Request for Proposals for
The Repurposing of Former Terminals at
Larnaka and/or Pafos International
Airports
Republic of Cyprus
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 2
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION 4
1.1 Important Note 4
1.2 General Information 4
2 PROJECT OVERVIEW 6
2.1 Summary 6
3 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 7
3.1 Process and Requirements: 7
3.2 Former Terminals Repurposing Objectives 7
3.3 The Requestor’s Position 7
4 PROPOSAL OUTLINE 8
4.1 Overview 8
4.2 Site and location characteristics 8
5 RFP PROCESS 10
5.1 Request for Proposal 10
5.2 Format of Proposals 10
5.3 Evaluation Criteria 11
5.4 Questions and Answers 14
5.5 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS 14
5.6 EVALUATION AND AWARD PROCESS 15
5.7 Timeframes 15
6 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 16
6.1 Questions and Answers 16
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 3
6.2 Costs Borne by Proponents 16
6.3 Ownership of Proposal Documents 16
6.4 Collusive Tendering 17
6.5 Conflict of Interest 17
6.6 Return or Destruction of Information 17
6.7 Disclaimer 17
6.8 Right to Amend / Terminate Process 17
6.9 No Obligation 17
6.10 Confidentiality 17
6.11 Addenda 18
7 APPENDICES 19
7.1 Appendix 1 – Larnaka Land Availability 19
7.2 Appendix 2 –Pafos Property Availability 22
7.3 Appendix 3 - Brief Note on the use of the Area of the Old Airport Larnaka 26
7.4 Appendix 4 – Disclosure Statement 35
7.5 Appendix 5 – Form For Acknowledgement 37
7.6 Appendix 6 – Returnable Schedule 39
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 4
1 Introduction
1.1 Important Note
The Republic of Cyprus and Hermes Airports Ltd (collectively referred to as the “Requestor”) jointly
proceed with the Request For Proposal (RFP) for the repurposing of the former Terminals at Larnaka
and/or Pafos International Airports.
The information in this document is for the guidance of Proponents interested to submit a proposal
to this RFP.
This document may not contain all the information that Proponents or their advisors require.
Proponents must form their own views as to what information is relevant to their decisions and
make their own independent investigations in relation to any such information.
This document outlines the Requestor’s expectations and the terms and conditions of the RFP
process. The Requestor reserves the right at its sole discretion to expand the dates of Submission
and expand the time limits subject to section 5.6.
Proponents and their advisors must not, under any circumstances, make any enquiries of, or hold
any discussions with, any Requestor’s employee or other representatives of the Requestor or the
media in connection with the proposed Project, except as provided for in this RFP or with the prior
written consent of the Requestor’s Project Manager, his details seen below. Such requests should
only be addressed to him:
Elias Liolios
Senior Manager Commercial & Business Development
Hermes Airports Ltd
P.O. Box 43027
6650 Larnaka International Airport, Cyprus
Phone: +357 24 742144
Fax: +357 24643633
Email: [email protected]
1.2 General Information
The Government of the Republic of Cyprus through the Ministry of Transport, Communications and
Works (the “Grantor”) has entered into an agreement (the “Concession Agreement”) with Hermes
Airports Limited in its capacity as Project Co. (as defined in the Concession Agreement) for the
development, construction, expansion and operation of Larnaka International Airport and Pafos
International Airports for the Concession Period, which started on 11 May 2006 and expires on 11
May 2031.
The Requestor is seeking Proposals from interested parties for the repurposing and future
development of currently disused former terminals (building and land) at the Larnaka and/or Pafos
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 5
International Airports. Proposals should capitalize on the strategic location of the Sites through the
development of a quality project which is compatible with the airport activities.
The Requestor will shortlist a minimum of three (3) Proponents to be invited to submit more
detailed information or documentation without any obligation to endorse and/or accept any
proposal. In the event that less than three (3) completed proposals are received, the Requestor will
continue assessing all of them.
It is clarified that Proponents shall not be required to submit on their own additional information or
material subsequent to the date of submission and such material if submitted shall be disregarded
unless requested by the Requestor at its sole discretion at the evaluation stage after closing date.
It is essential that Proponents ensure that all the required details are provided fully and completely.
The Requestor will not provide any funding of its own to the Project. An attractive Proposal will,
inter alia, minimize risks whilst maximizing financial benefit to the Requestor. All proposals should
incorporate the right to use the land for project(s) up to 99 years from the commencement date or
more than 99 years if that is required and justified by the successful Proponent. All proposals should
fully comply with the development aspirations as expressed by the Requestor in section 2.1 and
elsewhere within this document.
Hermes will enter into a land license agreement(s) with the successful proponent for a term up to
11 May 2031; its Concession Period. The Government of the Republic of Cyprus will enter into a
separate land license agreement(s) for any proposed term from 12 May 2031 onwards, up to 99
years (or more as the case may be) from the commencement date of the successful proposal.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 6
2 Project Overview
2.1 Summary
The project is the repurposing and future development of currently disused former terminals
(building and land) at the Larnaka and/or Pafos International Airports.
Proposals should capitalize on the strategic location of the Sites through the development of a
quality project which is compatible with the airport activities.
Proposals should incorporate principles of sustainable development, maximise the dwelling yield of
the airport land, and capitalise on the major site features. It would be beneficial for proposed
developments or land use to be compatible with the existing airports’ facilities and not to
compromise in any way their core operational functions.
Proposals must take into consideration the Local Town Plan of the respective town.
Appendices 1 & 2 include more details on the Lands/Buildings available.
Relevant site plans are also included in Appendices 1 & 2.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 7
3 Request for Proposals
3.1 Process and Requirements:
The following sections provide an overview of the RFP Process, specify the general terms and
conditions for participation by Proponents in the RFP Process, and outline the Requestor’ specific
requirements for the preparation and submission of Proposals.
3.2 Former Terminals Repurposing Objectives
The Repurposing Objectives are to:
� Maximize the financial return of the Sites
� Have repurposing projects under development by the 2nd half of 2016
� Minimize the Requestor’ exposure to any risk in achieving these objectives
� Enhance the Requestor’ standing in the community through the delivery of the quality outcomes
referred to in section 2.1.
