10
Short Response (SR)CommentaryThis year’s SR subtest comprised 17 items across eight units. As students worked through each unit, they interacted with challenging and engaging stimulus material. Test developers paid careful attention to framing each item in a way that made it accessible to most students. The SR testpaper comprised units with stimulus material selected from fields as diverse as mathematics, science, history, IT, literature, physical and social sciences and visual arts.
This year’s paper was varied in its content, covering a broad range of CCEs. The different tasks included using various mathematical formulae, presenting data in a table, investigating the behaviour of a correction factor, testing the strength of passwords, drawing an arc with a compass, composing a short speech, explaining using examples, comparing and giving reasons for differences, justifying a personal interpretation from stimuli as diverse as a company logo, a photographic triptych and a historical account. These tasks aimed to interest students and impart knowledge while assessing student achievement.
Model responses and commentaries on student performanceWhat follows is an item-by-item discussion that includes model responses and marking schemes, tables and graphs of the distributions of grades, and commentaries that discuss how students handled the tasks noting some common observed errors and that give suggestions that might be useful. At times, references to specific student responses are included to exemplify observations. As much as possible, model responses are actual student responses. Model responses are those that demonstrate a high level of performance and would have been awarded the highest grade.
For some items, especially the more open-ended items, responses were extremely varied. For these it is not possible to provide examples of the many ways in which students responded. The detailed, item-specific marking schemes indicate the scope of acceptable responses for different grades. Even for the more closed items the marking schemes demonstrate that different ways of perceiving ‘the solution’ were able to gain credit.
Marking schemesThe marking schemes used during the marking operation and included in this section of the Retrospective are not designed to be read in isolation. They are but one element of the marking prescription. During the marking operation markers undergo rigorous training in how to apply the marking schemes to student responses of one marking unit. The training involves careful consideration and application of the material presented by immersers.
For organisational purposes during the marking operation, the testpaper units were grouped into five marking units. In 2011, Marking Unit 1 contained testpaper units One and Five, Marking Unit 2 contained testpaper units Two and Eight, Marking Unit 3 contained testpaper unit Three, Marking Unit 4 contained testpaper units Four and Six and Marking Unit 7 contained testpaper unit Seven.
Since all short response items are double marked, this means that a student’s response booklet was marked by at least 10 different independent markers — more, if any response/s required referee marking.
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
SR 2011 summary
Note: CCEs specific to an item are listed on the item’s marking scheme.The baskets into which CCEs are grouped are shown in Appendix 2.
Unit Item Basket Common Curriculum Elements
OneCollatz
1 16 Calculating with or without calculators37 Applying a progression of steps to achieve the required answer
TwoUnilever
2 4 Interpreting the meaning of words …5 Interpreting the meaning of pictures …31 Interrelating ideas/themes/issues
ThreeKangaroo Count
3 14 Compiling results in a tabular form16 Calculating with or without calculators17 Estimating numerical magnitude19 Substituting in formulae33 Reaching a conclusion which is consistent with a given set of
assumptions37 Applying a progression of steps to achieve the required answer
4
5
FourTunnel
6 10 Using vocabulary appropriate to a context29 Comparing, contrasting31 Interrelating ideas/themes/issues33 Inferring43 Analysing48 Justifying
7
FivePassword Protected
8 6 Interpreting the meaning of tables …7 Translating from one form to another13 Recording/noting data16 Calculating with or without calculators19 Substituting in formulae30 Classifying36 Applying strategies to trial and test ideas and procedures43 Analysing46 Creating/composing/devising
9
10
SixTriptych
11 5 Interpreting the meaning of pictures/illustrations31 Interrelating ideas/themes/issues43 Analysing
SevenIsland Views
12 6 Interpreting the meaning of … maps …16 Calculating with or without calculators17 Estimating numerical magnitude19 Substituting in formulae32 Deducing37 Applying a progression of steps to achieve the required answer43 Analysing50 Visualising57 Manipulating/operating/using equipment
13
14
EightRhetoric
15 4 Interpreting the meaning of words …10 Using vocabulary appropriate to a context26 Explaining to others27 Expounding a viewpoint30 Classifying43 Analysing44 Synthesising45 Evaluating46 Creating/composing/devising
16
17
Queensland Studies Authority | 11
12
Unit One
This unit is based on a cartoon that makes reference to the Collatz Conjecture.
The following table shows the percentage of responses awarded the various grades for the item in this unit.
Item 1
Model response
CommentaryItem 1 is a two-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 37 Applying a progression of steps to achieve the required answer and 16 Calculating with or without calculators.
This item required students to look at a cartoon that made reference to a mathematical conjecture by Lothar Collatz. Students were to show two different ways of calculating the value of the number that belongs in the empty enlarged bubble on the left-hand side of the cartoon. The actual conjecture was articulated for the students separate to the cartoon.
An A-grade response needed to show the correct working to provide 53 as the required number. The two acceptable calculations showed 106 (an even number) divided by 2 and 160 minus 1 then divided by 3. No incorrect working could be shown in the creditable parts of the response. Students should be careful to only submit their final response and to clearly cross out any other working.
The responses that were awarded a B-grade mostly showed that students did not do as the stem instructed and calculate 53 from 160 but simply verified that using 53 and applying the rule for an odd number would give 160 as the result. Students should be mindful of responding to the specific task stipulated in the stem.
A B C D E N O
Item 1 45.4 23.9 16.5 9.9 4.1
A shaded box indicates that the grade was not available for that item.
I. Show two different ways of calculating the value of the number that belongs in the
enlarged bubble on the left-hand side of the cartoon.
II. Write the number that belongs in the enlarged bubble here.
Show all steps of one calculation here.
Show all steps of the other calculation here.
53
106 ÷ 2 = 53
160 – 1= 53
3
A B C N O
100%
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
Octo
be
r 1
0,
20
11
14
:01
pm
(*fo
ote
r to
re
ma
in u
ntil fin
al p
rin
t*)
T:\
qcs\s
ri\s
ri2
011
\Pa
pe
r\sri3
92\m
sch
em
es\0
1-0
01
-ms.f
m
UN
IT
ON
EIT
EM
1
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 1
1 o
f 6
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
37
Ap
ply
ing
a p
rog
ress
ion
of
step
s to
ach
iev
e th
e re
qu
ired
an
swer
16
Ca
lcu
lati
ng
wit
h o
r w
ith
ou
t ca
lcu
lato
rs
C
Th
e re
spon
se p
rovid
es 5
3 a
s th
e re
qu
ired
nu
mb
er
AN
D O
NE
of
•su
ffic
ien
t, c
orr
ect
work
ing t
hat
show
s h
ow
53 c
an
be
calc
ula
ted
fro
m 1
06
•su
ffic
ien
t, c
orr
ect
work
ing t
hat
show
s h
ow
53 c
an
be
calc
ula
ted
by b
ack
track
ing f
rom
160
•a
corr
ect
met
hod
th
at
wou
ld c
hec
k t
hat
53 w
ou
ld
lea
d t
o 1
06
•a
corr
ect
met
hod
th
at
wou
ld c
hec
k t
hat
53 w
ou
ld
lea
d t
o 1
60
.
No in
corr
ect
work
ing is
show
n in
th
e cr
edit
ab
le p
art
s
of
the
resp
on
se.
A
Th
e re
spo
nse
pro
vid
es 5
3 a
s th
e re
qu
ired
nu
mb
er a
nd
pro
vid
es s
uff
icie
nt,
corr
ect
work
ing t
hat
show
s h
ow
53
ca
n b
e ca
lcu
late
d
•fr
om
106
•b
y b
ack
tra
ckin
g f
rom
160
.
No in
corr
ect
wo
rkin
g is
show
n in
th
e cr
edit
ab
le p
art
s
of
the
resp
on
se.
B
Th
e re
spo
nse
pro
vid
es 5
3 a
s th
e re
qu
ired
nu
mb
er a
nd
pro
vid
es
•su
ffic
ien
t, c
orr
ect
work
ing t
hat
show
s h
ow
53 c
an
be
calc
ula
ted
fro
m 1
06
•a
corr
ect
met
hod
th
at
wou
ld c
hec
k t
hat
53 w
ou
ld
lea
d t
o 1
60
.
No in
corr
ect
work
ing is
show
n in
th
e cr
edit
ab
le p
art
s
of
the
resp
on
se.
Th
e re
spo
nse
pro
vid
es 5
3 a
s th
e re
qu
ired
nu
mb
er a
nd
pro
vid
es
•a
corr
ect
met
hod
th
at
wou
ld c
hec
k t
hat
53 w
ou
ld
lea
d t
o 1
06
•su
ffic
ien
t, c
orr
ect
work
ing t
hat
show
s h
ow
53 c
an
be
calc
ula
ted
by
back
tra
ckin
g f
rom
16
0.
No in
corr
ect
work
ing is
show
n in
th
e cr
edit
ab
le p
art
s
of
the
resp
on
se.
OR
Note
s:
1.
Inco
rrec
t se
ttin
g o
ut
(e.g
. =
53)
is n
ot
pen
ali
sed
.
2.
Ch
eck
ing t
hat
53 l
ead
s to
160, i.
e.
does
not
show
back
track
ing f
rom
160.
16
01
1
59
3=
–
53
31
+
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
I. II.
10
62
53
=
16
01
–
3---
------
------
---
53
=
53
Last
Page
Cou
nt
Queensland Studies Authority | 13
14
Unit Two
This unit is based on the multifaceted mission statement of a particular company and the logo that appears on its products.
The following table shows the percentage of responses awarded the various grades for the item in this unit.
Item 2
Model response
A B C D E N O
Item 2 0.9 11.3 23.1 61.3 2.1 1.3
A shaded box indicates that the grade was not available for that item.
ITEM 2 [***]
Using examples, explain how the mission statement is reflected in the logo.
...............................................................................
...............................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
In the white space around
the logo, label features of
the logo to which you refer.
The style used in drawing the many small icons gives a feeling of
‘movement’ which reflects vitality. Nutrition is indicated through
the carrot and the spoon, hygiene by the water splash, personal care by the pot of
moisturiser and the long-sleeved shirt to protect from sunburn. The smiling lips
represent looking good, the heart represents feeling good and the palm tree reminds us
of tropical holidays and getting more out of life.
palm tree
spoon
carrot
smiling lips
water splash
heart
shirt
pot of moisturiser
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
CommentaryItem 2 is a three-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 4 Interpreting the meaning of words …, 5 Interpreting the meaning of pictures … and 31 Interrelating ideas/themes/issues.
This item required students to explain, using examples, how the mission statement is reflected in the logo. The cue indicated that students should label features of the logo in the white space around the logo. The intention of this was to allow unambiguous interpretation of what students were referring to in their written responses.
The mission statement included seven facets: vitality; the three needs of nutrition, hygiene and personal care; and the three aspirations of feeling good, looking good and getting more out of life. The logo used visual features such as picture icons (the DNA symbol, fish, carrot, hands) and the actual shape and colour of the logo (flowing lines, the vibrant purple colour, U shape).
The marking scheme recognised two different ways of approaching the task. One way was to find individual features to represent needs, aspirations and vitality as referred to in the mission statement. Another way was to show how the three needs were represented in the logo and then make links from the needs to the aspirations (or vitality), e.g. ‘The water bubbles represent hygiene and if you are clean you will certainly feel good.’
It was not enough just for responses to make an association between a facet and a feature of the logo. Responses had to show how it was represented, e.g. ‘The bird stands for the blue bird of happiness and happiness makes you feel good.’
An A-grade response could either show how six of the seven facets were represented in the logo or show how the three needs were represented and then make sufficient credible links to reveal how the three aspirations (or two aspirations and vitality) were achieved.
Many students discussed the features of the logo but did not show the link between this discussion of the logo and a facet, e.g. vitality or personal needs. The link had to be explicit.
Students should practise identifying all the key words of the stimulus material and the item stem to better understand exactly what to do. Responses that mentioned a few features of the logo and then had a general discussion of the company’s positive intentions or their respect for the environment were graded at the lower end of the marking scheme because they focused on the logo rather than linking the logo to the mission statement.
A B C N O
100%
D
Queensland Studies Authority | 15
16
UN
IT
TW
OIT
EM
2
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 2
1 o
f 5
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
4In
terp
reti
ng
th
e m
ean
ing
of
wo
rds
…
5In
terp
reti
ng
th
e m
ean
ing
of
pic
ture
s …
31
Inte
rrel
ati
ng
id
eas/
them
es/i
ssu
es C
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s h
ow
th
ree
face
ts
are
rep
rese
nte
d i
n t
he
log
o.
Th
e re
spon
se
•sh
ow
s h
ow
tw
o o
f th
e n
eed
s are
rep
rese
nte
d i
n t
he
logo
•m
ak
es s
uff
icie
nt
cred
ible
lin
ks
to
revea
l h
ow
on
e of
the
asp
irati
on
s is
ach
ieved
.
OR
A
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s h
ow
six
of
the
seven
face
ts a
re r
epre
sen
ted
in
th
e lo
go.
Th
e re
spon
se
•sh
ow
s h
ow
th
e th
ree
nee
ds
are
rep
rese
nte
d i
n t
he
log
o
•m
ak
es s
uff
icie
nt
cred
ible
lin
ks
to
revea
l h
ow
th
e th
ree
asp
irati
on
s (o
r
two
asp
ira
tio
ns
an
d v
itali
ty)
are
ach
ieved
.
OR
B
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s h
ow
fou
r fa
cets
are
rep
rese
nte
d i
n t
he
logo.
Th
e re
spon
se
•sh
ow
s h
ow
th
e th
ree
nee
ds
are
rep
rese
nte
d i
n t
he
logo
•m
ak
es s
uff
icie
nt
cred
ible
lin
ks
to
revea
l h
ow
on
e of
the
asp
irati
on
s is
ach
ieved
.
OR
D
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s h
ow
on
e fa
cet
is
rep
rese
nte
d i
n t
he
log
o.
Th
e re
spon
se p
rovid
es a
dis
cuss
ion
of
posi
tive
asp
ects
of
life
wh
ich
in
clu
des
refe
ren
ces
to e
xa
mp
les
fro
m t
he
log
o.
OR
Note
s:
1.
Th
e ‘n
eed
s’ a
re n
utr
itio
n, h
ygie
ne
an
d p
erso
nal
care
. T
he
‘asp
irati
on
s’ a
re f
eeli
ng g
ood,
lookin
g g
ood a
nd
get
tin
g m
ore
ou
t o
f li
fe.
Th
e se
ven
fa
cets
co
mp
rise
th
e n
eed
s, t
he
asp
irati
on
s an
d v
itali
ty.
2.
Fea
ture
s m
ay i
ncl
ud
e in
div
idu
al
icon
s, t
he
“U
”sh
ap
e, t
he
colo
ur,
th
e sm
ooth
lin
es a
nd
oth
er r
elev
an
t asp
ects
of
the
logo.
3.
A r
esp
on
se ‘
show
s h
ow
’ a f
ace
t is
rep
rese
nte
d w
hen
it
is c
lear
how
th
e fe
atu
re c
ited
is
ab
le t
o b
e in
terp
rete
d a
s re
pre
sen
tati
ve
of
tha
t fa
cet.
So
me
ass
oci
ati
on
s a
re c
lea
r (e
.g.
a c
arr
ot
rep
rese
nti
ng
nu
trit
ion
); o
ther
s w
ill
req
uir
e a s
tate
men
t to
mak
e th
e ass
oci
ati
on
cle
ar
(e.g
. th
e p
alm
tre
e re
pre
sen
ts g
etti
ng m
ore
ou
t of
life
bec
au
se i
t is
rem
inis
cen
t of
holi
days)
.
4.
Th
e fo
llow
ing a
ssoci
ati
on
s are
con
sid
ered
to
be
clea
r in
sh
ow
ing h
ow
face
ts a
re r
epre
sen
ted
in
th
e lo
go.
