Revised Appropriate Assessment for A0239-01 Carna and Environs · 16-Dec-08 11 10 0.6 4 2.9 0.58 3...

Wexford County Council

Revised Appropriate Assessment for A0239-01 Carna and Environs

Page 1 of 30

Revised Appropriate Assessment for A0239-01 Carna and

Environs

Table of contents

Management of Site............................................................................................... 2

Description of Project........................................................................................... 2

Assessment of Significance ................................................................................. 7

Stage 2 Assessment .................................................................................................. 8

Qualifying Interests.................................................................................................. 8

Habitats .................................................................................................................... 9

Fauna / Fauna......................................................................................................... 10

Wildfowl.................................................................................................................. 10

Site Conservation Objectives............................................................................ 11

Background data.................................................................................................... 12

Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 13

Impact prediction ..................................................................................................... 13

Cumulative Impacts .................................................................................................. 15

Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................ 19

Effect of mitigation measures .......................................................................... 21

Appendix ..................................................................................................................... 23

NWPS Site Synopsis – Carnesore Point .......................................................... 23

WFD Slaney Estuary Water Management Unit Action Plan ....................... 27

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 2 of 30

Management of Site

The Carna agglomeration and its discharge are neither directly connected

nor necessary to the management of the Carnsore Point Nature Conservation

Sites.

Description of Project

A description of the waste water works and the activities carried out

therein:

The Carna Agglomeration is serviced by Carna Waste Water Treatment

Plant, which is located adjacent to the public toilets at Carna Beach. The

plant treats the waste water generated from the public toilets, 4 local

houses, the local shop and the St Vincent De Paul respite centre only, which

is solely domestic in nature. There are currently no plans in place to either

increase the existing plant size or to modify the treatment process.

The sources of emissions from the waste water works:

There is one single discharge from the Carna Waste Water Treatment Plant

which is the Primary Discharge point (SW1), which discharges treated

effluent to St Georges Channel, just below the low water mark.

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 3 of 30

There are no reports of either noise or odour complaints originating from

the plant.

The nature and quantities of foreseeable emissions from the waste

water works into the receiving aqueous environment as well as

identification of significant effects of the emissions on the environment:

The plant is designed to cater for a population equivalent of 125P.E. or 7.5Kg

of BOD daily with a 25/35 discharge standard. Based on the calculated

plant PE of 97, the estimated dry weather flow is 16.19 cubic meters/day,

assuming 167 l/head/day. There are no plans to increase the plant beyond

its current size.

The proposed technology and other techniques for preventing or, where

this is not possible, reducing emissions from the waste water works:

There are currently no proposals with regard to the above.

Further measures planned to comply with the general principle of the

basic obligations of the operator, i.e., that no significant pollution is

caused:

It is Wexford County Councils intention to continue to operate and maintain

the existing plant to ensure that the above obligations are met.

Measures planned to monitor emissions into the environment:

Wexford County Council will monitor the final effluent, in accordance with

our monitoring regime (4 times per year). This work is undertaken on behalf

of Wexford County Council by an independent ILAB accredited laboratory.

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 4 of 30

The contract for this testing is renewed every three years by open

procurement. The current contract is with Environmental Services Limited,

Acorn Business Campus, Mahon Industrial Park, Blackrock, Co. Cork. The

current contract has just been renewed for a period of 3 years and thus the

contract will have to be re-tendered under open procurement regulations in

January of 2012.

Process Description

Plant process description

The Carna Waste Water Treatment plant was constructed in conjunction with

the public toilets in the 1970s, the plant was upgrade in 2006 with secondary

treatment installed, utilising the existing primary settlement tank located at

public toilets adjacent to the beach.

The plant is designed to cater for a population equivalent of 125P.E. or 7.5Kg

of BOD daily with a 25/35 discharge standard. Based on the calculated

plant PE of 97, the estimated dry weather flow is 16.19 cubic meters/day,

assuming 167 l/head/day. There are no plans to increase the plant beyond

its current size.

