+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Robert J.R. Elliott (University of Birmingham, UK) Puyang Sun (Nankai University, China) Siyang Chen...

Robert J.R. Elliott (University of Birmingham, UK) Puyang Sun (Nankai University, China) Siyang Chen...

Date post: 19-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 219 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:

of 29

Click here to load reader

Transcript
  • Slide 1
  • Robert J.R. Elliott (University of Birmingham, UK) Puyang Sun (Nankai University, China) Siyang Chen (National University of Singapore, Singapore) FDI, Energy Intensity and Growth: Evidence from Chinese Cities
  • Slide 2
  • Motivation China now has become the largest recipient of foreign investment in the developing world with inflows of $95.25 billion in 2010 (World Development Indicators 2010) China currently accounts for 17.7% of global energy consumption to produce approximately 8% of global output In 2008 Chinas emissions of sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) were the highest and second highest in the world at 23.32 million and 2.7 billion tons respectively In this paper we investigate the relationship between economic development, FDI and the efficiency of energy consumption in China
  • Slide 3
  • Energy Intensity (ENTI) is a measure of the energy efficiency of an economy, which is calculated as units of energy per unit of GDP Industrial Energy Intensity (ENDD) Energy intensity is negatively correlated with energy efficiency Measurement of Energy Efficiency
  • Slide 4
  • Improving the energy efficiency of Chinese firms is essential to the sustainable development of the country. Energy efficiency is not only important from a pollution perspective but also from the perspective of being able to use less oil, gas and coal in production (and hence less imports) and hence cheaper products. One possible channel to enhance energy efficiency is energy- saving technology transfer from developed to developing countries FDI is considered a critical channel for technology transfer (Keller 2004)
  • Slide 5
  • cities with the highest & lowest aggregate energy efficiency cities with the highest & lowest industrial energy efficiency CityENTICityENTICityENDDCityENDD Ningde 0.545 Panzhihua** 3.581 Haikou 0.241 Qitaihe* 6.589 Shanwei 0.567 Baise** 3.677 Zhongshan 0.451 Hegang* 6.606 Shenzhen 0.568 Lvliang* 3.723 Xiamen 0.500 Yuncheng* 6.898 Taizhou 0.595 Linfen* 4.068 Shenzhen 0.564 Xinzhou* 7.103 Xiamen 0.625 Zhongwei** 4.300 Yanan** 0.671 Weinan** 7.174 Zhuhai 0.632 Laiwu 4.385 Putian 0.695 Shuangyashan* 7.316 Shantou 0.658 Wuhai* 5.671 Wenzhou 0.710 Laibin** 7.578 Zhanjiang 0.698 Wuzhong** 5.952 Foshan 0.764 Dazhou** 7.973 Zhangzhou 0.703 Shizuishan** 7.651 Heyuan 0.797 Heihe* 8.150 Wenzhou 0.705 Liupanshui** 8.691 Zhoushan 0.810 Jixi* 10.391 Source: China City Statistical Yearbook, 2006-2009 *Indicates cities in central region **Indicates cities in western region Top 10 and Bottom 10 Cities of Energy Efficiency in China, 2005-2008 Nearly all the cities with highest level of energy efficiency are in eastern coastal provinces The majority of cities at the bottom belong to the central or western areas
  • Slide 6