3.3 The Requestor’s Position
This RFP is not an offer to undertake or to treat any repurposing and future development (or any
offer of any other kind), and does not indicate an intention by the Requestor to enter into any form
of legal relations with any Proponents receiving it.
The Requestor wishes to optimize private sector involvement in the design, construction, and
development of the land and property available at airport grounds. The Requestor will require the
proposed repurposing and future development to be fully at the successful Proponent’s cost and
risk.
The successful Proponent is to be responsible for the development of the entire infrastructure
necessary for the Project.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 8
4 Proposal Outline
4.1 Overview
4.1.1 Compliance with Government Requirements
In developing the Proposal, Proponents must comply with all applicable legislation and government
requirements as may be applicable from time to time, as well as airport rules and the Requestor’s
requirements regarding the development of the Sites.
Airport rules may be made available upon request and according to each Proposal.
4.1.2 Other requirements
The successful Proponent will (in consultation with the Requestor, who will provide assistance where
possible) be required to:
� Obtain all required approvals, permits, licenses and consents for the proposed development,
Satisfy all environmental and health and safety issues
� Undertake any community consultation and attend to issues which arise
� Engage with and resolve governmental and local authorities issues
� Remediate any site contamination to required standards
� Enter into contractual legal documentation.
4.2 Site and location characteristics
4.2.1 Site description
The Sites are governmental land presently operated by Hermes Airports.
Larnaka International Airport
The site consists of:
� 5.5 ha of greenfield
� 5.7 ha of unused car parks
The area has numerous built areas to be redeveloped:
� 13,786 m2 of floor area of the old terminal building (on a plot of approx. 20,000 m2)
� Approx. 68,000 m2 of land currently occupied by warehouses
� 28,000 m2 of fuel farm
Pafos International Airport
The site consists of:
� Terminal Area of 12, 000 m2
� Land of 32, 450 m2 of Parking spaces could be utilized for land development
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 9
All areas are shown in further detail in Appendices 1 & 2 and is an indicative area for the purposes of
the RFP.
4.2.2 Proposed Repurposing/Developments
Proposals for any type of repurposing of all or part of the available site will be accepted for review.
Examples of possible repurposing of the sites include:
� Hotel
� Outlet
� Entertainment and leisure e.g. amusement park
� Big Box Retail
� Freeport
� Other development opportunities that may be permitted
Other such development opportunities as may be permitted4.2.3 Payment
and Structuring options
The Requestor may consider the structuring options such as:
Payment Options:
� Up front lump sum payment
� License fee payable under a land license agreement
� Combination of any of these options or others
Structuring Options:
� Single company
� Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV)
� Joint venture Proponent arrangement
� Other options
4.2.4 Infrastructure provision
The Requestor wishes to optimize private sector involvement in the design, construction, and
development of each phase of the repurposing and future development of the former terminals and
requires the development and operation of the Sites to be at no cost or risk to the Requestor.
Proponents should address the indicative infrastructure provision and ongoing arrangements for
maintenance of major infrastructure items.
The Requestor can provide, on request, CAD files which may assist Proponents in locating the closest
utility connection points.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 10
5 RFP Process
5.1 Request for Proposal
Proponents will be provided with the opportunity to visit the Sites between 23rd October 2015 – 30th
October 2015.
Proponents will be evaluated against the following criteria (in no particular preferential order):
� Technical capacity, expertise and partnering, alliance or co-operative venture experience to
undertake the Project whilst:
- Exemplifying best practice principles for repurposing and future development
- Proposing built form concepts and phasing of delivery which will support and enhance the
Airport’s current and future activities
- Supporting other Airport Projects and the broader locality
- Managing stakeholder consultation / negotiation processes and track record, and
- Approaches to working with the Requestor for overall building and place management, as
well as meeting agreed maintenance standards and responsibilities.
� Financial backing and capacity to undertake the repurposing and future development of the
terminals as outlined in the proposal
� Preferred financial structure(s), and
� The phasing plan.
5.2 Format of Proposals
The following matters should be taken into account by Proponents in responding to the RFP:
� Proposals should contain all information and details requested in this RFP. The information
should be prepared having regard to the objectives stated in section 3.2
� Proposals should be formatted in accordance with the RFP Requirements and Evaluation Criteria
set out in this section. Proposals must address all relevant requirements
� Proposals should be clear and concise
� Proponents must comply with the applicable personal data protection laws and intellectual
property laws in relation to personal information provided in Proposals.
The Requestor may at any time:
� Take into account any information from its own and other sources in evaluating Proposals
� Give preference to any one or more of the Evaluation Criteria over other criteria and consider
the relative trade-offs between criteria
� Question any Proponent in order to clarify any matter relating to the Proponent’s Proposal
� Conduct due diligence investigations
� Draw on outside expertise as required.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 11
5.3 Evaluation Criteria
5.3.1 Technical capacity, expertise and partnering, alliance or co-operative
venture experience to undertake the repurposing and development
projects.
Proponents must provide evidence of their capability and experience to undertake all aspects of
repurposing and development projects. In particular, Proponents must provide evidence of their
capability and experience in relation to the:
� Design, construction, financing, marketing and ongoing management of comparable projects
� Supervision of projects of a similar type and scale, including land use planning, and ensuring that
repurposing and development occurs in a timely and controlled manner
� Design and construction of comparable projects to program, budget and defined quality
standards
� Time Schedule outlining the financing, repurposing and development, contraction and operation
of the proposed project
� Management of any approvals (internal or external) required by the Proponent in order to
progress repurposing and future development of the proposal, and the likely timing for
obtaining such approvals
� Management of effective internal or external stakeholder consultation processes throughout the
design, construction and marketing phases
� Consideration of the Local Town Plan of the respective town. The relevant information can be
found in Appendix 3.
