6
CHAPTER - 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Recently, there is a great interest in active vibration control of
beam, plate and shell structures. Vibration is an undesirable
phenomenon in aerospace, mechanical and civil systems. In particular
aerospace structures (curved/ flat/ thin walled) may experience
adverse aerodynamic environments, which induce random vibrations.
The concept of active vibration control is very much useful to enhance
the performance in such structures. Electro-mechanically coupled PZT
materials are now considered as actuators and sensors in many active
vibration control applications.
A number of studies are reported on the modeling of electro-
mechanical coupling with different structural applications in active
vibration control. A few experimental studies are also available on the
active vibration control of composite beams and plates. A thorough
understanding of electro mechanical coupling, control concepts is
prerequisites for present research. For critically assessing the
available literature relevant to the present research problem, the
complete literature review process is carried out.
7
2.2 SOME STUDIES ON PIEZOELECTRICITY AND PIEZOCERAMICACTUATORS
Pierre and Jacques Curie brothers (1880), examined the
piezoelectric effect on crystal materials, (quartz, Rochelle salt) which
have the ability to produce electrical charges in response to externally
applied forces. This effect they named as "Piezoelectricity", after the
Greek word “piezein”, which means to squeeze or press.
Lippmann (1881), deduced mathematically the converse
piezoelectric effect from the fundamental thermodynamic principles.
This phenomenon illustrates that the application of an electrical field
creates a mechanical stress.
Cady’s (1946), worked on development of piezoelectric devices.
These developments led to numerous ceramic materials with better
piezoelectric properties. The discovery of piezoelectricity in PZT in the
late 1960’s increased the number of applications for industrial use.
Hagood and Bent (1993), developed an alternative actuators to
existing commercial actuator by combining the interdigitated
electrodes (IDEs) with piezoceramics. The circular cross-section PZT
fibers of the Active Fiber Composite (AFC) had very little contact area
between the interdigitated electrodes and the fibers. Due to this the
transfer of the electric field into the PZT fibers is inefficient and also
the AFC operates at very high voltage.
8
Bent et al. (1994), developed the first generation of
piezocomposite actuators. They are the remedy for the significant
drawbacks of monolithic piezoceramics. Piezo Fiber Composite (PFC)
combines piezoceramic materials and additional inactive components
in a specific structure to form an overall actuator/sensor package.
Adriaens et al. (2000), presented An electromechanical piezo
model, based on physical principles. In this model, a first-order
differential equation is adopted to describe the hysteresis effect, and a
partial differential equation is used to describe the mechanical
behavior.
Wilkie et al. (2000), developed the Macro Fiber Composite (MFC)
at NASA Langley Research Center. The MFC is a piezoelectric fiber
composite which has the rectangular cross-section and unidirectional
piezoceramic fibers embedded in the polymer matrix and uses the
interdigitated electrode. Unlike the AFC, the rectangular PZT fiber of
the MFC ensured the maximum contact area between the PZT fibers
and the interdigitated electrodes.
9
2.3 FE FORMULATION WITH PIEZOELECTRIC COUPLING- AREVIEW
Allik and Hughes (1970), presented a finite element formulation
which includes the piezoelectric and electroelastic effect. The
dynamical matrix equation of electroelasticity was formulated by them
to develop tetrahedral finite element.
Macneal (1978), formulated a four-noded quadrilateral shell
element, called QUAD4, which was based on isoparametric principles
with modifications which relax excessive constraints.
Naganarayana and Prathap (1989) reported on force and
moment corrections for the warped four-node quadrilateral plane shell
element. The element stiffnesses were generated for a ‘mean plane’
equidistant from the four nodes, and are corrected by introducing
equilibrated forces and moments.
Chandrashekhara and Agarwal (1993), presented a finite
element formulation for modeling the behavior of laminated
composites with integrated piezoelectric sensors and actuators. This
model they validated for both continuous and segmented piezoelectric
elements that can be either surface bonded or embedded in the
laminated plate.
Samanta et al. (1996), formulated a generalized finite element
procedure for active vibration control of a laminated plate with
10
piezoelectric laminas. They derived an eight-noded shear deformable
plate element. Also the vibration control was studied by them with a
simple feedback control strategy.
Varadan et al. (1996), Discussed the three dimensional finite
element model to predict the effects of both active and passive
damping of a vibrating structure. A cantilever structure made of
viscoelastic core sandwiched between piezoelectric actuator and
sensor was considered by them for the closed loop control analysis.
