+ All Categories
Home > Engineering > Response spectra

Response spectra

Date post: 19-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: 321nilesh
View: 61 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
20
1 2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra • Definition CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis 25 2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra • Definition There are different types of response spectra: SD = | x | max = relative displacement response spectrum (spectral max displacement) SV = | x | max = relative velocity response spectrum (spectral velocity) SA = | x | max = relative acceleration response spectrum SDa= | x + x | s max = absolute displacement response spectrum SVa = | x + x | s max = absolute velocity response spectrum SA = | x + x | s max = absolute acceleration response spectrum (spectral acceleration) CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis 26 The earthquake spectra that are most useful in earthquake engineering are SD, SV and SA.
Transcript
Page 1: Response spectra

1

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Definition

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

25

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Definition

There are different types of response spectra:

SD = |x| max = relative displacement response spectrum (spectral || max p p p ( p

displacement) SV = |x| max

= relative velocity response spectrum (spectral velocity)

SA = |x| max = relative acceleration response spectrum

SDa = |x + x| s max = absolute displacement response spectrum

SVa = |x + x| s max = absolute velocity response spectrum

SA = |x + x| s max = absolute acceleration response spectrum (spectral

acceleration)

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

26

) The earthquake spectra that are most useful in earthquake engineering are SD, SV and SA.

Page 2: Response spectra

2

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Definition

Northridge-Rinaldi

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

27

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Properties of Response Spectra

Response spectra have the following properties : 1 they give the maximum response values of a SDOF system subjected to a given1. they give the maximum response values of a SDOF system subjected to a given

earthquake accelerogram; 2. they give the maximum response values in each mode of a MDOF system

subjected to a given earthquake accelerogram; This result will be discussedfurther in this chapter.

3. they indicate the frequency distribution of the seismic energy of a given

earthquake accelerogram, meaning that the response of a SDOF system is

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

28

q g , g p yamplified when the seismic energy is close to its natural frequency.

Page 3: Response spectra

3

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Exact Response SpectraThe relative displacement response spectrum is obtained directly by Duhamel’s integral given by equation 4.69 :

| d )-(t e )(x 1

-| = | x | = S d)-(t-

s

t

0dD maxmax sin

The acceleration and the relative velocity are as follows :

dt

dx(t) = (t)x

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

29

dt

x(t)d = (t)x2

2

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Exact Response Spectra

By convolution, if a time function, F(t), is given by :

(t)

then its time derivative becomes :

d )(t, f = F(t)(t)u

(t)u

1

0

t) (t),u( fdt

(t)du - t) (t),u( f dt

(t)du + d t

)(t, f =

dt

dF(t)0

01

1(t)u

(t)u

1

0

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

30

(t)u0

the above is known also as Leibnitz derivative of an integrated function

Page 4: Response spectra

4

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Exact Response SpectraApplying convolution to Duhamel’s integral given by equation 4.69, we have :

)-(t e )(x 1

- = )(t, f d)-(t-

sd

sin

d )-(t e )(x

1- = x(t) d

)-(t -s

t

0d

sin

t = (t)u

0 = (t)u

1

0

The relative velocity is then :

d )-(t e )(x - = (t)x d)-(t-

s

t

0

cos

(4 100)

t) (t),u( fdt

(t)du - t) (t),u( f dt

(t)du + d t

)(t, f =

dt

dF(t)0

01

1(t)u

(t)u

1

0

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

31

The relative velocity response spectrum is given by :

d )-(t e )(x -1

+ d)-(t-

s

t

02

sin

|(t)x | = SV max

(4.100)

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Exact Response SpectraSimilarly, the relative acceleration is obtained by differentiating equation 4.100 with respect to time :

(t)x - d )-(t e )(x - 1

)2 - (1 +

d )-(t e )(x 2 = (t)x

sd)-(t-

s

t

02

2

d)-(t-

t

0

sin

cos

(4.102)

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

32

The absolute acceleration response spectrum is then :

| (t) x + (t)x | = S sA max

Page 5: Response spectra

5

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Exact Response Spectra

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

33

Datafile

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Pseudo Response Spectra

Usually, a civil engineering structure has low damping (lower than 20% critical). The following hypotheses can then be made :g yp