5.3.2 Financial backing and capacity to undertake the Proposal
Proponents must demonstrate:
� The financial capacity of the Proponents to deliver the Proposal
� The experience of the Proponents in raising funding for similarly sized proposals
� A financial structuring and funding approach that has the potential to deliver the Proposal, in
accordance with the RFP Objectives
� An appropriate financial and entity structure for undertaking the Proposal.
In particular, Proponents should address the following criteria, and where relevant refer to the
experience and delivery record gained by the Proponents on similar projects:
� The demonstrated financial capacity of the Proponents, including:
- A credit reference from the principal banker or financial institution providing credit facilities
to the proponent, confirming the proponent’s proposed financing
- A statement confirming the solvency of the Proponents and if any of the Proponents are a
subsidiary, the relevant parent company
- A description of the level and type of any parent company support expected to be provided
to the Proponents including a confirmation letter from the parent company/ies
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 12
� The Proponents experience and delivery record in developing effective financing and entity
structures for undertaking proposals of this nature
� Proposed SPV, equity participants, project gearing and long-term tenure / exit strategy.
5.3.3 Preferred financial structure(s) and return to the Requestor
Proponents must propose a preferred financial structure(s) to develop the Proposal and provide
details of indicative timing and value for each payment to the Requestor.
The Proponents should provide details of the methodology for calculating the Requestor financial
benefit including a table identifying estimated payment values and timing of same.
Other factors that will be considered by the Requestor in evaluating a Proponent’s financial offer
include proposed risk allocation, management and mitigation strategies.
5.3.4 Indicative concept phasing plan
Proponents are required to outline conceptually:
� The proposed elements, mix, market positioning and development quality of the Proposal
� How the repurposing and future development would be integrated with the airport.
5.3.5 Disclosure Statement
Proponents are required to provide a disclosure statement, addressing the requirements identified
in Appendix 4, duly signed by the Proponents that they are not aware of any matter of a probity
nature requiring disclosure (or, alternatively, if relevant, details of any such disclosure).
5.3.6 Other Proposal Requirements
Proponents’ Details
The Proposal is to include:
� For the Proponents:
- Full name, nature of the entity, address, telephone, email, facsimile number(s) and the
principal contacts (including, where the Proponent is a company, details of its current
directors, shareholders, place of incorporation, registered office and company number)
- Where the Proponent has a holding company, its position in the relevant group structure,
together with (if not provided above) the name, registered office (or equivalent), head office
address, current directors, principal shareholders, beneficial owners (if different from
principal shareholders)
- A statement that the Proponent is not aware of any application to place the Proponent or
any of its shareholders or group entities (or any relevant holding company) in liquidation,
administration, or equivalent.
Where a Proponent is a publicly listed company, the Proposal only needs to include shareholder
information in relation to the ten major shareholders and any shareholder having shares of more
than 5% of the entity’s share capital.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 13
� For each group of Proponents:
- The information specified in the paragraph above as if references to the Proponent were a
reference to the group
- The role of the group’s Entity
- Contact details for the person nominated by the Proponent as the point of contact for the
purposes of the RFP Process
- Description of its relationship with the Proponent and other entities, together with summary
details of any agreements or other documents evidencing these relationships
- Summary details of any shareholder agreements (or other relationship documents) with
other entities for the development of the project proposed.
Board Support
A statement of support signed by the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer or an authorized Director of
the Board (or equivalent entity) of the Proponent, and the Boards (or equivalent entity) of the
Proponents, confirming that they support the submission of the Proponent’s Proposal or a certified
copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors of the Proponent authorizing the submission of the
proposal.
Confirmation of Resources
Evidence that the Proponent has the necessary resources, (or a reasonable expectation of obtaining
access to such resources), to prepare and lodge applications and manage same through to timely
approvals. This can be given in the form of a letter from the proponent’s financial institute outlining
the support of/possibility of obtaining the necessary funds for the proposals.
Confirmation of Capacity to Meet Contractual Obligations
Confirmation that the Proponents have the legal capacity to undertake the Project and that there is
no restriction under any relevant law to prevent them from proposing.
Details of any circumstance that may affect the ability of the Proponents to meet their contractual
obligations in relation to the Proposal need to be clearly stated. Examples of circumstances, which
should be detailed, are:
� Regulatory or law enforcement agency investigations of the Proponents, related organizations or
principals
� Contract termination for cause against the Proponents
� Significant disputes or current or pending litigation or arbitration in which the Proponent, group
entities, related organizations or principals have been or are currently involved
� Details of any event between the date on which the latest set of accounts were authorized for
issue and the date of the submission of the Proposal that, had the accounts not been authorized
for issue until the Proposal submission date, would have required to be adjusted for, or
disclosed
� Material contingent liabilities of the Proponents
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 14
� Mergers/acquisitions, as can be notified, either occurring in the last three months or which are
imminent
� Any application to place the Proponents or any of their shareholders or participants (or any
relevant holding company) in liquidation, administration or equivalent (whether voluntary or
involuntary).
Acknowledgement and Undertaking
The Proponents must submit with their Proposal a completed and signed Acknowledgement and
Undertaking substantially in the form of Appendix 5.
Certification of Proposals
Proposals must be accompanied by a certification as to the accuracy and completeness of the
information provided in the RFP. The certification is to be made by a director (or equivalent officer).
5.4 Questions and Answers
There will be a dedicated period of two (2) weeks during which interested Proponents will have the
opportunity to raise any questions and/or address any clarifications they may need..
Answers to all questions will be distributed to all Proponents within the following three (3) weeks.
Please refer to the below Timeframes in section 5.7.
5.5 Submission of Proposals
Proposals comprising original loose-leaf copies (maximum 40 printed pages, plus the Returnable
Schedule in Appendix 6,) and five (5) bound copies shall be submitted in a sealed envelope, clearly
labeled:
“Request for Proposals for the Repurposing of Former Terminals at Larnaka and/or Pafos
International Airports “
Proposals shall be delivered by hand or sent by post or courier to the following address:
Tender Box of the Grantor
Ministry of Transport, Communications and Works
Acheon 28
1424 Nicosia
Republic of Cyprus
Facsimile and e-mailed Proposals will not be accepted, and the Requestor reserves the right to reject
late Proposals.
