+ All Categories
Home > Documents > REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Date post: 14-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: trinhnguyet
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
32
Review of Earlier Studies 43 2 REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES 2.1. Studies Relating to Creating Customers in Retailing. 2.2. Studies on Public Distribution System and Food Retailing. 2.3. Studies on the Role of Consumer Co-operatives A literature review is a body of text that is aimed at evaluating the level of current knowledge and /or methodological approaches on a particular topic. As secondary sources of knowledge, these are helpful to researchers in understanding the gap of knowledge to be filled by them. It brings the reader to update the knowledge of a topic and forms the basis for other goals. A well- structured literature review is characterized by a logical flow of ideas: current and relevant references with proper use of terminology and an unbiased and comprehensive view of previous research on the topic. An attempt is made here to review the available literature on related studies. Only limited studies have been made on the working of consumer cooperatives in India and abroad. Public distribution system and consumer goods distribution system managed by co-operatives are directly linked. In many countries consumer co-operatives have been part and parcel of their public distribution system. In India, since the inception of the third five year plan, the central government intentionally included consumer cooperatives in the public trade mechanism. The role performed by consumer cooperatives is not just confined to be a part of PDS but in the modern era, they compete with supermarkets run by organized retailers as well. Therefore, 1) Studies on Creating Customers in Retailing, 2) Studies on Public Distribution System Contents
Transcript
Page 1: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 43

2 RREEVVIIEEWW OOFF EEAARRLLIIEERR SSTTUUDDIIEESS

 2.1. Studies Relating to Creating Customers in Retailing. 2.2. Studies on Public Distribution System and Food Retailing. 2.3. Studies on the Role of Consumer Co-operatives

A literature review is a body of text that is aimed at evaluating the level

of current knowledge and /or methodological approaches on a particular topic.

As secondary sources of knowledge, these are helpful to researchers in

understanding the gap of knowledge to be filled by them. It brings the reader

to update the knowledge of a topic and forms the basis for other goals. A well-

structured literature review is characterized by a logical flow of ideas: current

and relevant references with proper use of terminology and an unbiased and

comprehensive view of previous research on the topic.

An attempt is made here to review the available literature on related

studies. Only limited studies have been made on the working of consumer

cooperatives in India and abroad. Public distribution system and consumer

goods distribution system managed by co-operatives are directly linked. In

many countries consumer co-operatives have been part and parcel of their

public distribution system. In India, since the inception of the third five year

plan, the central government intentionally included consumer cooperatives in

the public trade mechanism. The role performed by consumer cooperatives is

not just confined to be a part of PDS but in the modern era, they compete with

supermarkets run by organized retailers as well. Therefore, 1) Studies on

Creating Customers in Retailing, 2) Studies on Public Distribution System

Cont

ents

Page 2: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 44

and 3) Studies on Role of Consumer Co-operatives are the three areas

significantly reviewed in the study.

2.1 Studies on Creating Customers in Retailing.

Oliver (1980), in his research work had specified that to retain customers with

a retailing store it has to satisfy its existing customers, those who bring new

customers to the outlet. He defines customer satisfaction as a function of the

level of product/service performance in relation to customer expectations. It

also depends on the locus of attribution that customers make about the success

or failures in product /service performance. In his opinion customer satisfaction

is a function of the perceived locus of responsibility for product or service

performance and if the perceived locus of responsibility can be shifted by

states of self awareness, it should be possible to influence customer

satisfaction by merely varying their level of self awareness. He suggests that

the quality and performance of the product creates customers1.

Michel Porter, E (1985), clearly stated in his article on` Competitive

Advantage; Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance’ that retailing

process includes sourcing materials, designing products, manufacturing

,transporting, fixing selling physical products and services from multiple or

linked suppliers. According to him different sequences in the retailing are

a) Locating the merchandise or raw materials

b) Designing products

c) Manufacturing products

d) Transportation

e) Fixing the price of the product and

f) The process of sale

Page 3: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 45

He identified that competitive advantage is at the heart of a firm’s

performance in the competitive market. Low-cost and differentiation strategies

are the two categories of strategies that a firm can follow when there is

competition. A company deciding to adopt a cost leadership strategy strives to

perform important value chain activities at a lower cost than the competitors,

while a company following differentiation strategy strives to creative and

market unique products for varied customer groups2.

Raut (1987) pointed out in his study on ‘Consumer attitudes towards advertising’

that 89 percentage of the respondents believed that advertising was useful to the

consumers for getting convenient information about the products and helps to

compare products. It makes shopping easier to the consumers. The paper provides

an insight to the need for promotion in retailing process. 3

Gummensson (1987) argued that to be successful a retailer must practice

relationship marketing. Service imperatives and solutions will further

strengthen the orientation of marketers towards relationship marketing4.

Dwyer & Schurr (1987) had the opinion that buyer-seller relationships are

bilateral relationships and evolve through five phases, viz. awareness,

exploration, expansion, commitment and consistency. If any of these phases

are distorted, customers may not remain with the seller and the seller should

listen keenly the needs of customers.5

Agarwal (1989) explained in his study `How are good the Indian Supermarkets’

the origin, growth and present condition of supermarkets in India. Here

remarked that the success was because of clean and packed assortment of

household goods mainly under one roof. He concluded that customers’

preferences are at the base of innovations and not profits. 6

Page 4: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 46

Reicheld.F.F and Schiefter. P (1990) have recognized that profits are

enhanced when strategies focus on retaining current customers. They also

argued that dedication- based relationships contribute to enhanced profit to a

firm. 7

Fornel (1992) identified that customer satisfaction is an important indicator

for the assessment of the performance of a retailer. He said that there is a

positive correlation between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty for a

retail firm. While customer satisfaction acts as a double edged- sword in

confirming customer loyalty and profitability for a supermarket retailer,

adoption of a customer-centric retail strategy is also said to have a positive

impact on the firm’s ability to acquire a greater market share. 8

Shanmugasundaram and John, Gunaseelan (1993) spoke in their article

`Consumer Satisfaction-A Study on Consumer Supermarkets’ about the attitude

of the consumers of Karpagom Co-operative supermarket, Vellore. Consumers of

the supermarket were satisfied with the location of the store and the quality of the

