Date post: | 02-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | camron-cain |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Chapter 5 – The Role of Tribology in Engineering Materials
Tribology comprises the science and technology of interacting surfaces in relative motion; that is, friction, lubrication and wear. Tribology is a vast and interdisciplinary subject, ranging from the fundamental physics of surface contact and adhesion to the application of advanced materials and lubricants to solve practical industrial friction and wear problems.
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Motivation:
• Most common forms of metal failure:– Corrosion– Fatigue (cyclic loading)– Wear (surface abrasion due to excessive
friction or lack of lubrication) = TRIBOLOGY
– CASE STUDIES (my own)
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
What is Friction
• Force tangential to the interface of two contacting bodies = Ff.– Dynamic and static– Dynamic produces
heat
NFf
Friction Force
Coefficient of friction s and d
Normal Force
Assumptions: Ff independent of contact area, = constant
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
More Complicated Models Exist:
• Contact Mechanics
In actuality, as N increases, contact area increases, thereby affecting . is a non-linear function of N. What else might vary with??
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
More Complicated Models Exist:
F = Fa + Fp + Fs + Fn NFf
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
What about contact stresses???
Recall: Pitting stress in gear teeth
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
How to Measure ???
• Do you want s or d???
• For most stress analysis want s – why??
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Good for measuring s. You should know how to derive this.
Good for measuring s
and d.
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Typical Friction Force Curves
s = Fa/Nd = Fb/N
Stick- Slip – difficult to get a
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Figure 3-8: Average n for various materials in reciprocating motion of an annular ring rider (.1 sq in) on a type 316 stainless steel counter face at 20 C 50% relative humidity at various normal forces. The stroke was 50 mm and the frequency was 0.5 Hertz. The friction force was averaged for eight cycles for each test.
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
CASE Study:
• Compression seal. Coefficient of friction was key for proper design and analysis.
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Friction Testing – Slide flat EPDM samples across ABS slab
CASE Study
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Coefficient of Friction Results:
•Incumbent Material = 0.15, 0.13•M-858-2(2) = 0.23, 0.17•M-858-2(6) = 0.30, 0.30•M-858-2(7) = 0.24, 0.21•M-858-2(8) = 0.23, 0.22•M-858-2(9) = 0.37, 0.38•M-858-2(10) = 0.31, 0.31•M-858-2(12) = 0.36, 0.33•M-858-2(13) = 0.25, 0.29•M-858-2(14) = 0.29, 0.25•M-858-2(15) = 0.21, 0.24•M-858-2(16) = 0.21, 0.28
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
4” seal section shownActuator Force/Displacement
Fixed to load frame
ABS
Polycarbonate
Test Set-up for K and Stress Relaxation:
Seal glued with 3M CA40H Adhesive
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
L/D Curves for All 4" Samples
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
Deflection (in)
Lo
ad
(lb
)
4" Sample #1
4" Sample#2
4" Sample #3
4" Sample w/ Polycarbonate contact
4" Sample #1 Immersed
4" Sample #2 Immersed
Load Only
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
L/D Curves - FEA vs. Measured Results
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
Deflection (in)
Lo
ad (
lb)
Measured - Incumbent Sample #1
Measured - Incumbent Sample#2
Measured - QC-19095 Sample 1"
Measured - QC-19095 Sample 2"
FEA Results - Incumbent Seal
FEA Results - QC-19095
FEA Results - Modif ied QC-19095
Note:1. All results for 4" seal length.2. FEA results - hyper data, 60 duro EPDM, friction = 0.25.
Note, modified seal slightly stiffer at lower deflections and softer at higher deflections!
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
WEIGHT USED: SLED + 1LB WEIGHT (704g)
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
5.4 Definition of Surface Wear
• Wear - Damage to a solid surface involving progressive loss of material due to contact and relative motion with another surface. 13 types of wear!!
• Erosion – Damage to a solid surface involving progressive loss of material due to mechanical interaction between that surface and a fluid, impinging liquid or solid particles. 5 kinds of erosion
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Figure 5.14 – Major Categories of wear and specific types of wear in each category.