5.
Lin
ks
ma
y i
nv
olv
e v
ita
lity
, in
div
idu
al
nee
ds,
in
div
idu
al
asp
irati
on
s, t
wo
or
thre
e n
eed
s co
llec
tivel
y o
r tw
o o
r th
ree
asp
ira
tion
s co
llec
tiv
ely.
Vit
ali
tyN
utr
itio
nH
ygie
ne
Per
son
al
Care
Fee
lin
g g
ood
Look
ing g
ood
spark
le
exp
losi
on
fish
carr
ot
gra
pes
chil
li
icec
ream
past
ry (
Dan
ish
)
spoon
bow
l
recy
clin
g
wate
r/w
ave/
wate
rsp
lash
/
bu
bb
les
han
d +
bu
bb
les
han
d +
wate
r
soap
su
ds
con
tain
er/p
ot
of
crea
m/m
ois
turi
ser
vit
am
in/p
ill
bott
le
per
fum
e
hea
rtcl
oth
es/s
hir
t
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 2
2 o
f 5
UN
IT
TW
OIT
EM
2
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
1.
Th
e st
yle
use
d i
n d
raw
ing t
he
man
y s
mall
ico
ns
giv
es a
fee
lin
g o
f ‘m
ovem
ent’
wh
ich
refl
ects
vit
ali
ty. N
utr
itio
n is
ind
ica
ted
th
rou
gh
th
e ca
rro
t a
nd
th
e sp
oo
n, h
yg
ien
e b
y t
he
wate
r sp
lash
, p
erso
nal
care
by t
he
pot
of
mois
turi
ser
an
d t
he
lon
g-s
leev
ed s
hir
t to
pro
tect
fro
m s
un
bu
rn. T
he
smil
ing l
ips
rep
rese
nt
look
ing g
ood
, th
e h
eart
rep
rese
nts
feel
ing g
ood
an
d t
he
palm
tre
e re
min
ds
us
of
trop
ical
holi
days
an
d g
etti
ng m
ore
ou
t of
life
.
pa
lm t
ree
sp
oo
n
carr
ot
sm
iling
lip
s
wa
ter
sp
las
h
hea
rt
shi
rt
po
t o
f m
ois
turi
ser
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
2.
Th
e sp
oon
an
d c
hil
li a
re r
elate
d t
o f
ood
an
d t
her
efore
nu
trit
ion
an
d i
f you
have
good
nu
trit
ion
, you
’re
more
lik
ely t
o f
eel
good
an
d g
et m
ore
ou
t of
life
. T
he
bu
bb
les
an
d
wave/
wate
r in
dic
ate
hygie
ne
an
d c
lea
nli
nes
s. P
erso
nal
care
is
rep
rese
nte
d b
y l
ips
(lip
balm
) an
d t
he
com
b b
ecau
se t
hes
e th
ings
ind
icate
look
ing a
fter
you
r ap
pea
ran
ce a
nd
if
you
are
cle
an
an
d w
ell-
gro
om
ed y
ou
look
good
.
com
b
sp
oo
n
chill
iw
ave
/wa
terbu
bble
s
lips
Queensland Studies Authority | 17
18
Unit Three
The items of this unit are based on information about aerial surveys undertaken in order to estimate numbers of kangaroos.
The following table shows the percentage of responses awarded the various grades for the items in this unit.
Item 3
Model response
A B C D E N O
Item 3 11.8 18.1 33.4 7.3 25.2 4.2
Item 4 26.8 22.5 20.8 12.2 11.5 6.2
Item 5 2.4 6.4 7.2 25.7 12.5 28.8 17
A shaded box indicates that the grade was not available for that item.
For a survey of 21 counting periods, what total survey area (in km2) was viewed by the two
observers?
..............................................................................................
..............................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
Show all
steps. Distance travelled by each observer = 21 x x 18560 x 60
87
Area seen by one observer = 93.8875 x 0.2 = 18.7775
Area seen by two observers = x 2 = 37.555 km2
18.7775
= 93.8875
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
CommentaryItem 3 is a three-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 37 Applying a progression of steps to achieve the required answer and 16 Calculating with or without calculators.
This item required students to find the total area (in km2) surveyed by two observers counting kangaroos from a plane travelling at 185 km/h. The count was done within strips, 200 metres wide, either side of the plane during 21 observation periods each lasting 87 seconds. The cue instructed students to show all steps.
To find the total survey area the area of the rectangular survey strip on each side of the plane had to be found by multiplying the width of the strip by its length. The length, the distance flown by the plane, would be calculated by multiplying the speed of the plane by the time of the counting periods. The area of one strip would then be doubled to account for the two observers. Two unit conversions were necessary to correctly calculate the total survey area — one to have the length and the width in the same units and the other to have the speed and the time using compatible units. As the result was required in km2 the most efficient units to work in would have been kilometres for the length and therefore for time, hours. Some students chose to work in metres but then had to convert m2 to km2. This is a more involved conversion and was not handled well.
An A-grade response found the total area by a correct combination of the given data and correctly attended to unit conversions and rounding. No incorrect working could be shown.
The cue instructing students to show all steps was mostly heeded. Some responses showed good progress towards a solution but failed to track which data had been used and so left some information out. This led to incomplete solutions which could not be awarded the highest grade. A common omission was to leave out the information that there were two observers.
A general lack of awareness about the importance of matching units was also evident with responses frequently showing poor management of the mixture of metres, kilometres, seconds, minutes and hours. When many pieces of data must be combined to work towards a solution it is important to record when and how each piece is used. This can be done best by noting in words beside the mathematical steps what is being found by a particular calculation. It is also important to write the units next to the data and ensure that calculations only occur between compatible units.
A B C N O
100%
D
Queensland Studies Authority | 19
20
UN
IT
TH
RE
EIT
EM
3
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 3
1 o
f 4
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
do
es n
ot
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
37
Ap
ply
ing
a p
rog
ress
ion
of
step
s to
ach
iev
e th
e re
qu
ired
an
swer
16
Ca
lcu
lati
ng
wit
h o
r w
ith
ou
t ca
lcu
lato
rs
C
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s w
ork
ing t
hat
incl
ud
es a
t le
ast
on
e co
rrec
t u
nit
con
ver
sio
n c
orr
ectl
y u
sed
wit
h t
hre
e o
f
the
five
key
nu
mb
ers.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s th
e an
swer
for
the
tota
l a
rea i
s b
etw
een
37
.25
an
d 3
7.8
5
incl
usi
ve.
OR
A
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s w
ork
ing t
hat
corr
ectl
y a
tten
ds
to
•u
nit
con
ver
sion
s
•th
e si
ngle
-str
ip a
rea
•th
e to
tal
are
a.
Th
e a
nsw
er f
or
the
tota
l a
rea
is
bet
wee
n
37.2
5 a
nd
37
.85 i
ncl
usi
ve.
No i
nco
rrec
t w
ork
ing i
s sh
ow
n.
B
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s w
ork
ing t
hat,
exce
pt
for
at
mo
st O
NE
ob
serv
ab
le e
rror,
att
end
s
to •u
nit
con
ver
sion
s
•a
sin
gle
-str
ip a
rea
•a
to
tal
are
a.
Th
e a
nsw
er f
or
the
tota
l a
rea
is
con
seq
uen
tiall
y c
orr
ect.
D
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s w
ork
ing t
hat
incl
ud
es 4
.47 o
r it
s eq
uiv
ale
nt.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s w
ork
ing t
hat
incl
ud
es a
nom
inate
d l
ength
mu
ltip
lied
by
th
e w
idth
wh
ich
is
then
mu
ltip
lied
by e
ith
er
•2
1
or
•2
.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s w
ork
ing t
hat
incl
ud
es a
nom
inate
d s
pee
d
mu
ltip
lied
by
a t
ime
valu
e w
hic
h i
s
then
mu
ltip
lied
by O
NE
of
•0
.2 o
r 2
00
or
•2
1
or
•2
.
OR
OR
Note
s:
1.
Th
e ‘u
nit
co
nver
sion
s’ i
ncl
ud
e ti
me
con
ver
sion
(s),
con
ver
sion
of
km
/hr
to o
ther
un
its
an
d w
idth
con
ver
sion
.
2.
‘Ob
serv
ab
le’
mea
ns
that
suff
icie
nt
inte
rmed
iate
ste
p(s
) are
show
n s
o t
hat
an
in
fere
nce
does
not
nee
d t
o b
e m
ad
e ab
ou
t an
inco
rrec
t re
sult
.
3.
An
err
or
can
in
clu
de
•on
e in
corr
ect
un
it c
on
ver
sio
n
•a r
eco
gn
isa
ble
tra
nsc
rip
tio
n e
rro
r
•si
ngle
in
term
edia
te i
nap
pro
pri
ate
ro
un
din
g.
4.
‘Th
e co
rrec
t u
se o
f k
ey n
um
ber
s’ i
ncl
ud
es m
ult
ipli
cati
on
by
•185 o
r eq
uiv
ale
nt
for
the
spee
d o
f th
e p
lan
e
•87 o
r eq
uiv
ale
nt
for
the
tim
e fo
r ea
ch s
trip
•200 o
r eq
uiv
ale
nt
for
calc
ula
tin
g t
he
are
a o
f st
rip
s
•21 f
or
21 c
ou
nti
ng p
erio
ds
•2 f
or
acc
ou
nti
ng f
or
two o
bse
rver
s.
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
Dis
tan
ce t
ravel
led
by
ea
ch o
bse
rver
= = 9
3.8
875
Are
a s
een
by
on
e o
bse
rver
=
Are
a s
een
by t
wo o
bse
rver
s =
21
87
60
60
------------------
18
5
93
.887
50
.218.7
775
=
18
.777
52
37
.55
5 k
m2
=
Last
Page
Cou
nt
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
Item 4
Model response
CommentaryItem 4 is a two-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 17 Estimating numerical magnitude, 16 Calculating with or without calculators and 37 Applying a progression of steps to achieve the required answer.
This item explained how, after an aerial survey was conducted, the kangaroo count obtained was revised upwards to compensate for those kangaroos missed by the observers. The survey count is multiplied by a vegetation correction factor as the density of the vegetation cover in the survey area is a significant variable
affecting the visibility of the kangaroos from the air. A table showing the different cover factors for light, medium and heavy vegetation for both red and western grey kangaroos was provided in the introduction to the item. The outcome of a survey of part of a block of land with medium vegetation cover was given. Students had to use proportion to arrive at an estimate for the red kangaroo population of the entire block. There were instructions in the cues to show all steps and to round the answer to the nearest 100 kangaroos.
An A-grade response needed to show, (not necessarily in this order): multiplication of the survey count (244) by the correct vegetation correction factor (2.43); calculations to increase this figure proportionately considering that the survey area was 54 km2 and the entire block was 10663 km2. The answer was required to be rounded to the nearest hundred for a final estimate of 117100.
Many of the responses that gained a B-grade did not round the answer to the nearest hundred kangaroos. For a response to be capable of receiving the highest grade the stem and any cues must be attended to. When a particular rounding is required by a cue a common mistake is for intermediate results to be rounded. This cumulative rounding usually gives a result that is not sufficiently accurate. The requested rounding should only be done at the last step. The ‘save’ and ‘recall’ functions on the calculator are useful in maintaining the full numerical result of calculations as they are executed. This gives the most accurate and correct answer.
Students should be encouraged to check the reasonableness of their final answer. Some students gave population estimates only slightly more than the number of kangaroos sighted; for example, 480 is roughly double the survey count of 244 but the block of land is clearly more than twice as big as the survey area. After arriving at a result the stem should be read again and the result considered against the data provided.
Find the total population estimate of red kangaroos in this 10663 km2 block of land.
...........................................................................................
...........................................................................................
...........................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
Show all steps.
Round your
estimate to
the nearest
hundred.
estimated population in survey area = 244 x 2.43 = 592.92
total population estimate = x 10663
= 117079.74
54
592.92
= 117100to nearest hundred
A B C N O
100%
D
Queensland Studies Authority | 21
22
UN
IT
TH
RE
EIT
EM
4
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 3
2 o
f 4
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
has
bee
n m
ad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
17
Est
ima
tin
g n
um
eric
al
ma
gn
itu
de
16
Ca
lcu
lati
ng
wit
h o
r w
ith
ou
t ca
lcu
lato
rs
37
Ap
ply
ing
a p
rog
ress
ion
of
step
s to
ach
iev
e th
e re
qu
ired
an
swer
C
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•ca
lcu
lati
on
s a
sso
cia
ted
wit
h a
mea
nin
gfu
l p
rop
ort
ion
•a
t le
ast
on
e oth
er c
orr
ect
calc
ula
tio
n
tow
ard
a t
ota
l p
op
ula
tio
n e
stim
ate
.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•a
veg
etati
on
fact
or
use
d c
orr
ectl
y
•ca
lcu
lati
on
s ass
oci
ate
d w
ith
a
mea
nin
gfu
l p
rop
ort
ion
.
OR
A
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•th
eveg
etati
on
fact
or
use
d c
orr
ectl
y
•corr
ect ca
lcu
lati
on
s ass
oci
ate
d w
ith
a
mea
nin
gfu
l p
rop
ort
ion
•11
7100 a
s th
e to
tal
pop
ula
tion
esti
ma
te.
B
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•th
ev
eget
ati
on
fa
cto
r u
sed
co
rrec
tly
AN
D
all
ow
ing f
or
at
most
on
e ob
serv
ab
le
erro
r
•ca
lcu
lati
on
s a
ssoci
ate
d w
ith
a
mea
nin
gfu
l p
rop
ort
ion
•a
con
seq
uen
tiall
y c
orr
ect
resu
lt.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•a
veg
etati
on
fact
or
use
d c
orr
ectl
y
•co
rrec
t ca
lcu
lati
on
s ass
oci
ate
d w
ith
a
mea
nin
gfu
l p
rop
ort
ion
•a c
orr
ectl
y c
alc
ula
ted
to
tal
pop
ula
tio
n e
stim
ate
•th
is t
ota
l es
tim
ate
co
rrec
tly
ro
un
ded
to t
he
nea
rest
hu
nd
red
kan
garo
os.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
117
10
0 o
r 11
70
80
or
117
07
9 a
s th
e to
tal
pop
ula
tion
est
imate
.
OR
OR
D
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s w
ork
ing t
hat
incl
ud
es t
he
mu
ltip
lica
tio
n o
f
•th
e v
eget
ati
on
co
rrec
tio
n f
act
or
an
d
•th
e s
urv
ey c
ou
nt.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•ca
lcu
lati
on
s ass
oci
ate
d w
ith
a
mea
nin
gfu
l p
rop
ort
ion
.
OR
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
1.
esti
mate
d p
op
ula
tion
in
su
rvey
are
a =
=
592.9
2
tota
l p
op
ula
tion
est
imate
=
= 1
17 0
79.7
4,
to n
eare
st h
un
dre
d =
11
7 1
00.
24
42
.43
59
2.9
2
54
----------------
10
66
3
No
tes:
1.
Mea
nin
gfu
l p
rop
ort
ion
s are
10663/5
4 (
surv
ey a
reas
per
tota
l b
lock
), 2
44/5
4 (
roos/
km
2),
54
/24
4 (
km
2/r
oo).
2.
‘Ob
serv
ab
le’
mea
ns
that
suff
icie
nt
inte
rmed
iate
ste
p(s
) are
sh
ow
n s
o t
hat
an
in
fere
nce
does
not
nee
d t
o b
e
ma
de
ab
ou
t a
n i
nco
rrec
t re
sult
.
3.
An
err
or
can
in
clu
de
a t
ran
scri
pti
on
err
or ,
a m
ech
an
ica
l er
ror
or
a s
ing
le i
nte
rmed
iate
in
ap
pro
pri
ate
rou
nd
ing.
