+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion...

Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion...

Date post: 15-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 21 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type Signals over Optical Fiber R. Q. Shaddad, 1,2 A. B. Mohammad, 1 S. A. Al-Gailani, 1,3 and A. M. Al-Hetar 2 1 Lightwave Communications Research Group, Infocomm Research Alliance, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310 Johor, Malaysia 2 Communication and Computer Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, Taiz University, Taiz, Yemen 3 Industrial Technical Institute, Mallaa, Aden, Yemen Correspondence should be addressed to R. Q. Shaddad; [email protected] Received 28 August 2013; Accepted 2 February 2014; Published 16 March 2014 Academic Editors: C.-W. Chow and E. Stevens-Navarro Copyright © 2014 R. Q. Shaddad et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. e optical fiber is well adapted to pass multiple wireless signals having different carrier frequencies by using radio-over-fiber (ROF) technique. However, multiple wireless signals which have the same carrier frequency cannot propagate over a single optical fiber, such as wireless multi-input multi-output (MIMO) signals feeding multiple antennas in the fiber wireless (FiWi) system. A novel optical frequency upconversion (OFU) technique is proposed to solve this problem. In this paper, the novel OFU approach is used to transmit three wireless MIMO signals over a 20 km standard single mode fiber (SMF). e OFU technique exploits one optical source to produce multiple wavelengths by delivering it to a LiNbO 3 external optical modulator. e wireless MIMO signals are then modulated by LiNbO 3 optical intensity modulators separately using the generated optical carriers from the OFU process. ese modulators use the optical single-sideband with carrier (OSSB+C) modulation scheme to optimize the system performance against the fiber dispersion effect. Each wireless MIMO signal is with a 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz carrier frequency, 1 Gb/s data rate, and 16-quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM). e crosstalk between the wireless MIMO signals is highly suppressed, since each wireless MIMO signal is carried on a specific optical wavelength. 1. Introduction Next generation access networks are planned to provide customers with high data rate, broadband multiple services, and flexible communication. ere is strong competition between optical access technologies and wireless access tech- nologies to achieve these requirements, since the bandwidth demand of the end-users has become larger nowadays [1]. e optical fiber access networks provide high-bandwidth digital services and long-distance communication, but they are less ubiquitous. e wireless access networks provide flexible and ubiquitous communication with a low deployment cost. However, its deployment scalability is limited by spectrum and range [2, 3]. e FiWi access network is powerful hybrid architecture of optical backhaul and wireless front-end. is hybrid FiWi access network supports high data rates and throughput with minimal time delay [4]. Figure 1 shows architecture of a FiWi access network. e optical backhaul is a tree network connecting the central office (CO) and wireless front-end. e optical backhaul is comprised of an optical line terminal (OLT) at the CO, an SMF, a remote node (RN), and multiple access points (APs). e wireless front-end consists of widespread APs to penetrate numerous wireless end users (WEUs). ere are two main methods to transmit the wireless signals over the FiWi systems: ROF transmission and digitized radio-over- fiber (DROF) transmission [5, 6]. For wireless broadband transmission, the MIMO radio system has been defined as multiple transmit/receive anten- nas. e MIMO system is designed to improve transmission range/reliability and deliver higher data transmission rates than the single-input single-output (SISO) system. e wire- less MIMO signals are transmitted over fiber to get a powerful integrated FiWi system. e optical fiber is well adapted Hindawi Publishing Corporation e Scientific World Journal Volume 2014, Article ID 170471, 14 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/170471
Transcript
Page 1: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

Research ArticleOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission ofWireless MIMO-Type Signals over Optical Fiber

R Q Shaddad12 A B Mohammad1 S A Al-Gailani13 and A M Al-Hetar2

1 Lightwave Communications Research Group Infocomm Research Alliance Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)81310 Johor Malaysia

2 Communication and Computer Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering and Information TechnologyTaiz University Taiz Yemen

3 Industrial Technical Institute Mallaa Aden Yemen

Correspondence should be addressed to R Q Shaddad rqs2006gmailcom

Received 28 August 2013 Accepted 2 February 2014 Published 16 March 2014

Academic Editors C-W Chow and E Stevens-Navarro

Copyright copy 2014 R Q Shaddad et al This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Licensewhich permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited

The optical fiber is well adapted to pass multiple wireless signals having different carrier frequencies by using radio-over-fiber(ROF) technique However multiple wireless signals which have the same carrier frequency cannot propagate over a single opticalfiber such as wireless multi-input multi-output (MIMO) signals feeding multiple antennas in the fiber wireless (FiWi) system Anovel optical frequency upconversion (OFU) technique is proposed to solve this problem In this paper the novel OFU approachis used to transmit three wireless MIMO signals over a 20 km standard single mode fiber (SMF) The OFU technique exploits oneoptical source to produce multiple wavelengths by delivering it to a LiNbO

3external optical modulatorThe wireless MIMO signals

are then modulated by LiNbO3optical intensity modulators separately using the generated optical carriers from the OFU process

These modulators use the optical single-sideband with carrier (OSSB+C) modulation scheme to optimize the system performanceagainst the fiber dispersion effect Each wireless MIMO signal is with a 24GHz or 5GHz carrier frequency 1 Gbs data rate and16-quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) The crosstalk between the wireless MIMO signals is highly suppressed since eachwireless MIMO signal is carried on a specific optical wavelength

1 Introduction

Next generation access networks are planned to providecustomers with high data rate broadband multiple servicesand flexible communication There is strong competitionbetween optical access technologies and wireless access tech-nologies to achieve these requirements since the bandwidthdemand of the end-users has become larger nowadays [1]Theoptical fiber access networks provide high-bandwidth digitalservices and long-distance communication but they are lessubiquitous The wireless access networks provide flexibleand ubiquitous communication with a low deployment costHowever its deployment scalability is limited by spectrumand range [2 3] The FiWi access network is powerful hybridarchitecture of optical backhaul and wireless front-end Thishybrid FiWi access network supports high data rates andthroughput with minimal time delay [4]

Figure 1 shows architecture of a FiWi access networkTheoptical backhaul is a tree network connecting the centraloffice (CO) and wireless front-end The optical backhaulis comprised of an optical line terminal (OLT) at the COan SMF a remote node (RN) and multiple access points(APs) The wireless front-end consists of widespread APs topenetrate numerous wireless end users (WEUs) There aretwo main methods to transmit the wireless signals over theFiWi systems ROF transmission and digitized radio-over-fiber (DROF) transmission [5 6]

For wireless broadband transmission the MIMO radiosystem has been defined as multiple transmitreceive anten-nas The MIMO system is designed to improve transmissionrangereliability and deliver higher data transmission ratesthan the single-input single-output (SISO) system The wire-lessMIMO signals are transmitted over fiber to get a powerfulintegrated FiWi system The optical fiber is well adapted

Hindawi Publishing Corporatione Scientific World JournalVolume 2014 Article ID 170471 14 pageshttpdxdoiorg1011552014170471

2 The Scientific World Journal

Wireless front-endOptical backhaul

CO

RN

ONUAP

CO central officeOLT optical line terminalRN remote node

AP access pointWEUs wireless end-usersONU optical network unit

WEUs

OLT

ONUAP

ONUAP

ONUAP

ONUAP

ONUAP

RN

Figure 1 FiWi access network architecture

to pass multiple wireless signals having different carrierfrequencies by using ROF technique However multiplewireless signalswhich have the same carrier frequency cannotpropagate over a single optical fiber such as MIMO signalsfeeding multiple antennas in the FiWi system The problemstarts once multiple MIMO signals are combined and thenupconverted by a single optical carrier Individual MIMOsignals could not be separated and recovered thereafter withregular electrical filtering The simple approach to solve thisproblem is by transporting eachMIMOsignal over individualoptical fiber However this approach will not be cost-effectivewhen many MIMO signals are transmitted over severaloptical fibers An approach to solve this problem by usingwavelength division multiplexing (WDM) and subcarriersmultiplexing (SCM) techniques has also been proposed [78] These techniques are not cost-effective since multipleoptical sources and photodetectors are required When SCMtechnique is used all except one of the MIMO radio signalsare translated to different frequency bands to transport themover fiber Many frequency converters are then used totranslate the delivered signal back to the original frequencyband So the cost and complexity are high in this approachespecially when the number of MIMO signals is large

The phase quadrature double-sideband frequency-translation technique has been proposed to transport MIMOradio signals over single optical fiber [9] The achievedmodulation symbol rate was limited because the phase andamplitude of the double sidebands were not sufficiently

matched due to the dispersion and frequency response of theoverall system [9]

Transmission of three MIMO radio signals all with244GHz carrier frequency over an optical fiber was pro-posed and demonstrated using an electrical single-sidebandfrequency translation (ESSB-FT) technique [10] The tech-nique used here [10] improves the system performance [9]where the phase and amplitude of the single sidebands weremore matched The proposed approach decreased the max-imum crosstalk level between the different MIMO channelsas compared to transporting the same signals by using SCMtechnique In addition it could be applied to work withexisting commercially available ROF systems which weredesigned to carry just SISO radio signals

Recently threewireless 16-QAMMIMOsignals were pro-posed to be transmitted over a 20 km SMF using the opticalsingle-sideband frequency translation (OSSB-FT) technique(which is considered as OFU technique) [11] These wirelessMIMO signals weremodulated using the carrier frequency of244GHz and optically modulated using the optical double-sideband (ODSB) modulation scheme The ODSB modu-lation scheme is affected by the dispersion effects of thefiber segment The fiber chromatic dispersion also increasesdirectly proportional with increasing radio frequency (RF)modulating frequency [1] In terms of the spectral efficiencythe ODSBmodulation scheme is not attractiveThe proposedcommunication system achieved a bit error rate (BER) of10minus5

The Scientific World Journal 3

In this paper the OFU technique is proposed to solve theproblem of wireless MIMO signals transmission over fibersince it does not need low-frequency local oscillators (LOs)at the transmitter and the receiver as compared to [10] Thecrosstalk is highly suppressed between the different wirelessMIMO signals with the same carrier frequency since eachwireless MIMO signal is carried on specific optical wave-length By using the OFU technique one optical dual-armmodulator (DAM) is derived by one optical source to producemultiple wavelengths which convey multiple wireless MIMOsignals over the optical fiber The FiWi system based onthe new approach can also support the wavelength reusetechnique so one optical source is enough to generate theoptical carrier which is reused at theAP as uplinkwavelengthand multiple wavelengths which convey multiple wirelessMIMO signals over the SMF [12] The principles and thesimulation design of the OFU technique to transport wirelessMIMO signals over fiber are discussed in Section 3

The novel OFU approach is used to transmit three wire-less MIMO signals over a 20 km SMF The OFU techniqueexploits one optical source to produce multiple wavelengthsby delivering it to a DAM The parameters of the DAMare adjusted to produce number of wavelengths accordingto the number of the wireless MIMO signals The wirelessMIMO signals are then optically modulated by opticalintensity modulators separately using the produced opticalcarriers from the OFU process All these optical modulatorsare LiNbO

3Mach-Zehnder modulators (LN-MZMs) Each

wireless MIMO signal is with a 24GHz or 5GHz carrierfrequency 1 Gbs data rate and 16-QAM The crosstalkbetween the wireless MIMO signals is highly suppressedsince each wireless MIMO signal is carried on a specificoptical wavelength The system performance is evaluatedin terms of BER error vector magnitude (EVM) and eyediagrams for different RF carriers optical link distances andchannel spacings The novel technique provides a spectralefficient and reliable FiWi system

This paper is organized as follows Section 2 outlinesthe operation of the OFU technique Principles and designof the proposed system are demonstrated in Section 3 InSection 4 the mathematical model of the proposed systemillustrates how the OFU approach operates in the proposedsystem Section 5 analyzes and discusses the system perfor-mance Section 6 suggests how the proposed approach canbe extended to transport a higher number of wireless MIMOsignals Finally conclusions are given in Section 7

2 Optical Frequency Upconversion Technique

OFU technique is a prime technique in many fields of opticalcommunication External frequency modulators such as LN-MZMs can be used as a light-wave frequency upconverterin fiber optics [13] The LN-MZM is a DAM which can beused as an optical frequency upconverter when its dual-armsare supplied by a sinusoidal RF signal The LN-MZM is alsoused as an optical modulator for digital base-band signalsor modulated RF signals when these signals drive its dual-arms For broadband communication applications externalLN-MZMs provide broadband operation and minimize the

dispersion effects Moreover the external LN-MZMs offerhigh stability very low bias-voltage drift rates and bias-freedevices [14 15] The frequency conversion efficiency of theLN-MZMs can be increased by using low values of half-wavevoltage (119881

120587)

In this study the OFU technique is proposed to generatemultiple optical carriers which are used to modulate multiplewireless signals separately at many optical external intensitymodulators (IMs) The modulated optical signals can thenbe multiplexed together to the optical fiber since theyhave no overlapping adjacent spectral bands The DAM isset to generate first-order signal component (at the centersinusoidal RF frequency) and other higher-order modulatedcomponents around it The higher-order components areneglected since they have small amplitude compared tothe lower-order components In this approach the WDMinterleaver (WDM IL) is used after the DAM to separate thegenerated dominant wavelengths [16]

Generation of multiple wavelengths from one laser diode(LD) using OFU technique is illustrated in Figure 2 Oneoptical source LD with optical carrier frequency 119891

119901supplies

a DAM which is driven by a sinusoidal clock frequency 119891119898

(RFmodulating frequency)TheDAM is adjusted to generatemultiple frequency components first-order component withthe center optical carrier frequency 119891

119901and upper and lower

single sidebands components around the center frequencyThe lower single sideband components have the opticalfrequencies (119891

119901minus 119891119898 119891119901minus 2119891119898 119891119901minus 3119891119898 etc) At the

output the upper single sideband components will have theoptical frequencies (119891

119901+ 119891119898 119891119901+ 2119891119898 119891119901+ 3119891119898 etc) From

Figure 2 there are a number (five) of frequency componentsexceeding the other higher-order components which havesmall magnitudes as compared to their magnitudes Thesefrequency components are called dominant wavelengths orfrequencies which are interleaved separately by using WDMIL The channel frequency space (or wavelength interleave)between the generated wavelengths is 119891

119898 The dominant

wavelengths will be used as downlink wavelengths to conveythe multiple wireless MIMO signals over optical fiber

3 Principles and Design ofthe Proposed System

The block diagram of the OFU technique for transmissionof three wireless MIMO signals over a single optical fiberis shown in Figure 3(a) At the transmitter three wirelessMIMO signals MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3are generated

and modulated using M-QAM at the same carrier frequency119891119888

= 24GHz The spectra of these three wireless signalsare shown in Figure 3(b) in the insets ((i)ndash(iii)) A DAMwith the ODSB modulation technique is used to generatethree downlink wavelengths from one LD with a wavelength120582119889

= 155252 nm (193100 THz) as shown in Figure 3(b)the inset (iv) The three generated downlink wavelengths areshown in Figure 3(b) as the inset (v) Two ILs are used afterthe DAM to separate the three downlink wavelengths whichare the two single-sideband wavelengths 120582

1198891= 155232 nm

(193125 THz) and 1205821198892

= 155273 nm (193075 THz) and theoptical carrier frequency 120582

1198893= 155252 nm (193100 THz)

4 The Scientific World Journal

DAM

Clockfrequency

fm

fm

DC biasvoltage

Opticalcarrier

fp

fp

fp

fp minus fmfp minus 2fmfp minus 3fm

WDMIL

fp + 2fmfp + fm

fp + fm

fp + 3fm

Dominantwavelengths

fp

fp minus fm

fp minus 2fm

fp + 2fm

Figure 2 Generation of multiple wavelengths using OFU technique

The channel spacing between these wavelengths Δ120582 equalsthe frequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900= 25GHz (02 nm)

which is used in the DAM An optical attenuator is used inthe path of the downlink wavelength 120582

1198893to equilibrate its

power with the generated power from the other downlinkwavelengths 120582

1198891and 120582

1198892

The downlink wavelengths 1205821198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893are used to

modulate the three wirelessMIMO signalsMIMO1 MIMO

2

and MIMO3by external IMs respectively The wireless

MIMO signals are firstly biased to be compatible with thenature of the optical signals and then optically modulated bythe IMs These IMs use the OSSB+C modulation scheme tooptimize the system performance against the fiber dispersioneffectThe three modulated optical signals with the downlinkwavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893are coupled together as shown

in Figure 3(b) inset (vi) and then propagated along a 20 kmSMFwith attenuation of 02 dBkm and dispersion coefficientof 17 psnmkm

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into three modulated optical signals with thewavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893 as shown in Figure 3(b)

in the insets ((vii)ndash(ix)) The receiver then downconvertsthe three modulated optical signals directly to the suitable

electrical signals by using an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signals are then band-pass filtered accordingto the allocated RF carrier frequency 119891

119888= 24GHz by

using bandpass filters (BPFs) to get the wireless MIMOsignalsMIMO

1MIMO

2 andMIMO

3The crosstalk between

the received wireless MIMO signals which have the samefrequency is highly suppressed because each signal is carriedon an independent wavelength with a large channel spacing(25GHz) as compared to the carrier frequency (24GHz) Inthis simulation the PIN photodiodes with power sensitivityof minus20 dBm are used in the optical receivers

In the simulation design the OFU technique is used totransport three wireless MIMO signals with the same RFcarrier frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz over fiberThewirelessMIMO signals are modulated by using 16-QAM modulationto investigate the performance of this ROF system at differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves

4 Mathematical Model of the Proposed System

The optical field of the output signal 119864out(119905) from the DAMcan be expressed as [17 18]

The Scientific World Journal 5

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

19306

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

(i) (ii) (iii)

(iv) (v) (vi)

19306

T

19304

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T

19316

T

19306

T

19304

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T

19316

T

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

fd2fd3 fd1

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d3

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

CL

CL

120582d1

120582d1

120582d2

120582d2

LD laser diodeDAM dual-arm modulatorCL optical coupler

BPF band pass filter

Bias

Bias

Bias

IL

120582d1 120582d2RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

Receiver

IL

(i) MIMO1

(ii) MIMO2

(iii) MIMO3

IL optical WDM interleaverIM intensity modulator

(iv) (v)

(vii)

(viii)

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

BPF

BPF

BPF(ix)

IL

IL

From fiber

LD

Optical attenuator

(vi) To fiber

(a)

+

+

+

(b) continued

Figure 3 Continued

6 The Scientific World Journal

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

(vii) (viii) (ix)

(b)

Figure 3 Transport of wireless MIMO signals over optical fiber using the OFU technique (a) block diagram of the proposed technique and(b) power spectra of the signals according to the indicated insets

119864out (119905) = 120572119864in (119905) (1 minus 120574) 119890(119895120587V1(119905)119881120587RF+1198951205871198811198871119881120587DC)

+120574119890(119895120587V2(119905)119881120587RF+1198951205871198811198872119881120587DC)

(1)

Here119864in(119905) is the input optical signal to theDAMfrom theLD V1(119905) and V

2(119905) are the RF modulating electrical voltage

with the carrier frequency 119891119898

= 1205961198982120587 119881

1198871and 119881

1198872are

the DC bias voltages applied to the arms of the DAM 119881120587RF

and 119881120587DC are the switching RF and switching bias voltages

respectivelyThe parameter 120572 is given by

120572 = 10minus(Ω20)

(2)

Here Ω is the insertion loss in dB (It is assigned as 5 dBin this design) 120574 designates the power splitting (combining)ratio of arm two for the input (output resp) 119884-branchwaveguide 120574 is given by

120574 =(1 minus 1radic120576

119903)

2 (3)

where 120576119903= 10(Extinction Ratio10)

= 100 so 120574 asymp 12 in this workIn the simulation design the values of 119881

120587RF and 119881120587DC are

set to 4V and the bias voltages of 1198811198871and 119881

1198872are assigned as

minus1 V and 1V respectively In addition the generated opticalsignal from the LD can be expressed as 119864in(119905) = 119864

119901119890119895120596119901119905 and

the modulating electrical signals can be expressed as V1(119905) =

minusV2(119905) = cos(120596

119898119905) So (1) is rearranged as

119864out (119905) =1

2120572119890minus119895(1205874)

119864in (119905) (119890119895(1205874)V

1(119905)

+ 119895119890119895(1205874)V

2(119905))

=1

2120572119890minus119895(1205874)

119864119901119890119895120596119901119905(119890119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905+ 119895119890minus119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905)

(4)

From the Jacobi-Anger expansion [19]

119890119895119898ℎcos120601

=

infin

sum

119899=minusinfin

119895119899119869119899(119898ℎ) 119890119895119899120601

(5)

where 119869119899(119898ℎ) is the 119899-order Bessel function of the complex

parameter119898ℎ

The parameter119898ℎis called modulation index

Therefore

119890119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905=

infin

sum

119899=minusinfin

119895119899119869119899(120587

4) 119890119895119899120596119898119905

= minus119895119869minus1(120587

4) 119890minus119895120596119898119905+ 1198690(120587

4) + 119895119869

1(120587

4) 119890119895120596119898119905

(6)

where the values of 119869119899(1205874) are neglected for 119899 =

plusmn2 plusmn3 plusmninfin because of their too small valuesAlso

119890minus119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905= 119890119895(1205874) cos(120596

119898119905+120587)

= 119895119869minus1(120587

4) 119890minus119895120596119898119905+ 1198690(120587

4) minus 119895119869

1(120587

4) 119890119895120596119898119905

(7)

Since 119869minus119899(119911) = (minus1)

119899119869119899(119911) for integer value 119899 [19] so

119869minus1(1205874) = minus119869

1(1205874) The expression of the output optical

signal 119864out(119905) is then simplified as

119864out (119905) =1

2120572 (1 + 119895) 119890

minus119895(1205874)119864119901

times 1198690(120587

4) 119890119895120596119901119905+ 1198691(120587

4) [119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+ 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905]

=1

radic2

120572119864119901times 1198690(120587

4) 119890119895120596119901119905

+1198691(120587

4) [119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+ 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905]

(8)

The Scientific World Journal 7

So the output signal can be expressed as

119864out (119905) = 1198701times 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905

+ 1198702times 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+ 1198703times 119890119895120596119901119905

(9)

where1198701 1198702 and119870

3are constants according to (8)

