Date post: | 14-Feb-2017 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | trinhnguyet |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Review of Earlier Studies
43
2 RREEVVIIEEWW OOFF EEAARRLLIIEERR SSTTUUDDIIEESS
2.1. Studies Relating to Creating Customers in Retailing. 2.2. Studies on Public Distribution System and Food Retailing. 2.3. Studies on the Role of Consumer Co-operatives
A literature review is a body of text that is aimed at evaluating the level
of current knowledge and /or methodological approaches on a particular topic.
As secondary sources of knowledge, these are helpful to researchers in
understanding the gap of knowledge to be filled by them. It brings the reader
to update the knowledge of a topic and forms the basis for other goals. A well-
structured literature review is characterized by a logical flow of ideas: current
and relevant references with proper use of terminology and an unbiased and
comprehensive view of previous research on the topic.
An attempt is made here to review the available literature on related
studies. Only limited studies have been made on the working of consumer
cooperatives in India and abroad. Public distribution system and consumer
goods distribution system managed by co-operatives are directly linked. In
many countries consumer co-operatives have been part and parcel of their
public distribution system. In India, since the inception of the third five year
plan, the central government intentionally included consumer cooperatives in
the public trade mechanism. The role performed by consumer cooperatives is
not just confined to be a part of PDS but in the modern era, they compete with
supermarkets run by organized retailers as well. Therefore, 1) Studies on
Creating Customers in Retailing, 2) Studies on Public Distribution System
Cont
ents
Chapter -2
44
and 3) Studies on Role of Consumer Co-operatives are the three areas
significantly reviewed in the study.
2.1 Studies on Creating Customers in Retailing.
Oliver (1980), in his research work had specified that to retain customers with
a retailing store it has to satisfy its existing customers, those who bring new
customers to the outlet. He defines customer satisfaction as a function of the
level of product/service performance in relation to customer expectations. It
also depends on the locus of attribution that customers make about the success
or failures in product /service performance. In his opinion customer satisfaction
is a function of the perceived locus of responsibility for product or service
performance and if the perceived locus of responsibility can be shifted by
states of self awareness, it should be possible to influence customer
satisfaction by merely varying their level of self awareness. He suggests that
the quality and performance of the product creates customers1.
Michel Porter, E (1985), clearly stated in his article on` Competitive
Advantage; Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance’ that retailing
process includes sourcing materials, designing products, manufacturing
,transporting, fixing selling physical products and services from multiple or
linked suppliers. According to him different sequences in the retailing are
a) Locating the merchandise or raw materials
b) Designing products
c) Manufacturing products
d) Transportation
e) Fixing the price of the product and
f) The process of sale
Review of Earlier Studies
45
He identified that competitive advantage is at the heart of a firm’s
performance in the competitive market. Low-cost and differentiation strategies
are the two categories of strategies that a firm can follow when there is
competition. A company deciding to adopt a cost leadership strategy strives to
perform important value chain activities at a lower cost than the competitors,
while a company following differentiation strategy strives to creative and
market unique products for varied customer groups2.
Raut (1987) pointed out in his study on ‘Consumer attitudes towards advertising’
that 89 percentage of the respondents believed that advertising was useful to the
consumers for getting convenient information about the products and helps to
compare products. It makes shopping easier to the consumers. The paper provides
an insight to the need for promotion in retailing process. 3
Gummensson (1987) argued that to be successful a retailer must practice
relationship marketing. Service imperatives and solutions will further
strengthen the orientation of marketers towards relationship marketing4.
Dwyer & Schurr (1987) had the opinion that buyer-seller relationships are
bilateral relationships and evolve through five phases, viz. awareness,
exploration, expansion, commitment and consistency. If any of these phases
are distorted, customers may not remain with the seller and the seller should
listen keenly the needs of customers.5
Agarwal (1989) explained in his study `How are good the Indian Supermarkets’
the origin, growth and present condition of supermarkets in India. Here
remarked that the success was because of clean and packed assortment of
household goods mainly under one roof. He concluded that customers’
preferences are at the base of innovations and not profits. 6
Chapter -2
46
Reicheld.F.F and Schiefter. P (1990) have recognized that profits are
enhanced when strategies focus on retaining current customers. They also
argued that dedication- based relationships contribute to enhanced profit to a
firm. 7
Fornel (1992) identified that customer satisfaction is an important indicator
for the assessment of the performance of a retailer. He said that there is a
positive correlation between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty for a
retail firm. While customer satisfaction acts as a double edged- sword in
confirming customer loyalty and profitability for a supermarket retailer,
adoption of a customer-centric retail strategy is also said to have a positive
impact on the firm’s ability to acquire a greater market share. 8
Shanmugasundaram and John, Gunaseelan (1993) spoke in their article
`Consumer Satisfaction-A Study on Consumer Supermarkets’ about the attitude
of the consumers of Karpagom Co-operative supermarket, Vellore. Consumers of
the supermarket were satisfied with the location of the store and the quality of the
goods. The consumers were moderately satisfied with customer services provided
by the salesmen. Advertisements and customer information provided by the store
gave moderate satisfaction to the customers. 9
Reichheld (1996) has the opinion that relationship marketing is the only way
to stand out in the crowd by the marketers and to build up a healthy and long
term relationship with customers. He pointed out that empirical studies had
proved that the cost of acquiring a new customer was four or five times more
than retaining an existing customer. 10
Knights and McCabe (1997) have carried out research which illustrates that a
management often does not understand either the weaknesses or the
underlying philosophy of quality maintenance. They remind us that the quality
Review of Earlier Studies
47
of retailing should be controlled, especially in relation to the process of service
quality. They stated that quality relatively has linkages with the market share
and profitability of a retailer. 11
Zikmund. , d’Amico, and Michael (1998) identified in their publication
`Creating and Keeping Customers in Effective Marketing’ that a successful
retailer has to do three things viz. he must identify a niche for offerings among
all available market segments and determine a target market with an
opportunity for growth. Secondly, he must design and develop an appropriate
retail format. Finally, the retailer must figure out how to establish a sustainable
competitive advantage. 12
Barry Berman, Joel. R. Evans (2002) found that retailing today is at an
interesting crossroad. Retail sales are at their highest point in history.