Last
Page
Cou
nt
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
Item 5
Model response
CommentaryItem 5 is a four-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 19 Substituting in formulae, 14 Compiling results in a tabular form and 33 Reaching a conclusion which is consistent with a given set of assumptions.
This item required students to investigate the correction factor that is used to account for the ground temperature (the GTCF) and its effect on an accurate estimate of kangaroo populations. The GTCF equals 1 for temperatures up to 15°C and for temperatures from 15°C to 40°C, it is calculated using a given formula.
Data based on at least four temperatures was to be presented in a table and then the need for the GTCF had to be discussed (based on its behaviour and the job it was required to do in producing a better final estimate of the population of kangaroos in the survey area). Cues indicated that students were to refer to their table and to identify both practical and mathematical considerations within their response.
An A-grade response needed to provide a table that contained four temperatures spread across the range given in the introductory information. The correct corresponding GTCF data could either have been the GTCF values or the GTCF values multiplied by a nominated number of kangaroos. The table required headings for each of the rows or each of the columns depending on the table's orientation. The response also needed to provide a clear and correct description of the interactions between the variables in the question. The first interaction was between the temperature and the GTCF which increased at an increasing rate as the temperature rose. The second was that as the temperature increased kangaroos were more likely to seek shade. The third was that this kangaroo behaviour would make them difficult to spot and count from a plane. The final interaction was about how a GTCF greater than one multiplied by the kangaroo count would compensate for the decreasing kangaroo count by increasing the numbers to obtain a realistic final estimate.
Once again the correct use of the calculator was essential to gathering the data that would be useful in the response. The formula to be used in this item consisted of an algebraic fraction. Brackets should be used around the numerator or denominator when it contains an operation if the correct calculations are to be executed.
...........................................................................................
...........................................................................................
...........................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
Refer to your
table.
Identify both
practical and
mathematical
considerations.
temperature 15°C 20°C 25°C 30°C 35°C 40°C
GTCF 1 1.1876 1.4619 1.9011 2.7176 4.7619
As the ground temperature rises, the GTCF rises. Above 15 degrees
kangaroos begin sheltering from the heat under vegetation and become
difficult to spot and count. At 15 degrees the estimate is accurate as the
GTCF is 1 but with increasing temperature the count underestimates the
actual population by more and more. To counteract this, the GTCF rises by progressively
more as the temperature rises. For example, at 30 degrees about half the kangaroos are
visible to observers whereas at 40 degrees about one in 5 of the kangaroos is visible so
the count must be multiplied by 4.76 — about 5 to get a better final estimate.
A B C D N O
100%
E
Queensland Studies Authority | 23
24
UN
IT
TH
RE
EIT
EM
5
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 3
3 o
f 4
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
has
bee
n m
ad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
19
Su
bst
itu
tin
g i
n f
orm
ula
e1
4C
om
pil
ing
res
ult
s in
a t
ab
ula
r fo
rm
33
Rea
chin
g a
co
ncl
usi
on
wh
ich
is
con
sist
ent
wit
h a
giv
en s
et o
f a
ssu
mp
tio
ns
C
Th
e ta
ble
pre
sen
ted
sh
ow
s
•fo
ur
tem
per
atu
res
wh
ich
are
wit
hin
th
e giv
en r
an
ge
•co
rres
pon
din
g G
TC
F d
ata
•a
su
itab
le h
ead
ing f
or
on
e
row
or
on
e co
lum
n.
Th
e re
spon
se c
learl
y a
nd
corr
ectl
y d
escr
ibes
an
y T
WO
of
the
fou
r in
tera
ctio
ns.
A
Th
e ta
ble
pre
sen
ted
sh
ow
s
•fo
ur
tem
per
atu
res
wh
ich
are
spre
ad
acr
oss
th
e giv
en
ran
ge
•th
e co
rrec
t co
rres
pon
din
g
GT
CF
da
ta
•su
itab
le h
ead
ings
for
both
row
s o
r b
oth
co
lum
ns.
Ref
eren
ce i
s m
ad
e to
th
e ta
ble
show
n.
Th
e re
spon
se c
learl
y a
nd
corr
ectl
y d
escr
ibes
AL
L o
f th
e
fou
r in
tera
ctio
ns.
B
Th
e ta
ble
pre
sen
ted
sh
ow
s
•th
ree
tem
per
atu
res
wh
ich
are
sp
read
acr
oss
th
e giv
en
ran
ge
•th
e co
rrec
t co
rres
po
nd
ing
GT
CF
da
ta
•a
su
ita
ble
hea
din
g f
or
on
e
row
or
on
e co
lum
n.
Th
e re
spon
se c
lea
rly a
nd
corr
ectl
y d
escr
ibes
an
y
TH
RE
E o
f th
e fo
ur
inte
ract
ion
s.
D
Th
e ta
ble
pre
sen
ted
cle
arl
y
show
s
•fo
ur
tem
per
atu
res
wh
ich
are
wit
hin
th
e giv
en r
an
ge
•th
e co
rrec
t co
rres
pon
din
g
GT
CF
da
ta.
Th
e re
spon
se c
learl
y a
nd
corr
ectl
y d
escr
ibes
an
y T
WO
of
the
fou
r in
tera
ctio
ns.
OR
E
Th
e re
spo
nse
cle
arl
y s
ho
ws
•a
tem
per
atu
re th
at is
gre
ate
r
than
15°C
has
bee
n
sub
stit
ute
d i
nto
th
e G
TC
F
form
ula
•a
co
rrec
t co
rres
po
nd
ing
GT
CF
valu
e h
as
bee
n
calc
ula
ted
.
Th
e re
spon
se c
learl
y a
nd
corr
ectl
y d
escr
ibes
an
y O
NE
of
the
fou
r in
tera
ctio
ns.
OR
Note
s:
1.
GT
CF
data
is
der
ived
eit
her
fro
m a
pp
lica
tion
of
the
GT
CF
form
ula
or
from
th
e G
TC
F m
ult
ipli
ed b
y a
con
stan
t n
um
ber
of
kan
garo
os.
2.
‘Th
e giv
en r
an
ge’
can
be
15°C
(or
on
e oth
er
tem
per
atu
re b
elow
15°C
) an
d a
t le
ast
th
ree
oth
er t
emp
eratu
res
from
16°C
to 4
0°C
in
clu
sive
OR
at
least
fou
r te
mp
eratu
res
from
16°C
to
40°C
in
clu
sive.
3.
Th
e in
tera
ctio
ns
are
•te
mp
era
ture
an
d t
he
valu
e o
f th
e G
TC
F
•te
mp
era
ture
, k
an
ga
roo
beh
av
iou
r a
nd
vis
ibil
ity o
f k
an
garo
os
•v
isib
ilit
y o
f k
an
ga
roo
s a
nd
ka
ng
aro
o c
ou
nt
•th
e G
TC
F a
nd
ob
tain
ing a
n a
ccu
rate
fin
al
esti
mate
base
d o
n t
he
kan
garo
o c
ou
nt.
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 3
4 o
f 4
UN
IT
TH
RE
EIT
EM
5
Last
Page
Cou
nt
Mod
el R
esp
on
se 1
.
As
the
gro
un
d t
emp
eratu
re r
ises
, th
e G
TC
F r
ises
. A
bove
15 d
egre
es k
an
garo
os
beg
in s
hel
teri
ng f
rom
the
hea
t u
nd
er v
eget
ati
on
an
d b
ecom
e d
iffi
cult
to s
pot
an
d c
ou
nt.
At
15 d
egre
es t
he
esti
ma
te is
acc
ura
te
as
the
GT
CF
is
1 b
ut
wit
h i
ncr
easi
ng t
emp
eratu
re t
he
cou
nt
un
der
esti
mate
s th
e a
ctu
al
pop
ula
tio
n b
y
more
an
d m
ore
. T
o c
ou
nte
ract
th
is, th
e G
TC
F r
ises
by p
rogre
ssiv
ely m
ore
as
the
tem
per
atu
re r
ises
. F
or
exam
ple
, at
30 d
egre
es a
bou
t h
alf
th
e k
an
garo
os
are
vis
ible
to o
bse
rver
s w
her
eas
at
40 d
egre
es a
bou
t
on
e in
5 o
f th
e k
an
ga
roo
s is
vis
ible
so t
he
cou
nt
mu
st b
e m
ult
ipli
ed b
y 4
.76
— a
bo
ut
5 t
o g
et a
bet
ter
fin
al
esti
ma
te.
tem
per
atu
re1
5°C
20°C
25
°C3
0°C
35
°C4
0°C
GT
CF
11
.1876
1.4
619
1.9
011
2.7
176
4.7
619
Mod
el R
esp
on
se 2
.
Th
e ta
ble
sh
ow
s th
e G
TC
F, w
hen
ap
pli
ed t
o a
co
un
t o
f 2
44
kan
ga
roo
s, i
ncr
ease
s
from
244 t
o 1
162 a
s te
mp
eratu
re r
ises
fro
m 1
5°
to 4
0°.
Th
is i
nd
icate
s as
gro
un
d
tem
per
atu
re g
ets
hott
er, m
ore
an
d m
ore
kan
garo
os
are
lik
ely t
o h
ide
un
der
veg
eta
tio
n m
ak
ing
th
em h
ard
er t
o s
ee f
rom
a s
urv
ey p
lan
e an
d t
her
efo
re t
her
e’s
a
nee
d t
o a
dju
st t
he
cou
nt
up
ward
s. M
ult
iply
ing b
y a
GT
CF
th
at
incr
ease
s at
an
incr
easi
ng r
ate
hel
ps
acc
ura
tely
ad
just
su
rvey
nu
mb
ers
to a
ccou
nt
for
the
fact
les
s
kan
garo
os
are
vis
ible
as
more
an
d m
ore
sh
elte
r fr
om
th
e h
eat
the
hott
er i
t get
s.
tem
p (
°C)
GT
CF
x c
ou
nt
of
244 k
an
garo
os
15
24
4
20
29
0
25
35
7
30
46
4
40
116
2
Queensland Studies Authority | 25
26
Unit Four
The items of this unit are based on historical information about accidents involving explosives that occurred during the construction of a railway tunnel in Brisbane.
The following table shows the percentage of responses awarded the various grades for the items in this unit.
Item 6
Model response
CommentaryItem 6 is a three-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 33 Reaching a conclusion which is consistent with a given set of assumptions, 10 Using vocabulary appropriate to a context and 48 Justifying.
Students were required to identify three different characteristics/qualities of John from the extract provided in the stimulus. The cue asked them to provide evidence to justify those characteristics. The grade awarded to a response depended upon the number of qualities stated, how clearly they were stated, and how they were justified.
An A-grade response needed to provide three different distinguishing qualities, each directly supported by an explicitly identified aspect of the text. Responses needed to demonstrate that a conclusion had been drawn about John’s character consistent with, and based on, information provided in the extract. The response needed to move beyond what the extract related about John’s behaviour on the particular day in question, and make an inference about his qualities as a person.
Many responses did not provide three clearly different qualities. A common but incorrect approach was to simply identify adjectives from the extract, e.g. uncertain, angry. Other responses, whilst they provided three different qualities, did not provide any evidence to support them. Responses that generally tended to retell the story, rather than answer the question that was asked could not be awarded a creditable grade.
A B C D E N O
Item 6 14.6 42.9 26.4 7.4 7 1.6
Item 7 1.3 5.9 16.8 28.2 28.1 13.1 6.7
A shaded box indicates that the grade was not available for that item.
State three clearly different characteristics of John that the author has revealed in this extract.
...........................................................................................
...........................................................................................
...........................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
Provide
evidence from
the extract.
You may use
point form.
John is stubborn — “John, being John, wasn’t about to give in”.
This shows that John had a habit of standing his ground.
John is cautious — he did not take unnecessary risks in his job. He didn’t set
the second blast because he was uncertain as to its safety. John is principled — he walked
off the job (hence sacrificing his livelihood) rather than compromising safety.
A B C D N O
100%
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
UN
IT
FO
UR
IT
EM
6
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 4
1 o
f 5
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
33
Infe
rrin
g
10
Usi
ng
vo
cab
ula
ry a
pp
rop
ria
te t
o a
co
nte
xt
48
Ju
stif
yin
g
C
Th
e re
spo
nse
ref
ers
to O
NE
dis
tin
gu
ish
ing q
uali
ty o
f Joh
n.
Th
e q
uali
ty i
s co
nsi
sten
t w
ith
a
reaso
nab
le r
ead
ing o
f th
e w
hole
extr
act
.
Th
e q
ua
lity
ref
erre
d t
o i
s d
irec
tly
sup
po
rted
by
ev
iden
ce b
ase
d o
n e
xp
lici
tly
iden
tifi
ed a
spec
ts o
f th
e ex
tract
.
A
Th
e re
spon
se s
tate
s T
HR
EE
dif
fere
nt
dis
tin
gu
ish
ing q
uali
ties
of
Joh
n.
Ea
ch q
ua
lity
is
con
sist
ent
wit
h a
reaso
nab
le r
ead
ing o
f th
e w
hole
extr
act
.
Each
of
the
TH
RE
E s
tate
d q
uali
ties
is
dir
ectl
y s
up
po
rted
by
evid
ence
ba
sed
on
exp
lici
tly
id
enti
fied
asp
ects
of
the
extr
act
.
B
Th
e re
spon
se s
tate
s T
WO
dif
fere
nt
dis
tin
gu
ish
ing q
uali
ties
of
Joh
n.
Each
qu
ali
ty i
s co
nsi
sten
t w
ith
a
rea
son
ab
le r
ead
ing
of
the
wh
ole
extr
act
.
Each
of
the
TW
O s
tate
d q
uali
ties
is
dir
ectl
y s
up
port
ed b
y e
vid
ence
base
d o
n
exp
lici
tly id
enti
fied
asp
ects
of
the
extr
act
.
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
Joh
n i
s st
ub
born
— “
Joh
n, b
ein
g J
oh
n,
wasn
’t a
bou
t to
giv
e in
”.
Th
is s
how
s th
at
Joh
n h
ad
a h
ab
it o
f st
an
din
g h
is g
rou
nd
. Joh
n i
s ca
uti
ou
s —
he
did
not
tak
e
un
nec
essa
ry r
isk
s in
his
job
. H
e d
idn
’t s
et t
he
seco
nd
bla
st b
ecau
se h
e w
as
un
cert
ain
as
to i
ts s
afe
ty.
Joh
n i
s p
rin
cip
led
— h
e w
alk
ed o
ff t
he
job
(h
ence
sacr
ific
ing h
is
liv
elih
oo
d)
rath
er t
han
co
mp
rom
isin
g s
afe
ty.
Last
Page
Cou
nt
Note
s:
1.
Syn
on
ym
s are
to b
e tr
eate
d a
s a s
ingle
qu
ali
ty u
nle
ss t
he
resp
on
se e
stab
lish
es a
cle
ar
dis
tin
ctio
n i
n m
ean
ing.
2.
‘Su
pp
ort
ed b
y e
vid
ence
’ m
ean
s th
at
the
evid
ence
mu
st m
atc
h w
ith
th
e q
uali
ties
. A
leg
itim
ate
sta
ted
qu
ali
ty m
ay b
e u
nd
erm
ined
by u
nre
late
d e
vid
ence
.
3.
‘Dir
ectl
y s
up
port
ed’
mea
ns
that
the
lin
ks
are
est
ab
lish
ed b
y t
he
stu
den
t an
d a
mark
er d
oes
not
fill
th
e gap
.
4.
‘Exp
lici
tly i
den
tifi
ed’
can
be
ach
ieved
th
rou
gh
dir
ect
qu
ote
s, a
ccu
rate
lin
e re
fere
nci
ng,
para
ph
rasi
ng …
D
Th
e re
spo
nse
ref
ers
to T
WO
dif
fere
nt d
isti
ng
uis
hin
g q
ua
liti
es
of
Joh
n.
