Research ArticleOn Coupled Systems of Time-Fractional Differential Problemsby Using a New Fractional Derivative
Ahmed Alsaedi1 Dumitru Baleanu23 Sina Etemad4 and Shahram Rezapour4
1Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science King Abdulaziz University Jeddah 21589 Saudi Arabia2Department of Mathematics Cankaya University Ogretmenler Caddesi 14 Balgat 06530 Ankara Turkey3Institute of Space Sciences Magurele Bucharest Romania4Department of Mathematics Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University Tabriz Iran
Correspondence should be addressed to Dumitru Baleanu dumitrucankayaedutr
Received 19 August 2015 Revised 12 October 2015 Accepted 27 October 2015
Academic Editor Ismat Beg
Copyright copy 2016 Ahmed Alsaedi et alThis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Licensewhich permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited
The existence of solutions for a coupled system of time-fractional differential equations including continuous functions and theCaputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative is examined After that we investigated a coupled system of time-fractional differentialinclusions including compact- and convex-valued 1198711-Caratheodory multifunctions and the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative
1 Introduction
The fractional calculus is nowadays an excellent mathemat-ical tool which opens the gates for finding hidden aspectsof the dynamics of the complex processes which appearnaturally in many branches of science and engineering [1ndash6] The methods and techniques of this type of calculus arecontinuously generalized and improved especially during thelast few decades We recall that the existence and multiplicityof positive solutions corresponding to singular fractionalboundary value problems were discussed in [7] Also theexistence results for several nonlinear fractional differentialequations were reported in [8] Besides the existence ofpositive solutions corresponding to a coupled system ofmultiterm singular fractional integrodifferential boundaryvalue problems was shown in [9] Inventing new derivativesand applying them to study the dynamics of complex systemsare an important priority for researchers As a result veryrecently a new fractional derivative without singular kernelhas been provided [10 11] By using themain results presentedin these two new works we present the next definition
Definition 1 (see [10]) The 120572 order Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractional differential derivative of the function 119906 is writtenas
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905)
=(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
2 (1 minus 120572)int
119905
0
exp [minus120572 (119905 minus 119904)1 minus 120572
]120597119906
120597119905119889119904
(119905 ge 0)
(1)
where119872(120572) represents a normalization function 0 lt 120572 lt 1and 119906 isin 1198671[(0 1) times (0 1)]
Note that (CF119863120572119905119906)(119909 119905) = 0 whenever 119906 is a constant
function and the kernel has no singularity at 119905 = 119904 [1011] Also Losada and Nieto defined the new time-fractionalintegral based on the new definition of Caputo-Fabriziofractional derivative [11] By using this idea we provide thenotion of Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractional integral
Hindawi Publishing CorporationJournal of Function SpacesVolume 2016 Article ID 4626940 8 pageshttpdxdoiorg10115520164626940
2 Journal of Function Spaces
Definition 2 The 120572 order time-fractional integral of a func-tion 119906 has the form [11]
(CF119868120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119906 (119909 119905)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119906 (119909 119904) 119889119904
(119905 ge 0)
(2)
where119872(120572) represents a normalization function and 0 lt 120572 lt1
Losada and Nieto showed that119872(120572) = 2(2 minus 120572) for all0 le 120572 le 1 [11] By substituting 119872(120572) in (1) we obtain thedefinition of the time-fractional Caputo-Fabrizio derivativeof order 120572 for a function 119906 as follows
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) =
1
1 minus 120572int
119905
0
exp [minus120572 (119905 minus 119904)1 minus 120572
]120597119906
120597119904119889119904
((119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1])
(3)
They proved that solution of (CF119863120572119905V)(119909 119905) = 119892(119909 119905) is given
by
V (119909 119905) =2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119892 (119909 119905)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119892 (119909 119904) 119889119904 + V (0 0) (4)
where 0 lt 120572 lt 1 and (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] [11]The next step is to consider (119883 119889) being a metric space
Let us denote by P(119883) and 2119883 the class of all subsets andthe class of all nonempty subsets of 119883 respectively HencePcl(119883)Pbd(119883)Pcv(119883)Pcp(119883) andPcpcv(119883) are the classof all closed subsets the class of all bounded subsets the classof all convex subsets the class of all compact subsets and theclass of all compact and convex subsets of 119883 respectivelyWe claim that 119906 isin 119883 is a fixed point of the multifunction119865 119883 rarr 2
119883 whenever 119906 isin 119865119906 [12] A multifunction 119865
[0 1] times [0 1] rarr Pcl(R) is called measurable whenever thefunction (119909 119905) 997891rarr 119889(119908 119865(119909 119905)) = inf 119908 minus V V isin 119865(119909 119905) ismeasurable for all119908 isin R [12]ThePompeiu-Hausdorffmetric119867119889 2119883times 2119883rarr [0infin) is defined by
119867119889(119860 119861) = maxsup
119886isin119860
119889 (119886 119861) sup119887isin119861
119889 (119860 119887) (5)
such that 119889(119860 119887) = inf119886isin119860
119889(119886 119887) [13] (CB(119883)119867119889) is a
metric space and (CB(119883)119867119889) depicts a generalized metric
space Here CB(119883) denotes the set of closed and boundedsubsets of119883 and119862(119883) represents the set of closed subsets of119883[12 13]We recall that119865 is said to be convex-valued (compact-valued) whenever 119865119906 is convex (compact) set for each 119906 isin 119883[12] We mention that a multifunction 119865 119883 rarr 119862(119883) is acontraction whenever there exists a constant 120574 isin (0 1) suchthat 119867
119889(119865119906 119865V) le 120574119889(119906 V) for all 119906 V isin 119883 [12] In 1970
Covitz andNadler proved that each closed-valued contractive
multifunction on a complete metric space has a fixed point[14]
Below we examine the existence of solutions for two cou-pled systems of nonlinear time-fractional differential equa-tions and inclusions within Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractionalderivative First we discuss the coupled system namely
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) = 119891
1(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(CF119863120573
119905V) (119909 119905) = 119891
2(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(6)
such that
119906 (0 0) = 0
V (0 0) = 0(7)
where 0 lt 120572 lt 1 0 lt 120573 lt 1 (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] andthe mappings 119891
1 1198912 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr R are
continuous functions In addition we discuss the existence ofsolutions for the coupled system of nonlinear time-fractionaldifferential inclusions
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) isin 119865
1(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(CF119863120573
119905V) (119909 119905) isin 119865
2(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(8)
such that
119906 (0 0) = 0
V (0 0) = 0(9)
where 1198651 1198652 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr P(R) are some
multivalued mapsWe say that 119865 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr 2
R is aCaratheodory multifunction whenever (119909 119905) 997891rarr 119865(119909 119905 119906
1
1199062) is measurable for all 119906
119894isin R and (119906
1 1199062) 997891rarr 119865(119909 119905 119906
1 1199062)
is upper semicontinuous (usc) for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times[0 1] and 119906
1 1199062isin 119883 [12] A Caratheodory multifunction
119865 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr 2R is said to be an 1198711-
Caratheodory whenever for each 120588 gt 0 there exists 120601120588isin
1198711([0 1] times [0 1]R+) such that1003817100381710038171003817119865 (119909 119905 1199061 1199062)
1003817100381710038171003817
= sup(119909119905)isin[01]times[01]
|119904| 119904 isin 119865 (119909 119905 1199061 1199062) le 120601120588 (119909 119905)(10)
for all |119906119894| le 120588 and for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] [12]
The set of selections of 119865119894at 119906119894is defined by
119878119865119894(119906119894)
= 119908119894isin 1198711([0 1] times [0 1] R) 119908119894 (119909 119905)
isin 119865 (119909 119905 119906119894(119909 119905) 119906
1015840
119894(119909 119905)) for almost all (119909 119905)
isin [0 1] times [0 1]
(11)
for all 119906119894 1199061015840
119894isin 119862R([0 1]times [0 1]) for 119894 = 1 2The sets 119878
119865119894(119906119894)are
nonempty for all119906119894isin 119862119870([0 1]times[0 1])whenever dim119870 lt infin
[12 15]The graph of themultifunction119865 119883 rarr 119884 is defined
Journal of Function Spaces 3
by the set Gr(119865) = (119909 119910) isin 119883 times 119884 119910 isin 119865(119909) (see [12 13])We say that the graph Gr(119865) of 119865 119883 rarr Pcl(119884) is a closedsubset of 119883 times 119884 whenever for all sequences 119906
119899119899isinN in 119883 and
119910119899119899isinN in 119884 with 119906
119899rarr 1199060 119910119899rarr 1199100 and 119910
119899isin 119865(119906
119899) for all
119899 we have 1199100isin 119865(119906
0) [12] Below we introduce the following
results which will be required in our proofs
Theorem 3 (see [12]) Suppose that 119883 is a Banach space 119879
119883 rarr 119883 is a completely continuous operator and the set 119870 =
119906 isin 119883 119906 = 120582119879119906 119891119900119903 119904119900119898119890 120582 isin [0 1] is bounded Then 119879has a fixed point
Lemma 4 (see [12 Proposition 12]) If 119865 119883 rarr P119888119897(119884) is
upper semicontinuous then119866119903(119865) is a closed subset of119883times119884 If119865 is completely continuous with a closed graph then it is uppersemicontinuous
Lemma 5 (see [12]) Let 119883 be a separable Banach space and119865 [0 1] times [0 1] times 119883 times 119883 rarr P
119888119901119888V(119883) an 1198711-Caratheodoryfunction Then the operator Θ sdot 119878
119865 119862119883([0 1] times [0 1]) rarr
P119888119901119888V(119862119883([0 1]times[0 1])) defined by 119906 997891rarr (Θsdot119878
119865)(119906) = Θ(119878
119865119906)
is a closed graph operator where Θ is a linear continuousmapping from 119871
1([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) into 119862
119883([0 1] times [0 1])
Theorem 6 (see [12]) Let 119864 be a Banach space 119862 a closedconvex subset of 119864 119880 an open subset of 119862 and 0 isin 119880Let us suppose that 119865 119880 rarr P
119888119901119888V(119862) depicts an uppersemicontinuous compact map such thatP
119888119901119888V(119862) denotes thefamily of nonempty compact convex subsets of 119862 Then either119865 admits a fixed point in119880 or there exist 119906 isin 120597119880 and 120582 isin (0 1)such that 119906 isin 120582119865(119906)
2 Main Results
First we investigate the coupled system
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) = 119891
1(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(CF119863120573
119905V) (119909 119905) = 119891
2(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(12)
equipped with the boundary value conditions 119906(0 0) = 0
and V(0 0) = 0 where 1198911 1198912 [0 1] times [0 1] times 119883
2rarr
119883 are continuous mappings 120572 120573 isin (0 1) 119909 119905 isin [0 1]and CF
119863120572
119905and CF
119863120573
119905are the Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractional
derivatives Now consider the Banach space 119883 = 119906
119906 isin 119862R([0 1] times [0 1]) endowed with the sup-norm 119906119883=
sup(119909119905)isin[01]times[01]
|119906(119909 119905)| Thus the product space (119883 times
119883 sdot 119883times119883
) is also a Banach space via the product norm(119906 V)
119883times119883= 119906119883+V119883 First we prove the next key lemma
Lemma 7 Suppose that119891 isin 1198711119883([0 1]times[0 1]) and 0 lt 120572 lt 1
The function 1199060isin 119862119883([0 1] times [0 1]) is a solution for the time-
fractional integral equation
119906 (119909 119905) =2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(119891 (119909 119905) minus 119891 (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119891 (119909 119904) 119889119904
(13)
if and only if1199060is a unique solution of the time-fractional differ-
ential equation
(119862119865119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) = 119891 (119909 119905) (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1]
119906 (0 0) = 0
(14)
Proof A solution of initial value problem (14) is denoted by1199060 As a result (CF119863120572
1199051199060)(119909 119905) = 119891(119909 119905) and 119906
0(0 0) = 0 By
integrating both sides we get
1199060(119909 119905) minus 119906
0(0 0)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(119891 (119909 119905) minus 119891 (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119891 (119909 119904) 119889119904
(15)
and so 1199060(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120572)(2 minus 120572)119872(120572))(119891(119909 119905) minus 119891(0 0)) +
(2120572(2 minus 120572)119872(120572)) int119905
0119891(119909 119904)119889119904 This shows that 119906
0represents
the solution of time-fractional integral equation (13) If1199061and
1199062are two distinct solutions for initial value problem (14)
then CF119863120572
1199051199061(119909 119905) minus
CF119863120572
1199051199062(119909 119905) = [
CF119863120572
1199051199061minus 1199062](119909 119905) = 0
and (1199061minus 1199062)(0 0) = 0 By the property of the Caputo-
Fabrizio time-fractional derivative in [11] we get 1199061= 1199062
Hence 1199060is a unique solution of initial value problem (14)
Now suppose that 1199060is a solution of time-fractional integral
equation (13)Then we conclude that 1199060(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120572)(2minus
120572)119872(120572))(119891(119909 119905)minus119891(0 0))+(2120572(2minus120572)119872(120572)) int119905
0119891(119909 119904)119889119904 By
using (4) one can see that this function represents a solutionfor initial value problem (14) Note that 119906
0(0 0) = 0
Now we consider (1)-(2) For each (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1]define the operators 119879
1 1198792 119883 rarr 119883 by
(1198791V) (119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
(1198792119906) (119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
(16)
4 Journal of Function Spaces
and put
1198731=
4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1198732=
4 minus 2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
(17)
Theorem 8 Suppose that 1198911 1198912 [0 1]times [0 1]times119883times119883 rarr 119883
are the continuous mappings in system (6)-(7) and there existpositive constants 119871
1and 119871
2fulfilling |119891
1(119909 119905 119906
1 1199062)| le 119871
1
and |1198912(119909 119905 119906
1 1199062)| le 119871
2for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and
1199061 1199062isin 119883 Then system (6)-(7) possesses at least one solution
Proof Let the operators 1198791 1198792 119883 rarr 119883 defined by
(16) We define the operator 119879 119883 times 119883 rarr 119883 times 119883 by119879(119906 V)(119909 119905)fl ((119879
1V)(119909 119905) (119879
2119906)(119909 119905)) for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times
[0 1] Note that 119879 is continuous because the mappings 1198911
and 1198912are continuous We prove that the operator 119879 maps
bounded sets into the bounded subsets of 119883 times 119883 Let Ω be abounded subset of119883times119883 (119906 V) isin Ω and (119909 119905) isin [0 1]times[0 1]Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (0 0 0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le 1198711
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119905 le 119871
1
4 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) le 119871
1
4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) = 119871
11198731
(18)
and so (1198791V)(119909 119905)
119883le 11987111198731 Also we have
1003816100381610038161003816(1198792119906) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
=
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (0 0 0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)
sdot int
119905
0
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 s))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le 1198712
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)+
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)119905 le 119871
2
4 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573) le 119871
2
4 minus 2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
= 11987121198732
(19)
and so (1198792119906)(119909 119905)
119883le 11987121198732 Thus 119879(119906 V)(119909 119905)
119883times119883le
11987111198731+ 11987121198732 This shows that the operator 119879maps bounded
sets into the bounded sets of 119883 times 119883 Now we show that theoperator119879 is equicontinuous Let (119909 119905
1) (119909 119905
2) isin [0 1]times[0 1]
with 1199051lt 1199052 Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 1199052) minus (1198791V) (119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 1199052 119906 (119909 119905
2) V (119909 119905
2))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199052
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
minus2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199051
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198911(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
1199052
1199051
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198911(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
21205721198711
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(1199052
minus 1199051)
(20)
Journal of Function Spaces 5
This implies that |(1198791V)(119909 119905
2) minus (119879
1V)(119909 119905
1)| rarr 0 whenever
(119909 1199052) rarr (119909 119905
1) By utilizing the Arzela-Ascoli theorem 119879
1
is completely continuous Similarly we have1003816100381610038161003816(1198792119906) (119909 1199052) minus (1198792119906) (119909 1199051)
1003816100381610038161003816
=
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 1199052 119906 (119909 119905
2) V (119909 119905
2))
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)int
1199052
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))
+2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
minus2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)int
1199051
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)
sdot int
1199052
1199051
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
21205731198712
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)(1199052
minus 1199051)
(21)
Again by utilizing the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we ob-serve that 119879
2is completely continuous Therefore we get
119879(119906 V)(119909 1199052) minus 119879(119906 V)(119909 119905
2)119883times119883
rarr 0 whenever (119909 1199052)
tends to (119909 1199051) Thus 119879 is completely continuous In the next
step we prove that
Ω = (119906 V) isin 119883 times 119883 (119906 V) = 120582119879 (119906 V) for some 120582
isin [0 1]
(22)
is bounded Let (119906 V) be an arbitrary element of Ω Choose120582 isin [0 1] fulfilling (119906 V) = 120582119879(119906 V) Hence V(119909 119905) =
120582(1198791V)(119909 119905) and 119906(119909 119905) = 120582(119879
2119906)(119909 119905) for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times
