+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Resources and Financial Plan Sue Foffano WLCG Resource Manager C-RRB Meeting, 12 th October 2010.

Resources and Financial Plan Sue Foffano WLCG Resource Manager C-RRB Meeting, 12 th October 2010.

Date post: 28-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: earl-short
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
15
Resources and Financial Plan Sue Foffano WLCG Resource Manager C-RRB Meeting, 12 th October 2010
Transcript

Resources and Financial PlanSue FoffanoWLCG Resource Manager

C-RRB Meeting, 12th October 2010

[email protected] 2

• WLCG Collaboration & MoU status• Funding and expenditure for WLCG at CERN• Resource usage accounting

– CERN and external Tier-1s– Tier-2s

• Resource pledges 2011 & 2012– Pledge collection and use of gstat tool– Summary result of pledge data– Reminder of obligations for Spring & Autumn C-RRB sessions

• Summary

Supporting information can be found in– Written report (CERN-RRB-2010-094)– WLCG web pages: Lcg.web.cern.ch/LCG– WLCG public pages: Lcg.web.cern.ch/LCG/public

Agenda

12th October 2010

Lyon/CCIN2P3Barcelona/PICDe-FZK

US-FNAL

Ca-TRIUMF

NDGF

CERN US-BNL

UK-RAL

Taipei/ASGC

26 June 2009 [email protected] 3

Today we have 49 MoU signatories, representing 34 countries:

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Rep, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Rep. Korea, Netherlands, Norway, Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taipei, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, USA.

WLCG Collaboration StatusTier 0; 11 Tier 1s; 68 Tier 2 federations (129 Tier 2 sites)

New Collaboration Board Chair: Roger Jones / Lancaster

Amsterdam/NIKHEF-SARA

Bologna/CNAF

[email protected] 4

• Since the last C-RRB meeting no further signatures– Some expressions of interest expressed: administrative &

funding follow-up on-going

• In several cases MoU documents were signed some time ago– 12 WLCG MoU’s signed in January, February or March 2006– Certain countries are reviewing the organisation of their

Federation or adding new sites– A new French Tier-2 site CPPM in Marseille joined recently– Such changes are reflected in MoU Annex 1 (Tier 0-1’s) or

Annex 2 (Tier 2’s) – Any changes to be signalled to [email protected]

WLCG MoU Status

12th October 2010

[email protected] 5

WLCG MoU Annex 1

12th October 2010

WORLDWIDE LHC COMPUTING GRID COLLABORATION

Tier1

Centre Experiments served with

priority Representative to

WLCG Collaboration Funding Agencies

ALICE ATLAS CMS LHCb Canada, TRIUMF X M. Vetterli CFI France, CC-IN2P3 X X X X F. Malek (deputy: F. Chollet) CNRS/ IN2P3 and CEA/ DSM/ IRFU Germany, KIT X X X X K.-P. Mickel BMBF/ KIT Italy, CNAF X X X X M. Mazzucato (deputy: L. Dell’Agnello) INFN Netherlands LHC/ Tier1 X X X J. Templon NIKHEF Nordic Data Grid Facility (NDGF) X X 1 L. Fischer NSRC/ HIP/ RCN/ SRC Spain, PIC X X X M. Delfino (deputy: G. Merino) MEC Taipei, ASGC X X S. Lin Academia Sinica UK, RAL X X X X N. Geddes STFC USA, BNL X M. Ernst (alt.: R. Popescu) DOE USA, FNAL X V. White DOE

1 NDGF serves as a CMS Tier-2 resource

[email protected] 6

• Estimated expenditure status:– Personnel: planning tool APT used for cost

estimates of current contracts, planned replacements and impact of EGI/EMI projects on personnel budget

– Materials: cost planning still on-going due toRecent CERN budget cuts LHC run schedule & experiment requirements evolutionCERN’s existing Computer Centre upgrade & future Computer Centre strategy

• Too many unknowns to present precise information

• More information and details at next C-RRB

Funding and expenditure for WLCG at CERN

12th October 2010

[email protected] 7

• Accounting problems impacting last meeting resolved• Monthly reports available up to September (draft)• Sites are encouraged to consult the Accounting Portal

and check the reports• Certain Tier-2 Federations are still not reporting:

– Germany GSI follow-up on-going– India VECC Kolkata – under investigation– Ukraine

• Certain sites within Federations are not reporting: Hungary, Italy, Pakistan, Romania, Russia, Turkey, UK London

