Research & Development For Effective Avian Probiotics
Brian B. Oakley, Associate ProfessorMicrobial EcologyWestern Health Sciences UniversityCollege of Veterinary Medicine Pomona, CA
Poultry microbiology and its importance for nutrition and food safety
~ 9,000,000,000 broilers processed per yr in U.S.
~ 40,000,000 tons of feed per yr
Carbon footprint ~450,000,000,000 car miles yr-1
Major source of protein & foodborne illness
Microbiome of birds and production system as ‘super-organism’
Both Model and System
Renaissance of Microbial Ecology
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2015 1, 28-40DOI: (10.1016/j.jcmgh.2014.11.004) Copyright © 2015 The Authors
Renaissance of Microbial Ecology DNA sequencing costs are decreasing faster than
Moore’s law:
NGS Output
Pre-processed dataset
Reformat, parse, build data tables,
map OTUs to taxonomy
OTU/Taxonomy
Assignment
Statistical & Graphical summaries
>seq1 AACATCGTC>seq2 AACAGCCTA>seq3 AATATCGTA
UCLUST, USEARCHSILVA, PERL
R
mothur
seconds -minutes
PERL
PERL, QIIME
Bioinformatics gives the keys to the kingdom
seconds -minutes
Huse et al. 2007 Gen BiolQuince et al. 2009 Nat MetKunin et al. 2010 EM
Schloss et al. 2009 AEMOakley et al. 2012 ISMEJ
Pipeline built from generic building blocks
Last-generation Food Safety and Animal Health:
Oakley et al. 2012. DMID Rinttila et al. 2004. JAM
Pathogen detection and mitigation:
Next-generation management:
What do natural communities look like?
Why do pathogens persist?
Can we leverage this knowledge to displace pathogens and improve performance?
Can we manage the microbiota to achieve food safety and performance goals?
:
Community changes significantly as bird grows
Temporal differences > feed additives
What do natural communities look like?
Oakley et al. 2015 BMC Vet Res.
Degrees of Freedom
Sum of Squares
MeanSquares
F.Model
R2
Pr(>F)
Time
1
3.457
3.457
8.986
0.0912
0.0001
Treatment
3
1.137
0.379
0.985
0.0300
0.4935
Time:Treatment
3
1.019
0.340
0.883
0.0269
0.8455
Residuals
84
32.310
0.385
0.8520
Total
91
37.922
1.0000
Community changes significantly as bird grows
What do natural communities look like?
Oakley et al. 2015 BMC Vet Res.
Oakley and Kogut 2016
What do natural communities look like?
Cecum
Feces
Significant temporal and spatial differences
1 wk 3 wk 6 wk
What do natural communities look like?Significant temporal and spatial differences
Can we use recurring patterns to reconstitute a ‘normal flora’?
Oakley et al. 2015 BMC Vet Res.
What do natural communities look like?
Next-generation management:
What do natural communities look like?
Why do pathogens persist?
Can we leverage this knowledge to displace pathogens and improve performance?
Can we manage the microbiota to achieve food safety and performance goals?
:
• Analytical approach to explore taxon and metabolic pathway co-occurrence patterns
• Large NGS data set
• Allow inferences about physiology, ecological niche, and biotic interactions
• Networks reflect ecological relationships
Network Analysis
Network AnalysisOTU Level:
Network AnalysisOTU Level:
Can start to infer metabolic interdependencies, spatial and chemical niches…
Common themes of acetate consumption, butyrate production, oxic-anoxic interfaces,
Oakley et al. PLoS ONE 2013.
Why does Campylobacter persist? What is it’s ecological niche in the chicken??
Month Neg Pos1 2 42 8 43 2 84 10 65 2 96 3 17 6 48 5 39 2 3
10 2 211 2 312 2 3
GI microbiome of Campylobacter-positive versus negative birds
What is ecological niche of Campylobacter?
Significantly over-represented taxa (two examples):
P
Complex carbs
Oligosaccharides +ATP + NADH
Phosphoenolpyruvate + ATP + NADH
Low H2 High H2NADH -> NAD+ + H+ + 2e-
NADH + pyruvate -> ethanol, lactate, NAD+
Acetate
Butryrate
succinate
propionate
Major end products of fermentation by Alistipes, Rikenella
What is ecological niche of Campylobacter?