[0 1] Since
1
120582|V (119909 119905)| = 1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 119905)
1003816100381610038161003816 le 11987111198731(23)
we get |V(119909 119905)| le 12058211987111198731and so V(119909 119905)
119883le 12058211987111198731 Simi-
larly we prove that 119906(119909 119905)119883le 12058211987121198732 Thus (119906 V)
119883times119883le
120582[11987111198731+ 11987121198732] and so Ω is a bounded set Now by using
Theorem 3 we get that 119879 has a fixed point which is a solutionfor the coupled system of the time-fractional differentialequations
Next we study the existence of solution for the coupledsystem of time-fractional differential inclusions
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) isin 119865
1(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(CF119863120573
119905V) (119909 119905) isin 119865
2(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(24)
with the initial value conditions 119906(0 0) = 0 and V(0 0) = 0where 119865
1 1198652 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr P(R) are some
multivalued maps
Definition 9 One says that (1199061 1199062) isin 119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) times
119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) is a solution for the system of thetime-fractional differential inclusions whenever it satisfiesthe initial value conditions and there exists (119908
1 1199082) isin
1198711([0 1] times [0 1]) times 119871
1([0 1] times [0 1]) such that 119908
119894(119909 119905) isin
119865119894(119909 119905 119906(119909 119905) V(119909 119905)) for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and
119894 = 1 2 and also
119906119894(119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119908119894(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119908119894(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119908119894(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
(25)
for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and 119894 = 1 2
Theorem 10 Let 1198651 1198652 [0 1] times [0 1] timesR timesR rarr P
119888119901119888V(R)
be 1198711-Caratheodory multifunctions Suppose that there exist anondecreasing bounded continuousmap120595 [0infin) rarr (0infin)
and a continuous function 119901 [0 1] times [0 1] rarr (0infin) suchthat 119865
119894(119909 119905 119906
119894(119909 119905) 119906
1015840
119894(119909 119905)) le 119901(119909 119905)120595(119906
119894) for all (119909 119905) isin
[0 1] times [0 1] 119906119894 1199061015840
119894isin 119883 for 119894 = 1 2 Then coupled system
of time-fractional differential inclusions (8)-(9) has at least onesolution
Proof Define the operator119873 119883times119883 rarr 2119883times119883 by119873(119906
1 1199062) =
(1198731(1199061 1199062)
1198732(1199061 1199062)) where
1198731(1199061 1199062) = ℎ
1isin 119883 times 119883 there exists V
1
isin 1198781198651 1199061
such that ℎ1(119909 119905) = V
1(119909 119905) forall (119909 119905)
isin [0 1] times [0 1]
1198732(1199061 1199062) = ℎ
2isin 119883 times 119883 there exists V
2
isin 1198781198652 1199062
such that ℎ2(119909 119905) = V
2(119909 119905) forall (119909 119905)
isin [0 1] times [0 1]
6 Journal of Function Spaces
ℎ1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905) minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
ℎ2(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)V2(119909 119905) minus
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
sdot V2(0 0) +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
V2(119909 119904) 119889119904
(26)
By Lemma 7 it is clear that each fixed point of the operator119873 is a solution for system of time-fractional differentialinclusions (8) First we prove that the multifunction 119873 isconvex-valued Let (119906
1 1199062) isin 119883 times 119883 (ℎ
1 ℎ2) (ℎ1015840
1 ℎ1015840
2) isin
119873(1199061 1199062) Choose V
119894 V1015840119894isin 119878119865119894(1199061 1199062)
such that
ℎ119894(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V119894(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V119894(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V119894(119909 119904) 119889119904
ℎ1015840
119894(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1015840119894(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1015840119894(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1015840119894(119909 119904) 119889119904
(27)
for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and 119894 = 1 2 Let 0 le 120582 le 1be given Then we have
[120582ℎ119894+ (1 minus 120582) ℎ
1015840
119894] (119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[120582V119894(119909 119905) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[120582V119894(0 0) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
[120582V119894(119909 119904) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(119909 119904)] 119889119904
(28)
for 119894 = 1 2 Since the operator 119865119894has convex values 119878
119865119894(119906119894)is a
convex set and [120582ℎ119894+ (1 minus 120582)ℎ
1015840
119894] isin 119873119894(1199061 1199062) for 119894 = 1 2 This
implies that the operator119873 has convex values Now we provethat119873maps bounded sets of119883 into bounded sets Let 119903 gt 0119861119903= (1199061 1199062) isin 119883 times 119883 (119906
1 1199062) le 119903 be a bounded subset
of 119883 times 119883 (ℎ1 ℎ2) isin 119873(119906
1 1199062) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 119861119903 Then there
exists (V1 V2) isin 1198781198651(1199061)
times 1198781198652(1199062)
such that
ℎ1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(29)
and ℎ2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus120573)(2 minus120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus120573)(2 minus
120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for almost
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] If 119901infin= sup
(119909119905)isin[01]times[01]|119901(119909 119905)|
then we obtain
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904 le 119901 (119909 119905) 120595 (
100381710038171003817100381711990611003817100381710038171003817)
sdot 2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119905 le
10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
sdot 120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817) 4 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
le10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817) 4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) =
10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
sdot 120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)1198731
(30)
where the constant 1198731is defined by (17) This implies
that ℎ1 le 119901
infin120595(1199061)1198731 Similarly we get ℎ
2 le
119901infin120595(1199062)1198732 where the constant 119873
2is defined by (17)
Thus (ℎ1 ℎ2) le 119901
infin120595((119906
1 1199062))(1198731+ 1198732) Now we
prove that119873maps bounded sets into equicontinuous subsets
Journal of Function Spaces 7
of 119883 times 119883 Let (1199061 1199062) isin 119861119903and (119909 119905
1) (119909 119905
2) isin [0 1] times [0 1]
with 1199051lt 1199052 Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ1) (119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199052)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
1199052
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904 minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199051)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
minus2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199051
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199052
1199051
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057210038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(1199052minus 1199051)
(31)
By using a similar method we obtain1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ2) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ2) (119909 1199051)
1003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
1003816100381610038161003816V2 (119909 1199052) minus V2(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057310038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199062
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)(1199052minus 1199051)
(32)
Hence |ℎ119894(119909 1199052) minus ℎ119894(119909 1199051)| rarr 0 as (119909 119905
2) rarr (119909 119905
1) By
using the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we get that119873 is completelycontinuous Here we prove that119873 is upper semicontinuousBy using Lemma 4 119873 is upper semicontinuous whenever ithas a closed graph Since119873 is completely continuouswemustshow that119873 has a closed graph
Let (1199061198991 119906119899
2) be a sequence in 119883 times 119883 with (119906119899
1 119906119899
2) rarr
(1199060
1 1199060
2) and (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)with (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) rarr (ℎ
0
1 ℎ0
2)We
show that (ℎ01 ℎ0
2) isin 119873(119906
0
1 1199060
2) For each (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)
we can choose (V1198991 V1198992) isin 1198781198651(119906119899
1)times 1198781198652(119906119899
2)such that
ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1198991(119909 119904) 119889119904
(33)
and ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V119899
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V1198992(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V1198992(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1]times[0 1] It is sufficient to show that there exists(V01 V02) isin 1198781198651(1199060
1)times 1198781198652(1199060
2)such that
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(34)
and ℎ0
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] Now consider the linear operatorsΘ1 Θ2 1198711([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) rarr 119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) defined
by
Θ1(V) (119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V (119909 119904) 119889119904
(35)
andΘ2(V)(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V(119909 119905)minus(2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int119905
0V(119909 119904)119889119904 Note that
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
1(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(119909 119905) minus V0
1(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(0 0) minus V0
1(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
[V1198991(119909 119904) minus V0
1(119909 119904)] 119889119904
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
2(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(119909 119905) minus V0
2(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(0 0) minus V0
2(0 0)]
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
[V1198992(119909 119904) minus V0
2(119909 119904)] 119889119904
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
(36)
8 Journal of Function Spaces
By using Lemma 5 we get that Θ119894sdot 119878119865119894
is a closed graphoperator for 119894 = 1 2 Also we get ℎ119899
119894(119909 119905) isin Θ
119894(119878119865119894(119906119899
119894)) for
all 119899 Since 119906119899119894rarr 1199060
119894 we get
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(37)
and ℎ02(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for some
V0119894isin 119878119865119894(1199060
119894)(119894 = 1 2) Thus119873 has a closed graph
Now we prove that there is an open set 119880 sube 119883 with(1199061 1199062) notin 119873(119906
1 1199062) for all 120582 isin (0 1) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 120597119880
Let 120582 isin (0 1) and (1199061 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) Then there exists
V119894isin 1198711([0 1] times [0 1]R) with V
119894isin 119878119865119894(119906119894)
(119894 = 1 2) such that
1199061(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(38)
and 1199062(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] By using the above computedvalues we obtain 119906
119894 le 119901
infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894for 119894 = 1 2
This follows that 119906119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894le 1 for 119894 =
1 2 Choose 119872119894gt 0 with 119906
119894 = 119872
119894in such a way that
119872119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894gt 1 for 119894 = 1 2 Put 119880 = (119906
1 1199062) isin
119883 times 119883 (1199061 1199062) lt min 119872
11198722 We note that the
operator 119873 119880 rarr P(119883) is upper semicontinuous andcompletely continuous Also we showed that there is no(1199061 1199062) isin 120597119880 such that (119906
1 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) for some
120582 isin (0 1) Hence with the help of Theorem 6 we get that119873 has a fixed point (119906
1 1199062) isin 119880 which is a solution for time-
fractional differential inclusion (8)-(9)
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
Research of the last two authors was supported by AzarbaijanShahid Madani University
References
[1] R P Agarwal M Benchohra and S Hamani ldquoA survey onexistence results for boundary value problems of nonlinear frac-tional differential equations and inclusionsrdquo Acta ApplicandaeMathematicae vol 109 no 3 pp 973ndash1033 2010
[2] D Baleanu H Mohammadi and S Rezapour ldquoOn a nonlinearfractional differential equation on partially ordered metricspacesrdquo Advances in Difference Equations vol 2013 article 832013
[3] D Baleanu S Rezapour S Etemad and A Alsaedi ldquoOn a time-fractional integrodifferential equation via three-point boundaryvalue conditionsrdquo Mathematical Problems in Engineering vol2015 Article ID 785738 12 pages 2015
[4] K Diethelm The Analysis of Fractional Differential EquationsLecture Notes inMathematics Springer Berlin Germany 2010
[5] R Gorenflo and F Mainardi ldquoFractional calculus integraland differential equations of fractional orderrdquo in Fractals andFractional Calculus in ContinuumMechanics A Carpinteri andF Mainardi Eds Springer New York NY USA 1997
[6] G Samko A Kilbas and O Marichev Fractional Integrals andDerivatives Theory and Applications Gordon and Breach 1993
[7] Z Bai and W Sun ldquoExistence and multiplicity of positivesolutions for singular fractional boundary value problemsrdquoComputers amp Mathematics with Applications vol 63 no 9 pp1369ndash1381 2012
[8] D Baleanu R P Agarwal H Mohammadi and S RezapourldquoSome existence results for a nonlinear fractional differentialequation on partially ordered Banach spacesrdquo Boundary ValueProblems 2013112 8 pages 2013
[9] D Baleanu S Zahra Nazemi and S Rezapour ldquoThe existenceof positive solutions for a new coupled system of multiterm sin-gular fractional integrodifferential boundary value problemsrdquoAbstract and Applied Analysis vol 2013 Article ID 368659 15pages 2013
[10] M Caputo and M Fabrizio ldquoA new definition of fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 73ndash85 2015
[11] J Losada and J J Nieto ldquoProperties of a new fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 87ndash92 2015
[12] D R Smart Fixed PointTheorems Cambridge University PressCambridge UK 1980
[13] S M Aleomraninejad S Rezapour and N Shahzad ldquoOn fixedpoint generalizations of Suzukirsquos methodrdquo Applied MathematicsLetters vol 24 no 7 pp 1037ndash1040 2011
[14] H Covitz and S B Nadler ldquoMulti-valued contractionmappingsin generalizedmetric spacesrdquo Israel Journal of Mathematics vol8 pp 5ndash11 1970
[15] K S Miller and B Ross An Introduction to the FractionalCalculus and Fractional Differential Eqautions John Wiley ampSons 1993
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
2 Journal of Function Spaces
Definition 2 The 120572 order time-fractional integral of a func-tion 119906 has the form [11]
(CF119868120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119906 (119909 119905)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119906 (119909 119904) 119889119904
(119905 ge 0)
(2)
where119872(120572) represents a normalization function and 0 lt 120572 lt1
Losada and Nieto showed that119872(120572) = 2(2 minus 120572) for all0 le 120572 le 1 [11] By substituting 119872(120572) in (1) we obtain thedefinition of the time-fractional Caputo-Fabrizio derivativeof order 120572 for a function 119906 as follows
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) =
1
1 minus 120572int
119905
0
exp [minus120572 (119905 minus 119904)1 minus 120572
]120597119906
120597119904119889119904
((119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1])
(3)
They proved that solution of (CF119863120572119905V)(119909 119905) = 119892(119909 119905) is given
by
V (119909 119905) =2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119892 (119909 119905)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119892 (119909 119904) 119889119904 + V (0 0) (4)
where 0 lt 120572 lt 1 and (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] [11]The next step is to consider (119883 119889) being a metric space
Let us denote by P(119883) and 2119883 the class of all subsets andthe class of all nonempty subsets of 119883 respectively HencePcl(119883)Pbd(119883)Pcv(119883)Pcp(119883) andPcpcv(119883) are the classof all closed subsets the class of all bounded subsets the classof all convex subsets the class of all compact subsets and theclass of all compact and convex subsets of 119883 respectivelyWe claim that 119906 isin 119883 is a fixed point of the multifunction119865 119883 rarr 2
119883 whenever 119906 isin 119865119906 [12] A multifunction 119865
[0 1] times [0 1] rarr Pcl(R) is called measurable whenever thefunction (119909 119905) 997891rarr 119889(119908 119865(119909 119905)) = inf 119908 minus V V isin 119865(119909 119905) ismeasurable for all119908 isin R [12]ThePompeiu-Hausdorffmetric119867119889 2119883times 2119883rarr [0infin) is defined by
119867119889(119860 119861) = maxsup
119886isin119860
119889 (119886 119861) sup119887isin119861
119889 (119860 119887) (5)
such that 119889(119860 119887) = inf119886isin119860
119889(119886 119887) [13] (CB(119883)119867119889) is a
metric space and (CB(119883)119867119889) depicts a generalized metric
space Here CB(119883) denotes the set of closed and boundedsubsets of119883 and119862(119883) represents the set of closed subsets of119883[12 13]We recall that119865 is said to be convex-valued (compact-valued) whenever 119865119906 is convex (compact) set for each 119906 isin 119883[12] We mention that a multifunction 119865 119883 rarr 119862(119883) is acontraction whenever there exists a constant 120574 isin (0 1) suchthat 119867
119889(119865119906 119865V) le 120574119889(119906 V) for all 119906 V isin 119883 [12] In 1970
Covitz andNadler proved that each closed-valued contractive
multifunction on a complete metric space has a fixed point[14]
Below we examine the existence of solutions for two cou-pled systems of nonlinear time-fractional differential equa-tions and inclusions within Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractionalderivative First we discuss the coupled system namely
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) = 119891
1(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(CF119863120573
119905V) (119909 119905) = 119891
2(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(6)
such that
119906 (0 0) = 0
V (0 0) = 0(7)
where 0 lt 120572 lt 1 0 lt 120573 lt 1 (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] andthe mappings 119891
1 1198912 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr R are
continuous functions In addition we discuss the existence ofsolutions for the coupled system of nonlinear time-fractionaldifferential inclusions
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) isin 119865
1(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(CF119863120573
119905V) (119909 119905) isin 119865
2(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(8)
such that
119906 (0 0) = 0
V (0 0) = 0(9)
where 1198651 1198652 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr P(R) are some
multivalued mapsWe say that 119865 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr 2