They have showed that the hybrid concept introduces better damping
than purely passive or active system.
Chang et al.(1996), derived general finite element formulations for
piezoelectric sensors and actuators by using the virtual work
principle. The amplitude-frequency and the phase-frequency
characteristics of the closed-loop system were studied by them.
Chen et al. (1997), employed a plate finite element to model the
structural system parameters and used a negative velocity feedback
control law to demonstrate the active vibration control by piezoelectric
actuators. Using state-space equations, damped frequencies and
damping ratio were derived by them numerically.
Han et al (1997) experimentally studied active vibration control of
composite structures with a piezo-ceramic actuator and a piezo-film
sensor using the classical laminated beam theory and Ritz method, an
analytical model of the laminated composite beam with piezoelectric
sensors and actuators.
11
Benjeddou et al. (1997), presented a finite element model for
adaptive sandwich beams to deal with either extension or shear
actuation mechanism. For both configurations, an electric field is
applied through thickness of the piezoelectric layers.
Saravanos (1997), developed mixed laminate theory for
piezoelectric shells in curvilinear coordinates that combines single-
layer assumptions for the displacements. Mechanics for the analysis
of laminated composite shells with piezoelectric actuators and sensors
were presented.
Baruch and Abramovich (1997), extended the formulation of
Miller et al. (1995) to include the material and geometric variation. The
piezoelectric actuator forces were represented as equivalent
mechanical loads in the equations of motion in a generalised form so
that the solution could be found using well-established approximate
methods.
Batra and Liang (1997) presented an analytical solution for the
vibration control of a simply supported rectangular plate expanding
displacement functions as Fourier series.
Clinton et al. (1998), studied coupled structure-actuator-sensor
interactions and developed both analytical and numerical models to
realize the so called smart or adaptive structures.
12
Liu et al.(1999), presented a finite element formulation to model the
dynamic as well as static response of laminated composite plates
containing integrated piezoelectric sensors and actuators subjected to
both mechanical and electrical loadings. The formulation was based
on the classical laminated plate theory and Hamilton’s principle. A
four node non-conforming rectangular plate bending element was
implemented by them for the analysis. The influence of stacking
sequence and position of sensors/actuators on the response of the
plate was evaluated.
Dogan and Vaicaitis (1999) developed analytical model for active
control of nonlinear flexural vibrations of cylindrical shells under
random excitation. A velocity feedback control scheme was integrated
into the governing equations of motion using discrete surface-bonded
piezoelectric materials as collocated sensors/actuators.
Benjeddou (2000), has conducted survey on the advances and
trends in the formulations and applications of the finite element
modeling of adaptive structural elements focusing on the development
of adaptive piezoelectric finite elements.
Azzouz et al. (2001), have developed a triangular piezoelectric
shallow shell element for analyzing structures with MFC/AFC
actuators and compared the performance of the MFC actuator with
13
that of the traditional PZT actuator. Developed element was used to
investigate the effect of PZT fiber orientation on acoustic and
structural vibration control of plate and shells.
Wang et al.(2001), investigated the vibration control of smart
piezoelectric composite plates and the effect of the stretching-bending
coupling of the piezoelectric sensor/actuator pairs on the system
stability of smart composite plates. Based on first-order shear theory
and consistent methodology, a smart isoparametric finite element was
formulated and the classical negative velocity feedback control method
is adopted for the active vibration control analysis of smart composite
plates with bonded or embedded distributed piezoelectric sensors and
actuators.
Balamurugan and Narayanan (2001), proposed the mechanics
for the coupled analysis of piezolaminated plate and piezolaminated
curvilinear shell structures and their vibration control performance. A
plate/shell structure with thin PZT piezoceramic layers embedded on
top and bottom surfaces to act as distributed sensor and actuator was
considered.
Chad Landis (2001), presented a new finite-element formulation
for the solution of electromechanical boundary value problems. As
opposed to the standard formulation that uses scalar electric potential
as nodal variables, this new formulation implements a vector potential
from which components of electric displacement are derived.
14
Bernadou and Christophe (2003), developed a two-dimensional
modelization of piezoelectric thin shells the approximation of the
second formulation by a conforming finite element method was
analyzed.
Singh et al. (2003), described Some efficient strategies for the
active control of vibrations of a beam structure using piezoelectric
materials. The control algorithms have been implemented for a
cantilever beam model developed using finite element formulation.
