+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Review Part 1

Review Part 1

Date post: 14-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: travis
View: 19 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Review Part 1. Cognitive Biases. Participation again. Final Exam. 17 December 2013 (Tuesday) 18:30-20:30 In the Gymnasium 20 Questions All short answer 5 marks each Worth 20% of the course grade. Deadlines. Participation due: 10 th of December. Regression fallacy. Pareidolia. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
65
Review Part 1 Cognitive Biases
Transcript
Page 1: Review Part 1

Review Part 1

Cognitive Biases

Page 2: Review Part 1

PARTICIPATION AGAIN

Page 3: Review Part 1

Final Exam

• 17 December 2013 (Tuesday)• 18:30-20:30• In the Gymnasium• 20 Questions• All short answer• 5 marks each• Worth 20% of the course grade

Page 4: Review Part 1

Deadlines

Participation due: 10th of December.

Page 5: Review Part 1

REGRESSION FALLACY

Page 6: Review Part 1

Pareidolia

Page 7: Review Part 1

Patterns

People see patterns where there aren’t any.

Some scientists think this is because it’s better to see too many patterns than too few, so our brains are designed to find patterns wherever possible.

Page 8: Review Part 1

Correlation

Two variables are correlated when the value of one gives you (some) information about the value of the other.

Page 9: Review Part 1

Correlation (but not Causation)

Page 10: Review Part 1

Regression to the Mean

Whenever two variables are imperfectly correlated, extreme values of one variable tend to be paired with less extreme values of the other.

Page 11: Review Part 1

Average of Parents Height

# of Parents # of Children Shorter by

0.67 sd

# of Children Taller by 0.67 sd

Bottom 2% 7 0 142%-9% 45 2 32

9%-25% 80 1 9Middle 50% 219 6 10

75%-91% 50 16 091%-98% 14 29 0Top 2% 4 100 0

Page 12: Review Part 1

Average Phenomenon

Regression is an average phenomenon. It doesn’t mean that any two tall parents will have children who are shorter than them.

It means that the tallest parents will have children who are on average shorter than them.

Page 13: Review Part 1

Regression Fallacy

The regression fallacy is when you attribute a cause to a regression effect.

“We instituted new standards and pollution levels have been dropping since 2004!”

Page 14: Review Part 1

Regression Fallacy

Page 15: Review Part 1

WASON SELECTION TASK

Page 16: Review Part 1

Even vs. Odd

Even numbers: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12…

Odd numbers: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13…

Page 17: Review Part 1

Wason Selection Task

Suppose that I present you with four cards. On each card there is a number on one side and a color (blue or red) on the other. I claim:

If a card has an even number on one side then it is blue on the other side.

Which of the four cards do you need to turn over to tell whether this claim is true or false?

Page 18: Review Part 1

A B C D

Page 19: Review Part 1

Wason Selection Task

Card A doesn’t matter. First possibility:

1. The other side is blue. The claim says if it’s even, then it’s blue. It does not say that if it’s not even, then it is not blue.

Page 20: Review Part 1

Example

True claim: if a student makes an appointment, she can see me in my office.

Does not mean false claim: if a student does not make an appointment, she cannot see me in my office.

Page 21: Review Part 1

Wason Selection Task

Card A doesn’t matter. Second possibility:

2. The other side is red. The claim says even cards can’t be red. It does not say odd cards can’t be red.

Page 22: Review Part 1

A B C D

Page 23: Review Part 1

Wason Selection Task

Card D doesn’t matter. Two possibilities:

1. The other side is even (for example, it’s “4”). The claim says if it’s even, then it’s blue. It does not say that if it’s blue, then it’s even.

Page 24: Review Part 1

Example

True claim: If something is a dog, then it is an animal.

Does not mean false claim: if something is an animal, then it is a dog.

Page 25: Review Part 1

Wason Selection Task

Card D doesn’t matter. Two possibilities:

2. The other side is odd (for example, it’s “3”). The claim says if it’s even, then it’s blue. It does not say that if it’s not even, then it is not blue.

Page 26: Review Part 1

A B C D

Page 27: Review Part 1

Wason Selection Task

Card B is important.

4 is an even number. If other side of card B is red, then the claim is false, because B is a card with an even number on one side but it is not blue on the other side.

You must turn over B and make sure it is not red on the other side.

Page 28: Review Part 1

A B C D

Page 29: Review Part 1

Wason Selection Task

Card C is also important.

If the claim is true, this card must have an odd number on the other side. If it has an even number on the other side, then the claim is false.

You must turn over #3 and make sure there is not an odd number on the other side.

Page 30: Review Part 1

Statistical Results

Around ½ of people studied say “B: 4” and “D: Blue”.

About 1/3 say just “B: 4”.

Only about 1/20 get the right answer: “B: 4” and “C: Red”!

Page 31: Review Part 1

Analysis

People look for results that would agree with the claim.

Turning over B and D, you could get agreement– for example, [4, Blue] and [6, Blue].

You cannot get agreement by turning over C. But you can get disagreement and that is why the card is important!

Page 32: Review Part 1
Page 33: Review Part 1

CONFIRMATION BIAS

Page 34: Review Part 1

Confirmation Bias

People tend to look for evidence that agrees with what they already believe.

This is called confirmation bias.