goods. The consumers were moderately satisfied with customer services provided

by the salesmen. Advertisements and customer information provided by the store

gave moderate satisfaction to the customers. 9

Reichheld (1996) has the opinion that relationship marketing is the only way

to stand out in the crowd by the marketers and to build up a healthy and long

term relationship with customers. He pointed out that empirical studies had

proved that the cost of acquiring a new customer was four or five times more

than retaining an existing customer. 10

Knights and McCabe (1997) have carried out research which illustrates that a

management often does not understand either the weaknesses or the

underlying philosophy of quality maintenance. They remind us that the quality

Page 5: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 47

of retailing should be controlled, especially in relation to the process of service

quality. They stated that quality relatively has linkages with the market share

and profitability of a retailer. 11

Zikmund. , d’Amico, and Michael (1998) identified in their publication

`Creating and Keeping Customers in Effective Marketing’ that a successful

retailer has to do three things viz. he must identify a niche for offerings among

all available market segments and determine a target market with an

opportunity for growth. Secondly, he must design and develop an appropriate

retail format. Finally, the retailer must figure out how to establish a sustainable

competitive advantage. 12

Barry Berman, Joel. R. Evans (2002) found that retailing today is at an

interesting crossroad. Retail sales are at their highest point in history.

WALMART is the first $150 billion retailer (1999).New technologies are

improving retail productivity. There are ample opportunities to start a new

retail business or work for an existing one and to join a retail franchise. 13

Marn, Michael V, Roegner, Eric, V and Zawada (2003) identified different

factors which affect the profitability of a retailing enterprise. They are the

following;

a) Online order discounts

b) Delivery to the customer without appropriate charges,

c) Discounts that do not encourage rapid repayment or are given

without fast payments.

d) Co-operative advertising with the manufacturer is ineffective.

e) Market development incentives on brands or sales to customer

groups that do not work. 14

Page 6: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 48

Kumar (2003) revealed in his thesis that the majority of the consumers were

highly enlightened and were concerned about the quality of products. He

found that there is no difference in quality consciousness between customers

in rural and urban areas; they desire to avail of products at reasonable prices

and trust more the advice of the retailer. 15

Jyothikumar (2003) had the opinion that the process of buying starts

internally in the minds of a consumer, which leads to the search for

alternatives that can be acquired with their relative importance, advantages and

disadvantages. All the marketing plans embody myriad assumptions about the

retailer. Whether the marketers are trying to retain customers, to convert

buyers from rivals to friends, or simply to increase sales with existing

customers, the marketing strategy certainly influences the buyer. 16

Levy (2004) in his book ‘Retailing Management’ identified three components

of a successful strategy; the target market, the nature of the retail offering, and

nature of competitive advantage. According to him the retail strategy must be

well planned in respect of merchandise, location and service. A retail firm

should set the niche for offering his product. 17

Ferine and Sparks (2004) mentioned that the role of retailers in merchandise

transfer has taken part in coordinating transportation logistics, where products

are interdependently transferred from the point of production (manufacturers)

to the point of consumption. 18 They also pointed out that the supply of

products to retail outlets has been initiated by manufacturers. Recently, the

domain has shifted to retailers to gauge customers’ needs and wants with the

market intelligence disseminated to suppliers for their responsive actions.

According to Levy and Weitz (2005), retailers have to carry out four major

activities among them the first and most important one is the retailer providing

Page 7: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 49

an assortment of goods from which one can choose. Secondly, the retailer buys

at larger quantities and breaks them down in to more consumable sizes. Third,

retailers hold an inventory close by with a view to provide convenience to the

consumers. Finally, retailers provide services to enhance the value of the

product to the consumer. 19

According to Rundh (2005) packaging helps in attracting consumer attention

to a particular brand and influences the consumer’s perception or buying

behaviour about a product. Food product brands make use of packing attributes,

combining colors, designs, shapes, symbols, and messages20.

Shah and Metha (2006) have identified that with the Indian retail sector

getting increasingly competitive there appears to be an urgent need for

developing an effective competitive strategy. Companies should be customer-

centric and adopt strategies which will attract new customers21.

Vijayaraghavan (2007) opined in his report that the entry of many huge retail

formats in India created large level competition in the retail sector. The entry

of the huge grocery format of Reliance and the proposed venture of Bharti-

Wal Mart are expected to further hike the level of competition in the sector

and put pressure on margins. 22

Levy & Weitz (2007) described retailing can be viewed in a value chain as

“the set of business activities that add value to the products and services sold

to the consumers for their personal or family use” 23

James. B. Ayers and Mary Ann Odegaard (2008) defined the Term `retail’

as final sales to mostly non-business customers and end users, generally called

consumers. However, it is also important to remember that most businesses

also purchase at retail stores. Transactions in this trend also can be regarded

Page 8: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 50

retailing. They also defined Customer segments as homogeneous blocks of end

users. A segment consists of customers who share buying habits and product

performance and have common needs for supply chain performance. This

performance includes features like cost quality and responsiveness that are

built in to the supply chain design24.

Barry Schwartz (2008) has suggested that too many consumption choices

make customers confused, unsatisfied, less happy, psychologically drained,

and more likely to experience negative emotions. Some customers confess to

feeling ‘paralysed’ by the vast array of choices in retail aisles, and tend to

defensively cling to their old brands, or to buy nothing at all 25.

