+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Returning to Normal - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta...Owen Humpage & Ellis Tallman FRBA Workshop...

Returning to Normal - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta...Owen Humpage & Ellis Tallman FRBA Workshop...

Date post: 28-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
41
Owen Humpage & Ellis Tallman FRBA Workshop on Economic History May 15, 2017 Returning to Normal The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland or of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Transcript
  • Owen Humpage & Ellis Tallman FRBA Workshop on Economic History

    May 15, 2017

    Returning to Normal

    The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland or of the Board of

    Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

  • Introduction• Monetary policy has fiscal consequences (Sims 2016).

    ~ A complete separation (independence) is impossible.· Political economy issues can arise.

    ~ Under normal circumstances fiscal consequences are small. ~ When balance sheet is large and government debt ratio is high

    (and rising) the consequences can be large.

    • Following “normalization principles.”~ The Fed balance sheet will return to “normal” in several years. ~ Over the same time, federal deficits will likely increase and the

    debt burden will likely be rising.

    • Do historical precedents—WW1 and WW2—offer any lessons for what might be coming?

  • World War I• Declaration of War in April 1917.

    ~ Change in priorities: help Treasury fund the war.

    • Governance Structure:~ Treasury Secretary McAdoo was Chairman of the Federal

    Reserve Board. ~ Comptroller of the Currency Williams was member of the

    Board.

    • Treasury policies drive Federal Reserve actions. ~ Fed becomes fiscal agent (1915).

    · Maintain order in financial markets. · Keep cost of funding low.

    ~ Overman Act; Treasury can take over Fed.

  • WWI: Balance Sheet Increases • Discount window to support sale of Treasury debt.

    ~ Lending on US Treasury collateral.~ Preferential interest rates – June 12, 1917 until mid-1921.

    · Set below discount rate on eligible collateral. · Set below interest rate on Treasury debt. (chart 1)

    • Fed intentionally increases balance sheet. ~ A policy choice with widespread Fed support throughout

    the war. ~ Real bills doctrine influenced how Fed acted.

    · Fed does not hold Treasury debt on its balance sheet. · Distributes debt to public.

  • 0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8 Percent

    Treasury Bonds

    Treasury Notes

    Chart 1: FRBNY Discount Rates on 16 – 90 Day Paper

    Commercial Paper

    June 1921

    Temporally suspended

  • WWI: Balance Sheet Increases • Discount window to support sale of Treasury debt.

    ~ Lending on US Treasury collateral.~ Preferential interest rates – June 12, 1917 until mid-1921.

    · Set below discount rate on eligible collateral. · Set below interest rate on Treasury debt.

    • Fed intentionally increases balance sheet. ~ A policy choice with widespread Fed support throughout

    the war. ~ Real bills doctrine influenced how Fed acted.

    · Fed does not hold Treasury debt on its balance sheet. · Distributes debt to public.

  • WWI: Balance Sheet Size• Nominal Terms – a “reasonable” comparison.

    ~ 1916 $1.2 billion; 1918 $5.3 billion; 1919 $6.3 billion. ~ 1920 $6.3 billion; 1921 $5.1 billion – a sharp contraction.

    • Notable increase relative to GDP. (chart 2)~ 2.7% in 1916 to 7.9% in 1918. ~ Peaks at 8.3% in 1919 but then fall to 5.9% in 1924.

    • Similar Patter relative to M2. ~ From 5.4% in 1916 to 18% in 1918. ~ Peaks at 18.7% in 1919 but then falls to 12.6% in 1924.

