+ All Categories
Home > Documents > RFID as a Platform for Growing U.S. Consumer Charge … $ 151.6B ... – Opportunity to integrate...

RFID as a Platform for Growing U.S. Consumer Charge … $ 151.6B ... – Opportunity to integrate...

Date post: 02-May-2018
Category:
Upload: ledieu
View: 216 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
23
Ponte Vedra Beach, FL October 2003 SMART CARD ALLIANCE CONFERENCE – SMART CARDS IN MOTION RFID as a Platform for Growing U.S. Consumer Charge Volume This document is confidential and is intended solely for the use and information of the client to whom it is addressed.
Transcript

Ponte Vedra Beach, FLOctober 2003

SMART CARD ALLIANCE CONFERENCE – SMART CARDS IN MOTION

RFID as a Platform for Growing U.S. Consumer Charge Volume

This document is confidential and is intended solely for the use and information of the client to whom it is addressed.

1

Top five things that you will never hear from a consultant…

1. Everything looks okay to me

2. I can't take the credit - it was Ed in your marketing department

3. I don't know enough to speak intelligently about that

4. How about paying us based on the success of the project?

5. This whole strategy is based on a Harvard business case I read

2

Growth in Credit Card Charge Volume

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001

Gro

wth

Rat

e

Source: UBS Warburg Equity Research, Federal Reserve Bank, Cardweb.com, Blue Chip Economic Indicators

Avg. Card Growth ‘91-’95:

15.9%

Avg. Card Growth ‘96-’01:

11.6%

The U.S. credit card industry is experiencing slowing growth in charge volumes and new accounts...

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.5

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 20010%

1%

2%

3%

Card Industry Mailings and Response Rates

Ann

ual m

ail V

olum

e (in

BB

)

Annual R

esponse Rate

= Annual Mail Volume

Source: UBS Warburg Equity Research, BAI Mail Monitor

= Annual Response Rate

3

… and is facing increasing competition from emerging payment technologies and new intermediaries in the market

Card issuers traditionally own the consumer relationship

Traditional Relationship Marginalized Relationship

Card Not In Relationship

Source: Booz Allen Hamilton

Activity around alternative payment models that exclude cards

Some momentum is evident in wireless

Intermediary payment devices marginalize the Card issuer’s role

These devices are gaining share with convenience transactions

Potential for new entrants to issue payment devices

??

Issuing Bank Issuing Bank

4

Despite targeting cash-to-card conversion for years, 19% of U.S. consumer purchases are still cash …

Source: The Nilson Report; Concord EFS; Salomon Smith Barney

Durable Goods12%

Housing20%

Medical Care15%

Recreation4%

U.S. Consumer PurchasesTotal: $6.7 Trillion

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis,

Food14%

Clothing5%

Energy Purchases

3%Other

Non-Durable8%

Transportation

4%

Other Services

16%

Method of PaymentMethod of Payment

Majority of payments by U.S. consumers remain paper-based (65% by check or cash)– 46% Check– 19% Cash– 29% Credit/Debit Cards– 4% Electronic

Majority of payments by U.S. consumers remain paper-based (65% by check or cash)– 46% Check– 19% Cash– 29% Credit/Debit Cards– 4% Electronic

5

…and sizable, cash and transaction intensive merchant segments exist

U.S CASH PAYMENTSIN SELECT INDUSTRIES

Quick Serve Restaurants

$133.4B

Movie Theatres$7.58B

Movie and Video Game

Rental$10.6B

TOTAL: $151.6B

CommentsComments

Total size of the U.S quick serve restaurant, movie theatre, and movie/game rental industries is $160B……with cash transactions accounting for ~95% of the value– Fast food consumption ~

7% card penetration– Movie theaters ~ 12% card

penetration

Total size of the U.S quick serve restaurant, movie theatre, and movie/game rental industries is $160B……with cash transactions accounting for ~95% of the value– Fast food consumption ~

7% card penetration– Movie theaters ~ 12% card

penetration

Source: Concord EFS; Salomon Smith Barney; Celent Communications

6

Penetrating these merchant segments and capturing these cash transactions requires extending the current card platform