This signal is delivered to optical ILs to separate the threedownlink optical carriers 119891

1198891= 119891119901+ 119891119898(1205821198891) 1198911198892

= 119891119901minus

119891119898(1205821198892) and 119891

1198893= 119891119901(1205821198893) Three wireless MIMO signals

1198721(119905) 119872

2(119905) and 119872

3(119905) are OSSB+C modulated by these

the three optical carriers 1198911198891 1198911198892 and 119891

1198893 respectively using

three IMs as shown in Figure 3(a) The three MIMO signalshave different QAM data stream at the same carrier RF of119891119888= 1205961198882120587

The modulated OSSB+C optical signal at each IM can bewritten as [18]

119864SSB119894 (119905) asymp 119862119894119890119895120596119889119894119905+119872119894 (119905) 119890119895(120596119889+120596119888)119905 (10)

where 119862119894is a constant 120596

119889119894= 2120587119891

119889119894is the optical downlink

carrier 119872119894is the 119894th wireless MIMO signal with RF carrier

frequency of 119891119888 and 119894 is the index of MIMO signal (119894 =

1 2 or 3) The three modulated optical signals by the opticalwavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893) are combined into a single

optical fiber So the input optical signal to the optical fiber isgiven by

119864in fiber (119905) asymp 1198621119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+1198721 (119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198622119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+1198722(119905) 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198623119890119895120596119901119905+1198723(119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119888)119905

(11)

This signal propagates along an SMFwith the propagationconstant of 120573(120596) and attenuation magnitude 120572

119891 where 120596 is

the angular frequency So the output lightwave at the end ofthe SMF with length of 119911 can be approximated as [20]

119864out fiber (119911 119905) prop 119890minus1205721198911199111198621119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898)119911]

+1198721(119905 minus 1199051198891)

times 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198622119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898)119911]

+1198722(119905 minus 1199051198892)

times 119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198623119890119895[120596119901119905+120573(120596

119901)119911]

+1198723(119905 minus 1199051198893) 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119888)119911]

(12)

where 119905119889119894(119894 = 1 2 or 3) is the time delay of the 119894th optical

downlink signal The time delay is calculated by the firstderivative of 120573(120596) since 119905

119889119894= 1205731015840(120596119889119894

+ 120596119888) and 120596

119894is the

120596p120596p minus 120596m 120596p + 120596m

120596

Am

plitu

de

USSB2 USSB3 USSB1

fd2 fd3 fd1

Figure 4 The propagated lightwave signal over the optical fiber

119894th optical downlink carrier frequency The output lightwaveat the end of fiber is considered as three optical signals withdifferent downlink frequencies of 120596

119901+ 120596119898 120596119901minus 120596119898 and 120596

119901

which convey the three wireless MIMO signals in their uppersingle sidebands (USSBs) as shown in Figure 4

The optical receiver receives the transmitted optical sig-nals and separates them according to their downlink wave-lengths by using optical ILs as shown in Figure 3 Each opticaldownlink signal is then directly detected by a photodetector(PD) so the photocurrent for each detectedMIMOsignal canbe written as the following equation according to the square-law PD [18]

119868119894(119911 119905) = 120588

1003816100381610038161003816119864119894 (119911 119905)1003816100381610038161003816

2= 120588119864119894(119911 119905) times 119864

lowast

119894(119911 119905)

prop 120588119890minus2120572119891119911times 119862119894119890119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890119895[(120596119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

times 119862119894119890minus119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890minus119895[(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

119868119894(119911 119905) prop 120588119890

minus2120572119891119911

times 119862119894

2+119872119894

2(119905 minus 119905119889119894)

+2119862119894119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) cos (120596

119888(119905 + 120573119911))

(13)

where 120588 is the responsivity of the photodetectorAccording to (13) the photocurrent is comprised of

the DC component and the RF component at 120596119888after

transmission The detected signal is then passed throughBPF with a center frequency of 119891

119888 so the DC component

is removed Each detected wireless MIMO signal with thecarrier frequency 119891

119888is directly amplified and propagated by

using MIMO antenna technique through wireless channel

8 The Scientific World Journal

Launched optical power (dBm)0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

BER

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

24GHz 16QAM50GHz 16QAM

Figure 5 The fiber nonlinearity effect on the system performance

The wireless end-user will receive the three MIMO signalsand demodulate them using the suitable QAMdemodulationand MIMO decoding techniques

5 System Performance Evaluation

In this work the communication system is designed toprovide a data rate of 1 Gbs for each 16-QAMwirelessMIMOsignal Figure 3 in the inset (vi) shows the input opticalpower to the optical fiber where the three modulated opticalsignals with the downlink wavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893

are coupled to propagate through 20 km optical fiber Thetotal input power of the three optical signals is 1626 dBmaccording to the simulation calculations for both RF carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHzThis power is suitable to belaunched to avoid the nonlinear effects along the optical linkFigure 5 shows the system performance at different launchedoptical powers Nonlinearity of the fiber negatively affects thesystem performance when the launched optical powers aregreater than 108 dBm and 79 dBm at the carrier frequenciesof 24GHz and 50GHz respectively

To evaluate the performance of the proposed techniqueFigures 6(a) and 6(b) show the BER performance versus thereceived optical power at the receiver for the three wirelessMIMO signals (MIMO

1 MIMO

2 andMIMO

3) at the carrier

frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz respectively The powersensitivity differences of the receivers for the three MIMOsignals are small especially between the two MIMO signals(MIMO

1and MIMO

2) The maximum power penalties of

347 dB and 4 dB are recorded at BER of 10minus9 for the carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHz receptively

Figure 7 shows the system performance at three differentfiber lengths (20 km 30 km and 50 km) of the optical fiber Inthe proposed system the fiber length of 50 kmhas slight effecton the performance of the transmitted optical signals whichcarry the wireless MIMO signals The system performance

deteriorates progressively when the access distance becomeslonger than 50 km

In addition the system performance is analyzed by usingdifferent wavelength interleaves between the optical carrierfrequency (or RF clock frequency 119891

119900) Figure 8 shows the

systemperformance at differentwavelength interleaves (Δ119891 =

15 25 and 50GHz which are compatible with Δ120582 = 01202 and 04 nm resp) When the wavelength interleaves aresmaller than 15GHz the system performance will degradeand the error floor clearly appears

Figures 9(a)ndash9(c) show 1Gbs 16-QAM constellationdiagrams for the received MIMO signals MIMO

1 MIMO

2

and MIMO3 respectively at 24GHz Clear scatter-plots are

achieved at EVM values of minus208780 dB minus202873 dB andminus212961 dB for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3 respectively

So the proposed technique has achieved a good performanceof transmitting wireless MIMO signals over the optical fiberat the carrier frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz The EVMs arecalculated considering the following equation [21]

EVM (dB) = 10 sdot log10[sum119872

119896=1

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119896 minus 119878119903119909119896

1003816100381610038161003816

2

sum119872

119896=1

10038161003816100381610038161198781199051199091198961003816100381610038161003816

2] (14)

where EVM is the value of the difference between a collectionof received symbols and transmitted or ideal symbols 119878

119905119909119896

is the corresponding transmitted symbol of the constellationassociated with the 119896th symbol 119878

119903119909119896is the received symbol

associated with 119878119905119909119896

and119872 is the number of the symbols forthe inphase-quadrature constellation

Figures 10(a)ndash10(c) show the eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the received 16-QAMbaseband signals forMIMO

1

MIMO2 and MIMO

3 respectively Also Figures 11(a)ndash11(c)

show the eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the received 16-QAM baseband signals for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3

respectively The eye diagrams of both 119868-branch and 119876-branch of the received wireless MIMO signals at the receivershow slight differences and good quality communicationsystem at a BER around of 10minus9 The BER are calculatedaccording to (15) [22]

BER asymp

(1 minus 119876minus1)

log2119876

lowast 120576

120576 = erfc[

[

radic1

radic2

sdot3 sdot log

2119876

(1198762minus 1)

sdot2

(119896 sdot EVMrms)2sdot log2119872

]

]

119896 =

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909max1003816100381610038161003816

sum119872

119894=1(1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119894

1003816100381610038161003816 119872)

(15)

where 119876 is the number of signal levels within each branchof the constellation diagram log

2119872 is the amount of bits

encoded into one QAM symbol and 119896 is a modulationformat-dependent factor giving the relationship betweenmaximum field magnitude and average overall119872 field mag-nitudes defined by the constellation diagram for the chosenmodulation formatThis factor is calculated according to (15)

The Scientific World Journal 9

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6 minus4

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

(a)

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

Received optical power

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

(b)

Figure 6 The BER performance versus received optical power at the carrier frequencies (a) 24GHz and (b) 5GHz

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8

L = 20kmL = 30kmL = 50km

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

Received optical power

BER

Figure 7The system performance at different lengths of the opticalfiber

to be 6(radic5+2) for 16-QAMThe 119878119905119909119894

is the ideal transmittedfield vector and 119878

119905119909max is the field vector of the outermostconstellation point In this paper the performance of EVMand the BER is evaluated for the 16-QAM MIMO signalswithout using forward error correction (FEC) techniques

6 Transmission of More Wireless MIMOSignals over Optical Fiber

Figure 12 shows the proposed OFU technique to transmitfive wireless MIMO signals over fiber At the OLT the DAM

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

10minus20

10minus18

10minus16

10minus14

10minus12

10minus10

10minus8

10minus6

10minus4

10minus2

100

BER

Δf = 15GHzΔf = 25GHzΔf = 50GHz

Figure 8 The system performance at different wavelength inter-leaves

is injected by LD with the wavelength 120582119889 The DAM is a

LN-MZM Adjusting the parameters of the DAM to suitablevalues can generate multiple wavelengths The dominantwavelengths are considered and the remaining outside wave-lengths are neglected because of their very small magnitudesThe OLT allocates five downlink wavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893

1205821198894 and 120582

1198895) which are used for downstream modulation

To generate five dominant wavelengths the values of DAMparameters are configured as minus05 V 05 V DC bias voltagesare applied to respectively first and second arms of theLN-MZM the RF clock voltage with frequency of 119891

119900drives

10 The Scientific World Journal

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(a)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)(b)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(c)

Figure 9 Constellation diagrams of the demodulated 16-QAMMIMO signals (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

to the DAM and the DC and RF switching voltages areset to 4V and 2V respectively The wavelength interleavesbetween the five generatedwavelengthswhich are equal to thefrequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900 The power magnitudes

of the fivewavelengths are approximately equal and the centerwavelength 120582

1198893has maximum value The difference between

this and the others is around 6 dB To get balanced powermagnitudes an optical attenuator is used in path of the centerwavelength after IL as shown in Figure 12 Each generatedwavelengthmodulates theMIMO signal by using IMThefive

modulated optical signals propagate along the same opticalfiber

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into the five modulated optical signals withthe wavelength 120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893 1205821198894 and 120582

1198895as shown in

Figure 12The receiver then downconverts the fivemodulatedoptical signals directly to the suitable electrical signals byusing an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signalsare then band-pass filtered according to the allocated RFcarrier frequency 119891

119888by using BPFs to get the original five

The Scientific World Journal 11

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 10 Eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

wireless MIMO signals MIMO1 MIMO

2 MIMO

3 MIMO

4

and MIMO5

7 Conclusions

The novel OFU technique is proposed to solve the problemof wireless MIMO signals transmission over a single opticalfiberThree wireless 16-QAMMIMO signals have been trans-mitted over a 20 km SMF using the OFU technique Thesewireless MIMO signals were modulated using the carrier

frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz at data rate of 1 Gbs for eachsignal The physical layer performance has been reported interms of the BER at different RF carrier frequencies differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves Inaddition the EVM and the eye diagrams are analyzed in thisstudy

The proposed approach highly suppressed the crosstalkbetween different MIMO signals with the same RF carrierfrequency since each MIMO signal is carried on a spe-cific optical wavelength While the ESSB-FT technique [10]

12 The Scientific World Journal

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 11 Eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

requires a number of low-frequency LOs and electrical BPFsat the transmitter and the receiver the OFU technique doesnot require low-frequency LOs at the transmitter and thereceiver or electrical BPFs at the transmitter Less numberof electrical BPFs is required at the receiver in the proposedtechnique However a number of PDs are required at thereceiver which is equal to the number of MIMO signals Theproposed system supports many wavelengths for carrying

multiple wireless MIMO signals over the fiber using singleLD The novel technique provides a spectral efficient andreliable FiWi system

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 2: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

2 The Scientific World Journal

Wireless front-endOptical backhaul

CO

RN

ONUAP

CO central officeOLT optical line terminalRN remote node

AP access pointWEUs wireless end-usersONU optical network unit

WEUs

OLT

ONUAP

ONUAP

ONUAP

ONUAP

ONUAP

RN

Figure 1 FiWi access network architecture

to pass multiple wireless signals having different carrierfrequencies by using ROF technique However multiplewireless signalswhich have the same carrier frequency cannotpropagate over a single optical fiber such as MIMO signalsfeeding multiple antennas in the FiWi system The problemstarts once multiple MIMO signals are combined and thenupconverted by a single optical carrier Individual MIMOsignals could not be separated and recovered thereafter withregular electrical filtering The simple approach to solve thisproblem is by transporting eachMIMOsignal over individualoptical fiber However this approach will not be cost-effectivewhen many MIMO signals are transmitted over severaloptical fibers An approach to solve this problem by usingwavelength division multiplexing (WDM) and subcarriersmultiplexing (SCM) techniques has also been proposed [78] These techniques are not cost-effective since multipleoptical sources and photodetectors are required When SCMtechnique is used all except one of the MIMO radio signalsare translated to different frequency bands to transport themover fiber Many frequency converters are then used totranslate the delivered signal back to the original frequencyband So the cost and complexity are high in this approachespecially when the number of MIMO signals is large

The phase quadrature double-sideband frequency-translation technique has been proposed to transport MIMOradio signals over single optical fiber [9] The achievedmodulation symbol rate was limited because the phase andamplitude of the double sidebands were not sufficiently

matched due to the dispersion and frequency response of theoverall system [9]

Transmission of three MIMO radio signals all with244GHz carrier frequency over an optical fiber was pro-posed and demonstrated using an electrical single-sidebandfrequency translation (ESSB-FT) technique [10] The tech-nique used here [10] improves the system performance [9]where the phase and amplitude of the single sidebands weremore matched The proposed approach decreased the max-imum crosstalk level between the different MIMO channelsas compared to transporting the same signals by using SCMtechnique In addition it could be applied to work withexisting commercially available ROF systems which weredesigned to carry just SISO radio signals

Recently threewireless 16-QAMMIMOsignals were pro-posed to be transmitted over a 20 km SMF using the opticalsingle-sideband frequency translation (OSSB-FT) technique(which is considered as OFU technique) [11] These wirelessMIMO signals weremodulated using the carrier frequency of244GHz and optically modulated using the optical double-sideband (ODSB) modulation scheme The ODSB modu-lation scheme is affected by the dispersion effects of thefiber segment The fiber chromatic dispersion also increasesdirectly proportional with increasing radio frequency (RF)modulating frequency [1] In terms of the spectral efficiencythe ODSBmodulation scheme is not attractiveThe proposedcommunication system achieved a bit error rate (BER) of10minus5

The Scientific World Journal 3

In this paper the OFU technique is proposed to solve theproblem of wireless MIMO signals transmission over fibersince it does not need low-frequency local oscillators (LOs)at the transmitter and the receiver as compared to [10] Thecrosstalk is highly suppressed between the different wirelessMIMO signals with the same carrier frequency since eachwireless MIMO signal is carried on specific optical wave-length By using the OFU technique one optical dual-armmodulator (DAM) is derived by one optical source to producemultiple wavelengths which convey multiple wireless MIMOsignals over the optical fiber The FiWi system based onthe new approach can also support the wavelength reusetechnique so one optical source is enough to generate theoptical carrier which is reused at theAP as uplinkwavelengthand multiple wavelengths which convey multiple wirelessMIMO signals over the SMF [12] The principles and thesimulation design of the OFU technique to transport wirelessMIMO signals over fiber are discussed in Section 3

The novel OFU approach is used to transmit three wire-less MIMO signals over a 20 km SMF The OFU techniqueexploits one optical source to produce multiple wavelengthsby delivering it to a DAM The parameters of the DAMare adjusted to produce number of wavelengths accordingto the number of the wireless MIMO signals The wirelessMIMO signals are then optically modulated by opticalintensity modulators separately using the produced opticalcarriers from the OFU process All these optical modulatorsare LiNbO

3Mach-Zehnder modulators (LN-MZMs) Each

wireless MIMO signal is with a 24GHz or 5GHz carrierfrequency 1 Gbs data rate and 16-QAM The crosstalkbetween the wireless MIMO signals is highly suppressedsince each wireless MIMO signal is carried on a specificoptical wavelength The system performance is evaluatedin terms of BER error vector magnitude (EVM) and eyediagrams for different RF carriers optical link distances andchannel spacings The novel technique provides a spectralefficient and reliable FiWi system

This paper is organized as follows Section 2 outlinesthe operation of the OFU technique Principles and designof the proposed system are demonstrated in Section 3 InSection 4 the mathematical model of the proposed systemillustrates how the OFU approach operates in the proposedsystem Section 5 analyzes and discusses the system perfor-mance Section 6 suggests how the proposed approach canbe extended to transport a higher number of wireless MIMOsignals Finally conclusions are given in Section 7

2 Optical Frequency Upconversion Technique

OFU technique is a prime technique in many fields of opticalcommunication External frequency modulators such as LN-MZMs can be used as a light-wave frequency upconverterin fiber optics [13] The LN-MZM is a DAM which can beused as an optical frequency upconverter when its dual-armsare supplied by a sinusoidal RF signal The LN-MZM is alsoused as an optical modulator for digital base-band signalsor modulated RF signals when these signals drive its dual-arms For broadband communication applications externalLN-MZMs provide broadband operation and minimize the

dispersion effects Moreover the external LN-MZMs offerhigh stability very low bias-voltage drift rates and bias-freedevices [14 15] The frequency conversion efficiency of theLN-MZMs can be increased by using low values of half-wavevoltage (119881

120587)

In this study the OFU technique is proposed to generatemultiple optical carriers which are used to modulate multiplewireless signals separately at many optical external intensitymodulators (IMs) The modulated optical signals can thenbe multiplexed together to the optical fiber since theyhave no overlapping adjacent spectral bands The DAM isset to generate first-order signal component (at the centersinusoidal RF frequency) and other higher-order modulatedcomponents around it The higher-order components areneglected since they have small amplitude compared tothe lower-order components In this approach the WDMinterleaver (WDM IL) is used after the DAM to separate thegenerated dominant wavelengths [16]

Generation of multiple wavelengths from one laser diode(LD) using OFU technique is illustrated in Figure 2 Oneoptical source LD with optical carrier frequency 119891

119901supplies

a DAM which is driven by a sinusoidal clock frequency 119891119898

(RFmodulating frequency)TheDAM is adjusted to generatemultiple frequency components first-order component withthe center optical carrier frequency 119891

119901and upper and lower

single sidebands components around the center frequencyThe lower single sideband components have the opticalfrequencies (119891

119901minus 119891119898 119891119901minus 2119891119898 119891119901minus 3119891119898 etc) At the

output the upper single sideband components will have theoptical frequencies (119891

119901+ 119891119898 119891119901+ 2119891119898 119891119901+ 3119891119898 etc) From

Figure 2 there are a number (five) of frequency componentsexceeding the other higher-order components which havesmall magnitudes as compared to their magnitudes Thesefrequency components are called dominant wavelengths orfrequencies which are interleaved separately by using WDMIL The channel frequency space (or wavelength interleave)between the generated wavelengths is 119891

119898 The dominant

wavelengths will be used as downlink wavelengths to conveythe multiple wireless MIMO signals over optical fiber

3 Principles and Design ofthe Proposed System

The block diagram of the OFU technique for transmissionof three wireless MIMO signals over a single optical fiberis shown in Figure 3(a) At the transmitter three wirelessMIMO signals MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3are generated

and modulated using M-QAM at the same carrier frequency119891119888

= 24GHz The spectra of these three wireless signalsare shown in Figure 3(b) in the insets ((i)ndash(iii)) A DAMwith the ODSB modulation technique is used to generatethree downlink wavelengths from one LD with a wavelength120582119889

= 155252 nm (193100 THz) as shown in Figure 3(b)the inset (iv) The three generated downlink wavelengths areshown in Figure 3(b) as the inset (v) Two ILs are used afterthe DAM to separate the three downlink wavelengths whichare the two single-sideband wavelengths 120582

1198891= 155232 nm

(193125 THz) and 1205821198892

= 155273 nm (193075 THz) and theoptical carrier frequency 120582

1198893= 155252 nm (193100 THz)

4 The Scientific World Journal

DAM

Clockfrequency

fm

fm

DC biasvoltage

Opticalcarrier

fp

fp

fp

fp minus fmfp minus 2fmfp minus 3fm

WDMIL

fp + 2fmfp + fm

fp + fm

fp + 3fm

Dominantwavelengths

fp

fp minus fm

fp minus 2fm

fp + 2fm

Figure 2 Generation of multiple wavelengths using OFU technique

The channel spacing between these wavelengths Δ120582 equalsthe frequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900= 25GHz (02 nm)

which is used in the DAM An optical attenuator is used inthe path of the downlink wavelength 120582

1198893to equilibrate its

power with the generated power from the other downlinkwavelengths 120582

1198891and 120582

1198892

The downlink wavelengths 1205821198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893are used to

modulate the three wirelessMIMO signalsMIMO1 MIMO

2

and MIMO3by external IMs respectively The wireless

MIMO signals are firstly biased to be compatible with thenature of the optical signals and then optically modulated bythe IMs These IMs use the OSSB+C modulation scheme tooptimize the system performance against the fiber dispersioneffectThe three modulated optical signals with the downlinkwavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893are coupled together as shown

in Figure 3(b) inset (vi) and then propagated along a 20 kmSMFwith attenuation of 02 dBkm and dispersion coefficientof 17 psnmkm

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into three modulated optical signals with thewavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893 as shown in Figure 3(b)

in the insets ((vii)ndash(ix)) The receiver then downconvertsthe three modulated optical signals directly to the suitable

electrical signals by using an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signals are then band-pass filtered accordingto the allocated RF carrier frequency 119891