Lee and Yao (2003), experimentally studied the active vibration
control of structures subject to external excitations using piezoelectric
sensors and actuators. A simply supported plate and a curved panel
were used as the structures in experiments. The Independent Modal
Space Control (IMSC) approach was employed for the
controller design.
Raja et al. (2004), modeled a coupled piezoelectric field with an
expansion strain in the numerical formulation to analyze
piezohygrothermoelastic laminated plates and shells. Finite element
actuator and sensor equations are derived using a nine-noded field
consistent shallow shell element.
Robaldo et al. (2006), presented finite element for the dynamic
analysis of laminated plates embedding piezoelectric layers based on
the principle of virtual displacements (PVD) and a unified formulation.
15
The full coupling between the electric and mechanical fields was
considered. Numerical results have been given by them for the free-
vibrations frequencies of simply supported plates embedding
piezoelectric layers.
Balamurugan and Narayanan (2008), presented formulation of
a nine-noded piezolaminated degenerated shell finite element for
modeling and analysis of multilayer composite general shell structures
with bonded/embedded distributed piezoelectric sensors and
actuators.
Guennam and Luccioni (2009), developed a piezoelectric multi-
lamina shell FE to model for thin walled structures with piezoelectric
fiber composites polarized with interdigitated electrodes (PFCPIE). A
new scheme for the interpolation of the electric field was presented.
Ivelin V. Ivanov (2011), modelled Active Fibre Composites (AFC)
by piezo-electric Finite Elements (FEs) and their effective properties
are determined by FE analysis. Dynamic behaviour of a smart
composite structure was simulated by them in Finite Element.
16
2.4 VIBRATION CONTROL USING MFC ACTUATORS
Balas (1978) and Meirovitch et al. (1983), were among the first
to present the vibration control procedures for the large flexible
structural systems.
Aubrun (1980), presented the collocated or localized
interconnection concept for structural vibration control with
distributed actuators and sensors.
Meirovitch (1983) proposed coupled control. A unique and
globally optimal closed-form solution to the linear optimal control
problem of the distributed structure was presented.
Crawley & Luis (1987), presented the analytical and
experimental development of piezoelectric actuators as an element of
intelligent structure.
Tzou (1987) proposed a distributed active piezoelectric damper
and evaluated using analytical, experimental, and finite element
techniques for active vibration control of flexible structures via
converse piezoelectricity.
Baz and Poh (1988), presented the utilization of piezoelectric
actuators in controlling the structural vibrations of flexible beams. A
Modified Independent Modal Space Control (MIMSC) method was
presented for selecting the optimal location, control gains and
excitation voltage of the piezoelectric actuators.
Lammering (1991), focused on the finite element analysis of
shell structures with piezoelectric layers bonded on the surface. A
17
finite element formulation taking the piezo-electric effect into account
was given and a finite shell element was presented.
Clark & Fuller (1991), have studied on panels, the vibration
control and its effect on the reduction of sound radiation. Active
structural acoustic control (ASAC) using conventional fine mass
dampers and PZT activators are currently emerging as a popular
solution for vibration induced noise control problems.
Hwang & chul park (1993), presented FE formulation for
vibration control of a laminated plate with piezoelectric
sensors/actuators. Classical laminate theory with the induced strain
actuation and Hamilton's principle are used to formulate the
equations of motion.
Tzou and Hollkamp (1994), proposed a scheme based on
collocated spatially distributed actuators/sensors assembly to achieve
independent control of natural modes of a structural system. The
actuators/sensors were spatially shaped to capture the response and
control of a particular mode of a laminated cantilever beam.
Miller et al. (1995), developed a selective modal control strategy
based on Lyapunov’s second method for piezolaminated anisotropic
thin shells. The proposed scheme was used to demonstrate
simultaneous sensing and actuation of a particular mode with
arbitrarily chosen modal participation factors.
18
Baz and Poh (1996), proposed an active control scheme based
on Independent Modal Space Control (IMSC) for a flexible beam with
optimally placed piezoelectric actuators.
Yang and bian (1996), experimentally demonstrated that,
without sacrificing the structural advantages, the piezoelectric
element embedded in composite laminated structures can be applied
both as the in situ vibration sensor and as the vibration suppression
actuator.
Del Rosario et al. (1998), reported a study on vibration control of
thin shells with piezoelectric layers. The shell governing equations
were derived based on Donnell-Mushtari theory. Closed form solutions
of the shell dynamics and controls were presented using Galerkin
expansion and LQR based control strategy. Jung Woo Sohn et al.
studied active vibration control of smart hull structure using
piezoelectric composite actuators.
