
sion
er in
i ada
lah
seba
gai b
erik
ut:
- Pe
rtan
yaan
ter
tutu
p, d
enga
n al
tern
atif
jaw
aban
yan
g te
lah
dise
diak
an.
Res
pond
en d
ihar
apka
n M
elin
gkar
i ()
atau
che
ck m
ark
()
pada
ja
wab
an y
ang
palin
g se
suai
den
gan
kond
isi d
an p
enga
lam
an r
espo
nden
. Car
a m
enja
wab
yan
g be
rlai
nan
akan
dis
ampa
ikan
di m
asin
g–m
asin
g pe
rtan
yaan
.
- Pe
rtan
yaan
ter
buka
, ya
ng d
ihar
apka
n da
pat
diis
i ses
uai d
enga
n ko
ndis
i da
n pe
ngal
aman
res
pond
en.
- Ja
wab
an A
nda
tidak
aka
n di
nila
i ben
ar a
tau
sala
hnya
. Sila
hkan
men
jaw
ab
sesu
ai d
enga
n ko
ndis
i Per
usah
aan
And
a da
lam
men
jala
nkan
bis
nis.
In
form
asi y
ang
dida
patk
an d
ari s
urve
i ini
aka
n di
jam
in k
erah
asia
anny
a da
n tid
ak d
iseb
arlu
aska
n.
- Seb
agai
buk
ti ke
absa
han
jaw
aban
res
pond
en,
kam
i moh
on r
espo
nden
be
rken
an m
embu
buhk
an c
ap p
erus
ahaa
n pa
da k
otak
yan
g te
rsed
ia d
i ba
wah
ini.
Th
e t
ype
of q
uest
ions
in thi
s su
rvey
is fi
rst a
clos
e en
ded
ques
tion
with
Yes
or
No
answ
er. P
leas
e an
swer
the
“Yes
” /
“No”
que
stio
n by
pro
vidi
ng (
1)
for Ye
s or
(0
) fo
r N
o. A
n op
en-e
nded
que
stio
n qu
estio
n ne
eds
answ
er b
ased
on
the
resp
onde
nt’s
act
ual c
ondi
tion
and
expe
rien
ce
Info
rmat
ion
obta
ined
fr
om
this
su
rvey
w
ill
be
kept
co
nfid
entia
l an
d no
ju
degm
ent
on t
he “
righ
t” o
r "w
rong
”.
The
info
rmat
ion
will
be
used
on
ly f
or
stat
istic
al r
esea
rch
purp
oses
and
will
not
be
disc
lose
d in
a fo
rm in
whi
ch y
ou o
r yo
ur f
irm
can
be
iden
tifie
d. A
s an
ack
now
ledg
emen
t of
inf
orm
atio
n in
thi
s qu
estio
nnai
re a
nd y
our
part
icip
atio
n in
thi
s su
rvey
, p
leas
e pr
ovid
e id
entit
y of
yo
ur c
ompa
ny a
nd s
ign
of r
espo
nden
t.
Tand
a Ta
ngan
dan
Cap
Per
usah
aan/
sign
of th
e re
spon
dent
229
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
ID R
espo
nden
Nam
a Pe
rusa
haan
:
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
Nam
e of
est
ablis
hmen
t
Ala
mat
Per
usah
aan
:
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
Add
ess
Kec
amat
an
:
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
Sub-
rege
ncy
Kab
/Kot
a*
:
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
Reg
ency
/Mun
icip
ality
Nam
a Res
pond
en
:
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
Nam
e of
res
pond
ent
Jaba
tan
Res
pond
en
:
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
Posi
tion
of r
espo
nden
t
Tele
pon
Res
pond
en
:
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
Tele
phon
e
Nam
a Pe
waw
anca
ra
:
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
Nam
e of
enu
mer
ator
Nam
a Sup
ervi
sor
:
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
Nam
e of
sup
ervi
sor
*cor
et y
ang
tidak
per
lu
230
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
BLO
K I:
PRO
FIL
PERU
SAHA
AN
SECT
ION
I: C
OM
PAN
Y PR
OFI
LE
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Nam
a pe
rusa
haan
/Nam
e of
est
ablis
hmen
t ...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
....
2.
Tahu
n be
rdiri
per
usah
aan/
Year
of e
stab
lishm
ent
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.
3.
Stat
us P
erus
ahaa
n
1.
Kant
or p
usat
/Hol
ding
com
pany
2.
Ca
bang
/ Bra
nch
3.
Subs
idia
ry /A
nak
peru
saha
an
4.
Inde
pend
en
4.
Alam
at k
anto
r / p
abrik
Ad
dres
s of e
stab
lishm
ent/
prod
uctio
n un
it
.
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
....
a.
Alam
at k
anto
r/pa
brik
/Add
ress
.
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
b.
Desa
/Kel
urah
an*)
Adm
inist
rativ
e vi
lage
...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
....
c.
Keca
mat
an/ S
ub-r
egen
cy
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.
d.
Kota
/Kab
upat
en*)
/ Re
genc
y/M
unici
palit
y ...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
....
e.
Prov
insi/
prov
ince
...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
....
5.
Alam
at k
anto
r pus
at/h
ead
quar
ter i
nfor
mat
ion
a.
Alam
at k
anto
r pus
at /
Addr
ess o
f hea
d qu
arte
r
b.
Prov
insi/
prov
ince
c.
Kode
pos
/ Pos
tal c
ode
d.
Tele
pon/
Tel
epho
ne n
umbe
r
e.
Fax/
Facs
imile
f. Su
rel/E
mai
l
g.
Titik
koo
rdin
at k
anto
r/GP
S Co
ordi
nate
(L
ongi
tude
and
latit
ude)
231
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
6.
Stat
us k
epem
ilika
n pe
rusa
haan
/ow
ners
hip
* Fo
reig
n-ow
ned
firm
s are
def
ined
as f
irms w
ith
mor
e th
an 1
0% o
f sha
res o
wne
d by
fore
ign
inve
stor
s.
1. P
MDN
(dom
estic
) L
anju
tkan
ke
no.
8
2. P
MA
(fore
ign
inve
sted
)
7.
Stat
us k
epem
ilika
n/Na
tiona
lity
of m
ajor
fore
ign
inve
stor
1.
Am
erik
a/U
S 2.
Kan
ada/
Cana
da
3. J
epan
g/Ja
pan
4. K
orea
/Kor
ea
5. C
ina/
Chin
a 6.
Lai
nnya
, seb
utka
n/ O
ther
s, sp
ecify
...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.
8.
Jum
lah
peke
rja (3
1 De
sem
ber 2
016)
/ Num
ber o
f wor
kers
(p
er D
ecem
ber 3
1, 2
016)
a.
Jum
lah
peke
rja te
tap/
per
man
ent w
orke
rs
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
..ora
ng/e
mpl
oyee
s
b
.Jum
lah
peke
rja ti
dak
teta
p/no
n-pe
rman
ent
wor
kers
...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.....o
rang
/em
ploy
ees
b.
Apak
ah
peru
saha
an in
i mel
akuk
an se
ndiri
keg
iata
n te
knis
berik
ut in
i?
Is yo
ur fi
rm co
nduc
ting
the
follo
win
g te
chni
cal a
ctiv
ities
by
you
r ow
n?
1.
Desa
in m
engg
unak
an C
AD (C
ompu
ter a
ssist
ed d
esig
n)/C
AM
(Com
pute
r ass
isted
man
ufac
ture
) dat
a/De
sign
CAD/
CAM
2.
De
sain
gam
bar u
ntuk
pen
ceta
kan
atau
pew
arna
an/D
esig
n of
dr
awin
g fo
r mol
d or
die
3.
De
sain
gam
bar p
rodu
k /D
esig
n of
dra
win
g fo
r pro
duct
s 4.
De
sain
sist
em p
rodu
ksi /
Desig
n of
pro
duct
ion
syst
em
5.
Lain
nya,
sebu
tkan
/ oth
er, s
pecif
y: _
____
____
____
___
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/N
o
c.
Apak
ah p
erus
ahaa
n in
i mel
akuk
an se
ndiri
keg
iata
n pe
nguj
ian
berik
ut?
Is yo
ur fi
rm co
nduc
ting
the
follo
win
g te
sts b
y yo
ur o
wn?
1.
Uji
keku
atan
/ str
engt
h te
st
2.
Uji
kine
rja/ p
erfo
rman
ce te
st
3.
Uji
keta
hana
n/du
rabi
lity
test
4.
La
inny
a, se
butk
an/ o
ther
, spe
cify:
___
____
____
____
____
_
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/N
o
11. A
paka
h pe
rusa
haan
ini m
elak
ukan
send
iri
kegi
atan
unt
uk p
enin
gkat
an p
rose
s pr
oduk
si ?
1.
KAIZ
EN (a
ktiv
itas y
ang
bers
ifat s
istem
atis
dim
ana
tena
ga
kerja
men
disk
usik
an m
asal
ah d
i lin
gkun
gan
kerja
(pro
duks
i da
n m
enca
ri so
lusi)
/any
syst
emat
ic ac
tivity
in w
hich
wor
kers
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/N
o
232
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
Is yo
ur fi
rm co
nduc
ting
the
follo
win
g ac
tiviti
es fo
r inc
reas
ing
prod
uctio
n pr
oces
s by
you
r ow
n?
disc
uss p
robl
ems i
n th
e w
orks
hop
and
try
to so
lve
them
(doe
s no
t nee
d to
be
calle
d "K
aize
n")
2.
5R/5
K/3R
/3K/
5S: a
ktiv
itas s
istem
atis
untu
k m
enja
ga
kebe
rsih
an d
an k
enya
man
ling
kung
an k
erja
)/an
y sy
stem
atic
activ
ity to
clea
n th
e w
orks
hop
and
put p
rodu
cts a
nd m
ater
ial
in a
n or
derly
way
3.
KO
NTRO
L KUA
LITA
S/Q
ualit
y Co
ntro
l : a
ktiv
itas s
istem
atis
untu
k st
anda
risa
kual
itas p
rodu
k be
rrda
sark
an d
ata
/ any
syst
emat
ic ac
tivity
to st
anda
rdize
qu
ality
of p
rodu
cts b
ased
on
data
4.
Ak
tivita
s lai
nnya
unt
uk m
anda
patk
an d
an a
tau
mem
pert
ahan
kan
ISO
/ Any
ac
tivity
to o
btai
n or
kee
p IS
O/
5.
Lain
nya,
sebu
tkan
/ oth
er, s
pecif
y __
____
____
____
____
__
BLO
K II
PERU
SAHA
AN P
EMBE
LI/
SECT
ION
II. C
UST
OM
ER F
IRM
S
233
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
1.
Sebu
tkan
5 p
erus
ahaa
n pe
mbe
li te
rbes
ar b
eser
ta n
ama
prod
uk y
ang
diju
al d
enga
n ni
lai p
embe
lian
terb
esar
pad
a ta
hun
2016
! Pl
ease
list
the
5 la
rges
t cus
tom
er co
mpa
nies
by
mea
ns o
f val
ue o
f sal
es a
nd 3
mai
n pr
oduc
ts w
hich
they
pur
chas
ed in
201
6 [T
o en
umer
ator
s] If
the
resp
onde
nt d
oes n
ot w
ant t
o di
sclo
se th
e na
mes
of c
usto
mer
s, pl
ease
do
not s
top
aski
ng b
ut tr
y to
get
info
rmat
ion
of su
pplie
rs
with
out n
ames
.
