+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Revalidation...

Revalidation...

Date post: 01-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: haley-cantrell
View: 17 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Revalidation. “…should be the spark that sets alight the comprehensive provision of educational opportunity and support for doctors.” Dr Nick Lyons Education for Primary Care (2011) 22: 360. New appraiser training Welcome back to day two. Facilitators: Organiser: Date, Venue:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
39
Revalidation... “…should be the spark that sets alight the comprehensive provision of educational opportunity and support for doctors.” Dr Nick Lyons Education for Primary Care (2011) 22: 360 1
Transcript
Page 1: Revalidation...

Revalidation...

“…should be the spark that sets alight the comprehensive provision of educational opportunity and support for doctors.”

Dr Nick LyonsEducation for Primary Care (2011) 22: 360

1

Page 2: Revalidation...

New appraiser trainingWelcome back to day two

Facilitators:

Organiser:

Date, Venue:

All images used in this presentation are provided courtesy of the NHS photo library, Microsoft or other free clipart sites.

Page 3: Revalidation...

Housekeeping

3

Page 4: Revalidation...

Ground rules

• Confidentiality

• Listen

• Respect

• Participate

• Punctuality

• Have fun!

4

Page 5: Revalidation...

Looking back to day one

5

Page 6: Revalidation...

Looking ahead to the partial appraisals: reflection and preparation

6

Page 7: Revalidation...

Rehearsing appraisal skills

Time Appraiser Doctor Observer

09:30 C B A

10:15 B A C

11:00 Coffee11:15 A C B

Finish exercise at 12:00 and go to lunch

In your appraisal trios ………..

7

Page 8: Revalidation...

Lunch

8

Page 9: Revalidation...

Conducting an appraisal

9

Reflection

Page 10: Revalidation...

Looking at the personal development plan(PDP)

10

Page 11: Revalidation...

Why bother with a good PDP?

Discuss:• What makes a good PDP?• What do you need as an doctor?• What do you need as an appraiser?

11

Page 12: Revalidation...

The PDP – hitting the target

12

Page 13: Revalidation...

What does the PDP look like?

Page 14: Revalidation...

PDPs: all doctors need an agreed PDP

• Links to summary of discussion and is driven by doctor

• Needs ‘SMART’ objectives

• Reflects the doctor’s approach to learning (not the appraiser’s)

• ‘Quality not quantity’ of entries, as some doctors find PDPs less useful than others, and learning styles vary

• Not everything needs to go on the PDP – indeed, ‘agreed actions’ should be captured for each doctor in the summary

• Doctors need to focus on real needs, identified in a structured and objective way, rather than perceived needs

14

Page 15: Revalidation...

SMART(IES) objectives

• S Specific• M Measurable• A Achievable• R Relevant • T Timely• I Interesting• E Economic• S Shared success

Page 16: Revalidation...

Making the PDP specific to the doctor

Experiencing

Reviewing

Concluding

Planning & applying Reflector

Theorist

Activist

Pragmatist

Honey & Mumford, 1992

Page 17: Revalidation...

PDP task

As an individual derive an appropriate PDP objective for yourself – either from the discussion this morning or as a new appraiser

Remember:

PDP objectives should be SMART(IES)

17

Page 18: Revalidation...

Why bother with a good summary of appraisal?

• For the doctor• For the appraiser• For the responsible officer

Discuss:• What makes a good summary?• What do you want as a doctor?• What do you want as an appraiser?• What should the ‘service’ expect?

18

Page 19: Revalidation...

The summary of appraisal

The appraisal summary should cover for each domain:• an overview of the supporting information and the doctor’s

accompanying commentary• comment on the extent to which the supporting information

relates to the doctor’s scope and nature of work.

 

The general summary should include key elements of the wider appraisal discussion (particularly those arising from the information shared in section 12 – Achievements, Challenges and Aspirations) and any actions agreed that have not already been recorded.

Supporting Information for appraisal and revalidation (GMC, 2011)

19

Page 20: Revalidation...

PROGRESS and EXCELLENCE QA tools

20

Appraiser: Quality Assured by:

Date 1

2

3

PROGRESS QA toolQuality assurance and development of appraisal documentation

Score (out of 20)0-2 (absent – well done)0-4 (absent – well done)

CommentsHow can the appraiser improve the appraisal documentation?

1 2 3

Appraisal identifier (initials)

PROFESSIONAL (2) – is typewritten, objective, free from bias or prejudice, describes a professional appraisal: venue, time taken, good information governance, no identifiable third party info

1

2

3

REFLECTS A GOOD APPRAISAL DISCUSSION (4) – demonstrates support, challenge and focus on the reflection and needs of the doctor

1

2

3

OVERVIEW (2) – includes a description of the whole scope of work and context for the doctor, the appraisal and the revalidation cycle

1

2

3

GAPS (2) – identifies any gaps in requirements for revalidation or scope of work and specifies how they will be addressed (or states if no gaps)

1

2

3

REVIEWS SUPPORTING INFORMATION (SI) AND LESSONS LEARNED (4) – reviews SI in relation to Good Medical Practice; comments on SI not supplied electronically and any information the doctor was asked to bring. Reflects on lessons learned, changes made and actions agreed.

