+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Response After Complaint On Judge Frederick Smith & John Muzurek

Response After Complaint On Judge Frederick Smith & John Muzurek

Date post: 15-Sep-2015
Category:
Upload: conflict-gate
View: 22 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Response after complaint sent to the State of Kansas office of disciplinary administrator Dated June 8th, 2015.
Popular Tags:
2
STATE OF KANSAS STANTONA.HAZLETT Disciplinary Administrator ALEXANDER M. WALCZAK KIMBERLY L. KNOLL KA TE F. BAlRD DEBORAH L. HUGHES MICHAEL R. SERRA Deputy Disciplinary Administrators 701 Jackson St. r' Floor Topeka, Kansas 66603-3729 Telephone: (785) 296-2486 Fax: (785) 296-6049 OFFICE OF THE DISCIPLINARY ADMINISTRATOR GAYLE B. LARKIN Admissions Attorney June 8,2015 Mr. Lester Moore 508 East Viener, Lot A 1 Frontenac, Kansas 66763 Mr. Matt Moore 508 East Viener, Lot Ai Frontenac, Kansas 66763 Dear Mr. Moore and Mr. Moore: I have reviewed the letter of complaint received by this office on June 3, 2015. The letters are largely identical in substance. One letter is from Matt Moore, who is facing charges in Montgomery County and the other is from Lester Moore, Matt's father. . The report was made to the Office of Judicial Qualifications, and copied to our office, the Office of the Disciplinary Administrator. Many, if not all, of your allegations refer to alleged violations of the judicial canons. In your final paragraph you indicate that the complaint was copied to our office because both of the men are attorneys and "neither Rick Smith nor John Mazurek turned the other one in for both of their obvious violations of KRPC and Code of Judicial Conduct". You complain that the judicial officers should have disqualified themselves from presiding over certain matters. You allege failure to supervise. Our office does not have the authority to review or investigate alleged violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The allegations of judicial conflict are subject of review in the Office of Judicial Qualifications. This office would not ordinarily initiate a disciplinary investigation into the conduct of a judicial officer. In the event another disciplinary authority concludes that the Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct and/or the rules related to the discipline of attorneys are implicated then the matter may be ripe for disciplinary investigation by this, office.
Transcript
  • STATE OF KANSAS

    STANTONA.HAZLETTDisciplinary AdministratorALEXANDER M. WALCZAKKIMBERLY L. KNOLLKA TE F. BAlRDDEBORAH L. HUGHESMICHAEL R. SERRADeputy Disciplinary Administrators

    701 Jackson St.r' FloorTopeka, Kansas 66603-3729Telephone: (785) 296-2486Fax: (785) 296-6049

    OFFICE OFTHE DISCIPLINARY ADMINISTRATOR

    GAYLE B. LARKINAdmissions Attorney

    June 8,2015

    Mr. Lester Moore508 East Viener, Lot A 1Frontenac, Kansas 66763

    Mr. Matt Moore508 East Viener, Lot AiFrontenac, Kansas 66763

    Dear Mr. Moore and Mr. Moore:

    I have reviewed the letter of complaint received by this office on June 3, 2015.The letters are largely identical in substance. One letter is from Matt Moore, whois facing charges in Montgomery County and the other is from Lester Moore,Matt's father. .

    The report was made to the Office of Judicial Qualifications, and copied to ouroffice, the Office of the Disciplinary Administrator. Many, if not all, of yourallegations refer to alleged violations of the judicial canons. In your finalparagraph you indicate that the complaint was copied to our office because bothof the men are attorneys and "neither Rick Smith nor John Mazurek turned theother one in for both of their obvious violations of KRPC and Code of JudicialConduct". You complain that the judicial officers should have disqualifiedthemselves from presiding over certain matters. You allege failure to supervise.

    Our office does not have the authority to review or investigate alleged violationsof the Code of Judicial Conduct. The allegations of judicial conflict are subject ofreview in the Office of Judicial Qualifications. This office would not ordinarilyinitiate a disciplinary investigation into the conduct of a judicial officer. In theevent another disciplinary authority concludes that the Kansas Rules ofProfessional Conduct and/or the rules related to the discipline of attorneys areimplicated then the matter may be ripe for disciplinary investigation by this, office.

  • No action will be taken at this time.

    Very Truly Yours,

    [~Kate F. airdDeputy Disciplinary Administrator

    KFB:SG

    cc: John MuzurekJudge Frederick Smith


Recommended