G E A P h a r m a S y s t e m s G E A Ly o p h i l G m b H
Risk Based Design in Lyophilizer Projects
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Focus• Brief overview of risk management tools
• Opportunities and benefit
• Evaluation of risks and possibilities of risk reduction
• Risk management as part of project management
• Project focus on “real” process requirements
• Organisation of Lyophilizer projects in accordance with a risk-based approach
• Influence to life cycle phases like planning, design, manufacturing, testing and operation
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Quality Risk Management according ICH Q9• “The evaluation of the risk to quality should be based on
scientific knowledge and ultimately link to the protection of the patient; and
• The level of effort, formality and documentation of the quality risk management process should be commensurate with the level of risk.”
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Overview of risk management process (ICH Q9)
Risk Identification
Risk Evaluation
Risk Reduction
Risk Acceptance
Risk Events
Ris
k C
omm
unic
atio
n
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t Too
ls
Ris
kA
sses
smen
tR
isk
Con
trol
Risk Analysis
Output / Result of the Quality RiskManagement Process
Ris
k
Rev
iew
unac
cept
able
InitiateQuality Risk Management Process
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Overview of risk management tools- ICH Q9 Definitions
• Risk Assessment• consists of the identification of hazards and the analysis and
evaluation of risks associated with exposure to those hazards.• 1. What might go wrong?• 2. What is the likelihood (probability) it will go wrong? • 3. What are the consequences (severity)?
• Risk identification• is a systematic use of information to
identify hazards referring to the risk question or problem description.• Define limits and interfaces• Define intended use and restrictions• Define responsibilities
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Overview of risk management tools- ICH Q9 Definitions
• Risk analysis • is the estimation of the risk associated with the identified hazards.
• Risk evaluation • compares the identified and analyzed risk against given risk criteria.
Risk evaluations consider the strength of evidence for all three of the fundamental questions.
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Overview of risk management tools- ICH Q9 Definitions
• Risk control• might focus on the following questions:
• Is the risk above an acceptable level? • What can be done to reduce or eliminate risks? • What is the appropriate balance among benefits, risks and resources? • Are new risks introduced as a result of the identified risks being
controlled?
• Risk reduction• focuses on processes for mitigation or
avoidance of quality risk when it exceeds a specified (acceptable) level.
• Risk acceptance • formal decision to accept the residual risk.
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Overview of risk management tools- ICH Q9 Definitions
• Risk review• The output/results of the risk management process should be
reviewed to take into account new knowledge and experience.
• Risk communication• is the sharing of information about risk and risk management
between the decision makers and others.
Factor for successful risk mitigation:Consequent and correct usage of risk management tools
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Factor for successful risk mitigation:Consequent and correct usage of risk management tools
GEA Lyophil GmbH
URS should define clearly and preciselywhat the regulated company…
state anyconstraints
anddocumen-tation req.
and defineregulatory
wants thesystem to
do,
GAMP 5 Tab le 6 .1
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Factors influencing URSCompany
Specific Req.
OrganizationalReq.
(Bad) Experience
Legal Req.
Copy & Paste
Commercial Aspects
Nice to have
Not specific Req.
GEA Lyophil GmbH
This approach will lead to:+ highly customized systems including all requirements+ systems which fits into company restrictions
- very expensive systems- a kind of prototype including all related risks- mix out of 2 different quality systems- Not proven technology
Factor for successful risk mitigation:Focus on essential requirements
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Expertise within GMP Projects
• Who knows the GMP requirements of a product?
• Who has the responsibility regarding GMP conformity?
• Who knows all technical details within the equipment?
• Who knows which different solutions are on the market?
Factor for successful risk mitigation:Responsibilities according to expertise
RegulatedCompany
Supplier
√
√
√
√
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Risk Management as Part of Supplier Selection
Phas
e 1
Customer to define GMP related process requirements
Supplier 1
Technical offer basic design
Supplier 2
Technical offer basic design
End
Phas
e 2 Supplier 1
Risk Assessment technical needs
Supplier 2 Risk Assessment technical needs
End
Phas
e 3 Supplier 1
Risk Assessment validation & documentation
Target Phase 1: Definition of basic process requirements, like temp. and pressure ranges
Target Phase 3: Definition of Project Control, Responsibilities, Test and Documentation, Summary
Target Phase 2: Design requirements: cleaning concept, loading/ unloading concept, redundancy
Audit Supplier 1 Audit Supplier 2 Audit Supplier 3
Supplier 3
Technical offer basic design
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Risk Management during Design Phase• The highest risk is not to get what is required
• Key questions for each phase:• What are the real required features? • Where starts the “nice to have” area?• Who should do the activity?
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Advantage of Risk-Based Design
direct
indirect
Process
critical Non criticalComponents
Evaluation of risks may reduce all activities (design, manufacturing, testing and documentation).
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Advantage of Risk-Based Design
Legal Req.
Extraction of possible risks
SupplierSpec.
GoodPractice
URS
GMP require-ments
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Risk Management during Design Phase• Design and functionality is based on current requirements• GMP and safety related components will be detected• Critical process parameters, steps and events will be
determined• Project team members will get a deeper view into the process • Interdisciplinary teams ease further communication within the
project (e.g. engineering vs production vs QA)
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Risk Management during Design Phase• Priorities for the qualification and validation activities will be
identified• Documented evidence and description of the scope of
qualification and validation activities will be clarified• Traceability is assured from risk detection to end of validation • Testing and documentation can be limited to previously
defined objects. No ‘dead paper’!
Factor for successful risk mitigation:Design focused consequently towards GMP risks
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Controls for leveraging supplier involvement• The regulated companies remain responsible during entire
process
• It is not about trust! It is about controlled relationship!
• Each possible supplier contribution to the project must be seen before the start and also supervised during performance
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Controls for leveraging supplier involvement• Decision making must be visible and structured:Activity Performed by Why Controls
Functional Spec.
Supplier DetailedKnowledge
Standard Doc. verified during pre audit/ final to be approved
Design Review
Supplier/ RegulatedCompany
Both shouldapprove design docs.
Regulated company to crosscheck against Specification
(GMP) Risk assessment
RegulatedCompany
Procces understanding
Supplier should participate and contribute
Test-documents (e.g. IQ/OQ)
Supplier More experience with dedicated equipment
Pre-approved documents/ supervision during testing/ final approval
Factor for successful risk mitigation:Controlled and documented decision making process
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Factors for successful risk mitigationConsequent and correct usage of risk assessment tools
Responsibilities according to expertise
Focus on essential requirements
Design focused consequently towards GMP risks
Controlled and documented decision making process
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Disadvantages of risk based project design • Difficulty to estimate the cost of the project
• Difficulty to estimate the duration of the project
• Time and personnel intensive start phase
• Open discussion may lead to uncomfortable results (e.g. chosen supplier is not the right one)
GEA Lyophil GmbH
Advantages of risk based project design • Clarifications in early project phases (e.g. scope, terms and
‚way of doing‘) will save time, money and reduce confrontations at the end
• Proven technology may be used more often
• Supplier knowledge should be used where ever reasonable
• Amount of documentation and testing should be limited to the real needs. No ‘dead papers’!
• Design is based on requirements not on standard specifications. No ‘dead functionality’!