R is aCaratheodory multifunction whenever (119909 119905) 997891rarr 119865(119909 119905 119906
1
1199062) is measurable for all 119906
119894isin R and (119906
1 1199062) 997891rarr 119865(119909 119905 119906
1 1199062)
is upper semicontinuous (usc) for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times[0 1] and 119906
1 1199062isin 119883 [12] A Caratheodory multifunction
119865 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr 2R is said to be an 1198711-
Caratheodory whenever for each 120588 gt 0 there exists 120601120588isin
1198711([0 1] times [0 1]R+) such that1003817100381710038171003817119865 (119909 119905 1199061 1199062)
1003817100381710038171003817
= sup(119909119905)isin[01]times[01]
|119904| 119904 isin 119865 (119909 119905 1199061 1199062) le 120601120588 (119909 119905)(10)
for all |119906119894| le 120588 and for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] [12]
The set of selections of 119865119894at 119906119894is defined by
119878119865119894(119906119894)
= 119908119894isin 1198711([0 1] times [0 1] R) 119908119894 (119909 119905)
isin 119865 (119909 119905 119906119894(119909 119905) 119906
1015840
119894(119909 119905)) for almost all (119909 119905)
isin [0 1] times [0 1]
(11)
for all 119906119894 1199061015840
119894isin 119862R([0 1]times [0 1]) for 119894 = 1 2The sets 119878
119865119894(119906119894)are
nonempty for all119906119894isin 119862119870([0 1]times[0 1])whenever dim119870 lt infin
[12 15]The graph of themultifunction119865 119883 rarr 119884 is defined
Journal of Function Spaces 3
by the set Gr(119865) = (119909 119910) isin 119883 times 119884 119910 isin 119865(119909) (see [12 13])We say that the graph Gr(119865) of 119865 119883 rarr Pcl(119884) is a closedsubset of 119883 times 119884 whenever for all sequences 119906
119899119899isinN in 119883 and
119910119899119899isinN in 119884 with 119906
119899rarr 1199060 119910119899rarr 1199100 and 119910
119899isin 119865(119906
119899) for all
119899 we have 1199100isin 119865(119906
0) [12] Below we introduce the following
results which will be required in our proofs
Theorem 3 (see [12]) Suppose that 119883 is a Banach space 119879
119883 rarr 119883 is a completely continuous operator and the set 119870 =
119906 isin 119883 119906 = 120582119879119906 119891119900119903 119904119900119898119890 120582 isin [0 1] is bounded Then 119879has a fixed point
Lemma 4 (see [12 Proposition 12]) If 119865 119883 rarr P119888119897(119884) is
upper semicontinuous then119866119903(119865) is a closed subset of119883times119884 If119865 is completely continuous with a closed graph then it is uppersemicontinuous
Lemma 5 (see [12]) Let 119883 be a separable Banach space and119865 [0 1] times [0 1] times 119883 times 119883 rarr P
119888119901119888V(119883) an 1198711-Caratheodoryfunction Then the operator Θ sdot 119878
119865 119862119883([0 1] times [0 1]) rarr
P119888119901119888V(119862119883([0 1]times[0 1])) defined by 119906 997891rarr (Θsdot119878
119865)(119906) = Θ(119878
119865119906)
is a closed graph operator where Θ is a linear continuousmapping from 119871
1([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) into 119862
119883([0 1] times [0 1])
Theorem 6 (see [12]) Let 119864 be a Banach space 119862 a closedconvex subset of 119864 119880 an open subset of 119862 and 0 isin 119880Let us suppose that 119865 119880 rarr P
119888119901119888V(119862) depicts an uppersemicontinuous compact map such thatP
119888119901119888V(119862) denotes thefamily of nonempty compact convex subsets of 119862 Then either119865 admits a fixed point in119880 or there exist 119906 isin 120597119880 and 120582 isin (0 1)such that 119906 isin 120582119865(119906)
2 Main Results
First we investigate the coupled system
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) = 119891
1(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(CF119863120573
119905V) (119909 119905) = 119891
2(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(12)
equipped with the boundary value conditions 119906(0 0) = 0
and V(0 0) = 0 where 1198911 1198912 [0 1] times [0 1] times 119883
2rarr
119883 are continuous mappings 120572 120573 isin (0 1) 119909 119905 isin [0 1]and CF
119863120572
119905and CF
119863120573
119905are the Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractional
derivatives Now consider the Banach space 119883 = 119906
119906 isin 119862R([0 1] times [0 1]) endowed with the sup-norm 119906119883=
sup(119909119905)isin[01]times[01]
|119906(119909 119905)| Thus the product space (119883 times
119883 sdot 119883times119883
) is also a Banach space via the product norm(119906 V)
119883times119883= 119906119883+V119883 First we prove the next key lemma
Lemma 7 Suppose that119891 isin 1198711119883([0 1]times[0 1]) and 0 lt 120572 lt 1
The function 1199060isin 119862119883([0 1] times [0 1]) is a solution for the time-
fractional integral equation
119906 (119909 119905) =2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(119891 (119909 119905) minus 119891 (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119891 (119909 119904) 119889119904
(13)
if and only if1199060is a unique solution of the time-fractional differ-
ential equation
(119862119865119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) = 119891 (119909 119905) (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1]
119906 (0 0) = 0
(14)
Proof A solution of initial value problem (14) is denoted by1199060 As a result (CF119863120572
1199051199060)(119909 119905) = 119891(119909 119905) and 119906
0(0 0) = 0 By
integrating both sides we get
1199060(119909 119905) minus 119906
0(0 0)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(119891 (119909 119905) minus 119891 (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119891 (119909 119904) 119889119904
(15)
and so 1199060(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120572)(2 minus 120572)119872(120572))(119891(119909 119905) minus 119891(0 0)) +
(2120572(2 minus 120572)119872(120572)) int119905
0119891(119909 119904)119889119904 This shows that 119906
0represents
the solution of time-fractional integral equation (13) If1199061and
1199062are two distinct solutions for initial value problem (14)
then CF119863120572
1199051199061(119909 119905) minus
CF119863120572
1199051199062(119909 119905) = [
CF119863120572
1199051199061minus 1199062](119909 119905) = 0
and (1199061minus 1199062)(0 0) = 0 By the property of the Caputo-
Fabrizio time-fractional derivative in [11] we get 1199061= 1199062
Hence 1199060is a unique solution of initial value problem (14)
Now suppose that 1199060is a solution of time-fractional integral
equation (13)Then we conclude that 1199060(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120572)(2minus
120572)119872(120572))(119891(119909 119905)minus119891(0 0))+(2120572(2minus120572)119872(120572)) int119905
0119891(119909 119904)119889119904 By
using (4) one can see that this function represents a solutionfor initial value problem (14) Note that 119906
0(0 0) = 0
Now we consider (1)-(2) For each (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1]define the operators 119879
1 1198792 119883 rarr 119883 by
(1198791V) (119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
(1198792119906) (119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
(16)
4 Journal of Function Spaces
and put
1198731=
4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1198732=
4 minus 2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
(17)
Theorem 8 Suppose that 1198911 1198912 [0 1]times [0 1]times119883times119883 rarr 119883
are the continuous mappings in system (6)-(7) and there existpositive constants 119871
1and 119871
2fulfilling |119891
1(119909 119905 119906
1 1199062)| le 119871
1
and |1198912(119909 119905 119906
1 1199062)| le 119871
2for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and
1199061 1199062isin 119883 Then system (6)-(7) possesses at least one solution
Proof Let the operators 1198791 1198792 119883 rarr 119883 defined by
(16) We define the operator 119879 119883 times 119883 rarr 119883 times 119883 by119879(119906 V)(119909 119905)fl ((119879
1V)(119909 119905) (119879
2119906)(119909 119905)) for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times
[0 1] Note that 119879 is continuous because the mappings 1198911
and 1198912are continuous We prove that the operator 119879 maps
bounded sets into the bounded subsets of 119883 times 119883 Let Ω be abounded subset of119883times119883 (119906 V) isin Ω and (119909 119905) isin [0 1]times[0 1]Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (0 0 0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le 1198711
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119905 le 119871
1
4 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) le 119871
1
4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) = 119871
11198731
(18)
and so (1198791V)(119909 119905)
119883le 11987111198731 Also we have
1003816100381610038161003816(1198792119906) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
=
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (0 0 0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)
sdot int
119905
0
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 s))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le 1198712
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)+
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)119905 le 119871
2
4 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573) le 119871
2
4 minus 2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
= 11987121198732
(19)
and so (1198792119906)(119909 119905)
119883le 11987121198732 Thus 119879(119906 V)(119909 119905)
119883times119883le
11987111198731+ 11987121198732 This shows that the operator 119879maps bounded
sets into the bounded sets of 119883 times 119883 Now we show that theoperator119879 is equicontinuous Let (119909 119905
1) (119909 119905
2) isin [0 1]times[0 1]
with 1199051lt 1199052 Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 1199052) minus (1198791V) (119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 1199052 119906 (119909 119905
2) V (119909 119905
2))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199052
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
minus2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199051
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198911(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
1199052
1199051
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198911(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
21205721198711
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(1199052
minus 1199051)
(20)
Journal of Function Spaces 5
This implies that |(1198791V)(119909 119905
2) minus (119879
1V)(119909 119905
1)| rarr 0 whenever
(119909 1199052) rarr (119909 119905
1) By utilizing the Arzela-Ascoli theorem 119879
1
is completely continuous Similarly we have1003816100381610038161003816(1198792119906) (119909 1199052) minus (1198792119906) (119909 1199051)
1003816100381610038161003816
=
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 1199052 119906 (119909 119905
2) V (119909 119905
2))
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)int
1199052
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))
+2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
minus2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)int
1199051
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)
sdot int
1199052
1199051
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
21205731198712
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)(1199052
minus 1199051)
(21)
Again by utilizing the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we ob-serve that 119879
2is completely continuous Therefore we get
119879(119906 V)(119909 1199052) minus 119879(119906 V)(119909 119905
2)119883times119883
rarr 0 whenever (119909 1199052)
tends to (119909 1199051) Thus 119879 is completely continuous In the next
step we prove that
Ω = (119906 V) isin 119883 times 119883 (119906 V) = 120582119879 (119906 V) for some 120582
isin [0 1]
(22)
is bounded Let (119906 V) be an arbitrary element of Ω Choose120582 isin [0 1] fulfilling (119906 V) = 120582119879(119906 V) Hence V(119909 119905) =
120582(1198791V)(119909 119905) and 119906(119909 119905) = 120582(119879
2119906)(119909 119905) for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times
[0 1] Since
1
120582|V (119909 119905)| = 1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 119905)
1003816100381610038161003816 le 11987111198731(23)
we get |V(119909 119905)| le 12058211987111198731and so V(119909 119905)
119883le 12058211987111198731 Simi-
larly we prove that 119906(119909 119905)119883le 12058211987121198732 Thus (119906 V)
119883times119883le
120582[11987111198731+ 11987121198732] and so Ω is a bounded set Now by using
Theorem 3 we get that 119879 has a fixed point which is a solutionfor the coupled system of the time-fractional differentialequations
Next we study the existence of solution for the coupledsystem of time-fractional differential inclusions
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) isin 119865
1(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(CF119863120573
119905V) (119909 119905) isin 119865
2(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(24)
with the initial value conditions 119906(0 0) = 0 and V(0 0) = 0where 119865
1 1198652 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr P(R) are some
multivalued maps
Definition 9 One says that (1199061 1199062) isin 119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) times
119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) is a solution for the system of thetime-fractional differential inclusions whenever it satisfiesthe initial value conditions and there exists (119908
1 1199082) isin
1198711([0 1] times [0 1]) times 119871
1([0 1] times [0 1]) such that 119908
119894(119909 119905) isin
119865119894(119909 119905 119906(119909 119905) V(119909 119905)) for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and
119894 = 1 2 and also
119906119894(119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119908119894(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119908119894(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119908119894(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
(25)
for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and 119894 = 1 2
Theorem 10 Let 1198651 1198652 [0 1] times [0 1] timesR timesR rarr P
119888119901119888V(R)
be 1198711-Caratheodory multifunctions Suppose that there exist anondecreasing bounded continuousmap120595 [0infin) rarr (0infin)
and a continuous function 119901 [0 1] times [0 1] rarr (0infin) suchthat 119865
119894(119909 119905 119906
119894(119909 119905) 119906
1015840
119894(119909 119905)) le 119901(119909 119905)120595(119906
119894) for all (119909 119905) isin
[0 1] times [0 1] 119906119894 1199061015840
119894isin 119883 for 119894 = 1 2 Then coupled system
of time-fractional differential inclusions (8)-(9) has at least onesolution
Proof Define the operator119873 119883times119883 rarr 2119883times119883 by119873(119906
1 1199062) =
(1198731(1199061 1199062)
1198732(1199061 1199062)) where
1198731(1199061 1199062) = ℎ
1isin 119883 times 119883 there exists V
1
isin 1198781198651 1199061
such that ℎ1(119909 119905) = V
1(119909 119905) forall (119909 119905)
isin [0 1] times [0 1]
1198732(1199061 1199062) = ℎ
2isin 119883 times 119883 there exists V
2
isin 1198781198652 1199062
such that ℎ2(119909 119905) = V
2(119909 119905) forall (119909 119905)
isin [0 1] times [0 1]
6 Journal of Function Spaces
ℎ1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905) minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
ℎ2(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)V2(119909 119905) minus
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
sdot V2(0 0) +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
V2(119909 119904) 119889119904
(26)
By Lemma 7 it is clear that each fixed point of the operator119873 is a solution for system of time-fractional differentialinclusions (8) First we prove that the multifunction 119873 isconvex-valued Let (119906
1 1199062) isin 119883 times 119883 (ℎ
1 ℎ2) (ℎ1015840
1 ℎ1015840
2) isin
119873(1199061 1199062) Choose V
119894 V1015840119894isin 119878119865119894(1199061 1199062)
such that
ℎ119894(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V119894(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V119894(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V119894(119909 119904) 119889119904
ℎ1015840
119894(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1015840119894(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1015840119894(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1015840119894(119909 119904) 119889119904
(27)
for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and 119894 = 1 2 Let 0 le 120582 le 1be given Then we have
[120582ℎ119894+ (1 minus 120582) ℎ
1015840
119894] (119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[120582V119894(119909 119905) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[120582V119894(0 0) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
[120582V119894(119909 119904) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(119909 119904)] 119889119904
(28)
for 119894 = 1 2 Since the operator 119865119894has convex values 119878
119865119894(119906119894)is a
convex set and [120582ℎ119894+ (1 minus 120582)ℎ
1015840
119894] isin 119873119894(1199061 1199062) for 119894 = 1 2 This
implies that the operator119873 has convex values Now we provethat119873maps bounded sets of119883 into bounded sets Let 119903 gt 0119861119903= (1199061 1199062) isin 119883 times 119883 (119906
1 1199062) le 119903 be a bounded subset
of 119883 times 119883 (ℎ1 ℎ2) isin 119873(119906
1 1199062) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 119861119903 Then there
exists (V1 V2) isin 1198781198651(1199061)
times 1198781198652(1199062)
such that
ℎ1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(29)
and ℎ2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus120573)(2 minus120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus120573)(2 minus
120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for almost
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] If 119901infin= sup
(119909119905)isin[01]times[01]|119901(119909 119905)|
then we obtain
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904 le 119901 (119909 119905) 120595 (
100381710038171003817100381711990611003817100381710038171003817)
sdot 2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119905 le
10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
sdot 120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817) 4 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
le10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817) 4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) =
10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
sdot 120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)1198731
(30)
where the constant 1198731is defined by (17) This implies
that ℎ1 le 119901
infin120595(1199061)1198731 Similarly we get ℎ
2 le
119901infin120595(1199062)1198732 where the constant 119873
2is defined by (17)
Thus (ℎ1 ℎ2) le 119901
infin120595((119906
1 1199062))(1198731+ 1198732) Now we
prove that119873maps bounded sets into equicontinuous subsets
Journal of Function Spaces 7
of 119883 times 119883 Let (1199061 1199062) isin 119861119903and (119909 119905
1) (119909 119905
2) isin [0 1] times [0 1]
with 1199051lt 1199052 Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ1) (119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199052)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
1199052
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904 minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199051)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
minus2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199051
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199052
1199051
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057210038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(1199052minus 1199051)
(31)
By using a similar method we obtain1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ2) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ2) (119909 1199051)
