+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley...

Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley...

Date post: 17-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: christal-fowler
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
35
Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security Can We Afford Public Pensions? www.nirsonline.org
Transcript
Page 1: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Retirement Issues 2013National Press FoundationWashington, D.C.

April 8, 2013 Diane OakleyExecutive DirectorNational Institute on Retirement Security

Can We Afford Public Pensions?

www.nirsonline.org

Page 2: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Overview

• State of U.S. Retirement

• Economics of Pensions

• Close Up on Public Pensions

2

Page 3: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

The Quiet Crisis: Retirement Deficit • Massive wave of Baby Boomers retiring

and majority ill-prepared, especially late boomers.

• Insufficient 401(k) savings, private pensions disappearing, Social Security cuts, plus increase healthcare costs.

• Half workforce has no workplace retirement plan – women and minorities particularly vulnerable.

• What are costs of broken system? Financial strains on families to support parents, pressure on public assistance, reverting to elder poverty.

3

Page 4: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Shifting Retirement InfrastructureShifts Risk to Individuals

Source:, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, 20129

National Retirement Risk Index ( 1983 – 2010) Working Households at Risk of Falling Short of Pre-

Retirement Living Standard

Source: DOL, PBGC and EBRI

Private Sector Workers Participating in Employer Based Retirement Plan by Plan Type, 1979-2008 (all workers)

Page 5: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

5

23 Million Americans 60+ Received DB Income, but Boomers Trend Downward

Percent of Older Americans (60+) with DB Pension Income, 1998, 2003, 2006 and 2010

32%28%

52% 52%48%

43%

34% 34%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

1998 2003 2006 2010Own DB Pension Own or Spouse's DB Pension

Source: The Pension Factor, Table 1.

Page 6: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

What Do Americans Think About Retirement?

6

Page 7: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Anxiety Not Dissipating

How concerned are you about current economic conditions affecting your ability to achieve a secure retirement?

7Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 8: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

It’s Only Getting Harder to Prepare for Retirement

Do you feel that – compared to today – it will be easier or harder for Americans to prepare for retirement in the future, or will there be no

difference?

8Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 9: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

High Support for Pensions

How would you describe your overall view of a pension?

9Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 10: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Disappearance of Pensions an Impediment to “American Dream”

To what extent do you agree/disagree that the disappearance of pensions has made it harder for workers to achieve the

“American Dream?”

10

Page 11: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Pension Bigger Employer Draw Than 401(k) AccountsLet’s say you’re taking a new job and considering two employers – one offered a pension and the other a 401(k). How likely would you

be to choose the employer with the pension or 401(k)?

11Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 12: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Economics of Pensions Pensions are unique in that they:• Avoid the problem of “over-saving” by pooling the longevity

risks of large numbers of individuals – resulting in a 15% cost savings.

• Are ageless and therefore can perpetually maintain an optimally balanced investment portfolio rather than the typical individual strategy of down-shifting over time to a lower risk/return asset allocation – resulting in a 5% cost savings.

• Achieve higher investment returns as compared to individual investors because of professional asset management and lower fees – resulting in a 26% cost savings.

12

Page 13: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Economics of Pensions Economies of scale enable group pensions to provide same retirement

benefit at half the cost of individual 401(k)-type account.

DB pensions cost 46% less than DC accounts for the same benefit.

Conversely, DC system costs 83% more than DB system.

Source: NIRS, Better Bang for the Buck, 2008 13

Page 14: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

What About Public Pensions?

Source: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (data not provided for 1995, 1997, 1999)

Strong Position Going Into Financial Crisis

Aggregate State and Local Pension Funding Levels Assets as a Share of Trust Fund Liabilities (percent)

14

Page 15: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

NIRS “On The Right Track?”Recent Reforms

• Closing a DB pension can incur unfunded liability growth and large transition costs.

• Substituting DB pensions with DC accounts is inefficient.

• Most states have pursued changes to DB plans to make them more sustainable.

15

Page 16: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Aggressive Reforms In Virtually All States to Ensure Sustainability of Public Pensions

9

16

29

39

0 10 20 30 40 50

Employer contribution increase (statutory)

Reduced COLA for current members

Employee contribution increase

Reduced benefits for new hires

Number of States

Source: Author’s analysis of NCSL data. Changes affect some or all members of state-run plans in each state.