Prahalad, C.K. (2008), defined organized retailing in his article `Art of out

sourcing ‘as chain store penetration. Lower level of penetration, as in India

(3%) and China (20%), hold promise for future growth unavailable in mature

economies. This paper prophesies successful future retailers who are trying to

penetrate in the retail market of the country. 26

Sehgal (2008) opined that food and grocery enjoys the dominant market share

of 75 per cent of Indian retail but has only one percent penetration in

organized retail. The author critically assessed the market share of organized

and unorganized food retailers in India and found that unorganized food retail

enjoys the lion share. 27

Jelveh (2008) assessed that one way of differentiating individual behaviour

was taking the locations of the stores into the decision making process. Other

attributes include the size of the stores, price, location, level of service and

quality of products. The paper analyzed various attributes which lead to the

influence of purchase behaviour and found that in addition to the above

Page 9: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 51

attributes, post purchase experience and the satisfaction that consumers

enjoyed through the product too were significant. 28

James and Mary Ann Odegaard (2008) described that retail strategic

segmentation of a market can be based on a number of factors including the

following.

Geography or location

Income level

Demographics such as age and gender

Frequency of usage

Benefits of value to the customer or end-user, such as convenience,

cost and prestige

Preference for distribution channels

Family life cycle stage29

Schiffman, Kanuk & Leslie. (2008) ‘The term consumer behavior is defined

as the behavior that consumers display in searching for, purchasing, using,

evaluating, and disposing of products and services that they expect will satisfy

their needs’30.

Kotler (2008) stated that segmenting the markets is essential to discover a

firm for the customer groups that it will serve. Without knowing the customer

groups, ‘positioning’ also is not possible. Therefore, identifying the customer

groups to serve is the first in the function of a marketer. 31

Geethakumary. K.P (2009) in her study on `Margin-Free Markets in Kerala:

An Evaluation study ‘about the working of Margin Free Markets in Kerala and

their consumer satisfaction level. She found that Consumers of Margin Free

Page 10: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 52

Markets are satisfied with the self service, dealings of the staff and the quality

of commodities. Most of the customers of MFM replied that selling goods

below MRP is the major reason for their shift to the MFM from private

traders. Private Traders were of opinion that the arrival of MFN has very much

affected their sales. She recommended that Margin Free Market must store

more varieties of goods to be offered at reasonable prices. 32

Sami Finne and Hanna Sivonen (2009) stated in their book –`Retail Value

Chain –How to gain Competitive Advantage Through Efficient Response

Strategies’ as convergence continues new entrants enter retailing, and many

retailers also expand to new business areas such as banking ,insurance,

healthcare, telecommunications and travel. Retail infrastructure is also affected

by many external factors such as technology and product trends, forcing the

players to rethink their conventional models. 33

Surajith and Bilab (2009) have observed in their study that education has no

significant influence on a consumer’s exploratory tendencies of brand

switching, innovativeness in shopping. They found that one’s education does

not justify appropriately one’s psychological set up. Again they found that the

income level of the customers has no influence on shopping exploratory

tendencies such as brand switching and innovativeness. 34

Renuka Moorthy T.R and Devaraju (2010), in their article ` Customer

Satisfaction; A comparative Study in Retail Marketing’, measured the current

level of customer satisfaction with the existing provisions of services provided

by various retail outlets in Mysore city. To analyze customer satisfaction, they

have evaluated variables such as the quality of products supplied, service and

information provided, customer support facilities, after sales services,

discount, and customer delight. According to the analysis Retailer `MORE’s

Page 11: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 53

customers are more satisfied than those of retailers such as` Spencer’s and`

Loyal World.’ They suggested that the retail outlet can specialize in certain

varieties of products rather than carrying a broad array of merchandise

category. They recommended that customers would be satisfied if the price

matches the quality of the products and they would continue to purchase. 35

Frank. Q .Fu, Keith A. Richard, Douglas E. Hughes &Eli Jones (2010)

stated in their research the relative influence of sales personnel’s attitudes

towards selling a new product, perceptions of subjective norms, and efficacy

on the development of selling intentions and ultimately, the success of a new

product launch. By examining sales person-level variance on a new product

performance, the authors suggest that managers should focus on increasing

sales person’s self-efficacy and positive attitudes towards selling the products

to build selling intentions and quickly grow new product performance. They

also suggest that sales managers should resist the temptation to relay on

normative pressure during new product introduction. 36

Glenn. B.Voss, Andrea Godfrey &Kathleen Seiders (2010) have described

that customer satisfaction has no effect under certain circumstances. In their

study the authors developed a framework for understanding the complex

relationships among satisfaction, moderating variables, and repurchases. They

propose that the satisfaction-repurchase link is subject to complementary and

substitute effect and present satiation and inertia as key theoretical

mechanisms that explain and predict those effects. Telyhe findings offer new

theoretical insights and substantive guidance for managers to effectively

allocate resources to initiatives that complement or substitute for customer

satisfaction. 37

Page 12: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 54

Andez George (2010) revealed that studying consumer behavior enables

marketing firms and manufacturing firms to realize more about the consumer

decision making process and helps to design marketing strategies and

promotional messages that will influence consumers effectively. 38

Dr.Shekhar and Shantanu (2011) evaluated products, price, store location,

promotion, quality of staff, process and environment to understand the retail

strategy implemented by an apparel chain store at Bangalore. They concluded

that humorous commercials help customers remember a product. However, no

evidence has been found that humorous advertisements necessarily lead to the

purchase of a product. 39

Md.Sanuwar Rashid (2011) in his article ‘the Structured frame of Category

Management for Optimisation of Retail Business’, stated that technological

improvement and the frequently changing fashion trends reduce the product

life cycle. In this new environment ,a regular basis of supply of products in

the market is mandatory to retain sales opportunities at all times .Category

Management opens the door of opportunity for retailers to link up to suppliers

to improve their service level. From the customers’ point of view, at retailing

shops having category management, a customer can easily compare the prices

of different brands of the same category. It encourages customers to buy their

required product as they are confident about the price and quality of the same

product of another brand.40

Sumedhu Kalia & Rishi Kalia (2011) in ‘Subhiksha; A Battle for Survival’

found that Subikshas being small in size though in prime localities in a city

with no air conditioning and fancy shelves and designer things went against

them. Customers could not get all brands they wanted making choice very

limited. Low assortment was another reason for the failure of Subhiksha.