1

2

3

ENCOURAGES EXCELLENCE (2) – affirms good practice, celebrates achievements and actions accomplished, gives examples of good practice and records aspirations (some of which may have a timescale over one year)

1

2

3

SIGN OFFS & STATEMENTS (2) – ensures the input and output statements, including health and probity, have been completed, commented on and, where appropriate, explanation made to the RO

1

2

3

SMART PDP (2) – PDP objectives arise from the SI and appraisal discussion and are SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and have a Timescale

1

2

3

TOTAL

Overall impression:

Page 21: Revalidation...

PROGRESS vs. EXCELLENCE

P Professional

R Reflects a good appraisal

O Overview

G Gaps

R Reviews supporting information and lessons learned

E Encourages excellence

S Sign Offs & Statements

S SMART PDP

E Encompasses all

X Excludes bias and prejudice

C Challenge, support and encourage

E Explain statements

L Look at supporting info and lessons learned

L Look at last year’s PDP

E Encourage excellence

N Note any gaps

C Contain a SMART PDP

E Explain the new PDP21

Page 22: Revalidation...

Summary of appraisal task

• Look at the example summaries and PDPs provided

• Quality assure the write up for Dr No Concerns first, using the QA tool provided

• Now that you are familiar with the tool, QA the outputs of Dr Part Time and / or Dr Been Ill

What have you learned?

22

Page 23: Revalidation...

There’s no such thing as…

• A perfect summary of discussion• A perfect PDP• A perfect appraisal

But…

…we are all striving to improve.

23

Page 24: Revalidation...

Tea/coffee

24

Page 25: Revalidation...

Preparing for difficult medical appraisals

• Identify potential areas of difficulty within the appraisal process

• Understand the possible causes for these difficulties

• Develop strategies for dealing with difficult appraisals

25

Page 26: Revalidation...

Appraiser concerns

26

Page 27: Revalidation...

What doctor problems could make an appraisal difficult?

• Preparation• Too much or too little documentation, supporting

information or reflection

• Attitude• Arrogant/cynical/dependent/disengaged

• Special cases • Poor performance• Conduct issues• Illness• Whistleblowing

27

Page 28: Revalidation...

Preparation: time to postpone the appraisal?

•Potential conflicts of interest (allocate a different appraiser)

•No pre-appraisal documentation/illegible documentation

• Late receipt of pre-appraisal documentation with no time to prepare

• No previous summary of appraisal or PDP from last years’ appraisal

•Inadequate supporting information

•Unsuitable venue

•Lack of protected time

28

Page 29: Revalidation...

Attitude – don’t take it personally!

29

Page 30: Revalidation...

Special cases

Try as far as possible to crystallise:

• Are patients at risk?

• Should the appraisal continue?

• What action are you going to take?

• How you can signpost clearly the next steps to doctor.

Sometimes it is appropriate for the appraisal to continue but for the appraiser to take action in the way that the appraisal is written-up or the appraisal statements are signed-off

30

Page 31: Revalidation...

Summary –reality is complex

• In practice, doctors do not conform to stereotypes (unless they are choosing to play a single role).

• Difficult appraisals will usually involve a mixture of some of these attitudes and behaviours.

• The high flying doctor may also produce too much meticulously organised paperwork and then reveal that it is all fuelled by alcohol as a stress reliever.

• Being an appraiser is a privilege but it is not easy and there are no perfect answers.

31

Page 32: Revalidation...

What potential pitfalls do you recognise for yourself as an appraiser?

32

The over-involved/colluder

The people pleaser The elder statesman

The rescuer The head teacher

The judge The perfectionist

The diffidentThe task oriented

The money orientedThe doctor

Page 33: Revalidation...

Being self-aware

• Acknowledge that personal stumbling blocks exist

• Do not let them get in the way of delivering an effective appraisal

• Rehearse alternative strategies within an appraisal support group or network

• Reflect on and discuss difficult appraisals after they have occurred (in terms of process, not specific content) to gain useful insights

33

Page 34: Revalidation...

Before each appraisal

Be self-aware Be doctor aware

What are my personal pitfalls to beware?

What issues of preparation or attitude might I have to challenge here?

If there are no apparent issues, how can I add value to this appraisal?

34

Page 35: Revalidation...

Handling unexpected serious concerns arising during the appraisal discussion

Discussion:• The requirement to suspend an appraisal discussion because

of a serious concern is not new• It is exceptionally rare for such a serious concern to arise

during the appraisal discussion that the appraiser needs to take off the ‘appraiser hat’ and move into other processes.

Exercise:• A chance to try out different ways of reacting to a doctor who

reveals something for the first time during appraisal that raises serious concerns about their conduct, capability, or health.

35

Page 36: Revalidation...

Local processes and specialty specific issues

• Appraisal leadership and support• Appraisal policy• Occupational health and poor performance procedures• Whistle-blowing policies• What does your designated body advise?• What does your royal college or faculty advise?• Are you clear about how this links to the GMC

requirements for revalidation?• Any other issues?

36

Page 37: Revalidation...

Questions and answers

37

Page 38: Revalidation...

Evaluation forms

• We welcome all constructive feedback.

• If anything is unclear and you wish us to get back to you, please put your name and contact details on the form.

• Remember that you need to look again at the self assessment of competencies and mark whether your confidence has changed as a result of the training today.

• Thank you for your participation.

38

Page 39: Revalidation...

Delivering a supportive and challenging medical appraisal is worth the effort

39

Thank you for your hard work


Recommended