Types of Changes Enacted

16

Page 17: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

States Adjusted DB Plans Rather Than Wholesale Switch to DC Plans

3

3

33

0 10 20 30 40

Mandatory CB (DB closed)

DB + DC hybrid

Adjust existing DB plan

Number of States

Types of Changes to New Hire Benefits

Source: Author’s analysis of NCSL data. Changes affect some or all members of state-run plans in each state.

17

Page 18: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Example 1:Minnesota Statewide Retirement Systems

• Medium term cost decrease; dramatic short term cost increase.

• Long term: DC plan less efficient than existing DB in cost-benefit terms

• $2.8B transition cost, mostly from accelerated amortization of unfunded liabilities

18

Page 19: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Example 2: Texas Teachers Retirement System Study

• $11.7 billion/49% increase in closed DB plan liability due to a more liquid asset allocation

• Cost comparison of multiple plan design options– DC most expensive– DB least expensive

19

Page 20: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

• Simulations to realistically measure probable outcomes for workers in DC system:

– lower returns– higher fees– market volatility

• Workers would have only a 50% chance of reaching 60% of the benefit provided by the DB plan, at the same cost.

Example 2 (continued): Texas Teachers Retirement System Study

20

Page 21: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Recent Reforms Projected to Work

Boston College Center for Retirement Research:

• For most plans, reforms “fully offset or more than offset the impact of the financial crisis on the sponsors’ costs.”

• Normal cost for employer will be halved, from 8.2% to 4.5% of payroll.

• Pension costs as a share of state-local budgets will fall below pre-crisis levels over long run.

Munnell et al., Feb 2013.

21

Page 22: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Strong Support for Public Pensions Because Employees Pay

To what extent do you agree/disagree that state/local employees deserve benefits because they finance cost by contributing from every

paycheck?

22Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 23: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

American Believe Public Pension Benefits Levels Just Right

The average retirement benefit for public workers is $2150/month. Some may be more or less. Is that too high, low, about right?

23Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 24: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Police/Fire Deserve Pensions to Compensate for Risk

To what extent do you agree/disagree that police/fire have agreed to take jobs that involve risk and therefore deserve pensions that will afford

a secure retirement?

24Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 25: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Teachers Deserve Pensions to Compensate for Pay

To what extent do you agree/disagree that public school teachers deserve pension to compensate for lower pay?

25Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 26: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Americans Want Pensions for All

To what extent do you agree/disagree that all workers, not just those employed by state/local governments, should have a pension?

26Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 27: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Retirement Needs Reform (89%) To what extent do you agree/disagree that the retirement system in this country is under stress and needs reform?

27Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 28: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

What do Americans think about at “new” pension system for all?

Suppose Congress were considering a bill that would provide all workers access to a new type of privately-run pension plan. 

All Americans could participate and make contributions along with their employer. Like a traditional pension, the money would be professionally managed. At retirement, those who participate would get a check every month for as long as they live.  But unlike a traditional pension, the benefits would be portable so that people can take their money with them as they change jobs.  This retirement plan would also be easy for employers, because they wouldn’t be responsible for administering the funds or managing the money. Those tasks would all be handled by an independent board of trustees.  Employers would just have to enroll their employees and make sure that their contributions go into the plan. 

Is this a good idea? 

28

Page 29: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Strong Support for “New” Pension System for all Americans

29Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 30: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

High Appeal: Portable, Monthly Income, Available to All

How appealing are each of the following aspects of this plan?

30Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 31: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Economic Imperative for Retirement Security

To what degree do you agree/disagree that increasing numbers of Baby Boomers retiring without pensions & inadequate savings is

putting stress on families and the economy?

31Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 32: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Pensions Ensure Self-Reliance

To what extent do you agree/disagree that all workers should have a pension to be self-reliant, independent in retirement?

32Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 33: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Washington Must Give Retirement Higher Priority

To what extent do you agree/disagree that leaders in Washington need to give a higher priority to ensuring more

Americans can have a secure retirement?

33Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 34: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Key Take-Aways

• Quiet Crisis – most Americans not prepared to be self-sufficient in retirement retirement.

• High cost for retirement insecurity – for individuals, families, public assistance, broader economy.

• Americans see pensions as solution to relieve high retirement anxiety.

• Public pensions recovering from impacts of financial crisis, continuing pensions.

Page 35: Retirement Issues 2013 National Press Foundation Washington, D.C. April 8, 2013 Diane Oakley Executive Director National Institute on Retirement Security.

Questions?

Diane OakleyNIRS Executive Director

[email protected]

www.nirsonline.org


Recommended