Proposals are to be received by:
Date: 21st December 2015
Time: 12.00hrs
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 15
For any further information, please refer inquiries to:
Elias Liolios
Senior Manager Commercial & Business Development
Hermes Airports Ltd
P.O. Box 43027
6650 Larnaka International Airport, Cyprus
Phone: +357 24742144
Fax: +357 24643633
Email: [email protected]
5.6 Evaluation and Award Process
Evaluation of the proposals will be conducted on the basis of the Evaluation Criteria of section 5.3.
Shortlisted and non-shortlisted Proponents will be notified in writing.
Parallel negotiations will commence with shortlisted Proponents for the selection of the successful
Proponent. Following conclusion of parallel negotiations, an award letter will be sent to the
successful Proponent setting a deadline for signing relevant documentation.
The whole process will follow the Timeframes listed in section 5.7.
During the Evaluation Process, the requestor may invite presentations from Proponents, or
negotiate with Proponents to form a preferred entity or group.
The Requestor may decline to consider any Proposal that does not fully comply with the RFP
Requirements and Evaluation Criteria or for any other reason.
5.7 Timeframes
The Requestor envisages that the RFP Process will follow these timeframes:
RFP Distribution: 25th September 2015 – 23rd October 2015
Site Visits: 23rd October 2015 – 30th October 2015
Questions and answers period: 30th October 2015 – 20th November 2015
Submission date: 21st December 2015
Submission time: 12.00hrs
Proposal Presentations: 11th January 2016 – 29th January 2016
Response to Submissions: 26th February 2016
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 16
6 General terms and conditions
6.1 Questions and Answers
All inquiries from Proponents are to be transmitted in writing to the contact person referred to in
section 1.1.
After the receipt of the Proposals, the Requestor’s responses generally affecting the Proposals or the
conduct of the rest of the RFP Process will be forwarded to the shortlisted Proponents. Responses to
questions that are claimed by a Proponent to be confidential to that Proponent, and accepted by the
Requestor as such, will not be broadcast.
6.2 Costs Borne by Proponents
All costs, including legal costs, and expenses incurred by Proponents in any way associated with the
development, preparation and submission of the Proposals, including attendance at meetings,
discussions, etc., and providing any additional information required by the Requestor, will be borne
entirely and exclusively by the Proponents.
6.3 Ownership of Proposal Documents
All documents submitted in the RFP Process become the property of the Requestor on lodgment.
Such intellectual property rights of the Proponents or other parties, as may be clearly demonstrated
by the Proponents to exist in the information contained in materials submitted by the Proponents,
will remain the property of the Proponents or those other relevant parties.
The Proponents license and authorize the Requestor, its employees, advisors, consultants and
agents to copy, adapt, disclose or do anything else necessary (in the Requestor’s opinion) to all
material (including that which contains intellectual property rights of the Proponents or other
parties) contained in the documents or materials submitted, for the purposes of the RFP Process
including, without limitation, for use in:
� Its evaluation of Proposals,
� Negotiation of the Development Agreements,
� Other related matters, and
� Complying with applicable laws.
The Requestor may make such copies of documents or materials submitted, as it requires, for its
purposes.
The Requestor shall not be liable if no selection procedure takes place within one year from the
Submission date. The Requestor shall have the right to keep the proposed documents respecting
the Intellectual Property Rights of the Proponents and ensure that no document will be copied,
used, replaced, exposed in publicity without the prior consent of the Proponents.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 17
6.4 Collusive Tendering
Proponents and their respective officers, employees, agents and advisors must not engage in any
collusive tendering, anti-competitive conduct or any other similar conduct with any other
Proponents or any other person in relation to the preparation or submission of Proposals.
Proponents must provide a certification with their Proposal that they and their group entities have
not engaged in any anti-competitive conduct.
6.5 Conflict of Interest
Proponents and their respective officers, employees, agents and advisors must not place themselves
in a position that may, or does, give rise to a conflict of interest (or a potential conflict of interest)
between the interests of the Requestor (on the one hand), and any other interests (on the other
hand), during the RFP Process. Proponents must provide a certification with their Proposal that they
and their group entities are not aware of any conflicts of interest.
6.6 Return or Destruction of Information
The Requestor reserves the discretion to require that material and other information provided to
Proponents (and copies or reproductions of such information) be either destroyed by the
Proponents or returned to the Requestor. The Requestor may require that the Proponents provide
evidence (in a form satisfactory to the Requestor) that any the Requestor requirements in this
respect have been fully complied with.
6.7 Disclaimer
Proponents must make and rely on their own investigations and satisfy themselves in relation to all
aspects of the RFP objective. The Requestor will not be liable for any incorrect or misleading
information or omission to disclose information whether provided in this document or otherwise.
6.8 Right to Amend / Terminate Process
The Requestor reserves the right at any time to revise or amend the process or the RFP terms set out
in this document by notice in writing to Proponents who have not withdrawn or been excluded from
the process at such time. Such amendment may include cancellation, termination, variation or
supplementation of the process.
6.9 No Obligation
No legal or other obligation other than those associated with this section shall arise between
Proponents and the Requestor unless and until formal project documentation has been signed. The
Requestor is not obliged to proceed with any Proposals or Proponents, and no compensation will be
payable.
6.10 Confidentiality
All information submitted by Proponents may be examined and assessed by the Requestor, its
specialist consultant advisors and any other party from whom the evaluation team may seek advice.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 18
The confidentiality of any information submitted by Proponents, which is not available to the public,
will be respected except where disclosure is permitted or required by law.
All Proponents will be required to maintain confidentiality with respect to their own RFP Proposals,
and should not seek details of competing proposals.
Proponents must not make any public statements whatsoever in relation to the Project.
Proponents may be required to sign a Confidentiality Agreement prepared by the Requestor.
All information and/or documentation provided to the Requestor by the Proponents should be
retained confidential.