Opportunity for Cash ConversionOpportunity for Cash Conversion

Big ticket purchases have been driven to card– Consumers like convenience,

financing, and float– Merchant margins can support

fees

Current platform has been less successful in capturing smaller dollar value transactions– Cash has speed, convenience

appeal– Merchants resist paying for card

fees and infrastructure

Big ticket purchases have been driven to card– Consumers like convenience,

financing, and float– Merchant margins can support

fees

Current platform has been less successful in capturing smaller dollar value transactions– Cash has speed, convenience

appeal– Merchants resist paying for card

fees and infrastructure

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

$0 $5 $10 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $500

Card Penetration by Transaction Size

Transaction Amount (in $)

% C

redi

t/Deb

it C

ards

Source: Paying with Plastic, Evans & Schmalensee; Visa’s Payment Systems Panel Study Booz Allen

Cas

h-C

ard

Thre

shol

d

7

RFID technology is a market-proven and economical way to extend the current payment platform and grow card volume

Opportunity for RFIDOpportunity for RFID

Market-proven in initial rollouts (e.g., tolls, gas retailers, mass transit)

Technical standards are established

Low(er) cost technology

Durable and low maintenance -no battery required

Market-proven in initial rollouts (e.g., tolls, gas retailers, mass transit)

Technical standards are established

Low(er) cost technology

Durable and low maintenance -no battery required

What is RFID?What is RFID?

Radio Frequency identification (RFID) technology is a method for wireless transmission of data between a remote tag and a reader

– Tag holds payment identity (e.g., account number, instructions)

– Antenna activates tag and receives data

– Data processor completes transaction and links to back-end systems

Radio Frequency identification (RFID) technology is a method for wireless transmission of data between a remote tag and a reader

– Tag holds payment identity (e.g., account number, instructions)

– Antenna activates tag and receives data

– Data processor completes transaction and links to back-end systems

RFID TAG ANTENNA &TRANSCEIVER

DATA PROCESSO

R

8

Over 20M households in the U.S use RFID to make payments and a number of pilots and trials are underway today

Over 20M U.S households use RFID to make payments today– 6M+ RFID payment fobs issued in the

United States…– …with 4M+ active and occasional users– 25M+ RFID toll transponders in the U.S

Multiple products and payment pilots and trials underway today to include:– American Express – ExpressPay– Commerce Systems – 2Scoot– ExxonMobil – Speedpass– FreedomPay– MasterCard – Paypass– …

DemographicDemographic

Average HH income

Average HH income

Use RFIDUse RFID

$62,800$62,800

Average ageAverage age 4646

MarriedMarried 53%53%

No RFIDNo RFID

$46,700$46,700

5151

52%52%

Children <18 yrs old

Children <18 yrs old

39%39% 23%23%

College degreeCollege degree 39%39% 28%28%

Technology optimist

Technology optimist

61%61% 48%48%

FemaleFemale 53%53% 54%54%

Source: Forrester Research, Tower Group

RFID Payment User Profile

9

Issuers, merchants, and consumers in the U.S market show high interest/openness to RFID enabled products

Valu

e A

dd o

f “C

hip”

High

Low High

Stakeholder Demand

Low

• Proximity Payments

• Couponing

• e-cash• Chip-Based

Loyalty

• Data Storage• Id/Authenticate• Ticketing• Host-Based Loyalty

Primary Application On Device/Card Stakeholder DemandStakeholder Demand• Was there a strong interest in the

functionality with the applicable stakeholders?

• What is the urgency in the stakeholder population to use the functionality?

Value Add of “Chip”Value Add of “Chip”• What is the benefit of using chip

or RFID technology in delivering the functionality?

• Can comparable results be achieved using magnetic stripe or bar code alternatives?

IncreasingAttractiveness

Source: Booz Allen analysis

10

RFID appears to offer a clear value proposition for all key constituencies

Issuers

Merchants Consumers

11

RFID can offer merchants tangible benefits – reduced operating costs, incremental revenue, information capture mechanism

Reduced operating costs/improved operational efficiency– Speed of throughput at the register - time savings with key chain RFID fobs

can average 5-8 seconds per user/per transaction – in some cases can be as high as 15 seconds per transaction – note that production must be able to keep up

– Reduced cash handling – reduces fraud, employee time required to process cash

Incremental revenue– Increased consumer spending - average transaction volume (up to) 20-30%

higher for purchases via an RFID wand vs. cash purchases -anecdotally number of visits is also higher for RFID users