H2 sinks:
SRBs: H2 + SO42- -> H2S Acetogens: H2 + CO2 -> acetate Methanogens: H2 + CO2 -> CH4 Uptake hydrogenases (over-represented in
Campylobacter, Helicobacter, & Megamonas)
Sargeant et al. 2014, PLoSONE
What is ecological niche of Campylobacter?
Conclusion: Campylobacter may actually be mutualist, not commensal!
Next-generation management:
What do natural communities look like?
Why do pathogens persist?
Can we leverage this knowledge to displace pathogens and improve performance?
Can we manage the microbiota to achieve food safety and performance goals?
:
Next-generation management:
Des
ired
stat
e
What is required to traverse alternate stable states?
Timely challenge: Define desired state!!
…And understand why. Ditto for undesired.
LRFI HRFI
LRFI HRFI
Genetics vs. microflora
Reciprocal transplant of fecal material from adults to chicks:
Plus uninoculated controls...
Can we manage the microbiota?
FemalesGenetics vs. microflora
Can we manage the microbiota?
Early stage inoculum significantly improves weight gain
Can we manage the microbiota?
Early stage inoculum significantly improves feed efficiency
Can we manage the microbiota?
Different cecal communities at 6 weeks
Can we manage the microbiota?
Can FMT ‘lay the golden egg’?
14 d1 d
5x
• Community composition• Metagenome• Host Transcriptome• Immune response (M1 vs. M2)• AME• Pathogen load• Growth
FMT+
FMT-
Different cecal communities at 6 weeks
Strain Identification
Microbiome datasets are amenable to high-throughput data mining to identify potentially desirable & undesirable taxa.
Statistical associations of particular taxa with pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines…
Strain Identification
Oakley and Kogut 2016
Microbiome datasets can guide targeted cultivation of potentially novel strains from chicken G-I tract:
Novel strains shown in red genome sequenced April 2015
Strain Identification
Outer ring = consensus of cut sites
Fragment sizes and order reflect true arrangement in genome
Provides true barcode of genome
Provides template for assembly of genome sequence reads
Characterization of new isolates Genome Sequencing Optical Mapping
Strain characterization
CONCLUSIONS
Managing the microbiota can improve performance and food safety
Next-generation sequencing is a transformative tool
Proper management starts with understanding natural communities
‘Efficacy-first’ inversion of traditional strain-centric approach may be valuable
CONCLUSIONS
Food Animals = Tabula Rasa + Microbiome
Acknowledgements
USDA ARS Athens• Bruce Seal• Johnna Garrish• Mark Berrang• Nelson Cox• Eric Line• Jeff Buhr• Seung-Chul Yoon• Rick Meinersmann• Cesar Morales• Susan Brooks• Jessica Johnson (SCSU summer student)• Raja Chalghoumi (Fulbright fellow)
CDC Atlanta• Vladimir Loparev• Rebecca Lindsey
UGA• Sammy Aggrey• Steve Collett• Eldin Talundzic
SEPRL• Laszlo Zak• Michael Day
U.S. Poultry & Egg AssociationUSDA NIFA 1433 Formula FundsWesternU competitive Intramural
ARS College Station• Mike Kogut
Western University• Kris Irizzary• Yvonne Drechsler• Santiago Aguilar• Ella Richardson• Edith Martinez
Research & Development For Effective Avian ProbioticsSlide Number 2Slide Number 3Renaissance of Microbial Ecology Bioinformatics gives the keys to the kingdomLast-generation Food Safety and Animal Health:Next-generation management:Community changes significantly as bird growsCommunity changes significantly as bird growsSignificant temporal and spatial differencesSignificant temporal and spatial differencesSlide Number 12Next-generation management:Network AnalysisNetwork AnalysisNetwork AnalysisGI microbiome of Campylobacter-positive versus negative birdsWhat is ecological niche of Campylobacter?What is ecological niche of Campylobacter?What is ecological niche of Campylobacter?Next-generation management:Next-generation management:Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Can we manage the microbiota?Can we manage the microbiota?Can FMT ‘lay the golden egg’?Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Slide Number 31Slide Number 32CONCLUSIONSSlide Number 34Acknowledgements