  • 0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    0.05

    0.06

    0.07

    0.08

    0.09

    0.05

    0.07

    0.09

    0.11

    0.13

    0.15

    0.17

    0.19

    0.21

    1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924

    Prop

    ortio

    nChart 2: Balance Sheet Size Relative to Aggregates

    Balance Sheet Relative to M2 FR BS to GDP

    Left scale

    8

    Right scale

  • 0.08

    0.1

    0.12

    0.14

    0.16

    0.18

    0.219

    17:0

    819

    17:1

    119

    18:0

    219

    18:0

    519

    18:0

    819

    18:1

    119

    19:0

    219

    19:0

    519

    19:0

    819

    19:1

    119

    20:0

    219

    20:0

    519

    20:0

    819

    20:1

    119

    21:0

    219

    21:0

    519

    21:0

    819

    21:1

    119

    22:0

    219

    22:0

    519

    22:0

    819

    22:1

    119

    23:0

    219

    23:0

    519

    23:0

    819

    23:1

    119

    24:0

    219

    24:0

    519

    24:0

    819

    24:1

    1

    Monthly Observations

    Federal Reserve Total Assets Relative to M2 (NBER)

    9

    October 1920

    October 1918

  • WWI: Balance Sheet Composition

    • Gold inflows & embargo on outflows enable a relatively unrestrained increase in the balance sheet. ~ Embargo lifted in mid-1919 leading to outflows. (chart 3)

    • Sharp rise in member-bank borrowing. ~ Borrowing increases from about 25% of balance sheet in early

    1918 to 40% in October 1918.

  • 0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    13-Jul-17 13-Jul-18 13-Jul-19 13-Jul-20 13-Jul-21 13-Jul-22 13-Jul-23 13-Jul-24

    Chart 3: Federal Reserve System Assets:July 1917 to January 1925

    Gold Reserves Nongold Reserves Bills discounted and loans Short-term Govt Securities

    Long Term Govt Securities Due from other Feds (transit) Uncollected Items Other assets

    June 9, 1919 – End of gold export embargo

    11

    War ends Recession

  • WWI: Balance Sheet Liabilities

    • Federal Reserve Notes increase. (Chart 4)~ Main liability to increase as balance sheet expanded.~ Relatively minor increase in bank reserves.

    • Limited bank credit contraction when Fed increased rates.

  • 0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    13/0

    7/19

    1721

    /09/

    1917

    30/1

    1/19

    178/

    2/19

    1819

    /04/

    1918

    28/0

    6/19

    186/

    9/19

    1815

    /11/

    1918

    24/0

    1/19

    194/

    4/19

    1913

    /06/

    1919

    22/0

    8/19

    1931

    /10/

    1919

    9/1/

    1920

    19/0

    3/19

    2028

    /05/

    1920

    6/8/

    1920

    15/1

    0/19

    2024

    /12/

    1920

    4/3/

    1921

    11/5

    /192

    120

    /07/

    1921

    28/0

    9/19

    217/

    12/1

    921

    15/0

    2/19

    2226

    /04/

    1922

    5/7/

    1922

    13/0

    9/19

    2222

    /11/

    1922

    31/0

    1/19

    2311

    /4/1

    923

    20/0

    6/19

    2329

    /08/

    1923

    7/11

    /192

    316

    /01/

    1924

    26/0

    3/19

    244/

    6/19

    2413

    /08/

    1924

    22/1

    0/19

    2431

    /12/

    1924

    Billi

    ons

    of U

    S $

    Chart 4: Federal Reserve System Liabilities:July 1917 to December 1924

    Reserve deposits Federal Reserve notes Capital paid inGovernment deposits Deferred availability items All other liabilities

    13

  • Post War Financial Stability• 1919 “unlimited demand for credit,” “speculation in

    commodities,” “no incentive … to produce cheaply.”

    • Treasury Secretary Carter Glass:~ Preferred “moral suasion” or “direct pressure” to limit credit to

    “speculative” enterprises. ~ Preferred to avoid discount-rate increase.

