Date post: | 18-Jan-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | vivian-luu |
View: | 584 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Rise of the Twittizen?The role of Twitter as a social-media platform for citizen
engagement and political deliberation surrounding net neutrality
CM 504 Final PaperFall 2010
Vivian Luu
Research Questions
• What does conversation about net neutrality look like on Twitter?
• Is Twitter an effective tool for creating a public space for citizen engagement and political deliberation?
Scope
• 19,000 tweets, Aug. 1 - Aug. 12• Focus: Aug. 8 announcement of Google-Verizon net
neutrality proposal• Reviewing RT trends through traffic,tweets and
tweeps
Traffic
• Peaks right before and right after Aug. 8• “Buzz” is short-lived, no clearly sustained discussion
Tweets
• @freepress / I just told Google: Don’t be evil. Support #NetNeutrality. You can too: http://freepr.es/bXFB7
• @freepress / just told Washington to stand for me and Obama for #NetNeutrality. You turn. http://bit.ly/4sigrp
• @MoveOn / Google: Say no to VZN to kill #NetNeutrality. Don’t be evil! http://bit.ly/dgxZd
• @CREDOaction / Tell the FCC: It’s up to you not Google & Verizon to regulate the Internet. http://bit.ly/b6Njhc Pls RT.
Analysis
• Rise of an Information elite: Producers of popular content limited to special-interest groups and public figures
• Action without background: Calls for action don’t come with context
• Coding divide: Set format for optimal retweeting
Implications
• New space for advocacy, but lack of diverse voices
• Perpetuation of already-existing thin democracy and limited, ‘surface’ citizen engagement
• Digital Divide during acculturation process: New, digital "oughts" of individualism and citizenship splitting those who possess requisites for "new" participation and those who don't
What's Next?
• Redefining the citizen in context of "netizenship" and new methods of participation
• Cultivation of diverse voices: Twitter as a potential space for citizen engagement and deliberative democracy
• Roots of influence: Where do
already-existing hubs of influence derive their legitimacy and following?