Each
qu
ali
ty is
con
sist
ent
wit
h a
reaso
nab
le r
ead
ing o
f th
e w
hole
extr
act
.
Queensland Studies Authority | 27
28
Item 7
Model response
CommentaryItem 7 is a four-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 31 Interrelating ideas/themes/issues, 29 Comparing and contrasting and 43 Analysing.
This item related to both the family story and a newspaper extract from around the same time as the incident. Students were instructed to assume that the two versions referred to the same incident. In this item students were required to consider various perspectives and motives, and to suggest reasons for the differences between them. The cue indicated that students should refer to details from both versions.
An A-grade response needed to identify two points of difference (PODs), and provide details of each source’s version of events for those PODs. Furthermore, the response needed to suggest at least one reason, from the perspective of the authors of each source, that could explain the differences.
Some responses showed little attention to detail, and made broad sweeping assertions rather than actually supporting what was said with any meaningful evidence. This highlights the need for careful reading and a methodical approach to answering the actual question asked. Students need to better distinguish between summarising or paraphrasing a text, and analysing it.
Assume — for argument’s sake — that this newspaper account and the family story refer to the
same incident. Consider various perspectives and possible motives, and hence suggest reasons
for the differences between the two versions.
...........................................................................................
...........................................................................................
...........................................................................................
Refer to details
from both
versions.
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
One difference between the two versions is regarding who was to blame for
the accident. The family story blames the foreman for the charge being set
after John left. However, the news report blames the explosives person who
carelessly left powder lying around. It is possible that the foreman, who was interviewed
for the report, deflected attention away from what might have been his own poor decision
making. A second difference was about the timing of the accident. This difference may
simply be due to the story having been modified over years of telling between family
generations.
A B C N O
100%
D E
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
UN
IT
FO
UR
IT
EM
7
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 4
2 o
f 5
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
do
es n
ot
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
has
bee
n m
ad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
31
Inte
rrel
ati
ng
id
eas/
them
es/i
ssu
es
29
Co
mp
ari
ng
, co
ntr
ast
ing
43
An
aly
sin
g
C
Th
e re
spon
se
•re
fers
to
on
e P
OD
•p
rop
ose
s tw
o r
easo
ns
for
the
dif
fere
nce
fro
m t
he
per
spec
tive
of
on
e or
both
sou
rces.
A
Th
e re
spon
se
•id
enti
fies
tw
o p
oin
ts-o
f-
dif
fere
nce
(P
OD
s)
an
d f
or
on
e P
OD
,
•d
etail
s th
e p
urp
ort
ed f
act
s
from
each
so
urc
e
•p
rop
ose
s a r
easo
n f
or
the
dif
fere
nce
fro
m t
he
per
spec
tive
of
on
e so
urc
e
an
d f
or
the
sam
e o
r o
ther
PO
D
•p
rop
ose
s a r
easo
n f
or
the
dif
fere
nce
fro
m t
he
per
spec
tiv
e o
f th
e o
ther
sou
rce.
B
Th
e re
spon
se
•id
enti
fies
tw
o P
OD
s
an
d, o
ne
of
the
foll
ow
ing
•fo
r ea
ch P
OD
, p
rop
ose
s o
ne
reaso
n f
or
the
dif
fere
nce
from
th
e p
ersp
ecti
ve
of
eith
er s
ou
rce
or
•fo
r on
e P
OD
, p
rop
ose
s tw
o
reaso
ns
for
the
dif
fere
nce
from
th
e p
ersp
ecti
ve
of
on
e
or
bo
th s
ou
rces
.
Th
e re
spon
se
•id
enti
fies
on
e P
OD
•d
etail
s th
e p
urp
ort
ed f
act
s
fro
m e
ach
so
urc
e
•p
rop
ose
s tw
o r
easo
ns
for
the
dif
fere
nce
fro
m t
he
per
spec
tive
of
on
e or
both
sou
rces
.
OR
D
Th
e re
spon
se
•re
fers
to o
ne
PO
D
•p
rop
ose
s a r
easo
n f
or
the
dif
fere
nce
fro
m t
he
per
spec
tive
of
on
e so
urc
e.
Th
e re
spon
se p
rop
ose
s tw
o
poss
ible
rea
son
s th
at
cou
ld b
e
resp
on
sib
le f
or
on
e or
more
PO
Ds.
OR
E
Th
e re
spon
se r
efer
s to
tw
o
PO
Ds.
Th
e re
spo
nse
pro
pose
s o
ne
poss
ible
rea
son
th
at
cou
ld b
e
resp
on
sib
le f
or
a P
OD
.
OR
Mo
del
Res
po
nse
:
On
e d
iffe
ren
ce b
etw
een
th
e tw
o v
ersi
on
s is
reg
ard
ing w
ho w
as
to b
lam
e fo
r th
e acc
iden
t.
Th
e fa
mil
y s
tory
bla
mes
th
e fo
rem
an
for
the
charg
e b
ein
g s
et a
fter
Joh
n l
eft.
How
ever
,
the
new
s re
port
bla
mes
th
e ex
plo
sives
per
son
wh
o c
are
less
ly l
eft
pow
der
lyin
g a
rou
nd
. It
is p
oss
ible
th
at
the
fore
man
, w
ho w
as
inte
rvie
wed
for
the
rep
ort
, d
efle
cted
att
enti
on
aw
ay f
rom
wh
at
mig
ht
have
bee
n h
is o
wn
poor
dec
isio
n m
ak
ing. A
sec
on
d d
iffe
ren
ce w
as
ab
ou
t th
e ti
min
g o
f th
e acc
iden
t. T
his
dif
fere
nce
may s
imp
ly b
e d
ue
to t
he
story
havin
g
bee
n m
od
ifie
d o
ver
yea
rs o
f te
llin
g b
etw
een
fa
mil
y g
ener
ati
on
s.
Queensland Studies Authority | 29
30
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 4
3 o
f 5
UN
IT
FO
UR
IT
EM
7
Note
s:
1.
Th
e fo
llow
ing t
ab
le p
rovid
es e
xam
ple
s of
poin
ts-o
f-d
iffe
ren
ce (
PO
D)
an
d p
urp
ort
ed f
act
s:
2.
Som
e of
the
reaso
ns
that
may a
ccou
nt
for
a p
oin
t-of-
dif
fere
nce
(P
OD
) in
clu
de:
•th
e fa
mil
y s
tory
is
seco
nd
han
d/h
isto
rica
l p
ersp
ecti
ve
an
d m
ay h
ave
bee
n c
han
ged
over
tim
e
•th
e fa
mil
y s
tory
may b
e an
att
emp
t to
bu
ild
a h
ero
ic p
ictu
re o
f th
e an
cest
or
or
pro
tect
th
e an
cest
or’s
rep
uta
tion
•th
e fa
mil
y s
tory
is
sub
ject
ive
or
base
d o
n o
ne
per
son
’s a
ccou
nt
•th
e fa
mil
y s
tory
is
inte
nd
ed
to b
e en
tert
ain
ing
•th
e n
ewsp
ap
er r
eport
er
may b
e u
nd
er p
ress
ure
to r
eass
ure
th
e p
ub
lic
that
the
tun
nel
is
a s
afe
work
pla
ce
•th
e n
ewsp
ap
er q
uote
d t
he
fore
man
, w
ho m
ay h
ave
wis
hed
to d
efle
ct b
lam
e or
to p
rote
ct t
he
com
pan
y’s
rep
uta
tion
•th
e n
ewsp
ap
er r
epo
rt i
s ob
jecti
ve
an
d p
rob
ab
ly b
ase
d o
n t
he
acc
ou
nt
of
eyew
itn
esse
s
•th
e n
ewsp
ap
er i
s in
th
e b
usi
nes
s of
sell
ing p
ap
ers.
3.
Ign
ore
con
clu
sion
s re
gard
ing w
hic
h t
ext
is m
ore
rel
iab
le.
4.
Sim
ply
ref
erri
ng t
o u
nsp
eci
fied
gen
eral
‘bia
s’ i
s n
ot
suff
icie
nt
to c
on
stit
ute
a m
oti
ve/
per
spec
tive.
PO
INT
-OF
-DIF
FE
RE
NC
E (
PO
D)
PU
RP
OR
TE
D F
AC
T F
RO
M F
AM
ILY
ST
OR
YP
UR
PO
RT
ED
FA
CT
FR
OM
NE
WS
PA
PE
R
wh
o w
as
to b
lam
e fo
r th
e in
cid
ent
fore
man
irre
spon
sib
le w
ork
er w
ho l
eft
exp
losi
ves
lyin
g a
rou
nd
tim
e of
the
inci
den
tm
orn
ing
even
ing a
rou
nd
8:3
0 p
m
inju
ries
/fa
tali
ties
two
wo
rker
s k
ille
dfo
ur
inju
red
/no
fata
liti
es
how
th
e acc
iden
t h
ap
pen
edin
ten
tion
al/
neg
ligen
t b
last
of
flaw
ed r
ock
acc
iden
t in
volv
ing c
an
dle
/bla
stin
g p
ow
der
Last
Page
Cou
nt
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
Unit Five
The items of this unit are based on information about the strength or weakness of computer passwords.
The following table shows the percentage of responses awarded the various grades for the items in this unit.
Item 8
Model response
CommentaryItem 8 is a three-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 19 Substituting in formulae and 16 Calculating with or without calculators.
For this item students were required to use the formula that was given to them in the stimulus. An example of using the formula was provided. Students had to determine how long it would take to check a six-character password made up from the 26 lower-case letters. In the cues students were told to show all steps and to round their answer to the nearest whole minute.
To be awarded an A-grade the response needed to show the correct values written in the correct positions as per the formula and then provide the final rounded answer of 515. It is important to follow the instructions on how to present the response given in cues. The second cue stated that the answer was to be rounded to the nearest whole minute. The highest grade cannot be awarded to a response that ignores or overrides cues. No incorrect working was allowed in the creditable parts of the response.
Common failings identified in responses were: not rounding to the nearest minute and not dividing by the correct number, i.e. 600 000. When many zeros are part of a number, extra care should be taken to make sure the correct number of zeros is used.
Some students were not able to correctly calculate 266. Students should be able to use functions such as powers on the type of calculator they will be using during the test. Some responses would also indicate that the students did not understand that without brackets around the operation in the denominator, 60 x 10 000, the calculation completed would be 266 divided by 60 and then the result of that multiplied by 10 000. Students need to be proficient in the use of the calculator they bring to the QCS Test. As indicated by memos sent to schools in the early part of the year, calculators with CAS functionality are not permitted to be used in the QCS Test.
A B C D E N O
Item 8 54.9 30 8 4.3 2.7
Item 9 20 25 22.1 20.3 7 5.6
Item 10 6.8 59.6 15.5 5.4 4.4 8.4
A shaded box indicates that the grade was not available for that item.
..........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
Show all steps.
Round your
answer to the
nearest whole
minute.
266
60 x 10000= 308915776
600000
= 514.85962666 � 515
A B C N O
100%
Queensland Studies Authority | 31
32
No
ve
mb
er
15
, 2
011
13
:32
pm
(*fo
ote
r to
re
ma
in u
ntil fin
al p
rin
t*)
T:\
qcs\s
ri\s
ri2
011
\Pa
pe
r\sri4
00\m
sch
em
es\0
5-0
08
-ms.f
m
UN
IT
FIV
EIT
EM
8
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 1
2 o
f 6
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
19
Su
bst
itu
tin
g i
n f
orm
ula
e1
6C
alc
ula
tin
g w
ith
or
wit
ho
ut
calc
ula
tors
C
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s su
bst
itu
tion
in
to t
he
giv
en
form
ula
wit
h a
t m
ost
on
e vari
ab
le i
nco
rrec
t.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s a c
orr
ectl
y r
ou
nd
ed o
r tr
un
cate
d
resu
lt b
etw
een
514 a
nd
515 i
ncl
usi
ve.
OR
A
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•co
rrec
t su
bst
itu
tion
in
to t
he
giv
en f
orm
ula
•515 a
s th
e re
sult
.
No
in
corr
ect
wo
rkin
g i
s sh
ow
n i
n t
he
cred
itab
le p
art
s
of
the
resp
on
se.
B
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•su
bst
itu
tion
in
to t
he
giv
en f
orm
ula
wit
h a
t m
ost
on
e
vari
ab
le i
nco
rrec
t
•a
con
seq
uen
tiall
y c
orr
ect
resu
lt.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•co
rrec
t su
bst
itu
tio
n i
nto
th
e g
iven
form
ula
•a
calc
ula
tion
wit
h a
t m
ost
on
e ob
serv
ab
le a
rith
met
ic
erro
r
•a
con
seq
uen
tiall
y c
orr
ect
resu
lt.
OR
Note
s:
1.
Rou
nd
ing t
he
resu
lt t
o t
he
nea
rest
wh
ole
min
ute
is
a r
equ
irem
ent
for
the
A-g
rad
e on
ly.
2.
calc
ula
ted
as
is
not
an
ari
thm
etic
err
or;
it
is a
con
cep
tual
erro
r. A
res
pon
se w
ith
a c
on
cep
tual
erro
r ca
nn
ot
be
aw
ard
ed a
B-g
rad
e.
3.
Wh
en 2
6 a
nd
6 a
re r
ever
sed
in
th
e fo
rmu
la, th
is i
s co
un
ted
as
two
su
bst
itu
tion
err
ors
in
th
e g
iven
fo
rmu
la.
4.
Wh
en a
ny p
art
of
the
form
ula
is
om
itte
d, th
e re
spon
se d
oes
not
show
su
bst
itu
tion
in
to t
he
giv
en f
orm
ula
.
266
266
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
266
6010
000
--------
--------
--------
---30
8915
776
6000
00----
--------
--------
-------
51
4.85
9626
6651
5=
=
Last
Page
Cou
nt
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
Item 9
Model response
CommentaryItem 9 is a three-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 6 Interpreting the meaning of tables, 13 Recording/noting data, 30 Classifying and 7 Translating from one form to another.
This item required students to determine the score for the password ‘Catch-22’ using the scoring system that was modelled by the two example passwords given in the stimulus. The stem asked students to complete the table to show how the score was calculated.
An A-grade response needed to show correct completion of all parts of the table and to give the correct score as 60. No incorrect entries could be included in the table.
The majority of students felt comfortable interacting with this item but simple calculation errors when finding the points or totals occurred.
Mistakes in the ‘count’ columns were also common. Omitting to recognise the hyphen as a symbol (even though it was listed earlier in the stimulus as an example of a symbol) and not counting ‘successive’ in the manner exemplified in the tables showing the scoring of the example passwords were two often-observed errors. It cannot be over emphasised how necessary it is to thoroughly read the stimulus provided.
A few students indicated the ‘count’ results by writing down the letters or digits involved instead of the numbers. It is worth pointing out to students that whenever an example is provided they should follow the given layout or format as closely as possible rather than develop their own system and run the risk of being incorrect.
Catch–22
Positives Weighting Count Points
Number of characters (K) K 4 8 32
Upper-case letters (U) (K–U) 2 1 14
Lower-case letters (L) (K–L) 2 4 8
Digits (D) D 4 2 8
Symbols (S) S 6 1 6
Digits/symbols that are not in first
or last position in password (M)
M 2 2 4
Total 72
Negatives Weighting Count Penalty
Letters only K –1 0 0
Digits only K –1 0 0
Successive upper-case letters (u) u –3 0 0
Successive lower-case letters (l) l –3 3 –9
Successive digits (d) d –3 1 –3
Successive symbols (s) s –3 0 0
Total –12
Score 60
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
A B C D N O
100%
Queensland Studies Authority | 33
34
No
ve
mb
er
15
, 2
011
13
:37
pm
(*fo
ote
r to
re
ma
in u
ntil fin
al p
rin
t*)
T:\
qcs\s
ri\s
ri2
011
\Pa
pe
r\sri4
00\m
sch
em
es\0
5-0
09
-ms.f
m
UN
IT
FIV
EIT
EM
9
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 1
3 o
f 6
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
6In
terp
reti
ng
th
e m
ean
ing
of
tab
les
…1
3R
eco
rdin
g/n
oti
ng
da
ta
30
Cla
ssif
yin
g7
Tra
nsl
ati
ng
fro
m o
ne
form
to
an
oth
er
C
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s th
e
•co
un
t co
lum
ns
•p
oin
ts c
olu
mn
an
d t
ota
l
•p
enalt
y c
olu
mn
an
d t
ota
l
•sc
ore
com
ple
ted
, w
ith
at
mo
st t
wo e
rrors
.