119888= 24GHz by

using bandpass filters (BPFs) to get the wireless MIMOsignalsMIMO

1MIMO

2 andMIMO

3The crosstalk between

the received wireless MIMO signals which have the samefrequency is highly suppressed because each signal is carriedon an independent wavelength with a large channel spacing(25GHz) as compared to the carrier frequency (24GHz) Inthis simulation the PIN photodiodes with power sensitivityof minus20 dBm are used in the optical receivers

In the simulation design the OFU technique is used totransport three wireless MIMO signals with the same RFcarrier frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz over fiberThewirelessMIMO signals are modulated by using 16-QAM modulationto investigate the performance of this ROF system at differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves

4 Mathematical Model of the Proposed System

The optical field of the output signal 119864out(119905) from the DAMcan be expressed as [17 18]

The Scientific World Journal 5

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

19306

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

(i) (ii) (iii)

(iv) (v) (vi)

19306

T

19304

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T

19316

T

19306

T

19304

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T

19316

T

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

fd2fd3 fd1

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d3

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

CL

CL

120582d1

120582d1

120582d2

120582d2

LD laser diodeDAM dual-arm modulatorCL optical coupler

BPF band pass filter

Bias

Bias

Bias

IL

120582d1 120582d2RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

Receiver

IL

(i) MIMO1

(ii) MIMO2

(iii) MIMO3

IL optical WDM interleaverIM intensity modulator

(iv) (v)

(vii)

(viii)

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

BPF

BPF

BPF(ix)

IL

IL

From fiber

LD

Optical attenuator

(vi) To fiber

(a)

+

+

+

(b) continued

Figure 3 Continued

6 The Scientific World Journal

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

(vii) (viii) (ix)

(b)

Figure 3 Transport of wireless MIMO signals over optical fiber using the OFU technique (a) block diagram of the proposed technique and(b) power spectra of the signals according to the indicated insets

119864out (119905) = 120572119864in (119905) (1 minus 120574) 119890(119895120587V1(119905)119881120587RF+1198951205871198811198871119881120587DC)

+120574119890(119895120587V2(119905)119881120587RF+1198951205871198811198872119881120587DC)

(1)

Here119864in(119905) is the input optical signal to theDAMfrom theLD V1(119905) and V

2(119905) are the RF modulating electrical voltage

with the carrier frequency 119891119898

= 1205961198982120587 119881

1198871and 119881

1198872are

the DC bias voltages applied to the arms of the DAM 119881120587RF

and 119881120587DC are the switching RF and switching bias voltages

respectivelyThe parameter 120572 is given by

120572 = 10minus(Ω20)

(2)

Here Ω is the insertion loss in dB (It is assigned as 5 dBin this design) 120574 designates the power splitting (combining)ratio of arm two for the input (output resp) 119884-branchwaveguide 120574 is given by

120574 =(1 minus 1radic120576

119903)

2 (3)

where 120576119903= 10(Extinction Ratio10)

= 100 so 120574 asymp 12 in this workIn the simulation design the values of 119881

120587RF and 119881120587DC are

set to 4V and the bias voltages of 1198811198871and 119881

1198872are assigned as

minus1 V and 1V respectively In addition the generated opticalsignal from the LD can be expressed as 119864in(119905) = 119864

119901119890119895120596119901119905 and

the modulating electrical signals can be expressed as V1(119905) =

minusV2(119905) = cos(120596

119898119905) So (1) is rearranged as

119864out (119905) =1

2120572119890minus119895(1205874)

119864in (119905) (119890119895(1205874)V

1(119905)

+ 119895119890119895(1205874)V

2(119905))

=1

2120572119890minus119895(1205874)

119864119901119890119895120596119901119905(119890119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905+ 119895119890minus119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905)

(4)

From the Jacobi-Anger expansion [19]

119890119895119898ℎcos120601

=

infin

sum

119899=minusinfin

119895119899119869119899(119898ℎ) 119890119895119899120601

(5)

where 119869119899(119898ℎ) is the 119899-order Bessel function of the complex

parameter119898ℎ

The parameter119898ℎis called modulation index

Therefore

119890119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905=

infin

sum

119899=minusinfin

119895119899119869119899(120587

4) 119890119895119899120596119898119905

= minus119895119869minus1(120587

4) 119890minus119895120596119898119905+ 1198690(120587

4) + 119895119869

1(120587

4) 119890119895120596119898119905

(6)

where the values of 119869119899(1205874) are neglected for 119899 =

plusmn2 plusmn3 plusmninfin because of their too small valuesAlso

119890minus119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905= 119890119895(1205874) cos(120596

119898119905+120587)

= 119895119869minus1(120587

4) 119890minus119895120596119898119905+ 1198690(120587

4) minus 119895119869

1(120587

4) 119890119895120596119898119905

(7)

Since 119869minus119899(119911) = (minus1)

119899119869119899(119911) for integer value 119899 [19] so

119869minus1(1205874) = minus119869

1(1205874) The expression of the output optical

signal 119864out(119905) is then simplified as

119864out (119905) =1

2120572 (1 + 119895) 119890

minus119895(1205874)119864119901

times 1198690(120587

4) 119890119895120596119901119905+ 1198691(120587

4) [119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+ 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905]

=1

radic2

120572119864119901times 1198690(120587

4) 119890119895120596119901119905

+1198691(120587

4) [119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+ 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905]

(8)

The Scientific World Journal 7

So the output signal can be expressed as

119864out (119905) = 1198701times 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905

+ 1198702times 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+ 1198703times 119890119895120596119901119905

(9)

where1198701 1198702 and119870

3are constants according to (8)

This signal is delivered to optical ILs to separate the threedownlink optical carriers 119891

1198891= 119891119901+ 119891119898(1205821198891) 1198911198892

= 119891119901minus

119891119898(1205821198892) and 119891

1198893= 119891119901(1205821198893) Three wireless MIMO signals

1198721(119905) 119872

2(119905) and 119872

3(119905) are OSSB+C modulated by these

the three optical carriers 1198911198891 1198911198892 and 119891

1198893 respectively using

three IMs as shown in Figure 3(a) The three MIMO signalshave different QAM data stream at the same carrier RF of119891119888= 1205961198882120587

The modulated OSSB+C optical signal at each IM can bewritten as [18]

119864SSB119894 (119905) asymp 119862119894119890119895120596119889119894119905+119872119894 (119905) 119890119895(120596119889+120596119888)119905 (10)

where 119862119894is a constant 120596

119889119894= 2120587119891

119889119894is the optical downlink

carrier 119872119894is the 119894th wireless MIMO signal with RF carrier

frequency of 119891119888 and 119894 is the index of MIMO signal (119894 =

1 2 or 3) The three modulated optical signals by the opticalwavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893) are combined into a single

optical fiber So the input optical signal to the optical fiber isgiven by

119864in fiber (119905) asymp 1198621119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+1198721 (119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198622119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+1198722(119905) 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198623119890119895120596119901119905+1198723(119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119888)119905

(11)

This signal propagates along an SMFwith the propagationconstant of 120573(120596) and attenuation magnitude 120572

119891 where 120596 is

the angular frequency So the output lightwave at the end ofthe SMF with length of 119911 can be approximated as [20]

119864out fiber (119911 119905) prop 119890minus1205721198911199111198621119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898)119911]

+1198721(119905 minus 1199051198891)

times 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198622119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898)119911]

+1198722(119905 minus 1199051198892)

times 119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198623119890119895[120596119901119905+120573(120596

119901)119911]

+1198723(119905 minus 1199051198893) 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119888)119911]

(12)

where 119905119889119894(119894 = 1 2 or 3) is the time delay of the 119894th optical

downlink signal The time delay is calculated by the firstderivative of 120573(120596) since 119905

119889119894= 1205731015840(120596119889119894

+ 120596119888) and 120596

119894is the

120596p120596p minus 120596m 120596p + 120596m

120596

Am

plitu

de

USSB2 USSB3 USSB1

fd2 fd3 fd1

Figure 4 The propagated lightwave signal over the optical fiber

119894th optical downlink carrier frequency The output lightwaveat the end of fiber is considered as three optical signals withdifferent downlink frequencies of 120596

119901+ 120596119898 120596119901minus 120596119898 and 120596

119901

which convey the three wireless MIMO signals in their uppersingle sidebands (USSBs) as shown in Figure 4

The optical receiver receives the transmitted optical sig-nals and separates them according to their downlink wave-lengths by using optical ILs as shown in Figure 3 Each opticaldownlink signal is then directly detected by a photodetector(PD) so the photocurrent for each detectedMIMOsignal canbe written as the following equation according to the square-law PD [18]

119868119894(119911 119905) = 120588

1003816100381610038161003816119864119894 (119911 119905)1003816100381610038161003816

2= 120588119864119894(119911 119905) times 119864

lowast

119894(119911 119905)

prop 120588119890minus2120572119891119911times 119862119894119890119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890119895[(120596119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

times 119862119894119890minus119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890minus119895[(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

119868119894(119911 119905) prop 120588119890

minus2120572119891119911

times 119862119894

2+119872119894

2(119905 minus 119905119889119894)

+2119862119894119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) cos (120596

119888(119905 + 120573119911))

(13)

where 120588 is the responsivity of the photodetectorAccording to (13) the photocurrent is comprised of

the DC component and the RF component at 120596119888after

transmission The detected signal is then passed throughBPF with a center frequency of 119891

119888 so the DC component

is removed Each detected wireless MIMO signal with thecarrier frequency 119891

119888is directly amplified and propagated by

using MIMO antenna technique through wireless channel

8 The Scientific World Journal

Launched optical power (dBm)0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

BER

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

24GHz 16QAM50GHz 16QAM

Figure 5 The fiber nonlinearity effect on the system performance

The wireless end-user will receive the three MIMO signalsand demodulate them using the suitable QAMdemodulationand MIMO decoding techniques

5 System Performance Evaluation

In this work the communication system is designed toprovide a data rate of 1 Gbs for each 16-QAMwirelessMIMOsignal Figure 3 in the inset (vi) shows the input opticalpower to the optical fiber where the three modulated opticalsignals with the downlink wavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893

are coupled to propagate through 20 km optical fiber Thetotal input power of the three optical signals is 1626 dBmaccording to the simulation calculations for both RF carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHzThis power is suitable to belaunched to avoid the nonlinear effects along the optical linkFigure 5 shows the system performance at different launchedoptical powers Nonlinearity of the fiber negatively affects thesystem performance when the launched optical powers aregreater than 108 dBm and 79 dBm at the carrier frequenciesof 24GHz and 50GHz respectively

To evaluate the performance of the proposed techniqueFigures 6(a) and 6(b) show the BER performance versus thereceived optical power at the receiver for the three wirelessMIMO signals (MIMO

1 MIMO

2 andMIMO

3) at the carrier

frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz respectively The powersensitivity differences of the receivers for the three MIMOsignals are small especially between the two MIMO signals(MIMO

1and MIMO

2) The maximum power penalties of

347 dB and 4 dB are recorded at BER of 10minus9 for the carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHz receptively

Figure 7 shows the system performance at three differentfiber lengths (20 km 30 km and 50 km) of the optical fiber Inthe proposed system the fiber length of 50 kmhas slight effecton the performance of the transmitted optical signals whichcarry the wireless MIMO signals The system performance

deteriorates progressively when the access distance becomeslonger than 50 km

In addition the system performance is analyzed by usingdifferent wavelength interleaves between the optical carrierfrequency (or RF clock frequency 119891

119900) Figure 8 shows the

systemperformance at differentwavelength interleaves (Δ119891 =

15 25 and 50GHz which are compatible with Δ120582 = 01202 and 04 nm resp) When the wavelength interleaves aresmaller than 15GHz the system performance will degradeand the error floor clearly appears

Figures 9(a)ndash9(c) show 1Gbs 16-QAM constellationdiagrams for the received MIMO signals MIMO

1 MIMO

2

and MIMO3 respectively at 24GHz Clear scatter-plots are

achieved at EVM values of minus208780 dB minus202873 dB andminus212961 dB for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3 respectively

So the proposed technique has achieved a good performanceof transmitting wireless MIMO signals over the optical fiberat the carrier frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz The EVMs arecalculated considering the following equation [21]

EVM (dB) = 10 sdot log10[sum119872

119896=1

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119896 minus 119878119903119909119896

1003816100381610038161003816

2

sum119872

119896=1

10038161003816100381610038161198781199051199091198961003816100381610038161003816

2] (14)

where EVM is the value of the difference between a collectionof received symbols and transmitted or ideal symbols 119878

119905119909119896

is the corresponding transmitted symbol of the constellationassociated with the 119896th symbol 119878

119903119909119896is the received symbol

associated with 119878119905119909119896

and119872 is the number of the symbols forthe inphase-quadrature constellation

Figures 10(a)ndash10(c) show the eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the received 16-QAMbaseband signals forMIMO

1

MIMO2 and MIMO

3 respectively Also Figures 11(a)ndash11(c)

show the eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the received 16-QAM baseband signals for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3

respectively The eye diagrams of both 119868-branch and 119876-branch of the received wireless MIMO signals at the receivershow slight differences and good quality communicationsystem at a BER around of 10minus9 The BER are calculatedaccording to (15) [22]

BER asymp

(1 minus 119876minus1)

log2119876

lowast 120576

120576 = erfc[

[

radic1

radic2

sdot3 sdot log

2119876

(1198762minus 1)

sdot2

(119896 sdot EVMrms)2sdot log2119872

]

]

119896 =

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909max1003816100381610038161003816

sum119872

119894=1(1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119894

1003816100381610038161003816 119872)

(15)

where 119876 is the number of signal levels within each branchof the constellation diagram log

2119872 is the amount of bits

encoded into one QAM symbol and 119896 is a modulationformat-dependent factor giving the relationship betweenmaximum field magnitude and average overall119872 field mag-nitudes defined by the constellation diagram for the chosenmodulation formatThis factor is calculated according to (15)

The Scientific World Journal 9

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6 minus4

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

(a)

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

Received optical power

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

(b)

Figure 6 The BER performance versus received optical power at the carrier frequencies (a) 24GHz and (b) 5GHz

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8

L = 20kmL = 30kmL = 50km

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

Received optical power

BER

Figure 7The system performance at different lengths of the opticalfiber

to be 6(radic5+2) for 16-QAMThe 119878119905119909119894

is the ideal transmittedfield vector and 119878

119905119909max is the field vector of the outermostconstellation point In this paper the performance of EVMand the BER is evaluated for the 16-QAM MIMO signalswithout using forward error correction (FEC) techniques

6 Transmission of More Wireless MIMOSignals over Optical Fiber

Figure 12 shows the proposed OFU technique to transmitfive wireless MIMO signals over fiber At the OLT the DAM

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

10minus20

10minus18

10minus16

10minus14

10minus12

10minus10

10minus8

10minus6

10minus4

10minus2

100

BER

Δf = 15GHzΔf = 25GHzΔf = 50GHz

Figure 8 The system performance at different wavelength inter-leaves

is injected by LD with the wavelength 120582119889 The DAM is a

LN-MZM Adjusting the parameters of the DAM to suitablevalues can generate multiple wavelengths The dominantwavelengths are considered and the remaining outside wave-lengths are neglected because of their very small magnitudesThe OLT allocates five downlink wavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893

1205821198894 and 120582

1198895) which are used for downstream modulation

To generate five dominant wavelengths the values of DAMparameters are configured as minus05 V 05 V DC bias voltagesare applied to respectively first and second arms of theLN-MZM the RF clock voltage with frequency of 119891

119900drives

10 The Scientific World Journal

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(a)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)(b)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(c)

Figure 9 Constellation diagrams of the demodulated 16-QAMMIMO signals (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

to the DAM and the DC and RF switching voltages areset to 4V and 2V respectively The wavelength interleavesbetween the five generatedwavelengthswhich are equal to thefrequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900 The power magnitudes

of the fivewavelengths are approximately equal and the centerwavelength 120582

1198893has maximum value The difference between

this and the others is around 6 dB To get balanced powermagnitudes an optical attenuator is used in path of the centerwavelength after IL as shown in Figure 12 Each generatedwavelengthmodulates theMIMO signal by using IMThefive

modulated optical signals propagate along the same opticalfiber

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into the five modulated optical signals withthe wavelength 120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893 1205821198894 and 120582

1198895as shown in

Figure 12The receiver then downconverts the fivemodulatedoptical signals directly to the suitable electrical signals byusing an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signalsare then band-pass filtered according to the allocated RFcarrier frequency 119891

119888by using BPFs to get the original five

The Scientific World Journal 11

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 10 Eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

wireless MIMO signals MIMO1 MIMO

2 MIMO

3 MIMO

4

and MIMO5

7 Conclusions

The novel OFU technique is proposed to solve the problemof wireless MIMO signals transmission over a single opticalfiberThree wireless 16-QAMMIMO signals have been trans-mitted over a 20 km SMF using the OFU technique Thesewireless MIMO signals were modulated using the carrier

frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz at data rate of 1 Gbs for eachsignal The physical layer performance has been reported interms of the BER at different RF carrier frequencies differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves Inaddition the EVM and the eye diagrams are analyzed in thisstudy

The proposed approach highly suppressed the crosstalkbetween different MIMO signals with the same RF carrierfrequency since each MIMO signal is carried on a spe-cific optical wavelength While the ESSB-FT technique [10]

12 The Scientific World Journal

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 11 Eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

requires a number of low-frequency LOs and electrical BPFsat the transmitter and the receiver the OFU technique doesnot require low-frequency LOs at the transmitter and thereceiver or electrical BPFs at the transmitter Less numberof electrical BPFs is required at the receiver in the proposedtechnique However a number of PDs are required at thereceiver which is equal to the number of MIMO signals Theproposed system supports many wavelengths for carrying

multiple wireless MIMO signals over the fiber using singleLD The novel technique provides a spectral efficient andreliable FiWi system

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 3: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

The Scientific World Journal 3

In this paper the OFU technique is proposed to solve theproblem of wireless MIMO signals transmission over fibersince it does not need low-frequency local oscillators (LOs)at the transmitter and the receiver as compared to [10] Thecrosstalk is highly suppressed between the different wirelessMIMO signals with the same carrier frequency since eachwireless MIMO signal is carried on specific optical wave-length By using the OFU technique one optical dual-armmodulator (DAM) is derived by one optical source to producemultiple wavelengths which convey multiple wireless MIMOsignals over the optical fiber The FiWi system based onthe new approach can also support the wavelength reusetechnique so one optical source is enough to generate theoptical carrier which is reused at theAP as uplinkwavelengthand multiple wavelengths which convey multiple wirelessMIMO signals over the SMF [12] The principles and thesimulation design of the OFU technique to transport wirelessMIMO signals over fiber are discussed in Section 3

The novel OFU approach is used to transmit three wire-less MIMO signals over a 20 km SMF The OFU techniqueexploits one optical source to produce multiple wavelengthsby delivering it to a DAM The parameters of the DAMare adjusted to produce number of wavelengths accordingto the number of the wireless MIMO signals The wirelessMIMO signals are then optically modulated by opticalintensity modulators separately using the produced opticalcarriers from the OFU process All these optical modulatorsare LiNbO

3Mach-Zehnder modulators (LN-MZMs) Each

wireless MIMO signal is with a 24GHz or 5GHz carrierfrequency 1 Gbs data rate and 16-QAM The crosstalkbetween the wireless MIMO signals is highly suppressedsince each wireless MIMO signal is carried on a specificoptical wavelength The system performance is evaluatedin terms of BER error vector magnitude (EVM) and eyediagrams for different RF carriers optical link distances andchannel spacings The novel technique provides a spectralefficient and reliable FiWi system

This paper is organized as follows Section 2 outlinesthe operation of the OFU technique Principles and designof the proposed system are demonstrated in Section 3 InSection 4 the mathematical model of the proposed systemillustrates how the OFU approach operates in the proposedsystem Section 5 analyzes and discusses the system perfor-mance Section 6 suggests how the proposed approach canbe extended to transport a higher number of wireless MIMOsignals Finally conclusions are given in Section 7

2 Optical Frequency Upconversion Technique

OFU technique is a prime technique in many fields of opticalcommunication External frequency modulators such as LN-MZMs can be used as a light-wave frequency upconverterin fiber optics [13] The LN-MZM is a DAM which can beused as an optical frequency upconverter when its dual-armsare supplied by a sinusoidal RF signal The LN-MZM is alsoused as an optical modulator for digital base-band signalsor modulated RF signals when these signals drive its dual-arms For broadband communication applications externalLN-MZMs provide broadband operation and minimize the

dispersion effects Moreover the external LN-MZMs offerhigh stability very low bias-voltage drift rates and bias-freedevices [14 15] The frequency conversion efficiency of theLN-MZMs can be increased by using low values of half-wavevoltage (119881

120587)

In this study the OFU technique is proposed to generatemultiple optical carriers which are used to modulate multiplewireless signals separately at many optical external intensitymodulators (IMs) The modulated optical signals can thenbe multiplexed together to the optical fiber since theyhave no overlapping adjacent spectral bands The DAM isset to generate first-order signal component (at the centersinusoidal RF frequency) and other higher-order modulatedcomponents around it The higher-order components areneglected since they have small amplitude compared tothe lower-order components In this approach the WDMinterleaver (WDM IL) is used after the DAM to separate thegenerated dominant wavelengths [16]

Generation of multiple wavelengths from one laser diode(LD) using OFU technique is illustrated in Figure 2 Oneoptical source LD with optical carrier frequency 119891

119901supplies

a DAM which is driven by a sinusoidal clock frequency 119891119898

(RFmodulating frequency)TheDAM is adjusted to generatemultiple frequency components first-order component withthe center optical carrier frequency 119891

119901and upper and lower

single sidebands components around the center frequencyThe lower single sideband components have the opticalfrequencies (119891

119901minus 119891119898 119891119901minus 2119891119898 119891119901minus 3119891119898 etc) At the

output the upper single sideband components will have theoptical frequencies (119891

119901+ 119891119898 119891119901+ 2119891119898 119891119901+ 3119891119898 etc) From

