Date post: | 20-May-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | nasapmc |
View: | 13,602 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Deferred Maintenance Reduction Plan
Steve RiderFacilities Engineering and Real Property Division
NASA Headquarters Office of InfrastructureFebruary 2011
Agenda
• Why we did the analysis• Background• Analysis• Conclusions
2
Why did we do this analysis?An Extract from the 2008 NASA Authorization Act: (a) In General- In order to sustain healthy Centers that are capable of
carrying out NASA’s missions, the Administrator shall ensure that adequate maintenance and upgrading of those Center facilities is performed on a regular basis.
(b) Review- The Administrator shall determine and prioritize the maintenance and upgrade backlog at each of NASA’s Centers and associated facilities, and shall develop a strategy and budget plan to reduce that maintenance and upgrade backlog by 50 percent over the next five years.
(c) Report- The Administrator shall deliver a report to Congress on the results of the activities undertaken in subsection (b) concurrently with the delivery of the fiscal year 2011 budget request.
3
BACKGROUND
4
5
Time (or Service Life)
Ad
eq
ua
te
Per
form
ance
(o
r C
on
dit
ion
)
Ina
de
qu
ate
New Facility
Replace facility.
Average Performance Curve for an inventory with full sustainment
More rapid deterioration due to inadequate sustainment, and subsequent loss of service life.
Repair necessary to bring facility to an acceptable condition.
Recapitalization Investments: Addresses obsolescence, modernization, revitalization by replacement.
Facility Life-Cycle Performance Curve
Background
Background• NASA uses and reports “Backlog” as Deferred
Maintenance (DM)• DM is estimated by:
– Third party contractor estimates condition of 9 systems for each facility
– Facilities are categorized into 42 different building types– Each system’s condition is estimated and given a rating of
1- 5 (5 = very good)– Formula to calculate DM includes building type, system
condition, and Current Replacement Value– Formulas are based upon curves extracted from the Corps
of Engineers builder program 6
Background
• Facilities Resources ($) Available:– Construction of Facilities (CoF)– Facilities Maintenance (Center Management)– Recapitalization– Demolition
7
Background
• This presentation used data newer than when we submitted the report for Congress
• The new data presented some revisions to our original analysis, but not our basic conclusions
• Out-year estimates and data were removed due to the public nature of this venue
8
ANALYSIS
9
NASA DM 2010 by System
10
DM 2007-2010(by Center)
11
All facilities (active and inactive)
12Total Agency DM: $2.55 B all facilities
$2.0 B active facilities
Deferred Maintenance
Active Facilities Only
Condition 2007-2010
13
All facilities (active and inactive)
Condition 2007-2010
14
Active facilities only
15
Current Replacement Value (CRV)
Bill
ion
s $
As of Oct 2010
16
Average Facility Age
(As of Nov 2009)
17
Do
llars
in M
illio
ns
CoF Funding 2006-2011(Procurement Only)
(American Reinvestment and Recovery Act)
18
Maintenance and Repair (M&R)
*M&R is the recurring day-to-day work required to preserve facilities in such a condition that they may be used for their designated purpose over an intended service or design life.
$Mill
ions
Not corrected for inflation
Estim
ated
DM/CRV (%)
19Measured Rate of DM Change Over Time CurveMeasured Rate of DM Change Over Time Curve
All Facilities
2020
DM/CRV (%)
20Measured Rate of DM Change Over Time CurveMeasured Rate of DM Change Over Time Curve
Active Facilities
• Facilities organizations are managing the Agency’s assets the best they can with the resources provided
• The reduction in DM/CRV (%) is primarily due to demolition and secondary new construction
• DM overall has leveled off, but has increased a bit over last year
• With recapitalization funding, it may actually start downward
Analysis Conclusions
21
Five-Year Plan Recommendations
• Our recommendation to OMB and Congress was to continue down our chosen path (steady as she goes)
• As stated earlier, this updated review has not changed that conclusion
• We will continue to measure and monitor our facilities condition and trends
• We’re doing OK
22
QUESTIONS??
23