No
Nam
a pe
rusa
haan
pem
beli
Nam
e of
cust
omer
Ti
ga p
rodu
k de
ngan
nila
i pem
belia
n te
rbes
ar
Nam
e of
goo
ds p
rocu
red
Prod
uk te
rbes
ar 1
Pr
oduk
terb
esar
2
Prod
uk te
rbes
ar 3
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
2.
Se
butk
an p
rofil
5 p
erus
ahaa
n pe
mbe
li de
ngan
nila
i pem
belia
n te
rbes
ar in
201
6 !
Plea
se g
ive
som
e ge
nera
l inf
orm
atio
n ab
out t
he 5
larg
est c
usto
mer
s list
ed a
bove
N
o N
ama
peru
saha
an
pem
beli
Neg
ara/
Prov
insi
Coun
try/
Prov
ince
Ka
bupa
ten/
Kota
Di
strc
it/Ci
ty
Uku
ran
peru
saha
an
Firm
size
1:
Kec
il (1
-19
wor
kers
) 2:
Sed
ang
(20-
99)
3: B
esar
(>10
0)
PMA/
Fo
reig
n-ow
ned
firm
? 1.
Ya/
Yes
0. T
idak
/ N
o
Apak
ah
peru
saha
an in
i m
emili
ki m
odal
di
peru
saha
an
ters
ebut
?/Do
es
your
com
pany
hol
d an
y ca
pita
l ow
ners
hip
of th
e cu
stom
er?
Ya
(1)
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/N
o
Apak
ah p
erus
ahaa
n te
rseb
ut m
emili
ki
mod
al d
i per
usah
aan
ini?
/Doe
s the
cu
stom
er h
old
any
capi
tal o
wne
rshi
p of
yo
ur c
ompa
ny?
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
3.
Apak
ah a
da
pem
beria
n in
form
asi/j
asa/
duku
ngan
lain
nya
yang
terk
ait d
enga
n ke
mam
puan
tekn
is da
ri se
tiap
peru
saha
an p
embe
li ke
pada
per
usah
aan
ini
234
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
pada
tahu
n 20
16?
Wha
t kin
d of
tech
nica
l inf
orm
atio
n/se
rvice
s/su
ppor
ts d
id y
ou re
ceiv
e fr
om cu
stom
ers i
n 20
16?
(per
eac
h cu
stom
er)
[To
enum
erat
ors:
The
se se
rvice
s or s
uppo
rts c
an b
e ei
ther
free
or n
ot fr
ee. C
olum
ns 2
-4, d
esig
n of
dra
win
g fo
r mol
d or
die
, pro
duct
s, an
d pr
oduc
tion
syst
em
shou
ld in
volv
e tr
aini
ng b
y th
e cu
stom
er, w
hile
colu
mn
1 is
only
pro
visio
n of
dat
a.]
No
Nam
a pe
rusa
haan
pem
beli
1. D
ata
untu
k de
sain
m
engg
unak
an C
AD
(Com
pute
r ass
isted
de
sign)
/CAM
(C
ompu
t er a
ssist
ed
man
ufac
ture
) Pr
ovisi
ons o
f CA
D/CA
M d
ata
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
2. D
esai
n ga
mba
r un
tuk
penc
etak
an
atau
pew
arna
an
Desig
n of
dra
win
g fo
r m
old
or d
ie
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
3. D
esai
n ga
mba
r pr
oduk
De
sign
of d
raw
ing
for
prod
ucts
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
4. D
esai
n sis
tem
pr
oduk
si De
sign
of p
rodu
ctio
n sy
stem
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
5.
Lain
nya,
sebu
tkan
O
ther
s, sp
ecify
Na
me
of C
usto
mer
1
2
3
4
5
_ 4.
Ap
akah
ada
pem
beria
n in
form
asi/j
asa/
duku
ngan
lain
nya
yang
terk
ait d
enga
n pe
nguj
ian
dari
setia
p pe
rusa
haan
pem
beli
kepa
da p
erus
ahaa
n in
i pad
a ta
hun
2016
? W
hat k
ind
of in
form
atio
n/se
rvice
s/su
ppor
t for
test
ing
did
you
rece
ive
from
cust
omer
s in
2016
? (p
er e
ach
cust
omer
) [T
o en
umer
ator
s: T
hese
serv
ices o
r sup
port
s can
be
eith
er fr
ee o
r not
free
. The
y m
ay in
volv
e tr
aini
ng b
y th
e cu
stom
er o
r may
be
only
pro
visio
n of
test
ing
devi
ces.
]
No
Nam
a pe
rusa
haan
pem
beli
1. U
ji ke
kuat
an
stre
ngth
test
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
2. U
ji pe
rfor
ma
perf
orm
ance
test
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
3. U
ji ke
taha
nan
dura
bilit
y te
st
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
4. L
ainn
ya, s
ebut
kan
Oth
ers,
spec
ify
Na
me
of C
usto
mer
1
2
3
235
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
4
5
5.
Apak
ah a
da p
embe
rian
info
rmas
i/jas
a/du
kung
an la
inny
a ya
ng te
rkai
t den
gan
perb
aika
n pr
oses
pro
duks
i dar
i set
iap
peru
saha
an p
embe
li ke
pada
pe
rusa
haan
ini p
ada
tahu
n 20
16?
Wha
t kin
d of
info
rmat
ion/
serv
ice/s
uppo
rts f
or p
rodu
ctio
n pr
oces
s im
prov
emen
t fro
m cu
stom
ers i
n 20
16?
(per
eac
h cu
stom
er)
[To
enum
erat
ors:
The
se se
rvice
s or s
uppo
rts c
an b
e ei
ther
free
or n
ot fr
ee.]
No
Nam
a pe
rusa
haan
pem
beli
Nam
e of
Cus
tom
er
1. K
AIZE
N
(any
syst
emat
ic a
ctiv
ity in
w
hich
wor
kers
disc
uss
prob
lem
s in
the
wor
ksho
p an
d tr
y to
solv
e th
em)
2. 5
R/5K
/3R/
3K/5
S (a
ny sy
stem
atic
act
ivity
to
clea
n th
e w
orks
hop
and
put
prod
ucts
and
mat
eria
l in
an
orde
rly w
ay)
3. K
ontr
ol K
ualit
as/
Qua
lity
Cont
rol
(any
syst
emat
ic a
ctiv
ity to
st
anda
rdize
the
qual
ity o
f pr
oduc
ts b
ased
on
data
)
4. IS
O
(any
syst
emat
ic
activ
ity to
obt
ain
or k
eep
ISO
)
5.La
inny
a,
sebu
tkan
/ O
ther
s, sp
ecify
1.Ya
/Yes
1.
Ya/Y
es
1.Ya
/Yes
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
0.
Tida
k/No
0.
Tida
k/No
0.
Tida
k/No
1
2
3
4
5
6.
Sela
in 5
(lim
a) p
erus
ahaa
n pe
mbe
li te
rbes
ar y
ang
suda
h di
sebu
tkan
di a
tas,
apa
kah
peru
saha
an in
i men
erim
a in
form
asi/j
asa/
duku
ngan
lain
nya
dari
peru
saha
ape
mbe
li la
inny
a pa
da ta
hun
2016
? Be
sides
the
top
5 cu
stom
ers m
entio
ned
abov
e, d
id y
ou re
ceiv
e an
y in
form
atio
n/se
rvic
e/su
ppor
ts fr
om o
ther
cust
omer
s in
2016
?
236
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
Jeni
s inf
orm
asi /
jasa
In
form
atio
n/se
rvice
s
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
Peru
saha
an D
omes
tik
Indo
nesia
n-ow
ned
com
pany
Pe
rusa
haan
Mili
k As
ing
(PM
A)
Fore
ign-
owne
d co
mpa
ny
Prov
insi
yang
sam
a Sa
me
prov
ince
Prov
insi
yang
be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
pul
au y
ang
sam
a O
utsid
e th
e pr
ov. b
ut in
the
sam
e isl
and
Di p
ulau
yan
g be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
Indo
nesia
O
utsid
e th
e isl
and
but i
n In
done
sia
Prov
insi
yang
sam
a Sa
me
prov
ince
Prov
insi
yang
be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
pul
au y
ang
sam
a O
utsid
e th
e pr
ov. b
ut in
the
sam
e isl
and
Di p
ulau
yan
g be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
Indo
nesia
O
utsid
e th
e isl
and
but i
n In
done
sia
Luar
neg
eri
Abro
ad
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Info
rmas
i bisn
is Bu
sines
s-re
late
d in
form
atio
n 1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
2. K
emam
puan
tekn
is
Tech
nica
l ser
vice
s
a)
Data
unt
uk d
esai
n m
engg
unak
an
CAD/
CAM
/CAM
/CAD
dat
a 1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
b)
Desa
in g
amba
r unt
uk p
ence
taka
n at
au
pew
arna
an/d
esig
n of
mol
d an
d di
e 1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
c)
Desa
in g
amba
r pro
duk/
Desig
n of
pro
duct
s 1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
d)
Desa
in si
stem
pro
duks
i/Des
ign
of p
rodu
ctio
n sy
stem
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
3. P
engu
jian
Test
ing
serv
ices (
stre
ngth
, per
form
ance
, dur
abili
ty)
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
4. P
enin
gkat
an p
rodu
ktiv
itas
Prod
uctiv
ity im
prov
emen
t ser
vice
s (Ka
izen,
5R
/5K/
3R/3
K, Q
C, IS
O)
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
BLO
K III
. PER
USA
HAAN
PEM
ASO
K/SE
CTIO
N II
I.SU
PPLI
ERS
1.
Sebu
tkan
5 p
erus
ahaa
n pe
mas
ok te
rbes
ar b
eser
ta n
ama
baha
n ba
ku y
ang
dibe
li de
ngan
nila
i pem
belia
n te
rbes
ar p
ada
tahu
n 20
16!
237
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
Plea
se li
st th
e 5
larg
est s
uppl
iers
by
mea
ns o
f val
ue o
f pur
chas
e/pr
ocur
emen
t and
thei
r top
3 p
rodu
cts i
n 20
16 !
[To
enum
erat
ors]
If th
e re
spon
dent
doe
s not
wan
t to
disc
lose
the
nam
es o
f sup
plie
rs, p
leas
e do
not
stop
ask
ing
but t
ry to
get
info
rmat
ion
of su
pplie
rs w
ithou
t nam
es.
No
Nam
a pe
rusa
haan
pem
asok
Na
me
of su
pplie
r Ti
ga b
ahan
bak
u te
rbes
ar y
ang
dibe
li Na
me
of g
oods
pro
cure
d
Prod
uk b
ahan
bak
u te
rbes
ar 1
Pr
oduk
bah
an b
aku
terb
esar
2
Prod
uk b
ahan
bak
u te
rbes
ar 3
1
2
3
4
5
2.
Sebu
tkan
pro
fil 5
per
usah
aan
pem
asok
den
gan
nila
i pem
belia
n te
rbes
ar in
201
6!