Kim et al. (2000), designed distributed sensor and actuator for
the active vibration control of shell structure. To prevent the adverse
effect of spillover, distributed modal sensor/actuator system was
established by optimizing the electrode pattern and the lamination
angle of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF).
Bevan (2001), has proposed a modified GA based optimal
placement scheme for MFC actuator using LQR control strategy.
19
Further he has examined the performance of the MFC actuator in
vibration and acoustic control of carved and flat panels.
Jha and Inman (2003), modeled the dynamics of a lightweight,
inflatable shell structure commonly used in telecommunications
satellites and other space-based structures and also experimentally
investigated the suitability of using the MFC for structural vibration
applications.
Williams et al. (2004), investigated the mechanical properties of
the MFC using the classical lamination theory. Nonlinear mechanical
behaviors of the MFC were studied by the experiment, and the linear
mechanical properties of the MFC were compared with the result of
the analytical method. In addition, Williams measured the nonlinear
actuation properties of the MFC under various loads. There are also
some researches for the application of the MFC to the structure.
Ruggerio et al. (2004), used several MFCs as both actuators
and sensors to measure the dynamic behavior of the inflatable
satellite structure and to control its vibration. The flexibility of the
MFC made for convenient attachment to the doubly-curved surface,
and it was found that MFC outperformed the other actuators.
Schultz and Hyer (2006), used the flexibility and high force
output of the MFC to snap-through an unsymmetric composite
laminate from one stable configuration to the other.
20
Kovalovs et al. (2007), demonstrated experimentally the
application of MFC actuators in vibration control of aluminum beam
and metal music plate. The MFC’S are used, one as an exciter and
other as an actuator. ANSYS was used to model the structures with
thermal analogy for including the piezoelectric actuation.
Ro et al. (2007), adopted a LQR based feedback control strategy
using MFC actuators to suppress the flexural vibration of cycle handle
bar to establish the natural frequencies and mode shapes.
Shon and Choi (2008), used GA to optimally place MFC
actuators on cylindrical aluminum shell and conducted active
vibration control experiments. A Lagrangion based theoretical
formulation was made by them to capture the dynamics of the shell
including the electro-mechanical couplings of MFC actuators.
Kwak et al. (2009), performed theoretical and experimental
investigations on aluminum cylindrical shell vibration control using
the MFC actuators. The theoretical model was developed by them
using Rayleigh Ritz approximation and the strain displace relations
are established based on Donnel-Mushtari theory. First three modes
of the cylinder are successfully controlled by a positive position
feedback, implemented in DS1104.
Rolf Paradies and Paolo Ciresa (2009), implemented Piezoelectric
macro fiber composites (MFCs) actuators into an active composite
21
wing. Dynamic tests were also performed by them on a sandwich wing
of the same size with conventional aileron control for comparison.
Eliza Munteanu and Ioan Ursu (2010), obtained control law
LQG/LTR (Linear Quadratic Gaussian/ Loop Transfer Recovery).The
robustness characteristics of the optimal control LQR (Linear
Quadratic Regulator) are recovered by the Kalman filter applying a
special construction for the estimator.
Alibeigloo and Kani (2010), studied vibration problem of
multilayered shells with embedded piezoelectric layers. An approach
combining the state space method and the differential quadrature
method (DQM) was used for shell vibration control
22
2.5 BUCKLING AND SHAPE CONTROL OF COMPOSITE
CYLINDRICAL SHELL PANELS
Sobels et al. (1976), studied buckling of cylindrical panels under
axial compression. The effect of boundary conditions and panel width
on the axially compressive buckling behavior of un-stiffened, isotropic,
circular cylindrical panels was investigated.
Becker et al. (1982), conducted experimental investigation on the
instability of composite cylindrical panels. A detailed description of
test methods and analytical procedures used to evaluate the buckling
of composite curved panels are presented.
Zhang and Matthews (1983), studied Initial buckling of curved
panels of generally layered composite materials. An initial buckling
analysis for cylindrically curved panels made of generally layered
composite materials was presented. The influence of curvature, fibre
angles, stacking sequence and panel aspect ratios on buckling was
investigated.
Reddy (1984), reported on exact solutions of moderately thick
laminated shells. Static and dynamic behavior of shell was captured.