Rel
ate
d e
ntr
ies,
aft
er t
he
erro
r(s)
,
are
con
seq
uen
tiall
y c
orr
ect.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s th
e p
oin
ts
sect
ion
corr
ectl
y c
om
ple
ted
, w
ith
a
tota
l o
f 72
.
OR
A
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s th
e
•co
un
t co
lum
ns
•p
oin
ts c
olu
mn
an
d t
ota
l
•p
enalt
y c
olu
mn
an
d t
ota
l
•sc
ore
of
60
corr
ectl
y c
om
ple
ted
.
No i
nco
rrec
t en
trie
s are
in
clu
ded
in
th
e
tab
le.
Catc
h–22
Co
un
tP
oin
ts
83
2
11
4
48
28
16
24
To
tal
72
Cou
nt
Pen
alt
y
00
00
00
3–9
1–3
00
To
tal
–12
Sco
re6
0
Extract from Model response
B
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s th
e
•co
un
t co
lum
ns
•p
oin
ts c
olu
mn
an
d t
ota
l
•p
enalt
y c
olu
mn
an
d t
ota
l
•sc
ore
com
ple
ted
, w
ith
at
most
on
e er
ror.
Rel
ate
d e
ntr
ies,
aft
er t
he
erro
r, a
re
con
seq
uen
tiall
y c
orr
ect.
D
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s at
least
fou
r n
on
-
zero
ro
ws
corr
ectl
y c
om
ple
ted
.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s th
e p
oin
ts s
ecti
on
com
ple
ted
, w
ith
at
mo
st o
ne
erro
r.
Rel
ate
d e
ntr
ies,
aft
er t
he
erro
r, a
re
con
seq
uen
tia
lly
co
rrec
t.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s th
e p
enalt
y
sect
ion
corr
ectl
y c
om
ple
ted
, w
ith
a
tota
l o
f -1
2.
OR
OR
Note
s:
1.
A c
orr
ectl
y c
om
ple
ted
cou
nt
colu
mn
may c
on
tain
ele
men
ts o
f th
e w
eigh
tin
g f
orm
ula
e, e
.g.
.
2.
Bla
nk
cel
ls o
r ce
lls
con
tain
ing
da
shes
in
th
e co
un
t, p
oin
ts a
nd
pen
alt
y c
olu
mn
s a
re a
ssu
med
to
rep
rese
nt
zero
.
3.
A s
ingle
err
or
can
in
clu
de
•co
nsi
sten
tly c
ou
nti
ng ‘
Let
ters
on
ly’
an
d ‘
Dig
its
on
ly’
inco
rrec
tly
•co
nsi
sten
tly c
ou
nti
ng s
ucc
ess
ive
chara
cter
s in
corr
ectl
y
•co
nsi
sten
tly o
mit
tin
g t
he
hyp
hen
(–)
in c
alc
ula
tion
s (l
ead
ing t
o a
sco
re o
f 44)
•o
ne
inco
rrec
t co
un
t, m
ult
ipli
cati
on
or
ad
dit
ion
•o
ne
om
itte
d t
ota
l or
score
.
81
2–
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
No
ve
mb
er
15
, 2
011 1
3:3
7 p
m(*
foo
ter
to r
em
ain
un
til fin
al p
rin
t*)
T:\
qcs\s
ri\s
ri2
011
\Pa
pe
r\sri
40
0\m
sch
em
es\0
5-0
09
-ms.f
m
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 1
4 o
f 6
UN
IT
FIV
EIT
EM
9
Last
Page
Cou
nt
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
Ca
tch
–2
2
Po
siti
ves
Wei
gh
tin
gC
ou
nt
Po
ints
Nu
mb
er o
f ch
arac
ters
(K
)K
48
32
Upper
-cas
e le
tter
s (U
)(K–U
) 2
11
4
Low
er-c
ase
lett
ers
(L)
(K–L
) 2
48
Dig
its
(D)
D 4
28
Sy
mbols
(S
)S
61
6
Dig
its/
sym
bols
that
are
not in
fir
st
or
last
po
siti
on
in
pas
swo
rd (M
)
M 2
24
To
tal
72
Neg
ati
ves
Wei
gh
tin
gC
ou
nt
Pen
alt
y
Let
ters
only
K
–1
00
Dig
its
on
ly
K –
10
0
Succ
essi
ve
upper
-cas
e le
tter
s (u
)u
–3
00
Succ
essi
ve
low
er-c
ase
lett
ers
(l)
l –
33
–9
Succ
essi
ve
dig
its
(d)
d –
31
–3
Succ
essi
ve
sym
bols
(s)
s –
30
0
To
tal
–12
Sco
re6
0
Queensland Studies Authority | 35
36
Item 10
Model response
CommentaryItem 10 is a three-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 36 Applying strategies to trial and test ideas and procedures, 43 Analysing and 46 Creating/composing/devising.
This item required students to increase the strength of the password ‘Scorpio’ as much as possible without increasing the number of characters or affecting the memorability of the word. The stimulus provided ‘Password’ as an example of this. Students could only use the five manipulations that were listed but were also told
to take into account the scoring system, which indicated how to maximise points and minimise penalties.
An A-grade response needed to provide one of the two possible versions of the password that would gain the maximum score. The table had to be correctly completed and show the correct score of 82.
For an A-grade the table had to be completed correctly but for the lower grades the emphasis was on the strategies used to increase the strength of the password rather than the mathematics of the table.
Overriding the stem by adding extra characters and hence increasing the length of the password resulted in a penalty of one grade being applied. Attending to the task outlined in the stem is important when responding to items.
OR
Positives Weighting Count Points
Number of characters (K) K 4 7 28
Upper-case letters (U) (K–U) 2 1 12
Lower-case letters (L) (K–L) 2 1 12
Digits (D) D 4 3 12
Symbols (S) S 6 2 12
Digits/symbols that are not in first
or last position in password (M)
M 2 3 6
Total 82
Negatives Weighting Count Penalty
Letters only K –1 0 0
Digits only K –1 0 0
Successive upper-case letters (u) u –3 0 0
Successive lower-case letters (l) l –3 0 0
Successive digits (d) d –3 0 0
Successive symbols (s) s –3 0 0
Total 0
Score 82
5 [ Ø R p ! Ø
5 [ Ø r P ! Ø
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
A B C D N O
100%
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
No
ve
mb
er
18
, 2
011
14
:18
pm
(*fo
ote
r to
re
ma
in u
ntil fin
al p
rin
t*)
T:\
qcs\s
ri\s
ri2
011
\Pa
pe
r\sri4
00\m
sch
em
es\0
5-0
10
-ms.f
m
UN
IT
FIV
EIT
EM
10
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 1
5 o
f 6
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
36
Ap
ply
ing
str
ate
gie
s to
tri
al
an
d t
est
idea
s a
nd
pro
ced
ure
s4
3A
na
lysi
ng
46
Cre
ati
ng
/co
mp
osi
ng
/dev
isin
g
C
Th
e re
spon
se g
ives
a p
ass
word
wh
ich
show
s th
at
at
least
fou
r of
the
six
stra
tegie
s h
ave
bee
n a
pp
lied
.
A
Th
e re
spon
se g
ives
•5
ØR
p!Ø
or
•5
ØrP
!Ø
as
the
pa
ssw
ord
.
Th
e ta
ble
ha
s th
e p
oin
ts, p
enalt
ies
an
d
tota
ls s
ecti
on
s co
rrec
tly c
om
ple
ted
.
Th
e co
rrec
t sc
ore
of
82 i
s sh
ow
n.
Co
un
tP
oin
ts
72
8
11
2
11
2
31
2
21
2
36
Tota
l8
2
Extract from Model response
D
Th
e re
spon
se g
ives
a p
ass
word
wh
ich
sho
ws
tha
t a
t le
ast
tw
o o
f th
e si
x
stra
tegie
s h
ave
bee
n a
pp
lied
.
Note
s:
1.
Th
e si
x s
trate
gie
s are
•u
sin
g a
mix
ture
of
up
per
- an
d l
ow
er-c
ase
let
ters
•su
bst
itu
tin
g Ø
(i.
e. z
ero)
for
o o
r O
•su
bst
itu
tin
g 1
or
! fo
r i
or
I
•su
bst
itu
tin
g 5
or
$ f
or
s or
S
•su
bst
itu
tin
g
for
c o
r C
•h
avin
g z
ero p
ena
ltie
s.
2.
Wh
en c
hara
cter
s h
ave
bee
n o
mit
ted
, gra
de
the
resp
on
se a
ccord
ing t
o t
he
mark
ing s
chem
e an
d t
hen
ap
ply
a o
ne-
gra
de
pen
alt
y.
3.
Wh
en e
xtr
a c
hara
cter
s or
man
ipu
lati
on
s oth
er t
han
th
ose
all
ow
ed h
ave
bee
n u
sed
, ig
nore
th
e ex
tran
eou
s ch
ara
cter
s,
gra
de
the
resp
on
se a
ccord
ing t
o t
he
mark
ing s
chem
e an
d t
hen
ap
ply
a o
ne-
gra
de
pen
alt
y.
B
Th
e re
spon
se g
ives
a p
ass
word
wh
ich
sho
ws
tha
t a
t le
ast
fiv
e o
f th
e si
x
stra
teg
ies
ha
ve
bee
n a
pp
lied
.
Th
e ta
ble
has
the
poin
ts s
ecti
on
com
ple
ted
.
Queensland Studies Authority | 37
38
No
ve
mb
er
18
, 2
011 1
4:1
8 p
m(*
foo
ter
to r
em
ain
un
til fin
al p
rin
t*)
T:\
qcs\s
ri\s
ri2
011
\Pa
pe
r\sri
40
0\m
sch
em
es\0
5-0
10
-ms.f
m
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 1
6 o
f 6
UN
IT
FIV
EIT
EM
10
Mo
del
Res
po
nse
:
OR
Posi
tives
W
eigh
tin
gC
ou
nt
Poin
ts
Nu
mber
of
char
acte
rs (K
)K
47
28
Upper
-cas
e le
tter
s (U
)(K–U
) 2
11
2
Lo
wer
-cas
e le
tter
s (L
)(K–L
) 2
11
2
Dig
its
(D)
D 4
31
2
Sym
bols
(S
)S
62
12
Dig
its/
sym
bo
ls that
are
no
t in
fir
st
or
last
posi
tio
n i
n p
assw
ord
(M
)
M 2
36
To
tal
82
Neg
ati
ves
Wei
gh
tin
gC
ou
nt
Pen
alt
y
Let
ters
only
K
–1
00
Dig
its
only
K
–1
00
Succ
essi
ve
upper
-cas
e le
tter
s (u
)u
–3
00
Succ
essi
ve
low
er-c
ase
lett
ers
(l)
l –
30
0
Succ
essi
ve
dig
its
(d)
d –
30
0
Succ
essi
ve
sym
bols
(s)
s –
30
0
To
tal
0
Sco
re8
2
5 [
Ø R
p ! Ø
5 [
Ø r
P ! Ø
Last
Page
Cou
nt
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
Unit Six
This unit is based on a triptych of photographs.
The following table shows the percentage of responses awarded the various grades for the item in this unit.
Item 11
Model response
A B C D E N O
Item 11 4.6 13 35.4 20.9 10.1 7.1 8.8
I. What message is conveyed by this triptych?
............................................................................................
II. Justify your interpretation by considering unifying and contrasting elements and the order
of the photographs.
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
Write your
message here.
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
You’re never too old to keep challenging yourself.
This message is conveyed by the unifying elements of the old man and the sea. The man’s
age is important for this message and so the old wrinkly man is repeated in all three
photos. The sea is also repeated as it is what represents the challenge to the old man.
What really conveys the message are the two aspects of the contrasting element and
the order of the photos. The contrasting element in the triptych is the man’s changing
actions. In photo one, he is contemplating the challenge of the swim. In photo two he is
attempting the swim and in photo three he is diving back in to keep challenging himself by
repeating the swim, even as he gets older and older. The unifying elements of the old man
and the sea, the contrasting element of his actions and the unique order of the photos
convey the message: you’re never too old to keep challenging yourself.
Queensland Studies Authority | 39
40
CommentaryItem 11 is a three-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 5 Interpreting the meaning of pictures/illustrations, 43 Analysing and 31 Interrelating ideas/themes/issues.
This item required students to study the photographic triptych, to interpret a message that is conveyed by this triptych and to justify their interpretation by considering unifying and contrasting elements and the order of the photographs.
An A-grade response needed to proffer a credible message and identify two unifying elements and one contrasting element of the triptych. The response had to explain how a unifying and a contrasting element and the order of the photographs, as given, contributed to the stated message.
Problems that occurred most frequently were students identifying elements as they appeared in individual photographs instead of identifying elements that existed in the triptych as a whole and not accepting the seemingly incongruous ordering of the three photographs.
A B C N O
100%
D E
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
UN
IT
SIX
IT
EM
11
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 4
4 o
f 5
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
5In
terp
reti
ng
th
e m
ean
ing
of
pic
ture
s/il
lust
rati
on
s 4
3A
na
lysi
ng
31
Inte
rrel
ati
ng
id
eas/
them
es/i
ssu
es
C
Th
e re
spon
se
•re
vea
ls a
cre
dib
le m
essa
ge
or
them
e
•d
escr
ibes
an
y T
HR
EE
elem
ents
of
the
ph
oto
gra
ph
s
•acc
epts
th
e giv
en o
rder
of
the
ph
oto
gra
ph
s
•m
ak
es r
efer
ence
to
ho
w a
n
elem
ent
an
d t
he
ord
er o
f th
e
ph
oto
gra
ph
s co
ntr
ibu
te t
o
the
revea
led
mes
sage
or
them
e.
A
Th
e re
spon
se
•st
ate
s a
cre
dib
le m
essa
ge
•id
enti
fies
TW
O u
nif
yin
g
elem
ents
of
the
trip
tych
•id
enti
fies
ON
E c
on
trast
ing
elem
ent
of
the
trip
tych
•a
ccep
ts t
he
giv
en o
rder
of
the
ph
oto
gra
ph
s
•ex
pla
ins
how
a u
nif
yin
g a
nd
a c
on
trast
ing e
lem
ent
an
d
the
ord
er o
f th
e p
hoto
gra
ph
s
con
trib
ute
to
th
e st
ate
d
mes
sage.
B
Th
e re
spon
se
•st
ate
s a
cre
dib
le m
essa
ge
or
them
e
•id
enti
fies
TW
O e
lem
ents
an
d d
escr
ibes
ON
E o
ther
elem
ent
of
the
trip
tych
•O
NE
of
thes
e T
HR
EE
elem
ents
mu
st b
e
con
trast
ing
•a
ccep
ts t
he
giv
en o
rder
of
the
ph
oto
gra
ph
s
•ex
pla
ins
how
tw
o o
f th
e
elem
ents
an
d t
he
ord
er o
f
the
ph
oto
gra
ph
s co
ntr
ibu
te
to t
he
state
d m
essa
ge
or
them
e.