)(t- sin by replaced becan cos d

)-(t

0 ,

d

d

2

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

34

Page 6: Response spectra

6

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Pseudo Response SpectraWith these assumptions, equation 4.100 becomes:

x(t)=d)-(tex-(t)x d)-(t-

s

t

sin

d )-(t e )(x - = (t)x d)-(t-

s

t

0

cos (4.106)

The pseudo relative velocity response spectrum is then:

With the same assumptions, equation 4.102 is written:

( ))(ex( ) ds

0

S=S DV

2)(tt

d )-(t e )(x -1

+

d)-(t-

s

t

02

sin

d )-(t e )(x 2 = (t)x d)-(t-

t

0

cos

d )-(t e )(x 1

- = x(t) d)-(t -

s

t

0d

sin

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

35

The pseudo absolute acceleration response spectrum becomes:

x(t) =d)-(texx+x 2d

)-(t-s

0

s sin

S = S = S VD2

A

(t)x - d )-(t e )(x - 1

)2 - (1 +

sd)-(t-

s

t

02

2

sin

(4.108)

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra• Comparison Between Exact and

Pseudo Response Spectra– Comparing exact response spectra

(equations 4.100, 4.102) with pseudo response spectra (equations. 4.106, 4.108) for different accelerograms, yields the following tendencies:yields the following tendencies:

• in a system with zero damping, results are essentially identical for natural periods less than one second (T < 1 s);

• when damping increases to 20 % critical, differences are within 20 % but without any observable bias;

• pseudo acceleration response spectrum more precise than pseudo velocity response spectrum.

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

36

– Variations within acceptable range expected from seismic analysis.

– Pseudo response spectra must not be used for highly damped systems ( > 20 % critical) or for systems with long natural periods (T >> 1 s).

Page 7: Response spectra

7

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra• Tripartite Representation

of Pseudo Response Spectra– In practice, response p , p

spectra represented by a graph with multiple logarithmic scales called a tripartite graph.

– Tripartite graph display on same curve the following information :

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

37

information :• exact relative displacement

response spectrum;• pseudo relative velocity

response spectrum;• pseudo absolute acceleration

response spectrum.

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra• Tripartite Representation of Pseudo Response Spectra

– To understand tripartite graph, consider variation of log10Sv with log10T for constant values of SA or SD.

a) SA = constant = C1 If the pseudo acceleration response spectrum is equal to a constant, C1, it can be written:

operating with the log10 on this equation, it yields:

S T

2 = S = S = C = S VDD

21A

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

38

or

S + T - 2 = C V101010110 loglogloglog

2 - C + T = S 1011010V10 loglogloglog

Page 8: Response spectra

8

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra• Tripartite Representation of Pseudo Response Spectra

2 - C + T = S 1011010V10 loglogloglog

then

This result indicates that a line at + 45º on the tripartite graph represents a constant spectral acceleration, SA .

1 + =

T d

S d

10

V10

log

log

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

39

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra• Tripartite Representation of Pseudo Response Spectra

b) SD = constant = C2 If the relative displacement response spectrum is equal to a constant, C2, it can be p p p qwritten:

S 2

T = S = C = S V

V2D

operating with the log10 on this equation, it yields :

S + 2 - T = C V101010210 loglogloglog

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

40

or

2 + C + T - = S 1021010V10 loglogloglog

Page 9: Response spectra

9

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra• Tripartite Representation of Pseudo Response Spectra

then

2 + C + T - = S 1021010V10 loglogloglog

then

This result indicates that a line at -45º on a tripartite graph represents a constant relative displacement spectrum, SD.

1- =

T d

S d

10

V10

log

log

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

41

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra• Tripartite Representation of Pseudo

Response Spectra– Figure illustrates, for different damping

values, response spectra of El Centro earthquake (1940 05 18, comp. S00E).

– Response spectrum of an earthquake er irreg larvery irregular.

– Spectrum has a general trapezoidal shape (shape of a tent) characteristic of earthquake response spectra and has the following physical explanation :

• for long natural periods, maximum relative displacement equal to maximum ground displacement and maximum absolute acceleration tends toward zero;

• for intermediate natural periods

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

42

for intermediate natural periods, relative displacement, relative velocity and absolute acceleration amplified;

• for short natural periods, maximum absolute acceleration equal to maximum ground acceleration and maximum relative displacement tends toward zero.

