Risk Management in a Negative Interest Rate Environment
Martijn de Groot
Associate Director
Zanders
April 2015
2
The views expressed in the following material are the
author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of
the Global Association of Risk Professionals (GARP),
its Membership or its Management.
2
Conventional wisdom is that interest rate earned on investments are never less than zero because investors could alternatively hold cash.
‘Earning’ interest
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1-1
-20
07
1-6
-20
07
1-1
1-2
00
7
1-4
-20
08
1-9
-20
08
1-2
-20
09
1-7
-20
09
1-1
2-2
00
9
1-5
-20
10
1-1
0-2
01
0
1-3
-20
11
1-8
-20
11
1-1
-20
12
1-6
-20
12
1-1
1-2
01
2
1-4
-20
13
1-9
-20
13
1-2
-20
14
1-7
-20
14
1-1
2-2
01
4
EUR 1 month rate
3
Historically low curve:
- Short end is negative
- Very flat, difference between 1M and 50Y is smaller than 80bp
- Entire curve below 1%
Flat and low yield curve
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
O/N 1W 1M 2M 3M 6M 1Y
18M 2Y 3Y 4Y 5Y 6Y 7Y 8Y 9Y
10
Y
11
Y
12
Y
15
Y
20
Y
25
Y
30
Y
35
Y
40
Y
45
Y
50
Y
EUR 6M swap curve
18-4-2006 16-4-2009 16-4-2012 16-4-2015
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
O/N 1W 1M 2M 3M 6M 1Y
18M 2Y 3Y 4Y 5Y 6Y 7Y 8Y 9Y
10Y
11Y
12Y
15Y
20Y
25Y
30Y
35Y
40Y
45Y
50Y
EUR 6M swap curve
18-4-2006 16-4-2009 16-4-2012 16-4-2015 OIS curve
4
CHF 6M swap curve is far below zero for a large part of the curve
Extreme case of Switzerland
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Axi
s Ti
tle
CHF swap curve
24-3-2015
6
Operational risks
System errors in working with zero or negative rates
• Log normal models crash
• Swaption valuation based on SABR model
• etc…
Miscalculation
• Scaling parameters may change sign and cause unwanted effects
• Volatility calibration of HW models based on BBG data
• etc…
Incorrect payments and balances
• Some banks do not take deposits since they cannot handle negative rates
• Settlement -> payments become collections
• Negative accrued interest
• etc…
7
Direct P&L hits:
• Floors on interest in contracts, trades, collateral, etc.
• Break in perfect hedges
– When contract clauses in hedge contract and hedged item differ, your hedgemight break when the clause is hit -> e.g. many floating loan coupons will notbecome negative
Hedge impact
-50
-25
-10
0 0
50
25
10
-10 -15
1 2 3 4 5
cash f
low
in E
UR
Period
Cash flows in a hedge relation
(floating loan plus IRS)
loan
hedge (floating leg)
8
Question
Are negative interest rates bad for financial institutions?
Are negative interest rates bad for risk management?
9
Pension and life insurance
• Present value of future liabilities
• Coverage ratios are under pressure despite good recent asset returns
• Yield as high as the ultimate forward rate will probably not be made on high rated
bonds for many years ahead.
Client behaviour
• Cheap lending
• Mortgage redemptions
• Savings
Modelling interest rate scenarios
• Originally insignificant assumptions may have crucial impact in current market
situation
We are in uncharted waters
10
Rethink crucial assumptions
Suddenly risk managers should revisit some crucialassumptions:
1) Is there a floor in interest rates and2) do we model this in our risk management?
11
Conventional wisdom is that interest rate earned on investments are never less than zero because investors could alternatively hold cash. Yet cash is not costless to hold:
Is there a floor in interest rates?
It is subject to theft
and physical destruction,
is expensive to safeguard in large
amounts,
is difficult to use for large and
remote transactions,
and in large quantities, may be
monitored by governments
Storage cost
Insurance cost
Inconvenience cost
Tax on cash
Availability of cash
Cost of cash
So in time of turmoil, investors accept zero or negative nominal yields as a fee for safety.
However, cash is not a sustainable alternative, due to tightening monetary conditions which is counterintuitive to a low interest and QE by the government
Cash reserve accounts (CRAs): during the day a normal checking account which is swept into cash during the night. No interest settled, estimated cost of 50 bp.
Alternative
12
Floors in Banking regulations, some examples:
Some of these regulations are not unambiguous regarding whetherto floor the client rate or the swap rate.
Regulatory defined floors
UK Stress test 2015
• Decrease in bank rate to 0%
EBF on IRRBB
• Customer rates may embed optionality, such as flooring as the
customer rates usually cannot become negative
DNB on IRRBB reporting in its explanatory notes
• The interest rate will not fall below zero in a downward scenario.
This means that a downward interest rate shock of 200 basis points
(bp) will be applied to the entire yield curve and all negative interest
rates resulting from this shock will be cut off at 0%.
13
EaR -> gradually shock interest earnings and expenses. Liabilities generally have shorter duration, react more quickly to changes and in general have lower rates.
Consider 2 examples (but impact can differ per balance sheet)
• Assume current rate =1%
• Assume current rate = -0,5%
Downward shock Upward shockEaR (max impact of up or downward shock)
• Shocked expenses with floor are higher
• Impact on interest earned is smaller
• EaR higher with floor
• No differenceIn total no impact if (impact up) > (impact down)
Earnings at risk example impact of floor
Downward shock Upward shockEaR (max impact of up or downward shock)
• Base case = Shocked case
• EaR=0
• Expenses in Base Case higher with floor
• EaR lower with floor
In total EaR lower with floor
-3,0%
-2,0%
-1,0%
0,0%
1,0%
2,0%
3,0%
4,0%
5,0%
0 0,5 1 1,5 2
Shocked rate = 1,0%
-3,0%
-2,0%
-1,0%
0,0%
1,0%
2,0%
3,0%
4,0%
5,0%
0 0,5 1 1,5 2
Shocked rate = -0,5%
14
• Extra factors can be implemented when it is deemed that interest rates have a floor or markets behave differently in low/negative interest rate periods.
• HW 1 factor model has equal chance of up and down shocks (over a mean reverting short rate)
Market risk – interest rate scenarios
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
0 1 2 3 4 5
Sh
ort
ra
te i
n p
erc
en
tag
e
years
HW 1-factor short rate prediction model
Short rate99% percentile95% percentile5% percentile1% percentile
15
How to model from an extreme base case?• First note that your current model is
already based on certain assumptions
• Equal chance of moving up or down is also
an assumption
• History might not be representative,
maybe there is no floor?
• There is no reference situation
• Historical data is only partly
representative so we need expert
judgement
• Expert judgement is not based on
experience but on gut feeling
• For capital requirements you need tomodel the extreme events, so thinkbeyond what currently is deemedpossible
• Impact of central bank policy is significant
Market risk – interest rate scenarios
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
0 1 2 3 4 5
Sh
ort
ra
te i
n p
erc
en
tag
e
years
HW 1-factor short rate prediction model
Short rate99% percentile95% percentile5% percentile1% percentile
16
Conclusion
• We are in uncharted waters
• Market is currently pushing the ‘former’ floor in interest rates
• Maybe negative rates are not sustainable,
• But current interest rates are further decreasing
• No consensus on risk modelling, but:
– Be aware of possible operational risks
– Critically look at all floors implemented in your calculations
– Revisit crucial assumptions e.g. in client behaviour and interest rate scenarios