Ple
ase
prov
ide
som
e ge
nera
l inf
orm
atio
n ab
out t
he 5
larg
est s
uppl
iers
list
ed a
bove
N
o N
ama
peru
saha
an p
emas
ok
Nam
e of
supp
lier
Neg
ara/
Prov
insi
Kabu
pate
n/Ko
ta
Skal
a / F
irm
size
1: K
ecil
(1- 1
9 w
orke
rs)
2: S
edan
g (2
0-99
) 3:
Bes
ar (>
100)
PMA/
Fo
reig
n-ow
ned
firm
? 1.
Ya/
Yes
0. T
idak
/ N
o
Apak
ah p
erus
ahaa
n An
da m
emili
ki m
odal
di
per
usah
aan
ters
ebut
? Do
es y
our c
ompa
ny
hold
an
y ca
pita
l ow
ners
hip
of th
e cu
stom
er?
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
Apak
ah p
erus
ahaa
n te
rseb
ut m
emili
ki
mod
al d
i pe
rusa
haan
And
a?
Does
the
cust
omer
ho
ld a
ny c
apita
l ow
ners
hip
of y
our
com
pany
?
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/N
o 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
3.
Ap
akah
ada
pem
beria
n in
form
asi/j
asa/
duku
ngan
lain
nya
yang
terk
ait d
enga
n ke
mam
puan
tekn
is da
ri se
tiap
peru
saha
an p
emas
ok k
epad
a pe
rusa
haan
ini p
ada
tahu
n 20
16? W
hat k
ind
of te
chni
cal i
nfor
mat
ion/
serv
ices/
supp
orts
did
you
rece
ive
from
you
r sup
plie
rs in
201
6? (p
er e
ach
supp
lier)
[T
o en
umer
ator
s: T
hese
serv
ices o
r sup
port
s can
be
eith
er fr
ee o
r not
free
. Col
umns
2-4
, des
ign
of d
raw
ing
for m
old
or d
ie, p
rodu
cts,
and
prod
uctio
n sy
stem
shou
ld in
volv
e tr
aini
ngby
the
supp
lier,
whi
le co
lum
n 1
is on
ly p
rovi
sion
of d
ata.
]
238
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
No
Nam
a pe
rusa
haan
pem
asok
Na
me
of su
pplie
rs
1. D
ata
untu
k de
sain
m
engg
unak
an C
AD
(Com
pute
r ass
isted
de
sign)
/CAM
(C
ompu
ter a
ssist
ed
man
ufac
ture
) Pr
ovisi
on o
f CA
D/CA
M d
ata
2. D
esai
n ga
mba
r un
tuk
penc
etak
an
atau
pew
aarn
aan
De
sign
of
draw
ing
for M
old
or D
ie
3. D
esai
n ga
mba
r pr
oduk
De
sign
of d
raw
ing
for
prod
ucts
4. D
esai
n sis
tem
pr
oduk
si De
sign
of p
rodu
ctio
n sy
stem
5. L
ainn
ya,
sebu
tkan
O
ther
s, sp
ecify
1.Ya
/Yes
1.
Ya/Y
es
1.Ya
/Yes
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/N
o 0.
Tida
k/N
o 0.
Tida
k/N
o 0.
Tida
k/N
o
1
2
3
4
5
4.
Ap
akah
ada
pem
beria
n in
form
asi/j
asa/
duku
ngan
lain
nya
yang
terk
ait d
enga
n pe
nguj
ian
dari
setia
p pe
rusa
haan
pem
asok
kep
ada
peru
saha
an in
i pad
a ta
hun
2016
? W
hat k
ind
of in
form
atio
n/se
rvice
s/su
ppor
ts fo
r tes
ting
did
you
rece
ive
from
you
r sup
plie
rs in
201
6? (p
er e
ach
supp
lier)
[T
o en
umer
ator
s: T
hese
serv
ices
or s
uppo
rts c
an b
e ei
ther
free
or n
ot fr
ee. T
hey
may
invo
lve
trai
ning
by
the
supp
lier o
r may
be
only
pro
visio
n of
test
ing
devi
ces.
] N
o N
ama
peru
saha
an p
emas
ok
1. U
ji ke
kuat
an
stre
ngth
test
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
2. U
ji pe
rfor
ma/
kine
rja
perf
orm
ance
test
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
3. U
ji k
etah
anan
du
rabi
lity
test
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
4. L
ainn
ya, s
ebut
kan
Oth
ers,
spec
ify
Na
me
of su
pplie
rs
1
...
......
......
......
......
....
2
...
......
......
......
......
....
3
4
...
......
......
......
......
....
5
...
......
......
......
......
....
5.
Apa
kah
ada
pem
beria
n in
form
asi/j
asa/
duku
ngan
lain
nya
untu
k pe
rbai
kan
pros
es p
rodu
ksi y
ang
dite
rima
peru
saha
an in
i dar
i set
iap
peru
saha
an p
emas
ok
kepa
da p
erus
ahaa
n in
i pad
a ta
hun
2016
?
239
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
W
hat k
ind
of in
form
atio
n/se
rvice
/sup
port
s for
pro
duct
ion
proc
ess i
mpr
ovem
ent d
id y
ou re
ceiv
e fro
m y
our s
uppl
iers
in 2
016?
(per
eac
h su
pplie
r)
[To
enum
erat
ors:
The
se se
rvic
es o
r sup
port
s can
be
eith
er fr
ee o
r not
free
.]
No
N
ama
peru
saha
an p
emas
ok
1. K
AIZE
N (a
ny sy
stem
atic
act
ivity
in
whi
ch w
orke
rs d
iscus
s pr
oble
ms i
n th
e w
orks
hop
and
try
to so
lve
them
)
2. 5
R/5K
/3R/
3K
(any
syst
emat
ic a
ctiv
ity to
cl
ean
the
wor
ksho
p an
d pu
t pr
oduc
ts a
nd m
ater
ial i
n an
or
derly
way
)
3. Q
ualit
y Co
ntro
l (a
ny sy
stem
atic
act
ivity
to
stan
dard
ize th
e qu
ality
of
prod
ucts
bas
ed o
n da
ta)
4. IS
O
(any
sy
stem
atic
ac
tivity
to
obta
in o
r ke
ep IS
O)
5. L
ainn
ya,
sebu
tkan
O
ther
s, sp
ecify
Na
me
of su
pplie
rs
1.Ya
/Yes
1.
Ya/Y
es
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tid
ak/N
o
0.Ti
dak/
No
0.Ti
dak/
No
0.Ti
dak/
No
1. Y
a/Ye
s
1
2
3
4
5
6.
Sela
in 5
(lim
a) p
erus
ahaa
n pe
mas
ok y
ang
tela
h di
sebu
tkan
, apa
kah
ada
pem
beria
n in
form
asi/j
asa/
duku
ngan
lain
nya
sepe
rti b
erik
ut in
i per
usah
aan
pem
asok
la
inny
a ?
Bes
ides
the
top
5 cu
stom
ers m
entio
ned
abov
e, d
id y
ou re
ceiv
e an
y in
form
atio
n/se
rvice
/sup
port
s fro
m o
ther
cust
omer
s in
2016
?
240
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
Jeni
s inf
orm
asi /
jasa
In
form
atio
n/se
rvice
s
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
Peru
saha
an D
omes
tik
Indo
nesia
n-ow
ned
com
pany
Pe
rusa
haan
Mili
k As
ing
(PM
A)
Fore
ign-
owne
d co
mpa
ny
Prov
insi
yang
sam
a Sa
me
prov
ince
Prov
insi
yang
be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
pul
au y
ang
sam
a O
utsid
e th
e pr
ov. b
ut in
the
sam
e isl
and
Di p
ulau
yan
g be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
Indo
nesia
O
utsid
e th
e isl
and
but i
n In
done
sia
Prov
insi
yang
sam
a Sa
me
prov
ince
Prov
insi
yang
be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
pul
au y
ang
sam
a O
utsid
e th
e pr
ov. b
ut in
the
sam
e isl
and
Di p
ulau
yan
g be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
Indo
nesia
O
utsid
e th
e isl
and
but i
n In
done
sia
Luar
neg
eri
Abro
ad
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Info
rmas
i bisn
is Bu
sines
s-re
late
d in
form
atio
n 1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
2. K
emam
puan
tekn
is
Tech
nica
l ser
vice
s
a)
Data
des
ain
men
ggun
akan
CA
D/CA
M/C
AM/C
AD d
ata
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
b)
Desa
in g
amba
r unt
u pe
ncet
akan
ata
u pe
war
naan
/des
ign
of m
old
and
die
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
c)
Desa
in g
amba
r pro
duk/
Desig
n of
pro
duct
s 1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
d)
Desa
in si
stem
pro
duks
i/Des
ign
of p
rodu
ctio
n sy
stem
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
3. P
engu
jian
Test
ing
serv
ices (
stre
ngth
, per
form
ance
, dur
abili
ty)
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
4. P
enin
gkat
an p
rodu
ktiv
itas
Prod
uctiv
ity im
prov
emen
t ser
vice
s (Ka
izen,
5R
/5K/
3R/3
K, Q
C, IS
O)
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
241
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
BLO
K IV
. JAS
A KE
UAN
GAN
DAN
BIS
NIS
SE
CTIO
N IV
FIN
ANCI
AL a
nd B
USI
NES
S SE
RVIC
E 1.
Da
ri le
mba
ga k
euan
gan
utam
a m
ana
peru
saha
an in
i men
erim
a pi
njam
an
pada
tahu
n 20
16?
Sebu
tkan
3 y
ang
utam
a !
Jik
a “T
idak
ada
”,
lanj
ut k
e N
o. 4
W
hat a
re th
e to
p 3
finan
cial i
nstit
utio
ns th
at th
e co
mpa
ny re
ceiv
ed cr
edits
fr
om d
urin
g th
e pe
riod
of 2
016?
1.
Perb
anka
n ko
mer
sil/s
was
ta
Priv
ate
com
mer
cial b
anks
2.
Pe
rban
kan
pem
erin
tah
atau
lem
baga
keu
anga
n pe
mer
inta
h St
ate-
owne
d ba
nks o
rgo
vern
men
t age
ncy
3.
Inst
itusi
keua
ngan
non
-per
bank
an y
ang
term
asuk
inst
itusi
keua
ngan
mik
ro, k
oper
asi
simpa
n pi
njam
, ser
ikat
kre
dit,
atau
per
usah
aan
keua
ngan
No
n-ba
nk fi
nanc
ial i
nstit
utio
ns w
hich
inclu
de
micr
ofin
ance
intu
ition
s, cr
edit
coop
erat
ives
, cr
edit
unio
ns, o
r fin
ance
com
pani
es
4.
Lain
nya,
sebu
tkan
/ Oth
ers,
spec
ify:
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya
2.
Sebe
rapa
pua
skah
And
a te
rhad
ap p
elay
anan
yan
g di
berik
an o
leh
inst
itusi
keua
ngan
ters
ebut
? Ho
w m
uch
are
you
satis
fied
with
the
serv
ice th
at
finan
cial i
nstit
utio
ns p
rovi
des?
1.
Sang
at p
uas/
Ver
y sa
tisfie
d 2.
Puas
/ Sat
isfie
d 3.
Tida
k pu
as/ D
issat
isfie
d 4.
Sang
at ti
dak
puas
/ Ver
y di
ssat
isfie
d
1.
Perb
anka
n ko
mer
sil/s
was
ta
Priv
ate
com
mer
cial
ban
ks
1 2
3 4
2.