to be followed up via lcg.office @cern.ch

Tier-1 and Tier-2 Accounting

12th October 2010

[email protected] 8

CERN & Tier-1 Accounting 2010

12th October 2010

[email protected] 9

Tier-2 Accounting Jul-Aug 2010

12th October 2010

RU-RDIG

FR-G

RIF

IT-CMS-f

edera

tion

FR-IN

2P3-CC-T2

DE-DES

Y-RW

TH-CMS-T

2

RO-LCG

IT-ATLA

S-fed

eration

JP-Toky

o-ATLA

S-T2

US-AGLT2

US-MW

T2

US-NET

2

US-SW

T2

US-WT2

CH-CHIPP-CSCS

UK-London-Ti

er2

PL-TIER

2-WLC

G

ES-A

TLAS-T

2

TR-Ti

er2-fe

deration

UK-SouthGrid

ES-CMS-T

2

UK-ScotG

rid

BE-TIER

2

AT-HEP

HY-VIEN

NA-UIBK

UK-North

Grid

CN-IHEP

FR-IN

2P3-IPHC

IT-ALIC

E-fed

eration

SE-SN

IC-T2

T2_U

S_Calt

ech

T2_U

S_Flo

rida

T2_U

S_MIT

T2_U

S_Neb

raska

T2_U

S_Purd

ue

T2_U

S_UCSD

T2_U

S_W

isconsin

FR-IN

2P3-LPC

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

Tier-2 sites with CPU pledge > 7000 HS06

2010 CPU Pledge

CPU used July

CPU used August

[email protected] 10

Tier-2 Accounting Jul-Aug 2010

12th October 2010

DE-MCAT

DE-FREIB

URGWUPPER

TAL

PT-LIP-LC

G-Tier2

CZ-Prag

ue-T2

CA-EAST

-T2

CA-WES

T-T2

SI-SiG

NET

DE-DES

Y-ATLA

S-T2

IT-LH

Cb-federa

tion

FR-IN

2P3-LAPP

DE-GSI

PK-CMS-T2

ES-LH

Cb-T2

BR-SP-SP

RACE

EE-N

ICPB

DE-DES

Y-LHCB

IN-INDIACMS-T

IFR

IL-HEP

Tier-2

TW-FT

T-T2

KR-KNU-T2

FI-HIP-T2

AU-ATLA

S

HU-HGCC-T2

FR-IN

2P3-SUBATE

CH

DE-DES

Y-GOE-A

TLAS-T

2

IN-DAE-K

OLKATA

-TIER

2

UA-Tier2

-Federa

tion

NO-NORGRID-T2

KR-KISTI-T

20

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

Tier-2 sites with CPU pledge < 7000 HS06

2010 CPU Pledge

CPU used July

CPU used August

[email protected] 11

• At last C-RRB meeting 30/09/10 deadline for pledge input announced• Reminder send 04/05/10 including experiment requirements for 2011

agreed by Scrutiny Group & preliminary 2012 requirements• Deadline largely respected

– all input received except 1 Tier 1 & 2 Tier 2’s – received on 01/10/10 & 02/10/10 respectively

• Resource tables in CERN-RRB-2010-094 annex 1 are as final as possible – confirmed 2011 pledges apart from certain indicated countries – estimates for 2012

• Approval of pledge tables foreseen in MoU at Autumn session of C-RRB• Modifications or declaration of resources not deployed foreseen at Spring

session of C-RRB• Pledges also entered in gstat – future tool for pledge data. More

information at next meeting

Resource pledges 2011/2012

12th October 2010

[email protected] 12

• Tier-1 details in Pages 1-2 of annex• Tier-1 Summary shows overall shortfall, particularly

for ALICE and CMS• NL: unconfirmed pledge due to on-going negotiations

with Funding Agency. Assumed acceptance before end 2010 leading to delayed deployment (summer 2011)

• UK: Tape provisioned and deployed on demand

Pledge result Tier-1 summary

12th October 2010

[email protected] 13

• Tier-2 details in Pages 3-8 of annex

• Tier-2 Summary shows overall shortfall, particularly for ALICE and ATLAS disk

• Australia: pledges constrained by Data Centre, new centre available by mid 2011

• Belgium: FNRS pledges subject to approval of funding request• Canada: pledges unconfirmed due to timing of Call for Proposals.

Assumption is proposal accepted, deployment by April 2011• Russia: possibility that resources will increase for 2012• Sweden: decision on Tier-2 pledges to be taken on 4th November 2010• Ukraine: CPU to be provided in HS06. Pledges given under reserve due to

recent budget cuts

Pledge result Tier-2 summary

12th October 2010

[email protected] 14

• In most cases pledges increase or stay constant, but in certain cases pledge decreases are observed between 2010 and 2011 – to be understood

Tier-2’s with pledge decrease

12th October 2010

[email protected] 15

Summary• WLCG MoU: to be maintained up to date with additions

or changes to existing information particularly MoU annex 1 & 2

• WLCG Funding & Expenditure: strategy planning to be finalised for materials budget & cost estimates updated accordingly

• Tier-1 and Tier-2 accounting: to be checked frequently– Tier-2 sites not reporting must resolve their problems– Sites within Federations not reporting – to be followed up

• Resource Pledges: confirmed Tier-1 & Tier-2 pledges for 2011 shows shortfall particularly

– ALICE Tier-1 & Tier-2 CPU, Disk & Tape– ATLAS Tier-2 disk – CMS Tier-1 CPU, Disk & Tape

• Some pledge data still waiting confirmation from Funding Agencies

• Decreased pledges at Tier-2’s to be understood• Any change to pledges or failure to deploy resources by

April 2011 to be signalled at Spring 2011 C-RRB meeting


Recommended