Riparian Ecology ManagementStudy (REMS)
Washington Dept. of Ecology, Lacey, WA U.S.A / J. Janisch and W. Ehinger
WA DNR project: determine best management for small non-fish basins. if buffers, what design?• last state forested flowing water type• fish streams, amphibians, small mammals,
invertebrates high in watershed
TEMPERATURE, PART IIAIR (+ a little water)
• flower pots w/camo paint, vents• sensor suspended by string• ~1.5 m above forest floor • along stream, ~2-5 m off-channel
-so inside buffer, stream bubble-and multiple sensors per stream
• also mainstem and transects
EXPECTED TO MAKE MORE HEADWAY BUT
DIFFICULT
SO, TOUR THE DATA
EXAMPLES, ALL RAW DATA—JUL AND AUG
design
• DNR LANDS, 8 STANDS TOTAL• LATERAL STREAMS, SEASONAL AND PERENNIAL • BACI: REF CC FIX (ie, continuous) VAR
• AIR TEMPERATURE ONLY MONITORED IN 6• TEMP COLLECTION TO CONTINUE 2+ YEARS
POST-HARVEST• DRYING, INTERIOR STAND TEMP, TRT RESPONSE• DOES AIR TEMP TRANSLATE INTO WATER TEMP?
Type 5 by definition seasonal
Type 4/5: bfw<2ft; with or without well-defined channels andareas of perennial and/or seasonal seepage.
Two regions: Black Hills ~inland (70km)Willapa Hills ~coastal (25 km)
• 3 stands /region
HW network
M
Washington, USA N
WEIR
CHANNEL,CONFLUENCE
FOCUS
TEMP, PAIRED
200+ SENSORS30 MIN READINGS
PRE-HARVEST: SOME SOURCES OF VARIATION
AUG 05
JUN 03
NOV 03
FEB 07
harvest period
study period
range of basin area: ~1-7.5 habasin threshold/evapotranspiration may matter
range of channel length: ~100-400 m
storage above basin: ground vs. surface
flow: perennial vs seasonal drying
summer volume differences: 0-~400 ml/sec
slope: >35 % segments to fairly flat
velocity early and late: ~0.1-0.6 m/s
harvest timing varies air temp calibration period 1-2.5 summers
(gradient)
some blowdown /buffer width variation
POST-HARVEST: ADDITIONAL VARIATION
missing treatments /anova unbalanced
REGION STAND REF CC FIX VAR
COASTAL 1 ELFLCOASTAL 2 MCCOCOASTAL 3 LORIINLAND 4 MOSHINLAND 5 ROTTINLAND 6 SESA
drying
continuous flowsummer dryingalways dry
INLAND 1 2 3
T M W T M W T M W
A
B
C
D
COAST 4 5 6
T M W T M W T M W
A
B
C
D
STAND
10
20
30
40
AC
_M
AX
PRE-HARVEST (2003)max air temp at weir (low)
INLAND COASTAL
DESPITE VARIATION, AREPRE-HARVEST AIR TEMPSBETWEEN REFERENCE BASINSSIMILAR?
REFERENCE BASINS
range of mean about 5°C
A B C DWATERSHED
10
15
20
25
30
35
AC
_MA
X
A B C DWATERSHED
15
20
25
30
35
AC
_MA
XPRE-HARVEST 2003 max air temp at weir (low)
MS LR
INLAND (BH) COASTAL (WH)
drydry byoct 1
HOW ABOUT BASINS WITHINA STAND?
range 3-4°C
ELFL LORI MCCO MOSH ROTT SESA0
9
18
27
36
45
AIR
AN
D W
AT
ER
MA
X, L
OW
WC_MAXAC_MAX
ELFL LORI MCCO MOSH ROTT SESASTAND
5
10
15
20
WC
_M
AX
HOW ABOUT WATER TEMP---DOES IT CORRELATE WITHWATER TEMP?
PRE-HARVEST 2003 air AND water temp at weir (low)
REFERENCE BASINS
water temp at weir, max july-aug
air temp at weir, max july-augunclear.multi-year data and other details may resolve
drying
water only
compact signallong and short streamsconsistent source
POST HARVEST 2006
ELFL LORI ROTT SESASTAND
10
20
30
40
AP
_M
AX
ELFL LORI MCCO MOSH ROTT SESASTAND
10
20
30
40
AP
_M
AX
CLEARCUT CONTINUOUS
ELFL LORI ROTT SESASTAND
10
20
30
40
AC
_M
AX
ELFL LORI MCCO MOSH ROTT SESASTAND
10
20
30
40
50
AC
_M
AX
UP
PE
R S
TA
TIO
NLO
WE
R S
TA
TIO
N
drying, top
drying, bottom
perennial
always dry
drying
blowdown
how about post harvest,clearcut vs buffered?
