RESULTS FROM THE DOAB USER NEEDS STUDY

Janneke Adema(DOAB)OASPA conference 19-21 September, Budapest

www.doabooks.orgwww.doabooks.org

User Needs Research

• Overview of the online DOAB discussion• First results of the DOAB user needs survey

“The aim of the DOAB (Directory of Open Access Books) User Needs Research is to evaluate users’ experiences of DOAB (as it is currently set up in its beta-version), and to collect data on user needs and expectations with respect to a directory of Open Access books.”

http://listserv.gwdg.de/pipermail/doab/

http://doabooks.wordpress.com/

Main Focus Points of the Discussion

• What is an Open Access Book?

• What are suitable (requirements for) funding schemes/business models for Open Access books?

• How do we establish the quality of Open Access Books?

What is an Open Access Book?

Read-Only access or Read/Write access (Gratis vs Libre)

• Read-Only

- Authors’ needs- Access is the key issue- Different rights for different materials?

• Read/Write Access

- Compare with free software- Open Access definitions and declarations: Gratis + Libre

- Publishing/scholarship is a collaborative effort

‘Clearly, making works free to read has a huge impact on the dissemination of knowledge.’

- Rupert Gatti

Read-Only access or Read/Write access (Gratis vs Libre)

• Read-Only

- Authors’ needs- Access is the key issue- Different rights for different materials?

• Read/Write Access

- Compare with free software- Open Access definitions and declarations: Gratis + Libre

- Publishing/scholarship is a collaborative effort

• Not a simple dichotomy

• Reluctance amongst book publishers to use less restrictive Open Access licenses.

• Rethink our institutions

• Scholar’s needs

• Text and Data mining

‘I think there is much need for OA in the arts, humanities, and social sciences, but, from my experience, for the project to really catch on widely among the academic body in those disciplines, it has to have strong intellectual underpinnings’

- Joanna Zylinska

• Not a simple dichotomy

• Reluctance amongst book publishers to use less restrictive Open Access licenses.

• Rethink our institutions

• Scholar’s needs

• Text and Data mining

What are suitable (requirements for)funding schemes/business models for Open Access books?

• Access

• New collaborative production processes

• Enhanced content and formats

• Licenses

• Funding/research grants

• Alternative business models

• Funder’s responsibility

‘I’ve been known to buy print copies of books that I’ve discovered in Open Access

digital format’-

Malcolm Heath

• Access

• New collaborative production processes

• Enhanced content and formats

• Licenses

• Funding/research grants

• Alternative business models

• Funder’s responsibility

‘(…) for now I would be inclined to at least require re-use licenses as a common

standard for funded projects.’-

Angela Holzer

How do we establish the quality of Open Access Books?

• Evaluation procedure visible within the book

• Peer review, OA and ebooks

• Publisher Seal of Approval

• How to enforce?

• Differences in peer review

• Quality control or quality enhancement?

• Flexible standards

‘My view is that decisions about whether a new publisher is following appropriate quality-control practices should be decided by senior scholars in the discipline in which the publisher

operates, possibly in conjunction with established publishers. OASPA, the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, is a great start in this direction and

worth supporting.’-

Heather Morrison

• Evaluation procedure visible within the book

• Peer review, OA and ebooks

• Publisher Seal of Approval

• How to enforce?

• Differences in peer review

• Quality control or quality enhancement?

• Flexible standards

‘In moving to OA book publishing, should we force all publishers everywhere to adopt the same strict peer review procedures?

Or should we identify a number of adequate forms of quality control and screen OA publishers on the type of

quality control they are conducting? Or should we primarily aim to make the

quality control transparent and expect publishers to improve their reviewing procedures as they are made public?’

- Eelco Ferwerda

• Evaluation procedure visible within the book

• Peer review, OA and ebooks

• Publisher Seal of Approval

• How to enforce?

• Differences in peer review

• Quality control or quality enhancement?

• Flexible standards

‘One reason to avoid delineating which quality control mechanisms to use is that this could stifle what I see as

needed innovation in this area, such as open approaches to peer review and the more open approaches to writing such as

liquid peer review’-

Heather Morrison

DOAB SurveyDOAB Survey

• 15th August – 15th September

• 202 people filled out the survey, from all over the world

• 91 librarians• 55 academics• 23 DOAB publishers• 24 non-DOAB publishers• 9 funders/university representatives

CopyrightCopyright

AcademicsAcademics

Quality Quality ControlControl

Thank You

For more information, comments or questions:ademaj@uni.coventry.ac.uk

www.openreflections.wordpress.com@openreflections