6.11 Addenda
Written addenda issued by the Requestor are the only explanations of, or amendments to, the RFP
documents that will be accepted.
All Proponents should check they are registered with the Requestor (see Important Note at section
1.1) to ensure they are mailed addenda information.
Proponents are to satisfy themselves that they have received, acknowledged and addressed all
addenda that may have been issued up to the closing date for submission of the proposals. Updates
of addenda issued will be sent to registered Proponents.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 19
7 Appendices
7.1 Appendix 1 – Larnaka Land Availability
Larnaka airport is the main air gateway to Cyprus, in 2014, the airport handled 5,247,291 passengers. It is also the main air freight facility of the island with
a total cargo traffic of 25,769 tons in 2014.
Larnaka airport was completely revamped. A new passenger terminal opened in 2009 to replace the old terminal building which was unable to handle the
increased traffic. The new terminal has a total capacity of 7.5 million passengers, several extensions have already been planned to absorb future traffic
increases.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 20
Appendix 1 – Larnaka Land Availability, Arial Photo
.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 21
Appendix 1 – Larnaka Building Availability, Terminal Areas
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 22
7.2 Appendix 2 –Pafos Property Availability
Pafos airport is approx. 7 km from the center of Pafos and 50 km from Limassol. In 2008 the airport was restricted with a new terminal building being
constructed. In 2014 Pafos served 2,090,943 passengers.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 23
Appendix 2 –Pafos Property Availability (Old Departures Building)
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 24
Appendix 2 –Pafos Property Availability (Old Arrival Building)
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 25
Appendix 2 –Pafos Property/Land Availability
Available
PFO Land -
Parking
Areas
Available
PFO Land –
Parking
Areas
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 26
7.3 Appendix 3 - Brief Note on the use of the Area of the Old Airport
Larnaka1
Development sizes and Uses of the Land
1 Notwithstanding the basic operating facilities of Larnaka International Airport, in the rest of the
Special Airport Area (EA) and more specifically in the broader area of the old terminal, other
strategic developments and uses for attracting investment may be allowed, exploiting the
advantages offered by the space (geographical, transportation, land, proximity to the
International Airport, etc.). An extract of the Urban Zones plan and a relevant aerial photograph,
in which the space for development is highlighted in red is attached hereto as Annex 1.
2 In the approved Local Plan of Larnaka 2013 the following is provided:
a) The space for development may cover land with suitable access, provided that it ensures
the safe and orderly operation of the Airport.
b) The development factors that will be used, should make the project viable and will be
approved by the Cabinet.
c) The existing facilities of the old terminal could be integrated in the development and
counted in the buildable area.
d) The permitted main uses will essentially concern showrooms without sales / distribution of
products, conference and office space under a single structure, organization and
management (eg business, exhibition, conference center).
e) The additional uses should be of a comparatively limited size and support the project, and
can include retail, leisure and entertainment facilities, cultural facilities and hotel.
3 In addition to the above additional urban incentives are applicable which involve increased
building density and expansion of permitted uses. According to the "Incentive Town Planning
Scheme 2013 for the recovery of the development activity in Cyprus", the town planning
incentives that apply in this case, are the following:
� To encourage the development of large properties (over 2000 square meters) of the public
sector in relation to specific development plan, additional town planning incentives are
offered such as (a) a further increase of the building density, (b) any enlargement expansion
of the permitted uses and (c) implementation of incentives in state plots outside of the
Development Limit of Local Plans, provided that this is supported by a feasibility study and
that these properties will be developed through a tender process with a fee that will bring
substantial benefit to the Republic.
� In such cases the herein below basic requirements must be followed:
1 Note: This version of the brief note is a translation of the proceeding Greek version for assistance only. The Greek version
is the formal valid version of the brief note.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 27
a) compliance with increased distance from the borders, at the discretion of the Planning
Authority, in case where the number of floors will be increased
b) the additional buildable area and the subsequent intensification of development does not
impair the fair use or amenities of the adjoining properties and the surrounding territory
c) not adversely affecting the road network of the territory by the anticipated increase in
traffic ( The Town Planning Authority, at its sole discretion, may request a Traffic and
Environmental Study in cases of large-scale developments)
d) the high aesthetic and qualitative level and the high level of environmental planning of the
development.
Parking Spaces
4 In the Approved Local Plan of Larnaca 2013 the following are stipulated:
a) The parking spaces will be calculated based on the provisions of the relevant Directive
3/2011 of the Minister of Interior, with the exception of exhibition spaces where one
parking space is required for every 120 sq.m.
b) Additional parking spaces for a sufficient number of taxis and buses must be predicted, to
serve mainly foreign visitors.
c) For purposes of a good operation and proper inclusion of parking spaces in the whole
development, it will be sought as they are positioned in groups with ample landscaped space
in between or even as a multi-story parking, above ground or underground.
Landscape and quality of development
5. In the Approved Local Plan of Larnaca 2013 the following are stipulated:
a) The configuration of the various installations and buildings should be designed to guarantee
satisfactory optical escapes / openings.
b) The scale and composition of the volume of the buildings and their aesthetics, should ensure
the rational integration into the environmentally sensitive area of the Salt Lakes.
c) The development area will be landscaped with high quality materials and components, in
various outside areas outdoor seating facilities will be created and the planting will be done
with high quality vegetation.
d) in an appropriate location a private green area (park) will be created, which will have an
area of about 10% of the total space that is allocated for the project, which will be
landscaped appropriately and used freely by the public.
e) the maximum possible distances of buildings from the "Public Safety Zones" and the "noise
contours Aircraft Lnight 60dB (A)’’ for security purposes and amenities must be safeguarded.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 28
General Spatial Plan and other studies
6. The implementation of the development will be based on the General Spatial Plan (Master Plan)
which will be approved by the Director of Planning and Housing, as the Town Planning Authority.
7. Along with the General Spatial Plan and beyond the final approval of the development, there will
also be a submission of a Traffic Study, Environmental Impact Assessment Study and a
Commercial Impact Assessment Study which will be taken into consideration by the special
committee during the evaluation of the application.