1003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
1003816100381610038161003816V2 (119909 1199052) minus V2(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057310038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199062
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)(1199052minus 1199051)
(32)
Hence |ℎ119894(119909 1199052) minus ℎ119894(119909 1199051)| rarr 0 as (119909 119905
2) rarr (119909 119905
1) By
using the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we get that119873 is completelycontinuous Here we prove that119873 is upper semicontinuousBy using Lemma 4 119873 is upper semicontinuous whenever ithas a closed graph Since119873 is completely continuouswemustshow that119873 has a closed graph
Let (1199061198991 119906119899
2) be a sequence in 119883 times 119883 with (119906119899
1 119906119899
2) rarr
(1199060
1 1199060
2) and (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)with (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) rarr (ℎ
0
1 ℎ0
2)We
show that (ℎ01 ℎ0
2) isin 119873(119906
0
1 1199060
2) For each (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)
we can choose (V1198991 V1198992) isin 1198781198651(119906119899
1)times 1198781198652(119906119899
2)such that
ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1198991(119909 119904) 119889119904
(33)
and ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V119899
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V1198992(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V1198992(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1]times[0 1] It is sufficient to show that there exists(V01 V02) isin 1198781198651(1199060
1)times 1198781198652(1199060
2)such that
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(34)
and ℎ0
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] Now consider the linear operatorsΘ1 Θ2 1198711([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) rarr 119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) defined
by
Θ1(V) (119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V (119909 119904) 119889119904
(35)
andΘ2(V)(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V(119909 119905)minus(2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int119905
0V(119909 119904)119889119904 Note that
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
1(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(119909 119905) minus V0
1(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(0 0) minus V0
1(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
[V1198991(119909 119904) minus V0
1(119909 119904)] 119889119904
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
2(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(119909 119905) minus V0
2(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(0 0) minus V0
2(0 0)]
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
[V1198992(119909 119904) minus V0
2(119909 119904)] 119889119904
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
(36)
8 Journal of Function Spaces
By using Lemma 5 we get that Θ119894sdot 119878119865119894
is a closed graphoperator for 119894 = 1 2 Also we get ℎ119899
119894(119909 119905) isin Θ
119894(119878119865119894(119906119899
119894)) for
all 119899 Since 119906119899119894rarr 1199060
119894 we get
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(37)
and ℎ02(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for some
V0119894isin 119878119865119894(1199060
119894)(119894 = 1 2) Thus119873 has a closed graph
Now we prove that there is an open set 119880 sube 119883 with(1199061 1199062) notin 119873(119906
1 1199062) for all 120582 isin (0 1) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 120597119880
Let 120582 isin (0 1) and (1199061 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) Then there exists
V119894isin 1198711([0 1] times [0 1]R) with V
119894isin 119878119865119894(119906119894)
(119894 = 1 2) such that
1199061(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(38)
and 1199062(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] By using the above computedvalues we obtain 119906
119894 le 119901
infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894for 119894 = 1 2
This follows that 119906119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894le 1 for 119894 =
1 2 Choose 119872119894gt 0 with 119906
119894 = 119872
119894in such a way that
119872119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894gt 1 for 119894 = 1 2 Put 119880 = (119906
1 1199062) isin
119883 times 119883 (1199061 1199062) lt min 119872
11198722 We note that the
operator 119873 119880 rarr P(119883) is upper semicontinuous andcompletely continuous Also we showed that there is no(1199061 1199062) isin 120597119880 such that (119906
1 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) for some
120582 isin (0 1) Hence with the help of Theorem 6 we get that119873 has a fixed point (119906
1 1199062) isin 119880 which is a solution for time-
fractional differential inclusion (8)-(9)
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
Research of the last two authors was supported by AzarbaijanShahid Madani University
References
[1] R P Agarwal M Benchohra and S Hamani ldquoA survey onexistence results for boundary value problems of nonlinear frac-tional differential equations and inclusionsrdquo Acta ApplicandaeMathematicae vol 109 no 3 pp 973ndash1033 2010
[2] D Baleanu H Mohammadi and S Rezapour ldquoOn a nonlinearfractional differential equation on partially ordered metricspacesrdquo Advances in Difference Equations vol 2013 article 832013
[3] D Baleanu S Rezapour S Etemad and A Alsaedi ldquoOn a time-fractional integrodifferential equation via three-point boundaryvalue conditionsrdquo Mathematical Problems in Engineering vol2015 Article ID 785738 12 pages 2015
[4] K Diethelm The Analysis of Fractional Differential EquationsLecture Notes inMathematics Springer Berlin Germany 2010
[5] R Gorenflo and F Mainardi ldquoFractional calculus integraland differential equations of fractional orderrdquo in Fractals andFractional Calculus in ContinuumMechanics A Carpinteri andF Mainardi Eds Springer New York NY USA 1997
[6] G Samko A Kilbas and O Marichev Fractional Integrals andDerivatives Theory and Applications Gordon and Breach 1993
[7] Z Bai and W Sun ldquoExistence and multiplicity of positivesolutions for singular fractional boundary value problemsrdquoComputers amp Mathematics with Applications vol 63 no 9 pp1369ndash1381 2012
[8] D Baleanu R P Agarwal H Mohammadi and S RezapourldquoSome existence results for a nonlinear fractional differentialequation on partially ordered Banach spacesrdquo Boundary ValueProblems 2013112 8 pages 2013
[9] D Baleanu S Zahra Nazemi and S Rezapour ldquoThe existenceof positive solutions for a new coupled system of multiterm sin-gular fractional integrodifferential boundary value problemsrdquoAbstract and Applied Analysis vol 2013 Article ID 368659 15pages 2013
[10] M Caputo and M Fabrizio ldquoA new definition of fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 73ndash85 2015
[11] J Losada and J J Nieto ldquoProperties of a new fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 87ndash92 2015
[12] D R Smart Fixed PointTheorems Cambridge University PressCambridge UK 1980
[13] S M Aleomraninejad S Rezapour and N Shahzad ldquoOn fixedpoint generalizations of Suzukirsquos methodrdquo Applied MathematicsLetters vol 24 no 7 pp 1037ndash1040 2011
[14] H Covitz and S B Nadler ldquoMulti-valued contractionmappingsin generalizedmetric spacesrdquo Israel Journal of Mathematics vol8 pp 5ndash11 1970
[15] K S Miller and B Ross An Introduction to the FractionalCalculus and Fractional Differential Eqautions John Wiley ampSons 1993
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Journal of Function Spaces 3
by the set Gr(119865) = (119909 119910) isin 119883 times 119884 119910 isin 119865(119909) (see [12 13])We say that the graph Gr(119865) of 119865 119883 rarr Pcl(119884) is a closedsubset of 119883 times 119884 whenever for all sequences 119906
119899119899isinN in 119883 and
119910119899119899isinN in 119884 with 119906
119899rarr 1199060 119910119899rarr 1199100 and 119910
119899isin 119865(119906
119899) for all
119899 we have 1199100isin 119865(119906
0) [12] Below we introduce the following
results which will be required in our proofs
Theorem 3 (see [12]) Suppose that 119883 is a Banach space 119879
119883 rarr 119883 is a completely continuous operator and the set 119870 =
119906 isin 119883 119906 = 120582119879119906 119891119900119903 119904119900119898119890 120582 isin [0 1] is bounded Then 119879has a fixed point
Lemma 4 (see [12 Proposition 12]) If 119865 119883 rarr P119888119897(119884) is
upper semicontinuous then119866119903(119865) is a closed subset of119883times119884 If119865 is completely continuous with a closed graph then it is uppersemicontinuous
Lemma 5 (see [12]) Let 119883 be a separable Banach space and119865 [0 1] times [0 1] times 119883 times 119883 rarr P
119888119901119888V(119883) an 1198711-Caratheodoryfunction Then the operator Θ sdot 119878
119865 119862119883([0 1] times [0 1]) rarr
P119888119901119888V(119862119883([0 1]times[0 1])) defined by 119906 997891rarr (Θsdot119878
119865)(119906) = Θ(119878
119865119906)
is a closed graph operator where Θ is a linear continuousmapping from 119871
1([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) into 119862
119883([0 1] times [0 1])
Theorem 6 (see [12]) Let 119864 be a Banach space 119862 a closedconvex subset of 119864 119880 an open subset of 119862 and 0 isin 119880Let us suppose that 119865 119880 rarr P
119888119901119888V(119862) depicts an uppersemicontinuous compact map such thatP
119888119901119888V(119862) denotes thefamily of nonempty compact convex subsets of 119862 Then either119865 admits a fixed point in119880 or there exist 119906 isin 120597119880 and 120582 isin (0 1)such that 119906 isin 120582119865(119906)
2 Main Results
First we investigate the coupled system
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) = 119891
1(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(CF119863120573
119905V) (119909 119905) = 119891
2(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(12)
equipped with the boundary value conditions 119906(0 0) = 0
and V(0 0) = 0 where 1198911 1198912 [0 1] times [0 1] times 119883
2rarr
119883 are continuous mappings 120572 120573 isin (0 1) 119909 119905 isin [0 1]and CF
119863120572
119905and CF
119863120573
119905are the Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractional
derivatives Now consider the Banach space 119883 = 119906
119906 isin 119862R([0 1] times [0 1]) endowed with the sup-norm 119906119883=
sup(119909119905)isin[01]times[01]
|119906(119909 119905)| Thus the product space (119883 times
119883 sdot 119883times119883
) is also a Banach space via the product norm(119906 V)
119883times119883= 119906119883+V119883 First we prove the next key lemma
Lemma 7 Suppose that119891 isin 1198711119883([0 1]times[0 1]) and 0 lt 120572 lt 1
The function 1199060isin 119862119883([0 1] times [0 1]) is a solution for the time-
fractional integral equation
119906 (119909 119905) =2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(119891 (119909 119905) minus 119891 (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119891 (119909 119904) 119889119904
(13)
if and only if1199060is a unique solution of the time-fractional differ-
ential equation
(119862119865119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) = 119891 (119909 119905) (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1]
119906 (0 0) = 0
(14)
Proof A solution of initial value problem (14) is denoted by1199060 As a result (CF119863120572
1199051199060)(119909 119905) = 119891(119909 119905) and 119906
0(0 0) = 0 By
integrating both sides we get
1199060(119909 119905) minus 119906
0(0 0)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(119891 (119909 119905) minus 119891 (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119891 (119909 119904) 119889119904
(15)
and so 1199060(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120572)(2 minus 120572)119872(120572))(119891(119909 119905) minus 119891(0 0)) +
(2120572(2 minus 120572)119872(120572)) int119905
0119891(119909 119904)119889119904 This shows that 119906
0represents
the solution of time-fractional integral equation (13) If1199061and
1199062are two distinct solutions for initial value problem (14)
then CF119863120572
1199051199061(119909 119905) minus
CF119863120572
1199051199062(119909 119905) = [
CF119863120572
1199051199061minus 1199062](119909 119905) = 0
and (1199061minus 1199062)(0 0) = 0 By the property of the Caputo-
Fabrizio time-fractional derivative in [11] we get 1199061= 1199062
Hence 1199060is a unique solution of initial value problem (14)
Now suppose that 1199060is a solution of time-fractional integral
equation (13)Then we conclude that 1199060(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120572)(2minus
120572)119872(120572))(119891(119909 119905)minus119891(0 0))+(2120572(2minus120572)119872(120572)) int119905
0119891(119909 119904)119889119904 By
using (4) one can see that this function represents a solutionfor initial value problem (14) Note that 119906
0(0 0) = 0
Now we consider (1)-(2) For each (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1]define the operators 119879
1 1198792 119883 rarr 119883 by
(1198791V) (119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
(1198792119906) (119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
(16)
4 Journal of Function Spaces
and put
1198731=
4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1198732=
4 minus 2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
(17)
Theorem 8 Suppose that 1198911 1198912 [0 1]times [0 1]times119883times119883 rarr 119883
are the continuous mappings in system (6)-(7) and there existpositive constants 119871
1and 119871
2fulfilling |119891
1(119909 119905 119906
1 1199062)| le 119871
1
and |1198912(119909 119905 119906
1 1199062)| le 119871
2for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and
1199061 1199062isin 119883 Then system (6)-(7) possesses at least one solution
Proof Let the operators 1198791 1198792 119883 rarr 119883 defined by
(16) We define the operator 119879 119883 times 119883 rarr 119883 times 119883 by119879(119906 V)(119909 119905)fl ((119879
1V)(119909 119905) (119879
2119906)(119909 119905)) for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times
[0 1] Note that 119879 is continuous because the mappings 1198911
and 1198912are continuous We prove that the operator 119879 maps
bounded sets into the bounded subsets of 119883 times 119883 Let Ω be abounded subset of119883times119883 (119906 V) isin Ω and (119909 119905) isin [0 1]times[0 1]Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (0 0 0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le 1198711
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119905 le 119871
1
4 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) le 119871
1
4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) = 119871
11198731
(18)
and so (1198791V)(119909 119905)
119883le 11987111198731 Also we have
1003816100381610038161003816(1198792119906) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
=
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (0 0 0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)
sdot int
119905
0
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 s))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le 1198712
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)+
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)119905 le 119871
2
4 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573) le 119871
2
4 minus 2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
= 11987121198732
(19)
and so (1198792119906)(119909 119905)
119883le 11987121198732 Thus 119879(119906 V)(119909 119905)
119883times119883le
11987111198731+ 11987121198732 This shows that the operator 119879maps bounded
sets into the bounded sets of 119883 times 119883 Now we show that theoperator119879 is equicontinuous Let (119909 119905
1) (119909 119905
2) isin [0 1]times[0 1]
with 1199051lt 1199052 Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 1199052) minus (1198791V) (119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 1199052 119906 (119909 119905
2) V (119909 119905
2))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199052
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
minus2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199051
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198911(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
1199052
1199051
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198911(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
21205721198711
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(1199052
minus 1199051)
(20)
Journal of Function Spaces 5
This implies that |(1198791V)(119909 119905
2) minus (119879
1V)(119909 119905
1)| rarr 0 whenever
(119909 1199052) rarr (119909 119905
1) By utilizing the Arzela-Ascoli theorem 119879
1
is completely continuous Similarly we have1003816100381610038161003816(1198792119906) (119909 1199052) minus (1198792119906) (119909 1199051)
1003816100381610038161003816
=
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 1199052 119906 (119909 119905
2) V (119909 119905
2))
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)int
1199052
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))
+2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
minus2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)int
1199051
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)
sdot int
1199052
1199051
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
21205731198712
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)(1199052
minus 1199051)
(21)
Again by utilizing the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we ob-serve that 119879
2is completely continuous Therefore we get
119879(119906 V)(119909 1199052) minus 119879(119906 V)(119909 119905
2)119883times119883
rarr 0 whenever (119909 1199052)
tends to (119909 1199051) Thus 119879 is completely continuous In the next
step we prove that
Ω = (119906 V) isin 119883 times 119883 (119906 V) = 120582119879 (119906 V) for some 120582
isin [0 1]
(22)
is bounded Let (119906 V) be an arbitrary element of Ω Choose120582 isin [0 1] fulfilling (119906 V) = 120582119879(119906 V) Hence V(119909 119905) =
120582(1198791V)(119909 119905) and 119906(119909 119905) = 120582(119879
2119906)(119909 119905) for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times
[0 1] Since
1
120582|V (119909 119905)| = 1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 119905)
1003816100381610038161003816 le 11987111198731(23)
we get |V(119909 119905)| le 12058211987111198731and so V(119909 119905)
119883le 12058211987111198731 Simi-
larly we prove that 119906(119909 119905)119883le 12058211987121198732 Thus (119906 V)
119883times119883le
120582[11987111198731+ 11987121198732] and so Ω is a bounded set Now by using
Theorem 3 we get that 119879 has a fixed point which is a solutionfor the coupled system of the time-fractional differentialequations
Next we study the existence of solution for the coupledsystem of time-fractional differential inclusions
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) isin 119865
1(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(CF119863120573
119905V) (119909 119905) isin 119865
2(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(24)
with the initial value conditions 119906(0 0) = 0 and V(0 0) = 0where 119865
1 1198652 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr P(R) are some
multivalued maps
Definition 9 One says that (1199061 1199062) isin 119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) times
119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) is a solution for the system of thetime-fractional differential inclusions whenever it satisfiesthe initial value conditions and there exists (119908
1 1199082) isin
1198711([0 1] times [0 1]) times 119871
1([0 1] times [0 1]) such that 119908
119894(119909 119905) isin