WALMART is the first $150 billion retailer (1999).New technologies are
improving retail productivity. There are ample opportunities to start a new
retail business or work for an existing one and to join a retail franchise. 13
Marn, Michael V, Roegner, Eric, V and Zawada (2003) identified different
factors which affect the profitability of a retailing enterprise. They are the
following;
a) Online order discounts
b) Delivery to the customer without appropriate charges,
c) Discounts that do not encourage rapid repayment or are given
without fast payments.
d) Co-operative advertising with the manufacturer is ineffective.
e) Market development incentives on brands or sales to customer
groups that do not work. 14
Chapter -2
48
Kumar (2003) revealed in his thesis that the majority of the consumers were
highly enlightened and were concerned about the quality of products. He
found that there is no difference in quality consciousness between customers
in rural and urban areas; they desire to avail of products at reasonable prices
and trust more the advice of the retailer. 15
Jyothikumar (2003) had the opinion that the process of buying starts
internally in the minds of a consumer, which leads to the search for
alternatives that can be acquired with their relative importance, advantages and
disadvantages. All the marketing plans embody myriad assumptions about the
retailer. Whether the marketers are trying to retain customers, to convert
buyers from rivals to friends, or simply to increase sales with existing
customers, the marketing strategy certainly influences the buyer. 16
Levy (2004) in his book ‘Retailing Management’ identified three components
of a successful strategy; the target market, the nature of the retail offering, and
nature of competitive advantage. According to him the retail strategy must be
well planned in respect of merchandise, location and service. A retail firm
should set the niche for offering his product. 17
Ferine and Sparks (2004) mentioned that the role of retailers in merchandise
transfer has taken part in coordinating transportation logistics, where products
are interdependently transferred from the point of production (manufacturers)
to the point of consumption. 18 They also pointed out that the supply of
products to retail outlets has been initiated by manufacturers. Recently, the
domain has shifted to retailers to gauge customers’ needs and wants with the
market intelligence disseminated to suppliers for their responsive actions.
According to Levy and Weitz (2005), retailers have to carry out four major
activities among them the first and most important one is the retailer providing
Review of Earlier Studies
49
an assortment of goods from which one can choose. Secondly, the retailer buys
at larger quantities and breaks them down in to more consumable sizes. Third,
retailers hold an inventory close by with a view to provide convenience to the
consumers. Finally, retailers provide services to enhance the value of the
product to the consumer. 19
According to Rundh (2005) packaging helps in attracting consumer attention
to a particular brand and influences the consumer’s perception or buying
behaviour about a product. Food product brands make use of packing attributes,
combining colors, designs, shapes, symbols, and messages20.
Shah and Metha (2006) have identified that with the Indian retail sector
getting increasingly competitive there appears to be an urgent need for
developing an effective competitive strategy. Companies should be customer-
centric and adopt strategies which will attract new customers21.
Vijayaraghavan (2007) opined in his report that the entry of many huge retail
formats in India created large level competition in the retail sector. The entry
of the huge grocery format of Reliance and the proposed venture of Bharti-
Wal Mart are expected to further hike the level of competition in the sector
and put pressure on margins. 22
Levy & Weitz (2007) described retailing can be viewed in a value chain as
“the set of business activities that add value to the products and services sold
to the consumers for their personal or family use” 23
James. B. Ayers and Mary Ann Odegaard (2008) defined the Term `retail’
as final sales to mostly non-business customers and end users, generally called
consumers. However, it is also important to remember that most businesses
also purchase at retail stores. Transactions in this trend also can be regarded
Chapter -2
50
retailing. They also defined Customer segments as homogeneous blocks of end
users. A segment consists of customers who share buying habits and product
performance and have common needs for supply chain performance. This
performance includes features like cost quality and responsiveness that are
built in to the supply chain design24.
Barry Schwartz (2008) has suggested that too many consumption choices
make customers confused, unsatisfied, less happy, psychologically drained,
and more likely to experience negative emotions. Some customers confess to
feeling ‘paralysed’ by the vast array of choices in retail aisles, and tend to
defensively cling to their old brands, or to buy nothing at all 25.
Prahalad, C.K. (2008), defined organized retailing in his article `Art of out
sourcing ‘as chain store penetration. Lower level of penetration, as in India
(3%) and China (20%), hold promise for future growth unavailable in mature
economies. This paper prophesies successful future retailers who are trying to
penetrate in the retail market of the country. 26
Sehgal (2008) opined that food and grocery enjoys the dominant market share
of 75 per cent of Indian retail but has only one percent penetration in
organized retail. The author critically assessed the market share of organized
and unorganized food retailers in India and found that unorganized food retail
enjoys the lion share. 27
Jelveh (2008) assessed that one way of differentiating individual behaviour
was taking the locations of the stores into the decision making process. Other
attributes include the size of the stores, price, location, level of service and
quality of products. The paper analyzed various attributes which lead to the
influence of purchase behaviour and found that in addition to the above
Review of Earlier Studies
51
attributes, post purchase experience and the satisfaction that consumers
enjoyed through the product too were significant. 28
James and Mary Ann Odegaard (2008) described that retail strategic
segmentation of a market can be based on a number of factors including the
following.
Geography or location
Income level
Demographics such as age and gender
Frequency of usage
Benefits of value to the customer or end-user, such as convenience,
cost and prestige
Preference for distribution channels
Family life cycle stage29
Schiffman, Kanuk & Leslie. (2008) ‘The term consumer behavior is defined
as the behavior that consumers display in searching for, purchasing, using,
evaluating, and disposing of products and services that they expect will satisfy
their needs’30.
