+ All Categories
Home > Education > Research Week 2014: Connecting with the Community: Research and Community Engagement

Research Week 2014: Connecting with the Community: Research and Community Engagement

Date post: 16-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: wilfrid-laurier-university
View: 42 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
27
Connecting with the Community
Transcript

Connecting with the Community

• What is community-university research? • Why is this important to me (researcher)? • What works when doing CBR? • How do I connect with the community? • How do I fund CBR?

Agenda

What is community engaged research? • Community situated • Participatory • Action oriented

Goal: Research outcomes that address needs identified by the community

Background

• Community situated - begins with a research topic of practical relevance to the community (as opposed to individual scholars) and is carried out in community settings.

• Participatory - community members and researchers equitably share control of the research agenda through active and reciprocal involvement in the research design, implementation and dissemination.

• Action-oriented - the process and results are useful to community members in making positive social change and to promote social equity.

Background

Knowledge production

Knowledge mobilization

Community mobilization

Why community engaged scholarship? • Supporting the local community

• Academic research that is more reflective of NGO budgetary concerns

• Supporting your program of research • Peer-reviewed quality research using new data

sources and adaptable models • Connecting with Tri-Council principles

• SSHRC is looking for fruitful engagement with its partners in the academic, public, private and not-for-profit sectors.

Why?

• Academic Excellence means the strict adherence to a series of research rules that maintain standards of quality

• Community Relevance means the ability of research to take on problems that require a solution

Why us?

Reflective Action (e.g. Lewin): Ongoing cycles of planning, acting, & reflecting to imagine and pursue a new future together that is not pre-determined by past

Social Justice (e.g. Friere): Linking research and education, and conscientization in an emancipatory framework that advocates for equitable access

Legitimizing community expertise (e.g. Indigenous self-determination: People most affected by an issue gain voice and choice that is expressed in their own terms, motivating them to act

Approaches

Community-based Research

• Responsive & open communication • Evaluation committee approach • Simplified, evaluative research • Punctual delivery of outputs & products • Availability for meetings, presentations, etc. • Multiple final products (reports, summaries,

pamphlets, etc.)

What is expected

• Varying levels of engagement

• Distracted points of contact

• Frequent staffing/admin/exec turnover

• Communications challenges

• Apathy from organization (sometimes)

• Top-down support for recruitment

What to expect

• Top-down support for recruitment

• Access to neutral/comfortable research spaces

• Access to internal/private documents & data

• Enthusiasm from organization (Sometimes)

• On-site support for data collection/review, etc.

• Simple research methods: Surveys, Focus Groups, Interviews, and Lit review

• Simple data analysis: Descriptives and correlations (p>.05)

• Subcommittees: Avoid cat wrangling • Paper-trails: Document processes for

repeatability, continuity • Ethics: On your end; bolsters the validity of

the research in the partner’s eyes • Plain language: Summaries should be made

that are digestible by all audiences

What works

How to engage communities • Informal partnership – Leveraging existing relationships with

community leaders. I.E. Best friend’s uncle’s dogwalker’s sister.

• Outreach – Making on-the-ground connections with community groups and leaders through dissemination activities. I.E. Open seminars, community meet-and-greets, newsletter contributions.

• Engaging – Actively joining and/or contributing to community groups. I.E. Joining executive boards, volunteering, participating in meetings.

• Brokering – Making connections with the assistance of a third party. I.E. Knowledge mobilization officer, existing centres (CCRLA, SIRG, MCHL), public tendering systems.

How to connect

• Partnership Development Grant • To foster new research and/or related activities with new or

existing partners; and to design and test new partnership approaches for research and/or related activities.

• $75,000 to $200,000 over one to three years

• Partnership Grant • Support for new or existing formal partnerships for

initiatives that advance research, research training and/or knowledge mobilization in the social sciences and humanities.

• $500,000 to $2.5 million over four to seven years.

SSHRC Partnership Grants

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Supports: formal partnerships between academic researchers, businesses and other partners that will advance knowledge and understanding on critical issues of intellectual, social, economic and cultural significance.

• Partnership Development Grant • November 2014

• Partnership Grant Stage 1: Letter of Intent Up to $20,000 • February 2015 Stage 2: Formal Application (by invitation)

Deadlines

Matching Funds

Partnership Development Grant: • Applicants must have matching

funds (cash and/or in-kind) • No minimum Partnership Grant: • 35% matching funds from

sources other than SSHRC

Adjudication

Partnership Development Grant • Challenge: 50% • Feasibility: 20% • Capability: 30% Partnership Grant • Challenge: 40% • Feasibility: 30% • Capability: 30%

• Supports: • short-term targeted knowledge

mobilization activities (most often conferences and workshops)

• outreach activities such as artistic activities, development of interactive technologies, media events, adaptations, software etc…

• emphasis is on connecting Post-secondary research and the community

SSHRC Connection Grant

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Emphasis on facilitating connections between Post-secondary research and community (also on open access) Also, a clear priority for events that support relationships across and outside of academia, as well as increasing the accessibility of Humanities and Social Sciences research

• There are four adjudications per year • December, March, June, September

Deadlines

Presenter
Presentation Notes
You cannot get funding for an event that has already taken place SSHRC indicates that you have to be prepared to wait for 16 weeks from the time of confirmation of application That confirmation might not come for a week or two after submission

Eligibility

• There are Individual and Institutional versions of the Connection grant

• Researchers should submit the Individual version (even if the event involves a large team)

• The focus should be on mobilizing Canadian research, especially if the event is outside Canada

• Applicant must have a primary affiliation with a Canadian PSE

• Grant funds must be administered by a Canadian PSE • Co-applicants and collaborators do not need to be

Canadian nor affiliated with a PS institution

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Events can take place outside of Canada Applicants must be the organizers of the event

Value

• Connection grants range from $7,000 to $25,000 for an event and up to $50,000 for an outreach activity

Matching Funds

• Applicants must have 50% matching funds (cash and/or in-kind, excluding registration fees for event)

• For example, if you are requesting $15,000 from SSHRC, you must have $7,500 from elsewhere

• The matching funds cannot be from another SSHRC grant (although you may use SSHRC funds for the event provided there is no duplication of support)

Matching Funds cont…

• Applicants should approach their departments and faculties for financial assistance

• Applicants may have funds from another grant (other than SSHRC)

• Some examples of relevant in-kind contributions include:

• Conference space • Administrative support • Technical support • Communications and Knowledge Mobilization support

Adjudication

• Challenge: 40% • Feasibility: 30% • Capability: 30%


Recommended