  • Cities with the highest FDI inflow in actual use Cities with the highest agglomeration in finance sector Figure 1 The Geographic Distribution of Agglomeration and FDI (2003- 2008) Literature FDI & Energy Consumption AuthorsEvidenceLimitation Eskeland & Harrison (2003) Foreign ownership is associated with more energy- efficient production in an analysis of manufacturing plants in Cote dIvoire, Mexico and Venezuela. These studies are based on cross- country panel data in which heterogeneity may result in misspecification Cole et al. (2011) Multinational firms are less pollution intensive than domestic firms since the latter may utilize more advanced technologies, cleaner production methods, and possess more developed environmental management systems Chichilnisky (1994) Motta & Thisse (1994) Pollution Havens Hypothesis: FDI may be attracted to economies by less stringent environment regulations Hbler & Keller (2009) Aggregate FDI inflows do not help to reduce energy intensity in a developing country context
  • Slide 7
  • Contribution We employ an extensive city-level data set that covers 206 of Chinas largest cities for the period 2005-2008 to investigate more closely the relationship between economic growth, FDI and the efficiency of energy consumption in China We believe that a city-level study is a better able to represent regional differences compared with the more usual province level studies We examine the relationship between the output of domestically- owned, foreign-owned and by Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macao (HTM) owned firms to better understand the relationship between FDI and local energy intensity
  • Slide 8
  • Mechanism Total energy consumption can be decomposed into three channels: (Hbler and Keller, 2009) Scale effect is left out when energy intensity is used (Keller, 2009) One of indirect effects from FDI to energy savings in our estimation The main dimension in our study
  • Slide 9
  • Technique Effects of FDI on Energy Savings Direct Effects : Technology Transfer Demonstration Effects Labor Turnover Effects Vertical Linkage Effects Indirect Effects : Income-Induced Technique Effects Technique effects of FDI on Energy Savings
  • Slide 10
  • Core question: Does FDI envourage energy saving (i.e. reduce energy intensity) in China through the technique effect? Sub-questions: 1. How do technique effects of FDI differ across Chinese cities? 2. If the effect of FDI differs by region, what are the mechanisms that drive these differences ?
  • Slide 11
  • Regional facts of Energy Intensity Lighter dots: Cities with lower energy intensity (i.e., higher energy efficiency)
  • Slide 12
  • Regional distribution of FDI Darker dots: Cities with higher FDI inflows
  • Slide 13
  • Regional facts of income Darker dots: Cities with higher income level
  • Slide 14
  • These maps suggest: Cities with the highest income are also those that receive the greatest volume of FDI, and Cities with the highest income have higher energy efficiency (lower value of energy Intensity) We now identify if these relationships hold econometrically and whether these relationships are consistent across Chinese cities and which if not which mechanisms drive any regional differences
  • Slide 15
  • Estimation equation& Empirical results VariableDefinition of VariableFunction of variable Expected sign Explained Variables ENTI Aggregate energy intensity ENDD Industrial energy intensity Explaining Variables YPC 2 quadratic term of income per capita to capture the inverted-U shaped relationship between YPC and EI - FDI Foreign direct investment normalized by GDP (%) to capture the energy-saving technology transfer of FDI - GIPf Industrial product normalized by GDP for foreign countries invested firms to capture the energy-saving technology transfer of foreign investment alternatively - GIPh Industrial product of the firms from HTM, normalized by GDP to compare the effects of foreign firms and firms from HTM +/- GIPd Gross industrial product normalized by GDP to compare the effects of foreign and domestic investment +
  • Slide 16