Perb
anka
n pe
mer
inta
h at
au le
mba
ga k
euan
gan
pem
erin
tah
Stat
e-ow
ned
bank
s or
gove
rnm
ent a
genc
y 3.
In
stitu
si ke
uang
an n
on-p
erba
nkan
yan
g te
rmas
uk in
stitu
si ke
uang
an m
ikro
, kop
eras
i sim
pan
pinj
am, s
erik
at k
redi
t, at
au p
erus
ahaa
n ke
uang
an
Non-
bank
fina
ncia
l ins
titut
ions
whi
ch in
clude
m
icro
finan
ce in
tuiti
ons,
cred
it co
oper
ativ
es,
cred
it un
ions
, or f
inan
ce co
mpa
nies
4.
La
inny
a, se
butk
an/ O
ther
s, sp
ecify
: __
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
3.
Bera
pa ju
mla
h kr
edit
yang
dite
rima
peru
saha
an d
iban
ding
kan
deng
an ju
mla
h kr
edit
tota
l yan
g di
ajuk
an p
ada
tahu
n 20
16 ?
Co
mpa
red
with
the
amou
nt o
f cre
dits
the
com
pany
wan
ted
to re
ceiv
e du
ring
the
perio
d of
201
6, h
ow m
uch
did
the
com
pany
act
ually
rece
ive?
__
____
%
4.
Apak
ah a
da ja
sa u
saha
yan
g di
baya
r ole
h pe
rusa
haan
And
a ke
pada
pih
ak
ketig
a se
lain
per
usah
aan
pem
beli
dan
pem
asok
di t
ahun
201
6?
Wha
t kin
d of
bus
ines
s ser
vice
s did
you
rece
ive
from
any
com
pany
or
inst
itutio
n in
201
6?
242
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
Jasa
/Ser
vice
s 1.
Ya/Y
es
0. T
idak
/No
Jasa
/Ser
vice
s 1.
Ya/Y
es
0. T
idak
/No
1.
Stra
tegi
bisn
is/
Busin
ess s
trat
egy
2.
Rise
t pas
ar/s
urve
y M
arke
t re
sear
ch/s
urve
y 3.
Pe
nghi
tung
an
paja
k/ak
unta
si ac
coun
ting/
tax
calcu
latio
n 4.
Ba
ntua
n hu
kum
dan
do
kum
en
lega
l and
doc
umen
t su
ppor
t 5.
O
utso
urce
pek
erja
an
adm
inist
ratif
ou
tsou
rce
of
adm
inist
rativ
e w
ork
6.
E-co
mm
erce
/b
isnis
onlin
e 7.
Fo
rum
/tem
u bi
snis
Busin
ess
mat
chin
g 8.
La
inny
a,
sebu
tkan
ot
hers
, sp
ecify
...
......
......
.....
9.
Ti
dak
ada,
No
ne
Lanj
ut k
e Bl
ok
V/Co
ntin
ue
to S
ectio
n V
5.
Apak
ah A
nda
mem
pero
leh
info
rmas
i ter
kait
pem
esan
an/k
ontr
ak b
aru
dari
piha
k ke
tiga
ters
ebut
? Di
d yo
u re
ceiv
e an
y in
form
atio
n of
new
ord
er/c
ontr
act f
rom
abo
ve
busin
ess/
tech
nica
l des
ign/
test
ing
serv
ice p
artn
ers?
1.
Ya
dan
men
dapa
tkan
pem
esan
an/k
ontr
ak b
aru
yes a
nd g
ot a
new
ord
er/c
ontr
act
2.
Ya, t
etap
i tid
ak a
da k
ontr
ak b
aru
yang
terja
di
yes b
ut it
is w
as n
ot re
alize
d
3.
Tida
k m
enda
patk
an in
form
asi
No
243
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
7.
Se
lain
dar
i pih
ak k
etig
a ya
ng te
lah
dise
butk
an, a
paka
h ad
a pe
mbe
rian
info
rmas
i/jas
a/du
kung
an la
inny
a ya
ng d
iterim
a pe
rusa
haan
ini p
ada
tahu
n 20
16 ?
B
esid
es su
ppor
ts fr
om cu
stom
ers a
nd su
pplie
rs, d
id y
ou re
ceiv
e th
e fo
llow
ing
info
rmat
ion/
serv
ices/
supp
orts
from
oth
er co
mpa
nies
or i
nstit
utio
ns in
201
6 ?
If fr
om w
hom
? O
ther
com
pani
es a
nd in
stitu
tions
inclu
de c
ompa
nies
of r
elat
ive
and
frie
nd, n
eigb
ours
, pub
lic tr
aini
ng a
nd te
stin
g in
stitu
tions
, and
fore
ign
aid
inst
itutio
ns.
[To
enu
mer
ator
s] P
leas
e m
ake
sure
that
supp
orts
from
cust
omer
s or s
uppl
iers
are
not
inclu
ded
in th
is qu
estio
n .
244
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
Jeni
s inf
orm
asi /
jasa
In
form
atio
n/se
rvice
s
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
Peru
saha
an D
omes
tik
Indo
nesia
n-ow
ned
com
pany
Pe
rusa
haan
Mili
k As
ing
(PM
A)
Fore
ign-
owne
d co
mpa
ny
Prov
insi
yang
sam
a Sa
me
prov
ince
Prov
insi
yang
be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
pul
au y
ang
sam
a O
utsid
e th
e pr
ov. b
ut in
the
sam
e isl
and
Di p
ulau
yan
g be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
Indo
nesia
O
utsid
e th
e isl
and
but i
n In
done
sia
Prov
insi
yang
sam
a Sa
me
prov
ince
Prov
insi
yang
be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
pul
au y
ang
sam
a O
utsid
e th
e pr
ov. b
ut in
the
sam
e isl
and
Di p
ulau
yan
g be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
Indo
nesia
O
utsid
e th
e isl
and
but i
n In
done
sia
Luar
neg
eri
Abra
od
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Info
rmas
i bisn
is Bu
sines
s-re
late
d in
form
atio
n 1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
2. K
emam
puan
tekn
is
Tech
nica
l ser
vice
s
a)
Data
des
ain
men
ggun
akan
CA
D/CA
M/C
AM/C
AD d
ata
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
b)
Desa
in g
amba
r unt
u pe
ncet
akan
ata
u pe
war
naan
/des
ign
of m
old
and
die
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
c)
Desa
in g
amba
r pro
duk/
Desig
n of
pro
duct
s 1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
d)
Desa
in si
stem
pro
duks
i/Des
ign
of p
rodu
ctio
n sy
stem
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
3. P
engu
jian
Test
ing
serv
ices (
stre
ngth
, per
form
ance
, dur
abili
ty)
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
4. P
enin
gkat
an p
rodu
ktiv
itas
Prod
uctiv
ity im
prov
emen
t ser
vice
s (Ka
izen,
5R
/5K/
3R/3
K, Q
C, IS
O)
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
245
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
V. P
ENGE
MBA
NGA
N D
AN S
UM
BER
DAYA
MAN
USI
A SE
CTIO
N V
I HU
MAN
RES
OU
RCE
& D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
1.
Apak
ah p
erus
ahaa
n in
i mem
iliki
insin
yur y
ang
mem
iliki
tuga
s uta
ma
sepe
rti b
erik
ut?
Jika”
Ya”
, ber
apa
bany
ak in
sinyu
r unt
uk
mas
ing-
mas
ing
posis
i ter
sebu
t? (s
ebut
kan
jum
lahn
ya)
Does
you
r com
pany
has
eng
inee
r who
is m
ainl
y in
char
ge o
f wor
k su
ch
as li
sted
? Ho
w m
any
engi
neer
s for
eac
h po
sitio
n?(s
pecif
y in
bra
cket
) If
one
pers
on e
ngag
es in
mul
tiple
task
s, fo
r exa
mpl
e, b
oth
tech
nica
l de
sign
and
mol
d an
d jig
des
ign,
ple
ase
repo
rt y
es to
bot
h 2
and
3 an
d re
port
1 p
erso
n fo
r bot
h 2
and
3.
N
o.
Insin
yur d
i bid
ang/
engi
neer
s in
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
Jik
a Ya
, se
butk
an
jum
lah
1 Pe
nelit
ian
dan
peng
emba
ngan
/ R&
D
2
Desa
in te
knis/
Tec
hnica
l Des
ign
3 De
sain
ben
tuk
dan
pola
/ Mol
d an
d Jig
De
sign
4 De
sain
pro
duks
i/ Pr
oduc
tion
desig
n
5
Kend
ali p
rodu
ksi P
rodu
ctio
n co
ntro
l
Jeni
s inf
orm
asi /
jasa
In
form
atio
n/se
rvice
s
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
****
Dom
estik
In
done
sian-
man
aged
inst
itutio
n **
***
Mili
k As
ing
(PM
A)
Fore
ign-
man
aged
inst
itutio
n
Prov
insi
yang
sam
a Sa
me
prov
ince
Prov
insi
yang
be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
pul
au y
ang
sam
a O
utsid
e th
e pr
ov. b
ut in
the
sam
e isl
and
Di p
ulau
yan
g be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
Indo
nesia
O
utsid
e th
e isl
and
but i
n In
done
sia
Prov
insi
yang
sam
a Sa
me
prov
ince
Prov
insi
yang
be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
pul
au y
ang
sam
a O
utsid
e th
e pr
ov. b
ut in
the
sam
e isl
and
Di p
ulau
yan
g be
rbed
a te
tapi
di
Indo
nesia
O
utsid
e th
e isl
and
but i
n In
done
sia
Luar
neg
eri
Abra
od
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1.
Info
rmas
i bisn
is Bu
sines
s-re
late
d in
form
atio
n 1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
2. K
emam
puan
tekn
is
Tech
nica
l ser
vice
s
a)
Data
des
ain
men
ggun
akan
CA
D/CA
M/C
AM/C
AD d
ata
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
b)
Desa
in g
amba
r unt
u pe
ncet
akan
ata
u pe
war
naan
/des
ign
of m
old
and
die
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
c)
Desa
in g
amba
r pro
duk/
Desig
n of
pro
duct
s 1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
d)
Desa
in si
stem
pro
duks
i/Des
ign
of p
rodu
ctio
n sy
stem
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
↓
3. P
engu
jian
Test
ing
serv
ices (
stre
ngth
, per
form
ance
, dur
abili
ty)
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
4. P
enin
gkat
an p
rodu
ktiv
itas
Prod
uctiv
ity im
prov
emen
t ser
vice
s (Ka
izen,
5R
/5K/
3R/3
K, Q
C, IS
O)
1.Ya
/Yes
0.Ti
dak/
No ↓
246
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
2.
Ap
akah
per
usah
aan
ini m
engi
rimka
n ah
li/te
knisi
unt
uk m
empe
laja
ri ke
ahlia
n ya
ng d
isebu
tkan
di b
awah
ini k
e pe
rusa
haan
reka
nan
Anda
(p
elan
ggan
, pem
asok
, dll.
)? D
oes y
our c
ompa
ny se
nd y
our
expe
rt/e
ngin
eer a
s tra
inee
to le
arn
liste
d ex
pert
ise to
you
r par
tner
co
mpa
ny (c
usto
mer
, sup
plie
r, et
c.)?
N
o.