Figure 2 there are a number (five) of frequency componentsexceeding the other higher-order components which havesmall magnitudes as compared to their magnitudes Thesefrequency components are called dominant wavelengths orfrequencies which are interleaved separately by using WDMIL The channel frequency space (or wavelength interleave)between the generated wavelengths is 119891

119898 The dominant

wavelengths will be used as downlink wavelengths to conveythe multiple wireless MIMO signals over optical fiber

3 Principles and Design ofthe Proposed System

The block diagram of the OFU technique for transmissionof three wireless MIMO signals over a single optical fiberis shown in Figure 3(a) At the transmitter three wirelessMIMO signals MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3are generated

and modulated using M-QAM at the same carrier frequency119891119888

= 24GHz The spectra of these three wireless signalsare shown in Figure 3(b) in the insets ((i)ndash(iii)) A DAMwith the ODSB modulation technique is used to generatethree downlink wavelengths from one LD with a wavelength120582119889

= 155252 nm (193100 THz) as shown in Figure 3(b)the inset (iv) The three generated downlink wavelengths areshown in Figure 3(b) as the inset (v) Two ILs are used afterthe DAM to separate the three downlink wavelengths whichare the two single-sideband wavelengths 120582

1198891= 155232 nm

(193125 THz) and 1205821198892

= 155273 nm (193075 THz) and theoptical carrier frequency 120582

1198893= 155252 nm (193100 THz)

4 The Scientific World Journal

DAM

Clockfrequency

fm

fm

DC biasvoltage

Opticalcarrier

fp

fp

fp

fp minus fmfp minus 2fmfp minus 3fm

WDMIL

fp + 2fmfp + fm

fp + fm

fp + 3fm

Dominantwavelengths

fp

fp minus fm

fp minus 2fm

fp + 2fm

Figure 2 Generation of multiple wavelengths using OFU technique

The channel spacing between these wavelengths Δ120582 equalsthe frequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900= 25GHz (02 nm)

which is used in the DAM An optical attenuator is used inthe path of the downlink wavelength 120582

1198893to equilibrate its

power with the generated power from the other downlinkwavelengths 120582

1198891and 120582

1198892

The downlink wavelengths 1205821198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893are used to

modulate the three wirelessMIMO signalsMIMO1 MIMO

2

and MIMO3by external IMs respectively The wireless

MIMO signals are firstly biased to be compatible with thenature of the optical signals and then optically modulated bythe IMs These IMs use the OSSB+C modulation scheme tooptimize the system performance against the fiber dispersioneffectThe three modulated optical signals with the downlinkwavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893are coupled together as shown

in Figure 3(b) inset (vi) and then propagated along a 20 kmSMFwith attenuation of 02 dBkm and dispersion coefficientof 17 psnmkm

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into three modulated optical signals with thewavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893 as shown in Figure 3(b)

in the insets ((vii)ndash(ix)) The receiver then downconvertsthe three modulated optical signals directly to the suitable

electrical signals by using an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signals are then band-pass filtered accordingto the allocated RF carrier frequency 119891

119888= 24GHz by

using bandpass filters (BPFs) to get the wireless MIMOsignalsMIMO

1MIMO

2 andMIMO

3The crosstalk between

the received wireless MIMO signals which have the samefrequency is highly suppressed because each signal is carriedon an independent wavelength with a large channel spacing(25GHz) as compared to the carrier frequency (24GHz) Inthis simulation the PIN photodiodes with power sensitivityof minus20 dBm are used in the optical receivers

In the simulation design the OFU technique is used totransport three wireless MIMO signals with the same RFcarrier frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz over fiberThewirelessMIMO signals are modulated by using 16-QAM modulationto investigate the performance of this ROF system at differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves

4 Mathematical Model of the Proposed System

The optical field of the output signal 119864out(119905) from the DAMcan be expressed as [17 18]

The Scientific World Journal 5

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

19306

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

(i) (ii) (iii)

(iv) (v) (vi)

19306

T

19304

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T

19316

T

19306

T

19304

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T

19316

T

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

fd2fd3 fd1

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d3

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

CL

CL

120582d1

120582d1

120582d2

120582d2

LD laser diodeDAM dual-arm modulatorCL optical coupler

BPF band pass filter

Bias

Bias

Bias

IL

120582d1 120582d2RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

Receiver

IL

(i) MIMO1

(ii) MIMO2

(iii) MIMO3

IL optical WDM interleaverIM intensity modulator

(iv) (v)

(vii)

(viii)

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

BPF

BPF

BPF(ix)

IL

IL

From fiber

LD

Optical attenuator

(vi) To fiber

(a)

+

+

+

(b) continued

Figure 3 Continued

6 The Scientific World Journal

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

(vii) (viii) (ix)

(b)

Figure 3 Transport of wireless MIMO signals over optical fiber using the OFU technique (a) block diagram of the proposed technique and(b) power spectra of the signals according to the indicated insets

119864out (119905) = 120572119864in (119905) (1 minus 120574) 119890(119895120587V1(119905)119881120587RF+1198951205871198811198871119881120587DC)

+120574119890(119895120587V2(119905)119881120587RF+1198951205871198811198872119881120587DC)

(1)

Here119864in(119905) is the input optical signal to theDAMfrom theLD V1(119905) and V

2(119905) are the RF modulating electrical voltage

with the carrier frequency 119891119898

= 1205961198982120587 119881

1198871and 119881

1198872are

the DC bias voltages applied to the arms of the DAM 119881120587RF

and 119881120587DC are the switching RF and switching bias voltages

respectivelyThe parameter 120572 is given by

120572 = 10minus(Ω20)

(2)

Here Ω is the insertion loss in dB (It is assigned as 5 dBin this design) 120574 designates the power splitting (combining)ratio of arm two for the input (output resp) 119884-branchwaveguide 120574 is given by

120574 =(1 minus 1radic120576

119903)

2 (3)

where 120576119903= 10(Extinction Ratio10)

= 100 so 120574 asymp 12 in this workIn the simulation design the values of 119881

120587RF and 119881120587DC are

set to 4V and the bias voltages of 1198811198871and 119881

1198872are assigned as

minus1 V and 1V respectively In addition the generated opticalsignal from the LD can be expressed as 119864in(119905) = 119864

119901119890119895120596119901119905 and

the modulating electrical signals can be expressed as V1(119905) =

minusV2(119905) = cos(120596

119898119905) So (1) is rearranged as

119864out (119905) =1

2120572119890minus119895(1205874)

119864in (119905) (119890119895(1205874)V

1(119905)

+ 119895119890119895(1205874)V

2(119905))

=1

2120572119890minus119895(1205874)

119864119901119890119895120596119901119905(119890119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905+ 119895119890minus119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905)

(4)

From the Jacobi-Anger expansion [19]

119890119895119898ℎcos120601

=

infin

sum

119899=minusinfin

119895119899119869119899(119898ℎ) 119890119895119899120601

(5)

where 119869119899(119898ℎ) is the 119899-order Bessel function of the complex

parameter119898ℎ

The parameter119898ℎis called modulation index

Therefore

119890119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905=

infin

sum

119899=minusinfin

119895119899119869119899(120587

4) 119890119895119899120596119898119905

= minus119895119869minus1(120587

4) 119890minus119895120596119898119905+ 1198690(120587

4) + 119895119869

1(120587

4) 119890119895120596119898119905

(6)

where the values of 119869119899(1205874) are neglected for 119899 =

plusmn2 plusmn3 plusmninfin because of their too small valuesAlso

119890minus119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905= 119890119895(1205874) cos(120596

119898119905+120587)

= 119895119869minus1(120587

4) 119890minus119895120596119898119905+ 1198690(120587

4) minus 119895119869

1(120587

4) 119890119895120596119898119905

(7)

Since 119869minus119899(119911) = (minus1)

119899119869119899(119911) for integer value 119899 [19] so

119869minus1(1205874) = minus119869

1(1205874) The expression of the output optical

signal 119864out(119905) is then simplified as

119864out (119905) =1

2120572 (1 + 119895) 119890

minus119895(1205874)119864119901

times 1198690(120587

4) 119890119895120596119901119905+ 1198691(120587

4) [119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+ 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905]

=1

radic2

120572119864119901times 1198690(120587

4) 119890119895120596119901119905

+1198691(120587

4) [119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+ 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905]

(8)

The Scientific World Journal 7

So the output signal can be expressed as

119864out (119905) = 1198701times 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905

+ 1198702times 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+ 1198703times 119890119895120596119901119905

(9)

where1198701 1198702 and119870

3are constants according to (8)

This signal is delivered to optical ILs to separate the threedownlink optical carriers 119891

1198891= 119891119901+ 119891119898(1205821198891) 1198911198892

= 119891119901minus

119891119898(1205821198892) and 119891

1198893= 119891119901(1205821198893) Three wireless MIMO signals

1198721(119905) 119872

2(119905) and 119872

3(119905) are OSSB+C modulated by these

the three optical carriers 1198911198891 1198911198892 and 119891

1198893 respectively using

three IMs as shown in Figure 3(a) The three MIMO signalshave different QAM data stream at the same carrier RF of119891119888= 1205961198882120587

The modulated OSSB+C optical signal at each IM can bewritten as [18]

119864SSB119894 (119905) asymp 119862119894119890119895120596119889119894119905+119872119894 (119905) 119890119895(120596119889+120596119888)119905 (10)

where 119862119894is a constant 120596

119889119894= 2120587119891

119889119894is the optical downlink

carrier 119872119894is the 119894th wireless MIMO signal with RF carrier

frequency of 119891119888 and 119894 is the index of MIMO signal (119894 =

1 2 or 3) The three modulated optical signals by the opticalwavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893) are combined into a single

optical fiber So the input optical signal to the optical fiber isgiven by

119864in fiber (119905) asymp 1198621119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+1198721 (119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198622119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+1198722(119905) 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198623119890119895120596119901119905+1198723(119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119888)119905

(11)

This signal propagates along an SMFwith the propagationconstant of 120573(120596) and attenuation magnitude 120572

119891 where 120596 is

the angular frequency So the output lightwave at the end ofthe SMF with length of 119911 can be approximated as [20]

119864out fiber (119911 119905) prop 119890minus1205721198911199111198621119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898)119911]

+1198721(119905 minus 1199051198891)

times 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198622119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898)119911]

+1198722(119905 minus 1199051198892)

times 119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198623119890119895[120596119901119905+120573(120596

119901)119911]

+1198723(119905 minus 1199051198893) 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119888)119911]

(12)

where 119905119889119894(119894 = 1 2 or 3) is the time delay of the 119894th optical

downlink signal The time delay is calculated by the firstderivative of 120573(120596) since 119905

119889119894= 1205731015840(120596119889119894

+ 120596119888) and 120596

119894is the

120596p120596p minus 120596m 120596p + 120596m

120596

Am

plitu

de

USSB2 USSB3 USSB1

fd2 fd3 fd1

Figure 4 The propagated lightwave signal over the optical fiber

119894th optical downlink carrier frequency The output lightwaveat the end of fiber is considered as three optical signals withdifferent downlink frequencies of 120596

119901+ 120596119898 120596119901minus 120596119898 and 120596

119901

which convey the three wireless MIMO signals in their uppersingle sidebands (USSBs) as shown in Figure 4

The optical receiver receives the transmitted optical sig-nals and separates them according to their downlink wave-lengths by using optical ILs as shown in Figure 3 Each opticaldownlink signal is then directly detected by a photodetector(PD) so the photocurrent for each detectedMIMOsignal canbe written as the following equation according to the square-law PD [18]

119868119894(119911 119905) = 120588

1003816100381610038161003816119864119894 (119911 119905)1003816100381610038161003816

2= 120588119864119894(119911 119905) times 119864

lowast

119894(119911 119905)

prop 120588119890minus2120572119891119911times 119862119894119890119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890119895[(120596119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

times 119862119894119890minus119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890minus119895[(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

119868119894(119911 119905) prop 120588119890

minus2120572119891119911

times 119862119894

2+119872119894

2(119905 minus 119905119889119894)

+2119862119894119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) cos (120596

119888(119905 + 120573119911))

(13)

where 120588 is the responsivity of the photodetectorAccording to (13) the photocurrent is comprised of

the DC component and the RF component at 120596119888after

transmission The detected signal is then passed throughBPF with a center frequency of 119891

119888 so the DC component

is removed Each detected wireless MIMO signal with thecarrier frequency 119891

119888is directly amplified and propagated by

using MIMO antenna technique through wireless channel

8 The Scientific World Journal

Launched optical power (dBm)0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

BER

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

24GHz 16QAM50GHz 16QAM

Figure 5 The fiber nonlinearity effect on the system performance

The wireless end-user will receive the three MIMO signalsand demodulate them using the suitable QAMdemodulationand MIMO decoding techniques

5 System Performance Evaluation

In this work the communication system is designed toprovide a data rate of 1 Gbs for each 16-QAMwirelessMIMOsignal Figure 3 in the inset (vi) shows the input opticalpower to the optical fiber where the three modulated opticalsignals with the downlink wavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893

are coupled to propagate through 20 km optical fiber Thetotal input power of the three optical signals is 1626 dBmaccording to the simulation calculations for both RF carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHzThis power is suitable to belaunched to avoid the nonlinear effects along the optical linkFigure 5 shows the system performance at different launchedoptical powers Nonlinearity of the fiber negatively affects thesystem performance when the launched optical powers aregreater than 108 dBm and 79 dBm at the carrier frequenciesof 24GHz and 50GHz respectively

To evaluate the performance of the proposed techniqueFigures 6(a) and 6(b) show the BER performance versus thereceived optical power at the receiver for the three wirelessMIMO signals (MIMO

1 MIMO

2 andMIMO

3) at the carrier

frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz respectively The powersensitivity differences of the receivers for the three MIMOsignals are small especially between the two MIMO signals(MIMO

1and MIMO

2) The maximum power penalties of

347 dB and 4 dB are recorded at BER of 10minus9 for the carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHz receptively

Figure 7 shows the system performance at three differentfiber lengths (20 km 30 km and 50 km) of the optical fiber Inthe proposed system the fiber length of 50 kmhas slight effecton the performance of the transmitted optical signals whichcarry the wireless MIMO signals The system performance

deteriorates progressively when the access distance becomeslonger than 50 km

In addition the system performance is analyzed by usingdifferent wavelength interleaves between the optical carrierfrequency (or RF clock frequency 119891

119900) Figure 8 shows the

systemperformance at differentwavelength interleaves (Δ119891 =

15 25 and 50GHz which are compatible with Δ120582 = 01202 and 04 nm resp) When the wavelength interleaves aresmaller than 15GHz the system performance will degradeand the error floor clearly appears

Figures 9(a)ndash9(c) show 1Gbs 16-QAM constellationdiagrams for the received MIMO signals MIMO

1 MIMO

2

and MIMO3 respectively at 24GHz Clear scatter-plots are

achieved at EVM values of minus208780 dB minus202873 dB andminus212961 dB for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3 respectively

So the proposed technique has achieved a good performanceof transmitting wireless MIMO signals over the optical fiberat the carrier frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz The EVMs arecalculated considering the following equation [21]

EVM (dB) = 10 sdot log10[sum119872

119896=1

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119896 minus 119878119903119909119896

1003816100381610038161003816

2

sum119872

119896=1

10038161003816100381610038161198781199051199091198961003816100381610038161003816

2] (14)

where EVM is the value of the difference between a collectionof received symbols and transmitted or ideal symbols 119878

119905119909119896

is the corresponding transmitted symbol of the constellationassociated with the 119896th symbol 119878

119903119909119896is the received symbol

associated with 119878119905119909119896

and119872 is the number of the symbols forthe inphase-quadrature constellation

Figures 10(a)ndash10(c) show the eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the received 16-QAMbaseband signals forMIMO

1

MIMO2 and MIMO

3 respectively Also Figures 11(a)ndash11(c)

show the eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the received 16-QAM baseband signals for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3

respectively The eye diagrams of both 119868-branch and 119876-branch of the received wireless MIMO signals at the receivershow slight differences and good quality communicationsystem at a BER around of 10minus9 The BER are calculatedaccording to (15) [22]

BER asymp

(1 minus 119876minus1)

log2119876

lowast 120576

120576 = erfc[

[

radic1

radic2

sdot3 sdot log

2119876

(1198762minus 1)

sdot2

(119896 sdot EVMrms)2sdot log2119872

]

]

119896 =

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909max1003816100381610038161003816

sum119872

119894=1(1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119894

1003816100381610038161003816 119872)

(15)

where 119876 is the number of signal levels within each branchof the constellation diagram log

2119872 is the amount of bits

encoded into one QAM symbol and 119896 is a modulationformat-dependent factor giving the relationship betweenmaximum field magnitude and average overall119872 field mag-nitudes defined by the constellation diagram for the chosenmodulation formatThis factor is calculated according to (15)

The Scientific World Journal 9

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6 minus4

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

(a)

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

Received optical power

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

(b)

Figure 6 The BER performance versus received optical power at the carrier frequencies (a) 24GHz and (b) 5GHz

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8

L = 20kmL = 30kmL = 50km

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

Received optical power

BER

Figure 7The system performance at different lengths of the opticalfiber

to be 6(radic5+2) for 16-QAMThe 119878119905119909119894

is the ideal transmittedfield vector and 119878

119905119909max is the field vector of the outermostconstellation point In this paper the performance of EVMand the BER is evaluated for the 16-QAM MIMO signalswithout using forward error correction (FEC) techniques

6 Transmission of More Wireless MIMOSignals over Optical Fiber

Figure 12 shows the proposed OFU technique to transmitfive wireless MIMO signals over fiber At the OLT the DAM

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

10minus20

10minus18

10minus16

10minus14

10minus12

10minus10

10minus8

10minus6

10minus4

10minus2

100

BER

Δf = 15GHzΔf = 25GHzΔf = 50GHz

Figure 8 The system performance at different wavelength inter-leaves

is injected by LD with the wavelength 120582119889 The DAM is a

LN-MZM Adjusting the parameters of the DAM to suitablevalues can generate multiple wavelengths The dominantwavelengths are considered and the remaining outside wave-lengths are neglected because of their very small magnitudesThe OLT allocates five downlink wavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893

1205821198894 and 120582

1198895) which are used for downstream modulation

To generate five dominant wavelengths the values of DAMparameters are configured as minus05 V 05 V DC bias voltagesare applied to respectively first and second arms of theLN-MZM the RF clock voltage with frequency of 119891

119900drives

10 The Scientific World Journal

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(a)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)(b)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(c)

Figure 9 Constellation diagrams of the demodulated 16-QAMMIMO signals (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

to the DAM and the DC and RF switching voltages areset to 4V and 2V respectively The wavelength interleavesbetween the five generatedwavelengthswhich are equal to thefrequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900 The power magnitudes

of the fivewavelengths are approximately equal and the centerwavelength 120582

1198893has maximum value The difference between

this and the others is around 6 dB To get balanced powermagnitudes an optical attenuator is used in path of the centerwavelength after IL as shown in Figure 12 Each generatedwavelengthmodulates theMIMO signal by using IMThefive

modulated optical signals propagate along the same opticalfiber

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into the five modulated optical signals withthe wavelength 120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893 1205821198894 and 120582

1198895as shown in

Figure 12The receiver then downconverts the fivemodulatedoptical signals directly to the suitable electrical signals byusing an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signalsare then band-pass filtered according to the allocated RFcarrier frequency 119891

119888by using BPFs to get the original five

The Scientific World Journal 11

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 10 Eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

wireless MIMO signals MIMO1 MIMO

2 MIMO

3 MIMO

4

and MIMO5

7 Conclusions

The novel OFU technique is proposed to solve the problemof wireless MIMO signals transmission over a single opticalfiberThree wireless 16-QAMMIMO signals have been trans-mitted over a 20 km SMF using the OFU technique Thesewireless MIMO signals were modulated using the carrier

frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz at data rate of 1 Gbs for eachsignal The physical layer performance has been reported interms of the BER at different RF carrier frequencies differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves Inaddition the EVM and the eye diagrams are analyzed in thisstudy

The proposed approach highly suppressed the crosstalkbetween different MIMO signals with the same RF carrierfrequency since each MIMO signal is carried on a spe-cific optical wavelength While the ESSB-FT technique [10]

12 The Scientific World Journal

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 11 Eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

requires a number of low-frequency LOs and electrical BPFsat the transmitter and the receiver the OFU technique doesnot require low-frequency LOs at the transmitter and thereceiver or electrical BPFs at the transmitter Less numberof electrical BPFs is required at the receiver in the proposedtechnique However a number of PDs are required at thereceiver which is equal to the number of MIMO signals Theproposed system supports many wavelengths for carrying

multiple wireless MIMO signals over the fiber using singleLD The novel technique provides a spectral efficient andreliable FiWi system

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 4: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

4 The Scientific World Journal

DAM

Clockfrequency

fm

fm

DC biasvoltage

Opticalcarrier

fp

fp

fp

fp minus fmfp minus 2fmfp minus 3fm

WDMIL

fp + 2fmfp + fm

fp + fm

fp + 3fm

Dominantwavelengths

fp

fp minus fm

fp minus 2fm

fp + 2fm

Figure 2 Generation of multiple wavelengths using OFU technique

The channel spacing between these wavelengths Δ120582 equalsthe frequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900= 25GHz (02 nm)

which is used in the DAM An optical attenuator is used inthe path of the downlink wavelength 120582

1198893to equilibrate its

power with the generated power from the other downlinkwavelengths 120582

1198891and 120582

1198892

The downlink wavelengths 1205821198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893are used to

modulate the three wirelessMIMO signalsMIMO1 MIMO

2

and MIMO3by external IMs respectively The wireless

MIMO signals are firstly biased to be compatible with thenature of the optical signals and then optically modulated bythe IMs These IMs use the OSSB+C modulation scheme tooptimize the system performance against the fiber dispersioneffectThe three modulated optical signals with the downlinkwavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893are coupled together as shown

in Figure 3(b) inset (vi) and then propagated along a 20 kmSMFwith attenuation of 02 dBkm and dispersion coefficientof 17 psnmkm

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into three modulated optical signals with thewavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893 as shown in Figure 3(b)

in the insets ((vii)ndash(ix)) The receiver then downconvertsthe three modulated optical signals directly to the suitable

electrical signals by using an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signals are then band-pass filtered accordingto the allocated RF carrier frequency 119891