Page 35: Review Part 1

CONFIRMATION/ DISCONFIRMATION BIAS

Page 36: Review Part 1

Confirmation Bias

People tend to look for evidence that agrees with what they already believe.

This is called confirmation bias.

Page 37: Review Part 1

U.S. Slavery

Page 38: Review Part 1

Slavery Apologist

“No, I haven’t seen the [12 Years a Slave], but I’ve read reviews…

A lot of people were very happy with [slavery/ oppression under communism]. You didn’t have to think much, or take much responsibility. And that suits many of us just fine.” – John Derbyshire

Page 39: Review Part 1

Seeking Confirmation: Sources

Page 40: Review Part 1

Seeking Confirmation: Sources

If you assume someone is untrustworthy, you usually don’t stick around to see what they say, and then later find out whether they were telling the truth or not.

“People tend to grossly underestimate the trustworthiness of other people.” (Fechtenhauer & Dunning)

Page 41: Review Part 1

Disconfirmation Bias

Disconfirmation bias is the tendency to subject evidence against your views to a greater degree of scrutiny than evidence in favor of your views.

It is a double-standard for evidence evaluation.

Page 42: Review Part 1

“Republicans who think they understand the global warming issue best are least concerned about it; and among Republicans and those with higher levels of distrust of science in general, learning more about the issue doesn't increase one's concern about it.” – ChrisMooney

Page 43: Review Part 1

Dunning-Kruger

The Dunning-Kruger effect is when people:

(a) Perform badly because they lack the skills and knowledge for the task.

(b) Think they are performing well because they lack the same skills and knowledge to evaluate themselves.

Page 44: Review Part 1
Page 45: Review Part 1

Motivated Reasoning

"People who have a dislike of some policy—for example, abortion—if they're unsophisticated they can just reject it out of hand," says Lodge. "But if they're sophisticated, they can go one step further and start coming up with counterarguments.“ – Taber & Lodge

Page 46: Review Part 1

Climategate

“In late November 2009, more than 1,000 emails between scientists at the Climate Research Unit of the U.K.’s University of East Anglia were stolen and made public by an as-yet-unnamed hacker. Climate skeptics are claiming that they show scientific misconduct that amounts to the complete fabrication of man-made global warming.” – FactCheck.org

Page 47: Review Part 1

The Smoking Gun

“I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (i.e., from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.”

Using tricks to hide the decline in average global temperature!

Page 48: Review Part 1

What the Researchers Did

• Observed increase in temperature since the 60’s.

• Tree-ring data correlate with rise in temperature until the 60’s. Then they show “decrease” when we actually observe increase.

• Trick: present real data alongside tree-ring data.

Page 49: Review Part 1

BASE RATE FALLACY

Page 50: Review Part 1

Perfect English

• 100% of Westerners write perfect English.• Only 5% of Chinese/ Japanese/ Malaysian/

Indonesian/ Indian/ Pakistani/ Thai/ etc. write perfect English.

Page 51: Review Part 1

This OpenRice review is written in perfect English. What is the probability that the author is a Westerner?• 100%• 95%• 12%

Page 52: Review Part 1

Base Rates

Western population 0.7%

Ethnic Chinese: 93%

Total Non-Western: 99.3%

Page 53: Review Part 1

Demographics

5% of Non-Westerners write perfect English:

So, 5% x 99.3% x 7.155m = 355,245

100% of Westerners write perfect English:

So, 100% x 0.7% x 7.155m = 50,085

Page 54: Review Part 1

Probability Westerner wrote review:

#Westerners with perfect English÷

#People with perfect English

Page 55: Review Part 1

Probability Westerner wrote review:

50085÷

405330=

12%

Page 56: Review Part 1

Importance of Base Rates

The proportion of false positives out of total positives increases:

False Positive÷

False Positive + True Positive

Page 57: Review Part 1

MULTIPLE ENDPOINTS

Page 58: Review Part 1

Multiple Endpoints

One way that our expectations can influence our beliefs is called “the problem of multiple endpoints.”

Page 59: Review Part 1

Fortune Telling

“Your daughter won’t succeed in applications to universities in the northwest and northeast, but she will succeed if she applies to universities in the southwest and southeast.”

Page 60: Review Part 1

Fortune Telling

Obviously, there are lots of ways for this fortune to come true! (2,236 Universities in China)

And, if it’s false, the fortune teller can always cite “other reasons” for the outcome. He can never really be wrong.

Page 61: Review Part 1

Multiple Endpoints/ Comparisons

Page 62: Review Part 1

Dead Fish

Craig Bennett is a neuroscience graduate student. He wanted to test out his fMRI machine, so he bought a whole dead salmon.

He put the dead salmon in the machine and showed it “a series of photographs depicting human individuals in social situations.”

Page 63: Review Part 1

Experimental Design

The salmon “was asked to determine what emotion the individual in the photo must have been experiencing.”

Then Bennett looked to see whether there were correlations between changes in the blood flow in the salmon’s brain, and the pictures.

Page 64: Review Part 1

Correlations!

Unsurprisingly, there were.

16 out of 8,064 voxels (volumetric pixels) were correlated with picture-viewing.

Page 65: Review Part 1

Multiple Endpoints

If there are enough “goals” then there will always be some success.

Low false positives will still result in many positives if you look broadly enough.


Recommended