Ahli
di b
idan
g/Ex
pert
in
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1
Pene
litia
n da
n pe
ngem
bang
an/ R
&D
2
Desa
in te
knis/
Tec
hnica
l Des
ign
3
Pros
es p
rodu
ksi,
kend
ali m
utu/
Pro
duct
ion
Proc
ess,
QC
3.
Ap
akah
per
usah
aan
ini m
engi
rimka
n ah
li/te
knisi
unt
uk m
empe
laja
ri ke
ahlia
n te
rten
tu k
e le
mba
ga/t
empa
t ber
ikut
? Do
es y
our c
ompa
ny se
nd y
our e
xper
t/en
gine
er a
s tra
inee
to le
arn
the
expe
rtise
to o
ther
ent
ities
such
as l
isted
? N
o.
Inst
itusi
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k/No
1
Uni
vers
itas/
Uni
vers
ity
2
Lem
baga
pel
atih
an p
emer
inta
h/
Gove
rnm
ent-o
wne
d tr
aini
ng in
stitu
tions
3 Le
mba
ga p
elat
ihan
swas
ta/ P
rivat
e tr
aini
ng
inst
itute
4 Fa
silita
s pel
atih
an la
inny
a/ o
ther
trai
ning
fa
cility
BLO
K VI
INO
VASI
DAN
MAN
AJEM
EN
SECT
ION
VI I
nnov
atio
n an
d M
anag
emen
t 1.
Ap
akah
per
usah
aan
ini m
elak
ukan
inov
asi p
rodu
k da
lam
3
tahu
n te
rakh
ir?
Inov
asi p
rodu
k m
erup
akan
pen
gena
lan
prod
uk(b
aran
g/ja
sa)
yang
bar
u at
au te
lah
men
gala
mi p
erub
ahan
per
baik
an y
ang
signi
fikan
pad
a ka
rakt
er (s
pesif
ikas
i tek
nis,
kom
pone
n, b
ahan
, ba
han,
softw
are,
kem
udah
an p
engg
unaa
n ba
gi p
engg
una)
dan
fu
ngsi
kara
kter
istik
lain
nya)
.
Have
you
cond
ucte
d an
y pr
oduc
t inn
ovat
ion
in th
e la
st 3
yea
rs?
A pr
oduc
t inn
ovat
ion
is th
e in
trod
uctio
n of
a g
ood
or se
rvice
th
at is
new
or s
igni
fican
tly im
prov
ed w
ith re
spec
t to
its
char
acte
ristic
s or i
nten
ded
uses
. Thi
s inc
lude
s sig
nific
ant
impr
ovem
ents
in te
chni
cal s
pecif
icatio
ns, c
ompo
nent
s and
m
ater
ials,
inco
rpor
ated
softw
are,
use
r frie
ndlin
ess o
r oth
er
func
tiona
l cha
ract
erist
ics. (
OEC
D, O
slo M
anua
l, 3r
d ed
ition
) 1.
Ya
/Yes
0.
Ti
dak
/No
2.
Apak
ah p
erus
ahaa
n in
i mel
akuk
an k
erja
sam
a ko
labo
rasi
atau
be
laja
r dar
i per
usah
aan
atau
inst
itusi
lain
unt
uk in
ovas
i pro
duk
pada
tahu
n 20
16 ?
Di
d yo
u en
gage
in co
llabo
ratio
n w
ith o
r lea
rnin
g fr
om o
ther
co
mpa
nies
and
inst
itutio
ns fo
r pro
duct
inno
vatio
n in
201
6?
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k /N
o, la
njut
ke
No.
5
247
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
3.
Jik
a “Y
a”, a
paka
h pe
rusa
haan
ini b
eker
ja sa
ma
deng
an
peru
saha
an m
ilik
dala
m n
eger
i ata
u in
stitu
si ya
ng d
iman
ajer
i da
lam
neg
eri?
If
yes,
with
loca
lly-o
wne
d co
mpa
nies
or l
ocal
ly-m
anag
ed
inst
itutio
ns?
1.
Ya
/Yes
0.
Ti
dak
/No
4.
Jika
“Ya”
, apa
kah
beke
rja sa
ma
deng
an p
erus
ahaa
n m
ilik
asin
g at
au in
stitu
si ya
ng d
iman
ajer
i ole
h in
stitu
si as
ing?
If
yes,
with
fore
ign-
owne
d co
mpa
nies
or f
orei
gn-m
anag
ed
inst
itutio
ns?
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k /N
o
5.
Apak
ah A
nda
mel
akuk
an in
ovas
i pro
ses p
ada
tahu
n 20
16 la
lu?
Seb
uah
inov
asi p
rose
s ad
alah
impl
emen
tasi
met
ode
prod
uksi
yan
g ba
ru
atau
per
baik
an m
etod
e pr
oduk
si y
ang
sign
ifika
n. T
erm
asuk
di
anta
rany
a ad
alah
per
ubah
an tek
nik,
per
alat
an, d
an/a
tau
soft
war
e ya
ng
sign
ifika
n Co
nduc
ted
any
proc
ess i
nnov
atio
n du
ring
the
perio
d of
201
6? A
pr
oces
s inn
ovat
ion
is th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of a
new
or
signi
fican
tly im
prov
ed p
rodu
ctio
n or
del
iver
y m
etho
d. T
his
inclu
des s
igni
fican
t cha
nges
in te
chni
ques
, equ
ipm
ent a
nd/o
r so
ftwar
e. (O
ECD,
Oslo
Man
ual,
3rd
editi
on)
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k /N
o
6.
Apak
ah p
erus
ahaa
n in
i mel
akuk
an k
erja
sam
a ko
labo
rasi
atau
be
laja
r dar
i per
usah
aan
atau
inst
itusi
lain
unt
uk in
ovas
i pro
ses
pada
tahu
n 20
16 ?
Di
d yo
u en
gage
in co
llabo
ratio
n w
ith o
r lea
rnin
g fr
om o
ther
co
mpa
nies
and
inst
itutio
ns fo
r pro
cess
inno
vatio
n in
201
6?
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k /N
o, la
njut
ke
No.
5
7.
Jika
“Ya”
, apa
kah
peru
saha
an in
i bek
erja
sam
a de
ngan
pe
rusa
haan
mili
k da
lam
neg
eri a
tau
inst
itusi
yang
dim
anaj
eri
dala
m n
eger
i?
If ye
s, w
ith lo
cally
-ow
ned
com
pani
es o
r loc
ally
-man
aged
in
stitu
tions
?
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k /N
o 8.
Jik
a “Y
a”, a
paka
h be
kerja
sam
a de
ngan
per
usah
aan
mili
k as
ing
atau
inst
itusi
yang
dim
anaj
eri o
leh
inst
itusi
asin
g?
If ye
s, w
ith fo
reig
n-ow
ned
com
pani
es o
r for
eign
-man
aged
in
stitu
tions
? 1.
Ya
/Yes
0.
Ti
dak
/No
9.
Apak
ah p
erus
ahaa
n An
da m
emili
ki ta
rget
pro
duks
i?
Did
you
have
pro
duct
ion
targ
et?
1.
Ya/ Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
10. A
paka
h ta
rget
dan
pen
capa
ian
prod
uksi
dipa
jang
di l
ingk
unga
n ke
rja se
lam
a ta
hun
2016
?
Wer
e th
ere
disp
lay
boar
ds in
pla
nt th
at sh
ow ta
rget
or
achi
eved
pro
duct
ion
piec
es in
201
6?
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.
Tida
k /N
o
11. S
eber
apa
serin
g pe
rusa
haan
And
a m
elac
ak/m
emer
iksa
setia
p pr
oduk
si pa
da ta
hun
2016
?
How
freq
uent
ly d
id y
ou k
eep
trac
k of
the
volu
me
of p
rodu
ctio
n pi
eces
in 2
016?
1.
Ya
, set
iap
hari/
Yes,
daily
248
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
2.
Ya, s
etia
p m
ingg
u/Ye
s, ev
ery
wee
k 3.
Ya
, 2 m
ingg
uan/
Yes,
once
in tw
o w
eek
4.
Ya, b
ulan
an/Y
es, M
onth
ly
5.
Ya, t
riwul
anan
/cat
urw
ulan
/sem
este
ran
/ qu
arte
rly/f
our-m
pnth
ly/ s
emes
ter
6.
Ya, t
idak
tent
u/Ye
s, Irr
egul
ar
7.
Tida
k pe
rnah
/Nev
er
12
. Sia
pa y
ang
mem
iliki
aks
es d
ata
prod
uksi
min
ggua
n di
pe
rusa
haan
And
a un
tuk
tahu
n 20
16?
Who
got
to se
e th
e pr
oduc
tion
data
on
a w
eekl
y ba
sis in
201
6?
No.
Ja
bata
n/Po
sitio
n 1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak/
No
1 Di
rekt
ur/B
oard
of D
irect
ors
2
Man
ajer
/Man
ager
3 Su
perv
isor
4
Staf
/kar
yaw
an/s
taff
13
. Apa
kah
peru
saha
an in
i mem
berik
an p
enila
ian
kine
rja te
rhad
ap
peke
rja?
Did
you
asse
ss w
orke
rs’ p
erfo
rman
ce in
201
6?
1.Ya
/Yes
0.
Tida
k /N
o, la
njut
ke
No.1
3
14. S
eber
apa
serin
g pe
rusa
haan
ini m
elak
ukan
pen
ilaia
n pe
rfor
ma
di ta
hun
2016
? an
d if
so in
wha
t fre
quen
cy in
201
6?
1.
Ya, t
iap
bula
n/Ye
s mon
thly
2.
Ya
, triw
ulan
an/Y
es, q
uart
erly
3.
Ya
, tia
p se
mes
ter/
Yes,
ever
y se
mes
ter
4.
Ya, t
iap
tahu
n/Ye
s. ye
arly
15. A
paka
h pe
rusa
haan
ini m
embe
rikan
bon
us a
tau
prom
osi a
tas
penc
apai
an ta
rget
ters
ebut
? if
so d
o yo
u gi
ve b
onus
or p
rom
otio
ns in
201
6?
1.
Ya/ Y
es
0.
Tida
k/No
16. A
paka
h ba
han
baku
ya
ng d
igun
akan
unt
uk p
rodu
ksi d
iper
iksa
ku
alita
snya
sebe
lum
dig
unak
an d
i tah
un 2
016?
W
as th
e m
ater
ial u
sed
for p
rodu
ctio
n ch
ecke
d fo
r its
qua
lity
befo
re u
sed
in 2
016?
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak
/No
17. A
paka
h pe
rusa
haan
ini m
elak
ukan
pen
cata
tan
terh
adap
bar
ang
caca
t/ru
sak
pada
tahu
n 20
16?
Di
d yo
u re
cord
def
ects
in 2
016?
1.
Ya/Y
es
0.Ti
dak
/No
18. A
paka
h pe
rusa
haan
ini m
empu
nyai
ISO
pad
a ta
hun
2016
? Ji
ka
“Ya”
, kap
an IS
O te
rseb
ut d
iper
oleh
?Di
d yo
ur fi
rm h
ave
ISO
in
2016
? If
so, w
hen
did
your
firm
obt
ain
it?