  • Variable DefinitionSource EIEnergy Intensity, energy consumption per unit of GDP (ton per 10,000 yuan) Government Report (2006-2010) by Chinese Provincial Bureau of Statistics YPCIncome per capita (2005 price). China City Statistical Yearbook (2010) FDIShare of foreign direct investment in GDP (100 yuan per yuan) (%) GIP d,h,f Industrial product normalized by GDP for domestic/HTM/foreign firms (100 yuan per yuan) Data (From 2005 to 2008, across 206 Chinese municipal-cities )
  • Slide 17
  • ENTIENDD 123456123456 YPC -0.2527 *** 1.1633 ** -0.2693 *** 1.5326 *** -0.6432 ** -0.1533-0.3772 *** 2.8992 ** -0.4552 *** 2.3817 * -1.1829 * 0.6106 YPC 2 -0.0785 *** -0.0970 *** -0.0185 -0.1877 *** -0.1584 ** -0.0676 FDI -0.0197 *** -0.0267 *** -0.0309 ** -0.0339 ** GIPd 0.1228 *** 0.0958 *** 0.2553 ** 0.1189 GIPf -0.0018-0.0019 0.0183-0.0116 GIPh -0.0028-0.0030 - 0.0287* - 0.0537* Haus man for RE 1.47 (0.225) 1.79 (0.408) 2.85 (0.242) 3.44 (0.329) 8.21 (0.084) 26.52 (0.000) 1.33 (0.250) 2.58 (0.276) 2.82 (0.244) 0.37 (0.947) 16.15 (0.024) 1.12 (0.952) Haus man for IV 17.67 (0.000) 5.53 (0.063) 9.82 (0.007) 7.04 (0.071) 15.13 (0.004) 23.55 (0.000) 13.92 (0.000) 10.02 (0.007) 9.58 (0.008) 7.02 (0.071) 12.58 (0.014) 25.29 (0.000) Turnin g point (RMB) 1651.7 2697.3 2259.6 1840.9 Results (National Level)
  • Slide 18
  • YPC & EI (national regression) Column 2, 4 : Inverted-U relationship between income per capita and energy intensity is confirmed at the national level Turning point of the inverted-U curve is estimated at between RMB 1,651 and RMB 2,697 for ENTI, and RMB 1,840 and RMB 2,259 for ENDD The majority of Chinese cities belong to the downward sloping part of the inverted-U curve, which means the rising income per capita contributes to energy savings in these cities A significant income-induced technique effect is expected to be found in the cities with higher income levels
  • Slide 19
  • Income level appreciation of better environment reinforcement in regulation income-induced effect We propose that there is an inverted-U-shaped relationship between income per capita and energy intensity. The nonlinear relationship is expected to exist at the national level At the regional level, we pay more attention to the linear relationship between income and energy intensity, which reflects the income-induced technique effect The income-induced effect intensifies with the income level and is expected to be prominent in the region with higher income Indirect technique effects:
  • Slide 20
  • FDI & EI (national regression) Column 3, 4 inflows of FDI facilitate energy savings in China A 1% of FDI inflows will generate a 0.02%-0.027% reduction in aggregate energy intensity A 1% of FDI inflows will generate a around 0.03% reduction in industrial energy intensity
  • Slide 21
  • Columns 5, 6 Production of domestic firms can lead to a reduction of energy efficiency in China Production of firms from HTM is helpful to enhance energy efficiency in China It is further confirmed that foreign firms help to enhance energy efficiency in China Industrial Production(GIPd, GIPf,GIPh) & EI (national regression)
  • Slide 22
  • Eastern Areas (A)Central Areas (B)Western Areas (C) A(1)A(2)A(3)A(4)B(1)B(2)B(3)B(4)C(1)C(2)C(3)C(4) YPC -0.3770 *** 0.6841*-0.5340 *** -0.30640.1978 *** 3.9294 *** -0.14490.42580.15820.86870.0528-0.0559 YPC2 -0.0554 *** -0.0081 -0.2189 *** -0.0457 -0.0386 0.6606 FDI -0.0014-0.0043 -0.0884 *** -0.0523 *** -0.0458 *** -0.0517 *** GIPd 0.1938 *** 0.1599 ** 0.1475 * 0.1933 ** 0.2386 *** 0.0032 * GIPf 0.0063-0.0017 -0.0250-0.0034 -0.0360 * -0.0070 GIPh 0.0176*0.0095 -0.0343 ** -0.0184 * -0.0322 ** -0.0091 Test RE 4.32 (0.116) 4.05 (0.256) 7.73 (0.357) 8.28 (0.407) 0.05 (0.976) 5.98 (0426) 2.46 (0.652) 1.29 (0.936) 3.99 (0.136) 2.93 (0.403) 8.51 (0.290) 26.08 (0.000) Test IV 87.33 (0.000) 157.28 (0.000) 10.41 (0.034) 50.45 (0.000) 112.91 (0.000) 16.6 (0.010) 37.68 (0.000) 1188.68 (0.000) 6.6 (0.037) 16.09 (0.001) 13.37 (0.010) 6.81 (0.236) Results (Regional Level)