An extension of the Sanders shell theory for doubly curved shells to a
shear deformation theory of laminated shells was presented.
23
Jun and Hong (1988), presented formulation of the geometrically
nonlinear finite element procedure based on an updated Lagrangian
on the buckling behavior of laminated composite cylindrical panels
under axial compression.
Sheinmany et al. (1992), developed PBCOMP program for buckling
and post buckling of stiffened laminated curved panels. The program
was based on the von Karman kinematic approach and uses the eigen
functions of an isotropic beam in the longitudinal direction and finite
differences in the lateral direction.
Sai Ram et al. (1992), studied hygrothermal effects on the buckling
of laminated composite Plates. The effects of moisture and
temperature on the static instability of laminated composite plates are
investigated.
Geie and Singh (1997), studied some simple solutions for buckling
loads of thin and moderately thick cylindrical shells and panels of
laminated composite material.
Mandal et.al. (2000), conducted experiments on the buckling of
thin cylindrical shells under axial compression. Simple experiments
such as self-weight buckling of thin, open-top, fixed-base, small-scale
silicone rubber cylindrical shells are presented.
24
Girsh, and Ramachandra (2008), studied the stability and
vibration behavior of composite cylindrical shell panels under axial
compression and secondary loads. The influence of initial geometric
imperfection, temperature field, and lateral pressure loads, and
mechanical edge loads on the static response and vibration behavior of
the shell panel.
Himayat Ullah (2009), reported on buckling of thin-walled
cylindrical shells under axial compression. He concluded that the
effects of non-Linearity and geometric imperfections are responsible
for the mismatch between theoretical and experimental results.
Raja et al.(2011) studied the use of surface bonded and embedded
piezoelectric composite actuators through a numerical study by
applying the isoparametric finite element approach to idealize
extension-bending and shear-bending couplings due to piezoelectric
actuations for deflection and vibration control of laminated plates.
2.6 SCOPE OF THE PRESENT WORK
Finite element and many theoretical analysis employed in active
vibration control analysis have been reported on amplitude and shape
control for beams and plates. The active vibration control of shell
structures is still very much limited. There is further scope for
research on developing either analytical or numerical models on
25
composite cylindrical and spherical shells. Macro Fiber Composite
(MFC) produces more induced actuation strain than transerversely
polarized monolithic piezoelectric ceramic patch because of In-plane
poling property of MFC with interdigitated electrodes. Further MFC is
flexible and therefore more suitable to the curved structures.
The review of literature shows that not much attention has been
given to this promising area where MFC actuator was employed for
vibration control of panels and shells. As smart structure concepts are
increasingly exploited in aerospace composite structural systems,
active vibration control is a more promising technology today and with
active materials having distributed actuation and sensing capabilities.
However, all the developed and developing concepts using the new or
existing analytical and numerical models must be experimented to
convert the theoretical concept into a promising technology.
Some experiments were earlier reported on the active vibration
control in the literature using feedback, feed forward and neural
network based controllers. However, there is a need to develop smart
structure concepts to use the piezoelectric actuation effectively to
control different elastic modes (bending or torsion) by properly
selecting the type of control i.e., displacement or velocity.
Displacement control with piezoelectric actuation will stiffen the
structure and bring down the amplitude by shifting the closed loop
system frequency. On the other hand, velocity control develops a
26
resistive force that will help to improve the system damping. Thus by
properly controlling a state (displacement or velocity), a desired
structural response can be enforced on the structural system.
The review of relevant literature has brought the following
observations.
Use of the MFC actuators for directional actuation is efficient
Studies on isotropic beams, plates are successfully
conducted
Beam, plate, triangular shell finite elements are proposed
with MFC actuators
However,
The study on composite shell with piezoelectric composites
(MFC) is very much limited
An efficient electromechanically coupled shell element
validated with experiment may be required
Evaluation of in plane actuation on the vibration of coupled
elastic membrane – bending modes needs further attention
Control of in-plane disturbances (buckled shell shape
control) by piezoelectric actuation needs to be evaluated; so
that the design of wing panels, panel flutter, dynamic
buckling kinds of problems must be addressed
27
Keeping these objectives, a shear flexible field consistent four
noded facet shell element is proposed in the present work. Further a
deep cylindrical shell made of CFRP has been fabricated and
instrumented with three MFC actuators and three PZT patch sensors.
A state feedback LQG controller is implemented in DS1104 DSP board
and both modal and selective control feedback strategies are
demonstrated.