Korea-Australia Rheology Journal March 2010 Vol. 22, No. 1 75
Korea-Australia Rheology JournalVol. 22, No. 1, March 2010 pp. 75-80
Ribbing instability in rigid and deformable forward roll coating flows
Je Hoon Lee1, Sang Kwon Han
2, Joo Sung Lee
3, Hyun Wook Jung
1,* and Jae Chun Hyun1
1Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-713, Korea2POSCO, Surface Technology Research Group, Gwangyang 545-090, Korea
3LG Chem/Research Park, Daejeon 305-380, Korea
(Received December 2, 2009; final version received February 2, 2010)
Abstract
Dynamics and ribbing instability for Newtonian and viscoelastic liquids have been investigated in both rigidand deformable forward roll coating flows. Especially, the role of viscoelasticity of coating liquids and rolldeformability or hardness on the coating flow has been scrutinized. Coating thickness at steady uniformstates and wavelength and severity at unstable ribbing states have been measured, incorporating thicknessmeasurement device and two-roll coating equipment. Relationship between wavelength and severity in rib-bing instability strongly depends on the viscoelasticity as well as other operating conditions such as cap-illary number, coating gap, and roll deformability. Coating windows demarcating uniform and ribbinginstability are considerably reduced by increasing viscoelasticity and decreasing roll deformability. In otherwords, ribbing is aggravated as the viscoelasticity of coating liquids that can generate the extensional prop-erty in film splitting region rises or roll deformability decreases, leading to higher severity and narrowerwavelength.
Keywords : ribbing, forward roll coating, wavelength, severity, viscoelasticity, roll deformability, coating
window
1. Introduction
Various coating processes have currently been involved
in many industries manufacturing flat panel displays, sec-
ondary batteries, multi-purpose films, Cr-free steel prod-
ucts, solar cells and fuel cells. The main purpose of the
coating technology is to produce continuous or intermit-
tently patterned coating layers of desired uniform thickness
by optimally controlling stability and dynamics in coating
flow regimes (Cohen and Gutoff, 1992; Kistler and Sch-
weizer, 1997; Weinstein and Ruschak, 2004). It is actually
difficult task to maintain uniform coatings at high speeds
because coating processes are inevitably subject to unex-
pected disturbances, affecting the productivity of coating
products and processability. Many kinds of flow instabil-
ities or defects such as leaking, air entrainment, ribbing,
cascade, rivulet, barring, etc. are frequently observed in
coating flows (Gutoff and Cohen, 1995). Numerous impor-
tant theoretical and experimental facts on flow behaviors
and instabilities in coating flows have been explored by
many researchers in both industry and academia, however,
there exist many unresolved issues in this area, for
instance, role of viscoelasticity on coating flows, compli-
cated flow dynamics in multilayer coatings, high-speed
coating technology for productivity enhancement, etc
(Coyle, 1984; Kistler and Scriven, 1984; Benjamin, 1994;
Gutoff and Cohen, 1995; Carvalho, 1996; Dontula et al.,
1997; Dontula, 1999, Gaskell et al., 2001; Benkreira et al.,
2002). As polymeric liquids or suspensions or slurries to be
coated are being diversified and specified, it is indispens-
able to elucidate the rheological aspects of coating liquids
for the environment-friendly drying process to efficiently
evaporate solvent and for enhancement of the product
quality (Dontula, 1999).