Page 10: Response spectra

10

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Motivation

• For practical seismic design of structures, simplified response spectra are used.

• Different regions of simplified spectra represented by straight lines.

• Position of these lines (amplitude) function of seismic hazard of the region.

• Many simplified design response spectra have been proposed.

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

43

y p g p p p p

• Most common are described in the following sections.

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Housner’s Response Spectra (1959)

Relying on response spectra obtained for four historical earthquakes of Southern California (El Centro, 1934, M=6.5; El Centro, 1940, M=6.7 and Tehachapi, 1952, M=7.7) and one from Washington (Olympia, 1949, M=7.1)., G. Housner (1959) proposed, for the first time, an “average design spectrum”. This spectrum was calibrated for a maximum ground acceleration of 0,20g and for a probability of exceedence of 50 %, in other words, for the average of the historical spectral values. The values obtained from this spectrum are to be multiplied by a scale factor to take into account the seismic hazard of the region. For example, if the design earthquake of a given site is 0,15g, then the spectral acceleration will be:

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

44

Housner of S of 20

15 equals A

S A

Page 11: Response spectra

11

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Housner’s Response Spectra (1959)

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

45

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Newmark and Hall’s Response Spectra (1969)

• Developed for nuclear industry

• Simplified spectra based on standard ground motion parameters:

– maximum ground acceleration : 0,50 g;

– maximum ground velocity : 61 cm/s (24 in/s);

– maximum ground displacement : 46 cm (18 in).

– Relying on the study of 28 earthquake records, values represent l i b diff d i i

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

46

average relation between different ground seismic parameters.

– For a given site, values are scaled directly to the maximum design acceleration, which is function of seismic hazard of the region.

– Simplified spectrum obtained by multiplying each branch of ground parameters by an amplification factor which depends on damping coefficient of the structure.

Page 12: Response spectra

12

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Newmark and Hall’s Response Spectra (1969)

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

47

Note!

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Newmark and Hall’s Response Spectra (1969)

Table 4.2 Amplification factors for Newmark and Hall’s design response spectra (From Newmark et Hall, 1982).

Damping ratio

% of critical

Probability of exceedence

of 16 % (mean + 1 standard deviation)

Probability of exceedence of 50 %

(mean value)

SA

SV

SD

SA

SV

SD

0,5

5,10

3,84

3,04

3,68

2,59

2,01

1

4,38

3,38

2,73

3,21

2,31

1,82

2

3,66

2,92

2,42

2,74

2,03

1,63

3

3,24

2,64

2,24

2,46

1,86

1,52

5

2,71

2,30

2,01

2,12

1,65

1,39

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

48

7 2,36 2,08 1,85 1,89 1,51 1,29

10

1,99

1,84

1,69

1,64

1,37

1,20

20

1,26

1,37

1,38

1,17

1,08

1,01

For the seismic design of nuclear plants, Newmark and Hall recommended the use of amplification factors corresponding to a probability of exceedence of 16 %.

Page 13: Response spectra

13

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Newmark and Hall’s Response Spectra (1969)

• Procedure to plot Newmark’s simplified spectra – Step 1 - Plot of the ground motion parameters

» Limits of ground motion parameters linked by straight lines: maximum horizontal acceleration, maximum horizontal velocity and maximum horizontal displacement.

» If maximum horizontal acceleration is only known parameter at site, standard ground motion parameters can be used with maximum design acceleration, e.g. if maximum design

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

49

acceleration of 0,33g, at site is only known parameter:

cm 30,36 = cm 46 0,50

0,33 = ntdisplaceme ground

cm/s 40,26 = cm/s 61 0,50

0,33 = velocityground

g 0,33 = g 0,50 0,50

0,33 = onaccelerati ground

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra• Simplified Design Response

Spectra– Newmark and Hall’s

Response Spectra (1969)

Table 4.3 Recommended Damping Values.

Strain Level

Types of structures and conditions

% of Critical

Damping Response Spectra (1969)• Procedure to plot Newmark’s

simplified spectra – Step 2 - Plot different regions

of spectrum

» Amplification factors, shown in Table 4.2, used to plot different regions

welded steel, prestressed concrete, reinforced concrete with light cracking

2 to 3

reinforced concrete with heavy cracking

3 to 5

less than 50 % of the elastic limit

bolted or rivetted steel, nailed or bolted timber

5 to 7

welded steel, prestressed concrete without complete loss of prestressing

5 to 7

prestressed concrete with prestressing loss

7 to 10

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

50

p gof simplified spectrum.