D
Th
e re
spo
nse
•re
vea
ls a
cre
dib
le m
essa
ge
or
them
e
•d
escr
ibes
an
y T
WO
elem
ents
of
the
ph
oto
gra
ph
s
•acc
epts
th
e giv
en o
rder
of
the
ph
oto
gra
ph
s
•m
ak
es r
efer
ence
to
how
th
e
mes
sage
or
them
e is
revea
led
.
E
Th
e re
spon
se
•re
vea
ls a
cre
dib
le m
essa
ge
or
them
e
•m
enti
on
s O
NE
ele
men
t of
the
ph
oto
gra
ph
s
•m
ak
es r
efer
ence
to
how
th
e
mes
sage
or
them
e is
revea
led
.
Note
s:
1.
Mes
sage
— a
sh
ort
sta
tem
ent
that
tran
smit
s m
ean
ing, an
d g
ener
all
y i
ncl
ud
es a
ver
b. A
use
ful
test
is
that
a m
essa
ge
wil
l co
mp
lete
th
e st
ate
men
t: “
Th
is a
rtw
ork
tel
ls u
s
that
…” T
hem
e —
a s
tan
d-a
lon
e id
ea s
imil
ar
to a
tit
le.
2.
Iden
tifi
es —
tre
ats
th
e art
work
as
a w
hole
an
d i
den
tifi
es t
he
elem
ents
as
com
pon
ents
of
that
wh
ole
.
Des
crib
es —
ap
pro
ach
es t
he
art
work
ph
oto
gra
ph
by p
hoto
gra
ph
, d
escri
bin
g t
he
elem
ents
as
they
ap
pea
r in
part
icu
lar
ph
oto
gra
ph
s.
Men
tion
s —
ma
kes
an
ob
serv
ati
on
ab
ou
t an
ele
men
t of
the
trip
tych
bu
t d
oes
not
lin
k t
hat
elem
ent
to a
ny p
art
icu
lar
ph
oto
gra
ph
or
to t
he
art
wo
rk a
s a
wh
ole
.
3.
Th
e re
spon
se s
tate
s a m
essa
ge
or t
hem
e if
th
e m
essa
ge
or
them
e is
eit
her
wri
tten
in
th
e re
spon
se s
pace
pro
vid
ed i
n I
, or
un
am
big
uou
sly s
tate
d i
n t
he
op
enin
g s
ente
nce
of
the
resp
on
se i
n p
art
II.
Th
e re
spon
se r
evea
ls a
mes
sage
or
them
e if
it
is n
ot
state
d b
ut
bec
om
es e
vid
ent
thro
ugh
rea
din
g t
he
bod
y o
f th
e re
spon
se.
Queensland Studies Authority | 41
42
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 4
5 o
f 5
UN
IT
SIX
IT
EM
11
Mod
el r
esp
on
se
I.Y
ou
’re
nev
er t
oo o
ld t
o k
eep
ch
all
engin
g y
ou
rsel
f.
II.
Th
is m
essa
ge
is c
on
vey
ed b
y t
he
un
ify
ing e
lem
ents
of
the
old
man
an
d t
he
sea. T
he
man
’s a
ge
is i
mp
ort
an
t fo
r th
is m
essa
ge
an
d s
o t
he
old
wri
nk
ly m
an
is
rep
eate
d i
n a
ll
thre
e p
hoto
s. T
he
sea i
s als
o r
epea
ted
as
it i
s w
hat
rep
rese
nts
th
e ch
all
enge
to t
he
old
man
. W
hat
reall
y c
on
vey
s th
e m
essa
ge
are
th
e tw
o a
spec
ts o
f th
e co
ntr
ast
ing
elem
ent
an
d t
he
ord
er o
f th
e p
hoto
s. T
he
con
tra
stin
g e
lem
ent
in t
he
trip
tych
is
the
ma
n’s
ch
an
gin
g a
ctio
ns.
In
ph
oto
on
e, h
e is
con
tem
pla
tin
g t
he
chall
enge
of
the
swim
.
In p
hoto
tw
o h
e is
att
emp
tin
g t
he
swim
an
d i
n p
hoto
th
ree
he
is d
ivin
g b
ack
in
to k
eep
ch
all
engin
g h
imse
lf b
y r
epea
tin
g t
he
swim
, ev
en a
s h
e get
s old
er a
nd
old
er. T
he
un
ifyin
g e
lem
ents
of
the
old
man
an
d t
he
sea, th
e co
ntr
ast
ing e
lem
ent
of
his
act
ion
s a
nd
th
e u
niq
ue
ord
er o
f th
e p
hoto
s co
nvey
th
e m
essa
ge:
you
’re
nev
er t
oo o
ld t
o k
eep
cha
llen
gin
g y
ou
rsel
f.
Last
Page
Cou
nt
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
Unit Seven
The items of this unit are based on information about the distance from an observer to their visible horizon.
The following table shows the percentage of responses awarded the various grades for the items in this unit.
Item 12
Model response
CommentaryItem 12 is a two-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 19 Substituting into formulae and 16 Calculating with or without calculators.
This item required students to use a given formula twice to find the visible horizon distances from two observers with different eye-level heights. Students were then required to calculate the difference between these two distances.
An A-grade response needed to show correct substitutions into the formula for both observers, to determine the correct numerical difference between the two
calculated values and to use correct units of measurement.
A common error identified in responses involved the units of measurement. The given formula, as explained in the stimulus, used metres for the observer’s height but the visible horizon distance result was in kilometres. Some students stated incorrectly that the difference was in metres or neglected to include the final unit, which was also treated as incorrect. Students should be encouraged to include units in any working they show as it allows easier tracking when they check their work to see if formulas and data have been used appropriately.
Another error that arose concerned the fact that before the square root could be found the multiplication of the height and 12.7 had to be completed. In many cases this did not occur, which resulted in an incorrect calculation. An operation under the square root sign should be enclosed in brackets to ensure the required operations are executed in the correct order. A calculator is essential equipment for the QCS Test and as such students should become proficient with its use.
A B C D E N O
Item 12 50.5 18.5 14.6 13.7 2.7
Item 13 38.1 4.5 8.6 5.8 36.8 6.3
Item 14 4.3 1.7 0.6 12.5 33.8 25.1 21.9
A shaded box indicates that the grade was not available for that item.
Calculate how much further the lifeguard can see than the child can see.
...........................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
Show all steps.Distance lifeguard can see further than child
=
= 7.6 – 3.9
= 3.7 km
12.7 x 4.55 – 12.7 x 1.2
A B C N O
100%
Queensland Studies Authority | 43
44
UN
IT
SE
VE
NIT
EM
12
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 7
1 o
f 4
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
19
Su
bst
itu
tin
g i
n f
orm
ula
e1
6C
alc
ula
tin
g w
ith
or
wit
ho
ut
calc
ula
tors
C
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•co
rrec
t su
bst
itu
tion
in
to t
he
giv
en f
orm
ula
for
on
e
of
the
ob
serv
ers
•co
rrec
t n
um
eric
al v
alu
e fo
r th
e d
ista
nce
to
th
e v
isib
le
hori
zon
for
that
ob
serv
er.
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•co
rrec
t su
bst
itu
tion
in
to t
he
giv
en f
orm
ula
for
on
e
of
the
ob
serv
ers
•att
end
an
ce t
o d
eter
min
ing t
he
req
uir
ed d
iffe
ren
ce.
Th
e co
rrec
t n
um
eric
al
va
lue
for
the
dif
fere
nce
wit
h
the
corr
esp
on
din
gly
corr
ect
un
it i
s st
ate
d (
3.7
km
or
a c
orr
ect
equ
iva
len
t).
OR
OR
A
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•co
rrec
t su
bst
itu
tio
n i
nto
th
e g
iven
fo
rmu
la f
or
each
ob
serv
er
•a
tten
dan
ce t
o d
eter
min
ing t
he
req
uir
ed
dif
fere
nce
.
Th
e co
rrec
t n
um
eric
al valu
e fo
r th
e d
iffe
ren
ce w
ith
the
corr
esp
on
din
gly
co
rrec
t u
nit
is
sta
ted
(3
.7 k
m
or
a c
orr
ect
equ
ivale
nt)
.
B
Th
e re
spon
se s
how
s
•co
rrec
t su
bst
itu
tion
in
to t
he
giv
en f
orm
ula
for
each
ob
serv
er
•att
end
an
ce t
o d
eter
min
ing t
he
req
uir
ed
dif
fere
nce
.
Th
e n
um
eric
al
valu
e fo
r th
e d
iffe
ren
ce i
s st
ate
d,
all
ow
ing f
or
at
most
ON
E o
bse
rvab
le e
rror
— t
he
resu
lt p
rovid
ed d
oes
not
matc
h t
he
wri
tten
inte
nti
on
. Calc
ula
tion
s aft
er t
he
erro
r is
mad
e m
ust
be
con
seq
uen
tiall
y c
orr
ect.
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
1.
Dis
tan
ce l
ifeg
uard
can
see
fu
rth
er t
han
ch
ild
= =7.
6–
3.9
= 3
.7 k
m.
12.7
4.55
12.7
1.2
–
Note
s:
1.
‘Att
end
an
ce t
o d
eter
min
ing t
he
req
uir
ed d
iffe
ren
ce’
can
be
show
n b
y:
- ex
pli
cit
use
of
the
sub
tract
ion
sig
n b
etw
een
th
e li
fegu
ard
’s d
ista
nce
to v
isib
le h
ori
zon
an
d t
he
chil
d’s
dis
tan
ce t
o v
isib
le h
ori
zon
- ci
tin
g a
res
ult
th
at
can
be
infe
rred
as
the
dif
fere
nce
- u
sin
g w
ord
s to
th
at
effe
ct,
e.g. ‘d
iffe
ren
ce i
s’, ‘t
he
life
gu
ard
ca
n s
ee …
fu
rth
er’,
etc
.
2.
Corr
ect
equ
ivale
nts
wit
h t
he
corr
esp
on
din
gly
corr
ect
un
it f
or
the
req
uir
ed d
iffe
ren
ce a
re:
•3
.7 k
m o
r 3.7
0 k
m o
r 3.6
97xxx k
m o
r 3.6
98xxx k
m
•3
70
0 m
or
36
97
.xx
x m
or
36
98
.xx
x m
.
(Wh
ere
‘xxx’
has
bee
n s
how
n i
t si
gn
ifie
s th
at
an
y d
igit
s in
th
ese
posi
tion
s d
o n
ot
nee
d t
o b
e ch
eck
ed.)
3.
‘Ob
serv
ab
le’
mea
ns
that
suff
icie
nt
inte
rmed
iate
ste
ps
are
sh
ow
n s
o t
hat
an
in
fere
nce
does
not
nee
d t
o b
e m
ad
e ab
ou
t h
ow
an
in
corr
ect
resu
lt w
as
ob
tain
ed.
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
Item 13
Model response
I. Using suitable equipment, draw an arc on the map to represent the visible horizon of an
observer on the peak of I. Pinta.
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
II. List the names of islands that are fully or partially within the visible horizon of I. Pinta.
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
Show any
calculations
here.
Draw the arc
in pencil.
I. Marchena, I. Genovesa, I. Isabela, I. San Salvador
Scale1 mm = 2 km
N
I. Santa Maria
I. San Cristobal
896
640I. Española
206
I. Baltra
I. San Salvador
I. Fernandina
1707
906
864259
1547
I. Santa Cruz
I. Santa FeI. Isabela
343
777
76
I. Pinta
I. Marchena I. Genovesa
Queensland Studies Authority | 45
46
CommentaryItem 13 is a three-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 57 Manipulating/ operating/using equipment, 6 Interpreting the meaning of … maps and 37 Applying a progression of steps to achieve the required answer.
This item required students to use a drawing compass to construct an arc on a scaled map of the Galapagos Islands to represent the visible horizon for an observer on the mountain peak of Isla Pinta. Students had to name the four islands that were within the visible horizon arc. Working space was provided for any calculations.
An A-grade response needed to provide an arc that appeared to be constructed using a drawing compass, and the names of the four correct within-horizon islands. The correct arc had a radius of 49.7 mm but a tolerance of ± 1.5 mm was allowed.
It was evident that some students did not have a drawing compass or did not realise that this equipment had to be used in this situation. Essential equipment for the QCS Test includes a drawing compass. Students should bring one to the test, recognise when it must be used and be able to use it effectively. A cue instructed the use of a pencil for the arc, which allows for incorrect responses to be erased. A sharp pencil should be used for accuracy. When an item has a specialist response area such as a map there will always be a copy provided in the back pages of the test paper in case the first response area is spoiled. Students should ensure they have crossed out the response they do not wish to be graded. If there is more than one response given, the first response will be the one graded.
A B C N O
100%
D
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
UN
IT
SE
VE
NIT
EM
13
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 7
2 o
f 4
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
57
Ma
nip
ula
tin
g/o
per
ati
ng
/usi
ng
eq
uip
men
t6
Inte
rpre
tin
g t
he
mea
nin
g o
f …
ma
ps
…
37
Ap
ply
ing
a p
rog
ress
ion
of
step
s to
ach
iev
e th
e re
qu
ired
an
swer
C
Th
e re
spon
se p
rovid
es t
he
arc
.
It is
dra
wn
all
ow
ing f
or
on
e d
iscr
epan
cy.
Th
e re
spon
se p
rovid
es
•co
rrec
tly
ex
ecu
ted
dir
ect
pro
po
rtio
n
calc
ula
tion
s to
det
erm
ine
the
dis
tan
ce
to I
. P
inta
’s v
isib
le h
ori
zon
•a
n a
rc c
on
sist
ent w
ith
th
e ca
lcu
lati
on
s.
It i
s d
raw
n a
ccu
rate
ly.
OR
A
Th
e re
spo
nse
pro
vid
es t
he
arc
.
It i
s d
raw
n a
ccu
rate
ly.
Th
e n
am
es o
f on
ly t
he
wit
hin
-hori
zon
isla
nd
s are
giv
en,
i.e.
•M
arc
hen
a
•G
enoves
a
•Is
ab
ela
•S
an
Sa
lvad
or
•(P
inta
).
B
Th
e re
spo
nse
pro
vid
es t
he
arc
.
It i
s d
raw
n a
ccu
rate
ly.
Th
e re
spo
nse
pro
vid
es
•ca
lcu
lati
on
s b
ase
d o
n t
he
‘d-f
orm
ula
’
wit
h a
t m
ost
tw
o o
bse
rvab
le e
rro
rs
•a
n a
rc c
on
sist
ent w
ith
th
e ca
lcu
lati
on
s.
It i
s d
raw
n a
ccu
rate
ly.
OR
D
Th
e re
spon
se p
rovid
es
•ca
lcu
lati
on
s to
det
erm
ine
the
dis
tan
ce
to I
. P
inta
’s v
isib
le h
ori
zon
•a
n a
rc c
on
sist
ent w
ith
th
e ca
lcu
lati
on
s.
It i
s d
raw
n a
ccu
rate
ly.
Th
e re
spon
se p
rovid
es
•ca
lcu
lati
on
s b
ase
d o
n t
he
‘d-f
orm
ula
’
wit
h a
t m
ost
tw
o o
bse
rva
ble
err
ors
•a
n a
rc c
on
sist
ent w
ith
th
e ca
lcu
lati
on
s.
It is
dra
wn
all
ow
ing f
or
on
e d
iscr
epan
cy.
OR
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
Note
s:
1.
Mea
sure
men
ts c
on
cern
ing a
ny a
rc a
re m
ad
e fr
om
th
e p
oin
t m
ark
ing t
he
pea
k o
f I.
Pin
ta.
2.
Wh
en a
ny a
rc i
s re
qu
ired
to
be
‘dra
wn
acc
ura
tely
’ it
mu
st a
pp
ear
to h
ave
bee
n d
raw
n u
sin
g a
dra
win
g c
om
pass
an
d i
t m
ust
lie
wit
hin
mm
of
the
posi
tion
th
e re
spon
se i
nd
icate
s it
sh
ou
ld l
ie.
