John TomblinWaruna Seneviratne
Paulo EscobarYoon-Khian Yap
Pierre Harter
National Institute for Aviation Research
Wichita State University
Nx
Nx
Ny
Ny
NxyNxy
NxyNxy
FAA Workshop on Key Characteristics for Advanced Material Control
September 16 – 18, 2003
RESEARCH / DESIGN / TESTING / CERTIFICATION
Adhesive Behavior in Aircraft ApplicationsAdhesive Behavior in Aircraft Applications
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Program Overview• Coupon Level Testing
– Investigation of Thick Bondline Adhesive Joints• Adhesive test methods• Bondline thickness effects• Environmental effects
[FAA Report: DOT/FAA/AR-01/33]– Characteristic Shear Responses of Structural Adhesives
[FAA Report: DOT/FAA/AR-02/97]– Fatigue & Stress Relaxation of Adhesive Joints
[FAA Report: Submitted to FAA]
• Subcomponent Testing & Analysis– Box Beam Torsion Lap Shear Test– Shear Loaded Bonded Joint (SLBJ) Theory [Purdue University]
[FAA Report: DOT/FAA/AR-03/21]
Available electronically at http://actlibrary.tc.faa.gov
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Research Effort
Industry Partners
Funded byFAA
Partnered withPurdue University
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Motivation
• Number of certification programs involve a large range of adhesive bonding applications
• Migration from secondary to primary structure
• Limited guidance material existed• Limited experimental analytical
models that can be effectively used in design
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Motivation (contd..)
• Traditional bondline thicknesses used : less than 0.010”
• Current bondline thicknesses : up to 0.140”
• Generate data regarding the effects of thick bondlines
• Long term durability of adhesive joint (fatigue/creep) needs to be addressed with respect to thick bondline joints
A
A
Section A-A
CloseoutBonded toSpar Caps
Pinned JointsThrough Spar
WebWing Skin BondedDirectly to Spar Caps
Bending andTorsion Loads
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Adhesive Test Methods
0.0
1000.0
2000.0
3000.0
4000.0
5000.0
6000.0
7000.0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
Average bondline thickness (in)
App
aren
t She
ar S
tren
gth
(psi
)
ASTM D1002ASTM D3165ASTM D5656
Adhesive/Cohesive
Adhesive Adhesive
Adhesive/Cohesive
• ASTM D1002 & D3165 for joint characterization• ASTM D5656 for adhesive characterization
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
ASTM D5656 Test Method
• Thick adherend– Adhesive characterization
rather than Jointcharacterization
– Elastic Limit & Plastic Strain– Design & Analysis– Reduced peel stresses
• Correction for metal deformation
• Four-Pin Configuration– Reduces errors due to rotation
and slippage– Reduced scatter in data
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Failure Modes
ASTM D5656
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Bondline Thickness Effects
• Increasing bondline thickness resulted in reduced plastic strain and lower yield stress
PTM&W ES6292Bondline Thickness
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45
Shear Strain
Shea
r Str
ess
t = 0.013 int = 0.043 int = 0.083 int = 0.123 in
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Environmental Effects
• Yield stress and stiffness decreased with increasing temperature and humidity
• Environmental condition affects failure mode
MGS A100/B100
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8Shear Strain
She
ar S
tress
(psi
)
CTD
RTD
ETD 160°
ETW 160°
ETD 200°
ETW 200°
Bondline Thickness = 0.013" nom.Tg (dry) = 175°FTg (wet) = 135°F
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Characteristic Shear Responses of Structural Adhesives
• 18 Adhesive Types– 6 Film Adhesives– 12 Paste Adhesives
• ASTM D5656 [4 pin holes]• Three Environmental
Conditions– Room Temp. ambient [RTD]– Elevated Temp. (180°F) dry [ETD]– Elevated Temp. (180°F) wet [ETW]
• 145 °F and 85% relative humidity for 1000 hrs
• Bondline Thickness– Film Adhesives: 0.01” – 0.03”– Paste Adhesives: 0.03” – 0.05”
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Adhesive Types Investigated