Kotler (2008) stated that segmenting the markets is essential to discover a
firm for the customer groups that it will serve. Without knowing the customer
groups, ‘positioning’ also is not possible. Therefore, identifying the customer
groups to serve is the first in the function of a marketer. 31
Geethakumary. K.P (2009) in her study on `Margin-Free Markets in Kerala:
An Evaluation study ‘about the working of Margin Free Markets in Kerala and
their consumer satisfaction level. She found that Consumers of Margin Free
Chapter -2
52
Markets are satisfied with the self service, dealings of the staff and the quality
of commodities. Most of the customers of MFM replied that selling goods
below MRP is the major reason for their shift to the MFM from private
traders. Private Traders were of opinion that the arrival of MFN has very much
affected their sales. She recommended that Margin Free Market must store
more varieties of goods to be offered at reasonable prices. 32
Sami Finne and Hanna Sivonen (2009) stated in their book –`Retail Value
Chain –How to gain Competitive Advantage Through Efficient Response
Strategies’ as convergence continues new entrants enter retailing, and many
retailers also expand to new business areas such as banking ,insurance,
healthcare, telecommunications and travel. Retail infrastructure is also affected
by many external factors such as technology and product trends, forcing the
players to rethink their conventional models. 33
Surajith and Bilab (2009) have observed in their study that education has no
significant influence on a consumer’s exploratory tendencies of brand
switching, innovativeness in shopping. They found that one’s education does
not justify appropriately one’s psychological set up. Again they found that the
income level of the customers has no influence on shopping exploratory
tendencies such as brand switching and innovativeness. 34
Renuka Moorthy T.R and Devaraju (2010), in their article ` Customer
Satisfaction; A comparative Study in Retail Marketing’, measured the current
level of customer satisfaction with the existing provisions of services provided
by various retail outlets in Mysore city. To analyze customer satisfaction, they
have evaluated variables such as the quality of products supplied, service and
information provided, customer support facilities, after sales services,
discount, and customer delight. According to the analysis Retailer `MORE’s
Review of Earlier Studies
53
customers are more satisfied than those of retailers such as` Spencer’s and`
Loyal World.’ They suggested that the retail outlet can specialize in certain
varieties of products rather than carrying a broad array of merchandise
category. They recommended that customers would be satisfied if the price
matches the quality of the products and they would continue to purchase. 35
Frank. Q .Fu, Keith A. Richard, Douglas E. Hughes &Eli Jones (2010)
stated in their research the relative influence of sales personnel’s attitudes
towards selling a new product, perceptions of subjective norms, and efficacy
on the development of selling intentions and ultimately, the success of a new
product launch. By examining sales person-level variance on a new product
performance, the authors suggest that managers should focus on increasing
sales person’s self-efficacy and positive attitudes towards selling the products
to build selling intentions and quickly grow new product performance. They
also suggest that sales managers should resist the temptation to relay on
normative pressure during new product introduction. 36
Glenn. B.Voss, Andrea Godfrey &Kathleen Seiders (2010) have described
that customer satisfaction has no effect under certain circumstances. In their
study the authors developed a framework for understanding the complex
relationships among satisfaction, moderating variables, and repurchases. They
propose that the satisfaction-repurchase link is subject to complementary and
substitute effect and present satiation and inertia as key theoretical
mechanisms that explain and predict those effects. Telyhe findings offer new
theoretical insights and substantive guidance for managers to effectively
allocate resources to initiatives that complement or substitute for customer
satisfaction. 37
Chapter -2
54
Andez George (2010) revealed that studying consumer behavior enables
marketing firms and manufacturing firms to realize more about the consumer
decision making process and helps to design marketing strategies and
promotional messages that will influence consumers effectively. 38
Dr.Shekhar and Shantanu (2011) evaluated products, price, store location,
promotion, quality of staff, process and environment to understand the retail
strategy implemented by an apparel chain store at Bangalore. They concluded
that humorous commercials help customers remember a product. However, no
evidence has been found that humorous advertisements necessarily lead to the
purchase of a product. 39
Md.Sanuwar Rashid (2011) in his article ‘the Structured frame of Category
Management for Optimisation of Retail Business’, stated that technological
improvement and the frequently changing fashion trends reduce the product
life cycle. In this new environment ,a regular basis of supply of products in
the market is mandatory to retain sales opportunities at all times .Category
Management opens the door of opportunity for retailers to link up to suppliers
to improve their service level. From the customers’ point of view, at retailing
shops having category management, a customer can easily compare the prices
of different brands of the same category. It encourages customers to buy their
required product as they are confident about the price and quality of the same
product of another brand.40
Sumedhu Kalia & Rishi Kalia (2011) in ‘Subhiksha; A Battle for Survival’
found that Subikshas being small in size though in prime localities in a city
with no air conditioning and fancy shelves and designer things went against
them. Customers could not get all brands they wanted making choice very
limited. Low assortment was another reason for the failure of Subhiksha.