– Opportunity to acquire new customers/differentiate

Customer information capture– Easy gathering of data on user’s buying habits– Opportunity to integrate into a loyalty program/targeted marketing program

12

RFID offers consumers payment convenience and a new way to make payments

Convenience– Reduces “hassle factor” of physically opening wallet and searching for

payment card or cash to pay for transaction– No worry about not having enough cash to pay for purchase– Need to carry less cash and make fewer trips to the ATM– Easier to manage and track cash expenditures– Easier use of merchant loyalty programs

Novelty appeal– Form factor of payment devices (wand, card, watch, integrated into cell

phone/other personal devices)– “Wave vs. swipe” appeal

13

RFID enabled payment solutions provides issuers with the opportunity to acquire new customers with a differentiated product and drive incremental revenues

New/incremental interchange revenues– Cash conversion– Increased usage

Opportunity for product differentiation

Improved customer acquisition and retention– RFID payment users compare favorably to the general population

14

To reach its full potential the RFID operating model needs to evolve beyond today’s brand exclusive/closed loop environment

RFID programs today are designed to drive loyalty for the device issuer– Limited acceptance– Closed loop networks– Limited/no platform interoperability

57% of non-users don’t have RFID because they don’t know any company that offers it

Introduction of multiple, national/regional single brand RFID networks will reduce consumer convenience and at some point begin to dilute the value of the platform

ProgramProgram

Speedpass/ ExxonMobilSpeedpass/ ExxonMobil

AcceptanceAcceptance

ExxonMobil, selected McDonalds, Stop & Shops

ExxonMobil, selected McDonalds, Stop & Shops

Smartrip/ Washington Transit

Smartrip/ Washington Transit

Transit fares and parking at stations

Transit fares and parking at stations

E-ZPassE-ZPass Toll collection – DE, MA, NY, WVA, MD, NJ, PA

Toll collection – DE, MA, NY, WVA, MD, NJ, PA

Source: Forrester Research

ILLUSTRATIVE

ILLUSTRATIVE

15

Category exclusive merchant coalitions are the likely next step in the evolution of RFID payments - some may have bigger plans

Single BrandSingle Brand Merchant CoalitionsMerchant Coalitions

Network Based Acceptance

Network Based Acceptance

• Single brand owns and operates the payment network

• Payments only accepted by the device issuer

• Key challenge – value proposition and scale

• Category exclusive multi-merchant coalitions

• Payments are accepted by all merchants within coalition

• May evolve within a given location or geography (I.e., Orlando or merchants located at a Washington Metro station) or more broadly

• Key challenge – building and managing merchant coalition

• Broad(er) acceptance across merchants within a given payment network

• Likely driven by closed loop network issuers or issuers with strong acquiring businesses

• Key challenge – POS costs and transaction pricing

16

There are a number of challenges to operating Merchant Coalitions

ProgramProgram

Branding of the service offering

Ownership of customer information and opportunity to cross-sell

Responsibility for the customer experience

Trade-off between good merchant customer and bad credit risk

Branding of the service offering

Ownership of customer information and opportunity to cross-sell

Responsibility for the customer experience

Trade-off between good merchant customer and bad credit risk

Potential OutcomesPotential Outcomes

3rd party (potentially issuers and/or processors) manage coalitionsPayment network owner spins out the RFID processing and servicing business3rd party (potentially issuers and/or processors) manage coalitionsPayment network owner spins out the RFID processing and servicing business

17

Efforts to drive RFID acceptance will likely focus on convenience brands/merchants

Source: External interviews; disguised client data; Booz Allen analysis

Rewards to increase frequency of purchase of non-essential, small ticket items Low High

Low

HighA

vera

ge T

icke

t

Frequency of Usage

Chip Applications for Merchant SegmentsILLUSTRATIVE

ILLUSTRATIVE

Entertain-ment

MassTransit

Super-markets

DepartmentStores

Gas

VendingGift &Paper

Books

Fast Food

Airlines

Health-care

Office Supply

Loyalty to prevent share shift to competitors between infrequent purchases

Use of chip to capture cash/check volume for frequent, small ticket purchases

Cross-sell and up-sell by leveraging affinity to establishment for frequent, big ticket sales