Page 13: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 55

Another major problem they faced was expansion without sufficient funds in

hand. They concluded that for the success of chain stores, the retail stores

would have to identify with different life styles. 41

Nilesh Neelmani (2011) has studied consumer attitude towards FMCGs and

compared private labels with National brands. He found that consumers still

believe that national brands have better quality compared to private labels. At

the same time consumers tend to believe that private labels have higher value

for money compared to national brands. It is also believed that national brands

are less risky to buy compared to private labels .The comparison means value

indicates that the National Brands hold higher prestige compared to Private

Labels as far as consumers’ attitude is concerned. 42

Pratibha Goyal and Adithya Sharma (2011) described that the trend of

retailing has changed from kirana stores/grocers/provision stores to attractive

air-conditioned retail outlets. The present day Indian consumer seeks more

values in terms of improved availability and quality of goods and a pleasant

shopping environment. 43

Ramanathan and Hari (2011) have studied retail variables distinguishing the

selection of organized and unorganized retail formats by the customers. They

found that customer income is the basic variable that determines selection where

the low income group selects unorganized retailers while the high income group

selects organized retailers. They reported that there was no association between

the respondent’s age and the shopping experience at organized and unorganized

retail formats. It was also found that buyers perceived a difference among services

offered by organized and unorganized retailers. 44

Manju Malik (2012) conducted a study on customer satisfaction towards the

service quality of organized retails stores in Hariyana and found that the

Page 14: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 56

majority of people visiting the organized retail outlets were male and most of

them belonged to the younger age group as well as to the middle income

group. She further found that dimensions of service quality were positively

related to customer satisfaction. Product quality, physical aspects and

promotional schemes were the most important variables that determined

customer satisfaction. No gender bias was found in the case of variables

mentioned above for choosing products. 45

Praveenkumar and Asha (2012), stated in their article ‘Effectiveness of

FMCG distribution with respect to satisfaction of consumers in rural markets’

that at least one product should be made available under all categories by the

retailer, which will solve the purpose without brand and sometimes customers

were least bothered about good or bad. Many of the customers have their own

methods to identify products, rural customers, especially people who have an

agrarian back ground do not buy branded products. They found that customer

dissatisfaction would be the result if the product length was too short in retail

stores. 46

2.2 Studies on Public Distribution System and Food Retailing.

Mirchandani, R.T (1960) studied food retailing and indicated that an efficient

system of marketing food items would aim at balancing conflicting interests

such as consumers preferring to get their required quantities of food in pure

quality at the least possible cost and middlemen aiming at realizing the

maximum possible profits from the deal. Therefore, quality and price are the

most important elements in the food retailing47.

Sheo Narain Singh (1972) clearly stated that the Central government has got

sufficient powers in relation to the fixation of prices of essential communities under

the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. He recommended the extension of fair price

Page 15: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 57

shops to rural areas for easy availability of essential goods at low prices. It is also

important that state governments should take fresh measures to strengthen the PDS,

for the protection of the vulnerable section of the community. 48

Gopalakrishnan , P.K (1978) observed that a rational food policy for India

should aim at the twin objectives of increase in production and equitable

distribution, in conformity with the recommended National Minimum

Nutritional Standard. He also stated that the per capita regional production of

food grains and calorie intake are highly co-related. 49

Prabha, T (1982) observed that there is a significant relation between per-

capita production of food grains and per-capita calorie intake of food grains,

but the influence of income on this factor is found to be significant. He

believes that a huge number of our population has insufficient income to

consume food grains at levels mentioned for getting sufficient calorie.

Therefore, he suggested that the present Public distribution system has to be

revised so as to ensure the supply of food grains to all. 50

Chattopadhya. P (1982) stated that essential commodities such as food grains

and pulses supplied through the public distribution system are of low quality

due to deterioration during storage and due to infestation. Careless handling,

and outdated storage facilities are also other major causes for low quality. 51

Balram Dogra (1987) revealed the shortcomings of the PDS and pointed out

that the system functions in a very lethargic manner and the private sector

takes the fruits of this weakness. This can be eradicated by proper

reorganization of PDS through a thorough monitoring process52.

Suryanarayana. M. H (1996) evaluated the trends in Public Distribution

System off-take, cereal consumption and changes in the level of calorie intake

Page 16: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 58

in Kerala during a few selected years. He found that inadequate access and

poor quality of the rice supplied through the PDS are the two major reasons for

the inadequate utilization of the system. 53

Frontline (1997) described that PDS is primarily a social welfare and anti-

poverty programme of the Govt. of India. With a net work of more than

4,00,000 Fair Price Shops (FPS), the Public Distribution System in India is

perhaps the largest distribution machinery of its type in the world .The success

of this huge network is dependent on its ability to translate a macro level self

sufficiency to micro level, by ensuring availability of food grains for poor

households. 54

According to Dreze & Amartyya Sen (1998), the stability of food prices in

India is quite remarkable. During the drought of 1987-88 which led to

considerable decline in food production food grain prices increased by less

than 10 per cent. This was largely due to large scale sale of food through the

Public Distribution System. The contribution of price stabilization measures to

the protection of entitlement during crises in India is a major one.55

Ajithkumar Ghose, (1999) narrated that the history behind the introduction

of Public Distribution System in India is rooted in famines and food scarcity

during the entire period of British Colonial rule in India. Food Grains

Procurement Commission 1950 suggested rationing in all towns with

population exceeding 50000, informal rationing in all small towns and

regulated supply of grains to rural areas. In response to it, the government of

India officially started a Public Distribution System in our country. 56

Krishnaji . N, Krishnan T. N (2000) stated in their study that even poor

people were purchasing food grains from the open market. So, vigorous efforts

Page 17: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 59

are to be made in future to stabilize the consumption level of poor people,

which is one of the aims of public distribution system. 57

Anilkumar . B (2002) explained in his study on `Impact of Targeted Public

Distribution System among Rural Below Poverty Line Group, Kerala ’ PDS

as an instrument of the ‘Food Management Policy’ of the government under

the Essential Commodities Act, specially to the weaker sections of the society.