In this study, forward roll coating processes, which have
been conventionally used for quite a long time, have been
revisited, among many possible coatings to be employed in
industries such as slot, slide, curtain, air-knife, and roll
coatings. Roll coating is characterized by the use of one or
more gaps or nips between rotating rolls to meter and apply
a coating liquid to web or substrates. Fig. 1 exhibits a basic
schematic diagram of two-roll rigid and deformable for-
ward roll coatings. Many researchers experimentally and
theoretically exploited flow dynamics and ribbing insta-
bility in forward roll coating processes (Mill and South,
1967; Middleman, 1977; Fall, 1978; Greener et al., 1980;
Gokhale, 1981; Savage, 1984; Castillo and Patera, 1997;
Carvalho and Scriven, 1997, 1999; Hao and Haber, 1999;
Benkreira et al., 2002; Chong et al., 2007). Coyle (1984)*Corresponding author: [email protected]© 2010 by The Korean Society of Rheology
Je Hoon Lee, Sang Kwon Han, Joo Sung Lee, Hyun Wook Jung and Jae Chun Hyun
76 Korea-Australia Rheology Journal
systematically solved roll coating dynamics using two-
dimensional Navier-Stokes equation. Carvalho and Scriven
(1997, 1999, 2003) eloquently developed novel simulation
for deformable roll coating flow. Also, ribbing instability,
which is a regular cross-web variation, for various coating
liquids has been experimentally elucidated in the literature
(Hasegawa and Sorimachi, 1993; Varela Lopez et al.,
2002; Chong et al., 2007; Han et al., 2009).
Albeit important aspects on the forward roll coating flow
have been established, the role of viscoelastic nature of
coating liquids on flow behavior and instability has not
been fully understood yet. In this study, based on preceding
results by Han et al. (2009), steady and unsteady flow
behaviors in both rigid and deformable forward roll coat-
ings have been investigated, focusing effects of the vis-
coelasticity of several coating liquids and roll deformability
or hardness. Considering rheological properties of coating
liquids, final wet coating thickness at steady states and
wavelength and severity for ribbing information at unstable
states have been correlated with the use of flow visual-
ization apparatus.
2. Experiments
Newtonian (a mixture of 90 wt% glycerin and 10 wt%
water (N)) and two viscoelastic liquids (addition of
200 ppm (P1) and 500 ppm (P2) of Polyacrylamide
(PAAm, 5,000,000 Mw) in the Newtonian liquid) are con-
sidered in the forward roll coating experiments. Rheolog-
ical properties for these liquids are fully reported in Han et
al. (2009), exhibiting that they give the same constant
shear viscosity (0.163 Pa.s) and surface tension (about
65 mN/m), and viscoelastic liquids as Boger fluids possess
elastic property by a small amount of PAAm. From fil-
ament breakup time data of coating liquids via the CaBER
experiment (Han et al., 2009), it has been found that strain
hardening extensional property in polymer solutions is
larger than Newtonian case.
Cr-coated rigid roll and deformable rolls with hardness
35 and 60 specified by Shore durometer (e.g., deformable
roll with hardness 35 is softer than 60 one.) have been
implemented for two-roll forward coating experiments
shown in Fig. 1. Their diameter is 136 mm. The wet coat-
ing thickness is measured by a thickness sensor (IFD-2401,
Micro-Epsilon Co.) with submicron accuracy (0.04 µm
resolution) which uses a confocal measurement principle.
Because the polychromatic light source of this device is
only focused on a spot of roll surface, wet thickness under
stable conditions has been averaged within 3% tolerance
error from data measured for 30 seconds at different roll
positions. It should be also noted that maximum and min-
imum thicknesses at unstable ribbing state for estimating
the severity have been more carefully recorded, since a rib-
bing pattern slightly moves from side to side, keeping
nearly constant amplitude and wavelength. Wavelength of
ribbing is captured using Camscope or DSLR Camera.
