47
C2 to C5 fit up review-R4 1 Review of MC Type C to C assembly clearances with C2 to C5 shell surface interface details 12/19/06 Rev 4
C2 to C5 fit up review-R4 1
Review of MC Type C to C assembly clearances
with
C2 to C5 shell surface interface details
12/19/06
Rev 4
2
Sec - C
C2
C5
1
10
2030
3
Sec – D looking outside
4
Sec - B
C2
C5
30
40
50
5
Sec - A
6
Sec – D looking inside
7
Clamp interference
8
No local interferences with CAD defined services
9
Clamp interference
10
0.323 min CAD clearance
11
0.25 offset of inner surface of poloidal break leaves 0.073” clearance
12
0.25 offset of inner surface of poloidal break leaves 0.073” clearance
Based on final C2 measurements, MC C2 poloidal break extends inward 0.19” along the full surface. See slide 24.
13
Type C2
0.323” min clearance to Interfacing Type C
14
0.624” min clearance to Interfacing Type C
15
MTM metrology data points shown as white points.
Steve’s original metrology data points are red points
Interfacing Type-C wings is shown in overlay with underside surface represented.
16
There are minimum points to inspect but Se141-116-wing-c clearance looks okay with a 0.222” clearance identified at one location. The underside surface of the wing is typical out by +0.025”, leaving a minimum clearance of 0.197”.
0.253
0.294
0.267
0.33
0.247
0.363
0.222
0.575
0.264 0.280.67
Slide taken from review: C2 MTM metrology review-R1
Type C2
Interfacing Type C
wing
0.481
0.448
0.634
0.566
17
Type C2
Interfacing Type C
wing0.221” min clearance
18
Mark up for 1/6” -1/8” grind area
Slide taken from review: C2 MTM metrology review-R1
Additional grinding on Type C2 was done in region shown.
19
The surface offset of pints in the pink area is in the range of +.021” to +.039” except where noted.
The surface offset of pints in the blue area is in the range of +.075” to .102”. Nominal surface cut is .12” Are we deep enough?
Offset of pints in the orange area is in the range of .020” to .037”.
The values shown is the machined surface of the large Wing C male side. It will interface with the surface shown in slide 6.
C to C Side
Outside Large Wing E Side
+.032
+.037
+.041
+.048
+.054
+.052+.067
+.055+.050
+.070
+.054
+.042
+.043
+.038
+.038
+.036
+.039
Slide taken from review: MC C5 review-R1
20
The following slides are full wing and flange scans of C2 and C5
Mike Ducdo data: 120606_c2_wing_scan.IGS. Points shown are centers of 1.5” Ø measurement probe.
21
The as-built surface is generally off by +0.030” with a few front edge point out be +0.050”
120606_c2_wing_scan DATA
22
0.058” MTM 0.061” Duco
0.19” MTM 0.20” Duco 1.18” to C5
0.065” MTM 0.070” Duco
0.03” to 0.04”
0.23” min C to C CAD space
0.03” to 0.05”
General 0.35” C to C CAD space in this area
120606_c2_wing_scan DATA
23
0.23” min C to C CAD space. surface measured data is in the range of 0.0” to +0.01”
120606_c2_wing_scan DATA
24
+0.10” OOT at the root (point indicated)
+0.02” to -.08” surface variation over the remainder of the cut region.
+0.06” Out of Tolerance in the enclosed area.
MC C2 metrology data shown
25
MC C2 poloidal break extends inward 0.19” along the full surface.
MC C2 metrology data shown
26
Based on final measurements of C2 and C5 a gap of +0.033 exists at the poloidal break interface area. Local grinding on this wing is needed to increase the gap.
The C5 small wing geometry is similar to C2 (see slide 30).
27
The as-built surface is generally off in the range of +0.030” to +0.050”
121106_c5_wing_scan DATA
28
0.170” Duco 0.87” to C2
0.20” Duco 1.18” to C2
0.050” Duco 0.42” to C2
0.02” to 0.06”
0.23” min C to C CAD space
0.05”
General 0.35” C to C CAD space in this area
121106_c5_wing_scan DATA
29
0.23” min C to C CAD space. surface measured data is in the range of -0.05”
121106_c5_wing_scan DATA
30
+0.16” OOT at the root (point indicated)
+0.05” to -.02” surface variation over the remainder of the cut region.
+0.06” Out of Tolerance in the enclosed area.
MC C5 metrology data shown
31
MC C5 poloidal break extends inward 0.18” along the full surface.
MC C5 metrology data shown
I though C5 break inner surface was nearly flush… check this.
32
MC C5 metrology data MC C2 metrology data
Surface measures -0.07” to -0.13”
Surface measures -0.13” to -0.17”
Surface -0.02” to +0.14”
Surface -0.05” to +0.15”
33
Measured CAD distance with C2 and C5 located in their translated positions.
Origin (inches) Orientation (degrees) X Y Z About X About Y About ZC1r1 0.00040934 0.00674867 0.00309482 0.00402910 -0.00164692 -0.00234224C2r1 -0.00323208 -0.03096037 0.02236041 0.02613692 0.05253439 0.01904024C3r1 -0.01426276 -0.01285752 -0.02457020 0.03075978 0.03998892 -0.01316786C4r1 0.01163284 0.00620140 0.01452996 -0.03328320 -0.00150808 0.00988164
The movement of C2 and C5 was made using Art’s large motion case (r1) provided in email (FW C1-4 Realignment Coordinate Transformations in ProE nomenclature) dated 10/6/06. C2 was positioned using C2r1 data and C5 positioned using C4r1 data. The translated position is based on the CS0 coordinate system.
34
0.1997” CAD gap
C2
C5
35
0.311” CAD gap
Large wing underside local
surface
C2
C5
36
0.336” CAD gap
Large wing local front nose
surfaceC2
C5
37
0.461” min bladder inner surface CAD gap
Inside surface of bladder pocket
C2
C5
38
0.212” CAD gap
C2
C5
39
0.375” CAD gap
C2
C5
40
0.371” CAD gap
Large wing local front nose surface
C2
C5
41
0.4297” CAD gap
C2
C5
0.443” CAD gap
0.560” CAD gap
0.567” CAD gap
(inside corners)
Side-B
Side-A
Side-A
42
0.311” CAD clearance to underside surface of poloidal break.
Expected gap = .311 -.20 - .06 = +.051”
C2
C5
0.58” at root
+.06” AB
+.2” AB break lower surface
4.35”
43
C2
C5
4.2”
0.387” CAD clearance to underside surface of poloidal break.
Expected gap = .387 -.20 - .06 = +.127”
0.62” at root
44
Post grinding C5
Plane located 4.35” from flange face.
-0.042” red
+0.039” blue
+0.043” blue
-0.047” red
-0.025” red
-0.00” red
45
●
●
●
1. 8 monuments are located on each mating MC, so positioned that they can be seen by the Lica metrology system which has been optimally positioned. The monuments are to be located on stable surfaces where part deflection is minimal.
2. The first MC is positioned on the Stage 2 support stand and secured in place.
3. A reference coordinate system (to be designated ACS0) will be determined through metrology measurement of the first MC, referencing the 8 monuments.
46
47
C2 pt 1
C2 pt 2
C2 pt 3C5 corner
pts
