Revive vet Quality assurance tools

http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/

Quality assurance criteria for integration of ICT in VET and CVET

Estela DaukšienėVytautas Magnus University

Leonardo da Vinci TOI project REVIVE VET - Reviewing and Reviving VET practices


Revive VET project aims

The project aims to contribute to quality assurance systems' development by reviewing and reviving VET and CVET practices applying innovative ICT integration methodologies and

building VET professional online quality communities.


ConsortiumNo. in

projectAbbreviation Organization full name (in English) Country code

P0. VDU Vytautas Magnus UniversityLT

P1. EFQUEL European Federation for Quality in E-LearningBE

P2. BUTE/BME Budapest University of Technology and EconomicsHU

P3. SCIENTER SCIENTER Soc. Cons. a R.L.IT

P4.LieDM

associationLithuanian Association of Distance and E. Learning

LT

P5. KMPPMC Kaunas Food Industry and Trade Training CentreLT

P6. FFE Fondo Formación EuskadiES

P7. EDEN European Distance and E-Learning NetworkUK


Project results (1)

• Quality criteria identified for ICT integration on – Institutional level, –Curriculum level, –Professional skill development level and –Overall quality assurance process (national

level);• Templates available at -

http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/quality-criteria/



Project results (2)

• Case development methodology adapted to VET sector;

• Peer review methodology adapted to VET sector;

• Training material on application of adapted case development, peer review methodologies and Revive methodology;


Project results (3)

• Tools for self-assessment, case development and peer review on – Institutional level, –Curriculum level, –Professional skill development level and

• 32 developed cases in the areas and levels selected.


Revive VET solutions

• First step to describe a responsible integration of ICT in an educational institution

• Quality criteria for TEL integration on institutional, professional skill development and curriculum levels

• Development of expert community for TEL integration into an institution

• Opening up TEL integration cases for peer reviewing



Quality criteria for ICT integration on Curriculum level:

SELF-ASSESSMENT, CASE DEVELOPMENT, AND PEER REVIEW

TOOL

AIM – assessing and reviewing ICT integration on curriculum level – i.e. course or learning/study

module


www.reviveproject.eu/vet/quality-criteria/



Tool structure

• Assessment summary• 4 Groups of criteria:

A. Didactic pedagogical part (A1-A6)

B. Information technologies part (B1-B6)

C. Overall structure, language and design (C1-C6)

D. Learning organization (D1-D4)

• Each group – 4-6 criteria


Tool structure

• Each criterion is explained by subcriteria


Tool structure

• sub-criterion are supported by descriptions


Tool structure

• It is also explained how to reach each of the criterion


Tool structure


Tool structure


Quality criteria for curriculum designGROUP A. DIDACTICAL/

PEDAGOGICAL PART (A1 - A6)A1. Definition of competences and learning objectives is

measurable

A2. Variety of learning methods used

A3. Assessment strategies clearly and measurably presented

A4. Open Educational Resources used and learners encouraged to re-use them

A5. Assignment description clear and to the point

A6. Experiential validity ensured (practical application to professional practices)


Quality criteria for curriculum designA.Didactical/pedagogical part,

A1 criterion


Diactical part – A2


Didactical part – A3






B. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES


B. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

• B1. Navigation and external links• B2. Publishing tools• B3. Group work and active learning tools employed• B4. Assesment, self-assesment and assignment tools• B5. Glossary of terms• B6. Recorded lectures and tools to support virtual

classroom


C. OVERALL STRUCTURE, LANGUAGE AND DESIGN





• C1. Soundness, clarity of writing, grammar• C2. Clarity of organization and suitability for the

target group• C3. General esthetics• C4. Copyright issues• C5. Logical structure and flexible learning path

possibility• C6. Bibliography and study resources


Quality criteria for curriculum design D. LEARNING ORGANIZATION

D1. Interactivity


D1. Interactivity


D2. Learning support, eTutoring


D2. Learning support, eTutoring


D3. Workload and schedule


D. LEARNING ORGANIZATION (D1-D4)

• D1. Interactivity• D2. Learning support, eTutoring• D3. Workload and schedule• D4. Learner feedback


The tools are available at

• Revive VET project website – http://www.reviveproject.eu/vet/quality-criteria/

• You’re welcome to use them

• Or join us at EDEN Nap area

Thank you


Date post:	18-Jul-2015
Category:	Education
Upload:	estela-dauksiene
View:	84 times
Download:	2 times