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Types of Wear:
Figure 5:20 – Adhesion wear – localized bonding between contacting surfaces
Figure 5-21: Galling wear – severe adhesion actually leads to material flow up from the surface.
adhesion
adhesion
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Figure 5-23: Fretting wear of splined shaft– small oscillatory motion abrades surface – looks like rust – surface looks pitted.
adhesion
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
F5-24: low stress abrasion wear – bushing sliding on shaft
abrasion
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Surface fatigue
F 5-27 – Pitting surface fatigue – large roller thrust bearing race – compressive stress developed between roller bearing and race = pitting. Material actually fatigued and removed from surface!!
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Surface fatigue
F 5-30: Brinelling – brinelling of bearing race due to static overload. Note brinelling more of a static failure (indentation) versus fatigue or wear failure.
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
F 3-27: Factors that affect wear at various size levels.
Key: Bonds between atoms!
Key: Dislocations
Key: Grain Size
Key: Surface asperities
Key: Surface confromance
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Figure 5-15: Types of Erosion – Note all involve fluids or smoke (particulates)
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Fig5– 16: solid particle erosion due to fly ash.
Types of Erosion
5-17: Slurry erosion due to pumping slurry mixture of silica and water
erosion
erosion
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Case Study – WEAR
Requirement: Coat steel flight bars on conveyor of continuous miner with “soft” material for noise reduction. Must meet life requirement of 500,000 tons of coal (min) without significant wear.
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Joy Continuous Mining Machines
14CM series targeted for noise reduction
14CM Series12HM Series12CM Series
2010 SME Annual Meeting & ExhibitPhoenix, Arizona
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Commitment to Health & Safety
Industry Leading Dust and Noise Reduction Initiatives
Wethead Cutterhead System Dual Sprocket Conveyor
2010 SME Annual Meeting & ExhibitPhoenix, Arizona
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Ongoing Developments
Coated Dual Sprocket Chain
2010 SME Annual Meeting & ExhibitPhoenix, Arizona
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Figure 7-14 – abrasion wear of various plastics
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Taber Test – common test for abrasion resistance of elastomers/polymers
RJM, 9/16/06 All photos and figures - Copyright, Prentice Hall
Compound No. Rheometer Data Original Physical Properties After Aging 70 hrs at 70°C Compression Set Taber
Ml Mh ts1 tc90
tan Delta @
MhCure Time
Cure Temper
ature
100% Modulu
sElong ation Tensile
Duro meter
∆ 100% Modulu
s∆ Elong
ation∆
Tensile∆ Duro meter
Cure Time
Cure Temper
ature22 hrs
@ 70 °Cmg loss per rev.
XM-AR (1) 3.28 19.59 114 335.97 0.095m35s 155 496 479 3439 67.6 6.1 -1.5 -2.2 210m35s 155 24.4 0.0892
XM-AR (2) 3.72 26.56 105 319.98 0.095m20s 155 870 290 2504 75.1 2.5 -4.5 -5.5 2.810m20s 155 25.3 0.0305
XM-AR (3) 3.56 19.96 111 311.4 0.095m11s 155 590 451 3405 70.6 2.7 -0.7 -3.7 0.810m11s 155 27.4 0.006
XM-AR (4) 2.41 23.36 121.2 355.65 0.075m55s 155 736 352 2562 72 12.9 5.4 8.8 2.210m55s 155 20.3 0.0187
XM-AR (5) 2.62 20.94 126 321.16 0.075m21s 155 498 423 2981 65.6 7.7 8.7 4.7 2.610m21s 155 19.6 0.0163
XM-AR (6) 3.31 24.85 127.8 359.58 0.076m0s 155 683 393 2856 72 3.5 2.3 0.7 2.211m0s 155 9.4 0.0163
XM-AR (7) 0.49 17.82 150 404.82 0.036m45s 155 780 527 4318 68.5 12.3 -20.3 -14.5 1.811m45 155 45.4 0.0261
XM-AR (8) 0.77 20.58 114 381.98 0.046m22s 155 1306 517 4032 74.2 -0.3 -10.8 0.6 2.611m22s 155 34.2 0.164
XM-AR (9) 0.74 23.83 123.6 434.22 0.047m14s 155 695 524 4577 71.2 23.2 -12.4 -2.6 3.612m14s 155 39.2 0.0239
XM-AR (10) 3.69 26.06 61.2 286.38 0.074m37s 155 912 310 2691 76.2 3.6 -9.4 -5.8 0.49m37s 155 25.7 0.0108
Incumbent Mat'l 0.0154