    • FRBNY Governor Benjamin Strong:~ Raising interest rates only way to slow credit accumulation. ~ Discount rate vs. Stock Index. (chart 5)

    • Preferential rates remain in force –heavy borrowing. (chart 1)

  • 0.65

    0.75

    0.85

    0.95

    1.05

    1.15

    1.25

    1.35

    1.45

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    81/

    1/19

    175/

    1/19

    179/

    1/19

    171/

    1/19

    185/

    1/19

    189/

    1/19

    181/

    1/19

    195/

    1/19

    199/

    1/19

    191/

    1/19

    205/

    1/19

    209/

    1/19

    201/

    1/19

    215/

    1/19

    219/

    1/19

    211/

    1/19

    225/

    1/19

    229/

    1/19

    221/

    1/19

    235/

    1/19

    239/

    1/19

    231/

    1/19

    245/

    1/19

    249/

    1/19

    241/

    1/19

    255/

    1/19

    259/

    1/19

    25

    Inde

    x (A

    pril

    1917

    =1.

    0)

    Perc

    ent

    Chart 5: NY Fed Discount Rate vs Stock Index LevelNY Fed Discount Rate (left scale) Stock Index (right scale)

    15

  • 0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8 Percent

    Treasury Bonds

    Treasury Notes

    Chart 1: RBNY Discount Rates on 16 – 90 Day Paper

    Commercial Paper

    June 1921

    January 1920

    June 1920

    May 1921

  • Post War Financial Stability• Gold outflows when embargo ends in June 1919.

    ~ Reserve ratio (notes & deposits) falls to 40.6%.~ Fear about leaving the gold standard.

    • Sharp hike in discount rate: (chart 1)~ Up 1.25% to 6% in January 1920 and to 7% in June 1920. ~ Preferred rates remain in force. ~ Discount window borrowing expands until early 1921. ~ Balance sheet contracts (chart 3). ~ Composition of discount window changes in 1919

    • Recession begins in January 1920; ends in July 1920.

  • 0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8 Percent

    Treasury Bonds

    Treasury Notes

    Chart 1: RBNY Discount Rates on 16 – 90 Day Paper

    Commercial Paper

    June 1921

    January 1920

    June 1920

    May 1921

  • 0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    13-Jul-17 13-Jul-18 13-Jul-19 13-Jul-20 13-Jul-21 13-Jul-22 13-Jul-23 13-Jul-24

    Chart 3: Federal Reserve System Assets:July 1917 to January 1925

    Gold Reserves Nongold Reserves Bills discounted and loans Short-term Govt Securities

    Long Term Govt Securities Due from other Feds (transit) Uncollected Items Other assets

    June 9, 1919 – End of gold export embargo

    Discount rate 7%

    Discount rate 6%

    19

    War ends Recession

    Preferential rates end

  • 0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    0.05

    0.06

    0.07

    0.08

    0.09

    0.05

    0.07

    0.09

    0.11

    0.13

    0.15

    0.17

    0.19

    0.21

    1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924

    Prop

    ortio

    nChart 1: Balance Sheet Size Relative to Aggregates

    Balance Sheet Relative to M2 FR BS to GDP

    Left scale

    20

    Right scale

  • Post War Fiscal Policy

    • Reduction in balance sheet after 1919. ~ Beginning in FY1920, federal government primary surplus until

    1930.~ Federal debt fall peaks at 32% of GDP in 1921 and 1922, then

    falls until 1930.

    • Fed balance sheet policy as part of “independence”.~ Initiatives by Strong get monetary policy to be driven by Fed

    and not Treasury. ~ Balance sheet reduction – part fiscal (Treasury debt reductions)

    and response to Fed interest rate policies.

  • WWII: Interest Rate Control

    • Federal Reserve is more independent.

    • Federal Reserves agrees to help finance the War. ~ Debt-management concerns trump inflation concerns.

    • Federal Reserve adopts a yield-curve policy. ~ Cap long-term Treasuryies at 2.5%. ~ Peg T-bills at 0.375%; cap certificates at 0.75%.~ Cap other rates in a consistent manner. ~ A low and steep yield curve.