All flows of waste water to the plant are by gravity. Flow enters the site at

manhole No. 1, from which flow enters the primary settlement tank where

gross solids are allowed to settle (settled sludge is removed and disposed by a

tanker as required, approximately every 16 weeks). This settlement process

removes approximately 40% of the Total Suspended Solids and 30% of the

Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) loading. (The primary settlement tank is

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 5 of 30

equipped with a bypass, which in case of a blockage of the inlet to the PST,

diverts flow around the PST to the outlet Manhole of the PST.

The outlet manhole of PST is divided into 2 sections, the first section accepts

flow of settled Waste Water from the outlet of the PST and diverts it to the

forward pumping Station, from where it is delivered to the forward feed

station.

The forward feed station is equipped with 2 number submersible pumps which

operate as duty/standby and these pump flow to 2 number RBC units which

operate in parallel. The use of 2 number parallel units is required due to the

very large variation in loading between off peak winter months and peak

summer loading, with 1 unit removed from operation in off peak period.

The RBC’s principle mode of operation is extended aeration, where the

biological activity is carried out by the biological growth on the surface area of

the discs, with the oxygen being provided by the rotation of each disc, with

1/3rd of each disc being submerged and 2/3rd of each disc rotating in air at any

one time.

The RBC unit is equipped with a settlement zone, where the suspended humus,

resulting from biological activity in the RBC, is allowed to settle. Settled final

effluent is then discharged (by displacement). The humus sludge settlement

zone is equipped with a sloping floor and a sludge return settlement pump which

automatically, routinely returns sludge to the primary zone of the RBC.

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 6 of 30

From the RBC units the secondary treated effluent is combined and returns to

the second section of the outlet manhole where it discharges via the outfall to

St George’s Channel.

Summary of results

The table below outlines effluent results from the Carna WWTP, as can be

seen from the results, the standard of effluent is good, and exceeds the

plant design standard of 23/35.

Chemical

Oxygen

Demand

Suspended

Solids

Total

Phosphorous BOD

Total Oxidised

Nitrogen(TON)

Ortho

Phosphate

Total

Nitrogen Ammonia

Total

Kejdahl

Nitrogen

O2 P O2 N03-N P N NH3-N N

Sample

Date mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l

28-Feb-07 12 12 1.6 3 4.54 0.43 5 0.067 0.46

09-May-07 43 1 4 15 17.86 3.08 20 0.17 2.14

09-Aug-07 60 18 8.2 11 15.96 7.33 25 0.68 8.36

10-Jun-08 85 < 1 7.4 5 27.2 3.59 29 0.794 1

15-Jul-08 13 16 10.9 5 21.1 5.19 33 0.58 11.3

16-Dec-08 11 10 0.6 4 2.9 0.58 3 0.117 < 1

17-Dec-08 12 4 0.5 < 4 2.21 0.5 5 0.215 2.6

11-May-09 < 8 < 1 0.85 < 2 6.27 0.71 6.6 0.279 < 1

04-Aug-09 27 10 4.23 < 2 14 3.7 17 1.2 1.8

Additional comments

This application does not propose nor seek approval for any additional civil

works (excavation, construction, intrusion works etc) nor modification of the

treatment process or site activities, nor expansion of the discharge beyond

its current capacity and committed loading.

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 7 of 30

Therefore, the only potential source of any possible impact on Carnsore

Nature Conservation Sites is solely from the discharges to the aquatic

environment.

Additionally, the discharge, as outlined above, is pre-existing, with the

current discharge point in position since the 1970s, therefore, it would be

fair to infer that, as the original discharge preceded the site designation,

requirements for knowledge of the existence of the development by, and

consultation with, all interested parties have been met.

Assessment of Significance

Assessment as per Circular Letter L8/08 Appendix 1:

1. Is the development in a nature conservation site? No.

2a. Is the development in the surface catchments of a nature

conservation site? Yes.

The area at the point of discharge is on the boundary of the Carnsore

Point SAC, Site Code 002269;

2b. Is the development in the groundwater catchments or within 5Km of a

nature conservation site? No.

3. Are the qualifying habitats and species of the site water dependant?

Yes.