CasualDining

SportsCarDealers

Key App: Loyalty

Key App: CouponingKey App: Proximity/Contactless Payment

Key App: Data Storage

18

While there are a number of items to consider in structuring a RFID payment product four key factors stand-out

Card transmits an identification number which is subsequently linked to a user account or card vs. card transmitting the actual account number

Data Transmission

Data Transmission

Form FactorForm Factor

Payment PlatformPayment Platform

Shape of the product – key fob, attached to a consumer’s electronic device (cell phone, PDA), integrated into a card with a magnetic stripe, embedded into another device (I.e., wrist watch) - implications for portability, theft, fraud etc

Stored value (on network or on card)

Device linked to a debit or credit card

Authorization and Payment Processing

Authorization and Payment Processing

Real-time vs. batch authorization and processing

Chip-based vs. network based authorization

Other controls i.e, usage caps, spending limits etc

19

We see four fundamental processing models (with permutations) – each with differing costs, complexity and transaction times

Real-time Card Processing

TIME

Customer waves device

to start transaction

Customer waves device

to start transaction

Request sent to Issuer for

approval

Request sent to Issuer for

approval

Merchant gets approval and finishes sale

Merchant gets approval and finishes sale

Transaction confirmation sent to Issuer

Transaction confirmation sent to Issuer

Sale complete

Customer waves device

to start transaction

Customer waves device

to start transaction

Request sent to Issuer for

approval

Request sent to Issuer for

approval

Merchant gets approval and finishes sale

Merchant gets approval and finishes sale

Sale complete

Transactions aggregated and sent to

Issuer

Transactions aggregated and sent to

Issuer

Customer waves device

to start transaction

Customer waves device

to start transaction

POS reader accepts dataPOS reader accepts data

Sale complete

Transactions aggregated and sent to

Issuer

Transactions aggregated and sent to

Issuer

T0 6 seconds 15 secondsSource: Concord EFS, Booz Allen analysis

Real-time Authorization,

Batched Processing

Batch Authorization

and Processing

Customer waves device

to start transaction

Customer waves device

to start transaction

POS checks card balance

and debits sale

POS checks card balance

and debits saleSale

complete

Transactions aggregated and sent to

Issuer

Transactions aggregated and sent to

IssuerStored Value

POS recharges card if needed

(100msec)

POS recharges card if needed

(100msec)

RFID Processing Model Options

20

Looking forward we are optimistic around the potential for RFID enabled consumer payments in selected merchant segments…

U.S. Market Scenarios

Low

Hig

h

Low High

Competitive Activities and Market Demand

Bus

ines

s C

ase

and

Mar

ket R

eadi

ness

LOOKING FOR DEMAND

ADOPTION

AND GROWTH

DIES OUTEXPERIMENTATIO

N

Source: Booz Allen analysis

RationaleRationale

Meets un-met needs with a compelling value proposition across key stakeholders– Issuer – incremental revenue and

customers– Merchant – improved customer

service and lift at point of sale– Consumer – increased convenience

Success of Speedpass and anecdotal information coming out of other multi-merchant U.S RFID trials initially encouraging

Proven, low cost technology solution that is simple to operate

21

…however there are still a number of barriers to address

Merchants

– Historical resistance to accepting cards for convenience transactions

– Need to upgrade (or install) POS to accept RFID payments

Consumers

– Overcoming consumer concerns/ reluctance around security and data privacy

– Changing consumer payment behavior

Issuers

– Evolving the operating model and extending acceptance

– Potential competition with card-based payment products

– Transaction pricing for the merchant

57

29

24

23

14

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

I don't know any company ororganization that offers one

I don't like ot pay for services inadvance

I am concerned that the tag wouldget stolen

I am concerned that I will losecontrol of my personal information

I know companies that offer RFIDbut I don't do business with them

“Why haven’t you used RFID to pay for products and services”

Source: Forrester Research

22

Contact InformationContact InformationDavid Owen

Principal, U.S. Financial Services

Booz Allen Hamilton101 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10178

(212)551 6642 (office)(646)734 6094 (mobile)[email protected]

David OwenPrincipal, U.S. Financial Services

Booz Allen Hamilton101 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10178

(212)551 6642 (office)(646)734 6094 (mobile)[email protected]


Recommended