  • 0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    1940 1942 1944 1946 1948 1950 1952

    Percent

    15 year7-9 year9-12 month3 month

    September 1945

    Chart 6: Select Interest Rates 1940-1952

    April 1942 June 1947 Accord

  • WWII: Balance Sheet• Federal Reserve’s balance-sheet expands.

    ~ Investors prefer now-liquid long-term rates and sell bills/ certificates to the Fed.

    ~ Fed does not intervene in long-term market. ~ Almost all short-term Treasuries.~ Balance sheet expands:

    • reaching 22 % of GDP in 1940 — Gold .• reaching 41 % of M2 in 1940 — Gold.

    • Fed continues debt-management policies after 1945. ~ Treasury refinance operations. ~ Concern about bank balance sheets—capital losses on long-

    term Treasuries

  • SOMA vs. Balance Sheet

    • System Open Market Committee (SOMA)~ Contains only assets shared by the Federal Reserve System. ~ Contains no gold or other assets held on the balance sheet of

    specific reserve banks. ~ These are held on the consolidated balance sheet.

    • Distinction is not so important today, but was more important during WW2 and, especially during WWII.

  • 0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951

    Billions of dollars

    Bills

    Certificates

    Bonds

    Notes

    Chart 7: SOMA 1941-1951

    Agreement with

    Treasury

    War ends T-bill peg ends

    Accord

  • WWII: Balance Sheet• Federal Reserve’s balance-sheet expands.

    ~ Investors prefer now-liquid long-term rates and sell bills/ certificates to the Fed.

    ~ Fed does not intervene in long-term market. ~ Almost all short-term Treasuries.~ Balance sheet expands:

    • reaching 22 % of GDP in 1940 — Gold .• reaching 41 % of M2 in 1940 — Gold.

    • Fed continues debt-management policies after 1945. ~ Treasury refinance operations. ~ Concern about bank balance sheets—capital losses on long-

    term Treasuries

  • 12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    22

    24

    24

    28

    32

    36

    40

    44

    48

    1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953

    Percent

    Required Reserves

    Percent

    Balance Sheet Size Relative to GDP and M2

    GDPM2

  • Federal Reserve System Assets 1939-1953

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953

    Gold Reserves Reserves other than gold Bills discounted and bought

    Short-term US Government Securities Long-term US Government Securities Cash items in the process of collection

    Industrial Advances All other assets

    Billions of DollarsWar ends AccordUS enters

    war

  • Federal Reserve System Liabilities 1939-1953

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953

    Reserve deposits w/o Govt. dep. Federal reserve notes Capital paid in

    Government Deposits Deferred availability items All other liabilities

    Billions of Dollars

  • WWII: Balance Sheet• Federal Reserve’s balance-sheet expands.

    ~ Investors prefer now-liquid long-term rates and sell bills/ certificates to the Fed.

    ~ Fed does not intervene in long-term market. ~ Almost all short-term Treasuries.~ Balance sheet expands:

    • reaching 22 % of GDP in 1940 — Gold .• reaching 41 % of M2 in 1940 — Gold.

    • Fed continues debt-management policies after 1945. ~ Treasury refinance operations. ~ Concern about bank balance sheets—capital losses on long-

    term Treasuries

  • WWII: Post War Strategy

    • Fed seeks to flatten yield curve. ~ Treasury permits increase in short-term rates beginning in

    1947. ~ Investors (banks) liquidate holding of long-term debt. ~ Fed buys long-term Treasuries; sells short-term Treasuries. ~ Portfolio composition changes.

    • Fed-Treasury Accord in March 1951. ~ 1949 Congressional support for a Fed focus on monetary policy.~ Korean War inflation fears.

    • Fed does not

  • 0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951

    Billions of dollars

    Bills

    Certificates

    Bonds

    Notes

    Chart 7: SOMA 1941-1951

    Agreement with

    Treasury

    War ends T-bill peg ends

    Accord

  • WWII: Post War Strategy

    • Fed seeks to flatten yield curve. ~ Treasury permits increase in short-term rates beginning in

    1947. ~ Investors (banks) liquidate holding of long-term debt. ~ Fed buys long-term Treasuries; sells short-term Treasuries. ~ Portfolio composition changes.