Review of Earlier Studies
55
Another major problem they faced was expansion without sufficient funds in
hand. They concluded that for the success of chain stores, the retail stores
would have to identify with different life styles. 41
Nilesh Neelmani (2011) has studied consumer attitude towards FMCGs and
compared private labels with National brands. He found that consumers still
believe that national brands have better quality compared to private labels. At
the same time consumers tend to believe that private labels have higher value
for money compared to national brands. It is also believed that national brands
are less risky to buy compared to private labels .The comparison means value
indicates that the National Brands hold higher prestige compared to Private
Labels as far as consumers’ attitude is concerned. 42
Pratibha Goyal and Adithya Sharma (2011) described that the trend of
retailing has changed from kirana stores/grocers/provision stores to attractive
air-conditioned retail outlets. The present day Indian consumer seeks more
values in terms of improved availability and quality of goods and a pleasant
shopping environment. 43
Ramanathan and Hari (2011) have studied retail variables distinguishing the
selection of organized and unorganized retail formats by the customers. They
found that customer income is the basic variable that determines selection where
the low income group selects unorganized retailers while the high income group
selects organized retailers. They reported that there was no association between
the respondent’s age and the shopping experience at organized and unorganized
retail formats. It was also found that buyers perceived a difference among services
offered by organized and unorganized retailers. 44
Manju Malik (2012) conducted a study on customer satisfaction towards the
service quality of organized retails stores in Hariyana and found that the
Chapter -2
56
majority of people visiting the organized retail outlets were male and most of
them belonged to the younger age group as well as to the middle income
group. She further found that dimensions of service quality were positively
related to customer satisfaction. Product quality, physical aspects and
promotional schemes were the most important variables that determined
customer satisfaction. No gender bias was found in the case of variables
mentioned above for choosing products. 45
Praveenkumar and Asha (2012), stated in their article ‘Effectiveness of
FMCG distribution with respect to satisfaction of consumers in rural markets’
that at least one product should be made available under all categories by the
retailer, which will solve the purpose without brand and sometimes customers
were least bothered about good or bad. Many of the customers have their own
methods to identify products, rural customers, especially people who have an
agrarian back ground do not buy branded products. They found that customer
dissatisfaction would be the result if the product length was too short in retail
stores. 46
2.2 Studies on Public Distribution System and Food Retailing.
Mirchandani, R.T (1960) studied food retailing and indicated that an efficient
system of marketing food items would aim at balancing conflicting interests
such as consumers preferring to get their required quantities of food in pure
quality at the least possible cost and middlemen aiming at realizing the
maximum possible profits from the deal. Therefore, quality and price are the
most important elements in the food retailing47.
Sheo Narain Singh (1972) clearly stated that the Central government has got
sufficient powers in relation to the fixation of prices of essential communities under
the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. He recommended the extension of fair price
Review of Earlier Studies
57
shops to rural areas for easy availability of essential goods at low prices. It is also
important that state governments should take fresh measures to strengthen the PDS,
for the protection of the vulnerable section of the community. 48
Gopalakrishnan , P.K (1978) observed that a rational food policy for India
should aim at the twin objectives of increase in production and equitable
distribution, in conformity with the recommended National Minimum
Nutritional Standard. He also stated that the per capita regional production of
food grains and calorie intake are highly co-related. 49
Prabha, T (1982) observed that there is a significant relation between per-
capita production of food grains and per-capita calorie intake of food grains,
but the influence of income on this factor is found to be significant. He
believes that a huge number of our population has insufficient income to
consume food grains at levels mentioned for getting sufficient calorie.
Therefore, he suggested that the present Public distribution system has to be
revised so as to ensure the supply of food grains to all. 50
Chattopadhya. P (1982) stated that essential commodities such as food grains
and pulses supplied through the public distribution system are of low quality
due to deterioration during storage and due to infestation. Careless handling,
and outdated storage facilities are also other major causes for low quality. 51
Balram Dogra (1987) revealed the shortcomings of the PDS and pointed out
that the system functions in a very lethargic manner and the private sector
takes the fruits of this weakness. This can be eradicated by proper
reorganization of PDS through a thorough monitoring process52.
Suryanarayana. M. H (1996) evaluated the trends in Public Distribution
System off-take, cereal consumption and changes in the level of calorie intake
Chapter -2
58
in Kerala during a few selected years. He found that inadequate access and
poor quality of the rice supplied through the PDS are the two major reasons for
the inadequate utilization of the system. 53
Frontline (1997) described that PDS is primarily a social welfare and anti-
poverty programme of the Govt. of India. With a net work of more than
4,00,000 Fair Price Shops (FPS), the Public Distribution System in India is
perhaps the largest distribution machinery of its type in the world .The success
of this huge network is dependent on its ability to translate a macro level self
sufficiency to micro level, by ensuring availability of food grains for poor
households. 54
According to Dreze & Amartyya Sen (1998), the stability of food prices in
India is quite remarkable. During the drought of 1987-88 which led to
considerable decline in food production food grain prices increased by less
than 10 per cent. This was largely due to large scale sale of food through the
Public Distribution System. The contribution of price stabilization measures to
the protection of entitlement during crises in India is a major one.55
Ajithkumar Ghose, (1999) narrated that the history behind the introduction
of Public Distribution System in India is rooted in famines and food scarcity
during the entire period of British Colonial rule in India. Food Grains
Procurement Commission 1950 suggested rationing in all towns with
population exceeding 50000, informal rationing in all small towns and
regulated supply of grains to rural areas. In response to it, the government of
India officially started a Public Distribution System in our country. 56
Krishnaji . N, Krishnan T. N (2000) stated in their study that even poor
people were purchasing food grains from the open market. So, vigorous efforts
Review of Earlier Studies
59
are to be made in future to stabilize the consumption level of poor people,
which is one of the aims of public distribution system. 57
Anilkumar . B (2002) explained in his study on `Impact of Targeted Public
Distribution System among Rural Below Poverty Line Group, Kerala ’ PDS
as an instrument of the ‘Food Management Policy’ of the government under
the Essential Commodities Act, specially to the weaker sections of the society.