Feasibility Studies and Techno-economic Feasibility
8. The Feasibility Study and Techno-economic Feasibility Study will have to be submitted for the
evaluation of the applications, on which the feasibility, the techno-economic data and the extent
and size of the development will be evaluated.
9. The Feasibility Study and Techno-economic Feasibility Study, which, inter alia, will include the
required proposed economic benefit compared to the cost that will make the development
sustainable, will be assessed by a special committee to be appointed for this purpose by the
Ministry of Transport, Communications and Works.
Special settings due to the Airport
10. The area to be developed is not affected by the "Public Safety Zones" and the "contours Aircraft
Lnight 60dB (A)’’. Related plans are attached as Annex 2.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 29
Greek Version
ΣΥΝΟΠΤΙΚΟ ΣΗΜΕΙΩΜΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΞΙΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΟΥ
ΧΩΡΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΠΑΛΙΟΥ ΑΕΡΟΔΡΟΜΙΟΥ ΛΑΡΝΑΚΑΣ
Αναπτυξιακά Μεγέθη και Χρήσεις Γης
Ανεξάρτητα από τις βασικές εγκαταστάσεις λειτουργίας του Διεθνούς Αερολιμένα Λάρνακας, στην
υπόλοιπη Ειδική Ζώνη Αερολιμένα (ΕΑ) και πιο συγκεκριμένα στην ευρύτερη περιοχή του παλιού
τερματικού, δυνατό να επιτραπούν άλλες στρατηγικής σημασίας αναπτύξεις και χρήσεις για
προσέλκυση επενδύσεων, αξιοποιώντας τα πλεονεκτήματα που προσφέρει ο χώρος (γεωγραφικά,
συγκοινωνιακά, έκτασης, γειτνίασης με τον Διεθνή Αερολιμένα κλπ). Απόσπασμα σχεδίου
Πολεοδομικών Ζωνών και αεροφωτογραφία, στα οποία ο χώρος προς ανάπτυξη σημειώνεται με
κόκκινο χρώμα, επισυνάπτονται ως Παράρτημα 1.
Στο εγκριμένο Τοπικό Σχέδιο Λάρνακας 2013 προνοούνται τα ακόλουθα:
(α) Ο προς ανάπτυξη χώρος είναι δυνατό να αφορά έκταση γης με κατάλληλη προσπέλαση,
νοουμένου ότι θα διασφαλίζεται η ασφαλής και εύρυθμη λειτουργία του Αερολιμένα.
(β) Οι συντελεστές ανάπτυξης που θα χρησιμοποιηθούν, πρέπει να καθιστούν το έργο βιώσιμο
και θα εγκριθούν από το Υπουργικό Συμβούλιο.
(γ) Οι υφιστάμενες εγκαταστάσεις του παλιού τερματικού μπορούν να ενσωματωθούν στην
ανάπτυξη και να συνυπολογιστούν στο δομήσιμο εμβαδό.
(δ) Οι επιτρεπόμενες κύριες χρήσεις θα αφορούν βασικά εκθεσιακούς χώρους χωρίς πώληση/
διακίνηση προϊόντων, συνεδριακούς χώρους και γραφειακούς χώρους υπό ενιαία δομή, οργάνωση
και διαχείριση (π.χ. επιχειρηματικό, εκθεσιακό, συνεδριακό κέντρο).
(ε) Οι συμπληρωματικές χρήσεις πρέπει να είναι συγκριτικά περιορισμένου μεγέθους και
υποστηρικτικές του έργου, και μπορεί να διαλαμβάνουν λιανικό εμπόριο, διευκολύνσεις αναψυχής και
ψυχαγωγίας, πολιτιστικές διευκολύνσεις, καθώς και ξενοδοχείο.
Πέραν των προαναφερόμενων, στο χώρο του παλιού αεροδρομίου Λάρνακας ισχύουν πρόσθετα
πολεοδομικά κίνητρα, τα οποία αφορούν αύξηση του συντελεστή δόμησης και διεύρυνση των
επιτρεπόμενων χρήσεων. Σύμφωνα με το «Σχέδιο Παροχής Πολεοδομικών Κινήτρων 2013 για
σκοπούς ανάκαμψης της αναπτυξιακής δραστηριότητας στην Κύπρο», τα πολεοδομικά κίνητρα που
ισχύουν στην περίπτωση αυτή, είναι τα ακόλουθα:
Για ενθάρρυνση της αξιοποίησης μεγάλων ιδιοκτησιών (εμβαδού πέραν των 2.000 τ.μ.) του δημόσιου
τομέα σε σχέση με ειδικό πρόγραμμα ανάπτυξης, προσφέρονται πρόσθετα πολεοδομικά κίνητρα,
όπως (α) περαιτέρω αύξηση του συντελεστή δόμησης, (β) ενδεχόμενη διεύρυνση των επιτρεπόμενων
χρήσεων, και (γ) εφαρμογή των κινήτρων σε κρατικά τεμάχια εκτός Ορίου Ανάπτυξης των Τοπικών
Σχεδίων, νοουμένου ότι αυτό τεκμηριώνεται από μελέτη βιωσιμότητας και ότι οι ιδιοκτησίες αυτές θα
αναπτυχθούν μέσα από διαδικασία προσφοροδότησης με μίσθωμα που θα επιφέρει σημαντικό
όφελος στη Δημοκρατία.