Film Adhesives (6)– AF 126– EA 9628– EA 9695– EA 9696– FM 300– FM 73
Paste Adhesives (12)– EA 9309.3 NA– EA 9346.5– EA 9359.3– EA 9360– EA 9392– EA 9394– EA 9396– MGS L418– PTM&W ES 6292– 3M DP-460 EG– 3M DP-460 NS– 3M DP-820
Adhesives & Aluminum sub-panels (Phosphoric Anodized) were provided by Cessna Aircraft, Wichita, KS
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Apparent Shear Strength Comparison
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AF 126
AF 126
EA 9628
EA 9628
EA 9695
EA 9695
EA 9696
FM 300
FM 300
FM 73
FM 73
Film Adhesive
She
ar S
treng
th (k
si)
RTDETDETW
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
EA 9309.3
NA
EA 9346
.5EA 93
59.3
EA 9359.3
EA 9360
EA 9360
EA 9360
EA 9392
EA 9392
EA 9394
EA 9396
MGS L418
PTM&W
ES 62
923M
DP-46
0 EG
3M D
P-460 N
S3M D
P-820
Paste Adhesive
She
ar S
treng
th (k
si)
RTDETDETW
Film Adhesive
Paste Adhesive
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Shear Modulus Comparison
0.00
0.03
0.05
0.08
0.10
0.13
0.15
0.18
0.20
AF 126
AF 126
EA 9628
EA 9628
EA 9695
EA 9695
EA 9696
FM 300
FM 300
FM 73
FM 73
Film Adhesive
Shea
r M
odul
us (M
si)
RTDETDETW
0.00
0.03
0.05
0.08
0.10
0.13
0.15
0.18
0.20
EA 9309
.3 NA
EA 9346.5
EA 9359
.3EA 93
59.3
EA 9360
EA 9360
EA 9360
EA 9392
EA 9392
EA 9394
EA 9396
MGS L418
PTM&W
ES 62
923M
DP-46
0 EG
3M D
P-460 N
S3M D
P-820
Paste Adhesive
She
ar M
odul
us (M
si)
RTDETDETW
Film Adhesive
Paste Adhesive
FAA Final Report: DOT/FAA/ARFAA Final Report: DOT/FAA/AR--02/9702/97
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Fatigue of Thick Bondline Adhesive Joints
Modified ASTM D3166-99[Aluminum Adherend of 0.375”]
• Three Adhesives– PTM&W [0.060” & 0.160”]– Loctite [0.032”]– EA9696 [0.02”]
• Three Stress Levels– 103, 104 and 105 cycles
• Three Frequencies– F=2 Hz, 5 Hz and 10 Hz
• Three Environmental Conditions
– RTD, RTW– CTD (-40°F)
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Stress Level Determination
Based on the initial SN Curve
y=-3.227*ln(x)+100.96
100000Cy SL1≈65% UL ≈183% LL10000Cy SL2≈72% UL ≈202% LL1000Cy SL3≈78% UL ≈220% LL
Note: For RTW and CTD, %UL are different
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000
Number of Cycles
% o
f Ulti
mat
e
Loctite (RTD)
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Loctite Stress Levels
Fatigue life in a range below knee point and above linear limit point.
Loctite RTD
0
10 0 0
2 0 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 .3 0 . 4 0 .5 0 . 6
S h e a r S t ra in (in / in )
2 3 0 6 p s i2 117 p s i19 18 p s i
Lin e a r Limit Lo a d
3 9 3 lb s (1 04 8 p si)
Loctite CTD
0
10 0 0
2 0 0 0
3 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
5 0 0 0
6 0 0 0
0 0 .1 0 .2 0 .3 0 .4 0 .5 0 .6
S h e a r S t ra in (in /in )
Lin e a r Lim it Lo a d5 7 6 lb s (15 3 6 p s i)
3 3 7 9 p s i3 10 2 p s i2 8 10 p s i
Loctite RTW
0
5 0 0
10 0 0
15 0 0
2 0 0 0
2 5 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 0 .1 0 .2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 .6
S h e a r S t ra in (in /in )
Lin e a r Lim it Lo ad2 2 5 lb s (6 0 0 p s i)
13 2 4 p s i12 15 p s i110 1 p s i
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Fatigue Behavior of Adhesives
2 Hz 5 Hz 10 Hz
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 10000000
Number of Cycles
% o
f Ult
imat
e
RTDRTWCTD
SL1
SL1
SL1
SL2
SL2
SL2
SL3
SL3
SL3
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 10000000Number of Cycles
% o
f Ult
imat
e
RTDRTWCTD
SL1
SL1
SL1
SL2
SL2
SL2
SL3
SL3
SL3
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 10000000Number of Cycles
% o
f Ult
imat
e
RTDRTWCTD
SL1
SL1
SL1
SL2
SL2
SL2
SL3
SL3
SL3
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Stress Relaxation of Adhesive Joints
• Applied stress gradually decreases to a stable value over time • Elastic strain that appears during initial rapid loading is slowly
replaced by creep strain, with the total of the two being constant • Steady-state creep and linear viscoelastic material behavior
0t
σ
Ge ε’
G1 ε’
σ0
Δσ