119865119894(119909 119905 119906(119909 119905) V(119909 119905)) for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and
119894 = 1 2 and also
119906119894(119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119908119894(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119908119894(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119908119894(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
(25)
for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and 119894 = 1 2
Theorem 10 Let 1198651 1198652 [0 1] times [0 1] timesR timesR rarr P
119888119901119888V(R)
be 1198711-Caratheodory multifunctions Suppose that there exist anondecreasing bounded continuousmap120595 [0infin) rarr (0infin)
and a continuous function 119901 [0 1] times [0 1] rarr (0infin) suchthat 119865
119894(119909 119905 119906
119894(119909 119905) 119906
1015840
119894(119909 119905)) le 119901(119909 119905)120595(119906
119894) for all (119909 119905) isin
[0 1] times [0 1] 119906119894 1199061015840
119894isin 119883 for 119894 = 1 2 Then coupled system
of time-fractional differential inclusions (8)-(9) has at least onesolution
Proof Define the operator119873 119883times119883 rarr 2119883times119883 by119873(119906
1 1199062) =
(1198731(1199061 1199062)
1198732(1199061 1199062)) where
1198731(1199061 1199062) = ℎ
1isin 119883 times 119883 there exists V
1
isin 1198781198651 1199061
such that ℎ1(119909 119905) = V
1(119909 119905) forall (119909 119905)
isin [0 1] times [0 1]
1198732(1199061 1199062) = ℎ
2isin 119883 times 119883 there exists V
2
isin 1198781198652 1199062
such that ℎ2(119909 119905) = V
2(119909 119905) forall (119909 119905)
isin [0 1] times [0 1]
6 Journal of Function Spaces
ℎ1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905) minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
ℎ2(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)V2(119909 119905) minus
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
sdot V2(0 0) +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
V2(119909 119904) 119889119904
(26)
By Lemma 7 it is clear that each fixed point of the operator119873 is a solution for system of time-fractional differentialinclusions (8) First we prove that the multifunction 119873 isconvex-valued Let (119906
1 1199062) isin 119883 times 119883 (ℎ
1 ℎ2) (ℎ1015840
1 ℎ1015840
2) isin
119873(1199061 1199062) Choose V
119894 V1015840119894isin 119878119865119894(1199061 1199062)
such that
ℎ119894(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V119894(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V119894(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V119894(119909 119904) 119889119904
ℎ1015840
119894(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1015840119894(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1015840119894(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1015840119894(119909 119904) 119889119904
(27)
for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and 119894 = 1 2 Let 0 le 120582 le 1be given Then we have
[120582ℎ119894+ (1 minus 120582) ℎ
1015840
119894] (119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[120582V119894(119909 119905) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[120582V119894(0 0) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
[120582V119894(119909 119904) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(119909 119904)] 119889119904
(28)
for 119894 = 1 2 Since the operator 119865119894has convex values 119878
119865119894(119906119894)is a
convex set and [120582ℎ119894+ (1 minus 120582)ℎ
1015840
119894] isin 119873119894(1199061 1199062) for 119894 = 1 2 This
implies that the operator119873 has convex values Now we provethat119873maps bounded sets of119883 into bounded sets Let 119903 gt 0119861119903= (1199061 1199062) isin 119883 times 119883 (119906
1 1199062) le 119903 be a bounded subset
of 119883 times 119883 (ℎ1 ℎ2) isin 119873(119906
1 1199062) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 119861119903 Then there
exists (V1 V2) isin 1198781198651(1199061)
times 1198781198652(1199062)
such that
ℎ1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(29)
and ℎ2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus120573)(2 minus120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus120573)(2 minus
120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for almost
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] If 119901infin= sup
(119909119905)isin[01]times[01]|119901(119909 119905)|
then we obtain
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904 le 119901 (119909 119905) 120595 (
100381710038171003817100381711990611003817100381710038171003817)
sdot 2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119905 le
10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
sdot 120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817) 4 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
le10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817) 4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) =
10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
sdot 120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)1198731
(30)
where the constant 1198731is defined by (17) This implies
that ℎ1 le 119901
infin120595(1199061)1198731 Similarly we get ℎ
2 le
119901infin120595(1199062)1198732 where the constant 119873
2is defined by (17)
Thus (ℎ1 ℎ2) le 119901
infin120595((119906
1 1199062))(1198731+ 1198732) Now we
prove that119873maps bounded sets into equicontinuous subsets
Journal of Function Spaces 7
of 119883 times 119883 Let (1199061 1199062) isin 119861119903and (119909 119905
1) (119909 119905
2) isin [0 1] times [0 1]
with 1199051lt 1199052 Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ1) (119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199052)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
1199052
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904 minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199051)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
minus2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199051
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199052
1199051
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057210038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(1199052minus 1199051)
(31)
By using a similar method we obtain1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ2) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ2) (119909 1199051)
1003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
1003816100381610038161003816V2 (119909 1199052) minus V2(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057310038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199062
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)(1199052minus 1199051)
(32)
Hence |ℎ119894(119909 1199052) minus ℎ119894(119909 1199051)| rarr 0 as (119909 119905
2) rarr (119909 119905
1) By
using the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we get that119873 is completelycontinuous Here we prove that119873 is upper semicontinuousBy using Lemma 4 119873 is upper semicontinuous whenever ithas a closed graph Since119873 is completely continuouswemustshow that119873 has a closed graph
Let (1199061198991 119906119899
2) be a sequence in 119883 times 119883 with (119906119899
1 119906119899
2) rarr
(1199060
1 1199060
2) and (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)with (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) rarr (ℎ
0
1 ℎ0
2)We
show that (ℎ01 ℎ0
2) isin 119873(119906
0
1 1199060
2) For each (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)
we can choose (V1198991 V1198992) isin 1198781198651(119906119899
1)times 1198781198652(119906119899
2)such that
ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1198991(119909 119904) 119889119904
(33)
and ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V119899
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V1198992(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V1198992(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1]times[0 1] It is sufficient to show that there exists(V01 V02) isin 1198781198651(1199060
1)times 1198781198652(1199060
2)such that
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(34)
and ℎ0
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] Now consider the linear operatorsΘ1 Θ2 1198711([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) rarr 119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) defined
by
Θ1(V) (119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V (119909 119904) 119889119904
(35)
andΘ2(V)(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V(119909 119905)minus(2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int119905
0V(119909 119904)119889119904 Note that
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
1(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(119909 119905) minus V0
1(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(0 0) minus V0
1(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
[V1198991(119909 119904) minus V0
1(119909 119904)] 119889119904
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
2(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(119909 119905) minus V0
2(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(0 0) minus V0
2(0 0)]
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
[V1198992(119909 119904) minus V0
2(119909 119904)] 119889119904
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
(36)
8 Journal of Function Spaces
By using Lemma 5 we get that Θ119894sdot 119878119865119894
is a closed graphoperator for 119894 = 1 2 Also we get ℎ119899
119894(119909 119905) isin Θ
119894(119878119865119894(119906119899
119894)) for
all 119899 Since 119906119899119894rarr 1199060
119894 we get
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(37)
and ℎ02(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for some
V0119894isin 119878119865119894(1199060
119894)(119894 = 1 2) Thus119873 has a closed graph
Now we prove that there is an open set 119880 sube 119883 with(1199061 1199062) notin 119873(119906
1 1199062) for all 120582 isin (0 1) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 120597119880
Let 120582 isin (0 1) and (1199061 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) Then there exists
V119894isin 1198711([0 1] times [0 1]R) with V
119894isin 119878119865119894(119906119894)
(119894 = 1 2) such that
1199061(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(38)
and 1199062(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] By using the above computedvalues we obtain 119906
119894 le 119901
infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894for 119894 = 1 2
This follows that 119906119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894le 1 for 119894 =
1 2 Choose 119872119894gt 0 with 119906
119894 = 119872
119894in such a way that
119872119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894gt 1 for 119894 = 1 2 Put 119880 = (119906
1 1199062) isin
119883 times 119883 (1199061 1199062) lt min 119872
11198722 We note that the
operator 119873 119880 rarr P(119883) is upper semicontinuous andcompletely continuous Also we showed that there is no(1199061 1199062) isin 120597119880 such that (119906
1 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) for some
120582 isin (0 1) Hence with the help of Theorem 6 we get that119873 has a fixed point (119906
1 1199062) isin 119880 which is a solution for time-
fractional differential inclusion (8)-(9)
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
Research of the last two authors was supported by AzarbaijanShahid Madani University
References
[1] R P Agarwal M Benchohra and S Hamani ldquoA survey onexistence results for boundary value problems of nonlinear frac-tional differential equations and inclusionsrdquo Acta ApplicandaeMathematicae vol 109 no 3 pp 973ndash1033 2010
[2] D Baleanu H Mohammadi and S Rezapour ldquoOn a nonlinearfractional differential equation on partially ordered metricspacesrdquo Advances in Difference Equations vol 2013 article 832013
[3] D Baleanu S Rezapour S Etemad and A Alsaedi ldquoOn a time-fractional integrodifferential equation via three-point boundaryvalue conditionsrdquo Mathematical Problems in Engineering vol2015 Article ID 785738 12 pages 2015
[4] K Diethelm The Analysis of Fractional Differential EquationsLecture Notes inMathematics Springer Berlin Germany 2010
[5] R Gorenflo and F Mainardi ldquoFractional calculus integraland differential equations of fractional orderrdquo in Fractals andFractional Calculus in ContinuumMechanics A Carpinteri andF Mainardi Eds Springer New York NY USA 1997
[6] G Samko A Kilbas and O Marichev Fractional Integrals andDerivatives Theory and Applications Gordon and Breach 1993
[7] Z Bai and W Sun ldquoExistence and multiplicity of positivesolutions for singular fractional boundary value problemsrdquoComputers amp Mathematics with Applications vol 63 no 9 pp1369ndash1381 2012
[8] D Baleanu R P Agarwal H Mohammadi and S RezapourldquoSome existence results for a nonlinear fractional differentialequation on partially ordered Banach spacesrdquo Boundary ValueProblems 2013112 8 pages 2013
[9] D Baleanu S Zahra Nazemi and S Rezapour ldquoThe existenceof positive solutions for a new coupled system of multiterm sin-gular fractional integrodifferential boundary value problemsrdquoAbstract and Applied Analysis vol 2013 Article ID 368659 15pages 2013
[10] M Caputo and M Fabrizio ldquoA new definition of fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 73ndash85 2015
[11] J Losada and J J Nieto ldquoProperties of a new fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 87ndash92 2015
[12] D R Smart Fixed PointTheorems Cambridge University PressCambridge UK 1980
[13] S M Aleomraninejad S Rezapour and N Shahzad ldquoOn fixedpoint generalizations of Suzukirsquos methodrdquo Applied MathematicsLetters vol 24 no 7 pp 1037ndash1040 2011
[14] H Covitz and S B Nadler ldquoMulti-valued contractionmappingsin generalizedmetric spacesrdquo Israel Journal of Mathematics vol8 pp 5ndash11 1970
[15] K S Miller and B Ross An Introduction to the FractionalCalculus and Fractional Differential Eqautions John Wiley ampSons 1993
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
4 Journal of Function Spaces
and put
1198731=
4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1198732=
4 minus 2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
(17)
Theorem 8 Suppose that 1198911 1198912 [0 1]times [0 1]times119883times119883 rarr 119883
are the continuous mappings in system (6)-(7) and there existpositive constants 119871
1and 119871
2fulfilling |119891
1(119909 119905 119906
1 1199062)| le 119871
1
and |1198912(119909 119905 119906
1 1199062)| le 119871
2for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and
1199061 1199062isin 119883 Then system (6)-(7) possesses at least one solution
Proof Let the operators 1198791 1198792 119883 rarr 119883 defined by
(16) We define the operator 119879 119883 times 119883 rarr 119883 times 119883 by119879(119906 V)(119909 119905)fl ((119879
1V)(119909 119905) (119879
2119906)(119909 119905)) for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times
[0 1] Note that 119879 is continuous because the mappings 1198911
and 1198912are continuous We prove that the operator 119879 maps
bounded sets into the bounded subsets of 119883 times 119883 Let Ω be abounded subset of119883times119883 (119906 V) isin Ω and (119909 119905) isin [0 1]times[0 1]Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (0 0 0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le 1198711
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119905 le 119871
1
4 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) le 119871
1
4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) = 119871
11198731
(18)
and so (1198791V)(119909 119905)
119883le 11987111198731 Also we have
1003816100381610038161003816(1198792119906) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
=
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (0 0 0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)
sdot int
119905
0
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 s))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le 1198712
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)+
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)119905 le 119871
2
4 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573) le 119871
2
4 minus 2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
= 11987121198732
(19)
and so (1198792119906)(119909 119905)
119883le 11987121198732 Thus 119879(119906 V)(119909 119905)
119883times119883le
11987111198731+ 11987121198732 This shows that the operator 119879maps bounded
sets into the bounded sets of 119883 times 119883 Now we show that theoperator119879 is equicontinuous Let (119909 119905
1) (119909 119905
2) isin [0 1]times[0 1]
with 1199051lt 1199052 Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 1199052) minus (1198791V) (119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 1199052 119906 (119909 119905
2) V (119909 119905
2))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199052
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)1198911(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
minus2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199051
0
1198911(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198911(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
1199052
1199051
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
10038161003816100381610038161198911 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198911(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
21205721198711
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(1199052
minus 1199051)
(20)
Journal of Function Spaces 5
This implies that |(1198791V)(119909 119905
2) minus (119879
1V)(119909 119905
1)| rarr 0 whenever
(119909 1199052) rarr (119909 119905
1) By utilizing the Arzela-Ascoli theorem 119879
1
is completely continuous Similarly we have1003816100381610038161003816(1198792119906) (119909 1199052) minus (1198792119906) (119909 1199051)
1003816100381610038161003816
=
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 1199052 119906 (119909 119905
2) V (119909 119905
2))
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)int
1199052
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))
+2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
minus2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)int
1199051
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)
sdot int
1199052
1199051
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
21205731198712
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)(1199052
minus 1199051)
(21)
Again by utilizing the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we ob-serve that 119879
2is completely continuous Therefore we get
119879(119906 V)(119909 1199052) minus 119879(119906 V)(119909 119905
2)119883times119883
rarr 0 whenever (119909 1199052)
tends to (119909 1199051) Thus 119879 is completely continuous In the next
step we prove that
Ω = (119906 V) isin 119883 times 119883 (119906 V) = 120582119879 (119906 V) for some 120582
isin [0 1]
(22)
is bounded Let (119906 V) be an arbitrary element of Ω Choose120582 isin [0 1] fulfilling (119906 V) = 120582119879(119906 V) Hence V(119909 119905) =
120582(1198791V)(119909 119905) and 119906(119909 119905) = 120582(119879
2119906)(119909 119905) for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times
[0 1] Since
1
120582|V (119909 119905)| = 1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 119905)
1003816100381610038161003816 le 11987111198731(23)
we get |V(119909 119905)| le 12058211987111198731and so V(119909 119905)
119883le 12058211987111198731 Simi-
larly we prove that 119906(119909 119905)119883le 12058211987121198732 Thus (119906 V)
119883times119883le
120582[11987111198731+ 11987121198732] and so Ω is a bounded set Now by using
Theorem 3 we get that 119879 has a fixed point which is a solutionfor the coupled system of the time-fractional differentialequations
Next we study the existence of solution for the coupledsystem of time-fractional differential inclusions
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) isin 119865
1(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(CF119863120573
119905V) (119909 119905) isin 119865