Στις περιπτώσεις αυτές θα πρέπει να τηρούνται οι πιο κάτω βασικές προϋποθέσεις:
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 30
(α) η τήρηση αυξημένων αποστάσεων από τα σύνορα, κατά την κρίση της Πολεοδομικής Αρχής, σε
περίπτωση αύξησης του αριθμού ορόφων,
(β) το επιπλέον δομήσιμο εμβαδόν και η συνεπακόλουθη εντατικοποίηση της ανάπτυξης να μην
παραβλάπτουν την εύλογη χρήση ή τις ανέσεις παρακείμενων ιδιοκτησιών και της περιβάλλουσας
περιοχής,
(γ) ο μη δυσμενής επηρεασμός του οδικού δικτύου της περιοχής από την αναμενόμενη αύξηση της
κυκλοφορίας (κατά την κρίση της Πολεοδομικής Αρχής σε μεγάλης κλίμακας αναπτύξεις, είναι
δυνατόν να απαιτηθεί η υποβολή Κυκλοφοριακής και Περιβαλλοντικής Μελέτης), και
(δ) η ψηλή αισθητική και ποιοτική στάθμη και το ψηλό επίπεδο περιβαλλοντικού σχεδιασμού της
ανάπτυξης.
Χώροι στάθμευσης
Στο εγκριμένο Τοπικό Σχέδιο Λάρνακας 2013 προνοούνται τα ακόλουθα:
(α) Οι χώροι στάθμευσης θα υπολογίζονται με βάση τις πρόνοιες της σχετικής Εντολής 3/2011
του Υπουργού Εσωτερικών, με εξαίρεση τους εκθεσιακούς χώρους όπου θα απαιτείται ένας χώρος
στάθμευσης για κάθε 120 τ.μ.
(β) Επιπρόσθετοι χώροι στάθμευσης για ικανοποιητικό αριθμό ταξί και λεωφορείων πρέπει να
προβλεφθούν, για εξυπηρέτηση κυρίως των ξένων επισκεπτών.
(γ) Για σκοπούς καλής λειτουργίας και σωστής ένταξης των χώρων στάθμευσης στο σύνολο της
ανάπτυξης, θα επιδιώκεται όπως αυτοί χωροθετούνται σε ομάδες με άνετο ενδιάμεσο ελεύθερο
τοπιοτεχνημένο χώρο ή ακόμη και ως πολυώροφοι, υπέργειοι ή και υπόγειοι.
Χωροδιάταξη και ποιότητα ανάπτυξης
Στο εγκριμένο Τοπικό Σχέδιο Λάρνακας 2013 προνοούνται τα ακόλουθα:
(α) Η χωροδιάταξη των διαφόρων εγκαταστάσεων και κτιρίων θα πρέπει να γίνεται κατά τρόπο
που να διασφαλίζονται ικανοποιητικά οπτικές φυγές/ ανοίγματα.
(β) Η κλίμακα και η σύνθεση των όγκων των οικοδομών, καθώς και η αισθητική τους, θα
διασφαλίζουν την ορθολογική ένταξη στον περιβαλλοντικά ευαίσθητο χώρο των Αλυκών.
(γ) Ο χώρος της ανάπτυξης θα είναι τοπιοτεχνημένος με υλικά και στοιχεία υψηλών
προδιαγραφών, κατά τόπους θα δημιουργούνται υπαίθρια καθιστικά και η φύτευση θα γίνεται και με
υψηλή βλάστηση.
(δ) Σε κατάλληλη τοποθεσία θα δημιουργηθεί ιδιωτικός χώρος πρασίνου (πάρκο), που θα έχει
έκταση 10% περίπου του συνολικού χώρου που διατίθεται για το έργο, ο οποίος θα τοπιοτεχνηθεί
κατάλληλα και θα χρησιμοποιείται ελεύθερα από το κοινό.
(ε) Θα διασφαλίζονται οι μέγιστες δυνατές αποστάσεις των κτιρίων από τις «Ζώνες Δημόσιας
Ασφάλειας» και από την «Ισοθορυβική Καμπύλη Αεροσκαφών Lnight 60dB(A)» για σκοπούς ασφάλειας
και ανέσεων.
Γενικό Χωροταξικό Σχέδιο και άλλες Μελέτες
Η εκτέλεση της ανάπτυξης θα γίνεται με βάση Γενικό Χωροταξικό Σχέδιο (Master Plan) που θα
εγκρίνεται από τον Διευθυντή Τμήματος Πολεοδομίας και Οικήσεως, ως Πολεοδομική Αρχή.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 31
Μαζί με το Γενικό Χωροταξικό Σχέδιο και πέραν της τελικής αδειοδότησης της ανάπτυξης, θα
υποβάλλονται επίσης Κυκλοφοριακή Μελέτη, Μελέτη Περιβαλλοντικών Επιπτώσεων και Μελέτη
Εμπορικών Επιπτώσεων, που θα λαμβάνονται υπόψη από την ειδική επιτροπή.
Μελέτες Σκοπιμότητας και Τεχνο-οικονομικής Βιωσιμότητας
Για την αξιολόγηση των αιτήσεων θα υποβάλλονται Μελέτη Σκοπιμότητας και Τεχνο-οικονομική
Μελέτη Βιωσιμότητας, βάσει των οποίων θα αξιολογούνται η σκοπιμότητα, τα τεχνο-οικονομικά
δεδομένα και η έκταση και το μέγεθος της ανάπτυξης.
Η Μελέτη Σκοπιμότητας και η Τεχνο-οικονομική Μελέτη Βιωσιμότητας, η οποία, μεταξύ άλλων, θα
περιλαμβάνει το απαιτούμενο προτεινόμενο οικονομικό όφελος σε σχέση με το κόστος ώστε η
ανάπτυξη να καταστεί βιώσιμη, θα αξιολογούνται από ειδική επιτροπή που θα οριστεί από το
Υπουργείο Μεταφορών, Επικοινωνιών και Έργων.
