+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Resource Persons

Resource Persons

Date post: 08-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: bishop
View: 45 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Workshop on Orientation and Basic Training Course Management and Facilitation Skills Program Report Oct 8-16, 2012 Organized by Mekong Institute Sponsored by New Zealand Foreign Affairs & Trade Aid Programme. Resource Persons. Dr . Suchat Katima Ms . Maria Theresa Medialdia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
32
Workshop on Orientation and Basic Training Course Management and Facilitation Skills Program Report Oct 8-16, 2012 Organized by Mekong Institute Sponsored by New Zealand Foreign Affairs & Trade Aid Programme
Transcript
Page 1: Resource Persons

Workshop on Orientation and Basic Training Course Management and Facilitation Skills

Program Report

Oct 8-16, 2012

Organized by Mekong InstituteSponsored by New Zealand Foreign Affairs & Trade Aid Programme

Page 2: Resource Persons

RESOURCE PERSONSDr. Suchat Katima Ms. Maria Theresa MedialdiaMr. Madhurjya Kumar DuttaMs. Joy OganMr. Sopheak SeangMs. Jian WangDr. Nittana SouthisengMs. Deborah LingMs. Jutamas ThongcharoensMs. Nguyen HuyenMs. Supaphan ChaiyapornMr. Narathip DahanMs. Yupawadee DuanghaklungMs. Pornwilai PumiraMs. Uthaiwan KhamnualthongMr. Srengkong Ung

Page 3: Resource Persons

FACILITATION TEAM

Ms. Jian Wang (Tina) Mr. Sopheak Seang

(Sopheak)

Ms. Jenisa Belardo (Jane)

Page 4: Resource Persons

PROGRAM CONTENTSModule 1: Setting the Context and Expectations• Getting to Know Each Other• Setting the Context and Exploring Group• Program Objective• Setting Norm and Mood Meter

Page 5: Resource Persons
Page 6: Resource Persons

Overview of GMS Countries

Page 7: Resource Persons

Module 2: Required Core Facilitation Competencies of a Professional Services Organization• Roles of Facilitator• Required Competencies of a Facilitator

Page 8: Resource Persons

Module 3: Effective Facilitation Skills & Tools

• Introduce Facilitation Tools Kits• Different Facilitation Tools and Techniques

Page 9: Resource Persons

Module 4 : MI Standard Training Program Cycle, Checklist and Communication Procedure• Introduce three stages: Pre, During and Post

Page 10: Resource Persons

Module 5: Monitoring, Documenting and Reporting Capacity Building Program • Introduce Evaluation Tools• Introduce Reporting Format

Page 11: Resource Persons

Module 6: Participatory Approach Service Delivery and Principle of Adult Education• Introduction to Participatory Approach• Principle of Adult Education

Page 12: Resource Persons

Module 7 : Designing and Facilitating SLV, Field Trip and Excursion• Introduce the designing and Planning the SLV, Field

Trip and Excursion• Travel to field sites

Page 13: Resource Persons

Module 8: Integrating Skills and Way Forward

Page 14: Resource Persons

Module 9: Information and Knowledge Management Program (IKMP) Matters • Introduce IKPM Knowledge and Repository System• Alumni Database

Page 15: Resource Persons

Special Session: Policy and Planning Unit

Page 16: Resource Persons

Module 10: Finance and Administrative Support

• Administration Matters• Budgeting (Internal and External)• Advance, Travel Authorization

Page 17: Resource Persons

EVALUATION

Page 18: Resource Persons

EVALUATION RESULTSPRE-SELF ASSESSMENT AVERAGE RATING : 1.88Based on a Self-Assessment of Participants: 11

POST-SELF ASSESSMENT AVERAGE RATING : 3.07Based on a Self-Assessment of Participants: 11

• 4 = I know it very well, I can teach it to others • 3 =I know it well and I can apply it in my work • 2 = I have heard about it but have not used it • 1 =I only learned about it now    