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 8 of 30

Designation is based on geological and ecological importance of the

sand/mud flats and off-shore reefs, both of which are listed in Annex

1 of the EU habitats Directive and which can be classified as water

dependant;

4. Not Applicable

5. Is there a WFD sub-basin plan for the site or its protected

habitats/species? Yes

WFD Ballyteige Bannow Management Unit Plan Action Plan

6. This plan cover all potential receptors (habitats and species) Yes

Conclusion

Therefore in line with L8/08 screening addition assessment is required

based on WFD plan

Stage 2 Assessment

Qualifying Interests

The NPWS Site Synopsis for Carsore states

“

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 9 of 30

Habitats

• Inter-Tidal Mudflats/ Sand flats

This habitat is primary confined to area of site which is located by

moderately exposed shore at Carne beech

The lower shore is dominated by the bivlve moosusc (Angelus tenuis) and

crusteracea ( Portumnus Laptipes and Crangon crangon), the mid-shore is

predominately populated by ploychaete worms and the burrowing amphipod,

Batyporeia pelagica

While in the upper region living under drift algae is to be found talirid

amphipods.

Reefs

The site has a number of both inert-tidal and sub tidal reefs, which typically

are strewn with boulders, cobbles and patches of sand

The inter – tidal reefs located to the east of Carsore point are moderately

exposed to wave action, and have extensive areas of granite

The communities to be found in this region are typical for this habitat type

The upper shore is populated with junior barnacles,, the limpet Pettella

Vulgara and Top Shell Osilinu lineatus

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 10 of 30

While the mid shore is dominated with knotted wrack (Asophyllum nodossum)

with the epiphyte (Polysiphonia lanosa)

The lower shore line population is predominately Fucus serratus and

occasional LAminainaria digitata and grren algae Cladohhora Rupestris

Sub-tidal reefs which are exposed to wave action is general are populated

with Mytilus edulis, Alaria esculenta and the Corallina officanalas . In

shallow water less exposed to wave action are populated by kelp park

Laminaria hyperborean , with sponges, hydroids and bryozoans

The reefs of deeper waters in excess of 10m, are dominated by sea squirts

Polyclinum aurantium with the bryozoan Flusta foliacea. While in waters at

23m low lying rocks surrounded with course sand is covered with the bivalve

Musculus discora.

Fauna / Fauna

The site is not designated for either Annex 1 / Annex 11 floral / Faunal

species additionally it is not noted for existence of any other rare of

protected species.

Wildfowl

This is not designated as a Special Protected Area (SPA).

Shellfish

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 11 of 30

The nearest designated shellfish waters, namely Wexford Harbour Outer is

located in excess of 16Km northwest of the point of discharge SW1.

Site Conservation Objectives

Unfortunately the NPWS, as yet, have not completed and issued a

Conservation Management Plan for the Canrsore SAC

However, this report envisages that the possible conservation objectives of

this site can be summarised as follows:

1. Maintain the range of habitats within the site;

2. Prevent loss of surface area of habitats within the site;

3. Ensure no reduction in area or distribution of habitats;

4. Ensure that individual operations or activities, combined with other

operations or activities, do not cause a change in typical species

composition in more than 25% of the area occupied by each of the

principle community types;

5. Ensure that the water quality in the site is of sufficient quality to

maintain the integrity of the principle aquatic community type and

ensure sufficiently large habitat of suitable quality is available to

support the long term survival of species associated with the habitat.

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 12 of 30

The only potential conflict with the above assumed conservation objectives

is the possible effects of the discharge on the aquatic environment and its

dependant qualifying habitats and their supported Floral and Faunal species.

Background data

Plant effluent results for Carna WWTP are outlined above, these results

demonstrated that the plant is operational while within design limits

The WFD Ballyteige Bannow Management Unit Plan Action Plan, (which

encompasses the actual point of discharge and majority of the designated

area,) assesses that there is no risk or potential for impact on water quality

resulting from Carna WWTP.

Receiving Waters Quality

The WFD assessment of status and impact is outlined below.

STATUS/IMPACTS

Overall

status

30 RWB - 6 Good, 21 Moderate, 3 Poor Status. There are no lakes.

Status

elements

Q score dictates status in all but 2 monitored WBs, Phys Chemical dictates

status for 1 good WB and Hydromorph and Phys Chemical reduce a good WB

to moderate (Assaly River at Finoge Bridge). Phys Chemical status high or

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 13 of 30

good elsewhere where monitored.

Status was extrapolated for 24 sites. Chemical status is not monitored.