3.
Th
e re
d z
on
e on
th
e te
mp
late
in
dic
ate
s th
e re
gio
n i
n w
hic
h t
he
arc
mu
st l
ie w
hen
it
is d
raw
n a
ccu
rate
ly.
4.
An
‘ob
serv
ab
le’
erro
r m
ean
s th
at
suff
icie
nt
inte
rmed
iate
ste
ps
are
sh
ow
n s
o t
hat
an
in
fere
nce
does
not
nee
d t
o b
e m
ad
e ab
ou
t h
ow
an
in
corr
ect
resu
lt w
as
ob
tain
ed.
Su
ch e
rro
rs c
ou
ld i
ncl
ud
e: a
sta
ted
res
ult
not
matc
hin
g t
he
wri
tten
in
ten
tion
, a m
isu
se o
f u
nit
s, a
sca
lin
g e
rror,
a r
ecogn
isab
le t
ran
scri
pti
on
err
or.
5.
A d
iscr
epan
cy i
s on
e of
the
foll
ow
ing:
(i)
the
arc
does
NO
T a
pp
ear
to h
ave
bee
n d
raw
n u
sin
g a
dra
win
g c
om
pass
bu
t d
oes
lie
wit
hin
th
e re
d z
on
e
(ii)
a d
raw
ing c
om
pass
does
ap
pea
r to
have
bee
n u
sed
bu
t an
arc
dra
wn
can
- a
t ti
mes
lie
ou
tsid
e th
e m
m o
f th
e p
osi
tion
th
e re
spo
nse
in
dic
ate
s it
sh
ou
ld l
ie (
i.e.
fo
r th
earc
, th
e re
d z
on
e)
(iii
) a d
raw
ing c
om
pass
does
ap
pea
r to
have
bee
n u
sed
bu
t an
arc
dra
wn
ca
n -
co
nsi
sten
tly l
ie n
o m
ore
th
an
m
m o
uts
ide
the
posi
tion
th
e re
spon
se i
nd
icate
s it
sh
ou
ld l
ie (
i.e.
for
the
arc
, n
o m
ore
th
an
1 m
m o
uts
ide
the
red
zon
e).
6.
Wh
en a
rep
rod
uct
ion
of
I. S
an
ta M
ari
a’s
vis
ible
hori
zon
arc
is
pro
vid
ed i
t ca
nn
ot
be
aw
ard
ed a
cre
dit
ab
le g
rad
e.
1.5
1.5
2.5
Queensland Studies Authority | 47
48
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 7
3 o
f 4
UN
IT
SE
VE
NIT
EM
13
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
Scale
1 m
m =
2 k
m
N
I. S
anta
Maria
I. S
an C
risto
bal
896
640
I. E
spañola
206
I. B
altra
I. S
an S
alv
ador
I. F
ern
andin
a
1707
906
864
259
1547
I. S
anta
Cru
z I. S
anta
Fe
I. Isabela
343
777
76
I. P
inta
I. M
arc
hena
I. G
enovesa
I.M
arc
hena
,I.
Genove
sa
,I.
Isa
bela
,I.
Sa
nS
alv
ad
or
..............................................................................................
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
Item 14
Model response
CommentaryItem 14 is a five-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 43 Analysing, 32 Reaching a conclusion which is necessarily true provided a given set of assumptions is true, 50 Visualising and 17 Estimating numerical value.
This item required students to determine the height of a tower that could be constructed on the peak of I Genovesa so that an observer on the top of this tower would be able to just see the peak of I San Cristobal.
An A-grade response needed to use a legitimate strategy to determine this tower height. The strategy had to be evidenced in a clear and logical sequence of steps and use appropriate measurements and correct calculations.
A legitimate strategy recognised that the arcs representing the visible horizons of observers on the peak ofI San Cristobal and the tower on I Genovesa had to just touch. A strategy typically involved these elements: finding the distance to the visible horizon of I San Cristobal (using the formula); finding the distance from this horizon to I Genovesa; using this distance in the formula to solve for the height of an observer on the tower; finding the height of the tower by subtracting the height of the peak.
Some observed problems were: very inaccurate measuring (this might have arisen from poor use of a ruler or use of a poor ruler); working in incorrect units; incorrect use of the formula; and not considering the height of the peak to give the final result. Clear setting out of the calculations used with accompanying written descriptions would assist students when they need to re-read their work and to make sure the result obtained is what was required by the stem. Careful use of equipment such as rulers, compasses and sharp pencils will result in more accurate work.
Determine the minimum height of a tower that would have to be constructed on the peak
of I. Genovesa so that an observer on the top of the tower would be able to just see the
peak of I. San Cristobal.
..........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
Present your
reasoning
clearly and
logically.
Show all steps.
Distance from I. San Cristobal to I. Genovesa = 74 mm which is really 148 km
Combined height of tower and peak on I.G. = (41 12.7) = 132.36 m2
�
Distance to visible horizon for I.S.C. =
The distance that an observer on the tower on the peak of I.G. would need
to be able to see is 148 – 107 = 41 km
So the tower height would need to be 132 – 76 = 56 metres.
12.7 x 896 = 106.7 km
A B C D N O
100%
E
Queensland Studies Authority | 49
50
UN
IT
SE
VE
NIT
EM
14
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 7
4 o
f 4
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy
the
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
has
bee
n m
ad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
43
An
aly
sin
g3
2D
edu
cin
g
50
Vis
ua
lisi
ng
17
Est
ima
tin
g n
um
eric
al
ma
gn
itu
de
C
Th
e re
spon
se s
ets
ou
t a
seq
uen
ce o
f st
eps
that
sup
port
s
a l
egit
imate
str
ate
gy t
hat
cou
ld
be
use
d t
o d
eter
min
e th
e
com
bin
ed h
eig
ht
of
pea
k a
nd
tow
er.
A c
om
bin
ed h
eigh
t of
pea
k a
nd
tow
er i
s giv
en.
A
Th
e re
spon
se s
ets
ou
t a
seq
uen
ce o
f st
eps
that
con
stit
ute
s a leg
itim
ate
str
ate
gy
that
cou
ld b
e u
sed
to d
eter
min
e
the
hei
gh
t o
f th
e re
qu
ired
to
wer
on
I.
Gen
oves
a.
Mea
sure
men
ts, w
ith
in t
he
tole
ran
ce a
llo
wed
, a
re u
sed
.
Ap
pro
pri
ate
calc
ula
tion
s are
use
d a
nd
are
exec
ute
d c
orr
ectl
y.
Th
e h
eigh
t of
the
req
uir
ed
tow
er w
ith
corr
ect
un
its
is
giv
en.
B
Th
e re
spon
se s
ets
ou
t a
seq
uen
ce o
f st
eps
that
con
stit
ute
s a le
git
imate
str
ate
gy
that
cou
ld b
e u
sed
to d
eter
min
e
the
hei
gh
t of
a t
ow
er.
At
most
on
e ob
serv
ab
le e
rror
can
occ
ur
in e
ith
er
•th
e m
easu
rem
ents
use
d
or
•a
pp
rop
ria
te c
alc
ula
tio
ns.
An
y c
alc
ula
tion
s a
fter
th
e er
ror
is m
ad
e m
ust
be
con
seq
uen
tiall
y c
orr
ect.
D
Th
e re
spon
se p
rov
ides
at
lea
st
thre
e st
eps
that
wou
ld h
ave
bee
n u
sefu
l in
a l
egit
imate
stra
tegy to d
eter
min
e th
e h
eigh
t
of
a t
ow
er o
n I
. G
eno
ves
a.
E
Th
e re
spon
se p
rovid
es a
t le
ast
on
e st
ep t
hat
wou
ld h
ave
bee
n
use
ful in
a leg
itim
ate
str
ate
gy
to d
eter
min
e th
e h
eigh
t o
f a
tow
er o
n I
. G
enoves
a.
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
Dis
tan
ce f
rom
I. S
an
Cri
stob
al to
I. G
enoves
a =
74 m
m w
hic
h is
reall
y 1
48 k
m
Dis
tan
ce t
o v
isib
le h
ori
zon
fo
r I.
S.C
. =
km
Th
e d
ista
nce
th
at
an
ob
serv
er o
n t
he
tow
er o
n t
he
pea
k o
f I.
G.
wou
ld n
eed
to b
e ab
le t
o s
ee i
s 1
48 –
10
7 =
41
km
Com
bin
ed h
eigh
t of
tow
er a
nd
pea
k o
n I
.G.
=
So t
he
tow
er h
eigh
t w
ou
ld n
eed
to b
e 132 –
76 =
56 m
etre
s.
12.7
896
106.
7=
(41
2 ÷
12.7
) =
132.3
6 m
No
tes:
1.
Wh
en w
ork
ing i
s sh
ow
n o
n t
he
ma
p o
n p
age
22, co
nsi
der
it
wh
en g
rad
ing t
he
resp
on
se.
2.
‘Mea
sure
men
ts w
ith
in t
he
tole
ran
ce a
llow
ed’
are
wit
hin
m
m o
f th
e p
osi
tion
th
e w
ork
ing
in t
he
resp
on
se i
nd
icate
s. A
ll d
ista
nce
s are
ass
um
ed t
o b
e m
ad
e fr
om
th
e p
oin
t m
ark
ing a
pea
k
an
d t
o b
e m
ad
e in
a s
traig
ht
lin
e.
3.
Th
e on
ly c
alc
ula
tion
s d
eem
ed ‘
ap
pro
pri
ate
’ w
hen
det
erm
inin
g v
isib
le h
ori
zon
dis
tan
ce f
rom
a
hei
gh
t or
vic
e ver
sa u
se t
he
‘d-f
orm
ula
’.
4.
Inte
rmed
iate
ro
un
din
g o
r tr
un
cati
ng i
s acc
epta
ble
.
5.
An
‘ob
serv
ab
le’
erro
r m
ean
s th
at
suff
icie
nt
inte
rmed
iate
ste
ps
are
sh
ow
n s
o t
hat
an
in
fere
nce
does
not
nee
d t
o b
e m
ad
e ab
ou
t h
ow
an
in
corr
ect
resu
lt w
as
ob
tain
ed.
Su
ch e
rro
rs a
re:
— o
mit
tin
g t
o s
ub
tract
th
e h
eigh
t of
the
pea
k
— a
sta
ted
res
ult
no
t m
atc
hin
g t
he
wri
tten
in
ten
tio
n
— a
rec
ogn
isab
le t
ran
scri
pti
on
err
or
— a
mis
use
of
un
its
— a
sca
lin
g e
rror
— a
pro
ced
ura
l er
ror
wh
en s
olv
ing
an
eq
uati
on
— a
rec
ogn
isab
le m
easu
rem
ent
erro
r (I
. G
enoves
a m
ust
be
on
e of
the
isla
nd
s u
sed
)
— p
laci
ng t
he
tow
er o
n I
. S
an
Cri
stob
al
inst
ead
of
I. G
enoves
a.
1.5
Last
Page
Cou
nt
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
Unit Eight
The items of this unit are based on an extract from the 1993 speech ‘Funeral Service for the Unknown Australian Soldier’, delivered by the then Prime Minister Paul Keating to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the end of the First World War.
The following table shows the percentage of responses awarded the various grades for the items in this unit.
Item 15
Model response
A B C D E N O
Item 15 2.3 16.1 37.1 16.2 23.3 5
Item 16 27.2 19.4 29.2 17.4 6.8
Item 17 7.2 41.9 26 5.8 2.6 4 12.6
A shaded box indicates that the grade was not available for that item.
Effective speeches use language that is simple, apt and forceful. Why is this an effective
speech according to these criteria?
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
Give a specific example
from the extract for
each criterion. The language used is
simple — short sentences are used with repeated straightforward phrases, e.g.
‘We do not know’, making the speech easy to understand.
apt — uses dignified language such as ‘occupation’ rather than ‘work’; ‘foreign soil’
rather than ‘overseas’, no humour or colloquial wording, thus making it suitable for a
solemn occasion.
forceful — throughout the 2nd last paragraph, we are bombarded with ‘one of …’,
‘one of …’ which has a strong impact and builds to a climax in the last line.
�
�
�
Queensland Studies Authority | 51
52
CommentaryItem 15 is a three-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 45 Evaluating, 4 Interpreting the meaning of words and 26 Explaining to others.
Students were required to assess the effectiveness of the speech by considering how simple, apt and forceful the language used was. The cue indicated that the students should give a specific example from the extract for each criterion.
An A-grade response provided an appropriate example from the text for each of the criteria: simple, apt, and forceful. It also correctly matched the examples to an
aspect of style or subject matter and explained how each of the criteria was met.
Responses that were awarded an A-grade, proffered a specific example from the extract (by either quoting, paraphrasing, referencing the line numbers or by citing an absence, e.g. ‘He doesn't use technical language’). They clearly identified an aspect of style (e.g. repetition, vocabulary, sentence structure) or subject matter (e.g. the fact that he was anonymous, the use of statistics). In other words, they identified a specific focus as the basis of their evaluation. Their explanations were not recursive (‘it is simple because it’s not complex’). They clearly showed how the criteria of simple, apt or forceful were being met.
Many responses did not move beyond the information in the stem and simply talked about the example being forceful or that it used ‘forceful language’. Some students wrote well about why it was an effective speech but failed to address the criteria and could not be awarded a creditable grade. Students should be reminded that by identifying and acting on the key words in the stem, they have a better chance of responding well.
A B C N O
100%
D
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
UN
IT
EIG
HT
IT
EM
15
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 2
3 o
f 5
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
45
Ev
alu
ati
ng
4
Inte
rpre
tin
g t
he
mea
nin
g o
f w
ord
s …
26
Ex
pla
inin
g t
o o
ther
s
C
Th
e re
spon
se e
valu
ate
s th
e sp
eech
acc
ord
ing t
o t
he
foll
ow
ing n
um
ber
of
crit
eria
at
the
sta
nd
ard
in
dic
ate
d.
(1 k
hak
i)
OR
(2 g
rey).
OR
(3 b
eig
e).
A
Th
e re
spon
se e
valu
ate
s th
e sp
eech
acc
ord
ing t
o t
he
foll
ow
ing n
um
ber
of
crit
eria
at
the
stan
dard
in
dic
ate
d.
(3 k
hak
i).
B
Th
e re
spon
se e
valu
ate
s th
e sp
eech
acc
ord
ing t
o t
he
foll
ow
ing n
um
ber
of
crit
eria
at
the
stan
dard
in
dic
ate
d.
(2 k
hak
i)
OR
(3 g
rey
).
Note
s:
1.
Exam
ple
s m
ay b
e p
rese
nte
d t
hro
ugh
para
ph
rasi
ng o
r re
fere
nci
ng l
ine
nu
mb
ers
as
wel
l as
thro
ugh
qu
oti
ng.
It i
s p
oss
ible
to p
rov
ide
an
exa
mp
le b
y c
itin
g a
n a
bse
nce
.
2.
Th
e fo
llow
ing s
tan
dard
s are
to b
e ap
pli
ed w
hen
mak
ing j
ud
gm
ents
ab
ou
t h
ow
wel
l ea
ch o
f th
e th
ree
crit
eria
— s
imp
le, ap
t an
d f
orc
efu
l la
ngu
age
— a
re a
dd
ress
ed.
3.
For
a p
art
icu
lar
crit
erio
n,
if t
he
req
uir
emen
ts o
f k
hak
i are
met
, so
are
th
ose
for
gre
y a
nd
bei
ge.
Sim
ilarl
y, i
f th
e re
qu
irem
ents
for
gre
y a
re m
et, so
are
th
ose
fo
r b
eige.