2(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(24)
with the initial value conditions 119906(0 0) = 0 and V(0 0) = 0where 119865
1 1198652 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr P(R) are some
multivalued maps
Definition 9 One says that (1199061 1199062) isin 119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) times
119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) is a solution for the system of thetime-fractional differential inclusions whenever it satisfiesthe initial value conditions and there exists (119908
1 1199082) isin
1198711([0 1] times [0 1]) times 119871
1([0 1] times [0 1]) such that 119908
119894(119909 119905) isin
119865119894(119909 119905 119906(119909 119905) V(119909 119905)) for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and
119894 = 1 2 and also
119906119894(119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119908119894(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119908119894(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119908119894(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
(25)
for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and 119894 = 1 2
Theorem 10 Let 1198651 1198652 [0 1] times [0 1] timesR timesR rarr P
119888119901119888V(R)
be 1198711-Caratheodory multifunctions Suppose that there exist anondecreasing bounded continuousmap120595 [0infin) rarr (0infin)
and a continuous function 119901 [0 1] times [0 1] rarr (0infin) suchthat 119865
119894(119909 119905 119906
119894(119909 119905) 119906
1015840
119894(119909 119905)) le 119901(119909 119905)120595(119906
119894) for all (119909 119905) isin
[0 1] times [0 1] 119906119894 1199061015840
119894isin 119883 for 119894 = 1 2 Then coupled system
of time-fractional differential inclusions (8)-(9) has at least onesolution
Proof Define the operator119873 119883times119883 rarr 2119883times119883 by119873(119906
1 1199062) =
(1198731(1199061 1199062)
1198732(1199061 1199062)) where
1198731(1199061 1199062) = ℎ
1isin 119883 times 119883 there exists V
1
isin 1198781198651 1199061
such that ℎ1(119909 119905) = V
1(119909 119905) forall (119909 119905)
isin [0 1] times [0 1]
1198732(1199061 1199062) = ℎ
2isin 119883 times 119883 there exists V
2
isin 1198781198652 1199062
such that ℎ2(119909 119905) = V
2(119909 119905) forall (119909 119905)
isin [0 1] times [0 1]
6 Journal of Function Spaces
ℎ1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905) minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
ℎ2(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)V2(119909 119905) minus
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
sdot V2(0 0) +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
V2(119909 119904) 119889119904
(26)
By Lemma 7 it is clear that each fixed point of the operator119873 is a solution for system of time-fractional differentialinclusions (8) First we prove that the multifunction 119873 isconvex-valued Let (119906
1 1199062) isin 119883 times 119883 (ℎ
1 ℎ2) (ℎ1015840
1 ℎ1015840
2) isin
119873(1199061 1199062) Choose V
119894 V1015840119894isin 119878119865119894(1199061 1199062)
such that
ℎ119894(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V119894(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V119894(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V119894(119909 119904) 119889119904
ℎ1015840
119894(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1015840119894(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1015840119894(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1015840119894(119909 119904) 119889119904
(27)
for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and 119894 = 1 2 Let 0 le 120582 le 1be given Then we have
[120582ℎ119894+ (1 minus 120582) ℎ
1015840
119894] (119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[120582V119894(119909 119905) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[120582V119894(0 0) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
[120582V119894(119909 119904) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(119909 119904)] 119889119904
(28)
for 119894 = 1 2 Since the operator 119865119894has convex values 119878
119865119894(119906119894)is a
convex set and [120582ℎ119894+ (1 minus 120582)ℎ
1015840
119894] isin 119873119894(1199061 1199062) for 119894 = 1 2 This
implies that the operator119873 has convex values Now we provethat119873maps bounded sets of119883 into bounded sets Let 119903 gt 0119861119903= (1199061 1199062) isin 119883 times 119883 (119906
1 1199062) le 119903 be a bounded subset
of 119883 times 119883 (ℎ1 ℎ2) isin 119873(119906
1 1199062) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 119861119903 Then there
exists (V1 V2) isin 1198781198651(1199061)
times 1198781198652(1199062)
such that
ℎ1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(29)
and ℎ2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus120573)(2 minus120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus120573)(2 minus
120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for almost
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] If 119901infin= sup
(119909119905)isin[01]times[01]|119901(119909 119905)|
then we obtain
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904 le 119901 (119909 119905) 120595 (
100381710038171003817100381711990611003817100381710038171003817)
sdot 2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119905 le
10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
sdot 120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817) 4 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
le10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817) 4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) =
10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
sdot 120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)1198731
(30)
where the constant 1198731is defined by (17) This implies
that ℎ1 le 119901
infin120595(1199061)1198731 Similarly we get ℎ
2 le
119901infin120595(1199062)1198732 where the constant 119873
2is defined by (17)
Thus (ℎ1 ℎ2) le 119901
infin120595((119906
1 1199062))(1198731+ 1198732) Now we
prove that119873maps bounded sets into equicontinuous subsets
Journal of Function Spaces 7
of 119883 times 119883 Let (1199061 1199062) isin 119861119903and (119909 119905
1) (119909 119905
2) isin [0 1] times [0 1]
with 1199051lt 1199052 Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ1) (119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199052)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
1199052
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904 minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199051)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
minus2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199051
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199052
1199051
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057210038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(1199052minus 1199051)
(31)
By using a similar method we obtain1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ2) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ2) (119909 1199051)
1003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
1003816100381610038161003816V2 (119909 1199052) minus V2(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057310038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199062
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)(1199052minus 1199051)
(32)
Hence |ℎ119894(119909 1199052) minus ℎ119894(119909 1199051)| rarr 0 as (119909 119905
2) rarr (119909 119905
1) By
using the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we get that119873 is completelycontinuous Here we prove that119873 is upper semicontinuousBy using Lemma 4 119873 is upper semicontinuous whenever ithas a closed graph Since119873 is completely continuouswemustshow that119873 has a closed graph
Let (1199061198991 119906119899
2) be a sequence in 119883 times 119883 with (119906119899
1 119906119899
2) rarr
(1199060
1 1199060
2) and (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)with (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) rarr (ℎ
0
1 ℎ0
2)We
show that (ℎ01 ℎ0
2) isin 119873(119906
0
1 1199060
2) For each (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)
we can choose (V1198991 V1198992) isin 1198781198651(119906119899
1)times 1198781198652(119906119899
2)such that
ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1198991(119909 119904) 119889119904
(33)
and ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V119899
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V1198992(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V1198992(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1]times[0 1] It is sufficient to show that there exists(V01 V02) isin 1198781198651(1199060
1)times 1198781198652(1199060
2)such that
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(34)
and ℎ0
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] Now consider the linear operatorsΘ1 Θ2 1198711([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) rarr 119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) defined
by
Θ1(V) (119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V (119909 119904) 119889119904
(35)
andΘ2(V)(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V(119909 119905)minus(2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int119905
0V(119909 119904)119889119904 Note that
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
1(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(119909 119905) minus V0
1(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(0 0) minus V0
1(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
[V1198991(119909 119904) minus V0
1(119909 119904)] 119889119904
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
2(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(119909 119905) minus V0
2(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(0 0) minus V0
2(0 0)]
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
[V1198992(119909 119904) minus V0
2(119909 119904)] 119889119904
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
(36)
8 Journal of Function Spaces
By using Lemma 5 we get that Θ119894sdot 119878119865119894
is a closed graphoperator for 119894 = 1 2 Also we get ℎ119899
119894(119909 119905) isin Θ
119894(119878119865119894(119906119899
119894)) for
all 119899 Since 119906119899119894rarr 1199060
119894 we get
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(37)
and ℎ02(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for some
V0119894isin 119878119865119894(1199060
119894)(119894 = 1 2) Thus119873 has a closed graph
Now we prove that there is an open set 119880 sube 119883 with(1199061 1199062) notin 119873(119906
1 1199062) for all 120582 isin (0 1) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 120597119880
Let 120582 isin (0 1) and (1199061 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) Then there exists
V119894isin 1198711([0 1] times [0 1]R) with V
119894isin 119878119865119894(119906119894)
(119894 = 1 2) such that
1199061(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(38)
and 1199062(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] By using the above computedvalues we obtain 119906
119894 le 119901
infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894for 119894 = 1 2
This follows that 119906119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894le 1 for 119894 =
1 2 Choose 119872119894gt 0 with 119906
119894 = 119872
119894in such a way that
119872119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894gt 1 for 119894 = 1 2 Put 119880 = (119906
1 1199062) isin
119883 times 119883 (1199061 1199062) lt min 119872
11198722 We note that the
operator 119873 119880 rarr P(119883) is upper semicontinuous andcompletely continuous Also we showed that there is no(1199061 1199062) isin 120597119880 such that (119906
1 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) for some
120582 isin (0 1) Hence with the help of Theorem 6 we get that119873 has a fixed point (119906
1 1199062) isin 119880 which is a solution for time-
fractional differential inclusion (8)-(9)
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
Research of the last two authors was supported by AzarbaijanShahid Madani University
References
[1] R P Agarwal M Benchohra and S Hamani ldquoA survey onexistence results for boundary value problems of nonlinear frac-tional differential equations and inclusionsrdquo Acta ApplicandaeMathematicae vol 109 no 3 pp 973ndash1033 2010
[2] D Baleanu H Mohammadi and S Rezapour ldquoOn a nonlinearfractional differential equation on partially ordered metricspacesrdquo Advances in Difference Equations vol 2013 article 832013
[3] D Baleanu S Rezapour S Etemad and A Alsaedi ldquoOn a time-fractional integrodifferential equation via three-point boundaryvalue conditionsrdquo Mathematical Problems in Engineering vol2015 Article ID 785738 12 pages 2015
[4] K Diethelm The Analysis of Fractional Differential EquationsLecture Notes inMathematics Springer Berlin Germany 2010
[5] R Gorenflo and F Mainardi ldquoFractional calculus integraland differential equations of fractional orderrdquo in Fractals andFractional Calculus in ContinuumMechanics A Carpinteri andF Mainardi Eds Springer New York NY USA 1997
[6] G Samko A Kilbas and O Marichev Fractional Integrals andDerivatives Theory and Applications Gordon and Breach 1993
[7] Z Bai and W Sun ldquoExistence and multiplicity of positivesolutions for singular fractional boundary value problemsrdquoComputers amp Mathematics with Applications vol 63 no 9 pp1369ndash1381 2012
[8] D Baleanu R P Agarwal H Mohammadi and S RezapourldquoSome existence results for a nonlinear fractional differentialequation on partially ordered Banach spacesrdquo Boundary ValueProblems 2013112 8 pages 2013
[9] D Baleanu S Zahra Nazemi and S Rezapour ldquoThe existenceof positive solutions for a new coupled system of multiterm sin-gular fractional integrodifferential boundary value problemsrdquoAbstract and Applied Analysis vol 2013 Article ID 368659 15pages 2013
[10] M Caputo and M Fabrizio ldquoA new definition of fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 73ndash85 2015
[11] J Losada and J J Nieto ldquoProperties of a new fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 87ndash92 2015
[12] D R Smart Fixed PointTheorems Cambridge University PressCambridge UK 1980
[13] S M Aleomraninejad S Rezapour and N Shahzad ldquoOn fixedpoint generalizations of Suzukirsquos methodrdquo Applied MathematicsLetters vol 24 no 7 pp 1037ndash1040 2011
[14] H Covitz and S B Nadler ldquoMulti-valued contractionmappingsin generalizedmetric spacesrdquo Israel Journal of Mathematics vol8 pp 5ndash11 1970
[15] K S Miller and B Ross An Introduction to the FractionalCalculus and Fractional Differential Eqautions John Wiley ampSons 1993
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Journal of Function Spaces 5
This implies that |(1198791V)(119909 119905
2) minus (119879
1V)(119909 119905
1)| rarr 0 whenever
(119909 1199052) rarr (119909 119905
1) By utilizing the Arzela-Ascoli theorem 119879
1
is completely continuous Similarly we have1003816100381610038161003816(1198792119906) (119909 1199052) minus (1198792119906) (119909 1199051)
1003816100381610038161003816
=
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 1199052 119906 (119909 119905
2) V (119909 119905
2))
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)int
1199052
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))
+2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)1198912(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
minus2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)int
1199051
0
1198912(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)
sdot int
1199052
1199051
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904))1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
10038161003816100381610038161198912 (119909 1199052 119906 (119909 1199052) V (119909 1199052))
minus 1198912(119909 1199051 119906 (119909 119905
1) V (119909 119905
1))1003816100381610038161003816 +
21205731198712
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)(1199052
minus 1199051)
(21)
Again by utilizing the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we ob-serve that 119879
2is completely continuous Therefore we get
119879(119906 V)(119909 1199052) minus 119879(119906 V)(119909 119905
2)119883times119883
rarr 0 whenever (119909 1199052)
tends to (119909 1199051) Thus 119879 is completely continuous In the next
step we prove that
Ω = (119906 V) isin 119883 times 119883 (119906 V) = 120582119879 (119906 V) for some 120582
isin [0 1]
(22)
is bounded Let (119906 V) be an arbitrary element of Ω Choose120582 isin [0 1] fulfilling (119906 V) = 120582119879(119906 V) Hence V(119909 119905) =
120582(1198791V)(119909 119905) and 119906(119909 119905) = 120582(119879
2119906)(119909 119905) for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times
[0 1] Since
1
120582|V (119909 119905)| = 1003816100381610038161003816(1198791V) (119909 119905)
1003816100381610038161003816 le 11987111198731(23)
we get |V(119909 119905)| le 12058211987111198731and so V(119909 119905)
119883le 12058211987111198731 Simi-
larly we prove that 119906(119909 119905)119883le 12058211987121198732 Thus (119906 V)
119883times119883le
120582[11987111198731+ 11987121198732] and so Ω is a bounded set Now by using
Theorem 3 we get that 119879 has a fixed point which is a solutionfor the coupled system of the time-fractional differentialequations
Next we study the existence of solution for the coupledsystem of time-fractional differential inclusions
(CF119863120572
119905119906) (119909 119905) isin 119865
1(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(CF119863120573
119905V) (119909 119905) isin 119865
2(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
(24)
with the initial value conditions 119906(0 0) = 0 and V(0 0) = 0where 119865
1 1198652 [0 1] times [0 1] times R times R rarr P(R) are some
multivalued maps
Definition 9 One says that (1199061 1199062) isin 119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) times
119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) is a solution for the system of thetime-fractional differential inclusions whenever it satisfiesthe initial value conditions and there exists (119908
1 1199082) isin
1198711([0 1] times [0 1]) times 119871
1([0 1] times [0 1]) such that 119908
119894(119909 119905) isin
119865119894(119909 119905 119906(119909 119905) V(119909 119905)) for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and
119894 = 1 2 and also
119906119894(119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119908119894(119909 119905 119906 (119909 119905) V (119909 119905))
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119908119894(0 0 119906 (0 0) V (0 0))
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
119908119894(119909 119904 119906 (119909 119904) V (119909 119904)) 119889119904
(25)
for all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and 119894 = 1 2
Theorem 10 Let 1198651 1198652 [0 1] times [0 1] timesR timesR rarr P
119888119901119888V(R)
be 1198711-Caratheodory multifunctions Suppose that there exist anondecreasing bounded continuousmap120595 [0infin) rarr (0infin)
and a continuous function 119901 [0 1] times [0 1] rarr (0infin) suchthat 119865
119894(119909 119905 119906
119894(119909 119905) 119906
1015840
119894(119909 119905)) le 119901(119909 119905)120595(119906
119894) for all (119909 119905) isin
[0 1] times [0 1] 119906119894 1199061015840
119894isin 119883 for 119894 = 1 2 Then coupled system
of time-fractional differential inclusions (8)-(9) has at least onesolution
Proof Define the operator119873 119883times119883 rarr 2119883times119883 by119873(119906
1 1199062) =
(1198731(1199061 1199062)
1198732(1199061 1199062)) where
1198731(1199061 1199062) = ℎ
1isin 119883 times 119883 there exists V
1
isin 1198781198651 1199061
such that ℎ1(119909 119905) = V
1(119909 119905) forall (119909 119905)
isin [0 1] times [0 1]
1198732(1199061 1199062) = ℎ
2isin 119883 times 119883 there exists V
2
isin 1198781198652 1199062
such that ℎ2(119909 119905) = V
2(119909 119905) forall (119909 119905)
isin [0 1] times [0 1]
6 Journal of Function Spaces