119888= 24GHz by

using bandpass filters (BPFs) to get the wireless MIMOsignalsMIMO

1MIMO

2 andMIMO

3The crosstalk between

the received wireless MIMO signals which have the samefrequency is highly suppressed because each signal is carriedon an independent wavelength with a large channel spacing(25GHz) as compared to the carrier frequency (24GHz) Inthis simulation the PIN photodiodes with power sensitivityof minus20 dBm are used in the optical receivers

In the simulation design the OFU technique is used totransport three wireless MIMO signals with the same RFcarrier frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz over fiberThewirelessMIMO signals are modulated by using 16-QAM modulationto investigate the performance of this ROF system at differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves

4 Mathematical Model of the Proposed System

The optical field of the output signal 119864out(119905) from the DAMcan be expressed as [17 18]

The Scientific World Journal 5

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

19306

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

(i) (ii) (iii)

(iv) (v) (vi)

19306

T

19304

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T

19316

T

19306

T

19304

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T

19316

T

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

fd2fd3 fd1

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d3

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

CL

CL

120582d1

120582d1

120582d2

120582d2

LD laser diodeDAM dual-arm modulatorCL optical coupler

BPF band pass filter

Bias

Bias

Bias

IL

120582d1 120582d2RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

Receiver

IL

(i) MIMO1

(ii) MIMO2

(iii) MIMO3

IL optical WDM interleaverIM intensity modulator

(iv) (v)

(vii)

(viii)

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

BPF

BPF

BPF(ix)

IL

IL

From fiber

LD

Optical attenuator

(vi) To fiber

(a)

+

+

+

(b) continued

Figure 3 Continued

6 The Scientific World Journal

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

(vii) (viii) (ix)

(b)

Figure 3 Transport of wireless MIMO signals over optical fiber using the OFU technique (a) block diagram of the proposed technique and(b) power spectra of the signals according to the indicated insets

119864out (119905) = 120572119864in (119905) (1 minus 120574) 119890(119895120587V1(119905)119881120587RF+1198951205871198811198871119881120587DC)

+120574119890(119895120587V2(119905)119881120587RF+1198951205871198811198872119881120587DC)

(1)

Here119864in(119905) is the input optical signal to theDAMfrom theLD V1(119905) and V

2(119905) are the RF modulating electrical voltage

with the carrier frequency 119891119898

= 1205961198982120587 119881

1198871and 119881

1198872are

the DC bias voltages applied to the arms of the DAM 119881120587RF

and 119881120587DC are the switching RF and switching bias voltages

respectivelyThe parameter 120572 is given by

120572 = 10minus(Ω20)

(2)

Here Ω is the insertion loss in dB (It is assigned as 5 dBin this design) 120574 designates the power splitting (combining)ratio of arm two for the input (output resp) 119884-branchwaveguide 120574 is given by

120574 =(1 minus 1radic120576

119903)

2 (3)

where 120576119903= 10(Extinction Ratio10)

= 100 so 120574 asymp 12 in this workIn the simulation design the values of 119881

120587RF and 119881120587DC are

set to 4V and the bias voltages of 1198811198871and 119881

1198872are assigned as

minus1 V and 1V respectively In addition the generated opticalsignal from the LD can be expressed as 119864in(119905) = 119864

119901119890119895120596119901119905 and

the modulating electrical signals can be expressed as V1(119905) =

minusV2(119905) = cos(120596

119898119905) So (1) is rearranged as

119864out (119905) =1

2120572119890minus119895(1205874)

119864in (119905) (119890119895(1205874)V

1(119905)

+ 119895119890119895(1205874)V

2(119905))

=1

2120572119890minus119895(1205874)

119864119901119890119895120596119901119905(119890119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905+ 119895119890minus119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905)

(4)

From the Jacobi-Anger expansion [19]

119890119895119898ℎcos120601

=

infin

sum

119899=minusinfin

119895119899119869119899(119898ℎ) 119890119895119899120601

(5)

where 119869119899(119898ℎ) is the 119899-order Bessel function of the complex

parameter119898ℎ

The parameter119898ℎis called modulation index

Therefore

119890119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905=

infin

sum

119899=minusinfin

119895119899119869119899(120587

4) 119890119895119899120596119898119905

= minus119895119869minus1(120587

4) 119890minus119895120596119898119905+ 1198690(120587

4) + 119895119869

1(120587

4) 119890119895120596119898119905

(6)

where the values of 119869119899(1205874) are neglected for 119899 =

plusmn2 plusmn3 plusmninfin because of their too small valuesAlso

119890minus119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905= 119890119895(1205874) cos(120596

119898119905+120587)

= 119895119869minus1(120587

4) 119890minus119895120596119898119905+ 1198690(120587

4) minus 119895119869

1(120587

4) 119890119895120596119898119905

(7)

Since 119869minus119899(119911) = (minus1)

119899119869119899(119911) for integer value 119899 [19] so

119869minus1(1205874) = minus119869

1(1205874) The expression of the output optical

signal 119864out(119905) is then simplified as

119864out (119905) =1

2120572 (1 + 119895) 119890

minus119895(1205874)119864119901

times 1198690(120587

4) 119890119895120596119901119905+ 1198691(120587

4) [119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+ 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905]

=1

radic2

120572119864119901times 1198690(120587

4) 119890119895120596119901119905

+1198691(120587

4) [119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+ 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905]

(8)

The Scientific World Journal 7

So the output signal can be expressed as

119864out (119905) = 1198701times 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905

+ 1198702times 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+ 1198703times 119890119895120596119901119905

(9)

where1198701 1198702 and119870

3are constants according to (8)

This signal is delivered to optical ILs to separate the threedownlink optical carriers 119891

1198891= 119891119901+ 119891119898(1205821198891) 1198911198892

= 119891119901minus

119891119898(1205821198892) and 119891

1198893= 119891119901(1205821198893) Three wireless MIMO signals

1198721(119905) 119872

2(119905) and 119872

3(119905) are OSSB+C modulated by these

the three optical carriers 1198911198891 1198911198892 and 119891

1198893 respectively using

three IMs as shown in Figure 3(a) The three MIMO signalshave different QAM data stream at the same carrier RF of119891119888= 1205961198882120587

The modulated OSSB+C optical signal at each IM can bewritten as [18]

119864SSB119894 (119905) asymp 119862119894119890119895120596119889119894119905+119872119894 (119905) 119890119895(120596119889+120596119888)119905 (10)

where 119862119894is a constant 120596

119889119894= 2120587119891

119889119894is the optical downlink

carrier 119872119894is the 119894th wireless MIMO signal with RF carrier

frequency of 119891119888 and 119894 is the index of MIMO signal (119894 =

1 2 or 3) The three modulated optical signals by the opticalwavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893) are combined into a single

optical fiber So the input optical signal to the optical fiber isgiven by

119864in fiber (119905) asymp 1198621119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+1198721 (119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198622119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+1198722(119905) 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198623119890119895120596119901119905+1198723(119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119888)119905

(11)

This signal propagates along an SMFwith the propagationconstant of 120573(120596) and attenuation magnitude 120572

119891 where 120596 is

the angular frequency So the output lightwave at the end ofthe SMF with length of 119911 can be approximated as [20]

119864out fiber (119911 119905) prop 119890minus1205721198911199111198621119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898)119911]

+1198721(119905 minus 1199051198891)

times 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198622119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898)119911]

+1198722(119905 minus 1199051198892)

times 119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198623119890119895[120596119901119905+120573(120596

119901)119911]

+1198723(119905 minus 1199051198893) 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119888)119911]

(12)

where 119905119889119894(119894 = 1 2 or 3) is the time delay of the 119894th optical

downlink signal The time delay is calculated by the firstderivative of 120573(120596) since 119905

119889119894= 1205731015840(120596119889119894

+ 120596119888) and 120596

119894is the

120596p120596p minus 120596m 120596p + 120596m

120596

Am

plitu

de

USSB2 USSB3 USSB1

fd2 fd3 fd1

Figure 4 The propagated lightwave signal over the optical fiber

119894th optical downlink carrier frequency The output lightwaveat the end of fiber is considered as three optical signals withdifferent downlink frequencies of 120596

119901+ 120596119898 120596119901minus 120596119898 and 120596

119901

which convey the three wireless MIMO signals in their uppersingle sidebands (USSBs) as shown in Figure 4

The optical receiver receives the transmitted optical sig-nals and separates them according to their downlink wave-lengths by using optical ILs as shown in Figure 3 Each opticaldownlink signal is then directly detected by a photodetector(PD) so the photocurrent for each detectedMIMOsignal canbe written as the following equation according to the square-law PD [18]

119868119894(119911 119905) = 120588

1003816100381610038161003816119864119894 (119911 119905)1003816100381610038161003816

2= 120588119864119894(119911 119905) times 119864

lowast

119894(119911 119905)

prop 120588119890minus2120572119891119911times 119862119894119890119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890119895[(120596119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

times 119862119894119890minus119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890minus119895[(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

119868119894(119911 119905) prop 120588119890

minus2120572119891119911

times 119862119894

2+119872119894

2(119905 minus 119905119889119894)

+2119862119894119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) cos (120596

119888(119905 + 120573119911))

(13)

where 120588 is the responsivity of the photodetectorAccording to (13) the photocurrent is comprised of

the DC component and the RF component at 120596119888after

transmission The detected signal is then passed throughBPF with a center frequency of 119891

119888 so the DC component

is removed Each detected wireless MIMO signal with thecarrier frequency 119891

119888is directly amplified and propagated by

using MIMO antenna technique through wireless channel

8 The Scientific World Journal

Launched optical power (dBm)0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

BER

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

24GHz 16QAM50GHz 16QAM

Figure 5 The fiber nonlinearity effect on the system performance

The wireless end-user will receive the three MIMO signalsand demodulate them using the suitable QAMdemodulationand MIMO decoding techniques

5 System Performance Evaluation

In this work the communication system is designed toprovide a data rate of 1 Gbs for each 16-QAMwirelessMIMOsignal Figure 3 in the inset (vi) shows the input opticalpower to the optical fiber where the three modulated opticalsignals with the downlink wavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893

are coupled to propagate through 20 km optical fiber Thetotal input power of the three optical signals is 1626 dBmaccording to the simulation calculations for both RF carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHzThis power is suitable to belaunched to avoid the nonlinear effects along the optical linkFigure 5 shows the system performance at different launchedoptical powers Nonlinearity of the fiber negatively affects thesystem performance when the launched optical powers aregreater than 108 dBm and 79 dBm at the carrier frequenciesof 24GHz and 50GHz respectively

To evaluate the performance of the proposed techniqueFigures 6(a) and 6(b) show the BER performance versus thereceived optical power at the receiver for the three wirelessMIMO signals (MIMO

1 MIMO

2 andMIMO

3) at the carrier

frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz respectively The powersensitivity differences of the receivers for the three MIMOsignals are small especially between the two MIMO signals(MIMO

1and MIMO

2) The maximum power penalties of

347 dB and 4 dB are recorded at BER of 10minus9 for the carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHz receptively

Figure 7 shows the system performance at three differentfiber lengths (20 km 30 km and 50 km) of the optical fiber Inthe proposed system the fiber length of 50 kmhas slight effecton the performance of the transmitted optical signals whichcarry the wireless MIMO signals The system performance

deteriorates progressively when the access distance becomeslonger than 50 km

In addition the system performance is analyzed by usingdifferent wavelength interleaves between the optical carrierfrequency (or RF clock frequency 119891

119900) Figure 8 shows the

systemperformance at differentwavelength interleaves (Δ119891 =

15 25 and 50GHz which are compatible with Δ120582 = 01202 and 04 nm resp) When the wavelength interleaves aresmaller than 15GHz the system performance will degradeand the error floor clearly appears

Figures 9(a)ndash9(c) show 1Gbs 16-QAM constellationdiagrams for the received MIMO signals MIMO

1 MIMO

2

and MIMO3 respectively at 24GHz Clear scatter-plots are

achieved at EVM values of minus208780 dB minus202873 dB andminus212961 dB for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3 respectively

So the proposed technique has achieved a good performanceof transmitting wireless MIMO signals over the optical fiberat the carrier frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz The EVMs arecalculated considering the following equation [21]

EVM (dB) = 10 sdot log10[sum119872

119896=1

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119896 minus 119878119903119909119896

1003816100381610038161003816

2

sum119872

119896=1

10038161003816100381610038161198781199051199091198961003816100381610038161003816

2] (14)

where EVM is the value of the difference between a collectionof received symbols and transmitted or ideal symbols 119878

119905119909119896

is the corresponding transmitted symbol of the constellationassociated with the 119896th symbol 119878

119903119909119896is the received symbol

associated with 119878119905119909119896

and119872 is the number of the symbols forthe inphase-quadrature constellation

Figures 10(a)ndash10(c) show the eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the received 16-QAMbaseband signals forMIMO

1

MIMO2 and MIMO

3 respectively Also Figures 11(a)ndash11(c)

show the eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the received 16-QAM baseband signals for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3

respectively The eye diagrams of both 119868-branch and 119876-branch of the received wireless MIMO signals at the receivershow slight differences and good quality communicationsystem at a BER around of 10minus9 The BER are calculatedaccording to (15) [22]

BER asymp

(1 minus 119876minus1)

log2119876

lowast 120576

120576 = erfc[

[

radic1

radic2

sdot3 sdot log

2119876

(1198762minus 1)

sdot2

(119896 sdot EVMrms)2sdot log2119872

]

]

119896 =

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909max1003816100381610038161003816

sum119872

119894=1(1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119894

1003816100381610038161003816 119872)

(15)

where 119876 is the number of signal levels within each branchof the constellation diagram log

2119872 is the amount of bits

encoded into one QAM symbol and 119896 is a modulationformat-dependent factor giving the relationship betweenmaximum field magnitude and average overall119872 field mag-nitudes defined by the constellation diagram for the chosenmodulation formatThis factor is calculated according to (15)

The Scientific World Journal 9

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6 minus4

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

(a)

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

Received optical power

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

(b)

Figure 6 The BER performance versus received optical power at the carrier frequencies (a) 24GHz and (b) 5GHz

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8

L = 20kmL = 30kmL = 50km

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

Received optical power

BER

Figure 7The system performance at different lengths of the opticalfiber

to be 6(radic5+2) for 16-QAMThe 119878119905119909119894

is the ideal transmittedfield vector and 119878

119905119909max is the field vector of the outermostconstellation point In this paper the performance of EVMand the BER is evaluated for the 16-QAM MIMO signalswithout using forward error correction (FEC) techniques

6 Transmission of More Wireless MIMOSignals over Optical Fiber

Figure 12 shows the proposed OFU technique to transmitfive wireless MIMO signals over fiber At the OLT the DAM

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

10minus20

10minus18

10minus16

10minus14

10minus12

10minus10

10minus8

10minus6

10minus4

10minus2

100

BER

Δf = 15GHzΔf = 25GHzΔf = 50GHz

Figure 8 The system performance at different wavelength inter-leaves

is injected by LD with the wavelength 120582119889 The DAM is a

LN-MZM Adjusting the parameters of the DAM to suitablevalues can generate multiple wavelengths The dominantwavelengths are considered and the remaining outside wave-lengths are neglected because of their very small magnitudesThe OLT allocates five downlink wavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893

1205821198894 and 120582

1198895) which are used for downstream modulation

To generate five dominant wavelengths the values of DAMparameters are configured as minus05 V 05 V DC bias voltagesare applied to respectively first and second arms of theLN-MZM the RF clock voltage with frequency of 119891

119900drives

10 The Scientific World Journal

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(a)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)(b)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(c)

Figure 9 Constellation diagrams of the demodulated 16-QAMMIMO signals (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

to the DAM and the DC and RF switching voltages areset to 4V and 2V respectively The wavelength interleavesbetween the five generatedwavelengthswhich are equal to thefrequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900 The power magnitudes

of the fivewavelengths are approximately equal and the centerwavelength 120582

1198893has maximum value The difference between

this and the others is around 6 dB To get balanced powermagnitudes an optical attenuator is used in path of the centerwavelength after IL as shown in Figure 12 Each generatedwavelengthmodulates theMIMO signal by using IMThefive

modulated optical signals propagate along the same opticalfiber

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into the five modulated optical signals withthe wavelength 120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893 1205821198894 and 120582

1198895as shown in

Figure 12The receiver then downconverts the fivemodulatedoptical signals directly to the suitable electrical signals byusing an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signalsare then band-pass filtered according to the allocated RFcarrier frequency 119891

119888by using BPFs to get the original five

The Scientific World Journal 11

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 10 Eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

wireless MIMO signals MIMO1 MIMO

2 MIMO

3 MIMO

4

and MIMO5

7 Conclusions

The novel OFU technique is proposed to solve the problemof wireless MIMO signals transmission over a single opticalfiberThree wireless 16-QAMMIMO signals have been trans-mitted over a 20 km SMF using the OFU technique Thesewireless MIMO signals were modulated using the carrier

frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz at data rate of 1 Gbs for eachsignal The physical layer performance has been reported interms of the BER at different RF carrier frequencies differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves Inaddition the EVM and the eye diagrams are analyzed in thisstudy

The proposed approach highly suppressed the crosstalkbetween different MIMO signals with the same RF carrierfrequency since each MIMO signal is carried on a spe-cific optical wavelength While the ESSB-FT technique [10]

12 The Scientific World Journal

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 11 Eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

requires a number of low-frequency LOs and electrical BPFsat the transmitter and the receiver the OFU technique doesnot require low-frequency LOs at the transmitter and thereceiver or electrical BPFs at the transmitter Less numberof electrical BPFs is required at the receiver in the proposedtechnique However a number of PDs are required at thereceiver which is equal to the number of MIMO signals Theproposed system supports many wavelengths for carrying

multiple wireless MIMO signals over the fiber using singleLD The novel technique provides a spectral efficient andreliable FiWi system

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 5: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

The Scientific World Journal 5

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

19306

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

0

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

(i) (ii) (iii)

(iv) (v) (vi)

19306

T

19304

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T

19316

T

19306

T

19304

T

19308

T

1931

T

19312

T

19314

T

19316

T

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

1G 2G 3GFrequency (Hz)

fd2fd3 fd1

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d3

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

CL

CL

120582d1

120582d1

120582d2

120582d2

LD laser diodeDAM dual-arm modulatorCL optical coupler

BPF band pass filter

Bias

Bias

Bias

IL

120582d1 120582d2RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

Receiver

IL

(i) MIMO1

(ii) MIMO2

(iii) MIMO3

IL optical WDM interleaverIM intensity modulator

(iv) (v)

(vii)

(viii)

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

BPF

BPF

BPF(ix)

IL

IL

From fiber

LD

Optical attenuator

(vi) To fiber

(a)

+

+

+

(b) continued

Figure 3 Continued

6 The Scientific World Journal

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

(vii) (viii) (ix)

(b)

Figure 3 Transport of wireless MIMO signals over optical fiber using the OFU technique (a) block diagram of the proposed technique and(b) power spectra of the signals according to the indicated insets

119864out (119905) = 120572119864in (119905) (1 minus 120574) 119890(119895120587V1(119905)119881120587RF+1198951205871198811198871119881120587DC)

+120574119890(119895120587V2(119905)119881120587RF+1198951205871198811198872119881120587DC)

(1)

Here119864in(119905) is the input optical signal to theDAMfrom theLD V1(119905) and V

2(119905) are the RF modulating electrical voltage

with the carrier frequency 119891119898

= 1205961198982120587 119881

1198871and 119881

1198872are

the DC bias voltages applied to the arms of the DAM 119881120587RF

and 119881120587DC are the switching RF and switching bias voltages

respectivelyThe parameter 120572 is given by

120572 = 10minus(Ω20)

(2)

Here Ω is the insertion loss in dB (It is assigned as 5 dBin this design) 120574 designates the power splitting (combining)ratio of arm two for the input (output resp) 119884-branchwaveguide 120574 is given by

120574 =(1 minus 1radic120576

119903)

2 (3)

where 120576119903= 10(Extinction Ratio10)

= 100 so 120574 asymp 12 in this workIn the simulation design the values of 119881

120587RF and 119881120587DC are

set to 4V and the bias voltages of 1198811198871and 119881

1198872are assigned as

minus1 V and 1V respectively In addition the generated opticalsignal from the LD can be expressed as 119864in(119905) = 119864

119901119890119895120596119901119905 and

the modulating electrical signals can be expressed as V1(119905) =

minusV2(119905) = cos(120596

119898119905) So (1) is rearranged as

119864out (119905) =1

2120572119890minus119895(1205874)

119864in (119905) (119890119895(1205874)V

1(119905)

+ 119895119890119895(1205874)V

2(119905))

=1

2120572119890minus119895(1205874)

119864119901119890119895120596119901119905(119890119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905+ 119895119890minus119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905)

(4)

From the Jacobi-Anger expansion [19]

119890119895119898ℎcos120601

=

infin

sum

119899=minusinfin

119895119899119869119899(119898ℎ) 119890119895119899120601

(5)

where 119869119899(119898ℎ) is the 119899-order Bessel function of the complex

parameter119898ℎ

The parameter119898ℎis called modulation index

Therefore

119890119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905=

infin

sum

119899=minusinfin

119895119899119869119899(120587

4) 119890119895119899120596119898119905

= minus119895119869minus1(120587

4) 119890minus119895120596119898119905+ 1198690(120587

4) + 119895119869

1(120587

4) 119890119895120596119898119905

(6)

where the values of 119869119899(1205874) are neglected for 119899 =

plusmn2 plusmn3 plusmninfin because of their too small valuesAlso

119890minus119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905= 119890119895(1205874) cos(120596

119898119905+120587)

= 119895119869minus1(120587

4) 119890minus119895120596119898119905+ 1198690(120587

4) minus 119895119869

1(120587

4) 119890119895120596119898119905

(7)

Since 119869minus119899(119911) = (minus1)

119899119869119899(119911) for integer value 119899 [19] so

119869minus1(1205874) = minus119869

1(1205874) The expression of the output optical

signal 119864out(119905) is then simplified as

119864out (119905) =1

2120572 (1 + 119895) 119890

minus119895(1205874)119864119901

times 1198690(120587

4) 119890119895120596119901119905+ 1198691(120587

4) [119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+ 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905]

