+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Review and highlight of the main priorities from the 15...

Review and highlight of the main priorities from the 15...

Date post: 03-Apr-2019
Category:
Upload: haanh
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
14
Review and highlight of the main priorities from the 15 th Session of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission’s Compliance Committee. What does this mean for Indonesia? Gerard Domingue Compliance Coordinator, IOTC Secretariat
Transcript

Review and highlight of the main priorities from the 15th Session of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission’s Compliance Committee.

What does this mean for Indonesia?

Gerard Domingue – Compliance Coordinator, IOTC Secretariat

15th Session of the IOTC Compliance Committee

• Location: Bangkok, Thailand

• 13 – 15 May 2018

• Attended by 79 delegates: • 22 Contracting Parties (Members)

• Indonesia represented by 7 delegates; inclusive of three industry representatives

• 2 Cooperating Non-Contracting Parties

• 6 Observers, including 3 Invited Experts

The main conclusions of CoC15• CoC15 NOTED a marginal improvement in the levels of compliance

by some CPCs in 2017

• CoC15 NOTED the lack of completeness of data/information sets:• Impact on the work of the Scientific Committee and its subsidiary bodies

(WPs)

• Ability of CoC to fully assess the level of compliance of Members and Cooperating Non-Contracting Parties (CPCs) with their obligations (CMMs)

• The CoC is concerned about the persistent low level of compliance from many CPCs regarding the submission of size frequency data of one fish per metric ton

• The CoC is concerned about late submissions of mandatory reports and its impact on availability of meeting documents

The main conclusions of CoC15(cont’d)

• The CoC ENCOURAGED CPCs to continue to increase their efforts to comply with the requirements of Resolution 17/05 for data on sharks, as this is a measure with one of the lowest levels of compliance

• The CoC RECOMMENDED that the Secretariat provide a list of CPCs not meeting the reporting requirements for nominal catch per species and gears for future meetings.

• Resolution 16/06 – Provision of nominal catch

• Distribution of IOTC Circulars to concerned staff

• CoC recommended and Commission agreed for a further review of the Compliance Report for Indonesia – IOTC-2018-CoC15-08

• Resulted in a revised Compliance Report for Indonesia – IOTC-2018-CoC15-08 Rev1

Review of Indonesia’s 2017 Compliance Report: IOTC-2018-CoC15-08 Rev1

N° SourceInformation

required

Deadline/

Remarks

Previous Status Current StatusObservations

Timeliness Content Timeliness Content

2 Management Standards

2.1 Res. 15/04Marking of

gears 2C P/C C P/C

Has indicated that gears are marked.

Source IOTC-2018-CoC15-CQ08.

No legal reference provided.

3 Reporting on Vessels

3.1 Res. 10/08List of Active

vessels15.02 C C L P/C

Received 06.03.18. Some mandatory

information missing: registration

number.

5 Mandatory statistical requirement – Flag State CPCs

Nominal Catch

5.1

Res. 15/02

&

Res 15/05

Surface

fisheries: PS,

BB, GN

30.06 C P/C L P/C

Date received: 03.11.17. Combined

catch reports for large and small scale

vessels;

Date received: 04-05-18. Submitted

partial data from sampling programme

from 7 landing sites only. Not raised to

total catch

Longline

fisheries30.12 C P/C C P/C

Date received: 30.06.17. Data not

reported for fleet based outside

Indonesia

Review of Indonesia’s 2017 Compliance Report:IOTC-2018-CoC15-08 Rev1

N° SourceInformation

required

Deadline/

Remarks

Previous Status Current StatusObservations

Timeliness Content Timeliness Content

5.2

Res. 15/02

&

Res 15/05

Catch &

Effort

Coastal

fisheries30.06 N/C N/C L P/C

Date received: 04.05.18. Submitted partial

data from sampling programme from 7

landing sites only. Not raised to total catch

Surface

fisheries: PS,

BB, GN

30.06 N/C N/C N/C N/C No data provided

Longline

fisheries30.12 N/C N/C N/C N/C

Catch-and-effort data received on 04.05.18

are not submitted according to the

requirements of Resolution 15/01 (i.e., data

should be derived from logbooks collected by

the Master of the fishing vessel. Data

collected by observers cannot be submitted in

place of logbooks, in the case of catch-and-

effort data).