  • Slide 23
  • Eastern Areas (A)Central Areas (B)Western Areas (C) A(1)A(2)A(3)A(4)B(1)B(2)B(3)B(4)C(1)C(2)C(3)C(4) YPC -0.4178 *** 6.4257 * 0.02360.3819-0.02883.5690 * -0.3560 * 1.0862-0.3236 * -6.1219-0.3604 * - 12.963* * YPC2 -0.3714 ** -0.056 -0.2106 * -0.0926 0.3532 0.7370 ** FDI -0.0426-0.0443 -0.0548 *** -0.0484 *** -0.0204-0.0295 * GIPd 0.315 4*** 0.2528 ** -0.0765-0.0552 -0.00910.1729 GIPf -0.1307 ** 0.0026 -0.0206-0.0030 -0.0226-0.0315 GIPh -0.1419 *** -0.1002 *** -0.0206-0.0258 -0.0369 ** -0.0032 Test RE 5.54 (0.354) 1.63 (0.652) 2.57 (0.632) 6.37 (0.272) 0.76 (0.685) 1.19 (0.978) 1.65 (0.977) 0.68 (0.984) 1.66 (0.437) 0.25 (0.968) 4.16 (0.385) 4.12 (0.532) Test IV 13.82 (0.001) 34.94 (0.000) 9.70 (0.046) 10.07 (0.073) 22.35 (0.000) 15.01 (0.002) 26.00 (0.000) 15.82 (0.007) 6.02 (0.049) 8.05 (0.045) 27.19 (0.000) 188.91 (0.000) Results (Regional Level)
  • Slide 24
  • YPC & EI (regional results) EAST (Group A) A significant negative linear relationship is confirmed The income-induced technique effect is significant in the East China: in this area energy efficiency will ascend in accordance with income per capita CENTER (Group B) For both ENTI and ENDD, an inverted-U relationship between YPC and EI is confirmed with negative and positive For ENTI, there is a significantly positive linear relationship between income and energy intensity in this region, while for ENDD, this relationship becomes negative The income-induced technique effect is ONLY significant for aggregate energy intensity in Central China. WEST (Group C) For ENTI, NO significant relationship between income and energy intensity is found ( linear or nonlinear) For ENDD, a negative linear relationship exists Similarly, the income-induced technique effect is also ONLY significant for aggregate energy intensity in Central China
  • Slide 25
  • FDI & EI (regional results) A direct technique effect from FDI is insignificant for the east and exhibits a magnified in the central and western regions in terms of both significance and absolute value The value of is slightly larger in the central rather than the western areas of China The elasticity of ENTI on foreign investment is higher than that estimated for ENDD In western cities, there is highly possible to exist a relatively higher technical difference between firm with FDI and domestic firms, compared with lower difference gap in eastern cities. This provide a reasonable reason to explain why the technical effects in western cities are more significant than in eastern cities.
  • Slide 26
  • Demonstration effect: We denote demonstration effects in East, Center and West China by D1, D2 respectively so that: EastCenter & West Technological gap between domestic and foreign firms smalllarge Demonstration effect Less SignificantMore Significant Mathematical expression D1 < D2 Direct Technique Effect of FDI - regional analysis the gaps between foreign energy- saving technology and current practice in local business Demonstration effects
  • Slide 27
  • Vertical linkage effect We denote the vertical linkage effect in the east, center and west of China by V1, V2 respectively so that we have: EastCenter & West export and import-oriented HighLow Foreign ownership Integration of business chain Vertical spilloverLess SignificantMore significant Mathematical expression V1

Recommended