Well targeted and properly functioning PDS is an important constituent of the
strategy for poverty alleviation. 58
Nirmala Mabel. E.R (2006) has done a study `Evaluation of the Working of
Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited’. The study was to evaluate
the activities carried out by the Corporation and to ascertain the role performed
by it in the Public Distribution System in Kerala. It was found that the
Corporation had an important role in the Public Distribution system in Kerala
but consumer satisfaction was at low a low level. Ninety two per cent of
customers interviewed was of the opinion that Supplyco was successful in
offering goods at lower prices. 59
Priyesh (2006) suggested in his thesis that it is not necessary to extent
subsidization of food grains to all people and the government should revamp the
traditional functions of our Public Distribution System. He also recommended
that a government controlled system should be started to deal with frequent
fluctuations in the price of essential commodities. 60
Carpenter & Moor (2006) stated in their study ‘Consumer demographics,
store attribute and retail format choice in the US grocery market industry’ that
the grocery industry is strongly driven by price competitiveness, product
selection, assortment and the courtesy of personnel. While determining the
format choice, cleanliness is the most important attribute, regardless of the
Chapter -2
60
type. Again, price level and distance from the residence of buyers also are
other determining drivers for the store choice. 61
Reardon & Gulati (2008) found that retailing environment has been growing
tremendously in size and market dominance of large players grows with
greater store size. The food and beverages segment constitutes the largest
share, at more than 70 percent of the retail pie. Food and grocery accounts for
the bulk of Indian retailing and its share is about 60 per cent. Organized
retailing accounts for less than 10 per cent of food retailing in India. However,
the share of organized retailing in the food sector will grow to 15-20 per cent,
if the current trends of expansion continue. 62
Thulseedharan Nair (2008) described the Public Distribution System as a
retailing mechanism that entitles households to specified quantities of selected
commodities at subsidized prices. The objectives of the Public Distribution
System are maintaining price stability, rationing during times of scarcity,
welfare of the poor, and keeping a check on private trade63.
2.3 Studies on the Role of Consumer Co-operatives
Jawaharlal Nehru (1962) strongly favored the role of consumer co-operatives
and he believed that the movement has an important role in maintaining price
levels in the country. He observed that co-operatives can work as a checking
measure against the tendency of rising prices in the country and this was
vindicated in 1960, when prices of essentials had shown a rising tendency. 64
Marian Radetzki (1965) studied the role of consumer cooperatives and
reported that the most important role is to check private organizations from
overcharging consumers in the distribution of necessary commodities. He also
opined that consumers’ co-operatives contribute to lower distribution costs
through rationalization which will ultimately benefit to consumers. 65
Review of Earlier Studies
61
Chakarvarti (1972) in his article ‘Role of Consumer Co-operatives in
Distribution and Price Control’ opined that a strong co-operative sector should
be created as a balancing sector between the public and private sectors.
Consumer Co-operatives play a dominant role in our economy to increase
agriculture production and consumer goods distribution. They protect
consumers from rise in prices, adulteration and other unhealthy trade practices
like hoarding, speculation, underweight, etc. He pointed out that consumer co-
operatives are important agencies of Public Distribution System. 66
Annasaheb. P. Sinde (1973) has given in his articles ‘Co-operative Reliable
and Socially Motivated Machinery for Handling Distributive Trade’ that co-
operation has the responsibility to make PDS successful, especially in the
present situation. Co-operative societies have a great responsibility in
protecting consumers and safeguarding the interests of producers. He
suggested the government to try to get more and more involvement of co-
operation in the Public distribution System. 67
Banwarilal, Bhatiya (1973) has pointed out in his study that consumer co-
operatives had not been able to achieve their main objectives so far as the
‘Price Setter’ in the market by holding the price line. They had been suffering
from many structural, operational and administrative weaknesses. Unattractive
prices, inadequate stock of fast moving goods, poor salesmanship and absence
effective sales promotion are some of the factors that contributed to their steep
decline. There is a vast scope for the consumers’ co- operatives, provided they
are organized on sound lines and better economic footing with active
assistance from the government.68
Bahl (1976) in his study` The Role of Consumer Co-operatives in Public
Distribution System’ found that the consumer co-operatives have a great role
Chapter -2
62
in the eradication of exploitation and adulteration .He strongly opined that
consumer co-operative societies are able to provide remedies against higher
pricing and other malpractices.They can provide commodities at fair prices
maintaining purity, better quality, pure weight, etc. 69
Bhagavathyram (1985) in the report on Chinthamani Co-operative Supermarket
has stated the need for fixing the sales targets systematically and scientifically70.
He recommended;
1) Provision of purchase rebate
2) Provision of welfare measures to employees
3) Self service improvement and
4) Efficient inventory management to avoid stock deficit
Misra, N.K (1988) explained that the association of the Co-operative
institutions with the Public Distribution System was inevitable. It becomes
clear in the light of the fact that unless the consumer himself is involved in the
procurement and distribution of the consumer goods, the element of undue
profit and malpractices in respect of price, quality and quantity can never be
checked. 71
Report of International Cooperative Alliance (1988) stated that house
wife’s involvement in consumer cooperatives in most of the developing
countries is passive. They suggest that member education is necessary, and
advise to redefine the objectives of consumer cooperatives and provide
opportunity for social and cultural upliftment of members. 72
Sasikumar (1989) has done a study `The Role of Consumer Co-operatives in
Public Distribution System of Kerala ‘to learn the role of district Wholesale
Co-operative Stores in the state. He found that quality, price, correct weight
and measurement are the most important aspects of Public Distribution
Review of Earlier Studies
63
System. He stressed the need for the implementation of a permanent PDS in
Kerala73.
Nilkanth and Sanjay Sanker Kapter (1994) suggested that consumer
cooperatives should strengthen consumerism and extent protection to their
consumers without entirely depending upon the government for consumer
protection. 74
Misra (1995) stated in his article, ‘Open Economy in Consumer Co-operatives’
that the development of consumer co-operatives in Japan, Sweden, Thailand,
England and Singapore are along with other supermarkets in the private sector
because these countries have always been free market economies. He
opined that the small consumer co-operative stores working in India
function with the financial help of states and so they cannot follow the
principles of co-operation. The existence of these co-operatives will be a
problem unless they grow or amalgamate with the leading consumer stores
in the neighborhood. 75
Ravichandran and Pandmanabhan (1998) have done a study on
Chinthamani Co-operative supermarket in Coimbatore city to examine the
purchase behavior and constraints on consumer purchase. The various factors
that influenced the consumers for the purchase at Supermarket were the
quality of products, reasonable price, unadulterated commodities and the
availability of full range of commodities. 76
Gautam .T.C (2000) observed the importance of consumer co-operatives in
the national economy and found that consumer co-operatives have emerged as
very strong organizations in the distributive trade. Co-operative trade in India
not only distributes essential commodities but also provides all other consumer
goods at reasonable price. 77
Chapter -2
64
Dhanasekara and Tamilmani.B (2007) observed that consumer co-
operatives which have been doing yeoman service to the public by providing
them quality consumer goods and services at competitive prices, are
witnessing a difficult situation. The complexity of the situation has grown
further at an alarming level especially in the post liberalized period, as it is
marked by the arrival of new players and their strategies in the retail trade. 78
Gangan, Arora (2010) argued that consumer cooperatives being value based
enterprises with a unique blend of economic and social responsibilities is a
preferred option in the supply of consumer goods at low prices without private
interest. Consumer cooperatives are worldwide models for common stands
against private exploitation. 79
Farahnaz, Ogliabian and Nagendra Babu (2011) suggested that with the
increase in education and civilized urbanization, huge populations transfer
from lower social-economic classifications to higher socio –economic
classifications. The consuming class predominantly comprises socio-economic
classifications A&B and represents around 105 million people in 22 million
families of urban population in India. 80
Balnave, Nikola and Patmore, Greg (2010) explained in their article named
`Practical Utopians; Rockdale Consumer Cooperatives in Australia and New
Zealand’ that Rockdale consumer cooperatives have played an integral role in the
lives of many people in Australia and New Zealand in mining areas, rural regions
and in metropolitan and suburban areas. In the years prior to Second World War,
both the countries showed waves of interest in consumer cooperatives. In the post
second world war period the survival of many of these cooperatives was not
secure. As a result in the rise of chain supermarkets and shopping centers many of
these cooperatives became incompetent and fell in to permanent decline. 81
Review of Earlier Studies
65
Tamilnadu Journal of Cooperation (2011)80 in an article ‘Food Security and
Cooperation’ stated that Public Distribution System is also run successfully by
cooperatives in the majority of villages. At present 21000 cooperatives, 30
consumer cooperative federations with 8000 branches are providing consumer
items at reasonable prices. Besides, 674 wholesale stores with 5391 branches
work in the distribution of consumer goods. This structure should be
developed with the support of the Government of India so that proper and
adequate food grains can be accessed by every person in the country. 82
2.4 Research Gap
The review of earlier studies reveals that particularly no concrete and
precise analysis has yet been made regarding the activities, performance and
evaluation of Kerala State Consumers Co-operative Federation Ltd. The
present study is aimed at that direction. Even though the study is confined to
the state of Kerala, it obviously has relevance to the successful operation of
Co-operative Distribution System in India which is also relevant to the
functioning of Public Distribution System in other states of India. As co-
operatives are alternatives and virtually government enterprises, critical
evaluation on the performance of CONSUMERFED is indeed necessary to
recommend the ways and means to improve its performance in future.
Chapter -2
66
References
[1] Oliver, Richard L, (1980) ‘A Cognitive Model of Antecedents and
Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions’, Journal of Marketing
Research, November. Vol.XXI, No.3.pp 36-49.
[2] Porter, Michael, E. (1985) ‘Competitive Advantage; Creating and
Sustaining Superior Performance’, The Free Press, New York.
November 11. Pp.33-37
[3] Rout, K.C (1987), ‘Consumer Attitude towards advertising’, Indian
Journal of Marketing.Vol.31(4). p.11.
[4] Gummession. E, (1987) ‘the new marketing- developing long term
interactive relationship’. Long Range Planning. Vol. 20, No.4.
p- 10-20.
[5] Dwyer. F Robert, Schurr Paul H and Oh Sejo, (1987) ‘Developing
Buyer- Seller Relationships’. Journal of Marketing, Vol 51, pp-11-27
[6] Agarwal. A.D, (1989) ‘How good are the Indian Supermarkets’. Vinod
Publishing House New Delhi, p-26.
[7] Reicheld, F.F, and Schiefter. P (1990), ‘E-Loyalty’. Harward Business
Review .Vol 78 No.4, pp. 105-113.
[8] Fornell, Claes, and Birger, Wernerfelt (1992) ‘Defencive Marketing
Strategy by Customer Complaint Management’. Journal of Marketing
Research, Vol 24, pp.337-346.
[9] Shanmugasundaram. S and John Gunaseelan G, (1993) ‘Customer
Satiesfaction-A study in a Co-operative Supermarket’.The Indian
Co-operative Review.Vol.XXX, NO-3, January. pp-39-36
Review of Earlier Studies
67
[10] Reichheld, Fredrick, F, (1996). ‘The Loyalty Effect; The Hidden Force
Behind Growth, Profits and Lasting Value’, Bosten Hardward Business
school Press, p.44.
[11] Knights and Mac Cabe, (1997) ‘Quality in a retailer’ Journal of
Management studies, Vol 34, pp 371-89.
[12] Zikmund, William G, d’Amico, Michael, (1998). ‘Creating and Kepping
Customers; Effective Marketing. Cicinnati:South western college
Publishing Company, p.42.
[13] Berman, Barry, Joel .R. Evans, (2002) Retailing Management-A
Srategic Approrch, Prentice- Hall India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, p-4.
[14] Marn, Michael V., Roegner , Eric ,V and Zawada, (2003). ‘The Power of
Pricing’. The McKincy Quarterly, No.1, p-27.
[15] S. Kumar. (2003). ‘A study on Consumer Behaviour with reference to
selected products’. Finance India. Vol.17(4) p 1478-1483.
[16] NYR, Jyothikumar. (2003). ‘News paper marketing in India.’ Anmol
Publications, New Delhi. pp 132-134.
[17] Levy, Michel. (2004). Retail Management, 5th edition Tata McGraw
Hill, New Delhi. p-89.
[18] J.Fernie and L.Sparks, (2004). Logistics and Retail Management:
insights into current practices and trends from leading Experts, Kogan
Page Limited London. pp. 234-43
[19] Levy and Weitz, (2005). Retailing Management, 6th edit, Mc Graw Hill
Irwin, New York, p-7.
[20] Rundh, B.(2005), ‘The multi- faceted dimension of Packaging’ British
Food Journal, Vol 107 No.9 pp 670-684.
Chapter -2
68
[21] Shah and Metha (2006), ‘Consolidation of Indian Retail Industry’,
Report-XLRI Jamshedpur, pp 3-8.
[22] Vijayaraghavan, K, (2007) ‘Future group to focus on life styles and non –
grocery biz for the higher margins’. The Economic Times, February 5, pp. 4.
[23] Levey. M and Weitz, op.cit. p. 234.
[24] Ayers, B, James and Mary Ann Odegaard. (2008) Retail supply Chain
Management, Auerbach Publications. Taylor and Francis Group ,Boca
Raton. p.175.
[25] Schwartz, Barry (2008) ‘The Tyranny of Choice’, Scientific American,
April.p.71-74
[26] Prahalad , C .K, (2005) `The Art of Outsourcing’. The Wall Street
Journal- June 8, p-A14.
[27] Sehgal, R(2008)Value retailing retrieved on food from http://www.value
notes.com/angel/retail-05
[28] Jelveh, S (2008) Food retail system and influence on customer behaviour
and perception of food products, retrieved from http://www.projects
paradise.com/food retailing influence-customer behaviour.
[29] Ayers, B. James and Mary. Ann. Odegaard, op.cit. p.3.
[30] Schiffman, G.Leon &Kanuk, Lazar, Leslie. (2008), Consumer Behavior,
Nineth edition, PHI Learing Private Limited, New Delhi. p- 4.
[31] Kotler, Philip and Armstrong, Gary. (2008) Principles of Marketing.
PHI Learning Private Limited, New Delhi.p-182.
[32] Geethakumari. K .P, (2009), PhD Thesis in Commerce. University of
Kerala.
Review of Earlier Studies
69
[33] Sami, Finne and Hanna, Sivonen, (2009), `Retail Value Chain –How to
gain Competitive Advantage Through Efficient Response Strategies’.
New Light Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd, London, p-1-3.
[34] Ghosh , Surajith and Datta Biplab (2009). ‘Demographic Differences in
Consumer Exploratory Tendencies; An Empirical Examination’. IIMB
Management Review, Vol 21, No.4 December. Pp. 297-311.
[35] Moorthy, Renuka, T,R and Devaraju. (2010). Customer Satiesfaction :
Comparitive Study in Retail Marketing. Southern Economist,Vol.49,
Aug.15, pp.11-22.
[36] Frank Q .Fu, Keith A.Richard, Douglas E.Hughes &Eli Jones, (2010).
Motivating sales people to sell new products; The relative influence of
attitudes, subjective norms and self efficacy. Journal of Marketing.
Vol.74, November, pp.49-63.
[37] Glenn. B,Voss. Andrea Godfrey &Kathleen Seiders. (2010). `How
Complementarily and Substitution Alter the Customer Satisfaction-
Repurchase links Journal of Marketing, Vol.74, November. pp. 94-
109.
[38] George, Andez. (2010). Study on Consumer Behaviour in Toys Market
of Kerala, thesis for PhD, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kerala p.9
[39] Shekhar, Shantanu (2011) Building Successful Retail Strategies ;A case
studies of Coupon Stores, Indian Journal of Marketing.Vol.41, No.9.
pp. 43-49
[40] Md.Sanuwar, Rashid (2011), The Structured Framework Catogory
Management For Optimisation Of Retail Business. Indian Journal of
Marketing, Vol.41, No-8.September, pp.33-42.
Chapter -2
70
[41] Kalia, Sumedha &Rishi Kalia , (July-2011). ‘Subhiksha :A Battle For
Survival’ Indian Journal of Marketing,Vol.4,1,No.6, , p 45-53
[42] Nelesh, Neelmani.(Aug 2011)`Consumer Attitude Towards FMCGs; A
Comparative Study of Private Label and National Brands’ Indian
Journal of Marketing, Vol.41 no. page. 19-29
[43] Goyal, Pratibha & Sharma, Aditya. (2011). ‘Consumer preference for
organized and unorganized food retail stores’. International Journal of
Commerce and Business Management, vol.4, issue-1,April, pp. 57-68.
[44] Ramanathan .V and Hari .K (2011) ‘A Study on Consumer Perception
about Organized VS Unorganized Retailers at Kanchipuram, Tamil
Nadu’. Indian Journal of Marketing. Vol.41.No.12, December. pp. 11-
16
[45] Malik, Manju (2012), ‘A study on customer satisfaction towards service
quality of organized retail stores in Haryana. Indian Journal of
Marketing, February, pp. 51-58.
[46] Bhoyar, Praveenkumar and Nagendra, Asha,(2012). ‘Effectiveness of
FMCG distribution with respect to satisfaction of consumers in rural
markets’, Indian Journal of Marketing ,Vol.42 ,No.1,2012 pp 17-21
[47] R,T, Mirchandani (1960), ‘Marketing Programmes and Their
Evaluation’. Agriculture marketing, Vol.111, No.1.January –april.1963,
p.23.
[48] Sheo Narain Singh. (1972), Community Prices : The Malaise and the
Measures, Yojana,Vol.XVI,No-10,June-1, pp.414-16,
[49] Gopalakrishnan, P.K. (1978).National Public Distribution System,
Mainsream, New Delhi. pp.178-204
Review of Earlier Studies
71
[50] Prabha .T, (1982) Public Distribution and Rice Procurement in Tamil
Nadu. PhD thesis, University of Kerala.
[51] Chattopadhya, P, (1982) ‘Public Distribution of Food Grains’, Commerce
Annual, November, p. 20.
[52] Balram Dogra, (1987). “New Public Distribution Scheme”, Indian
Journal of Marketing, April, pp. 8-13.
[53] Suryanarayana .M.H (1996).`Food Security and PDS in Kerala Form and
Scope for Reforms ‘Indira Gandhi Institute Development for Research,
Mumbai.
[54] Frontline .Vol.14, No.21. October 18, 1997.
[55] Dreze, Jean and Sen, Amartya. (1998). ‘Hunger and Public Action’,
Oxford, Clarendon Press. p.41
[56] Ghose, Ajithkumar. (1999). Food Supply and Starvation;´A Study on
Famines with Reference to India Sub –Continent’, The Economics on
Famine. Edward Elgar. U.K. p.67.
[57] Krishnaji, N. Krishnan,T.N,(2000). Public support for food security,
Sage Publication Pvt Ltd, New Delhi. P 212.
[58] Anilkumar. B (2002). `Impact of Targeted Public Distribution System
among Rural and Below Poverty Line Group in Kerala-a Case Study’.
PhD thesis, University of Kerala.
[59] Mabel, Nirmala .E.R, (2006) `Evaluation of the Working of Kerala State
Civil Supplies Corporation Limited’ PhD thesis University of Kerala.
[60] Priyesh. C.A. (2006). Economic Reforms and Public Distribution System
with Special Reference to Kerala. PhD Thesis, University of Kerala.
Chapter -2
72
[61] Carpenter, Janson.M and Moor, Marquerite (2006) ‘Consumer
Demographics, Store Attribute and retail Format Choice in the US
Grocery Market’, International Journal for Retail Distribution. Vol.
34, No.49, pp- 400-412.
[62] Reardon and Gulati, (2008). ‘PDS a Success Story’. International
Journal of Retail Distribution and Management. Vol.28, No34, No.6,
pp. 434-52.
[63] Thulseedharan Nair, (2008) ‘Targeted Public Distribution System in
Food grains; Extent of Utilisation by Tribal Population in Kerala’ , PhD
thesis, Cochin University of Science and Technology.
[64] Nehru, Jawaharlal, (1962). Address in the meeting of the National
Development Council, November 14.
[65] Radetzki, Marian.(1965) ‘Economics of consumer cooperatives-
cooperative series1’, International Cooperative Alliance, Geneva.
[66] Chakravarti,S. (1972) `Role of Consumer Co-operatives in Distribution
and price control’. Indian Co-operative Review, July.Vol. IX.No.4. p-
449-451.
[67] Annasaheb, P. Sinde,(1973), Co-operative Reliable and Socially
Motivated machinery for handling Distributive Trade. The Co-operative
Review, Vol -XI, September.15. No.15. pp.6-10.
[68] Banwarilal, Bhatiya (1973). Co-operative Movement in Jaipur District,
PhD thesis, University of Rajasthan.
[69] Bahl,O.P, (1976) ‘Role of Consumer Co-operatives in Public
Distribution System’, Co-operator , Vol.XIV NO.1, July, p-34.
Review of Earlier Studies
73
[70] Bhagavathyram, (1985). A Report on Chinthamani Co- operative
Supermarket, Tamil Nadu. Office of the Registrar of Co-operative
Societies, 1985.
[71] Misra, N, K. (1988). Role of Co-operatives in Public Distribution
System’ Article published by Regional Training Centre Mandi,
Himachal Pradesh December 12-17.
[72] Cooperative Alliance International (1988) Report on members
participation and house wife’s involvement, March, p.103.
[73] Sasikumar, K. (1989) A Study on the Role Consumer Co-operatives in
the Public Distribution System of Kerala. PhD Thesis, University of
Calicut.
[74] Nilkanth,V, Kapatar and Sanker, Sanjay (1994). ‘Consumer cooperatives;
role of voluntary organizations to combat consumer exploitation’.
Encyclopedia of Cooperative Management. Vol.4, Deep and Deep
Publications (pvt) Ltd, New Delhi. 1994.
[75] Misra, S.C. (1995), Open Economy Consumer Co-operatives, Indian
Co-operative Review; Vol. 22 .No.4 December, pp.39-42.
[76] Ravichandran, S.A and Padmanabhan, N.R. (1998).‘Purchase Behaviour
of Consumers in Consumer Co-operatives’. Indian Co-operative
Review. Volume XXXV No.3 January. P. 227.
[77] Gautam, T .C, (2000), Consumer Co-operatives in the new Millennium,
The Co-opeartor,Vol.XXXVI,No_8,.February. pp. 371-372.
[78] Dhanasekara, D and Tamilmani,B. (2007), ‘Indian retail scenario in the
globalizes era and the place of consumer co-operatives’ Indian
Consumer Cooperator, Vol.35 No.4, pp.8-16.
Chapter -2
74
[79] Arora, Ganjan.(2010), Indian Consumer cooperator, vol.38 No.1, pp. 6-8.
[80] Farahnaz. Olgliabian and Nagendre Babu, (2011), Urban consumers of
India. Southern Economist .Vol.49, No.20, Feb.15. p 24.
[81] Balnave, Nikola and Patmore Greg (2010) ‘Practical Utopians’
Rochdale Consumer cooperatives in Australia and New Zealand
Labour History, University of Sydney.
[82] Tamil Nadu Journal of Cooperation (2011), ‘Food Security and
Cooperation’ August.
….. …..