Date post: | 02-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | leona-ramsey |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 2 times |
2
Alternative to historical cost accounting
The alternative to historical cost accounting is a form of current value accounting, either:
1. Constant purchasing power (CPP) or
2. Current cost accounting (CCA)
3
Alternative to historical cost accounting
Constant purchasing power accounting
1. Accounts figures are adjusted to show all figures in terms of money with the same purchasing power
2. A general price index is used for this3. Figures in the IS and SFP are adjusted by the CPP
factor4. CPP factor = Index at the reporting date / Index
at the date of entry in accounts
4
Alternative to historical cost accounting
Advantages of CPP accounting1. CPP accounting is both simple and objective.
It relies on the standard index2. It adjusts for changes in the unit of
measurement and therefore is a true system of inflation accounting
3. It measures the impact on the company in terms of shareholders purchasing power
5
Alternative to historical cost accounting
Disadvantages of CPP1. Its fails to capture economic substance when
specific and general price movements diverge2. The unfamiliarity of information stated in terms
of current purchasing power units3. CPP does not show the current values (value to
the business) of assets and liabilities4. The general price index used is not necessarily
appropriate for all assets in all businesses
6
Alternative to historical cost accounting
Current cost accounting (CCA)1. It is based on deprival values or value to the business2. Stock and non-current assets are valued at deprival
value3. Monetary assets (cash, receivables, payables, loans)
are not adjusted4. Assets are stated at their value to the business5. Holding gains are eliminated from profit6. Users will be able to assess the current state or recent
performance of the business
7
Alternative to historical cost accounting
Disadvantages of CCA1. Possibility greater subjectivity and lower
reliability than historical cost2. Lack of familiarity3. Complexity4. CCA only adjust values for non-monetary
asset not all assets and liabilities
9
Solution
• Financial statements will generally show a fair presentation when:
1. They conform with accounting standards2. They conform with the any relevant legal
requirements3. They have applied the qualitative
characteristics from the framework
11
Intangible assets
• The objective of IAS 38 is to prescribe the specific criteria that must be met before an intangible asset can be recognised in the accounts
12
Intangible assets
Definition
• An intangible asset is an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance.
• To meet the definition the asset must be identifiable, i.e. separable from the rest of the business or arising from legal rights.
13
Intangible assets
It must also meet the normal definition of an asset:
• Controlled by the entity as a result of past events (normally by enforceable legal rights)
• A resource from which future economic benefits are expected to flow (either from revenue or cost saving)
14
Intangible assets
Recognition To be recognised in the financial statements an intangible
asset must
• Meet the definition of an intangible asset, and
• Meet the recognition criteria of the framework:– It is probable that future economic benefits attributable to the
asset will flow to the entity.– The cost of the asset can be measured reliably.
15
Internally-generated intangibles
The following internally-generated items may never be recognised:
1. Goodwill2. Brands3. Mastheads4. Publishing titles5. Customer lists
17
Purchased intangibles
• If an intangible asset is acquired in a business combination, the fair value of that asset at the date of acquisition is taken.
• The determination of that fair value is easy if an active
market exists, otherwise it may be necessary to take the price the entity would have paid in an arm’s length transaction.
• Any intangible which cannot be measured reliably in an acquisition has to be included in goodwill.
18
Internally-generated intangibles
• It is impossible to separate the costs of internally-generated intangibles from the normal costs of running and developing a business, so these intangibles cannot be measured reliably.
20
Internally-generated intangibles
Brands:
1. The accounting treatment of brands has been a matter of controversy for some years.
2. IAS 38 intangible assets has now ended the controversy by stating that internally-generated brands and similar assets may never be recognised
21
Internally-generated intangibles
3. Expenditure in internally-generated brands cannot be distinguished from the cost of developing the business as a whole, so should be written off as incurred.
4. Where a brand name is separately acquired and can be measured reliably, then it should be separately recognised as an intangible non-current asset and accounted for in accordance with the general rules of IAS 38.
22
Example – Intangible classification
Q: How should the following intangible assets be treated in the financial statements?
1. A publishing title acquired as part of a subsidiary company
2. A licence purchased in order to market a new product
23
Example – Intangible classification
1. A publishing title acquired as part of a subsidiary company
Answer: The answer depends on whether the asset can be
valued reliably. If this is possible, the title will be recognised at its fair value, otherwise it will be treated as part of goodwill on acquistion of the subsidiary
24
Example – Intangible classification
• A licence purchased in order to market a new product
Answer: • As the licence has been purchased separately
from a business, it should be capitalised at cost
25
Measurement of intangible assets
Measurement after initial recognition
There is a choice between
1. The cost model
2. The revaluation model
26
Measurement of intangible assets
The cost model
• The intangible asset should be carried at cost less amortisation and any impairment losses
• This model is more commonly used in practice
27
Measurement of intangible assets
The revaluation model
• The intangible asset may be revalued to a carrying value of fair value less subsequent amortisation and impairment losses.
• Fair value should be determined by reference to an active market.