ℎ1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905) minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
ℎ2(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)V2(119909 119905) minus
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
sdot V2(0 0) +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
V2(119909 119904) 119889119904
(26)
By Lemma 7 it is clear that each fixed point of the operator119873 is a solution for system of time-fractional differentialinclusions (8) First we prove that the multifunction 119873 isconvex-valued Let (119906
1 1199062) isin 119883 times 119883 (ℎ
1 ℎ2) (ℎ1015840
1 ℎ1015840
2) isin
119873(1199061 1199062) Choose V
119894 V1015840119894isin 119878119865119894(1199061 1199062)
such that
ℎ119894(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V119894(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V119894(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V119894(119909 119904) 119889119904
ℎ1015840
119894(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1015840119894(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1015840119894(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1015840119894(119909 119904) 119889119904
(27)
for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and 119894 = 1 2 Let 0 le 120582 le 1be given Then we have
[120582ℎ119894+ (1 minus 120582) ℎ
1015840
119894] (119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[120582V119894(119909 119905) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[120582V119894(0 0) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
[120582V119894(119909 119904) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(119909 119904)] 119889119904
(28)
for 119894 = 1 2 Since the operator 119865119894has convex values 119878
119865119894(119906119894)is a
convex set and [120582ℎ119894+ (1 minus 120582)ℎ
1015840
119894] isin 119873119894(1199061 1199062) for 119894 = 1 2 This
implies that the operator119873 has convex values Now we provethat119873maps bounded sets of119883 into bounded sets Let 119903 gt 0119861119903= (1199061 1199062) isin 119883 times 119883 (119906
1 1199062) le 119903 be a bounded subset
of 119883 times 119883 (ℎ1 ℎ2) isin 119873(119906
1 1199062) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 119861119903 Then there
exists (V1 V2) isin 1198781198651(1199061)
times 1198781198652(1199062)
such that
ℎ1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(29)
and ℎ2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus120573)(2 minus120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus120573)(2 minus
120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for almost
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] If 119901infin= sup
(119909119905)isin[01]times[01]|119901(119909 119905)|
then we obtain
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904 le 119901 (119909 119905) 120595 (
100381710038171003817100381711990611003817100381710038171003817)
sdot 2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119905 le
10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
sdot 120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817) 4 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
le10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817) 4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) =
10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
sdot 120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)1198731
(30)
where the constant 1198731is defined by (17) This implies
that ℎ1 le 119901
infin120595(1199061)1198731 Similarly we get ℎ
2 le
119901infin120595(1199062)1198732 where the constant 119873
2is defined by (17)
Thus (ℎ1 ℎ2) le 119901
infin120595((119906
1 1199062))(1198731+ 1198732) Now we
prove that119873maps bounded sets into equicontinuous subsets
Journal of Function Spaces 7
of 119883 times 119883 Let (1199061 1199062) isin 119861119903and (119909 119905
1) (119909 119905
2) isin [0 1] times [0 1]
with 1199051lt 1199052 Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ1) (119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199052)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
1199052
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904 minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199051)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
minus2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199051
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199052
1199051
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057210038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(1199052minus 1199051)
(31)
By using a similar method we obtain1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ2) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ2) (119909 1199051)
1003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
1003816100381610038161003816V2 (119909 1199052) minus V2(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057310038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199062
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)(1199052minus 1199051)
(32)
Hence |ℎ119894(119909 1199052) minus ℎ119894(119909 1199051)| rarr 0 as (119909 119905
2) rarr (119909 119905
1) By
using the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we get that119873 is completelycontinuous Here we prove that119873 is upper semicontinuousBy using Lemma 4 119873 is upper semicontinuous whenever ithas a closed graph Since119873 is completely continuouswemustshow that119873 has a closed graph
Let (1199061198991 119906119899
2) be a sequence in 119883 times 119883 with (119906119899
1 119906119899
2) rarr
(1199060
1 1199060
2) and (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)with (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) rarr (ℎ
0
1 ℎ0
2)We
show that (ℎ01 ℎ0
2) isin 119873(119906
0
1 1199060
2) For each (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)
we can choose (V1198991 V1198992) isin 1198781198651(119906119899
1)times 1198781198652(119906119899
2)such that
ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1198991(119909 119904) 119889119904
(33)
and ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V119899
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V1198992(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V1198992(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1]times[0 1] It is sufficient to show that there exists(V01 V02) isin 1198781198651(1199060
1)times 1198781198652(1199060
2)such that
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(34)
and ℎ0
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] Now consider the linear operatorsΘ1 Θ2 1198711([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) rarr 119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) defined
by
Θ1(V) (119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V (119909 119904) 119889119904
(35)
andΘ2(V)(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V(119909 119905)minus(2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int119905
0V(119909 119904)119889119904 Note that
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
1(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(119909 119905) minus V0
1(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(0 0) minus V0
1(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
[V1198991(119909 119904) minus V0
1(119909 119904)] 119889119904
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
2(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(119909 119905) minus V0
2(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(0 0) minus V0
2(0 0)]
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
[V1198992(119909 119904) minus V0
2(119909 119904)] 119889119904
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
(36)
8 Journal of Function Spaces
By using Lemma 5 we get that Θ119894sdot 119878119865119894
is a closed graphoperator for 119894 = 1 2 Also we get ℎ119899
119894(119909 119905) isin Θ
119894(119878119865119894(119906119899
119894)) for
all 119899 Since 119906119899119894rarr 1199060
119894 we get
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(37)
and ℎ02(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for some
V0119894isin 119878119865119894(1199060
119894)(119894 = 1 2) Thus119873 has a closed graph
Now we prove that there is an open set 119880 sube 119883 with(1199061 1199062) notin 119873(119906
1 1199062) for all 120582 isin (0 1) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 120597119880
Let 120582 isin (0 1) and (1199061 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) Then there exists
V119894isin 1198711([0 1] times [0 1]R) with V
119894isin 119878119865119894(119906119894)
(119894 = 1 2) such that
1199061(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(38)
and 1199062(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] By using the above computedvalues we obtain 119906
119894 le 119901
infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894for 119894 = 1 2
This follows that 119906119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894le 1 for 119894 =
1 2 Choose 119872119894gt 0 with 119906
119894 = 119872
119894in such a way that
119872119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894gt 1 for 119894 = 1 2 Put 119880 = (119906
1 1199062) isin
119883 times 119883 (1199061 1199062) lt min 119872
11198722 We note that the
operator 119873 119880 rarr P(119883) is upper semicontinuous andcompletely continuous Also we showed that there is no(1199061 1199062) isin 120597119880 such that (119906
1 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) for some
120582 isin (0 1) Hence with the help of Theorem 6 we get that119873 has a fixed point (119906
1 1199062) isin 119880 which is a solution for time-
fractional differential inclusion (8)-(9)
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
Research of the last two authors was supported by AzarbaijanShahid Madani University
References
[1] R P Agarwal M Benchohra and S Hamani ldquoA survey onexistence results for boundary value problems of nonlinear frac-tional differential equations and inclusionsrdquo Acta ApplicandaeMathematicae vol 109 no 3 pp 973ndash1033 2010
[2] D Baleanu H Mohammadi and S Rezapour ldquoOn a nonlinearfractional differential equation on partially ordered metricspacesrdquo Advances in Difference Equations vol 2013 article 832013
[3] D Baleanu S Rezapour S Etemad and A Alsaedi ldquoOn a time-fractional integrodifferential equation via three-point boundaryvalue conditionsrdquo Mathematical Problems in Engineering vol2015 Article ID 785738 12 pages 2015
[4] K Diethelm The Analysis of Fractional Differential EquationsLecture Notes inMathematics Springer Berlin Germany 2010
[5] R Gorenflo and F Mainardi ldquoFractional calculus integraland differential equations of fractional orderrdquo in Fractals andFractional Calculus in ContinuumMechanics A Carpinteri andF Mainardi Eds Springer New York NY USA 1997
[6] G Samko A Kilbas and O Marichev Fractional Integrals andDerivatives Theory and Applications Gordon and Breach 1993
[7] Z Bai and W Sun ldquoExistence and multiplicity of positivesolutions for singular fractional boundary value problemsrdquoComputers amp Mathematics with Applications vol 63 no 9 pp1369ndash1381 2012
[8] D Baleanu R P Agarwal H Mohammadi and S RezapourldquoSome existence results for a nonlinear fractional differentialequation on partially ordered Banach spacesrdquo Boundary ValueProblems 2013112 8 pages 2013
[9] D Baleanu S Zahra Nazemi and S Rezapour ldquoThe existenceof positive solutions for a new coupled system of multiterm sin-gular fractional integrodifferential boundary value problemsrdquoAbstract and Applied Analysis vol 2013 Article ID 368659 15pages 2013
[10] M Caputo and M Fabrizio ldquoA new definition of fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 73ndash85 2015
[11] J Losada and J J Nieto ldquoProperties of a new fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 87ndash92 2015
[12] D R Smart Fixed PointTheorems Cambridge University PressCambridge UK 1980
[13] S M Aleomraninejad S Rezapour and N Shahzad ldquoOn fixedpoint generalizations of Suzukirsquos methodrdquo Applied MathematicsLetters vol 24 no 7 pp 1037ndash1040 2011
[14] H Covitz and S B Nadler ldquoMulti-valued contractionmappingsin generalizedmetric spacesrdquo Israel Journal of Mathematics vol8 pp 5ndash11 1970
[15] K S Miller and B Ross An Introduction to the FractionalCalculus and Fractional Differential Eqautions John Wiley ampSons 1993
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
6 Journal of Function Spaces
ℎ1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905) minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
ℎ2(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)V2(119909 119905) minus
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
sdot V2(0 0) +
2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
V2(119909 119904) 119889119904
(26)
By Lemma 7 it is clear that each fixed point of the operator119873 is a solution for system of time-fractional differentialinclusions (8) First we prove that the multifunction 119873 isconvex-valued Let (119906
1 1199062) isin 119883 times 119883 (ℎ
1 ℎ2) (ℎ1015840
1 ℎ1015840
2) isin
119873(1199061 1199062) Choose V
119894 V1015840119894isin 119878119865119894(1199061 1199062)
such that
ℎ119894(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V119894(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V119894(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V119894(119909 119904) 119889119904
ℎ1015840
119894(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1015840119894(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1015840119894(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1015840119894(119909 119904) 119889119904
(27)
for almost all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] and 119894 = 1 2 Let 0 le 120582 le 1be given Then we have
[120582ℎ119894+ (1 minus 120582) ℎ
1015840
119894] (119909 119905)
=2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[120582V119894(119909 119905) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[120582V119894(0 0) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
[120582V119894(119909 119904) + (1 minus 120582) V1015840
119894(119909 119904)] 119889119904
(28)
for 119894 = 1 2 Since the operator 119865119894has convex values 119878
119865119894(119906119894)is a
convex set and [120582ℎ119894+ (1 minus 120582)ℎ
1015840
119894] isin 119873119894(1199061 1199062) for 119894 = 1 2 This
implies that the operator119873 has convex values Now we provethat119873maps bounded sets of119883 into bounded sets Let 119903 gt 0119861119903= (1199061 1199062) isin 119883 times 119883 (119906
1 1199062) le 119903 be a bounded subset
of 119883 times 119883 (ℎ1 ℎ2) isin 119873(119906
1 1199062) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 119861119903 Then there
exists (V1 V2) isin 1198781198651(1199061)
times 1198781198652(1199062)
such that
ℎ1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(29)
and ℎ2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus120573)(2 minus120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus120573)(2 minus
120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for almost
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] If 119901infin= sup
(119909119905)isin[01]times[01]|119901(119909 119905)|
then we obtain
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119905)1003816100381610038161003816
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (0 0)1003816100381610038161003816 +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
119905
0
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904 le 119901 (119909 119905) 120595 (
100381710038171003817100381711990611003817100381710038171003817)
sdot 2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)119905 le
10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
sdot 120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817) 4 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)+
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
le10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817) 4 minus 2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572) =
10038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
sdot 120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)1198731
(30)
where the constant 1198731is defined by (17) This implies
that ℎ1 le 119901
infin120595(1199061)1198731 Similarly we get ℎ
2 le
119901infin120595(1199062)1198732 where the constant 119873
2is defined by (17)
Thus (ℎ1 ℎ2) le 119901
infin120595((119906
1 1199062))(1198731+ 1198732) Now we
prove that119873maps bounded sets into equicontinuous subsets
Journal of Function Spaces 7
of 119883 times 119883 Let (1199061 1199062) isin 119861119903and (119909 119905
1) (119909 119905
2) isin [0 1] times [0 1]
with 1199051lt 1199052 Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ1) (119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199052)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
1199052
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904 minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199051)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
minus2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199051
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199052
1199051
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057210038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(1199052minus 1199051)
(31)
By using a similar method we obtain1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ2) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ2) (119909 1199051)
1003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
1003816100381610038161003816V2 (119909 1199052) minus V2(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057310038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199062
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)(1199052minus 1199051)
(32)
Hence |ℎ119894(119909 1199052) minus ℎ119894(119909 1199051)| rarr 0 as (119909 119905
2) rarr (119909 119905
1) By
using the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we get that119873 is completelycontinuous Here we prove that119873 is upper semicontinuousBy using Lemma 4 119873 is upper semicontinuous whenever ithas a closed graph Since119873 is completely continuouswemustshow that119873 has a closed graph
Let (1199061198991 119906119899
2) be a sequence in 119883 times 119883 with (119906119899
1 119906119899
2) rarr
(1199060
1 1199060
2) and (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)with (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) rarr (ℎ
0
1 ℎ0
2)We
show that (ℎ01 ℎ0
2) isin 119873(119906
0
1 1199060
2) For each (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)
we can choose (V1198991 V1198992) isin 1198781198651(119906119899
1)times 1198781198652(119906119899
2)such that
ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1198991(119909 119904) 119889119904
(33)
and ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V119899
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V1198992(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V1198992(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1]times[0 1] It is sufficient to show that there exists(V01 V02) isin 1198781198651(1199060
1)times 1198781198652(1199060
2)such that
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(34)
and ℎ0
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] Now consider the linear operatorsΘ1 Θ2 1198711([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) rarr 119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) defined
by
Θ1(V) (119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V (119909 119904) 119889119904
(35)
andΘ2(V)(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V(119909 119905)minus(2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int119905
0V(119909 119904)119889119904 Note that
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
1(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(119909 119905) minus V0
1(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(0 0) minus V0
1(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
[V1198991(119909 119904) minus V0
1(119909 119904)] 119889119904
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