Distance between peaks (or troughs) of a regular ribbing
are also calculated from pixels of digital image data, prov-
ing that the averaged wavelength taken from over
5 pictures at a given experiment are reliable within 5% tol-
erance error. Steady and unsteady flows have been
observed by changing coating gap between two rolls from
100 to 400 µm and roll speed from 0 to 40 m/min.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Coating thickness profile at steady statesWet coating thickness on the roll surface in downstream
flow regime under stable conditions is measured using IFD-
2401 in real-time. Fig. 2 displays wet film thickness profile
of Newtonian and viscoelastic coating liquids depending on
Capillary number ( , η: shear viscosity, V: roll
speed, σ: surface tension, Ca is defined as ratio between
viscous and surface tension forces.), minimum gap between
rolls, roll deformability, and viscoelasticity. As Ca (e.g., roll
speed) and coating gap increases, wet thickness is raised
due to the increase of flow rate of coating liquids pene-
trating film splitting region (i.e., converging-diverging gap
region). As depicted in Fig. 2a, the roll deformability sig-
nificantly affects wet film thickness under small gap con-
dition. Coating liquid can easily pass through the film
splitting region with large gap (e.g., 400 µm here), regard-
less of roll deformability or hardness, resulting in the same
wet film thickness (i.e., same flow rate) at different roll
deformability cases. The flow rate of coating liquid pen-
etrating the film splitting region is of course running down
with decreasing coating gap. In this case, the wet film thick-
ness by more deformable roll operation is larger than that
Ca ηV σ⁄≡
Fig. 1. Schematic diagrams of two-roll coating process with (a)
rigid rolls and (b) rigid and deformable rolls.
Ribbing instability in rigid and deformable forward roll coating flows
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal March 2010 Vol. 22, No. 1 77
by less deformable or rigid one. It is also worthwhile to note
that the reason why the range of Ca to measure wet film
thickness is different with the coating gap is closely related
with the occurrence of unstable ribbing instability, which is
featured by cross-web variation.
Fig. 2b substantiates that a small portion of viscoelastic
polymer in coating liquids can dramatically changes flow
behavior, albeit coating liquids to be adopted here gives the
same shear viscosity. From the results, it has been found
that the viscoelasticity makes the wet film thickness thin-
ner, resulting from elastic or extensional stress in film split-
ting region. Reduction of film thickness (or flow rate) by
viscoelastic nature might be due to the significant exten-
sional viscosity by a small amount of polymer in coating
liquids in upstream film splitting region (i.e., converging
flow domain).
3.2. Coating windowsOperability coating windows for both Newtonian and
viscoelastic coating flows have been established with gap-
to-diameter ratio (H0/D, H0: minimum gap between two
rolls, D: diameter of roll) and capillary number (Fig. 3).
Neutral curve for the Newtonian liquid for two-roll rigid
case, demarcating uniform state and ribbing instability, is
almost in agreement with those introduced in the previous
reports (Gokhale, 1981; Carvalho and Scriven, 1999; Don-
tula 1999; Chong et al., 2007). Fig. 3a displays that the sys-
tem is more stable with increasing gap-to-diameter ratio and
decreasing Ca and also more deformable roll expands the
stable uniform regime. This stability tendency might be
related to flow rate data under same conditions. In other
words, as described in the previous section, deformable roll
increases flow rate of coating liquids penetrating the narrow
converging-diverging film splitting regions under the same
operating conditions, leading to stabilizing the system.
As illustrated in Fig. 3b, the viscoelasticity makes the
system more unstable, aggravating the ribbing instability.
The destabilizing effect of the polymer solution might be
Fig. 2. (a) Effect of roll deformability on wet thickness in New-
tonian case and (b) effect of viscoelasticity on the wet
thickness using deformable roll with 60 roll hardness.
Fig. 3. (a) Effect of roll deformability on the stability in New-
tonian case and (b) effect of viscoelasticity on the stability
using deformable roll with 60 roll hardness.
Je Hoon Lee, Sang Kwon Han, Joo Sung Lee, Hyun Wook Jung and Jae Chun Hyun
78 Korea-Australia Rheology Journal
caused by the reduction of flow rate due to the high elastic/
extensional property of polymer coating liquids in
upstream and downstream film splitting regimes, compar-
ing with Newtonian case. From the theoretical ribbing cri-
terion introduced in the literature (Gokhale, 1981; Castillo
and Patera, 1997; Carvalho and Scriven, 1997), ribbing
instability inevitably occurs in forward roll coating systems
due to the always positive pressure gradient at downstream
meniscus. Ribbing can be readily seen under the condition
inducing the large positive pressure gradient. It is also
believed that from the experimental facts of this study, the
viscoelasticity makes the pressure gradient in the down-
stream more positive (Hao and Haber, 1999; Gaskell et al.,
2001; Benkreira et al., 2002; Zevallos et al., 2005). Fig. 4
shows examples of ribbing instability under various oper-
ating conditions.