Review of Indonesia’s 2017 Compliance Report: IOTC-2018-CoC15-08 Rev1

N° Source Information required

Deadline

/

Remarks

Previous Status Current StatusObservations

Timeliness Content Timeliness Content

5.3

Res. 15/02

&

Res 15/05

Size Frequency

Coastal fisheries 30.06 N/C N/C N/C N/C

Received 16.03.18, summary of

size frequency data available from

pelagos. No detailed on size,

month, gear.

Surface fisheries: PS,

BB, GN30.06 N/C N/C N/C N/C

Received 16.03.18, summary of

size frequency data available from

Pelagos. No detailed on size,

month, gear.

Longline fisheries 30.12 C P/C C P/C

Data received: 30.06.17; Not by

IOTC standard, no spatial

information

N° SourceInformation

required

Deadline/

Remark

Previous Status Current Status

ObservationsTimeliness Content Timeliness

Content

6 Implementation of mitigation measures and bycatch of non-IOTC species

6.1Res.

17/05

Submission of data

regarding Sharks –

Catch & effort

30.06 N/C N/C N/C N/C

No data provided for sharks.

Attachment 5a submitted

06.03.18 and attachment 6

submitted 04.05.18 is a summary

of papers provided for IOTC

Working Parties.

Submission of data

regarding Sharks –

Size frequency

30.06 N/C N/C N/C N/C

Received 16.03.18, summary of

size frequency data available

from Pelagos. No detailed on size

of fish, month, gear, grid.

Review of Indonesia’s 2017 Compliance Report: IOTC-2018-CoC15-08 Rev1

N° Source Information requiredDeadline/

Remark

Previous Status Current Status Observations

Timeliness Content Timeliness Content

9 Observers

9.1

Res. 11/04

Regional Observer

Scheme2 (No. of vessels

monitored and coverage

by gear type)

16.03.2018 C N/C C P/C

Received 04.05.18: 7 vessels

monitored; 2 PS (0.33%) and

5 LL (1.59%).

9.2

5% Mandatory, at sea

(All vessels)2 Since 2013 C N/C L P/C

7 vessels monitored in 2016;

difficult to estimate the

coverage rate as the observer

reports submitted are

incomplete (e.g. not providing

the number of hooks

observed).

9.3

9.4 Observer reports150 days

after tripN/C N/C L P/C

Date received 04.05.18; Seven

reports submitted; the reports

are missing information (i.e.,

number of hooks & sets

information);

Review of Indonesia’s 2017 Compliance Report: IOTC-2018-CoC15-08 Rev1

N° Source Information requiredDeadline/

Remark

Previous Status Current StatusObservations

Timeliness Content Timeliness Content

12 Market

12.1 Res. 10/10

Report on import,

landing and

transhipment of tuna

and tuna-like fish

products in ports 2

16.03.201

8N/C N/C C P/C

Received: 16.03.18. Not to

IOTC Standard. Missing

information on landing and

transhipments.

Review of Indonesia’s 2017 Compliance Report: IOTC-2018-CoC15-08 Rev1

Trends in reporting obligations

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Requirements

(Indonesia)

Requirements

(Commision)

Year C P/C N/C N/A

Total

Requirements

(Indonesia)

2010 6 16 24 9 46

2011 3 15 27 10 45

2012 24 18 9 13 51

2013 30 18 18 14 66

2014 38 17 6 18 61

2015 39 15 11 16 65

2016 46 7 15 17 68

2017 46 11 6 21 63

0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

90%

Annual reports

Management standards

Record Authorised Vessels

Active vessels

Fishing capacity

Vessel Monitoring System

Mandatory statistical requirementBycatch

Transhipments

Observers

Stat Doc BET

Port State Measures

Market Measures

2010

2016

2017

Trends in compliance levels with

the different fisheries

management tools -

Commission as a whole.

What are the next steps?

• Develop a national plan of action for meeting Indonesia’s obligations to submit:• Nominal catch data

• Catch & effort data

• Size frequency data

• Attain the 5% observer coverage by gear type

• Timely submission of complete observer reports

• Push through legislation to ban finning of sharks

• Develop interagency collaboration where required, e.g. on market related measures

Thank you, for your attention!


Recommended