Ειδικές Ρυθμίσεις λόγω Αερολιμένα
Ο χώρος προς ανάπτυξη δεν επηρεάζεται από τις «Ζώνες Δημόσιας Ασφάλειας» και από την
«Ισοθορυβική Καμπύλη Αεροσκαφών Lnight 60dB(A)». Σχετικά σχέδια επισυνάπτονται ως Παράρτημα
2.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 32
Annex 1 / Παράρτημα 1
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 33
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 34
Annex 2 / Παράρτημα 2
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 35
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 36
7.4 Appendix 4 – Disclosure Statement
Disclosure Statement
For the purpose of this Statement, the Requestor wishes to be notified if any of the Proponents are
aware of any:
� Matters relating to the commercial, financial or legal capacity or status of the Proponents or any
group entity, or
� Litigation, proceeding, judicial or administrative enquiry, investigation, claim or allegation, actual
or threatened, and whether admitted or contested, by another person or body (including
regulatory bodies such as the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, the Cyprus
Competition Commission, the Cyprus Stock Exchange or equivalent bodies), against or in any
way involving the Proponents or a group entity, or any settlement in respect of any such matter,
or
� Proven or alleged breach or default of or under any law, regulation, agreement, order or award
binding on the Proponents or a group entity, or
� Criminal or illegal act, insolvency, bankruptcy or scandalous or immoral behavior, conduct or
activities of any of its member of the board of directors related to the professional duties.
Wherever arising, inside or outside Cyprus, which may:
� Materially adversely affect its position as a Proponents or group entity, or
� Attract or have attracted negative publicity or attention or generate public or media criticism
either inside or outside Cyprus.
Where Proponents are, or may in the future, be involved as a group entity or provider for different
Proponents, the Proponents should provide details of:
� The relationship between related companies (if relevant)
� The processes by which decisions concerning the Proponents’ Proposal will be made and
responsibilities discharged during the procurement process
� Procedures and internal governance arrangements which the Proponents have or propose to
put in place to ensure transparency and accountability, and safeguard independence and
perceived competitiveness of their tenders.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 37
7.5 Appendix 5 – Form For Acknowledgement
Acknowledgment and Undertaking
By
[name, address of Proponents (or each Participant, where a group entity/(Proponent)
in favor of the Requestor.
1. Acknowledgement and Undertaking
The Proponent:
(a) Acknowledges and accepts each of the terms and conditions set out in the ‘Important Note’
contained in the RFP,
(b) Acknowledges and accepts all other general terms and conditions as set out in the RFP, and
(c) Undertakes to comply with the terms and conditions referred to in sections (a) and (b) above, as
the same may be varied by the Requestor from time to time.
2. Proponents’ Warranties
The Proponent hereby represents and warrants to the Requestor:
(a) They have made their own enquiries about the RFP and have carried out all relevant
investigations and have examined and satisfied themselves concerning all information provided in
the RFP or made available in connection with the RFP
(b) That the Proponent has the legal capacity and corporate authority to make a proposal in
response to this RFP and that there is no restriction under any relevant law to prevent the
Proponents from bidding for or undertaking the Project which could not be overcome to the
satisfaction of the Requestor [Proponents to include details here of any restrictions and how they
propose to address them]
(c) That all entity-specific information supplied in the Proponents’ Proposal relating to the
Proponent is correct and complete at the time of submitting the Proposal and not by omission
misleading
(d) That all information supplied in the Proponent’s Proposal, is correct and complete at the time of
submitting the Proposal and not by omission misleading.
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 38
(e) Disclaimer: All plans and photos are for the purpose of enlightened discussion and in no way
implies commitment to its implementation by any party, nor does it transfer property rights. No part
of this plan shall be reproduced in any format without the expressed written permission of the
Requestor. The Requestor accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of the data and information
presented on this plan. All plans and photos and the information contained and content implied
herein is subject to review and change by the Requestor.
3. Release
The Proponent (and if the Proponent is a group entity, jointly and severally), insofar as is permitted
by law, releases the Requestor from and against all claims, which it may now or in the future have
against the Requestor arising out of or in connection with:
(a) Any information contained in the RFP or made available in connection with the RFP
(b) The short listing of Proponents or any other matter in connection with the RFP or the RFP Process
(c) The costs and expenses of the Proponents in submitting a Proposal and participating in the RFP
Process.
4. Definitions
In this Agreement words used in capital letters, unless otherwise defined herein above shall have the
following meaning:
(a) ‘Request for Proposals’ (RFP) means the document entitled ‘Request for Proposals for the
Repurposing of Former Terminals at Larnaka and/or Pafos International Airports’.
(b) ‘Claim’ includes any claim:
(i) Under, arising out of, or in any way in connection with, any contract between the Proponents
and the Requestor in respect of the Project,
(ii) Arising out of, or in any way in connection with, any task, thing or relationship connected
with the Project, or
(iii) Otherwise at law or in equity including (without limitation):
(1) By statute,
(2) In tort, negligence or otherwise, including (without limitation) negligent is
representation, and
(3) For restitution including (without limitation) restitution based on unjust enrichment.
In witness whereof this Undertaking is signed:
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 39
[Instructions for Execution: All Proponents to execute using appropriate execution clause (examples
follow), and if under power of attorney, a certified copy of the power of attorney must be lodged
with the Proposal]
Signed sealed and delivered by [name of each Proponent] by its duly appointed attorney who states
that he or she has no notice of revocation of the power of attorney, in the presence of:
______________________________
Signature of Attorney
______________________________
Signature of Witness
______________________________ ____________________________________
Name of Witness in full Date of Power of Attorney
[or alternatively]
Executed by [Company] by on in the presence of:
______________________________ ____________________________________
Signature of Director Signature of Secretary / other Directors in full
______________________________ ____________________________________
Name of Director in full Name of Secretary / other Directors in full
[or alternatively]
The Common Seal of [Company] was affixed in the presence of:
______________________________ ____________________________________
Signature of Director Signature of Secretary / other Directors in full
______________________________ ____________________________________
Name of Director in full Name of Secretary / other Directors in full
7.6 Appendix 6 – Returnable Schedule
Returnable Schedule:
Repurposing of Former Terminals
Request for Proposals
Ref. GEN-30/15 40
This Schedule should record the Proponents’ technical capacity, expertise and partnering, alliance or
co- operative venture experience in respect to completed similar proposals.
� Proposal name
� Address
� Client
� Type of project and mix
� Size of proposal in terms of land area and gross floor area
� Construction timeframe
� Development structure including joint venture / partnering agreements
� Role of Proponents
� Proposal special features in terms of innovation
� Long-term operation / exit timeframe
� Key success factors