3.3. Wavelength and severity of ribbing To further clarify the ribbing instability, its wavelength
and severity have been scrutinized as delineated in Figs. 5
and 6. The wavelength decreases by increasing Ca and
decreasing roll deformability and coating gap for New-
tonian liquid from Figs. 5a and 5b. Also, the viscoelasticity
of polymer solutions leads to the decrease of wavelength
(Fig. 5c) in comparison with Newtonian case under the
same conditions. Considering the operability coating win- dows, it has been revealed that the system with shorter
Fig. 4. Examples of ribbing for liquid P2 at (a) Ca=0.33 in 400 m
coating gap and (b) Ca=1.2 in 100 m coating gap (60 roll
hardness).
Fig. 5. Effects of (a) coating gap for Newtonian liquid (60 roll
hardness), (b) roll deformability for Newtonian liquid, and
(c) viscoelasticity of coating liquids (60 roll hardness) on
the wavelength of ribbing instability.
Ribbing instability in rigid and deformable forward roll coating flows
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal March 2010 Vol. 22, No. 1 79
wavelength is more unstable, although the wavelength of
ribbing does not change so much at high Ca regime.
To predict reliable severity of ribbing, we tried to mea-
sure maximum and minimum thickness along with roll
width direction during ribbing state using thickness mea-
surement device. Severity data, defined as 2(Tmax−Tmin)/
(Tmax+Tmin), will decisively represent the intensiveness of
ribbing instability or non-uniformity of coating layer. From
Figs. 6a and 6b in the Newtonian case, the increase of the
coating gap and roll deformability makes the severity
lower. It is noted that there is no dependence on the roll
deformability of the severity for large coating gap (e.g.,
400 µm here), indicating that the role of roll deformability
is meaningful only in small positive or squeezing negative
gaps. Above severity and wavelength data are well
matched with each other, implying that the shorter wave-
length, the larger severity. Furthermore, the increase of the
viscoelasticity gives rise to the larger severity due to the
aggravation of the ribbing instability in contrast to New-
tonian case.
4. Conclusion
Forward rigid and deformable roll coating experiments
have been performed employing Newtonian and viscoelas-
tic polymeric liquids. Based on fundamental results by Han
et al (2009), more refined information on ribbing insta-
bility has been further elucidated in this study, focusing the
role of roll deformability and viscoelasticity of coating liq-
uids on dynamics and stability in roll coating systems. Wet
film thickness at steady states and wavelength and severity
at ribbing states have been connected with process con-
ditions such as capillary number (or roll speed), coating
gap, roll deformability (or hardness), and viscoelasticity.
Wet coating thickness decreases as coating gap or softness
of the roll decreases and the viscoelastic nature rises. Espe-
cially, a small amount of polymer in coating liquids with
same shear viscosity plays a key role in reducing the wet
film thickness, generating the higher elastic or extensional
property in film splitting region. Also, the viscoelasticity
aggravates the ribbing instability and then curtails the coat-
ing window, leading to larger severity and smaller wave-
length in comparison with Newtonian case.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by research grants from the
Seoul R&BD program and POSCO company. Also, the
support of the KOSEF (R01-2008-000-11701-0) is grate-
fully acknowledged.
References
Benjamin, D.F., 1994, Roll Coating Flows and Multiple Roll Sys-
tems, Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota.
Benkreira, H., M.F. Edwards and W.L. Wilkinson, 2002,
Fig. 6. Effects of (a) coating gap for Newtonian liquid (60 roll
hardness), (b) roll deformability for Newtonian liquid, and
(c) viscoelasticity of coating liquids (60 roll hardness) on
the severity of ribbing instability.
Je Hoon Lee, Sang Kwon Han, Joo Sung Lee, Hyun Wook Jung and Jae Chun Hyun
80 Korea-Australia Rheology Journal
“Dynamic wetting in metering and pre-metered forward roll
coating,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 57, 3025-3032.