G2 η2
σ
G1
ε
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Modified ALCOA Stressing Fixture
σ(t) = μ • 2 δ (t)
Calibration for each environmental condition
Test Results Format
δ
P
Load Cellδ
P
Load Cell
δ (t)
σ (t)
μ
δ (t)
σ (t)
μ
Time
σ
Time
σ
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Stress Level DeterminationSh
ear
Stre
ss
Shear Strain
25% YS
15% YS
10% YS
Test Temperatures
150°F
180°F
210°FYield Stress
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Creep Deformation
• Loctite– 25% YS– 180 °F– 167 hours
~18°[50X magnification]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Loctite Stress Relaxation Results
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000
Time (sec)
Stre
ss (p
si)
10% YS
15% YS
25% YS
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000
Time (sec)
Stre
ss (p
si)
25% YS
10% YS
15% YS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000
Time (sec)
Stre
ss (p
si)
10% YS
15% YS
25% YS
150 °F
180 °F
210 °F
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Box Beam Lap Shear Torsion Test
Load
Loading Plate
Side Plate (Inboard)
2½ Cylindrical Shaft
Fixed-end block
Side Plate (Outboard)
Pivot-end Base
Fixed-end Base
Joint Failure Prediction
Shear Loaded Bonded Joint
(SLBJ) Theory
non-linear constitute behavior
of adhesive
Box Beam Lap Shear Torsion
Testing
Validation
Design Guidelines & Certification
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Adhesive Lap Joint Specimen
Flat JointPTM&WEA9360Loctite
Joggle JointPTM&WEA9360
Gage width ~ 0.5”Gage section ~ 17.25”
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Materials
• Adhesives– PTM&W ES6292 [t = 0.05” ~ 0.20”]– EA 9360 [t = 0.10”]– Loctite (CESSNA Proprietary) [t = 0.05”]
• Adherend– NEWPORT E-Glass Fabric 7781 / NB321– NEWPORT NB321/3K70P Carbon Cloth
• Fiberglass/Carbon Layup Schedule – [04/45/-45/04]– Aluminum 2024-T3 Clad
• Phosphorus Anodized & Bond Primed[CESSNA Aircraft, Wichita, Kansas]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Maximum Shear Flow (Comparison)
Constitutive behavior for 0.20 was not available
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
Bondline Thickness (in)
Max
. She
ar F
low
(lbf
/in)
q-Experimentalq-SLBJ
ES6292 - Newport 7781FG
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
ConclusionsEnvironmental Effects• Adhesives become weak and ductile at high temperatures
and brittle at low temperatures. • Yield stress and modulus of all adhesives decrease with
increasing temperature and humidity • The plastic behavior of adhesives at elevated
temperatures caused significant shear deformation• Mechanical properties of adhesives can be substantially
degraded by the absorption of moisture • Environmental condition affects the failure mode as well
as the mechanical properties
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Conclusions (Contd..)
Fatigue• ‘High stress’ fatigue life of adhesive exists in a range
below Knee point and above linear limit point• Failure modes indicate that moisture affects adhesive
bulk instead of the adhesive-adherend interface (RTW cohesive failures)
• Observation – lower void in bondline = longer fatigue life
• Film adhesive indicates better resistance to moisture (less voids?)
Stress Relaxation• Stress relaxation was increased as the stress level and
temperature was increased
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AVIATION RESEARCH
Wichita State University
Conclusions (Contd…)
Box Beam Lap Shear Torsion• Load carrying capabilities of adhesive joints decreases as
bondline thickness increases• Purdue Analysis predictions (SLBJ Theory) comparable
with box beam test results• Increasing bondline thickness affects the failure mode of
bonded joints• Accumulation of large plastic strains in thin bondlines
resulted in high adherend interlaminar strains and caused substrate (first-ply) failure
• Unstable damage development of thick bondlines (lower plastic strain development) resulted in adhesive cracking in multiple locations with a cohesive type failure and lower failure strengths