1. Y
a, ta
hun
pert
ama
kali
men
dapa
tkan
ISO
: ……
……
…../
Yes
0. T
idak
/No
No
Jeni
s ISO
/ Typ
e of
ISO
Ta
hun
/ Yea
r of
obta
inin
g
249
Le
mba
ga P
enye
lidik
an E
kono
mi d
an M
asya
raka
t Fa
kulta
s Ek
onom
i Uni
vers
itas
Indo
nesi
a
BLO
K VI
I KIN
ERJA
KEU
ANGA
N /
SE
CTIO
N V
II. F
INAN
CIAL
PER
FORM
ANCE
Sebu
tkan
kon
disi
lapo
ran
keua
ngan
dal
am ti
ga ta
hun
tera
khir
!
Plea
se in
put f
igur
es a
bout
the
finan
cial s
tate
men
t of 2
016,
201
5 an
d 20
14
20
16
2015
20
14
1 O
mse
t tah
unan
Annu
al sa
les
Rp...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
Rp
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
...
Rp...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
2 La
ba b
ruto
(% d
ari o
mse
t)
Gros
s pro
fit
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
...%
...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
%
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
...%
3 Ek
spor
(% d
ari o
mse
t)
Expo
rts
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.. %
. ...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
%
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
...%
NO
TES
OF
ENU
MER
ATO
R
250
13.3.4. Questionnaire of Tegal Survey
251
ID Kuisioner:
R A H A S I A
1.
BLOK I : BUSINESS LOCATION/KETERANGAN TEMPAT
(1) (2) (3)
1.Provinsi/ Province ........................................................................…………………………………..
2. Kabupaten/Kota*) Regency/City ........................................................................…………………………………..
3. Kecamatan/District ........................................................................…………………………………..
4. Desa/Kelurahan*)/ Administrative Village
........................................................................…………………………………..
5. Titik Koordinat GPS/ GPS Coordinate (longitude dan latitude)/(longitude and latitude)
*) Coret yang tidak sesuai/Delete where not applicable
SURVEI RANTAI PASOKAN DAN JARINGAN USAHA PADA INDUSTRI PENGOLAHAN BERBASIS LOGAM DI KABUPATEN TEGAL
Keberadaan rantai pasokan yang berkelanjutan dan jaringan usaha yang kuat merupakan faktor yang penting bagi perkembangan dan daya saing industri pengolahan dewasa ini. Survei rantai pasokan dan jaringan usaha ini dilakukan oleh Lembaga Penyelidikan Ekonomi dan Masyarakat, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia (LPEM FEBUI). Survei ini bertujuan untuk melihat bagaimana rantai pasokan dan jaringan usaha dapat menularkan informasi, pengetahuan, keterampilan, teknologi dan inovasi yang pada gilirannya dapat meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan pengolahan logam di wilayah Kabupaten Tegal. Semua informasi dan data yang diperoleh dari survei ini bersifat RAHASIA dan tidak akan dipublikasikan kecuali untuk kepentingan survei dan menghasilkan informasi yang teragregasi.
252
BLOK II: KETERANGAN PEMILIK/ INFORMATION ON OWNERS (1) (2) (3)
1. Nama pemilik/ Name of the owners
...........................................................................................................................
2. Jabatan dalam perusahaan/ Position in the company
...............................................................
3. Jenis kelamin pemilik/ Owner’s gender Laki-laki/ Male
Perempuan/ Female
- 1 - 0
4. Umur pemilik/ Owner’sAge (bulatkan ke bawah) . .................................................................................. Tahun/ Years
5. Pendidikan tertinggi yang ditamatkan pemilik Owners’ educational attainment
Tidak Tamat SD/ Did not finish elementary school - 1
SD dan Sederajat/ Elementary school - 2
SLTP dan Sederajat/ Junior high school - 3
SLTA dan Sederajat/ Highschool -4
SMK/ Vocational school - 5 Diploma I / II - 6 Akademi / DIII - 7 Sarjana S1/DIV/ Bachelor
degree - 8
Pascasarjana S2/S3/ Postgraduate -9
253
BLOK III : KETERANGAN PERUSAHAAN / USAHA (INFORMATION ON COMPANY/BUSINESS)
(1) (2) (3)
1. Nama Perusahaan/Usaha Name of the company/business
……………………………………………………………………
1. Alamat Perusahaan/Usaha Address of the company/business
……………………………………………………..
(Tuliskan nama jalan, gang atau keterangan yang sejenis dan lengkapi dengan RT/RW atau dusun)
.......................................................................
.......................................................................
2. Nomor Telepon/Faksimili Phone number/fax
T:......................................................................... F:.........................................................................
3. e-mail/homepage
E:........................................................................ H:........................................................................
4. Type of industry/Jenis usaha yang dimiliki
Kode 5 digit KBLI
5. Apakah perusahaan ini memiliki badan hukum? Does this company possess a legal form?
Ya/Yes -1 Tidak/No -0
6. Apakah perusahaan ini dimiliki oleh perorangan/sendiri? Is this company owned privately/individually?
Ya/Yes -1 Tidak/No -0
7. Bentuk badan usaha/ badan hukum
Type of business/ legal form
CV/Persekutuan Komanditer/Limited partnership -1
Koperasi/ Co-operative - 2 Firma (FA)/ General Partnership - 3
UD-Usaha Dagang/Sole proprietorship -4 Perseroan Terbatas (PT)/ - 5 Limited liability company
Lainnya /Others ............................ - 6
254
8. Tahun mulai berproduksi secara komersial Starting year for commercial production
........................................................................................
9. Tahun pertama terdaftar sebagai perusahaan Year of the company being registered formally
........................................................................................
10. Jenis izin yang dimiliki Type of permit owned
a. Surat Ijin Usaha Perdagangan (SIUP) b. Ijin Gangguan (HO) c. Surat Keterangan Usaha (SKU) d. Tanda Daftar Perusahaan (TDP) e. Tanda Daftar Industri (TDI) f. Lainnya/Others…………………………..
11. Apakah pernah menerima dana dari perusahaan asing? Have you received fund from foreign company?
Ya/Yes – 1, berupa/in form Tidak/No-0 a) Modal/Capital b) Down payment c) Pinjaman/Loans d) Lainnya/others…………………………..
12. Apabila No. 12 jawabannya ya, pada tahun berapa dana tersebut diterima terakhir kali? If the answer for No. 12 is yes, identify the latest year was the fund received.
13. Jenis sumber modal : Type of Source of capital:
a. Perorangan (Modal sendiri)/ Own capital ................. %
b. Koperasi/ Co-operative ................. %
c. Lembaga Keuangan Bukan Bank/
Non-bank financial institution ................ %
d. Modal ventura/ Venture capital ................ %
e. Mitra Kerja/ Business partner …............. %
f. Bank KUR (government-backed) ............... %
Domestik/Local Asing/Foreign
1 0 0
1 0 0
255
BLOK IV: KETERANGAN PEKERJA DAN BALAS JASA/ INFORMATION ON EMPLOYEES AND WAGE
Banyaknya pekerja untuk kegiatan tahun 2014 dan 2016: The number of workers for business activities in 2014 and 2016
Uraian Description
Satuan Unit 2014 2016
a.1 Banyaknya pekerja dengan pendikan di bawah SMA/SMK Number of workers with education lower than senior high school
Person
a.2. Banyaknya pekerja yang tamat SMA Number of workers with general high school education
Person
a.3. Banyaknya pekerja yang tamat SMK Number of workers with technical high school education
Person
a.4. Banyaknya pekerja yang tamat universitas/politeknik Number of workers with tertiary education
Person
b. Rata-rata gaji pekerja per hari The average of daily wage per worker
Rp/day
BLOK V : MANAJEMEN/MANAGEMENT
1. Bagaimana metode yang digunakan untuk pembukuan dan pencatatan di dalam perusahaan? Bookkeeping and record keeping method Tidak menggunakan pembukuan/ Not using bookkeeping - 0 Bentuk tulisan/Manual - 1 Diproses dengan komputer/Computerized - 2
2. Bagaimana dengan susunan/struktur organisasi dan pembagian tugas? Apakah ada personel khusus untuk pembukuan/pencatatan?
Organization chart/structure and task division, Is there any dedicated personnel for bookkeeping/record keeping?
Ya/Yes - 1 Tidak/No - 0
256
3. Seberapa sering perusahaan mengecek volume unit produksi pada tahun:
How frequently did you keep track of the volume of production pieces in :
a. 2014 ?
0. Tidak ada pengecekan/No checking
1. Tidak tentu/Irregular
2. Setiap triwulan/ Quarterly
3. Setiap bulan/Monthly
4. Setiap minggu/Weekly
5. Setiap hari/Daily
b. 2016 ?
0. Tidak ada pengecekan/No checking
1. Tidak tentu/Irregular
2. Setiap triwulan/ Quarterly
3. Setiap bulan/Monthly
4. Setiap minggu/Weekly
5. Setiap hari/Daily
4. Apakah terdapat papan pengumuman di tempat kerja/pabrik yang menunjukkan target, unit produksi yang dicapai/informsi terkait pekerja pada tahun:
Were there display boards in plant that show target or
/achieved production pieces/any information regarding the employee performance in :
a. 2014? –Ya/Yes -1
Tidak/No – 0
b. 2016? –Ya/Yes -1
Tidak/No – 0
5. Siapa yang dapat melihat data produksi dalam basis regular di tahun:
Who got to see the production data on a regular basis in :
a. 2014?
Jabatan/Position Tidak/No = 0, Ya/Yes = 1
Pemilik/Owner
Manajer/Manager
Supervisor
Pekerja/Employee
b. 2016?
Jabatan/Position Tidak/No = 0, Ya/Yes = 1
Pemilik/Owner
Manajer/Manager
Supervisor
Pekerja/Employee
6. Apakah Anda menilai performa pekerja di tahun:
Did you assess workers’ performance in :
a.1. 2014
Tidak/No – 0
Ya, tapi tidak selalu/Yes, but not always –1
Ya/Yes – 2
a.2. Dan apabila melakukan penilaian, seberapa sering:
And if so in what frequency .
1. Tidak tentu/Irregular
2. Tahunan/Yearly
3. Setiap triwulan/ Quarterly
4. Setiap bulan/Monthly
5. Setiap minggu/Weekly
6. Setiap hari/Daily
257
b.1. 2016 Tidak/No – 0 Ya, tapi tidak selalu/Yes, but not always –1
Ya/Yes – 2 b.2. Dan apabila melakukan penilaian, seberapa sering: And if so in what frequency:
1. Tidak tentu/Irregular 2. Tahunan/Yearly 3. Setiap triwulan/ Quarterly 4. Setiap bulan/Monthly 5. Setiap minggu/Weekly
6. Setiap hari/Daily
7. a. Apakah Anda memiliki target produksi
Did you have any production target a.1. 2014 Tidak/No – 0; Ya/Yes – 1 a.2. 2016 Tidak/No – 0; Ya/Yes – 1
b.Bila Ya, apakah ada bonus/promosi berdasarkan pencapaian target? Do you give bonus or promotions based on the target achievement? : b.1. 2014?