Carvalho, M.S., 1996, Roll Coating Flows in Rigid and Deform-
able Gaps, Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota.
Carvalho, M.S. and L.E. Scriven, 1997, Deformable roll coating
flows: Steady and linear perturbation analysis, J. Fluid Mech.,
339, 143-172.
Carvalho, M.S. and L.E. Scriven, 1999, Three-dimensional sta-
bility analysis of free surface flows: Application to forward
deformable roll coating, J. Comput. Phys., 151, 534-562.
Carvalho, M.S., 2003, Effect of thickness and viscoelastic prop-
erties of roll cover on deformable roll coating flows, Chem.
Eng. Sci., 58, 4323-4333.
Castillo, M. and A.T. Patera, 1997, Three-dimensional ribbing
instability in symmetric forward-roll film-coating processes, J.
Fluid Mech., 335, 323-359.
Chong, Y.H., P.H. Gaskell and N. Kapur, 2007, Coating with
deformable rolls: An experimental investigation of ribbing
instability, Chem. Eng. Sci., 62, 4138-4145.
Cohen, E.D. and E.B. Gutoff, 1992, Modern Coating and Drying
Technology, VCH Publishers, New York.
Coyle, D.J., 1984, The Fluid Mechanics of Roll Coating, Ph.D.
thesis, University of Minnesota.
Dontula, P., M. Parsquali, C.W. Macosko and L.E. Scriven, 1997,
“Can extensional viscosity be measured with opposed nozzle
devices,” Rheol. Acta., 36, 429-448.
Dontula, P., 1999, Polymer Solutions in Coating Flows, Ph.D.
thesis, University of Minnesota.
Fall, C., 1978, Surface ribbing of a thin viscous fluid from
emerging from a spreader or roller, Trans. ASME., 100, 462-
466.
Gaskell, P.H., N. Kapur and M.D. Savage, 2001, Bead-break
instability, Phys. Fluids, 13, 1243-1253.
Gokhale, V.V., 1981, Bounds for region of ribbing instability in
some free surface coating flows, J. Rheol., 25, 421-432.
Greener, J., T. Sullivan, B. Turner and S. Middleman, 1980, Rib-
bing instability of a two-roll coater: Newtonian fluids, Chem.
Eng. Commun., 5, 73-83.
Gutoff, E.B. and E.D. Cohen, 1995, Coating and Drying Defects,
John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Han, S.K., D.M. Shin, H.Y. Park, H.W. Jung and J.C. Hyun,
2009, Effect of viscoelasticity on dynamics and stability in roll
coatings, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics, 166, 107-110.
Hao, Y. and S. Haber, 1999, Reverse roll coating flow, Int. J.
Numer. Meth. Fl., 30, 635-652.
Hasegawa, T. and K. Sorimachi, 1993, Wavelength and depth of
ribbing in roll coating and its elimination, AIChE J. 39, 935-
945.
Kistler, S.F. and L.E. Scriven, 1984, Coating flow theory by finite
element and asymptotic analysis of the Navier-Stokes system,
Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 4, 207-229.
Kistler, S.F. and P.M. Schweizer, 1997, Liquid Film Coating,
Chapman & Hall, New York.
Middleman, S., 1977, Fundamentals of Polymer Processing,
McGraw-Hill, New York.
Mill, C.C. and G.R. South, 1967, Formation of ribs on rotating
rollers, J. Fluid Mech., 28, 523-529.
Savage, M.D., 1984, Mathematical model for the onset of rib-
bing, AIChE J., 30, 999-1002.
Varela Lopez, F., L. Pauchard, M. Rosen and M. Rabaud, 2002,
Non-Newtonian effects on ribbing instability threshold, J. Non-
Newtonian Fluid Mech., 103, 123-139.
Weinstein, S.J. and K.R. Ruschak, 2004, Coating flows, Ann.
Rev. Fluid Mech., 36, 29-53.
Zevallos, G.A., M.S. Carvalho and M. Pasquali, 2005, Forward
roll coating flows of viscoelastic liquids, J. Non-Newtonian
Fluid Mech., 130, 96-109.