» Table 4.3 shows recommended damping values to be used.

prestressing loss 7 to 10 reinforced concrete

7 to 10

bolted or rivetted steel, bolted timber

10 to 15

close to or over the elastic limit

nailed timber

15 to 20

Page 14: Response spectra

14

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Newmark and Hall’s Response Spectra (1969)

• Procedure to plot Newmark’s simplified spectra – Step 3 - Modification of spectral limits for high frequencies

– Find corner frequency, 1, which links velocity branch to acceleration branch.

– At frequency of about 41, start reducing linearly acceleration branch of spectrum until reaching limit of peak ground acceleration for a frequency of 101.

– Theoretically, displacement branch should also be modified for low

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

51

y, pfrequencies (lower than 0.1 Hz). But, as low frequencies have little impact on Civil Engineering structures, modification can be omitted.

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Design Response Spectrum of ASCE 7-05

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

52

Page 15: Response spectra

15

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Design Response Spectrum of ASCE 7-05

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

53

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Design Response Spectrum of ASCE 7-05

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

54

Page 16: Response spectra

16

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Design Response Spectrum of ASCE 7-05

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

55

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Design Response Spectrum of ASCE 7-05

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

56

Page 17: Response spectra

17

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Design Response Spectrum of ASCE 7-05

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

57

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Design Response Spectrum of ASCE 7-05

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

58

Page 18: Response spectra

18

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Design Response Spectrum of ASCE 7-05

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

59

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Design Response Spectrum of ASCE 7-05

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

60

Page 19: Response spectra

19

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Design Response Spectrum of ASCE 7-05

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

61

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

• Simplified Design Response Spectra– Consider a seismic zone in Southern California on Site

Class B (rock)

H )f(g.

T

g.g.S

g.g.S

.FF

g.Sg;.S

D

Ds

va

s

33812060

20

60903

2

01513

2

01

9051

1

1

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

ctra

l Acc

eler

atio

n (

g)

ASCE 7-05 Design Spectrum

Newmark-Hall Spectrum, 5%damping, PGA=0.40 g

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

62

Hz).f(orT

Hz).f(or.g.

g.T

Hz).f(or.g.

g.T

LL

os

oo

0830sec12

671sec60001

60

338sec12001

20

0

0.2

0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)

Sp

ec

Page 20: Response spectra

1

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra• Floor Response Spectra

– Response spectra, discussed in previous sections, used to determine maximum response of SDOF structure subjected to base motion.

– Similarly, maximum response of equipment, located in a building, can be obtained using response spectrum corresponding to the floor where the g p p p gequipment is located.

– Vibration of a complex building varies from storey to storey, creating, therefore, a variation in the response spectra of the various floors.

– Traditional technique used to generate a floor response spectrum is, first, to calculate historical horizontal acceleration of a floor and then use this accelerogram to construct a response spectrum.

– If a simplified design response spectrum of a floor is to be constructed, the procedure starts with an ensemble of accelerograms at the base and the

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

64

procedure starts with an ensemble of accelerograms at the base and the resulting spectra are smoothened.

– Because of the large quantity of calculations required to generate a floor response spectrum, approximate methods have been proposed (Singh, 1975, Biggs and Roesset, 1970).

2. Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra

Generation of Floor Motion Ensembles

Generation of Floor Motion Ensembles

Floor Response Spectra

• Floor Response Spectra

DynamicAnalysis

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)

Spe

ctra

l Acc

eler

atio

n (g

)

ASCE 7-05 Design Spectrum

Newmark-Hall Spectrum, 5%damping, PGA=0.40 g

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)

Spe

ctra

l Acc

eler

atio

n (

g)

ASCE 7-05 Design Spectrum

Newmark-Hall Spectrum, 5%damping, PGA=0.40 g

CIE 619 Chapter 4 – Seismic Analysis

65

Ground Motion Ensembles (Ground Response Spectra)

Ground Motion EnsemblesGround Response Spectra

Building

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)

Spe

ctra

l Acc

eler

atio

n (g

)

ASCE 7-05 Design Spectrum

Newmark-Hall Spectrum, 5%damping, PGA=0.40 g


Recommended