Well targeted and properly functioning PDS is an important constituent of the

strategy for poverty alleviation. 58

Nirmala Mabel. E.R (2006) has done a study `Evaluation of the Working of

Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited’. The study was to evaluate

the activities carried out by the Corporation and to ascertain the role performed

by it in the Public Distribution System in Kerala. It was found that the

Corporation had an important role in the Public Distribution system in Kerala

but consumer satisfaction was at low a low level. Ninety two per cent of

customers interviewed was of the opinion that Supplyco was successful in

offering goods at lower prices. 59

Priyesh (2006) suggested in his thesis that it is not necessary to extent

subsidization of food grains to all people and the government should revamp the

traditional functions of our Public Distribution System. He also recommended

that a government controlled system should be started to deal with frequent

fluctuations in the price of essential commodities. 60

Carpenter & Moor (2006) stated in their study ‘Consumer demographics,

store attribute and retail format choice in the US grocery market industry’ that

the grocery industry is strongly driven by price competitiveness, product

selection, assortment and the courtesy of personnel. While determining the

format choice, cleanliness is the most important attribute, regardless of the

Page 18: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 60

type. Again, price level and distance from the residence of buyers also are

other determining drivers for the store choice. 61

Reardon & Gulati (2008) found that retailing environment has been growing

tremendously in size and market dominance of large players grows with

greater store size. The food and beverages segment constitutes the largest

share, at more than 70 percent of the retail pie. Food and grocery accounts for

the bulk of Indian retailing and its share is about 60 per cent. Organized

retailing accounts for less than 10 per cent of food retailing in India. However,

the share of organized retailing in the food sector will grow to 15-20 per cent,

if the current trends of expansion continue. 62

Thulseedharan Nair (2008) described the Public Distribution System as a

retailing mechanism that entitles households to specified quantities of selected

commodities at subsidized prices. The objectives of the Public Distribution

System are maintaining price stability, rationing during times of scarcity,

welfare of the poor, and keeping a check on private trade63.

2.3 Studies on the Role of Consumer Co-operatives

Jawaharlal Nehru (1962) strongly favored the role of consumer co-operatives

and he believed that the movement has an important role in maintaining price

levels in the country. He observed that co-operatives can work as a checking

measure against the tendency of rising prices in the country and this was

vindicated in 1960, when prices of essentials had shown a rising tendency. 64

Marian Radetzki (1965) studied the role of consumer cooperatives and

reported that the most important role is to check private organizations from

overcharging consumers in the distribution of necessary commodities. He also

opined that consumers’ co-operatives contribute to lower distribution costs

through rationalization which will ultimately benefit to consumers. 65

Page 19: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 61

Chakarvarti (1972) in his article ‘Role of Consumer Co-operatives in

Distribution and Price Control’ opined that a strong co-operative sector should

be created as a balancing sector between the public and private sectors.

Consumer Co-operatives play a dominant role in our economy to increase

agriculture production and consumer goods distribution. They protect

consumers from rise in prices, adulteration and other unhealthy trade practices

like hoarding, speculation, underweight, etc. He pointed out that consumer co-

operatives are important agencies of Public Distribution System. 66

Annasaheb. P. Sinde (1973) has given in his articles ‘Co-operative Reliable

and Socially Motivated Machinery for Handling Distributive Trade’ that co-

operation has the responsibility to make PDS successful, especially in the

present situation. Co-operative societies have a great responsibility in

protecting consumers and safeguarding the interests of producers. He

suggested the government to try to get more and more involvement of co-

operation in the Public distribution System. 67

Banwarilal, Bhatiya (1973) has pointed out in his study that consumer co-

operatives had not been able to achieve their main objectives so far as the

‘Price Setter’ in the market by holding the price line. They had been suffering

from many structural, operational and administrative weaknesses. Unattractive

prices, inadequate stock of fast moving goods, poor salesmanship and absence

effective sales promotion are some of the factors that contributed to their steep

decline. There is a vast scope for the consumers’ co- operatives, provided they

are organized on sound lines and better economic footing with active

assistance from the government.68

Bahl (1976) in his study` The Role of Consumer Co-operatives in Public

Distribution System’ found that the consumer co-operatives have a great role

Page 20: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 62

in the eradication of exploitation and adulteration .He strongly opined that

consumer co-operative societies are able to provide remedies against higher

pricing and other malpractices.They can provide commodities at fair prices

maintaining purity, better quality, pure weight, etc. 69

Bhagavathyram (1985) in the report on Chinthamani Co-operative Supermarket

has stated the need for fixing the sales targets systematically and scientifically70.

He recommended;

1) Provision of purchase rebate

2) Provision of welfare measures to employees

3) Self service improvement and

4) Efficient inventory management to avoid stock deficit

Misra, N.K (1988) explained that the association of the Co-operative

institutions with the Public Distribution System was inevitable. It becomes

clear in the light of the fact that unless the consumer himself is involved in the

procurement and distribution of the consumer goods, the element of undue

profit and malpractices in respect of price, quality and quantity can never be

checked. 71

Report of International Cooperative Alliance (1988) stated that house

wife’s involvement in consumer cooperatives in most of the developing

countries is passive. They suggest that member education is necessary, and

advise to redefine the objectives of consumer cooperatives and provide

opportunity for social and cultural upliftment of members. 72

Sasikumar (1989) has done a study `The Role of Consumer Co-operatives in

Public Distribution System of Kerala ‘to learn the role of district Wholesale

Co-operative Stores in the state. He found that quality, price, correct weight

and measurement are the most important aspects of Public Distribution

Page 21: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 63

System. He stressed the need for the implementation of a permanent PDS in

Kerala73.

Nilkanth and Sanjay Sanker Kapter (1994) suggested that consumer

cooperatives should strengthen consumerism and extent protection to their

consumers without entirely depending upon the government for consumer

protection. 74

Misra (1995) stated in his article, ‘Open Economy in Consumer Co-operatives’

that the development of consumer co-operatives in Japan, Sweden, Thailand,

England and Singapore are along with other supermarkets in the private sector

because these countries have always been free market economies. He

opined that the small consumer co-operative stores working in India

function with the financial help of states and so they cannot follow the

principles of co-operation. The existence of these co-operatives will be a

problem unless they grow or amalgamate with the leading consumer stores

in the neighborhood. 75

Ravichandran and Pandmanabhan (1998) have done a study on

Chinthamani Co-operative supermarket in Coimbatore city to examine the

purchase behavior and constraints on consumer purchase. The various factors

that influenced the consumers for the purchase at Supermarket were the

quality of products, reasonable price, unadulterated commodities and the

availability of full range of commodities. 76

Gautam .T.C (2000) observed the importance of consumer co-operatives in

the national economy and found that consumer co-operatives have emerged as

very strong organizations in the distributive trade. Co-operative trade in India

not only distributes essential commodities but also provides all other consumer

goods at reasonable price. 77

Page 22: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 64

Dhanasekara and Tamilmani.B (2007) observed that consumer co-

operatives which have been doing yeoman service to the public by providing

them quality consumer goods and services at competitive prices, are

witnessing a difficult situation. The complexity of the situation has grown

further at an alarming level especially in the post liberalized period, as it is

marked by the arrival of new players and their strategies in the retail trade. 78

Gangan, Arora (2010) argued that consumer cooperatives being value based

enterprises with a unique blend of economic and social responsibilities is a

preferred option in the supply of consumer goods at low prices without private

interest. Consumer cooperatives are worldwide models for common stands

against private exploitation. 79

Farahnaz, Ogliabian and Nagendra Babu (2011) suggested that with the

increase in education and civilized urbanization, huge populations transfer

from lower social-economic classifications to higher socio –economic

classifications. The consuming class predominantly comprises socio-economic

classifications A&B and represents around 105 million people in 22 million

families of urban population in India. 80

Balnave, Nikola and Patmore, Greg (2010) explained in their article named

`Practical Utopians; Rockdale Consumer Cooperatives in Australia and New

Zealand’ that Rockdale consumer cooperatives have played an integral role in the

lives of many people in Australia and New Zealand in mining areas, rural regions

and in metropolitan and suburban areas. In the years prior to Second World War,

both the countries showed waves of interest in consumer cooperatives. In the post

second world war period the survival of many of these cooperatives was not

secure. As a result in the rise of chain supermarkets and shopping centers many of

these cooperatives became incompetent and fell in to permanent decline. 81

Page 23: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 65

Tamilnadu Journal of Cooperation (2011)80 in an article ‘Food Security and

Cooperation’ stated that Public Distribution System is also run successfully by

cooperatives in the majority of villages. At present 21000 cooperatives, 30

consumer cooperative federations with 8000 branches are providing consumer

items at reasonable prices. Besides, 674 wholesale stores with 5391 branches

work in the distribution of consumer goods. This structure should be

developed with the support of the Government of India so that proper and

adequate food grains can be accessed by every person in the country. 82

2.4 Research Gap

The review of earlier studies reveals that particularly no concrete and

precise analysis has yet been made regarding the activities, performance and

evaluation of Kerala State Consumers Co-operative Federation Ltd. The

present study is aimed at that direction. Even though the study is confined to

the state of Kerala, it obviously has relevance to the successful operation of

Co-operative Distribution System in India which is also relevant to the

functioning of Public Distribution System in other states of India. As co-

operatives are alternatives and virtually government enterprises, critical

evaluation on the performance of CONSUMERFED is indeed necessary to

recommend the ways and means to improve its performance in future.

Page 24: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 66

References

[1] Oliver, Richard L, (1980) ‘A Cognitive Model of Antecedents and

Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions’, Journal of Marketing

Research, November. Vol.XXI, No.3.pp 36-49.

[2] Porter, Michael, E. (1985) ‘Competitive Advantage; Creating and

Sustaining Superior Performance’, The Free Press, New York.

November 11. Pp.33-37

[3] Rout, K.C (1987), ‘Consumer Attitude towards advertising’, Indian

Journal of Marketing.Vol.31(4). p.11.

[4] Gummession. E, (1987) ‘the new marketing- developing long term

interactive relationship’. Long Range Planning. Vol. 20, No.4.

p- 10-20.

[5] Dwyer. F Robert, Schurr Paul H and Oh Sejo, (1987) ‘Developing

Buyer- Seller Relationships’. Journal of Marketing, Vol 51, pp-11-27

[6] Agarwal. A.D, (1989) ‘How good are the Indian Supermarkets’. Vinod

Publishing House New Delhi, p-26.

[7] Reicheld, F.F, and Schiefter. P (1990), ‘E-Loyalty’. Harward Business

Review .Vol 78 No.4, pp. 105-113.

[8] Fornell, Claes, and Birger, Wernerfelt (1992) ‘Defencive Marketing

Strategy by Customer Complaint Management’. Journal of Marketing

Research, Vol 24, pp.337-346.

[9] Shanmugasundaram. S and John Gunaseelan G, (1993) ‘Customer

Satiesfaction-A study in a Co-operative Supermarket’.The Indian

Co-operative Review.Vol.XXX, NO-3, January. pp-39-36

Page 25: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 67

[10] Reichheld, Fredrick, F, (1996). ‘The Loyalty Effect; The Hidden Force

Behind Growth, Profits and Lasting Value’, Bosten Hardward Business

school Press, p.44.

[11] Knights and Mac Cabe, (1997) ‘Quality in a retailer’ Journal of

Management studies, Vol 34, pp 371-89.

[12] Zikmund, William G, d’Amico, Michael, (1998). ‘Creating and Kepping

Customers; Effective Marketing. Cicinnati:South western college

Publishing Company, p.42.

[13] Berman, Barry, Joel .R. Evans, (2002) Retailing Management-A

Srategic Approrch, Prentice- Hall India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, p-4.

[14] Marn, Michael V., Roegner , Eric ,V and Zawada, (2003). ‘The Power of

Pricing’. The McKincy Quarterly, No.1, p-27.

[15] S. Kumar. (2003). ‘A study on Consumer Behaviour with reference to

selected products’. Finance India. Vol.17(4) p 1478-1483.

[16] NYR, Jyothikumar. (2003). ‘News paper marketing in India.’ Anmol

Publications, New Delhi. pp 132-134.

[17] Levy, Michel. (2004). Retail Management, 5th edition Tata McGraw

Hill, New Delhi. p-89.

[18] J.Fernie and L.Sparks, (2004). Logistics and Retail Management:

insights into current practices and trends from leading Experts, Kogan

Page Limited London. pp. 234-43

[19] Levy and Weitz, (2005). Retailing Management, 6th edit, Mc Graw Hill

Irwin, New York, p-7.

[20] Rundh, B.(2005), ‘The multi- faceted dimension of Packaging’ British

Food Journal, Vol 107 No.9 pp 670-684.

Page 26: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 68

[21] Shah and Metha (2006), ‘Consolidation of Indian Retail Industry’,

Report-XLRI Jamshedpur, pp 3-8.

[22] Vijayaraghavan, K, (2007) ‘Future group to focus on life styles and non –

grocery biz for the higher margins’. The Economic Times, February 5, pp. 4.

[23] Levey. M and Weitz, op.cit. p. 234.

[24] Ayers, B, James and Mary Ann Odegaard. (2008) Retail supply Chain

Management, Auerbach Publications. Taylor and Francis Group ,Boca

Raton. p.175.

[25] Schwartz, Barry (2008) ‘The Tyranny of Choice’, Scientific American,

April.p.71-74

[26] Prahalad , C .K, (2005) `The Art of Outsourcing’. The Wall Street

Journal- June 8, p-A14.

[27] Sehgal, R(2008)Value retailing retrieved on food from http://www.value

notes.com/angel/retail-05

[28] Jelveh, S (2008) Food retail system and influence on customer behaviour

and perception of food products, retrieved from http://www.projects

paradise.com/food retailing influence-customer behaviour.

[29] Ayers, B. James and Mary. Ann. Odegaard, op.cit. p.3.

[30] Schiffman, G.Leon &Kanuk, Lazar, Leslie. (2008), Consumer Behavior,

Nineth edition, PHI Learing Private Limited, New Delhi. p- 4.

[31] Kotler, Philip and Armstrong, Gary. (2008) Principles of Marketing.

PHI Learning Private Limited, New Delhi.p-182.

[32] Geethakumari. K .P, (2009), PhD Thesis in Commerce. University of

Kerala.

Page 27: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 69

[33] Sami, Finne and Hanna, Sivonen, (2009), `Retail Value Chain –How to

gain Competitive Advantage Through Efficient Response Strategies’.

New Light Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd, London, p-1-3.

[34] Ghosh , Surajith and Datta Biplab (2009). ‘Demographic Differences in

Consumer Exploratory Tendencies; An Empirical Examination’. IIMB

Management Review, Vol 21, No.4 December. Pp. 297-311.

[35] Moorthy, Renuka, T,R and Devaraju. (2010). Customer Satiesfaction :

Comparitive Study in Retail Marketing. Southern Economist,Vol.49,

Aug.15, pp.11-22.

[36] Frank Q .Fu, Keith A.Richard, Douglas E.Hughes &Eli Jones, (2010).

Motivating sales people to sell new products; The relative influence of

attitudes, subjective norms and self efficacy. Journal of Marketing.

Vol.74, November, pp.49-63.

[37] Glenn. B,Voss. Andrea Godfrey &Kathleen Seiders. (2010). `How

Complementarily and Substitution Alter the Customer Satisfaction-

Repurchase links Journal of Marketing, Vol.74, November. pp. 94-

109.

[38] George, Andez. (2010). Study on Consumer Behaviour in Toys Market

of Kerala, thesis for PhD, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kerala p.9

[39] Shekhar, Shantanu (2011) Building Successful Retail Strategies ;A case

studies of Coupon Stores, Indian Journal of Marketing.Vol.41, No.9.

pp. 43-49

[40] Md.Sanuwar, Rashid (2011), The Structured Framework Catogory

Management For Optimisation Of Retail Business. Indian Journal of

Marketing, Vol.41, No-8.September, pp.33-42.

Page 28: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 70

[41] Kalia, Sumedha &Rishi Kalia , (July-2011). ‘Subhiksha :A Battle For

Survival’ Indian Journal of Marketing,Vol.4,1,No.6, , p 45-53

[42] Nelesh, Neelmani.(Aug 2011)`Consumer Attitude Towards FMCGs; A

Comparative Study of Private Label and National Brands’ Indian

Journal of Marketing, Vol.41 no. page. 19-29

[43] Goyal, Pratibha & Sharma, Aditya. (2011). ‘Consumer preference for

organized and unorganized food retail stores’. International Journal of

Commerce and Business Management, vol.4, issue-1,April, pp. 57-68.

[44] Ramanathan .V and Hari .K (2011) ‘A Study on Consumer Perception

about Organized VS Unorganized Retailers at Kanchipuram, Tamil

Nadu’. Indian Journal of Marketing. Vol.41.No.12, December. pp. 11-

16

[45] Malik, Manju (2012), ‘A study on customer satisfaction towards service

quality of organized retail stores in Haryana. Indian Journal of

Marketing, February, pp. 51-58.

[46] Bhoyar, Praveenkumar and Nagendra, Asha,(2012). ‘Effectiveness of

FMCG distribution with respect to satisfaction of consumers in rural

markets’, Indian Journal of Marketing ,Vol.42 ,No.1,2012 pp 17-21

[47] R,T, Mirchandani (1960), ‘Marketing Programmes and Their

Evaluation’. Agriculture marketing, Vol.111, No.1.January –april.1963,

p.23.