Possible

Impacts

- EPA

Water

Quality

2004

Sow -(SE_12_2504 - Status 09 -Moderate based on Q Score); Generally

satisfactory ecological condition in 2007 apart from in the upper reaches.

Clear signs of nutrient enrichment with abundant macrophyte growth.

Tinnokilla Stream (SE_12_2565 -Status 09 - Moderate); The Tinnokilla

stream was in an unsatisfactory ecological condition in 2007. Excavation

works in the area suspected.

Conclusion

Given the quality of effluent been discharged, and as the WFD Ballyteige

Bannow WMU does not assess Carna WWTP nor it discharge as either posing

a direct nor potential impact to water quality

It is assessed that the discharge from Carna is not impacting on receiving

water quality and as such is thus not impacting on water quality of

designated area.

Thus the development does not in any way impede nor does not conflict with

the conservation object of the Nature Conservations sites

Impact prediction

Inter-Tidal Mudflats/ Sand flats

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 14 of 30

While this habitat could be impact if there was physical intrusion or

substantial reduction in water quality .

Given that there is no physical intrusion, the quailtiy of effluent discharge

and assessment of WFD plan

It is assessed that there is no potential for impact on this habitat as a

result of the Carna discharge SW1

Reefs

While this habitat could be impact if there was physical intrusion or

substantial reduction in water quality.

As there is no physical intrusion and that there is no reduction in water

quality predicted resulting from Carna discharge SW1.

It is assessed that there is no potential for impact on this habitat as a

result of the discharge.

Protected Fauna / Flora

While the sites is not designated for the presence of list Annex II / Annex

species, nor does not contain other rare or protected species.

The occurring species could be impacted by a reduction in water quality.

Given that there is no reduction in water quality predicted, it is assessed

that the Carna discharge SW1 does not pose a potential impact for resident

species.

Wildfowl

Not applicable ..

Shellfish

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 15 of 30

Given that the nearest designated shellfish waters are in excess of 16Km

from discharge SW1 and that WFD WMU Slaney Estuary assess that Carna

WWTP does not pose a risk

It is assessed that there is no potential for impact on these designated

areas as a result of the Carna discharge SW1

Cumulative Impacts

The NPWS site synopsis for Carnsore Point 00269 does not cite any

cumulative impacts for the designated area.

The WFD Slaney Estuary WMU plans assessment of cumulative impacts are

outlined below

For i

nspe

ction

purp

oses

only.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40


Revised Appropriate Assessm

ent for A0239-01 Carna and Environs

Page 16 of 30

PRESSURES/R

ISKS

Nutrient

sources

78% of TP is Diffuse, 65% of which is from Agriculture.. 22% of TP comes from WWTP.

Point

pressures

14 WWTPs - Ballagh - Village; Ballaghkeen - Hse Est; Ballyhogue; Ballymurn; Bree; Castlebridge WWTP;

Crossabeg; Galbally, Wexford; Glenbrien; Murrintown - JP Park;

Piercetown WWTP; Tagoat Wexford, Oilgate

40 Section 4s – 19 Private Companies, 3 Construction Companies, Lodge, 7 Property Development

Companies(1), Golf & Leisure Resort,2 Hotels, Car Sales, Architects, 2 Financial Consultancy, Community

Centre, Building Contractor, School.

4 IPPC- Metal Manufacturing Company, Engineering Company, Pig Farm, Manufacturers.

2 WTP's - Wexford Treatment Works and Kilmallock Treatment Works.

2 EPA Licensed Waste Facilities

Wastewater

Treatment

Plants

(WWTP) and At Risk WWTP’s (refer to Action Table):

Castlebridge WWTP

Piercetown WWTP

Murrintown - JP Park

For i

nspe

ction

purp

oses

only.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40




Page 17 of 30

Industrial

Discharges

Oilgate

Wexford

Ballymurn

Rosslare Strand WWTP

Galbally, Wexford

Ballaghkeen - Hse Est

Tagoat

2 Section 4s are at risk due to lack of assimilative capacity for BOD and nutrients

IPPC – not at risk

Quarries,

Mines

&

Landfills

There are 9 quarries, no mines and 1 landfill but no waterbodies at risk.