1. Memiliki target dan memberikan bonus/promosi/ Have target and give bonus or promotion
2. Memiliki target tapi tidak memberikan bonus/promosi Have target but do not give bonus or promotion
b.2. 2016? 1. Memiliki target dan memberikan bonus/promosi/
Have target and give bonus or promotion 2. Memiliki target tapi tidak memberikan bonus/promosi
Have target but do not give bonus or promotion
8. Apakah Anda mencatat produksi yang cacat di tahun: Did you record defects in :
a.. 2014? Tidak/No – 0 Ya, tapi tidak selalu/Yes, but not always –1 Ya/Yes – 2 b. 2016 ? Tidak/No – 0 Ya, tapi tidak selalu/Yes, but not always –1 Ya/Yes – 2
9. Apakah Anda mengadakan pertemuan dengan pekerja tentang barang produksi yang cacat dan apabila demikian, seberapa sering di tahun:
Did you have meetings with workers on defects, and if so in what frequency in :
a.1. 2014? Tidak/No – 0 Ya/Yes -1 a.2. Harian/Daily – 1
Mingguan/Weekly – 2 Bulanan/ Monthly – 3 Tidak tentu/Irregular - 4
b.1. 2016? Tidak/No – 0 Ya/Yes -1 b.2. Harian/Daily – 1
Mingguan/Weekly – 2 Bulanan/ Monthly – 3 Tidak tentu/Irregular - 4
10. Apakah bahan yang digunakan untuk produksi dicek
kualitasnya sebelum digunakan, pada tahun: Was the material used for production checked for its quality before used in : a. 2014? Tidak/No – 0
Ya/Yes – 1 Ya, tapi tidak selalu/ Yes, but not always –2
b. 2016? Tidak/No – 0 Ya/Yes – 1
258
BLOK VI : PENGEMBANGAN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA / HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
1. Apakah pemilik/pekerja mengikuti pelatihan atau workshop untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pada tahun 2016? Any participation of owner/workers in training and workshop to improve skills in 2016?
Ya/Yes - 1 Tidak/No - 0
2. Apakah ada pelatihan dan workshop internal untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pemilik/pekerja pada tahun 2016? Any internal training and workshop to improve skills in 2016?
Ya/Yes - 1 Tidak/No - 0
3. Apakah perusahaan mengirim pemilik/pekerja ke pelatihan dan workshop eksternal untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pekerja pada tahun 2016?
Send your owner/workers to external training and workshop to improve skills in 2016?
Ya/Yes - 1 Tidak/No - 0
4. Apabila melakukan pelatihan eksternal, sebutkan jenis
bimbingan/pelatihan/penyuluhan eksternal yang pernah diikuti selama setahun lalu. Sebutkan 3 penyelenggara eksternal yang utama selama setahun lalu. If the answer in question was yes, name 3 main providers!
Jenis/ Type
Penyelenggara/ Institution
Lokasi/ Location
Nama Penyelenggara/
Name of Institution
Note:
Jenis : 1. Managerial & Administrasi 2. Keterampilan (skill)/teknis produksi 3. Pemasaran/marketing 4. Lainnya/others (……………….) Penyelenggara: 1. Instansi pemerintah/government agencies 2. Perusahaan swasta/private agencies 3. Yayasan/LSM/NGOs 4. Lainnya/others (………………….) Lokasi : 1. Kecamatan yang sama/same district 2. Kabupaten yang sama/same regency 3. Provinsi yang sama/same province 4. Pulau yang sama/same island 5. Pulau lain/other island 6. Luar negeri/abroad
259
BLOK VII : INOVASI/INNOVATION
(1) (2)
1. Apakah perusahaan mengadakan inovasi produk di tahun 2016? Inovasi produk
merupakan pengenalan produk atau layanan yang baru atau ditingkatkan secara signifikan dari karakteristik produk/layanan tersebut atau tujuan penggunaannya. Hal ini perubahan signifikan dalam spesifikasi teknis, komponen dan material, perangkat lunak yang digunakan, kemudahan operasional untuk pengguna atau karakteristik fungsional lainnya, atau membuat produk baru berdasarkan pesanan. Conducted any product innovation? A product innovation is the introduction of a good or service that is new or significantly improved with respect to its characteristics or intended uses. This includes significant improvements in technical specifications, components and materials, incorporated software, user friendliness or other functional characteristics, or whether they can fulfill new design based on the orders.
Ya/Yes - 1 Tidak/No - 0
2. Apakah perusahaan berkolaborasi dengan atau belajar dari perusahaan lainnya untuk inovasi produk di tahun 2016? Engaged in collaboration with or learning from other companies for product innovation in 2016?
Ya/Yes - 1 Tidak/No - 0 If yes, go to question 3
If no, go to question 4
3. Jumlah perusahaan lainnya yang berkolaborasi dengan perusahaan ini dalam inovasi produk? The number of other companies that collaborated with this company in product innovation.
Nama Perusahaan/Name of company Same
Village Same
District Same
Regency Same
Province Same Island
Different province
Abroad
260
4. Berapa banyak tipe produk yang mulai diproduksi pada tahun 2016 dibandingkan dengan tahun 2015? Produk baru di sini adalah desain baru atau material baru. How many new types of products did you start to produce in 2016 compared to 2015? New products include new design or new materials.
Local Fo
5. Apakah perusahaan melakukan inovasi proses dalam periode 2016? Inovasi proses adalah penerapan dari metode produksi atau pengiriman yang baru atau telah diperbaharui secara signifikan . Hal ini termasuk teknik, peralatan dan/atau perangkat lunak. Conducted any process innovation during the period of 2016? A process innovation is the implementation of a new or significantly improved production or delivery method. This includes significant changes in techniques, equipment and/or software. Ya/Yes - 1 Tidak/No - 0
Local Fo
6. Apakah perusahaan terlibat dalam kolaborasi atau proses belajar dengan perusahaan lainnya untuk inovasi proses di tahun 2016? Engaged in collaboration with or learning from other companies for process innovation in 2016? Ya/Yes - 1 Tidak/No - 0 If yes, go to question 7
If no, go to question 8
7. Jumlah perusahaan lainnya yang berkolaborasi dengan perusahaan ini dalam inovasi proses? The number of other companies that collaborated with this company in process innovation.
Nama Perusahaan/Name of company Same
Village Same
District Same
Regency Same
Province Same Island
Different province
Foreign
261
BLOK VIII : PENJUALAN/SALES
1. Apakah perusahaan mengeksport barang ke pembeli asing atau perusahaan asing? Do you export to foreign buyers or to the foreign companies?
Ya/Yes -1 Tidak/No -0 Apabila ya, apakah melakukan proses eksport sendiri atau melalui perusahan perantara? —if yes, do you do it directly or to local traders (including local based-foreign company)? Ya/Yes -1 Tidak/No -0
2. Total penjualan di tahun: Total sales in :
2016 2014
1. % eksport/export ............... % …………..% 2. % non-eksport/non-export ................ % …………..% Dari eksport yang dilakukan, presentase untuk/export composition: 1 . Eksport langsung/Direct export ………….% …………. % 2. Eksport lewat perusahan perantara/ Export through Intermediary Company …………. %
%
3. 5 produk dengan penjualan tertinggi di tahun 2016
Top 5 products in sold in 2016
6 digit HS2012
Nama Produk/ Name of product Kode HS % of Sales % ekspor langsung /
Direct ekspor % eksport idak
langsung/ Indirect export %
Using Imported supply ? Yes/no
262
BLOK IX : BIAYA/COST
(1) (2)
1. Total pembelian mesin dan peralatan di tahun 2016 Total value of purchases of machineries and equipment in 2016
2. Total pembelian untuk material, dan komponen selama periode 2016
Total value of purchases of materials, parts and components during the period of 2016
3. Presentase dari pemasok domestik terhadap total nilai pembelian material di tahun 2016 Share of domestic suppliers in total purchase value of materials in 2016 (%)
4. Presentase dari pemasok asing (importer) terhadap total
nilai pembelian material di tahun 2016 Share of foreign suppliers (importers) in total purchase value of materials in 2016 (%)
Rp .................................................................. Rp ..................................................................
......................................................................%
......................................................................%
BLOK X : KEUANGAN/FINANCE
1. Apakah perusahaan memiliki rekening di bank pada
tahun 2016? Did you have an account in any bank in 2016? Ya/Yes - 1 Tidak/No - 0
2. Apakah Anda mengajukan pinjaman di lembaga
keuangan bank atau non-bank di tahun 2016? Did you apply for any loans at any banks or non-bank financial institutions in 2016? Ya/Yes - 1 Tidak/No - 0
263
3. Apakah Anda mendapatkan pinjaman dari lembaga
keuangan bank atau non-bank di tahun 2016? Did you get loans from any banks or non-bank financial institutions in 2016? Ya/Yes - 1 Tidak/No - 0
4. Apakah Anda mendapatkan pinjaman dari pemerintah (KUR)? Did you get a government loan (KUR)? Yes- 1 No-0 Don’t know- 2
5. Berapakah jumlah yang didapat? If yes, what amount? …………….. Apakah jumlah tersebut sesuai dengan angka pinjaman yang diajukan? Was the loan amount granted equal to your initial proposal? Ya/Yes - 1 Tidak/No - 0
264
BLOK XI : PERTUKARAN INFORMASI/INFORMATION SHARING 1. Jaringan saat ini yang berada dalam satu desa (Current Insider, currently active network within the village)
ID Name Hubungan keluarga/
Family-Relatives Yes/No
Bagaimana anda saling mengenal?
How did you meet?*
Did you already exchange
information in 2014?
1 2
3
4
5
(*)Note:
2. Kontak personal/Personal contact 3. InisiatifContact from them first 4. Website/Media 5. Other companies introduction 6. Business meetings/exhibitiion 7. Government agencies introduction 8. Village community 9. Business association
2. Jaringan lama yang berada dalam satu desa ( telah berhubungan sebelum tahun 2016, sekarang sudah tidak
berhubungan) Old Insider (Network since years before 2016 within the village, but currently inactive)
ID Name Hubungan keluarga/
Family-Relatives Yes/No
Bagaimana anda saling mengenal?
How did you meet?* 1
2
3
4
5
(*)Note:
1. Kontak personal/Personal contact 2. InisiatifContact from them first 3. Website/Media 4. Other companies introduction 5. Business meetings/exhibitiion 6. Government agencies introduction
265
7. Village community 8. Business association
3. Jaringan saat ini yang berada di luar desa (Current Outsider, currently active network outside the village)
ID Name Hubungan keluarga/
Family-Relatives Yes/No
Bagaimana anda saling mengenal?
How did you meet?*
Did you already exchange
information in 2014?
1 2
3
4
5
(*)Note:
1. Kontak personal/Personal contact 2. InisiatifContact from them first 3. Website/Media 4. Other companies introduction 5. Business meetings/exhibitiion 6. Government agencies introduction 7. Village community 8. Business association
4. Jaringan lama yang berada di luar desa ( telah berhubungan sebelum tahun 2016, sekarang sudah tidak berhubungan) Old Outsider (Network since years before 2016 outside the village, but currently inactive)
ID Name Hubungan keluarga/
Family-Relatives Yes/No
Bagaimana anda saling mengenal?