[48] Sheo Narain Singh. (1972), Community Prices : The Malaise and the

Measures, Yojana,Vol.XVI,No-10,June-1, pp.414-16,

[49] Gopalakrishnan, P.K. (1978).National Public Distribution System,

Mainsream, New Delhi. pp.178-204

Page 29: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 71

[50] Prabha .T, (1982) Public Distribution and Rice Procurement in Tamil

Nadu. PhD thesis, University of Kerala.

[51] Chattopadhya, P, (1982) ‘Public Distribution of Food Grains’, Commerce

Annual, November, p. 20.

[52] Balram Dogra, (1987). “New Public Distribution Scheme”, Indian

Journal of Marketing, April, pp. 8-13.

[53] Suryanarayana .M.H (1996).`Food Security and PDS in Kerala Form and

Scope for Reforms ‘Indira Gandhi Institute Development for Research,

Mumbai.

[54] Frontline .Vol.14, No.21. October 18, 1997.

[55] Dreze, Jean and Sen, Amartya. (1998). ‘Hunger and Public Action’,

Oxford, Clarendon Press. p.41

[56] Ghose, Ajithkumar. (1999). Food Supply and Starvation;´A Study on

Famines with Reference to India Sub –Continent’, The Economics on

Famine. Edward Elgar. U.K. p.67.

[57] Krishnaji, N. Krishnan,T.N,(2000). Public support for food security,

Sage Publication Pvt Ltd, New Delhi. P 212.

[58] Anilkumar. B (2002). `Impact of Targeted Public Distribution System

among Rural and Below Poverty Line Group in Kerala-a Case Study’.

PhD thesis, University of Kerala.

[59] Mabel, Nirmala .E.R, (2006) `Evaluation of the Working of Kerala State

Civil Supplies Corporation Limited’ PhD thesis University of Kerala.

[60] Priyesh. C.A. (2006). Economic Reforms and Public Distribution System

with Special Reference to Kerala. PhD Thesis, University of Kerala.

Page 30: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 72

[61] Carpenter, Janson.M and Moor, Marquerite (2006) ‘Consumer

Demographics, Store Attribute and retail Format Choice in the US

Grocery Market’, International Journal for Retail Distribution. Vol.

34, No.49, pp- 400-412.

[62] Reardon and Gulati, (2008). ‘PDS a Success Story’. International

Journal of Retail Distribution and Management. Vol.28, No34, No.6,

pp. 434-52.

[63] Thulseedharan Nair, (2008) ‘Targeted Public Distribution System in

Food grains; Extent of Utilisation by Tribal Population in Kerala’ , PhD

thesis, Cochin University of Science and Technology.

[64] Nehru, Jawaharlal, (1962). Address in the meeting of the National

Development Council, November 14.

[65] Radetzki, Marian.(1965) ‘Economics of consumer cooperatives-

cooperative series1’, International Cooperative Alliance, Geneva.

[66] Chakravarti,S. (1972) `Role of Consumer Co-operatives in Distribution

and price control’. Indian Co-operative Review, July.Vol. IX.No.4. p-

449-451.

[67] Annasaheb, P. Sinde,(1973), Co-operative Reliable and Socially

Motivated machinery for handling Distributive Trade. The Co-operative

Review, Vol -XI, September.15. No.15. pp.6-10.

[68] Banwarilal, Bhatiya (1973). Co-operative Movement in Jaipur District,

PhD thesis, University of Rajasthan.

[69] Bahl,O.P, (1976) ‘Role of Consumer Co-operatives in Public

Distribution System’, Co-operator , Vol.XIV NO.1, July, p-34.

Page 31: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Review of Earlier Studies

 73

[70] Bhagavathyram, (1985). A Report on Chinthamani Co- operative

Supermarket, Tamil Nadu. Office of the Registrar of Co-operative

Societies, 1985.

[71] Misra, N, K. (1988). Role of Co-operatives in Public Distribution

System’ Article published by Regional Training Centre Mandi,

Himachal Pradesh December 12-17.

[72] Cooperative Alliance International (1988) Report on members

participation and house wife’s involvement, March, p.103.

[73] Sasikumar, K. (1989) A Study on the Role Consumer Co-operatives in

the Public Distribution System of Kerala. PhD Thesis, University of

Calicut.

[74] Nilkanth,V, Kapatar and Sanker, Sanjay (1994). ‘Consumer cooperatives;

role of voluntary organizations to combat consumer exploitation’.

Encyclopedia of Cooperative Management. Vol.4, Deep and Deep

Publications (pvt) Ltd, New Delhi. 1994.

[75] Misra, S.C. (1995), Open Economy Consumer Co-operatives, Indian

Co-operative Review; Vol. 22 .No.4 December, pp.39-42.

[76] Ravichandran, S.A and Padmanabhan, N.R. (1998).‘Purchase Behaviour

of Consumers in Consumer Co-operatives’. Indian Co-operative

Review. Volume XXXV No.3 January. P. 227.

[77] Gautam, T .C, (2000), Consumer Co-operatives in the new Millennium,

The Co-opeartor,Vol.XXXVI,No_8,.February. pp. 371-372.

[78] Dhanasekara, D and Tamilmani,B. (2007), ‘Indian retail scenario in the

globalizes era and the place of consumer co-operatives’ Indian

Consumer Cooperator, Vol.35 No.4, pp.8-16.

Page 32: REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES

Chapter -2

 74

[79] Arora, Ganjan.(2010), Indian Consumer cooperator, vol.38 No.1, pp. 6-8.

[80] Farahnaz. Olgliabian and Nagendre Babu, (2011), Urban consumers of

India. Southern Economist .Vol.49, No.20, Feb.15. p 24.

[81] Balnave, Nikola and Patmore Greg (2010) ‘Practical Utopians’

Rochdale Consumer cooperatives in Australia and New Zealand

Labour History, University of Sydney.

[82] Tamil Nadu Journal of Cooperation (2011), ‘Food Security and

Cooperation’ August.

 

….. …..


Recommended