    • Fed-Treasury Accord in March 1951. ~ 1949 Congressional support for a Fed focus on monetary policy.~ Korean War inflation fears.

  • Post-Accord Policy

    • Fed does not entirely withdraw for debt management. ~ Supports Treasury plan minimize bondholder loss. ~ Supports Treasury offerings in 1951 – 1952.

    • Fed adopts “bills only” for credibility. ~ controversial with Fed and among economists.~ ends with Operation Twist in 1960.

    • Fed adopts “even keel” ~ No change in monetary policy during Treasury financing

    operations.~ Ends in mid-1975, when Treasury adopts auction techniques.

  • Fiscal Policy

    • Beginning in FY 1947, federal government runs a primary fiscal surplus (except in 1953) until late 1960s.

    • Federal debt burden falls until 1975.

    • Benign economic outcomes and more moderate reduction in balance sheet than for WW I.

    • Fiscal debt contraction and more monetary-policy “independence” with Fed Treasury accord

  • Current Issues and Lessons from Past

    • Likely outcome for near term: Fed will contract the balance sheet as federal debt expands – interest rates may rise.

    • Lessons? During the wars, the Fed balance sheet and federal debt moved together.

    ~ As they expanded, Fed kept the costs cost of issuing and servicing the Treasury’s debt low.

    ~ As they contracted, Treasury surpluses reduced debt outstanding, facilitating Fed balance-sheet reduction.

  • Current Issues and Lessons from Past

    • Not comparable to current outlook – fiscal dominance? ~ Fed LSAPs and other policies verged on fiscal policy. ~ No direct fiscal dominance of monetary policy in contrast to

    world wars.~ Balance-sheet reduction during fiscal-debt expansion may have

    fiscal consequences that challenges to monetary policy independence from fiscal sources.

    ~ Fiscal expansion during a balance-sheet contraction makes challenges the credibility of monetary action (see Sims 2016).

  • Current Issues and Lessons from Past

    • WW II – Treasury views excess reserves as close substitute for Treasuries.

    ~ Treasury – minimizing its debt cost – favored financial repression

    ~ Not an option today with interest on excess reserves paid by Fed.

    ~ Does paying interest of excess reserves create an unacceptable fiscal challenge?

  • Current Issues and Lessons from Past

    • Another lessons? Speed of return to normal matters. om WW1

    ~ WW1 discount window supported balance sheet growth· Steep increase in discount rate. · Rapid reduction of balance sheet. · Severe recession followed.

    ~ WW2 gradual balance sheet reduction. · More benign economic outcomes.

  • Owen Humpage & Ellis Tallman FRBA Workshop on Economic History

    May 15, 2017

    Returning to Normal

    The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland or of the Board of

    Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

    Returning to NormalIntroductionWorld War IWWI: Balance Sheet Increases Slide Number 5WWI: Balance Sheet Increases WWI: Balance Sheet SizeSlide Number 8Slide Number 9WWI: Balance Sheet CompositionSlide Number 11WWI: Balance Sheet Liabilities Slide Number 13Post War Financial StabilitySlide Number 15Slide Number 16Post War Financial StabilitySlide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Post War Fiscal PolicyWWII: Interest Rate ControlSlide Number 23WWII: Balance SheetSOMA vs. Balance SheetSlide Number 26WWII: Balance SheetSlide Number 28Federal Reserve System Assets 1939-1953Federal Reserve System Liabilities 1939-1953WWII: Balance SheetWWII: Post War StrategySlide Number 33WWII: Post War StrategyPost-Accord Policy Fiscal Policy Current Issues and Lessons from Past Current Issues and Lessons from Past Current Issues and Lessons from Past Current Issues and Lessons from PastReturning to Normal


Recommended