How did you meet?* 1
2
3
4
5
(*)Note:
1. Kontak personal/Personal contact 2. InisiatifContact from them first 3. Website/Media
266
4. Other companies introduction 5. Business meetings/exhibitiion 6. Government agencies introduction 7. Village community 8. Business association
267
BL
OK
XII :
R
ANTA
I PAS
OKAN
/SUP
PLY
CHAI
N
1. Tu
liska
n nam
a per
usah
an ya
ng m
enjad
i sum
ber p
asok
an un
tuk m
ateria
l, bag
ian, a
tau ko
mpon
en di
tahu
n 201
6 Fir
m na
me fr
om w
hich y
our f
irm bo
ught
mater
ials,
parts
, or c
ompo
nents
in 20
16
(S
ebutk
an 5
Peru
saha
an de
ngan
juml
ah pe
mbeli
an te
rban
yak/T
op 5
in ter
ms of
amou
nt of
purch
ase)
No
Nam
e of
Com
pany
Lo
kasi/
Loca
tion
Kepe
milik
an/O
wner
ship
(a
) Ju
mlah
kary
awan
(num
ber
of em
ploy
ees)
How
did
you
get t
o kn
ow ea
ch o
ther
(b)
Tech
nica
l se
rvice
s/ su
ppor
t re
ceive
d (c
)
Test
ing
serv
ices/
supp
ort
rece
ived
(d)
Prod
uctio
n se
rvice
s/ su
ppor
t re
ceive
d (e
)
1
2
3
4
5
Note:
a. Sa
me di
strict
/rege
ncy/p
rovin
ce/is
land/a
broa
d b.
Loca
l/fore
ign/do
n’t kn
ow
c. 10
0 or m
ore/l
ess t
han 1
00
d. Op
tions
Konta
k per
sona
l/Per
sona
l con
tact
Ini
siatifC
ontac
t from
them
first
Web
site/M
edia
Othe
r com
panie
s intr
oduc
tion
Busin
ess m
eetin
gs/ex
hibitii
on
Go
vern
ment
agen
cies i
ntrod
uctio
n
Vi
llage
comm
unity
Busin
ess a
ssoc
iation
268
e. Op
tions
:
AD
/CAM
data,
Desig
n of
draw
ing fo
r Mold
& D
ie,
De
sign o
f dra
wing
for p
rodu
cts,
Desig
n of p
rodu
ction
syste
m,
Ot
hers
(
),
None
f.
Optio
ns:
str
ength
test,
perfo
rman
ce te
st,
du
rabil
ity te
st,
oth
ers (
),
5.
None
g.
Optio
ns
KA
IZEN
,
5S,
QC
,
Othe
rs (
),
No
ne
2. Ju
mlah
pema
sok d
i Teg
al da
n lua
r Teg
al/Nu
mber
of su
pplie
rs in
Tega
l and
outsi
de T
egal
Ko
ta Te
gal d
an
Kab.
Tega
l Da
erah
lain
di Ind
ones
ia/Ot
her
regio
ns in
Indo
nesia
Lu
ar N
eger
i/For
eign c
ountr
ies
2014
2016
269
BL
OK
XIII :
P
EMBE
LI/B
UYER
S
1. Tu
liska
n nam
a per
usah
an ya
ng m
enjad
i pem
beli d
i tahu
n 201
6 Fir
m na
me fr
om w
hich y
ou so
ld yo
ur pr
oduc
t to in
2016
(Seb
utkan
5 Pe
rusa
haan
deng
an ju
mlah
penju
alan t
erba
nyak
/Top
5 in
terms
of am
ount
of sa
les)
No
Nam
e of
Com
pany
Lo
kasi/
Loca
tion
Kepe
milik
an/O
wner
ship
(a
) Ju
mlah
kary
awan
(num
ber
of em
ploy
ees)
How
did
you
get t
o kn
ow ea
ch o
ther
(b)
Tech
nica
l se
rvice
s/ su
ppor
t re
ceive
d (c
)
Test
ing
serv
ices/
supp
ort
rece
ived
(d)
Test
ing
serv
ices/
supp
ort
rece
ived
(e)
1
2
3
4
5
Note:
a. Sa
me di
strict
/rege
ncy/p
rovin
ce/is
land/a
broa
d b.
Loca
l/fore
ign/do
n’t kn
ow
c. 10
0 or m
ore/l
ess t
han 1
00
d. Op
tions
Konta
k per
sona
l/Per
sona
l con
tact
Ini
siatifC
ontac
t from
them
first
Web
site/M
edia
270
Ot
her c
ompa
nies i
ntrod
uctio
n
Bu
sines
s mee
tings
/exhib
itiion
Gove
rnme
nt ag
encie
s intr
oduc
tion
Villa
ge co
mmun
ity
Bu
sines
s ass
ociat
ion
e. Op
tions
:
AD/C
AM da
ta,
De
sign o
f dr
awing
for M
old &
Die,
Desig
n of d
rawi
ng fo
r pro
ducts
,
De
sign o
f pro
ducti
on sy
stem,
Othe
rs (
),
No
ne
f. Op
tions
:
stren
gth te
st,
pe
rform
ance
test,
dura
bility
test,
other
s (
),
5. No
ne
g. Op
tions
KAIZ
EN,
5S
,
QC,
Ot
hers
(
),
None
2.
Juml
ah pe
mbeli
di T
egal
dan l
uar T
egal/
Numb
er of
buye
rs in
Tega
l and
outsi
de T
egal
Ko
ta Te
gal d
an
Kab.
Tega
l Da
erah
lain
di Ind
ones
ia/Ot
her
regio
ns in
Indo
nesia
Lu
ar N
eger
i/For
eign c
ountr
ies
2014
2016
271
BLOK XIV : JARINGAN BISNIS/BUSINESS NETWORK
Berapa banyak keanggotaan yang Anda miliki untuk persatuan/serikat profesional, seperti kamar dagang dan industri serta asosiasi industri?
How many memberships did you hold for any professional union/association, such as chambers of commerce and industry and industry associations?
Kamar dagang Chamber of Commerce Asosiasi pengusaha Entrepreneurs Association Asosiasi bisnis-KUB. Business Association Lainnya/Others
272
BLOK XV : PREFERENSI MANAJER/MANAGER’S PREFERENCES
1. Berhubungan dengan pihak luar sangat bagus untuk memperoleh informasi
baru.
Connection/relationships with outsiders is a good way to access new
information.
1. Sangat setuju/ Strongly agree
2. Setuju/Agree
3. Tidak Setuju/Disagree
4. Sangat tidak setuju/ Strongly disagree
5. Tidak tahu/don’t Know
2. Perdagangan bebas baik untuk bisnis saya.
Free trade is good for my business.
1. Sangat setuju/ Strongly agree
2. Setuju/Agree
3. Tidak Setuju/Disagree
4. Sangat tidak setuju/ Strongly disagree
5. Tidak tahu/don’t Know
3. Secara umum, pemerintah harus membatasi kepemilikan asing dalam
273
BLOK XVI : KAPASITAS TEKNIS/TECHNICAL CAPACITY
Silahkan mengisi tabel di bawah ini. Please fill in the table below
No Mesin
Machineries
Berapa unit yang
bekerja yang
dimiliki Anda?
How many units in
operation do you
have
Apabila memiliki mesin tsb , mohon
dispesifikasikan tahun pembuatan mesin
yang dapat digunakan yang terbaru
If you have one, please specify the year of
the latest model among units in operation
Apakah mesin
diimpor?
Is this machine
imported
Yes/No
Jika diimpor,
dari negara
mana? If
imported, from
which country?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
No Pengujian yang dilakukan/
Testing conducted
Di mana pengujian
dilakukan? Where
did the test take
place?
(in house/ local
regency/ buyers’
place/ suppliers’
place)
Frekuensi pengujian/ Testing frequency
(irregular/annual/quarterly
/monthly/weekly/daily)
Apakah
menggunakan
peralatan impor
atau jasa asing?
Did you use
imported
machinery/services
for the test?
Yes/No
Jika ya, dari
negara mana? If
yes, from which
country?
1
2
3
4
274
No Pengujian yang dilakukan/
Testing conducted
Di mana pengujian
dilakukan? Where
did the test take
place?
(in house/ local
regency/ buyers’
place/ suppliers’
place)
Frekuensi pengujian/ Testing frequency
(irregular/annual/quarterly
/monthly/weekly/daily)
Apakah
menggunakan
peralatan impor
atau jasa asing?
Did you use
imported
machinery/services
for the test?
Yes/No
Jika ya, dari
negara mana? If
yes, from which
country?
5
6
7
8
9
10
No
Pemeriksaan yang
dilakukan/
Inspection/checking
conducted
Di mana
pemeriksaan
dilakukan? Where
did the inspection
take place?
(in house/ local
regency/ buyers’
place/ suppliers’
place)
Frekuensi pemeriksaan/ Inspection
frequency
(irregular/annual/quarterly
/monthly/weekly/daily)
Apakah
menggunakan
peralatan impor
atau jasa asing?
Did you use
imported
machinery/services
for the inspection?
Yes/No
Jika ya, dari
negara mana? If
yes, from which
country?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
275
BLOK XVIII: KETERANGAN RESPONDEN/RESPONDENTS
1. Nama pemberi jawaban/ Name
: …………………………….
4. Tanggal pengesahan/ Date
: …………………………….
2. Jabatan/ Position : …………………………….
3. No. Telp. / HP /Mobile
: ……………………………. …………………………….
Tanda tangan
BLOK XIX: KETERANGAN PETUGAS/ENUMERATORS
Uraian Pencacah Pengawas (1) (2) (3)
BLOK XVII : CATATAN/ ADDITIONAL NOTES
Apabila ada hal-hal yang memerlukan keterangan lebih lanjut, tuliskan pada blok ini. Selain informasi dari responden, pencacah dan
pemeriksa juga bisa menambahkan catatan untuk memperjelas masalah yang berkaitan dengan daftar isian. Seluruh Informasi
tersebut akan direkam.
276
1. Nama petugas/ Name
……………………………………..…………….
…………………………….…..……………. 2. Tanggal pelaksanaan kegiatan/ date
3. No. HP/ Mobile ……………………………………..……………. …………………………….…..…………….
4. Tanda tangan/ Signature
277
13.4. Reference
AdhiLukman (Chairman, GAPMMI) (2016), “Opportunities to Partner with the Indonesia Food Industry”
(presentation at Asia Australia Food Innovations 2016)
Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (2014) “Study on Asia Potential of Biofuel
Market”
Emmanuel A. San Andres (2015), “Manufacturing of Consumer Electronic Appliances in Indonesia” in
“Services in Global Value Chains: Manufacturing-Related Services”
Hall, Bronwyn H. and Mairesse, Jacques (1992) “Exploring the relationship between R&D and
productivity in French manufacturing firms”, NBER Working Paper
International Trade Centre, The (2016), “Indonesia: Company Perspectives – An ITC Series on
Non-Tariff Measures”
Jakarta Japan Club, and JETRO Jakarta Office (2015), “Indonesia Handbook 2015”
Japan Economic Research Institute Inc. (2015), “Indonesia no Genchi Chushou Kigyou no Jittai Chosa
(Survey on local sumall and medium enterprises in Indonesia)”
Japan External Trade Organization (2016), “Sangyo Ricchi ha Dou Kawaruka –Denki Denshi Hen-
(Change of Direction of Industrial Location –Electrical and Electronics Industry-)”
Ministry of Industry, Republic of Indonesia (2016), “Industry, Facts & Figures”
Michael Taylor (2014), “Indonesian sugar sector "at critical point" due to scarce raw imports”, in
Bloomberg (November 21, 2014)
Ministry of Finance (2018), Annual Debt Financing Strategy 2018
ERIA “Study on Asia Potential of Biofuel Market” 2014
278