=1

radic2

120572119864119901times 1198690(120587

4) 119890119895120596119901119905

+1198691(120587

4) [119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+ 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905]

(8)

The Scientific World Journal 7

So the output signal can be expressed as

119864out (119905) = 1198701times 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905

+ 1198702times 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+ 1198703times 119890119895120596119901119905

(9)

where1198701 1198702 and119870

3are constants according to (8)

This signal is delivered to optical ILs to separate the threedownlink optical carriers 119891

1198891= 119891119901+ 119891119898(1205821198891) 1198911198892

= 119891119901minus

119891119898(1205821198892) and 119891

1198893= 119891119901(1205821198893) Three wireless MIMO signals

1198721(119905) 119872

2(119905) and 119872

3(119905) are OSSB+C modulated by these

the three optical carriers 1198911198891 1198911198892 and 119891

1198893 respectively using

three IMs as shown in Figure 3(a) The three MIMO signalshave different QAM data stream at the same carrier RF of119891119888= 1205961198882120587

The modulated OSSB+C optical signal at each IM can bewritten as [18]

119864SSB119894 (119905) asymp 119862119894119890119895120596119889119894119905+119872119894 (119905) 119890119895(120596119889+120596119888)119905 (10)

where 119862119894is a constant 120596

119889119894= 2120587119891

119889119894is the optical downlink

carrier 119872119894is the 119894th wireless MIMO signal with RF carrier

frequency of 119891119888 and 119894 is the index of MIMO signal (119894 =

1 2 or 3) The three modulated optical signals by the opticalwavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893) are combined into a single

optical fiber So the input optical signal to the optical fiber isgiven by

119864in fiber (119905) asymp 1198621119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+1198721 (119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198622119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+1198722(119905) 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198623119890119895120596119901119905+1198723(119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119888)119905

(11)

This signal propagates along an SMFwith the propagationconstant of 120573(120596) and attenuation magnitude 120572

119891 where 120596 is

the angular frequency So the output lightwave at the end ofthe SMF with length of 119911 can be approximated as [20]

119864out fiber (119911 119905) prop 119890minus1205721198911199111198621119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898)119911]

+1198721(119905 minus 1199051198891)

times 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198622119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898)119911]

+1198722(119905 minus 1199051198892)

times 119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198623119890119895[120596119901119905+120573(120596

119901)119911]

+1198723(119905 minus 1199051198893) 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119888)119911]

(12)

where 119905119889119894(119894 = 1 2 or 3) is the time delay of the 119894th optical

downlink signal The time delay is calculated by the firstderivative of 120573(120596) since 119905

119889119894= 1205731015840(120596119889119894

+ 120596119888) and 120596

119894is the

120596p120596p minus 120596m 120596p + 120596m

120596

Am

plitu

de

USSB2 USSB3 USSB1

fd2 fd3 fd1

Figure 4 The propagated lightwave signal over the optical fiber

119894th optical downlink carrier frequency The output lightwaveat the end of fiber is considered as three optical signals withdifferent downlink frequencies of 120596

119901+ 120596119898 120596119901minus 120596119898 and 120596

119901

which convey the three wireless MIMO signals in their uppersingle sidebands (USSBs) as shown in Figure 4

The optical receiver receives the transmitted optical sig-nals and separates them according to their downlink wave-lengths by using optical ILs as shown in Figure 3 Each opticaldownlink signal is then directly detected by a photodetector(PD) so the photocurrent for each detectedMIMOsignal canbe written as the following equation according to the square-law PD [18]

119868119894(119911 119905) = 120588

1003816100381610038161003816119864119894 (119911 119905)1003816100381610038161003816

2= 120588119864119894(119911 119905) times 119864

lowast

119894(119911 119905)

prop 120588119890minus2120572119891119911times 119862119894119890119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890119895[(120596119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

times 119862119894119890minus119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890minus119895[(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

119868119894(119911 119905) prop 120588119890

minus2120572119891119911

times 119862119894

2+119872119894

2(119905 minus 119905119889119894)

+2119862119894119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) cos (120596

119888(119905 + 120573119911))

(13)

where 120588 is the responsivity of the photodetectorAccording to (13) the photocurrent is comprised of

the DC component and the RF component at 120596119888after

transmission The detected signal is then passed throughBPF with a center frequency of 119891

119888 so the DC component

is removed Each detected wireless MIMO signal with thecarrier frequency 119891

119888is directly amplified and propagated by

using MIMO antenna technique through wireless channel

8 The Scientific World Journal

Launched optical power (dBm)0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

BER

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

24GHz 16QAM50GHz 16QAM

Figure 5 The fiber nonlinearity effect on the system performance

The wireless end-user will receive the three MIMO signalsand demodulate them using the suitable QAMdemodulationand MIMO decoding techniques

5 System Performance Evaluation

In this work the communication system is designed toprovide a data rate of 1 Gbs for each 16-QAMwirelessMIMOsignal Figure 3 in the inset (vi) shows the input opticalpower to the optical fiber where the three modulated opticalsignals with the downlink wavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893

are coupled to propagate through 20 km optical fiber Thetotal input power of the three optical signals is 1626 dBmaccording to the simulation calculations for both RF carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHzThis power is suitable to belaunched to avoid the nonlinear effects along the optical linkFigure 5 shows the system performance at different launchedoptical powers Nonlinearity of the fiber negatively affects thesystem performance when the launched optical powers aregreater than 108 dBm and 79 dBm at the carrier frequenciesof 24GHz and 50GHz respectively

To evaluate the performance of the proposed techniqueFigures 6(a) and 6(b) show the BER performance versus thereceived optical power at the receiver for the three wirelessMIMO signals (MIMO

1 MIMO

2 andMIMO

3) at the carrier

frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz respectively The powersensitivity differences of the receivers for the three MIMOsignals are small especially between the two MIMO signals(MIMO

1and MIMO

2) The maximum power penalties of

347 dB and 4 dB are recorded at BER of 10minus9 for the carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHz receptively

Figure 7 shows the system performance at three differentfiber lengths (20 km 30 km and 50 km) of the optical fiber Inthe proposed system the fiber length of 50 kmhas slight effecton the performance of the transmitted optical signals whichcarry the wireless MIMO signals The system performance

deteriorates progressively when the access distance becomeslonger than 50 km

In addition the system performance is analyzed by usingdifferent wavelength interleaves between the optical carrierfrequency (or RF clock frequency 119891

119900) Figure 8 shows the

systemperformance at differentwavelength interleaves (Δ119891 =

15 25 and 50GHz which are compatible with Δ120582 = 01202 and 04 nm resp) When the wavelength interleaves aresmaller than 15GHz the system performance will degradeand the error floor clearly appears

Figures 9(a)ndash9(c) show 1Gbs 16-QAM constellationdiagrams for the received MIMO signals MIMO

1 MIMO

2

and MIMO3 respectively at 24GHz Clear scatter-plots are

achieved at EVM values of minus208780 dB minus202873 dB andminus212961 dB for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3 respectively

So the proposed technique has achieved a good performanceof transmitting wireless MIMO signals over the optical fiberat the carrier frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz The EVMs arecalculated considering the following equation [21]

EVM (dB) = 10 sdot log10[sum119872

119896=1

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119896 minus 119878119903119909119896

1003816100381610038161003816

2

sum119872

119896=1

10038161003816100381610038161198781199051199091198961003816100381610038161003816

2] (14)

where EVM is the value of the difference between a collectionof received symbols and transmitted or ideal symbols 119878

119905119909119896

is the corresponding transmitted symbol of the constellationassociated with the 119896th symbol 119878

119903119909119896is the received symbol

associated with 119878119905119909119896

and119872 is the number of the symbols forthe inphase-quadrature constellation

Figures 10(a)ndash10(c) show the eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the received 16-QAMbaseband signals forMIMO

1

MIMO2 and MIMO

3 respectively Also Figures 11(a)ndash11(c)

show the eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the received 16-QAM baseband signals for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3

respectively The eye diagrams of both 119868-branch and 119876-branch of the received wireless MIMO signals at the receivershow slight differences and good quality communicationsystem at a BER around of 10minus9 The BER are calculatedaccording to (15) [22]

BER asymp

(1 minus 119876minus1)

log2119876

lowast 120576

120576 = erfc[

[

radic1

radic2

sdot3 sdot log

2119876

(1198762minus 1)

sdot2

(119896 sdot EVMrms)2sdot log2119872

]

]

119896 =

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909max1003816100381610038161003816

sum119872

119894=1(1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119894

1003816100381610038161003816 119872)

(15)

where 119876 is the number of signal levels within each branchof the constellation diagram log

2119872 is the amount of bits

encoded into one QAM symbol and 119896 is a modulationformat-dependent factor giving the relationship betweenmaximum field magnitude and average overall119872 field mag-nitudes defined by the constellation diagram for the chosenmodulation formatThis factor is calculated according to (15)

The Scientific World Journal 9

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6 minus4

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

(a)

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

Received optical power

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

(b)

Figure 6 The BER performance versus received optical power at the carrier frequencies (a) 24GHz and (b) 5GHz

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8

L = 20kmL = 30kmL = 50km

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

Received optical power

BER

Figure 7The system performance at different lengths of the opticalfiber

to be 6(radic5+2) for 16-QAMThe 119878119905119909119894

is the ideal transmittedfield vector and 119878

119905119909max is the field vector of the outermostconstellation point In this paper the performance of EVMand the BER is evaluated for the 16-QAM MIMO signalswithout using forward error correction (FEC) techniques

6 Transmission of More Wireless MIMOSignals over Optical Fiber

Figure 12 shows the proposed OFU technique to transmitfive wireless MIMO signals over fiber At the OLT the DAM

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

10minus20

10minus18

10minus16

10minus14

10minus12

10minus10

10minus8

10minus6

10minus4

10minus2

100

BER

Δf = 15GHzΔf = 25GHzΔf = 50GHz

Figure 8 The system performance at different wavelength inter-leaves

is injected by LD with the wavelength 120582119889 The DAM is a

LN-MZM Adjusting the parameters of the DAM to suitablevalues can generate multiple wavelengths The dominantwavelengths are considered and the remaining outside wave-lengths are neglected because of their very small magnitudesThe OLT allocates five downlink wavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893

1205821198894 and 120582

1198895) which are used for downstream modulation

To generate five dominant wavelengths the values of DAMparameters are configured as minus05 V 05 V DC bias voltagesare applied to respectively first and second arms of theLN-MZM the RF clock voltage with frequency of 119891

119900drives

10 The Scientific World Journal

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(a)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)(b)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(c)

Figure 9 Constellation diagrams of the demodulated 16-QAMMIMO signals (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

to the DAM and the DC and RF switching voltages areset to 4V and 2V respectively The wavelength interleavesbetween the five generatedwavelengthswhich are equal to thefrequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900 The power magnitudes

of the fivewavelengths are approximately equal and the centerwavelength 120582

1198893has maximum value The difference between

this and the others is around 6 dB To get balanced powermagnitudes an optical attenuator is used in path of the centerwavelength after IL as shown in Figure 12 Each generatedwavelengthmodulates theMIMO signal by using IMThefive

modulated optical signals propagate along the same opticalfiber

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into the five modulated optical signals withthe wavelength 120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893 1205821198894 and 120582

1198895as shown in

Figure 12The receiver then downconverts the fivemodulatedoptical signals directly to the suitable electrical signals byusing an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signalsare then band-pass filtered according to the allocated RFcarrier frequency 119891

119888by using BPFs to get the original five

The Scientific World Journal 11

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 10 Eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

wireless MIMO signals MIMO1 MIMO

2 MIMO

3 MIMO

4

and MIMO5

7 Conclusions

The novel OFU technique is proposed to solve the problemof wireless MIMO signals transmission over a single opticalfiberThree wireless 16-QAMMIMO signals have been trans-mitted over a 20 km SMF using the OFU technique Thesewireless MIMO signals were modulated using the carrier

frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz at data rate of 1 Gbs for eachsignal The physical layer performance has been reported interms of the BER at different RF carrier frequencies differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves Inaddition the EVM and the eye diagrams are analyzed in thisstudy

The proposed approach highly suppressed the crosstalkbetween different MIMO signals with the same RF carrierfrequency since each MIMO signal is carried on a spe-cific optical wavelength While the ESSB-FT technique [10]

12 The Scientific World Journal

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 11 Eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

requires a number of low-frequency LOs and electrical BPFsat the transmitter and the receiver the OFU technique doesnot require low-frequency LOs at the transmitter and thereceiver or electrical BPFs at the transmitter Less numberof electrical BPFs is required at the receiver in the proposedtechnique However a number of PDs are required at thereceiver which is equal to the number of MIMO signals Theproposed system supports many wavelengths for carrying

multiple wireless MIMO signals over the fiber using singleLD The novel technique provides a spectral efficient andreliable FiWi system

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 6: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

6 The Scientific World Journal

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

minus100

minus80

minus60

minus40

minus20

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

19306

T

19303

T

19309

T

19312

T

19315

T

(vii) (viii) (ix)

(b)

Figure 3 Transport of wireless MIMO signals over optical fiber using the OFU technique (a) block diagram of the proposed technique and(b) power spectra of the signals according to the indicated insets

119864out (119905) = 120572119864in (119905) (1 minus 120574) 119890(119895120587V1(119905)119881120587RF+1198951205871198811198871119881120587DC)

+120574119890(119895120587V2(119905)119881120587RF+1198951205871198811198872119881120587DC)

(1)

Here119864in(119905) is the input optical signal to theDAMfrom theLD V1(119905) and V

2(119905) are the RF modulating electrical voltage

with the carrier frequency 119891119898

= 1205961198982120587 119881

1198871and 119881

1198872are

the DC bias voltages applied to the arms of the DAM 119881120587RF

and 119881120587DC are the switching RF and switching bias voltages

respectivelyThe parameter 120572 is given by

120572 = 10minus(Ω20)

(2)

Here Ω is the insertion loss in dB (It is assigned as 5 dBin this design) 120574 designates the power splitting (combining)ratio of arm two for the input (output resp) 119884-branchwaveguide 120574 is given by

120574 =(1 minus 1radic120576

119903)

2 (3)

where 120576119903= 10(Extinction Ratio10)

= 100 so 120574 asymp 12 in this workIn the simulation design the values of 119881

120587RF and 119881120587DC are

set to 4V and the bias voltages of 1198811198871and 119881

1198872are assigned as

minus1 V and 1V respectively In addition the generated opticalsignal from the LD can be expressed as 119864in(119905) = 119864

119901119890119895120596119901119905 and

the modulating electrical signals can be expressed as V1(119905) =

minusV2(119905) = cos(120596

119898119905) So (1) is rearranged as

119864out (119905) =1

2120572119890minus119895(1205874)

119864in (119905) (119890119895(1205874)V

1(119905)

+ 119895119890119895(1205874)V

2(119905))

=1

2120572119890minus119895(1205874)

119864119901119890119895120596119901119905(119890119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905+ 119895119890minus119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905)

(4)

From the Jacobi-Anger expansion [19]

119890119895119898ℎcos120601

=

infin

sum

119899=minusinfin

119895119899119869119899(119898ℎ) 119890119895119899120601

(5)

where 119869119899(119898ℎ) is the 119899-order Bessel function of the complex

parameter119898ℎ

The parameter119898ℎis called modulation index

Therefore

119890119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905=

infin

sum

119899=minusinfin

119895119899119869119899(120587

4) 119890119895119899120596119898119905

= minus119895119869minus1(120587

4) 119890minus119895120596119898119905+ 1198690(120587

4) + 119895119869

1(120587

4) 119890119895120596119898119905

(6)

where the values of 119869119899(1205874) are neglected for 119899 =

plusmn2 plusmn3 plusmninfin because of their too small valuesAlso

119890minus119895(1205874) cos120596

119898119905= 119890119895(1205874) cos(120596

119898119905+120587)

= 119895119869minus1(120587

4) 119890minus119895120596119898119905+ 1198690(120587

4) minus 119895119869

1(120587

4) 119890119895120596119898119905

(7)

Since 119869minus119899(119911) = (minus1)

119899119869119899(119911) for integer value 119899 [19] so

119869minus1(1205874) = minus119869

1(1205874) The expression of the output optical

signal 119864out(119905) is then simplified as

119864out (119905) =1

2120572 (1 + 119895) 119890

minus119895(1205874)119864119901

times 1198690(120587

4) 119890119895120596119901119905+ 1198691(120587

4) [119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+ 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905]

=1

radic2

120572119864119901times 1198690(120587

4) 119890119895120596119901119905

+1198691(120587

4) [119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+ 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905]

(8)

The Scientific World Journal 7

So the output signal can be expressed as

119864out (119905) = 1198701times 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905

+ 1198702times 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+ 1198703times 119890119895120596119901119905

(9)

where1198701 1198702 and119870

3are constants according to (8)

This signal is delivered to optical ILs to separate the threedownlink optical carriers 119891

1198891= 119891119901+ 119891119898(1205821198891) 1198911198892

= 119891119901minus

119891119898(1205821198892) and 119891

1198893= 119891119901(1205821198893) Three wireless MIMO signals

1198721(119905) 119872

2(119905) and 119872

3(119905) are OSSB+C modulated by these

the three optical carriers 1198911198891 1198911198892 and 119891

1198893 respectively using

three IMs as shown in Figure 3(a) The three MIMO signalshave different QAM data stream at the same carrier RF of119891119888= 1205961198882120587

The modulated OSSB+C optical signal at each IM can bewritten as [18]

119864SSB119894 (119905) asymp 119862119894119890119895120596119889119894119905+119872119894 (119905) 119890119895(120596119889+120596119888)119905 (10)

where 119862119894is a constant 120596

119889119894= 2120587119891

119889119894is the optical downlink

carrier 119872119894is the 119894th wireless MIMO signal with RF carrier

frequency of 119891119888 and 119894 is the index of MIMO signal (119894 =

1 2 or 3) The three modulated optical signals by the opticalwavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893) are combined into a single

optical fiber So the input optical signal to the optical fiber isgiven by

119864in fiber (119905) asymp 1198621119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+1198721 (119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198622119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+1198722(119905) 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198623119890119895120596119901119905+1198723(119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119888)119905

(11)

This signal propagates along an SMFwith the propagationconstant of 120573(120596) and attenuation magnitude 120572

119891 where 120596 is

the angular frequency So the output lightwave at the end ofthe SMF with length of 119911 can be approximated as [20]

119864out fiber (119911 119905) prop 119890minus1205721198911199111198621119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898)119911]

+1198721(119905 minus 1199051198891)

times 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198622119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898)119911]

+1198722(119905 minus 1199051198892)

times 119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198623119890119895[120596119901119905+120573(120596

119901)119911]

+1198723(119905 minus 1199051198893) 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119888)119911]

(12)

where 119905119889119894(119894 = 1 2 or 3) is the time delay of the 119894th optical

downlink signal The time delay is calculated by the firstderivative of 120573(120596) since 119905

119889119894= 1205731015840(120596119889119894

+ 120596119888) and 120596

119894is the

120596p120596p minus 120596m 120596p + 120596m

120596

Am

plitu

de

USSB2 USSB3 USSB1

fd2 fd3 fd1

Figure 4 The propagated lightwave signal over the optical fiber

119894th optical downlink carrier frequency The output lightwaveat the end of fiber is considered as three optical signals withdifferent downlink frequencies of 120596

119901+ 120596119898 120596119901minus 120596119898 and 120596

119901

which convey the three wireless MIMO signals in their uppersingle sidebands (USSBs) as shown in Figure 4

The optical receiver receives the transmitted optical sig-nals and separates them according to their downlink wave-lengths by using optical ILs as shown in Figure 3 Each opticaldownlink signal is then directly detected by a photodetector(PD) so the photocurrent for each detectedMIMOsignal canbe written as the following equation according to the square-law PD [18]

119868119894(119911 119905) = 120588

1003816100381610038161003816119864119894 (119911 119905)1003816100381610038161003816

2= 120588119864119894(119911 119905) times 119864

lowast

119894(119911 119905)

prop 120588119890minus2120572119891119911times 119862119894119890119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890119895[(120596119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

times 119862119894119890minus119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890minus119895[(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

119868119894(119911 119905) prop 120588119890

minus2120572119891119911

times 119862119894

2+119872119894

2(119905 minus 119905119889119894)

+2119862119894119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) cos (120596

119888(119905 + 120573119911))

(13)

where 120588 is the responsivity of the photodetectorAccording to (13) the photocurrent is comprised of

the DC component and the RF component at 120596119888after

transmission The detected signal is then passed throughBPF with a center frequency of 119891

119888 so the DC component

is removed Each detected wireless MIMO signal with thecarrier frequency 119891

119888is directly amplified and propagated by

using MIMO antenna technique through wireless channel

8 The Scientific World Journal

Launched optical power (dBm)0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

BER

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

24GHz 16QAM50GHz 16QAM

Figure 5 The fiber nonlinearity effect on the system performance

The wireless end-user will receive the three MIMO signalsand demodulate them using the suitable QAMdemodulationand MIMO decoding techniques

5 System Performance Evaluation

In this work the communication system is designed toprovide a data rate of 1 Gbs for each 16-QAMwirelessMIMOsignal Figure 3 in the inset (vi) shows the input opticalpower to the optical fiber where the three modulated opticalsignals with the downlink wavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893

are coupled to propagate through 20 km optical fiber Thetotal input power of the three optical signals is 1626 dBmaccording to the simulation calculations for both RF carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHzThis power is suitable to belaunched to avoid the nonlinear effects along the optical linkFigure 5 shows the system performance at different launchedoptical powers Nonlinearity of the fiber negatively affects thesystem performance when the launched optical powers aregreater than 108 dBm and 79 dBm at the carrier frequenciesof 24GHz and 50GHz respectively

To evaluate the performance of the proposed techniqueFigures 6(a) and 6(b) show the BER performance versus thereceived optical power at the receiver for the three wirelessMIMO signals (MIMO

1 MIMO

2 andMIMO

3) at the carrier

frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz respectively The powersensitivity differences of the receivers for the three MIMOsignals are small especially between the two MIMO signals(MIMO

1and MIMO

2) The maximum power penalties of

347 dB and 4 dB are recorded at BER of 10minus9 for the carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHz receptively

