Robert-Jan Sips IBM Center for Advanced Studies 28-5-2015
Only 30% of US workforce is currently engaged in their work.
This means that the vast majority of workers does not reach their full potential. The estimated costs of Disengagement (visible in e.g. lack of productivity, lower customer satisfaction, employee turnover, absenteeism, etc) are an estimated
$450-550 billion
Source: The state of the American Workplace (Gallup)
Currently, companies use monetary rewards to engage and retain employees, in the ‘war on talent’.
2008: Google vs. Facebook, causing Google to raise all salaries by 10%.
Asking employees, across generations, teaches us that soft factors are considered at least equally important as hard factors
The inclusive Enterprise: working towards Inclusion: “a sense of belonging: feeling respected, valued for who you are; feeling a level of supportive energy and commitment from others so than you can do your best work” By taking a Computer Science approach.
Source: Sips, Bozzon, Smit, Houben. The Inclusive Enterprise Vision and Roadmap. ICWE 2015.
“Primum non nocere"
Guiding principles
(1) Integration and Transparency (2) Engagement by Design (3) Trustworthy and Privacy by Design (4) Reuse
Source: Sips, Bozzon, Smit, Houben. The Inclusive Enterprise Vision and Roadmap. ICWE 2015.
The Inclusive Enterprise system Starting with a series of studies
(1) Social Environment Sensing (2) Engagement / Gamification (3) Physical Environment Sensing
Enterprise
Directory
Our study
Enterprise
Social Networks
Communications
Enterprise Q&A
Enterprise Blogs
Professional
Social Networks
Personal
Social Networks
Personal Blogs
Source: Bozzon, Efstathiades, Houben, Sips. A study of the online profile of enterprise users in professional social networks. WWW 2014.
A study in how enterprise employees use and perceive Social Media
Survey
134 IBMers
January - March 2013
LinkedIn API Access
9000 IBMers
IBM BluePages 40K 1st
Level Contacts
134 IBMers
January - March 2013
Which enterprise organisation information (role) is implicitly
revealed by users in professional social networks?
Blue Pages LinkedIn
No IBM Policy Manual Inspection
Equal (75%)
Blue Pages LinkedIn
Similar (13%)
(23.5%) Same role described with different terms “CICS TS Product Manager” in BluePages “CICS Product Line Manager at IBM” in LinkedIn
(76.5%) Generalised role description “Service Sales Public/ING” in BluePages Service Sales at IBM” in LinkedIn
Blue Pages LinkedIn
Different (12%)
(80.2%) Generalised role description "Associate Project Manager IBM” in LinkedIn and ”Mobility phones, data cards, blackberries Services”
(19.8%) different job role description used a personalised, captivating description ”Passionate provider of Competitive Advantage for IBM” and as ”European Sales Execution Leader” in BluePages
Blue Pages LinkedIn
Insight
Majority (~80%) IBMers Report Their Internal Job Role: actual information about IBM internal organisation are
also accessible to the outside world
When different: Self-promotion
Can an organisations’ key employees (managers) be identified
from professional social network profiles?
Managers: coordination of other people’s
work. :
> 2200 in our dataset
Identify patterns in the terminology used in
LinkedIn job description
• Only 16% in the top 50 bigrams are shared by both managers and non-managers • The words Manager/Leader/Director emerge as the most used in both categories • “Senior” is popular in non-manager => level of knowledge and experience
Insight
Clear linguistic distinction in job role
Easy to identify important
coordination figures within the
organisation
Overlapping terms generally refer to more operational responsibilities
Which factors related to the employer influence the social
reach (# Connections) of an employee?
Country of
Employment
Company
Industry Company
Size Computer/Software Management Consulting Financial, Banking
Very Big, Big, Small, Very Small Netherlands, US, Belgium, UK
All 40K users < 500 connection
Compared #
Connections Only factors that
passed normality test
Insight
Influence of Country of Origin but some latent factors can play a role
Influence of Industry Type
Which factors related to the operational organisation within
a company influence the social reach of an employee?
134 seed IBMers
< 500 connection
A manages B in BluePages
Insight
Managers tend to connect more with employees higher in the organisation’s hierarchy
Connection with manager (and manager’s manager) => more social
reach
Questions?