Agriculture The majority of the area of the WMU is at risk from Agriculture

On-site

systems

There are 6579 septic tanks in this WMU, 2324 are at risk.

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40




Page 18 of 30

Forestry

No waterbodies at risk from forestry

Dangerous

substances

No waterbodies at risk from Dangerous Substances.

Morphology 1 waterbody at risk due to Channelisation - SE_12_851(River Sow Drainage District, pre 1945

channelisation)

Abstractions 12 abstractions - 3 waterbodies at risk - SE_12_2334, SE_12_2504 and SE_12_3

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 19 of 30

Conclusion

As the WFD Ballyteige Bannow Water Management Unit action does not assess

Carna WWTP and its discharges as posing cumulative effect (pressure point) on

the water body which encompasses the designated area it is assessed that the

discharge from Carna is not having a cumulative impact on the site nor it’s

qualifying interest

Mitigation Measures

While there is no measured or predicted, either direct or cumulative impacts on

the nature conservation site, arising from Carna Discharge SW1

The only direct mitigation measure currently in place is to limit connections to the

WWTP, available capacity to insure no decline in the current position.

Additional mitigation measures with regards to cumulative effects are outlined

below, based on WFD Slaney Estuary Water Quality Management Unit Action Plan

In addition the Wexford Harbour Outer Pollution Reduction programme, has been

developed and implemented

The introduction and implantation of both of these plans will not only insure that

there is no increase in direct / cumulative impacts, but the impacts shall be

reduced and the required restoration objects achieved

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 20 of 30

SELECTED ACTION PROGRAMME

NB All relevant basic measures, general supplementary measures and SEA mitigation measures apply

Point

Sources

POINT SOURCE:

WWTP – Refer to table below

INDUSTRY – Examine the terms of discharge authorisations to determine whether they

require review for the purpose of compliance with water body objectives including protected

area objectives and environmental quality standards.

Diffuse

Sources

AGRICULTURE – Good Agricultural Practice Regulations and Enforcement.

ON-SITE SYSTEMS - Inspection of on-site systems in at-risk areas to ensure that treatment

systems are adequate and maintained to prevent pollution of waters. Consider connection to

municipal sewerage systems based on inspections and economic tests.

Other MORPHOLOGY - SE_12_851 will require Channelisation Investigation to

determine impact of drainage works.

OTHER: Protection of drinking water, abstraction control and future licensing.

Measures included in Shellfish Pollution Reduction Programmes under the

Shellfish Directive.

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 21 of 30

Effect of mitigation measures

Inter-Tidal Mudflats/ Sand flats

While there is no predicted potential from either direct or cumulative impacts on

this habitat nor it’s species resulting from the Carna discharges.

The implementation of these mitigation measures will insure that direct impacts

will not occur and the cumulative impacts shall be reduced.

Reefs

As there is no predicted either direct or cumulative impacts on theses habitats

resulting from Carna Discharge, the implementation of these measures will insure

that no future impacts will occur from Carna discharges and that the cumulative

effects shall be reduced

Protected Fauna / Flora

While the sites is not designated for the presence of list Annex II / Annex I

species, nor does not contain other rare or protected species and the occurring

species could be impacted by a reduction in water quality.

The implementation of theses measures will insure that no future impacts shall

occur and that cumulative effects shall be reduced

Wildfowl

Not applicable ..

Shellfish

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:40



Page 22 of 30

While there are direct or cumulative impacts resulting from Carna discharges on

designated shellfish waters.

The implementation of these measure will insure no future impacts will occur and

that cumulative impacts shall be reduced

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:41



Page 23 of 30

Appendix

NWPS Site Synopsis – Carnesore Point

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:41



Page 24 of 30

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:41



Page 25 of 30

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:41



Page 26 of 30

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:41




Page 27 of 30

WFD Slaney Estuary Water Management Unit Action Plan

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:41




Page 28 of 30

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:41




Page 29 of 30

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:41




Page 30 of 30

Fo

r ins

pecti

on pu

rpos

es on

ly.

Cons

ent o

f cop

yrigh

t own

er req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 27-07-2013:00:22:41

Date post:	10-Feb-2021
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

Revised Appropriate Assessment for A0239-01 Carna and Environs · 16-Dec-08 11 10 0.6 4 2.9 0.58 3...

Documents