Figure 7 shows the system performance at three differentfiber lengths (20 km 30 km and 50 km) of the optical fiber Inthe proposed system the fiber length of 50 kmhas slight effecton the performance of the transmitted optical signals whichcarry the wireless MIMO signals The system performance

deteriorates progressively when the access distance becomeslonger than 50 km

In addition the system performance is analyzed by usingdifferent wavelength interleaves between the optical carrierfrequency (or RF clock frequency 119891

119900) Figure 8 shows the

systemperformance at differentwavelength interleaves (Δ119891 =

15 25 and 50GHz which are compatible with Δ120582 = 01202 and 04 nm resp) When the wavelength interleaves aresmaller than 15GHz the system performance will degradeand the error floor clearly appears

Figures 9(a)ndash9(c) show 1Gbs 16-QAM constellationdiagrams for the received MIMO signals MIMO

1 MIMO

2

and MIMO3 respectively at 24GHz Clear scatter-plots are

achieved at EVM values of minus208780 dB minus202873 dB andminus212961 dB for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3 respectively

So the proposed technique has achieved a good performanceof transmitting wireless MIMO signals over the optical fiberat the carrier frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz The EVMs arecalculated considering the following equation [21]

EVM (dB) = 10 sdot log10[sum119872

119896=1

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119896 minus 119878119903119909119896

1003816100381610038161003816

2

sum119872

119896=1

10038161003816100381610038161198781199051199091198961003816100381610038161003816

2] (14)

where EVM is the value of the difference between a collectionof received symbols and transmitted or ideal symbols 119878

119905119909119896

is the corresponding transmitted symbol of the constellationassociated with the 119896th symbol 119878

119903119909119896is the received symbol

associated with 119878119905119909119896

and119872 is the number of the symbols forthe inphase-quadrature constellation

Figures 10(a)ndash10(c) show the eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the received 16-QAMbaseband signals forMIMO

1

MIMO2 and MIMO

3 respectively Also Figures 11(a)ndash11(c)

show the eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the received 16-QAM baseband signals for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3

respectively The eye diagrams of both 119868-branch and 119876-branch of the received wireless MIMO signals at the receivershow slight differences and good quality communicationsystem at a BER around of 10minus9 The BER are calculatedaccording to (15) [22]

BER asymp

(1 minus 119876minus1)

log2119876

lowast 120576

120576 = erfc[

[

radic1

radic2

sdot3 sdot log

2119876

(1198762minus 1)

sdot2

(119896 sdot EVMrms)2sdot log2119872

]

]

119896 =

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909max1003816100381610038161003816

sum119872

119894=1(1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119894

1003816100381610038161003816 119872)

(15)

where 119876 is the number of signal levels within each branchof the constellation diagram log

2119872 is the amount of bits

encoded into one QAM symbol and 119896 is a modulationformat-dependent factor giving the relationship betweenmaximum field magnitude and average overall119872 field mag-nitudes defined by the constellation diagram for the chosenmodulation formatThis factor is calculated according to (15)

The Scientific World Journal 9

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6 minus4

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

(a)

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

Received optical power

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

(b)

Figure 6 The BER performance versus received optical power at the carrier frequencies (a) 24GHz and (b) 5GHz

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8

L = 20kmL = 30kmL = 50km

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

Received optical power

BER

Figure 7The system performance at different lengths of the opticalfiber

to be 6(radic5+2) for 16-QAMThe 119878119905119909119894

is the ideal transmittedfield vector and 119878

119905119909max is the field vector of the outermostconstellation point In this paper the performance of EVMand the BER is evaluated for the 16-QAM MIMO signalswithout using forward error correction (FEC) techniques

6 Transmission of More Wireless MIMOSignals over Optical Fiber

Figure 12 shows the proposed OFU technique to transmitfive wireless MIMO signals over fiber At the OLT the DAM

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

10minus20

10minus18

10minus16

10minus14

10minus12

10minus10

10minus8

10minus6

10minus4

10minus2

100

BER

Δf = 15GHzΔf = 25GHzΔf = 50GHz

Figure 8 The system performance at different wavelength inter-leaves

is injected by LD with the wavelength 120582119889 The DAM is a

LN-MZM Adjusting the parameters of the DAM to suitablevalues can generate multiple wavelengths The dominantwavelengths are considered and the remaining outside wave-lengths are neglected because of their very small magnitudesThe OLT allocates five downlink wavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893

1205821198894 and 120582

1198895) which are used for downstream modulation

To generate five dominant wavelengths the values of DAMparameters are configured as minus05 V 05 V DC bias voltagesare applied to respectively first and second arms of theLN-MZM the RF clock voltage with frequency of 119891

119900drives

10 The Scientific World Journal

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(a)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)(b)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(c)

Figure 9 Constellation diagrams of the demodulated 16-QAMMIMO signals (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

to the DAM and the DC and RF switching voltages areset to 4V and 2V respectively The wavelength interleavesbetween the five generatedwavelengthswhich are equal to thefrequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900 The power magnitudes

of the fivewavelengths are approximately equal and the centerwavelength 120582

1198893has maximum value The difference between

this and the others is around 6 dB To get balanced powermagnitudes an optical attenuator is used in path of the centerwavelength after IL as shown in Figure 12 Each generatedwavelengthmodulates theMIMO signal by using IMThefive

modulated optical signals propagate along the same opticalfiber

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into the five modulated optical signals withthe wavelength 120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893 1205821198894 and 120582

1198895as shown in

Figure 12The receiver then downconverts the fivemodulatedoptical signals directly to the suitable electrical signals byusing an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signalsare then band-pass filtered according to the allocated RFcarrier frequency 119891

119888by using BPFs to get the original five

The Scientific World Journal 11

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 10 Eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

wireless MIMO signals MIMO1 MIMO

2 MIMO

3 MIMO

4

and MIMO5

7 Conclusions

The novel OFU technique is proposed to solve the problemof wireless MIMO signals transmission over a single opticalfiberThree wireless 16-QAMMIMO signals have been trans-mitted over a 20 km SMF using the OFU technique Thesewireless MIMO signals were modulated using the carrier

frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz at data rate of 1 Gbs for eachsignal The physical layer performance has been reported interms of the BER at different RF carrier frequencies differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves Inaddition the EVM and the eye diagrams are analyzed in thisstudy

The proposed approach highly suppressed the crosstalkbetween different MIMO signals with the same RF carrierfrequency since each MIMO signal is carried on a spe-cific optical wavelength While the ESSB-FT technique [10]

12 The Scientific World Journal

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 11 Eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

requires a number of low-frequency LOs and electrical BPFsat the transmitter and the receiver the OFU technique doesnot require low-frequency LOs at the transmitter and thereceiver or electrical BPFs at the transmitter Less numberof electrical BPFs is required at the receiver in the proposedtechnique However a number of PDs are required at thereceiver which is equal to the number of MIMO signals Theproposed system supports many wavelengths for carrying

multiple wireless MIMO signals over the fiber using singleLD The novel technique provides a spectral efficient andreliable FiWi system

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 7: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

The Scientific World Journal 7

So the output signal can be expressed as

119864out (119905) = 1198701times 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905

+ 1198702times 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+ 1198703times 119890119895120596119901119905

(9)

where1198701 1198702 and119870

3are constants according to (8)

This signal is delivered to optical ILs to separate the threedownlink optical carriers 119891

1198891= 119891119901+ 119891119898(1205821198891) 1198911198892

= 119891119901minus

119891119898(1205821198892) and 119891

1198893= 119891119901(1205821198893) Three wireless MIMO signals

1198721(119905) 119872

2(119905) and 119872

3(119905) are OSSB+C modulated by these

the three optical carriers 1198911198891 1198911198892 and 119891

1198893 respectively using

three IMs as shown in Figure 3(a) The three MIMO signalshave different QAM data stream at the same carrier RF of119891119888= 1205961198882120587

The modulated OSSB+C optical signal at each IM can bewritten as [18]

119864SSB119894 (119905) asymp 119862119894119890119895120596119889119894119905+119872119894 (119905) 119890119895(120596119889+120596119888)119905 (10)

where 119862119894is a constant 120596

119889119894= 2120587119891

119889119894is the optical downlink

carrier 119872119894is the 119894th wireless MIMO signal with RF carrier

frequency of 119891119888 and 119894 is the index of MIMO signal (119894 =

1 2 or 3) The three modulated optical signals by the opticalwavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893) are combined into a single

optical fiber So the input optical signal to the optical fiber isgiven by

119864in fiber (119905) asymp 1198621119890119895(120596119901+120596119898)119905+1198721 (119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198622119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+1198722(119905) 119890119895(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905

+ 1198623119890119895120596119901119905+1198723(119905) 119890119895(120596119901+120596119888)119905

(11)

This signal propagates along an SMFwith the propagationconstant of 120573(120596) and attenuation magnitude 120572

119891 where 120596 is

the angular frequency So the output lightwave at the end ofthe SMF with length of 119911 can be approximated as [20]

119864out fiber (119911 119905) prop 119890minus1205721198911199111198621119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898)119911]

+1198721(119905 minus 1199051198891)

times 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198622119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898)119911]

+1198722(119905 minus 1199051198892)

times 119890119895[(120596119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901minus120596119898+120596119888)119911]

+ 1198623119890119895[120596119901119905+120573(120596

119901)119911]

+1198723(119905 minus 1199051198893) 119890119895[(120596119901+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119901+120596119888)119911]

(12)

where 119905119889119894(119894 = 1 2 or 3) is the time delay of the 119894th optical

downlink signal The time delay is calculated by the firstderivative of 120573(120596) since 119905

119889119894= 1205731015840(120596119889119894

+ 120596119888) and 120596

119894is the

120596p120596p minus 120596m 120596p + 120596m

120596

Am

plitu

de

USSB2 USSB3 USSB1

fd2 fd3 fd1

Figure 4 The propagated lightwave signal over the optical fiber

119894th optical downlink carrier frequency The output lightwaveat the end of fiber is considered as three optical signals withdifferent downlink frequencies of 120596

119901+ 120596119898 120596119901minus 120596119898 and 120596

119901

which convey the three wireless MIMO signals in their uppersingle sidebands (USSBs) as shown in Figure 4

The optical receiver receives the transmitted optical sig-nals and separates them according to their downlink wave-lengths by using optical ILs as shown in Figure 3 Each opticaldownlink signal is then directly detected by a photodetector(PD) so the photocurrent for each detectedMIMOsignal canbe written as the following equation according to the square-law PD [18]

119868119894(119911 119905) = 120588

1003816100381610038161003816119864119894 (119911 119905)1003816100381610038161003816

2= 120588119864119894(119911 119905) times 119864

lowast

119894(119911 119905)

prop 120588119890minus2120572119891119911times 119862119894119890119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890119895[(120596119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

times 119862119894119890minus119895[120596119889119894119905+120573(120596

119889119894)119911]

+119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) 119890minus119895[(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119905+120573(120596

119889119894+120596119888)119911]

119868119894(119911 119905) prop 120588119890

minus2120572119891119911

times 119862119894

2+119872119894

2(119905 minus 119905119889119894)

+2119862119894119872119894(119905 minus 119905119889119894) cos (120596

119888(119905 + 120573119911))

(13)

where 120588 is the responsivity of the photodetectorAccording to (13) the photocurrent is comprised of

the DC component and the RF component at 120596119888after

transmission The detected signal is then passed throughBPF with a center frequency of 119891

119888 so the DC component

is removed Each detected wireless MIMO signal with thecarrier frequency 119891

119888is directly amplified and propagated by

using MIMO antenna technique through wireless channel

8 The Scientific World Journal

Launched optical power (dBm)0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

BER

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

24GHz 16QAM50GHz 16QAM

Figure 5 The fiber nonlinearity effect on the system performance

The wireless end-user will receive the three MIMO signalsand demodulate them using the suitable QAMdemodulationand MIMO decoding techniques

5 System Performance Evaluation

In this work the communication system is designed toprovide a data rate of 1 Gbs for each 16-QAMwirelessMIMOsignal Figure 3 in the inset (vi) shows the input opticalpower to the optical fiber where the three modulated opticalsignals with the downlink wavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893

are coupled to propagate through 20 km optical fiber Thetotal input power of the three optical signals is 1626 dBmaccording to the simulation calculations for both RF carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHzThis power is suitable to belaunched to avoid the nonlinear effects along the optical linkFigure 5 shows the system performance at different launchedoptical powers Nonlinearity of the fiber negatively affects thesystem performance when the launched optical powers aregreater than 108 dBm and 79 dBm at the carrier frequenciesof 24GHz and 50GHz respectively

To evaluate the performance of the proposed techniqueFigures 6(a) and 6(b) show the BER performance versus thereceived optical power at the receiver for the three wirelessMIMO signals (MIMO

1 MIMO

2 andMIMO

3) at the carrier

frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz respectively The powersensitivity differences of the receivers for the three MIMOsignals are small especially between the two MIMO signals(MIMO

1and MIMO

2) The maximum power penalties of

347 dB and 4 dB are recorded at BER of 10minus9 for the carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHz receptively

Figure 7 shows the system performance at three differentfiber lengths (20 km 30 km and 50 km) of the optical fiber Inthe proposed system the fiber length of 50 kmhas slight effecton the performance of the transmitted optical signals whichcarry the wireless MIMO signals The system performance

deteriorates progressively when the access distance becomeslonger than 50 km

In addition the system performance is analyzed by usingdifferent wavelength interleaves between the optical carrierfrequency (or RF clock frequency 119891

119900) Figure 8 shows the

systemperformance at differentwavelength interleaves (Δ119891 =

15 25 and 50GHz which are compatible with Δ120582 = 01202 and 04 nm resp) When the wavelength interleaves aresmaller than 15GHz the system performance will degradeand the error floor clearly appears

Figures 9(a)ndash9(c) show 1Gbs 16-QAM constellationdiagrams for the received MIMO signals MIMO

1 MIMO

2

and MIMO3 respectively at 24GHz Clear scatter-plots are

achieved at EVM values of minus208780 dB minus202873 dB andminus212961 dB for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3 respectively

So the proposed technique has achieved a good performanceof transmitting wireless MIMO signals over the optical fiberat the carrier frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz The EVMs arecalculated considering the following equation [21]

EVM (dB) = 10 sdot log10[sum119872

119896=1

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119896 minus 119878119903119909119896

1003816100381610038161003816

2

sum119872

119896=1

10038161003816100381610038161198781199051199091198961003816100381610038161003816

2] (14)

where EVM is the value of the difference between a collectionof received symbols and transmitted or ideal symbols 119878

119905119909119896

is the corresponding transmitted symbol of the constellationassociated with the 119896th symbol 119878

119903119909119896is the received symbol

associated with 119878119905119909119896

and119872 is the number of the symbols forthe inphase-quadrature constellation

Figures 10(a)ndash10(c) show the eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the received 16-QAMbaseband signals forMIMO

1

MIMO2 and MIMO

3 respectively Also Figures 11(a)ndash11(c)

show the eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the received 16-QAM baseband signals for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3

respectively The eye diagrams of both 119868-branch and 119876-branch of the received wireless MIMO signals at the receivershow slight differences and good quality communicationsystem at a BER around of 10minus9 The BER are calculatedaccording to (15) [22]

BER asymp

(1 minus 119876minus1)

log2119876

lowast 120576

120576 = erfc[

[

radic1

radic2

sdot3 sdot log

2119876

(1198762minus 1)

sdot2

(119896 sdot EVMrms)2sdot log2119872

]

]

119896 =

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909max1003816100381610038161003816

sum119872

119894=1(1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119894

1003816100381610038161003816 119872)

(15)

where 119876 is the number of signal levels within each branchof the constellation diagram log

2119872 is the amount of bits

encoded into one QAM symbol and 119896 is a modulationformat-dependent factor giving the relationship betweenmaximum field magnitude and average overall119872 field mag-nitudes defined by the constellation diagram for the chosenmodulation formatThis factor is calculated according to (15)

The Scientific World Journal 9

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6 minus4

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

(a)

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

Received optical power

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

(b)

Figure 6 The BER performance versus received optical power at the carrier frequencies (a) 24GHz and (b) 5GHz

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8

L = 20kmL = 30kmL = 50km

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

Received optical power

BER

Figure 7The system performance at different lengths of the opticalfiber

to be 6(radic5+2) for 16-QAMThe 119878119905119909119894

is the ideal transmittedfield vector and 119878

119905119909max is the field vector of the outermostconstellation point In this paper the performance of EVMand the BER is evaluated for the 16-QAM MIMO signalswithout using forward error correction (FEC) techniques

6 Transmission of More Wireless MIMOSignals over Optical Fiber

Figure 12 shows the proposed OFU technique to transmitfive wireless MIMO signals over fiber At the OLT the DAM

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

10minus20

10minus18

10minus16

10minus14

10minus12

10minus10

10minus8

10minus6

10minus4

10minus2

100

BER

Δf = 15GHzΔf = 25GHzΔf = 50GHz

Figure 8 The system performance at different wavelength inter-leaves

is injected by LD with the wavelength 120582119889 The DAM is a

LN-MZM Adjusting the parameters of the DAM to suitablevalues can generate multiple wavelengths The dominantwavelengths are considered and the remaining outside wave-lengths are neglected because of their very small magnitudesThe OLT allocates five downlink wavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893

1205821198894 and 120582

1198895) which are used for downstream modulation

To generate five dominant wavelengths the values of DAMparameters are configured as minus05 V 05 V DC bias voltagesare applied to respectively first and second arms of theLN-MZM the RF clock voltage with frequency of 119891

119900drives

10 The Scientific World Journal

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(a)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)(b)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(c)

Figure 9 Constellation diagrams of the demodulated 16-QAMMIMO signals (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

to the DAM and the DC and RF switching voltages areset to 4V and 2V respectively The wavelength interleavesbetween the five generatedwavelengthswhich are equal to thefrequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900 The power magnitudes

of the fivewavelengths are approximately equal and the centerwavelength 120582

1198893has maximum value The difference between

this and the others is around 6 dB To get balanced powermagnitudes an optical attenuator is used in path of the centerwavelength after IL as shown in Figure 12 Each generatedwavelengthmodulates theMIMO signal by using IMThefive

modulated optical signals propagate along the same opticalfiber

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into the five modulated optical signals withthe wavelength 120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893 1205821198894 and 120582

1198895as shown in

Figure 12The receiver then downconverts the fivemodulatedoptical signals directly to the suitable electrical signals byusing an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signalsare then band-pass filtered according to the allocated RFcarrier frequency 119891

119888by using BPFs to get the original five

The Scientific World Journal 11

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 10 Eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

wireless MIMO signals MIMO1 MIMO

2 MIMO

3 MIMO

4

and MIMO5

7 Conclusions

The novel OFU technique is proposed to solve the problemof wireless MIMO signals transmission over a single opticalfiberThree wireless 16-QAMMIMO signals have been trans-mitted over a 20 km SMF using the OFU technique Thesewireless MIMO signals were modulated using the carrier

frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz at data rate of 1 Gbs for eachsignal The physical layer performance has been reported interms of the BER at different RF carrier frequencies differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves Inaddition the EVM and the eye diagrams are analyzed in thisstudy

The proposed approach highly suppressed the crosstalkbetween different MIMO signals with the same RF carrierfrequency since each MIMO signal is carried on a spe-cific optical wavelength While the ESSB-FT technique [10]

12 The Scientific World Journal

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 11 Eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

requires a number of low-frequency LOs and electrical BPFsat the transmitter and the receiver the OFU technique doesnot require low-frequency LOs at the transmitter and thereceiver or electrical BPFs at the transmitter Less numberof electrical BPFs is required at the receiver in the proposedtechnique However a number of PDs are required at thereceiver which is equal to the number of MIMO signals Theproposed system supports many wavelengths for carrying

multiple wireless MIMO signals over the fiber using singleLD The novel technique provides a spectral efficient andreliable FiWi system

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 8: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

8 The Scientific World Journal

Launched optical power (dBm)0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

BER

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

24GHz 16QAM50GHz 16QAM

Figure 5 The fiber nonlinearity effect on the system performance

The wireless end-user will receive the three MIMO signalsand demodulate them using the suitable QAMdemodulationand MIMO decoding techniques

5 System Performance Evaluation

In this work the communication system is designed toprovide a data rate of 1 Gbs for each 16-QAMwirelessMIMOsignal Figure 3 in the inset (vi) shows the input opticalpower to the optical fiber where the three modulated opticalsignals with the downlink wavelengths 120582

1198891 1205821198892 and 120582

1198893

are coupled to propagate through 20 km optical fiber Thetotal input power of the three optical signals is 1626 dBmaccording to the simulation calculations for both RF carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHzThis power is suitable to belaunched to avoid the nonlinear effects along the optical linkFigure 5 shows the system performance at different launchedoptical powers Nonlinearity of the fiber negatively affects thesystem performance when the launched optical powers aregreater than 108 dBm and 79 dBm at the carrier frequenciesof 24GHz and 50GHz respectively

To evaluate the performance of the proposed techniqueFigures 6(a) and 6(b) show the BER performance versus thereceived optical power at the receiver for the three wirelessMIMO signals (MIMO

1 MIMO

2 andMIMO

3) at the carrier

frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz respectively The powersensitivity differences of the receivers for the three MIMOsignals are small especially between the two MIMO signals(MIMO

1and MIMO

2) The maximum power penalties of

347 dB and 4 dB are recorded at BER of 10minus9 for the carrierfrequencies of 24GHz and 5GHz receptively

Figure 7 shows the system performance at three differentfiber lengths (20 km 30 km and 50 km) of the optical fiber Inthe proposed system the fiber length of 50 kmhas slight effecton the performance of the transmitted optical signals whichcarry the wireless MIMO signals The system performance

deteriorates progressively when the access distance becomeslonger than 50 km

In addition the system performance is analyzed by usingdifferent wavelength interleaves between the optical carrierfrequency (or RF clock frequency 119891

119900) Figure 8 shows the

systemperformance at differentwavelength interleaves (Δ119891 =

15 25 and 50GHz which are compatible with Δ120582 = 01202 and 04 nm resp) When the wavelength interleaves aresmaller than 15GHz the system performance will degradeand the error floor clearly appears