Average Setting the Context and Expectation

s

Modular Training

Cycle and Integrate

d Curriculu

m

Participatory

Approach to

Service Deliver

y

Principles of Adult

Education

Roles of a

Facilitator and

Required

Competencies

Facilitation Tools

Planning and

Organizing a

Training Course/Worksho

p

Training Program

Cycle, Checklist

and Communication Procedu

res

Designing and Facilitating SLV,

Field Trip and

Excursion

Monitoring,

Documenting and

Reporting Capacity Building

Program

Integrating Skills and

Way Forward

Pre 2.00 1.36 2.00 1.64 1.91 2.18 2.45 1.73 1.64 2.09 1.73

Post 3.00 2.82 2.91 2.91 3.27 3.45 3.36 3.00 3.00 3.09 2.91

Page 19: Resource Persons

EVALUATION RESULTS1 Learning Program Content

Topic5

Very relevant

4 3Relevant

2 1Not

relevantAverage Rating

Learning Program Content

30% (3) 70% (7)

4.3

Table 1. Participants’ Satisfaction on Learning Program Content

Topic5

Too advanced

4 3Fair

2 1Too

basicAverage Rating

Level of Instruction

40% (4)

60% (6) 3.4

Table 2. Level of Instruction

Page 20: Resource Persons

Table 3. Relevance of Topics to Young GMS Professionals and MI Staff’s work

Topic5

Very relevant4 3

Relevant2 1

Not relevantAverageRating

Setting the Context and Expectations

80% (8) 20% (2) 4.3

Regional Cooperation and Integration

70% (7) 20% (2) 10% (1) 4.6

Overview of GMS Countries 50% (5) 50% (5) 4.5MI Program Information 20% (2) 80% (8) 4.2

Facilitation Cycle 30% (3) 70% (7) 3.9Principle of Adult Education 60% (6) 40% (4) 4.6

Roles of a Facilitator and Required Competencies

90% (9) 10% (1) 4.9

Effective Facilitation Skills and Tools Kit

70% (7) 30% (3) 4.7

Organizing a Training Course/Workshop/ Learning Visit/ Field Trip, etc

90% (9) 10% (1) 4.9

Monitoring and Evaluation Methods

50% (5) 50% (5) 4.5

MI Finance and Budgeting 30% (3) 50% (5) 20% (2) 4.1

Documentation and Writing MI Completion Report

50% (5) 40% (4) 10% (1) 4.4

Integrating Skills and Ways Forward

70% (7) 30% (3) 4.4

Total Average 4.5

Page 21: Resource Persons

Table 4. Application of Newly Acquired Knowledge and Skills

Topic5

Yes4 3

May be2 1

NoAverage Rating

Newly Acquired knowledge and skills

30% (3) 50% (5) 20% (2) 4.1

Table 5. Usefulness of Learning Methods

2 Learning Program Methodology

Topic5

Very appropriated

4 3Good

2 1Not

appropriatedAverage Rating

Learning Method

40% (4) 60% (6) 4.4

Page 22: Resource Persons

Table 6. Balance between Theory and Practice

Table 7. Use of Training Materials

3.2 Learning Program Methodology

5Very

satisfied

4 3Satisfied

2 1Not satisfied Average

Rating

Training Materials

50% (5) 50% (5) 4.5

Topic5

Very good balance

4 3Balance

2 1Not

balanceAverage Rating

Balance between Theory and Practice

80% (8) 20% (2) 3.0

Page 23: Resource Persons

Table 8. Satisfaction Training Facilities

Table 9. Participants’ Assessment on the Usefulness of Monitoring and Evaluation Methods for the Learning Program

5Very

satisfied

4 3Satisfied

2 1Not satisfied Average

Rating

Training Facilities

90% (9) 10% (1) 4.9

5Very

satisfied

4 3Satisfied

2 1Not satisfied Average

Rating

Pre and Post Test Questionnaire

20% (2) 70% (7) 10% (1) 4.1

Board of Directors (BOD)

