Date post: | 19-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Reasons for writing a literature review
1. You need to know what is already known – reinventing the wheel
2. Learn from others mistakes and avoid them3. Learn about different theoretical and
methodological approaches4. Understand the context of the problem5. Understand the structure of the problem6. Help you develop your analytical framework7. Consider to include additional variables –
extend research8. Suggest future RQ’s9. Help with the interpretation of your findings10. Gives you pegs on which to hang your
findings11. Its expected!
A good literature review
1. Literature mentioned and discussed relates to the problem statement of the study
2. Mentions different theoretical ideas contributing to the future exploration or explanation of the study’s problem statement
3. Summarizes previous studies addressing and investigating the current study’s problem statement
4. Discusses the theoretical ideas mentioned against the background of the results of previous studies
5. Analyses and compares previous studies in the light of their research design and methodology
6. Demonstrates how the current study fits in with previous studies, and shows its specific new contribution
Narrative literature review
• Traditional• To generate
understanding rather than accumulating knowledge
• Evolving process• Suitable for inductive
studies
Read!
Keep notes
Generate New keywords
Note key words
Note referred literature
Search
Systematic literature review
Critique against narrative literature review– can lack a means for making sense of what
the collection of studies is saying – can be biased by the individual researcher – often lack rigor
• Not transparent• Not reproducible
– low emphasize on practitioners • The relevance gap• The language of practitioners
Systematic literature review• Planning the review
– Review Panel (Experts)– Review Protocol
• RQ• The population• The search strategy• Inclusion & exclusion
• Conducting the review– Identification of research– Selection of studies– Quality assessment– Data extraction– Data analysis
• Reporting and dissemination– Report and recommendations– Disseminating into practice
Systematic literature review• Planning the review
– Review Panel (Experts)– Review Protocol
• RQ• The population• the search strategy• Inclusion & exclusion
• Conducting the review– Identification of research– Selection of studies– Quality assessment– Data extraction– Data analysis
• Reporting and dissemination– Report and recommendations– Disseminating into practice
Critique• Depend on definitions• Bureaucratic process• Positivistic approach• Tricky to deal with
qualitative research
NotesReference Summary Type Theoretical
perspectiveMain RQ
Main conclusion
Research design
Empirical data
Good / Bad
Searching• Key words
– Save them!• Time dependent• Different meaning in different
discourses• US/UK
– AND, OR, NOT, *, ?, *,’xxx’• References
– Times cited– Authors
• Search engines & library– http://scholar.google.se/– EBSCO– www.ub.gu.se/
• Review papers– Academy of Management Review– International Journal of
Management Reviews
Discuss 2 and 2
Come up with a suggestion for at least 5 search terms for either a, b or c
After break write on boardMotivate your choices a) Who becomes an entrepreneur and what does
it take to be a successful one?b) What explains the difference in
internationalization strategies chosen by financial institutions in Europe?
c) How effective is impression management in the consultancy industry?
Source criticism
• Trustworthy source– Updated?
• Independent sources• Secondary sources
– The Chinese whisper game!• Motivation
– Why do they say this?
• Peer reviewed, academic, journals
• Trade journals• Books
Meta-analysis• Combining / Pooling of
quantitative studies• Emerged in psychotherapy
research in the 70ties Overall generalizations
• Positivistic• Allows for an increase in
power and thus based on a summary estimate of the effect size and its confidence interval, a certain intervention may be proved to be effective even if the individual studies lacked the power to show effectiveness (Ohlsson, 1994, p. 27)
Meta-ethnography
• Translate and interpretations of other researchers studies
• Translations between studies – what can I see in this? – Alternative interpretations– Higher order interpretations
• Synthesis and expressing (writing it up)
• Depends upon the richness in empirical material
Reading
1. Read abstract2. Skim through it!
1. Title, headings, chapters2. Check empirical evidence & kind
of method
3. Check the references 4. Read sub-headings
1. Figures, tables, pictures…
5. Skim through preface and introduction
6. Read conclusions, interesting chapters, last chapter
7. ….Everything else
Reading• Take notes• Nice position• Fresh and crisp air• Light• Use highlighting pens• Read & look at the text -Do not
‘sound out’ in your head -( no silent speech)
• Do not bother with trying to understand every word
• You actually reads sentences - Do not focus on every word
• Read with a ‘moving pen’ -Do not go back