Sta
nd
ard
Exam
ple
Asp
ect
of
style
or
sub
ject
ma
tter
Exp
lan
ati
on
Kh
ak
iA
pp
rop
ria
te &
fait
hfu
lC
orr
ectl
y m
atc
hed
wit
h e
xam
ple
Exp
lain
s h
ow
th
is c
rite
rion
is
met
Gre
yA
pp
rop
ria
te &
fait
hfu
lC
orr
ectl
y m
atc
hed
wit
h e
xam
ple
Bei
ge
Ap
pro
pri
ate
& f
ait
hfu
lW
ord
matc
h t
o s
tem
— s
imp
le,
ap
t or
forc
efu
l
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
1.
Th
e la
ngu
age
use
d i
s
•si
mp
le —
sh
ort
sen
ten
ces
are
use
d w
ith
rep
eate
d s
tra
igh
tfo
rwa
rd p
hra
ses,
e.g
. ‘W
e d
o n
ot
kn
ow
’, m
ak
ing t
he
spee
ch e
asy
to u
nd
ers
tan
d.
•a
pt
— u
ses
dig
nif
ied
lan
gu
age
such
as
‘occ
up
ati
on
’ ra
ther
th
an
‘w
ork
’; ‘
fore
ign
soil
’ ra
ther
th
an
‘over
seas’
, n
o h
um
ou
r or
coll
oq
uia
l w
ord
ing, th
us
mak
ing i
t su
itab
le f
or
a s
ole
mn
occ
asi
on
.
•fo
rcef
ul
— t
hro
ug
hou
t th
e 2n
d l
ast
para
gra
ph
, w
e are
bom
bard
ed w
ith
‘on
e of
…’,
‘on
e of
…’
wh
ich
has
a s
tron
g i
mp
act
an
d b
uil
ds
to a
cli
max i
n t
he
last
lin
e.
D
Th
e re
spo
nse
ev
alu
ate
s th
e sp
eech
acc
ord
ing t
o t
he
foll
ow
ing n
um
ber
of
crit
eria
at
the
stan
dard
in
dic
ate
d.
OR
(1 g
rey
).
OR
(2 b
eige)
.
Queensland Studies Authority | 53
54
Item 16
Model response
CommentaryItem 16 is a two-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 30 Classifying and 43 Analysing.
This item required students to describe how each of the three forms of rhetoric, described in the stimulus material, was evident at the 75th anniversary commemoration.
A response complied with the demands of the stem when it linked appropriate aspects of the commemoration to the relevant form of rhetoric. For ethos most
students correctly identified the Prime Minister, Paul Keating, as the speaker who was delivering the speech. For logos a response had to point out that facts or data had been incorporated into the speech or to provide an appropriate example of this. For pathos a response elaborated on the emotion, e.g. ‘an emotional connection’ or ‘a welling of emotions’ or it identified a specific type of emotion (e.g. patriotic pride, sadness, empathy, sympathy, fear).
The response area would indicate that for this item the response did not need to be lengthy. However, the response did need to be specific rather than general and to not simply paraphrase the stimulus. Responses that just referred to an ‘important person’ when trying to describe how ethos was evident were considered to have given only a part description as were the responses for pathos that merely stated the speech appealed to emotion.
Describe how each of these three rhetorical forms was evident at the 75th anniversary
commemoration.
Ethos
Logos
Pathos
Speech is delivered by the Prime Minister on a very formal occasion.
Paragraph three is based on logic and data, the numbers of deaths
and injuries; the stark facts of war.
He appeals to the sympathy of the audience by discussing the everyday
aspects of the soldier’s life — his life is our life — ‘He is all of them.
He is one of us’.
A B C N O
100%
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
UN
IT
EIG
HT
IT
EM
16
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 2
4 o
f 5
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
ha
s b
een
mad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
30
Cla
ssif
yin
g
43
An
aly
sin
g
C
Th
e re
spon
se
•co
rrec
tly
des
crib
es h
ow
on
e o
f th
e rh
eto
rica
l fo
rms
wa
s
evid
ent
•p
art
ly d
escr
ibes
ho
w a
noth
er r
het
ori
cal fo
rm w
as
evid
ent.
A
Th
e re
spon
se c
orr
ectl
y d
escr
ibes
ho
w a
ll
thre
e rh
etori
cal
form
s w
ere
evid
ent.
B
Th
e re
spon
se
•co
rrec
tly d
escr
ibes
how
tw
o o
f th
e rh
etori
cal
form
s w
ere
evid
ent
•p
art
ly d
escr
ibes
how
th
e th
ird
rh
etori
cal
form
was
evid
ent.
Note
s:
1.
Th
e re
spo
nse
co
rrec
tly
des
crib
es e
tho
s w
hen
it
refe
rs t
o t
he
infl
uen
tia
l p
erso
n b
y n
am
e o
r ti
tle;
it
pa
rtly
des
crib
es e
tho
s w
hen
it
refe
rs t
o a
n i
mp
ort
an
t p
erso
n.
2.
Th
e re
spon
se c
orr
ectl
y d
escr
ibes
logos
wh
en i
t re
cogn
ises
th
at
fact
s/d
ata
have
bee
n i
nco
rpora
ted
in
to t
he
spee
ch e
ith
er t
hro
ugh
a s
tate
men
t or
by p
rovid
ing a
n
ap
pro
pri
ate
ex
am
ple
.
3.
Th
e re
spon
se c
orr
ectl
y d
escr
ibes
path
os
wh
en i
t u
ses
pa
rt o
f th
e te
xt
to s
ho
w h
ow
an
asp
ect
of
path
os
is e
vid
ent;
it
pa
rtly
des
crib
es p
ath
os
wh
en i
t att
emp
ts t
o l
ink
part
of
the
tex
t to
path
os.
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
Eth
os
Spee
ch i
s del
iver
ed b
y t
he
Pri
me
Min
iste
r on a
ver
y f
orm
al o
ccas
ion.
Lo
go
sP
arag
rap
h t
hre
e is
bas
ed o
n l
og
ic a
nd
dat
a, t
he
nu
mb
ers
of
dea
ths
and
in
juri
es;
the
star
k f
acts
of
war
.
Pat
hos
He
appea
ls t
o t
he
sym
pat
hy o
f th
e au
die
nce
by d
iscu
ssin
g t
he
ever
yday
asp
ects
of
the
sold
ier’
s li
fe —
his
lif
e is
our
life
— ‘
He
is a
ll o
f th
em. H
e is
one
of
us’
.
Queensland Studies Authority | 55
56
Item 17
Model response
CommentaryItem 17 is a four-star item that tested achievement in CCEs 46 Creating/composing/devising, 10 Using vocabulary appropriate to a context, 27 Expounding a viewpoint and 44 Synthesising.
This item required students to consider the information given about marine debris and then compose a short persuasive speech that urges an audience to take some form of action. Within their speech students had to incorporate the three forms of rhetoric: ethos, logos and pathos.
An A-grade response needed to provide examples of all three forms of rhetoric. It was also required to urge a specified action on the problem of marine debris, and to use vocabulary and language structures strategically to capture the attention of the audience and to inspire them. It needed to present a clear, coherent and cohesive speech.
Many students managed to weave the given data into their arguments and display pathos effectively through their vocabulary choices and through imagery of toxic oceans and dying animals. The two reasons that most often precluded responses from being awarded an A-grade were the failure to attend to ethos and providing a general suggestion, e.g. ‘let’s clean up our oceans’ rather than a specified action, e.g. ‘put your litter in a bin’.
If a stem specifies a number of requirements (e.g. encourage some form of action; incorporate ethos, logos, pathos) that must appear in the response, it is useful to mark them off in some manner as they are attended to so that none is omitted.
Compose a short persuasive speech in which you urge your audience to take some form of
action to counter the problem of marine debris. Incorporate the three forms of rhetoric defined
on the previous page — ethos, logos and pathos — into your speech.
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
I am travelling the world as a representative of the David Suzuki Environmental
Foundation to warn you of an impending global catastrophe. Our complacency and selfish
lifestyles murder 100000 marine animals each year. It is a catastrophe that so many
animals are victims of the rubbish we allow to wash down our drains into the ocean. It is a
catastrophe that whales, dolphins and turtles drown in nets because of our
carelessness. How many more sea birds must die by ingesting litter? How many more
turtles must be killed by being tangled in fishing lines and nets? I ask you, no I beg you, to
take responsibility for your waste. Take one simple action. Put your rubbish in a bin. Stop
it from entering the oceans. Stop it from killing our marine environment. Stop it from
becoming a global catastrophe.
A B C D N O
100%
E
| Retrospective 2011 QCS Test
UN
IT
EIG
HT
IT
EM
17
PE
RF
OR
MA
NC
E D
OM
AIN
MA
RK
IN
G S
CH
EM
E
Mark
ing
Un
it 2
5 o
f 5
N
Res
pon
se i
s
un
inte
llig
ible
or
does
not
sati
sfy t
he
req
uir
emen
ts
for
an
y o
ther
gra
de.
O
No r
esp
on
se
has
bee
n m
ad
e
at
an
y t
ime.
46
Cre
atin
g/c
om
po
sin
g /
dev
isin
g
10
Usi
ng
vo
cab
ula
ry a
pp
rop
ria
te t
o a
co
nte
xt
27
Ex
po
un
din
g a
vie
wp
oin
t4
4S
yn
thes
isin
g
C
Th
e re
spon
se i
ncl
ud
es a
ll t
hre
e of
•et
ho
s
•d
ata
fro
m t
he
stim
ulu
s
•p
ath
os.
Th
e re
spon
se i
ncl
ud
es t
wo o
f
•im
pli
ed e
tho
s
•d
ata
fro
m t
he
stim
ulu
s
•im
pli
ed p
ath
os
an
d
•en
cou
rages
oth
ers
to t
ak
e act
ion
on
the
pro
ble
m o
f m
ari
ne
deb
ris.
Th
e re
spon
se i
ncl
ud
es t
wo o
f
•im
pli
ed e
tho
s
•d
ata
fro
m t
he
stim
ulu
s
•im
pli
ed p
ath
os
an
d
•u
ses
vo
cab
ula
ry a
nd
lan
gu
age
stru
ctu
res
to c
ap
ture
th
e att
enti
on
of
the
au
die
nce
.
OR
OR
A
Th
e re
spon
se i
ncl
ud
es a
ll t
hre
e of
•et
hos
•lo
gos
•p
ath
os
an
d
•u
rges
a s
pec
ifie
d f
orm
of
act
ion
on
the
pro
ble
m o
f m
ari
ne
deb
ris
•u
ses
voca
bu
lary
an
d l
an
gu
age
stru
ctu
res
stra
tegic
all
y t
o c
ap
ture
att
enti
on
an
d in
spir
e th
e au
die
nce
•p
rese
nts
a c
lear,
coh
eren
t an
d
coh
esiv
e sp
eech
.
B
Th
e re
spon
se i
ncl
ud
es t
wo o
f
•et
hos
•lo
gos
•p
ath
os
an
d
•u
rges
act
ion
on
th
e p
rob
lem
of
ma
rin
e d
ebri
s
•u
ses
vo
cab
ula
ry a
nd
la
ng
ua
ge
stru
ctu
res
to c
ap
ture
th
e
att
enti
on
of
the
au
die
nce
.
D
Th
e re
spon
se i
ncl
ud
es t
wo o
f
•im
pli
ed e
thos
•d
ata
fro
m t
he
stim
ulu
s
•im
pli
ed p
ath
os.
Th
e re
spon
se i
ncl
ud
es o
ne
of
•im
pli
ed e
thos
•d
ata
fro
m t
he
stim
ulu
s
•im
pli
ed p
ath
os
an
d
•en
cou
rages
oth
ers
to t
ak
e act
ion
on
the
pro
ble
m o
f m
ari
ne
deb
ris.
OR
E
Th
e re
spon
se i
ncl
ud
es o
ne
of
•im
pli
ed e
thos
•d
ata
fro
m t
he
stim
ulu
s
•im
pli
ed p
ath
os.
Note
s:
1.
Eth
os
may b
e d
emon
stra
ted
th
rou
gh
dir
ect
self
-id
enti
fica
tio
n o
f th
e
spea
ker
, o
r b
y i
den
tify
ing
th
e sp
eak
er o
uts
ide
of
the
spee
ch.
2.
Logos
is d
emon
stra
ted
wh
en t
her
e h
as
bee
n p
urp
ose
ful
use
of
data
from
th
e st
imu
lus
to s
up
port
an
arg
um
ent.
3.
‘Im
pli
ed e
thos’
is
dem
on
stra
ted
wh
en t
he
resp
on
se i
mp
lies
th
at
the
spea
ker
has
rep
uta
tion
/sta
tus/
exp
erie
nce
to i
nfl
uen
ce t
he
inte
nd
ed
au
die
nce
.
4.
‘Im
pli
ed p
ath
os’
may b
e d
emon
stra
ted
, fo
r ex
am
ple
, th
rou
gh
incl
usi
ve
sta
tem
ents
.
5.
Path
os
enco
mp
ass
es im
pli
ed p
ath
os;
eth
os
enco
mp
ass
es im
pli
ed e
thos;
log
os
enco
mp
ass
es c
itin
g d
ata
fro
m t
he
stim
ulu
s; u
rges
en
com
pa
sses
enco
ura
ges
.
6.
A s
pec
ifie
d f
orm
of
act
ion
is
som
eth
ing t
hat
an
au
die
nce
mem
ber
can
enact
wit
hin
a r
easo
nab
le t
ime
fram
e.
Mod
el R
esp
on
se:
I am
tra
vel
lin
g t
he
worl
d a
s a r
epre
sen
tati
ve
of
the
David
Su
zuk
i E
nvir
on
men
tal
Fou
nd
ati
on
to w
arn
you
of
an
im
pen
din
g g
lob
al
cata
stro
ph
e. O
ur
com
pla
cen
cy a
nd
self
ish
lif
esty
les
mu
rder
100
000 m
ari
ne
an
imals
each
yea
r. I
t is
a c
ata
stro
ph
e th
at
so
man
y a
nim
als
are
vic
tim
s of
the
rub
bis
h w
e all
ow
to w
ash
do
wn
ou
r d
rain
s in
to t
he
oce
an
. It
is a
cata
stro
ph
e th
at
wh
ale
s, d
olp
hin
s an
d t
urt
les
dro
wn
in
net
s b
ecau
se o
f ou
r
care
less
nes
s. H
ow
man
y m
ore
sea
bir
ds
mu
st d
ie b
y i
nges
tin
g l
itte
r? H
ow
man
y m
ore
turt
les
mu
st b
e k
ille
d b
y b
ein
g t
an
gle
d in
fis
hin
g lin
es a
nd
net
s? I
ask
you
, no I
beg
you
,
to t
ak
e re
spon
sib
ilit
y f
or
you
r w
ast
e. T
ak
e on
e si
mp
le a
ctio
n. P
ut
you
r ru
bb
ish
in
a b
in.
Sto
p i
t fr
om
en
teri
ng t
he
oce
an
s. S
top
it
from
kil
lin
g o
ur
mari
ne
envir
on
men
t. S
top
it
fro
m b
eco
min
g a
glo
ba
l ca
tast
rop
he.
Last
Page
Cou
nt
Queensland Studies Authority | 57
ISSN 1321-3938
© The State of Queensland (Queensland Studies Authority) 2011
Copyright protects this material. Copyright in the Core Skills Test is owned by the State of Queensland and/or the QueenslandStudies Authority. Copyright in some of the material included in the paper is owned by third parties.
Except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth), reproduction by any means (photocopying, electronic, mechanical,recording or otherwise), making available online, electronic transmission or other publication of this material is prohibited withoutprior written permission of the relevant copyright owner/s.
The Queensland Studies Authority requires to be recognised as the source of the Core Skills Test and requires that its materialremain unaltered.
Enquiries relating to copyright in this material, which is owned by the State of Queensland or the Queensland Studies Authority,should be addressed to:
Manager Publishing UnitEmail: [email protected]