70% (7) 30% (3) 3.7

Mood Barometer

40% (4) 20% (2) 40% (4) 4.0

Participatory Evaluation

70% (7) 20% (2) 10% (1) 4.6

Total Average 4.1

Page 24: Resource Persons

Table 10A. Presenter’s Expertise

3 Training Resource Persons

5Very

Satisfied

4 3Satisfied

2 1Not

SatisfiedAverageRating

Dr. Suchat Katima 100% (10) 5

Ms. Tess Medialdia 100% (10) 5

Ms. Jutamas Thongcharoen (Nue)

60% (6) 30% (3) 10% (10) 4.5

Ms. Deborah Ling (Debbie)

70% (7) 30%(3) 3.7

Ms. Supaphan Chaiyaporn (Fon)

60% (6) 40% (4) 3.6

Mr. Srengkong Ung (Kong)

70% (7) 30% (3) 4.7

Total Average 4.4

Page 25: Resource Persons

Table 10B. GMS’s Culture and Society Presenters5

Very satisfied

4 3Satisfied

2 1Not

satisfiedAverageRating

Ms. Seang Sopheak (Cambodia)

70% (7) 30% (3) 4.7

Ms. Jian Wang(China)

70% (7) 20% (2) 10% (1) 4.6

Ms. Jutamas Thongcharoen (Thailand)

60% (6) 40% (4) 4.6

Ms. Deborah Ling (Myanmar)

10% (1) 70% (7) 20% (2) 3.9

Dr. Nittana Southiseng(Lao PDR)

60% (6) 40% (4) 4.6

Ms. Nguyen Huyen(Vietnam)

20% (2) 70% (7) 10% (1) 4.1

Total Average 4.4

Page 26: Resource Persons

Table 11. Presenter’s Communication and Cooperation

5Very

satisfied

4 3Satisfied

2 1Not

satisfiedAverageRating

Dr. Suchat Katima 100% (1) 5

Ms. Tess Medialdia 100% (1) 5

Ms. Jutamas Thongcharoen (Nue)

70% (7) 30% (3) 4.7

Ms. Deborah Ling (Debbie)

30% (3) 40% (4) 30% (3) 4

Ms. Supaphan Chaiyaporn (Fon)

40% (4) 40% (4) 20% (2) 4.2

Mr. Srengkong Ung (Kong)

50% (5) 50% (5) 4

Total Average 4.5

Page 27: Resource Persons

Table 12. Training Facilitators

5 Training Facilitators

6 Co-participants in the Training

5Very

Satisfied

4 3Satisfied

2 1Not

SatisfiedAverage

rating

Facilitator’s Communication and Cooperation

80% (8) 20% (2)

4.8

Page 28: Resource Persons

6 Co-participants in the TrainingTable 13. Participants’ Satisfaction on Co-participants

5Very

satisfied

4 3Satisfied

2 1Not

satisfiedAverage Rating

Exchange of information and experiences among co-participants

100% (10) 5

Working atmosphere within the group

100% (10) 5

Group’s professional experience and skill level

60% (6) 40% (4)

4.6

Total Average 4.9

Page 29: Resource Persons

Table 14. Participants’ Satisfaction on Training Administration

7 Learning Administration

5Very

satisfied

4 3Satisfied

2 1Not

satisfiedAverage Rating

Food (Snacks/ Meals)

5 3 2 4.3

Support by IT 2 4 4 3.8

Support by Training Staff

8 2 4.8

Total Average 4.3

Page 30: Resource Persons

Table 16. Overall Assessment of the Training

8 Overall Assessment

Table 15. Duration of Learning Program

Too long Just right Too shortDuration 10% (1) 90% (9)

5Very

satisfied

4 3Satisfied

2 1Not

satisfiedAverage Rating

Overall assessment of the training

10% (1) 80% (8)

1 4

Recommend this training to others

40% (4) 60% (6)

4.4

Total Average 4.2

Page 31: Resource Persons
Page 32: Resource Persons

Thank you for your attention!


Recommended