2(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(119909 119905) minus V0
2(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(0 0) minus V0
2(0 0)]
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
[V1198992(119909 119904) minus V0
2(119909 119904)] 119889119904
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
(36)
8 Journal of Function Spaces
By using Lemma 5 we get that Θ119894sdot 119878119865119894
is a closed graphoperator for 119894 = 1 2 Also we get ℎ119899
119894(119909 119905) isin Θ
119894(119878119865119894(119906119899
119894)) for
all 119899 Since 119906119899119894rarr 1199060
119894 we get
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(37)
and ℎ02(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for some
V0119894isin 119878119865119894(1199060
119894)(119894 = 1 2) Thus119873 has a closed graph
Now we prove that there is an open set 119880 sube 119883 with(1199061 1199062) notin 119873(119906
1 1199062) for all 120582 isin (0 1) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 120597119880
Let 120582 isin (0 1) and (1199061 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) Then there exists
V119894isin 1198711([0 1] times [0 1]R) with V
119894isin 119878119865119894(119906119894)
(119894 = 1 2) such that
1199061(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(38)
and 1199062(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] By using the above computedvalues we obtain 119906
119894 le 119901
infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894for 119894 = 1 2
This follows that 119906119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894le 1 for 119894 =
1 2 Choose 119872119894gt 0 with 119906
119894 = 119872
119894in such a way that
119872119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894gt 1 for 119894 = 1 2 Put 119880 = (119906
1 1199062) isin
119883 times 119883 (1199061 1199062) lt min 119872
11198722 We note that the
operator 119873 119880 rarr P(119883) is upper semicontinuous andcompletely continuous Also we showed that there is no(1199061 1199062) isin 120597119880 such that (119906
1 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) for some
120582 isin (0 1) Hence with the help of Theorem 6 we get that119873 has a fixed point (119906
1 1199062) isin 119880 which is a solution for time-
fractional differential inclusion (8)-(9)
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
Research of the last two authors was supported by AzarbaijanShahid Madani University
References
[1] R P Agarwal M Benchohra and S Hamani ldquoA survey onexistence results for boundary value problems of nonlinear frac-tional differential equations and inclusionsrdquo Acta ApplicandaeMathematicae vol 109 no 3 pp 973ndash1033 2010
[2] D Baleanu H Mohammadi and S Rezapour ldquoOn a nonlinearfractional differential equation on partially ordered metricspacesrdquo Advances in Difference Equations vol 2013 article 832013
[3] D Baleanu S Rezapour S Etemad and A Alsaedi ldquoOn a time-fractional integrodifferential equation via three-point boundaryvalue conditionsrdquo Mathematical Problems in Engineering vol2015 Article ID 785738 12 pages 2015
[4] K Diethelm The Analysis of Fractional Differential EquationsLecture Notes inMathematics Springer Berlin Germany 2010
[5] R Gorenflo and F Mainardi ldquoFractional calculus integraland differential equations of fractional orderrdquo in Fractals andFractional Calculus in ContinuumMechanics A Carpinteri andF Mainardi Eds Springer New York NY USA 1997
[6] G Samko A Kilbas and O Marichev Fractional Integrals andDerivatives Theory and Applications Gordon and Breach 1993
[7] Z Bai and W Sun ldquoExistence and multiplicity of positivesolutions for singular fractional boundary value problemsrdquoComputers amp Mathematics with Applications vol 63 no 9 pp1369ndash1381 2012
[8] D Baleanu R P Agarwal H Mohammadi and S RezapourldquoSome existence results for a nonlinear fractional differentialequation on partially ordered Banach spacesrdquo Boundary ValueProblems 2013112 8 pages 2013
[9] D Baleanu S Zahra Nazemi and S Rezapour ldquoThe existenceof positive solutions for a new coupled system of multiterm sin-gular fractional integrodifferential boundary value problemsrdquoAbstract and Applied Analysis vol 2013 Article ID 368659 15pages 2013
[10] M Caputo and M Fabrizio ldquoA new definition of fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 73ndash85 2015
[11] J Losada and J J Nieto ldquoProperties of a new fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 87ndash92 2015
[12] D R Smart Fixed PointTheorems Cambridge University PressCambridge UK 1980
[13] S M Aleomraninejad S Rezapour and N Shahzad ldquoOn fixedpoint generalizations of Suzukirsquos methodrdquo Applied MathematicsLetters vol 24 no 7 pp 1037ndash1040 2011
[14] H Covitz and S B Nadler ldquoMulti-valued contractionmappingsin generalizedmetric spacesrdquo Israel Journal of Mathematics vol8 pp 5ndash11 1970
[15] K S Miller and B Ross An Introduction to the FractionalCalculus and Fractional Differential Eqautions John Wiley ampSons 1993
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Journal of Function Spaces 7
of 119883 times 119883 Let (1199061 1199062) isin 119861119903and (119909 119905
1) (119909 119905
2) isin [0 1] times [0 1]
with 1199051lt 1199052 Then we have
1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ1) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ1) (119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816 =
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199052)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0) +
2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
sdot int
1199052
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904 minus
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 1199051)
+2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
minus2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199051
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
1199052
1199051
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 119904)1003816100381610038161003816 119889119904
le2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)
1003816100381610038161003816V1 (119909 1199052) minus V1(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057210038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199061
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)(1199052minus 1199051)
(31)
By using a similar method we obtain1003816100381610038161003816(ℎ2) (119909 1199052) minus (ℎ2) (119909 1199051)
1003816100381610038161003816
le2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)
1003816100381610038161003816V2 (119909 1199052) minus V2(119909 1199051)1003816100381610038161003816
+212057310038171003817100381710038171199011003817100381710038171003817infin
120595 (10038171003817100381710038171199062
1003817100381710038171003817)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)(1199052minus 1199051)
(32)
Hence |ℎ119894(119909 1199052) minus ℎ119894(119909 1199051)| rarr 0 as (119909 119905
2) rarr (119909 119905
1) By
using the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we get that119873 is completelycontinuous Here we prove that119873 is upper semicontinuousBy using Lemma 4 119873 is upper semicontinuous whenever ithas a closed graph Since119873 is completely continuouswemustshow that119873 has a closed graph
Let (1199061198991 119906119899
2) be a sequence in 119883 times 119883 with (119906119899
1 119906119899
2) rarr
(1199060
1 1199060
2) and (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)with (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) rarr (ℎ
0
1 ℎ0
2)We
show that (ℎ01 ℎ0
2) isin 119873(119906
0
1 1199060
2) For each (ℎ119899
1 ℎ119899
2) isin 119873(119906
119899
1 119906119899
2)
we can choose (V1198991 V1198992) isin 1198781198651(119906119899
1)times 1198781198652(119906119899
2)such that
ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1198991(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1198991(119909 119904) 119889119904
(33)
and ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V119899
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V1198992(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V1198992(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1]times[0 1] It is sufficient to show that there exists(V01 V02) isin 1198781198651(1199060
1)times 1198781198652(1199060
2)such that
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(34)
and ℎ0
2(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] Now consider the linear operatorsΘ1 Θ2 1198711([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) rarr 119862([0 1] times [0 1] 119883) defined
by
Θ1(V) (119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V (0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V (119909 119904) 119889119904
(35)
andΘ2(V)(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V(119909 119905)minus(2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int119905
0V(119909 119904)119889119904 Note that
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
1(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
1(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(119909 119905) minus V0
1(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)[V1198991(0 0) minus V0
1(0 0)]
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
[V1198991(119909 119904) minus V0
1(119909 119904)] 119889119904
10038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
10038171003817100381710038171003817ℎ119899
2(119909 119905) minus ℎ
0
2(119909 119905)
10038171003817100381710038171003817
=
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(119909 119905) minus V0
2(119909 119905)]
minus2 (1 minus 120573)
(2 minus 120573)119872 (120573)[V1198992(0 0) minus V0
2(0 0)]
+2120573
(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)int
119905
0
[V1198992(119909 119904) minus V0
2(119909 119904)] 119889119904
100381710038171003817100381710038171003817100381710038171003817
997888rarr 0
(36)
8 Journal of Function Spaces
By using Lemma 5 we get that Θ119894sdot 119878119865119894
is a closed graphoperator for 119894 = 1 2 Also we get ℎ119899
119894(119909 119905) isin Θ
119894(119878119865119894(119906119899
119894)) for
all 119899 Since 119906119899119894rarr 1199060
119894 we get
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(37)
and ℎ02(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for some
V0119894isin 119878119865119894(1199060
119894)(119894 = 1 2) Thus119873 has a closed graph
Now we prove that there is an open set 119880 sube 119883 with(1199061 1199062) notin 119873(119906
1 1199062) for all 120582 isin (0 1) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 120597119880
Let 120582 isin (0 1) and (1199061 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) Then there exists
V119894isin 1198711([0 1] times [0 1]R) with V
119894isin 119878119865119894(119906119894)
(119894 = 1 2) such that
1199061(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(38)
and 1199062(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] By using the above computedvalues we obtain 119906
119894 le 119901
infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894for 119894 = 1 2
This follows that 119906119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894le 1 for 119894 =
1 2 Choose 119872119894gt 0 with 119906
119894 = 119872
119894in such a way that
119872119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894gt 1 for 119894 = 1 2 Put 119880 = (119906
1 1199062) isin
119883 times 119883 (1199061 1199062) lt min 119872
11198722 We note that the
operator 119873 119880 rarr P(119883) is upper semicontinuous andcompletely continuous Also we showed that there is no(1199061 1199062) isin 120597119880 such that (119906
1 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) for some
120582 isin (0 1) Hence with the help of Theorem 6 we get that119873 has a fixed point (119906
1 1199062) isin 119880 which is a solution for time-
fractional differential inclusion (8)-(9)
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
Research of the last two authors was supported by AzarbaijanShahid Madani University
References
[1] R P Agarwal M Benchohra and S Hamani ldquoA survey onexistence results for boundary value problems of nonlinear frac-tional differential equations and inclusionsrdquo Acta ApplicandaeMathematicae vol 109 no 3 pp 973ndash1033 2010
[2] D Baleanu H Mohammadi and S Rezapour ldquoOn a nonlinearfractional differential equation on partially ordered metricspacesrdquo Advances in Difference Equations vol 2013 article 832013
[3] D Baleanu S Rezapour S Etemad and A Alsaedi ldquoOn a time-fractional integrodifferential equation via three-point boundaryvalue conditionsrdquo Mathematical Problems in Engineering vol2015 Article ID 785738 12 pages 2015
[4] K Diethelm The Analysis of Fractional Differential EquationsLecture Notes inMathematics Springer Berlin Germany 2010
[5] R Gorenflo and F Mainardi ldquoFractional calculus integraland differential equations of fractional orderrdquo in Fractals andFractional Calculus in ContinuumMechanics A Carpinteri andF Mainardi Eds Springer New York NY USA 1997
[6] G Samko A Kilbas and O Marichev Fractional Integrals andDerivatives Theory and Applications Gordon and Breach 1993
[7] Z Bai and W Sun ldquoExistence and multiplicity of positivesolutions for singular fractional boundary value problemsrdquoComputers amp Mathematics with Applications vol 63 no 9 pp1369ndash1381 2012
[8] D Baleanu R P Agarwal H Mohammadi and S RezapourldquoSome existence results for a nonlinear fractional differentialequation on partially ordered Banach spacesrdquo Boundary ValueProblems 2013112 8 pages 2013
[9] D Baleanu S Zahra Nazemi and S Rezapour ldquoThe existenceof positive solutions for a new coupled system of multiterm sin-gular fractional integrodifferential boundary value problemsrdquoAbstract and Applied Analysis vol 2013 Article ID 368659 15pages 2013
[10] M Caputo and M Fabrizio ldquoA new definition of fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 73ndash85 2015
[11] J Losada and J J Nieto ldquoProperties of a new fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 87ndash92 2015
[12] D R Smart Fixed PointTheorems Cambridge University PressCambridge UK 1980
[13] S M Aleomraninejad S Rezapour and N Shahzad ldquoOn fixedpoint generalizations of Suzukirsquos methodrdquo Applied MathematicsLetters vol 24 no 7 pp 1037ndash1040 2011
[14] H Covitz and S B Nadler ldquoMulti-valued contractionmappingsin generalizedmetric spacesrdquo Israel Journal of Mathematics vol8 pp 5ndash11 1970
[15] K S Miller and B Ross An Introduction to the FractionalCalculus and Fractional Differential Eqautions John Wiley ampSons 1993
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
8 Journal of Function Spaces
By using Lemma 5 we get that Θ119894sdot 119878119865119894
is a closed graphoperator for 119894 = 1 2 Also we get ℎ119899
119894(119909 119905) isin Θ
119894(119878119865119894(119906119899
119894)) for
all 119899 Since 119906119899119894rarr 1199060
119894 we get
ℎ0
1(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V01(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V01(119909 119904) 119889119904
(37)
and ℎ02(119909 119905) = (2(1minus120573)(2minus120573)119872(120573))V0
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1minus120573)(2minus
120573)119872(120573))V02(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V02(119909 119904)119889119904 for some
V0119894isin 119878119865119894(1199060
119894)(119894 = 1 2) Thus119873 has a closed graph
Now we prove that there is an open set 119880 sube 119883 with(1199061 1199062) notin 119873(119906
1 1199062) for all 120582 isin (0 1) and (119906
1 1199062) isin 120597119880
Let 120582 isin (0 1) and (1199061 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) Then there exists
V119894isin 1198711([0 1] times [0 1]R) with V
119894isin 119878119865119894(119906119894)
(119894 = 1 2) such that
1199061(119909 119905) =
2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(119909 119905)
minus2 (1 minus 120572)
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)V1(0 0)
+2120572
(2 minus 120572)119872 (120572)int
119905
0
V1(119909 119904) 119889119904
(38)
and 1199062(119909 119905) = (2(1 minus 120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V
2(119909 119905) minus (2(1 minus
120573)(2 minus 120573)119872(120573))V2(0 0) + (2120573(2 minus 120573)119872(120573)) int
119905
0V2(119909 119904)119889119904 for
all (119909 119905) isin [0 1] times [0 1] By using the above computedvalues we obtain 119906
119894 le 119901
infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894for 119894 = 1 2
This follows that 119906119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894le 1 for 119894 =
1 2 Choose 119872119894gt 0 with 119906
119894 = 119872
119894in such a way that
119872119894119901infin120595(119906119894)sum119899
119894=1119873119894gt 1 for 119894 = 1 2 Put 119880 = (119906
1 1199062) isin
119883 times 119883 (1199061 1199062) lt min 119872
11198722 We note that the
operator 119873 119880 rarr P(119883) is upper semicontinuous andcompletely continuous Also we showed that there is no(1199061 1199062) isin 120597119880 such that (119906
1 1199062) isin 120582119873(119906
1 1199062) for some
120582 isin (0 1) Hence with the help of Theorem 6 we get that119873 has a fixed point (119906
1 1199062) isin 119880 which is a solution for time-
fractional differential inclusion (8)-(9)
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
Research of the last two authors was supported by AzarbaijanShahid Madani University
References
[1] R P Agarwal M Benchohra and S Hamani ldquoA survey onexistence results for boundary value problems of nonlinear frac-tional differential equations and inclusionsrdquo Acta ApplicandaeMathematicae vol 109 no 3 pp 973ndash1033 2010
[2] D Baleanu H Mohammadi and S Rezapour ldquoOn a nonlinearfractional differential equation on partially ordered metricspacesrdquo Advances in Difference Equations vol 2013 article 832013
[3] D Baleanu S Rezapour S Etemad and A Alsaedi ldquoOn a time-fractional integrodifferential equation via three-point boundaryvalue conditionsrdquo Mathematical Problems in Engineering vol2015 Article ID 785738 12 pages 2015
[4] K Diethelm The Analysis of Fractional Differential EquationsLecture Notes inMathematics Springer Berlin Germany 2010
[5] R Gorenflo and F Mainardi ldquoFractional calculus integraland differential equations of fractional orderrdquo in Fractals andFractional Calculus in ContinuumMechanics A Carpinteri andF Mainardi Eds Springer New York NY USA 1997
[6] G Samko A Kilbas and O Marichev Fractional Integrals andDerivatives Theory and Applications Gordon and Breach 1993
[7] Z Bai and W Sun ldquoExistence and multiplicity of positivesolutions for singular fractional boundary value problemsrdquoComputers amp Mathematics with Applications vol 63 no 9 pp1369ndash1381 2012
[8] D Baleanu R P Agarwal H Mohammadi and S RezapourldquoSome existence results for a nonlinear fractional differentialequation on partially ordered Banach spacesrdquo Boundary ValueProblems 2013112 8 pages 2013
[9] D Baleanu S Zahra Nazemi and S Rezapour ldquoThe existenceof positive solutions for a new coupled system of multiterm sin-gular fractional integrodifferential boundary value problemsrdquoAbstract and Applied Analysis vol 2013 Article ID 368659 15pages 2013
[10] M Caputo and M Fabrizio ldquoA new definition of fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 73ndash85 2015
[11] J Losada and J J Nieto ldquoProperties of a new fractionalderivative without singular kernelrdquo Progress in Fractional Dif-ferentiation and Applications vol 1 no 2 pp 87ndash92 2015
[12] D R Smart Fixed PointTheorems Cambridge University PressCambridge UK 1980
[13] S M Aleomraninejad S Rezapour and N Shahzad ldquoOn fixedpoint generalizations of Suzukirsquos methodrdquo Applied MathematicsLetters vol 24 no 7 pp 1037ndash1040 2011
[14] H Covitz and S B Nadler ldquoMulti-valued contractionmappingsin generalizedmetric spacesrdquo Israel Journal of Mathematics vol8 pp 5ndash11 1970
[15] K S Miller and B Ross An Introduction to the FractionalCalculus and Fractional Differential Eqautions John Wiley ampSons 1993
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of