Figures 9(a)ndash9(c) show 1Gbs 16-QAM constellationdiagrams for the received MIMO signals MIMO

1 MIMO

2

and MIMO3 respectively at 24GHz Clear scatter-plots are

achieved at EVM values of minus208780 dB minus202873 dB andminus212961 dB for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3 respectively

So the proposed technique has achieved a good performanceof transmitting wireless MIMO signals over the optical fiberat the carrier frequencies 24GHz and 5GHz The EVMs arecalculated considering the following equation [21]

EVM (dB) = 10 sdot log10[sum119872

119896=1

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119896 minus 119878119903119909119896

1003816100381610038161003816

2

sum119872

119896=1

10038161003816100381610038161198781199051199091198961003816100381610038161003816

2] (14)

where EVM is the value of the difference between a collectionof received symbols and transmitted or ideal symbols 119878

119905119909119896

is the corresponding transmitted symbol of the constellationassociated with the 119896th symbol 119878

119903119909119896is the received symbol

associated with 119878119905119909119896

and119872 is the number of the symbols forthe inphase-quadrature constellation

Figures 10(a)ndash10(c) show the eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the received 16-QAMbaseband signals forMIMO

1

MIMO2 and MIMO

3 respectively Also Figures 11(a)ndash11(c)

show the eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the received 16-QAM baseband signals for MIMO

1 MIMO

2 and MIMO

3

respectively The eye diagrams of both 119868-branch and 119876-branch of the received wireless MIMO signals at the receivershow slight differences and good quality communicationsystem at a BER around of 10minus9 The BER are calculatedaccording to (15) [22]

BER asymp

(1 minus 119876minus1)

log2119876

lowast 120576

120576 = erfc[

[

radic1

radic2

sdot3 sdot log

2119876

(1198762minus 1)

sdot2

(119896 sdot EVMrms)2sdot log2119872

]

]

119896 =

1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909max1003816100381610038161003816

sum119872

119894=1(1003816100381610038161003816119878119905119909119894

1003816100381610038161003816 119872)

(15)

where 119876 is the number of signal levels within each branchof the constellation diagram log

2119872 is the amount of bits

encoded into one QAM symbol and 119896 is a modulationformat-dependent factor giving the relationship betweenmaximum field magnitude and average overall119872 field mag-nitudes defined by the constellation diagram for the chosenmodulation formatThis factor is calculated according to (15)

The Scientific World Journal 9

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6 minus4

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

(a)

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

Received optical power

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

(b)

Figure 6 The BER performance versus received optical power at the carrier frequencies (a) 24GHz and (b) 5GHz

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8

L = 20kmL = 30kmL = 50km

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

Received optical power

BER

Figure 7The system performance at different lengths of the opticalfiber

to be 6(radic5+2) for 16-QAMThe 119878119905119909119894

is the ideal transmittedfield vector and 119878

119905119909max is the field vector of the outermostconstellation point In this paper the performance of EVMand the BER is evaluated for the 16-QAM MIMO signalswithout using forward error correction (FEC) techniques

6 Transmission of More Wireless MIMOSignals over Optical Fiber

Figure 12 shows the proposed OFU technique to transmitfive wireless MIMO signals over fiber At the OLT the DAM

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

10minus20

10minus18

10minus16

10minus14

10minus12

10minus10

10minus8

10minus6

10minus4

10minus2

100

BER

Δf = 15GHzΔf = 25GHzΔf = 50GHz

Figure 8 The system performance at different wavelength inter-leaves

is injected by LD with the wavelength 120582119889 The DAM is a

LN-MZM Adjusting the parameters of the DAM to suitablevalues can generate multiple wavelengths The dominantwavelengths are considered and the remaining outside wave-lengths are neglected because of their very small magnitudesThe OLT allocates five downlink wavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893

1205821198894 and 120582

1198895) which are used for downstream modulation

To generate five dominant wavelengths the values of DAMparameters are configured as minus05 V 05 V DC bias voltagesare applied to respectively first and second arms of theLN-MZM the RF clock voltage with frequency of 119891

119900drives

10 The Scientific World Journal

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(a)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)(b)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(c)

Figure 9 Constellation diagrams of the demodulated 16-QAMMIMO signals (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

to the DAM and the DC and RF switching voltages areset to 4V and 2V respectively The wavelength interleavesbetween the five generatedwavelengthswhich are equal to thefrequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900 The power magnitudes

of the fivewavelengths are approximately equal and the centerwavelength 120582

1198893has maximum value The difference between

this and the others is around 6 dB To get balanced powermagnitudes an optical attenuator is used in path of the centerwavelength after IL as shown in Figure 12 Each generatedwavelengthmodulates theMIMO signal by using IMThefive

modulated optical signals propagate along the same opticalfiber

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into the five modulated optical signals withthe wavelength 120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893 1205821198894 and 120582

1198895as shown in

Figure 12The receiver then downconverts the fivemodulatedoptical signals directly to the suitable electrical signals byusing an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signalsare then band-pass filtered according to the allocated RFcarrier frequency 119891

119888by using BPFs to get the original five

The Scientific World Journal 11

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 10 Eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

wireless MIMO signals MIMO1 MIMO

2 MIMO

3 MIMO

4

and MIMO5

7 Conclusions

The novel OFU technique is proposed to solve the problemof wireless MIMO signals transmission over a single opticalfiberThree wireless 16-QAMMIMO signals have been trans-mitted over a 20 km SMF using the OFU technique Thesewireless MIMO signals were modulated using the carrier

frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz at data rate of 1 Gbs for eachsignal The physical layer performance has been reported interms of the BER at different RF carrier frequencies differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves Inaddition the EVM and the eye diagrams are analyzed in thisstudy

The proposed approach highly suppressed the crosstalkbetween different MIMO signals with the same RF carrierfrequency since each MIMO signal is carried on a spe-cific optical wavelength While the ESSB-FT technique [10]

12 The Scientific World Journal

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 11 Eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

requires a number of low-frequency LOs and electrical BPFsat the transmitter and the receiver the OFU technique doesnot require low-frequency LOs at the transmitter and thereceiver or electrical BPFs at the transmitter Less numberof electrical BPFs is required at the receiver in the proposedtechnique However a number of PDs are required at thereceiver which is equal to the number of MIMO signals Theproposed system supports many wavelengths for carrying

multiple wireless MIMO signals over the fiber using singleLD The novel technique provides a spectral efficient andreliable FiWi system

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 9: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

The Scientific World Journal 9

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6 minus4

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

(a)

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

Received optical power

BER

1e minus 15

1e minus 10

1e minus 5

1e + 0

(b)

Figure 6 The BER performance versus received optical power at the carrier frequencies (a) 24GHz and (b) 5GHz

minus22 minus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8

L = 20kmL = 30kmL = 50km

100

10minus2

10minus4

10minus6

10minus8

10minus10

10minus12

10minus14

10minus16

10minus18

10minus20

Received optical power

BER

Figure 7The system performance at different lengths of the opticalfiber

to be 6(radic5+2) for 16-QAMThe 119878119905119909119894

is the ideal transmittedfield vector and 119878

119905119909max is the field vector of the outermostconstellation point In this paper the performance of EVMand the BER is evaluated for the 16-QAM MIMO signalswithout using forward error correction (FEC) techniques

6 Transmission of More Wireless MIMOSignals over Optical Fiber

Figure 12 shows the proposed OFU technique to transmitfive wireless MIMO signals over fiber At the OLT the DAM

Received optical powerminus20 minus18 minus16 minus14 minus12 minus10 minus8 minus6

10minus20

10minus18

10minus16

10minus14

10minus12

10minus10

10minus8

10minus6

10minus4

10minus2

100

BER

Δf = 15GHzΔf = 25GHzΔf = 50GHz

Figure 8 The system performance at different wavelength inter-leaves

is injected by LD with the wavelength 120582119889 The DAM is a

LN-MZM Adjusting the parameters of the DAM to suitablevalues can generate multiple wavelengths The dominantwavelengths are considered and the remaining outside wave-lengths are neglected because of their very small magnitudesThe OLT allocates five downlink wavelengths (120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893

1205821198894 and 120582

1198895) which are used for downstream modulation

To generate five dominant wavelengths the values of DAMparameters are configured as minus05 V 05 V DC bias voltagesare applied to respectively first and second arms of theLN-MZM the RF clock voltage with frequency of 119891

119900drives

10 The Scientific World Journal

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(a)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)(b)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(c)

Figure 9 Constellation diagrams of the demodulated 16-QAMMIMO signals (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

to the DAM and the DC and RF switching voltages areset to 4V and 2V respectively The wavelength interleavesbetween the five generatedwavelengthswhich are equal to thefrequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900 The power magnitudes

of the fivewavelengths are approximately equal and the centerwavelength 120582

1198893has maximum value The difference between

this and the others is around 6 dB To get balanced powermagnitudes an optical attenuator is used in path of the centerwavelength after IL as shown in Figure 12 Each generatedwavelengthmodulates theMIMO signal by using IMThefive

modulated optical signals propagate along the same opticalfiber

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into the five modulated optical signals withthe wavelength 120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893 1205821198894 and 120582

1198895as shown in

Figure 12The receiver then downconverts the fivemodulatedoptical signals directly to the suitable electrical signals byusing an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signalsare then band-pass filtered according to the allocated RFcarrier frequency 119891

119888by using BPFs to get the original five

The Scientific World Journal 11

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 10 Eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

wireless MIMO signals MIMO1 MIMO

2 MIMO

3 MIMO

4

and MIMO5

7 Conclusions

The novel OFU technique is proposed to solve the problemof wireless MIMO signals transmission over a single opticalfiberThree wireless 16-QAMMIMO signals have been trans-mitted over a 20 km SMF using the OFU technique Thesewireless MIMO signals were modulated using the carrier

frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz at data rate of 1 Gbs for eachsignal The physical layer performance has been reported interms of the BER at different RF carrier frequencies differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves Inaddition the EVM and the eye diagrams are analyzed in thisstudy

The proposed approach highly suppressed the crosstalkbetween different MIMO signals with the same RF carrierfrequency since each MIMO signal is carried on a spe-cific optical wavelength While the ESSB-FT technique [10]

12 The Scientific World Journal

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 11 Eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

requires a number of low-frequency LOs and electrical BPFsat the transmitter and the receiver the OFU technique doesnot require low-frequency LOs at the transmitter and thereceiver or electrical BPFs at the transmitter Less numberof electrical BPFs is required at the receiver in the proposedtechnique However a number of PDs are required at thereceiver which is equal to the number of MIMO signals Theproposed system supports many wavelengths for carrying

multiple wireless MIMO signals over the fiber using singleLD The novel technique provides a spectral efficient andreliable FiWi system

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 10: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

10 The Scientific World Journal

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(a)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)(b)

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

minus20m minus10m 0 10m 20mAmplitude-I (au)

Am

plitu

de-Q

(au

)

(c)

Figure 9 Constellation diagrams of the demodulated 16-QAMMIMO signals (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

to the DAM and the DC and RF switching voltages areset to 4V and 2V respectively The wavelength interleavesbetween the five generatedwavelengthswhich are equal to thefrequency of the sinusoidal clock 119891

119900 The power magnitudes

of the fivewavelengths are approximately equal and the centerwavelength 120582

1198893has maximum value The difference between

this and the others is around 6 dB To get balanced powermagnitudes an optical attenuator is used in path of the centerwavelength after IL as shown in Figure 12 Each generatedwavelengthmodulates theMIMO signal by using IMThefive

modulated optical signals propagate along the same opticalfiber

The receiver receives the optical downstream and theninterleaves it into the five modulated optical signals withthe wavelength 120582

1198891 1205821198892 1205821198893 1205821198894 and 120582

1198895as shown in

Figure 12The receiver then downconverts the fivemodulatedoptical signals directly to the suitable electrical signals byusing an optical receiver for each signalThe electrical signalsare then band-pass filtered according to the allocated RFcarrier frequency 119891

119888by using BPFs to get the original five

The Scientific World Journal 11

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 10 Eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

wireless MIMO signals MIMO1 MIMO

2 MIMO

3 MIMO

4

and MIMO5

7 Conclusions

The novel OFU technique is proposed to solve the problemof wireless MIMO signals transmission over a single opticalfiberThree wireless 16-QAMMIMO signals have been trans-mitted over a 20 km SMF using the OFU technique Thesewireless MIMO signals were modulated using the carrier

frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz at data rate of 1 Gbs for eachsignal The physical layer performance has been reported interms of the BER at different RF carrier frequencies differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves Inaddition the EVM and the eye diagrams are analyzed in thisstudy

The proposed approach highly suppressed the crosstalkbetween different MIMO signals with the same RF carrierfrequency since each MIMO signal is carried on a spe-cific optical wavelength While the ESSB-FT technique [10]

12 The Scientific World Journal

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 11 Eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

requires a number of low-frequency LOs and electrical BPFsat the transmitter and the receiver the OFU technique doesnot require low-frequency LOs at the transmitter and thereceiver or electrical BPFs at the transmitter Less numberof electrical BPFs is required at the receiver in the proposedtechnique However a number of PDs are required at thereceiver which is equal to the number of MIMO signals Theproposed system supports many wavelengths for carrying

multiple wireless MIMO signals over the fiber using singleLD The novel technique provides a spectral efficient andreliable FiWi system

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 11: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

The Scientific World Journal 11

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 10 Eye diagrams of the 119868-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

wireless MIMO signals MIMO1 MIMO

2 MIMO

3 MIMO

4

and MIMO5

7 Conclusions

The novel OFU technique is proposed to solve the problemof wireless MIMO signals transmission over a single opticalfiberThree wireless 16-QAMMIMO signals have been trans-mitted over a 20 km SMF using the OFU technique Thesewireless MIMO signals were modulated using the carrier

frequency of 24GHz or 5GHz at data rate of 1 Gbs for eachsignal The physical layer performance has been reported interms of the BER at different RF carrier frequencies differentaccess distances and different wavelength interleaves Inaddition the EVM and the eye diagrams are analyzed in thisstudy

The proposed approach highly suppressed the crosstalkbetween different MIMO signals with the same RF carrierfrequency since each MIMO signal is carried on a spe-cific optical wavelength While the ESSB-FT technique [10]

12 The Scientific World Journal

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 11 Eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

requires a number of low-frequency LOs and electrical BPFsat the transmitter and the receiver the OFU technique doesnot require low-frequency LOs at the transmitter and thereceiver or electrical BPFs at the transmitter Less numberof electrical BPFs is required at the receiver in the proposedtechnique However a number of PDs are required at thereceiver which is equal to the number of MIMO signals Theproposed system supports many wavelengths for carrying

multiple wireless MIMO signals over the fiber using singleLD The novel technique provides a spectral efficient andreliable FiWi system

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 12: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

12 The Scientific World Journal

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(a)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(b)

0 05 1

minus20m

minus10m

0

10m

20m

Am

plitu

de (a

u)

0 05 1

Time (bit period)

(c)

Figure 11 Eye diagrams of the 119876-branch of the demodulated 16 QAM baseband signals for (a) MIMO1 (b) MIMO

2 and (c) MIMO

3

requires a number of low-frequency LOs and electrical BPFsat the transmitter and the receiver the OFU technique doesnot require low-frequency LOs at the transmitter and thereceiver or electrical BPFs at the transmitter Less numberof electrical BPFs is required at the receiver in the proposedtechnique However a number of PDs are required at thereceiver which is equal to the number of MIMO signals Theproposed system supports many wavelengths for carrying

multiple wireless MIMO signals over the fiber using singleLD The novel technique provides a spectral efficient andreliable FiWi system

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 13: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

The Scientific World Journal 13

IM

IM

IM

IM

IM

DAM

fo

120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

Transmitter

120582d

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

MIMO1

MIMO2

MIMO3

MIMO4

MIMO5

120582d1

120582d2

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias

AWG

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

RF amplifier

fc

fc

fc

fc

fc

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalreceiver

Opticalfiber

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

BPF

IL

IL

Receiver

LD 120582d3

120582d4

120582d5

120582d1

120582d2

Optical attenuator

+

+

+

+

+minus70

minus50

minus30

minus10

0

minus20

minus40

minus60

1929T 193T 1931T 1932T 1933T

Pow

er (d

Bm)

Frequency (Hz)

Figure 12 Transmission of five wireless MIMO signals over fiber using the novel approach

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) under the Postdoctoral fellowship scheme Theauthors greatly appreciate UTM and Photonics ResearchLaboratory for providing the facilities which enabled themto accomplish this work They would also like to thank theMinistry of Science Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)Malaysia for sponsoring this work under Project vote no73720

References

[1] L Kazovsky S-W Wong T Ayhan K M Albeyoglu MR N Ribeiro and A Shastri ldquoHybrid optical-wireless accessnetworksrdquo Proceedings of the IEEE vol 100 no 5 pp 1197ndash12252012

[2] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad and AM Al-hetar ldquoAnalysisof physical layer performance of hybrid optical-wireless accessnetworkrdquo Optics Communications vol 284 no 20 pp 4894ndash4899 2011

[3] R Q Shaddad A Bakar Mohammad and A M Al-hetar ldquoPer-formance evaluation for optical backhaul andwireless front-endin hybrid optical-wireless access networkrdquo Optoelectronics andAdvanced Materials Rapid Communications vol 5 no 4 pp376ndash380 2011

[4] C Lim A Nirmalathas M Bakaul et al ldquoFiber-wirelessnetworks and subsystem technologiesrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 4 pp 390ndash405 2010

[5] A Nirmalathas P A Gamage C Lim D Novak and RWaterhouse ldquoDigitized radio-over-fiber technologies for con-verged optical wireless access networkrdquo Journal of LightwaveTechnology vol 28 no 16 pp 2366ndash2375 2010

[6] Z Jia J Yu G Ellinas and G-K Chang ldquoKey enablingtechnologies for optical wireless networks optical millimeter-wave generation wavelength reuse and architecturerdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3452ndash3471 2007

[7] A Zelst ldquoSystem for transporting multiple radio frequencysignals of a multiple input multiple output wireless communi-cation system tofrom a central processing base stationrdquo USpatent application 20040017785A1 2004

[8] I Seto H Shoki and S Ohshima ldquoOptical subcarrier mul-tiplexing transmission for base station with adaptive arrayantennardquo IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-niques vol 49 no 10 pp 2036ndash2041 2001

[9] C-P Liu and A Seeds ldquoTransmission of MIMO radio signalsover fibre using a novel phase quadrature double sidebandfrequency translation techniquerdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEInternational Meeting on Microwave Photonics Jointly Held withthe Asia-Pacific Microwave Photonics Conference pp 23ndash26Gold Coast Australia October 2008

[10] C-P Liu and A J Seeds ldquoTransmission of wireless MIMO-type signals over a single optical fiber without WDMrdquo IEEETransactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques vol 58 no11 pp 3094ndash3102 2010

[11] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgailani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overoptical fiberrdquo in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferenceon Photonics (ICP rsquo12) Penang Malaysia 2012

[12] R Shaddad A Mohammad and A Al-hetar ldquoSpectral efficienthybrid wireless optical broadband access network (WOBAN)based on transmission of wireless MIMO OFDM signals overWDM PONrdquo Optics Communications vol 285 no 20 pp4059ndash4067 2012

[13] K Shimizu T Horiguchi and Y Koyamada ldquoFrequency trans-lation of light waves by propagation around an optical ringcircuit containing a frequency shifter 1 Experimentrdquo AppliedOptics vol 32 pp 6718ndash6726 1993

[14] E L Wooten K M Kissa A Yi-Yan et al ldquoA review of lithiumniobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systemsrdquoIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics vol 6no 1 pp 69ndash82 2000

[15] P Yao R Shireen J Macario C A Schuctz S Shi and D WPrather ldquoDesign fabrication and characterization of LiNbO

3

optical modulator for high-sensitivity mmW imaging systemrdquoin Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology XI vol 6948 ofProceedings of SPIE March 2008

[16] R Q Shaddad A B Mohammad A M Al-hetar and S AAlgeelani ldquoA novel optical single-sideband frequency transla-tion technique for transmission of wireless MIMO signals overfiber-wireless systemrdquo Optics amp Laser Technology vol 47 pp347ndash354 2013

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 14: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

14 The Scientific World Journal

[17] J C Cartledge ldquoPerformance of 10Gbs lightwave systemsbased on lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulators withasymmetric Y-branch waveguidesrdquo IEEE Photonics TechnologyLetters vol 7 no 9 pp 1090ndash1092 1995

[18] J Ma J Yu C Yu X Xin J Zeng and L Chen ldquoFiberdispersion influence on transmission of the optical millimeter-waves generated using LN-MZM intensitymodulationrdquo Journalof Lightwave Technology vol 25 no 11 pp 3244ndash3256 2007

[19] A Cuyt V B Petersen B Verdonk H Waadeland and W BJones Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special FunctionsSpringer Berlin Germany 2008

[20] J Ma L Chen X Xin et al ldquoTransmission of a 40GHzoptical millimeter wave generated by quadrupling a 10GHzlocal oscillator via a Mach-Zehnder modulatorrdquo Journal ofOptics A Pure and Applied Optics vol 11 no 6 pp 1ndash7 2009

[21] A Moscoso-Martir I Molina-Fernandez and A Ortega-Monux ldquoSignal constellation distortion and BER degradationdue to hardware impairments in six-port receivers with analogIQ generationrdquo Progress in Electromagnetics Research vol 121pp 225ndash247 2011

[22] D Hillerkuss R Schmogrow T Schellinger et al ldquo26 Tbit sminus1line-rate super-channel transmission utilizing all-optical fastFourier transform processingrdquo Nature Photonics vol 5 no 6pp 364ndash371 2011

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of

Page 15: Research Article Optical Frequency Upconversion …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/170471.pdfOptical Frequency Upconversion Technique for Transmission of Wireless MIMO-Type

International Journal of

AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

RoboticsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Active and Passive Electronic Components

Control Scienceand Engineering

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

International Journal of

RotatingMachinery

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014

Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom

VLSI Design

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Shock and Vibration

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Civil EngineeringAdvances in

Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Journal of

Advances inOptoElectronics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom

Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

SensorsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and

Propagation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

Navigation and Observation

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014

DistributedSensor Networks

International Journal of


Recommended