AIR ONLY
Jan 3Mar 3
May 3Jul 3
Sep 3Nov 3
Jan 4Mar 4
May 4Jul 4
Sep 4Nov 4
Jan 5Mar 5
May 5Jul 5
Sep 5Nov 5
Jan 6Mar 6
May 6Jul 6
Sep 6Nov 6
Jan 70
9
18
27
36
45
AT
_M
AX
(H
an
d L
) V
S W
T_
MA
X (
L),
(C
)
WC_MAXAC_MAXAP_MAX
Jan 3Mar 3
May 3Jul 3
Sep 3Nov 3
Jan 4Mar 4
May 4Jul 4
Sep 4Nov 4
Jan 5Mar 5
May 5Jul 5
Sep 5Nov 5
Jan 6Mar 6
May 6Jul 6
Sep 6Nov 6
Jan 70
9
18
27
36
45
AT
_MA
X (
H a
nd
L)
VS
WT
_M
AX
(L
), (
C)
WC_MAXAC_MAXAP_MAX
POST-HARVEST EXAMPLE (2006): WH (coastal)
REFERENCE CLEARCUT
2003 2003 2006
road
harv
est
headwall differentthan weir
water temp at weir, max july-aug
air temp at weir, max july-aug
air temp at headwall, max july-aug
convergence,effect penetration?mainstem buffer
drying?
cc: min &max AT increasewater temp increases
2006
EF_b
Jan 3Mar 3
May 3Jul 3
Sep 3Nov 3
Jan 4Mar 4
May 4Jul 4
Sep 4Nov 4
Jan 5Mar 5
May 5Jul 5
Sep 5Nov 5
Jan 6Mar 6
May 6Jul 6
Sep 6Nov 6
Jan 70
9
18
27
36
45
AT
_M
AX
(H
an
d L
) V
S W
T_
MA
X (
L),
(C
)
WC_MAXAC_MAXAP_MAX
2006 POST-HARVEST EXAMPLE: WH (coastal)
REFERENCE CONTINUOUS
2003 2003 2006
road
harv
est
headwall differentthan weir but reversed
water temp at weir, max july-aug
air temp at weir, max july-aug
air temp at headwall, max july-aug
more blowdown,convergence
2006
Jan 3Mar 3
May 3Jul 3
Sep 3Nov 3
Jan 4Mar 4
May 4Jul 4
Sep 4Nov 4
Jan 5Mar 5
May 5Jul 5
Sep 5Nov 5
Jan 6Mar 6
May 6Jul 6
Sep 6Nov 6
Jan 70
9
18
27
36
45
AT
_MA
X (
H a
nd
L)
VS
WT
_M
AX
(L
), (
C)
WC_MAXAC_MAXAP_MAX
EF_c
Jan 3Mar 3
May 3Jul 3
Sep 3Nov 3
Jan 4Mar 4
May 4Jul 4
Sep 4Nov 4
Jan 5Mar 5
May 5Jul 5
Sep 5Nov 5
Jan 6Mar 6
May 6Jul 6
Sep 6Nov 6
Jan 70
9
18
27
36
45
AT
_MA
X (
H a
nd
L)
VS
WT
_M
AX
(L
), (
C)
WC_MAXAC_MAXAP_MAX
Jan 3Mar 3
May 3Jul 3
Sep 3Nov 3
Jan 4Mar 4
May 4Jul 4
Sep 4Nov 4
Jan 5Mar 5
May 5Jul 5
Sep 5Nov 5
Jan 6Mar 6
May 6Jul 6
Sep 6Nov 6
Jan 70
9
18
27
36
45
AT
_MA
X (
H a
nd
L)
VS
WT
_M
AX
(L
), (
C)
WC_MAXAC_MAXAP_MAX
continuous, top=flow, weir=flow continuous, top=<no flow>, weir=flow
in the absence of surface flowbuffer air temp range morelike clearcuts than reference basins
how about buffers with and withoutflowing streams?
air temp pressure from outsidewater temp pressure from inside
shade: buffers differentfrom clearcut
air temp: when channelis dry buffers seem like clearcut
CANOPY PHOTOGRAPHY, BEFORE AND AFTER HAVEST
harv
est
summarybuffer air temperature and shade more like clearcuts or reference basins? does air temp translate into water temp?
does water temp track air temp?
• data still very preliminary but• buffer air temp seems more like clearcut
could be all edge
• buffer shade seems more like reference• air temp signal is different at headwall than weir
but seem to converge /creep over time • need to explore air temp vs shade as water temp
driver
• not clear yet
REF 19.8VAR 23.9FIX 24.1CC 22.8
what next?
• much data coding needed• remove annual climate signal• autocorrelation• sine/cosine regression model• trim data to balance anova?• paired basin study?• slash accumulation• riparian vegetation re-growth• other data sets
stream wets upafter harvest:evapotrans
surface flowconsistent pre vs. post
Project support: Jordan Martinez, Jeremy Graham, Jeremiah McMahan, and Steve Barrett .Field Staff: Steve Crow, Christopher Clinton, Brian Engeness, Stephanie Estrella, Nicholas Grant, Chad Hill, Kevin Kennedy, Charlotte Milling, Christen Noble, Brenda Nipp, Tanya Roberts, Matias Rudback,
Crystal Vancho, Elizabeth Werner, Troy Warnick, and others
J. Janisch 360.407.6649 / [email protected]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Cooperators
TANX!