Date post: | 16-Feb-2017 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | subrata-saha |
View: | 71 times |
Download: | 1 times |
PowerPoint Presentation
Applying Deep Learning to Finite Element Model Calibration Research Intern: Subrata SahaAdvisor: Zheng Yi Wu
2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Needs for Model CalibrationAdequately represent conditions of in-service infrastructuresAbove- and underground infrastructure systemsAssess infrastructure performance Functionality, capacity, serviceability, safety and deficiency etc.Support decision-making for proactive maintenance Be preventive instead of reactive
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated What is it?Start with initial model, e.g. design modelAdjust model parameters to minimize goodness-of-fit scoreChallenges: intensive computationsFE SolverAdjust parametersGoodness-of-fit scoreStop?Initial modelMeasured responsesCalibrated model
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Apply Surrogate ModelConstruct a meta-model (approximation), e.g. deep learning, or CMS Replace FE full analysis to Improve iterative calibrationFE SolverAdjust parametersGoodness-of-fit scoreStop?Initial modelMeasured responsesCalibrated modelSurrogate solver
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Apply Deep Learning SolutionInput parametersFE Model Solver
Goodness-of-fitInput parametersPrediction (DBN DLL)
Goodness-of-fit
Training DatasetDBN Training
Trained Model
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated (1) UCLA factor building model (2) 60 decision variables - 30 for elasticity - 30 for stiffness (3) 1357 beams (4) 30 groups
Dataset
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated
CommandCombined OutputInstance Generation RequestInstance GeneratedTraining Set GenerationInput variables:60Output:Goodness-of-fit scoreTraining dataset6,00012 hours
1. Generate random number using uniform distribution within a certain range for each of the decision variables2. Compute score using FE solver
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated DBN Prediction Accuracy
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated DBN Prediction Accuracy
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated DBN Prediction Accuracy
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Comparison between FEM and DBN Calibrator RMS error: 0.304611778
DBN Calibration
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Scores from FEM and DBN Calibrator given top solutionDBN Calibration
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated DBN Tune CalibrationRMS error: 0.306776256
Comparison between FEM and DBN Tune Calibrator
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Scores from FEM and DBN Tune given top solutionDBN Tune Calibration
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Calibration Time
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Trial vs Fitness Score
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Trial vs Time
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Software
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Thank You!
# | WWW.BENTLEY.COM | 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated